ML20097E714
| ML20097E714 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/31/1992 |
| From: | Olive K NRC OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER |
| To: | |
| References | |
| NUREG-1350, NUREG-1350-V04, NUREG-1350-V4, NUDOCS 9206120335 | |
| Download: ML20097E714 (130) | |
Text
_
'i
,i i
i f
d l
l Jitutt
$8
~.;
i L BEEE L
EWWF E E W B F
EEF9' puur F
N.
MlL.u.h:!I.
~
m'.
m t!c!L!
!!!!!n!!d!?!nt-I.g!.RICI.?!.?!.
=w
.: x
.9206120335 920331 f;
- 1350 R l
~
4 Availability Notice l
n_/
Availability of Reference Materials Cited in NRC Publications Most documents cited in NRC publications will be available from ono of the following sources:
1.
The NRC Public Document Room, 2120 L Street, NW, Lower Level, Washington, DC 20555 2.
The Superinterident of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, P.O. Box 37082. Washington, DC 20013-7082 3.
The National Technical Information Service. Springfield, VA 22161 Although the listing that follows represents the majority of documents cited in NRC publications, it is not intended to be exhaustive.
Referenced documents available for inspection and copying for a fee from the NRC Pubtle Document Room include NRC correspondence anri internal NRC memoranda:
NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement bulletins, circulars, information noticos, inspection and investigation notices; Licensee Event Reports; vendor reports and cor-respondence; Commission papers; and applicant and licensco documents and correspondence.
(
)
The following documents in the NUREG series are available for purchase from the GPO V
Sales Program: formal NRC staff and contractor reports NRC-sponsored conference proceedings, and NRC booklets and brochures, Also available are Regulatory Guides, NRC regulations in the Code of Federal Regulations, and Nuclear Regu'atory Commis-slon issuances.
Documents available from the National Technical Information Servlee include NUREG series reports and technical reports prepared by other federal agencies and reports prepared by the Atomic Energy Commission, forerunner agency to the Nuclear Regu-latory Commission.
Documents available from public and special technical libraries include all open litera-ture items, such as books, journal and periodical articles, and transactior.s. Federal Register notices, federal and state legislation, and congressional reports can usually be obtained from these libraries.
Documents such as thesas, dissertations, foreign reports and transl.tlons, and non-NRC conference proceedings are aval!able for purchase from the organizhilon' sponsoring the publication cited.
Single copies of NRC draft reports are available free, to the extent of supply, upon written reqyest to the Office of Administration, Distribution and Mail Services Section.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555.
Copics of Industry codes and standards used in a substantive manner in the NRC regu-latory process are maintained at the NRC Library, 7920 Norfolk Avenue, Bethesda,
(]j
/
Maryland, and are available there for reference use by the public. Codes and stan-dards are usually copy-righted and may be purchased from the originatlog organization
~
tr, if they are American National Standards, from the Arr.:.ilcan National Standards Institute,1430 Broadway, New York, NY 10018.
~
l O Nuolear Regulatory commission Information
@ Digest 6
-CC2 Zr.n-v.
O NtflEG1350 Wlume 4 4-3
,g
%{bs/
stg' Manuscript Compleed.
March 1992
- hS[l Date Pub!!shed; f,
g;;;.j,p March 1992 k
Division of Budget and Analysis DNice of the Controlle-
~
~
~
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
+
Commission s.'
Washington, DC 20555 O
/
%.T-.r b
i i
1 I
(
i 4
I I
I h
a f
i i
.w?
Y
i l
iI e
i t
i i
a a
i 5
9 i
L i
+
i L
t
-r i
i)
T r
l..
I.
1 r
i*
\\.
I.
i, p'
l-r L
f
'- il Y;
- NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION m
...._.-.___._.~....~._..-....._..-,....._.....,..,.._,..._.....--._m.__..,_,,,,_.,
l l
(3 Abstract The Nuclear Regulatory Commission on generating capacity and average Information Digest provides a capacity factor for operating U.S.
summary of information about the commercial nuclear power reactors is U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission obtained from monthly operating (NRC), NRC's regulatory responsi.
reports that are submitted directly to bilities, the activities NRC licenses, the NRC by the licensee. This and generalinformation on domestic information is reviewed by the NRC and worldwide nuclear energy. This for consistency only and no digest is a compilation of nuclear-independent validation and/or and NRC-related data and is verification is performed.
designed to provide a quick reference to major facts about the agency and For detailed and complete information the industry it regulates, in general, about tables and figures, refer to the the data cover 1975 through 1991, source publications. This digest is with exceptions noted. Information published annually.
/^\\
V O
1992 INFORMATION DIGEST iii
_.. ~ _ _ _ _ _... _
-_..__.._.._._.___.._>_._,__._m.
%l~
f i
1 I
t F
r t
t i
1 i
i t
b I
e
~f L
'h t
i i
l' I
f
?
i t
i i
i 7
P
+
e G
t 3
9 J
5 a
Kiv NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1
.. __ ~
~
i 6
i 1
L/:
Contents Ab stra ct......................................................
iii Ed itor's N ote..................................................
xi For More Information...........................................
xiii 1
NRC as a Regulatory Agency...................................
1 Mission and Statutory Authority...............................
2 Principles of Good Regulation................................ -
3 t
4 L
Major Activities........................,....................
Organizations and Functions.................................
5 N RC Locations.............................................
-8 NC Fiscal Year 1992 Resourcer,..............................
10 I
U.S. and Worldwide Energy..................................... - 17 IN U.S. Electricity..............................................
18 4' 'y
- U.S. Electricity. Generated by Commercial N uclear Power.............................................
25-Worldwide Electricity Generated by Commercial Nuclear Power..................................
28 31-
, - Operating Nuclear Reactors.....................................
U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors......................
32 Performance at U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors............................................
43.
Future U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Ucensing. -.........................................
46.
- U.S. Nuclear Nonpower Reactors......................,.....
54 N uclear' Material ' Safety........................................
57 y
_U.S. Fuel Cycle Facilities.....................................
58 U.S. Material Ucenses.......................................
60 p'
U.S. Nuclear Material Transportation a
and. Safeguards............................................
63 1992 INFORMATION DIGEST
. v.
x
c i
_q
.(
j intemational Nuclear Safety..................................
64 v
R a d ioactive Wa ste............................................
65 U.S. Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal.....................
66 U.S. High-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal....................
72
. Appendice s...................................................
77 List of Abbreviations Used in Appendices...........................
78 A.
U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors......................
79 L
B.
U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors Formerly Ucensed to Operate................................
92 C.
Canceled U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power R eactors..................................................
94
- D.
U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors by Ucens ee................................................
98 E.
U.S. Nuclear Nonpower Reactors....................,.......
100 7(d F.
World Ust of Nuclear Power Reactors.......................,.
104 G.
Nuclear Power Units by Reactor Type, Worldwide................................................
105
+
' H.
Top 50 Units by Capacity Factor, Worldwide..................... 106
- i.. - Top 50 Unit" by' Generation, Worldwide....................... 108' G ib s sa ry...................................................... 110 Figures
- 1. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Organization Chart..........................................
6
- 2. Map of NRC Regions......................................
0
- 3. ~ Distribution of NRC Fiscal Year 1992 Budget Authority-.........................................
11
- 4. _ Distribution of NRC Fiscal Year.1992 Staff.....................................,................
12 Lb
< 5. NRC Budget Authority, Fiscal Years Q
1 980 - 1 992................................................
13
= vi -
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
-.=
T
)
- 6. NRC Personnel Ceiling, Fiscal Years 1 980 - 1 992................................................
14
- 7. Sources of NRC Fiscal Year 1991 Budget Authority..................................................
15 8.
1990 U.S. Electric Capability and Net Generation by Energy Source................................
19
- 9. Map of 1990 Net Electricity Generated in Each State by Nuclear Power......................................
21
- 10. U.S. Net Electric Generation by Source, 1975-1990..............
22 l
11. U.S. Electric Generating Capability arid Electricity Generated by Sourco, 1986 - 1999.................. -.........
23
- 12. U.S. Average Nuclear Reactor and Coal-Fired Plant Generation and Production Expenses, 1986-1990..........
24
- 13. Net Generation of U.S. Nuclear Electricity, 1976-1991...........
26
- 14. - 1990 Net Nuclear Electric Power as Percent of World Nuclear and Total Domastic Electricity Gen 6iation................
29 V
- 15. Diagram of a Typical Nuclear Reactor................,.........
33
- 16. Map of U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Sites......................................................
34
- 17. Map of NRC Region ! Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Sites..............................................
35 18.- Map.of NRC Region ll Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Sites..............................................
36
- 19. Map of NRC Region 111 Cornmercial Nuclear Power Reactor Sites..............................................
37
- 20. Map of NRC Region IV Commercial Nuclear Power
. Reactor Sites..............................................
38-
- 21. Map of NRC Region V Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Sites,.............................................
39
- 22. U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Operating Ucenses issued by Year.....................................
41 j
' 23. J Fiscal Year 1991 NRC Inspection Effort at Operating
-A R e actors............................................ :.....
42 n
h L
1992 INFORMATION DIGEST vil
-~~
(V)
- 24. NRC Performance Indicators; Annual Industry Averages, 1985 - 1 991......................................
44
- 25. U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Generating Capacity Assuming Construction Recapture, 1960 - 2050......................................
47
- 26. U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Operating Licenses-Expiration Date by Year Assuming Construction Recapture.............................
49
- 27. Basic Design Certification and Reactor Ucensing Process...............................................
51
- 28. Diagram of Future Reactor Designs..............
53
- 29. Map of U.S. Nuclear Nonpower Reactor Sites..................
55
- 30. Map of Major U.S. Fuel Cycle Facility Sites.....................
59
- 31. Map of NRC Agreement States...............................
62
- 32. Volume of Low-Level Radioactive Waste Generated in the United States in 1990..................................
67 m()
- 33. Volume of Low-Level Waste Received at Currently Operating U.S. Disposal Facilities, 1984 - 1990.................
68
'~
- 34. Radioactivity of Low Level Waste Received at Currently Operating U.S. Disposal Facilities, 1 984 - 1 990...............................................
69
- 35. Map of U.S. Low. Level Waste Compacts....................
71
- 36. Diagram of a Conceptual Design of the U.S.
High-Level Waste Repository.................................
73 Tables 1.
NRC Budget Authority, Fiscal Years 1980- 1992...............
13
- 2. NRC Personnel Ceiling, Fiscal Years 1980-1992............
14
- 3. 1990 Electric Generating Capability and Electrich' Generated in Each State by Nuclear Power.,.............,....
20 4.
U.S. Net Electric Generation by Source, 1975 - 1990...............................................
22 O
- 5. U.S. Electric Generating Capability by Source, f
V 1 9 8 6 - 1 990...............................................
23 viii NUCLEAR REGUl.ATOR bOMMISSION l
a
. f"
(
- 6. U.S. Average Nuclear Reactor and Coal Fired Plant Generation Expenses, 1986 - 1990.......................
24 i
7.
U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Average Capacity Factor and Net Generation. -1975-1991..............
26 8.
1991 U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor l
Average Capacity Factor by Vendor and Reactor Type.........................................
27
- 9. 1991 Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Average Gross Capacity Factor and Gross Generation by Selected Country..............................
30 l
- 10. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Average Gross l
Capacity Factor by Selected Country,1981-1991 30
- 11. U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Operating Ucenses issued by Year.....................................
40
- 12. - U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Operating Ucenses-Expiration Date by Year............................
48-
- 13. Future Reactor Designs......................................
52-
- 14. U.S. Material Ucenses by State...............................
01_
o
- 15. U.S. Low Level Waste Compacts..............................
70
- 16. Spent Nuclear Fuel Stored at U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors-Total Metric Tons b y S tat e...................................................
74
- 17. NRC-Approved Dry Spent Fuel Storage Designs...,.......,.....
75
. 18. NRC Dry Spent Fuel Storage Ucensees........................
76 T
1992 INFORMATION DIGEST-ix A
7, ye%,
,w,--,
[ #.
,,-gy-,
,,,, _,,y y
--e...
-,.+.
m w',-
.~,, ~.,.
._ _.. ~.
~-
4 4
a 4
k r
i i
),
4 i,.:
+
i s
+
-A-
. )
i
' I I
4.
, e i
l A
r e
u i
3_
, =
n%
i h
P
)
h i
I 4
+
L-N
't L
<9 j k.I b
N
- 1_ k l _
e Ij f
im.. -.
p ;i,
n e
l :.
[g fl-N l.
E 26 1-A A [< (.
t T
' ^
m x-NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION -
4
.r,re e.',m. g
,ry g r ~,, w-% p, y -m,-w -
vt =v-ve *vve 9. www+m w ewww.ww.re em r%w*e ww w re wvneeve *. wwwm <er-en wh e e -e-ww ownenew--w w'++=we+
===1*
Twrw*'-+-ere*w-*+-
- = " ="w-a
b t -.
i
,tsIj Editor's Note-s The scope and presentation of data welcomed. Comments should be were changed in Volume 4, and directed to Karen Olive, M/S 10204, l
readers should be alert to these Division of Budget and Analysis, changes._ Comments and/or Office of the Controller, Washington,
. responses, especially where these D.C. 20555 (301) 492-8153.
changes can he improved, are A
r ie i
s 1992 INFORMATION DIGEST xi,
z. _
t t
i
)
i-1
^l I
f o
l-l L
L r
i l..
- xii '
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
- =.. -...... -
n.4
.h i!!
L
+
/
kJ For More Information...
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory all documents made publicly available Commission (NRC) offers a variety of by the NRC since 1981, in addition to 6
programs to make agency, licensee, those about the nearby nuclear facility, and nuclear industry information The agency makes the majority of its 1
available to the public. The agency regulatory and technical publications maintains a Public Document Room in available for sale at both the Washington, D.C., that provides public Government Printing Office and the access to documents pertaining to the National TechnicalInformation licensing and regulation of nuclear Service. Copies of agency facilities and materials and related publications are also routinely sent agency information. The NRC has also to U.S. Depository Libraries through -
established Local Public Document out the United States and the -
i-Rooms (LPDRs) near the site of each Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
commercial nuclear power reactor, To learn more about these and other -
low-level waste repository, the proposed high-level waste repository, sources of public information about and certain fuel cycle facilities. The agency activities, send for a free copy of the booklet, " Citizen's Guide to LPDR collections consist of all publicly
.f U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
\\
available documents about the facility, Information" (NUREG/BR-0010,.
including hearing transcripts, safety Rev.1), at the following 5ddress:
evaluation reports, environmental impact statements, and inspection and U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission licensee event reports. Power reactor ATTN: Distribution and Mail Services LPDRs also maintain a microfiche file of Washington, 7.C. 20555 (5
'h t y O
1992 INFORMATION DIGEST -
xiii.
- r
\\
NRC as a Regulatory Agency I
e N'
F d
+
h u
4
,.)~
- _ $_ [ _ ',
r t..
s
+,
e t
i.
]
- a. %r
\\
w 9,
w__..
3
-w-w -e 4
,,*--+RT w
- f***~~-P "Y-g-*=Bvrw**<atwe's e ma w t wre-" % s e--
e se
=***e'+se e mi-e ' ' -er em e h e=r-*-wei-e-man'"wwer-*m.am+m-++ex= ' e-se +ew -- a w e
i
'I Mission and Statutory Authority The mission of the U.S. Nuclear
. Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, Regulatory Commission (NRC) is to as amended; ensure adequate protection of the public health and safety, the common
. Uranium MillTailir gs Radiation Control Act of 1978, as amended; defense and security, and the environreient in the use of nuclear
. Nuclear Non Proliferation Act of materials in the United States. The 1978-'
NRC's scope of responsibility includes regulation of commercial
. Low Level Radioactive Waste Policy
- nuclear power reactors; nonpower Act of 1980; tors fu c c e fac fit es; dic I
. West Valley Demonstration Project academic, and industrial uses of Act of 1980; nuclear materials; and the transport,
. Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982; storage, and disposal of nuclear materials and waste.
- Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Ame me s Act of 1985; The NRC was created as an independent agency by the Energy
. Diplomatic Security and A
Reorganization Act of 1974, which Anti Terrorism Act of 1986; Q
abolished the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) and moved the
. NuclearWaste Policy Amendments AEC's regulatory function to NRC.
Act of 1987; and This act, along with the Atomic
. Solar, Wind, Waste and Geothermal Energy Act of 1954, as amended, Power Production I'centives' Act of provides the foundation for reguitat. ion 1990 of the nation's commercial nuclear power industry.
The NRC cnd its licensees share a common responsibility to protect the NRC regulations are issued under the public health and safety. Federal United States Code of Federal regulations and the NRC regulatory
- Regulations (CFR) Title 10, Chapter 1, program are important elements in
' Principal statutory authorities that the protection of the public. NRC govern NRC's work are:
licensees, however, have the primary
. Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as responsibility for the safe use of amended; nuclear materials.
v 2
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 4
J NRC AS A REGULATORY AGENCY i
Q Principles of Good Regulation The NRC adheres to the foilowing be a constant agency goal. NRC Principles of Good Regulation:
must establish means to evaluate and continually upgrade its
. Independence-Nothing but the regulatory capabilities. Regulatory highest possible standards of activities should be consistent with ethical performance and the degree of risk reduction they professionalism should influence achieve. Where several effective regulation. However, alternatives are available, the independence does not imply option which minimizes the use of isolation. All available facts and resources chould be adopted.
opinions must be sought openly Regulatory decisions should be from licensees and other interested made without undue delay.
members of the public. The many and possibly conflicting public
. Clarity-Regulations should be interests involved must be coherent, logical, and practical.
- considered. Final decisions must There should be a clear ne.~.us be based on objective, unbiased between regulations and agency assessments of allinformation, and goals and objectives whether
,o
- must be documented with reasons explicitly or implicitly stated, g
explicitly stated.
Agency positions shuuld be readily
. Openness-Nuclear regelation is understood and easily applied, the public's business, and it must be transacted publicly and
. Reliability-Regulations should be based on the best available candidly. The public must be informed about and have the knowledge from research and opportunity to participate in the operational experience. Systems o
d cert in s and e
v rsity of by la pen c anne s of communication must be licensees and regulatory activities must all be taken into account so
- maintained with Congress, other that risks are maintained at an government agencies, licensees, and the public, as well as with the acceptably low level. Once international nuclear community.
established, regulation should be perceived to be reliable and not
. Efficiency-The American unjustifiably in a state of transition.
taxpayer, the rate-paying Regulatory actions should always-consumer, and licensees are all be fully consistent with written entitled to the best possible regulations and should be management and administration of promptly, fairly, and decisively regulatory activities. The highest administered so as to lend stability 1,,5 technical and managerial to the nuclear operational and b
competence is required, and must planning processes.
1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 3
5>,
N Major Activities The NRC fulfills its responsibilities information for making timely l
through a system of licensing and regulatoryjudgments and for i
i regulatory activities that include:
anticipating problems of potential
. Licensing the construction and safety significance.
operation of nuclear reactors and
. Developing and implementing rules other nuclear facilities, such as and regulations that govern nuclear fuel cycle facilities and licensed nuclear activities.
nonpower test and research reactom.
. Investigating nuclear incidents and -
allegations concerning any matter
. Licensing the possession, use, regulated by the NRC.
processing, handling, and export of nuclear material.
. Enforcing NRC regulations and the conditions of NRC licenses.
. Licensing the siting, design, construction, operation, and
. Conducting public hearings on closure of low level redioactive matters of nuclear and radiological waste disposal sites under NRC safety, environmental concern, jurisdiction and the construction, common defense and security, and f) operation, and closure of the antitrust matters.
V-geologic repository for high-level radioactive waste.
- Developing eifective w7tking relationships with the States
. Licensing the operators of nuclear regarding reactor operations and power and nonpower test and the regulation of nuclear material, research reactors.
. Maintaining the NRC incident
. Inspecting licen.n ' racilities and Response Program, including the actis.itles.
NRC Operations Center.
. ; Conducting the principal U.S.
. Collecting, analyzing, and Government research program on disseminating information about light-water reactor safety.
the operational safety of
. Conducting research to provide commercial nuclear power reactors independent expertise and and certain nonranctor activities.
O\\j 4
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION -
o_
NRC AS A REGULATORY AGENCY j
.py
()
Organizations and Functions The NRC is headed by five and in transit, management and Commissioners appointed by the disposal of low level and high-President and confirmed by the level radioactive nuclear waste, Senate for 5 year terms. One of them and decontamination and is designated by the President to be decommissioning of facilities and the Chairman, serving as the principal sites.
executive officer and official spokesperson of the Commission.
- Analysis and Evaluation of l
The staff, headed by the Executive Operational Data-Collects, Director for Operations, carries out analyzes, and disseminates -
the policies and decisions made by information about the operational the Commission. The NRC's safety of commercial nuclear power principal offices are:
reactors and certain nonreactor activities, and manages the NRC's
. Nuclear Reactor incident Response Program and Regulation-Directs alllicensing the NRC,s Technical Training and inspection activities associated Center.
with the design, construction, and operation of nuclear power reactors
. Regional Offices-Conduct
[]
and nonpower reactors.
inspection, enforcement, licensing, and emergency response b'
. Nuclear Regulatory programs that the headquarters Research-Provides independe-.
offices originate.
expertise and information for making timely regulatory
. Inspector General-Provides the judgments, anticipating problems Commission with an independent of potential safety significance, and -
review and appraisd of NRC resolving safety issues and programs and operations to ensure-developing technical regulations their effectiveness, efficiency, and and standare.
integrity.
. Nuclear Material Safety and Refer to the " Nuclear Regulatory Safeguards-Directs alllicensing Commission 1990 Annual Report" ond inspection activities associated (NUREG-1145) for additional with nuclear fuel cycle facilities, information regarding NRC offices uses of nuclear ma'erial, transport and their functions, of nuclear material, safeguarding of Figure 1 is an org nization chart of nuclear material at nuclear facilities the NRC.
1
./,
L 1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 5
I i
t Figure 1. U.S. Nuclear ftagulatory Commission (NRC)
The Chainnan The Commissioners E
I p---=y==
i 1
Advisory Atomic Safety Ottee of Advisory Committee on CoeAtee on and Ucensing the LSS Reactor Nuclear Waste Board Panet Administrator Sateguards I
I I
I Office of Once of Onceof the Officeof the Executive Director Commission Intemational Gener*'
gg, Secretary Ior Operations Programs Counsel Adjudication
\\
Assistant forOperations I
Deputy Executive Director for Nuclear Materials Safety, Safeguards and Operations support I
I I
I I
Offee of Nuclear "I
MaterialSafety Mceof Wa of Mce of State Pmgrams Enforcement investsations Administration and Safeguards l
I I
I Direct Supervision Regioni Region 11 Region tr:
's.
======= Coordinaton -
Philadelphia A!!anta Chcago i
)
ins usi 6
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
---a m
m aey'
,t-e-w-
J NRC AS A REGULATORY AGENCY
+
I I
OUiceof the Inspector General 1
Office of Offee of Congressional Pubke Affairs Niairs ll I
I Office of Offee of l
Policy Planning
' Consordation
. Office of Officeof the ammmmmmmmmmmmmmmmusum Personnel Controller 1
Deputy Executive Directorfor Nuclear Reactor Regulation, RegionalOomths Office of Smalland and Research Disadvantageu Offee fdaWs i
Business Utilization and Evaluation of l
and Civil Rights OperationalData Offceof Information Resources l
l Management Offee of Nuclear Offee of Nuclear Reactor Regulatory I
I Regulation Resear:h
- Region IV RegionV d;
Dallas San Francisco 1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 7
NRC Locations Headgaarters:
Operations Center:
Bethesda, Maryland Greater Washington, D.C., Area (301) 951 - 0550 (301) 492-7000 The NRC maintains an Operations Center that provides a focal point for The NRC is in the Process of NRC communications with its consolidat.ing its headquarters I censees, State agencies, and other staff in Rockville, Maryland. The Federal agencies concerning consolidation is expected to be operating events in the commercial completed in 1994.
nuclear sector. The Operations Center is staffed 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> a day by NRC operations officers.
Regional Offices:
The NRC has five regional offices Region lli located throughout the G!en Ellyn, Illinois g
United States (see Figure 2):
(708) 790-5500 Region I Region IV King of Prussia, Pennsylvania Arlington, Texas (215)337-5000 (817)860-8100 Region ll Region V Atlanta, Georgia Walnut Creek, Calliornia-(404)331 -4503 (510)975-0200 Resident Sites:
Technical Training Center:
P least two NRC resident Chattanooga, Tennessee inspectors who report to the (615)855-0500 appropriate regional office are located at each nuclear power Uranium Recovery Field Office:
reactor site. Refer to Figure 16 for a map of the U.S. commercial Golden, Colorado nuclear power reactor sites.
(303)231 - 5800 l
8 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
NRC AS A REGULATORY AGENCY
.j Q
Figure 2. NRC Regions s
REGION V REGIONlli REGION IV REGION I Nw MN VT ME WA
-l
(
MT ND MA WI l
M!
