ML20092N724
| ML20092N724 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane |
| Issue date: | 06/29/1984 |
| From: | Giacobbe F, Lee D, Slear D GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20092N717 | List: |
| References | |
| 83-491-04-OLA, 83-491-4-OLA, OLA, NUDOCS 8407030481 | |
| Download: ML20092N724 (15) | |
Text
,,
Jt.
R E U' M D C :.n. s s a u g UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ogg NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION us En
- k Before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Ed -j
' 'I6
'f '.,,
.In the. Matter of
)
~ 'E
)
~5 METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY, ET AL.)
Docket No. 50-289-OLA
)
ASLBP 83-491-04-OLA
'(Three. Mile Island Nuclear
)
(Steam Generator Repair)
Station, Unit No. 1)
)
LICENSEE'S TESTIMONY OF DOUGLAS E.
- LEE, F.
SCOTT GIACOBBE AND
. DAVID G.
SLEAR ON ISSUE 3'(CONTENTION 1.a)
To Mr. Lee:
Q1.
Please state-your name and address, and describe your
-involvement with the TMI-1 steam generator tube repair.
A1.
My name is Douglas E.
Lee.
I am employed by Babcock
& Wilcox,.an operating unit of McDermott, Inc.,
P.O.
Box 1260, Lynchburg, Virginia 24505.
I managed the Mechanical Engineer-ing Section lif the Engineering Department.
This section contained the Mechanical Design Unit that was assigned to de-sign, qualify and implement the kinetic expansion joint in-stalled as part of the TMI-1 steam generator tube repair pro-
. gram.
A statement of my professional qualifications is attached.
l 8407030481 840629 PDR ADOCK 05000289 T
~To Mr.' Giacobbe:
HQ2.
Please state your name and address, and describe your involvement with the TMI-l steam generator tube repair program.
A2.
My name.is F.
Scott Giacobbe.
I am employed by GPU Nuclear Corporation, P.O.
Box 1018, Reading, Pennsylvania 19603.
As-Manager of Materials Engineering / Failure Analysis, I p
have.been involved in the' planning and management of the fail-ure analysis activities, corrosion test programs, materials evaluation and tube sampling and removal programs associated
- with the steam generator tube repair program.
A statement of my professional qualification 3 is attached.
=To Mr. Slear:
. Q3.
Please state your name and address, and describe your involvement with the.TMI-l steam generator tube repair program.
A3.
My'name is David G.
Slear.
I am employed by GPU Nu-F<
clear' Corporation, 100 Interpace Parkway, Parsippany, New Jersey 07054.
'I amLthe Manager of Engineering Projects for TMI-1.
As such, I was the overall task manager for the TMI-l OTSG Tube Repair Program reporting directly to the Vice Presi-denttof. Technical Functions.
My responsibilities included all activites associated with the evaluation and. repair of the steam generators.
Azstateme.it of my professional-qualifications is' attached.
,.w-
'O To All Witnesses:
Q4.
What.is the purpose of your testimony?
A4. "The purpose-of-this testimony is to address Issue 3
- of. Contention 1.a as enumerated at page 23 of the Board's Memo-r'andum and Order (Rulings on Motions for Summary Disposition, dated June 1, 1984) in which the Licensing Board stated:
3.
The reasons for not including hardness tests on repaired tubes in the post repair testing program should be addressed.
QS.
Did the post-repair testing program include testing the repair joints for hardness?
c.i5.
No.
Hardness testing of the repair joints would be both unnecessary and impractical.
Hardness is a material prop-erty which measures a material's resistance to deformation.
When_ tubes are expanded (through " cold working"), the hardness of-the material increases due to the deformation.
This can re-
~
~
sult in high residual tensile stress, which can be indicative of increased susceptibility to intergranular stress assisted cracking (IGSAC).
The' kinetic expansion process used at TMI-1 resulted in cold working of the expanded portions of the tube, which in-creaseu the hardness of the material.
The roll expansion pro-cess used in the original tube-to-tubesheet joints also pro-duced cold working and thereby increased the material's hardness.
?-
Hardness testing was used during the qualification pro-grams to determine how the kinetic expansion process compares to_the non-stress-relieved roll expansions in terms of cold working.
These tests showed the kinetically expanded joints to be less-hard, and therefore to have less cold working of the inside diameter surface, than non-stress-relieved rolled joints.
