ML20092E289

Staff Exhibit S-EP-004,consisting of FEMA Exercise Rept of 840215-16 Exercise

ML20092E289
Person / Time
Site:	Catawba
Issue date:	05/09/1984
From:	Federal Emergency Management Agency
To:
References
OL, S-EP-004, S-EP-4, NUDOCS 8406220368
Download: ML20092E289 (66)

Text

p,.

Y'f I

4/rf ax

$0-fl3 Y/t/ 6Z n

E EXERCISE REPORT

'84 fuir24

~

All:57 E

MARCH 5, 198I t:

E CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION n

e EXERCISE E

FEBRUARY 15-16, 1984 e

I h 10t[AR RECULA70RY COWVliS40N Deckt #9 k'

I Off;cg! fsh No.

p m - wa.2_4 g bdca k 1 _.~

I. u -

e wr

/

m m v'

g

2

::K r.:1 :: c w,,.

CU bJf2t.

1 LII( _,]

g i

___._m...__.-

{;

g gsa, x

[ ;j'gaugl'N 7

I s

I.g-

.j?

g gi [,+ A r

aps

\\,

,i

~p I,

.1 /

s

/

i.

f..

/

t I

1!

GFEDERALcE MERGENCY j,

c7/IANAGEMEXTcAGENCY l

0406220360 840509 I

I2DR ADOCK 03000 y

l>.

t

$, w.. r.v

[A.1:t.'rr.

aj s

-2 9

...s her 4%

h,f t, A::.ve's

':lt E

a r 7

.. s t

.g 3Wwme.

as.w.-

r s*

w.tz,t

- n M-i,

y,)

.y

$,U$. h..*,

t

' r tei,r'.s.

.')

&.E.A..' %bA t

s s un sts-ns a.t t

.r-':....

'")

• • l.4'VI.W.W.W '.WAm h.i.'.S.

.n D. ssthtshtIm n= tt d

'.. g

)ptwNdisch

$%e'- E.- g

., rt

~: t..

,','.M.03' f.Wtrard.fA a..-..

v5 NEdp..h s s tu

. :~ -..

..u t t mt

!ar.m Avvs./

.: 1 l;!rWWW..

.m9 t

e,.,

0,W '.et r i.t m l.s 5 s.f

1. .Y4 A 4 %

& 6 S. 'V t.a '.v.ma s

...t

.. d

'I, prise h

- s

...... a v t. t liv 21r.r.wh g v

-..aWd.'m h ws A e

.n..

e**

'W.4%[-b mbh 6 R4 Nt is '4 t

's*-

hgetPHttbaa ttilt d I glf f u I

-117_......

l

=

EwxA r.J.wsvM.m:turb Vt,tW.tm"9ttsmti' ti su's t s]

W.****'N.,.

test 1%etttMuMitMUMMgih

.,.,.,.. * * ?* *!.' {

WpWuWh%%%%h4* u sim.t 14$$9Eilimltlf t84194tstFJ/

4

,4 M.**',

.,.. ~ ?

(~9m4444t pultu H - Pit'i.T tuw'*%%1W ww v.Y nW unM t

h%N..M%'.%uuEm49

- /

e g

-t b.....u,i.hhs 4H t it rt u..a.[.tS t,B e

9

1. d& ' %7 %% 4 3,@

o.

e t l.gLWM. 'tWMN#ti/.f:U.vh.1 hv.gvhbtNb Al.' tis nit [8

'b A

P m,

e in.mn..n,u-.9t,u,...,,.

w ~.-

htumuswsott'rw v.4

'/. l O*I*'."

,,. e a t r* t b. j.

^

9 m,

. \\w.9.m.. %%W1.,,-

att

.,,, tt pta tett e

,, y.4* ta. ttt.i t e.

7 M.04%%.%M% %M' It W.V4t' j h

<weeee..

a

,, j 99W wt.et.u. H l tti rtJ f f 2f4 6

p...........,

N ow.. nuunimmunous.

I.k NU

.,..N....,'sNb g

4etstu.gh4%it*W'en Atut.e s

=

y.,,,,

.....y,.

49500e8999911S4Ulf ff9?HitH4

. 3ermm.ef..,

re-i f.gr mmmmnw i g gnyas4 luettuett95W.vt %v.untmest

-....,t.S.7t&H"Ett fitt. i H.*. g

~..

smt4Htsmi euensoy e

t

? ***?'

.,,. "f '(

4tgetM%%9W sMimette a ttit s

cp,.

o.g ro.wmy.,m..muu t+t t h.,.u t g e

f,.,,,,y betteteM19H 6..* tH 6 e en ne e. $

thf**> f*'l * *1 ??

• t.,.'

y M. M..%%%..WW*d%%..%W'.W..,

4

.,09$W k n+

..... "?f i

"ve'tMM'tume nutseen'ad{

I *f.. o L

S

. us'?"seteevetS9H e++ t t m.'"e t

'* T '?

g e

at

/******?!

,,, 8l 'F *

• 9 r ? ' t' ImMI$1 k litI kI E I $ If f 0I L

.eaopassy eeef e.ge ame g

Fert.y a.e.u.se+94

+

..,ies.

e meeg R594MmM4 s

v *~:r:.~3 p

s,

+

i,-m4 I

'**?*****?**j

+

• greesseese,

/,

e.

>yous., spy g

.r lishelpetenu reye-mesee.)

s itHM949tW e

4 g-Meegetheg g

m e

,.n o re95EstW4W.

? **;9**wt*

,s*

m P4,99P%r.'99M 3

,p.9....

te4**ttee tt*i

,e.*;** ? Pad e

et%.e.w..i.m.

g me.e 1

g,

,.L.. _.it.4 hi g;

?"P.=~**j e

$He

• • /*'*1**

e..

o i

/

w

c - - - - - -

f Federal Emargency Management Agency 5

Region IV 1375 Peachtree Street, NE Atlanta, Georgia 30309 i

e e-h:-?

i

=

R CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION EXERCISE

{

M Conducted on February 15-16, 1984 Exercise Report March 5, 1984 Utility:

Duke Power Company Plant Location:

In York County, near Rockhill, South Carolina Participating State and local governments:

f State of South Carolina State of North Carolina Counties of:

York, Lancaster, Chester, Union, Cherokee, S.C.

Counties of:

Mecklenburg, e,aston, "nien, Cabarrus, Cleveland, N.C.

P

,, ' ~

• • ~'

~~

S--...

E y.I.-- 5 @u--.M' '. * ' t-co muti e

n

'. ~.. ',, -

s,.."g p: ! I (

h

"" ' ' T N. LA10DN A

~

E

' noe E,-

)

I A

J. H *.'

5

s..aec g

.,I. 7.,. U.*," L sc'.I.,

LLEG,

' Y C,.,{.

+ sun.

met AaA',

e

^

,,,,,,,,y s

1"',,

t w=*.

. er 8

jyI".p'l'"* '

Q,,,, S

• • "y

,,$'e'..

b,'

"g""*' a,,,,,,

lI

\\.

• u~.

ren =~m.

a..,

+

R %,%u -

un..

Swan

+

• l*

U R,

lEt c, g,.,,5="** '

"""**E... s ::..:'..

\\

-.***,u

'N

?

.ni3.n..

.--,4.

,,,i,*.

o=.,

g,,.4.c 6.

.. [. ',,3,,;*>,

• i m.

n..n co mei-A,to c.,

N..... ",. s...'.

-g

• ,,,,o

+6, A,... : } S T

~

"",*"' ' ' /

i i,,,,,..

O K c.

S i"3 5*

n

.t4 o..;.* ;' "

occ....

a,,,,,,,.

l p. T A U G A '.'

(mi c

w

",=. '..,i e y..n e

, N' o.ii 5

I a8 5'*.

w},

,c g 'c vianete

.g.,

~'

u...

.a W

l a 'L" 5 " h.K E S

b-=*

i.u s

.'-.a

-a8

' i a

m.

R.

'f-i

. W;;;.,.' 7 s-~

. f.;,,,,,;,. 3

,,,, > -y.,..

g s

a' (R

g,..

n,-

N9 3,.....

3,,,,,,,..

.wa

,, y wF**'

l9 C.***

is a

y.,,J,,e A'h*E '*'

s 6,

..o.n.,ue a,s-r k="'... r y

8' si =mn iss g

g.,,.,,,....

.m

.l 3

a,

).a

..c,..+~

)

a-a b a*.

r,, +

l lys g Dg i

N ); F k,

-Q, pH l c

y

":J'g

/ p d' h p ", Nipy'@0

" '-j/~j h,,,,,,.,,

[#xL~rWinSl00 SalBm'.7 =

' ' E ' I If e. -.--

u ',

g e

....,9-s w

l l

~.a u.i.h l*

'..,r,D- ' $ High ein.

h. /

' " '.h/ '~

~ ' " -

e=

Fa.un.c

)

7 g

e.

d.

^ 'j 3(

,/

ALEXAhDER(...,f i

--.A, e '

a...

c

'E f

. h",lO. A

_l "

+ i.,,...+.1 3

.I Ed

, I.d.m.

a= f"hC333TiUt

.';f sc.n.nm 4

i

..,o.

AN f

a r

E L'l. b. e S g-,t. - Wp o

=

Va i

T e...o I

e car..ts-r

+'

gi ED r'cono

.g c.

.n, a.

/

i t,n,..,, a.a i

q

• ;, =

'y.,..W.,e;T,,_ n4,r,,,/l. i,

..n

. n.

si.,,,

J e

A.s

v. p.,

, w

.,.(

b

' y/

Q,-

y -- an qq-4 I

.'7,"

W.,.".,

6 ;,,,b,.f n

s

%in C

I '"

g s

s-c-

I t..

.~.

c..,

"""'"s c

[.r,, 4 Statesn,lle......' % u.D, A \\ >=_J. S O 'N a

R I

e,-

, ngmc.;

ug +,

r t

.

,;,;,,,_,,~%,f >

!c, e

t**y..,,y)gkn,,

w s

u-

, prtr n

.o

/

n.. <

n.

,y

=

g,

.g 3

-t L.........

' g",3U.'.k i,.,,,,,,.., ),

"'" i,,g,

[

i

..p.--

• P a

os

+x c,T/,a,.

+

k sNic'I'.,'g

%K E

a 2 A - W,B n)

S ki>,

,,A,.N""'"

iu.

si.,,

e 1

e-

,/ -

z

"'.'""W'Y" y g. ad,,l,

. fC

' T,3 g.

A nW '. R

,O/ W4

^

b s' ms* a=

u,,,,j.

s. %

rw gq.

g x

(

.pq /2 _

y v.

co.,

1~.L.

L C

i?

N Y"b--*,a "j~.". "'".. -'I

- k.'*8 "'" '** b "I u N 9,,

w f'

3:a=~a.

th, y,,0 i F o..,a7

,/ K3ng3pgl[$

mea ~ja..

. ' _\\g.

4

\\

u I

'I i ee.?"'"

b,_p*",,",,,*".

t aur.

'g c

(

d ui. Ac.i..k 4

,+ Lmcotnten 0 w j-.....a;p 'g _m..t p,,,,, & gj,., \\,

l;, f - Q ',,; \\

a h

c-p.,

g 3

s

" Y' '

Ph bh \\'

~

eU I

w..

+

- /.

y,XN Anesant.

si.e Y

' //..

'RU {f y

q

'p '

.3.,

n s.,c.,

7 n w; h g. f g,, g. ma :

, u ',,,,,J u.

6A G A

c. TN.f M, cr,, gg /gM'/,

D

,C.i - :_ g3 g '.-

~

V

g. -;, u.~~+. 3.%g.

,-p; a E mv an a.

ST A :,

Y g,

un

,s r

.e m.

g e,y

,. y.

