ML20095C132
| ML20095C132 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Wolf Creek  |
| Issue date: | 08/15/1984 |
| From: | Koester G KANSAS GAS & ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| KMLNRC-84-143, NUDOCS 8408220389 | |
| Download: ML20095C132 (38) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
. ~ KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY CLENN LNOESTER vict partssOENT- kWCLEAR August 15, 1984 Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Peactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 KMLNRC 84-143 Re Docket No. STN 50-482 Ref: 1) Letter of 6/7/84 from DGEisenhut, NRC, to GLKoester, KG&E
- 2) Letter KMLNRC 84-028 dated 3/9/84 from CLKoester, KG&E, to HRDenton, NRC Subj Wolf Creek Design Verification Activities Dear Mr. Denton Reference 1) requested additional information beyond that provided by KG&E in Reference 2) concerning Sargent & Lundy design verification activities for Wolf Creek. The Attachment provides information which shows that:
- 1. Ultimate heat sink (UHS) design calculations reflect as-built conditions,
- 2. UHS design information was documented in a controlled manner and was coordinated among design interfacing organizations, and
- 3. UHS design information was properly coordinated internally at Sargent & Lundy.
IdG&E has reviewed the information sanmarized in the Attachment in the offices of both KG&E and Sargent & Lundy. Considering the information provided in the Attachment and that previously provided in Reference 2) ,
KG&E concludes that further independent design verification activities do not appear necessary.
Yours very truly, f '
f lad $ 6 GLK bb xc:JCollins, Reg. IV PO'Connor (2)
HBundy 8408220389 840815 g 40 PDR ADOCK 05000482 A PDR 201 N. Market ~ WicNta, Kansas - Mail Address: PO. Box 208 i Wichita, Kansas 67201 - Telephone: Arett Code (316) 261-6451
OATH OF AFFIRMATION STATE OF KANSAS )
) SS:
COUNTY OF SEDGWICK )
I, Glenn L. Koester, of lawful age, being duly sworn upon oath, do depose, state and affirm that I am vice President - Nuclear of Kansas Gas and l Electric Company, Wichita, Kansas, that I have signed the foregoing letter f of transmittal, know the contents thereof, and that all statements contained therein are true.
l i
KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY ATTEST:
By_ fffM) ,
~
f//
Glenn L. Koester Vice President - Nuclear F.D. Prothro, Assistant Secretary i
STA7E OF KANSAS )
) SS:
COUNTY OF SEDGWICK )
BE IT REMEMBERED that on this 15th day of August, 1984 , before
.me, Evelyn L. Fry, a Notary, personally appeared Glenn L. Koester, Vice
- President - Nuclear of Kansas Gas and Electric Company, Wichita, Kansas, who is personally known to me and who executed the foregoing instrument, and he duly acknowledged the execution of the same for and on behalf of and as the act and deed of said corporation.
' IN WITNESS WHEFSOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my seal the date and year above written.
/
fD .**,' , . *
- I. . '.
))
- j,goTA.b ,1 '. Evelyr)fi[.
F Fry, NotaY
.'gp:/,'am a a
.g ' ,,ssion expires on August 15, 1985'.
f
~ ;
..O. . .F. .<. .
x
. Attachment to KHLNRC 84-143 Wolf Creek Generating Station Unit No. 1 Design Verification Activities Response to D.G. Eisenhut Letter to G.L. Koester Dated June 7, 1984 s
Kansas Gas and Electric Company August 15, 1984
s NRC REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Request (a)
Audit records or other documentation which verify that Sargent & Lundy had performed and updated the calculations needed to support the current Ultimate Heat Sink design.
Response
Sargent & Lundy (S&L) designed the Wolf Creek Generating Station Ultimate Heat. Sink (URS). The major calculations by S&L which supported the design of the UHS included determination of the UHS area and capacity, seepage, heat rejection analysis and stability design of the basin, slopes and dam.
First construction on the UHS began in August 1978. UHS construction was completed when filling of the reservoir commenced in May 1980 A. Design Confirmation for UHS Area and Capacity The area and capacity of the UHS was originally calculated by the S&L Water Resources and Site Development Division (See Figure 4 for S&L organization Chart) in Calculation No. WR-WC-UH-1, Rev. O, dated 3/3/77 through coordination with the S&L Mechanical Analytical Division on the required URS surface area and volume. (Engineering Studies MAD 73-714,73-806 and 74-031). This calculation was then revised on 2/13/81 based upon survey information from the as-built drawings of the UHS transmitted to S&L by KG&E via letter KWCLO-078 ;
dated 11/3/80. The results from the as-built area and capacity calculation were then.used by the S&L Mechanical Analytical Division to revise the heat rejection analysis.
B.. Design Confirmation for UHS Seepage Rate I- .
t- The rate of seepage through the . UHS dam was originally calculated by
- .the Geotechnical Division in Calculation No. UHSD-7, Rev. O, dated 5/10/75. The permeability of the insitu rock was determined through -
tests by Dames & Moore, and this information was used to calculate .the seepage through the UHS.
j, The rates of ' seepage were used by the Mechanical Analytical Division as input into the heat rejection analysis. After construction of-the UHS dam and slopes was completed, confirmatory permeability tests were performed on soil samples taken from the UHS. embankment. is documented in Dames & Moore report DMLK-667 dated 9/26/80. The Geotechnical '
l- Division evaluated the results of the confirmatory tests, and confirmed - that original calculation UHSD-7 was conservative, since the -
L permeability used in the calculation was greater than the permeability
! determined through the confirmatory tests. The Geotechnical' Division's evaluation of the results of. the confirmatory soil tests is -i documented in a S&L interoffice memorandum dated 11/26/80.
J .
. l Response to (a) (Continued) i C. _ Design Confirmation for the UHS Heat Rejection Analysis The design values for the minimum required UHS surface area and volume of water, the maximum UHS temperature and the maximum UHS water drawdown were determined by the Mechanical Analytical Division in Calculation No. MAD 79-678, Rev. O, dated 12/28/79. Upon receipt of the as-built area and capacity information from the Water Resources
'and Site Devlopment Division (WR-UC-UH-1, Rev.1), a new calculation was performed (MAD 81-556, Rev. O, dated 10/9/81) to calculate the as-4 built maximum temperature and drawdown values. .In addition, the Mechanical. Analytical Division performed Calculation No. MAD 80-503 on i
9/9/81 to verify that the rock " islands", which were left in the UHS l , basin as part of the as-built condition, had no significant effect on the performance of the UHS.
D. Design Confirmation for.the UHS Basin, Slopes and Dam Several calculations, including UHS-2 (Rev. O dated 3/14/77), UHS-2A (Rev. O dated 5/4/79), UHS-2B (Rev. O dated 4/30/79), UHSD-5 (Rev. O dated 6/3/75), UHSD-8 (Rev. O dated 1/27/76), UHSD-11 (Rev. O dated 8/21/74), and HS-DY-CPI (Rev. O dated 1/10/75) were made to support the UHS basin, slopes, and dam design in the areas of ESWS intake channel alignment, static slope stability, seismic stability, maximum settlement and camber. After construction completion on the UHS, the as-built soil properties and UHS profiles were reviewed to verify that the as-built condition conformed to the specified design condition.
After construction of the UHS dam and slopes was completed, confirmatory tests were performed on soil samples taken from the UHS embankment, including consolidation tests; consolidated undrained triaxial tests; and stress and strain controlled cyclic triaxial tests. :The resu'lts of the confirmatory soil tests are documented iri '
! Dames'& Moore report-DMLK-667 dated 9/26/80. The Geotechnical Division evaluated the results of the confirmatory tests. The -
evaluation confirmed that original calculations UHS-2, UHS-2A, UHS-2B, UHSD-5, UNSD-8, UHSD-11 and HS-DY-CP' were conservative, since the soil parameters used in these original calculations conoervatively
( enveloped the soil parameters determined from the confirmatory. tests.
The Goetechnical Division's ualuation of the confirmatory tests is
! documented in an interoffice memoranoum dated 11/26/80.
The as-built profile of the UHS dam was transmitted to Sargent & Lundy by KG&E in letter..KWCLO-078 dated 11/3/80. The Goetechnical Division's evaluation of the as-built profile confirmed that the as-built profile and crest elevation, including crest camber allowance
! for settlement, were greater than or equal to the specified E elevations. This evaluation is documented in a S&L interoffice memorandum dated 6/16/81.
e i
Response to (a) (Continued)
During construction of the UHS basin, the Geotechnical Division generated calculation No. UHS-3 (Rev. O dated 6/25/80), in support of the disposition to Field Change Request (FCR) 1-0539-C, which proposed that several rock " islands" be left as-is in the UHS basin to preclude the need for blasting. The calculation was generated to determine the additional volume required to replace the volume lost by not removing.
the rock " islands". Based upon the results of the calculation, S&L gave conditional approval to FCR 1-0539-C, with direction to excavate additional volume along the northwest slope of the UHS basin.