Less cold working results in lower residual tensile stresses.
This suggests that the kinetically expanded joint will be less susceptible to intergranular stress assisted
. cracking (which is associated with residual tensile stress) than are non-stress-relieved rolled joints.
Such rolled joints have operated'successfully in many steam generators in nuclear power plants.
Hardness was not considered a parameter indicative of the adequacy of the kinetic expansion joint.
The joint was quali-fied for a range of material tensile strengths bracketing those of the TMI-l steam generator tubes and a range of possible tubesheet annulus geometries and conditions.
Joint adequacy was established by qualification tests and internal tube diame-ter measurements.
Post-repair testing in the steam generator included measurements to verify that the expansion process was in accordance with the qualification program.-
This provided a much more direct and informative means of assessing the adequa-cyfof the joint than would any measurement of hardness.
More-over, as a practical matter, hardness testing is-done with rel-atively~1arge equipment. and cannot be performed on the repaired tubes within the steam generator.
_4_
l -e i
En PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS t
t DOUGLAS E. LEE EXPERIENCE-Sabcock s Wilcox Company.
l t
s
-(Current Assign' ment) Manager, Engi neering Department -
"[
Responsible for engineering activities involving system design, performance analysis, component design and structural / stress
- analysis inLsupport of'B&W supplied engineering services and engineered. service products.
Responsibilities.also include engineering' efforts to complete nuclear steam supply system backlog contracts in the above areas.
Responsible to define
-and, implement.research programs to maintain and. advance base ctechnology,. develop new products and services and to automate i
engineering-functions. ' Work is. managed to be in.accordance with1 customer, regulatory :and quality assurance requirements.
ManagedLthe. efforts of 250 professionals organized into-three l
sections.and ten' units.
j t
- (1982 - 1983)~ Manager, Mechanical Engineering Section -
-Reponsible for reactor component and reactor accessory
[
. equipment mechanical. design, specification, acquisition
. hardware and related engineering services.
Also responsible
[
.~for-component' performance such as. steam generator tube l
' integrity and for reactor plant materials and chemistry.
Defined and implemented research programs to maintainLand strengthen materials and chemistry technology.
Work is managed
.to-be.in accordance with contractural, internal and quality assurance requirements.
Managing the efforts of about 90 l
professionals in four working units.-
l (1980 - 1982) Manager, Plant Engineering Section - Responsible
- to provide competitive, quality-engineered nuclear power plant 3
and: system level engineering design and analysis including l'
reliability and-risk evaluations.
Responsibilities included l
' system design requirements and functional design, performance i
p'
.and. safety analyses, preparation of appropriate SAR materials,-
l defining.and implementing. computer code development programs, resolving operational problems and. developing operator j
P guidelines to safely manage the plant during anticipated transients.
Work was managed to be in accordance with 3
. contractual and quality assurance requirements. -Managed;the l
H. efforts of:approximately 110 professionals in six working
[
units.
l t
f t
I t
i i
i-l
+
i i
(1980) Manager, Equipment Engineering Section - Responsible to
[
. develop, specify, standardize, license and provide competitive, reliable, quality-engineered equipment and equipment related
. services for plant protection, control, monitoring and display, for reactor coolant system and auxiliary system operation, and t
- for fuel storage activities which comply with contractual obligations, satisfy customer needs, meet plant and system
. performance' requirements and meet. applicable quality assurance requirements.' Managed the efforts of approximately 50 l
[
professionals in three working technical units.
I L
l (1978 - 1980) Manager, Fluid Systems Unit - Unit responsible
[
for NSSS auxiliary system design, hardware specification and e
- procurement.- Specific systems are makeup, chemical addition, l
-decay heat, emergency safeguard cooling and waste processing.
Hardware' responsibilities include valves, heat exchangers, l
tanks, domineralizers and filters.
Work was managed in accordance with technical, contractual and quality assurance requirements. -Directly managed the efforts of 15-20 professionals.
(1978) Associate Project Manager - Responsible for portions of
'the NSSS being supplied to the Power Authority of the State of i
New: York for the Greene County Nuclear Power Plant.
Plant
[
' design and licensing reached the stage of meeting the Jrequirements for a-construction permit.
