ML20091R559
| ML20091R559 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 06/01/1984 |
| From: | CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.) |
| To: | STONE & WEBSTER, INC. |
| References | |
| CSC-7836, NUDOCS 8406150168 | |
| Download: ML20091R559 (5) | |
Text
~.
COASUMERSh0WERCOMPANY N
1 MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER 9 327 g,3j38 Transmittal No: CSC-7836 Date: June 1, 1984 To:
Stone'& Webster P O Box 1963 Midland, MI 48640 PRINCIPAL STAFF
/A A(f0PRP
/
3 l
D/RA DE Attached 1s:
Partial Responce To A/RA DRMSP RC DRMA
@ Complete Response To PAO SL3 sGA W__
/
ENF File hf/_
For Your Information Other
==
Description:==
Tracked Recommendation Item 082.
I M
Signature:
{3 M 15$[' d RNgit h 5N) h"w/[;if 5
CC:
'JJHirrfs8n', NRC 'Refion III
~
a BLBurgess, NRC Site w/a RAWells, MPQAD w/a BHPeck, HEC w/a 1p NIReichel,'MEC w/a DDJohnson, MEC w/a 1
8406150168 840601 PDR ADOCK 05000329 6
PDR SWOS84-001-CN04 I1II a
w
ITEM / HOLD POINT NOTIFICATION FORM Sheet 1 of 2 ITEM NUM H LD POINT NUMBER STONE & WEFSTE#
1 9g2 CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION O TR ACKED ACTION ITEM OVERVIEW O TRACKED 94 FORMATION ITEM N/PldNP NvetE4A MANT/.0. #0. /4509 O TRACKED RECOMMENDATION ITEM O UNTRACKE:D
- TEM REFERENCE (S)
CIO Evaluation No. MP-MIS-092-001 O H6'LD POINT NOTIFICATION CONDITION DETAILS The results of the above referenced evaluation jadicates that with the following exceptions the Audits and Management Systems (A&MS)(Jackson) meet the requirements of 10CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVIII:
1)
It was not readily apparent that all of the applicable criteria of 10CFR50, Appx B
had been audited for each of the major site contractors and their subtier contractors located on site.
A matrix was developed of the audits performed by A&MS which revealed some criteria had not been audited,
- however, it was noted that DQAE-Ann Arbor and the site audit branch had performed audits which may meet all or some of these requirements.
Furthermore, it was observed that A&MS has already instituted a mechanism to matrix audits performed in 1984 to 10CFR50, Appx B criteria.
It is recommended that A&MS review past audits to assure that 10CFR50, Appx 0 requirements have been audited for on and off site contractors.
(PAGE 0 NO (Continued on Sheet 2)
O veS Nos>
ATTACHMENTS f
ggggf)etgg/f Q<
//fn f-p/-S Y DATE RESPONSE REQ'D.
INITLATOf/DATQg;p flNITIATION APPROVED /DATE
//hl{A-/---lg//;j 6/4/84 RESPONSE (SEE NOTE)
Attached memo DJones to BHPeck dated May 30, 1984 provides our response to this item.
I e
(PAGE O yES NC'5)
NO ATTACHMENTS EST. CORRECTIVE ACTION RESPO DENT TITLE DATE f
W vl Q / $f RESPONSE ACCEPTED DATE RESPONSE VERIFIED / CLOSED DATE A
5!OTE - FOR TRACKED ACTION ITEMS CMLY. EXPLAIN CLE ARLY OR REPORENCE ATTACMMENTS FOR:
t) CAUSE OF OssERVED CONDiflON 2) CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN 3) PREVENTIVE ACTION TAKEN l
l 500-027(CN)
LcGiT~wn 1
' Sheet 2 of 2
. Condition Details (Cont.)
~
2)
It was noted that two audits remained open from 1982 (M01-25-02-04F and M03-03-02 i
OIF).
CIO recommends review of findings and an expeditious closure to these reports.
3)
A review of audit reports revealed the use of liquid paper or correction tape.
It
-was noted that Mr.
Dave Jones, Section Head, Audits and Management Systems, had issued a letter on 4/25/84 to all A&MS Personnel providing direction as to the proper method of making changes to audit reports.
Some audit forms / checklists were not complete (ie.,
AMS-84-09 blank spaces, no indication as to audit results (satisfactory or unsatisfactory), signatures etc.).
It is recommended that these instructions be proceduralized.
4)
During microfilming of audits, reports were assigned (dummy) cartridge numbers.
. Although no records were lost, some difficulty was experienced in retrievability of specific audit data.
CIO recommends that original copies of records should not be destroyed until microfilming is complete and accuracy has been checked.
I 500-02f'(CN)
- mrn.
y i?' 0;i To BHPeck, Midland cf From DJones, J3C-20en ' w~._-
~ CONSUMERS POWER Date May 30, 1984 COMFANY Subj ect MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER GWO 7020 Internal CIO TRACKED RECOMMENDATION ITEM 082 Correspondence CC BWMarguglio, JSC-220A DJ-84-84 WCCarr, JSC-205 Following is Audit and Management Systems' response to the subject Tracked Recommendation item.
Exception 1 It was not readily apparent that all of the applicable criteria of 10CFR50, Appendix B had been audited for each of the major site contractors and their subtier contractors located on site. A matrix was developed of the audits performed by A&MS which revealed some criteria had not been audited, however, it was noted that DQAE.taa Arbor c.nd the Site Audit Branch had performed audits which may meet all or some of these requirements. Furthermore, it was observed that A&MS has already instituted a mechanism to matrix audits pcr-formed in 1984 to 10CTR50, Appendix B criteria.
Response
A&MS is planning to review 1983 Midland audits of CP Co's principal suppliers and develop a matrix.of 10CFR50 Appendix b criteria audited.
(Note that subtier contractors are audited by the Site Audit Branch, not by A&MS). This matrix will be provided to Stone and Webster by July 1, 1984. As noted in the evaluation, A&MS has develc;ed a new Audit Plan and an Audit Scope and Summary Form to plan audits on an 18 criteria basis and record the criteria actually audited.
Exception 2 It was noted that two audits remained open from 1982'(M01-25-02-04F and M03-03-02-01F).
Responsa j
AFR M01-25-02-04F was closed on 5/3/84 and A&MS has received a further re-sponse to M03-03-02-01F. A&MS is requesting additional action from B&W, Lynchburg before the finding can be closed. The estimated date for completion of this additional action is 6/30/84, l
IC0584s0028A-AM01 o
ema ev a; m.
e 1
i 2
Exception 3 e
A review of audit reports revealed the use of liquid psper or correction tape.
It was noted that Mr Dave Jones, Section Head, Audits and Management Systems, had issued a letter on 4/25/84 to all A&MS Personnel providing direction as to the proper method of making changes to audit reports.
Response
Audit Procedure, F-1, is in the process of being revised and will include instructions for corrections to audit documents and will emphasize the need to complete checklists. This revision is expected to be conplete by August 1, 1984 Exception 4 During microfilming of audits, reports ware assigned (dummy) cartridge num-bars. Although no records were lost, some difficulty was experienced in retrievability of specific audit data.
Response
The DCCs are no longer using dummy cartridge numbers (since 1981) and A&MS will reviev the current STAIRS Index to ensure all past A&MS audits are-retrievable. This review is expected to be complete by August 15, 1984. As acknowledgements of audit report microfilming are received from the DCC, the STAIRS Index will be reviewed to ensure the reports have been indfxed correctly.
Should you have any questions regarding these response, please contact me or WCCarr.
DJ/11b O
I IC0584-0038A-AM01 O