Summar_g Based on the above described design calculations and design calculation confirmations, the as-built configuration of the Ultimate Heat Sink basin, slopes and dam was determined by KG&E to be satisfactorily conservative. A summary of the history of the above listed original calculations and their revisions is provided for the major UHS design studies in Table 1 and Figure 1.
9 l
i e
r h
. . . - . ... - - . ~ ..- --
'4 ,
s Request (b) '
Audit records or other documentation which verify that Sargent & Lundy has maintained and updated the ultimate heat sink design criteria document / data and that this updated information had been properly coordinated with the other design interfacing organizations (i.e. Bechtel, Dames & Moore).
Response
S&L's design of the UHS involved coordination with external interfacing organizations on two primary design subjects. The UHS heat rejection analysis, involving primarily the S&L Mechanical Analytical Division, was coordinated with Bechtel and the SNUPPS organization (including KG&E), as shown in Figure 2. The physical design of the UHS involved primarily the S&L Geotechnical Division and was coordinated with Bechtel, SNUPPS, and Dames & Moore, as shown in Figure 3.
Design criteria, or design bases information, in the S&L UHS scope of work, is documented in design criteria documents, Safety Analysis Report (SAR) sections and engineering compilation reports. Design criteria documents define generalized performance objectives and prescribe analytical and/or test methods. The SAR sections contain all of the same information as the design criteria documents, plus more detailed information which describes how the design objectives are met, how compliance with the relevant
' Regulatory Guide is accomplished, and the design basis results of analysis and/or testing. Engineering compilation reports are generated at the completion of projects. Design compilation reports contain the same information found in the design criteria documents and the SAR, as well as a summary of the as-built condition (from construction surveillance reports, confirmatory tests and confirmatory as-built calculations), and confirmation that the as-built condition conforms to the original design bases.
Throughout all phases of the project, S&L's design of the UHS was coordinated with the other interfacing design organizations, and the design bases documents were periodically revised to reflect current design i
in formation .
- UHS Heat Rejection Analysis - Design Basis and Coordination The design bases information associated with the UHS heat rejection analysis is documented in Design Criteria DC-UHS-01-WC and SAR Site Addendum Section 9.2.5. The heat rejection analysis required external coordination of the
- design information itemized in Figure 2. The correspondence which documents the transfer of information between S&L, and the other interfacing, design organizations is listed in fable 2. Table 2 also summarizes the revisions to Design Criteria DC-l'HS-01-WC and SAR Site Addendum Section 9.2.5, which were made to reflect ti e status of design basis information.
a
^
Response (b) Continued UHS Physical Design - Design Bases and Coordination Design bases information associated with the physical design of the UHS is documented in Design Criteria DC-URS-02-WC and SAR Site Addendum Section 2.5.5. Physical design of the UHS required coordination with
~ SNDPPS, Bechtel and Dames & Moore on the design information shown in Figure 3.
l To develop consistency among all the original SNUPPS sites in the very early stages of the project, the SNUPPS organization (including KG&E), along with the site A/E's and Bechtel, developed a standardized consensus of design criteria for the geotechnical design work associated with each site's UHS.
The standardized geotechnical design criteria, documented in BLSE-432, dated 2/1/74, established a prescribed soils testing program as well as safety factors and methods for stability and seismic stability analysis. When Wolf Creek became the only SNUPPS site to design a submerged UHS, the design requirements for the Wolf Creek UHS became unique. Thereafter, S&L was entirely responsible for the development of UHS design basis information, except for the determination of the site specific SSE, which was the responsibility of Dames & Moore. Table 3 summarizes the revisions to the design bases documents, with a list of correspondence which documents the transfer of design basis information between S&L and the other interfacing organizations.
Design coordination between S&L and Bechcel was required primarily during the detailed design phase of the project to develop the physical design interfaces between the UHS intake channel and the ESWS Pumphouse. Changes which occured during physical design development only impacted the design drawings, and did not cause changes to the original design bases information. Design drawings and/or sketches were routinely revised to reflect the current status of design information. Documentation of the coordination between S&L and Bechtel is summarized in Tabl6 4.
Except for the SSE as noted above, coordination between S&L and Dames &
Moore was required to execute the UHS soils testing and investigation program during the engineering study phase of the project; the geotechnical surveillance program during construction of the UHS; and the confirmatory soils test program upon completion of construction on the UHS. Changes which occurred during implementation of the testing, investigation and surveillance programs did not impact the original design bases documents.
Documentation of the coordination between S&L and Dames & Moore is summarized in Table 5.
Response (b) UHS Physical Des! gn - Design Bases and Coordination Continued After construction and testing on the UHS was completed, S&L prepared a report ( A-3831), entitled " Engineering Data Compilatioa for Water Control Structures at Wolf Creek Lake", dated 4/3/81. This report incorporates the UHS design bases information and summarizes the results of Sargent & Lundy's design analysis and soils testing programs, including the confirmatory soil testing. The report also summarizes both the as-built condition of the UHS and Sargent & Lundy's evaluation to verify that the as-built condition conformed to the design basis requirements. The soils testing portions of the report are based .upon information provided by Dames & Moore through geotechnical investigation and confirmatory soil test reports. The as-built portions of the report are based upon information provided by Dames &
Moore's surveillance report and by KG&E and/or the contractor in the form of Field Change Requests and as-built survey drawings. Documentation of Sargent & Lundy's coordination of the report is summarized in Table 6.
Summary As described above, the documents which contained design basis information were maintained. current by Sargent & Lundy, and Sargent & Lundy's UHS design work was properly coordinated with the work of other interfacing organizations.
(
e
., , . , _ . . __r_. __. , , - . . . . - _ ,- ,_ . _ . - . , . _ , . _ . , . . ,
,- 1 g j .
Request (c)
Audit records or other documentation which verify that Sargent & Lundy has performed adequate interdivisional coordination associated with the Ultimate Heat Sink design.
Response
A summary of the design data which required interdivisional coordination within S&L is shown in Figure 1. Interdivisional coordination of the UHS i
design information and design documents was performed in accordance with the S&L Quality Assurance Program, Wolf Creek project specific instructions and Wolf Creek project status reports.
Project specific. documents which prescribe the scope of responsibilities among departments / divisions, and the interface of design information among the departments / divisions are:
- Project Instruction PI-WC-003, which prescribes the design and design interfaces between the Mechanical Department and the Structural Department.
- 4
- Project Instruction PI-WC-002, which designates the division of responsibility for the processing and coordination of reviews of external to S&L design documents.
-_ Project Status Reports which list the project design documents, and the responsible division for each document.
- Project Distribution List, which lists each design document (or
. category of design document) with the required interoffice distribution for each design document. - ;
Throughout- the design of the UHS, design input information from one division to another division was documented in interoffice memoranda. Normally, .
specific design assignments and design input / interface requirements were discussed and resolved in routine project meetings held twice each month or,
'later in the' project, monthly project meetings. The results from calculations, studies and design evaluations from one division, which constituted design input to another division's work, were documented in interoffice memoranda from the originating division to either the Project Engineering Division or the Project Management Division, with carbon copies to the other interfacing division (s). Table 7 summarizes the memoranda which document the interdivisional transmittal of UHS design input information, for the primary interdivisional interfaces shown in Figure 1.
E Draft copies of designated design documents, including design criteria, functional descriptions, drawings and specifications were issued for interdivisional review and comment prior to their release for use, as required by the Quality Assurance Program. Draft copies of tae design
. document were issued for review and comment by the originating division via e interoffice memorandum to the Project Engineering Division or the Project Management Division, with carbon copies to the other. interfacing divisions.
i
~ - - - - > - , - , , , - , . ,---,w,-- .m-.., ,sn--- , - - - - - - - - - - . - , . . , ,-----n - -.-- .< , - - , ,
Response (c) Continued Reviews of the draft document by the reviewing divisions, either with or without comments, were documented by annotating the transmittal memo and/or the attached document. The reviewer signed and dated the annotation, and returned the transmittal memo back to the originating division. Subsequent revisions to the design document were issued for interdivisional review and comment in the same manner as the original. Documentation of interdivisional reviews is not considered by the S&L QA Program as a lifetime record. Such documentation is retained for a minimum of one year by the originating division. Nevertheless, documentation of the interdivisional reiiew and comment on Design Criteria DC-URS-02-WC is available in the Geotechnical Division's files. The interdivisional review of all revisions to DC-UHS-02-WC is summarized in Table 8, and is representative of the interdivisional review process at S&L for the Wolf Creek Project.
u After resolution and/or incorporation of interdivisional review comments, design documents were released for use. Released design documents were issued to designated interoffice divisions for use, as delineated in the Project Distribution List (currently Rev. 10, dated 5/19479). For example, the Project Distribution List requires the distribution of UHS design criteria documents to the Project Management Division, Structural Project Engineering Division, Electrical Project Engineering Division, Environmental Division, Nuclear Safeguards and Licensing Division, Geotechnical Division, Water. Resources and Site Development Division, Structural Analytical Division and Quality-Assurance Division. Documentation of controlled interoffice distribution is also normally retained for only a minimum of one year in the project files as it too is not considered a lifetime QA record.
