ML20091C165
| ML20091C165 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | North Anna  |
| Issue date: | 03/27/1992 |
| From: | Stewart W VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.) |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20091C166 | List: |
| References | |
| 92-193, NUDOCS 9204030085 | |
| Download: ML20091C165 (3) | |
Text
.. _ _._. _ _ _ _ -. _. _ _. _ _ _ _ _
YlHU1NIA LL1:rTHIC ANil I'O W I;H C O M i% N Y u wiinuxu,vinossa unue,I March 27,1992 i
w= n--,
i U. S. Nuclear Regu!atory Commission Serial No.
92 193 i
Attn.: Document Control Desk NL&P/TAH: R0 Washington, D.C. 20555 Docket Nos.: 50 3 License Nos.:
7 Gentlemen:
YlRGINJA ELE.CTRIC AND POWER COMPANY NORTH AJ),NA,, POWER STATION UNIT 2 SECOND TEN YEAR INSERVICE INSPECTION lNTERVAL REVISED.Ej PROGRAM AND PLAN s
Virginia Electric and Power Company has revised the North Anna Unit 2 Inservice Inspection Program and Plan to incorporate the requirements of ASME Section XI, 1966 Edition, for Category C F-2 piping welds.' In addition, we have revised our prev;ous response to item "E" of your request for additional information, dated August 5,1991. -The revised response is included as Attachment 1 and the Inservice Inspection Program and Plan for the Second Inspection Intervalis Attachment 2.
if you have any further questions, please contact us.
. Very truly yours, I
L 4
('
N W. L Stewa Senior Vice President Nuclear Attachment pc; U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region 11 101 Marietta Street, N.W.
Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Mr. M. S. Lesser -
.NRC Senior Resident inspector North Anna Power Station
( '.;. b ','
I 9204030005 N O3EY PDR. ADOCK'0500o339 G
HOL
j i
ATTACHMENT 1 REVISED RESPONSE TO THE AUGUST 3.1991 I
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ITEM "E" 1
NORTH ANNA POWER STATION UNIT 2 i
1 l
t l
l l-f 2
L 1
1' i
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY 4
L
Docket Nos.: 50 339 SedalNo.
92 193 Page 1 of 1 REVISED RESPONSE TO THE AUGUST 5.1991 REQUEST FORJDDITIONAL INFORMATION ITEM "E" E) ME Request for Relief NDE 7:
Please provide clarification on the 4
proposed alternati"o examination.
Should the alternative read,
... associated with 'each' branch connection welds..." instead of
"... associated with 'one' branch connection weld..."?
VEPCO: The selection of pipin0 welds per Category C-F-2 of the 1986 Edition of ASME Section XI provides for more than one branch connection weld to be examined.
The alternative has been changed to read as you suggested, "... associated with 'ench' branch connection weld...".
A total of four branch connections were selected.
Two of the branch connections woulo fall under this relief request.
VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY
._.