ML20091A356

Performance Indicators Rept for Feb 1992

ML20091A356
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Calhoun
Issue date:	02/29/1992
From:	OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To:
Shared Package
ML20091A354	List: ML20091A351 ML20091A356
References
NUDOCS 9203260291
Download: ML20091A356 (55)

Text

- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ._____ ___-__ _____-_-_-_______-- - _ _ - - . .

3 .

FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FEBRUARY 1992 m

• ij[l((lhC f '**

hf mas ==#ed5; Egg:.-

N __

EII w s=== q - A .

imaliii gig

= ~ C;- . '

b, - - .

_mv-

.~.

se ,/

Prepared by:

Production Engineering Division System Engineering Test and Performance Gtoup P D 0 00 85 P PDR

4 0%sud of wraLna w wn, aKL...

d Onvok wudern, wnd sowndjul g rnal...

dwa,bjek,,cwwwAngcoinwukal...

d w a, way, of b;h,...d w de&ng, Ljob

'94l & /ast 6,, wety, 6. Jl w Owns-duwebd, nel L audl of w11svnal ywuwa,, a w owv ows af wedb wk un, ww, wnd L paa asui Q% horn, vms ce-/- % L 9u w ej pasein,, neljud On, do&ng, L ?qht Unsup.

Jaans ).6%nor

k

-OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT .

l l

I 1

)

Prepared By:

Production Engineering Divisica System Engineering Test and Performance Group FEBRUARY 1992

-* *v

ABSTRACT PURPOSE The *Portormance Indicators Program"is in: ended to provide selected Fort Calhoun plant perfor-mance information to OPPD's personnel responsible for optimizing unit performance. The information is presented in a way that provides ready icentification of trends and a means to track progress toward reaching corporate goals. The information can be used for assessing and monitonog Fort Calhoun's plant performance, with emphasis on saf ety and reliability. Some performance indicators show company goals or industry informatic n This information can be used for comparison or as a means of promoting pride and motivation.

SCOPE The conddions, goals, and projections retected within this report are current as of the end of the month being reported. unless otherwise Etaled.

In order for the Performance Indicator Program to be etfective, the following guidelines were followed while implementing the program:

1) Data was selected which most e!!0ctively monitors Fort Calhoun's performance in key areas.

2) Established corporate goals and industry information were included for comparison.

3) Formal definitions were developed for each performance parameter to ensure consistency in future reports and allow comparison with industry averages where appropnate. '

Comments and input are encouraged to ensure that this program is tailored to address the areas which are most met.ningful to the peopia using the report. Please refer cominents to the System Engineering Department's Test and Performance Group. To increase personnel awareness of Fort Calhoun Station's plant performance, it is suggested tnat this report be distnbuted throughout your respective departments.

REFERENCES INPO Good Practices OA 102, " Performance Monitoring - Management Information" INPO Report Dated November 1984," Nuclear Power Plant Operational Data" NUMARC 87-00," Guidelines and Technical Bases for NUMARC Initiatives Addressing Station Black-out at Light Water Reactors" Revision 1, Appendix D,"EDG Reliability Program", dated April 6,1990.

t

FOREWOhO This report is being produced in an abbreviated form during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage to allow many performance indicator data sources to devote more time to outage activities. Publication of allindicators will resume in the May 1992 report.

I

Table of Contents / Summary INPO INDUSTRY KEY PARAMETERS PAGE ecusiny .cern. etcp ut otAs geat iws uO*mi LAEI LO?mi HQQ SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANOE:

EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM. ..o 017 , o 24 . o .. o .I 3 COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE (Man Rem) 277/YR .- 250NR . 65 5 . 3 97 NA .5 VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOUD RADIOACTIVE WASTE (Cubic Ft ).. . 4.DGO'YR 3.CooNR . .o. o. NA. .6 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ACCIDENT RATE / DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE . . 0 72 o3 .o. O l. .7 OPERATIONS EeQL w n utt .ctec. ceco ME DLAN coat THis Lt2Hu LAET MO'UU 1Bf,MQ UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS - (INPO DEFINITION).. . ..o . o .. .o o. . l .. .1 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS - (NRC DEFINITION).. ..o.. .o. o .. o. l .. .. ?

PLANNED CAPABILITY LOCS FACTOR , .17.8% . . 28.3% . .100%.

. . 0% .. .. N A .. .4 OPERATIONR AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET. .. N A . . NA . . NA _ . NA . N A .. .. B DOCUMENT REVIEW . . .. N A . ..NA .NA. NA. N A .. .9 MAINTENANCE PAGE .

WOUSTRY ,QfEQ, QEEQ ucctw acAL Tms 9.nemi tAsT LObmi IBf,g DIESEL GENERATOR UNAVAILABILITY . .. N A ., .. NA . .. N A . NA.. .. N A . .10 AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE

'NORK ORDERS (CORRECTIVE NON OUTAGE) . .. N A . ..NA, _ N A. . , N A .. !J A .. .11 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (CORRECTIVE NON OUTAGE) . . . N A .. .. N A . .. N A . ..NA.. .NA. .12 CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (NON OUTAGE).. .. N A . . NA .. .58% 44 8 % . N A .. .13 RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE (NON OUTAGE) . .. NA .. .65%. . Bo 8%. .67 8% . ..l. .14 NUMBER OF OUT-OF.SF AVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRvMENTS . ..NA. <13. 11 . 24 - 1. .15 I

MAfNTENANCE (cont'd)) PAGE -.

Woosiny .QEED. CE2D m m TH!S KONTH LAET LONTH M MAINTENANCE OVERTIME ,,, . , , , . . N A .. .10%. . 38 2% .. 7.9% .- . NA .. 16 PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE .

INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE) ... . . . . .. . .. .. . .. N A . .. N A . . 0 .. .0. .. l . .17

^

MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG (CORRECTIVE NON OUTAGE MAINTEN ANCE).. .. NA . J. <350 . . 250.. 261. . . l .. .18 NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS. .. , , , . . . . .. . .,NA. 0 .. .0. .0. .. l . .19 MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS . . .. .. .. NA . .. NA .  ;. N A . .. N A . .. N A . .20 CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE . . . . . N A .- . 2 00E-6.. 608E-6.. . 6 07E 7. .NA. . 21 3 CHEMISTRY AND R ADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION PAGE

.13DusTRY .02EQ. CEfD MEDAN M TH!S P.ONI}j LAST LONTH TREND COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE (Man. Rem) . . . . . . . ... , , . . 277NR . . 250'NR ., . 65 5.. . 3 97.. ,. N A .. . . 5

-VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID -

RADIOACTIVE WASTE (Cubic Ft ) .. .. . .. ... . .... . 4.06aTR ... 3.000TR , .,0 .. .0. . ._ . . . . N A .. . . 6 MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL -

RADIATION EXPOSURE (mrem),.. ..., . ... .. NA .. .. 1.500NR . . 772., .416. ,. N A .. ,. 22 TOTAL SKIN AND' -

CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS . ... ., , , , ..NA . . 144 .. ,. 30 .. .5, _ N A ... . 23 ,

1 DECONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA. ...- ,. . ... . ..-... .. .. ., N A .. .. 88% ; . 85 8% .. ,.87.8% . .. N A .. . .. 24 RADIOLOGICAL WORK ~

PRACTICES FROGRAM , . . , , ,, , . .. N A .... mNA. . 15 .. .4. .. D .. . 25

- NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS .. , , ,, . . ,. N A .. NA. . 64 .  ;.6 5 .- .. l ., . . . 26 GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING J DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT (curies).. .. .. N A , .340. .358 5.. . . - . . .. N A , , .. N W,. . 27 LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING

~ DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT (curies) .. . ,,,NA .. . .. 225.. .176. . . N A .. . l .. .. 28 SECURITY - PAGE wousiny Ofl0 DEED m Q2aL TH!S AONTH LAST LONTH M LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE

-INCIDENTS (SECU9ITY) . . . . ... . , .. N A . .. N A . . 75.. . 82. NA. . 29 SECURITY NON-SYSTEM FAILURES . . .. NA - .. NA .. ..N A . .. N A .. . N A .- . 30 ii t

. SECURITY tconrm f20s innesinY QEID CEE2 ta 0Ri m TH'E LONTH L AET CN!H If1LND SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES .. .NA. NA. .NA .NA .. N A . . 31 M ATERIALS AND OUTSIDE SERVICES {2 21 INousinY QEEQ QEEQ nw m THis LO*nH tar! LO*nn InLug EXPEDITED PURCHASES.. . NA .05% . 0 76 % .02%. NMA .. . 32 DESIGN ENGINEERING {LACf q' INDUSTRY QEf2 QEED d (X O AN M THis ?.ONTH LAET LONTH M Ex -

TEMPr? - MODIFICATIONS (C"^ ; -  ! SCAFFOLDING) . .. N A . O. 32 . 25. .NA. . 33 5 GTERING ASSISTANCE Q ' JEST (EAR) BREAKDOWN . .NA. NA 153. 143. .NA. . 34 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS. .. N A .. .. N A . 1 54 . 156 . ..NA. . 35 INDUSTRI AL S AFETY {MQE INDUSTRY QEEQ QEfQ EZQ M TH!S LONTH LAET LONTH TRFNO DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE . ..o 72 .03. .0. 0. ,l. 7 RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS CASES FREQUENCY RATE . .. N A .. .20. ,1 0 . .2 37, .. l . . 36 HUMAN RESOURCES PAGE iNonSTpY REER REER uro An m Juts LO*nH LAET LOMTH 18E32 NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LERS. .. N A .. .. N A . .2. .1 .. D . . 37 LER ROOT CAUSE BREAKDOWN . .. N A . NA - NA. . NA . . NA . .38 STAFFING LEVEL . .. N A . .. NA , .NA, . NA . . NA . .39 iii

e TRAINING AND OUALIFICATION ElGE -

INDOETRY QEE,Q QffQ

@g M TH'S LONTH LA?T LONTH M LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAINING.. . .. , . . ..NA. . NA .. .NA. . NA .. .. N A . .40 LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS., ., ., N A .. .. N A .. .. N A . .. N A .. .. N A . . 41 HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS. . ,, , .. N A .. .. N A , .. N A , .. NA .. .NA. . 42 REFUELING OUTAGE PAGE LNDUEIRY QEQ CffQ l/1DLA,N M TH!S LONTH tAST kv> NTH M EMERGENT MWOs APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN THE CYCLE 14 REFUELING OUTAGE., , , . . . . .. .. NA .. .. NA .. .NA. .. N A . ..A. .,,43 OUALITY ASSURANCE EAQ.E INDUSTRY QffQ QFfQ MEDtAN M TH?S LONTH LAST LONTH M VOLATIONS PER 1,000 INSPECTON HOURS . . .. NA ,-.1 5 . . .1 52 .. 1.24 . ..NMA . . 44 .

CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND NCVs (TWELVE-MONTH RUNNING TOTAL) . . . . .. N A .. ,. N A .. .6/4. _ &3.. .. N A . .. 45 .

CARS ISSUED vs. SIGNIF, CARS vs. .

NRC VOLATONS ISSUED vs.