(1977 - 1978) Site Coordinator - Temporarily assigned to TMI-2 Lto organize and coordinate site efforts to install
. accelerometers and_ strain gages in the primary side of a steam 1
-generator for the purpose-of measuring tube vibration.
Work-t included supervision'of craft personnel ~, planning and l
l.
coordination with customer, site personnel and B&W design L
engineering to complete the installation prior to reactor j
j start-up.'
l L
'(1975 - 1977) Associate Project Manager, NSSS supplied to Power i
Authority of the State of New York.
Responsibilities included t
ensuring 1that the accessory equipment portion of the B&W scope of supply is technically acceptable, delivered on time and delivered:within1the contract budget.
Contract in the detailed
[
L design-phase requiring frequent, detailed interface with the i
L
-Architect Engineer as well as project direction of engineers in j
matrix organization assigned to the contract.
f I
(1974 - 1975) Geraric Project Manager - Responsibilities inciudad-identifying items with-potential risk impact (cost increases) to backlog NSSS contracts and driving these problems r
'to a least. impact solution,. managing selected programs designed l
p i
l-l f
E' s:
to minimize costfimpacts to backlog contracts, an'd performing
. assigned Project Management Department projects.
Key feature of assignment was to work across-NSSS contracts to identify and minimise contract risk.
~
- (1973 -~1974) Auxiliary Systems Engineer - Responsible for the isystem design and. equipment procurement for reactor support fluid systems such as makeup'and decay heat.
Work included preparingisystem descriptions, P9AR material, equipment-specifications and obtaining q.;eations for the Toledo Units 2 and 3 (NSS-25 &f26) project as well as providing support for the Toledo Unit _1_(NSS-14) project.. Achieved _the functional level.of Task Engineer in this assignment.
Division of Naval Reactors, USAEC k1968-1973) Engineer in the-Refueling Branch - Responsible
.for supervising prime contractor organizations in the refueling and maintenance of U.S. Navy and.AEC nuclear reactors.
This
, work-includes. technical responsibility for the develcpment of refueling systems, for: planning and following refueling _ work and'for design and procurement.of specialized refueling
_ Work with equipment-ranged from approving initial
- equipment.
equipment design concepts and specifications'through use of the equipment'by field. organizations such as shipyards.
Have
' extensive experience in planning,_ design, procurement and use of special purpose: weld cutting and welding machines.
EDUCATION University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia B.S. degree in Engineering, graduated with distinction in June, 1968.
Majored in aerospace engineering.
Dean's List, elected
~
to Tau Beta Pi. Honorary engineering fraternity.
Naval Reserve Officer's Training Corps scholarship program.
Midshipman Battalion Commander.
Awarded the Commanding Officer's Sword as
-the outstanding _ midshipman.
Lynchburg College, Lynchburg, Virginia LMaster of' Business Administration in May, 1980.
Subject area was Management Control.
MILITARY SERVICE
-Commissioned'Ension, USN in June, 1968 upon graduation from
= college.
Assignet. duty with the Division of Naval Reactors, USAEC, Washington, D.C.
Earned a certificate from the Bettis
r s
~ Reactor Engineering School, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania in June,
- 1969.. Promoted to grade of Lieutenant in June, 1971.
s
\\
a 4
'm__.
l
-i
' STATEMENT.OF QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE l
F. SCOTT GIACOBBE
{
i I, F. Scott'Giacobbe, am employed by General Public l
Utilities Nuclear Corporation as Manager, Materials Enginear-j ing/ Failure Analysis.
I have been in this position since July of 1982.
I My education-includes a Bachelor's Degree in Mechanical fl Engineering from Villanova University in 1970 and a Master's r
Degree in Materials Engineering from Drexel University in 1975.
l J
9 My work experience has provided me many years of direct j
involvement in the materials evaluation and failure analysis of-
]
power plant components; early in my career it also provided a j
t very intense involvement in, heat exchanger tubing evaluations.
l t
l l
In 1970, I began my_ employment with Westinghouse Electric f
Corporation in their Heat Transfer Division as a Materials En-
[
gineer.
In this position I worked on the materials selection, j
corrosion evaluations and failure analysis of heat exchanger i
components such as feedwater heaters, condensors, radioactive j
waste evaporators and other. secondary side heat exchangers.
In i
i particular, I was responsible for-assuring that tubing utilized j
in the Westinghouse heat exchangers was properly specified and manufactured.
