Text

Performance Indicators,Mar 1992
	ML20095H860
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Calhoun
Issue date:	03/31/1992
From:	; OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To:	;
Shared Package
ML20095H859	List: ML20095H852; ML20095H860;
References
	NUDOCS 9204300305
	Download: ML20095H860 (72)
	v • d • e

{{#Wiki_filter:_ - _______ FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS MARCH 1992 / x I'9djfj !g gl au,mme{il RlggllgE".im p/, ,,/ l ,/ ,/~ Prepared by: Production Engineering Division System Engineering Test and Performance Group \\ 38242888R!!8883e3 R PDR

\\ 0 % ud e m L a w aav al& ds... 9 a inwalus audem, wnd souauljud oned... y d w a, b)Wns, cwawv4ng, comandsawnl... dwa,way,ofbje,...awdo&ng,U. job nigM U.,% l %, weap %. St w w -d u a,,d o. ai p i g _.,aw - e_ ge ,4-s. a.s o. A a.ui Au-as - p a,0. qu u 4 pean,, ndjud iav de&ng, U. 9 11 %gs. Jaans ).6%noio e- .a .-w. - -,. -mr.+~_..-_.,-._me. ,,r. -,-,w.c~.i.----m--.-_., ,,-.r- ,myy,, .--w .--3 ,r---

OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS REPORT Prepared By: Production Engineering Division System Engineering Test and Performance Group MARCH 1992 r

ABSTRACT PURPOSE The " Performance Indicators Program" is intended to provide selected Fort Calhoun plant perfor-mance information to OPPD's personnel responsible for optimizing unit performance. The information is presented ire a way that provides ready identification of trends and a means to track progress toward reaching corporate goals. The information can be used for assessing ard monitoring Fort Calhoun's plant performance, with emphasis on safety and reliability. Some performance indicators -how company goals or industry information. This information can be used for comparison or as a means of promotirg pride and motivation. SCOPE The conditions, goals, and projections reflected within this report are current as of the end of the month being reported, unless otherwise stated. In order for the Performarce Indicator Progic to be effective, the following guidelines were followed while irnplementing the program:

1) Data was selected which most effectively monitors Fort Calhoun's performance in key areas.

2) Established corporate goals and industry information were included for comparison.

3) Formal definitions were developed for each performance parameter to ensure consistency in future reports and allow comparison with industry averages where appropriate.

Comments and input are encouraged to ensure that this program is tailored to address the areas - which are most meaningful to the people using the report. Please refer comments to the System Engineering Department's Test and Performance Group. To increase personnel awareness of Fort Calhoun Station's piant performance, it is suggested that this report be distributed throughout i .your respective departments. REFERENCES i INPO Good Practices OA 102,

Performance Monitoring Management Information" INPO Report Dated November 1984," Nuclear Power Plant Operational Data' NUMARC 87-00, *Guidel'nes and Technical Bases for NUMARC Initiatives Addressing Station l

j ' Black-out at Light Water Reactors", Revision 1, Appendix D,"EDG Reliability Program", dated April 6,1990. 4 0 d

FOREWORD This report is being produced in an abbreviated form during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage to allow many performance indicator data sources to devote more time to outage activities. Publication of all indicators will resume in the May 1992 report. i ) i

a ,(> a a a ar. + Table of Contents / Summary INPO INDUSTRY KEY PARAMETERS P.AE EL11BI .0.PID. Deen u NAN coal.1 Hrs uwin ust TENTH Inrno SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE: EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM.. .. NA. . 0 024. ..0.. .. o. .. l.. .3 COLLECTIVE RADIATON EXPOSURE (Man. Rem).216YR... 25aYR...175.1. . 65 5.. .. N A..... 5 VOLUME OF LOW. LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE (Cubic Ft.).. .. 4.16&YR... 3.004'YR.. ..17. 0. N A.. .6 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ACCIDENT RATE / DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE. 0 76.. . 0.3. ..0.. .0. .. l.. .7 OPERATIONS PAGE ra.rSTRY .QEEQ,, QffQ .,y n;63. m THis uwTH usT tcNTH IBl.N2 UNFLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATONS - (INPO DEFINITION) - .._..0._.. .. 0.. ..0 .0 I .1 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATONS -(NRC DEFINITION).. .....0.. . 0.. ..0.. .. o. .. l.. .2 PLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR 18.3%.. 28.3%..100%. .100%.. ..NA.... 4 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET.... ..NA _..-..... NA ..NA.. .. N A.. .. N A.... .8 DOCUMENT REVIEW.. - NA.. .. N A,. ..N A _.. .. NA.. .. N A.. .9 MAINTENANCE PAGE wmTpy .CEF.R. CEER Jg,Q:6M QQ6L TH's LONTH LAsT MONTH M DIESEL GENERATOR UN AVAILABILITY.. ... NA.. .. NA.. ..NA. .. N A.. .. N A.,.10 AGE OF OUTSTANDING IAAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS (CORRECTIVE NON OUTAGE).

. NA..

.. N A,_. ..NA _._ .. N A.. .... N A.,.11 MAINTENANCE WORK OPDER BREAKDOWN (CORRECTL /E WON. OUTAGE). .. N A.. .. N A... .,NA, .. N A.. .. N A.. 12 CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (NONOUTAGE).. .. N A.. ., NA. . 50 4 %..._... 58W. ., NA... 13 . =.. RATO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE.. .. NA.. .. N A. . 77.4%.. . 80 8%. .. N A.. 14 NUMBER OF OUT.OF4ERViCE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS. .. NA. .. < 13. ..9.. .11. .. l. .15 i

MAINTENANCE (cont'd)) IMr.E emsTny . CECA. CEE2 m G2aL TH!$ LONTH LAST LONTH M MAINTENANCE OVERTIME..... .. NA.. .10%..,. 40 4%.. . 38.2%. .. NA.,.16 PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE).............. .... NA.. .. N A.. 2. .0. .. D... 17 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLCA (CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE MAINTENANCE).....NA. .. <350.. . 339.. .250. .. D..... 18 NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS. - ... NA.. ..-...0-..-...0.. . 0.. .. l...19 MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS. .. NA. .. NA.. .. N A.. .. N A.. .. NA... 20 CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE. ... NA.-.. 2 00E.6.. 6 07E 7 6 08E-7. .. NA.. 21 CHEMISTRY AND RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION e%QE emsTRY ,QDfQ QEEQ LE D.AN QQ6L TH'S WWTH LAST LONTH IP.DO COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE (Man-Rem) = .. 216NR....-. 250NR..175.1. . 65 5.. .. N A.... 5 VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE (Cubb Ft.)..-.. ..... 4,166NR... 3,000NR _.1.7. .0. .. N A.... 6 MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE (mrem)................. .. NA . 1,500NR.. 857....-... 7 72 _. .. NA.... 22 TOTAL SKIN AND l CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS. NA.. . 144.. . 129.. . 30.. .. N A... 23 DECONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA = .. NA.. . 88% _... 85 9%.. . 85.8%...... N A...24 1,_...... RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM. ...... NA.. ... NA. -.. 5 9...-., .15. ..D. 25 NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS. ..NA.. .. N A. . 61 - . 64. -.... l.... 26 GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT (curies)... .. NA.. .340. . 3 58 5........ NA ;. , N A... 27 LIQUID RADOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT (curies).......NA. . 225. . 176.1. .. N A .. l..., 28 SECURITY PAGE wousTRY QeE2 - QEED LEDMN QQ&L THis MOmH USMOMTH IEEtQ LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY).... ..... N A. .. NA. . 57.. .. 75._..... N A... 29 SECURITY NON. SYSTEM FAILURES...... .. N A.= .. NA., _NA. .. N A.. ..N A a. 30 l ii

SECURITY - (wsre) PAGE NEUSTRY cfen gegQ ggm gag-THis AmTH LASi keWH M SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES.... .. ~... N A.. .. NA.. .. N A. .. N A.. .. N A... 31 ' jdM.ERIALS AND OUTSIDE SERVICES IgGE s msiny gegg ger.g LERAN ggg TH's MNmi LAST LOCH M EXPEDITED PURCHASES...... .... NA. .. O 5%.. ..3.15%. . 0 76%.. . NMA... 32 DESIGN ENG!NEERING PAGE e 201.5I81 CRED CEED g.p m nog Tum om tAsT kmTH TRf.FD TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS (EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING),. ........ N A. .._0.. .._.... 28. . 32. .. N A -. 33 l INDUSTRIAL SAFETY PAGE ta miny gggg aggg krotA.s gag THrs tmTH LAST LWTH M i DISABIING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE 0.76. .. o 3. ..o. ..... o. .. l..... 7 t t-RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS CASES ( FREQUENCY RATE.... ....... _.,.. NA -.. . 2 0., ..-.0 60. .1.0.. .. l., . 34 HUM AN RESQURCES PAGE mT9y geen ogga g.g m gag THm komi LAST ANTH TREND ' NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LERS.... ...... NA. .. NA. 1. . 2 _... .. l... 35 LER ROOT CAUSE BREAKDOWN......... ... NA _.. NA... ..NA. .. NA........ N A. .36 STAFFING '.puEL. .. NA.. .. NA.. ..N A..... .. NA.. .. N A...37 i TRAINING AND OUAllFICATION Iggg en "T AY QEE2 QEED typg gag THm umm4 LAsT tmtu Ignm LICENSED OPERATOR REQUAtlFICATlON TRAINING.. ...... N A.. .. N A, ..NA.. . NA.. .. NA.. 38 LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS.. .. N A._.. , N A.. ..NA. . N A -.. .. N A... 39 HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS. ..N A. .. NA. ..NA. .. _.,.. N A.. .. N A.. 40 .y. r iii .~- 2