LERs REPORTED... .. . ...........,......,,....NA.. .. NA .. .. N A . .. N A .. .. NA . ,. 4 6 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITONS . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . 47 SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX . . . . 51 REPORT DISTRIBUTION LIST.. . . .. . . . .. . . . . . . . 53 SUMM ARY SECTION POSITIVE TREND REPORT.. .. . ., . . . . . . . . , , , , . . . . 54 ADVERSE TREND REPORT. ... . .. .. . . . . . . . 54 INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT ATTENTION REPORT.. . . 54 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT IMPROVEMENTS / CHANGES , . . .. . 54 TABLE OF CONTENTS /SUMM ARY TREND SYMBOLS A- ADVERSE TREND l - lMPROVED PERFORMANCE D - DECLINING PERFORMANCE

- NMA - NEEDS MANAGEMENT ATTENTION NA - NOT APPLICABLE /AVAILABLE iv l

l

3-0 Safety System Actuations

--&- 1992 Fort Calhoun Goal C Industry Upper 10 Percentile 2- GOOD V

1 1-i i i6 0 m iu i u iu , u , u i u i u , u , u i u ,u i

'89 '90 '91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS-(INPO DEFINITION)

There were no u'nplanned safety system actuations during the month of February 1992.

The 1992 goal for the number of unplanned safety system actuations is zero.

The industry upper ten percentile value for the number of unplanned safety system actuations per year is zero. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper ten percentile of nuclear power plants for this indicator.

Data Source: Monthly Operations Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Accou ntability: Jaworski/Foley/Ronning Adverse Trend: None 1

4

- 12 Month Running Total SSA 10- -1000

--G- Critical Hours

~

@ Safety System Actuations (SSA) 8- -800 7

-700 7 p 6- .r -600 $

W a: 5 r k' e

-500 3

$ 1 S fj $4- -400 g w a j $ -300 M

l 2

r 2- 7; ,

a\ --

-200 L

!. 1 j )

-100

s 4 y .; '; j .; -

0 fj y i i -(-- i 0 4

4

-0

'89'90 91 MAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASONDJF 1990 1991 1992 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS-(NRC DEFINITION)

This indicator shows the number of unplanned safety system actuations (SSAs) which include the High and Low Pressure Safety injection Systems, the Safety injection Tanks, and the Emergency Diesel Generators. The NRC classification of SSAs in-cludes actuations when major equipment is operated and when the logic systems for these safety systems are challenged.

The last event oi this type occurred in June 1991 when there were two anticipatory signal starts for DG-2. The first start occurred after a control relay was bumped causing a momentary loss of powerto safety bus 1 A4. DG 2 started a second time when a breaker trip occurred during DG-1 breaker synchronization, DG-2 was not required to provide power to the safety bus in either of these situations.

The majority of SSAs displayed above were related to 1990 Refueling Outage activities and are currently being reviewed under the Safety Systern Actuation Reduction Pro-gram. The goal of the Program is to reduce the number of SSAs at Fort Calhoun. The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is a maximum of three.

Data Source: Monthly Operations Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Accountability. Jaworski/Foley/Ronning Adverse Trend: None l 2

E 1992 Monthly Emergency AC Power Unavailability Value

-4t- 1992 Emergency AC Power Unavailability Value Year to Date

-O- 1991 &1992 Fort Calhoun Goals

-+- 1991 Emergency AC Power Unavailability Value Year to-Date

-A- 1995 INPO Industry Goat (0.025)

-O- Industry Median Value (0.017) 025-1 0.04 -

0.03-g--A A A A A A A A- A A A

"*~

, c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a 0.01 -

0 i 3 , i , , , , , , xi X ,

Mar 91 Apr May Jun Jul At.g Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb92 EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE This indicator shows the Emergency AC Power System unavailability value, as defined -

by INPO in the Safety System Performance Indicator Definiticas. for tho reporting month.

The Emergency AC Power System unavailability value for February 1992 is zero. The Emergency AC Power System unavailability value year-to-date is zero.

The 1992 and 1991 Fort Calhoun year- end goals for this indicator are 0.024. The 1995 INPO industry goalis 0.025 and the industry median value (for the three year period from 7/88 through 6/91) is 0.017.

Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning Accountability: Jaworski/Ronning Adverse Trend: None 3

_ - _ - _ _ _ = _ _

1

~ '

~

O 1992 Monthly Planned Capability Loss Factor 90% - -M- 1992 Year-to Date Average PCLF ~

GOOD B0% -

+ 1991 Year-to Date Average PCLF V

-O- 1991 & 1992 Fort Ca!houn Goa!s 70%-

-C}- Industry Median (17.8% for a Three Year Average) 60% -

50% -- N 40%-

30%- .g m

~

D- C O O O O O O O D- O 10%-

C O O O O O O O O

? 1 -i =

~

^

0% , , ,

1 , , , , , , - , , ,

Mar 91 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb92 PLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR s This indicator shows the plant monthly Planned Capability Loss Factor (PCLF) and the Fort Calhoun yearly average PCLF goals for 1991 and 1992. Planned Capability Loss Factor is defined as the ratio of the planned energy losses during a given period of time, to the reference energy generation (the energy that could be produced if the unit were operated continuously at full power under reference ambient conditions), expressed as a percentage.

The PCLF was reported as 100% for the month of February 1992 due to the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun yearly average Planned Capability Loss Factor goalis 28.3%.

The 1991 goal was 7%.

The industry median value (for the three year period from 7/88 through 6/91) is 17.8%.

Data Source: Generation Totals Report & Monthly Operating Report Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trend: None 4

i

Personnel Cumulatwe Radiation Exposure (Man.

Rom)

--G- Fort Calhoun Annua 1 Goal (250 Man Rom) 1995 INPO Industry Goal (185 Man Rom)

--O- Cycle 14 Refuehng Outage Goal (210 Man Rom) 400 - GOOD 300 -

Y 23

C O O O O O O O O O O O 200- C C U s a A- A a a a a a a a a a D

M.v:

lhX i

15y ..

i i 100 -

0

'89 '90 '91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPOSURE During February 1992,61.579 man rem was recorded by TLDs worn by personnel while working at the Fort Calhoun Station. The year-to-date exposure is 65.S54 man-rem.

The Fort Calhoun goal for personnel radiation exposure (cumulative) du,ing 1992 is 250 man tem. The total Cycle 14 refueling outage goalis 210 man-rem. The 1995 INPO industry goal is 185 man-rem per year.

Data Source: PattersonAVilliams (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverse Trend: None SEP54 I

5 1

1200o - ~

O Cumulativo ory Active Wasto Sent For Procoscing (in cubic foot) 800o-4000-Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 Cumulative Radioactivo Wasto Buried

--O- Fort Calhoun Goat For Waste Buried (3.000 cubic foot)

- 1995 INPO Industry Goat (3884 cubic foet) 750o -C}- Industry Median (4060 cubic foot) 6000 - O Radioactivo Wasto Buried This Month (in cubic feet)

, f, g 30 O - - - - - - - - - -

f%y 1334

@j N ,1500o -

'9o 91 Jan92 Fob Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sop Oct Nov Dec92 Year-end Total VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE The upper graph shows the volume of radioactive oil and dry radioactive we ta sent for processing. The lower graph shows the volume of the monthly, the cumulative annual total, and the year end total of radioactive waste buried the previous 2 years.

The monthly and cumulative volumes of radioactive waste which were buried during the month of February 1992 have been revised. These revisions are due to the delay in.

volved in the shipping for processing, the processing, and the burying of radioactive waste.

Cumulative amount of solid radwaste shipped off site 1or processing (cubic feet) 2,560 Volume of solid radioactive waste which was buried during the month of February (cubic feet) 0.0 Cumulative volume of solid radioactive waste buried in 1992 (cubic feet) 0.0 Amount of solid radioactive waste in temporary storago (cubic feet) 0.0 The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for the volume of solid radioactive waste which has been buried is 3,000 cubic feet. The 1995 INPO industry goal is 110 cubic meters (3,884 cubic feet) per year. The industry median value is 115 cubic meters (4,060 cubic feet) per year.

Data Source: Patterson/Breuer (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Bilau Adverse Trend: None SEP54 6

_. s . - -_ , _ _ _ . ._ . _ _ ._ _ .._. _ . _ _ _ . . _ _ . . _ __ - ~ -

i

'4 1

l

. 4

@ 1992 Disabling injury /lliness Frequency Rate

- 1.6 - X .1991 Disabling injury /lliness Frequency Rate

1.4 -

5. Year Average Disabling injury / Illness Frequency Rate GOOD 1.2 - -O- Fort Calhoun Goal (0.3)

V j_ -A- 1995 INPO Industry Goal (0.5) l 0.8 -

O.6 -

.A A $~ u A 4 u A

.0.4- '

M i C O -O O O- --C - O O O O O 0.2 - ,

0

- i o i i i

~ i # i i e i i i Jan92- Feb - Mar Apr May Jun - Jul - Aug. Sep Oct Nov Dec92

. DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE)

This indicator shows the 1992 monthly disabling injury / illness frequency rate in column L

. form. The 1991 disabling injury / illness frequency rate and the .5 year average (from 1987 through 1991) of the corresponding monthly disabling injury / illness frequency rates are also shown.

There were no (zero) lost time accidents reported at the Fort Calhoun Station in Febru-l ary 1992. The total number of lost time accidents that have been reported during 1992 is zero. The 1992 disabling injury / illness frequency rate goal was set at 0.3. The 1995 lNPO Industry goal is 0.50.

i_

SThe industry upper ten percentile disabling injury / illness frequency rate is 0.

l E  : Ygar: Year-End Rata 1989- ;0.4

' 1990-. 0.5

.1991

0.4 -

L.

-. Data Source: Sorenson/Skaggs (Manager / Source) n

~

Accountability: Patterson/ Richard p.

Positive Trend SEP 25 & 26 7

4 ' er e. * - r--

+- e, w , - - - -y r- t-

. . . . . _ _ . . . . _ . - . ._-.___..,__.__.--_.-___s

.(

Operations 1992 Budget ($ Mdlion) 80-0 1992 Cumulative Total ($ Million) i 60- ' -

20-c ,

Jan92 Feb Mar . Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 80- intename 1992 Budget ($ Mon) 60- 0 1992 Cumulative Total ($ Millinn)

.40-20- .

0

'Jan92 Feb- Mar Apr May .Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct . Nov Dec92 OPERATIONS 'AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET '

The Operations and Maintenance Budget Indicator shows the budget year-to-date as -

well as the actual expenditures for operations and maintenance for the Fort Calhoun Station:

The budget year-to-date for Operations was : ; 282,300 dollars for February 1992 while -

the actual cumulative expenditures through February totaled 11,320,745 dollars, DThe budget year-to date for Maintenance was 4,352,800 dollars for February 1992 while i- the; actual cumulative expenditures through February totaled 3,595,311 dollars.

l Data. Source: Gleason/ Parent (Manager / Source)

-.. ; LAccountability: Scofield u

5 . -

l- - Adverse Trend: None

y

. . ~ . - , E- l i vE =- .y ,-

1o00-

--*-- Documents Schedufod for Rovicw ,

1

Documents Roviewed l

-V- Overdue Documents 0 045 --

400 -

200 -

o- h Y Mar 91 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov In .- FebO2 DOCUMENT FIEVIEW This indicator shows the number of completed, scheduled, and overdue (greater than 6 months past the scheduled due date) blonnial reviews for the reparting month. These docu nent reviews are performed in house and include Special Procedures, the Site Occ9tity Plan, Maintenance Procedures, Preventive Maintenance Procedures, and the Operafog Manual.