However, several interoffice memoranda are available in the project files which substantiate that design documents were distributed internally, as
-required-by the Project Distribution List. Examples of the interoffice distribution for the UHS design criteria documents DC-URS-01-WC and DC-URS-02-WC are summarized.in Table 9.
.m l Summary-l Based upon the procedures and documents described above, KG&E concludes that design input information and design documents associated with the URS have l had satisfactory interdivisional coordination within Sargent & Lundy.
i l
4 i
l l
- . . . .- . - - ._ .- - -. . . - .= --
Figure 1 SAIGNP & IUNDY URS CALCGATIONS Dames & Moore Dames & Moore Envirornnental Data Design Phase l l Soil Test Data V
Bechtel-St0PPS s/
DBA Cmditions Sargent & LttMy Required Flow Rate Sargent & Lundy Geotechnical Divisicm Max. Intake Tenp. Environmental Division Rate of Seepage QED-7 Discharge Tetp/Thne Design Weather Conditions UHS Dam Min. ESSE Intake Elev.
I I I I E s/ \/ \!/
.Sargent & Lundy 79-678 73-714 Mechanical Analytical Division 80-503 73-806 Heat Rejection Analysis81-566 74-031 Minimin GE Surface Area
--) and Volune Maxir:un Drawdown Elevation Marinan GE Temperature Maxinun Lake Temperatu e prior to Start of ESW f
i Heat Rejection i
/\ p
\/ !
8 Dames & Moore -
Sargent & Lundy Design Soils Test Data l Water Resources and Site Development Div. WR-WC-MI-l Site Specific SSE Area / Capacity Calculations WR-NC-UH-3
- Effect of Main Dam Failure on UHS WR-WC-Wi-4
- Ioss of Capacity Due to Sedimentation i
I /\
Q V VE s/ i USH-2 U ED-5 Sargent & Lundy UHS-2A UHSD-8 Geotechnical Division UE-2B UHSD-ll Physical Design UIE-3 HS-DY-cpl
@i ^'
t i Dames & Moore Kansas Gas and Electric Cbnpany As-Built Soil Test Data DEK-667 UHS As-Built Documentation KWCU>-078 EUR l-0539-C e y Flow for Original Calculations and Letters
> Flow for Design Confirmaticn Calculations, Letter, FCRs
Figure 2 SARGENT & IDNDY UHS - HEAT REJECTICN ANALYSIS CDORDIIRTICH WITH OIHER INFERFACIS ORGANIZATIONS BEC1ffEL - SNUPPS
- KANSAS Gl6 & ELECTRIC (D.
DBA CDNDITIONS GIS AS-BUILT DOCLNENTATION REQUIRED FIIW RATE MAX INEAKE TEMP DISGARGE HEAT RATE __
5/ %/ "
SARGENT & IDNDY HEAT RCJECFION ANALYSIS REQUIRED WIS VOLUME CAICJLATED MAX. UHS TEMPERATURE MAXIMUM MIS DRAWDOWN ELEVATION e
- Includes HG&E involvement .
t
- . . . , e , - , . . - , . , - . . - , ,, . - , . . , - - ,
Figure 3 SARGENT & M NDY UdS PHYSICAL DESIGN CDORDINATION Wr1H CfmER INTERFACING ORGANI2ATIONS SNUPPS*
INITIAL STANDARDIZED UHS GECTTECHNICAL DESIGN MEM ODS INCWDING:
- STATIC ANALYSIS
- SEISMIC PSEUD 0 STATIC ANALYSIS
- SOIL TESTS / INVESTIGATIONS
/
BEGITEL N ESW PUMPf00SE CDNFIGURATION ICE PREVENTATION AT INEAKE ESW DISGARGE STRUCIURE DAMES & MOORE
. SITE SPECIFIC SSE GEDIECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS SOIL TEST DATA 00NFIRMATORY SOIL TEST DATA INSPEX: TION & SURVEILLANCE KANSAS GAS & ELBCTRIC C0.
IkIS AS-BUILT DOCUMENTATION
\/\/ \/ \/
SARGENT & LUNDY
- tilS PHYSICAL DESIGN
- t. INVESTIGATION / TEST REQUIREMENTS i
SURVEILLANCE / INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS UHS INTAKE CHANNEL DESIGN MAXIMJM SEDIMENTATION AT INEAKE CHANNEL l ,
l -ESW DISCHARGE STRUCIURE LOCATICE 1
i
- Includes N3&E involvement.
i
Figure.4 ~
Sargent & Lundy Typical' Project Organization SimeOR PARTate i
lseaccion or :=0=reni=0] joearCfonoPstaviCaslf I I I i i l' i STRUCTWAAL WE CM AmeC AL ELE C T RIC AL f tCH41 CAL SteveCES etPAnf utset uAgA0am of PARTMtWT WAteAOf 4 oEPARTeettet esAleA0f A oEPARTWtlef MAteAotR I
l PROJCCT uaseAotut4T oeve$ EON .
] PROJECT otatCTOR y k
,,,,,,,, }q I
l l PAOJECT l PROJECi esAuASTesA440teessef S oevision]l OgnteAL A=ALTTIC AL L !
l osv'SiO4 [ l OU ALITY C09?p0L g PROJECT t=084E13eeseo piv'sion elve ssow
, gg PROJECT EN0aattem0 olvetsome SENIOR Ste vCTumAL ##0JE C T l
' L a ""'* G 4 SENICA ELECTRICAL PAOJECT 4 l teamgge wtCesAmiCAL PROJECT tie 0tmEER E " 8'4 E I R
[ SCME oWLmo esva9*04 ] 4 CO* S tavC T'04 STRUCTUn*L PROJECT Enemttas WE CM AmeC AL E N0pstE A S uanActurest cowsesom [
[~*
E LECT #eC AL (=0MCERS A N A L T TsC AL SPECef eC Af eO4S j A N AL T ilC AL 3 S PE C ETIC A teces s l Ag AL T TIC at S PE CIFIC A Te0'et oevision seveseou 3 oeveston I povetiou
[ . owsSion h
i Devisions ESTsuhTINO oevess0se ot o f s CwmC AL l [otSe0= a onAeTwo 8 0 " ' " ' C ' ""0" lot se= a onArTe=0 losSiO= a paAafms1 l oevese04 osvlSeces j l olvtS604 1UCt=Se=0 eevettomI muCLe osmiON Am s AssowAnos a l W ATER RESOWACg g a gef g gavimosewte T AL C04T AOL & . COnePUTER St etweCit l
[ oevissom {
of wit 0Put est sevess0se osvesecas esegTnUwCNTion osveteou *
=
_-1.E P,eo0. AP eCS osv,Sec.l EJ'O'"LI ##'O uv AC elveleOse
~
WCMAeoC4 Luvess0N l LEGEND Administrative and/or technical responsibility
, Project coordination
Programmatic direction or QA activities ~ v a
n
Pags 1 of 2' TABIE.1 -
Sargent'& Inndy Major HIS CS1culations
' Calculation -
Identification No. Calculation Title Issue Date Revision Date ' Ccmnents hR-MC-UI-l L Area / Capacity of GE 03/03/77 02/13/81 Revision basal on as-built information.
WR4JC-QI-4 Ioss of Capacity Due to 03/03/77 No revision required since' sedimentation is 40 Year Sedimentation 4
dependent on the drainage basin above the-
- GIS which has not change 1.
i MAD 79-678 U E Performance '12/28/79 10/09/81 Preliminary stuiles BRD 73-714,73-806 - arri 74-31 precealed this design calculation.
i It was uplated by BRD 81-566 "GE Per-j formance per As-Built Area arri Chpacity Data".
MAD 80-503 UE Depth Evaluation i
09/09/81 Evaluation of as-built rock "islarris"
, effect on heat rejection.
d QED-7 Seepage 'Ihrough ME Dam i m/10/75 01/22/81 Revisal to add conputer printout for record
< purposes. N3 uplate is requiral since confirmatory permeability tests on GIS embankment material showed that the soil parameters usel in the original calcula-tion were conservative.
UE-2 ES4S Intake 01annel New 03/14/77 01/23/01 Revision 1 added a conputer printout 4
Alignnent
- attachnent for record purposes anr1 added
. calculations on slope stability for the
" rapid drawdown condition" as requested by NRC questions. 'Ihe calculation did not require as-built revision since confirma-tory, . consolidated-urrirainel triaxial tests on the UE embankment materials showed that the soil parameters uset in the original calculation were conservative.
i UE-2A Stability - Walge ' Method 05/04/79 No update was requirei since consolidated -
G E Evacuation Slopes i undrained triaxial tests of UE embankment
! materials showel that the original soil parameters.used in the original calculation
- were conservative.
1
1 Paga 2 L of 2 TABIE 1 Continued
- Sargent & Inndy mjor UE Calculations Calculation Identification No. Calculation Title . Issue Date . Revision Date' Ccutments 35-2B Stability - ESWS Intake- 04/30/79 01/25/81 Revision 1 added a conputer. printout Channel
.attachnent for record purposes. . 1he
. calculation did not require as-built revision since confirmatory, consolidated- .
undrained traixial tests on the US embankment materials sh3wed that the soil parameters used in the original calculation-were conservative.