REFUELING OUTAGF, g tNousiny QPfD QPfD LEDAN GQ&L TH!9 At WDf tMT A*'WTH TREND EMERGENT MWOs APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN THE CYCLE 14 REFUELING OUTAGE., ....... N A.. . 59wk.. .. NA ... NA.. .. A.... 41 QUALITV ASSURANCE PAGE IN'T ?STRY QPfQ QPfpQ LED!AN QQ$L Te e? LONTH LAST LO*frH M - VOLATIONS PER 1,000 INSPECTON HOURS.... ..NA.. . 1.5..._. 1.51. .,1.52. .NMA.. 42 CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND NCVs (TWELVE-MONTH RUNNING TOTAL)..... .... N A...._... NA.. .. &4. . ud.. .. N A.... 43 CARS ISSUED vs. SIGNIF. CARS vs. NRC VOLATONS ISSUED vs. LERs REPORTED.. .. N A.. .. N A.... .. N A....._ .. N A.. .. NA.. 44 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITONS.. ....... 45 SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX.... .49 REPORT DISTRIBUTON LIST-. . 51 SUMM ARY SECTION POSITIVE TREND REPORT.... . 52 AL 'ERSE TREND REPORT....... - ..... 52 INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT ATTENTON REPORT.. .. 52 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT IMPROVEMENTS / CHANGES.. .. 52 TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUMMARY

TTIEND SYMBOLS A-ADVERSETREND l-lMPROVED PERFORMANCE D - DECLINING PERFORMANCE NMA - NEEDS MANAGEMENT ATTENTON NA - NOT APPLICABLE /AVAILABLE iv

3-Q Safety System Actuations 0 1992 Fort Calhoun Goal O Industry Upper 10 Percentile 2-1 1-O O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O,O, i '89 '90 '91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 l j UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS -(INPO DEFINITION) There were no unplanned safety system actuations during the month of March 1992. Tne 1992 goal for the number of unplanned safety system actuations is zero. ( The industry upper ten percentile value for the number of unplanned safety system actuations per year is zero. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper ten percentile of nuclear power plants for this indicator, j l l Data Source: Monthly Operating Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs) l Accountability: Jaworski/Foley/Ronning Adverse Treno: None l l 1 l

- 12 Month Running Total SSA 10 - --O-Critical Hours 900 Safety System Actuations (SSA) 8-800 7 7 8 700 W 3 h E 6-600 E 500 ~n y 2 R .9 yl "4 - 4008 [ 4 y 300 h U\\ 3 2 200 f 2-p) 100 a 3 3 l 2 0 l h '50 x i i l-~i 0-d B9 90 31 AMJJASONDJFMAMJJASONDJFM 1990 1991 1992 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS-(NRC DEFINITION) This indicator shows the number of unplanned safety system actuations (SSAs) which include the High and Low Pressure Safety injection Systems, the Safety injection Tanks, and the Emergency Diesel Generators. The NRC classification of SSAs includes actuations when major equipment is operated and when the logic systems for these safety systems are challenged. The last event of this type occurred in June 1991 when there were two anticipatory signal starts for DG-2. The first start occurred after a control relay was bumped causing a momentary loss of power to safety bus 1 A4. DG-2 started a second time when a breaker trip occurred during DG-1 breaker synchroni, ation. DG 2 was not required to provide power to the safety bus in either of these situations. The majority of SSAs displayed above were related to 1990 Refueling Outage activities. These were reviewed urider the Safety System Actuation Reduction Program. The goal of the Program (now complete) was to reduce ine number of SSAs at Fort Calhoun. The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is a maximum of three. Data Source: Monthly Operating Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs) Accountability: Jaworski/Foley/Ronning Adverse Trend: None 2 l

E 1992 M0nthly Emergency AC Power Unavailabisty Value --It-1992 Emergency AC Power Unavailability Value Year to Date --O-1991 &1992 Fort Calhoun Goals (0.024) GOOD l -- 1991 Emergency AC Power Unavailability Value Year to Date k -- 1995 INPO Industry Goa! (0.025) 0.05 - 5 0.04 - e x ~~ 0.03 - b O d 0 8 O 0 D ~O d 0.02 - 0.01 - l 0 ,x ,x ,x Apr91 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct N-Dec Jan Feb Mar 92 EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the Emergency AC Power System unavailability value, as defined by INPO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definitions, for the reporting month. The Emergency AC Power System unavailability value for March 1992 is zero. The Emergency AC Power System unavailability value year-to-date is zero. The 1992 and 1991 Fort Calhoun year-end goals for this indicator are 0.024. The 1995 INPO industry goal is 0.025. Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning Accountability:Jaworski/Ronning Adverse Trend: None 3

+.4 1

100 % - O 1992 Monthly Planned Capability Loss Factor ~ --$t-1992 Year to-Date Average PCLF 80%- -- - 1991 Year to-Date Average PCLF 70%- -O-1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Goals b 60%- -C}- Industry Median Value (18.3% for a Three Year Average) ~ 50%- GOOD 40%- Y U 30%- 4 g 20%- 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 D d 10%- C O O--C O C O O ^ ^ ^ A h a 4 4 9 g Apr91 May Jun J'A Aug Sep Oct Nov Deo Jan Feb Mar 92 PLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR This indicator shows the plant monthly Planned Capability Loss Factor (PCLF), the PCLF year-to-date average, and the Fort Calhoun yearly average PCLF goals for 1991 and 1992. Planned Capability Loss Factoris defined as the ratio of the planned energy losses during a given period of time, to the reference energy generation (the energy that could be produced if the unit were operated continuously at full power under reference ambient r.onditions), expressed as a percentage. The PCLF was reported as 100% for the month of March 1992 due to the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage. The year-to-date average PCLF for 1992 is 67%. The 1992 Fort Calhoun yearly average Planned Capability Loss Factor goalis 28.3% The 1991 goal was 7%. The PCLF industry median value (for the three year period from 1/89 through 12/91)is 18.3 % Data Source: Generation Totals Report & Monthly Operat:ng Report Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trend: None 4 t i

Personnel Cumulative Radiation Exposure (Man-Rom) --EH-Fort Calhoun Annual Goal (250 Man Rom) - 1995 INPO Industry Goal (185 Man Rom) -H>- Cycle 14 Refueling Outage Goal (210 Man Rom) -O-Industry Median Value (216 Man Rom for a Three Year Average) 276 ~ j C C C C C C C C C C C C C O O U U U U U U 200_ S a a a a a a a a a a a i ^ I 93.4 100-52 i_. _ _. ?f. 8., 0 '89 '90 '91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dac92 COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE During March 1992,109.5 man rem was recorded by TLDs worn by personnel while working at the Fort Calnoun Station during the Cycle 14 Refueling Ou; age. The year-to-date exposure is 1751 man rem. The Fort Calhoun goal for personnel radiation exposure (cumulative) during 1992 is 250 man-rem. The total Cycle 14 refueling outage goalis 210 man rem. The 1995 INPO industry goalis 185 man rem per year. The industry median value (for the three year period from 1/89 through 12/91)is 216 man-rem per year. Data Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source) - Accountability Patterson/Lovett - Adverse Trend: None SEP54 e, 5

12000-Cumulative Dry Active Waste Sent For Processing (in cubic feet) 8000 - 4000 - Jan92 Feb Mar Apr-May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DL.42 E Radioactive Waste Buried This Month (in cubic feet) Cumulative Radioactive Waste Buried -C-Fort Calhoun Goat For Waste Buried (3,000 :ubic feet) 7500- -e-1995 INPO Industry Goal (3.884 cubic feet) 1 000 - -{1-Industry Median (4.166 cubic feet) 4310 4500 - n n n n n n-n n n t-' n n 3000 - 6 6 3 O O O--6 6 6 6 O 3 1334 1500-O i i i 90 St Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 Year-end Total VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE The upper graph shows the cumulative volume of dry radioactive waste sent for pro-cessing. The lower graph shows the volume of radwaste buried this month, the cumula-tive radwaste buried this year, and the year-end totals for radioactive waste buried the previous 2 years. The monthly and cumulative volumes of radioactive waste which were buried during the month of March 1992 have been revised. These revisions are due to the delay involved in the shipping for processing, the processing, and the burying of radioactive waste. Cumulative amount of solid radwaste shipped off site for processing (cubic feet) 7.680 Volume of solid radioactive waste which was buried during the rnonth of March (cubic feet) 1.7 Cumulative volume of solid radioactive waste buried in 1992 (cubic feet) 1.7 Amount of solid radioactive waste in temporary storage (cubic feet) 0.0. The 1992 Fort Ca'houn goal for the volume of solid radioactive waste which has been buried is 3,000 cubic feet.- The 1995 INPO industry goal is 110 cubic meters (3,884 cubic feet) per year. The industry median value is 118 cubic meters (4,166 cubic feet) per year. Data Source: Patterson/Breuer (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson/Bilau Adverse Trend: None SEP54 6

1.6 - 1992 Disabling injury / Illness Frequency Rate - N.- 1991 Disabling injury /111 ness Frequency Rate -<>-- 5 Year Average Disabling injury / Illness Frequency Rate 1.2 - - C>- Fort Calhoun Goal (0.3) -A-1995 INPO Industry Goal (0.5) ~ O Industry Median Value (0J6) ' ~ O O O O O O O O O O O O 4 C O O O O O O O O O O 0.2 - 0 0 m Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 DISABLING INJURY!!LLNESS FREQUENCY RATE (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE) This indicator shows the 1992 monthly disabling injury / illness frequency rate, the 1991 disabling injury / illness frequency rate and the 5 year average (from 1987 through 1991) of the corresponding monthly disabling injury / illness frequency rates. There were no (zero) lost time accidents repor1ed at the Fort Calhoun Station in March .1992. The total number of lost time accidents that have been reported during 1992 is zero. The 1992 disabling injury / illness frequericy rate goal was set at 0.3. The 1995 INPO Industry goal is 0.50. The disabling injury / illness rate for the past twelve months is 0.34. The industry upper ten percentile disabling injury / illness frequency rate is 0. y_ Ear ypr-End Rate 1989 0.4 1990 0.5 1991 0.4 Data Source: Sorenson/Skaggs (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson/ Richard Positive Trend SEP 25 & 26 7