During February 1992 thrue were 72 document reviews completed while 387 document reviews were scheduled. At the end of February, there were 28 document reviews overdue.

During the month of February there were 94 new or renamed documents reviewed.

These new or renamed documents will need to be reviewed again in 1994 Dats Source: Patterson/McKay'(Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Jeworski Adverse Trend: None SEP 46 9

e C Planned Hovra of Diesel Generator No. 2 Unavailabdity Q Unplannod Hours of Diesel Gonorator No 2 Unavailability D Estimatod Hours of Diosol Generator No. 2 Unavailability E PWnned Hovra of Diosol Generato No i unavailability C Unp'anned Hovra of Diosol Genotator No.1 Unavailabdity

,g 200-160-100-50-

--* 0~

- " - n m 8 I i 1 i I I I I 1 4 i Mar 91 Apr May Jur. Jui Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb92 200- +

E Cumulative Hours of 601 Unavadabliity f rom 9/1/91 to 1P/31/91 Q Cumulateve Hours of DG P Unevadabihty from Ort t91 to 12/31/91 iLO-O Cumulativn Hours of DG.1 Unevailabihty for 1997 j O Cumuistive Hoo , oi Do.a unavaanb.i.iy r 1992 Fort CalhouM F'12 Months AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS (CORRECTIVE NON OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the age of corrective non outage maintenance work orders (MWOs) remaining open at the end v. the reporting month.

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba Adverse Trend: Because we are currently in the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage, an adverse trend is not indicated based on three consecutive months of increasing values for cor-rective non-outage MWOs 3 6 months old and MWOs 9 12 months old.

11

t O November 1991 400 - i December 1991 350-O January 1992 G February 1992 250 -

E 200 -

5~~f l

d g{j c I'.'-

W:

160 - If A k

n. << , w-  : ps:

.' - R:

100 -  !) 71 y j

,: .J i -? .

i _

5 l',k G i 1j ]!

~

50- l J i

.g 5,,-

s

, . . :,;, q ~i 7 -

0_

4 W ,

//

4+

$  ?' 7 .j

[-~~ f'. , ll d m, , ,

i Total Open MWOs Open MW0s>3 Total Open Safety Open Safety Open High Priority months old Related MWOs Related MWOs > 3 MWOs Months Old MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (CORRECTIVE Nord OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the total number of corrective non outage MWOs remaining open at the end of the reporting month, along with a breakdown by several key categories.

The number of open MWOs >3 months old is increasing because on line activities must be scheduled beyond the end of the Cycle 14 Refueling Outrge.

Data Surrce: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Acenuntability: Patterson/ Bobba Adverse Trend: Because we are currently in the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage, an adverse trend is not indicated based on increasing values for three consecutive months for corrective non-outage Open MWOs >3 months old ar.d Open Safety Related MWOs >3 months oldi SEP 36 12

~ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ = _ _ - . _ . _ _ _ . _ __. __ . . _ - - .

4

' d

- Corrective Mar.:enance Backlog > 3 Months Old 60W GOOD Y

40W  %

20W 0%

Mar 91 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb92 CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (NON OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the percentage of open corrective non outage maintenance work orders that were greater than three months old at the end of the reporting month.

The percentage of open corrective non outage maintenance work orders that were greater than three months old at the end of February 1932 was reported as 58%.

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba Adverse Trend: Because we are currently in the Cycle 14 Reft Tg Outage, an ad-verse trend is not indicated based on increasing values for open corrective non outage MWOs far four consecutive months.

13

Ratio of Pieventivo to Total Maintenance 90%- -O- 1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Goals 4

80%- I GOOD 70%-

--O

^

60%- C O -O O O O O- --C

/

50%-

40%-

30%-

20% -

Mar 91 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb92 RtTlO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE (NON OllTAGE)

Th!s indicator shows the ratio of completed non outage preventive maintenance to total completed non outage maintenance.

The ratio of preventive to total maintenance was 80.8% in February 1992. The values for this indicator decreased during September and October 1991 due to a greater em-phasis being placed on completion of MWO work during the battery outage.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goalis to attain a ratio of preventive to total maintenance greater than 65% The 1991 Fort Calhoun goal was to attain a ratio of preventive to total maintenance greater than 60%

Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 41 i

o o 14

O Number of C. R. Instruments Repairablo On Lino O Totai conirai naoin instrurnents Oui-of.servico 50-

-O- 1991 & 1992 Fort Ca!houn Goals For Total Out-of Servico Instruments 40-30-E -

)'

n-:

20- E 7 y$ 'M M,/7 -

V6 M M 75i $l #$ '

d v-

__ q_..o ze

_ g uz.

o3 w

g_ oj z?: ve 4

w n o ze

'h]

d, o 10~

0

• Y,@

"*" f#' "' 4@,6

• M,

,,,,  %% .- ;: %E 4%s d 7 XS): *WA 44

'#: M' WA c,2 YQ 6X? (%:  %% 6

%: n'w Yz %7 xx '

.l. z w Wg: w;.

g'g

.i h' b

hN

f[$

'~ hu N A" "'-~

M N "' " ' '

! q

0-i i i i i l i i i i i i

Mar 91 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb92 NUMBER OF OUT OF SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS This indicatar shows the number of out of service control room instruments, the number of instruments repairable during plant operations (on-line), the industry upper quartile for this indicator, and the Fort Calhoun goal.

There was a total of 11 out of service control room instruments at the end of February 1992. None of these instruments require a plant outage to repair.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goalis to have less than 13 out of-service control room instru-monts. The 1991 Fort Calhoun goal was to have less than 14 out-of service control rocm instruments.

Data Source: Patterson/Spijker (Manager / Source)

Accountabil;ty: Patterson/ Bobba Adverse Trend: None l

15

- - - _ _. _ _ .- _ _ _ _ . . _ ~ . - . . . _ __ ..

l

~

80% - - l Maintenanco Overtime ,

GOOD l 70%. --)(- 12 Month Average  !

V

+ 1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun "On Line" Goals

- 60% -  !

-50%-

40%-

30%-  ;

c' O- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0  ;

20%-

i 10%-

,x m o

,o o u

- , o

- ./ o 0%

Mar 91 - Apr 'May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb92 MAINTENANCE OVERTIME .

The Maintenance Overtimo Indicator monitors the ability to perform the desired mainte-nance activities with the allotted resources, Excessive overtime indicates insufficient ,

resource allocation and can lead to errors due to fatigue.

The percent of overtime hours with respect to nonnal hours was reported as 38.2%

during the month of February 1092, The 12 month average percentage of overtime- -

hours with respect to nortnal hours was reported as 10.2% ,

-The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for the "on line" percentage of maintenance overtime hours worked is 10%

' Data Source; Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)  !

Accountability: Patterson/ Bobba c Adverse Trend: None L .

16 0

, . _ . ~ . . . . . . . _ _....,.,_..__,,,,.4~_._ .._. . . , . - . . . . . . . _ _ . _ . . , _ . . .._._. ... .., _ _ . _ . . , . . . . _ . . , _ . - . _ . . . _ - . . . _

15- ,s (taa<ntenance)

O open ins Related to tne use of Procee O Closed IRS Related to the Use of Procedures (!Aaintent nce)

O Procedur al Noncomphance irs (fAa ntenance) 10 -

5-3 3 3

2 2 1 1 111 1 1 11 1 00 00 0 0 000 000 000 0 0 i 000 i 0 0 6 i i i i i i i i i Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb92 Mar 91 Apr May Jun Jul PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLI ANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTEN ANCE)

This indicator shows the number of open Maintenance tricident Reports (irs) that are related to the use of procedures,the number of closed irs that are related to the use of procedures, and the number of open and closed irs that received procedural noncorru pliance cause codes.

There were no procedural rioncompliance incidents for maintenance reported for the month of February 1992.

Data Source: Patterson/McKay (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Bobba SEP 15,41 & 44 Adverse Trend: None 17

-L__.. . _ . _ ,

i.

l

{ 800- s Open MWOs

-O- 1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Goals 600-C C C C C C *C C C '

400-314 310 322 318 0 302 289 287 C p gj E m n W h _266 261 250 271 281

" ~

g; g g g a m m 2

, - 1 ,

j $$ $ yj[

200- ., l

< Ym wx; n .:

5 I'

,j [h, wa /m/

pgg M 7'( @

w, g Pg /.

, i

M@d A / %M

'# % WA MS:  ? 'x '/4s '

L

, i zu >

E '. dL : 1 M ! .' n M L  : E

.{ ..' s ; j1 si i? g '4 1 ,

.. j g (,ffy,j -j

+ ze 1, ,. VZ+: . - -

'+%' .L n...:

c' 1~ I ?? ..

'AW XW 'j %fa  %'n .

I i i i i i l 4 i i I I Mar 91 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb92 ,

l MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG (CORRECTIVE NON OUTAGE MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the number of corrective non-outage Maintenance Work Orders i (MWOs) that were open at tne end of the reporting month, i The 1992 goal for this indict.ior is to have less than 350 corrective non outage mainte-nance work orders remaining open. The 1991 goal for this indicator was to have less than 450 corrective non outage maintenance work orders remaining open.

i l l Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source) I I

Accountability: Patterson/Bobba l Adverse Trend: None SEP 36 l

18 l

l l

-- _ .~_-.. -.. - __- _.=. -- - _ . - . - . . - ._

l 3-Q Number of Missed STs Hesulting in LERs 2-1-

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i e i O- , , , , , , , , , , , ,

t 'C 0 91 Mar 91 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb92 NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS This indicator shows the number of missed Surveillance Tests (bTs) that result in Lic-ensee Event Reports (LERs) during the reporting month. The graph on the left shows the yearly totals for the hdicated years.

During the month of February 1992, there were no misno' STs that ret:ulted in LERs.

The 1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun goals for this indicator are zero.

Data Source: Monthly Operating Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs) l Accountability: Patterson/Jaworski Adverse Trend: None SEP 60 & 61 l

l 19 i

m- p- * >yy ,

Components With More Than One Failure GOOD 20- - - - -

-X- Components Witn More Than Two Failures y 15-10-0 N/

Mar 91 Apr

^

May Jun

^

Jul 5

Aug Sep Oct Nov 4

Dec Jan Feb92 MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS The Maintenance Effectiveness Indicator was developed following guidelines set forth by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office foi Analysis and Evaluation of Opera-tional Data (NRC/AEOD). The NRC/AEOD is currently developing and verifying a '

maintenance effectiveness indicator using the Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System (NPRDS) component failures.

This indicator has been revised to show the number of NPRDS components with more than one failure during the last eighteen months and the number of NPRDS compo-nents with more than two failures during the last eighteen months. The number of NPRDS components with more than two failures in an eighteen month period should indicate the effectiveness of plant maintenance. (This change applies only to the Sep-tember 1991 through February 1992 data. The data for March through August 1991 is based on a twelve month interval.)

During the last 18 reporting months there were 18 NPRDS components with more than 1 failure. 3 of the 10 had inore than two failures. The tag numbers of the components with more than two failures are CH 1 A, CH 1 B, and RC-4.