WY IA i
e N
OH
\\
NE NV uT i
MO
/
CO p
DC e
KS CA N-VA KY OK AR E
NC
\\
AZ h,
g SC s_)
MS
^
TX LA j AL-
' REGION 11 i
FL e RegionalOffice a TechnicalTraining Center A Uranium Recovery Field Office W Headouarters Note: Alaska and Hawaii are included in Region V.
l Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission L
1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 9
i
A V
NRC Fiscal-Year 1992 Resources The Energy and Water Development
. Special and independent Reviews, Appropriations Act (Public Law investigations, and Enforcement 102-104) appropriated $512.5 million
.(SIRIE) to the NRC for Fiscal Year (FY) 1992.
The NRC's FY 1992 personnel ceiling
. Nuclear Safety Management and is 3,335 ful'-time equivalent (FTE) staff.
Support (NSMS)
The NRC allocates funds a:id staff to
. Inspector General (IG) the following programs (see Figures 3 and 4):
These programs fallinto three
^
. Reactor Safety and Safeguards categories - reactor-related, n nre ctoFrelated, and execuM Regulation (RSSR) management and support.
. Nuclear Safety Research (NSR)
In 1980 constant dollars, the NRC's
. Nuclear Material and Low-Level FY 1992 budget has decreased Waste Safety and Safeguards "Q
"(
a re 5 Regulation (NMLLWSSR)
The NRC personnel ceiling has g
. High-Level Nuclear Waste incieased approximately 9 percent
, -( j Regulation (HLNWR) since 1980 (see Table 2 and Figure 6).
Public Law 101-508, the. Omnibus NRC was required to collect Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990, approximately $445 million through requires the NRC to recover 100 these fees (see Figure 7). In FY 1992,
- percent of its budget authority, less the NRC is required to collect-appropriations from the Nuclear Waste approximately $493 million. The fees Fund, for FYs 1991-1905 by assessing assessed to the major classes of NRC fees to its licensees. In FY 1991, the licensees in FY 1991 were:
Class of Licensee Range of Annual Fees Operating Power Reactor
$2,903,000 to $3,132,000 Fuel Facility
$683,500 to $1,643,500 Uranium Recovery Facility
$67,100 to $100,100 Transportation Approval
$1,800 to $29,100 Materials User
$290 to $10,800 The NRC's enforcement program penalties was paid. These civil seeks to protect the public health and penaltics are deposited in the U.S.
safety by ensuring compliance with Treasury and w not used by the requirements and correction of NRC.' Refer M ihe " Nuclear violations and deterrence of future Regulatory ('omer ission 1990 Annual L n(
violations. More sipificant violations Report" (Nli,dC-1145) for additional l
j result in civil penait':es, in FY 1991, information regarding the approximately $3 million in civil enforcement program.
10 NUCLEAR BEGULATORY COMMISSION
NRC AS A REGULATORY AGENCY
.m s:y._
N_
Figure 3.
Distribution of NRC FY 1992 Budget Authority (Dollars in Millions) we N
-. REACTOR :
-- ($325.8) 63%
-f.
.)
a NONREACTOR K'
b
^. '
EXECUTIVE
~
t pg. f~
. ($85.8);i g'
'N
^
t MANAGEMENT 17%
AND SUPPORT gi4 N
rN
' DOLLARS BY CATEGORY
.i i
sd.
IG
($3.7) 1%
Total Authority:
l $512.5 Million NSMSI l($_149)},._
$SSR ?" '
?.,($155) -
SIRIE I
HLN\\ R
. '.aepjt; g
($39) 8'/.
DOLLARS BY PROGRAM
.y.
Note: Percentages are rocnded to the nearest whcie number.
/
'~)
8 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 11
. ww
]')l Figure 4. Distribution of NRC FY 1992 Staff v
- EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT
. AND SUPPORT NONREACTOR 2
.N (576)
,/ 17 %
iREACTOR.,
W l(2,0580 SIRIE p
7)
(2 )
[ 1%
HLNWR s.g.-
8 (79).
2%
(NSRl STAFF BY CATEGORY (237)-
-NSMSL^
NMLLWSSR y-y86)l)
- y V (3 )
-; 24*e
+-
' MS5RY' n:i m.
s N 1]S$3)$
s J
.w,;gj. ' '
STAFF BY PROGRAM (R5GIONAi(!
j(562,bj g I-p i-
}-- l j26p;)
RESIDENT INSPECTORS L
(181)
(
l HEADQUARTERS ?
5%
(2.292 5
..y
- sg.
~
L Total l-starf:
STAFF BY' LOCATION Note: Percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number.
L Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission 12 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
NRC AS A REGULATORY AGENCY Table 1, NRC Budget Authority, FYs 1980-1992 (Dollars in Millions)
Fiscal Year Actual Dollars 1980 Constant Dollars 1980
$400
$400 1981 441 403 1982 466 401 1983 465 385 1984 466 370 1985 444 341 1986 400 299 1987 401 290 1988 393 273 1989 420 276 1990 439 281 1991 465 287 1992 513 308 Figure 5. NRC Budget Authority, FYs 1980-1992 DOLLARS IN MILLIONS 600 500 ACTUAL DOLLARS 400
[
300 1980 CONSTANT DOLLARS 200 100 0
L 1980 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 1992 L
F8 SCAL YEAR Note: Dollars are rounded to the nearest rniilion.
Source (Table 1 and Figure 5): Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 13
-mmmmmmmmmmmmmm
)
\\
x- 'i Table 2, NRC Persorsnel Celling, FYs 1980-1992 Fiscal Year Staff
- 1980 3.066 1981 3.300 1982 3;325 1983 3,303 1984 3,416 1985 3,491 1986 3,491, 1987 3,369 1988 3,250 1989 3.180 1990 3.195
- 1991 3240 1992 3.335
?
4
.v/
Fi ure 6. NRC Personnel Cellin, FYs 1980-1992 STAFF
- N
~
-N
~9
'..~n. y~a.M., ;%,,m,, n.e.W.W,+g..m,W %. wq~ -f'J
~~ ~
3600
- 1 t a -:a b
cf W1 ao w.4 A, m w 9
p t
- m. u 2 ;: g M%,.*MWcp~?y, W i g..: 6 a Ldm.w.mu.,.x..cf.a. Add W.r}t.x+.6.sw A4wa.,Ma.*asA,s.,d./. r.w..pv. ?;W%. haw. weh%
4,,;;',.*
p r
. wil J
. eQpw v
ny ny.
m awa
+
35% y_r5;w":- m.%b,,nW..M wmmypy~g my %aw.m.s vmrmyr a:n p g i. r,m' s ;, #m q e pm w y r.gq}l+ s M $
x ygpg zib~nXi2UT&gafk E f:lik M big u,
MWy?hEhhiW t
y s
p n
&ci,iMO 3400 f@m,:A @WMyly p#g#e.m y%y v:mlbsth W Mi@ MQ@m m n pwn-w;-
exn#Wde W M
NF rm-op ;wnw'P
- wSA n L %q j $ c M Q,Ye::Axtdn y@datec;ygeMuw m
r k
gey Yfi' '
Qlqe$?
R user-
,300 mw 3
r.;.;;,.; A:gbum. h.u y>r';%m yd/.uia.g;;MNud.h.,w%cm ww n.~mm-: 7 ~ r w g w w ew.x x x ~ w y: W o %w';; e %j ;
m mi a e
e o%.g ib. '11Ltrb'i@~ '-
,Mv. p w.QWm.-
~
q.&q
,% n 4
M, r
--Q y
anA?.d
'.E MAMGi,i,,;;M2:.10-%d A*
J 3200
,a.
syrr,7m up m n p.
- m..g. m $ g p $ y m g a; w w y r.3, w @ m, u ; @w g@ $ p.
. m..qmgyq.y$fM6/ p @
Qp.@i$m;;M W M e, n ag
.,g
@4 W M;#3
$9 m.6-ui Wb d.A,aG%%:xx&k1eaG8h4 a u LeM%2 3100 m m r ~g m :a:~ w a ~,
mwn rmnm
~m wmnw w.qa;p3 n i,.;eg.~o~.v:s
- m m-n :n.
an m.. m.., xq., a;;,.
x M Mb %A)" f JG.s & &,4,&;,e,5;g~.r.r.
s n
d~
{ M,,
- of,f.,yty ;g, 9 y p, ny un s
n t,.
.m w
o~.
nm,,
y* ' ? 3 -_
.l i+V'L & + q.*
4
.,l
,;% a
't
- 4#M. 5 Q n*,;:
Q
- y.t fyt N
%8M 3000
.1980 81-82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 1992 FISCAL YEAR (N
- FY1980-1981 data reflect permanent positions at end-of-year strength. Starting (f
in FY 1982, the data reflect full-time equivalents.
Source (Table 2 and Figure 6): Nuclear Regulatory Commission
~
14 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
l NRC AS A REGULATORY AGENCY l l~f (j
Figure 7. Sources of NRC FY 1951 Budget Authority fREACTOR FEES, NONREACTOR FEES -
I($392.3)J J
($53.0) -
84%E 12%
NUCLEAR WASTE FUND
($19.7).
4%
DOLLARS IN MILLIONS Total Authority:
$465 Million Pd Note: Percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number.
's/
Source: Nuc! ear Regulatory Commission 1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 15:
.,a...
-. ~ -
)
.mmmmmmmmanammmmm.
=. 4 y c.
.a a :,,
.g.,-.s.-:
- p.m
- z
.:. s 1
?
e A
i
.,q-k I 'i s
i -
Il l
l.'
I !
!j.
I'
"^
'?
l,
- f
~,,
-u_
16 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i-6
.+..
-em.v-
,,e- - - -
,--, - -m.,
.-.-.,e-->.
I i
h v
3 N
U.S. and Worldwide Energy
'9 si d sfe%im ar spelP
%s c-bl',*q;(, %, > }:l wg.T
%(.
s
- xl[
f gw$ p v.,
A. c^%e a;W{QC?l k%"h.;.g%
Wii KQ~N.
ASOn
'd R
e eM@W yd wiecAA.;gA.g: (M'v cry,t.1 w sp+y:.y;r:trggw n,s,W+gp y -
n m; 7 s er yy
. * {&w
> he-M c:. 2":c D*;c;',
sq v v sa 6'f.
tw:lj:ar)r,9 ' ' 'ru kg
'* kN V.N b
/
C'b+C~n %* +f44%$31d%ysmh;l id9 1%j@pigyyllyg 9'S O
a <:*.
y%
g.,
ast ev
,4 y?AN.
sy
'r g
'Qsg yp
/+
r r
.____.______.-.__.___.____.__.__________.____________..i_._-._..___.____..-__.______.__.______-.
k
\\
x.
[j ~d U.S. Electricity Capability and Net Generation:
Electricity from coal and nuclear sources, which accounted for 57.
U.S.Lelectric generating capability percent of the U.S. generating -
i totaled approximately 690 gigawatts
. capability, produced 77 percent of the j
in 1990. Nuclear energy accounted net electricity generated in 1990 (see for approximately 14 percent of this Table 5 and Figure 11).
capability (see Figure 8).
i Average Generation Expenses:
- U.S. riet electric generation totaled approximately 2,807 thousand The generation expense data
- gigawatthours in 1990. Nuclear presented here include all nuclear
.and coal-fired. power plants owned energy accounted for approximately 21 percent of this generation (see and operated by the major investor-owned electric utilities in the United
.i Figure 8)'-
States (see Glossary). For jointly owned plants, only the portion owned
- In 1990,111 operating nuclear by the major investor-owned electric
- reactors in 33 States generated utilities is included (see Table 6 and
. approximately one-fifth of the nation's Figure 12).-
7 electricity (see Table 3 and Figure 9).
-. In 1990, generation expenses 7 States relied on nuclear power for averaged 5.74 cents per kilo-more than 50 percent of their
- watthour for nuclear reactors and electricity.,
2.98 cents per kilowatthour for coal-fired plants. Production
. :11 additional States relied on expenses averaged 2.27 cents per nuclear power for 25 to 50 percent kilowattnour for nuclear reactors of their electricity.
and 2.12 cents per k]owatthour for-Since 1975, nuclear electric.
generation has tripled and coal-fired
. Recently built nuclear reactors
. generation has doubled, while :
generally incur higher interest electricity' generated by ail othm costs, which are a major sources has decreased by 25 percent component of the capital (see Table 4 and Figure 10),
expenses.
18 NUOLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
w-3S. AND WORLDWIDE ENERGY-yy i
-( d Figure 8.1990 U.S. Electric Capability and Net Generation by Energy Source COAL 1
.(300)-.
HYDROELECTRIC (91)
N 43%
13 %
77 11 %
- (120)-
17%.
(.,
. (100) :
N
- 14% -
70%! Capabihty
600 Gigawatts CA/ ABILITY N
PETROLEUM COAb
\\
(117) if(1;553)f 4%
f')N-~
I56W
'\\
t m
'w QYDROELECTRIC (280) 10%
. NUCIIAR -
1(577)?
21E GAS Total Generation"'
2,807 Thousand Gigawatthours GENERATION
- Total does not equal sum of components due to independent rounding. Total value includes approximately 4 gigawatts of other generating capability (geothermal, refuse, waste heat, waste steam, solar, wind, and wood), which represents less than 1 percent of total capability.
- Total value includes approximately 11 thousand gigawatthours of generation by other energy sources (geothermal, wood, wind, waste, and solar), which represents less than 1 percent of total generation.
.p)
Note: Net summer capability. Percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number.
(
Source: DOE /EIA Eiectric Power Annua! 1990 (DOE /EIA-0348(90)) and DOE /EIA Monthly Energy Review (DOE /EIA-0035 (91/12))
1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 19
?
.u
. - l-
+'s
(^
Table 3.
1990 Electric Generating Capability and Electricity
~
Generated in Each State by Nuclear Power
- Percent Net Nuclear P_erce'nt Net Nuclear-
. Capability Generation State
- Capability Generation State Alabama 24 16 Missouri 7
14
. Arizona 25' 33 Nebraska 23-35 Arkansas 18 30 New Hampshire '44
'38 4
Califomia 11 29 New Jersey 28 65
- Connecticut 45 62 New York 16 18 Florida 12 18 North Carolina 23 33 Georgia 18 25 Ohio 8
8 lilinois 39-57
. Orecon 10 12 lowa 7-10 Pennsvivania '
26 35 Kansas 12 23
- South Carolina 43 62 f'X Miana 12 24 Tennessee 14 19-V-
-- 7
-- Maryland 17
'4 Vermont 47 72
14
- Virainia 25 51 7
Michiaan 18 24-Washinaton 5
6-Minnesota
'17 30 Wisconsin 14 25
~ Mississippi 16 32
' Others*
O O
h
[
- There are 17 States with no nuclear generating capability.
Note: Net summer capability. Percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number.
lI
)
Source: DOE /EIA Electric Power Annua! 1990 (DOE /EIA-0348 (90) and DOE /EIA Report l; N on Elactric Power Generation u
NUOLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION h
- 20 y,.
-mmmmmmm.
U.S. AND WORLDWIDE ENERGY-
.,r ~
N)
Figure 9.1990 Net Electricity Generated in Each State by Nuclear Power
_WA NH b
i MT
\\
ND J'on;
, MN -
[
)
CD
^ W1 ID NY:
N'
{
WY
- gg,
[
RI M:
j g.
NE-NV q
lH 9
E UT g
4 ' ';
o
- CA..
co Ks 4 '
s r:
- MO)
Y
'O'N'i' L
s.
'yet Y..
AZs oK g-;
i NM
':e IMs ny
~
y
' Nf'!{yE'h Luss#
'sM
_ V y
l d::N:p c
.A M More than 50% (7)
T' O 25 % to so s (ii) y O 1% to 24% <1s)
O None(17)
L Note: There are no commercial reactors in Alaska or Hawaii. Percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number.
Source: DOE /EIA Report on Electric Power Generation 1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 21
)
(,/
Table 4.
IJ.S. Net Electric Generation by Source, 1975-1990 (Titcusand Gigawatthours)
Year Coal Petroleum Gas Hydroelectric Nuclear 300 300 173 1975 853 289 1976 944 320 295 284 191 1977 985 358 306 220 251 1978 976 365 305 280 276 1979 1,075 304 329 280 255 1980 1.162 246 346 276 251 1981 1,203 206 346 261 273 1982 1,192 147 305 309 283 1983 1,259 144 274 332 294 1984 1,342 120 297 321 328 1985 1,402 100 292 261 384
,1986 1,386 137 249 291 414 1987-1,464 118 273 250 455
,l(
)
1988 1,541 149 253 223 527 xl 1989 1,554 158 267 265 529 o-1990 1,558 117 264 280 577 Figure 10. U.S. Net Electric Generation by Source, 1975-1990 THOUSAND GIGAWATTHOURS E dg?,^454 % y s 04 M yf WE Q pfP;Q ] ['
ECTU6M?
1600 p[:r$Wyt:Gb@hbxA&M L '" mads +
@f9Mo ?d#
l fyrfMJ"- Y*o,y N T.,m.
. L' mttD L:.:.,xmis22 i,h
[*3bh
_ MiE
' " [:%~BMT@fSKf4EEMiliE s
L 52h
- P M is lmdi
'"Ei2E E WL5fB M? 2Lw a m hee
- V49&s2MGBGMthX&iPE%1%BWC'~:X+2i lp:.T q ~ yLW J T L p wmgizgg3 0 NSEN NENNNbNEMEENY'2MM 1975 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 YEAR
(
Source (Table 4 and Figure 10): DOE /EIA Monthly Energy Review (DOE /EIA-0035 (91/12))
22 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
U.S. AND WORLDWIDE ENERGY l
Table 5.
U.S. Electric Generating Capability by Source, 1986-1990 (Gigawatts)
Year Coal Petroleum Gas Hydroelectric Nuclear 1986 290 78 117 89 85 1987 293 76 118 90 94 1988 295 77 116 90 95 1989 297 78 117 90 98 1990 300 77 120 91 100 Figure 11. U.S. Electric Generating Capability and Electricity Generated by Source, 1986-1990 CAPABIL BY SOURCE GENERAT BY SOURCE 120 120
- O 1
1 YEAR YEAR MOTHER CCOAL O NUCLEAR M OTHER OCOAL C NUCLEAR Note (Table 5 and Figure 11): Net summer capability. Percentages are rounded to the near-est whole number.
Source (Table 5 and Figure 11): DOE /EIA Electric Power Annual 1990 (DOE /EIA-0348(90))
1992 INFORM '~lON DIGEST 23
j j
A'J Table 6. U.S. Average Nuclear Reactor and Coal Fired Plant
~
Generation Expenses, 1986-1990 (Cents Per Kilowatthour) l Production Expenses Operation Total and Capital Generation Year Maintenance Fuel Exp~enses Expenses Nuclear:
_1986 1.25 0.75 3.34 5.34 1987 1.37 0.76 3.25 5.38 1988 1.46 0.79 3.35 5.60 1989-1.62 0.75 3.73 6.10 1990*
1.55 0.72 3.47 5.74 Coal-Fired:
1986 0.44 1.85 0.99 3.27 1967 0.45 1.69 1.03 3.17 1988 0.36 1.65 1.06 3.07 1989 0.39 1.75 0.79 2.93
.Q 1990*
0.35 1.77 0.86 2.98 t,')
Figure 12. U.S. Average Nuclear Reccior and Coal Fired Plant Generation and Production Expenses, 1986-1990 CENTS PER KILOWATTHOUR 5
SEEEEEEE 1
0 b
1988 87 88 89
~ 993 1
- 1990 data is preliminary.
YEAR Note (Table 6 and Figure 12): Generation expenses include costs associated both witn production expenses (operation, maintenance, and fuei costs) and with capital expenses (V
(taxes, depreciation, interest, and retum on equity, etc.). Costs have not been adjusted to
)
reflect inflation. Totals do not equal sum of components due te independent rounding.
Source (Table 6 and Figure 12): DOE /EIA Electric Plant Ccst and Power Production -
Expenses 1989 (DOE /EIA-0455(89))
24 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
L U.S. AND WORLDWIDE ENERGY t
)
U.S. Electricity Generated by Commercial Nuclear Power Net nuclear-based electric generation
. More than half of the U.S.
in the United States surpassed its commercial nuclear reactors previous-year level for the eleventh operated above a c-3 city factor of consecutive year, reaching an all time 70 percent in 1991 t
high in 1991 of 613 thousand Table 8).
gigawatthours (see Table 7 and
. Babcock and Wilcox (B&W)
Figure 13).
reactors had the highest average capacity factors compared to those in 1990, the average U.S. net of the other three vendors. The capacity factor was 68 percent, in seven B&W reactors had an 1991, it increased to 71 percent. This average capacity factor of 83 is the third consecutive year that the percent. The average capacity 1
average U.S. capacity factor has factors for the other three vendors increased (see Table 7).
were the following: 15 Combustion Engineering reactors-76 o
. Capacity factor is the ratio of percent,52 Westinghouse
',)
electricity generated to the amount reactors-72 percent, and 37 4
of energy that could have been General Electric reactors-65 generated. See Glossan/.
percent (see Table 8).
7~V i
l 1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 25 '
C
e
/
(t Table 7.
U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Average Capacity Factor and Net Generation, 1975-1991 Number of Average Annual Net Generation of Electricity Operating Capacity Factor Thousands of Percent of Year Reactors (Percent)
Gigawatthours Total U.S.
1975 51 67 167 8.7 1976 55 64 185 9.1 1977 63 64 240 11.3 1978 66 67 271 12.3 1979 66 61 25 11.2 1980 67 58 248 10.9 1981 70 61 268 11.7 1982 72 58 270 12.4 1983 74 58 280 12.1 1984 82 Sj}
317 91 1985 89 63 371 15.0 19R8 95 60 404 18 7 1987 102 62 446 17.3 1988 108 65 522 19.3
[!,%/]
19R9 109 83 R7A 19_0
/
1990' 111 68 578 20 5 1441 111 71 A19
- Data are not available.
Figure 13. Net Generation of U.S. Nuclear Electricity, 1975-1991 THOUSAND GIGAWATTHOURS-
=
700 mmm"7
- =
- R myn
~r~n=r~'
4,
"f 600 W;,n % Cs4...:#N@.# M#:. % =.MS.df i 12 t 500-" % s :::;Usi*ut?.gNNq==Yl$r. w:h2=: ' '~'= &
a, 7
400j T W O '" MiM^~;di n d::n3: 4D =
'a 7
a 300i t h h !='29 M k:n - + -
^
1-2 c.
200; gf@=
n ' '!.; a *,p: =
=>
1;- :
100-"v;#v a @ $P.+ % s e x '. M.
.i _.e.
+
'- u;
/
0 w a=,a.. c i a_i_ai.u s _. i m t -. o~. = i a n _ _ a _
1975 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 68 89 90 1991 YEAR Note (Table 7 and Figure 13): Average annual capacity factor is based on net maximum
.c dependable capacity. See Glossary for definition.
Source (Table 7 and Figum 13): Licensee data as compiled by t'.e Nuclear Regulatory Commission 26 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
U.S. AND WORLDWIDE ENERGY,,
y n
)
A' Table 8.
1991 U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Average Capacity Factor by Vondor and Reactor Type Number of Percent of 1991 Operating Net Nuclear Capacity Factor Reactors Generated Above 70 Percent
_G9 72 50 to 70 Percent 28 23 Below 50 Percent 14*
5 Total 111 Average Number of Capacity Percent of Operating Factor Net Nuclear Reactors (Pwcent)
Generated Vendor:
,i s I
Babcock & Wilcox' 7
83
-7 MJ Combustion Engineering 15 76 15 General Electric 37
- 65 30
._ estinghouse Electric 52 72 48 W
Total 111
' Reactor Type:
~ Boiling-Water Reactor 37
- 65 30 Pressurized-Water Reactor 74 73 70 Total 111
- Includes two reactors (Browns Ferry 1 and Browns Ferry 3) that were shut down for the entire year.
Note: Average capacity factor is based on net maximum dependable capacity. See l A Glossary for definition. Refer to Appendix A for the 1991 average capacity factor for each lQ reactor. Percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number.
L Source: Ucensee data as c'ompiled by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission L
1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 27 i
Worldwide Electricity Generated by Commercial Nuclear Power in 1991,414 operating reactors in 32 was approximately 75 percent (see countries had a maximum Figure 14).
dependable capacity of 323,092 in 1991, reactors. Sweden (85 in megawatts electric (net MWe). World percent), Canada and Japan (72 nuclear-based capacity rose 1 percent), and the United States (69 percent from that in 1990.
percent) had the highest average gross capacity factors. Reactors in
. Refer to Appendix F for a world list the United States had the greatest of nuclear power reactors and gross generation by almost double Appendix G for nuclear power units the next highest producer, France by reactor type, worldwide.