- ~, - - - ( e Operations 1992 Budget ($ Million) 80- -M-- 1992 Cumulative Total ($ Million) ' 60-40-20-0 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 Maintenance 1992 Budget ($ Million) 60- -- W - 1992 Cumulative Total ($ Million) 40-20-O ^^ Jan92-Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET The Operations and Maintenance Budget Indicator shows the budget year to-date as -well as the actual expenditures for operations and maintenance for the Fort Calhoun Station.~ 4 The b'udget year-to-date for Operations was 20,225,000 dollars for March 1992 while the actual cumulative expenditures through March totaled 17,486,348 dollars. The 1992 year-end budget for operations has been revised to 66,560,800 dollars, which is a . reduction of 100,000 dollars. The budget year-to-date for Maintenance was 8,453,800 dollars for March 1992 while the_ actual cumulative expenditures through March totaled 7,884,713 dollars. Data Source: Gleason/ Parent (Manager / Source) Accountability Scofield - Adverse Trend: None ^ ~., t---r Te-t-e v-n.1 w-a 9 ."y

== y yi e e-

4 O Documents seneeuieo for Review s00 - Documents Reviewed Overdue Documents 400-300 - 5'$ \\ 200 - f 7 j

,x
^

A ? h L h b y 2 100 - W 7 ? h 1 y j j-

'j,$

y

f; g

,j O Apr91 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov D]c Jan Feb Mar 92 DOCUMENT REVIEW This indicator shows the number of completed, scheduled, and overdue (greater than 6 months past the scheduled due date) biennial reviews for the reporting month. These document reviews are performed in-house and include Special Procedures, the Site Security Plan, Maintenance Procedures, Preventive Maintenance Procedures, and the Operating Manual.~ During March 1992 there were 93 document reviews completed while 87 document reviews were scP66uled. At the end of March, there were 18 document reviews over-due. During the month of March there were 30 new or renamed documents reviewed. These new or renamed documents will need to be reviewed again in 1994. - Data Source: Patterson/McKay (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson/Jaworski - Adverse Trend: None SEP 46 9

O Psanned Hours of Diesel Generator No. 2 Unavailability @ Unplanned Hours of Diesel Generator No. 2 Unavailabihty G Estimated Hours of Diesel Generator No. 2 Unavailability M Planned Hours of Diesel Generator No.1 Unavailabihty O unptanned Hours of Diesel Generator No.1 Unavailability

200-150-

} [ 100 - D 50-n m O i Apr91 May Jun Jul Au9 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb MarD2 200-0 Cumulative Hours of DG-1 UnavaliabAy f rom 9/1/91 to 12/31/01 ^ Cumulative Hours of DG-2 Unevaittability from 9/1/91 to 12/31/91 150- ~44 - Cumulative Hours of DG.1 Unavailabihty for 1992 + Cumulative Hours of DG-2 Unavoitabihty for 1992 [100-Fcrt Calhoun Oost for 9/1/91 to 12/31/91 3 ~ C M 6 3 0 O O O --- 7 i Nov91 Dec Jan Feb M ar92 DIESEL GENERATOR UNAVAILABILITY This indicator provides a monthly illustration of diesel generator unavailability. The top graph shows the diesel generator planned, unplanned, and estimated unavailable hours for DG-1 and DG-2 for each month. The lower graph shows the cumulative hours of unavailabiiity for each diesel generator for two time periods: from October through December 1991 and for January through March 1992. There were no (zero) unavailable hours for DG-1 and DG-2 during the month of March 1992 The 1992 Fort Calhoun yearly goalis not to exceed 210.24 unavailable hours per diesel generator. Fort Calhoun met the goal of 43.8 unavailable hours per DG for the last four months of 1991. This goal is based on the 1990 INPO industry median value for diesel generator unavailable hours. The 14.4 hours of DG-1 unavailability and 18.3 hours of DG 2 unavailability for the last four months of 1591 were attributable to planned maintenance activities. Data Source: hworskWanning (Manager / Source) Accountability: Jaworski/Ronning Adverse Trena: None 10 l

400- @ Decernber 1991 Outstanding MWOs January 1992 Outstanding MWOs February 1992 Outstanding MWOs ] 300- ' March 1992 Outstanding MWOs ' ' Programmatic change to reRect change in non outage criteria. 200-7 100-4 l r / fA t u di ry; W pa ir s g i I I i 1 0-3 Morr.hs 3-6 Months 6-9 Months 912 Months >12 Marths AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS (CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE) This indicator shows the age of corrective non-outage maintenance work orders (MWOs) remaining open at the end of the reporting month. Data Source: Fatterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson! Bobba Adverse Trend: Because we are currently in the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage, an adverse trend is not indicated based on three consecutive months of increasing values for corrective non-outage MWOs 3 - 6 months old and MWOs >12 months old. 11

l @ December 1991 400-0 January 1992 350 - O February 1992 300 - 0 ' March 1992 250 - L ' Programmatic change to reflect e.ange in non-ou2;e enteru 200 - 150 - L: \\ A n,, l' h@ [ 100 - 50-4i 0 i i i i i Tctal Open MWOs Open MWOs>3 Total Open Safety Open Safety Open High Priority months old Related MWOs Related MWOs > 3 MWOs Months Old MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE) This indicator shows the total number of corrective non-outage MWOs remaining open at the end of the reporting month, along with a breakdown by several key categories. The number cf open MWOs >3 months old is increasing because on line sctivities must be scheduled beyond the end of tha Cycle 14 Refueling Outage. Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source) Accountability: Fatterson/ Bobba Adverse Trend: Because we are currently in the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage, an adverse trend is not indicated based on increasing values for three consecutive months for corrective non-outage Open MWOs >3 months old and Open Safety Related MWOs >3 months old. SEP 36 l l 12 I

E-i_a4+... r A4,..a 54.d a h 8-4 J m m 80*/. - ' E Corrective Maintenance Backlog > 3 Months Old ' 60% - llllihll 0% - Apr91. May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb

Mar 92
Programmatic change to reRect change in noncutage criteria.

CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (NON-OUTAGE) T_his indicator shows the percentage of open corrective non-outage maintenance work orders that were greater than three months old at the end of the reporting month. The percentage of open corrective non-outage maintenance work orders that were greater than three months old at the end of March 1992 was reported as 50.44%. Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source) - Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba Adverse Trend: None ,M* 13

l 9 Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance g Cycle 14 i Refueling 90%- -O-1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Non Outage Goals Outage 60%- 3 70%- 3& 60%- -C _O-O O O O O-ifk ^ l W %ylh [

8 Rj W

1 S0%- 7 3}wpt M9 ? ee m (f ^' [

- ~

f {' 30%- e e 5 g 4 20% Ap61 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 92 RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTA! MAINTENANCE This indicator shows the ratio of completed preventive maintenance to total completed maintenance. The ratio of preventive to total maintenance was 77,4% in March 1992 during the Cycle .14 Refueling Outage. The values for this indicator decreased during September and October 1991 due to a greater emphasis being placed on completion of MWO work during the battery outage. The 1992 Fort Calhoun goalis to attain a ratio of non outage preventive to total mainte-nance greater than 65% The 1991 Fort Calhoun goal was to attain a ratio of non-outage preventive to total maintenance greater than 60%. Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source) Adverse Trend: None SEP 41 14

~ Control Room Instruments Repairable On Une O Total Number of Control Room Instruments Out-of-Service -O-- 1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Goals For Total Out of Service Instruments 40- ~ 30-E 20- 4 ra -)m m $-o-6 ^

q.c

1 -C O [

~

L gj '7f 10- : : 0 i Apr91 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 92 NUMBER OF OUT-OF-SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS This indicator shows the total number of out-of-service control room instruments, the number of instruments iepairable during plant operations (on-line), and the 1991 and 1992 Fort Calhoun goals. There was a total of 9 out-of-service control room instruments at the end of March 1992. None ci these instruments require a plant outage to repair. The 1992 Fort Calhoun goalis to have less than 13 out of-service control room instru- - ments. The 1991 Fort Calhoun goal was to have less than 14 out of-service control room instruments-Data Source: Patterson/Spilker (Manager / Source) . Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trend: None 15 s.. Lafh s

E Maintenance Overtime -X-12 Month Average Maintenance Overtime 70%- - O - 1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun "On-Line" Goals 60%- Cycle 14 Refuf.ing 50%- Outage 40%- 3 30%- C O O O O O O O I m,4 +- $jg 20%- = 10%- M b E h v v m

g -

<~ n w q~ q. ^ y 0% Apr91 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 92 MAINTENANCE OVERTIME The Maintenance Overtime Indicator monitors the ability to perform the desired mainte-nance activities with the allotted resources. Excessive overtime indicates insufficient resource allocation and can lead to errors due to fatigue. The percent of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was reported as 40.4% for the month of March 1992 during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage. The 12 month average percentage of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was reported as 12.9%. The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for the "on-line" percentage of maintenance overtime hours with respect to normal hours worked is 10%. l-Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson/Bobba . Adverse Trend: None l l l 16

O Open IPs Related to the Use of Procedures (Maintenance) l 15-O Closed irs Related to the Use of Procedures (Maintenance) @ Procedural Noncomphance irs (Maintenance) Cycle 14 10-Refueling Outage 7 5-4 4 S 2 2 )1 ) 1 11 1 1 1 o c 000 000 000 0 A- 0 000 0 0 '/ 0 'I O V 00 00 0 ? O 3 Apr91 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 92 PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE) This indicator shows the number of open Maintenance incident F i(irs) that are related to the use of procedures, the number of closed irs that ar6 L 9d to the use of procedures, and the number of open and closed irs that received prwedural noncom-pliance cause codes. There were two procedural noncompliance incidents for maintenance reported for the month of March 1992. The incidents were: IR 920193 - While performing a surveillance test to disassemble and inspect SI-159 a stud and two nuts were replaced without an MWR being written; and IR 0?0218 - A surveillance test was performed twice on HCV-238 but review of the final re. sum, was not completed in 24 hours as required by the test. Data Source: Patterson/McKay (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trend: An adverse trend is not indicated, although there has been an increase in the number of open irs related to the use of procedures for three consecutive months, because of the increase in the amount of mainte-narn work being performed during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage. SEP 15,41 & 44 17

809-Open MWOs

O-1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Goals 600-C O

O O O O O O 400-322 318 O 314 350 302 287 m ~ 281 i y L 266 3 250 ~ 200-s i i s.., Apr91 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 92 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG (CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE MAINTEN ANCE) This indicator shows the number of corrective non-outage Maintenance Work Orders (MWOs) that were open at the end of the reporting month. The 1992 goal for this indicator is to have less than 350 corrective non-outage mainte-nance work orders remaining open. The 1991 goal for this indicator was to have less than 450 corrective non-outage maintenance work orders remaining open. Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trend: None SEP 36 18 r