Data Source. Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

Accountaoility: Patterson/Bobba Adverse Trend: None 20

20-Calculated Check Valve Failure Rate par Mahon Component Hours i i

Industry Check Valve Failure Rate per Mill;on Component Hours 15-

-O- Fort Ca:houn Goal 10

. 10-GOOD V

W 5 .

1 O O O O O

'89 '90 Mar 91 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep ;c

~t Nov Dec Jan Feb92 Check Va've Failures CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE This indicator shows the Fort Calhoun check valve failure rate, the Fod Calhoun goal and the industry check valve failure ratc, This rate is based upon failures during the previous 18 months. The check valve failures at Fort Calhoun Station, fur the previous two years, are shown on the left.

The data for the industry check valve failure rate is three months behind the reporting month dt e to the time involved in collecting and processing the data.

For November 1991, the Fort Calhoun Station reported an actual check valve failure rate of .608 E-6, while the industry reponed an actual failure rate of 2.75 E-6. At the end of February 1992, the Fort Calhoun Station reported a calculated check valve failure rate of .608 E 6.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is a failure rate of 2.00 E-6.

Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source) l Accountability: Jaworski/Rollins Adverse Trond: None SEP 43 21

~

l O Highest Exposure for the Month (mrem)

O Highest Exposure for the Quarter (mrem) 5 Highest Exposure for the Year (mrem)

--O-- 1e92 Fort Calhoun Goal OPPD 4500 mrem /yr. Limit 400o-300o -

700o-v 977 977 . j 1000- 772 February 1992 )

l MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE e During February 1992, an individual accumulated 772 mrem which was the highest individual exposure for the rnonth.

The maximum individual exposure to date for the first quarter of 1992 w'as 977 mrem.

The maximum individual exposure reported for the year 1992 was 977 mrem.

The OPPD limit for the maximum yearly individual radiation exposure is 4,500 mrem /

year. The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal is 1,500 mrem / year. -

Date Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverse Trend: None P

22-o

i 250-O Monthly Personnei Contaminations v

ij'g Cumulative Personnel Contaminations

MS 200*' GOOD

-O- Fon Calhoun Annual Goal (144)

'(c[

ze - l xa Y NN; xe 8:2 150-y$ O O O O O O O O O O O O

n V/,%

. 100-SMS M6%

%9,0 SM:s SS

'[$

'. E .

50-

, ? 25 e .y 5/ '

.' j .

l

. .t 1 0 I i i i i i i i i i i i i i

'90 '91 Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS This indicator shows the number ci skin and clothing contaminations for the reporting month. A total of 30 contaminations have occurred during 1992.

There was a total of 55 skin and clothing cor.taminations in 1991.

There was a total of 237 skin and clothing contaminations in 1990.

The 1992 goal for skin and clothing cantaminations is 144.

Data Source: PattersonfNiiliams (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Pattersori/Lovett Adverse Trend: Nono SEP 15 & 54 1

23 j

h 100% - Decontaminated Radiation Controlled Area

-O- Fort Calhoun Goal (non outage months) 90%-

_x /

O C C C C C C C C f 80%-

A 70%-

GOOD 60%-

50 %

Mar 91 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb92 DECONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA This indicator shows the percentage of the RCA that is decontaminated (clean) besed on the total square footage, a 1991 Fort Calhoun goal of 85% decontaminated RCA for non-outage months and a 1992 goal of 88% decontaminated RCA for non outage months.

At the e.<J u in reporting month,85.8% of the total square footage of the RCA was decontari mir. ..

Date Source: Patterson/Gundal (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterscn/Lovett Adverse Trend: None SEP54 24

1 20-l O Number of Identified PRWPs l

~

I 15 15- 7 m

@b ug 10- I E

E E

m 1

5- , & '

3 g,:

g M

2

' 'l R "

2 2 [$ 'p2 1 'M 4 0 i i i i i i i i i i i i Mar 91 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb92 RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGR AM The Radio!ogical Work Practices Program Indicator shows the number of Poor Radio-lot,ical Work Practices (PRWPs) which were identified during the reporting month. The PRWPs are identified throu0h a review of the monthly Radiological Occurrence Reports and Personnel Contamination Reports.

The number of PRWPs which are identified each month should indirectly provide a mear,s to qualitatively assess supervisor accountability for their workers' radiological performance.

During the month of February 1992, fifteen PRWPs were identified. Of the fifteen PRWPs, twelve were persennel contaminations and three were Radiological Occur-rence Reports. The number of PRWPs for this month is higher due to the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage.

Data Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverse Trend: None SEP52 25

e a Total r4 umber of Hot Spots O Number of Additional Hot Spots identified

--s- 1991 Fort Calhoun Goal 75-65 64 63 63 63

@, 1!

r r,, , r,- . E .

7, < .

53 54 54 54 55 g { j m,f g

,{. . j

- r y ,. . :; y s n Y g a  %

50- A 3 5L '*: * * * '- 3

& E 'M 2 6 @ K k',: 4 g 's g.

E &

E & C S E & .E 2 2 p

E  %

v.

1 -@

y.

c m E r W I,, g.

u g .y /, . ii.

i ,

o. /, g, W$~~* ^Y s ,

y'

, ,,' ) h "

h 'Y

1. & a 2: & p: z w 4 &e '?

g

% # 6 4 e & .A M W M v s z w w 5 & c 8 e g w m 9 a e & v.  : g w v.  : w

'Y1 M @  % . g@ [^ l @ C h , K 25- .J: 2 0 21: ; 6 s M 'e '

6 c

y a

e5:

m

?

c y  :

.c

.f n

g-

'c 4

?':

6 .W z

% s n :e g a n & g e x

.4 g .

/ C & W y

M s 4;;  %: 'M p S y

.. .x .::

9 m's C ,:  : E  : 10 .n& # .

g e .' , .R ~: -

a w .. .: . r.

a c z c v. 7: &.;- -: m .: 5 9 .

73

.c 3 .

W

... 0 ft n 1 p(, 0 ', L 0 ;30 1 3 1 1 R 0 Y: 1 ,i 1 9,: n 4

( ~ ,

4 i i i ' i i i i i i i i Mar 91 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb92 NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS 4

This indicator shows the total number of hot spots which have been identified to exist in the Fort Calhoun Station and have been documented through the use of a hot spot identification sheet. A hot spot is defined as a smalllocalized source of high radiation.

A hot spot occurs when the contact dose rate of an item or piece of equipment is at least 5 times the General Area dose rate and the item or piece of equipment's dose rate is equal to or greater than 100 mrem / hour.

During February 1992 six hot spots were eliminated and five new hot spots were discov-cred.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goalis to resolve orio hot spot per month.

Date Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Adverse Trends: None 26

r .

O Monthly Radioactive Gas Discharged (Curies) 600- Cumulative Radioactive Gas Discharged (Curies)

-O- Cumulative AnnualGoal(Ouries) l 600- GOOD acs V

'- 4C9-

o 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 n= -cr= t

/

164 M 200- 'f g  %  ;

q k,;? [

y gf j i i 0- -- '

' i' 4 , - '' " *

,-' ' , , , i 3 i  ; i

'89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec01 GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT.

l The gaseous radioac!!ve waste being discharged to the environment is shown for Janu-ary 1,1991 through December 31,1991. A total of 358.5 curies have been released to the environment during this time, t

In September,238.236 curies of gaseous radioactive waste was released to the envi-ronment due to containment purges required during the unscheduled maintenance outage. Most of the radioactive waste was released in the form of Xenon 133.

The Fort Calhoun Station cumulative annual goal for 1991 is 340 curies for this indica-tor.

The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every six months.

Date Source: Franco /Krist (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Trausch Adverse Trend: None 27

l

@ Monthly Radioactive Liquid Discharged

- Cumulative Rad 1oactive Liquid Discharged

-O- Cumulative Annual Goal 231 228 g o,_ o- c c o-c o o o-o o o o

's U 100-g 4.0*"" 3" # iB 2 g 4 g 28q 4p33 95.3 28.2 I

2.3 I

22 7 I I I 6.3 I

i i i i I I I I 3 I

'88 '89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec91 40000-g O **#

y 30000-

/

)20000-E f10000-2370 2910/ 3B00 3360 3750 3010 304o 3910 2320 309c 2670 f- t-~ 1 IW F~4"1 r">~1 r""18 1420 i m rm r--i 1 O i i I i i i i i i Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec91 LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for January 1,1991 through December 31,1991. The !iquid radioactive waste that was discharged to the envi unment from all sources totaled 176.1 curies during this time. The Fort Calhoun Station cumulative annual goal for 1991 is 225 curies.

The bottom graph shows the volume of liquid radioactive waste that has been released from the radioactive waste monitor tanks and steam generators. The volume of liquid radioactive waste discharged to the environment from the radioactive waste monitor tanks and the steam generators totaled 35.7 million gallons from January through De-cember 1991. The liquid radioactme waste that was released to the environment in-cludes liquid released from the steam generators due to the fact that radioisotopes were i detected in the steam generator blowdown. The liquid radioactive waste being dis-charged to the environment is calculated every six months.

Data Source: Franco /Krist (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Lovett Positive Trend 28

i f4on System tailures 30 - __. ,,_

'UOOD 25- 20 20- y 15-10- 8, 5-0 , , , , , i , , , , , i Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct f40v Occ92 System Failur6: GOOD 80- n 70 - J t 60- 55 50 -

40-30-20-10 -

0 , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct f40v Doc 92 LOGG ABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SEC')RITY)

The Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Security) Indicator is depicts s in two separate graphs. The first graph depictt the total number of loggable/ reportable non system failures concerning Security Badges, Access Control and Authorization, and Security Force Error, and Unsecured Doors. The bottom graph shows the total number of '

loggable/ reportable incidents concerning system failures which occurred during the reporting month.

During the month of February 1992, there were 75 loggable/ reportable incidents identi-fied, System failures accounted for 55 (73%) of the loggable/ reportable incidents, and 25 (45%) cf these were environmental failures. Due to the increase in incidents involv-ing lost badges, tailgating, and unsecured doors, Security Services has implemented

" Concentrated Awareness Training"(CAT) teams in areas of the plant where potential security violations occur. The purpose of the CAT team is to instruct plant personnel on the proper use of card readers, ensure doors are closed after ingress or egress, identify potential tailgating problems, monitor visitor / escort responsibilities, and ensure security badges are being worn correctly.

Data Source: Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Sefick Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 29

I 25-O Number of Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Does not include System Failuros) 20 -

GOOD 15-10 --

7 7 6

5- l

{ 4, .

}ljy;"[ li:. .V 2 <

J 20 ^ 3 4..J ['

0 ,

1. , , i Badges Access Control Security Force Error Unsecutod Doors SECURITY NON SYSTEM FAILURES This indicator shows the number of loggable/ reportable non system failures for the reporting month. These items include: Security Badges Access Control and Authoriza-tion, Security Force Error, and Unsecured Doors.

,Non System Failures Number of Incidents Feb. '92 Jan. '92 Security Badges 7 6 Access Control and Authorization 6 2 Security Force Error 2" 0 Unsecured Doors Z Q Total 20 8 "Not included in total loggables/reportables. Both incidents involved the irnpropor issuing of security badges by the security force, therefore both incidents were counted in the Access Control and Authorization area.