(see Table 9),
Major producers of nuclear electricity
- c.efer to Appendix H for a list of the dun,ng 1990 were the United States top 50 units by gross capacity factor, worldwide, and Appendix 1 for a list of the top 50 units by
- / _
= Approximately 30 percent of the gross generation, worldwide.
\\
world's net nuclear-generated electricity was produced in the Over the past ten years, the average United States (see Figure 14).
annual gross capacity factor has gone up 21 percentage points in
- Although France produced Sweden,12 percentage points in approximately 16 percent of the Japan, and 11 percentage points in world's not nuctedr-generated the United States. However, the electricity, the nuclear portion of its capacity factor has gone down 16 total doinestic electricity generation percentage points in Canada.
O l
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION f
28
U.S. AND WORLDWIDE ENERGY
-r
((
Figure 14.1990 Net Nuclear Electric Power as Percent of World Nuclear and Total Domestic Electricity Generation PERCENT OF WORLD NUCLEAR GENERATION SWEDEN 3%
m U.S.S.R..
GERMANY *
- g4py4._
111 %
7%
N Ejd s
F f E[
CANADA f
- ALL OTH$RS
~
- 19% l-
! ON'ITED STATESi z
j30W Total World Net Nuclear m
Electric Generation:
1,898 Thousand Gigawatthours O
PERCENT OF TOTAL DOMESTIC NET ELECTRICITY GENERATION 80 75%
~
60 40 32%
20 I-26%
21 %
15%
13 %
I i
CANADA FRANCE GERMANY
- JAPAN SWEDEN UNITED U.S.S.R.
STATES
- Data are for West Germany only.
Note: Percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number.
Source: DOE /EIA International Energy Annual 1990 (DOE /EIA-0219(90))
1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 29,
(,
W d
' II N_/
Table 9, 1991 Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Average Gross Capacity Factor and Gross Generation by Selected Country _
Number of Average Total Operating Number of Gross Gross Nuclear
- Reactors Operating Number of Capacity Generation in Top 50 Reactors in Operating Factor Gig (Thousand by Capacity Top 50 by Country Reactors (Percent) awatthours)
Factor Generation
,Qanada 19 72 86 7
0 France 57 63 331 1
12 f
Germanv*
22 66 147 3
10' Japan-42 72 206 5
3
-Sweden
-12' 85 78 3
2 United S_tates 111 69**
643 17 20 U.S.S.R.
- Source
- Excerpted from Nucleonics Week @ 1992 by McGraw-Hill, int Reproduced by -
permission. Further reproduction prchibited.
/)
4
- Table 10; Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Average Gross i
~#
~ Capacity Factor by Selected Country, 1981-1991
- Average Gross Annual Capacity Factor (Percent)
Country 1981. 1982 1983 1984 1935 1986 1987= 1988 1989 1990 1991 Canada-88
-82 79 72 72 73 72 77 74
- 61 72 france 58 53 A
70 71 67 60 58
-62 63 63 Germanv* 67 -
70 70 76 87 78 75 74 69 66 66 Japan
-60 89 68 70
-71 76 77 71 71 72 72 Sweden 64 61-60
-76 71 81 77 77 74 75 85
- United 58 57-54
-56 58-57 57 64-62 66 69 States (61 58 58 58 63 60
-62 65 63 6E 71]"
U S.S.R.
- Data are for West Germany only.
- For comparison, U.S. average gross capacity factor is used. The 1991 U.S. average net capacity factor is 71 percent. Brackets [ ] in Table 10 denote average net capacity factor. See Glossary for definition.-
"* Data are not available.
('
Note (Table 9 and 10): Percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number.
(
Source: DOE /EIA Commercial Nuclear Power 1991 (DOE /EIA-0438) and licensee data as compiled by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission 30 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
r p
Operat'ng Nuclear Reactors-r 4
p15
.o edwry wppe,+4.epwywn+y._ p j G
c.f r.
.,_3 t:
.,2; 9";=**+' m %7M-C4* ]<y
, j M. 41;'4 <m/g.,.. k ~ < ;y a<r.,..
., w' s
kl
.j
- /r' E gc
, g;x > >
\\
T
'4y.
f'
']@E[y,,
- d./
g3[i;;,' ; E f Yj [A 1 M;I,'g& {
- l't
' y 'f !
,....c.'1
.., n R$6 O s M+1[-j')
I j :'. m?q, fD w;
g;_ -t_<
a n_ o wx; i,,
s-,
+
q u.A
'm
- Ylr1%3sn y
'. t :s,;
l:,. V, sc
.5 m%-y A-Q;.,i.j;;i; %a C+j.g(_.
>y-q
-r :
A-y mm _c,_-yr~
..,~.,s.,
., s Ah..gp
.y; + m 3,
i..
y p.
9 s
-g*4 %t*k q %c E
,e.a:g q $7-tiwp' a gg t
p 1>>
n L
,a.
y&, f, c,w' :%n-Q, !
gg-t N u f.y,n+ c.-c = y :n w
>..L o,_n,,
_ g A
. N.
c A; y3. w
- c..
-; >Rt,
.: 3
.. f...;.,, s -, ~e :;s ;'+ ; ?q +g i
s-
- -p>6 9.
4
+,.
gg w
. g s, c. J44.,,.. a q.
3.4.
wA3 v
..v,q,.
+
c%, u.1 4
- , l fQys p.,Lt - <.K
@ ; f Jp 4Qg 4 *; 7 l,
~(/ )s ylV_,R.f.pg;Q'.;,. *lOf
.s lA_' 24h,
.. [y y:Q1(,',.S s
r b_ ; x -
]"p f,.- m_
.s w m
.1 e.gf
. i. s,,f:s.p
$ $,.g('.
y *
- C,.1. {y }_ v-1 g!2 -.4
.. $ '?..t..
u.
N
- W
?.N g
s w
'wn=-
4 s
g f3,g3l.s,-.- TJl, Q:. ?,- s'7, :
g,,/;
, ;g'f[..
M, H n}
O Y.
- ;t 3;. ny ?.A,]t
. ;:,.'[= t.:,ll%
ggy.w.y g g e,p.
[.;f
,L_
pi [1,--:,
w)
- y g-s. c. o.._f.:.
ty ~ _,;,. 3...
y z'
4 i
g<
9 r
.V.s,
.I
^
,,_k
- f,4,
- N NNhb.<.m.n(f,I h, h, e.4) id., f [j ) bN1.xi VM,b;;. + < _ m
,w e
.e.,'.t., fu y kA +
r[f C h.,_?.
saw.
, nb 4 _,
n xpg3-9; ;,,
,y a4 bb k
.4
[.
n j" m.
+
...+ s g
, o a.
e.
MD. ;. -
~.;.e_s--v.-
r 4+
.o y -
n b, -
r.
- y,.
- g + ; %: r ;
p p.? p r3 p r.
?>
a ',
q
.4 x
A. Ln M + %q {q
- 4. Wp
'4j ~ -, QgA : f '
"m' r
t c
g mp l
h). g p. - J';
+,E~*
L<-
O P ' to
'?
^ ~ -
y s
I h
(
bgc r
i l
I 4
F 4
s
yO U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors There are 111 commercial nuclear accumulated by permanently shut power reactors currently licensed to down reactors.
cperate in 33 States (see Figures 1 6 - 21):
Principal Licensing and inspection Activities:
3 are under construction (Watts Bar e
. The NRC depends primarily on
-1 and 2 and Comanche Paak 2).
reactor and facility,nspections as i
5 are partially completed, but the basis for its independent e
construction has been deferred detacmination of licensee (Bellefonte 1 and 2, Perry 2, and cc ipliance with NRC regulations:
Washington Nuclear 1 and 3).
- Approximately 3,000 power Refer to Appendices A-D for a reactor inspections are listing of currently operating, conducted by the NRC annually, formerly operating, and canceled
- On average,4,430 inspection U.S. commercial nuclear power hours were expended at each reactors.
o erating reactor during FY 1991-(
Diversity: Although there are many (see Figure 23).
3 similarities, each reactor design can e Approximately 20 separate license be considered unique. A typ, cal changes are requested per power i
. light-water reactor is shown in reactor each year-resulting in Figure 15:
more than 2,000 separate NRC reviews per year.
4 reactor vendors
. Aporoximately 5,000 reactor 50 licensees -
operators are licensed:
e 80 different designs
- Each operator is licensed for a e
specific reactor.
. 73 sites
- Each operator is requalified Experience: The 111 reactors -
before renewal of a 6-year currently licensed to operate have Hcense.
accumulated 1,497 reactor-years of e::perience (see Table 11 and Figure
. Approximately 5,000 reactor event 22).- An additional 107 reactor-years reports are assessed by the NRC of experience have been annually.
(m 32 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
1 OPERATING NUCLEAH REACTORS x
Figure 15, Typical Nuclear Reactor How Nuclear Reactors Work in. typa coorw pres =ed westor rewor m ine ree-core creates heat, (2) pressurged itater en the pnmary coolant loop cames the heat to the steam generator, and (3) the steam generator vaporues the water in a secondary loop to dwe the turtune whch produces ekttroty Boeirn0-water reactors are strular to pressurged water reactors. but use the same loop to cool the reactar and to dekver steam to the turtane T he reactor's core.s cooled by water whch rs torcecrculated by electneah powered pumps. Emergency cooling water is suppled by other pumps wtuch can be powered by on-site desel Denerators. Other safety systems.
tg$[# DENT
,4 C
such as the contamment bueng avr cooiers. also need electr< power.
8YSTEu l
Amar%
y
(;
$]lQ '.
W11g
.w Iq,;[
p'if,{ch[.'
P; inJa n.
i 3
. Wr;;pQ
- p i'
% 2};:-
KJ N.
f f. Tune, M.,
i
.J%.
,js m
J
'y I:
-l t,
- l(
- 4. w',.,
N k
^,$tl.'%
2' mu on
/
j j
8vsTiQ
. n's^foeN ~~
ccn
~s r
(
Source: Peter Miller and Pierre Mion, National Geographic Society @. Reproduced by permission. Further reproduction prohibited 1
1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 33
,s
, s.
)
Figure 16.
U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Sites
,, v s h
n c
M s
4 F
NY JAA A
,M g
NE u
g
[w OH L ^^ 'IN UT
- \\
E CA CO 1'
u
.MD KSA d'
MO AA NC*
A AZ OK
h A
. /'N TX LA,
'A
^
tj Ae FL AA A
A Currently Ucensed to Operatn (111) m Under Construction (3)
- Deferred Construction (5) k^)'
Note: There are no commercial reactors in Alaska or Hawaii.
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission 34 NUCLEAR REGULATG.lY COMMISSION
a_._
j OPERATING NUCLEAR REACTORS
~s _
Figure 17. NRC Region I Commercial Nuclear Power Re tor Sites r
h l
l e
A i
N NH d'
N A
A A1 j
t
/A MA 3 M
A A
-Q-AA A
A Hope Creek 1
.AA A
.NJ A Oyster Creek A
A A Salem 1 and 2 NEW YORK DE A James A. FitzPatrick l
i i-I C
A Ginna -
A Indian Point 2 and 3 A Nine Mfie Point 1 and 2 CONNECTICUT PENNSYLVANIA A Haddam Neck -
A Beaver Valley 1 and 2 A Millstone 1,2, and 3 A Umcrick 1 and 2 MASSACHUSETTS A Peach Bottom 2 and 3 MAINE -
A Pilgrim 1 A Susquehanna 1 and 2 A Maine Yankee A Yankee Rowe A Ttree Mile Island 1 MARYLAND NEW HAMPSHIRE VERMONT A Calvert Cliffs 1 and 2 A Seabrook 1 A Vermont Yankee L
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission A Currently Licensed to Operate (30)
T 1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 35 n
~
,y
.f 3 (f
Figure 18. NRC Region il Commercial Nuclect Power Reactor Sites ALABAMA NORTH CAROLINA TE1NESSEE A Browns Ferry 1,2, and 3 A
Brunswick 1 and 2 A Sequoyah 1 and 2 A Joseph M. Farley 1 and 2 A McGuire 1 and 2 W Watts Bar 1 and 2 9 Bellefonte 1 and 2 A
Shearon Harris 1 VIRGINIA FLORIDA SOUTH CAROLINA A North Anna 1 and 2 ACrystal River 3 A Catawba 1 and 2 A Suny 1 and 2 A St. Lucie 1 and 2 A Ocones 1,2, and 3 ATurkey Point 3 and 4 A
H.B. Robinson 2 A
Summer GEORGIA A Edwin 1. Hatch 1 and 2 g
AVogtle 1 and 2 WV MISSISSIPPI VA t
AGrand Gulf 1 KY h
7 A
[O ua
(/
TN NC g
r
^
A..
i A
SC g
E MS f
A M
L.
A FL A Current:y Licensed to Operate (33) e Under Construction (2)
. Deferred Construction (2)
'd Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commissic.
36 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
OPERATING NUCLEAR REACTORS Figure 19. NRC Region 111 Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Sher ILLINOIS lOWA MINNESOTA A Braldwood 1 and 2 A Duane Arnold A Monticello
' A Byron 1 and 2 A Prairie Island 1 and 2 A Clinton MICHIGAN A Dresden 2 and 3 A Big Rock Point MISSOURI A La Salle County 1 and 2 A
D.C. Cook 1 and 2 A Callaway
' A Quad Cities 1 and 2 A Fermi 2 A Zion 1 and 2 A Palisades OHIO A Davis Besse A Perry 1
- Perry 2 5
WISCONSIN A Kewaunee A Point Beach 1 and 2 7y MN O
A A
' WI g
A.
Mi A
uk/A' -
' =
m AA g
A AA l
OH 1
IN i
IL g
A MO
~s
(
)
A Currently Licensed to Operate (28)
A/
' Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission e Deferred Construction (1) 1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 37
-~
Figure 20. NRC Region IV Commercial Nuclear Pow 6r Reactor Sites ARKANSAS LOUISIANA A Arkansas Nuclear 1 and 2 A River Bond 1 A Waterford 3 KANSAS A Wolf Creek 1 NEBRASKA A Cooper A Fort Calhoun I
TEXAS I
A Comanche Peak 1 a Comanche Peak 2 MT
'ND A South Texas Project 1 and 2
(
ID
(
So WY
}"r NE A
A UT.
CO KS A
,L OK NM AR N_--
U u
a A
g l
O A Currently Ucensed to Operate (10)
I a Under Construction (1)
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission l
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i 38
.~
\\
OPERATING NUCLEAR REACTORS jn 1'
Figure 21. NRC Region V Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Sites ARIZONA A Palo Verde 1,2, and 3 CALIFORNIA A Diablo Canyon 1 and 2
'e WA A San Onofre 1,2, and 3 A9
-+
OREGON A Trojan WASHINGTON OR A Washington Nuclear 2 l
9 Washington Nuclear 1 and 3i_
I i
1 NV CA P
M AZ A
M A
A A Currently Ucensed to Operate (10) e Deferred Construction (2)
O Note: There are no commercial reactors in Alaska or Hawaii.
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 39
f3
\\")
Table 11.
U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Operating Licenses issued by Year Number Total Number Total of Number of of Number of Reactor Licenses Operating Reactor Licenses Operating Year Name issued Licenses Year Name issued Licenses 1960 Yankee-Rowe 1
1 1974 (Conhnved) 1962 Big Rock Point 1
2 Edwin 1. Hatch 1 1967 Haddam Neck 2
4 James A FitzPatnck San Onofre i Oconee 3 1969 Dresden 2 4
8 Peach Bottom 3 Ginna Praine Island 1
%ne Mile Point 1 Prairie Island 2
' at h Three Mile Island 1 c
nn.
3 11 1975 Millstone 2 2
49 1%
"t YtN Trojan h 121 1976 Beaver Valley 1 7
56 1971 Dreswi3 2
13 Browns Ferry 3 Moni ef?
Brunswick 1 1972 Palisales 6
19 Caimt Cliffs 2 Pagnm 1 Indian Point 3 Quad Cities 1 Salem 1 Quad Gn;es 2 St. Lucie 1 Surry 1 1977 Crystal River 3 4
60 Turkey Point 3 Davis-Besse 1973 Browns Fe*ry 1 14 33 D.C Cook 2 Fort Calhoun Joseph M. Farley 1 Indian Point 2 1978 Arkansas Nuclear 2 3
63 Kewaunee Edwin I. Hatch 2
{
Maina Yankee North Anna 1 Oconee 1 1980 North Anna 2 2
65 Oconee 2 Sequoyah1 Peach Bottom 2 1981 Joseph M Farley 2 4
69 Point Beach 2 McGuire 1 Surry1 Salem 2 Turkey Point 4 Sequoyah 2 Vermont Yankee 1982 La Sane County 1 4
73 Zion 1 San Onofre 2 Zion 2 Summer 1974 Arkansas Nuclear 1 14 47 Susquehanna 1 Browns Ferry 2 1M3 McGuire 2 3
76 Brunswick 2 San Onotre 3 CaNert Cliffs 1 St. Lucie 2 Cooper 1984 Callaway 6
B2 D.C Cook 1 Diablo Canyon 1 O
Duane Arnold Grand Guti 1 40 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
OPERATING NUCLEAR REACTORS Number Total Number Total
~.
('v) of Number of of Number of Reactor Licenses Operating Reactor Licenses Operating Year Name issued Licenses Year Name issued Licenses 1964 (Continued) 1987 (Continued)
La Salle County 2 Chnton Susquehanna 2 Nine Mile Point 2 Wcshington Nuclear 2 Palo Verde 3 1985 Byron 1 9
91 Shearon Hams 1 Catawba 1 Vogtle 1 Diablo Canyon 2 1988 Braidwood 2 2
106 Fermi 2 South Texas Project i Umorick 1 1989 Umerick 2 3
109 Palo Verde 1 South Texas Project 2 Rrver Bend 1 Vogtle 2 Waterford 3 1990 Comanche Peak 1 2
111 Wolf Creek 1 Set. brook 1 1986 Catawba 2 5
Hope Creek 1 Note (Table 11 and Agure 22):
Mahtone 3 Umrted to reactors currently licensed to operate.
Palo Verde 2 Year is based on the date the initial full power Perry 1 operating heense wasissued.
'98I
YE O
Source (Table 11 and Dgure 22): Nuc\\ car Byron 2 Regulatory Commission t
Figure 22. U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Operating Licenses issued by Year NUMBER OF LICENSES ISSUED IS I' I#
14 12 10 o
a g
8 y
6 7
4 3
3 3
n L_
1960 62 67 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 1990 cs f' )
YEAR v
1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 41
Figure 23. FY 1991 NRC Inspection Effort at Operating Reactors NUMBER OF PLANTS 30 28 26 25 25
=
20
=
15
=
10
=
5 7
3 3
i 0
<2000 2500 3500 4500 5500 6500 7500 8500 9500 >10500 HOURS OF INSPECTION EFFORT l
l l
O Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission 42 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
OPERATING NUCLEAR REACTORS Ad Performance at U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors Performance Indicator Program:
collect and evaluate observations and data in order to assess and.better The Performance Indicator Program is understand the reasons for a licensee's a single, coordinated, overall NRC program that provides an additional pedonnance. The purpose of the view of operational performance and program is to direct both NRC and licensee attention and resources enhances the NRC's ability to toward those areas that need recognize areas of changing safety performance of operating plants.
improvement and that most affect nuclear safety. This involves review of When viewed as a set, the licensee performance over an performance indicators (Pis) for a given extended period of time (approximately plant provide additional data for 15 months) in such areas as (1) plant determining performance trends. Pls operations, (2) maintenance and focus attention on the need to assess survedlance, (3) radiological controls, and understand underlying causes of identified changes by evaluating other (4) emergency preparedness, (5) security, (6) engineering and technical available information (see Figure 24).
m) support, and (7) safety (V
The Pl Program is only a tool that must assessment / quality verification.
be used in conjunction with other tools, such es the results of routine and On the basis of a review of the special inspections and the Systematic consolidated information, a ratino of Assessment of Ucensee Performance "one" to three" is given in each' area, Program, for providing input to NRC with a "one"_ indicating superior management decisions regarding the performance and a "three" indicating need to adjust plant-specific regulatory improvement is requ;.M although programs. Pts have limitations and erformance generally meets minimum are subject to misinterpretation.
levels of NRC acceptance.The SALP Therefore, caution is warranted in the evaluations are publicly discussed with
- interpretation and use of the data. The the licensee and licensee written application of Pls for purposes and in comments are obtained before issuing manners other than those stated above the final SALP evaluation report will be counter to the NRC objective of presenting NRC's considered ensuring operational safety, judgment of overalllicensee Systematic Assessment of Licensee performance for the SALP evaluation period. For the latest SALP rating by Performance:
reactor, refer to NUREG-1214, D
The Systematic Assessment of
" Historical Data Summary of the I h Ucensee Performance, or SALP Systematic Assessment of Licensee i
Program is an integrated NRC effort to Performance."
1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 43 1
1
Figure 24. NRC Performance Indicators; AnnualIndustry Averages, 1985-1991 AUTOM ATIC SCRAMS WHILI. CRITICAL SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS AVERAGE NUMBER OF REACTOR SCRAMS AVERAGE NUMBER OF ACTUATIONS 3
6 8'
5j3 5-Ado
'4 2-4-
\\
J13 3-
, 33 Pj6
'Ja 1-2-
,j 1-
\\'
B O
O 1985 1980 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 YEAR YEAR SIGNIFICANT EVENTS SAFETY SYSTEM FAILURES AVERAGE NUMBER OF SIGNIFICANT EVENTS AVERAGE NUMBER OF FAILURES 3
4 W
3_Ci 3[.
2g3 3
- 'j f
y'i 2-
,y 2
- 22 '
3 2-m 1-u p cg =
0 24 0
0 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990.1991 1985 1986 1987* 1988' 1969'1990' 1991 YEAR YEAR 44 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
OPERATING NUCLEAR REACTORS
=
/"
\\
FORCED OUTAGE RATE EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS At ERAGE FORCED OUTAGE RATE (%)
AVERAGE EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGE RATE 12 2
i 33 3
m a-
^"
10 -
8-77 1 11 I
"1 6-1 o
4-2-
1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 YEAR YEAR COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE AVERAGE MAN-REM 600 g7
- The hatched areas represent additional data that resulted from re-300 -
classification of safety system failures.
- Estimated value.
400 -
-44 Note: Data represent annualindustry M9 M4 averages with plants in extended shut down excluded. These data may differ 300 -
go slightly from previoucly published data as a result of refinements in data quality.
The 1991 data are preliminary.
200 -
Source: Licensee data as compiled by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission 100 -
0 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991**
YEAR 1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 45
k t
(
')
- /
Future U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Licensing Reactor Aging and License in December 1991, the final Renewal:
regulation governing the renewal of nuclear power reactor operating in 1991,11 reactors were more than licenses was issued by the NRC. The 20 years old. This represents rule and associated documentation approximately 10 percent of the describe what a licenseo must be currently licensed reactors producin9 able to demonstrate in order for the approximately 5 percent of net NRC to make a determination that the nuclear-generated electricity.
plant can continue to be operated safely beyond the expiration of its in contrast by the year 2000 current 40-year license. Under the 63 reactors will be more than 20 rule, reactor operation for up to 20 years old. This represents additional years may be permitted, approximately 57 percent of the Applications for license renewal can currently licensed reactors producing be submM 5 to 20 years Mom h approximately 47 percent of net expiration of the current license.
nuclear-generated electricity.
Monticello is expected to submit the
[7 in 2000, the currently licensed fiut application for renewal in 1992.
C/
nuclear generating capacity could begin to decrease as reactors begin to reach their 40-year terms, a limit The NRC is conducting research imposed by the Atomic Energy Act of providing the technical bases to 1954, as amended (see Table 12 and ensure that critical reactor Figures 25 and 26).
components, safety systems, and structures will provide adequate Extending reactor operating licenses reliability as rnetors age. Research
- beyond their current 40 year terms results will be usefulin assessing will provide a viable approach for safetyimplications of age related electric utilities to ensure the degradation during the 40 year adequacy of future electricity license and in supporting safety generating capacity that offers decisions associated with license significant economic benefits when renewal.
compared to the constn.Gion of new reactors.
(Continued on page 50)
(l' 46 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION..'
_ ~_
OPERATING NUCLEAR REACTORS i.
Figure 25.
U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Generating Capacity Assuming Construction Recapture, 1960-2050 MAXIMUM DEPENDADLE CAPACITY (NET GIGAWATTS) 120 UNDER 109.7 TOTAL NET GWe 7
CONSTp5 G DEFERRED (6.2 GWe)
(
100 CURRENTLY LICENSED TO OPERATE (100.0 GWe) 50 25 0
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 YEAR E Licensed Capacity D Licensed Capacity - Extended 20 Years l
Note: Data assume current expiration dates have been adjusted for construction O
recapture. See Glossary for definition.
Source: Licensee data as compiled by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 47
1
-~
tj Table 12.
