ML20091D728
| ML20091D728 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oyster Creek |
| Issue date: | 04/03/1992 |
| From: | J. J. Barton GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| C321-92-2100, NUDOCS 9204100369 | |
| Download: ML20091D728 (2) | |
Text
+
t GPU Nuclear Corporation
}
gg g7 Post Office Box 388 Route 9 South Forked RNer. New Jersey 08731-0388 609 971-4000 Writer's Direct Dial Namber; April 3,1992 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission C321-92-2100 Attent-lon: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.
20555 Gentlemen:
t
Subject:
Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Docket No. 50-219 r
Reply to a Notice of Violation NRC Inspection Report No. 50-219/92-05 In accordance with 10 CFR 2.201, enclosed is GPU Nuclear's reply to the notice of violation identified in NRC Inspection Report No. 50 219/92-05.
If there are any questions, please call Mr. Michael Heller, Licensing Engineer, at (609) 971-4680.
Sincerely, J.J. Barton Vice President and Director Oyster Creek Enclosure cc:
NRC Region 1 Administrator NRC Resident Inspectc-Mr. A. Dromerick, NRC Ab b I.o p\\
\\
9204100369 920403 v
i j
PDR ADOCK 05000219 0
PDR j
I I
GPU Nuclear Corporation is a subsidiary of the General Pubhc Utihttes Corporat!an
- Enclosure C321-92-2100-Page 1 of 1 Violation:
License Condition 2.C(4) to.acility Operating License No. DPR-16 dated December 29, 1981, requires that the licensee fully implement and maintain all provisions of the NRC-approved Physical Security Plan.
The NRC-approved Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Physical Security Plan P.evision 28 dated May 29, 1990, Section 14.1 " Program Audit" states, in part, that the security program is reviewed every 12 months.
The review shall evaluate the security program's potential -impact on plan'u and personnel safety.
The results of the review and evaluation are documented, reported to the licensee's plant management and to corporate management.
Contrary to the above, the 1990 and 1991 Security Program Audits did not contain an evaluation of the security program's potential impact on plant and personnel safety.
This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement III).
Reolv:
GPUN. concurs with the violation as cited.
The violation is attributed to a failure to fully implement the requirement, when the Security Plan was revised in December,1988, to formally document the results of the safety impact evaluation in the annual audit report.
In response to this violation, during the week of March 9,1992, the Oyster Creek Site Audit Manager conducted an audit to evaluate the security program's potential impact on plant and personnel safety.
No adverse impacts were identified. -The results of this evaluatioa were documented in audit report no. S-0C-92-18 and distributed to appropriate plant and corporate management personnel in accordance with the security plan.
In-addition, to prevent recurrence of this violation, the GPUN Audit Program Matrix will be revised to provide additional reference to security plan requirements for the conduct of aucito.
This revision is scheduled for completion by May 31, 1992.
Full compliance was achieved on April 2, 1992 when the above audit report was approv3d and distributed.
L w_,
m.
.