ML20097H714

Forwards Independent Design Review of Limerick Generating Station Unit 1 Core Spray Sys, Bimonthly Status Rept 7. Related Correspondence

ML20097H714
Person / Time
Site:	Limerick
Issue date:	09/04/1984
From:	Carpenter F GENERAL ATOMICS (FORMERLY GA TECHNOLOGIES, INC./GENER
To:	Boyer V PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
References
OL, TPT:04T:FDC:84, TPT:4T:FDC:84, NUDOCS 8409200456
Download: ML20097H714 (6)

Text

,

.- Ej R:.7:TB-94 TORREY PINES TECHNOLOGY

..U.So -363 o o Po. Box 85608 San Diego, Cahtornia 92138 Telephone: (619) 455 2654

" ' ",g SiCE. "*

[

A ome.on of GA Technologies Inc.

~

TFf:04T:FDC:84 DOCXETED Sept a ber 4, 1984 usNac

'84 SEP 10 M1 :45 Philadelphia Electric Cmpany 2301 Market Street S25-1 .

~

Philadelghia, PA 19101 -

Attention: V. S. Boyer, Sr. Vice President Nuclear Power Gentimen:

The enclosed status report is the seventh issued for the Independent Design Review of the Limerick Generating Station Unit 1 Core Spray

' System. This report covers the period August 16, 1984 to August 31, 1984.

A copy of this report is being sent directly to the representative of the U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Cmmission.

Please call me if you have any questions regarding the contents of this report.

ce ely,

/

F. D. Carpenter Project Manager cc: PECo: R. A. Mulford N2-1 E. C. Kistner J. Moskowitz L. B. Pyrih G. J. Beck Bechtel: 3. J. Playhar .

USNRC: J. M. Milhoan, 011er Licensing Section l Quality Assurance Branch, Office of Inspection and Enforcement U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Camission EWS-305A Washington, DC 20555 8409200456 840904 DR ADOCK 05000352 PDR k _

. o-cc: Judge Iawrence Brenner " \

Judge Peter A. Morris (w/ enclosure)

Judge Richard F. Cole (w/ enclosure)

Judge Christine M. Kohl (w/ enclosure)

Judge Gary J. Edles (w/ enclosure)

Judge Reginald L. Gotchy (w/ enclosure)

Troy B. Conner, Jr., Esq. (w/ enclosure)

Ann P. Hodgdon, Esq. (w/ enclosure) 4 Mr. Frank.R. Romano (w/ enclosure)

Mr. Robert L. Anthony (w/ enclosure)

Ms. Maureen Mulligan (w/ enclosure)

Charles W. Elliott, Esq.' (w/ enclosure)

' Zori G. Ferkin, Esq. (w/ enclosure)

Mr. Thomas Gerusky (w/ enclosure)

Director, Penna. Emergency (w/ enclosure)

Management Agency (w/ enclosure)

AnyJus love, Esq.

David Wersan, Esq. (w/ enclosure)

Robert J. Sugarman, Esq. (w/ enclosure)

Martha W. Bush, Esq. (w/ enclosure)

Spence W. Perry, Esq. (w/ enclosure)

Jay M. Gutierrez, Esq. (w/ enclosure)

Atomic Safety & Licensing Appeal Board (w/ enclosure)

Atomic _ Safety & Licensing Board Panel (w/ enclosure)

Docket & Service section (w/ enclosure)

James Wiggins (w/ enclosure - 3 copies))

Timothy R. S. Campbell' (w/ enclosure)

(w/ enclosure) i O

r f

INDEPENDENT DESIGN REVIEW OF LI)ERICK GENERATING STATION #1 J CORE SPRAY SYSTEM I Bi-Monthly Status Report #7 Period Ending August 31, 1984 a Introduction This is the seventh bi-monthly status report. Eis report docunents information concerning the independent design review of Limerick's Core Spray Systen. Re work performed covers the period August 16, 1984 to August 31, 1984.

Surunary TASK A DESIGN PROCEDURE REVIEW Complete.

TASK B DESIGN PROCEDURE IMPLEMENTATION REVIEW

- Subtasks B1 through B3 are complete.

B4 he review of docunents fran the original workscope was completed. Work is in progress to review docunents for the expanded Task C workscope.

B5 he suunary report was drafted but issuance is being held until the review associated with the expanded workscope is completed.

TASK C TECHNICAL REVTFw ,

Subtasks C1 and C2 are complete.

C3 No change.

C4 he initial review of the original work scope has been completed.

Design docunents were obtained from BPC for the review of local contairrnent areas, and the review is in progress.

i Independent calculations were prepared to assess the impact of C5

two PFRs. Rese calculations were completed and checked, and will be attached to the respective PFRs.