3- [] Number of Missed STs Hesuhirg in LERs g. t 1-0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O-- s i i SO 91 Apr91 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 02 NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS This indicator shows the number of missed Surveillance Tests (STs) that result in Lic-ensee Event Reports (LERs) during the reporting month. The graph on the left shows the yearly totals for this indicator for the previous two years, During the month of March 1992, there were no missed STs met resulted in LERs. The 1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun goals for this indicator are zero. Data Source: Monthly Operating R0 port & nant Licensee Event Reports (LERs) Accountability: Patterson/Jaworski Adverse Trend: None SEP GO & 61 19

= Components With More Than One Failure 20- -X-Components With More Than Two Failures 15-10-5- v v U U v s o o o m o - Apr91 - May-Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 92 MAINTENANCE EFFECT.tVENESS The Maintenance Eifectiveness Indicator was developed following guidelines set forth by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office for Analysis and Evaluation _of Opera-

tional Data (NRC/AEOD). The NRC/AEOD is currently developing and verifying a main-

- tenance effectiveness indicator using the Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System (NPRDS) component failures. This indicator has been revised to show the number of NPRDS components with more < than one failure during the last eighteen months and the number of NPRDS compo-nents with more than two failures during the last eighteen months. The number of NPRDS components with more than two failures in an elghteen month period should indicate the effectiveness of plant maintenance. (This change applies only to the September 1991 through March 1992 data. The data for April through August 1991 is based on a twelve month interval.) During the last 18 reporting months there were 15 NPRDS components with more than 1 failure. : 3 of the 15 had more than two failures. The tag numbers of the components: with more than two failures are CH 1 A, CH 1 B, and RC-4. Data Source: Jaworslu/ Dowdy (Manager / Source) = Accountability: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trend: None

20.

20-Calculated Check Vafve Failure Rate per Million Component Houts - Industry Check Valve Failure Rate per Million Component Hours 15- -O-Fort Calhoun Goal 10 10-m a i kl a 5-J h (- /$ n n 9 1 w w w w r* 0 ~ '89 90 Apr91 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 92 Check Valve Failures CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE This indicator shows the Fort Calhoun check valve failure rate, the Fort Calhoun goal and the industry check valve failure rate. This rate is based upon failures during the previous 18 months. The check valve failures at Fort Calhoun Station for the previous twu years are shown on the left. The data for the industry check valve failure rate is three months behind the reporting month due to the time involved in collecting and processing the data. For December 1991, the Fort Calhoun Station reported an actual check valve failure rate of 6.07 E 7, while the industry reported an actual failure rate of 2.62 E-6. At the end of March 1992, the Fort Calhoun Station reponed a calculated check valve failure rate of 6.07E 7. The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is a failure rate of 2.00 E 6. Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source) Accountability: Jaworski/Rollins Adverse Trend: None SEP 43 21

O Highest Exposure for the Month (mRom) O Highest Exposure for the Quarter (mrem) E Highest Exposure for the Year (mrem) - O -- 1992 Fort Calhoun Goal OPPD 4500 mRom/yr. Limit 4000-3000-2000-0 1064 1064 1000-857 o i March 1992 MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE l. During March 1992, an individual accumulated 857 mrem which was the highest indi-vidual exposure for the month. The maximum individual exposure for the first quarter of 1992 was 1,064 mrem. The maximum individual exposure reported for the year 1992 was 1,064 mrem. The OPPD limit for the maximum yearly individual radiation exposure is 4,500 mrem / - year. The 1992 Fort Calhoun goalis 1,500 mrem / year. Date Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverse Trend: None 22 L

250-O Monthly Personnet Contaminations f/'I Cumulative Personnel Contaminations 3 200- --O-Fort Calhoun Annual Goal (144) i: ' 150-O O O O O O O O O O O O .s .h 100-55 ~ ~ 50-25 5/- ) i ~ 0-i i 1 90 91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS This indicator shows the number of skin and clothing contaminations for the reporting month. The number of skin and clothing contaminations has increased during the months of February and March as a result of the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage. A total of 129 contaminations have occurred during 1992. There was a total of 55 skin and clothing contaminations in 1991. There was a total of 237 skin and clothing contaminations in 1990. The 1992 goal for skin and clothing contaminations is 144. Data Source: PattersonMilliams (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverse Trend: None SEP 15 & 54 23

O Decontaminated Radiation ControDed Area y .L_ m%y ljlOM -O-Fort Calhoun Goat (non-outage months) t j Cycle 14 Refuehng 90% - m ? m w"" 7 Outage y 1 29 .; / ~ O O. O Q-O O i 7 k $h '![ '3 l 80% - T f b %4 sh @V: S y 4M i l

I *i

[ ji n.1 ( 9] 'O x 70%- O-4' n y J 4 .:g

M dj f

b gi; J 44 y a 44 .Q [ t Q q< f p.; v. h 0 f, 6 s0%. y l 3 a i 4 .u , ;9 r b v as hkh ??)

?..

'h y) 1 y y ,M + I n

y*

y 4 50% Apr91 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb mag 2 DECONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA This indicator shows the percentage of the RCA that is decontaminated (clean) based on the total square footage, a 1991 Fort Calhoun goal of 85% decontaminated RCA for non-outage months and a 1992 goal of 88% decontaminated RCA for non-outage months. At the end of the reporting month,85.9% of the total square footage of the RCA was decontaminated. Date Source: Patterson/Gundal (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverse Trend: None SEP54 24 l i

60-3 O Number of identified PRWPs '[ so-do-30-20-1s j io-3 2 2 2 o Apr91 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 92 RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM The Radiological Work Practices Program Indicator' hows the number of Poor Radio-logical Work Practices (PRWPs) which were identified during the reporting month. The PRWPs are identified through a review of the monthly Radiological Occurrence Reports and Personnel Contamination Reports. Tho number of PRWPs which are identified each month should indirectly provide a means to qualitatively assess supervisor accountability for their workers' radiological performance. During the month of March 1992,59 PRWPs were identified. Of the 59 PRWPs,13 were Radiological Occurrence Reports. The number of PRWPs for this month is higher than previous months due to the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage. Data Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverse Trend: Although the number of PRWPs identified has increased for three consecutive months, an adverse trend is not Indicated since the increases in February and March are attributable to the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage. SEP 52 25

l l 75-E Total Number of Hot Spots O Number of Additional Hot Spots identified Q Hot Spott Removed O nemovai eianned 50 ' -O-1992 Fort Calhoun Goal i i 2s-I i ? o-O~O ~~~~~* sli d, - * ~ ' i i i i i a i i i i i Jan92 Feb Mar Apr _ May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec92 NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS This indicator shows the total number of hot spots which have been identified to exist in the Fort Calhoun Station and have been documented through the use of a hot spot identification sheet. A hot spot is defined as a smalllocalized source of high radiation. A hot spot occurs when the contact dose rate of an item or place of equipment is at least 5 times the General Area dose rate and the item or piece of equipment's dose rate is equal to or greater than 100 mrem / hour. At the end of March, there were 61 hot spots identified. 34 of these hot spots were considered permanent,i.e., hot spots which are not significant dose contributors or are cost prohibitive for removal. 5 hot spots were removed and two new hot spots were identified during the month. Removalis planned for 19 hot spots. The 1992 Fort Calhoun goalis to resolve one hot spot per month. (Resolution consists of: permanent shielding, removal, or significant reduction in intensity of the source.) Date Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverse Trends: None 26 __ j

O Monthly Radioactive Gas Discharged ; Curies) 800 - Cumu!ative Radioactive Gas Discharged (Curies) -O-Cumulative AnnualGoat(Curies) 600 - 465 ~ o j 400-C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W N 2< 164 200- $g, 7 4; g je$ 9. / ^ en. e,,'" 0 3 3 'W,'---, -p",, i '89 90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec91 GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT. The gaseous radioactive waste being d:schart a the environment is shown for Janu-ary 1,1991 through December 31,1991. A total of 358.5 curies have been released to the environment during this time. in September,238.236 curies of gaseous radioactive waste was released to the envi-ronment due to containment purges required during the unscheduled maintenance outage. Most of the radioactive waste was released in the form of Xenon 133. The Fort Calhoun Station cumulative annual goal for 1991 is 340 curies for this indica-tor. The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every six months. Date Source: Franco /Krist (Manager / Source) Accountability: Pc.iterson/Trcusch Adverse Trend: None z.. 27

O Monthly Radio 30t:veliquid Discharged Cumulative Ra$oactive Uquid Discharged V -O-Cumulative AnnualGoa! 300 - 231 228 C O-0 0 O O 0---C O O O O 200 - + 175 ~ e 0 100 - 28.2 22.7 2BA M 82 0 i i i i 6 6 4 i i i i i i i i i '88 '89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec91 LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to tim environment is shown for January 1,1991 t...ough December 31,1991. The liquid radioactive waste that was discharged to the environment from all sources totaled 176.1 curies during this time. The Fort Calhoun Station cumulative annual goal for 1991 is 225 curies. The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every six months. Data Source: Franco /Krist (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterron/Lovett Adverse Trend: None 28

l O Non System Fadures 30-25-20-17 9 15-10-8 f 5-0 i Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 80-73 70- E 60-yj> 56 50 - M 43 40- "fj 30-20-p/,j ~ 0 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 LOGG ABLE! REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY) The Loggabla/ Reportable Incidents (Security) Indicator is depicted in two separate graphs. The first grcph depicts the total number of loggable/ reportable non system failures concerning Security Badges, Access Control and Authorization, Security Force Error, and Unsecured Doors. The bottom graph shows the total number of loggabi3/ reportable incidents concerning system f ailures which occurred during the reporting month. During the month of March 1992, there were 57 loggable/ reportable incidents identified. System failures accounted for 43 (75%) of the loggable/ reportable incidents, and 18 (41%) of these were environmenta! failures, which is a significant decrease from past months. During the same reporting period last year there were 43 CCTV environmental compared to on!y 5 this reporting month. This change is due to the acquisition of a CCD camera system, the repositioning of selected cameras, and consistent preventive main-tenance. An aggressive Concentrated Awareness TraininD (CAT) Team program has led to a decrease in access authorization incidents. Data Source: Sefick/Woemer (Manager / Source) Accountability: Sefick Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 29

