ML20092E372
| ML20092E372 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba  |
| Issue date: | 05/09/1984 |
| From: | Woodard G Federal Emergency Management Agency |
| To: | Pugh J NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF |
| References | |
| I-EP-036, I-EP-36, OL, NUDOCS 8406230028 | |
| Download: ML20092E372 (2) | |
Text
-
7,.,6,'e^( Federal Emergency Management gncy 3
E Region IV 1375 Peachtree Street, NE Atlanta, Georgia 30309 March 23,1984 g4 g 24 pt :45 i
grn.c pr[ir.-
f 00CLihggy Mr. Jesse T.
Pugh, III Director, North Carolina Division
[ f-3
/
of Emergency Management-h/
116 West Jones Street
- Raleigh, NC 27611 i.
gL
Dear Mr. Pugh:
Enclosed for your review are the Regional Assistance Committee's (RAC's) informal evaluation comments on the Off-Site Radiological Emergency Response Plans (January 1984 revision) for the Catawba Nuclear Station.
These comments are submitted to your office for appropriate action.
In view of the Catawba Hearings, which we understand will be held next month, it is urged that these changes be submitted to this office by April 13, 1984.
The evaluation comments are the result of the RAC meeting held on March 21, 1984, and represent concurring opinions of all RAC rep-resentatives (i.e., FDA, EPA, DOT, DOC, NRC and FEMA).
Should you have questions or need clarification on any of the items, please contact John Heard at 404/881-7079.
Sincerely, f
C.AwJL lenn C. Woodar Jr., Chief Natural and Technological Hazards Division Chairman, RAC IV Enclosure NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Ob#F n the atte j
IMf;TITIED Staff -
Applicant _
~~-
-m _
Iritervencs V.
- MO-
-~-
conigorr__.._ _ _ _
/
Contra'to, tAiE _ ( h [.
y 8406230028 840509 Wa"8 '
PDR ADOCK 05000413 other G
PDR j
g Reporter
~
~
CATAWBA PLAN (JANUARY 1984 REVISION) REVIEW by RAC, March 21, 1984 (NORTH CAROLINA)
NUREG ITEM RAC COMMENT RESPONSE BY N.C.
A.3.
Part I (Gaston Co.):
Needs letters of agreement for private agencies having emergency roles, e.g., Gaston Memorial Hospital (if private), Red Cross, EMS, etc.
Part III (Meckle:.ourg Co. ) :
g Needs 1.o.a.'s for list on p. 1-2.
The letters of agreement should meet NUREG-0654 criteria.
C.4.
Here again, letters of agreement are needed and, l.o.a.'s which are con-tained in plan reviewed by the RAC, need to be updated.
J.10.a.
Preselected radiological sampling and monitoring points for the plume expo-sure pathway are not on the operations map submitted.
J.12.
A letter of agreement from the Red Cross is needed and should include the " registering and monitoring of evacuees" as a Red Cross responsi-bility.
N.2.a.
Reference should be "page 90".
5 L