Data Source: Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Sefick Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 30 4 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ . . - _ . _ . _ . _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . . _ _ _ - . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _

O Environmontal O Faduro l l

.o _

v 15-1o- a 6

6- 4 0 0 y i 0 o , , , , ,

Alarma CCTV Computer Search Equipmont Doors O 1991 System Failuros D 1992 Systom Failutos l GOOD l 100 - y 80- 74 77 co- Eg E E g g 3

'7 ao_ (j U -

,, y I'0 - .

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sop Oct Nov Doc SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES This indicator shows the number of loggable/ reportable system failures for the reporting month These items include: A.larm System Failures, CCTV failures, Security Computer Fallures, Search Equipment Failures, and Door Hardware Failures. Alarm systems and

CCTV failures will be divided into two categories: environmental fa'!ures and failures as defined in the performance indicator definitions. Also, the 1991 and 1992 System Fail-uros will be compared on a monthly basis.

Syt,1cg1 Number of iivadgats February 92 Januarv '92 Environs Failures Environs Failures Alarms 8 6 16 18 CCTV 17 1 21 2 Computer N/A 4 N/A 3 Search Equipment N/A 2 N/A 6 Door Hardware N% 1Z N2 B Totals 25 30 37 37 Data Source: Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Setick/Petersen Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 31

2% ~ '

% of Total Purchases that are Expedited  :

-O- 1991 & 1992 Fort Calhoun Goals (0.5%)  !

1%-

C O O O O O- --O---

0% , , ,_ , , , , , , , , ,

Mar 91 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb92 EXPEDITED PURCHASES

, This indicator shows the percentage of expedited purchases compared to the total number of purchase orders generatea during the reporting month.

During February, there was a total of 526 purchase orders generated. Of the 526 pur-chase orders generated,4 (0.76%) were expedited purchases, The expedited pur-

' chases were for fuses, ERF computer system drive belts for printers in the control room and TSC, and gasksts for several MWOs.

The 1992 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 0,5%. The 1991 goal was 0.5%.

Date Source: Willrett/Fraser (Manage' dource)

. Accountability:Willrett/Fraser e Adverse Trend: None -  ;

u l

32

s. -

O Temporary Modifications >1 cycle old (RFO required for Removal)

O Temporary Modihcations >6 months old (Rernovable on kne)

--O- Fort Calhoun Goal for Temporary Modifications (0) 6-5-

4-3 3 -.

2 --

2 2

2 2 2 1- y ,(

',', y .

ny ,

,,,,,, +; ,4 , ,

O ^'O'~ , 3 , w i November '91 December '91 January '92 TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS (EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING)

This indicator provides information on the number of temporary modifications greater than one fuel cycle old requiring a refueling outage (RFO) for removal and the number of temporary modifications removable or. line that are greater than six months old. Also provided is the Fort Calhoun goal for temporary modifications.

The goal for this indicator was changed in August 1991 to be more indicative of Fort Calhoun's control and management of temporary modifications. There are currently 2 temporary modifications that are greater than one fuel cycle old. Both of these modifica-tions are 100% ready to be removed during the 1992 refueling outage. These are: Al-198 power supply failure alarm, and pressure indication for RW/CCW HXs, in addition, at the end of February there were 2 temporary modifications installed that were greater than six months old that man be removed on line. These were: handjack close of CCW/

RW valves, which is awaiting a system engineering evaluation of EAR 91037; and pctable water supply piping temporary repair, which will be mado permanent by ECN 91-077, issued 10/21/91, and ECN 91370, scheduled to be issued 2/28/92.

At the end of February, there was a total of 32 TMs installed in the Fort Calhoun Station.

22 of the 32 installed TMs require an outage for removal and 10 are removable on line, in 1992 a total of 21 temporary modifications have been installed.

Data Source: Jaworski/ Turner (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Jaworski/Gorence Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 & 71 33 m-remei

v Docomber '91 l 50-Janutary '92 O February '92 18 18 19 20-a2&;:

2 3 2 P 0- -

0 ,,

1 h$f----f ,

0 3 months 3 6 months >6 months System Engineering i

60- , , , _ . , ,

60- b 00" 91 O JanL, .4 39 M @

40- 35 37 30- 7 O February '92 ,

20- '

15 17 n

'. 9 10- jf'f .

^~

'= '

0-3 months 3 6 months >G months Design Engincoring ,

ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUEST (EAR) BREAKDOWN This indicator shows a breakdown of the number of EARS assigned to Design Engineer-Ing and System Engineering awaiting a technical response from engineering.

At the end of February 1992,5 EARS were in the initiation process and 24 EARS had been resolved and were going through_the closecut process. There were 3 EARS awaiting a technical response from Nuclear Projects.

Total EAR breakdown is as follows:

EARS opened during the month 17 Ears closed during the mon'h 11 Total EARS open as of the end of the month 153 Data Source: JaworskiNan Osdel(Manager / Source)

Accountability: Jaworski/Phelps AdverseTrend: None SEP 62 34

l

• ECNs Backlogged in DEN ECNs Opened During the Month

-V- ECNs Completed During the Month 200- -

A -

150-100--

. . -y

/y/' .

y75 50-

• ;f;'p r'- .

[ $ 1 9 v.

Mar 91 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DF: Jan Feb92 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS This indicator shows the number of Engineering Change Notices (ECNs) awaiting completion by DEN, the number of ECNs opened during the reporting rnonth, and the number of ECNs completed by DEN during the reporting month.

At the end of February 1992, there was a total of 154 DEN backlogged open ECNs.

There were 62 ECNs opened, and 68 ECNs completed during the month.

Although the number of open ECNs is currently high, activities are in progress to reduce the backlog of open ECNs. It is expected that the number of open ECNs will continue to decrease.

Data Source: Phelps/Pulvere nti (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Phelps/Jaworski Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 35

- . - - . . - .. - . _ . _ ~ ~ . = . . - - - -

O 1992 Recordable injury / Illness Frequency Rate GOOD 5- - *-- 1991 Recordable injury / Illness Frequency Rate 4.5 - -A- 5 Year Average Recordable injury /lliness Frequency 9 ate V 4- --O- 1992 Fort Calhoun Goal 3.5 -

3' .

2.t; . 2.37 A 2- tO- -

- :m-C D---Q'----C O 1.5 - k g

'1' s

0.5 - ,

0 -- , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Jan92 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS CASES FREQUENCY RATE This indicator shows the 1992 monthly recordable injury / illness cases frequency rate in column form. The 1991 recordable injury / illness cases frequency rato and the Fort Calhoun Station 5 year average (from 1987 through 1991) recordable injury / illness cases frequency rates are also shown.

A recordable injury / illness case is reported if Nuclear Operations Division personnel are injured on the job and require corrective medical treatment beyond first aid. The record-able cases frequency rate is computed on a year to date basis.

There were no (zero) recordable injury / illness cases reported during the month of Feb-ruary 1992. There has been a total of 1 recordable injury / illness case in 1992.

The 1992 goal for this indicator is 2.0.

Year Recordable Cases Year End Rate 1989 11 2.2 1990- .11 2.1 1991 18 3.3 Data Source: Sorenson/Skaggs (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Richarc8 Positive Trend SEP 15,25 & 26 36

4

@ Licenseo Event Reports 46

'69 0 PersonnelErrors Reportedin LERs

}

&g J

40- Cumulative Lcensee Event Reports p.a

'$ -+- Cumulative Personnel Errors Reported in LERs 31

@ T 2. 30-26 p @

M (@

r'

\

Qh

':! M -

p' 7.-

- 4

^4 .,

't a b?- .A

'l 10-I'  ; ' ;

l '

i; . ..

3 l' i

, 4 [')d,.

6 10 i M i i , i i i i i i i

'8B '89 '90 '91 Jan92 Feb t.%r Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec92 NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LERS This indicator shows the number of Licensee Event Repcrts (LERs) with report dates during February 1992, the LEE s ceriNiad to personnel errors, and the cumulative total of both. The year-end totals for the ,br previous years are also shown, in February, there were four LE7s reported. Two of the LERs were attributable to per-sonnel error. The LERs attributable to personnel error were: 92-03 " Inoperable Fire Zone - Missed Fire Watch" and 92 06 'No Alarm on RM. 041/042/043".

In January there v.ere three LERs reported. Cne of the LERs was attributable to person-

~

nel error. The LER attributable to parsonnel error was: 91-30 " Containment Purge without Radiation Monitors in Service".

Data Souice: Short/Howman (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Panerson Adverse Trend: None SEP 15 37 l

_-- _--__-_-______________ =-___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

[] Inadequate Administrative Controls LERs 1 Inappropriate Actions, Hurnan Error LERs 5- Equipment Failure / Malfunction LERs

@ Design Deficiency LERs 4- E Acts of Nature, Cause Unknown LERs 3- -

2- - - - ,

x i l 1,g --

q p -

g . - -

7 --7 i: ) I

,  : E i; E E :l E:

9 .

1 5  : s e  ; i sy E ' = -- ' =' * '

='-

0 , , , , , i , , , i i Mar 91 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb92 LER ROOT CAUSE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows the LERs by report ctate and Root Cause Code for the months from March 1991 through February 1992.

Data Source: Short/Howman (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson Adverse Trend: None l

1 38

i l

000~ O Actuai civision statting 548 553 .

~ "

Authorized Division Staffing 1 400 -

,g m

204 205 200-

• I <

(tt

,R> 50 51 6 :'

4 ' , g" -

y0)?

O , , i Nuclear Opera'5ns Production Engineering Nuclear Services STAFF 1NG Lf. ;EL The authorized and actual staffing levels are shown for the three Nuclect Divisions.

- Data Source: Sorenson/ Burke (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Waszak Adverse Trend: None SEP 24 i

s I-l l

l

39 1

I~

l l..

I Total Requalification Training Hours O Simulator Training Hours 60- 0 Non Requalification Trcining Hours u a a s i 50-41

~~

40-36 36 30- [ :. 28

', 24 24

.,, a.2 ,

20- 5: 18 9  :- 37 34 3 '.,

+

16 32

$ El7  :.  :% $ ,

4 k 4l*g 2

f 2 4

[h

,- 2 h

4 f

i

[4 n

5 0 2: 0  ?- , w$4 m '1 ,'. g 9 3 e -

i i i i i i 1 Cycle 912 Cycle 913 Cycle 914 Cycle 915 Cycle 916 Cycle 917 Cycle 921 LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAINING This indicator provides information on the total number of hours of training given to each crew during each cycle. The Simulator training hours shown on the graph are a subset of the total training hours. Non-Requalification Training Hours are used for AOP/EOP verification & validation, INPO commitments, GET, Fire Brigade, Safety Meetings, and Division Manager lunches.

Exam failures are defined as failures in the written, simulator, and Job Performance Measures (JPMs) segments of the Licensed Operator Requalification Training.

The individuals who failed exams were all remediated and approved for continued shift operations prior to the end of their scheduled Requalification Training week.

Data Source: Gasper /Guliani (Manager /Snurce)

Accountability: Gasper /Guliani Adverse Trend: None SEP 68 i

40 l

l

-- .. - - - - - - - _ _ _ ~ . - - - . - _- ..

O SRO Exams Administered

- 50 '- - 0 - sWO Exams passed D RO Exams Administered 40 - 0 RO Exams Passed 30- ]

20- -, -

10- '

? -

y  : __

0 i .i- i .