4 y

s

• * * ' ' ' ' '.. c,,

I Y ' ' **

t'u 0

-** n L;;'n,- J, (c :.n., '

% "h"E @n ' A. * ' bl0ttB+ N'fi

~

l'9 ' ~

Il.aaei o.%'.

~

.sr. ;% s

m. Wap 25t0Dia, 2 N

t

- c. A ai' P*

. 7,::

T4 -, y,,l

, * ', (

fnt,Hitt/Q ' w~e',, 7. w h'.

.% q,'*d 2..,,.

s*m.t$: 4'::rR 1

.g

' c i,,,,,,, y

/,

MECKLENELURG,,' d I

.h a,,,',,,,y l

-h

. /

w,/ n. ' i g;.:

.3,~; +94.-&,.I, g an.nQ.

= =.azh 1. ~.

1 a

>f-w e

x 3

3.-.T

, n

,, Q,,,., \\

U Ay 1

O N

., u e,,,,,_gy IP g

1

, g r,,,,./S " "'"... r,

W g

_ pie _

p --

+t

_, _..,g.al /"' "

s, (

7,., a,,,............i. g;,,

.g@

d(

h

/~. -> o~,.

w.-.

,\\.:n m h, c. 7 d..

~

i

.?-

L A

N S

4, Q/A/T (,1T//W8//

~

e 6,e

/

o

,r l/ i VM/779,/ !??QP i

m.) i

3. *

/%.,.J ;::;;::'~,

3, I

9 L

, /

l-V, N ARll"

..a.._,_.

l M W/ 8 / /

1. / [ H7/.

i\\y.

7, *"2

• 1 ACUk1

.,)

5,

.j 4,ii.. J.;.)

3

,, j, e......

..~

\\

(7.k,

-::=.:d hs b

g

f TABLE OF CONTENTS Page

,E.

L; 1

Exercise Summary PART 1 - SOUTH CAROLINA 3

I.

Detailed Discussion

=

?!!!

c::

3 Introduction 3

65 State Forward Emergency Operations Center r2 4

Radiological Health Activities Fm 6

El Crisis Management Center 6

Media Center

,,,,_e 6

York County Emergency Operations Center Lancaster, Chester, Union, Cherokee Counties 7

~

E Fire Activity II.

Summary Listing of Deficiencies 9

PART 2 - NORTH CAROLINA I.

Detailed Discussion 1C Introduction 10 State Emergency Response Tear Headquarters 10 Mobile Radiological Laboratcry 11 Field Monitoring Teams 11 m_,

F Crisis Management Center 11 Media Center 11 Mecklenburg County 11 Gaston County 12 Cabarrus, Cleveland, Union Counties 15 II.

Summary Listing of Deficiencies 16 Appendices A.

Evaluator List and Assignments E.

Exercise Objectices C.

Exercise Scenario D.

F:nte and ;; cal Fes~.2res:

o I

i E"

EXERCISE

SUMMARY

This full participation exercise was conducted on February 15-16, 35 1984, and was observed by 31 Federal evaluators representing six Federal agencies.

The exercise was the first conducted at Plant is Catawba and involved both the State of South Carolina and the State of North Carolina. Although the plant itself lies within York County, South Carolina, a the 10-mile Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) extends into two coun-ties of North Carolina - Mecklenburg and Gaston. n 5 The two Stater worked together quite well and demonstrated an efficient and cooperative relationship throughout the planning and implementation of the exercise. c:1 There were very few specific NUREG 0654 deficiencies observed during the exercise activities. These minor deficiencies, and i other suggested improvements found in Section I of both the South En Carolina (Part 1) and North Carolina (Part 2) portions of this report, can be easily corrected largely through additional train-ing and the procurement of equipment at the local government level y E in the area of radiological monitoring and decontamination. = The following is a brief summary of the States' and counties' _= exercise activities. State Field Headcuarters The South Carolina field headquarters for this exercise, called m the Forward Emergency Operations Center (FEOC), was located at the National Guard Armory in Clover, Scuth-Carolina. The Sorth = Carolina field headquarters, called the State Emergency Response Team (SERT), was located at Douglas Airport, Charlotte, North Carolina. = _oth the FEOC and SERT operations denonstrated effective leader-ship and a very cooperative relationship during the exercise. ^ The FEOC and. SERT physical facilities were spacious and well-E equipped.. Communications.were excellent. H The two States' radiological h'ealth activities include accident ~ assessment, field monitoring teams and mobile radiological laboratories. Radiological. health personnel are well-trained and professional in both States. Cenmunications witn field teams. were-good. Proper assessments of potential dose. rates pricr-to E'- the release were made,' and after the release, data was evaluated correctly and~ efficiently. E' E Soth State radiolocical-health staffs have the health ohysics and reactor technology expertise anf experience'to' properly L, ecaluate nuclear accidents and recenr.end cptimum-protective U SV n .~

~ l' i Y= !3 County Emergency Operations Centers !.9 l'3 Three County EOC's were activated during the exercise (York, Mecklenburg and Gaston). These EOC's were adequate in size ~ and internal design, well-equipped, and functioned effectively. Leadership was professional and staffs were trained in all

=

emergency response functions.

E Outside Facilities 1

E These local facilities consisted of shelters, decontamination stations and traffic control points. All counties had an ex-g j-cellent level of participation of local staff and volunteers. The use of students as " evacuees" in several locations facili-tated realistic demonstrations of monitoring and registration -e procedures. Several minor problems exist in the area of insufficient equip-m ment and lack of adequate training in all three sub-categories - j', shelters, decontamination stations, and traffic control points. j e t s i, , y.3 t

B El us a

t f 4..: s ?4 1-

i E Part 1 - South Carolina B I. "l' m DETAILED DISCUSSION

2

Introduction a.m.5 This exercise was the first conducted at the Catawba Nuclear ~ Station. Participants included the State of South Carolina, the State of North Carolina and ten county governments. Three

e of the counties which participated are risk counties - York,

'E Mecklenburg and Gaston. York County is the site location of the plant, in South Carolina, and Mecklenburg and Gaston Coun-ties lie within North Carolina and within the 10-mile EPZ. 5_ Criteria used to evaluate the exercise are contained in the

=

" Modular Format for Uniformity of Radiological Emergency Pre-g paredness Exercise Observations and Evaluations" issued by FEMA in June 1983. The Federal evaluators list, exercise objectives, scenario, and State and county resources used in the exercise are cen-tained in Appendices A through D in the last section of this 174 report. a.m.. State of South Carolina State Forward Emercency Operations Center (FEOC) m The FEOC was activated and staffed, through an in-place system, '~ in a timely manner. A roster with phone numbers was available

=

for shift changes. Twenty agencies participated, includine a member of the Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) who was dispatched to the utility for liaison purposes. 5: The FEOC was managed effectively with foint decision-makine be-- _ tween the officer-in-charge, the staff agencies, and the repre-sentatives from North Carolina. Plans, procedures, and message-logs were available for use by-the staff. Simulated Federal "~ assistance was recuested by FEOC for support f rom Savannah River. Internal message distribution was a problem. A system should Ebe established so that messages can be' circulated among the staff to inform them of actions taken. Briefings were appro-O priately timed and-informative regarding-general situation and radiological information. i5I We succest that the briefings include short reports from agency l'" representatives to. advise of-significant proposed actions that might affect other agencies. 3;;,

i

.A

f;i, i =. =

E The facility was adequately furnished to support operations for an extended period of time.

Classification levels and opera-tions maps were posted, as well as a clear and concise status eji-board giving significant action items. 4 The communications system was excellent in quality and quantity. , ?# The' conference phone line was clear and allowed quick and con-i !G tinual access to all key facilities. Each agency had a telephone. A communications van was available and furnished with chones and ^ l} radios. A computer and~telefax machine were available. e Sirens and EBS messages were well-coordinated. Activation took place following recommendations by the utility, the FEOC staff g l g; and the Governor's representative. Dairy farms were contacted by the agricultural representative to r put their livestock and dairy cows on stored food. Other agri-iE cultural problems were also solved by the agricultural represen-tative. nif Dosimetry equipment was available, adequate and included neces-sary instructions. Authorized personnel were on the staff to distribute KI and a supply was simulated. The FEOC simulated y ,E taking shelter, closed the ventilation system down and secured the building. 3-Radiclogical Health Activities ' I!.A DHEC was mobilized at the FEOC in a timely manner. Dose projec-

7 tions prior to the release were made using several hypothetical g-cases.

The projections were made on a portable computer using several models. Hand calculational methods were available as a backup to the computer methods. After'the release began, new- = im dose projections were made using the source terms as they be-came available. Field monitoring data was plotted and compared

o projections.

Several minor problems were encountered but_all . fE were quickly resolved which showed good resourcefulness. Pro-s tective action recommendations were based primarily on-plant conditions and recommendations of the utility and not ~on actual dose races. kE "ce-of'KI, while not called.for by the scenario, was dis-cussed and considered. Radiological infcrmation was made avail- = able to decision-makers in a timely manner. We would recommend that additional personnel beLtrained to act as backup for lead' personnel in the dose assessment area, and 3 that utility source term information.be obtained in a clear'and usable form. .E Field 7.onitoring' Teams -The three. South Carolina field teams m:bilization.was; prompt: and effective. They were ready fer,depicyment well~before1any

=

[ (( release was imminent. The teams were generally well-equipped and demonstrated good capability in monitoring, contamination control, and general health physics procedures. Communications 2 5? were good; however, a back-up radio system is needed. e KI was available and teams were trained in its use. Both low @] and mid-range dosimeters and TLD's were used and personnel were well-trained in exposure control procedures. M Suggestions for improvement include: 1. Development of Standard Operating Procedures (SOP's) for use of silver zeolite cartridges. e 2. Use of sample pumps operating from car battery to increase air sampling capability. ve V.: T 5. Mobile Radiological Laboratory The laboratory was appropriately equipped for emergency field = 5. monitoring. There was good depth of operating personnel. Com-munications were good and deployment of the field monitorinc teams was logical. Although the plume centerline may not have = si been identified, teams generally were advised to turn back when encountering the edge of the plume. 4" Suggestions for improvement include: 1. Written SOP's for preparation of samples and operation of the laboratory instrumentation,

e..

should be available. 2. The Mobile Laboratory is rcutinely used for envi-ronmental monitoring (i.e.,.long-lived fission products). There should be some provision also for handling the "very fresh fission products". iE Counting efficiencies for different distances and fM sample. geometries should be available to permit the counting of high activity'sa ples and the library of reference spectra should be checked to verifv that it includes these soectra asso-cia'ted with the short-1:ved fresh ' fission products ~ that may be expected tc ac:c= any'an airborne I t release. 3. The storage and disposal of samples could be im-proved. Any contaminated sample data which is i challenged would require that the samples-be re-trieved from a radiological waste disposal drum. \\ ZF 4. The scenario needs improvement ir the radiological. F ' ~ area. The short duratinn' f :he release.'did not provide adequate testing. Of the field tear's and 1 labcratorie's capah ;1ities. I 7 e

