ML20095K916

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Revised Emergency Response Guideline Generic Plant Comparison
ML20095K916
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 08/15/1984
From: Terrel N
TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC)
To:
Shared Package
ML20095K894 List:
References
TASK-1.C.1, TASK-1.C.8, TASK-TM NUDOCS 8408300085
Download: ML20095K916 (17)


Text

.

COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION EMERGENCY RESPONSE GUIDELINE GENERIC PLANT COMPARISON .

FORINFORMATION ONLYCs. i GENERIC PLANT COMPARISON REVISION DATE A"rast 1% 1984 4

e t

4 SUBMITTED BY (hn _I.O h kk JU..' '.' TITLE [no,i W eM DATE 8/ /O!M 'l-REVIEWED BY CM/t 0 0'L'u ENGINEER DATE 2O!bh I APPROVED BY -r /[ DATE NA ' /G- 9 p (/ WPERATIONS ENGINEER 8408300005 840824 DR ADOCK 05000 '

ODA-204-5 4 .. t

. - , . .,, - - , - e,- . , - . . - - - - ~ . -- - - - - - - . --.,.,--,,-,-,,r.. - - - . - - - - . - - - , .

Generic Plant Comparison to CPSES System CPSES differences Justification Completed RCS The RCS has no bypass manifold Yes p. 4 of 17. Reference FASR and untilizes N-16 detectors. p. 7.2-16 Section 7 2.1.1.h, 7.2.1.1 & 7.2.1.1.h.2.

RCS The over pressure protection Yes p. 5 of 17 Reference FSAR for RCS at low temperaturs is p. 7.6-22 Section 7 6.8.

automatically placed in service 6

ECCS CPSES design does not incor- Yes p. 6 of 17. Reference Westing-porate a BIT as.part of ECCS.' house proposal for BORON REDUCTION /

BIT REMOVAL ANALYSIS and W-letter TBX(ATP)79-325 concerning the same matter.

ECCS Charging miniflows do not re- Yes p. 7 of 17. Reference main open on an SI signal. 2323-M1-0255 & 2323-M1-2255-21.

Containment The containment-fan coolers Yes p. 8 of 17. Reference FSAR Ventilation at CPSES, are not used for Sec. 6.2.2., p. 6.2 h2.

( heat. removal purposes in emergency con,11tions.

Containment Ventilation Chill Water is the Yes p. 9 of 17. Reference FSAR Ventilation cooling supply to the Contain- Sec. 9.hA.1.1, p. 9.hA-1 &

ment Air Cooling and Recire. 2323-M1-0300.

Tans.

Main CPSES design does not utilize Yes p. 10of 17 Reference FSAR Feedwater a Motor Driven Feed Pump p. 10.h-58.

, Main The feedwater system design Yes p.11 of 17. Reference Feedwater causes slight variations in 2323-M1-2203-05, 07 & 08 the valves that are clcsed on feedvater isolation.

Auxiliary Each Motor Driven AFW pump is Yes p.12 of 17. Reference FSAR Feedvater normally aligned to feed 2 SGs p. 10.h-80.

but can be aligned to feed all b SGs.

PAGE 2 0F 17 ODA-204-5a

~

V 'p Generic Plant Comparison to CPSES System CPSES differences Justification Completed Reactor Vessel CPSES does not plan to have Yes p.13 of 17. Reference Tech Specs Level Indica- RVLIS in operation until the Table 3.3-10, p. 3/h.3-62.

tion System first refueling outage.

Containment CPSES utilizes Four Contain- Yes p. Ik of 17. Reference FSAR Spray ment Spray Pumps'for 2 trains. Sect. 6.5 2, p. 6.5-12 and 2323-M1-0232.

Containment The Containment Spray pumps Yes p.15 of lT. Reference FSAR Spray get a start signal on a SI p. 6-2-16 [23).

signal, as well as Phase "B" and Manual.