_i i i i i s' i i i May: Jun:

Mars 1 Apr Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov _ Dec Jan Feb92 LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS

. This indicator shows the number of Senior' Reactor Operator (SRO) and Reactor Opera-tor (RO) quizzes and exams taken and passed each month. These internally adminis-tered quizzes and exams are used to plot tiie SRO and RO candidates' monthly progress.-

During the month of February 1992, there were seven internally administered SRO exams taken and all seven of these exams were passed. There were three internally administered RO exams given and all three exams were passed.

E l' Also during February, there were two SRO NRC administered site specific exams given

and both of th.ese exams were passed. There were six RO NRC administered generic exams given and all slx exams were passed.

0 LData Source: Gasper / Herman (Manager / Source)

' Accountability.: Gasper / Lazar Adverse Trend: None SEP 68 41

. O Hotlines heitiated 35 .:

.B Hotlines Closed nos Gedue a Weeks 30-

@ Hotlines Overdue > 4 Weeks 25-20-15- p _

, 1 I 10- 5

, !d

', p \? _ ,

b

= , v 5- - 2 > !l E l m  ! = -

\

\

E [.- . i i i l  ;

T iE f  ; l E

)' -- .

E ' "

E E > E i 5 g j l

]' l = = ~

l =

0

' A '  !

i i i i i 4- 1- t i i i i Mar 91 Apr May - Jun Jul Aug : Sep Oct Nov Dec -Jan Feb92 >

-HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS This indicator shows the number of Hotline Training Memos that were initiated, retumed for close out, overdue less than four weeks, and overdue greater than four weeks for the reporting month.

' Dece:nber 1991 Initiated Hotlines -. 18 Closed Hotlines. 12 Hotlines Overdue < 4 wks. 14 Hotlines Overdue > 4 wks. 4

~ Data Source: Gasper /Newhouse_(Manager / Source)

. -- Accountability: Gasper Adverse Trend: None

( -!-

1 42.

. - . .; - .:_.=.

4

[] Emergent MWOs

- Total Emergent MWOs

--O- MWO Targenveek 500-450 -

/

400-350 -

300 -

250-200-150 -

100 - U9 75 - 76 50- hj h b d; O O O O O O O 0

Of  : 'q;;' ui

~'

i i i i i i i i i i i i i 2/1 2/8 2/15 2/22 2/29 3/7 3/14 3/21 3/28 4/2 4/9 4/16 4/23 EMERGENT MWOs APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN THE CYCLE 14 REFUELING OUTAGE This indicator shows the total number oc Emergent Maintenance Work Orders (MWOs) approved for inclusion in the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage scope. The total number of MWOs and PMOS in the outage schedule on 2/1/92 was 3,509. The goal for the outage is to maintain emergent work at less than 20%, or no more than 702 emergent MWOs during the outage. This number represents 59 MWOs per week for the twelve week outage.

Approximately 1,993 emergent MWOs were generated during the 1990 refueling cut-age, Data Source: Patterson/Dunham (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Patterson/Clemens Adverse Trend: Because the amount of emergent work is exceeding the target for each week, the Supervisor, Outage Projects has determined that an adverse trend is indi-cated.

SEP 31 43

.. .. ~ . - . -. . ~. . . - - . - - - . . . - - . . - . . . _ . . .

4 ,

j 1

l Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours j l

9 .- -O- Fort _Calhoun Goal i

l I

l Goob j 6- y

5- g-s

-8 .

3.7-52

! . 2.6 3-I iS:

s C O O O .O -O O O .

1 I l l 1- 1 ( l i I- l 4 4 4 I l L'88 _ '89 90' - Feb91 - Mar. Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep - _ Oct Nov Dec Jan92 VIOLATIONS PER 1,000 INSPECTION HOURS LThis indicator displays the number of NRC violations cited in inspection reports per - -

1,000. NRC inspection hours.- This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the, time involved _with collecting and processing the data. >

The vio!ations per 1,000 inspection h.ours indicator was reported as 1.52 for the twelve l months from February 1,1991 through January 31,1992.

iThe 1992 Fort Calhoun Goalis 1.5 violations per 1,000 inspection hours for 1991. The-1991 goal was 1.6 violations per 1,000 inspection hours.

' Data Sourcef Short/Howm. n (Manager / Source).

' Accountability!Shorti 1 Adverse Trend: None

.n ,

4 j

- 4_4 - g i

.y , _ _ . .-. . ___-___m._-

Q' 1 L;25- i 0: Number of Violations During the Last 12 Months  ;

<--- .O Number of NCVs During the Last 12 Months 20-16: 4 15- -

15- -

11 10- g 9;

@ r Q' 7 7

&l 7-_ 7 7 is 6 6

% W- @q 5 5

5 5

hI & I4 4 lMh 4

?g 3--

3

"~~

@5 $ K. 2 2 2 2 N !N m

u

!!I n

N p 1 g n

w y

W

+

v s s

% l

_9 .i i. i. i .. i. . .- i i i i i

! Feb91: ; Mar Apr' May 'Jun- Jul Aug -Sep- _ Oct Nov Dec _ Jan92

- CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND NCVs (TWELVE-MONTH RUNNING TOTAL)

The Cumulative Violations and Non-Cited Violations (NCVs) indicator shows the cumu-lative number'of violations and the cumulative number of NCVs for the last twelve months. -

c

-This indicator is one month behind the reporti_ng month due to the time involved with collecting and processing the data for this indicator, t

' Data Source! Short/Howman (Manager / Source)

A;Qantability: Short r

EAdverse Trend: None h

45-m

4 1991 SALP Funct.

Area CARS Signif. CARS NRC Viola. LERs A) Plant Operations 30 1 1 6 B) Radiolog. Controls 12 0 3 0 C;'.Aaint/ Surveil. 66 0 2 9 D) Ernergency 16 ') 0 0

. Preparedness E) Security 5 0 1 3 F) Engr / Tech Suppor1 93 3 1 12 G) Safety Assess > 27  ? 1 :2 Qual. Verif.

H) Other 0 0 0 0 Total 249 5 9 32 1992 SALP Funct.

Area CARS Signit. CARS NRC Viola. LERs A) Plant Operations 2 0 0 3 (2)

B) Radiolog. Controls 2 0 0 0 C) Maint/ Surveil, 21 (14)- 0 0 1 D) Emergency 4 (3) 1 1 (1) 0 Preparedness E) Security 1 (1) 0 0 0 F) Engr / Tech Suppori 3 (2) 0 0 3 (2)

G) Safety Assess / 7 (5) 0 0 0 Qual. Verit.

H) Other 0 0 0 0 Total 40(25) 1 1 (1) 7 (4)

N0te: ( ) Indicate values f0r the reporting rn0 nth.

CARS ISSUED vs. S!GNIFICANT CARS vs NRC VIOLATIONS ISSUED vs. LERs REPORTED The above matrix shows the number of Corrective Action Heports (CARS) issued by the Nuclear Services Division (NSD) vs. the number of Significant CARS issued by NSD vs. I the number of viols tocs issued by the NRC for the Fort Calhoun Station in 1991 and j 1992. Included n1 these tables are the number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs)identi- l

.fied by the station each year. The number of NRC-violations reported is one month behnd the reporting month due to the time involved in collecting and processing the violations.

Data Source: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source)-

Short/Howman (Manager / Source)

Accountability: Andrews/GambNr Gates Adverse Trend: None SEP 15,20,21 46

I

'. PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS ACE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORi DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE DERS (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE)

This indicator tracks the total number of outstr.nding cor- This indicator is defined ar, the number of accidents for rective non-outage Maintenance Work Orders at the Fort all utility personael permanently assigned to the station, Calhoun Staton versus their age in months, involving days away from work per 200,000 man-hours worked (1M man-years) This does r.ot irsclude contrac-CARS (SSUED vs. SIGNIFICANT CARS vs. NRC VIO- tor persor 41. This indcator tracks personnel perfor.

LATIONS vs. LERs REPORTED mance for EP #25 8 26.

Provides a companson of CARS issued. NRC volations, and LERs reported. This indicator tracks performance for DOCUMENT REVIEW SEP e15,20, & 21. The Document Review indcator shows the number of documents reviewed, the number of documents sched-CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE uled for review, and the number of document reviews Compares the Fort Calhoun check valve failure rate to that are ove'due for the reporting month, A document the industry check valve f ailure rate (f ailures por 1 million review is considered overdue if the review is not com.

component hours). The data for the industry f ailure rate pk .a within 6 months of the assigned due date. This indi-is three months behind the PI Report reporting month, cator tracks performance fo.' SEP #46.

This indicator tracks performance for SEP #43.

EMERGENCY AC POWER SYSTEM SAFETY SYSTEM COLLECTIVE RACIATION EXPOSURE PERFORMANCE

Collective radiation exposure is the totas external whole- The sum of the known (planned and unplanned) unavail-body doce received by all on-site personnel (including able and the estimated unavailable hours for the emer.

contractors and visitors) during a time period, as mea- gency AC power system for the reporting pered divided sured by the thewoiuminescent dosimeter (TLD). Col- by the number of hours in the reporting period multiplied lective radiation exposure is reported in units of man- by the nuinber of trains in the emergency AC power sys-rem, This indcator tracks radiologeal work performance tem.

for SEP #54 j EMERGENT MWOs APPROVED FOR INCLUSION IN CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THE CYCLE 14 REFUELING OUTAGE THAN 3 MONTH 3 OLD (NON OUTAGE) The total number of Emergent Maintenance Work Orders The percentage of total outstanding corrective mainte- (MWOs) approved for inclusion in the Cycle 14 Refueling nance items, not requiring an outage, that are greater Outage scope. This indcator tracks performance for SEP than three months old at the end of the porod reported. #31.

CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS & NON CITED VIOLA. ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUEST (EAR)

TIONS (12 MONTH RUNNtNG TOTAL) BREAKDOWN The cumulative number of violations and Non-Crted Vo- This indicator shows a breakdown, by age of the EAR, of lations for the last 12 months. the numoer of EARS assigned to Design Engineering Nuclear and System Engineenng. This indicator tracks DECONTAMINATED RADIATION i:ONTROLLED performance for SEP #62.

AREA The percentage of the Radiation Controlled Area, which ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) STATUS includes the auxiliary building, the radwaste building, and . The number of ECNs that were opened. ECNs that were areas of the C/RP building, that is decontaminated based completed, and open backlog ECNs awaiting completion on the total square footage. This indicator tracks perfor- by DEN for the reporting month. This indcator tracks per-mance for SEP 9 54. formance for SEP #62.

DIESEL GENERATOR UNAVAILABILITY - EXPEDITED P 9.CAASES This indicator provides monthly data on the number of The percentage ot expedited purchase

• which occurred hours of diesel generator planned and unplanned un- during the reporting month compared to the total number availabihty. The Fort Calhoun goal for the semnd half of of purchase orders generated.

1991 for the number of unavailable hours per diesel gen.

erator has been established based upon the 1900 indus- GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DIS-try median value provided by INr0. CHARGED /0 THE ENVIRONMENT This indicator displays the total number of Curies of all gaseous radioactive nuclides releaseo f rom FCS.