1 9 4 5!! Ei 5. During the next exercise, it is recommended that a sufficient number of field team controllers be utilized. g E ~ Crisis Management Center 3 South Carolina and North Carolina dispatched a Radiological Health 5' representative to the Duke Power Crisis Management Center to act in a liaison capacity. I$ This action enhanced the coordination of information between the States and Duke Power representatives. }f Media Center The State and local government PIO staffs in Charlotte were very professional, but were handicapped by the inadequacies of the T_ office space they were using and their distance from the press nu briefing area. The rumor control function was not effectively g established. The public information staffs were not adequately 5 exercised during this drill. There was no media or public de-mand for information - a very unreal circumstance given the scenario of events which began with an aircraft crash into a = M_ nuclear plant. Suggestions for improvements include: m 3 1. We would recommend the State and. local government' Public Information staffs co-locate with Duke Power in one staff working area, adjacent to the briefing-room for the media. This would facilitate the de-sired Joint Information Center concept of operations.. .h 2. During subsequent exercises, realistic public and ~ media demand for informatien should-be claced on-PIO staffs. 4 York County Emer:ency Opera:icns Center (EOC) The EOC was prcmptly activated, fully staffed, and cersonnel were kncwledgeable of their roles and responsibilities. -The actine m Director of the EOC was an effectice leader. Through ceriodic criefings and status boards frequen:1,. updated, the staff was. kept fully informed-of all major act-cities. No list of. mobility-impaired individuals was available, but ene is currently being developed which wil' provide the pertinent ,1 l' information to assist ~in their protection if needed. (J.10.d.) f \\ Telephones were the primary.means cf ccmmunication. . Backup radio communications were either unavaila'cle or were not adequately tested. In-ene instance, due to lack Of: aopropriate radios, cen-- . c e n t a c': between the EOC and field rersonnel was simulatec. (r.l.d.) 1 ~

i = 5 The installation of a hot-ring-down system betweer the EOC, the and local EOCs within-the 10-milt EPZ is planned utility, State, to be installed in the near future. Radio equipment is also yf planned to be in place soon. Suggestions for improvements include: %.y 1. In addition to the installation of radio equipment to facilitate contact with Sheriff's deouties and s._ transportation personnel', the installat' ion of addi-E tional radio equipment for the emergency medical system should be considered. -h 2. Excessive simulation made it difficult to assess the effectiveness of equipment, procedures and depth of personnel training. We would suggest E less simulation in future exercises, e.e Lancaster, Union, Chester and Cherokee Counties .m... Sheltering and Decontamination ~" Evacuee sheltering was played at Lancaster, Union, Chester and Cherokee Counties. All the counties had an excellent level of r-participation by county staff people and volunteers. The use of students as " evacuees" facilitated realistic demonstratiens of monitoring and registration procedures. The school facilities used for shelters were well adapted for-housing and feeding evacuees and providing health care, counseling and " quiet areas". e2 Suggestions for improvements include: 1. Communications - Telephones were relied on; the only radios present were police and fire car radios. Radio installations or RACES support would promote quick radio contact with local IE E00's and the State Forward EOC. L; 2. Dosimetry - Radiological monitors-generally had only high-range pocket dosimeters-low or mid-range and permanent, record dcsimeters shculd be provided. 3. Monitoring - Training is needed in~some cases on fine points of monitcring: - McVe the probe. slowly over the evacuee; - check the bottoms of-the shoes; ( ;is l - cover the1 probe with.a plastic bag to- -keep it from getting centaminated: l ' --keep menitored evacuees segrecated-frer-un-mon'itored evacuees. u m - /

1 i i en ff; .4. Decontamination - Training is needed at some loca-tions on fine points of decontamination: = Contaminated and uncontaminated persons 2; - should use separate entrances to the shelter and be kept separated at all

Mt times; nu mild soao should be used for decontami-Ei

. nation and any cuts or abrasions should be covered. Tr'affic Control Four traffic control points were observed in South Carolina. All officers had only a high range desimeter 0-200 R. A perma-nent recording device such as a film badge or TLD should be

g issued to every emergency worker.

? Most of the traffic control points had monitoring ecuipment although not all the officers were trained in its use. The Marine and Wildlife Department provided access control and r f soecial alerting for boaters on Lake Wylie. The function was carried out efficiently and very professionally. Officers were n stationed at every boa: landing, three boats patrolled the lake, and a helicopter " swept" the lake's cores. e-Fire Activity The Bethel Fire Department responded promptly (respense time nine minutes) - to the simulated fire in a storage building out-side the secured area of the plant. A large number (25) cf enthusiastic volunteers aggressively attacked the fire utiliz- ~ ing two tankers and one pumper. The 'Jnion Fire Department was en standby if needed. The responding department is based approximately fcur miles from the Catawba Plant at Station

• l.

A new station, Station v2, is under construction only one mile from the plant. Succestions for imercrements inclufe: 1. Outside fire department tra;n ng should include familiarization and training in the hazardcus. areas of the plant itself. 2.. Radio communication should be established be- -tween the off-site deparcment~and the plant. 1- ~ 3. A crocedure should be established to account ^ for incoming fire department eersonnel. '4. A command pcst should be eszahlished for.the responding fire departrent. W -.a

p iisE II.

SUMMARY

LISTING OF DEFICIENCIES [;;[ 2 The following is a summary listing of NUREG-0654 deficiencies

y observed during the Catawba Nuclear Station Exercise.

. State of South Carolina "5 N.UREG 06 54 Item Corrective Projected Date Action of Completion -:e None !E l.( York County .].] F.1.d. Emergency Communications .<e J.10.d. Protec'ive Response .f= 1 ist e'.* , 2*.'. 1 !*d; ?k r 5**. t e.* i a ( ( ?, -y g

1 l l J ..".1 + f n.\\ . 1 t I I. E r..L- ....s.. . eem w:::: utuu.u. nt' eees.9 k l' [e... L nv.- x v.~:....... 1,2211 ? (.... .n- :::::: s e'E'e ? " ~ **' :. n:--t .v.r..i., ,S 6e L. h a a esN e. -u nd- .'ar:.- .i e: v., +.

x.v.-

...s - -. -3 s.uTP ~ * " * ".* sa::tr

~:. :

, vattt '."a.2G t vu.s

**R*3 B:n.s<..:

e%W. .=ut s m .'...?."

wa.

p ki2.5.5 4 T-- :- :- L r -*=:tst "e.i.- tutt f:.,".m~~.' ^7.7

.7

-ts-te t ~*"s*ts**

s.

.t.v.t t$$*Nv*h' %. ....NU5 6.e 4.............. b &e s 9ttt'bkk'k * *

• i-GKii:526sKtv b.

. em e itdiiiiN-btiNi5titb-1 {5isiii-:iiki&Gs1 g..... .....mm: gst.. Gi-suis 6sshhi c:.i-assiE66E.wk, s&Gi;ikiiiiiriin:a insk,seisiiiiish6k idkk,iiGGiiGiisb iwasnMi66us.=.1, t 9 .I g

• t

f s s %s Part 2 - North Carolina .m.. 3 I. f;'f DETAILED DISCUSSION 3sts Introduction n M February 15-16, 1984 was the date of the licensing exercise for Duke Power's Catawba Nuclear Power Plant. It was obvious that both North Carolina and South Carolina devoted a great deal of m,,; time and effort to exercise preparation. The plant is located in York County, South Carolina, but affects Mecklenburg and Garton Counties in North Carolina, within the 10-mile EPZ. Most of the exercise evaluator comments were of a positive nature, with the exception of a few easily correctable

problems, tL Evaluators for the 1984 Catawba Exercise consisted of FEMA per-sonnel and RAC members.

Lists of evaluators, exercise ob3ectives, scenario, and actual event times are attached in Appendices A thrcugh D. The criteria used as a guide for evaluation of the exercise are contained in the " Modular Format for Uniformity of Radiolocica'l m Emergency Preparedness Exercise Observations and Evaluatiens" issued bv FEMA in June, 1983. State of North Carolina State Emergency Response Tear Headquarters The State Emergency Response Team (SERT) was activated in a timely manner, and SERT Headquarters, located at Douglas Airpcrt, Charlotte, was adequately staffed. Erergency operations were manaced in an effective manner. The facility is sufficient ir size and cas well crganized. i The ccmmunications equipment previded for excellent cocrdinaticn between Duke Power Company, the Media Center, North Carclina EFl counties, and South Carolina's Forward Emergency Operaticns Center located in Clover, South Carolina. Participation was outstanding with approximately 174 individuals signing in at the SERT Headquarters en each day of the exercise. I There was good political supper: vith ::crth Carolina Lecislators is;;ing the SERT :-:eadquarters en b::'c days cf the exercise. a

g n.- The accident assessment function was performed in a h,ighly pro-E fessional and efficient manner. Additional accident assessment

a programs to backup the existing computerized program would be desirable.

5 Mobile Radiological Laboratory = 5E. ~ E While the Mobile Radiological Laboratory staff appeared to be well trained and capable, there was no demonstration of laboratory analy-1g sis capabilities due to scenario, dif ficulties initially, and equip. (j ment malfunctions during the second day. Reliable equipment should be provided. 2 if Field Monitorine Teams .= Generally, communications and monitoring equipment was adequate jy to good. The limited field demonstrations appeared adequate. cenario limitations did not, as mentioned fcr the laboratory, = c provide adequate testing and training of the staff. e__ jy Crisis Management Center See Part 1 - South Carolina " Detailed Discussion". Media Center See Part 1 - South Carolina " Detailed Ciscussion". Mecklenburg County Emergency Operations Center (EOC) Mecklenburg County functioned offectively in most areas of re-sponse to_the fixed nuclear facility-erergency exercise. g The Emergency Operations Center (EOC) is an adequate facility even though it is net used as an EOC cn a daily basis. The recr can be converted easily frcm its ncrmal use (Police Assembly Room) to its emergency use as EOC. Staffing was prompt and numercur; ever 16 agencies functicns were represented. Players were enthusiastic, but a few were unsure cf their duties, and some.were unfamiliar with the terminclogy. Additional train-ing of backups is suggested. s The 24-hour communications / warning point is professionally man-aged, and more than adequate.with its State of the Art equip.ent.

hile the plan-states that the County

anacer. is in charge, three different individuals appeared te functicn as de ciM on-naker.

1 [ s a 3.

r + l __m 55 A blackboard was used as the status board, and all messages were listed. This situation becomes very cluttered and difficult to read. Development and utilization of a more permanent status q 5 board would help. There were some communication problems with York County, but the "I, backup system (radio) worked effectively. EOC staff had little input. Briefings were informative; however, 2 Staff members should be given an opportunity to make brief state- = ments concerning their agencies responses. T'he open-line speaker phone was not as effective as it may prove to be in the future. There was too much unnecessary conversation over the system. d PIO activities were excellent. The individual responsible for this function was very much on top of the situation; however, the EOC staff was never informed of what the public was being told. F There was good coordination in the areas of EBS activation and >ea siren sounding. ,7 Relocation Centers University of North Carolina at Charic::e (UNCC) is listed in the plan as Mecklenburg County's primary shelter. Due to simulated prcblems at USCC, other shelters were utilized. The Park Center was fully activated, and did an effective job cf processing approximately 67 evacuees. u Evacuees went through monitoring, registration, and were-fed. Staffing at the Park Center shelter was excellent; however, know-ledge of responsibilities of Shelter Health Services perscnnel was nc clearly demonstrated. The plan to use a blue slip of paper :: identify " clean" (non-centaminated; evacuees might be irpreref - i.e., hand stamp, etc. The demonstration at Park Center refierted that "schlenbur Ocunty does have the capability te prcperly pr:tect, and-shelter, thess members cf its petulation who w:u;d be evacuated during a real Catawba incident. Traffic Control Points and Decentamination Centers Traffic control points manned by 5crth Carolina State Highwa;- Patrol en were extremely well managed. Individuals knew their jobs, and were properly equipped. Char;c::e Pc; ice Department perscrnel mannine traffic contrcl points had n radiatien deteceirr equi;mant. .Charlctre Fire O

[ T.s.. Ei Department personnel at decontamination centers had no low-range dosimeters. (K.3.a.) nr5 Charlotte Policemen (traffic control) and Charlotte Firemen (decon-had no knowledge 'f appropriate levels of radiation tamination) o exposure for emergency workers in fixed nuclear facility accidents. 6._ (K.4.) b Local police and local firemen were told to report to, and man, their stations. Apparently litt.le training was conducted prior M to the exercise. (0.5.) The deficiencies noted in this section could be corrected fairly = i= easily by: 1. Development of SOPS for traffic control points ~r and decontamination centers'. 2 2. Procurement of proper instrumentation, low-range ..f dosimetry -nn 3. Development and delivery of some quality, detailed training on the SOPS and use of radiation detection 3y yg instruments. Gaston County 2 Emergency Operations Center Emergency operations management was adequate. The Emergency = Management Coordinator was effectively in charge. Decision-making was done in Mecklenburg County and at the State Emergency Response Team Headquarters af ter SERT tock control. Frequent briefings were held, but they generally ccnsisted of simply re-reading the incoming messages. The message content included technical jargon, and in scme cases was ccnfusing. Some method for insuring that the Emergency Management Coordinator has seen all incoming messages should 're implemented. .:e s sa ge s frcr SEET and Duke tower Ccmpany Ordering eracuation were conflicting. The Gaston County EOC facility was exceptional, and the communi-cations systems were.more than adequate. Sirens and EES activation'were well cocrdinated. C-ood coordination and proper handling' cf public inf ormation was evident.

i - W, li Relocation Centers The general attitude and enthusiasm of the individuals staffing c ji: shelters in Gaston County was superior. They did a commendable ~ job considering their experience and training, but could improve in the following areas: .= _e E There appears to be an inadequate amount of training being con-ducted in the area of radiological monitoring. (0.5.)

