ML20091B386

Forwards RA Wells 840514 Memo Re Reinsps to Close Open Quality Items & Summary of 840511 Meeting W/Nrc to Discuss Insps,Verifications or Tests

ML20091B386
Person / Time
Site:	Midland
Issue date:	05/17/1984
From:	CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
To:	STONE & WEBSTER, INC.
References
CSC-7764, NUDOCS 8405300273
Download: ML20091B386 (3)

Text

-

1. 'I CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY p MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER /

Transmittal No: CSC- 7764 Date: May 17, 1984 To: Stone & Webster P O Box 1963 Midland, MI 48640 PS!NCIPAL STAFF

/ J/RA M DPRP DE

'&Ld

'/

fg Attached Is: Partial Response To VRA DRMSP

_ 'C DRMA Complete Response To p0 _

SCS

_A 4L For Your Information ,

File A/

Other

Description:

Internal Correspondence - RAWells dated May 14, 1984 -

Subject:

Reinspections to close Open Quality Items.

Signature: [

cc: J JCKeppler, NRC .. Region III- w/aJ -

l "JJHarris on ; NRC 'Re gionTIII "iF/d RJCook, NRC Site w/a RAWells, MPQAD w/a BHPeck, MEC w/a NIReichel, MEC w/a DDJohnson, MEC w/a yg 8405300273 840517 9 " ^ " * **** B; Psa),\

^

)

a WRBird, P14-418A GFEwert, Midland RCSember, Midland n JTChristy, Midland HPleonard, Midland MLCurland, Midland J ielsenheimer, Midland n cy RAWells, Midland 72 y CORSum8IS se May 14,1984 [, POW 8r s;esec, MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER PROJECT - C0QBW REINSPECTIONS TO CLOSE OPEN INTca m QUALITY ITEMS ConRespoNDENCE cc JWCook, P26-336B DLQuamme, Midland NReichel, Midland On Friday, May 11, 1984, DLQuamme and I met with he NRC'(Ron Gardner and Bruce Burgess) to discuss the need to do inspections, verifications, or tests to allow the project to disposition and close open quality items.

We indicated that we needed to conduct inspections, verificatior:, and/or tests as necessary to evaluate, disposition, or close open items assoaated with non-conforming conditions or regulatory issues. We indicated that we planned to conduct these efforts throughout the plant even though such areas may not have been released for Phase I activities. We indicated that we planned to conduct these inspections, verifications, or tests of the following kinds of items:

Nonconformance Reports (NCRs)

Quality Action Requests (QARs)

. Management Corrective Action Reports (MCARs)

Audit Finding Reports (AFRs) 50.55e Items NRC Inspection Report Findings NRC Open Items CIO Nonconformance Reports -

CIO Tracking Items -

NRC Circulars, Notices or Bulletins We' indicated that efforts associated with the above activities will be performed by appropriate organizations in accordance with-existing project procedures and that such activities may require support from construction forces to prepare items for inspection, conduct tests, or provide related support. No new con-struction work, rework or repair would be conducted under this plan, however, unless all other CCP restraints and requirements, including release of any NRC/

Third Party hold points, had been satisfied. Required construction support would be controlled through the Contractor Work Request (CWR) or Construction Work

( Package (CWP) process.

We noted that inspections and verifications performed for _the purpose of address- -

l ing the items listed in this memo would be performed accordingly to established project procedures for disposition or closing of quality items; however, they may not be done in accordance with Status Assessment or Quality Verification Program procedures and requirements. In the case where Status Assessment or Quality Verifi-O

il ,

s le Leation Program procedures and requirements are not followed or in the case where

' Phase I releases have not been obtained for the area in which inspections are being conducted,_no. credit will be taken for CCP Phase'I reinspections. Commodi-ties falling into this category.would still undergo the required Status Assess-ment and Quality Verification Program inspections as a . separate activity. In areas where we do have Phase I release' and where we. follow the CCP Phase I pro-grams, we may elect to take credit for the inspection as part of CCP Phase I re-inspection requiremedts. .

Ron Ga'rdner indicated that we were correct in our understanding that the CCP pro-gram did not restrain implementation of the above plan and that we had the con-currence of NRC to proceed as outlined above.

-j in e

9 1

I Li ,

c