ECCS RWST level low-lov auto Yes p.16 of 17. Reference FSAR switchover to containment p. 6.3-2h [22] and 2323-M1-2263-06 sump arrangement, including auto switch over block.

BCS CPSES utilize T00# nitrogen- Yes p.17 of 17. Reference FSAE

_k- to operate their PORVs. Sec. 5.h.13.2., p. 5.h-80 and 2323-M1-0262.

PAGE 3 0F 17 ODA-204-5a

1 l

l

1. Difference Description- CPSES does not utilize a bynass line T hot and T cold measurements for the nurnose of RCS average temneratures.
2. Justification The bypass manifold arrangement has been replaced with a N-16 monitor and an in-line T cold measurement. The N-16 power monitor measures N-16 present in RCS due to r.eutron activation of oxygen con-tained in water. This is used with T cold to determine T avg . Indication for all temperatures remain the same.
3. Completed by bh hb DATE -/-6-8h

/

l The difference mentioned above does not compromise the generic technical basis for the guidelines.

bod @h / 9 'lI 74

, BNGINEER 'DATE The difference mentioned above does net. affect the overall objective of the Plant Specific ERG's

! kcM 9l 'l 84-ENGINEER ~DATE Generic Procedure

Reference:

E0P-0.0, EOS-0.1, EOS-1.1 4

Comments:

PAGE h 0F 17 l

ODA-204-5b a- --

,e ~~ ,e +v- , - , - , , , - - - - - , , - - - - - -

Jrl

-1. Difference Description The RCS overpressure' system at lov temperature

~

is automatically place in service.

2. Justification RCS lov temperature pressure control includes automatic actuaticn logic for 2 Pressurizer power operated relief valves. This actuation logic will only be unblocked when plant oepration is at a temperature below Reference Nil Dutility Temperature. This difference is an improvement over the reference plant, since no operator action is required
3. Completed by /- 'k DATE 7-6 ~8Y

/

-t The difference mentioned above does noc compromise the generic 3

technical basis for the guidelines.

bdA bd EIGINEER Sk% S4 UATL The difference mentioned above does not affect the overall objective of the Picnt. Specific ERG's G M @hsk/ T T ?4 ENGINEER DATE Generic Procedure

Reference:

NONE (N0 OPERATOR ACTION REQUIRED)

Conments:

PAGE 5 0F 17

! ODA-204-5b l I

. . . , _ ~ ._.- . ,

6,..,

r s

, 1._ .

Difference Description. The Centrifugal Charging portion of ECCS does not incorporate a Boron Injection Tank 2.' -Justification CPSES eliminated the BIT and it's associated equipment after Westinghouse completed extensive studies-in this area. CPSES design-was such that elimination .of the BIT did not lover the level of safety.' (i.e.

flow restrictors integral to SGs).

3. ' Completed by

/

/ k[/

k DATE '/-[c-dY

=

The difference mentioned above does not compromise the generic technical basis for the guidelines.

(

kMENGINEER @h/ Sf 8/8 4

'DATE y

The difference menticned above does'not affect the overall objective of.the Plant Specific ERG's bcdb.k bedhi 8

~ R) 8 4-E.NGulEER DRE t

Generic Procedure

Reference:

E0P-0.0, EOS-1.1, EOS-1.2, E0P-3.0, ECA-2.1. ECA-3.1, ECA-3.2, ECA-3.3, FRH-0.1, FRP-0.1 Comments:

1 F

PAGE 6 0F 17 f ODA-204-Sb l

g g g -m ,w e-w y my-- --,g --w--y-- w--- -+y-- ,---y+ en-+ * ,ae.m- ---- etww= r.s- * - -y M

= a.

l.. Difference Description The charging miniflow valves do not remain open on an SI at CPSES.