.

01 There also appears to be an inadequate amount of training being conducted in the area of shelter management. (0.5.) e5 More staff, knowledgeable in radiation detection and decontamina- ~~ tion procedures, and equipped with proper radiation detection equipment, is needed. (J.12.) ' 57i A supply of clean clothing is needed for contaminated evacuees to wear once they have been decontaminated.

.a

=?5 SOPS should be established for decontamination and general shelter management.

.jg Players appeared to have had advance knculcdge of scenaric events.

Traffic Control Pcints and Decontamination Centers 5P 5 General attitude of players was very good. Lack of activity for traffic control points and decontamination stations made evalua- ? tion of actual coerations difficult. =. Instrumentation is not adequace at traffic control points and decontamination stations. Low-range desimetry is needed. (K.3.a.) ~ Training in the area of radiation detection is also inadequate. (0.5.) n The deficiencies noted in this section could be corrected, the same as in Mecklenburg County, by-1. Deveicpment cf. SOPS.for traffic control points and decen aminaticn centers. 2. Procurement cf prcper instrumentation,-low-rance dosimetry. 3. Development and delivery of detailed training on the FOP's, and use of. radiation detection instruments. 4 1 C:4 e

J 3 i u E.9 Cabarrus County Relocation Center g en Central Cabarrus High School'was administratively opened. The f acility and its operation appeared generally adequate. Cleveland County Fl Relocation Center te A.ctivation and staffing play was minimal for this exercise. Rep-oo resentatives of the relevant county and local organizations were a f; there, and appeared to have a good grasp of their emergency duties. However, the facility was only administratively activated, and could not be fully evaluated. m 52 Union County nelocation Center .7 The Parkwood School Shelter in Union County has good facilities and resources to provide care for evacuees and is staffed by well-if trained individuals, familiar with procedures for monitoring, decontaminating, and regisrering evacuees. S< 2? 11 n:, t?:s

• s E

~_ ? r

f ~ \\ I 435tfb II.

SUMMARY

LISTING OF DEFICIENCIES =

15.

The following is a summary listing of NUREG-0654 deficiencies m. !Ei observed during the Catawba Nuclear Station Exercise, am 72 State of North Carolina 5 There were no NUREG-0654 deficiencies observed. .5 Mecklenburg County . 5? NUREG 0654 Item Corrective Projected Date Action of Comnletion i

"Ju K.3.a.

Radiological Exposure ,E, Control l K.4. Radiolocical Excosure ..im .= Control

i.

.m O.5. Radiological Emergency '[ Response Training Gaston Count _* J.12. Protective Response K.3.a. Radiological Exposure = Control E O.5. Radiological Emergency Response Training Cabarrus Ccunty .There were nc ;;UF.EG-06 5 4 deficiencies cbserved. 1 f Cleveland' County There were no NUREG-0654 deficiencies observed. Union County There were no NUEIC-0654 deficiencies cbserved. 1C

.s 4 4 ..1 t

-l

.s s-rs s,g e

%.. e O C dw ...nii ~ .:~. -g

.s s4 t

.: s ?:n.. ..::.v..; s

.v.

i;.h kGi-:iii-1 t :. 21 r, -.-.s l: ...... a L.. .1

. s

.'.'EG&

G-r:.i

.t

.8 utt a-

.ns .7 ...uur.e: v. .3

n n

-*:1 .1 .. a.

v.m:.%.

..itt:1*t t -.... $1;T*-!1 ..% V.stt.V n".::t' '.*.?*T7.' .4..... n* t h n " ??.'e..........;2 9. s ntr!. t*:....... j unw..u a ... tut--Y .ut it t .ih F tunMTin........... & *tt s..-:."s ..r::.:: >........... f*fP2 P.T?TMt???.,

• h f $$ It r

41.31f 3t1 1 st23 *t: 9

s. natt tu............

7:24 f............ .;ttistsstmatet u: star L".MY.Y.*.u u'. 'th. i*.11 i.............. '.v.it ,vt.*t.Trittr.. ......................j , tuttfTttttninM1***. 3 i................. .. s u s en.,. ....s W Ke.... '.:.4 ....................A ttmtmtstettensttred tidiihit5t'tG5%. 4 f.st m e.. ..irent 66tT6ssssh6Hd 64mE6ss-:6wd MiiiiGiiisuiiiiiii=1 a.mtiittii.istainiin ...............] LutMtillt 11113I113T% ...................----1 ,wva.wounstsssemiti e \\ t.

lJ

.s e

III. l~ APPENDICES m in

l en SS A. Evaluator List and Assicnments ~ i , e.v !.E I B. Exercise Objectives Part 1 - South Carolina e t 55 Part 2 - North Carolina s 1 l e=n. C. Exercise Scenario i s.._ ip D. State and Local Resources j ?? Part 1 - South Carolina Part 2 - North Carolina i nn 5 i }%2 e z-n j r. m 1 uu 5:, i ;a" l e t LL 1 ,Sm f I h ( w(. ? - I. f",

+.

) +, -.

p_. s 9 { b 5 1 gara '.0; 3:: a.E t ..~

==

i ne&&E t i P .mEYe }.sm . = = j s.k.a.: a i. Ism ) EU f =8:12 f3:2. ..UU d

s.

j U. 4: & G.; . tut ( 'ZS. + - h 1 i R$tt b O.Z l str l ::: )# , y -.. m.. be\\ ed e e * *** Oe o $5 1 1 4 e 4 - .l ). J'.'; 't t 4 .I k I' If,( 1 J 9 a += Y 4 1 4 1 4 9 I ' Ir + L t J i O I 1, i I f i -...m W., .-...-,.s.z-,a._..- ,.,----.a--n.,,-. -.,n., .-a. ..,,_--n-,-----.,.,._,_...._..

n. -., -, -,,,. _., _

mm__,,,_

6 s. t FEDERAL EVALUATOR ASSIGNMENTS r= j3 CATAWBA EXERCISE February 15-16, 1984 l Tm =. TS CHIEF OF EVALUATORS AND RAC CHAIRMAN Glenn C. Woodard, Jr. (FEMA) 7.... S.C. FORWARD EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER (CLOVER, S.C.) } Thomas Hawkins (FEMA) Joseph Keller (FEMA)

yy Dorothy Nevitt (USDA) l CRISIS MANAGEMENT CENTER (EOF ) ( CEARLOTTE, N. C. )

id Robert Trojanowski (NRC) = u,=,, PUBLIC INFORMATION/ MEDIA ACTIVITIES P Jack Glover (FEMA) E-RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH - FIELD ACTIVITIES, S.C. Rochelle Honkus (FEMA) Iaroline Herzenberg (FEMA) K. C. Chun (FEMA) Bradley Solmonson (FEMA) (Radiological Laboratory) E YORK COUNTY, S.C. Shana Aucsmith (FEMA) Bill Knoerzer (FEMA) E@ (Also, Ed Tanzman on Feb. 16th and Susan Barisas on Feb. 15th) LANCASTER COUNTY, S.C. 2" Ed Tanzman ( F E.A ) CHESTER COUNTY, S.C. Ed Tanzman (FEMA. UNION COUNTY, S.C. r Ed Tanzman ( FE:G., ~;; ~ C u. ~ .r * * ~s ~ C C '_. ' ~ ':', :. . .srsn s Ed Tanzman 1FE:'1 . ~ Cw.CC.... u r._

. : s-l 3 rad Eichcrs: (FIA, l

N.C. SERT (DOUGLAS AIRPORT, CHARLOTTE, N.C.) John Heard ( FE:'.A : Al Hall (DOT; r :. Dick Payne (EPA) i I RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH - FIELD AITIVITIES, N.C. t7 Karen Guziel ( F E:'A ; t Tony Toltman :TEMA) Jim Opelka ( F E:G. ' i i: v,-