.___._m .l 25-t O January 92 L Q February *02 ,20-D - March 12 = 15-i 10-5 6 6 5 '//, ,^ /s // ~, , ///, hi'~

/s W&T y

//, n ~ //h' l j'? hhh f'F /syl ) 1 1 -l 0 ris n 0 sis n n i 1 Badges ' Access Control Security Force Error Unr.ecured Doors SECURITY NON SYSTEM FAILURES This indicator chows the number of loggable/ reportable non system failures for the reporting month. These items include: Security Badges, Access Control and Authoriza. tion, Security Force Error,- and Unsecured Doors, Non System Failures Number of incidents Mar. '92 Feb. '92 Security Badges. 5 4 Access Control and Authorization 1 6 . Security Force Error 1 2" Unsecured Doors ~ Z Z . Total 14 .17 t "Not included in total loggablesfreportables. Both incidents involved the improper issuing of security badges by the security force, therefore both incidents were . counted in the Access Control and Authorization area, Data Source: Sefick/Woerner (Manage / Source) . Accountability: Sefick ' s. Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 30

O Environmental O Failuro l 1 20-13-13 13 10-3 .[ 5-p p i O y O l -l 0 P Alarms CCTV Computer Search Equipment Doors O 1991 syst m ra iu'es D 1992 System Failures 100 - 64 82 77 80-3 70 c7 60-56 Q ~ b 50 $3 33 43 ~"" ~ 42 40-20-0-- g-3- Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES This indicator shows the number of loggable/ reportable system failures for the reporting month. These items include: Alarm System Failures, CCTV failures, Security Computer Failures, Search Equipment Failures, and Door Hardware Failures. Alarm systems and CCW failures will be di/ided into two categories: environ,'.antal failures and failures as defined in the performance indicator definitions. Also, the 1991 and 1992 System Fail-ures will be compared on a monthly basis. System Number of incidents M arch 92 February '92 Environs Fai!ures Environs Failures Alarms 13 5 8 6 CCTV 5 2 17 1 Computer N'A 2 N'A 4 Search Equipment N/A 3 N'A 2 Door Hardware ((% D ti$ j3 Totals 18 25 25 31 Data Source: Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source) Accountability: Sefick/Petersen Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 31 1

4%- 3 % of Total Purchases that are Expedited -O-1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Goals (0.5%) 3%- y s 2%- 1%- c o o o-- o o o 6 o--- ^ g 0% 6 4 1 4 4 6 i I i i i i Apr91 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 92 EXPEDITED PURCHASES This indicator shows the percentage of expedited purchases compared to the total number of purchase orders generated during the reporting month. During March, there was a total of 445 purchase orders generated. Of the 445 purchase orders generated,14 (3.15%) were expedited purchases. The expedited purchases were for diesel gerierator parts, an expeditor's trip to St. Louis to check a program on diaphragms for T/G, a 3/4" globe valve, Eberline parts, and gaskets and fuses. The 1992 Fort Catheun goal for this indicator is 0.5%. The 1991 goal was 0.5%. Tne number of expedited purchases has been above the Fort Calhoun goal during the months of February and March 1992 due to the ordering of items related to the Cycle 14 refueling outage. Date Source: Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source) Accountability: Willrett/Fraser Adverse Trend: None 32 .- ____ A

D Temporary Modifcations >1 cycle old (RF0 required for Removal) O Temporary Modifcations >6 months old (Removable on line) - O-Fort Calhoun GoalIor Temporary Modifications >1 cycle old (0) 6-5- 4-3- 2 2 2 2 2 jpppp' W Wl S p:,, I 3

,.::4 1-

'/llll',b ./////, L ll,,l,', ;, ', %llll /v//, 0 v v i i v i January'92 February'92 March '92 TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS (EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING) This indicator provides information on the nurnber of temporary modifications greater than one fuel cycle old requiring a refueling outage (RFO) for removal and the number of temporary modifications removable on line that are greater than six months old. Also provided is the Fort Calhoun goal for temporary modifications. The goal for this indicator was changed in August 1991 to be more indicatin of Fort Calhoun's control and management of temporary modifications. There is currently 1 temporary modification, pressure indication for RW/CCW HXs, that is greater than one fuel cycle old. This modification is 100% ready to be removed during the 1992 refueling outage. In addition, at the end of March there were 2 temporary modifications installed that were greater than six months old that can be removed on-line. These were: handjack close of CCW/RW valves,in which OPS is reviewing a system ongineering suggestion for closure, and potable water supply pip:ng temporary repair, which is awaiting scheduling of MWOs 921203,921204, ar.d 921205. At the end of March, there was a total of 28 TMs installed in the Fort Calhoun Station. 17 of the 28 installed TMs require an outage for removal and 1 is removable on line. In 1992 a total of 27 temporary modifications have been installed. Data Source: Jaworski/ Turner (Manager / Source) Accountability: Jaworski/Gorence Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 & 71 33

1992 Recordable injury / Illness Frequency Rate 5-1991 Recordable injury / Illness Frequency Rate 4.s - --6~ 5 Year Average Recordable injury /Illners Frequency Rate 4- --O-- 1992 Fort Calhoun Goal 3.5 - 3-2.5 - A 2-0 0 1.5 - k / 1-0.5 - O Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS CASES FREQUENCY RATE This indicator shows the 1992 monthly recordable injury / illness cases frequency rate in column form. The 1991 recordable injury / illness cases frequency rate and the Fort Calhoun Station 5 year average (from 1987 through 1991) recordable injury / illness cases frequency rates are also shown. A recordable injury / illness case is reported if Nuclear Operations Division personnel are injured on the job and require corrective medical treatment beyond first aid. The record-able cases frequency rate is computed on a year to-date basis. The recordable injury / illness rate for March was reported to be 0.60. There were no (zero) recordable injury / illness cases reported during the month of March 1992. There has been a total of one recordable injury / illness case in 1992. The recordable injury / illness rate for the past twelve months is 2.92. The 1992 goal for this indicator is 2.0. Year Recordable Cases Year-End Ra_tc 1989 11 2.2 1990 11 2.1 1991 18 3.3 Data Source: Sorenson/Skaggs (Manager / Source) Accountability: Richard Positive Trend SEP 15,25 & 26 34

O Licensee Event Reports 48 O PersonnelErrors Reportedin LERs ~ 40-Cumulative Licensee Event Reports .s -+- Cumulative Personnel Errors Reported in LERs k 29 30- _3 1 20- \\

h

' ! 14 12

j

l ;

.I 9 [; 10-PT K l ' r

.i c'gS] %

i i 6 1 10 i i i i i i i '88 '89 '90 '91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LERS This indicator shows the number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) with report dates during March 1992, the LERs attributed to personnel errors, and the cumulative total of both. The year end totals for the four previous years are also shown. in March, there were four LERs reported. One of the LERs, LER 92-05 "RPS Actuation *, was attributable to personnel error. Data Source: Short/Hown.an (Manager / Source) Accoun; ability: Patterson Adverse Trend: None SEP 15 35

Inadequate Administrative Controls LERs O Inapproprie> Actions, Human Error LERs 5- @ Equipment Failure / Malfunction LERs @ DesignDeficiencyLERs 4-E Acts of Nature, Cause Unknown LERs 3-2- g x l l l 5 l .1 - -; q 3 4

t, 4

? 4 I ? ? e N ~ i 5 ~ 0 i i. 4 i i i .i i i i i i Apr91 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 92 LER ROOT CAUSE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows the LERs by report date and Root Cause Code for the months . from April 1991 through March 1992. Data Source: Short/Howman (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trend: None

6

+ '36

@0~ O Actuaicivision statiina y C Authorized Division Staffing ~ .m

x lpp

<p t 400-m. qpj'; n kr 2 g: J.., f4 e, a

bu 200-P.

203 205 a... 4

dp 5,4f{-[, ;

m a~e, n&91. i W]iW:< kw&y ^2 50 51

4. -

[hsje tb$ ^^ 0 i i i Nuclear Operations production Ergineering Nuclear Services STAFFING LEVEL The authorized una actual staffing levels are shown for the three Nuclear Divisions. Data Source: Sorenson/ Burke (Manager / Source) Accountability: Waszak Adverse Trend: None SEP 24 37

l O Total RequaWeatien Training Hours E SimulatorTraining Hours 60 ^ O Non Requalif::ation Training Hours 50-41 40-36 36 3 ~j 4' 30-28 /, /, 24 24 /,- 22 20-18 ?: 37 q / 16 / 16 14 /. /.. I 9 12 4 8 ',;- 8' R 8 :'. 10- / /, / i 6 5 4 9 'fL 4

/,

4 0 i i i i i i 7 Cyclo 912 Cycle 913 Cycle 914 Cycle 915 Cycle 916 Cycle 917 Cycle 921 LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAINING This indicator provides informatiun on the total number of hours of training given to each crew during each cycle. The Simu;ato' training hours shown on the graph are a subset of the total training hours. Non Requalihcation Training Hours are used for AOP/EOP verification & validation, INPO commitments, GET, Fire Brigade, Safety Meetings, and Division Manager lunches. Exam failures are defined as failures in the written, simulator, and Job Performance Measures (JPMs) segments of the Licensed Operator Requalification Training. The individuals who failed exams were all remediated and approved for continued shift operations prior to the end of their scheduled Requalification Training week. Data Source: Gasper /Guliani (Manager / Source) Accountability: Gasper /Guliani Adverse Trend; None SEP 68 9 38

O SRO Exams Administered 50-0 SRO Exams Passed B R0 Exams Administered 40-0 R0ExamsPassed 30-20-i 10-I / 'I / ,d 0 i i i i i i i Apr91 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan F?b Mar 92 LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS This indicator shows the number of Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) and Reactor Opera-tor (RO) quizzes and exams taken and passed each month. These intertially adminis-tered quizzes and exams are used to plot the SRO and RO candidates' oonthly progress. During the month of March 1992, there was one internally administered SRO exam taken and it was passed. There were two internally administered RO exams given and both of these exams were passed. During March, there were no SRO NRC administered site specific exams or RO NRC administered generic exams given. Data Source: Gasper / Herman (Manager / Source) Accountability: Gasper / Lazar Adverse Trend: None SEP 68 39 I 1 l