2.. -Justification Each CCP has a new miniflov arrangement. On an "S" signal,.

normal.miniflow valves close and valves.8511 A & B open aligning a mini-flow flovpath to a relief to 'open on high pressure. 8512 A & B are in series with 8511 A & B and are administratively kept open.- This differ-ence'is an inprovement since no operator action is required.

d

3. Completed by -

Mk DATE '7 - { ~ # N

, l The difference mentioned above does not compromise the generic technical basis for the guidelines.

Rink 6%s ein /s4 ENGINEER

-DATE The difference mentioned above does not affect the overall objective ,

of tbc Plant Specific ERG's

%tak 0%i si e Is+

ENGINEER '3 ATE Ceneric Procedure

Reference:

E0P-0.0, EOS-0.1, EOS-0.2, EOS-0.h, EOS-1.1 E0P-3.0, EOS-3.1, EOS-3.2, EOS-3.3, ECA-2.1, ECA-3.1, FRH-0.1 Comments:

f i PAGE 7 0F 17 r

ODA-204-Sb

p/

.'.~

- 1. - Difference Description Containment = Fan coolers are not used at CPSES

-for heat removal purposes following an accident.

~

e-2 .' Justification The design flovrate of each train of Containment Spray

-is sufficient to maintain the Containment pressure and temperature

.below Containment design values.

3. ~ Completed by~ .

Ed DATE 1-le -S t[

The difference mentioned above does not compromise the generic technical basis for the. guidelines.

A Lkk W%i ninins ENGINEER DATE' The difference mentioned above does not affect the overall objective of the Plant Specific ERG's hnk0.,bT.Inte/R[A/8<)

ENGINEER DATE Generic Procedure'

Reference:

E0P-0.0, ECA-0.1, ECA-0.2, ECA-1.1,.

FRZ-0.1' Comments:

PAGE 8 0F 17 ODA-204-5b

=-

ll  ;

E k

. - 1. 'DiffNrenceDescription 'The Containment Air Recirculation and- cooling y ,.

4

' System Fans utilize Ventilation Chilled-Water as their cooling medium

.. r ,

while the generic reference plant uses CCW.

.d ;

2. ~ Justification .This system is not required to operate following a DBA so th[' post accident CCW cooling is not required. It is required for E

loss'of fffsite power so it'is sequenced.on as well as the Ventilation

/ ,

Chilled Water System',: -

3. ' Completed by I

kb I DATE '7-[c - 8 k The difference mentioned above does [ot compromise the generic technical basis,for the guidelines.

. @dd @.bu/ a / s 1s+

/

ENGINEER BATl!'

The difference mentioned above does not affect the overall objective of:the Plant Specific ERG's,

@ n0m A @ laoa/ 818/84 ~

ENGINEER 'DATE GeneEic Procedure

Reference:

E0P-0.0, ECA-0.1, ECA-0.2, ECA-1.1, FRZ-0.1 Comments: ,

PAGE 9 0F '17 '

j ,

ODA-204-Sb F

(5' .,

i s

t /

a a

, , _ . - . . - . , . - . . , - - , . . . - - - , , , , , , - . . - - , , - . - ~ , , . - . - . . , - - . - . - , - , - , , . . . ~ , . - . . . - , , - - - - ~ , , , . ,

a .

.a-i 1.. Difference Description CPSES design does not incorporate a Motor

, Driven Feedvater Pump

2. Justification CPSES utilizes two 50% capacity feedvater pump. The dual admission feudvater pump turbine drivers' operate vith steam from two sources. One pump is required up to 50% power and from 50% to full power both are required. The Condensate Pumps can be used to pump

. vater at lover pressures.

3. Completed by /L b j db DATE 7-6 ff

/ -

4 g The difference mentioned above does not compromise the generic techt.ical basis for the guidelines.

GM SL' ENGINEER sle la<

- IFATE The difference mentioned above does not aff act the overall objective of the F'. ant Specific ERG's i @dd @b 8Jel84 ENGINEER DArE ~

Generic Procedure

Reference:

  • EOP-0.0, E0P-3.0, EOS-0.1, EOS-0.2, FRZ-0.1, FRH-0.5, FRH-0.1 I

N Comments:

!. ' PAGE 10 op 17 l ODA-204-Sb l .

