ML20092F255
| ML20092F255 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 02/10/1992 |
| From: | William Cahill, John Marshall TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC) |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| TXX-92068, NUDOCS 9202190206 | |
| Download: ML20092F255 (5) | |
Text
...
. _. ~... -. - _... -
f 4;
- o remusemanum
- ",", ll" =
Log # TXX 92068 L
l File # 10011.1 C
Ref. #-10CFR26.71(d) 1UELECTRIC William J. Cahill, Jr.
February 10, 1992 Group Wr Presiden:
5 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn:
Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 4
SUBJECT:
COMANCHE PEAK-STEAM ELECTRIC STATION (CPSES)
DOCKET NOS. 50-445 AND.50 446-~
TRANSMITTAL OF-SECOND HALF 1991 FITNESS-FOR-DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA Gentlemen:
The CPSES Fitness-For-Duty Program Performance' Data for:the' period of July 1.- 1991 through-December 31, 1991 is enclosed. --The data required by 10 CFR 26.71(d) is provided on a standard form with :the exception of the summary of management actions and list of events' reported,'which are provided as a separate enclosure on TV Electic letterhead.' If there are any questions, s
please contact James Brown or Hollis Hutchinson at (817) 897-8912 or (817) 897-8940, respectively, Sincerely,-.
i William J. Cahill,-Jr.
l
- By _
r J. S.~ Marshall'
.Generf c-Licensing Manager-
?-
DNB/dnb-Enclosures v
c'- Mr. R. D.. Martin. Region IV-Resident Inspectors..CPSES (2)
Mr.-T. A. Bergman. NRR (clo)
Mr. M. B. Fields, NRR '(clo) f
' *,1
\\
i,
\\.
.),'1 U \\l r* -OU j
e
~
e'!!"2%888 M e!s k
~ s-um
-a- *
'R PDR.
,f
. =. _. _.,.. _. _,
,, ~. _,,,
l Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data Personnel Subject to 10CFR 26 TU Electric December 31, 1991 como w a umrans Emma Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station Locanon J.E. Brown / H.R. Hutchison (817) 897-8912/(817) 897-8940 camma m Prone imcam wu coce)
Cutotts: ScreerVConfirmaton (ng/mt) 3 Appendix A to 10CFR 26 Marijuana
/
Amphetaminos
/
Cocaine
/
Phencyctidine
/
/
Opiates
/
Alcohol (% BAC)
/
Long Term Short Term Testing Results Contractor Contractor Licensee Employees Personnel Personnel Average Number with Unescorted Access 1193 NA 4266 Referred Access Categories Tested Positive to EAP Restorea Tested Positive Tested Positive j
Pre employment NA
^
av NA 2
[~
Pre-badgtng 27 0
2170 11 Periodic NA NA l +m;
- g::.
For cause 1
0 a
11 2
Post accident NA
^
NA Random 673 0
2444 6
Follow-uc 0
0 0
Otner NA
~
NA Tomi 701 0
4625 19 t
Itandoin Testing Prograin Results i
individuals Tested 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993
- Posillve 2
4 /
7 6
- Tested 1296 1620 2512 3117
% Positive
.2
.2
.3
.2 Graph of 5
- : : _-Z-
- Z
- 2
% Posalve 4 -.
3 2
^
s
=
g
- -j gp g,
y Confirined Positive Tests for Specific Substances Marijuana 5-2 10 9
Cocaine 1
1 3
6 Oplates 0
0 0
1 Amphetamines o
o 1
0 PMncyclidins n
0 0
0 l
Alcohol n
3 4
4 l
4
~7
--w-O ".".""*
TUELECTRIC COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION FITNESS FOR DUTY Summary of Management Actions Six Months Ending December 31, 1991 TU Electric has contracted with a local HHS certified laboratory to perform drug tests on specimen collected at Comanche Peak. On July 25, 1991, TU Electric was notified ay the laboratory that the certification for testing was suspended. This was due to a routine periodic NIDA inspection which resulted in several contested deficiencies.
While these deficiencies were being resolved, arrangements were made through a secondary HHS certified laboratory to provide testing with no break in service. Upon notification, the secondary laboratory was audited by the TU Electric Quality Assurance Department.
The audit indicated that the new laboratory had developed and effectively implemented a program meeting the requirements established by 10CFR26 and NIDA.
The audit also satisfied the 10CFR26, Appendix A, Section 2.7(m) requirements that the licensee conduct an inspection af the laboratory testing facility.
Currently, TU Electric has not received notification that the certification has been reinstated to the original laboratory and testing has continued through the secondary laboratcry.
Lesson Learned:
TU Electric feels that there are advantages in contracting with a company with more than one NIDA certified testing facility.
This enables the laboratory to continue testing at a certified facility should the other laboratory's certification be suspended, Currently, TU Electric is in the process of awarding a contract to a multi-facility laboratory for testing under the Fitness Ft. Duty Program.
On September 10, 1991, an individual was tested For-Cause under the CPSES Fitness For Duty Program. The supervisor observed signs that indicated the individual may not be fit for duty.
The individual was adninistered a breath alcohol test by Security that produced a negative result. The supervisor P.O. Box 1002 Glen Rose, Texas 76N31002
,9 9
also requested a search of the individual's lunch box that'was located inside the Protected Area.
The search produced a plastic bottle that contained a=
liquid that smelled like alcohol. A sample of the contents-was sent to the laboratory for analysis.
The results of the test indicated the liquid was alcohol.
1.
TU Electric Security contacted Region IV NRC office and reviewed the circumstances. Region IV inspector gave instructions to include the event in the six months reporting.
On November 9, 1991. Site Security reported that two 50 m1 bottles of; alcoholic beverage had been discovered inside the Protected' Area.. Both.
- bottles revealed the. manufacturers labels and sealed caps were intact. The bottles were discovered among waste products in a portable restroom.
Based on previous experience, the incident was included in the six months reporting.
No events were repo**ad by telephone under 10CFR26.73,-
S
.