U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Operating Licenses-Expiration Def e by Year Number Year Number Year of Assuming of Assuming Reactor Licenses Construction Reactor Ucenses Construction Year Name Expired Recapture
- Year Name Expired Recapture' 2000 Bug Rock Posnt 2
2002 2014 (Conunued)
Yankee Rowe Brunswick 2 2004, Oyster Cw.k 1 2
2009 Calvett Cliffs 1 San Onofre 1 Cooper 2006 Dresden 2 1
2009 D. C. Ccok 1 2007 Haddam Neck 4
Duane Amold Palisades 2011 Edwin L Hatch 1 Turkey Point 3 2012 James A. FrtzPatrick Turkey Point 4 2013 Oconee 3 2008 Diablo Canyon 1 5
2024 Prairie Island 2 For1Calhoun 2013 Three Mile Island 1 Maine Yankee 2012 2015 Millstone 2 1
Peach Bottom 2 2013 2016 Beaver Valley 1 7
Peach Bottom 3 2014 Browns Ferry 3 2009 Ginna 3
Brunswick 1
,_s
.-i i
Indian Point 3 2015 CaNert Cliffs 2 L
/
Nine Mile Point 1 Crystal River 3 2010 Diablo Canyon 2 5
2025 Salem 1 H. B. Robinson 2 St. Lucie 1 Millstone 1 2017 Davis Besse 3
Monticello D. C. Cook 2 Point Beach 1 Joseph M. Farley 1 2011 Dresden 3 2
2018 Arkansas Nuclear 2 3
Trojan 2015 Edwin I. Hatch 2 2012 Pilgnm 1 5
North Anna 1 Quad Cities 1 2020 North Anna 2 3
Quad Cities 2 Salem 2 Surry 1 -
Sequoyah1 Vermont Yankee 2021. Joseph M. Farley 2 3
2013 Browns Ferry 1 12 McGuire 2 indian Point 2 Sequoyah 2 Kewaunee 2022 Grand Gulf 1 4
Oconee1 La Salle County 1 Oconee 2 Summer Point Beach 2 Susquehanna 1 Prairie Island 1 2023 La Salle County 2 4
San Onofre 2 2022 McGuire 2
. San Onofre 3 2022 St. Lucie 2 Surry 2 Washington Nuclear 2 Zion 1 2024 Byron 1 7
Zion 2 Callaway
,_s
(
)_
2014 Arkansas Nuclear 1 12 Catawba 1
\\
/
A,wns Ferry 2 Umerick 1 48 -
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1
OPERATING NUCLEAR REAC, TORS
,-[d I
Number Year Number Year of Assuming of Assuming Reactor Licenses Construction Reactor Licenses Construction Year Nami Expired Recapture' Year Name Expired Recapture' 2024 (Continued) gngy gegy,7 yg;;,y y 5
Palo Verde 1 Braidwood 2 Susquehanna 2 Palo Verde 3 Waterford 3 South Texas Project 1 2025 Fermi 2 5
Vogtle 1 MCistone 3 2028 South Traas Project 2 1 Palo Verde 2 2029 Umenck 2 2
River Bend 1 Vogtie 2 Wolf Creek 1 2030 Comanche Peak 1 1
2026 Braidwood 1 9
Byron 2
' Year assumes that the maximum number of years Catawba 2 for construction recapture has been added to the Clinton curient expiration date. This column is limited to Hope Creek I reactors eligible for construction recapture. See Nine M:le Point 2 GlossaryIor definition.
Perry 1 Note (Table 12ana Figure 26):
Umited to reactors currently licensed to operate Ei Harns 1 Source (Table 12andFigure 26): Nuclear Regulatoy Commission Figure 26. U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Operating Licenses-Expiration Date by Year Assuming Construction Recapture NUMBER OF LICENSES EXPIRED 20
.lf 15 10
~
7 7
1 i
s y
3 __. -
l
-1 1
1 1
4 e
fir 111r1 a
II O
2000 02 04 07 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 2026 30 YEAR 1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 49
,mj Future U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Licensing (Continued)
Standardization of Future Reactor Currently under NRC review are two Designs:
advanced light water reactor designs evolved from the currently licensed generation of reactors the General Standardization can minim.ize Electric advanced boiling water i
excessive diversity in reactor designs reactor (ABWR) and the ASEA Brown and can increase confidence in the Boveri/ Combustion Engineering safety, reliability, and availability of advanced pressurized water reactor future nuclear power reactors. The System 80+. Additionally, the NRC NRC has revised its regulations to expects to receive two applications streamline the licensing process for for design certification of advanced future nuclear power reactors. The light water reactors that employ some changes should substantially improve passive safety features and modular the entire licens,ng process, with the construction, the Westinghouse i
goal that future nuclear power Electric advanced passive reactor reactors will use standard designs (AP600) and the General Electric already certified by the NRC and will simplified boiling-water reactor be located at preapproved sites (see (SBWR).
- v; Figure 27).
The NRC is also evaluating advanced The NRC is reviewing the F.lectric designs that may be submitted for Power Research Institute Evolution-design certification in the future, ary and Passive Requirements These include the CANDU 3 design, Documents. Each will be a an evolutionary form of the existing comprehensive statement of utility heavy water CANDU 6 reactors; the requirements for the design, process inherent ultimate safety construction, and performance of (PlUS) design, a pressurized advanced light water reactors. The water-cooled light water design; the development of these common utility modular high temperature requirements and their review and gas cooled reactor (MHTGR) design; approval by the NRC are important and the advanced liquid metal reactor steps toward achieving (ALMR) design (see Table 13 and standardization.
Figure 28).
v 50 NUCLEAR REGULATOR) 00MMISSION l
l OPERATING NUCLEAR REACTORS
.< ~,
\\
(
)
- Figure 27. Basic Design Certification and Reactor Licensing Process l
DESIGN EARLY SITE CERTIFICATION COMBINED OPERATING p" ROC SS E
PROC 3SS LICENSE PROCESS (OPTIONAL)
APPLICATION M "*P EARLY SITE DESIGN Pa? "N"**'mm'a *J FOR COMDINED K wye"TT!"T**
CERTIFICATION A _ ; h m ;. w g a e $
CAL PERMIT 1
O T G
[h (h
WY
,I U Q'
W SORY C' ?
COMMITTEE f-.. b STAFF f
b ON SAF GU RDS 4
REVIEW EARLY SITE REVIEW PERMIT fn HEARINGS RULEMAKING
,q #;l<
HEARING i$'
MANDATORY HEARING b?
[q.,
.%p
+
., u 2d 3
APPLICATION I
T)7 FOR EARLY SITE PERMIT A
FINAL DESIGN.
COMBINED
-[
j APPROVAL:
OPERATING
(' j LICENSE ISSUED h
d M-APPLICATION I
FOR -.
CONSTRUCTION DESIGN CERTIFICATION 4
kff FINDING
- ISSUED Y
OPTl"WAL HEARING OPERATION
- Finding issued after construction to determine whether conditions of combined operating license were met.
Notet: Process as specified under 10 CFR Part 52.
N-- -
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 51
l
- me-Table 13. Future Reactor Designs Design Electrical Design Name Rating Vendor (MWe)
Design Type Projected Schedules ABWR 1300 Boiling Water FDA: December 1992 General Electric DC: June 1994 System 80+
1300 Pressurized-Water FDA: November 1993 ASEA Brown Boveri/
DC: May 1995 Combustion Engineering AP600 600 Pressurized Water FDA: November 1994 Westinghouse Electric DC: May 1996 SBWR 600 Boiling-Water FDA: January 1995 General Electric DC: July 1996 CANDU 3 450 Heavy Water Atomic Energy of Canada
}
Limited PlUS 640 Pressurized Water ASEA Brown Boveri/
Combustion Engineering MHTGR 135 "
Gas-Cooled General Atomics ALMR 155 "
Uquid-Metal General Electric
- To be determined
" Represents MWe for individual modules.-Actual power plant design is expected to consist of a number of these ; nodules with common support facilities.
FDA - Final Design Approval DC - Design Certification Note: Schedules represent projections as of 01/31/92 and c:epend on NRC receipt of
, '~3 timely, sufficiently detailed information from the designers.
(_,/
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission 52 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
OPERATING NUCLEAR REACTORS
(
Figure 28. Future Reactor Designs PASSfYE WATER.
CCt".ED REB CTORS (Nftsgq12LD Repiacos active safety systems, LR that m a typcal nucts at tenctor ere portal'y powered by e ect.icity, with g
37, passive seiety estems that rely rin ER47h4 N
natural effects. che of the passive s
desgns under consideration r--
=*
by the NRC is the AP600 (rght) p-which uses gravity drain tanu to rQ]K replace safety pumps and Oravity spray no22kes to replaco air coomes.
Another passive deson under fR, conside'aton is the SBWR g
y (not pctured) wtuch uses natural cyculaton, buoyancy, and gravity
?
eNects to replace satoty pumps.
~
O TtNo q'*aa.
7
- p x
g
)
--C MODULAR ioq 2
Het'UM -
j l
HIGH. TEMPERATURE t
j GAS REACTOR okER.
Helum Want is circulated by AT 64 motor <triven pumps which transfer heal loo /
to a steam generator that boits water to produce steam which is directed m
g through a steam turtune generator to produce electncity. The toactor
~>
responds automatcally to transients (without actrve interventon) to safely ADVANCED t
q shut down the reactor and hmit HANc;h radcactive releases to negl+g:ble levela.
IOU METAL
.g Liquid sodum coolant is circulated
%c by electromagnete purvips throu0h e
loo T
an intermediate sodsum loop to a I /b
,f q
sodium to water steam generator NTiqq to produce etctncity. The reactor l
L gI uses automatic and passive responses to sate!y shut down the f;
reactor and bmit radcactwe 4
releases to nogigtbie levels.
j Eot$ ten %
- tatRg
>~e cow...
Source: Pierre Mion, National Geographic Society @. Reproduced by permission.
Further reproduction prohibited.
1992 INFORMATION DIGEST S3
l d
U.S. Nuclear Nonpower Reactors Nuclear nonpower reactors are 1 construction permit application designed and utilized for research, submitted by Arkansas Tech testing, and educational purposes, for University is under NRC review.
example:
. Refer to Appendix E for a listing of U.S. nuclear nonpower reactors.
. in the performance of research and Principal Licensing and Inspection testing in the areas of physics, Activities **
chemistry, biology, medicine, materials sciences, and rQtted
- Approximately 300 nonpower fields reactor operators are licensed:
- Each operator is licensed for a
. -In educating people for nuclear-specific reactor, related careers in the power industry, national defense,
- Each operator is requalified research, and education before renewal of a 6-year license.
/3 There are 46 nonpo,ver reactors
. Approximately 40 nonpower V
currently licensed to operate in 27 teactor inspections are conducted States (see Figure 29):
annually.
1 V
54 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
OPERATING NUCLEAR REACTORS p.g Figure 29. U.S. Nuclear Nonpower Reactor Sites A
WA N
NH k
,A ND
\\
MN Oa ID WI NY' P^
SD M,
,Aha A
WY A
' lA PA T
NE A
NV A
u y
^\\
IL IN E
A ' MDA A A CA CO 1
A Ks A VA M'
r-A L
NC TN A
AA AZ A
OK NM AR SC A
A MS AL GA
/O TX LA A
A' FL l
A Currently Ucensed to Operate (46) t
- Application for Construction Permit (1)
'(
Note: There are no nonpower reactors in Alaska or Hawaii.
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1992 INFORMATION DIGEST -
55
am.
seu a +2 m a-.
wom.. _ m a a-a u 4 2 4 m4-,a++ + < s eu-u..e -u m4=<m = * *e Aa 44.~ sue Js =--= Amo* h d * -- Ama2=
--4.*ws-A-4*sA.#*-.*-m t
r
)
t I
t g
P f
I e
P r
i n
k i
I e
5
'L a
k 9
E F
4 f
b s
- ?
W i
?
W 56 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
l e
t Nuclear Material Safety 5
f**'9.,,
4 -
/*4jv8
\\g-%
4 L-e 4:
s gg.$ '.I. c
-]Da" Y_'k_"D'Oh*@
- gg f-5 5g
- g w + %.y
- 97 nvy pw7+y =r +-*g =+q w a y 7wr yyryn3 5-4 i,
7. i 'it v 4 '.- J..,
j
,([:4as.
fjs t
4
,e #
'h, 'j..
a 16 -
r'1
. +r g,
N *3) W-s !,' ?
'y r
[i l_
?
?
f,
', l " < 'ul[. Q,Q j dQ'
- ff' u n. s;nf'm,m m
f j
_[,
~'W i
.,hn y, $ )f; < N 3Jpfe
.gf -y,
,y c u '"
y
{
.'4e.
g Q-, A,, n.
., y '
f t
4
~
, :e
? f. ' j, i. s.
1-nt i
- (-
- f{ ;,
s B.
LM
=Ag
/
%o
'; ;;M (
w r ' m;;
w nWs
<d
'L h 4 W-o s,
, x, t,9 y
j m' y' n
.,,y 3
.O, s yy; {
Q1, yQ V,1 a
-u m
.yc. 2 : (,4d$eeft.sb4 bemFmos.~mse. ~
y p e r.
d I_
r 4
M x*
I.
y e4,fja m.et-{
-..'.h n
e I-f *
%'t,[g 4 tw
.; J o
3
,y& Aff i I*
1 s..$
vr...
hv i#
-'t
'4 L,1i'< f, N f :n a 1.
e I
a,s p, &a
's db>
s,
,j~. ~.j,
pyT, ~
~~re.a w ?m,&,
-_cr~ p'rm-u? m., v-(.Q *::q
' [*
Q,,. g. -
y y
e MNf m(p A.g.
1, *,.. a n u,,:, s e>c:g w.x a,s*p.
w w m s
@m%[3,,;M,M, CE, bnW**b N
r7 p Q in jg A. :
h.i,$ D ].
$m$y
$6f mi h?
W m
ph m e.a
%@ 3 i n,
_a y2 fq.. p4 Qa p.,j9 q;,n;;?;Q~[flg;;,, ' ;4 fQQ QQQ
.n m
~4
.c t
.G,q
- mp.
. s m
u.&y
- F.7.,". f 1 @w%.._ y{y.v 2.,/o.dk".M;3.,' Qlj?
f Ml1,k, _?QQi. Q.f.lQl@ pGb l%@
pa g.j s p
yn et;q 7W O&p@Q :!fQ,%., u &h, v H
JGh Mri/
h s
mp y'
L = f QL e % 6 s:G * *;Q
.~
9
. 7L4 p,y,/grgN. Q, Qt.,
g
%.s
^*[...
',,;&-A i a 1 } [ \\ h ti V
e.
m gI
- %'.,,[
's.p
. ( 4 *.g, pg,5 S.
LGwMM(MghMhg __ 2 h em fj[._'u_.* J _ _
_,,.6fgl Industrial s
/
/
"N
'V U.S. Fuel Cycle Facilities The NRC licenses and inspects all
- Combustion Engineering commercial nuclear fuel facilities (Hematite, Missouri) involved in the. processing and
%rication of uranium ore into reactor
- General Electric (Wilmington, North Carolina)
- Westinghouse Electric There are 11 major facilities licensed to (Columbia, South Carolina) operate in 10 States (see Figure 30):
- Nuclear Fuel Services (Erwin, Tennessee)
. Uranium Hexafluoride Production
- Babcock & Wilcox Fuel Facilities:-
Company (Lynchburg, Virginia)
- _ Allied-Signal. Incorporated
- Babcock & Wilcox (Naval)
(Metropolis, Illinois)
(Lynchburg, Virginia)
- Sequoyah Fuels Corporation
- Siemens Nuclear Power (Sequoyah, Oklahoma)
Corporation (Richland,
_/9 -
. Washington)
U-
. Ura m Fuel Fabrication in January 1991, the NRC received an application to construct and operate
- General Atomics '
the nation's first privately owned (San Diego, California) uranium enrichment facility in Homer, Loulslana. The NRC is currently
- Combustion Engineering reviewing tha application and expects Windsor, Connecticut) to reach a decision by January 1994.
fY xj
- 58 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION >
i L
NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY
,u
.c
!=:
).
d Figure 30. Major U.S. Fuel Cycle Facility Sites WA
.D e
l NH ME ND I
W g g
MN g
-MA wi 5 WY MI PA
- T
}
OH
- ~*
~~
g CO WV VA. yh IN UT IL CA KS E
KY ee MO NC 3
TN e
A7.
3 OK e
> GA IX.\\.
Tx
'N
/
LA FL
)
\\)
a Uranium Hexafluoride Production Facility (2)-
e, Uranium Fuel Fabrication Facility (9)
- Uraniuni Enrichment Facility Site (1)-
.,f g r
(,/. -
Note: There are no fuel cicie facilities in Alaska or Hawaii, Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 59 ae
/\\
k)
U.S. Material Licenses Approximately 23,000 licenses are Academic: Used in universities, issued for medical, academic, and colleges, and other academic industrial uses of nuclear material institutions in course work and (see Table 14):
research.
e - 7,500 licenses are administered by industrial: Used in such areas as the NRC.
radiography, gauging devices, gas 15,000 licensos are administered chromatography, well logging, and e
by the 28 States that participate in smoke detectors.
- the NRC Agreement States Program. An Agreement State is Princ; pal Licensing and Inspection one that has signed an agreement Activities:
with the NRC allowing the State t regulate the use of radioactive
. NRC issues approximately 5,400 new, renewal, or license material within that State (see amendments for materiallicenses Figure 31).
annually. The Agreement States E-Medical: More than 7 million clinical issue more than 13,000 such
(
procedu'res using radioactive material actions annually.
are performed annually:
. NRC conducts approximately 3,100
. Approximately 7 million for medical health and safety inspections of diagnosis and therapy nuclear material Heensees annuaHy.
The Agreement States conduct
. Approximately 200 thousand for approximately 4,800 such,
treatment of patients inspections annually.
- .,m.
b) l 60-NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION O
s 4
e NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY !
s Table 14..
U.S. Material Licenses by State Numberof Ucenses Numberof Ucenses
+
Agreement Agreerrent NRC~
States State-NRC States State Alabama 24 467 Montana 101 0
L Alaska 70 0
Nebraska 5
t/7
~5da 5
142 N
~.
Mzona 20 295 Arkansas 11 266 New HampsNre -
6 90 Caldernia 84 2.271 New Jersey 641 0
Colorado 41 -
436 New Mexico 28 253 Connecticut 257 0
New York 62 1,872 e
Delaware 70 0
' North Carolina 22 556 Distnct of Columbia 71 0
87 Florida 30 1,052 Ohio 715 0
~
Hawaii 65 0
Oregon 16 287
-Idaho 114 0
Pennsylvania 936 0
filinois 83 900 Rhode Island 3
63 Indiana 337 0
313 Iowa
'8 219 South Dakota 48 0
- 38 537 Kentucky 20 359-Texas 72 1J53 Louisiana 15 550 Otah 16
'230 Maine 108 0
Vermont 43 0
Maryland -
66 516 Virginia 433 0
Massachusetts 500 0
Washington 27 370-Michigan _
616 0
West Virginia 209 0
212 0
Wisconsin 294 0
Mississippi 11 320 Wyoming 96' 0__
Missouri 370 0
Others' 178-0 Total 7,543 15,246
- Others include territories such as Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Guam, and American
('
- Samoa, d
Note: Data as of 12/31/91.
a Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
- 1992 INFORMATION DIGEST _
61 2.
l c
?
/"
'\\ d Figure 31. NRC Agreement States
~
j l
)
10 SD J
A wi NY.
{
WY MI
- f
(
pA T
. gg.
N' NV OH E
-M D
-CA KS MO KY N _.
. NC AZ ' J D
OK
'I:
.. AM g'
f SC m
f AL f'v}
- J
- (
MS OA l-u F1
?
O Asreement state (28)
Note: Data as of 01/31/92. The NRC is currently considering a request from Maine to be-
[,i come an Agreement State. Alaska and Hawaii are not Agreement States.
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission 62 NUCLE /.R REGULATORY COMMISSION
NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY
. (..
N3 U.S. Nuclear Material Transportation and Safeguards The NRC conducts transport-related possess'significant quantities of safety inspectionu; quality assurance strategic special nuclear mateilal, inspect:ons of designers, fabricators, and suppli'rs of approved Principal Licensing and Inspection transportaum containers: and Activities:
safeguards inspectinns of nuclear
. NRC reviews, evaluates, and materiallicensees.
certifies approximately 100 container-design applications for Both the NRC and the Department of the transport of nuclear material Energy (DOE) continue joint annually.
operation of a national database and information support system to track
- NRC reviews and evaluates movement of domestic and foreign approximately 165 license nuclear material under safeguards applications for the export of
- control, nuclear material from the United States amu illy.
The NRC institutes newly developed
. NRC conaucis comprehensive
- (Q techniques to evaluate security physical security and material
(,/
systems through tactical response control and accounting inspections exercises to evaluate the operational at the major fuel fabrication effectiveness'of licensees that facilities annually.
~[
N' v
1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 63
l-L yQ International Nuclear Safety The NRC participates in a broad
. NRC has worked with the former program of international cooperation U.S.S.R and is now working with the related to nuclear safety.
Commonwealth of Independent States to encourage improve-
. NRC has formal agreements to ments in reactor safety, to exchange technicalinformation understand the important technical with 25 countries and Taiwan.
!essons from the Chemobyl These agreements:
accident, and to obtain information of value for U.S. plant safety. This
- Ensure prompt notification of cooperative effsrt is carried out safety problems that warrant primarily through working group action or investigation.
meetings, field visits, and document exchanges.
- Provide bilateral cooperation on
. NRC participates in programs nuclear safety, safeguards, of the Intemational Atomic Energy waste management, and Agency (113 i.,iber countries) and environmental protection.
of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development's p)
- Partners are Argentina, Belg,um, Nuclear Energy Agency (24 member i
f.
gd Brazil, Canada, China, countries)_concemed with reactor Commonwealth of Independent safety research and regulatory States (formerly the Union of matters, radiation protection, waste Soviet Socialist Republics, management, transportation, U.S.S.R), Czechoslovakia, Egyn'.,
standards, training, and technical Finland, France, Germany, assic'ance.
Gieece, Hungary, Israel, Italy,
. NRC is involved in approximately Japan, Korea, Mexico, 50 joint intemational safety research Netherlands, Philippines, Spain, arrangements and agreements.
Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Participants share the funding, United Kingdom, and Yugoslavia.
technical support, and results of specinc projects and programs.
1%.
d 64 NUCLE.AR REGULATORY COMMISSION
s
.a
--A e-4, p
-/
. t.,
Radioactive
~
Waste 9
4 Y
gww-~ mpr n j;
/ ' ', II%Mj M.:. ' ;j f;j 5"2%
/
);
- j be[. $N/, s
/
z,u.,.sc._ n,_ m0 v
y_
b n
+
2:
.ry L:.a
..c
.: (
r
..v n;p
([h(f(k(A";p:xw(!jk(j 1E hNi'dd...
~ Me==e n% *,jyU$
\\
xg. wp 3e,s.
,an.s
.jfM 1.y-
- -Q(,j,,,,g,o, J E7J2swd*p}an//;y{ga+j jk 6
e
-4...
g g,:p..
e-w3.,w..,
"' '(
+ h d l@'j - -
m.m_
g
,gg% g ;
4c, 4<q,I,a4,; g..g gprmvmms gy y).,
c y 6,64 m;;
s y
--2
- y,
~-
w i
r
.W'
I
,7
.f)
U.S. Low Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Approximately 1.14 million cubic feet
. Exclusion of waste generated of low-level radioactive waste was outside a compact generated in 1990 (see Figure 32).
- Each compact (or State) to
. The NRC has developed a designate at least one active site classification system for low-level
. System of milestones, incentives, waste based on its potential and penalties to ensure that States hazards, and has specified and compacts will be responsible disposal and waste form for their own waste after January 1' requirements for each of the three 1993 (see Table 15 and Figure 35).
general classes of waste A, B, and C. Class A waste contains lower concentrations of radioactive There are three active licensed material than Class C waste.
disposal facilities:
The annualvolume of waste has
. Barnwell(South Carolina) dropped approximately 60 percent since 1985 (see Figure 33).
. Beatty (, a.vada)
(O'")
The radioactivity of wastes varies from
. Hanford (Washington) year to year based on the types and There are four sites under license quanuties of waste shipped each year review by the Agreement State (see Figure 34).
regulatory authorities:
The Low-Level Radioactive Waste
. Boyd County (Nebraska)
Policy Amendments Act (LLRWPAA)
. Clark County (Ill.inois) of 1985 authorized:
. Hudspeth County (Texas)
. Formation of regional compacts; nine compacts now active
. San Bernardino County (California)
(N 66 NUCLEAP. REGUl.ATORY COMMISSION
1 RADIOACTIVE WASTE V 's Figure 32. Volume of Low Level Radioactive Waste Generated in the United States in 1990 (Cubic Feet)
ACADEMIC
/
(49K) w 4%
INDUSTRIAL -
MEDICAL f3 (23K) 3 GOVERNMENT REACTOR:
(72K)
- (643K)'
7%
50%.