2 1ta i- ? - MECKLENBURG COUNTY, N.C. Brad Loar (FEMA) , 3:.:.3

s-Virginia Baker (FEMA)

~~~ Doug Hoell (FEMA) Gary Kaszynski (FEMA) llit Jim Levenson (FEMA) di John Rajan (FEMA) . E. GASTON COUNTY, N.C. n "S. Gordon Veerman (FEMA) Bob Neisius (FEMA) Phillis Becherman (FEMA) . =.. UNION COUNTY, N.C. = Susan Barisas (FEMA) !5E .CABARRUS COUNTY, N.C. = Ken Lerner (FEMA) . 7.. is CLEVELAND COUNTY, N.C. Ken Lerner (FEMA) . [if FIRE ACTIVITY Gordon Veerman (FEMA) t0 OBSERVERS 55 Peggy Coleman (DOT) Mark Collins (FDA) Marshall Sanders ' FEMA) i { * *:: i sii' b.. .T , bi. I I l l l-- l Z. lse'. 93 ~

'l g -e b e:o. = c t*** 2 L'E e { asta l 5 5 .m. O C 1 t.s.t.s. 1 Stas. t j I r:t:

• l Et*2.

. star .No e a333 st as '.I.I*.* MkI E.E .sz

• e

$a $

~!:.

Yh E e'J.7-seas- .m..ter. . s w a s.

==m e m m.e

• enee*

W stu a.t.t.:. Y t nr., 91t t .~.V.

?**

?.!.4. ' 1 hS.$. o-i mee A

n.. t t

.y ll I' } ?h + l c its: h i l m.

l G4c State of South Garolina fRiliturg Department ..y u. -- A k OFFICE OF THE ADJUTANT GENERAL T E570% eamCuaw? v iacU.S'ile"='in t MEMORANDUM m TO: Controllers and Players V FROM: Joshua P. Moore, Director S. DATE: January 16, 1984 ,y

SUBJECT:

CATAMEA NUCLEAR STATION EXERCISE February 15-16, 1984 This letter is a confirmation of the Catawba Nuclear Station exercise schedu)cd for February 15-16, 1984 The purpose of the exercise is to test the response of state and local governments to a major nuclear accident at the Catawha ':uclear Statien near Rock Hill, S. C. A state exercise (Table Tep) for exercise participants IPlavers) will be held c. Februarv 2, 1984 at 10:00 A.M. in the Ccnference Roem in the basement of the Rutledge Build-ing, 1429 Senate Street in Columbia. An Exercise Briefing will be held at 1:00 P.M. en February 2 at the same location for all controllers and evaluatcrs, plans to be tested include; the Scuth Carclina Operational Radiological Emergencv Fesconse Flan (SCOFERP), the South rarolina Technical Radiclocical Erergency Fespense Plcn (SCTCEPD), the Catawba Site Speci'i: Flan, end the local emergengv rescense plans o' Ycr% Ccunty. Y ur ace.c"'c cm.rticipatier is essential t e e n s.:r e t h::: s ete and Iccal cevernment car estrnd tc a nuclear accinc: : in the most e#fective and t it e l '. manner. We t.ppreciate ycur participation and I know I can count on your cooperation te help us reach thic objective. An; questions you may have in the meantime should be directed to Mr. J. R. Jones of the State Emergency Preparedness Division at ~58-2826. Please be #rmiliar with the enciesed exercise instructirnr prior tc tbc exercise. "ncleture .c p :- n:,e.c Emergency Preparedness Division Autiertge Bmic},og 14p $g e,sig $ttee Columtua South Catonna M;', 4.'1 fit 2226

i ,e .n:. E CATAWBA. NUCLEAR STATION EMERGDNCY, tjANAGEriENT ESPONSE EXERCISE PLAN

e

.m FE'BRUARY'15-16, 198_4, m re

=:

e.t . TABLE OF CONTENTS er I. Introcuction !;::;g -II. Purpose anci Scope III. Specific Exercise Objectives !III: !E IV. Exercise Organization I er-A. Controller / Evaluators ~B. Observers i C. Players 4j.f? V. Critique j r., 4 VI. Evaluation Forms .= ?' VII. Controller / Evaluator Assigr.nents t VII!. Controller / Evaluator Directives IX. Exercise Scenario e 1 :;;;.- i. t t i _I 5 I 9 i 4 x f Y F W s as 4 + .I, - -~ E

c. ~ x );y I. INTRODUCTION l The State of South Carolina was heavily impacted by the C Radiological Emergency Response (RER) requirements for-mulated by FEt1A and the NRC subsequent to the Three Mile Island incident. The State was primarily affected by the l' ?. new planning criteria, due to its high concentration of commercial and government nuclear power facilities. State and local governments are prepared to test the RER w plans developed in support of the Catawba Fixed Nuclear Facility (FNF) operated by Duke Power Company. The Catawba FNF is located near Rock Hill, South Carolina, and 5. the 10-mile Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) includes parts of York Countv. 5 Throughout the planning process, the states of South Carolina and Ncrth Caroline and affected counties, and Duke have closely cooperated to insure that the RER plans g, were not developed in a vacuum. Each party has a clear understanding of its emergency role as well as the responsibilities of the other parties. C T 5 0'; ' r I te? trl / 2 I j' y

i i 8, g .E'% w i s v (h II. ' PURPOSE-AND SCOPE On February 15-16, 1984, an emergency preparedness exer-g. cise will be conducted at-Catawba Nuclear Station to test '= the integrated capabilitie's of the various parties and the basic elements oT the, emergency preparedness plans. The 'E...! simulated' test will recuire the mobilization and the

35 deployment of stEte and local response forces to verify their abilities,b respond to'an actual emergency at the t

_E Catawba FNF. The nuclear station will activate its RER j teams and those of Duke's Crisis Management Team. The exercise will determine the utility's ability to work m. efficiently with state and local governments under emer-gency conditicns: sQualified evaluators will determine the strengths and weaknesses of the emergency response forces, 5 and tha deficiencies will form the basis for corrective m e a c tior..;. The specific elements of the Catawba Nucle,ar Station 7-a Emergency Plan that will be tested during the February exercise ~aresas follows: 1. Accident Assessment and Classification. = 2. Alert'and Motification. u, s 3. Manace(ia] Directier and Centrol. N 4. Techdic'al. Support Center Operationt s ,m 5. Operations Support C^nter Operations. e %t 4 6. S^ite Evacuatics, Perscnnel Accountability, and-Access 'E Control. 7. Near Site Emergency Operations Facility Operaticns. 'a

8.

• Erdiclocical Enercencv ::edical Care.

s, 0 9.- .adic1ccical Mcnit'cring anf Assessment. \\ 10. i:ew's *:edi5: :-rece6ure s. 11. Demons'trate proficiency ir determining ippropriate procedures,tc'be usef in recevery from an emergency. '\\ l ' '. Demonstrate eiYective and proper _ procedures for 2 ^ alerting, notifying end activating station, corpc-

g cte, state and local emergency resp 6nse organica--

tions. l 't d' m s 4 x se + .s ~ 4 D.

t%- E-13. Demonstrate the ability to make protective action recommendations, including dose calculations, compa-EE risons with Protective Action Guides and the use of evacuation time estimates. 14. Demonstrate proper procedure for emergency security =,E to include control of access and egress.

m The State of South Carolina as well as York County will

=

test the fol3owing elements of their plans and organiza-f ut tions: ![j 1. Communications and Warning. , ge 2. Accident Assessment. 55 3. Field Monitoring. - Ei 4. Imolementation of Protective Action Guidelines. . er .5 5. Public Information. E= 6. Evacuation Methodoloev.

e-7 Re-entry /Pecovery.

IE 8. Direction and Control. m-9. Activation of Emergency Operation Center. E 10. Decentamination Capabilities. , (;E 11. Accident' Alert and Notification. 12. Radiclogical Emergency Med cal Care. = tm t u , Ei c !!:. l^' e . m.

1J

i- ', THE CONDITIONS DESCRIBED IN THIS SCENARIO HAVE BEEN POSTULATED TO TEST.THE ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF EMERGENCY PLANNING. THE BASIS FOR MANY OF THE-PLANT CONDITIONS ARE CONJECTURAL AT BEST,

=-

' )"[ PUT THEY HAVE BEEN INCLUDED TO INITIATE CERTAIN ACTIONS EX-TERNAL TO THE CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION. WHILE SOME OF.THE CONDITIONS COULD OCCUR, THEY WOULD NOT ACUTALLY PRESENT A 7_ HAZARD TO THE PUBLIC AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF SUCH CONDITIONS Ve

'f0 HAVE BEEN SIGNIFICANTLY EXAGGERATED FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE EMERGENCY DRILL.

IN PARTICULAR, THE MAGNITUDE OF THE OFF-SITE RELEASE OF RADIOACTIVITY HAS BFEN EXAGGERATED IN ORDER TO we ' iE ' PRODUCE THE REQUIRED OFF-SITE RESPONSE ACTIONS FROM DUKE'S CORPORATE STAFF AS WELL AS STATE AND COUNTY ORGANIZATIONS. 4 12: T,:: ,.m = s+ E v: mu 4 r ( L I !li+ l O* b

7 G !5"" III. SPECIFIC EXERCISE OBJECTIVES Catawba Nuclear Station Emergency Plan / ff Duke Power Comcany Crisis Management Plan { m5 3. The adequacy of the Catawba Radiological Emergency Response Plan and its implementing procedures, 2. The familiarity of Duke's emergency organization f n personnel with the plant plan and procedures. e 3. Adequacy and effectiveness of the plant emergency M... facilities. 4. The effectiveness and proper procedure of notifying federal, state and local government personnel. 5. The capability to produce public information re-leases. 6. First aid procedures. 2 7 Timelv. and effective assessment of radiolo9 cal i releases. ~ 8. Preparation of reports, messages and records. The State of South Carolina: I 1. To test and assess the initiation and implementation of the state's plans and organizations with respect 'o a radiological emergency at the Catawba Nuclear. 7 Station. ~ 2. To test the ability cf State Government to assess the = impact of a radiological emergency on the public and to carry out the recuired alert and notification plans cf respense ferces and.the public. m 3. To test'the Emergenev-Cperaticns Center with. respect te: a. Adecunev of' faci 2itics te support operations -under emergency conditions. b. Interface of-the organization components. i c. Adequacy of resource _ materials to assist in decision makingEend-in implementation decisicns'. d. Adecuacy ci conmunicaticns systems toimaintair-centact with cther ccmponents of the.emergenc- 'N rGspCDs0 Syctem. m , b A

p .= 13th - 4. To test: the ability of the off-site radiological monitor- = ing program to accurately determine the public danger and institute appropriate protective actions. The following a 'E items will also be tested: eu Manpower and resource activation and develop-a. = ment. b. Adequacy of radiological monitoring equipment. T.... E c. Adequacy of the communications system. d. Decontamination procedures. . ;;u 5. To test the ability of the state to establish and direct a News Media Center for the dissemination of E:;;. public information. 6. To test the ability of the state to direct and compel 2 evacuation. m

N*h 7.

To test the ability of the state to institute recov-a ery/re-entry procedures, including the protective E,,E, actions needed for the Inc.estion Pathway EPZ. E. Tc test the state law enforcement capabilities to ~ secure evacuated areas, direct traffic, and reduce / mitigate crime under extreme circumstances. 9. Effect rumor contrci. m 10. To test decision-making related to emergency action levels. ~ York County: l To test and evaluate the operations of th'e York County S" Emergency Operations Cente'r. The specific components tested will include: 1. Adequacy of facilities to support operations under emergene, conditions. ?. Inter aec~of the various crganizational ccmponents. r 3. Adequacy of resource materials'to-assist in decision making and carrying out' protective action recommenda- .tions. 4. Adequacy of communications systems to maintain centact with county responders -and other E: ergency operations Center. 5. Abilitf of.the county to-Alert and Motify the public. C.

m 4 I L% ""E 5

=

i 6. County radiological monitoring capabilities in [g support of DHEC. r m 7. Emcrgency Welfare Service capabilities available to { assist evacuees. c

=

e??

e 8. Radiological' emergency medical care available to evacuees and to utility personnel as negotiated in .E I,etters of Agreement. 9. County law enforcement capabilities to secure evacu-3= ated areas, direct traffic, and reduce / mitigate crime [f: under extreme circumstances. 10. Effect rumor control. 4r 11. Test county fire and medical support on-site and off-site. = .= la 12. Test shelterinc capabilities of affected and host counties in North Carolina. i-33. Test sheltering capabilities of host counties in South Carolina. Et Oue to the availability of vclunteer forces such as volunteer. E

1. ire support, an actual test of the county' volunteer fire-department and rescue personnel will be conducted Februar*; 14, E

19F(. This will aise include the transcort of a simulated 5:2 certaminated-injured victim te a hospital so that the hespi-tal's capabilities can be adecuately tested to care for such a ' e victim.

Ed e

! b.m. i ',. 1 4

s s

n i & fil b9 s. t m o b. -e n--

1 N. J-am M ii IV. EXERCISE ORGANIZATION j[ The Exercise Organizations is split into three major != groups as defined below: A. Controllers / Evaluators ,= .en.s Controllers and evaluators are assigned to specific locations and/or groups as described in Part VII cf G...~ this Exercise Plan. Controllers are responsible for:

5 1.

Maintaining action acccrding to the scenario. 2. Providing input messages. g 3. Assist players in the questions that may'arise on data, situations, etc. .en. Evaluators are responsible for: 1. Observing players as they work in their special- =. ined functions. 2. Ccmpiling observatiens and judgements onte the m evaluation forr ir Part VI. In many instances one persen may serve in a dual J~ capacity as both controller and evaluater. Part VII cf this plan describes those assignments. I

p Simulated plant parameters and emergency messages will be provided to the centrol room cperators, monitoring team members, and other players as appro-priate by the contrcllers en a periodic basis.

g ~ Players are responsible fer initiating actions ir 2 respense to the mesnages and/cr data according ::'the amergency plan. F^uth Cnrelina cont-elle: '0"sluatcrs wil: he iderti-

1. ied by weari nc arecn ar'.

9. i t e.ctaff supper; bafets and arm hanes.

Selection ' of. controller.' evaluators is based on their expertise in, or their qualification to evaluate the area. assigned. All centrollers and evaluators wil ecmpile their observatiers prior to the critique and I crevide.the completed era:;ction form (see Sectier '/I ) te the Exercice Direct:r. The Exercise Dire:::r-will ccver-those itcms ir the critique (see Sectier V fer cenduct cf the criticuel.

r. F. t j e !!n re - E B. Observers Observers from various Duke organizations, other M-utilities, local, and state officials, may be author-ized on a limited basis, to participate in the exercise for the purpose of personal education. .m ~;;;; Pequest to participate as observers at the SEOC, TECC, or County EOC are to be submitted to: J. R. 'i

Jones, S.C. Emergency Preparedness Division, Rutledge j

Building, 1429 Senate Street, Columbia, S. C. 29201. = C. Players '.s"tSA Players include all plant and other Duke personnel assioned to perform functions of the station and 5. corporate emergency resranse plans including control room personnel assigned to participate in the exer-cise, Technical Support Cen:er personnel and other _M assigned station personnel _, Crisis Management Center E Personnel, including other Duke personnel who may be assicned as players. In addition there are ncn-Duke p3av.ers of offsite ac.encies. These persons perform gt actions at the state's EOC and FEOC, at the ccunty EOC, at local hospitals, or other emergency 1c-catiens. cma the success c' the e.':ercise is largely dependent or. player reaction, knowledge of the Emergency P'ans and procedures and their understanding of the Exercise Plan and objectives. Simulated plant conditiens will ~' he previded cor. trol room operators using pre-prepared plant parameters. Players-are responsible for E initiating actions /or messages during the exercise according to the precedures, responsibilities, and tasks outlined for their particular function in the rii;; Energency P]ans and Implementing Procedures. c; Fruth Carclina FFOC participants and those playcrs at the County EOC are cuided by SCOPERP (South Carclina ^re rational Eaficle:ical Energency Fesponse P" an) and vu-tv E~ernenc-Plans, rc =re c t i.*ely. C $$ff 'I 5,.5, It A e

• m s -

y e+ w

c. [-. e P F4 e ~ V. CR7TIOUE );;l Following the exercise, separate closed critiques will be .~ ~ held between Duke and NRC as well as between the State / County agencies and FEMA. The State Critique will be held et at 1730 hours on February 16 at the Clover Armory, to.1 At the critique, the following persons will be asked to comment on the event as to the areas needing improvement, m Controllers / evaluators will turn in their' evaluation re sheets to the E::ercise Director prior to the critique. This wil] allow the Director time to coordinate the group responses. 12 Critique Comments: 1552 State / County / feria Criticue [ 1. State EPD Directors (including controllers /evaluat' ors comments) 2. State Agency Pepresentative 3. Duke Representative C .r,...- m. n. 5. York County EPD Director A public meeting wil] be held in Clover, S.C. on February 1, 1984 at 1900 hours. The location of the meeting will be at Clever.ir. Figh School.

• he State o' South Carciina Emergency Preparedness Oivi-sion will develcp en a.'ter action report, which addresses

.eicnificant issues, preblem areas, and positive areas. Arv issues requiring ccrrective actions will be assigned

c a responsible individual with'a date for resoluticn cf the item.

Thc senrio ova 3untic: ferrs-in Part "I w.ill be used t; the 'hCir rfriews of grCup "CrfOrm- "entrollfr/CValuntCrF F? F.r C O. 0% e ae

i. -

t, 's ~ 'E 'T i esus- =,. -= Siu .._.?.* s, sil; s.a.a.s = sses = s.:.s.s. m,. = stsu. 1:23

=

ts:: 4;l. 13tJ- =. ts" =. saar U.'.' .:::..>-.. = ..a PART 2 7 9 f h.. l l h I ..r EII 1 111. tz

6 q-a i NORTH CAROLINA EXERCISE INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE si-CATAWBA, S.C. NUCLEAR STATION EXERCISE = February 15-16, 1984 m I. General ,is A. A full participation emergency preparedness exercise will be conducted at the Catawba Nuclear Station near Rock Hill, South Carolina on February 15-16, 1984. I B. The exercise will consist of a simulated accident a t. Catawba which will escalate to a general emergency and involve planned response and recovery actions by North and South Carolina. During the simulated emergency, an ~< off-site radiological release will occur and recuire =;7 responses by off-site personnel. .m II. Obj ectives : In accordance with NUREG 0654, the obj ectives of this exercise for North and South Carolina are as follows: A. To test and assess the initia ion and implementation of South Carolina's and North Carolina's plans and organizations with respect :c a radiological emergency at the Catawba Nuclear Statien. ~ B. To test the ability of Scuth Carolina and No'rth Carolina to assess the ircact of-a radiological emergency on the public and to carry out the recuired alert and notification plans of response forces and the public. C. To test the State Emergency Operations Center and Emergency Response Tear wi:h respect to: 1. Adequacy of facilities :c support operations under vie emergency conditions. 2. 'nterface-of the organize:icn components. 3. Adecuacy of rescurce a:er als

c assis:

in decision-making and in 1 :lementa: ion decisiens. 4. Adecuacy of communica:1:ns s ys tem s to maintain contact with other cccrenents of the emergency response system. D. To test the operations of the "ecklenburg and Gaston Counties Emergency Opera:icns Centers. The specific. components tested will include: ~ Fe'.-;, i c M.

o i 1. Adequacy of facilities to support operatione under emergency conditions. 2. Interface of the various organizational components. = i".2 3. Adequacy of resource materials to assist in decision-making and carrying out protective action m - recommendations. g 4. Adequacy of communications systems to maintain contact with county responders and other Emergency E_ e Operations Centers. g E.

Cabarrus, Cleveland and Union Counties will E

administratively open shelters in support of the exercise. ft III. Scope A. All major elements of the North Carolina Emergency Response Plan in Support of the Catawba Nuclear Station '= 5: (hereinafter referred to as the Plan) from initial notification through protective-actions will be exercised. This exercise will involve the State and 5 is affected local governments and their supporting agencies. B. State and local staffing and the level of play will be determined by the simulated nuclear accident scenario except as identified below. C. Evacuees will be played. D. Local emphasis for Gas ton and tiecklenburg Counties will be: 1. Alert and notification of the oublic. 2. Ability to assis in evacuation. 3. Capability to

rovide Traffic Control

Points, secure evacua:ed areas and to perform ot.her roles and responsibill:ies as identified in the tocal

~ plans. 4 Tes: fire and T.ed. cal sur cr. The level of play fcr Cabarrus, Cleveland and Union E. Counties will be: 1. 111nimum activation of the E00 2. Administrative)y-coening and staffing shelters

s....-

F. . State emphasis will include :he fellowing: 1 Coord ina tion of Em ert en c y :.e s ocn se h e: ween North Carolina and So n'r Carolina. $ Io d g De T l k

4. dw.-4,- +em-e-.5WW ha -e A d.m m, m mM. A.4 4 M Adi5 4lr z. E-. m.64 Eg a Rm# ab.4 F-.M 45.a p a.Ayme.a.h m,44- ---g. amp w a a,a m a. A ka,edir_Mm 6 4W eaws. A maM.4 5,.w_Ja r 9 04 g 5' f 1 ? - HIE + g.im iM i M. I u:: 1 r 1 - i l O% ', * *;l. asas Is.J. 1 i !.*..r.

i. 'ff*.

i f

• R.*.**

h .!..*..I t a=. i i j i 1 CZ asw IEEE. - rs.: l ama u.:: e.s.s.e.r I nr :.,.g C 4,.*.. i r $4%% i'.'. ??? ? @tM 1; GM A j E.Y0 .s. L N% l ' I

9.. ',. '.

tMt f sa a .s 1.t

• i J

5 t. $$N a b b evi. ill! l . ns 'd'. n,u. b ' R i IM ,. II I r I l i

