ML20092E380

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Intervenor Exhibit I-EP-34,consisting of Critique Sheet of Field Monitoring Team Evaluation of Emergency Plan
ML20092E380
Person / Time
Site: Catawba  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/09/1984
From: Morgan B
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
References
I-EP-034, I-EP-34, OL, NUDOCS 8406230031
Download: ML20092E380 (2)


Text

__

((pyy

= - -

6 P

I FAC.

DOUW

' %RC J

VI.

EVAI,tJATION FOltti CRITIQllE S!!EET FOR CONTROLLERS /EVALlMOMY 24 A11 :46 1.

Location C tl O W 8t?

F,ul 5t f[,

Lkteave.

Go%'hinG&A,Q BRANcu 2.

Date

/f./6 FW fl 3.

Time:

From NJO [vhTo

/388[t" 4.

Nature of Agency / Activity Observed, (such as Law Enforcement, Warning, EWS, etc.)

fUld m,I,lt,f,m Em J

Answer the following:

If not applicable, write NA.

S.

Was the County ECC fully operational at the time of your observation?

6.

Was the ECC. staffed properly?

1 7.

Did the EOC staff have an understanding of the basic situation at the time of your observation?

8.

Did the ECC function in a timely manner without excessive delay when messages were received?

  1. /&

l 9.

Was adequate. communications equipment available (Telephones, Radios) ?

h 10.

Did personnel understand their dutics?

US 11.

Were EOC staff personnel knowledgeabl' of their respective Plans, Annexes, SOP's?- YES n

NO 12.

Were they realistic in their response Eo messages?

/ ?

13.

Did the agencies ~ maintain control of-its resources?

?

14 Did the agencies know who to e neact once its resources had been exhausted?

0406230031 840509 c.~

PDR ADOCK 05000413 PDR 0

4

^

~1 f '.l. -

y 4

s 4ar k__

e DO i

I f

CL

\\g O !)I r

1

)

i>

j v-l,l Fl 1

. e sl "1 4 v 1

l g.3 s

w

.-e.ee s.

8 E4. E > -

- y r

,e h$

~ \\

x

-8 [ D L l

f,'j!

k' i

U t

3D

[g j ! l ! l h.i u N. 3 N,>,'!n i

ki i

i i

Y i5 h

r 0E.5y n

?

h [i e

esRS2sha

~

15.

Did you observe any weaknesses that would prevent the Agency /

EOC sta f f f rom functioning in an actual emergency (i.e.

the plan j.tself, communications, transportation, personnel, etc)?

Na m a i. -

weuk e J

16.

Did you observe any strong points that should be recognized to the Agency /EOC staff?

m e,, s s, uh',.,,

,,> f as a}

b.u l o s c.n hv I of-t h *b o Y h;*lb hen Y.~o.E eN eol 2

ate 0-m >ie.a 3

Co mzurs: grei.- xtkaIts c, e4,J, L.l 12/sioxele-d#e mLil _

4 m,; u J,.,

a b,,d ' chd om.,, vekL akJo hve pa-mn4 aJ,he o,L al Ca,l:L x.e.,,nh1 4,,c.a cun wu ~J M,Ild o

/

J 0

'f: _% s ?ff

!!(

,l, $ Were t e,

's* ]*

h e _)

V,

    • A u s,
    • v Jr 4 ffitler$

,Vl,2 ft;*

I/14-l'

/

$$_ ?v*r(,hg PMLi C1abf f y

t f.,

I n 9 (00,f**Vt,ill ARP0 b' f.'

t 'c mhsks @ )

njord es s a

J I

%Yef e 17 ( L

&b f 5& n.

kl O

[p% $ y f f 0*" et'$

loi

{

ff a an-

<e u.,L i<

g*t1)t.sen

' ?, S '

f s

sAas

/

(c,,fi,.ll, n v.:.In h kIII blkLs TITLE'

.'6L WVW

,y stoxATuay hot. owns - e<,s.n..,<.A.]

k j<aula, t

i,, evo. yg,Q a ..,1+ ; &gedAL, d u pu sw p,3 ,- e ea e.3. veyhA n.y.,3 ), o ,,, t-l Ae> M d /me c.y [b.ll~ dl us$ el mye $45e,) sy y 3 febwNa. - h&d w l h.i e,. n s,y e, resN labia l s>.y e, wu secrec0,%6 cava) u,,eeem, y,) e,el, 3 cf % je< Ih sr<.,sle L as-f wd 3 64e +he. .c nvelopi dk t h hl},,. w!) jeuj h ed,,.Q,; c k' L rM ,,,,,,,ensa,!,hdd 1 S4e ve k,<.k w.> lu c+ u k k~ def y~.3 ev<, 4 hunk ga,.c6 e AJJ

las<,.J k,,

ec.,.{,;. :n /, 5.., J eeti wuk h.k, ;,, cwMy , J.,,,,;,5 aJ, p e,~,,,q,j ';,f m L Jl, AL Co,y c .J,,o 3 ct, s s. ~ c, sak,3.,,, s p vAM c,vId c(6h be fe kere) j.md,l ) w fuwe.I we."<. Y< vve re

i

& fofee (n'* Lies u,L k)- Afyshde-he. e .i t .,J van cwacr-se,a;e. -.ia )eag.4

9-.

ug z e a-. r. 4c pa l) k s x e.- Y a %.}}