- ^
SOURCE 1,143 Thousand Cubic Feet
~
33:
CLASS C (9K)
(CLASS Aj
- p 1%
'(1.107K)?
9'rath CLASS B s
(27K) 6v 2%
2.
~,,
CLASS Note: Class A waste contains lower concentrations of radioactive material than Class C waste. Determination of the classification of waste, however,is a complex process. For more information, see 10 CFR Part 61. Percentages are rounded to the nearest whole
- number, Source: DOE 1990 State-by-State Assessment of Low-Level Radioactive Wastes Received s
at Commercial Disposal Sites (DOE /LLW-132) l 1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 67
Figure 33 Volume of Low Level' Waste Received at Currently Operating U.S. Disposal Facilities, 1984-1990 VOLUME (Thousands of Cubic Feet) 3000
'2,619 2,681 2500 2000 i,gg5 h642 1500
-7 1,428 1,626 7
1000
- I-lI-1,143 500 0
1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 YEAR A
! A$AFORD'i
~
1 BEA m i(295K CO,iF'.g t
(60K
. Ft.)
1990 VOLUME BY DISPOSAL FACILITY Note: Percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number.
f Source: DOE 1990 State-by-State Assessment of Low-Level Radioactive Wastes Received at Commercial Disposal Sites (DOE /LLW-132) 68 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
RADIOACTIVE WASTE Figure 34. Radioactivity of Low. Level Waste Received at Currently Operating 3.S. Disposal Facilities, 1984-1990 RADIOACTIVITY (Thousands of Curies) 1000 867 800 740 600 MB 499 270 260 2M 200 0
1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 YEAR O
- BdRNWEld '
ri(444dCurios)[i N
' !B1% '.
m UHANFORDc ^
~
y
[(93K CuhEs#S'2 I
la',
!47%
m
,4
- BEATTY (11K Curies) 2%
1990 RADIOACTIVITY BY DISPOSAL FACILITY Note: Percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number.
O Source: DOE 1990 State-by-State Assessment of Low-Level Radioactive Wastes Received at Commercial Disposal Sites (DOE /LLW-132) 1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 69
~!
,3
-Table 15. U.S. Low Level Waste Compacts Percent of Total Percent of Total 1990 Low level 1990 Low level Waste -
Disposal Waste Disposal Compact-Generated Technology Compact Generated Technology Northwest 8.4%
Central Midwest 90%
Alaska lilinois" Shallow land bunal banned Hawaii Kentucky Idaho Appalachlan 10 5 %
~ Oregon Maryland Utah Pennsylvania" Shallowland burialbanned Washington
- Shanowland burial West Virginia Southwestern ' 7.4%
Northeast 7.6%
Arizona Connecticut" California" Shallow land burial New Jersey" Shallow land burial banned North Dakota Southeast 29.4 %
- South Dakota Alabama Rocky Florida Mountain 0.4%
Georgia O
\\j Nevada' Shallowland burial North Carolina" Shallowland burialbanned New Mexico.
- Shallowland burial Wyoming Tennessee Midwest 7.6%
Virginia Indiana Uuaffiliated lowa States 14.6 %
- Minnesota District of Mouri Columbia
<.1 % -
L.. 0" Shallowland burial banned Maine" 0.7% Shallowland burialbanned Wisconsin Massachusetts" 3.6% Shallowland burialbanned Central Michigan 32%
interstate 5.1%
NewHampshire c.1%
Aransas =
New York" 62% Shallowland burialbanned Kansas Puerto Rico 0%
Louisiana Rhodeisland
<.1%
Nebraska" Shallowland burialbanned Texas" -
0.8% Shallowland burialbanned Oklahoma -
Vermont "
0% Sha!!owland burialbanned
- Current Host State (3)
" Selected Host State (14)
D Source: DOE 1990 State-by-State Assessment of Low-Level Radioactive Wastes Received at Commercial Disposa! Sites (DOE /LLW-132) and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission -
70-NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
RADIOACTIVE WASTE Figure 35. U.S. Low Level Waste Compacts
[N NORTHWEST WA MN MT
\\
o gj j
d NY ga ID '
3 lA
/
N IN OH
. NORTHEAST
' MO g
APPALACHIAN g
MOUNTAIN Q
h g
> DE CENTRAL WY INTERSTATE w
M 4DC NE NV C0 g
CENTRAL KS MIDWEST O
L ammu KY OK AR[g NM SOUTHWESTERN VA ND SOUTHEAST LA k'
TN SD.
TX CA g3 g4 AZ
_ 1.
- - ~
- Active DisposalSite(3) e Disposal Site Under License Review (4)
Note: Alaska and Hawaii belong to the North-west Compact. Puerto Rico is an unaffiliated 7
O Approved Compact (9) _
State.
O unarfiliatedState(10)
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 71
+ ).
U.S. High Level Radioactive Waste Disposal
(
Approximately 20,000 metric tons-radioactive waste disposal, with DOE of spent nuclear fuelis stored at having operational responsibility and commercial nuclear power reactors the NRC having regulatory responsi-as of 1990. By the year 2000, this bility for the lransportation, storage, amount is expected to double (see' and geologic disposal of the waste.
Table 16):
. The disposal of high-level in 1990, the NRC amended its e
radioactive waste requires a regulations to authorize licensees determination of acceptable health to store spent fuel at reactor sites and environmentalimpacts over in storage casks approved by the thousands of years.
NRC. Four cask designs received certificates of compliance as a
. Current plans call for the ultimate result of this rule change (see disposal of the waste in solid form Tables 17 and 18).
in a licensed deep, stable geologic structure (see Figure 36 for a Two offsite (i.e, not at the reactor site) conceptual design of the candidate spent fuel storage facilities no longer high-level waste repository).
<,m accept spent fuel for storage:
y
).
. The Amendments t.ct designated a
'v'
. West Valley (New York) candidate site for a high-level waste repository at Yucca
. Morris (Illinois)
Mountain, Nevada. DOE is "9
- The Nuclear Waste _ Policy Act of 1982 and the Nuclear Waste Policy
. Ultirnately, any high-level waste Amendments Act of 1987 specify a repository will require an NRC detailed approach for high-level license.
j3 72 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION L
RADIOACTIVE WASTE '
Figure 36. Conceptual Design of the U.S. High Level Waste Repository SURFACE FACluTY Delive'ed by rad or TUFF PtLE truck nuclear waste Formed of compa:ted would be urdoaded.
votanic ash and dust.
fesealed in Canisters, lu9 from exC&vahona then transported via would De pded at the f amps to the storage sof1300-then used area below later to teseal the 4
tunnets.
y
.;.., y
%,7w.c m. p[5T'{,s " Q Q
d*
y 4N *O
,feg
,;.*'; h *'
4
/
/
?
s l.
tanderground a! of
' pet.
FINAL BURtAL
/
g L ered towenoies.cansters
\\l would be monitored for leaks for 50 s
t years. Then tunnels. shafts, and ramps would be fined and sealed.
Nl
,/
I i
$$l l
j p, c/
. - w,2 6 l-l
- 3
,; 4
- y
(
v V
v Source: Peter Miller and Pierre Mion, National Geographic Society @. Reproduced by permission. Further reproduction prohibited.
1 l
'1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 73
RADIOACTIVE WASTE !
i Figure 36. Conceptual Design of the U.S. High Level Waste Repository i
SURFACE FACILITY Dehvered by f ail or TUFF PILE truck. nuclear oaste Formed of compacted would be unloaded voacanic ash and dust, resealed in cantsters.
tuff fromexcavabons then transported vta would be piled at the faanps to the storage suiace-then used area below tater to reseal the
, ;->gjQ tunnet g,
,,%..~ ;.W :,.#
~q
~u y p; 7-s,e p'
l
~
~
..r g:[/
W.2 *
.Y,,.
,v
'^
a a
- g#
4 l.
/
3 A_ -
.g
.4 linde.yround
~utal of
' turtle
/
f g'
FINAL BUR 1AL i
Loweredinto boreholes.Canasters N lI would be (nonstored for leaks for 50 I
1 years. Then tunnets, shah, and ramps would be filled and sealed.
\\ 81 1
/
...,hkI
- wdh
- 44 '
% D. '
- ,. u v
l l
L l
Source: Peter Miller and Pierre Mion, National Geographic Society @. Reproduced by permission. Further reproduction prohibited.
1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 73 t
(
)
Table 16.
Spent Nuclear Fuel Stored at U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors-Total Metric Tons by State State 1990 2000 State 1990 2000 Alabama 1,183 2,031 Missouri 162 387 Arizona 203 914 Nebraska 256 499 Arkansas 437
,753 New Hampshire 0
179 California 596 1,0!
New Jersey 807 1,559 Connecticut 1,003 1,646 New York 1,354 2,217 Florida 1,120 1,789 North Carolina 1,144 1,994 Georgia 644 1,340 Ohio 254 667
- Illinois.
2,605 4,998 Oregon 246 485 n
)
lowa 194 280 Pennsylvania 1,608 3,356 gas 118 307 Sou'h Carolina 1,318 2,571 Louisiana -
212 681 Tennessee 271 786 Maine 375 529 Texas 65 803 Maryland 509 852 Vermont 320 455 Massachusetts 356 560 Virginia 865 1,477 Michigan 940 1,688 Washington 131 349 Minnesota 492 837 Wisconsin 634 1,002 Mississippi 202 502 Total 20,624 40,054 J[
Note: Projection based on 114 reactors.
\\-
Source: DOE Spent Fuel Storage Requirements 1991 -2040 (DOE /RL-91 --54(92/02))
-74 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
RADIOACTIVE WASTE 7~
if Table 17.
NRC Approved Dry Spent Fuel Storage Designs Storage Certificate of Design Compliance Storage Design Capacity Approval Approval Vendor Model (Assemblies) Date Date General Nuclear MetalCask 21 PWR 09/30/1985 08/17/1990
' Systems, incorporated CASTOR V/21 Pacific Nuclear Concrete Module 7PWR 03/28/1986 Fuel Services, NUHOMS 7 iricorporated Westinghouse Eletric MetalCask 24 PWR 09/30/1987 08/17/1990 MC 10 Foster Wheeler Concrete Vault 83 PWR or 03/22/1988 Energy Applications, Modular Vault 150 BWR Incorporated Dry Store
\\
1 Nuclear Assurance MetalCask 26 PWR 03/29/1988 08/17/1990' Corporation NAC STC Nuclear Assurance MetalCesk 28 Canisters 09/29/1988 08/17/1990 Corporation NAC C28S/T (fuelrods from 56 PWR assemblies)
Pacific Nuclear Concrete Module-24 PWR 04/21/1989 Fuel Services, NUHOMS -24P Incorpoiated Transneclear, Metal Cask '
24 PWR 07/05/1989 incorporated TN 24 Nucleai Assurance MetalCask 28 PWR 02/01/1990 Corporation NAC 128/ST Pacific Sierra Concrete Cask 24 PWR 03/29/1991 Nuclear Associates VSC Note: PWR - Pressurized-Water Reactor; BWR - Boiling-Water Reactor
'~
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1992 INFOP.MATION DIGEST 75~
j-
),
):
Table 18.
NRC Dry Spent Fuel Storage Licensees Reactor Name-
. Date Storage Utility issued
'landor Model
- Surry 1,2_
General Nuclear MetalCask
. Virginia Electric &
07/02/1986
- Systems, CASTOR V/21 Power Company.
Incorporated H. B. Robinson 2 Pacific Nuclear NUHOMS-7 Carolina Power &
08/13/1986 Fuel Services, l.ight Company.
Incorporated Oconee 1,2,3 Pacif;c Nuclear NUHOMS 24P -
Duke Power Company 01/29/1990 Fuel Se' vices, incorporated Fort St. Vrain Foster Wheeler Modular bit y
Public Service.
11/04/1991 Energy Applications, Dry Store (MVDS)
'(j Company of Colorado incorporated Brunswick 1,2-Pacific Nuclear NUHOMS 7
- Carolina Power &
Fuel Services, Light Company incorporated Calvert Cliffs 1,2 Pacific Nuclear Baltimore Gas &-
Fuel Services, NUHOMS - 24P Electric Company Incorporated g
Prairie Island 1,2 Transnuclear, P
Northern States Incorporated TN 40 Power Company Rancho Seco
' Sacramento Municipal
- Utility District
- Application Received.
- To Be Deterrnined.-
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission 76 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
I I
i T:
Appendices
,/.
f k
I..
r t
t' '.
e.
it 1
f Y,-
~f.-
p V f_ i V
y b
h e-%
t t
yN 3
'y T'
.7*
e
- v. e.
+
g
'.m.r-
.h
- Wo..b+4 ' p.s.. e t he t Q
-'r 9'
s.
t y
'6.,u-
=
9
-- v%C
.c
. Ie j
3, t
g i
~
+
ef s.,
t y.'
g_,
i y7 ->
-w+-+
s' L,
%,v,' -
~
L.
y_
r-
'o i
L.
l t
e
[
[J h f
4,.
2
' e y,,
6,
,.t>
1*
/.gg g,.
1 p..
T h ;.
I l
9 e
i 5
8 s
W,
1 ?'
F 14 d
+
u 7 e'
y-4 N+
% 4 pg- +, W di 4
7 k
+
- ^. -
i g
. ' 4g(*M 47
~
W'
.?'
f~
/.
(#.
t 1
M
= * *%
.. ~
-- a; 4=
l -
' +
l
..ss w.-
, }4k-3+j W
r, w C
k i
C i
l 4
m.4's.-
(
A f
R 7
a.
-wn p.
-,pe.'
,4
.u.-5*_
4,,
u'
-y-k '_
'L
%_- w y.
+
%, 'z%
s
).'
I
+
[)
Abbreviations Used in Appendices ACEC0 WEN: Belgian Consortium with West:nghouse JONES:
J. A. Jones
' AE:
Architect-Engineer KAIS:
Kaiser Engineers AECL:
Atomic Energy of Canada, Ltd.
. KWU; Kraftwerk Union,Siemens AG AEE:
Atomenergoexpor' LIC. TYPE:
License Type AEP:
American Electric Power CP:
Construction Permit AGN; Aerojet-GeneralNucleonics OL-FP:
Operating License FullPour B&R Burns & Roe MDC:
Maximum Dependable Capacity-Net B&W:
Babcock & Wilcox MHl:
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
BALD:
Baldwin Associates MWe:
Megawatts Electrical BECH:
Bechtel MWt Megawatts Thermal BRRT:
Brown & Root NIAG:
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation BWR Boiling-Water Reactor NPF:
Nuclear Power Facility COMB:
Combustion Engineering NSP.
Northem States Power Company COMM. 0P.: Date of Commercial Operation NSSS:
Nuclear Steam System Supplier &
CON TYPE:
Containment Type Design Type DRYAM8: Dry, Ambient Pressure 1:
GE Type 1 DRYSUB: Dry,Subatmospheric 2:
GE Type 2 HTG:
High-Temperature Gas-Cooled 3:
GE Type 3 ICECND: Wet, Ice Condenser 4:
GE Type 4 LMFB:
Liquid Metal Fast-Breeder 5:
GE Type 5 MARK 1: Wet, MarkI 6:
GE Type 6
[%
MARK 2: Wet, Mark 11 2LF; Westinghouse Two-Loop
(
)
MARK 3: Wel Marklli 3tP:
WestinghouseThree-Loop OCM:
Organic Cooled & Moderated 4LP:
Westinghouse Four-Loop PTHW: ' Pressure Tube, Heavy Water CE-Combustion Engineering SCF:.
Sodium Cooled, Fast CE80:
CE Standard Design SCGM:
Sodium Cooled, Graphite-Moderated LLP:
B&WLowered Loop CPISSUED:
Date of Construction Permit issuance RLP.
B&W Raisedloop CPPR Construction Permit Power Reactor OLISSUED:
Date oflatest FullPower Operating Ucense CWE:
Commonwealth Edison Company PG&E:
PacificGas & Electt;c Company CX-Critical Assembly PSE:
PioneerServices & Engineering DANL DanielIntemational PUBS:
Public Service Electric & Gas Company DBDB:
Duke & Bechtel PWR Pressurized-Water Reactor DER Design Electric Rating R
Reseamh uf?
Demonstration Power Reactor S&L:
Sargent & Lundy DUKE -
Duke Power Company S&W:
Stone & Webster EBSO Ebasco SBEC:
Southern Services & Bechtel EXP DATE:
Expiration Date of Operating License SSl:
S uthemServicesIncorporated FRAM:
-Framatome TNPG:
The Nuclear Power Group FLUR:
Fluor Pioneer TOSH:
Toshiba
' &H-Gibbs & Hill TR Test Reactor GCR Gas-Cocu Reactor TVA TennesseeValleyAuthority GE.
GeneralElectric UE&C:
United Engineering & Constructors GHDR Gibbs & Hill & Durham & Richardson UTR UnntersalTraimng Reactor 77-Gil:
GilbertAssociates WDC0:
Westinghouse Development Corporation
(
)-
GPC:
Georgia Pont Company WEST:
Westinghouse Electnc HIT:
Hitachi HWR Prrr.lzed Heavy-Water Reactor 78 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Appendix A y,Q U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors 1991 iJnit Con Type CP issued Average Operating Utility NSSS OLlsaced License Capacity Location NRC Licensed Ni Comm. Op Type &
Factor Docket Number Rege onstructor MW1 MDC Exp. Date Number (Percent) Note Arkansas Nuclear 1 IV PWR-DRYAMB 2568 0836 12/06/1968 OL-FP 89.3 Entergy 0perations,Inc.
B&W LLP 05/21/1974 DPR-51 6 MIWNW of Russellville, AR BECH 12/19/1974 050-00313 BECH 05/20/2014 Arkansas Nuclear 2 IV PWR-DRYAMB 2815 0858 12/06/1972 OL-FP B1.4 Entergy Operations,Inc.
COMB CE 09/01/1978 NPF 6 6 MIWNW of Russellville, A?.
BECH 03/26/1980 050-00368 BECH 07/17/2018 Beaver Valley 1 I
PWR-DR7SUB 2652 0810 06/26/1970 OL-FP 52.2 Duquesne Light Co.
WEST 3LP 07/02/1976 DPR-66 17 MIW of McCandless, PA S&W 10/01/1976 050-00334 S&W 01/29/2016 Beaver Valley 2 i
PWR-DRYSliB 2652 0820 05/03/1974 OL-FP 94.1 Duquesne Light Co.
WEST 3LP 08/14/1987 NPF-73 17 MIW of McCandless, PA S&W 11/17/1987
-s
-(
'i 050-00412 S&W 05/27/2027 Beliciante1 Il PWR-DRYAMB 0000 1235 12/24/1974 CP (1)
TennesseeValley Authority B&W RLP (DER)
CPPR-122 6 M1NE of Scottsbor0, Al IVA 050-00438 TVA Bellefonte 2 11 PWR-DRYAMB 0000 1235 12/24/1974 CP (1)
TennesseeValley Authority B&W RLP (DER)
CPPR-123 6 MI NE of Scottsboro, AL
- TVA 050-00433 TVA Big Rock Point 111 BWR-DRYAMB ' 0240 0067 05/31/1960 OL-FP 83.8 Consumers Power Co.
GE 1 05/01/1964 DPR-6 4 MINE of Charlevoix,MI BECH 03/29/1963 050-00155 BECH 05/31/2000 Braidwood 1 111 PWR-DRYAMB 3411 1120 12/31/1975 OL-FP 50.8 Commonwealth Edison Co.
WEST 4LP 07/02/1987 NPF-72 24 Mt SSW of Joilet,IL S&L 07/29/1988 050 00456 CWE 10/17/2026 Braidwood2 Ill PWR-DRYAMB 3411 1120 12/31/1975 OL-FP 66,6 Commonwealth Edison Co.
WEST-4LP 05/20/1988 NPF-77 24 Mi SSW of Joilet,IL S&L 10/17/1988 050-00457 CWE 12/18/2027
- I
)
(Continued) 1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 79
{ }-
jggj
~.\\
J..
Unit Con Type CPissued Average
'V!
Operating Utility NS$$
OLissued License Capacity.
Location -
NRC AE -
Licensed Not Comm, Op Type &
Factor Docket Number Region Constructor Mn1 MDC Emp. Date Number (Percent) Note-Browns Ferry 1 11 BWR-MARK 1 3293 1065.
05/10/1 % 7 OL-FP 0
Tennessee Valley Authority GE-4 12/20/1973 DPR-33 10 MI NW of Decatur, AL TVA 08/01/1974 050-00259 TVA 12/20/2013 Browns Ferry 2 11 BWR-MARK 1 3293 1065 05/10/1967 OL-FP 40.3 Tennessee Valley Authority GE 4 08/02/1974 DPR 52 10 MINW of Decatur, AL TVA 03/01/1975 050-00260 TVA 06/2 & 2014 Browns Ferry 3 _
BWR-MARK 1 3293 1065 07/31/1968 OL-FP 0
Tennessee Valley Authority GE 4 08h8/1976 DPR-68 10 MINW of Decatur, AL TVA 03/01/1977 050-00296 TVA 07/02/2016 Brunswick 1 ll BWP-MARK 1.2436 0767 02r'/1970 OL-FP 65.4 Carolina Power & Light Co.
GE 4 11/12/1976 DPR-71 2 MI N of Southport, NC l'E&C 03/18/1977 050-00325 BRRI 09/08/2016 Brunswick 2 li BWR-MARK 1 2436 0754 02/07/1970 OL-FP 55.1 Carolina Power & Light Cc.
2 MIN of Southport, NC UE&C 11/03/1975 050-00324 BRRT 12/27/2014 Byron.
til PWR-DRYAMB 3411 1105 12/31/1975 OL-FP 65.2 Commonwealth Edison Co.
WEST 4LP 02/14/1985 NPF-37 17 MISW of Rockford,IL S&L 09/16/1985 050-00454 CWE 10/31/2024 Byron 2 Ill - PWR-DRYAMB 3411 1105 12/31/1975 OL-FP 90.6 Commonwealth Edison Coc WEST 4LP 01/30n987 NPF-66 17 MiSW of Rockford,IL S&L-08/215987 050-00455 CWE 11/06/2026 Callaway ill PWR-DRYAMB ' 3565 1125 04/16/1976 OL-FP 101.3 Union Electric Co.
- WEST 4LP 10/18/1984 NPF-30
'10 MlSE of Fulton, M0 BECH 12/19/1984 050-00483 DANI 10/18/2024 Calvert Cliffs 1 1-PWR-DRYAMB 2700 0825 07/07/1 % 9 OL-FP 75.6 Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.
COMB CE 07/31/1974 DPR-53 40 mis of Annapolis,MD BECH-05/08/1975 050-00317 BECH 07/31/2014 Calvert Cliffs 2 1
PWR-DRYAMB 2700 0825 07/07h9o9 OL-FP 50.3 Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.
COMB CE 11/30/1976 DPR-69 (9-40 mis of Annapolis, MD BECH 04/01/1977 L Nj 050-00318 BECH 08/31,0015
-80 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISo.ON
Appendix A. U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors (Continued) f-l
[.
1991
'f Unit NSSS OL1: sued License _ Capacity Con Type CP issued Averste
,~ '
OperatinC Utility.
Locatlen
'NRC AE.
Licensed Not Comm. Op Type &
Factor.
DockelNumber Repton Constructor MWt.
- Emp.Date Number (Percent) Note Catawba 1 ;
il PWR-ICECND 3411 1129 08/07/1975 OL-FP 67.4 Duke Power Co.
WEST 4LP 01/17/1985 NPF-35 6 Mi NNW of Rock tiill,SC DUKE 06R9/1985 050-00413 OUKE 12/06/2024 Catawba 2 ll PWR-ICECND 3411 1129 08/07/1975 OL-FP 73.5 4
Duke Power Co.
WEST 4LP 05/15/1986 NPF 52 6 MINNW of Rock Hill, SC DUKE 08/19/1986 050-00414 DUKE 0244R026 -
Clinton.
III BWR-MARK 3 2894 0930 02R4/1976 OL-FP 74.2 I!!inois Power Co.
GE 6 04/17/1987 NPF-62 6 MIE of Clinton,IL S&L 11R4/1987 05 4 00461 BALD 092 9/2026 Comanche Peak 1 IV PWR-DRYAMB 3411 1150 12/19/1974 OL-FP 53.2 Tcxas Utilities Electric Co.
WEST 4LP 04/17/'990 NPF-6/
4 MIN of Glen Rose,TX G&H 08/13/1990 0:4 00445 SRRT 02/08R030 Comanche Peak 2 IV PWR-DRYAMB 0000 1150 12/19h974 CP (2)
'(A) ~
Texas Utilities E!cctric Ct.
WEST 4LP (DER)
CPPR 127 W
. 4 M1 N of Glen Rose,TX
'BECH 050-00446 BRRT
~ Cooper IV BWR-MARK 1 2381 0764 06/04/1968 OL-FP 71.8 Nebraska Public Power District GE 4 01A8/1974 DPR-46
- 23 Mt S of Nebraska City, NE B&R 07/01/1974 050-00298 B&R 12M8/2014 CrystalRiver 3 11 PWR-ORYAMB 2544 0821 0945/1968 OL-FP 75.9 Florida Power Corp.