?' -

l i

)

~_-__._.-.___.-,_._.--__-.__._,.'_I .

q

]

i

)

.'l.- -Difference Description Due to the preheater arrangement in CPSES SGs the feedvater isolation signal closes more valves than the same signal of the generic plant reference.

2. -Justification. A feedvater isolation signal closes the F.W.~Preheater Valves and F.W. Splitflow Bypass Valve in addition to the normal valves.

,.This ensures feedvater isolation to the SGs. These additional valves are ij4 checked in the steps for feedvater isolation of the emergency procedures.

3. - Completed by Ix h M/ _ ' DATE 7 SY The difference mentioned above does not compromise the generic technical basis for the guidelines.

S& @S 8]6 l8 4

-ENGINEER 'DATE The difference mentioned above does not affect the overall objective

.'of the Plant' Specific ERG's

. @M GM/8} BIB +

ENGINEER DATE Generic Procedure

Reference:

E0P-0.0, EOS-0.1, E0P-1.0, E0P-2.0, E0P-3.0. ECA-3.1, FRZ-0.1, FRH-0.3, FRH-0.2 Comments:

PAGE 11 0F 17 ODA-204-5b A \

.e. *

. we' I Y%

I

-r q

  • ~1. Difference Description The generic plant reference refers to the Motor Driven AFW pumps being lined up to 2 SGs. CPSES's Motor Driven AFW pumps'are normally lined up to'2 SGs but have the capability to be lined up to h SGs.
2. Justification A normally closed interconnection between the motor driven pump discharge lines permits either pump to feed all four SGs. .This 1

provides a method for maintaining SG water level on a long-term basis, but vill not normally be used. -This difference is an improvement over the generic.

-3. Completed by

/

b/ ~

d DATE 7-6 -8 The difference mentioned above does not compromise the generic technical basis for the guidelines.

Redlal M R1 a la 4

, ENGINEER FATE' 1

The difference mentioned above does not affect the overall objective

of the Plant Specific-ERG's 1

@A A 0% sla luE.IGINEER UATE' Generic Procedure

Reference:

E0P-0.0. E0P-3.0. EOS-0.1. EOS-0.2 J

FRZ-0.1. FRH-0.L FRH-0.1 J

4 Comments:

PAGE 12 07 17 ODA-204-5b

~

j

' l. Difference Description The Reactor Vessel Level Indication System at l CPSES will not be operational until the first refueling' outage

2. Justification The steps that. dealt with RVLIS in'the emergency procedure

~

were revised as specified in the background documentation of the ERG's to meet nlant-design at this time. When RVLIS is functional it vill be incorocrated.

'3.. ' Completed by h '[b DATE 7-6-8k

/ /

The difference mentioned ab'ove-does not compromise the generic

technical basis for the guidelines.

%5tak h/ eb h4 ENGINEER DATE The difference mentioned above does not affect the overall objective of the Plant Specific ERG's l k @b/ BfifDATEM ENGINEER Generic Procedure

Reference:

FRI-0.3, FRC-0.2, FRC-0.1, ECA-2.1, 1

ECA-3.1. ECA-3.2, ECA-3.3, EOS-0.h. EOS-1.h , EOS-3.3 . EOS-0 3 Ccaments: This sheet will be removed after first refueling when RVLIS is installed.

5 PAGE 13 op 17

, ODA-204-5b

. _ . . .. . -, . . , . . . , . . . _ . . . ~ . ..-.- - --.-.-. ._-. ,, - .. - ---

Y

1. ' Difference Description Containment Spray pumps get a start signal on a SI as well as Phase "B" and Manual signals
2. Justification The CSS discharge valves open on a "P" signal which comes from a Phase "B" or Manual actuations. Having the pump start on an SI anticipates the need of the pump if conditions become more severe.

This difference is an improvement over the reference plant.

