ML20091M194
| ML20091M194 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oyster Creek |
| Issue date: | 01/22/1992 |
| From: | Baton J GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| C321-92-2014, NUDOCS 9201280383 | |
| Download: ML20091M194 (1) | |
Text
,
e i-4 as GPU Nuclear Corporation Nuclear
- e n
- r 88 Forked River. New Jersey 08731-0388 -
609 971-4000 Wnter's Dirnet Dial Number:
C321-92-2014 Jariua ry 22, 1992 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C.
20555 Gentlemen:
Subject:
Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Docket No. 50-219 Technical Specification Change Request No.183
'GPU Nuclear submitted the subject Technical Specification Change Request (TSCR) on February 15, 1990. The TSCR proposed-to-revise operability requirements for safety valve position-indicators. At the time,16 safety valves were installed.
Subsequently, on March 6,1991, the NRC staff approved a change in the number of
. safety valves from 16'to 9 when License Amendment No. 150 was issued.
During the recent Cycle 13R refueling outage, seven safety valves were removed.
The acoustic monitor position indicators associated with these seven safety
' valves were relocated to seven -of the nine remaining safety valves and are intehded for use as installed spares. This should improve the availability of the safety valve acoustic monitor position indicators.
As a result of the change in number of safety valves, we have evaluated TSCR 183 and have determined that the technical-basis for the proposed change is unaffected. -We conclude that the basis remains valid regardless of _ the number
,of safety valves installed.
In -addition, the current specifications and associated bases for safety valve position indicators contained in the Technical Specifications, Sections 3.13.and 4.13, as well as the proposed revised pages do not refer to a specific number of safety valves.
We encourage.the staff to-proceed with their review with the understanding that any reference to a specific 3
number of safety valves is irrelevant as regards the basis for the proposed
_ change.
j
)@ok filca el
/ --
10
_h,
$0 i700f C-
[J. J! B. ton een Vi resident and Director
$8 Creek
, ; rg JJB/PFC/amk-1 ox
\\
Jh_
cc: Administrator, Region I
\\ ) g-
~
NRC' Resident Inspector
- WU hM r br jrNn s a"N;Ydiary of General Putsc Utsties Corpo ation o
~
a
.