p._,. #.

.~,,-.-..,,,,.----,,-ey.-,--.---=,.- ---r-nev-+------

b.

CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION )) CHRONOLOGICAL LISTING OF EXERCISE EVENTS mi i '. Ant im - cA re . p. er r_vrg.g p .m ?E5 2-15-84 0535 Aircraft crash inte cooling ::.:e at Catawba FNF. , - c..,., D. 063o

r., r..

..= - - - -. r -

• wa

.m Initial..ctificatien to offsite t

E authcrities.

S.C. establish SEOC hi!! and depleys TEOC. N.C. establishes State EOC, alert, notify and de lo.v SERT. N.C. and S.C. County EOC's '= =cm activa:ec.

m

1 0800 Wind velocity increases. Eigh -+

m

h. ;.ncs nurlec. cebris into olant

=. di causing slight damage, i+5 1130 FEOC assumes ocerational cont cl. i er

;a 1200 A LOCA en unit 1 occurs.

Reactor fa and turbine trip. CMC being t T,m tinimally staffed. CSC fully staffed. SERT enrcute. Media I Center established. Counties

ii dispatch FIO to media center.

. e: 1 SITE AREA IMERGENCY DECLARED. L N tifica:icn of offsite auther-e ities. SERT is established and i ! L,, assures.cperational control cf 9 state agencies. N.C. Counties in 1 eperatienti contrel. Recommenda-n.o.s... e a...... c.a.:e.e e< .s ..o. scund strens with ne protective a ctie re cc=nendaticns. 1230 Recir:ulatien begins. 1230-Updates.:n Plant status.and 1500 meteere'cgical reperts. Public information on Plant status, 1500 N.C.' SERT assumes' direction and' n C C n t:C a. r i ot h

t o I f I Ls .E. CATT TIME EVENTS 1645 Ice depleted. Containment Fressure = 55 and temperature begins to rise. .e Uctification to off-site auth:r-

u

<a ...e.e. = ?!!! 1700 Exercise will be suspended wit:- iis rescect te time and scenaric. .g... 4 2-15-84 0715 577E AREA EMERGENCY continued. g,, m.. 0720 Lightening strikes switchyard. Loss of effsite power. "B" train L. loss. "A' cum: knocked out bv mechanical problems. Total recir-culation loss. Core press begins .n.

• o

.~.*ce. .8&1 0805 GENERAL EMERGENCY DECLARED. .= Reccmmendations to offsite author-ities fer a two mile precautienary evacuatier and evacuate downwind ["'- staffed. Protective acticns fer 5 miles. Shelters opened and . e - -... e n 2,2 .-.o o .c.a.e at..hn : a ..:e..., e siren system activated. EES message te pub,ic - counties conduct evacuation and shelterinc. as crdered by. Governor. Offsite m o...'....4... ~. ,7,. 0900 SG's are fepressuriced tc maximi:ed G hea: transfer. Notification of ,t.t.e.:.,. a. ,...;ee. . ~ coo c, m t.e.t . e. # " e.l d a.. a c. e ~.~ ~ "..- =. - cf g C,5

o. g 9.

• • e..... t.:ca.4mn..

c#Je.i., ot......a......a.s. i 1130 Loss of fan cecident causes slicht leak. Re' ease in progress. Not fication to offsite author-

ities, offsite monitoring contin-pu ues.

Direct protective actions to generci public as deemed appropri-ate. Moniter clume. 0:. 3, h[h

t a =.- D.~_.m. e.

e. _w. _r En, r_h,m..e;

e..

1200 Release terminated.."B" train recirculation established. Furge m valves closed. Recovery begir.r. ~'" Initiate reentry actions. .se.. 1300 Ixercise Terminated. t&tt u.., 1330 Table Tcp Exercise (Recovery ar.d s. Jii Keentry) SIRT only. = ,e,O C,.:._ _: .,e s-2 till m Jcintiv submitted: 7 un 1 .1 %=nua P. Modre sirector. South Carolina Imergejcy Pre aradness Division ex ,) /p~u-e.'b.. ec. ......e irec cr,

crth Carolina 5

Divisien of Emergency Management it t . a fhe 0" t 4 t h

O l kaa = .. fs.. g.,q e. -s). -'7. q J.M l b'.\\ .3. M.% A L.9.s $2 f-P.P. L*\\% 1 1 \\.. r-py h..TC; au .\\ um = e. na- .. :. c-s :.-. c= w4e.c.Je...c....... =.-. s =,, (..:.: T. he C.N a. w ' c e .c u.. 6.- e tf.. A

n.. :. 3

.C..e,

C. ;,:.

u. l, ..:. y.e e..J.. i. 1: ~ = r. 2,C... c w... c ..c.6 ..c... c 7.. e 3,.e.e. 4 a 6 ' "'.., 9 o C'.0....t. e.' a.

1. c
2. . C ~..e.

.-ww cle. 6 c -e-.: 6.c-. .i.c =<......:.. r 4 4 ..a .".c g n 1 o ..a. ;.. 4 .ke c;e.

..,..:..,:..e c....

. s.e. p;.c...,;. .h, 6 .. c.. s. .s u........, .s.. s. s

C'. c.:, :6 0 c..

, 4 - v.e.. ..b,:. n.c n n .e....:.:,

• ... e L.: - ;

s. g e. r6. e 2 w c c.3 .. m m .k eu3...h. n. . 1. L.s. D.4n. wu 4.;. ;..:...,g ys c-1 1 Cc" " c '.9.. _c c7. '.Y,.c ' - #.. w 4. 6. .6 6 s ..e-4.e. ..c .c.ne-w..v 3.., 3 r.,.... k... .:. 4 A .t

k.. c.le. CCn;.;.4..Ct Co

.g. ... a.. .6 ..O....: u g C,A.. C C r. 4 .,..s. w.4,.h.4 h.: n;

u.,..w.: 4 4,,s e..

..6..... .3 s 4 tz 1200 A LO".A en the cold leg of Unit 1 occes. The Reactor and urbine trip, the pressuri:er e.:pties, and bc h ECCS trains activz e J52-

=:

.' s .c ol c- *6e en. k.'.. E.n.,. e.c.e ". e and c^e.~. c ta. -. v. e *. 1 v.. Cen..c- '......a. u. a y pg in centai:rnent (3 pounds). Site ares eaergency declared. m... ..0 nec:.rculatien begins w ..- n. n. s C. n. C o c,. ; .s.i Co. :...e a.. .. - ~. 16 '0 9 6. '.: D. ob'. e..c da.ve'.Cp vs i h..'.C6U. f. 7.e c...#... ^ .c us" c 4.g .k..a.....- ~

b..9..sc s... c:....n.

Co,, Ca,v c..4 ...s 1 On -serc..se place,.,.en s..c,c., r.::., 0.... .,6 .p. .u : .- s s ue +- .= 4 ~3 w L 1.: ).e.C.ce .c......A 6-i ....c... c... re i c.e.c r..

c..:.e.s..

4 n...e.. 4.,e. .b .c. * ; p.e.. 7 9 c... k..

o. e..

rb

c. o. m. g y a.s 3..-..a3 s..

~ "w;; C o. e C. s* '.*s ' a..c V.c- " 1. ".~.c'_. ".-.."".-..a.....e. 4 "I ' ~ --..c*1 .#. ". y *...t.h. '. E

1. 4a

.e.o.p. J. ug, 6m. y... u o...c. .,. a s.... n.. .e. e..-.: -. we...c e. .c.c n.: m.~. c.c. e. n. c ~.. .,., u a.. a. e.. =.. e d 4.- C.=...a. ~..' :.. ^.. 3....- cc.#..:....e . a.c a.... a..#. - =. 4 n c c... c., . w-0500-1030 The cere heats up due tc lack cf flew and cc: ling 1030-1130 During this period clad exidation and 40i core mel; occurs. 1130 "E". diesel fixed and "3" train fica-reestablished. Cocid:kr. 4 4 r4 rettrn c.e.. .R

4. c..,.G.

-..e:C. s....., .e w e... e, c 2.s u,..: a w a u a

- =_. c t=i fan lolade damaces a penetraticn to the annulus. Release t e. of rac..icactivity initiated. i

=

t3.r l'0? Radicactive release tem inates.ctn cecrease in pressure T-inside centaiment. Recovery f anning begins. -_s. 1.t..' Exercise Teminated-i 9 ga4,, eell!! 1 b ,m a, .e.. I mu - ent ' 5:." r mW j:=

• ???

e. 1 = Id I '?..? ) N. M..* .f we

i. ?..?.

iem a.: i 4 a. p.. 3 ) '.*..: 1 1 \\ t* 1= lII e1.;' ' 2 4 i i l 1 4 Y... W. l t - E.*U 4 m8 -__---.__._.__._m_.__,

1 1 g WDD AW. 4JJ. Esta '444J hee t:t:. U.;. 4

4 s.

'c49 'N..'. Oe tav s t -::2. .l. '92. 2.

1. e re R..IE.?

N. :s We me t* L2 ,:. l T::. 4.'-' e mitm Weg 9 m # 9 e m ...e f'ee s enesor e e e w W w

• l :-

e %e w W* Uem44 m. p. .a.a.+ 44 ts. f all ti. : 1816

• tes ke U. 1 '

t.: t i l 's :: 1

C. (. \\ _s a M ATTACl!ME!!T 2 - ASSIGN 11E!1T OF RESPONSIBILIT" d, d, 7 j J rn j POSITION PRESENT TITLE / POSITION Warning County Sheriff m-fi Communication County Communications Officer = en E6 Public arid Emergency PIO Officer Information hh Chief, Law Enforcement County Sheriff Chief, Emergency Director of Social ig. Welfare Service Services Coordinator, Transportation County School Bus 5 Supervisor di Chief, Fire Service County Fire Marshall T 5 Chief, Rescue County Sheriff Chief, supply and Procurement Purchasing Superviser er Chief, Emergency Medical Hospital Administrato'r Service Medical Service J{it Chief, Engineering and County Public Works Public Works Director NE El-Radiological Defense Officer Radiolcgical Defense Officer Shelter Cfficer Shelter Officer Chief, Damage Assessment Tax Assesscr Er.ergency Operations Center Emergency Preparedness Ccrrdint. cr Ocordinater i E1 yy q ss. .; t.:; u A r y ; r. 4

f ~ e (.. s t J E h TABLE 3, RER RESPONSIBILITIES

SUMMARY

TABLE TO SCORERP. f ? FUNCTION AGENCY RESPONSIBILITY Primary Support ~is Command & Control Office of the Governor X i Emergency Preparedness Div. X v" office of the Adjutant X General .-3 Dept. of Health & Environ-X mental Control II Warning (Radio-Dept. of Health & Environ-X L logical Emergency mental control (BRH) X Response) Emergency Preparedness Div. X

E Utilities X

T! Radio & TV Stations X S.C. Educational Network X i State Law Enforcement Div. X (SLED) l County Governments & Muni-X cipalities r cm 1 1 Warning (War and State Law Enforcement Div. X v Natural (SLED) Cisasters) Emergency Preparedness Div. X S.C. Forestry Ccmmission X Office cf the Adjutant X General I - Dept. of Highways & Public X Transportation Wildlife & Marine Resources X l-Department Educational Televisien X Local Gcvernment X Private Sector TV & Radic X Nctificatien Bureau of Radic1:gical Health X 4 l C municatiens (DHEC) (Nuclear Emergency Preparedness Div. X Accident) Utilities X SLED (in cludes tr.c se in War..- X ing paragraph) Telephene Ocmpanies X Local Gevernment and X Municipalities Public Informa-Office of the Governer X tion Office cf the Ad?utant X General Parks, Recreatien & Tourism X Educatienal Te'evisien/Radie X Department cf C::recticns X 1.'d"/f7 "~E;

l ~.,., h FUNCTION AGENCY RESPONSIBILITY base 9 Primary Support ut Public Department of Mental Health X Znformation Dept. of Highways & Public X ~ (Continued) Transportation State Law Enforcement Div. X

-v (SLED)

Dept. of Health & Environ-X mental Control E Wildlife & Marine Rescurces X e" Department Department of Human Affairs X g;. Commission on Aging X is Dept. of Social Services X Private Sector Media X Utilities X Local Government X Accident Dept. of Health & Environ-X rr Assessment mental Control E.S RAP & IRAP (upon request) X SMRAP (upon request) X EPD (upen request) X NRC (upen request) X Clemsen University Ag '-"'- V tural Extensien Serv;ce Sc:ial Dept. of Social Services X Services Department of Educatier X County Departments cf X ,J, Sccial Services (Ener-gency Welfare Service) Red Cross X [ Salvation Army X Mennenites X Baptist Conventien X Fire & Rescue Ferestry Commissict X (Ferest Fire) Department cf Cerre::1:r.s X Dept. of Higr. ways & Put.':: X TranspCitatiCE l Dept. of Farks, Eccreat;;r X & Couris-U.S. Dept. of Fcrestry X (upon request) l (Urban & Rural Office of the Fire Marshall X l-Fire Service) Forestry Commissicr. X l Local Government Fire X L, Services (Perruel Wildlife & Marinc Fertur:er F Emergency Preparedr. cts ;;v. .r.. ...'.e.. , c.,.;. a

5, L' p + .l 3 jk FUNCTION AGENCY RESPONSIBILITY Primary Sucport i (Rescue) Forestry Commission X li; (Continued) Aeronautics Commission X ~ S.C. Civil Air Patrol X Dept. of Highways & Public X 23 Transportation Adjutant General X U.S. AF Rescue Coordination X . ss Center (upon recuest) Local Government Fire & X Rescue Units in EPZ Local Government Fire & X y Rescue Services (Mutual Agreement) E';' Traffic Centrol State Law Enforcement Div. X

,t

& Security Highway Patrol X Local Sheriff's Departments X

m Local Police Departments X