UED-5 Seisnic Stability of 06/03/75 No upiate was regired since stress and UE Dam strain controlled cyclic triaxial tests of HIS embankment materials showed that the original soil parameters used in the original calculation were conservative.
See Ibte 1.
UED-8 Camber for UE Ihm 01/27/76 No update was required since no update was necessary for calculation UED-ll.
t 4
UED-ll Settlement Analysis of 08/21/74 lb update was required since consolidation U S Dam 4
tests of UE embankment materials showed conservative asstruptions were made in the original calculation.
- IE-DY-cpl Finite Element Represen- 01/10/75 See cotment on UED-5. See Note 1. 'Ihis tation of UE Dam calculation is representative of 6 cal-culations which conprise the finite element i
analysis of the UE dam.
UE-3 U E Reservoir As-Built 06/25/80 Excavation Calculaticn was performed in support of EURl-0539C to determine the additional d
~
p F ' excavation voltane required to replace the cross-sectional volune lost by leaving the rock " islands" in the UIS basin.
Note 1.
As-built seisnic stability calculations were coupleted to identify additional margins in the UE. Calculation results are given in' FSAR Sections 2.5.6 and 3C arri are evaluated in Nblf Creek SER (NUREG-0881) Section 2.5.6.
i
Pagh .1 of 4? . ,
l TABIE 2 .
UE HEAT REJBCPICN ANAIRSIS S&L COORDINATICN CF DESIGN BASIS DOCLMENPS WI'IH EXTERNAL CRGANIZATIONS -
- DC-LIS-01-NC SAR 9.2.5
.Corress.mdSce (1)
Date No. Fran To Subject -
' Preliminary Preliminary. 08/20/731 BISE-104 BK Study. Phase SNUPPS Preliminary. description.of Standby Service -
- See Note (*2)
Mter System for GE studies.
- 08/29/73 BIRE-12' BIC: KGB SNUPPS PSAR table of contents and format guide.
08/30/73 BISE-119 BPC SNUPPS UHS criteria for multi-unit sites - 30 day cooling.
10/09/73 BIKE-20 1 BIC KGE Notes on meetirg of 9/19/73 between BPC, S&L, and KG&E - re: division of responsibilities for PSAR sections. '
10/17/73 BISE-195 BPC SNUPPS ' Preliminary information on the GE requirements for heat rejection, flow, max. inlet temp.,
and duration.
11/02/73' AIK-9 S&L KGB Propose max. inlet temp. of 95 instead of 85 .
11/06/73 'AIK-17 S&L KGE (bnfirm telecon, clarification of heat rejection requirements of BISE-195.
11/08/73 BISE-237 BPC SNUPPS ESN System - general description of function ard response to ALK-9, regarding max. inlet temp.
11/09/73 BISE-240 BIC SNUPPS Meeting agerda '- BPC, SNUPPS, Site A/E's to .
discuss interfaces.
12/11/73- AIK S&L KGE First draft PSAR 9.2.5 for review and connent.
Draft 01/14/74 AIK-109 S&L KGE PSAR Issue draft PSAR Section 9.2.5 for review &
comment.
01/24/74 BISE-407 BPC S'JUPPS Service water requirements based upon informa-tion fron IESS.
02/07/74 BIKE-89 BPC S&L Response to AIK-109 - review of draft PSAR Section 9.2.5.
02/14/74 BISE-456 ' BPC SNUPPS Clarification of BISE-407 - re: Service mter System design parameters.
05/23/74 BIEE-712 . BPC SNUPPS ESW System interface with UE - heat rejection requirements, flow rates, max. intake temp.,
Draft and division of design responsibilities.
06/26/74' AIK-1842. S&L KGE Issue DC-GE-01-WC, draft Revision 0, for Revision 0.
approval and sumnarize studies to determine size of UE.
07/29/74- KIA-206 KGB S&L Response to AIK-1042 - comnents on DC-GE-01-WC draft Revision 0.
-______ _ - _ - _ . - - - - - - -------- - --- -. ~ - -
M N + .
"Paga 2 -of'4~
TABLE 2 Continued:
~
UHS HEAT REJBCPION AtRLYSIS j .
.+'
j S&L COORDINATION OF DESIGN BASIS DOClbENTS WI'IH EXTERNPJ., ORGANI7ATICNS .
l Correspondence (1)>
- - DC-IIE-01-WC ' SAR 9.2.5 Date No. From To Subject i ,
08/20/74- AIB-1006 S&L- BPC Transmittal of LUS design heat rejection rates .
and request 'information."
l 09/06/74 AIK-1978 - 'S&L' KGE: Response to KLA-206 - sumarize forthcoming -
revisions to DC-OHS-01-WC.
i Revision 0 09/24/74 AIK-1983 S&L KGE Issue ' DC4HE-01-WC, Revision' 0, -.for review &
2 M/23/74 caninent.
I See Note (*3) 10/14/74 KLA-280 KGB S&L Response to AIK-1083 - otmnents on DC4XE-01-MC, Revision 0.-
4 11/01/74 BIEE-150 BPC KGB- Cbnfirming' telecon, ESWS heat' rejection requirements.
! Draft 11/11/74 AIK-1103 S&L KGB Issue DC4XE-01-41C, draft Revision 1 for review
! Revision 1 and caninent.
I 11/09/74 12/31/74 KIA-333 KGE S&L Response to AIK-1103 - no connents.on See Note (*4) DC4XE-01-WC, draft Revision 1.
, Revisicn 1 05/16/75 AIB-1022 S&L BPC Oortments arrl request for confirmation of heat
- 01/20/75 rejection requirunents defined in BISE-712.
See Note (*5) 06/11/75 BIKE-236 BPC KGB Response to AIB-1022 - Revised heat rejection reqairement and flow rate.
Revision 2 07/11/75 AIK-1225 S&L KGE Issue 'DC-LIE-01-44C, Revision 2, for .use.
l 7/9/75 06/10/76 BISE-3185 BPC SNUPPS Evaluation of impact if use mixed oxide fuel,
! See Note (*6) heat discharge.
08/24/76 BIKE-334 BPC- KGE (bnfirm S&L telecon of 8/11/76 - additional heat 4
rejection requirements if mixed oxide fuel used - S&L evaluating impact for IIE.
09/27/78 KIA-ll76 KGE S&L Schedule for preparation of ESAR and responsible organizations.
04/10/79 KEA-1242 KGE S&L Minutes of 4/4/79 Licensing meeting and revised division of responsibilities.
Revision 3 Draft 05/24/79 AIK-1826 S&L KGE Issue DC-OHS-01-WC, Revision 3.
5/10/79 ESAR 08/16/79 AIK-1862 S&L KGE Issue draft ESAR Section 9.2.5.
- See Note (*7) 08/29/79 BIKE-522 ~ BEC KGE Response to AIK-1862 - ocmnents on draft ESAR 9.2.5.
i 09/29/79 BIKE-525 BPC KGE Transmit ESWS figures for ESAR Section 9.2.5.
1 i
1 i -
Pagy 3 of 4 .
IIIS HFAT REJBCPION AIRLYSIS -
S&L COORDIt& TION CF DESIGN BASIS DOCIMEtfrS WI'IH EXTERtRL ORGANIZATIONS Correspondence (1)
DC-IAIS-01-WC SAR 9.2.5 Date No. Fran To Subject 11/06/79 ALK-1898 S&L KGE Response to BIEE-522. - response to BPC ccmnents ard explanation of interface 'of ESAR data between S&L ard BPC. Also contains S&L -
cx:mnents on SNUPPS FSAR Section 6.2.1.
t 12/04/79 BIKE-556 'BPC KGE Response to AIK-1898 - otmnents in addition to BIKE-522 cn S&L draft of ESAR 9.2.5.
ESAR 12/07/79 AIK-1915 S&L KGE Issue final ESAR Section 9.2.5.
Revision 0 12/21/79 AIX-1920 S&L KGB Issue final figures for ESAR Section 9.2.5.
02/19/80 11/03/80 IWCID-078 KGE S&L Transmittal of as-built IIIS survey infonnation.
Revision 8 11/25/81 AIK-6426 S&L KGB Results of as-built heat rejection analysis 02/26/82 compared to design requirements, with changes to ESAR Section 9.2.5.
t .
e
?
Page 4 o'f 4'. ,
-1 TABIE 2 Continued -
Notes (01) Correspon3ence was also carbon-copied to the other: interfacing organizations. Organir.stion abbreviations incitrie:
IGE = Kansas Gas & Electric -
S%L = Sargent & Inndy BPC = Bechtel Ibwer Corporation D/M = Dames & ! bore
- DIC = Ihniel International Corporation SNUPPS = SNUPPS staff i
(*2) Durirg the initial stages of the project, many studies were performed by both Sargent & Inndy and Bechtel to define the GIS design criteria arri to determine the most oost effective type of UHS (coolirg tower with UHS versus cooling lake with US). See Table 3 for a couplete list of correspondence during this initial phase of the project. After selection of a cooling lake with a subnerged URS for Wolf Creek, tha design of the UHS became the responsibility of SSL; and S&L prepared DC-GE-01-WC.
