ML20092M512
| ML20092M512 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Brunswick  |
| Issue date: | 02/24/1992 |
| From: | Spencer J CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| GL-89-10, NUDOCS 9202270337 | |
| Download: ML20092M512 (2) | |
Text
_ _ _ _____
t
,q s
CP&L Carolina Power & Ught Company gmgp-m -
Brunswick Nuclear Project P. O. Box 10429 Southport, N.C.
28461 0429 FEB 2 4 1333 FILE:
B09 135100 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT UNITS 1 & 2 DOCKET NO. 50 325 & 50 324 LICENSE NO, DPR-71 & DPR 62 Gentlemen:
During the week of October 21 25, 1991, inspection 91-31 of the Brunswick Generic Letter (G.L.) 89-10 program was conducted. In the ensuing Anspection report, a written response was requested regarding a concern that neither the Brunswick program nor its implementing procedures provided guidance for performance of the post-maintenance and post-modification testing needed to ensure that correct switch settings are maintained in accordance with the generic letter.
As noted in the inspection report, a Corporate level post-maintenance testing guidance matrix for valver that have received their G.L. 89-10 baseline testing has been draf ted but has not yet been formally implemented at the Brunswick facility.
Brunswick intends to incorporate the PMTR matrix into Engineering
-Procedure ENP-17, " Pump and Valve Inservice Testing." This procedure revision should be complete by March 31, 1992.
The inspectors also concluded that the " Nuclear Plant Modifications Program" (NPMP) does not provide procedural guidance for performance of post-modification testing of MOV's to ensure correct switch settings are maintained in accordance with G.L. 89-10.
CP&L will incorporate this guidance into Nuclear Engineering l
De r_&'nent (NED) design guido DG-VIII.41, " Design Guide for the Preparation of Plant Modification Acceptance Test (A.T.)."
This procedure will be revised by i
June 30,1992, which is well in advance of the next scheduled Brunswick Nuclear l
Plant refueling outage.
The enhancement of this procedure should provide the guidance necessary to alleviate the concerns raised in the inspection repcrt.
Very truly yours,
=
3 i
.ral Manager
.W
- Spencer, c swick Nuclear Project 2'70011 fjol px; pae9 A as 920:2703 { h $$$24
['
j;
..4_
.-, e.
=t'
.;--RK/
t Enclosure cc;-
Mr. S. D. Ebneter Mr.-N. B Le
-:BSEP NRC Resident Office-t w
r e
i i.
~-
cp--g y
u-y d es i+mu.
m -
.w my w#%F m
a e-
' -- - -