"3 Wildlife & Marine Resources X W.% l-Department Adiutant General X .. = ' M.. Emergency Dept. of Health & Enviren-X n" 1 Medical Services mental Centrol Local Rescue Service.= X Local Ambulance Services X Hospitals (Scrving EPZ) X Adjutant General X Law Enforcement (Same as Traffic Contrcl & Security) i Transpcrtation Public Service Cennissien X (Division cf Transpcrta-tion) Aerenautics Cc=missten X Depcrtment cf Educatier X Adjutant Genera' X Lccal Schocl Oc,ar: rents X Lecci Private Trans,ter:stien X Fr:tective Lept. cf Heal ~- Envaren-Fespense mental Centr:1 l Emergency Preparedness Div. X Dept. of Social Services - X Department of Education X State Law Enforcement Div. X (SLED) Highway Patrel NRC (upen recuest, DOE (upCn IcquCEt! a.

e. r. 1.-:.:, r."2 FUNCTION AGENCY RESPONSIEILITY "2 Primary Support Q Protective EPD (upon request) X Fj

Response

Emergency Services in local X (Continued) governments Local Governments X ?,2 Public Information X if Organizations Facilities X i.5, Radiological Dept. of' Health & Environ-X Exposure Control mental Control (DHEC) X e. Emergency Preparedness Div. X E Local Governments & X v:r Municipalities Facilities X Pre-arranged commitments X with SMTG?, I PAP, Facilities .-.n I w P 5# 9 ??? r9 W s gp J P t d.'in ..e

6

..m m m. m. m. .m

2.s 4 ,'l . M*:. asu O. 8%%% 'd est-ii x.;; , tsu ~ ?.?- ' titt ' l2l sua ".'Eo* 4 w.v 20 3 soma g mk1" .~ 'a'Os 23:: MA! -it ' U *. sur ." ll .s $Ne* .'U:- it' *

• d:de etre 9

. ri:t-r.:: L.w g. ' tit "? ?*. 3 ppt ] 9 he w ir 4

-_.y 1

1 l t j t er_t t t' t 1 l fft' a ?--

/\\[,[. r -PART 1 Page 28 m a PRIMARY AND SUPPORT RESPONSIBILITY

SUMMARY

A 'E RESPONSIBILITY FUNCTION ORGANIZATION PRIMARY SUPPORT 5.& Command and Control Dept. of Crime Control and Public Safety X Warning Dept. of Crime Control and Public Safety X g,y E National Weather Service X Police Information Network X Radio and television JE; stations serving the EPZ X County and municipal govern-ments in the EPZ. X ,ls j[ Notification Communi-Dept. of Crime Control and cations Public Safety X Police Informa' tion Network X 13 Southern Bell Telephone Co. X ~ Duke Power Company X Emergency Public Dept. of Crime Control and Information Public Safetv X Dept. of Human' Resources X j et Duke Power Company X Dept. of Natural Resources and Community Development X County and municipal ^ r, s governments in the EP: X Radio and televisien stations j,.., serving in EP7 X Local newspapers. X . z. Accident Assessment Duke Pcwer C:meanv X. Dept. c f F.um an Re's cu r c e s X ~ Dept. of Crime' Control and publi: Eafety X L'.S. Dept. cf Energy fEAP' ( IRAF) X Southern Emergency Response Council (SMRAF). X 5 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency X U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 3; Commission X .t t

h.,

m o k e

n _s + Page 29 PARTL1 y isC RESPONSIBILITY ' FUNCTION ORGANIZATION PRIMARY SUPPORT i s M Public Health and. Dept. of Human Resources X Sanitation County health departments in .m in the EPZ X .c

~

^ .U.S. Dept. Health and . Human Services X ~-

7;.

Social Services Dept. of Human Resources X [ County social services organi:ations in the EPZ X ~ Red Cross .X K. Fire and Rescue Dept. of Crime Control and Public Safety X '/ . Dept. of Transportation X

~

Dept. of Natural Resources and Con: uni:. Development X r 72 r,. f Local goyernnen: fire and l rescue

• uni:s serving the EPZ X

l Ef l ,Vo unteer fire and rescue organi:ati:ns' serving the c-EPZ X M Traffic" Control Dept. of Crime Control and Public Safe:y X County, sheriff's depts. in the X l'unicipal p:li:e depts..in .the EF: y, s Emergency Medical Dept. cf Xuman ?.esources X l Service Rescue er:ani:r.:icns in the !?~ X Ambulance :::.iders serving in the EF~ y, 6 Hespita'.s ir

..e EP; y,

Lw Enfercement

ert, cf ;ri +

:n rei and

~ Publi: S af t: - X .Coun:y sheriff s depts, in the EF*. y, Municipal ; li:e depts. in the EF*, y, Transportation Dept, cf Cri~e ;cn:tci. and Pu':'i: !eie:y y, m Dep. cf C:rre:: ten X Ccp:. f Trs.t:: :a:1.m y, I.:cli: 's :h: *. ; :ea r::.r:3 ic" " ' ' ! : ; *- ' !~.e E"* y, 1 A fie a m '

e, r I PART.1 Page 30 -m 6 RESPONSIBILITY if FUNCTION ORGANIZATION PRIMARY SUPPORT aw t l Protective Response Dept. of Crime Control e and Public Safety X b." Dept. of Human Resources X l~ Dept. of Agriculture X i 6 Dept. of Natural Resources '6 and Community Development X Dept. of Transportation X U.S. Nuclear Regulatory si Co= mission X U.S. Dept. of Agriculture X e U.S. Dept. of Energy X ,:S U.S. Environmental Protection Agency X County and municipal emergency service J.. providers in the EPZ X Radio and television stations serving the j; EPZ X i Radiological Exposure Dept. of Human Resources X ,7 Control Dept. of Crime Centrol and ~ Public Safety X Dept. of Agriculture X .3 ?e ' 5N1 1

w.

I !a t i 4 I k e.* U T C a 'C'*'.*d. q l

e v' t Page 16 u i PART 2. s .e

1. -w s

E Pli1 MARY AND SUPPORT RESPdNSIBILITY

SUMMARY

..y ~ RESPONSIBILITY ., ^ na FUNCTION ORGANIZATION PRIMARY SUPPORT i; ha Command and Gaston Co Dept. of Control Emergency Management x Warning Gaston Co. Communications -CenteY~ x ~ National 'sther Service x Police.Initreation Network x Radio 'and television stations x Volunteet ' fire departments x

cti.

J Rescue Squads x Sheriff's ' Department x ~ d.. Notification Gaston Co. Communications 2 Communications Center ~ x Police 16 formation Network x um~~ Southern-Bell x Duke Power Company x Public Infor-Gaston Co. Dept. of Emer-9 matien gency Managemen: x = Duke Power Company x Radio and television statiens x Local newspapers ~ x Law Enforcement Gaston Co. Police.De:t. I. Sheriff's Department' x x Rescue Scuads x Transportation Gaston Co. Bd. of Educarica x -Gaston Co. Administration Departmen:, x Acciden: Assess-Duke Power Compan-- x ment Gastor Cc'. Dept. Of Emergency Managemen: x Gastcr'Co. Apricui:ure ~ Extensicn Setigte x n Pu':1;c Mcal h Gas:cn Co. Heal b Dep':. .x and. Sanitation sGas:cn Co.~ Maintenance / - Departmen: x i " (. s _t e .s; s e j g' 't s g %n ,we

M" gNH~73 Page 17 1 RESPONSIH1LITY 6.;; FUUf; TION ORGAN 17.ATION PRI!1ARY SilPPORT h" Social Services, Gaston Co. Red Cross x _3 Shelter, thss Gaston Co. Dept. of Feeding, and Social Services x Clothing Gaston Co. Bd. of Education x _M Gaston Co.11 ental Health Dept. x Gaston Co. Agriculture i Extension Services x 5 Gaston Co. Emergency Management Department x Ambulance-Emergency Medical i..i.;. Services x Gaston Co. Rescue Scuads x Gaston Co. Landfill' x il Fire Gaston Co. VFDs x Cramerton VFD x = New Hope VFD x [i South Gastonia VFD x South Point VFD x e Union Road VFD x { Ranlo Fire and Rescue x Rescue Ranlo Fire & Rescue x is South Point Rescue Scuad ~ x Traffic Control Gaston Cc. Police Dert. x di Gaston Co. Sheriff's' Dept. x Gastonia Police Dept. x Belmont Police Dept. x gp Emergency Rescue Sc,uads x Medical Gaston County Medical Services Transport 'ervice S x Protective Gaston Cc. Emergent.

Response

Management Deja-i -- c x Bi Gaston Co. Boarc of 9 E c u c a t i -- _ y, Gaston Cc. Dept.rtner.t f

r...

Social Services x Gaston.Co. Police De t. .x Gaston Cc. VFDs x Gaston Co.. Agriculture Extension Services x e . (Os Figure 2 < Cent'. 3

c. z 1. 't -.jL*.

1 ~. 'O'

.a. [:. PAPT 2 Page 18 RESPONSIBILITY 5 FUNCTION ORGANIZATION PRIMARY SUPPORT

Protective Radio & television stations x

ElResponse Gaston Co. Health dept. x Gaston Co. Landfill x Gaston Co. Maintenance x = Fj South Point Rescue Squad x Ranlo Fire & Rescue x $ Radiological Gaston Co. Emergency Exposure Control Management Department x Gaston Co. Agriculture [2 Extension Services x 5 Gaston Co. Police Dept. x Gaston Co. VFDs x 5 So. Point Rescue Squad x Ranlo Fire & Rescue Scuad x Gaston Co. Landfill x Gaston Co. Health Dept. x 5 Gaston Co. Maintenance x l Gaston Co. Landfill Dept. x Gaston Co. Health Dept. x = 'r? Gaston Co. Maintenance Dept. x Sheriff's Department x m El ff f: nt; l i i l Ficure 2 (Cont'd. g._.,- l ar. 7-c.

i,. Page 14 PART 3 ):..a PRIMARY AND SUPPORT RESPONSIBILITY

SUMMARY

RESPONSIBILITY ?!!! FUNCTION ORGANIZATION PRIMARY SUPPORT w Command and Control Mecklenburg Co. Manager x 12 Mecklenburg Co. Em ergency Q" Management Office x Warning Mecklenburg Co. Police L Dept. x National Weather Service x Police Information Network x E Radio and television stations x Volunteer Fire Departments x Rescue Squads x JS Notification Com-Mecklenburg Co. Police munications Dept. x c: Police Information Network x 'A Southern Bell x Duke Power Company x 7 Public Information Mecilenburg Co. PSI x Charlotte PSI x Mecklenburg Cc. Energency Management Office x Duke Power Connanv x Radio and televis'icn stations x Local newspapers x w Law Enforcemen: Mecklenburg Co. Police Dept. x Charlotte Police Dent. x Pineville Police Dent. x Transportation Charlotte Dept. cf Transp. x Mecklenburg Cc. Ed. of EduCarion x ACCiCent AssessOen: Dude Power CcCnan'. x Mecklenburg Cc'. Ehergency ' '.an a t e men t Office x y.tecs encurg Cc. _2n-ren-mental. Health Dep. -x Public Health .Mecklenburg Co. Public Health Dept. x Mecklenburg Co. Environ-mental Health De;:. x u Charic: e-Mecklenbure l C:ility Dept. e k g g-(" 6 p

. P4RT 3 Page~15 A/, (, 1 1 PRIMARY AND SUPPORT RESPONSIBILITY

SUMMARY

i"i Ejj RESPONSIBILITY FUNCTION ORGANIZATION PR111ARY SUPPORT Et Shelter and Mecklenburg Co. Red Cross x ~ Mnss Feeding Mecklenburg Co. Dept. of Social Services x 19 Mecklenburg Co. Emergency Management Office x Fire Mecklenburg Co. Volunteer Fire Depts. x Charlotte Fire Dept. x n'~ Rescue Mecklenburg Co. Rescue Squads x Charlotte-Mecklenburg 4is Fire Depts. x Traffic Control Mecklenburg Co. Police Dept. x n 2.: Charlotte Police Dept. x ki State Highway Patro' v Emergency liedical 11ecklenburg Co. E=ergency = jd Service Medical Service x Mecklenburg Co Rescue Scuads x = = Prc:ective Response Mecklenburg Co. Emergency llanagement Office x Mecklenburg Co. Bd. cf Education x Mecklenburg Co. Dep:. of - ih Social Services x liecklenburg Co. Pci ce Dent. x Mecklenburg Co. Vclun:eer-Fire Depts. x liecklenburg Cc. Rescue Scuads x .liecklenburg Cc. Agricultural Service x Radio and telev. sic-stationc v

lecklenburg Ct. Er c rcn-mental. Heal:.- Ler:.

'ecklenburg Cc. Emergenc:.

!!edical Service x Duke Power Company = Fibure 2 (Ct.:'c. n =y. sh>

C^ PART 3 Page 16 cm PrE PRIMARY AND SUPPORT RESPONSIBILITY

SUMMARY

RESPONSIBILITY [ffFUNCTION ORGANIZATION PRIMARY SUPPORT - Radiological Mecklenburg Co. Environ-El Exposure Control mental Health Dept. x " and Sanitation Mecklenburg Co. Emergency Management Office x 3~ Mecklenburg Co. Agricultural E Extension Service x Mecklenburg Co. Police Dept. x = Mecklenburg Co. Volunteer [; Fire Depts. x Mecklenburg Co. Emergency Medical Service x t.3 gj Charlotte-Mecklenburg ~ Utility Dept. x Duke Power Company x w te5'

ll; as 1

/**N D: l 't Ed I i b *lr i b T. ~. s. (' h l b. i .}}