(*3) Revision 0 of DC-US-Sl-WC incorporated KGE cents of KIA-206.
(*4) Draft Revision 1 of DC-UIS-01-NC incorporated KGS comnents of IGA-280.
(*5) There were no chan3es to EC-URS-01-WC between the draft Revision 1 arr3 the Revision 1 which was issuel for use.
' (*6) Revision 2 of DC-UHS-01-4C incorp3 rated the charrJes in heat rejection rate fron the SNUPPS power block and' operating modes of the EShTS system; arri the tenperature arri seepage analyses.
(*7) Revision 3 of DC-GIS-01-WC incorporated internal S&L comnents on design criteria format and safety related designators.
Pags ' 1 of 4 '
TABE 3 .
GE RIYSICAL DESIGN S&L COORDINATICN OF DESIGN BASIS DOCLMENTS WI'III EXTERNAL ORGANIZATIONS II'-UIE-02-4C CURKESPONDENCE (1) -
Date No. Fran To Subject l
StMy Phase 08/16/73 BGE-99 Bm SNUPPS Request input fron sites regarding UE selection - depeMent upon See Note (*2) selection of cooling tower or cooling lake. If tower, BPC design UIS; If lake, site A/E designs UE.
08/30/73 BGE-119 BN SNUPPS GE criteria for multi-unit sites - 30 days cooling, two sources of water aM design basis events.
09/24/73 BGE-154 BK SNUPPS Proposed ag wla - meeting between SNUPPS, B T, and site geotech-nical organizations - coordination of analytical methods, safety factors, scope of field programs.
09/27/73 BG E-158 BK SNUPPS Final agenda for geotechnical meeting of 10/1/73.
10/09/73 BUE-20 BPC KGE Notes on meeting of 9/19/73, between BPC, S&L, and KG&E, regard-ing division of responsi'oilities for PSAR sections.
10/25/73 BGE-205 BN SNUPPS GE schemes - above grade cooling tower UE basin v,ersus below grade UE cooling tower basin.
10/26/73 A m -5 S&L KGE Proposed breakdown for PSAR Section 3.8.4.8, " Essential (boling 8
Pond."
11/05/73 l Am-12 S&L KGE Ebrthconing meetirv3 - SNUPPS, Bechtel, and site A/E's to discuss GE Slope Stability Analysis, so that all UE designs have canparable level of analysis.
11/06/73 Am-18 SLL KGB GIS schemes - with cooling tower versus with cooling lake.
11/06/73 BISE-230 BPC SNUPPS Notes of meeting of 10/1/73, and request another meeting among SNUPPS, BPC, and site A/E's aM geotechnical consultants to continue coordination aM staMardization of geotechnical methodology.
11/06/73 BME-31 BN KGB Response to Am-5, Review of draft PSAR Section 3.8.4.8.
11/08/73 BGE-32 BPC. KGE Subnittal date for draft PSAR on UlS.
11/08/73 BISE-235 BN KGE Proposed agenda for geotechnical meeting on 11/4/73.
11/09/73 BISE-241 BPC SNUPPS Transmit standardized and coordinated geotechnical criteria for review prior to meeting of 11/14/73.
11/12/73 Am-26 S&L KGE GE schemes - with cooling tower or with cooling lake, plus cost estimates for design / construction to site specific SSE versus SNUPPS SSE.
6
3 Pag 2 1 2 Eof 4' '
TABm 3 Continued ,
LIE PHYSICAL DESIGN -
S$1; COORDINATION OF DESIGN BASIS DOCINENPS WI'IH EXTERNAL ORGANIZATIONS IX:-lAE-02-WC CORRESPONDENCE .
Date l No. From To Subject 11/20/73 BISE-264 BK SNUPPS. Notes fran geotechnical meeting of 11/14/73l- Standardized -
geotechnical criteria.
11/23/73 AIK-42 S&L KE Transmit table on seis:nic category and quality group classifica-tions.
12/12/73 BME-44 BPC KGB BN connents 'on AIK-42, Seismic Ottegory aM Quality Group Classification Table.
12/21/73 BME-49 BPC KGB Draft PSAR Section 2.4.11.5.
01/07/74 BME-53 BPC KE Section 2.4 PSAR.
01/15/74 AIK-ll6 S&L KGB First draft PSAR Section 2.5.5'for review and connent.
02/01/74 BISE-432 BN SNUPPS Resolution of comnents, aM revision to the meeting notes and '
criteria of BISE-264.
02/25/74 BME-92 BK K2 Cbnfirming telecon - resolution of connents on AIK-ll6.
07/09/74 ALK-1053 S&L KT Meeting notes - IHE design review.
Rcvision 1 07/16/74 AIK-3028 S&L KGB Issue DC-UIE-02-WC, Revision 1, for review aM connent.
7/16/74 08/14/74 KLA-230 KGB- S&L Response to AIK-3028, connents on DC-UIE-02-WC, Revision 1.
08/27/74 BME-126 BK KG Response to AIK-1053, safety factor for slope stability analysis Revisicn 2 and separation of structures between nuclear plant units..
11/22/74 DMIK-194 D/M- S&L Cbordinate revisions to PSAR, Chapter 2.
9/20/74 See Note (*3)
Revision 3 01/14/75 ALK-3080 S&L KT Issue DC-OHS-02-NC, Revision 3, for review aM connent.
12/6/74 02/27/75 KLA-382 KGB S&L Response to ALK-3080, comnents on DC-UIE-02-UC, Revision 3. .
See Note (*4) 04/28/75 AIDM-3034 S&L D/M Issue draft of response to NRC question 323.3M and seismic stability analysis of WS for revew aM connent.
04/30/75 DMIK-279 D/M S&L Response to AIDM-3034, carments on draft response to NRC question 323. 30N, dynamic analysis GE Ihm.
05/07/75 AIDM-3035 S&L D/M Response to DiIK-279, resolution of comnents on draft response to NRC question 323.30W. -
05/16/75 DMIK-288 D/M BPC/S&L Site specific SSE is revised to 0.12 g.
08/11/75 DMIK-309 D/M K2 (bnfirming telecons to S&L aM BPC_- SSE load to be applied at the base of the foundation. P 6
y- r.
Paga 3 ' of 4 '
- TABLE 3 Cbntinued ',
LES HlYSICAL DESIGN.
S&L COORDItRTICN CF DESIGN BASIS DOCLNENPS WI'IH EXTERNAL ORGANIZATIONS DC-LIS-02-4C CORRESPONDENCE (1) ,
Date No. Fron To Subject Revision 4 10/23/75 ALK-3144 S&L KGB Issue DC-UIE-024C, Revision 4, for use. -
.10/22/75 KLA-ll76 09/27/78 KGE S&L Schedule for preparation of FSAR doctrnent with Soc Note (*5) ..
responsible organizations.
04/10/79 KLA-1242 KGB S&L Minutes of 4/4/79 Licensing meeting with revised division of responsibilities.
Revision 5 07/31/79 A M-3447 S&L KGE Issue DC-UfE-024fC, Revision 5, for record purposes.
7/26/79 12/03/79 IMM-603 D/M KGB Issue first draft of ESAR Sections 2. 5. 4, 2. 5. 5, and 2. 5. 6.
.See Note (*6)'
)
- 4 d'
i.
i i
L Paga 4 .of 4 TABIE 3 Continued -
UE HIYSICAL DESIGN S&L COORDINATICN CF DESIGN BASIS DOCU4ENTS WI'IH EXTERNAL ORGANIZATIONS Notes
(*l) See Ibte 1 of Table 2.
(*2) During the initial stages of the projects, many studies were performed by both S&L ard Dechtel to define the GE design criteria arrl to determine the nost cost effective type of GE (coolirg tower with MIS versus cooling lake with UE) . After the selection of a cooling lake with submerged UIS for Wolf Creek, the design of the UE become the responsibility of S&L; and S&L prepared Design Criteria DC-MIS-02-WC, Revision 1.
(*3) Revision 2 of DC-GIS-02-4C incorporated conments fron Sargent & Inndy's OA Division, and cmments from KG&E, KLA-230, ani was issued for internal Sargent & IAndy conments only.
(*4) Revision 3 of DC-GIS-02-WC incorporated cotments fron Sargent & Inndy's internal review of Revision 2, and added the finite elenent analysis method to evaluate seisnic stability, as a result of carments fran the NRC.
(*5) Revision 4 of DC-GIS-02-4C incorporated revisions to safety factors for rapid drawlown and steady state analysis (as a result of NRC connents); revise 1 the SSE fron 3.1 g. to 0.12 g. added applicability of tornado induced wave action, and added additional dynamic soil tests.
(*6) Revision 5 of DC-GIS-02-NC incorporated criteria for analysis of the UIS dam slope protection, as a result of a IG atrlit.
l .