B&W LLP 01/28/1977' DPR-72 7 M1NW of CrystalRiver,FL Gil' 03/13/1977 050-00302 JONES 12/03/2016 Davis-Besse 111 PWR-DRYAMB 2772 0874 03/24/1971 OL-FP 76.3 Toledo Edison Co.
B&W. LLP 04/22/1977 NPF-3 21 MIESE of Toledo,0H BECH 07/31/1978 050-00346 BECH 04/22/2017
- 0. C. Cook 1 111 PWR-ICECND 3250 1020 0345/1969 OL-FP B3.2
- Indiana / Michigan Power Co.
WEST 4LP 1045/1974 DPR-58 11 MIS of Benton Harbor,M1 AEP 0848/1975 050-00315 AEP 10454014 D. C. Cook 2 til PWR-ICECND 3411 1090 03/250 969 4 OL-FP B5.7 Indiana / Michigan Power Co.
WEST 4LP 12/23/1977 OPR-74 (m
' N}
11 mis of Benton Harbor.Mi AEP 07/01/1978 050-00316 AEP 12R34017 (Continued) i 1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 81 9
[
\\'
1991 kd/
Unit Con Type CP issued Average A
- Operating Utility.
NSSS OLissued License Cepecify Location NRC AE Licansed Net Comm. Op - Type &
rector Docket Number Region Constractor MW1 MDC Exp. Date Number (Percent) Note Diablo Canyon 1 V
PWR-DRYAMB 3338 1073 04/23A968 OL-FP 78.3 Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
WEST 4LP 11/02/1984 DPR-80 12 MIWSWof San Luis PG&E 05/07/1985 Obispo, CA PG&E 04/23/2008 050-00275
^
Diablo Canyon 2 V
PWR DRYAMB 3411 1087 12/09/1970 OL-FP 81.0 Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
WEST 4LP 08/26A985 DPR-82 12 MlWSWof San Luis PG&E 03/13/1986 Obispo, CA PG&E 12/09/2010 050-00323 Dresden 2 Ill BWR-MARK 1 2527 0772 01/10/1966 OL-FP 43.9 Commonwealth Edison Co.
GE 3 02/20/1991 DPR-19 9 MIE of Morris,IL S&L 06/09/1970 050-00237-UE&C 01/10/2006 Dresden 3 Ill BWR-MARK 1 2527 0773 10/14A966 OL-FP 37.9 CommonwealthEdison Co.
GE 3 03/025 971 DPR-25 9 MIE of Morris.It S&L 11/165 971 (N.
050@249 UE&C 01/12/2011 Duane Amold' 111 BWR-MARK 1 1658 0515 06/22/1970 OL-FP 91.9 lowa Electric Light & Power Co.
GE 4 02/22/1974 DPR-49 8 MINWof Cedar Rapids,IA BECH 02/01/1975 050-00331 BECH 02/21/2014 Edwin 1. Hatch 1-11 BWR-MARK 1 2436 0741 09/30/1969 OL-FP 72.4 Georgia Power Co.-
GE 4 10/13/1974. DPR-57 11 MI N of Baxley,GA BECH 12/31/1975 05 4 00321 GPC 08/06/2014 Edwin L Hatch 2.
11 BWR-MARK 1 -
2436 0761 12/27/1972 OL-FP 73.8 Georgia Power Co.
GE 4 06/13/1978 NPF-5 11 M1 N of Baxley,GA BECH 09/05A979 050 00366 GPC 06/13/2018 Fermi 2 111 BWR-MARK 1 3292 1060 09/26A972 OL-FP 66.7 Detroit Edison Co. -
GE 4 07/15/1985 NPF - 25 MINE of Toledo OH S&L 01/23/1988 050@341 DAN!
03/20/2025 Fort Calhoun.
IV PWR-DRYAMB 1500 0478 06/07/1968 OL-FP 77.6 Omaha Public Power District COMB CE 08/09A973 DPR40 19 MI N of Omaha, NE GHDR 06/20/1974 050-00285~
GHDR 06/07/2008 l, (-
g N
82 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I
Appendix A. U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors (Continued) b; Y
1901
!\\j Unit con Type CP issued Average Operating Utility NSSS
.OLissued License Capacity Location -
NRC AE Licensed Not Comm. Op Type &
Factor Docket Number Region Constructor MWI MDC Exp. Date Number (Percent) Note
- Ginna -
I PWR-DRYAMB 1520 0470 04/25/1966 OL-FP 84.6 Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.
WEST 2LP 12/10/1984 DPR-18 20 M1NE of Rochester,NY Gil 07/01/1970 050-00244 BECH 09/18/2009
- Grand Guit 1:
Il BWR-MARK 3 3833' 1143 09/04/1974 OL-FP 91.1 Entergy Operations,Inc.
GE 6 11/01/1984 NPF-29 25 M1 S of Vicksburg, MS BECH 07/01/1985
- 050-00416 BECH 06/16/2022 Haddam Neck l
PWR-DRYAMB 1825 0560-05/26/1964 OL-FP 74.9 CT Yankee Atomic Power Co.
WEST 4LP 12/27/1974 DPR-61 13 Ml E of Meriden,CT S&W 01/01/1968 050-00213 S&W 06/294 007 H. B. Robinson 2 M M YAMB 2300 0683 04/13/1967 OL-FP 80.0 Carolina Power & Light Co.
WEST 3LP 09/23n970 DPR-23 26 Mi from Florence,SC EBSO 03/07/1971 050@261 EBSO 07/314010 fN Hope Creek 1 3
SS'MAMK1 3293 1067 11/04/1974 OL-FP 81.9 1 J-Public Service Elec:ric &: Gas Co GE 4 07/25d986 NPF-57 18 MI SE of Wilmington.0E BECH 12/20/1986 050-00354 CECH 04/11/2026 Indian Poir42 1
PWR-DilYAMB 3071 0939 10A4/1966 OL-FP 47.5 ConsoMated EdittaCo.
WEST 4LP 09/28/1973 DPR 26 24 MINT,, NwYork C4 NY UE&C 08/01/1974
'05V0247 WDC0 09/28/2013 Inden PoM 3 1
PWR-DRYAMB 3025 0965 08/13n%9 OL-FP 86.4 POWMhorit;of the State of New York WEST 4LP 04/05/1976 DPft-64 24 Ml N of New York City, NY UE&C 08/30/1976 050-00286 WDC0 085 3/2009 James A. FitzPatrick I
B R MARK 1 2436 0780 05/20/1970 OL-FP 49.4 l.
Power Authority of the State of New York GE 4 10/17/1974 DPR-59 l
8 M1NE of Oswego,NY S&W 07/28/1975 05H0333 S&W 10/17/2014 Joseph M. Farley1 11 PWR-DRYAMB 2652 0814 08/16/1972 OL-FP 75.9 l
Southern Nuclear Operating Co.
WEST 3LP 06/25/1977 NPF-2
- 18 MISE of Dothan, AL SSI 12/01/1977 050-00348 DANI 06/25/2017 l
L Joseph M.Farley2 il PWR-DRYAMB 2652 0824 08/16/1972 OL-FP 93.4 O
Southern Nuclear Operating Co.
WEST 3LP 03/31/1981 NPF-8 l
(v) 18 W SE of Dothan, AL SSI 07/30/1981 05H0364 BECH 03/31/2021 (Continued) 1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 83
I h[
1991 Unit con Type CPIssued Average t\\~j :
Operating Utility NSSS OLlessed License Capacity Locsilon NRC AE Licensed Not Comm. 05 iype &-
Factor Docket Number -
Region Constructor MWI MDC Exp. Date Number (Percent) Note Kewaunee 111 PWR-DRYAMB 1650 0511 08/06/1968 OL-FP 82.7 Wisconsin Public Service Corp.
WEST 2LP 12/21/1973 DPR-43 27 MIE of Green Bay,WI PSE 06/16/1974 050-00305 PSE 12/212 013 La Salle County 1 Ill BWR-MARK 2 3323 1036 09n0/1973 OL-FP 75 2 Commonwealth Edison Co.
GE 5 08/13/1982 NPF-11 11 Ml SE of Ottawa. IL S&L 01/01/1984 050-00373 CWE 05/17/2022 La Salle County 2 111 BWR-MARK 2 3323 1036 09/1W1973 OL-FP 96.0
= Commonwealth Edison Co.
GE 5 03/23/1984 NPF-18 11 MlSE of Ottawa,IL S&L W19A984 050-00374 CWE a/164023 Limerick 1.
I BWR-MARK 2 3293 1055 06/19/1974 OL-FP 88.0 Philadelphia Electric Co.
GE -4 08/08/1985 NPF-39 21 MI NW of Philadelphia,PA BECH 02/01/1986 050-00352-BECH 1026/2024 Limerick 2 i
BWR-MARK 2 3293 1055 06/19/1974 OL-FP 77.3
- (p =
)-
Philadelphia Electric Co.
21 MINWof Philadelphia,PA BECH 01/08/1990 05H0353 BECH 06/222029 Maine Yankee -
I PWR-DRYAMB 2700 0860 10/21/1968 CL-FP 85.1 Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co.
COMB CE 06/29/1973 DPR 36 10 M1 N of Bath, ME S&W 12RB/1972 050-00309 S&W 1021/2008 McGuire 1 11 PWR-ICECND 3411 1129 02R3/1973 OL-FP 69.2 Duke Power Co.
WEST 4LP 07/08/1981 NPF-9 17 MIS of Charlotte, NC DUKE 12/01/1981 05H0369-DUKE 06/12/2021 McGuire 2 '
11 PWR-ICECND 3411 1129 0'/23/1973 OL-FP 96.2 Duke Power Co.
WEST 4LP 0547/1983 NPF-17
.17 MI S of Charlotte, NC -
DUKE 03/01/1984 05H0370 OUKE 03/03/2023 t
Millstone 1 i
BWR-MARK 1 2011 0654 05/19/1966 OL-FP 30.6 Northeast Nuclear Energy Co.
GE 3 10/31/1086 DPR-21 32 MIENE of New London,CT EBS0 03/01/1971 050-00245 EBS0 10/06/2010 Millstone 2 i
PWR-DRYAMB 2700 0863 12/11/1970 OL-FP 52.2 fw.
Northeast Nuclear Energy Co.
COMB CE 09/30/1975 DPR45 (V
)-
32 MIENE of New London,CT BECH 1246/1975 000-00336 BECH 07/312015
+
84:
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Appendix A.' U.S. Commercial Nucleat Power Reacton(Continued)
,mL
(
f IM1
' kf -
. Unit Con Type CPissued Ayerste NS$$
CLlassed License Cepecify Operating Utility
. NRC Al Licensed Not Comm.~ 0p. Type &
Factor Locellen Docket Number -
Region Constructor MWt MOC Exp. Oste Number (Percent) Note Millstone 3 _
i PWR-DRYSUB 3411 1137 08M9/1974 OL-FP 28.5 Nor1heast Nuclear Energy Co.-
WEST 4LP 01/31/1986 NPF-49 32 MIENE of New London, CT '
S&W 04/23/1986 050-00423 -
S&W 11/25/2025 Monticello ill BWR-MARK 1 1670 0536 06/19/1 % 7 OL-FP 76.6 Northern States Power Co.
GE 3 01M9/1981. DPR-22 30 MI NW of Minneapolis, MN BECH 06/30/1971
'050-00263 BECH 09/08/2010 Nine Mile Point 1 i
BWR-MARK 1 1850 0615 04/12/1965 OL-FP 71.9 Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
GE 2 12/26/1974 DPR43 6 M1NE of Oswego, NY N1AG 12/01/1 % 9 050-00220 S&W 08/22/2009 Nine Mile Point 2 i
BWR-MARK 2 3323 1097 06/24/1974 OL-FP 68.6 Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
GE-5 07/02/1987_ NPF-69 6 Ml NE of Oswego,NY S&W 03/11n988 050-00410 S&W 10/31/2026 lh North Anna 1 11 PWR DRYSUB 2893 0911 02/19/1971 OL-FP 70.5 Virginia Electric & Power Co.
WEST 3LP 04/01n978 NPF-4 40 MINW of Richmond,VA S&W 06/06/1978 050-00338 S&W 04/01/2018 North Anna 2 11 PWR-DRYSUB 2893 0909 0259n971 OL-FP 96.5 Virginia Electric & power Co.
WEST -3LP 08/21/1980 NPF-7 40 M1NWof Richmond,VA S&W 12/14/1980 050-00339 S&W 08/21/2020 Oconee1 11 PWR-DRYAMB - 2568 0846 11/06/1967 OL-FP 81 2 Duke Power Co.
B&W LLP-02/00n973 DPR-38 30 M1W of Greenville.SC DBDB 07d55973 050-00269 DUKE 02M6/2013 Oconee 2 11 PWR-DRYAMB 2568 0846 11/06/1967 OL-FP 100.2-Duke Power Co.
' 36 MlW of Greenville.SC DBOB 09/09d974 050-00270-DUKE 10/06/2013
' Oconee 3 Il PWR-DRYAMB 2568 0846 11/06/1967 OL-FP 75.4 Duke Power Co.
B&W LLP 07/19/1974 DPR-55 30 MIWof Greenville,SC DBDB 12/165 974 050-00287 DUKE C.'/19/2014 Oyster Creek i
BWR-MARK 1 1930 0610 12/155 964 OL-FP 54.7
(]f GPU Nuclear Corp.
- /
9 mis of TomsRiver,NJ B&R 12/01/1969 050 00219--
B&R 12/15/2004 (Con!inued) 1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 85
.amamusummuummmmmmmma 1
j/
k 1991 A "/.
Unit Can Type CPissued Average Operating Utility.
N3SS-
.OLtssued. Licene Capacity Location -
NRC-AE Licensed Net
' Comm, Op Type &
Factor DocLat Number Region Constructor.
MWt MDC F.xp. Date Number (Percent) Note Palisades til - PWh-DRYAMB 2530 0730 03/14n967 OL-FP 76 2 Consumers Power Co.
COMB CE 0221/1991 DPR-20 5 mis of South Haven, MI BECH 12/31/1971 050 4 0255 BECH 03/14R007 PaloVerde 1 V
PWR-DRYAMB 3800 1221 0525/1976 OL-FP 87,1 Arizona Public Service Co.
COMB CE80 06/01A985 NPF-41 36 MlW of Phoenix, AZ -
BECH 014 8/1986 050-00528-BECH 12212024 PaloVerde 2 V
PWR-ORYAMB 3800 1221 05/25/1976 OL-FP 77.3 Arizona Public Service Co.
COMB CE80 04/24/1986 NPF-51
- 36 MIWof Phoenix, AZ BECH 09/19/1986 050-00529 BECH 12/092025 Palo Verje 3.
V PWR-ORYAMB-3800 1221 0525/1976 OL-FP 70.3 Arizona Nblic Service Co.
COMB CE80 11RS/1987 NPF-74 36 M1W of Phoenix, AZ BECH 01/085 988 050-005Y)
BECH 03/25/2027 f]
Peach Botton'2 i
BWR-MARK 1 3293 1055 01/31/1968 OL-FP 54.8 Philadelphia Emic Co.
GE 4 12/14/1973 DPR-44 17.9 MIS of Laicaster,PA BECH 07/05/1974 050-00277 BECH 01/31/2008 Per1 Bottom 3 -
I BWR-MARK 1 3293 1035 01/31/1968 OL-FP 56.1 Pti!adelphia Electric Co.
GE 4 07/02/1974 DPR-56 17.9 MlS of Lancaster,PA BECH 1223/1974 050 4'278..
BECH 01/312008 u
Perry 1 111 BWR-MARK 3 3579 1166 05/03/1977 OL-FP 87.9 Cleveland Electric iliuminating Co. GE 6 11/13/1986 NPF-58 7 M1NE of Painesvitie,OH GIL 11/18/1987 050-00440-KAIS.
03/18/2026
' Perry 2 111 BWR-MARK 3 0000
-1205 05/03/1977 CP (1)
Cleveland Electric illuminatin0 Co. GE 6 (DER)
CPPR-149 7 M1 NE of Painesville,OH Gil 05H0441 KAIS Pilgrim 1.
I BWR-MARK 1 '1998 0670 08/26/1968 OL-FP
- 58.4 Boston Edison Co.
GE 3 09/15/1972 DPR-35 4 MISE of Plymouth, MA BECH
- 12/01/1972 05H0293 BECH 06/08/2012 -
Point Beach 1 '
lil PWR-DRYAMB 1518 0485 07/19/1 % 7 OL-FP 85.4 jq Wisconsin Electric Power Co.
WEST 2LP 10/05/19/0 DPR-24 t,V 13 MINNW of Manitowoc,W1 BECH 12/21/1970 t
050-00266 BECH 10/05/2010
+
86 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Appendix A. U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors (Continued)
},
i i
1991 ij'
- Unit Con Type CPissued Aversee s
Opeming Utility NSSS OLlassed - License Copacity Location
- NF;C. AE Licensed Not Comm. 0p - Type &
Factor Decket Number Re0lon Constructor MWt MDC Emp. Date Number (Percent) ' Note
. Point Beach 2 lil PWR-DRYAW 1518 0485 0745/1968 OL-FP 86.8 Wisconsin Electric Power Co.
WEST 2LP 03/08/1973 DPR-27 13 M1 NNW of Manitowoc,WI BECH 10/01/1972 -
050-00301 BECH 03/08/2013 Prairie Island 1 -
lll PWR-DRYAMB 1650 0503 06/25/1968 OL-FP 90.4 Northern States Power Co.
WEST 2LP 044 5/1974 DPR-42 28 MISE of M!nneapolis,MN FLUR 12/16/1973 350-00282 NSP 08/09 4 013 PrairieIsland 2 HI PWR-DRYAMB 1650 0500 06/25/1968 OL-FP 102.3 Northem States Power Co.
WEST 2LP 10/29/1974 DPR-60 28 MI SE of Minneapolis, MN FLUR 12R1/1974 050-00306 NSP 10R9/2014 Quad Cities 1 Ill BWR41 ARK 1 2511 0769 02/15/1 % 7 OL-FP 52.5 Commonwealth Edison Co.
GE 3 12/14A972 DPR-29 20 MI NE of Moline,IL S&L 02/18A973 0504X)254 UE&C 12/14/2012 fN Quad Cities 2 til BWH-MARK 1 2511 0769 02A5/1967 OL-FP 78.5
(' f' Commonwealth Edison Co.
GE 3 12n4/1972 DPR-30 20MihEof Moline,IL S&L 03/10/1973 050 00265 UE&C 12/142012 River Bend 1 IV BWR-MARK 3 2894 0936 03/25/1977 OL-FP 81.6 Gulf Fhtes Utilities Co.
GE 6 1120A985 NPF-47 24 MINNWof Raton Rouge,LA S&W 06ASA986 050-00458 S&W 08/29/2025 Salem 1._
l PWR-DRYAMB 3411 1106 09&SA968 OL-FP 70.3 Puble Service Electric & Gas Co.
WEST 4LP 12/01/1976 DPR-70 18 MlS of Wilmington,DE PUBS 06/30A977 050-00272 UE&C 08/13/2016 Salem 2 -
l-PWR-DRYAMB 3411 1106 09/25/1968-DeFP 79.1 Public Service Electric & Gas Co.
WEST 4LP 05/20A981 DPR-75 18 MIS of Wilmington, DE PUBS 10/13A981 050-00311 UE&C 04/18/2020 San Onofre 1 V
PWH-DRYAMB 1347 0436-03/02/1964 OL-FP 53.0 Southern Califomia Edison Co.
WEST 3LP 09/26/1991 DPR-13
& San Diego Gas & Electric Co. BECH 01/01A968
- 4 MISE of San Clemente,CA BECH 03 S24 004 050-00206
~
(Continued) 1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 87
/'^'\\,
1991 Unit Con Type CP issued Average 1
7 b
Operating Utility NSSS OLissued License Cepect?
Location NRC AE Licensed Not Comm. Op Type &
Factor Docket Number.
Region Constructor.
MWt MDC Exp. Date Number (Percent) Note San Onofre 2 '
V PWR-DRYAMB 3390 1070 10/18/1973 OL-FP 61.5 Southern California Edison Co.
& San Diego Gas & Electric Co. BECH 08/08/1983 4 MISE of San Ciernente, CA BECH 10/18/2013 050-00361 San Onofre 3 V
PWR-DRYAMB 3390 1030 10/18/1973 OL-FP 91.9 Southern California Edison Co.
& San Diego Gas & Electric Co BECH 04/01/1984 4 MISE of San Clemente, CA BECH 10/18/2013 050-00362 Seabrook1 i
PWR-DRYAMB 3411 1150 07/07/1976 OL-FP 67.6 Public Service Co. of NH WEST 4LP 03/15/1990 NPF-86 13 MI S of Porthsn.auth, NH UE&C 08/19/1990 050-00443 UE&C 10/17/2026 Sequoyah 1 11 PWR-ICECND 3411 1122 05/27/1970 OL-FP 73.9 Tennessee Valley Authority -
WEST 4LP 09/17/1980 DPR-77 9.5 M1 NE of Chattanooga, TN TVA 07/01/1981 050-00327' TVA 09/17/2020
(,)-
Sequoyah 2 11 PWR-ICECND 3411 1122 05/27/1970 OL-FP 94.8 Tennessee Valley Authority WEST 4LP 09/15/1981 DPR-79 9.5 M1NE of Chattanooga, TN TVA 06/01/1982 050-00328 TVA 09/15/2021 Shearon Harris 1 11 PWR-DRYAMB 2775 086C 01/27/1978 OL-FP 78.6 Carolina Power & Light Co.
WEST 3LP 01/12/1987 NPF-63 20 Ml SW of Raleigh,NC EBS0 05/02/1987 050-00400 DAN!
10/24/2026 South Texas Project 1 IV PWR-DRYAMB -3800 1251 12/22/1975 OL-FP 65.8 Houston Lighting & Power Co.
WEST ' 4LP 03/22/1988 NPF-76 12 MI SSW of Bay City,TX -
BECH 08/25/1988 050-00498 EBS0 08/20/2027 South Texas Project 2 IV PWR-DRYAMB 3800 1251 12/22/1975 OL-FP 66.2 Houston Lighting & Power Co.
WEST 4LP 03/28/1989 NPF-80 12 MiSSW of Bay City, TX BECH 06/19/1989 050-00499-EBS0 12/15/2028 S;Lucie 1 ll PWWORYAMB 2700 0839 07/01/1970 OL-FP 78.8 Florida Power & Ught Co.
COMB CE 03/01/1976 DPR-67 12 Mi SE of FL Pierce, FL EBSO 12/21/1976 050-00335 EBSO 03/01/2016 88-NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Appendix A. U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors (Continued) l I
(-
1971
(
-(/
Unit con Type CP issued Average Operating Utility NSSS OL issued Ucense Capacity Location NRC AE Licensed Net Comm. Op Ty;e&
Factor Docket Number Region Constructor MWt MDC Exp. Date Number (Percent) Note SL Lucie 2 11 PWR-DRYAMB 2700 0839 05/02/1977 OL-FP 101.1 Florida Power & Light Co.
COMB CE 06A0/1983 NPC-16 12 MISE of FL Pierce,FL EBS0 08/08/1983 OW00389 EBSO 04/06 2 023 Summer 11 PWR-DRYAMB 2775 0885 03R1/1973 OL-FP 68.9 South Carchna Dectric & Gas Co.
WEST 3LP 11n2/1982 NPF-12 26 MI NW of Columbia. SC Gil 01/01/1984 OS00395 DAN!
08/062 022 Surry1 11 PWR-DRYSUB 2441 0781 0645/1968 OL-FP M3 Virginia Electric & Power Co.
WEST 3LP 05/25/1972 OPR-32 17 MI NW of Necort News. VA S&W 12/22/1972 050-00280 S&W 05/25R012 Surry 2 ll PWR-DRYSUB 2441 0781 06/25/1968 OL-FP 58.3 Virginia Electric & Power Co.
WEST 3LP 0129/1973 DPR-37 17 MINW of Newport News,VA S&W 05/01/1973 050-00281 S&W 01R9/2013
("N Susquehanna1 1
BWR MARK 2 3293 1%
11/02/1973 OL-FP 96.8
(,)
Pennsylvania Power & LightCo.
GE 4 11/12n982 NPF-14 7 MI NE of Berwick, PA BECH 06/08/1983 050-00387 BECH 07/17/2022 Susquehanna 2 i
BWR-MARK 2 3293 1044 11/02/1973 OL-FP 76.9 Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.
GE 4 06R7/1984 NPF-22 7 MINE of Berwick, FA BECH 02/12/1985 050-00388 BEC; 03R3/2024 Three Mileisland1 i
PWR-DRYAMB 256A 0808 05/18A968 OL-FP 80.1 GPU Nuclear Corp.
B&W LLP 04/19/1974 DPR-50 10 MISE of Harrisbutg, PA G!L 09/02/1974 050-00289 UE&C 04n9R014 Trojan.
V PWR-DRYAMB 3411 1095 02/085 971 OL-FP 15.3 Port land GeneralElectricCo.
WEST 4LP 11 4 1/1975 NPF-1 32 MlN of Portland,OR BECH 05/20n976 050-00344 BECH 02/08/2011 Turkry Point 3 11 PWR-DRYAMB 2200 0666 0447/1967 OL-rP 22.5 Florida Power & Light Co.
WEST 3LP 07/19n972 DPR-31 25 M1S of Miami,FL BECH 12/14/1972 050-00250 BECH 04472007 Turkey Point 4 11 PWB-DRYAMB 2200 0666 04/27/1967 OL-FP 13.7
/O Florida Pcwer & Light Co.
WEST 3LP 04/10/1973 DPR-41
\\
)
25 Ml S of Miami, FL BECH 09/07/1973 050-00251 BECH 04R7/2007 inued) 1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 89
I s
4
()
1M1
_(
)~
Unit Co. Type Celeeued Avereg$
v Operating Utility NS$8 OLleased License CoposW Le etion NRC AE Lic.ensed Nel Comm. Op Type.&Fester weinem.,
no.io. Co.ei,ecier mi
.0C u,. 0eie me. e, cre..o Neie t
Vermon! Yankee i
BWR MARK 1 1593 0%4 12/11/1967 OL FP 93.1 Vi YarAee Nxlear Power Com.
5 MlS of Brattleboro,VI EBSO 11/30/1972 0%00271 EBS0 0321/2012 r
Vogtle 1 11 PWR DRYAMB 3d11 1100 0G/28/1974 OL FP 77.8
[
Georgia Power Co.
WEST 03/16/1987 NPF-68 26 MlSE of Augusta,GA SBEC 0G/01/1987 0%00424 GPC 01/162 027 Vogtle 2 11 PWR DRYAMB 3411 1097 OV28/1974 OL-FP 92.6 Georgia Power Co.
WEST 4LP 03n1/1989 NPF-81 26MiSEof Augusta,GA SBEC 052 0/1980 OS00423 GPC 02/092 029 Washington Nuclear 1 V
PWR DRYAMB 0000 1266 1234/1975 CP (1)
Washington Public Power B&W LLP (DER)
CPPR 134 Supply Systern UE&C 12 MINWof Richland,WA BECH 050-00460 Washington Nuclear 2 V
BWR MARK 2 3323 1085 03/19/1973 OL-FP 44.3 V)
Washington Public Power GE $
04/13/1984 NPF 21 Supply System B&R 12/i3/1984 12 MINW of Richland,WA BECH "2R0/2023 05 4 00397 Washington Nuclear 3 V
PWR-DRYAMB 0000 1242 04/11/1978 CP (1)
Washington Public Power -
-COMB CE80 (DER)
CPPR 154 SupplySystem EBSO 26 MIW of Olympla,WA EBSO OS00508 Wateriord 3 IV P60RYAMB 3390 1075 11/14/1974 OL FP 77.3 Entergy Operations,Inc.
COMB CE 03,'16/1985 NPF %
i 20 MIWof New Orleans,LA _
EBSO 0944/1985 003-00382 EBSO 12/18/2024 Watts Bar1 Il PWR-ICECND 0000 1165 01R3/1973 CP (2)
Temessee Valley Authonty WEST 4LP (DER)
CPPR-91
. 10 MIS of Spring City,TN IVA
- 0%00390 TVA Watts Bar 2 li
'MICECND 0000 1165 0123/1973 CP (2)
Tenne.seeValleyAuthority
-WEST _4LP (DER)
CPPR 92 10 MIS of Spring City.TN TVA OS00391 TVA
>!O 90 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION P
i
/Wodix A. U.S. Commerslal Neclear Power Reactors (Continusd)
(
tw
'(
Unit Con Type CPissued Average Operating Utility N888 OLlessed Lisease Cepecify Lacellen NRC AE Licensed Nel Comm. Op Type &
Fester Doctet Number 8tegies Constructor Mwt MDC Esp. Dele Number (Pereont) Note Wo!!Creck 1 IV PWR DRYAMB M11 1135 05/31/1977 OL-FP
$9 Wolf Crcek Nuclear Operating WEST 4LP 06/04/1985 NPF-42 Corp.
BECH 09/03/1985 3.5 MI NE of Burlington, KS DANI 03/11R025 05H0482 Yankee-Rowe i
PWR DRYAMB 0000 0167 11/04/1957 OL FP 67.8 (3)
Yankee Atomic Electric Co.
WEST 4LP 1234/1963 OPR 3 21 MINE of Pittsfield, MA S&W 07/01/1961 050-00029 S&W 07/092 000 Zion i lli PWR-DRYAMB 3250 1040 2R6/1968 OL-FP 46.8 Commxweah Edisor Co.
WEST 4LP 10/19/1973 DPR 39 40 MIN c! Chicago ll S&L 12/31/1973 050-00295 CWE 04/003013 Zion 2 lil PWR-DRYAMS 3250 1040 12R6/1968 OL-FP E3 Commonweatth Edison Co.
WEST 4LP 11/14/1973 DPR48 40 M1N of Chicago,IL S&L 09/17/1974 050-00304 CWE 11/140 013
\\
1 Note: (1) Deferred Construction (2)Under Construction (3) Under 10 CFR 50.82, Yankee Atomic Electric Company applied for termination of their license. Permanent cessation of power operation of the Yankee-Rowe nuclear power reactor was effective on 0247/92.
f^s
- Source: Nuclear Regulatorf Commission and licensee data as compiled by the Nuclear Regulatory,omrGsion u
1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 91
-_-..._.._,_, _ _ 2 -
Appendix B e' p. y
)
U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power P.eactors
'~'
Formerly Licensed to Operate Decommissionhe Unit Con fype OL issued Alternative Selected Location MWt shutdown
'urrent Stetus Bonus
PlHW 11/27/1962 SAFSTOR Parr, SC 65 01/01/1967 SAFSTOR Dresden t by/R 0928/1959 SAFSTOR Morris,IL 700 10/31/1978 SAFSTOR Preparation
_p Elk River *
%R 11/06/1962 DECON Elk Rira, MN 58 02/01/1968 DECON Completed Fermi t SCF 05/10/1963 SAFSTOR Lagoona Bea::h,MI 200 11 29/1972 SAFSTOR pq
(
)
Fort St.Vrain H1G 1241/1973 DECON Platteville, C0 642 08/18h989 NRC Review GE VCWR BWR 08/31n957 SAFSTOR Picasanton,CA 50 12/09/19S3 SAFSTOR Hallam
- SCGM 01/02/1962 ENTOMB Hallam, NE 256 09/01/1964 ENTOMB Humboldt Bay BWR 0828/1962 SAFSTOR Eureka, CA 200 07/02/1976 SAFSTOR Indian Point 1 PWR 0326/1962 SAFSTOR Buchanan, NY 615 10/31n984 NRC Review La Crosse BWR 07/03/1967 SAFSTOR Genoa,WI 165 04/30n987 SAFSTOR Pathfinder BWR 03/12A964 SAFSTOR Sioux Falls, SD.
190 10/01h967 DECONin Pro 0ress Peach Bottom 1 HTG 01R4/1966 SAFSTOR Peach Bottom,PA 115
'1/01/1974 SAFSTOR
\\
92 NUCLEAR P.EGULATORY COMMISSION
Appendix B. U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reestors Formerly Lloonsed te Oper:6e(Continued)
/
Decommissioning Unit Con Type OLissued Ahernative Selected Locaden MWt 85:t Down Current Status Piqua
- OCM 0833/1962 ENTOMB Piqua.0H 46 01/01/1966 ENTOMB j
. Rancho Seco PWR 08/16/1974 SAfSTOR i
Herald, CA 2772 06/07/1909 NRC Review
~ Shippir,gyrt *.
. N/A DECON Shippirgp~t, PA 236 1982 DECON Completed Shoreham BWR 04/21/1989 DECON
' Wading River,NY 2436 06/28/1989 NRC Review
- Three Mileisland 2 PWR 02/0W1978 Londonderry Township,PA 2770 03/28/1979
. f~}
- AEC/ DOE owned; not regulated by NRC, SAFSTOR is dehned as the attemetive in which the
" Holds byproduct license from State of South nuclear faciHty is placed and maintained in such -
Carolina' condition that the nuclear facility can be safety stored and subsequently decontaminated (deferred --
'" Three Mile Island ? Is undergoing decontamlaatim decontamination) to levels that permit release for
~
in selected areas. On completion of these activities, unrestricted use.
- fr ih; "riod DECON is defined as the attemative in which the g
equipment, structures, and portions of a facility and site Noe:
containing radioactive contaminants are removed or includes reactors of 10 MWl' capacity or greater,'
decontaminated to r. level that permits the property to be ENTOMB is defined as the altemative in which released for unrestricted use shortly after mssation of radioactive contaminants are encased in a structurally operatimsc long-lived material, such as concrete. The entombment Sourr DOE Integrated Data Base for 1990; U.S. Spent structure is appropriately maintained, and continued Fuel and Radioactive Waste inventories, Projections, suraillance is carried out until the radioactivity decays and Characteristics (DOE /RW-0006, Rev.6); and y\\-
. to a level permitting unrestricted release of the property.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
.. D(
i 1992 INFORMATION DfGEST 93
~
Appendix C
(
)
Canceled U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors Canceled Unit Con Type Date MWs Per Unit Status Utility Allens Creek 1 BWR 1982 Houston Lighting & Power Company 1150 Under CP Review Allens C.c:2 BWH 1976 Houstonlignting & Power Company 1150 Under CP Review Atlanta 1 & 2 PWH 1978 Public Service Electric & Gas Comptay 1150 Under CP Review Bailly BWR 1981 Northern Indiana Public Service Company 645 With CP Barton1 & 2 BWH 1977 Alabama Power & Light 1159 Under CP Review Barton 3 & 4 BWH 1975
/9 Alabama Power & Light 1159 Under CP Review
\\
1 Black Fox 1 & 2 BWR 1982 Public Service Company of Oklahoma 1150 Under CP Review Blue Hills 1 & 2 PWR 1978 Gulf States Utilities Company 318 under CP Review Callaway2 PWR 1981 Union Electric Company 1150 With CP Cherokee 1 PWR 1983-Duke Power Company 1280 With CP Cherokee 2 & 3 PWR 1982 Duke Power Company 1280 With CP Clinch River LMfB 1983 P.oject Management Corp.; DOE;1VA 350 Under CP Review Clinton 2 BWH 1983 lilinois Power Company 933 With CP Davis-Besse 2 & 3 PWH 1981 Toledo Edison Company 906 Under CP Review f~N Douglas Point 1 & 2 BWR 1977 Potomac Electric Power Company 1146 Under CP Review 94 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i
4 h
Appendix C. Conceled U.S. Cominertlel Nuclear Power Monctors (Continued)
-p~.
( f Conceled
' ~ '
Unit Con Type Date Util&j MWe Per Unit Status Erie 1 & 2 PWR 1930 Ohio Ed: son Company 1260 Under CP Review Forked River 1 PWR 1980 Jersey CentralPower & Ught Company 1070 With CP Fort Calhoun2 PWR 1977 Omaha Public Power District
-1136 Under CP Review
- ~
Fulton 1 & 2 HTG 1975 Philadelphia Electric Company 1160 lindar CP Review Grand Gull 2 BWR 1990 Entergy Operations, incorporated 1250 With CP Greene County PWH 1980 Power Authority of the State of NY 1191 Under CP Fwiew Greenwood 2 & 3 PWR 1980 Dettoit Edison Company 1200 Under CP Reiew
/~N Hartsville A1 & A2 BWR 1984
)
TeanesoeeValley Authority 1233 With CP Hartsville B1 & B2 BWR 1982 TennesseeValleyAuthority 1233 With CP Haven 1 PWR 1980 Wisconsin Electric Power Company 900 Under CP Review Haven 2(formerly Koshkonong 2)
PWR 1978 Wisconsin Electric Power Company 900 Under CP Review Hope Creek 2 BWR 1981 Public Service Electric & Ga Company 1067 With CP a
Jamesport1 & 2 PWR 1980' LongIsland Lighting Company 1150 With CP Marble Hill 1 & 2 PWR 1985 Public Service ofIndiana 1130-With CP Midland 1 -
PWR 1986 Consumers Power Comoany 492 With CP Midland 2 -
PWP.
1986 Consumers Power Compan) 818 With CP l
(
f~
(Continued) 1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 95
s 5'
I Canceled W
Unit Con Type Osts Utility MWs Per Unit Status Montague 1 & 2 BWR 1980 Northeast Nuclear Energy Company 1150 Under CP Review PM 1979 New England 1 & 2 New England Power Company 1194 Under CP Review New Haven 1 & 2 PNR 1980 New York State Electric & Gas Corporation 1250 Under CP Review North Anna 3 F#R 1982 Virginia Electric & Power Company-907.
With CP North Anna 4 PWR 1980 Virginia Electric & Power Company 907 With CP North Coast 1 PWR 1978 Puerto Rico Water Resources Authority 583 under CP Review PaloVerde 4 & 5 PWR 1975 Arizona Public Service Company 1270 Under CP Review I s' Pebble Springs 1 & 2 PWR 1982 g(v)
Portland GeneralElectric Company 1260 Under CP P.eview Perkins 1,2, & 3 Phn 1982 Duke Power Company 1280 Under CP Review Phipps Bend 1 & 2 BWR 1982 Tennessee Valley Authority 1220 With CP Pilgrim 2' PWR 1981 Boston Edison Company 1180 Under CP Review
- Pilgrim 3 PWR 1974 Boston Edison Company 1180 under CPReview
.o Ouanicassee1 & 2 PWR 1974 Consumers Power Company 1150 Under CP Review River Bend 2 BWR 1984 Gut! States Utilities Company 934 With CP Seabrook2 PWR 1988 Public Service Co.of New Hampshire 1198 With CP o
Shearon Harris 2 -
PWR 1983 o
<i b
Carolina Power & Light Company 900 With CP
[').
b&J i
L 96 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l
4
Appendix C, Canceled U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reesters(Continued)
I
(
)
Canceled k/
Unit Con Type Dale Utility MWe Per Unit Stelve Shearon Harris 3 & 4 PWR 1981 Carolina Power & Light Company 900 With CP Skagit/Handtd1 & 2 PWR 1983 Puget Sount Power & Light Company 1277 Under CP Review Sterling -
PWR 1980 Rochester Gas & Electric Corporation 1150 With CP Summit 1 & 2 HTG 1975 Delmarva Peer & Light Company 1200 Under CP Review Sundesert1 & 2 PWR 1978 San Diego Gas & Electric Company 974 Under CP Review Surry 3 & 4 PWR 1977 t
Virginia Electric & Power Company BB2 WMCP Tyrone 1 PWR 1981 Northern States Power Company 1150 Under CP Review (3'
[
Tyrone2 PWR 1974
/-
Northem States Power Company 1150 With CP Vogtle 3 & 4 PWR 1974 Georgia Power Company 1113 With CP Washington Nuclear 4 PWR 1982 Washington Public Power Supply System 121B With CP Washington Nuclear 5 PWR 1982 Washington Public Pvwer Supply System 1242 Witn CP Yellow Creek 1 & 2 BWR 1984 TennesseeValleyAuthority 1285 With CP Zimmer1' BWR 1984 CincinnatiGas & Electric Company 810 With CP Note Cancelation is defined as public announcement of cancelation or written notification to NRC.
Only docketed applications are irdicated.
Sourm: DOE /EIA Commercial Nuclear Power 1990 (DOE 41A-0438 (90)) and Nuclear Regulatory Commission l
1992 INFORMATION DIGE8T 97 l
Appendix D
[')
U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors by Licensee Utility Unit M20na Public Service Company Palo Verde 1,2, & 3 Baltimore Gas & Electric Company Calvert Cliffs 1 & 2 Bostor, Edison Company Pilgrim 1 Carolina Power & Light Company Brunswick 1 & 2 Carclina Power & Light Company H. B. Robinson 2 Carolina Power & Light Company Shearon Harris 1 Cleveland Electric illuminating Company Perry 1 & 2 Commonwealth Edison Company Braidwood 1 & 2 Corrmonwealth Ed: son Company Byron 1 & 2 Commonwealth Edison Company Dresden 2 & 3 Commonwea!!h Edison Company la Salle Coun41 & 2 Commonwalth Edison Company Quad Cities 1 & 2 Commonwealth Edison Company Zion 1 & 2 Consolidated Edison Company indian Point 2 Consumers Power Company Big Rock Point Consumers Power Company Palisades
(
)
CT Yankee Atomic Power Company HaddamNeck
'V Detroit Edison Company Fermi 2 Duke Power Company Catawba 1 f. 2 Duke Power Company McGuire1f 2 Duke Power Company Oconee 1,213 Duquesne Light Company Beaver Valley 1 & 2 Entergy Operations, incorporated Arkansas Nuclw 1 & 2 Entergy 0perations Incorporated Waterford 3 Entergy Operations, incorporated Grand Gulf 1 florida Po,wr Corporation CrystalRiver 3 Florida Power & Light Company St. Lucie ' & 2 florida Power & Ught Company Turkey Foint 3 & 4 Georgia Powt:r Company Edwin L Hatch 1 & 2 Georgia Power Company Vogtle 1 & 2 GPU Nuclear Corporation Oyster Creek -
GPU Nuclear Corporation Three MileIsland 1 Gulf States Utilities Company River Bend 1 Houston Lighting & Power Company SouthTexas Project 1 & 2 Slinois Power Company Clinton Indiana / Michigan Power Company D. C. Cook 1 & 2 (y
\\ J 1
l 98 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l
- l Appendix D. U.8, Ceausercial neclear Power Reesters by useasse (Continued) t f')%
Utility Unit
's_.
lowa Eltetric Ught & Power Company Duane Amold Maine Yankee Atomic Power Company Maine Yankee Nebraska Public Power Distuct Cooper Niagara Mnhawk Power Corporation Nine Mile Point 1 & 2 Northeast Nuclear Energy Company Millstone 1,2, & 3 Northern States Power Company Monticello Northern States Power Company PrairieIsland1 & 2 Omaha Public Power District Fort Calhoun Pacific Gas & Ebetric Company Diablo Canyon 1 & 2 Pennsylvania Power & Ught Company Susquehanna 1 & 2 F
Philadelphia Electric Company Umerick 1 & 2 Philadelphia Electric Company Peach Bottom 2 & 3 Portland GeneralElectric Company Trojan Power Authority of te State of New York Indian Point 3 Power Authority ef he State of New York James A FitzPatrick Public Service Company of New Hampshire Seabrook 1 Public Service Electric & Gas Company Hope Creek 1 Public Senice EWric & Gas Company Salem 1 & 2 Rochester Gas & Electric Corporation Ginna South Carolina Electric & Gas Company Summer Southern Chhfornia Edison Co.&
-(d San Diego Gas & Electric Company San Onofre 1,2, & 3 Southern Nuclear Operating Company Joseph M. Farley1 & 2 TennesseeValleyAuthority Deliefonte 1 & 2 TennesseeValleyAuthority Browns Ferry 1,2, & 3 Tennessee Valley Authority Sequoyah1 & 2 TennesseeValleyAuthr?,f
- Watts Bar1 & 2 Texas Utilities Electric Company Comanche Peak 1 & 2 Toledo Edison Company Davis-Becse Union Ehetric Company Callaway.
' VT Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation Vermont Yankee Virginia Electric & Power Company North Anna 1 & 2 Virginia Electric & Power Company
. Surry 1 & 2 Washington Public Power Supply System Washingtor Nuclear 1,2, & 3 Wisconsin Electric Power Company Point Beach 1 & 2.
Wisconsin Public Service Company Kewaunee Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation Wolf Creek 1
. Yankee Atomic Electric Company Yankee-Rowe Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
_[O 1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 99
Appendix E g)
U.S. Nuclear Nonpower Reactors L
uc.ni..
R..cierTyp.
uc.ni.Typ.
Lic.ni.
Loc.tlon OL lisued Dock.t Numb r Numbr Aerotest Triga(W.)
OL R 98 San Ramon, CA 07/02/1965 50-228 takansas Tech University Tritti Russellville, AR CP 4 plication Under Review by NRC Armed Forces Radiobiology ResearchInstitute Triga OL R84 Bethesda, MD 06/26/1962 50-170 ComellUniversity Zero Power OL R 89 ithaca, NY 12/11/1962 S 97 Cornell University Triga Mark 11 OL R-80 Ithaca, NY 01/11/1962 50 157 Dow ChemicalCompany Triga OL R-108 Midland, MI 07/03/1967 50 264
/~')
General Atomics Marki Triga Marki OL R-38
( )
San Diego,CA 05/03/1953 50-89 General Atomics Mark F Triga Mark F OL R-67 San Diego,CA 07/01/1960 S163 GeneralElectric Nuclear Test OL R-33 Pleasanton, CA 1W31/1957 50-73 Georgialastitute of Technology HeavyWater OL R-97 Atlanta,GA 12/29/19fA 50 160 idaho State Universi:y AGN-201 #103 OL R-110 Pocatello,ID 1W11/1967 50-284 lowa State University UTR-10 OL R 59 Ames,IA 10/16/1959 S116 Kansas State University Triga OL R-88 Manhattan, KS 10/16/1962 50 188 Manhfan College Tank OL R94 Bro,v, NY 03/24/1964 50-199 MassachusettsInstitute of (3
Technology HWR Reflected OL R-37 y1_-
Cambridge,MA 06/09/1958 S 20 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 100
Appendix E. U.S. Nuclear Nonpower Reactors (Continued)
.fs Licensee Reector Type License Type License
(
)
location OLissued Dockel Number Number
'O Nationalinstitute of Standards & Technology Nuclear Test OL TR 5 Gaithersbutg. MD OW3W1970 50-164 North Carolina State University Puistar OL R-120 Raleigh. NC 08/25/1972 5297 Ohio State University Pool OL R-75 Columbus.0H 0244/1961.
50 150 Oregon State University Triga Mark 11 OL R-106 Corvallis, OR 03/07/1967 S243 Pennsylvania State University Triga OL R-2 University Park PA 07/0 #1955 S5 Purdue University Lockheed OL R-87 West Lafayette,IN 08/16/1962 S182 Reed College Triga Marki OL R 112 Portland. 0R 07/02/1968 50 288 O
Rensselaer Polytechnic i
)
Institute Critical Assembly OL CX 22 Troy,NY 07/03/1964 5225 RhodeIsland Atomic Energy Carnmission GE Pool OL R-95 Narragansett.Rl 0741/1964 50-193 State Universityof New York (Buna!o)
Pulstar OL R 77 Buttalo,NY 0344/1961 S 57 Texas A&M University AGN-201M #106 OL R 23 College Station.1X 082 6/1957 B59 Texas A3M University Triga OL
<i-128 College Station,TX 12/07A961 50 128 U.S. GeologicalSurvey Triga Marki OL R 113 Denver,C0 02R4/1969 50-274 UniversityofArizona Triga Marki OL R-52 Tucson,AZ 12/05/1958 50-113 University of California /
Irvine Triga Marki OL R 116 i p Irvine.CA 1144/1969 50-326 (Continued) l 1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 101 lb
1 I
Ay]-
Licensee Rgacter Type License Type License Location -
OLlassed Docta! Number Number liniversityof Florida Argonaut OL R56 Gainesvi!Ie,FL 05/21/1959 50 83 UniversityofIllinois Triga OL R-115 Urbana,IL 07/22/1969 50-151 University ofIllinois Lopra OL R 117 Urbana,IL 12/27/1971 50-356 University of Lowell GE Pool OL R 125 Lowell, MA 12,74/1il74 50-223 Universityof Maryland Triga OL R70 College Park, MD 10/14/1960 50-166 University of Michigan Pool OL R 28 Ann Arbor, MI 09/13/1957 50-2 Universityof Missourl/Rolla Pool OL R-79 Rolla, MO 11/21/1961 50-123 University of Missouri /
. Columbia Tank OL R-103
(]
Columbia, MO 10/11/1966 3166 d
Universityof New Mexico AGN-201M #112 OL R 102
' Albuquerque, NM 09/17/1966 50-252 Universityof Texas Triga Mark 11 OL R-92 Austin,TX 01/17/1992 50-602 University of UtaNTriga Triga MarkI OL-R 126 Salt Lake City,UT 09/30/1975 50-407 -
Unive:sityofVirgina Pool OL R-66 Charlottesville,VA
' 06/27/1960 50-62 University of Washington
- Argonaut OL R Seattle,WA 03/31/1961 54139 University 01Wiscon.:in -
Triga OL R-74 Madison,WI 11/23/1960 50 156 VeteransAdministration Triga OL R-57 Omaha, NE -
06/26/1959
. 50 131 l
Washington State University Triga OL R-76 Pullman,WA 03/06/1961 50-27
/
\\
(
)..
yJ
-102 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
h r
Appendix E. U.S. Nuclear Nonpower Reactors (Continued) i l
/~
'(
Licensee Reactor Type License Type License Location OLissued Dockel Number Number Worcester Po!ytedinicInstitute GE OL R-61
[
Worcester, MA -
12/16M959 50-134 i
I r
t U
t L.
u
- The NRC is currently reviewing application to decommission facility.