O Hotlinesinitiated 35-E HotlinesClosed nes Omdue d Weeks 30- @ Hotlines Overdue > 4 Weeks 25-20-15-10-5- 5 m m 5 5 E '5 ? E E E = 1 ? ? ? i E E p ! 5, I3, 5 E 2, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, O i Apr91 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 92 HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS This indicator shows the number of Hotline Training Memos that were initiated, returned for close out, overdue less than four tveeKs, and Overdus greater than four weeks for the reporting month. March *19,2 if:itiated Hotlines 14 Closed Hotlines 18 Hotlines Overdue < 4 wks. 7 Hotlines Overdue > 4 wks. 4 ( Data Source: Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source) Accountability: Gasper Adverse Trend: None i 40 l

O Emergent MWOs 1000-Tota 1 Emergent MW0s 900 - --O-MWO TargeMVeek 800-- 700 - 600 - 500-400 - 300 - 200 - h 76 89 80 100-75 66 O O O O 1 i i i i i i l i i 4 4 4 2/1 2/8 2/15 2/22 2/29 3/7 3/14 3/21 328 4/2 4/9 4/16 4/23 EMERGENT MWOs APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN THE CYCLE 14 REFUELING OUTAGE This indicator shows the total number of Emergent Maintenance Work Orders (MWOs) approved for inclusion in the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage scope. The total number of MWOs and PMOs in the outage schedule on 2/1/92 was 3,509. The goal for the outage is to maintain emergent work at less than 20%, or no more than 702 emergent MWOs, during the outage. This numbst represents 59 MWOs per week for the twelve week outage. Approximately 1,993 emergent MWOs were generated during the 1990 refueling out-age. Data Source: Patterson/Dunham (Manager / Source) Accountability: Patterson/Clemens Adverse Trend: Because the amount of emergent work is exceeding the target for each week, the Supervisor, Outage Projects has determined that an adverse trend is indicated. SEP 31 41

Violations per i00 inspection Hours 9- --O-Fort Calhoun Goal e $1 .66 - E 5 g 7 s 8;?$"i y L 3.7 5 $3-26 ag 1] l ~6 5 O O--C O-C O O ,0 '88 '89 '90 Mar 91 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb92 VIOLATIONS PER 1,000 INSPECTION HOURS This indicator displays the number of NRC violations cited in inspection reports per 1,000 NRC inspection hours. This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the timo involved with collecting and processing the data. The violations per 1,000 inspection hours indicator was reported as 1.51 for the twelve months from March 1,1991 through February 29,1992. The 1992 Fort Calhoun Goalis 1.5 violations per 1,000 inspection hours for 1992. The 1991 goal was 1.6 violations per 1,000 inspection hours. Data Source: Short/Howman (Manager / Source) Accountability: Short Adverse Trend: None 42

25- --+- Nurnber of Violations During the Last 12 Months - Nurnber of NCVs During the Last 12 Months 20-15-9 10-5- O C 0 0 0 y Mar 91 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb92 CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND NCVs (TWELVE MONTH RUNNING TOTAL) The Cumulative Violations and Non-Cited Violations (NCVs) indicator shows the cumu-lative number of violations and the cumulative number of NCVs for the last twelve months. This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved with collecting and processing the data. Data Source: Short/Howman (Manager / Source) Accountability: Short Adverse Trend: None 43

1991 MLP Funct, Area CARS Signif. CARS NRC Viola. LERs A) Plant Operations 30 1 1 6 B) Ra$olog. Controls 12 0 3 0 C) MaintGurveit 66 0 2 9 D) Emergency 16 0 0 0 Preparedness E) Security 5 0 1 3 F) Engr / Tech Suppori 93 3 1 12 G) Safety Assess' 27 1 1 2 Qual. Verif, H) Other 0 0 0 0 Total 249 5 9 32 1992 SALP Funct. j Area CARS Signif. CARS NRC Viola. LERs A) Plant Operations' 2 0 0 4 (1) B) Radiciog. Controls 5 (3) 0 0 0 C) Maint/Surveit 47 (26) 1 (1) 0 2 (1) D) Emergene) 4 1 1 0 Preparedness E) Security 1 0 0 0 F) Engr / Tech Suppori 10(7) 0 0 5 (2) G) Safety Assessa 9 (2) 0 0 0 Qual. Verit. H) Other 0 0 0 0 Tota: 78 (38) 2 (1) 1 11 (4) Note: ( ) Indicate values for the reporting month. CARS ISSUED vs. SIGNIFICANT CARS vs NRC VIOLATIONS ISSUED vs. LERs REPORTED The above inatrix shows the number of Corrective Action Reports (CARS) issued by the Nuclear Services Division (NSD) vs. the number of Significant CARS issued by NSD vs. the number of violations issued by the NRC for the Fort Calhoun Station in 1991 and 1992. Included in these tables are the number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) identi-fied by the station each year. The number of NRC violations reported it one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved in collecting and processing the violations. Data Source: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source) Short/Howman (Manager / Source) Accountability: Andrews/Gambhir/ Gates Adverse Trend: None SEP 15,20,21 44

l l PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK OR-DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE DEP.S (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE) This indicator tracks the total number of outstanding mr. This indicator is defined as the number of accidents for rective non-outage Maintenance Work Orders at the Fort all utikty personnel permanently assigned to the staten. Calhoun Station vorsus their age in months. involving days away from work per 200.000 man hours work ed (100 man-years). This does not include contrac-CARS ISSUED vs. SIGNIFICANT CARS vs. NRC VIO-tot personnel Thrs indcator treks personnel pedor-LAT10NS vs. LERs REPORTED mance vor SEP #25 & 26 Provides a comparison of CARS issued. NRC volat.ons, and LERs reponed. This indcator trads periormance for DOCUMENT REVIEW SEP *15. 20, & 21. The Document Review indcator shows the number of documents reviewed, the number of documents sched-CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE uled for review, and the number of document reviews Compares the Fort Calhoun ened vatve f ailure rate to that are overdue for the reporting month. A document the indu f.ry check valve f ailure rate (f ailures per 1 milhon review is considered overdue if the review is not com-component hours). The data for the industry f ailure rate plete w!!hin 6 months of the assigned due date. This indi-is three months behind the Pl Report reporting month, cator trads pedormance for SEP 840. This indicator tracks periormance for SEP 843. EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE PERFORMANCE Collective radiaton exposure is the total external whole-The sum of the known (planned and unplanned) unavaib body dose received by all on-site personnel (including able and the estimated unavailable hours for the emer-contractors and visitors) during a time perod, as mea. gency AC power system for the reporting pared divide sured by the thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD). Col-by the number of hours in the reporting perod multiphed lective radiation exposure is reported in units of man. by the number of trains in the emergency AC power sys-rom. This indcator trais rad onogcal work periormance tem. for SEP #54. EMERGENT MWOs APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THE CYCLE 14 REFUELING OUTAGE THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (NON-OUTAGE) The total number of Emergent Maintenance Work Orders The percentage of total outstanding correctrve mainte-(MWOs) approved for inclusion in the Cycle 14 Refuehng nance stems, not requiring an outage, that are greater Outage scope. This indcator trads pedormance for SEP than three months old at the end of the pered reported.

31.

CUMULAT1VE VIOLATIONS & NON-CITED VIOLA. EXPEDITED PURCHASES TIONS (12 MONTH RUNNING TOTAL) The percentage of expedited purchases which occurred The cumulative number of volations and Non Cited Vo. during the reparting month compared to the total number latons for the last 12 months. of purchase orders generated. DECONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED GASFOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DIS. AREA CHARGED TO mE ENVIRONMENT The percentage of the Radiaton Cc.ntrolled Area, which This indcator displays the total number of Curies of all hcludes the r.uxihary buiding, the radwaste buildirig, and gaseous radioactive nuchdes released f rom FCS, areas of the C/RP building, that is decontaminated based on the total square 1ootage. This indicator tracks perfor. HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS rnance for SEP # 54. The number of Hotline Training Memos (HTMs)that are initiated, closed, and overdue less or greater than 4 DIESEL GENERATOR UNAVAILABILITY weeks for the indcated month. A HTM is a training docu-This indicator provides monthly data on the number of ment sent out for immed. ate review. The HTM should be hours of diesel generator planned and unplanned un-reviewed ano syned within 5 days of its receipt. availabihty. The Fort Calhoun goal for the second half of 1991 for the number of unavailable hours per diesel gen. LER ROOT CAUSE BREAKDOWN erator has been estabhshed based upm the 1990 indus. Th'rs indicator shows the number and foot cause type for try median value provided by INPO. License Event Reports. 45

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (cont'd) UCENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS This indcator shows the number of SRO ander RO quiz. The number of radiologeal hot spots which have been tes and exams that are acministered and passed each identified and r amentN to exist at FCS at the end of month. his indcator tracks training pedormance for rq m a A M @ n a W %W source of radiation. A hot spot occurs when the contact dose rate of an aem i(s* dose rate is equalto or greater least 5 times the General Area UCENSED OPERATOR REOUAUFICATION TRAIN. dose rate and the item ING than 100 mRemhour. The total numbe? of hours of training green to each crew during each cycle. Also provided are the simulator train-NUMBER OF OUT OF SERVICE CONTROL ROOM ing hours (which are a subset of the total training hours), INSTRUMENTS the number of non requalifcaton training hours and tLa number of exam iallures. This indicator tracks traimng A control room instrumeat thit cannot periorm as design function is considered a' of scryice. A control room pedormance for SEP s6S. instrument which has has.2 FAaintenance Work Order UQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCNARGED (MWO) wrrtten for n ar.d has not been repaired by the TO THE ENVIRONMENT end of the reporting period is considered out of.sorvice and will be counted. The duration of the out.o service This indicator displays the volume of 1.quW adcactive waste released from the rad:oactive waste monnor tanks, condi1on is not considered, Oomputer CRTs are not con-to include releases through the plant blowdown if radio-active nucides are detected in the b!owdown system; NUMBER OF MISdE9 SURVEILLANCE YESTS RE-The curies from all releases from FCS to the Missouri SULT1NG IN UCENSEE EVENT REPORTS Rrver are also shown. The number of Surveillance Tests (STs)that resuit in LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY) L consee Event Raports (LERs) during the reporting The total number of secunty incidents for the reporting month depicted in 1wo graphs. This indcator tracks secu. nty performance for SEP ASB' NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTf.D IN RS MAINTENANCE EFFECT1VENE"S The number of Licensee Event Repons (LERs) attributed The number of Nuclear Plant Reliabi, Data System (NPRDS) components with more than 1 f ailure and the to pers nnel err r on the original LER submittal. T his number of NPRDS components with more than 2 fallv'et.