3. Completed by wd DATE 7-[., ~ 8 Y The difference mentioned above does not compromise the generic technical basis for the guidelines.

kMDa/ 8 'l 24 EN'GINEER DATE' The difference mentioned above does not affect the overall objective of the Plant Specific ERG's RAA h/ sh i ss ENGINEER DATE Generic Procedure

Reference:

E0P-0.0. EOS-0.1. EOS-0.2, E0P-1.0, EOS-1.1, EOS-1.2, EOS-1.3, E0P-3.0, ECA-2.1, ECA-3.1 Comments:

PAGE lh 0F 17 l

l' ODA-204-5b '

l l.

). .

i l

l 1.- Difference Description The generic reference olant uses a two Contain-ment Spray Pump arrangement, while CPSES has four contaiment spray numns.

12. ~ Justification The redundancy requirements of the CSS are satisfied by dumplicating 2-100%' capacity trains, with each train having 2-50% capacity pumps.. This difference does not allow one pump failure to remove the

- capacity of one train completely.

3. Completed by b, k DATE '7-6 8 The difference mentioned above does not compromise the generic technical basis for the guidelines.

U ENGINEER O Ob8'%4 DAT3 The difference mentioned above does not affect the overall objective of the Plant Specific ERG's 6WGh INGINEER

/ 81818 4 ' DATE Generic Procedure

Reference:

E0P-0.0. E0P-1.0. EOS-1.3. ECA-2.1 ECA-9.1. FR2-0.1. ECA-0.2 Comments:

[ PAGE 15 0F 17 ODA-204-5b s gyr , ,-,,--w.#-- --7--4-7gr -y.y -p- y-=c-_+,p- ,g,--g -qs.,c.

, g-4m eyp -p-- p--pyp-~g y +--------.------.-aw yw m

/*'!

y h ,:

1. . ' Difference Description CPSES's design' includes an auto switchover of the RWST to the containment sump as RHR pump suction.

2.. Justification On an RWST low-lov level signal, coincident with an "S"

, signal, the containment sump valves'to RHR pump vill open. This arrangement is also se't up with reset-switches (independent of SI reset),

that can reset this function after SI is reset. This difference is an

-improvement over the reference plant.

3. Completed by I

__kt.k/ b DATE 9 b-OY The difference mentioned above does not compromise the generic.

technical basis for the guidelines.

ScW 0Y 8 6 84 ENGINEER DATE The difference mentioned above does not affect the overall objective of the Plant Specific ERG's M d h I h rial R A 84 2NGINEER DATE Generic Procedure

Reference:

E0P-0.0, E0P-1.0, EOS-1.1, EOS-1.2, EOS-1.3, E0P-3.0, ECA-2.1, ECA-3.1, ECA-2'..-2 Comments:

PAGE 16 0F 17 ODA-204-5b

2 4.

-1. Difference Description The Pressurizer PORV's at CPSES utilizes Nitrogen

~ gas as their pneumatic driver.

2. Justification The PRZR PORV's are pneumatic actuated vavles which respond to a signal from a pressure sensing system or to manual control as per the M-drawing, CPSES uses nitrogen as the pneumatic driver for the PORVs.

This is considered a minor difference which does not affect the plant.

- 3. Completed by di h b_ DATE 7-b-8

/ f

,i The difference mentioned above does not compromise the generic technical basis for the guidelines.

e GAAA/' ENGINEER s/s /a1 D' ATE The difference mentioned above does not affect the overall objective of the Plant Specific ERG's M @ L / 8/8/84 ENGINEER 'DATE Generic Procedure

Reference:

E0P-0.0; EOS-0.1. EOS-0.2. EOS-0.14

.EOP-1.0, EOS-1.1, EOS-1.2, E0P-?_.0, EOS-3.1. EOS-3.2, EOS-3.3, ECA-2.1, ,

ECA-3.1 Comments: I l

1 PAGE 17 0F 17 ODA-204-5b l

, . , . - - - - .