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
! n v
1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 103
.-... = -..... -.
.z.--_,.-.-.--..-
Appendix F f"
(
)
World List of Nuclear Power Reactors s J Under Construction in Operation Or On Order Total Number Number Number Country of Units Net MWs of Units Not MWe of Units Net MWe A,pentina 2
935 1
692 3
1,627 Belgium 7
5.484 0
0 7
5,484 Brazil 1
626 2
2,458 3
3,084 Bulgaria 6
3,538 2
1,906 8
5,444 Canada 19 12,799 3
2,643 22 15.442 China 0
0 3
2.100 3
2,100 Cuba 0
0 2
834 2
834 Czechoslovakia 8
3.264 6
3,340 14 6,604 finland 4
2,310 0
0 4
2,;10 france 55 55,608 6
8,205 61 63,813 Germany 21 22,408 0
0 21 22,4'38 Hungaty 4
1,695 0
0 4
i 595 India 7
1,394 9
2,480 16 3,874 Janan 42 31,994 13 12.495 55 44,489
/
Kazakhstan 1
135 0
0 1
135
~ U')
Korea 9
7,220 5
4.463 14 11,683 Lithuania 2
2,700 0
0 2
2,760 Mexico 1
654 1
654 2
1,308 Netherlands 2
507 0
0 2
507 Pakistan 1
125 1
300 2
425 Philippines 0
0 1
620 1
620 Romania 0
0 5
3,100 5
3.100 Russia 24 17,751 16 14.575 40 32.326 South Africa 2
1,840 0
0 2
1,840 Spain 9
7,071 6
5,747 15 12,818 Sweden 12 9,907 0
0 12 9,907 Switzerland 5
2,936 0
0 5
2,936 Tainn, China 6-4,884 0
0 6
4,834 -
Ukraine 15 13,020 6-5,700 21 18,720 United Kingdom 37 11,934 1
1,188 38 13,122 USA-III 99,673 8
9,634 119 109,307 Yugoslavia 1
620 0
0 1
620 Total 414 323,092 97 83,134 511 406,226 Note: Operable, under construction, or on order (30 MWe and over) as o! 12/31/91, f.s)_
Source Nuclear News (2/92) I v
1 04 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
4 Appendix G x
N V
Nuclear Power Units by Reactor Type, Worldwide in Operation Total Number Number Reactor Type of Units NetMWe of Units NotMWs Pressurized light-water rea: tors 238 206,877 298 263.981 Boilinglight water reactors 88 71.908 100 83.705 1
Gas-cooled readors,allvarieties 39 12.807 39 12,807 Heavy water readors,allvarieties 29 15.710 48 25.288 Graphite-moderated light-water readors 16 14.612 17 15.537 Liquid metalfast-breeder readors 4
1,178 9
4.908 Total 414 323,092 511 406,226 0
- N Note: Operable, under construdion, or on order (30 MWe and over) as of 12/31/91.
'tl\\Y Source: Nuclear News (2B2) 1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 105
Appendix H y
Top 50 Units by Capacity Factor, Worldwide i
I 1991 V
Gross Capacity 1991 Reactor Factor Gross Country Unit Type Vendor (Percent)
Generation U.S.
St. Lucie 2 PWR COMB 101.33 7829 U.Sl Callaway PWR WEST 100.09 10452 Canada Pickering 6 HWR AECL 99.75 4719 Japan Fukushima 1 5 BWR TOSH 99.56 6838 Canada Pickering 8 HWR AECL 99.23 4694 Japan Kashiwazaki Kariwa1 BWR TOSH 97.82 9426 Canada Point Lepreau HWR AECL 97.66 5818 Japan Fukushima 1 4 BWR HIT 97.61 6703 U.S.
North Anna 2 PWP WEST 97.37 8078 U.S.
Oconee 2 PWR B&W 97.23 7759 U.S.
Prairie Island 2 PWR WEST 96.61 4739 U.S.
Susquehanna 1 BWR GE 96.16 9140 U.S.
Surry 1 PWR WEST 96.12 6938 Spain Garona BWR GE 95.63 3854 Spain Almcraz 1 PWR WEST 95.60 7783 Canada Pickering 7 HWR AECL 95.06 4497 p)
Finland Olkiluoto 1 BWR ASEA 94.70 6097 (v
Japan Tsuruga 2 PWR MHI 94.39 9592 Germany Emsland PWR KWU 94.15 10837 Japan Ikata 1 PWR MHI 93.35 4628 U.S.
Sequoyah 2 PWR WEST 93.31 9670 Canada Bruce 6 HWR AECL 93.24 7474 U.S.
Joseph M. Farley 2 PWR WEST 92.82 7090 U.S.
San Onofre 3 PWR COMB 92.66 9148 Finland Olkiluoto 2 BWR ASEA 92.40 5949 Canada Bruce 8 HWR AECL 92.29 7398 U.S.
McGuire 2 PWR WEST 92.27 9902
' Argentina Atucha HWR KWU 92.04 2634 U.S.
Vogtle 2 PWR WEST
-92.00 9349
-U.S.
Beaver Valley 2 PWR WEST 91.76 7138 SouthKorea Ulchin1 PWR KWU '
91.72 7633 U.S.
La Salle County 2 BWR GE-91.63 9006 France-Chinon B3 PWR FRAM 91.46 7403 U.S.
Vermont Yankee BWR GE 91.17 4313 SouthKorea Wolsung1 HWR AECL 91.11 5417 Germany Grafenrheinfeld PWR KWU 90.26 10279 Hungary Paks 2 PWR AEE 90.11 3631 v
106 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
Appendix H. Top 50 Units by Capacity Factor,CorWwkle (Continued)
!,3) 1991
(
Gross Capacity 1991 Reactor Factor Gross Country Unit Type Vendor (Percent)
Generation Canada Bruce 5 HWR
- AECL, 90.02 7216 SouthKorea Kori1 PWR WEST 89.88 4622 U.S.
Byron 2 PWR WEST 89.55 9217 Britain Hunterston B 2 GCR TNPG 89.21 5143 Sweden Barsebaeck 2 BWR ASEA 89.16 4804 Finland Loviisa 2 PWR AEE 89.16 3632 i
. Switzerland Goesge.1 PWR KWU 89.13 7573 B31gium Doell PWR ACECOWEN 89.03-3213 U.S.
Duane Amold BWR GE 88.99 4412 t
Germany Isar1 BWR KWU 88.87 7051
. Sweden Forsmark 1 BWR ASEA 88.43 7785 Sweden Oskarshamn 3 BWR ASEA 88.33 9324 Hungary Paks 4 PWR
-AEE 88.16 3553
%j i
Source: Excerpted from Nucleonics Week @ 1992 by McGraw-Hill, Inc. Reproduced by n
permission; Further reproduction prohibited.
1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 107
~.
~
Appendixi o
Top 50 Units by Generation, Worldwide
(,)
1991 Gross 1991 Capacity Reactor Gross Factor Country Unit Type Vendor Generation (Percent)
Germany Emsland PWR KWU 10837 94.15 Germany -
Gronnde PWR KWU 10518 86.13 U.S.
Callaway PWR WEST 10452 100.09 Germany Philippsburg 2 PWR KWU 10415 88.07 Germany Isar 2 PWR KWU 10314 84,10 Germany Grafenrheinfeld PWR KWU 10279 90.26 France Cattenom 3 PWR FRAM 10182 85.34 Germany Neckar 2 PWR KWU 10143 88.12 Germany Brokdorf PWR KWU 9988 81.73 France Palvel 3 PWR FRAM 9978 84.68 France Golfech 1 PWR FRAM 9960 83.42 U.S.
McGuire 2 PWR WEST 9902 92.27 U.S.
Palo Verde 1 PWR COMB 9876 86.26 U.S.
Sequoyah 2 PWR WEST 9670 93.31 Japan Tsuruga 2 PWR MHI 9592 94.39 U.S.
Grand Gulf 1 BWR GE 9507 83.10
/\\v)
Japan KasNwazaki Kariwa1 BWR TOSH 9426 97.82 U.S.
Vogtle 2 PWR WEST 9349 92.00 Sweden Oskarshamn 3 BWR ASEA 9324 88.33 U.S.
Byron 2 PWR WEST 9217 89.55 U.S.
San Onofre 3 PWR COMB 9148 92.66 U.S.
Susquehanna 1 BWR GE 9140 96.16 France Belleville 1 PWR FRAM 9027 77.48 U.S.
La Salle County 2 BWR GE 9006 91.63 Sweden-Forsmark 3 BWR ASEA 8998 86.17 France Penly 1 PWR FRAM 8818-72.84 U.S.
Palo Verde 2 PWR COMB 8779 76.67 Fiance Paluel4 PWR FRAM 8689 73.75 France Nogent 2 PWR FRAM 8687 74.56 Germany Gundremmingen C BWR KWU-8578 74.75 U.S.
D.C. Cook 2 PWR WEST 8481 85.45 Germany -
Gundremmingen B BWR KWU 8472 73.83 U.S.
Limerick 1-BWR GE 8455 84.67 France Flamanville 2 PWR FRAM 8315' 70.57 France St. Alban/St. Maurice 2 PWR FRAM 8297 70.26 France St. Alban/St. Maurice 1 PWR FRAM 8290 70.20 108 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION L
Wndix 1. Top 50 Units by Generation,Clorldwkle (ConMued) f 5-id 1991 Gross 1991 Capacity Reactor Gross Facto:
Country Unit Type Vendor Generation (Percent)
France Belleville 2 PWR FRAM 8216 70.52 BWR KWU 8112 70.37 Germany Kruemmel PWR WEST 8100 79.44.
U.S.
Diablo Canyon 2 U.S.
North Anna 2 PWR WEST 8078 97.37 Belgium Tihange 3 PWR ACECOWEN 8043 85.81 Japan Fukushima 113 BWR TOSH 8033 83.37 -
U.S.
Palo Verde 3 PWR COMB 8010 69.96 U.S.
Salem 2 PWR WEST 7995 78.01 France Cattenom 2 PWR FRAM 7962 68.39 U.S.
Vogtle 1 PWR WEST 7878 77.53 Belgium Doel4 PWR ACECOWEN 7851 85.44 U.S.
St. Lucie 2 PWR COMB 7829 101.33 Spain Almaraz 1 PWR WEST 7789 95.60 r.
Source: Excerpted from Nucleonics Week @ 1992 by McGrt.w Hill,Inc. Reproduced by
[
. permission. Further reproduction prohibited.
A 1992 INFORMATION DIGEST 109-yy.
,-7.
y%y,-
gw*wyy y
.+
y.
myy-v.--e--y-,5-+
y
r-U GLOSSARY AGREEMENT STATE: A State that has signed an agreement with the NRC allowing the State to regulate the use of radioactive material within that State.
BOILING-WATER REACTOR (BWR): A nuclear reactor in which water, used as both coolant and moderator, is allowed to boil in the core.
CAPABILITY: The maximum load that a generating station can carry under specified conditions for a given period of time without exceeding approved limits of temperature and stress. Net summer capability is used in this report.
Measured in watts.
CAPACITY FACTOR (Gross): The ratio of the gross electricity generated, for the period of time considered, to the energy that could have been generated at continuous full power operation during the same period.
CAPACITY FACTOR (Net): The ratio of the net electricity generated, for the period of time considered, to the energy that could have been generated at continuous full power operation during the same period.
g'j COMPACE A group of two or more States formed to dispose of low level 1
radioactive waste on a regional basis. Forty-two States have formed nine compacts.
CONSTRUCTION RECAPTURE: The maximum number of years that could bc added to the license expiration date to recover the period from the construction permit to the date when the operating license was granted. A licensee is required to submit an application for such a change.
GENERATION (Gross): The total amount of electric energy produced by a generating station as measured at the generator termi,1als. Measured in watthours.
GENERATION (Net): The gross amount of electric energy produced less the electric energy consumed at a generating station for station use. Measured in watthours.
GENERATION EXPENSE: Ge,1eration expenses include costs associated both with production expenses (operation, maintenance and fuel costs) and with capital expenses (taxes, depreciation, interest, return on equity, etc.).
Generation expenses comprise the total cost of producing electricity that is the
(,)
basis for rates charged to electric utility customers. Production expenses are variable costs that a utility has some short-term control over and may vary 110 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
dWpe+
)
according to the amount of electricity generated in a year. Capital expenses are
'd generally fixed charges that are amortized over a facility's life and must be paid whether or not a facility operates.
GIGAWATT: One billion watts.
GIGAWATTHOUR : One billion watthours.
HIGH LEVEL WASTE: High level radioactive waste (HLW) means (I) irradiated (spent) reactor fuel; (2) liquid waste resulting from the operation of the first cycle solvent extraction system, and the concentrated wastes from subsequent extraction cycles, in a facility for reprocessing irradiated reactor fuel, and (3) solids into which such liquid wastes have been converted. HLW is primarily in the form of spent fuel discharged from commercial nuclear power rear, tors; it also includes some reprocessed HLW from defense activities, and a small quantity of reprocessed commercial HLW.
LOW LEVEL WASTE: Low-level radioactive waste is a general term or a wide range of wastes. Industries; hospitals and medical, educational, or r search q
institutions; private or government laboratories; and nuclear fuel cycle facilities Q'
(e.g., nuclear power reactors and fuel fabrication plants) using radioactive mater >ls generate low-level wastes as part of their normal operations. These wastes are generated in many physical and chemical forms and levels of contamination.
MAJOR INVESTOR-OWNED ELECTRIC UTILITY: An investor cwned electric utility that has had in the last three consecutive calendar years sales of electricity or transmission service that exceed at least one of the following: (1) 1 million megawatthours of total annual sales of electricity, (2)_100 megawattbours of annual sales of electricity for resale, (3) 500 megawatt 5ours of annual gross exchange of electricity between utilities, or (4) Sr)0 megawatthours of whi.sling for others (deliveries plus losses). Investor-owned electric utilities account for about 75 percent of total generation in the United States.
MAXIMUM DEPENDABLE CAPACITY (Gross): Dependable main unit gross
- capacity, winter or summer, whichever is smaller. The dependable capacity varies because the unit efficiency varies during the year due to cooling water b
temperature. variations. It is the gross electrical output as measured at the output terminals of the turbine generator during the most restrictive seasonal conditions (usually summer). Measured in watts, f'h O
MAXIMUM DEPENDABLE CAPACITY (Net): Gross maximum dependable capacity less the normal station service loads. Measured in watts.
1992lNFORMATION DIGEST 111
O'V MEGAWATT (MW): One million watts.
MEGAWATTHOUR (MWh): One million watthours.
NET SUMMER CAPABILITY: The steady hourly output, that generating equipment is expected to supply to system load exclusive of auxiliary power, as demonstrated by tests at the time of summer peak demand. Measured in watts.
~
PRESSURIZED-WATER REACTOR (PWR): A n ; tear reactor in which heat is transferred from the core to a heat exchanger via water kept under high pressure without boiling the water.
PRODUCTION EXPENSE: Production expenses are a component of generation expenses that includes costs associated with operation, maintenance, and fuel.
RADIOACTIVITY: The rate at which radioactive material emits radiation.
Measured in units of becquerels or disintegrations per second.
A SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL: Fuel that has been removed from a nuclear reactor V
because it can no longer sustain power production for economic or other reasons.
URANIUM FUEL FABRICATION FACILITY: A facility that (1) manufactures reactor fuel containing uranium for any of the following: (i) preparation of fuel materials; (ii) formation of fuel materials into desired shapes; (iii) application of protective cladding; (iv) recovery of scrap rnaterial; and (v) storage associated with such operations; or (2) conducts research and development activities.
URANIUM HEXAFLUORIDE PRODUCTION FACILITY: A facility that receives natural uranium in the form of ore concentrate; enriches it, either by gaseous diffusion or gas centrifuge methods; and converts it into uranium hexafluoride.
WATT: The electrical unit of power. The rate of energy transfer equivalent to I ampere flowing under a pressure _of I volt at unity power factor.
WATTHOUR: An electrical energy unit of measure equal to 1 watt of power supplied to, or taken'from, an electrical circuit steadily for 1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br />.
c WHEELING SERVICE: The movement of electricity from one system to another over transmission facilities of intervening systems, Wheeling service contracts can be established between two or more systems.
112 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
+
+,,3,,-m-e, e
aM A
a m,--m--
m e.
_a-a m
-m,awas-4m G:
O
+
/
.. q N
a ISBN 0-16-036196-6
^
90000 I
~
9 780160 36'968
7 J
5 g'
I
.. - ', f
.f 1 h. '..,.-
^
1,
' f.
-,n'.-
~i, - -.' -, s 4. '. ".7 7, '..' t g., -..,,n
.. f.-.
g g, ' g
- 1. -(
i ; *
,.g'..
,l,.
9.,
sy a 3
g '.
d.
j -. '.,, '
f.
e s - -
tr 4.. i A
.-s 2.
3-
.y;
. -. s.
- e..
.. y.s
- ~
s, a
o
..,.... - i
.a
- .,,...t.
,. gs
..v.
L 4n.
~ -
, g,.,
e T
- ' ^...
+
e * '
..e-g, s--
,.1 1.
.d 9 *, *-,, -
- p. ' '.,.,
t' '
- o.-
a,
.r
[ *) :....
..'..... ; 6.
.y
- ?. h....,;
... y......
'. './ ? '
' n
_r,
1.?.'
5 i.j f
?
. g
,f -
4 9
'I' a
,..p 7'
' " J' 4 f ; [.
y 7
+..
- ..(
- .
' ',i, 5,.
I
'e 1
), g.
<.3. *..
]f. hc 1
_w
...'s
- ) -
a
/
1;
[
y Y. ' '
';,.1
. - I..,.
j
- 1. * '
kg
[,.
. L ; [.
.A
. '. ',;,., 3..
- a,,.. -
n.;
,'.'s
.:. e...
g'-.._ - '.,? * "
, c
- *. +
_.~ :
{,.,,
1
- ,\\
h
%.e
... =
.g
,,3
. g
,3..,,, '., ',.'...
...... g
....., ' [g g
g
.l
,[
+
.'e
.a g
' [,
,k l,'
11.,
. '. '. - ]. /
1 l-
. g- } j,
u, e-
~
l
, =
a j'[//
,g',..
4 e
+
d v e,L
- t
- y is.,
,,.. if,
, ;[
_ -[
l
- ,
- *,..+
4p
~
q
+-
L',y%. ' '.-
.P.
.-..A....
2,.
. s.
v*
'. ll.
l',.
.p.'
i- -
...,,.,...y 1, y '
a
...,.. ').y y.
. 'e
- .., l } ;;, c.
(
,,g.'.
- f.. -. *;;- '
...y g,,
.,, j.
. ' t%
n
+
r..
e *.
',,.a'
- n n.
e.
_,s y i. ;.
,p
, ~
.a ' g?.\\*.. ' '...J,+"'
?..,
,jc. ;. '.h> >-
ag v
, 1.
a g ).d.' ?.,. 3 6.q.. y.w..
M-
,,,g.
- P.
.. ~,-.
.. -.' f,
5 r
'I e
\\',,
,..,.. * 'w h*
T# ".
.(.,.-...
~....
- g.....,
g...., _.. ; - - r..
.:.. ?.
4 -
t 8
s e.
. g.,
y.,..r.
em
' ' ' ', +
p:.
I.,
- \\
l' u
, g -
3
,,/
- - ' :).
t '.
.v
.,8
,I
( *.,
,9
'.q. v..
,, ' ) '
d a
t j.
4 r.
c.
L )
- '> .v.
'~ -.
- ~,., -... -
e'
'4 c
- g.... *. _
m.
- ',.. ig
,s;. 2.**
3,*p w'*
. \\
. %,,y
'g
,. *. +,
',..,4, g;
7
_ - i-
- c. t...
s
., M r
-.*,.:.A.
6,,
e.
ph ~ '
",I..,',..$,,,
. t...c'...s h'. ).[ [.,.'
'aj
- 'J i
i',.,, y.l*-
'*'s 3,'Lp '<
'}. ;.. ? i,,
4
.s.
g
.$.b
- +,. -
.y
' i
- ,.. *.,,o.
s'..
-'q: ~ 5.,,,
o,. f.
- f. '; '., ',.,
, i.3
,- ;, -.. :,..,u
,'g f. l 0,'....
31-g'...
,J
'- =,,.,...., i
..i
. : 7:.
c-u
- ..~,.
g
~ h
.. i ': ; 4... m.sw v... '.~.....' '
...u. 7).; ;
6
.[,
(
' :. n. 4.y u x 2
y s*
1.
$.. k>... ?,' ' '.. c
.v
.'. ;;.: ~.. :
. [. f.- 4'..
+
.n. '
.C.a
~.,ev.,..,,*..'t
. l a.
u ',;,;. '... a '. ' *. '
isp.
. j-h,' ' k l[kO/O. 4 ['.5...h.~.s z '[; 3.$.
. * *I' #
'. k
, y, : 7 'y ' ' y ^ 4
':... ' i;
,d p
.. ' '..,,,f.....,
)
,a T
y.l.
- l:'-
f.;.,',9..'-
i 0.q.Y. 3 jf.c c;;... s pb,
, o
,'. ;,.X):L,-f j :~;f f. e
..~
+
._ &.;,) -)s.
..J _ ? ;? ; 3. A.jh,'..f W: j% G '( 4 l7 -,.
-lll...[', '.2
- s. [
s: '$~. a. % 3_'.l.L
..g O.
,; Q '..y a:. ) )>.,. y:.. y. '.?..)* 9, '...1.....
w e.
r.
'.+
a
. ' < ;.......;u '...;. i. ".' *a:.*, J.,
- i. f y :;..,A q '.
.l I,
. 3),....
og.-
8 t...j,.
,.:j 4
. p :,
_R y :. [ku].
,,. 3 (:k.,.::. <.,y:O.;@f,..?. ;, s-y;,,L b y f g}g_:i ;;;y,3
.s 5.%
^
p1
,e
.a 4
ys
.m mm u m.[m. ]: :p '
[ n; ':.q
. :. ':ml &% \\ {. m; y.f:Q,Q,;.?!L-y W f.
.i fif Q M n
.V
'.kM Q;Qg..'gb g y.:] j3 yy'p;jy~;>.,
.. 3...jf ' l y;
.. : :.... j
- 4..
'$ f & }lh:{lk; f f f 'h l.) $ )a
,,,.. nv
..c a,.
.c m
~
r Q,&)
}.::l -
.l. _js.f'_{,hf &. f..w.h. c' a
.w..
w
.n
- .y.f.3, i..;. g fs.
. ~,p g.<j vi:ft. n._ j..n p-
^~ ~.
~
.b.,
~
5.
=. -.
.. ; ;..,. s....p: &y f.4..J ). y-ln7.<'.+*
4
.s a
..n vms.
- .,...~ s s.
- [ '. *,'.
n.....
f,y[r } '
.p J '
- ,'1
{, ' ;
.s,
.,.'g.
.;/,,
, *[.. j '.,.
rl:
.R t 4 a
, kW: ; %;. 4.:k@h;.%,%Wl}h% f:n. n :.% '.?
M Q<.QWM< 'x o '
d My i
4
. p. n.
c.. n.
.y:. /.y+.. ;. 5, L.;t. !. : '
.y, '.,
.P - 9.. _, m,;;;, x. :. i '.. ' ^.. i ' ' s m
~
.t (., L :'. :
y,%
,:3.,t v m
c
- n.~..
3 '.' y, -Q y ' x g r <u.,v., y, !.
Y'
. ;c
~,,;
-o
.o 'm
.' ', s : -
.c.
- 4
- )
c'.
-..,e s...,a.
ey r
.(.- '..m-
,;.,n..,..
1 a
w :. n '.
-v *1;:L% c.,.
e
.n J> [.. m.., s.v.
, Yo....!
. y !, ).. y'[', _ a,' : i. *.t
.:.....f.~ ,...q,.',e':'
r s;
- :,~.
- 2. n t-s..
s
._._,..y
'.L; 'r y,. :. 1.
. 8. '.,,..y, ;1 ;,y z" -
L
- ,?
n.-
..n..
>. :' r r.
.y
?
o.3 e
l y ;, f,.[ ;, [. [.:,'i;..;nf.;. jo;f.f. ;
7.}. y. y <-
4*,.
- l. f.,'..Qf 4 'a
..yy }.}.. ' tg,.y y.).... <}.
j.(. 2,,.j p., p. :[
wgy};,
,g l; _
,( p l ' ",' ;.; "
..-. ; y. ; ('
',f
't i
y
-;.c
.