- - "*""F*""

P* for the last eighteen months. OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET The year to date budget compared to the actual expw MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER B ACKLOG daures for Operatons and Maintenance departments. The number of corrective non outage maintenance work orders that remain open at the end of the reporting PLANNED CAPABluTY LOSS FACTOR month. This indcator was added to the PI Report t The ratio of the planned energy losses dunng a given trend open corrective non outage maintenance work or-enod of time, to the reference energy generation (the ders as stated in SEP #36' energy that could be produced tf the unit were operated mntinuously at full power under refetence ambient con-MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (COR-d #i "'I' * *P'****d **

P*'#*"'89*'

RECT 1VE NON-OUTAGE MAINTENANCE) This indicates is a breakdown of corrective non outage PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS maintenance work orders by several categories the re. (MAINTENANCE) main or - -t V end of the reporting month. This indica-The number of open annd closed irs related to the use tot tracks atenance performance for SEP #36. of procedures (includos the number of open and closed P "'" """*P ""#* h

MAINTENANCE OVERTIME W of pmceha%m@ame Rs.M Mcaw T! e % of overtime hours compared to normal hours for trends personnel performance for SEP 815,41 & 44.

maintenance. This includes OPPD personnel as well as - contract personnel. RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM The number of identified poor radiological work practices MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE (PRWP) for the reporting month. This indcator tracks The total maximum amount of radiaton received by a 9

8" person working at FCS on a monthly, quarterly, and an-nual basis.

46 1

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (Cont'd) RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE

3) CCTV Failures Mechantcal f ailures to all CCTV hard-The ratio of preventive ruintenance (including surveil-ware components.

lance testing and calibratien procedures) to the sum of

4) CCTV Environs Degrad Mons to CCTV performance non outage corrective maintenance and preventive main-as a result of environmental conditons (i e., rain, snow, tenance completed over the reporting period. The ratio.

frost, log, sunspots, shade). expressed as a percentage, is calculated based on man-

5) Security Computer Failures - Failure of the multi-hours. This indicator tracks preventive maintenance ac-plexer, central processing unit, and other computer hard-tivities for SEP 841.

ware and software. This category does not include soft-ware problems caused by operator error in using the RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS CASES FRE-software. QUENCY RATE

6) Search Equipment Failures Failures of x ra/, metal.

The number of injt., ries requiring more than rorrnal first of explosiv9 detectors and other equipment used to aid per 200.C00 man hours worked. This indcator trends search for s ntraband. This also incluces incidents personne! performance for SEP *15. 25 & 26. where the search equipment is found to be defective or dd not function property during testing. SECURITY NON SYSTLM FAILURES

7) Door Hardware Failures - Failure of the door alarm The following components are the types of loggable're-and other door hardware such as latches, electric strikes, portable non-system f ailures represented in this inFca-doorknobs, locks, etc.

tor. Incidents in this category include security badges.

8) 1991 versus 1992 W stem Fai!ures - Stat:stes from access control and authorizaton, security force error.

1991 wiH be compared on a monthly basis with 1992 and unsecured doors. loggab;e/ reportable system failures.

1) Securny Badges incidents associated with improper This indicator tracks secunty performance for SEP #58.

use and handling of securny badges. ucidents include securny badges that are lost, taken out of the protected STAFFING LEVEL area, out of control on-site, or inadvertently destroyed or The actual staffing level and the authorized staH ng level i broken. for the Nuclear Operatons Division, the Produc:an Engi-

2) Access Controland Authon2ation Administrative and neering Division, and the Nuclear Services Divison. This procedural errors associated with the use of the card-i"dcator tracks performatc+ for SEP a24.

access system such as taikjating, incorrut security badge issued, and improper escort procedures. This also TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS includes incidents that were caused by incorrect access The number of temporary rmchanical and electreat con-authonzaten information entered into t:1e securny sys-figuratior's to the plant's systems. tem computer.

1) Temporary configuratons are defined as electrical 33 Security Force Error Events caused by members of jumpers, electrical blocks, mecharsical jumpers, or me-the secunty force that are found to be inattentive to their chanical blocks which are installed in the plant operating duties or who neglected to properly perform assgned systems and are not show,1 on the latest revison of the functions (e.g., required search procedure or pa901).

P&lD, schematic, connecton, wiring, or flow diagrams,

4) Unsecured Doors - Doors which ere found to be unse-2) Jumpers and blocks which are installed for Surveil-cured with no compensatory officer posted or where the lance Tests, Maintenance Procedures, Calibrat on Pro-individual causing the alarm did no; remain at th6 cedures, Special Procedures, or Operating Procedures alarmed door until a security offcer responded. Events are not considered as temporary modifcations unless the where an unsecured door is caused by air cressure are jumper or block remains in place after the test or proce-included in this category unless there is an indcation that dure is complete. Jumpers and blocks instalted in test or an adjustment was made to the door.

lab instruments are f.ot considnred as temporary moddi-This indicator tracks seurity performance for SEP #58. catons.

3) Scaffolding is not considered a temporary modification, SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES Jumpers and blocks whch are installed and for which The following components are the types of loggable/re-MRs have been submitted will be considered as tempo-portable SECURITY SYS7 EM FAILURES represented in rary modificatons untilfinal resolution of the MR and the this indcator. Incidents in this category include alarm jumper or block is removed or is permanently recorded system f ailures, CCTV f ailures, securny computer iall-on the drawings. This indcator tracks temporary modifb ures, search equipment feilures, and doc

hardware f ail-catens for SEP #62 & #71.

ures. These system failures are further categorized as follows:

1) A' arm System Failure Detectim system events in-volving f alse/ nuisance alarms and mechanical failures.

2) Alarm System Environs - Degradations to detection system performance as a result of environmenta! condi-tions (i.e., rain, snow, frost).

47

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (cont'd) TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAM! NATIONS VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE The numbcr of skin and clothing contaminations for the WASTE reporting month. This indicator is defined as the volume of low-level solid radoactive waste actually shipped for burial. This indica-UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS. tot also shows the volume of lowlevel radcactive waste (INPO DEFINITION) which is in temporary storage, the amount of radoactve This indicawr is defined as the sum of the following oil that has been shipped off site for processing (when safety system actuations: data is available), and the volume of sohd dry radoactrve i 1)The number of unplanned Emergency Core Cochng waste which has been shipped off site for processing. System (ECCS) actuations that resuh from reaching an Low-level solid radcactive waste censists of dry active ECCS actuatica setpoint or from a spurious / inadvertent waste, sludges, resins, and evaporator bottoms gener. ECCS signal. att,d as a resutt of nuclear power plant operaton and 2)The number of unplanned emergency AC oower sys-maintenance. Dry radioactive waste includes contami-tem actuations thaf result from a loss of power to a safe-nated rags, cleaning materials, disposable protective guards bus. An unplanned safety system actuaton oc-ciathing, plastic containers, and any other material to be j curs when an actuation setpoint for a safety system is disposed of at a low level radoactive waste disposal site, reached or when a spurious or inadvertent signalis gen-except resin, sludge, or evaporator bottems. Low level j erated (ECCS on!y), and major equipment in the system refers to all radioactive waste that is not spent f uel or a j is actuated. Unplanned means that the system actuaton by product of spent f uel processing. This ind4cator tracks was not part of a planned test or evoluton. The ECCS radioogical work performance for SEP fr54. actuations to be counted are actuatons of the high pres-sure safety injection system, the low pressu's safety in-jection rystem, r, the saf ety injection tanks. L*NPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS (NRC DEFINI110N) i The number of safety system actuations which include (gn!y,) the High Pressure Safety injecton System, the Low Pressure Safety injaction System, the Safety injec-tion Tanks, and the Emergency Diesel Generators. The NRC classifcaton of safety system actuatons includes actuations when major equipment is operated gag when the logc systems for the above safety systems are chaL lenged. VIOLATIONS PER 1,00,..NSPECTION HOURS This indicator it defined as the rumber of violatons etted in NRC inspecton reports for FCS per 1,000 NRC in-spection hours. The violaticas are reported in the year that the insi,ection was actualty oedormed and not based on when the inspection report is rocerved. The hours re-ported for each inspection report are used as the inspec-tion hours. i

SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX The purpose of the Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Periormance indicators inder is to list perfor-mance indicators related to SEP ltems with parameters that can be trended. SEP Reference Number 15 EaQ2 increase HPES and IR Accountability Through Use of Performance Indicators Procedura! Noncompliance hcidents (Maintenance). .17 Total Sk'n and Clothing Contaminations... . 23 Recordable injury /lliness Cases Frequency Rate. . 34 Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LE.ls. . 35 CARS issued vs Signifcant CARS issued vs N lO Violations issued vs LERs Reported. . 44 SEP Reference Number 20 Quality Audits and Surveillance Programs are Evaluated, improved in Depth and Strengthened CARS issued vs Significant CARS issued vs NRC Violations issued vs LERs Reported. . 44 SEP Reference Number 21 Develop and Conduct Safety System Functional inspections CARS issued vs Significant CARS issued vs NRC Violations issued vs LERs Reported. . 44 SEP Reference Number 24 Complete Staff Studies Staffing Level . 37 SEP Reference Numbar 25 Training Program for Managers and Supervisors implemented Disabling ;njury/ Illness Frequency Rate.. .7 Recordable (njury/ Illness Cases Frequency Rate. . 34 SEP Reference Number 26 Evaluate and implement Station Standards for Safe Work Practice Requirements Disabling injury / illness Frequency Rate. .7 Recordable injury /ll! ness Cases Frequency Rate. . 34 SEP Refgrence Numbar 31 Develop Outage and Maintenance Planning Manual and Conduct Project Management Training Emergent MWOs Approved for inclusion in the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage.. . 41 GEP Reference Number 36 Reduce Corrective Non-Outage Backlog Maintenance Work Order (MWO) Breakdcwn (Corrective Non Outage Maintenance). ... 12 Maintenance Wo* Order (MWO) Backlog (Correctrve Non-Outage Maintenance).. .18 SEP Reference Number 41 Develop and implement a Preventive Maintenance Schedule Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance (Non Outage).. .14 .17 Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance). SEP Reference Number 43 Implement the Check Valve Test Program Check Valve Failure Rate . 21 SEP Reference Numbar 44 Compliance With and Use of Procedures Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance). .17 ,r. 49

SEP Reference Number 46 Design a Procedures Control and Administrative Program Decument Review.. ... 9 SEP Reference Numbar 52 Establish Supervisory Accountability for Workers Radiological Practices RadiologicalWork Practices Program... . 25 ,SEP Reference Number 54 Complete implementation of Radiological Enhancement Program Collective Radiation Exposure, ..S Volume of Low-Level Solid Radioactive Waste. .6 Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations. . 23 Decontaminated Radiation Controlled Area. . 24 SEP Reference Number 58 Revise Physical Secunty Training and Procedure Program Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Security). .. 29 Security Non-System Failures.. . 30 Security System Failures. . 31 SEP Reference Number 60 Improve Controls Over Surveillance Test Program Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports. .19 SEP Reference Number 61 Modify Computer Program to Correctly Schedule Surveillance Tests Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports. .........,,.19 SEP Reference Number 62 Establish Interim System Engineers - Temporary Modif; cations (Excluding Scat!olding). . 33 SEP Reference Numbar 68 Assess Root Cause of Poor Operator Training and Establish Means to Monitor Operator Training Licensed Operator Requalification Training.. ,. 38 License Candidate Exams....... . 39 SEP Reference Number 71 Improve Controls Over Temporary Modifications Temporary Modifications (Excluding Scaffolding).. . 33 50 4

REPORT DISTRIBUTION LIST K. B. Guliani W. W. Orr R. L. Andrews E. R. Gundal L L Parent G. L. Anglehart W. R. Bateman R. H. Guy T. L. Patterson K. L. Belek R. M. Hawkins R. L. Phelps A. D. Bilau M. C. Hendrickson W.J.Ponec B. H. Biome R. R. Henning T. M. Reisdoril C. N. Bloyd K. R. Henry A. W. Richard J.P.Bobba J. B. HerrK 'l D. G. Ried G. J. Hill G. K. Samide C. E. Boughter M. A. Breuer K. C. Holthaus T.J.Sandene C. J. Brunnert M. A. Howman B. A. Schmidt M. W. Butt L G. Huliska S. T. Schmitz C. A, Carlson C. J. Husk F. C. Scx) field J. W. Chase R. L. Jaworski L. G. Sealock G. R. Chatfield R. A. Johansen H. J. Sefick A. G. Christensen W. C. Jones D. K. Sentel A. J. Clark J. D. Kecy J. W. Shannon O. J. Clayton J. D. Keppler R. W. Short R. P. Clemens D. D. Kloock C. F. Simmons J. L Connolley J. C. Knight E.L.Skaggs G. M. Cook D. M. Kobunski J. L Skiles M. R. Core G. J. Krause F. K. Smith S. R. Crites L. J. Kripal R. L. Sorenson D. W. Dale J. G. Krist J. A. Spijker R. C. DeMeulmeester J. B. Kuhr K. E. Steele R. D. DeYoung L. T. Kusek W. Steele D. C. Dietz L E. Labs H. F. Sterba J. A. Drabota M. P. Lazar G. A. Teeple T. R. Dukarski R. C. Learch M. A. Tesar P. D. Dunham S.E. Lee T. G. Therkildsen R. G. Eurich R. E. Lewis J. W. Tills H. J. Faulhaber R. C. Liebentritt D. R. Trausch M. A. Ferdig B. R. Livingston P. R. Tumer V. H. Frahm J. H. MacKinnon J. M. Uhland F. F. Franco G. D. Mamoran C,F.Vanecek M. T. Frans J. W. Marcil J. M. Waszak H. K. Fraser N. L Marfice G. R. Williams J. F. W. Friedrichsen D. J. Matthews S. J. Willrett S. K. Garnbhir J. M. Mattice W. C. Woemer T. J. Mcivor J. K. Gasper W. G. Gates K. S. McCormick M. O. Gautier R. F. Mehaffey K. G. Melstad S. W. Gebers K. J. Morns J. M. Glantz J.T. Gleason D. C. Mueller R. J. Muellar L. V. Goldber0 J.B.Newhouse D. J. Golden D. C. Gorence M. W. Nichols C. W. Norris R. E. Gray M. J. Guinn J. T. O'Connor G. E. Guliani 51 1 4

POSITIVE TREND REPORT INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT ATTENTION REPORT The Positive Trend Report highlights several Perfor-This section lists the indicators which show inadequacies mance Indicators with data representing continued per-as compared to the OPPD goal and indicators which formance above the stated goal and indicators with data show inadequacies as compared to the industry median representing signifcar',1 improvement in recent months. or upper quartile. The indicators will be compared to the Industry median or upper quartile as relevant to that indi. The following indcators have been selected as exhibiting cator, positive trends: Excetted Puechasn Disabbnc iniurv/lf! ness Frecuency Rata e rc ntage of expedited purchases compared to (Page 7) total purchases for the reporting month (3.15%) exceeds The Disabling injury /llIness rate for the first three months the Fort Calhoun goal of 0.5%. of 1992 is zero. Votations ner 1000 Insneden Hours Recorda5le iniu v/11 Mess Cases Frecuenev Rate The vio ations per 1,000 inpection hours for the reporting he rdable injury /111 ness Cases Frequercy Rate m 4 Oone s e a un goalof M ' (0.60) has shown improvement for the first three months of 1992. End of Management Attention Report. End of Positive Trend Roport PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT ADVERSE TREND REPORT This report has been abbreviated to aliow some perfor-A Periormance indcator which has data representing mance indicator data sources to devote more time to three (3) consecutive months of declining performance refuehng outage activities. Publication of allindicators constitutes an adverse trend. The Adverse Trend Report wi!I resume with the May 1992 report. explains the conditions under which certain indcators are showing adverse trends. An explanation will be provided All performance indicstor graphs have been revised to for indicators with data representing three months of de-represent monthry data and year end hte for previous clining performance that have been labeled as adverse years with columns. Fort Calhoun goal war to4 ate trends. averagos, industry medians and INPO yeals are te - The following indicator is exhibrting an adverse trend for sented with lines, the reporting month: INPO Industry Key Parameters indicators have been re-vised to include the industry medan values published in Emercent MWOs Acoroved for incluson in the Ovele 14 the INPO 1991 Year FSd R6 port. Refuelino Outace (Page 41) Number of Ho' Scots This indicator has been determined to be erhibiting an (Page 26) adverse trend by the Supervisor, Outage Projects be' This indicator has been revised to inciude hot spots re-cause the amount of emergent work has exceeded the moved and hot spots planned for removal. weekty tar 00t of 59 MWOs for each week during the refueling outage. Licuid Radicadive Waste Beine Discharced to the Envi-ronment (Page 28) End of Adverse Trend Report. This indicator has been revised to show the monthly lig-uid radoactive waste discharged in curies only. The graph illustrating releases in thousands of gallons has been deleted for purposes of clanty and because INPO does not require this inforrr.ation. End of Indcator improvement / Changes Report. 52

FORT CALHOUN STATION OPERATING CYCLES AND REFUELING OUTAGE DATES Event Date Range Production (MWH) Cumulative (MWH) Cycle 1 09/26/73 -02/01/75 3,299,639 3,299,639 1st Refueling 02/01/75 -05/09/75 Cycle 2 05/09/75 10/01/76 3,853,322 7,152,961 2nd Refueling 10/01/76 12'1T76 Cycle 3 12/13/76 0/30/77 2,805,927 9,958,888 3rd Refueling 09/30/77 12/09/77 Cycle 4 12/09/77 10/14/78 3,026,832 12,985,720 4th Refueling 10/14/78 12/24/78 Cycle 5 12/24/78 - 01/18/80 3,882,734 16,868,454 Sth Refueling 01/18/80 06/11/80 Cycle 6 _06/11/80 09/18/81 3,899,714 20,768,168 6th Refueling 09/18/81 12/21/81 Cycle 7 12/21/81 -12/06/82 3,561,866 24,330,034 7th Refueling 12/06/82 04/07/83 Cycle 8 04/07/83 - 03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736,405 8th Refueling 03/03/84 07/12/84 Cycle 9 07/12/84 09/28/85 4,741,488 32,477,893 Sth Refueling 09/28/85 01/16/06 Cycle 10 01/16/86 - 03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 10th Refueling 03/07/87 06/08/87 . Cycle 11 06/08/87 - 09/27/88 4,936,859 41,771,505 11th Refueling 09/27/88 - 01/31/89 Cycle 12 01/31/83 - 02/17/90 3,817,954 45,589,459 12th Refueling 02/17/90-05/29/90 Cycle 13 05/29/90 02/01/92 5,451,069 51,040,528 13th Refueling 02/01/92 - 04/26/92 (Planned Dates) Cycle 14# 04/26192-09/19/93 14th Refueling 09/19/93 11/13/93 Cycle 15 11/13/93-03/12/95 15th Refueling 03/12/95-05/06/95 FORT CALHOUN STATION CURRENT PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS

RECORDS" First Sustained Reaction August 5,1973 (5:47 p.m.)

First Electricity Supplied to the System August 25,1973 Commercial Operation (160,000 KWH) September 26,1973 Achieved Full Power (100%) May 4,1974 Longest Run (477 days) June 8,1987 Sept. 27,1988 Highest Monthly Not Generation (364,468,800 KWH) October 1987 Most Productive Fuel Cycle (5,451,069 MWH)(Cycle 13) May 29,1990-Feb.1,1992}}

ML20095H860

Text

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search