C6 he first drafts of most review evaluation reports have been completed. We task sumnary report will be based on these drafts. Final reports are generally completed after final classification of any PFRs affecting the subject of the report has been made.

~

I l

TASK D PHYSICAL VERIFICATION All work on Task D is complete.  ;

TARK E POTENTIAL FINDINGS Tasks E1 through N3 are complete.

During this reporting period six potential finding reports were l initiated. ho of these were issued on Task A, and related to  ;

review and approval of design docunents. Four PFRs on Task C related to analytical inconsistencies.

De Findings Review Cmmittee convened during this period and classified eight PFRs.

TASK F ADMINISTRATIVE AND REPORTING he sunmary of projected vs. actual manpower graph was reviewed, and is attached hereto.

Total manhours spent on Task D will exceed the original estimate because of the work required for review of audit prograns in the area of design control. Eis was not part af the original proposal workscope or estimate, and required considerable time at PECo, Bechtel, and GE sites. .

/

O e e

.:, August 31, 1984 TABLE I CORE SPRAY LISTEM INDEPENDENT DESIGN REVIEW TASK / MILESTONE STATUS 5chedule Milestone Subiect ,Qcig Revised Jctual Document A1 Procedure Checklist 5/30 5/24 2524-PD-1 & 7 A2 Procedure Structure 6/15 7/08 2524QA-01,05,07,13 A3 Access Design Procedures 6/15 7/06 NA

. A4 Bechtel ' Review 7/05 7/03 TPr:012:FDC:84 A5 PECo/GE Review 7/05 7/05 2524QA-01, 05, 07 A6 Time-period Procedures 7/10 7/10 252 4 QA-12, 14, 15 A7 Task Sumnary 7/24 7/W 2524QA-11 B1 Procedure / Checklist 5/30 5/24 2524 PD-2 B2 Docunent Selection 6/15 7/27 7/W B3 Docunent Location 7/01 7/27 7/27 B4 Docunent Review 7/27 9/7 E5 Task Sumnary 8/10 9/14 C1 Procedure / Criteria 5/30 5/30 2524PD-3 '

C2 Design Chain 6/08 7/31 7/31 C3 Feature Selection Cont

• 2524:ENG:02:AS:84 C4 Design Review . 8/10 9/7 C5 Independent Analysis 7/27 8/24 C6 Task Sumnary 8/17 9/14 D1 Walkdown Procedure 5/30 5/31 252 4 PD-4 D2 Item Selection 6/04 5/29 2524:ENG:03:AS:84 D3 Complete Walkdown 6/W 6/15 D4 Task Sumnary -8/10 6/22 2524:ENG:07:CFD:84 l E1 Establish Ccumittee 5/30 5/18 Proj. Directive #3 E2 Define Criteria 5/30 5/25 2524-PD-5 '

E3 Procedure 5/30 5/30 2524PD-5 FA Processing PFRs cont 9/21 l F1 Management / cost cont Proj. Directive #1 F2 Protocol Procedure 6/01 6/01 2524PD-6 F3 Status Report #1 6/01 5/31 TPr:005:FDC:84 Status Report #2 6/15 6/15 TPr:012:FDC:84 Status Report #3 7/01 7/02 TPr:018:FDC:84 L Status Report #4 7/15 7/16 TPr:023:FDC:84

Status Report #5 8/01 8/01 TPr

029:FDC:84 Status Report #6 8/15 8/15 TPr:034:FDC:84 Status Report #7 9/04 9/04 TPr:045:FDC:84 Status Report #8 9/17 Status Report #9 10/1 F4 Information Ccmpilation 8/15 9/21 F5 Final Report Draft 8/24 10/5 F6 Final Report-Issue 8/31 10/12 t J

.. ., ACTIVITY,

SUMMARY

PECo INDEPENDENT DESIGN REVIEW PROJECT 2524. .

~

MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER .

6000 El N8 NS g 2 Ogg IM N2% OM6 Og g0 M 0 7

2 N4

- - - - N1-kb b- h h.

M- h-

,'S

- , I"

,'  ::i

, . ,s"

-5000 -

100

/

. / Q

/ 90

• 6000 .j 80.

/

/

70.

g -

j. .t 9 3000 . f .

60

.E 52 .

/ . .

l 50 ,.

f 2000 40

/ .

, 30 1000 / 20

/ .t

/ 10 0 - -

O Joj teted- 10 130 350 6801100 15001920 23202690 30903490 3930 4'290 463d4830 5000 516( 5310 542('5520 560C 56505700 *A Actual- 200 357 552 838 L169 1536 L876 2197 2473 2891 3347 3876 4364 4.9215445J790 '

- . . .