This function provided me with in-depth knowl-
{
edge of heat exchanger tubing fabrication practices, corrosion resistant properties and failure mechanisms.
l I l
i s
In 1977 I left Westinghouse to join General Public Utilities as a-Senior Engineer in their metallurgical laborato-ry.
This position afforded me the opportunity to expand my I
areas of expertise to include materials selection, corrosion cvaluation-and failure analysis of other components of both nu-clear and fossil power pl'nts, and to gain a broader under-a standing of power plant. operation.
In 1978 I was promoted to supervisor of the metallurgical i
laboratory.
This was a first line supervising position which l
i gave me the responsibility for the daily operation of the labo-i ratory and supervision of the technicians and engineers re-porting to me.-
This position also carried with it a large l
technical responsibility which kept me heavily involved in the j
day-to-day materials engineering problems.
My career took on a slight change in direction in 1980 when the company reorganized and formed the Nuclear Corpora-l tion.
At that time I became Materials and Welding Manager in j
l!
the Nuclear Assurance Division.
With this position I essen-tially had the same functions as before, with the added respon-sibility for welding at the nuclear power stations.
While in this position I was-responsible for the technical and metallur-gical aspects of the development of the Nuclear Corporation l
i l
welding program.
During this time I.was still supervising all i
failure analysis activities, including the TMI spent fuel pool I
pipe cracking incident.
! f l
t; i._____._...._._._______.._.__._....
f
"O In July 1982, another reorganization took place.
At this i
time my section merged with the materials engineering section l
in the Technical Functions Division and I took over management of!that newly formed section.
In this position I now had func-tional responsibility for the materials configuration control j
i
~of both GPU nuclear power plants as well as welding engineering l._SE'
'and failure analysis.
In addition, my section still provided i
o L
failure analysis services to the fossil companies.
l 1
f i
I have been involved in the' steam generator tube failure L
. issue from the beginning.
I participated directly in the ini-tial decision-making regarding the tube sampling and removal i
l l
operations and was present to perform the initial visual evalu-ations of the removed tubing.
I personally planned and oversaw l
~
the failure analysis activities performed by the outside la-boratories.
I also developed the corrosion testing programs 1
which GPUN implemented to gain insight and understanding into r
I l
'the failure mechanism.and responsible corredants.
It was also l
my responsibility to coordinate the input from all our techni-i cal consultants as.well as plant experience and formulate the l
current failure scenario.
l i
During the steam generator repair, my section also provid-l i
ed materials evaluation and consultation on all aspects of the j
repair including explosive expansion, flushing, peroxide cleaning, and so forth.
My section also developed and imple-f mented the long term corrosion testing program and is evaluating the results as the testing progresses.
i I~ ;
l
o Lastly, during the course of the steam generator repairs,
'I was responsible for making all presentations to the NRC on l
corrosion testing and failure analysis activities.
l Over the years I have kept fully abreast with the state-of-the-art in corrosion technology through my attendance and l
- participation in technical seminars and conferences, and through attending training sessions.
I am a member of the Edison Electric Institute Materials, Piping, Welding and Corro-l sion Task Force, a group of industry representatives who meet
' to share and develop solutions to corrosion problems in the 1
field of materials and welding in the power industry.
In addi-tion, I am a member of the American Society for Metals.
Publications 1.
F. S.'Giacobbe, " Examination, Evaluation and Repair of Stress Corrosion Cracking in a PWR Borated Water Piping System", NACE Corrosion 81.
2.
F.
S. Giacobbe, J.D._ Jones, R. L.
Long, D.
G.
- Slear, "Re-pairs of TMI-1 OTSG Tube Failures" Plant / operations Prog-ress AICHE, July 1983, Vol. 2, No. 3.
i 1
4 4
. ~...--... - ~
e
y.
E
~
PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS DAVID G. SLEAR
~ WORK ' EXPERIENCE Company:
GPU Nuclear Corporation
~~
- Title : ~
TMI-l Manager Engineering Projects Responsibilities:'
Management of TMI-l modification, which entails:
Management of the $25 million annual budget allocated for plant ' modifi-cation; prioritization of the various phases of plant modification; oversight of the technical adequacy of plant modifi-cation and of the components involved in plant modification; consultation regarding
. problem resolution with respect to matters
^ '
concerning plant modification; and direct supervision of'16 GPU employees.
This position demands constant attention to
~
long term and-daily plant modification' concerns and an extremely firm grasp of both the: technical aspects of TMI-Unit 1 and-of t6e various. modes and components. of modification available for implementation
-at TMI-Unit 1.
Dates:
1983 - Present Company:
GPU Nuclear Corporation
Title:
OTSG Repair Project Manager Responsibilities:
Management (in conjunction with individual task managers) of all aspects of the OTSG l
.-Recovery program at TMI-l including failure analysis, eddy current. testing, corrosion
. testing, RCS examination, RCS sulfer cleanups, and plant performance analysis.
This position involved direct management of the G
OTSG repair process and personal involvement in the decision making process with respect
-to the repair program.
This position also
-entailed the definition and implementation l
l~
of the overall project, and required a broad l
overview and analysis of the -OTSG Recovery b
- program.
In his capacity as OTSG Repair
~
Project Manager, Mr. Slear was also called l
l
g
- r
, / _.?
p pp o
V '.g y
~
.r f...
l
^
't David G.*Slear:
,J' N-
_7 -
1 Professional' Qualifications 3
-Page'Two_. N
' ~
+
i
~
/
upon-to deliver numerous presentations con,cerning project details before the NRC,
- 7
~ ; ACRS, TPR,,and the GPU Nuclear Corp.
j management.
1
" O...
, w
+
I Dates ;
December <l981 - November 1983 l
r
/
~
,w
, Company:'
GPU Service Corporation u
Title ~
.TMI-l Manager Engineering Projacts j
g
.lResposisibilities :
Similar: to those listed for Mr. Slear's
)'
present position including management.of
-a $20 million budget and of project engineer-ing for modification's.
}
y t
- Dates:
21979 - 1981
[
i
' Company:.
I,, ' cGPU Service Corporation.
f y"
Preliminary Engineering Manager j
Title:
Responsibilitie's hhis positio'n' entailed: e;the analysis and t
> -/
preliminary design of.;400 Megawatt l
- combustion, turbines and'_of a 600 Megawatt 7.. '
s-
/'
coal fired poweF plant; extensive _ analysis l
,~
of the reliability and availability of the vi components to be ins ~talled in'the prospec-(
4f' tive power plant; and the establishment of i
4,5 a baseline' criteria document.for the. designated plants including the technical' documentation l
and presentation of'the plant design for management review.,
xc
?
~
-Dates:
1978 - 1979 t
Company:
GPU' Service, Corporation j
m
Title:
' Component Engineer j
.s t
Responsibilitio,s : -
This position-entailed: the review of design i
specifications _and technical. details of t
products going'into TMI-2, including the I
steam generators, pressurizer, main i
<a y
j s
i gj 4
e i
m- --
W.
.v
?K N,
LDavid G) Slear.-
Professional Qualifications Page '.Three -
condensors, cooling towers, reactor vessel, and internals; _ technical consultation and analysis of problems; and review of the contractor's design work on new components going into a plant.
UNITED STATES NAVY -NUCLEAR SUBMAr(INE FORCE OFFICER
Title:
Engineer Officer Responsibilities :
This1 position entailed: essentially primary responsibility and control of the onboard nuclear. power plant; control of all engineering sections, command of 4 divisions; and supervision of approximately 55 crewmen.
Dates:
1972 - 1974
Title:
Machinery Division Officer Responsibilities:
As Machinery Division Officer, Mr. Slear was responsible for: all mechanical components of the primary and secondary systems of the power plant including the steam generator, reactor, and drive controls; chemistry control of the primary and secondary systems; and the superv'ision of 15 crewmen. _ Mr. Slear also served as an Auxiliary Division Officer in charge of non-nuclear life suppor.t systems, and as a Communications Division Officer.
Dates:-
1968 - 1972 Mr. Slear also attended the Nuclear Power Submarine School from 1966 - 1968, during which time he obtained one year of nuclear power plant training (6 months classroom, 6 months actual plant 4
training) in addition to the submarine qualification program.
EDUCATION College:
University of Oklahoma Degree:
B.S. Mechanical Engineering Dates :
1961 - 1966 College Stevens Institute of Technology Degree :
M.S. Mechanical Engineering 4
Dates:
1974
.1978 t