ML20092F525
| ML20092F525 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000605 |
| Issue date: | 02/11/1992 |
| From: | Marriott P GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | Pierson R NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM), Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| EEN-9222, MFN-036-92, MFN-36-92, NUDOCS 9202190379 | |
| Download: ML20092F525 (2) | |
Text
'
~
GE m ct w lucigy
,. - ~ ~, - - - - -.
-n--.--
-.. + - - - -. - - - - - - - - - -
-. -... + _.. - -. - -. - _ -.. _
Februa y 11,1992 hiFN No. 0%-92 Docket No. STN 50 605 EEN 9222 Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Attention:
Robert C. Pierson, Director Standardization and Non Power Reactor Project Directorate
Subject:
Gl; ltesponses to Performance and Quslity Evaluatio'n liranch Open llems on AllWR SSAR Chapter 14 Refer ens e:
1.etter from D. hi. Crutchfield (NRC) to P. W. hiarriott (GE), same subject, dated January 22,1992, h1FN 02192 It remains GE's plan to submit by hlarch 5,1992 the outstanding information necessary to obtain closure of AllWR SSAR Chapter 14 open items as identified in the staff's Draft Safety Evaluation Report (DSER) dated November 5,1991. As discussed below, we be!! eve this is supportive of the stalf's schedule for preparation of the Final Safety Evaluation Report (FSER).-
As you indicated in your letter of January 22,1992 a meeting was held in hiay 1991 at which thi.
pending DSER open items were discussed. The result of that meeting was agreement between GE and the staff (and its consultant) on specific resolutions and/or acceptable commitments regarding the necessary actions to close all identified items. As stated, via letter dated hiay 20,1991 GE provided responses to a portion of the identified items consistent with the prior agreements reached. Subsequently, the SSAR was formally amended to imorporate the necessary revisions for these items via Amendment 18, dated October 11,1991. It was GE's expectation that such revisions would result in closure of the associated open items.
The November 1991 DSER acknowledged that acceptable resolutions had been reached, and that the necessary revisions to the SSAR had been made, for those items addressed in our hiny and October submittals, llowever, it also characterized the related items as open. We assume that the FSER will reflect acceptable closure of these particular items based on the information already arovided. As such, the actual number of open items awaiting further information is substantially ess than that stated in the DSER. Further, we believe that the information to be provided for formal closure of a portion of the remaining items is strictly confirmatory in nature. Thus, it would appear that preparation of the FSER for Chapter 14 of the AI3WR SSAR is not highly dependent
'92021hCi$79 920211 PDR ADOCK 0D000605 A
e Document control Desk Docket No. STN $0 605 U.S. Nuclear llegulatory Commission hiFN No. 036 92 February 11,1992 Page 2 on information yet to be 3rovided, since only a limited number of items await closure details. We realize that,like GH, the NitC is operatin under very tight schedule constraints for com,leting the AllWit review. Consequently, we are ma cing every effort to respond to NitC requests n a timely manner, in turn, we encourage the NitC staff to consider approaches for handling the anticipated information that would allow expeditious preparation of the FSElt. It will require such efforts on both our parts to assure that schedules are net adversely impacted.
Sincerely,Wu P.W. hiatrii,hinnager llegulatory and Analysis Services hi/C 382, (408) 925-6948 cc: F. A. Ross (DOE)
N. D. Fletcher (DOE)
C. Poslusny, Jr.
(NitC)
D. hl. Cruchfield (NitC)
R. C. llerglund (GE)
J. F. Ouirk (GE)
..