47 1

l f

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (Cont'd)

HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS MAINTENANCE OVERTIME The number of Hotline Training Memos (HTM) that are liii, % of overtime hours compared to normal hours for initiated, closed, and overdue less or greater than 4 maintonance. This includes OPPD personnel as well as weeks for the ind cated month. A HTM is a training docu- contract personnel ment sont out for immediate review. The HTM should be teviewed and signed within 5 days of receipt of the HTM. MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE The total maximum amount of radiaton received by an LER ROOT CAUSE BREAKDOWN indivdual person working at FCS on a montNy, quarterly, This indicator shows the number and root cause type for and annual basis.

License Event Repcas.

NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS The number of radiological hot spots which have been This indicator shows the number of SRO and/or RO quiz- identified and document 9d to cxist at FCS at the erd of zes and exams that are administered and passed each the reporting montn. A hot spot is a smallIMalized month. This indicator tracks training periormance for source of 'adiation. A hot spot occurs when the wntact SEP #68. dose rate of an item is at least 5 times the General Area dose rate and the item's dose rate is equal to or greater LICENSED OPERATOR REQUk ,FICATION TRAIN- than 100 mRom/ hour, ING The total number of hours of training given to each crew NUMBER OF OUT OF-SERVICE CCNTROL ROOM durirg each cycle. Also provided are the simulator train- INS' RUMENTS ing hours (which are a subset of the total training hours), A control room instrument that cannot periorm its design the number of non requahficaton training hours and the function is considered as out-of-service. A con' ol room number of exam f ailures. This indics.or tracks training instrument which has had a Maintenance Work Order performance for SEP #68. (MWO) written for it and has not been repaired by the and of the reporting period is considered out of service LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED and will be counted. The duration of the out-of service TO THE ENVIRONMENT condition is not considerod. Computer CRTs are not con-This indicator displays the volutae of liquid radioactive sidered as control room instruments, I waste released from We radioactive waste monitor tanks, to include releases through the plant blowdown if radio- NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RE-active nuclides are detected in the blowdown system. SULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS The curies from all releases from FCS to the Missouri The r. umber of Survei!!anco Tests (STs) that result in River are also shown. Licensee Event Reports (LERs) during the reporting month. This indicator tracks missed STs for SEP #60 &

LOGGAOLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTG (SECURITY) - 61.

The total number of security incidents for tho reporting month depicted in two graphs. This indicator tracks secu- NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN rity performance for SEP#58. LERS The number of Wensee Event Reports (LERs) attnbuted -

MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS to personnel error on the original LER submitral. This The numter of Nuclear Plant Reliability Data S'jstem indicator trends personnel pertermance for SEP #15.

(NPROS) components with more than i failuro and the number of NPRDS compes. ants with more than 2 failures OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET for the last eightcan months. The year to date budget compamd to the actual expen-ditures for Operatons and Maintenance departments.

MAiNTEhrJCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG The number of corrective non-outage maintenance work PLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR orders that remain open at the end of the reporting The retio of the p:anned energy losses during a given month This indicator was added to the Pl Report to priod of time, to the reference energy generation (the trend open corrective non-outage maintenance work or- energy that could be produced if the unit were opstated dets as stated in SEP #36. continuously at full power under reference ambient con-d:tions), expressed as a perrantage.

l MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (COR-RECTIVE NON-OUTAGE MAINTENANCE)

This indicator is a breakdown of carrective nomoutage l

maintenance work ordsrs by several categories that re-main open at the end of the reporting month.This indica-tor tracks maintenance performance for SEP #36.

l l

l 48 i

i

~

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (Cont'd)

PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES (MAINTENANCE) The fobowing components are the types of loggable're-The number of identriiod ;ncidents concern;ng mainte- portable SECURilY SYSTEM FAILURES represented in nance procedure' "cblems, the number of closed IRS this indicator, Incidents in this category include alarm

related to the vos , procedures (includes the number of system f ailures, CCTV f ailures, secunty computer f a5 closed irs caused by procedural noncompliance), and ures, search equipment f ailures, and door hardware f al-the number of closed procedural noncompliance irs. ures. These system f ailures are further categorized as This indcator trends personnel performance for SEP follows

1. 15,41 & 44 1) Alarm System Failure Detect on system events in-volving f a!selnuisance alarms and mechanical f ailures.

~

RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM 2) Alarm Eystem Environs Degradatons to detecton The number of identified poor radoogical work practces system performa,ce as a result of environmental condi.

(PRWP) for the reporting month. This indcator tracks tions (i.e., rain, snow, f osa radiological work performance for SEP #52. 3) CCTV Failures Mechanical f ailures to all CCTV hard-ware components.

RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE 4) CCTV Environs - Degradatons to CCTV performance (NON-OUTAGE) as a result of environmental conditons (i e , rain, snow, _

The rato of preventive maintenance (inclutng surveil- frost, tog. sunspots, shee).

lanet 'esting and calibraton procedures) to the sum of 5) Secunty Computer Failures - Failure of the multr non outage corrective maintenance and preventive mam plexer, certral processmg unit, and other computer hard-tenance t'ompleted over the reporting pered. The rato, ware and software. This category does not include soft-expressed as a percentaga, is calculatnd based on marr ware problems caused by operator error in using the i t hours. This indicator tracks preventive maintenance ac- software.

tivities ior SEP #41, 6) Search Equipmsnt Fa:tures - Faitures of x ray, metal, or explosive ootectors and other equipment used to RECORDABLE INJURY 1LLNESS CASES FRE- search for contraband. This also includes incidents Ot,;ENCY RATE where the search equipment is found to be defective or The number of inpries raquiring more than normal firV did not function properly during testing.

aid per 200,000 man hours worked. This indicator trerds 7) Door Hardware Failures - Failure of the door alarm g personnel portormance for SEP 315,25 & 36. and other door hardware such as latches, electnc strikes, doorknobs, locks, etc.

SECURITY NON SYSTEM FAILU"ES 8) 1991 versus 1992 System Failures - Statistcs from The following components are the t> es of loggablo/r,3- 199 will be compared on a monthly basis with 1992 portable non-system f ailures represented in this indic+ loggable/ reportable sysism f:iilures.

tor, incidents in this category include security badges, This ind:cator tracks securin performan:e for SEP #58.

access control sind authorization, security force enor and unsecu.ed doors. STAFFING LEVEL

1) Security BMges Incidents associoted with improcer The actual staffing level and the authonzed staffing level use and handling of security badge:,. Incidants inciude for the Nuclear Operatons Division, the Production Enge security badges that are lost, taken out of the proteed nearing Division, and the Nuclear Servces Divison. This arek, out of cc*ntrol on-site, or inadvertently destroye d or indcator tracks performance for SEP #24.

baen.

2) Access Control and Authorizat or, Administrativo and TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS procedural enors assocated with the use of the card- The number o, temporary mechanical and elecifical con-access system such as tailguing, incorrect secunty figuratons to tha plant's systems.

badge issued, and improper escort procedures. Th.s also 1) Temporary configuratons are oewed as electncal includes incidents that were caused oy incorrect access jumpers, electncal blocks, mechanical jumpers, or me-authonzaton information entered into the secunty sys- chaMcal blocks which are installed in the plant operattng tom computer, systems and are not shown on the latest revision of the 1 3) Secunty Force Error Events caused by enembers of PalD. schematic, connection, winng, or flow diagrams.

tha secunty force that are found to be inattentive 13 their 2) Jumpers and blocks which are installed for Surveil- ,

duties or whc, neglected to properly perform assigned lance Tests, Maintenance Procedures Calibration Pro-functions (e.g., required se rch precedure or patrol). cedures, Special Procedures, or Operating Procedures

4) Unsecured Doors - Doc ". which are found to b+ unse- are not cortidered as temporary modifications unless the cured with no compensatory offcor posted or whore the jumper or b!ock remains in pwco after the test or proce.

- individual causing the alarm did not remain at the dure is complete. Jumpers and blocks instal!ed in test or alarmed doot until a scurity off cer respnnd ad. E vents lab instruments are no, consider.d as temporary modif r where an unsecured door is caused by ameng.g are catons.

included in this category unless there is un indication that 3) Scaffolding is not considered a temporary modification.

an adjustment was made to the door. Jumpers and blocks which are installed ar'd :or which This indicator tracks secunty performance for SEP #50 MRs have been submitted will be considered as tempo-49

l i

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (cont'd) rary modifcatons until final resoluton of the MR and the power plant operation and maintenance Dry radioactive jumper or block is removed or is permanently recorded waste includes contaminated tags, cleaning materials, on the drawings. This indcator tracks temporary modifi- drsposable prot 6ctive cloth.ng, plastic containers. and catons for SEP #62 & 71. any other material to be disposed of at a low level rad o-active waste disposa! site, except resin, sludge, or TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS evaporator bottoms. Low level reiars to all radioactive The number of skin and cL1 thing contaminatons for the waste that is not spent f uel or a by product of spent fuel reporting month. processing. This ind:cator tracks radiological work perfor-mance for SEP pr54.

UNDLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS-(INPO DEFINITION)

This indicator is defined as the sum of the following safety system actuations: '

1)The number of unplanned Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) actuatons that result from reaching an ECCS actuation setpoint or f rom a spurous/ inadvertent ECCS signal.

2)The number of unplanned emergency AC power sys-tem actuations that result from a loss of power to a safe-guards bus. An unp;anned safety system actuaton oc-cuts when an actuation setpoint for a safety system is reached or when a spurivus or inadvertent signal is gen-erated (ECCS only), and major equipment in the system is actuated. Unplanned means that the system actuaton was not part of a planned test or evoluton. The ECCS actuatons to be counted are actuations of the high pres-sure injection system, the low pressure injecton system, or the safety injecton tanks.

UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS(NRC DEFIN! TION)

The number of safety system actuations which include (2n!v) the High Pressure Safety injection System, the Lew Pressure Safety injection System, the Safety injec-tion Tanks, and the Emergency Diesel Generators. The Nr.C classifcaton of safety system actuatons includes natuations when major equipment is operated at when the logic systems for the above safety systems are chal-lenged, VIOLATIONS PER 1,000 INSPECTION HOURS This indicater is defined as the number of violations sited in NRC inspection reports for FCS per 1,000 NRC in-specton hours. The violationi are reported in the year that the inspection was actually performed and not based on when the inspecton report is receNed. The hours re-ported for each inspection report are used as the inspec-tion hours, VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE Th:s indicator is defined as the volume of hw level solid radioactive waste actually shippcd for burial, This ir. dica-tor also shows the volume of low level radloactive wast.s which ni in temporary storage, the amount of radcactive oil that has been shipped off-site for processing, and the volume of solid dry radioactive waste whch has been shipped off site for processing. Low level solid radioac-tive waste consists of dry active waste, sludges, resins, and evaporator bottoms genera:ed as a result of nuclear 50 i

,' SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX The purpose of the Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Periormance Indicators index is to list perior-mance indicators related to SEP items with parameters that can be trended.

