ML20093F916
| ML20093F916 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oyster Creek |
| Issue date: | 10/05/1984 |
| From: | Fiedler P GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP. |
| To: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737, TASK-1.A.1.3, TASK-2.B.3, TASK-2.F.1, TASK-2.K.3.03, TASK-2.K.3.19, TASK-TM NUDOCS 8410150272 | |
| Download: ML20093F916 (3) | |
Text
__ -
l GPU Nuclear Corporation NggIgf Post Office Box 388 Route 9 South Forked River, New Jersey 08731-0388 609 971-4000 Writer's Direct Dial Number:
October 5, 1984 Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, DC 20555
Dear Mr. Eisenhut:
Subject:
Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Docket No. 50-219 NUREG-0737 Technical Specifications The purpose of this submittal is to inform you of the technical specification changes we propose to submit in support of the NUREG-0737 required modifications installed during our current Cycle 10 refueling outage. Attachment I identifies the modifications, the extent of the technical specification change proposed, and the anticipated or actual date of the submittal.
Additionally, attachment II provides you with the status of our previously committed to Technical Specification changes as submitted in our correspondence dated September 22, 1983.
Should you require any further infonnation please contact Brenda Hohman, Oyster Creek Licensing Engineer at (609)971-4642.
Very truly yours,
~
P ter iedler Vice President and Director Oyster Creek PBF/BH/ dam Attachments cc: Dr. Thomas E. Murley, Administrator Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406 8410150272 841005 PDR ADOCK 05000219 NRC Resident Inspector P
PDR Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Forked River, NJ 08731
(
GPU Nuclear Corporation is a subsidiary of the General Pubhc Utilities Corporation
ATTACHMENT I
- 1) Post Accident Sampling System (II.B.3)
Appropriate Technical Specification changes will be addressed in the Administrative Controls section. These changes will ensure that the plant maintains the capability to obtain and analyze reactor coolant and containment atmosphere samples under accident conditions. A detailed description of the program will'be included in our plant procedures.
Schedule - These changes will be submitted on or before December 31, 1984.
- 2) Radioactive Effluent Monitoring System (II.F.1.1)(II.F.1.2)
Our recently installed system is currently undergoing evaluation, should changes be warranted, they will be submitted to you by June 1985.
- 3) Containment Pressure Monitor (l l.F.1.4)
Containment Water Level Monitor (ll.F.1.5)
Containment Hydrogen Monitor (l l.F.1. 6)
Provisions will be made in our technical specifications to allow for l
continuous indication in the control room during Power Operation and Startup modes. Technical Specifications for these monitors will be included with other accident monitoring instrumentation in Section 4.13.
Schedule - These changes will be submitted on or before December 31, 1984.
4 4
ATTACHMENT II Reporting' Safety Valve and Relief Valve Failures and Challenges II.K.3.3 As stated in our correspondence dated September 22,1983, "It is our position that we will make a change to the Technical Specifications which will add this requirement to the monthly reporting requirements. Our next revision to section 6.0 to the Technical Specifications will include this item as part of the change." This Technical Specification change was submitted to you as Technical Specification Change Request No.120 submitted June 8,1984.
a Interlock on Recirculation Pump Loops II.K.3.19 Technical Specification changes for this item will be submitted when the modification is installed.
In accordance with your order dated March 14, i.
1983, this modification will be installed during our Cycle 11 refueling outage.
i k
Limit Overtime I.A.l.3 Subsequent to our correspondence dated September 22, 1983, we have instituted corporate procedures to define the GPUNC extended overtime policy and to provide guidelines consistent with your Order dated March 14. 1983. As stated previously, while we agree with the philosophy of assuring that only alert personnel perform safety-related work, we feel it would be inappropriate to incorporate this philosophy into the Technical Specifications.
^
3