' Pagn 1 : of 3' ,
TABIE 4 "
GE PHYSICAL DESIGN DEVE[ DINE;7P COORDINNPION i CORRESPONDENCE BEIWEEN SARGENT &' LUNDY AND BECiffEL (1) . .
k
- Date Ntifa~ser Frcm To Subject l
f.
A
'11/27/73. AIK-43 S&L- KGE Transmit to Bechtel - drawing SK-lll73-1, UE boring location plan.
'01/14/74 BIKE-59 BPC KGB Probable maximtm mye run-up.
!. 01/16/74 BIEE-63 BPC KGB Transmit sketches of ESW Pumphouse intake bay.
1-07/31/74- BIKE-ll8 BN. KGB Transmit drawings of ESW Pumphouse.
0B/27/74' BIKE-126 BPC KGB Response to AIK-1053, safety factor for slope stability analysis and
~'.. separation of structures between nuclear plant units.
t
- 2/29/74' BIKE-127 BK KGE Routing of ESWS pipes, including discharge pipes to GE.
09/11/74 BIKE-131 BPC KGE Cbordinates for. the ESWS Discharge Structure.
09/13/74' .BIEE-131 BK KGE Transmit preliminary ESNS Pumphouse general arrangement drawings M-1GOBO, s
Revision A,.and M-lG @l, Revision A.
l :10/28/74 BIKE-147 BPC KGE (bnfirm telecon, elevation of GE intake with maximtm silt level.
j 10/30/74 AIB-3003 SEL BPC (bnfirm botton elevation for GE intake channel.
11/19/74~ BIKE-156 BPC KGE Transmittal of sketches SK-C-133, Revision A, and SK-C-175, Revision A.
.02/21/75 KLB-090 KGE BK ESWS Discharge Strtx:ture.
, 03/03/75 BIEE-191 BPC KGE Transmit preliminary sketches of ESWS Discharge Structure.
03/17/75 AIR-3007 S&L BPC Response to BIKE-191, comments and proposed new location for ESWS Discharge Structure.
03/21/75' BIEE-204 BN KGB Response to KLB-090, . transmittal of sketches on ESWS Discharge Structure i ' and confirming telecon to resolve alternate location for ESWS Discharge
- Structure.
04/03/75 BIEE-212 BPC KGB ESWS Discharge Structure.
4 04/09/75 AIR-30ll S&L BPC Response to' BIKE-204, Carments on ESNS Discharge Structure.
05/22/75 BIEE-225. BPC KGE Transmittal of preliminary drawi.ngs M-lGme, Revision B, and M-lGOB1, Revision B.
}.~
2/14/75- BIKE-253 BN' KGB Cbnfirming telecons for weeks of 7/14/75 through 7/28/75 - GE intake channel at ESWS Pumrihouse and location coordinates for ESWS PLnphouse.
09/16/75 ~
BIEE-261 BPC KGE Request that ICE authorize a study to determine probability of frazil ice j .
' fomation in cooling lake, UE.
i- 10/17/75 BIEE-2385 BN KGE
- Cbnfirming telecons for weeks of 9/29/75 through 10/6/75 - Unit 2 ESWS Pumphouse alternatives and frazil ice study.
. 01/16/76 BIEE-287 BN KGE (bnfirming telecon - BPC is authorized to proceed with study to determine 01/26/76 if frazil ice could form in UE area lake.
j AIR-3020 IS&L BPC Transmittal of draft drawing S-80 dated 1/15/76, us layout.
i 1 I 1 .
1Pags 2' of'3
. TABLE 4 Continued- -
UE PHYSICAL DESIGN DEVEIDINENT COORDItRTIOR -
CORRESPONDENCE BUIWEEN SARGENT & 11]NDY AND BEOffEL (1)
Date Nanber Fran To Subject 03/29/76 BIRE-302 BPC KGB Cbnfirming telecons for weeks of 3/8/76 through 3/15/76 - retaining walls at ESWS Pumphouse and confirmed receipt ard discussion of.telecopied.
sketch on alternate intake channel grading at ESWS pumphouse.
04/01/76 BIEE-303 BN KGB Response to BLKE-287 - Transmittal of report "Frazil ice formation in UE" and additional study required to determine width intake channel.
04/14/76 BIKE-306 BPC KGE (bnfirming telecons for weeks of 3/22/76 through 3/29/76-- retaining walls at ESWS Pumphouse intake; frazil ice study, developnent of ice in lake; and minimun lake (UE) level.
04/23/76 BIKE-309 BPC KGB Cbnfirming telecons for weeks of 4/5 through 4/12 - grading aM retaining walls at ESNS Pumphouse intake; and five foot berm en UE intake channel to prevent ice blockage.
04/27/76 BIEE-310 BK KGB Notes on meeting of 3/29/76 regarding frazil ice and ice blockage..
05/02/76 AIK-3201 S&L KGE Request additional justification for widening UE intake channel bench.
03/23/76 BIEE-329 BIC KGB Sunmary and recomnendation of study - ice prevention in ESNS Pumphouse intake and U E intake channel.
03/24/76 BLKE-334 BPC KGE (bnfirming telecons for weeks of 8/2/76 through 8/9/76 - frazil ice and ice blockage in U E intake channel.
10/04/76 BIKE-337 BIC KGB (bnfirming telecons for weeks of 9/13/76 through 9/20/76 - relocation of1 ESWS Pumphouse and BPC process for review of SSL drawings.
11/12/76 AIB-3028 SSL BEC Transmittal of preliminary drawing S-80, Revision A.
11/23/76 AIB-3029 S&L BIC Transmittal of preliminary drawing S-184, Revision B.
11/T/76 BIKE-344 BPC KGB Cbnfirming telecons for weeks of 10/25/76 through 11/8/76 - design for Unit 2 ESNS Pumphouse; agenda for 11/6/76 meeting. Request information for design of ESWS Discharge Structure.
12/03/76 BIKE-346 BPC KGB (bnfirming telecons for weeks of '11/15/76 through 11/22/76 - BIC comments cn review of S&L drawings S-80, Revision A, and S-184, Revision B.
12/2/76 BIKE-347 BIC KGE Notes on meeting of 11/16/76 - ESWS Pumphouse relocation.
- 02/15/77 AIB-3030 S&L BPC Transmittal of drawings S-80, Revision B, and S-184, Revision C.
02/23/77 AIB-3031 S&L BEC Request additional information regarding ESWS Pumphouse and Discharge Structure.
04/19/77 IEPP BEC S&L BIC connents on S&L drawing S-80, Revision B.
M/26/77 AIB-3036 S&L BEC Transmittal of sketches of UE with field survey spot elevations for l l routing of ESNS Discharge pipes, drawings S-82 ard S-83.
l 5/16/77 l IEPP 6083 l BEC l S&L BPC acknowledge receipt of S&L drawings S-82 and S-83, with no comments.
Page 3 of 3 -
TABLE 4 Continued ,
UIS RIYSICAL DESIGN DEVEIDIMENT COORDINATICN CORRESKNDENCE BL'lWEEN SARGEN'P & LINDY AND BECiffEL (1)
Date Number Fron To Subject 02/N/78 BDG-095 BPC VeMor Transmittal of drawing C-KC-304, Revision 1.
03/14/78 ALK-3317 S&L KGB Cbnfirming January engineering meeting - UllS intake channel with layout for future Unit 2 ESNS Pumphouse.
09/08/79 AIR-3042 S&L BPC Transmittal of UIS drawings S-80, Revision D; S-81, Revision C; S-184, Revision E; S-181, Revision J aM S-182, Revision D.
02/23/79 BSTP BN S&L BK connents on S&L drawings S-80, Revision D and S-81, Revision C. #
01/03/80 BDKE-255 BPC Vendor Transmittal of drawings C-KC 303, Revision 4; C-KC T5, Revision 5; and C-KC T6, Revision 5. ,
02/12/80 BDKE-263 BN Verrior Transmittal of drawings C-KC T1, Revision 5 and C-KC 302, Revision 4. '
03/11/80 ALK-3492 SLL KGE Transmittal of drawing S-80, Revision F.
06/05/80 BmE-300 BN Vendor Transmittal of drawings C-KC T2, Revision 5; C-KC 303, Revision 5; C-KC 305, Revision 6; and C-KC T6, Revision 6.
05/05/80 BDE-298 BPC Vendor Transmittal of drawing C-KC T1, Revision 1.
12/03/80 BDE-362 BN Vendor Transmittal of drawings C-KC 303, Revision 6; and C-KC 305, Revision 7.
02/20/81 ALB-3043 S&L BK Transmittal of IIIS drawings S-80, Revision K; S-81, Revision F; S-180, Revision E; S-181, Revision L; S-182, Revision E; aM S-184, Revision J.
01/27/81 BDE-412 BPC Vendor Transmittal of drawing C-KC 305, Revision 8.
06/W/81 BSTP-26203 BPC S&L BPC acknowledge receipt of drawings S-80, Revision K; S-81, Revision F; and S-184, Revision J, with no connents.
10/16/82 BDKE-515 BN Vendor Transmittal of drawing C-KC 305, Revision 9.
01/20/82 BDE-0637 BPC Vendor Transmittal of drawing C-KC-303, Revision 7.
05/05/82 BDE-0650 BN Vendor Transmittal of drawing C-KC-305, Revision 10.
Note 1: See Note 1 of Table 2.
9
, .. . . . .- ... . ~ . _
' Pag [l i of'2 -
TABM 5'.
- GIS PHYSICAL DESIGN COORDINATION CORRESIONDENCE BEIWEEN SARGENI' & IUNDY AND DAMES & MOORE (1) 3
-Date Number Fron To Subject 11/02/73 ALK-10 S&L KGE Boring locations for GE soil investigation. ,
11/06/73 ALK-21 S&L KGB Retransmit GE bority locations. .
11/07/7 3 Am-22 S&L- KGE Transmit drawing SK-11173 G B boring location plan.
11/15/73 None D/M S&L Omfirning meeting - lab tests .to be performed on UiS test pit bulk' samples. r 12/05/73 None D/M S&L Preliminary results fron tests on UE test pit bulk samples.
12/14/73 ALK-71 S&L KGB 01/11/74 None S&L Transmit revision to' drawing SK-F .73-1," UE boring location plan.
D/M Preliminary results of dynamic testing of proposed GE embanknent soils.
1 06/21/74 None D/M S&L Representative soll properties for design analysis.
] 06/26/74 None D/M S&L 4 Issue draft report, "Geotechnical Investigation - GE Reservoir and Ihm,"
for review aM connent.
l.
07/E/74 DME-131 D/M S&L US, IE-series soil boring program.
m/0,6/74 None-Moeting S&L D/M OB/m/74 AUN-3000 S&L Resolve connents on draft "Geotechnical Investigation Report - GE."
D/M Soil testing requirements, ESW piping and UE.
10/02/74 D4IK-158 D/M S&L Cbnfinn telecon - connent on ESW and HIS borirgs, with resolution.
10/02/74 D4m-159 D/M S&L As-drilled coordinates for ESN and UE borirgs.
10/14/74 AID 4-3012 S&L D/M 12/03/74 D4m-197 Response to Dim-159, concur wi.th location for as-drilled borings. ,
j D/M S&L Cbnfinn meeting, D/M is to develop stress controlled dynamic triaxial i tests, l, 12/09/74 DMM-205 D/M S&L Preliminary data fron dynamic triaxial tests.
! 12/20/74 D4IK-218 D/M S&L Data fron dynamic triaxial tests.
! 01/02/75 D41K-223 D/M S&L Data fron dynamic triaxial tests.
01/29/75 D4LK-235 D/M S&L Issue draft results of stress controlled dynamic triaxial tests.
l 01/T/75 D4m-236 D/M S&L Additional infonnation to cLtrify Dim-235.
} 04/01/75 DMIK-266 D/M S&L l 04/22/75 D4m-27G S&L As tested coordinates and elevations for UE test pits and borings.
D4m-D/M Preliminary data - stress controlled dynamic triaxial. tests.
j 04/28/75 D/M S&L j 05/07/75 Alai-3035 S&L Report - results of stress controlled dynamic triaxial tests. ,
D/M Eesponse to D4m-235 - connents on report on stress controlled dynamic i
i 07/29/75 Dim-304 triaxial test results ard interpretation of results.
D/M S&L j Cbnfinn meeting - resolution of ccmnents fron AUN-3335 regardits stress i
controlled dynamic triaxial tests.
10/14/76 None D/M S&L Issue final report "Geotechnical Investigation, Category;I Ibnd and Ihm, Ultimate Heat Sink."
4
! I I
4 Paga 2' cf 2 TABIE 5 Continued ; -
NE R8YSICAL DESICN COORDItRTICN CORRESIONDENCE BE'IWEEN SARGENT & IUNDY AND DN4ES & MOORE (1)
.,Date Number Fron To Subject-N/27/79 IMIK-509 D/M S&L Sumnary of Reg. Gaide 1.70 requirements, with proposed instrunentation and sampling and request requirements for UE embankment test program. -
05/ 33/79 AUN-3059 S&L D/M Response to IMIK-509 - Sample and test program requirements for tnlisturbed samples fron GIS dam embankment to verify soil properties.
L08/02/79.. INIK-555 D/M S&L Dispersive characteristics of borrow material fron UlS Dim.
04/18/80 AUN-3062 SEL D/M Response to INIX-555 - perform additional . tests on as-placed UE dam embankment material.
04/23/80' D4LK-625 D/M KGB ' Response to ALOM-3052 - confirming that additional soils tests will be performe1. l 04/ 33/80 IMIK-626 D/M KGB Proposed Irocedure for filling / inspection of HE Ihm for review and conment.
05/12/80 INIK-628 n/M ,
Sherard Request Sherard .to assess impact of dispersive type clays in GE dam.
05/16/80 None Sherard D/M Response to IMIK-628 - opinion on dispersive soils in GIS dam.
! 06/03/80 AIK-3542 S&L KGB GE dam - dispersive characteristics.
l 06/03/89- ALK-3543 S&L KGB Revised UE fill / inspection procedure.
CT1/23/83 IMIK-649 D/M S&L- Response to ALOM-3052, results of dispersive tests on UE embankment soils.
l C9/26/80 D4LK-667 D/M S&L Report - results of confinnatory tests on material fron GE embankment.
l l
i l
I Note 1: See Note 1 of Table-2.
=
[ . .,
Paga l' of 1_~ l,;
TABE 6 SARGNP & IINDY COORDINATION OE' REIORT -
ENGINEERING DATA C91PIIATION I Report Correspondence A-3831 Date Ntmiber Fran To Subject 10/14/76 None D/M S&L Issue final report, "Geotechnical Investigation, Category I Pbnd and Dam, Ultimate Heat' Sink."'
07/31/79 AIK-3447 S&L ~ KGB Design Criteria DC-GIS-02-WC', Favision 5.
Draft 1 01/30/80 AIK-3477 S&L' KGB Issue draft Report, "Ehgineering Data Cbmpilation. for Mter (bntrol Structures at Wif Creek Iake" for review and cornnent.
03/05/80 KNIA-003 K2 'S&L Response to AIK-3477 connents on engineering data conpilation report..
i 03/11/80 DMIK-620 'D/M S&L Omanents on draft report on engineering data compilation. i 06/06/80 ECR l-0539C DIC S&L Additional excavation in LHS to leave " rock islands."
09/26/80 DMIK-667 D/M S&L Report - results of confirmatory tests on material fron USS enbankment.
11/03/80 KWCID-078 KGE S&L Transmittal of as-built (HS survey information. -
01/26/81 AIDM-3065 S&L D/M Respanse to IMIK-620, confinning that D/M cornnents will be incorporated into report.
02/04/81 CIJHC-328 DIC KGE Transmittal of all lake work cross-section drawings.
S&L Final 04/03/S1 None S&L KGE Issue final Report A-3831, "Ehgineering Data Cbmpilation for Mter Cbntrol Structures."
01/26/81 AIK-3658 S&L KG Response to ENIA-003 - resolution of caninents on "Ehgineering Data 02npilation for hter Cbntrol Structures".
1 l:
Note 1: See Note 1 of Table 2 l
l s-
Pag s . 1 of '3 '
~
TABIE ~I .
SGe%RY OF INITROF'M < MB4NANIR
, INITRDIVISIOtRL INITRI' ACE OF .1111GN INPUP INFORMATION .
Interoffice Memorandum (1)
Design Input Date Frun: Div/ Individual To: Div/ Individual Description .
- 1. Design Weather 7/31/73 ENVD/Pocalujka BRD/Baschiere Met. data for Iake/GE Conditions -
8/01/73 ENVD/ Nicholas MAD /Baschiere Met. station data for Iake/GE 8/09/73 ENVD/Pocalujka BED /Baschiere Order met. data from Weather Records Center 8/09/73 BRD/hbrren ENVD/Pocalujka Ordering met. data
- 2. GE Seepage Rate 5/15/75 GFD/Ramanujam SPED /Kutin Seepage rate through U1S Ihm
] 3. IIeat Rejection 9/15/75 BRD/Roanan PMD/Spakoski Results of strdy - inlet / outlet Analysis tenperature ard average depth
)'
9/21/76 FMD/Ibzman PMD/Spakoski Results of re-evaluation of GE heat s rejection given fuel change.
4 2/01/79 MPED/lbhwer !%D/Yee Request analysis of UE drawdown 12/27/79 !%D/Yee PMD/tilllendore Results of UE heat rejection analysis based upon revised heat
. curves fron Bechtel 1/19/80 BRD/Ardiga MAD / File Lake performance sensitivity -
- maximttn lake temperature. This material was incorporated into the Environmental Report.
8/24/81 bmD/Yee PMD/Peterson Results of the calculation on UE depth - as-built rock islands 9/14/81 BRD/Yee PMD/Peterson Results of calculatiion - as-built UE heat rejection i I 6
Pags: 2 of I3 TABLE 7. Continued -
SLM4ARY OF INTEROFFICE MhN INITRDIVISIOtRL INTERFACE 'CF DESICN INPlTP INFORMATICN Interoffice Memorandum (1) l_ Design Input Date Fran: Div/ Individual To: Div/ Individual Description .