SEP Refe'rence Number 15 fice Increase HPES and IR Accountability I'hrough Use of Periormance Indicators Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance) . .17 Total Skin and Clothing Centarninations . , . 23 Recordable injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate . .36 Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LERs . . 37 CARS issued vs Significant CARS issued vs NRC Violations issued vs LERS Reported . .46 SEP Reference Number 2.Q Quality Audits and Surveillance Programs are Evaluated, improved in Depth and Strengthened CARS issued vs Significant CARS issued vs NRC Violations issued vs LERs Reported . .46 SEP Refgence Number 21 Develop and Conduct Safety System Functionalinspections CARS issued vs Significant CARS issued vs NRC Violations issued vs LERs Reported . .46 SEP Reference Number 24 Complete Statt Studies Statiing Level . . . . . . . .39 SEP Reference Number 25 Training Program for Managers and Supervisors Implemented

! Disabling injury / illness Frequency Rate . .7 Recordable lojury/lliness Cases Frequency Rate .. . . . . .36 SEP Reference Number 26 Evaluate and implement Station Standards for Safe Work Practice Requirements Disabling mjury/ Illness Frequency Rate . ,, . , . .7 Recordable injury / illness Cases Frequency Rate . . 36 SEP Reference Number 11 Develop Outage and Maintenance Pianning Manual and Conduct Project Management Training Emergent MWOs Approved for inclusion in the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage .. . . . .43 SEP Ref erence Number 36 Reduce Corrective Non-Outage Backlog Maintenance Work Order (MWO) Breakdown (Corrective Non-Outage Maintenance). .12 Maintenance Work Order (MWO) Backlog (Corrective Non-Outage Maintenance) . .18 SEP Reference Number 41 Develop and implement a Preventive Maintenance Schedule Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance (Non-Outage) . . .14 Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance) . .17 SEP Reference Number 43 Implement the Check Valve Test Program Check Valve Failure Rate . 21 SEP Reference Number 44 Compliance With and Use of Procedures Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance) . .17 51

!' o e

SEP leference Number 43 -

Design a Procedures Centrol and Admir.lstrahve Program Document Review . . . . . . . . ,9 SEP Reference Number _52 Establish Supervisory Accountaoility for Workers Radiologi0al Practices Radiological Work Practices Program. . 25 SEP Reference NumbgLM Complete implementation of Radiological Enhancement Program Collective Radiation Exposure . . .5 Volume of Low. Level Solid Radioactive Waste. . .6 Total Se.in and Clothing Contaminations . . . 23 Decontaminated Radiation Controlled Area. . 24 SEP Referenco Number SS Revice Physical Security Training and Procedure Piogram Logg able/ Reportable incidents (Security) .. . . 29 Secuilty Non. System Failures. . . .30

' Security System Failures . . . .. . . . 31 SEP Reference Number 60 Improve Controls Over Surveilance l Test Program Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Rcports. .19 SEP Reference Numbe(f21 Modif y Computer Program to Correctly Schedale Surveiliance Tests  ;

Number of Missed Survoillance Tests Resulung in Licensee Event Reports. .19 SEP Reference Number 62 Establish interim System Engineers Temporary Modifications (Excluding Scattolding) . . . .. . 33 Engineering Assistance Request (EAR) Breakdown.. . 34 Engineering Change Notice Status . . .. . .. .35

't SEP Reference Number 68 Assess Root Cause of Poor Operator Training and Establish h'eans to Monitor Operator Training Licensed Operator Requalification Training . - .. .. . . 40 License Candidate Exams. . . . . 41 SEP Reference Number 71 1 improve Controls Over Temporary Modification:

Temporary Modifications (Excluding Scaffolding) . . . . 33 1

I 52

t REPORT DISTRIBUTION LIS1 i

R. L. Andrews K. B. Guliani W. W. Orr G. L. Anglehart E. R. Gundal L. L. Parent W. R. Bateman R. H. Guy T. L. Patte~rson K. L. Belek R. M. Hawkins R. L. Phelps A. D. Bilau M. C. Hendrickson W.J.Ponec B. H. Biome R. R. Henning T. M. Reisdortf C N. Bloyd K. R. Henry A. W. Richard J.P.Bobba J. B. Herman D. G. Ried C. E. Boughter G. J. Hill G. K. Samide M. A. Breuer K. C. Holthaus 1.J.Sandene C.J Brunnert M. A. Howman B. A. Schmidt M. W. Butt L. G. Huliska S T. Schmitz

• C. A. Carlson C. J. Husk F. C. Scofield J. W. Chase R. L. Jaworski L. G Sealock G. R. Chatfield R. A. Johansen H. J. Sefick A. G. Christensen W. C. Jones D. K. ( ~ 'el A. J. Clark J. D. Kecy J. W. Shannon O. J. Clayton J. D. Keppler R. W. Short R. P. Clemens D. D. Kloock C. F. Simmons J. L. Connolley J. C. Knight E.L.Skaggs G. M. Cook D. M. Kobunski J. L. Skiles M. R. Core G. J. Krause F. K. Smith S. R. Crites L. J. Kripal H. L. Sorenson D. W. Dale J. G. Krist J. A. Spijker R. C. DeMeulmeester J. B. Kuhr K. E Steele R. D. DeYoung L. T. Kusek W. Steele D. C. Dietz L.E. Labs H. F. Sterba ,

J. A. Drahota M. P. Lazar G. A. Teeplo T, R. Dukarski R. C. Learch M. A. Tesar P. D. Dunham S.E. Lee T. G. Therkildsen R. G. Eurich R. E. Lewis J. W. Tills H. J. Faulhaber R. C. Liebentritt D. R. Trausch M. A. Ferdig C. J. Linden P. R. Tumer -

V. H. Frahm B. R. Livingston J. M. Uhland F. F. Franco J. H. MacKinnon C. F. Vanecek M. T. Frans G. D. Mamoran J. M. Waszak H. K. Fraser J. W. Marcil G. R. Williams J. F. W. Frieda :!41, , N . Martice S. J. Willrett D. J. Matthews W. C, Woerner S. K. Gambhir J. K. Gasper J. M. Mattice W. G. Gates T. J. Mcivor M. O. Gautier K. S. McCormick S. W. Gebers R. F. Mehaffey J. M. Glantz K. J. Morris J. T. Gleason D. C. Mueller L. V. Goldberg R. J. Mueller D. J. Golden J. B. Newhouse D. C. Gorence M. W. Nichols R. E. Gray C. W. Norris M. J. Guinn J. T. O'Connor G. E. Guliani 53

O s

POSITIVE TREND REPORT INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED -

MANAGEMENT ATiENTION REPORT The Positive Trend Report highlights several Perior. This secton lists the indicators WMch show inadequacies mance indcators with data representing continued per* as compared to the OPPD goal and ino;cators whch formance above the stated goal and indcators with data show inadequacies as compared to the industry median representiag significant improvement in recent months. or upper quartile. The indcators will be compared to the industry median or upper quartile as relevant to that indr The following indicators have been selecied as exhiortin9 cator.

positive trends:

Er t Purchases QsabHno laiurv'lyness Frecuenev Ra'e ,

The percentage of upedited purchases for the reporting he Dis bling injury /Iliness Frequency Rate for the morith (0.76%) excuds the 1992 Fort Calhoun monthly goalof 0.5%.

Recordable Iniurvittiness Cases Frecuency Rate Vo!ations oer 1.000 Intrection dpzti (Page 36)

I The Recordable injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate for Th vol . tons per 1,000 inspection hours value for the the reporting month (1.0) is below the 1992 Fort Calhoun tsoorting month (1.52)is above the Fort Calhoun goal of }

goal of 2.0. 1.5, End of Positrve Trend Report End of Management Attenton Report.

ADVERSE TREND REPORT PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT IMPROVEMENTS / CHANGES I A Porformance Indicator which has data representing three (3) censecutive months of 'Jeclining performance This report has been abbreviated to allow some perfor.

constitutes an adverse trend. The Advarse Trond Report mance indcator data sources to devole more time to explains the conditions under which certain indicators are refuehng ce? age activities Pubicat on of allindicators showing adverse trends. An explanation will be provided will resume with the May 1992 report, for indicators with data representing three months of d6-clining performance that have been labeled as adverse Planned Cacabihtv Less Factor trends. (Page 4)

The following indicator is exhibiting an adverse trend for This ind MU has been added to the report.

, the reporting month:

Emeroent MWOs Acorcygd for laclusion in the Cvele 14 Refuelino Outace Erneroent MWOs Acoroved for inclusion in the Cvete 14 fPage 43)

Refuelino Outace This indicator, formerly titled " Emergent MWO Planning (Page 43) Status", has been revised to more accurately represent This indsatt,r has been determined to be exhibity an the refuehng outage MWO status.

adverse trend by the Supervisor, Outage Projects be-cause the amount of emergent work has exceeded the weekly target of 59 MWOs for each week during the out- End of indcator improvement / Changes Report.

age.

End of Adverse Trend Report.

54

FORT CALHOUN STATION

. OPEPS(ING CYCLES AND REFUELING OUTAGE DATES Evsnt Date Range Production (MWH) Cumulative (MWH)

Cycle 1 09/26/73 02/010 5 3,299,639 3,299,639 1st Refueling 02/0195 05/09/75 Cycle 2 05/09/75 10!0106 3,853,322 7,152,961 2nd Refueling 10'0106 12/13/76 Cycle 3 12/13/76 9/30'77 2,805,927 9,958,888 3rd Refueling 09/30/77 12/0977 Cycle 4 12/09/77 10/1478 3,026,832 12,985,720 4th Refueling

• 10/14/78 -12/24/78

• Cycle 5 12/24/78 01/18!80 3,882,734 16,868,454 5th Refueling 01/10/80 06/11/80

• Cycle 6 06/11/80 09/18/81 3,899,714 20,768,168 6th Refueling 09/18/81 12/21/01 Cycle 7 12/21/81 12/06/82 3,561,866 24,330,034 7th Refueling 12/06/02 0l/07/03

• Cycle 8 04/07/83 - 03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736,405 8th Refueling 03/03/84 - 07/12/84

• Cycle 9 07/12/84 09/20!85 4,741,488 32,477,893 9th Refueling 09/28/85 01/16/83 *

• Cycle 10 01/16/86 - 03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 10th Refueling 03/07/87 - 06/03/87 *

• Cyr'e 11 06/08/87 - 09/27/88 4,936,859 41,771,505 11th F afueling . *

• 09/27/88 01/31/89

. Cycle 12 01/31/89 02/17/90 3,817,954 45,589,459 12th Refueling 02/17/90 05/29/90

• Cycle 13 05/29/90-02/01/92

• 13th Refueling 02/01/92 04/26/92 (Planned Dates)

Cycle 14# 04/26/92 09/19/93

• 14th Refueling 09/19/83 11/13!93 *

• Cycle 15 11/13/93-03/12/95 * '

15th Hefueling . OT12/95 05/06/95 *

• FORT CALHOUN STATION CURRENT PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS " RECORDS" First Sustained Reaction August 5,1973 (5:47 p.m.)

First Electricity Supplied to the System August 25,1973 Commercial Operation (180,000 KWH) September 26,1973 A:hleved Full Power (100%) May 4,1974 Longest Run (477 days) June 8,1987 Sept. 27,1988 Highest Monthly Net Generatiors (364,468,300 KWH) October 1987 Most Productive Fuel Cycle (4,936,859 MWH)(Cycle 11) June 8,19'.7 Sept. 27,1988 i l

4

_ - _ _ - _ - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - _ _ _ - _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - _ _ _ - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ - -