|
---|
Category:GENERAL EXTERNAL TECHNICAL REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20206P1651998-12-31031 December 1998 Fire Protection for Operating Nuclear Power Plants, Section Iii.F, Automatic Fire Detection ML20196E8261998-11-30030 November 1998 Response to NRC RAI Re Reactor Pressure Vessel Structural Integrity at Peach Bottom Units 2 & 3 ML20199J6981997-11-11011 November 1997 Rev 2 to 10CFR50.59 Review for Jet Pump Thermal Sleeve Cracking ML20202H1231997-09-30030 September 1997 Small Project Joint Permit Application & Attachments for PECO Energy Co,Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station,Rock Run Creek Low Flow Crossing, to Satisfy PA Dept of Environ Protection & Us Army Corps of Engineers ML20129E8711996-09-26026 September 1996 Rev 0 to 10CFR50.59 Review for Ncr Pb 96-03414,Core Spray T-Box Cracks for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station,Unit 2 ML20117E6351996-05-31031 May 1996 Seismic Evaluation Rept for Pbaps ML20117E6321996-05-31031 May 1996 USI A-46 Relay Evaluation Rept for PBAPS Units 2 & 3 ML20117E6251996-05-31031 May 1996 Seismic Safe Shutdown Equipment List for PBAPS Units 2 & 3 ML20129A4511996-01-11011 January 1996 Core Spray Sparger Downcomer Modification ML20129A4731995-12-11011 December 1995 Fabrication of Core Spray Line Downcomer Clamp ML20092M8921995-09-30030 September 1995 Shroud Vertical Team Weld Evaluation ML20098B1141995-09-30030 September 1995 Evaluation of Peach Bottom Unit 3 Core Spray Line ML20098B1211995-09-30030 September 1995 Residual Stress Analysis of Peach Bottom Unit 3 Core Spray Pipe to Sleeve Fillet Weld ML20092J8151995-09-15015 September 1995 Core Spray Line Tee-Box Analysis Rept for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 ML20094H0521995-06-30030 June 1995 Pyrolysis Gas Chromatography Analysis of 21 Thermo-Lag Fire Barrier Samples ML20092K9871995-06-13013 June 1995 Rev 3 to Shroud Stabilizer Hardware ML20083K6611995-04-26026 April 1995 Rev a to Upgraded Eals ML20077M0861995-01-31031 January 1995 Nonproprietary TS Improvement Analysis for RPS for PBAPS, Units 2 & 3 ML20077M0951995-01-31031 January 1995 Nonproprietary TS Improvement Analysis for ECCS Actuation Instrumentation for Pbaps,Units 2 & 3 ML20073J7501994-09-30030 September 1994 Shroud Mechnical Repair Program,Peach Bottom Shroud & Shroud Repair Hardware Stress Analysis ML20079S0911994-09-29029 September 1994 Rev 0 to Application of Screening Criteria ML20073J7411994-09-24024 September 1994 Rev 0 to Stress Rept 25A5607, Shroud Stabilizers ML20072P5791994-08-26026 August 1994 Power System Harmonic Study for Peach Bottom Nuclear Power Plant, Final Rept ML20072L9631993-12-13013 December 1993 Evaluation & Screening Criteria for Peach Bottom Unit-2 Shroud ML20064K4291993-12-0303 December 1993 Evaluation & Screening Criteria for Peach Bottom Unit 3 Shroud Indications ML20059L1391993-11-30030 November 1993 Core Spray Crack Analysis for Peach Bottom Unit 3 ML20059G0901993-10-27027 October 1993 Evaluation & Screening Criteria for Peach Bottom Unit-3 Shroud Indications ML20149G0401993-05-30030 May 1993 Fatigue Evaluation of Peach Bottom II & III Reactor Vessels ML20073E5881991-04-30030 April 1991 Revised Station Blackout Analysis ML20073D0221991-04-30030 April 1991 Full Structural Weld Overlay Design for Peach Bottom Unit 2 RWCU Weld 12-I-1D ML20055J3291990-07-20020 July 1990 Decommissioning Rept of Philadelphia Electric Co ML18095A3791990-07-20020 July 1990 Decommissioning Rept of Philadelphia Electric Co. ML20055J3271990-07-20020 July 1990 Decommissioning Rept of Philadelphia Electric Co ML20055J3231990-07-20020 July 1990 Decommissioning Rept of Philadelphia Electric Co ML20044H3281990-02-23023 February 1990 Rev a to 30-Month Stability Spec for Rosemount Models 1152, 1153 & 1154 Pressure Transmitters. ML20247N3951989-05-16016 May 1989 Methods for Performing BWR Reload Safety Evaluations ML20236A8351989-01-31031 January 1989 Rev 1 to Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Units 2 & 3, Verification of Calculated Auxiliary Distribution Sys Voltages by Test ML20236A8501989-01-31031 January 1989 Voltage Regulation Study ML20206K3021988-10-31031 October 1988 Rev 1 to Impact of Reg Guide 1.99,Rev 2 on Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 3 ML20206K3101988-10-31031 October 1988 Rev 1 to Impact of Reg Guide 1.99,Rev 2 on Limerick Generating Station Unit 1 ML20151M5501988-07-15015 July 1988 Security Problem Root Cause Assessment ML20147A7971988-02-23023 February 1988 Root Cause Investigation of Shutdown Cooling Isolations Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station ML20148H1211988-01-15015 January 1988 Rev 0 to Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station,Units 2 & 3, Response to IE Bulletin 85-003 ML20149D6981988-01-13013 January 1988 Methods for Performing BWR Steady-State Reactor Physics Analyses ML20196K0311987-12-31031 December 1987 1987 Annual Plant Mod Rept,Per 10CFR50.59 ML20236V3311987-11-20020 November 1987 SAR for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Spds ML20236J7141987-10-28028 October 1987 Commitment to Exellence Action Plan Status Rept ML20235H5601987-09-0909 September 1987 Methods for Performing BWR Sys Transient Analysis ML20236D1271987-09-0303 September 1987 Rev 0 to Safety Evaluation for Mod 2085,Peach Bottom Unit 3 ML20236K6081987-07-15015 July 1987 Rev 1 to Evaluation of Insulated Blind Barrel Splices on Dual Voltage Motors in Limitorque Actuators 1998-12-31
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20217K9931999-10-14014 October 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 234 to License DPR-56 ML20217B4331999-10-0505 October 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 233 to License DPR-56 ML20217G3541999-09-30030 September 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1999 for Pbaps,Units 2 & 3. with ML20216H7091999-09-24024 September 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 229 & 232 to Licenses DPR-44 & DPR-56,respectively ML20212D1281999-09-17017 September 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Proposed Alternatives CRR-03, 05,08,09,10 & 11 ML20212A5871999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Aug 1999 for Peach Bottom,Units 2 & 3.With ML20211D5501999-08-23023 August 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 228 & 231 to Licenses DPR-44 & DPR-56,respectively ML20212H6311999-08-19019 August 1999 Rev 2 to PECO-COLR-P2C13, COLR for Pbaps,Unit 2,Reload 12 Cycle 13 ML20210N7641999-07-31031 July 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Jul 1999 for PBAPS Units 2 & 3. with ML20209H1121999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for June 1999 for Pbaps,Units 2 & 3. with ML20195H8841999-05-31031 May 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for May 1999 for Pbaps,Units 2 & 3. with ML20206N1661999-04-30030 April 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Apr 1999 for Pbaps,Units 2 & 3. with ML20206A2921999-04-20020 April 1999 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Proposed Changes to EALs for PBAPS Are Consistent with Guidance in NUMARC/NESP-007 & Identified Deviations Meet Requirements of 10CFR50.47(b)(4) & App E to 10CFR50 ML20205K7411999-04-0707 April 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 227 & 230 to Licenses DPR-44 & DPR-56,respectively ML20205P5851999-03-31031 March 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Mar 1999 for Peach Bottom Units 2 & 3.With ML20207G9971999-02-28028 February 1999 Monthly Operating Repts for Feb 1999 for Peach Bottom Units 2 & 3.With ML20199E3471998-12-31031 December 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Dec 1998 for Peach Bottom,Units 1 & 2.With ML20205K0381998-12-31031 December 1998 PECO Energy 1998 Annual Rept. with ML20206P1651998-12-31031 December 1998 Fire Protection for Operating Nuclear Power Plants, Section Iii.F, Automatic Fire Detection ML20206D3651998-12-31031 December 1998 1998 PBAPS Annual 10CFR50.59 & Commitment Rev Rept. with ML20206D3591998-12-31031 December 1998 1998 PBAPS Annual 10CFR72.48 Rept. with ML20196G7021998-12-0202 December 1998 SER Authorizing Proposed Alternative to Delay Exam of Reactor Pressure Vessel Shell Circumferential Welds by Two Operating Cycles ML20196E8261998-11-30030 November 1998 Response to NRC RAI Re Reactor Pressure Vessel Structural Integrity at Peach Bottom Units 2 & 3 ML20198B8591998-11-30030 November 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Nov 1998 for Pbaps,Units 2 & 3. with ML20206R2571998-11-17017 November 1998 PBAPS Graded Exercise Scenario Manual (Sections 1.0 - 5.0) Emergency Preparedness 981117 Scenario P84 ML20198C6751998-11-0505 November 1998 Rev 3 to COLR for PBAPS Unit 3,Reload 11,Cycle 12 ML20195E5341998-10-31031 October 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Oct 1998 for Pbaps,Units 2 & 3. with ML20155C6071998-10-26026 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 226 to License DPR-44 ML20155C1681998-10-22022 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Proposed Alternative Plan for Exam of Reactor Pressure Vessel Shell Longitudinal Welds ML20155H7721998-10-12012 October 1998 Rev 1 to COLR for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2, Reload 12,Cycle 13 ML20154J2401998-10-0505 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 224 & 228 to Licenses DPR-44 & DPR-56,respectively ML20154H4771998-10-0505 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 225 & 229 to Licenses DPR-44 & DPR-56,respectively ML20154G6821998-10-0101 October 1998 SER Related to Request for Relief 01A-VRR-1 Re Inservice Testing of Automatic Depressurization Sys Safety Relief Valves at Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station,Units 2 & 3 ML20154G6631998-10-0101 October 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amends 223 & 227 to Licenses DPR-44 & DPR-56,respectively ML20154H5541998-09-30030 September 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Sept 1998 for Pbaps,Units 2 & 3. with ML20153B9651998-09-14014 September 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 9 to License DPR-12 ML20151Y2901998-08-31031 August 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Aug 1998 for Pbaps,Units 2 & 3. with ML20238F2661998-08-24024 August 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 222 to License DPR-44 ML20237B9531998-08-10010 August 1998 Specification for ISI Program Third Interval,Not Including Class Mc,Primary Containment for Bpaps Units 2 & 3 ML20237A7761998-08-10010 August 1998 SER Accepting Licensee Response to NRC Bulleting 95-002, Unexpected Clogging of RHR Pump Strainer While Operating in Suppression Pool Cooling Mode ML20237A5351998-07-31031 July 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for July 1998 for Pbaps,Units 2 & 3 ML20236R8281998-07-15015 July 1998 Safety Evaluation Approving Proposed Alternative (one-time Temporary non-Code Repair) Pursuant to 10CFR50.55a(a)(3) (II) ML20236M3471998-06-30030 June 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for June 1998 for Pbaps,Units 2 & 3 ML20249C4791998-06-0202 June 1998 Rev 6 to COLR for PBAPS Unit 2 Reload 11,Cycle 12 ML20248F4781998-06-0101 June 1998 Corrected Page 1 to SE Supporting Amends 221 & 226 to Licenses DPR-44 & DPR-56,respectively.Original Page 1 of SE Had Three Typos ML20248F7441998-05-31031 May 1998 Reactor Vessel Working Group,Response to RAI Regarding Reactor Pressure Vessel Integrity ML20248M3001998-05-31031 May 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for May 1998 for Pbaps,Units 2 & 3 ML20247N5351998-05-11011 May 1998 SER Accepting Third 10-year Interval Inservice Program for Pump & Valves for Plant,Units 2 & 3 ML20249C4751998-05-0707 May 1998 Rev 5 to COLR for PBAPS Unit 2 Reload 11,Cycle 12 ML20247G0721998-04-30030 April 1998 Monthly Operating Repts for Apr 1998 for Pbaps,Units 2 & 3 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
. - ~ . . . . . .- - - - _ - _ . _ _ . --
4 .
i i :
ATTACHMENT B PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-278 .
t GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY'S PRKcf0RE AECHKdfCE 29AE0KTION KH5 50EREKi REE5 REpKfR 5EEY5N i
)
J O
4 l
)
1 i
'$I
{
O na'*aaa'a'8lh a P
l - - , . . . - - , - , . _ - . - . . . .-. . _ _ - . . . _ . __ .__ _ _ _ _ _ ,_-
r.; .
.. .-- . Q .
r DRF #137-0010 NAR 84-19 SR03.DA l
l
- i .
EVALUATION OF THE INDICATIONS IN THE PEACH BOTTOM 3 JET PUMP INSTRUENTATION N0ZZLE SAFE END-REDUCER WELD June 1984
.k Q
$h. -
n
+r Pra,nnrnti Ry e '# I \^ ^-
S. Ranganafh, Manager Mechanics Analysis J
l e
O
- 1. EVALUATION BASIS
!Q Evaluation was performed for two sets of assumed flaw configurations as measured flaw sizes.
(I) A Loop welda Composite fIaw 1.87 inches Iong 0.075 inch deep B Loop weld: 0.75 inch long, 0.175 inch deep circumferential flaw These flaw sizes were based on best estimates of Level 11 Inspector.
(11) In the second evaluation, a through-wall flew equal to 1/6 of the circumference (16.7%) was postulated. This conservative assumption was made since the UT inspection was somewhat restricted over opproximately 1/3 of the circumference. The Level lll Inspector felt that in this position, the UT results were effective over half the length (or 1/6 of the circumference). The assumption of a 16.7% through-wall flaw therefore represents a !!miting condition.
O The following stress values were used for the purpose of predicting crack growth and allowable flaw sizes.
Pm = 3 ks! (pressure stress - pd/4t)
Pm+Pb = 5 ks!
The P,+ Pb was an estimate sinco the Information was not evallable in the str==s rape.rt: Navarthala==, I+ in ransonable since the reducer is not connected to any piping and therefore experlences no Piping loeds. Seismic loads are also insignificant.
For crack growth analysts a residual (banding) stress of 30 ksi is assumed.
Crack growth rates corresponding to f urnace sensitized material In 8 ppm oxygonated water (Figuro.1) was used. This is appropriate since the environmont In the reducer is stagnant.
6 1
.~.
./ .
- 2. EVALUATION OF CRACKS PER UT SIZING O Figures 2 and 3 show the allowable flow sizes per IWB-3642 (safety factor of JJ on the same plot, the as-measured initial flew size, and predicrea crack is shown. Based on the assumed conservative f urnace sensitized crack growth rate, both cracks are predicted to grow to through-wall in approximately 3000 heur:. Alth :ch : threuch-w:!! cr::h != =r:d!cted. It != ct!!! with!n the
' allowable value since the safety f actor of 3 can be maintained with a through-woll crack of over 405 of the circumference. Even after the crack .
becomes through-wall, further circumferential crack growth can be tolereted before the Code allowable length is exceeded. Thus, the component is acceptable for continued operation for at least 3000 hours0.0347 days <br />0.833 hours <br />0.00496 weeks <br />0.00114 months <br />.
- 3. EVALUATION ASSUMING THROUGH-WALL FLAW in this limiting calculation a through-wall crack of 16.7% circumference is assumed. Figure 4 shows that this is within the allowable crack length per IQ IWB-3642 of Section XI ASE Code. Assuming an average circumferential crack growth rate of 2 x 10~4 In/hr (corresponding to the plateau growth rates for furnace-sensitized material), it would take 9000 hours0.104 days <br />2.5 hours <br />0.0149 weeks <br />0.00342 months <br /> before the Code limits are reached. Thus, the flaw is acceptable even with the limiting essumptions.
v 2
.)
l 4 LEAK-BEFORE-BREAK CONSIDERATIONS Experience has shown that cracks In cmall diameter piping lead to leeks which are detected by leak detection systems. The circumferential variations In weld residual stress produce pref erential crack growth which leads eventually ,
iu iucai ivak. in inci, if une anumw= a liisuuwii weil u 6 J aquei to 1/0 of i the circumference, the expected leakage rate is of the order on 0.5 gpm. This could be detected by special leak monitors such as moisture sensitive tape, in any case, leak-before-break remains valid and provides inherent safety -
margins.
S. CD4CLUS 10N Continued oporetIon cen be justIfled for at ienst 3000 hours0.0347 days <br />0.833 hours <br />0.00496 weeks <br />0.00114 months <br /> of operation, even with conservativo assumptions on Initial crack size and crack growth rate. Even if the Indicotton becomes a through-well flew, Code safety umibrgins
.O .ouid be preserv.d for a much ionger ,oriod. teak-before-break ,rovides additional safety margin.
e O
3
.)
T' FROM SE 488 925-848? -- -- -
'94.06.64 09:03
-. m __. .. j l- MEDE-30538
- GENERAL El.ECTRIC CaiPANY PROPRIETARY INTORMATION CLASS III i l
l e
t o*' ,
=
l
- ! forme,c., bn6M vd
[
~
T PPM U cme. uwa 'in 4hc.
,,s _
bl qbi"a .
@ /T .
. s
- V 66N867:38o AT 11to'r In.c.2 seen
} ~ '
Og(MSAT 080041let Yt1611 4 stNettiato af 11to'r. t a:0.3 som 5 f r V Og tHEAT 03000t tet- f t te ti M [ Q stNeitigto aT'ittg8 ,34 7 n; I 10_g -
/@ 0.2 arm et404 = T114*H y Q 5th86 TIE 50 88VEMELv.0 -' T susn 03
' (O I s
~, r' w
+ -""""'
o sansmaso Av ties *p.34m;esom
, 5 "a 1 y
" @ 08 7141
. $ WANS.tLAAtt.64m80
@ 8060asoM-OSCAD ie.g - $ e4ASAO.KI-u.tTACMt#5 mA. LA
~
.@ PARW - ARGOfefe8 NAT LAS IAEP M 8ti d SENSITIEGO sat *F. 34 h;8SVaos wtLotNG.
0 88848I'LTS"U AT
- 3 i t I i _
1 18
! gg.7 30 W 79
$ 19 M N 45 STA188 6fff9NSITY E lbsl@
O Figure .1 Summary of 304SS Constant Toad Crack Crowth Data 2-11 i
( .
4 +
O.. . - -
gg * , ,
4 . .
e I'
O a. 9 . .
i g;g;..
. s--- ;
g.. - l 4- bgn .
s
%9 11 -N -
.v ..-
9[ n . . . . . . . .
(
.e. g Q< .
l
. ,i 0 -
i 8 I J i e i i e 8 q
T .
g O.
~ +
h n 8 l s a .e
- p
.h* a
( 0h 0 2
J 3
A'3 ]
2 o -t. W $3 e, e o
u ce y dau , a-
+ or _
o @
el 1**
afc, gb i
~
k) * % h '
v'- T n Q))y -
6 s c .- _.o- -. -
t, .
C.*~9
's - a 4 -
, f4gg -
$"' k
'9 k n 1 V
<o
- g. .
0 m
. 6 . -
i i ,
, , , , , i g a s 1 2
- .L/V - MM30 "?vpOSN3WIC-N ,
.t * * ;
. *a-1
e
, un ut .. .a.-..., . . . . . _ . , !
3 .
s "
. . .,:.. g a . .
en D
. . .p, .-.
9> . . .-
O
'T* -
9-h:;:,{ , , , , , , , ,
g.
E-m oo Y . -
. :.., d 4 g(4. k j. , , ,
.e. 3
.) 7 .
- .:;~--
f ,y. .., . . .
.a G.* N . .
O
, i i i
+
. i . W 0 -
+ ,
~$ h ,
g e N
- Q -
o v
~
) .a
.5 3gw.. ;. . . ,
o -
o s e. *, s
- o. -o '
0Y
~
s+e ,k .
- e E a%J .
(C).2U.&a- .,
,0 p}
o d-C.9 *0 '
- A -
"() #b' O G*
'j~& J )e s e _ .o 3 e
'R -
$. _. .! }'
.e.
.2 _p -
, , i i i 1 i i 5
I '
l 0 $ $ k
.Lfy tudzo TvNoSN3Wic-PON i ... f . c .
. ./. .
,q
FEON GE 408 925-168? '84.06,.14 09:05 O .. . . ..
i s
7.
4 V
e
,s , , ,,I n i o -
-cu g
. e.
r o
g<
( .
h
. e O *
~ O 2
^ a 3
= a3 * - - '
0 63 - 3d .
=
s9& .
g e. 6 o 5 e N ,! c v o
d sg '
d" c+li 0 i c[M .
la
% ? c
-}.
sp86 _.
.y ! p! B i
&, _ r o.
N N -
e
~
L t.
yJ -
M
# 1 I I f f f N
I I
O gg e (
a o G 0 6
.L/y - h.14130 "hrNOSN3WIO = PON g .. . .
.g O
b
- l. O - .
.}}