- 5/10/83 MAD /Yee PMD/Peterson GE heat rejection - performance sensitivity given postulated UE Dam". -
settlenent -
- 4. LIB Area / Capacity 7/26/78 SPED /Kutin WRSDD/Uhamidipaty Review potential for ice build-up -
& GFD/ Nelson per IE Circular & KLA-ll51 4
8/10/78 WRSDD/KamaMuri SPED /Kutin Results of evaluation on potential
'for ice build-up in U1S i
^
2/27/81 WRSDD/KanaMuri .PMD/Peterson Results of the calc. .- as-built GIS Area / Capacity
- 5. Effect of' Main 11/12/74 WRSDD/Gopalacharya SPED /Kutin Effects of Main Ihm failure on LHS i Dan Failure cn GE
- 6. Lab Test Recan- 1/09/74 ESD/Dhavala ESD/ File Lab testing for GE soils
- men 3ations '
l 7. UG Physical 11/09/73 GTD/Holish SPED /Kutin Preliminary design scope and design j Design criteria for LIE 7/11/74 GFD/Koctnik . SPED /Kutin Results of calc. -for design of UE 4
riprap l 5/01/75 GTD/Ramanujan SPED /Kutin Results of dynamic triaxial tests
^
5/07/75 GFD/Ramanujan ' SPED /Kutin Cbnfirming that the UIS ' stability .
analyses will be revised to incor-porate an SSE = 0.12g i 9/18/79 GFD/Nelma SPED /Kutin GE dam - camber requirements j 1/18/80 GFD/Nelen SPED /Kutin' Dispersion potential'in (IE embank-ment
.+
e
' ^ ~ ~
4
'Pago 3 ofi 3 c -
TABIE 7 Continued, *
~
SIM1ARY Oe' INTEROFFICE MS4mANDA INTERDIVISIONAL INTERFACE T DESICN. INPUT INFORMATION
-Interoffice Memorandum (1)
Design Input Date Fran: Div/ Individual To: Div/ Individual Description 06/16/83 GTD/ Nelson ~ SPED /Kutin Results of calculation on additional excavation.to support ECR l-0539-C '
11/17/80 TD/ Nelson ' SPED /Kutin Dispersion potential in IIE dam soils 11/26/80. GFD/ Nelson SPED /Kutin Evaluation of the results of the confirmatory (IS soil tests 12/02/80 GFD/ Nelson GTD/ File Evaluation of the shear modulus 06/16/81 GrD/ Nelson SPED /Kutin Results of evaluation of as-built IIE dam elevations
.J Note 1. Definitical of division abbreviations:
SPED = Structural Project Ehgineering Division IND = Project Management Divisicn '
GFD = Geotechnical Division OM) = Quality Assurance Division SAD = Structural Analytical Di. vision WRSDD = Water Resources.and Site Developnent Division 1 SED-6 = Structural Ehgineering Division - Structures EPED = Electrical Project Engineering Division MAD = Mechanical Analytical Division EWD = Erriironnental Division i MPED = Mechanical Project Engineering Division (Now the Project M1nagenent Division - PMD)
ESD = Earth Sciences Division Partner = S&L Partner J
. Pagr 1 - of .' 3 '
TABIE 8 --
- Sunmary of Interdivisional Review and Cbnment
On Design Criteria DC-IIE-02-WC (7)-
Revision Is. sued for Interdivisional Review Via Memo
- No. Date Revision Description Dated . Fron: Division /Name To: Division /Name ' Review Ccmnents I 7/16/74 ~ First draft for 7/01/74- GFD/iblish SPED /Kutin ' Returned w/o carments '
review & connent issued internally and externally SPED /&Iaughlin ' Returned w/o connents' PMD/Spakoski Returned with conments; -
PMD/Goldlust cannents resolved before 7/16/74 issue date GFD/Steinback Returned w/o conments Ebr OAD review, see Note 1.
II. 9/20/74 Incorporated O@ and 9/20/74 GTD/iblish SPED /Kutin KGB ccmnents incityl-ing the addition of a sunmary sheet, SPED /&Iaughlin Returned w/o connents cross-reference to DC-CHIS-01--WC and the PMD/Spakoski Returned with connents.
safety classifica- PMD/Goldlust tion. Issued for internal ccmnent cnly. OAD/Gillis Q2nnents; See Note 2' GTD/Steinbach III. 12/06/74 Incorporated 12/04/74 GTD/Iblish SPSD/Kutin- Returned with cotments internal connents fron Revisi.on 2 issue, ard added finite element ' SPED /McIaughlin Returned with connents analysis method to evaltate seismic stability. ~
Paga 2 tof' 3'* '
TABIE 8 Qntinued. ,
Sixtmary of Interdivisional Review and Cbmment .
On Design Criteria DC-UIS-02-WC (7)
Revision Issued for Interdivisional Review Via Psto Ao. Date Revision Description Dated Fran: Division /Name To: Division /Name Review Co1ments PMD/Spakoski Returned with cotments ard ,
meno; See Note 4 PMD/Goldlust Returned w/o conunents .
GTD/Steinbach OAD/Gillis Ebrmat connents; See Note 3
IV. 10/22/75 Revised to'incor- 4/17/75 GFD/ Nelson SAD /Qu Returned with cocinents;
- rrate conments on See tbte 6 Revision III and to.
reflect additional 9/05/75 GTD/ Nelson PMD/Spakoski Returned w/o connent dynamic analysis. ,
SPED /McIaughlin Returned w/o connent SPED /Kutin Returned with connent SAD /Chu Returned with connents; See Nate 5 QAD/Gillis WRSDD/Annambhotla Returned with connents GFD/Eblish Returned w/o conment V. 7/26/79 Revised to add slope 8/09/78 GFD/Nelsan SPED /Kutin, Shires Returned w/o catment Irotection, HIS dam, per L~E audit m
y w.
Paga 3 of 3}
TABIE 8 Continued -
Surmary of Interdivisional Review and Omment On Design Criteria DC-UIIS-02-WC (7)
Revision Issued for Interdivisional Review Via Memo
~
No. Date Revision Description Dated Fran: Division /Name To: Division /Name Review Cumeits PMD/Spakoski EPED/Feyen Returned w/o comment' -*
SED-6/Kazmi Returned w/o comient WRSDD/Talukder Ret.urned w/o comment OAD/Villasenor Returned w/o corrment Notes:
1.
A copy of Revision I of the D2 sign Criteria was transmitted to QAD at the time of formal release for use. Cartments on Design Criteria docunentation of issue arrl sign-offs were transmitted via interoffice memorarx3tm dated 8/28/74 fran Tella/OAD to Kutin/ SPED. Orments were incorporated into revision II of DC-UHS-024C. After this Revision I issue, O@ was placed on controlled distribution for interdivisional review and catment on draft revisions prior to release for use.
2.
Carments on Dasign Criteria format were transnitted via interoffice menorandtm dated 9/26/74 fran Tella/OAD to IIolish/GFD.
3.
Orments on format were transmitted via interoffice memorandtm dated 3/04/75 fran Tella/OAD to Iblish/GTD.
4.
Additional carments were returned via interoffice menorandtm fron Spakoski/IMD to Kutin/ SPED after review of the final Revision III was released for use.
5.
Qannents transmitted via interoffice memorandtm dated 9/12/75 fran Ibarr3/ SAD to Nelson /GFD.
6.
Connents transnitted via interoffice memorandtm dated 4/25/75 fran Huang / SAD to Nelson /GFD. Connents resolved in meeting of 4/24/75.
- 7. See Note 1 of Table 7.
i-i TABIE 9
.- o Examples of Controllei Interoffice Distribution.of Design Ibcunents Interoffice Memorandum (1)
Date From: Div/ Individual To: Div/ Individual Transmittal of:
6/19/75 PMD/Spakoski PMD/Coldlust DC-UHS-014C, MhD/ Aschoff Revision 2 ENVD/Mehta-NSID/ Crass EPED/ Clark SPED /M:Laughlin
- SPED /Kurtin SAD /Otu GFD/Holish WRSDD/Annambhotla
/mrtin MPED/lbhwer GFD/Nelmn SDD/Bandyopadhyay ADD /Gerlach 5/24/79 PMD/lbhwer EPED/ Clark DC-UHS-014C, .
Revision 3 SPED / Shires MAD /Werhane NSID/Dann SAD /Kao SPED /Kutin ENVD/Mehta PMD/M.111endore GFD/Nelon WRSDD/Pahati QAD/Skale CMD/Yesensky 8/21/79 SPED /Kutin MPED/Ibhwer DC-UHS-024C, -
Revision 5 EPED/ Clark & Feyen SPED / Shires SED-S/Kazmi ENVD/Mahta NSim/Dann SAD /Kao-HVACD/Ornberg QAD/Talamo
~'
& Villasenor GFD/ Nelson WRSDD/Pahati QCD/Kurtz QAD/Skale
.o Note 1: See Note'l.of Table 7.-
1
~ .. . .
. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _