|
---|
Category:GENERAL EXTERNAL TECHNICAL REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20202F7901999-01-25025 January 1999 1999 Four Year Simulator Certification Rept for MNGP Simulation Facility ML20198J4451998-10-22022 October 1998 Rev 2 to SIR-97-003, Review of Test Results of Two Surveillance Capsules & Recommendations for Matls Properties & Pressure-Temp Curves to Be Used for Monticello Rpv ML20197J8131997-12-31031 December 1997 Revised Evacuation Time Estimates for Plume Exposure Pathway Emergency Planning Zone at Monticello Nuclear Power Plant. W/One Oversize Drawing ML20141B9271997-06-30030 June 1997 LOCA Containment Analyses for Use in Evaluation of NPSH for RHR & Core Spray Pumps ML20148S6341997-06-23023 June 1997 NPSH - Rept of Sulzer Bingham Pump ML20138G7791996-12-18018 December 1996 Rev 20 to Operational QA Plan ML20217D8611996-09-28028 September 1996 Moisture Separator Sys Engineering Evaluation ML20101K8541996-02-29029 February 1996 Application of Regional Exclusion w/Flow-Biased APRM Neutron Flux Scram Stability Solution (Option I-D) to Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant ML20115E8921995-12-31031 December 1995 FERC Form 1:Annual Rept of Major Electric Utils,Licensees & Others for NSP (Minnesota) & (Wisconsin) ML20094N9321995-11-30030 November 1995 USNRC USI A-46 Resolution Seismic Evaluation Rept Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant ML20094P9541995-11-17017 November 1995 Rev 1 to Monticello IPE of External Events (Ipeee) ML20096C3581995-10-16016 October 1995 Qualification of Reactor Physics Methods for Application to Monticello ML20096C3931995-10-16016 October 1995 Reload Safety Evaluation Methods for Application to Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant ML20096F6741995-02-28028 February 1995 Application of Regional Exclusion W/Flow-Biased APRM Neutron Flux Scram Stability Solution (Option I-D) to Monticello Nuclear Power Plant ML20087F3041995-02-28028 February 1995 Non-proprietary Application of Regional Exclusion w/Flow- Biased APRM Neutron Flux Scram Stability Solution (Option I-D) to Monticello Npp ML20080R2601995-02-28028 February 1995 Individual Plant Exam of External Events (Ipeee) ML20078J0041995-01-27027 January 1995 Rev 3 of Reload Safety Evaluation Methods for Application to Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant ML20072M4551994-08-24024 August 1994 Qualification of Reactor Physics Methods for Application to Monticello ML20065K1621994-04-12012 April 1994 Rev 2 to Reload SE Methods for Application to Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant ML1132102891993-11-30030 November 1993 Control Room Habitability Toxic Chemical Study ML20034H5741993-03-0909 March 1993 Rev 0 to Basis for Continued Operation W/Crack in Core Spray Header ML20248L4081992-09-0101 September 1992 Annual Rept Review of Meteorological Data 1991 Monticello & Prairie Island Stations ML20147F8131988-01-15015 January 1988 Lab Exam of Recirculation Line Decontamination Flange from Monticello Nuclear Power Station ML20235B3121987-08-31031 August 1987 Comparison of Monticello & Brunswick Recirculation Pump Trip ML20094P5261984-06-30030 June 1984 Rev 1 to, Safety Analysis of RHR Intertie Line,Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant ML20064E5091982-10-31031 October 1982 Design Rept for Recirculation Line Cap Repair, Rev 0 ML20009C0381981-07-31031 July 1981 IE Bulletin 79-14,Safety-Related Piping Sys,Phase 2 Inaccessible Piping Insp Rept ML19345F2491980-12-31031 December 1980 Supplemental Reload Licensing Submittal for Facility Reload 8 (Cycle 9), Class 1 ML20090A6661980-04-30030 April 1980 Technical Evaluation of Electrical,Instrumentation & Control Design Aspects of Proposed License Amend for Single- Loop Operation of Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant ML19250A5511979-10-0808 October 1979 IE Bulletin 79-14,Safety-Related Piping Sys,Phase 2 Accessible Piping Insp Rept ML19209C2331979-10-0808 October 1979 IE Bulletin 79-14,Safety-Related Piping Sys,Phase 2 Accessible Piping Insp Rept, ML19249A2031979-08-31031 August 1979 Mgt & Technical Resources,Jul 1979 ML20127H3401978-03-15015 March 1978 ASME Code Section XI Inservice Insp & Testing Program & Info Required for NRC Review of Requests for Relief from ASME Code Section XI Requirements. Including Revs 1-5 ML20127H3001978-02-0808 February 1978 Reactor Containment Bldg Integrated Leak Rate Test - Nov 1977 ML20127N8951977-12-31031 December 1977 Suppl 1 to, Design Rept & SE for Replacement of Spent Fuel Pool Storage Racks ML20091A2731977-08-17017 August 1977 Design Rept & Safety Evaluation Re Replacement of Spent Fuel Pool Storage Racks ML20058L3661976-12-10010 December 1976 Comparison of Existing Fire Protection Provisions to Guidelines Contained in SRP 9.5.1 ML20091A6211976-11-11011 November 1976 Redundant Design Feature Mods & Safety Evaluation for Reactor Bldg Crane Sys at Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant ML20090L8251976-10-31031 October 1976 Suppl to Short-Term Program,Plant-Unique Torus Support & Attached Piping Analysis ML20058L4711976-07-21021 July 1976 Suppl 1 to App I Filing ML20091A9561976-06-0404 June 1976 App I Filing,Consisting of App 2.5-A & App 2.5-B Re Annual & Monthly Joint Frequency Distributions Appropriate for Surface & Elevated Releases,Respectively ML20091A8981976-04-30030 April 1976 Failure Analysis of Type 304 Stainless Steel 4-Inch Recirculation Bypass Lines of Monticello BWR Power Plant ML20079C4111976-01-23023 January 1976 Reactor Containment Bldg Integrated Leak Test ML20079C4021976-01-13013 January 1976 Analysis & Safety Evaluation of Spent Fuel Shipping Cask Handling at Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant ML20125A6251975-07-0909 July 1975 MNGP Loss-of Coolant Accident Analyses Conformance W/ 10CFR50 App K ML20127N7541975-06-30030 June 1975 Loss-of-Coolant Accident Analysis Conformance w/10CFR50 App K (Jet Pump Plant), Dtd June 1975 ML20090L6211974-10-0101 October 1974 Preliminary Rept of Fuel Cask Drop Accident Analysis ML20056B9851974-05-31031 May 1974 Reactor Containment Bldg Integrated Leak Test - May 1974 ML20090L5331974-02-11011 February 1974 Errata to Technical Rept on GE 8 X 8 Fuel Assembly, ML20090M5521974-02-0808 February 1974 Rev 1 to, Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant Second Reload Submittal 1999-01-25
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20217H2061999-10-12012 October 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 106 to License DPR-22 ML20217D1261999-09-30030 September 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1999 for Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant.With ML20216E7031999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant.With ML20210Q0521999-08-0404 August 1999 Safety Evaluation Approving Relief Request 10 to License DPR-22 Per 10CFR50.55a(g)(6)(i).Inservice Exam for Relief Request 10,Parts A,B,C,D & E Impractical & Reasonable Assurance of Structural Integrity Provided ML20210Q6611999-07-31031 July 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant.With 05000263/LER-1999-007, :on 990610,HPCI Test Return Valve Was Unable to Close Against Max Expected Differential Pressure.Caused by Failure to Accurately Predict Valve Performance.Procedure Revised.With1999-07-0909 July 1999
- on 990610,HPCI Test Return Valve Was Unable to Close Against Max Expected Differential Pressure.Caused by Failure to Accurately Predict Valve Performance.Procedure Revised.With
05000263/LER-1999-006-01, :on 990602,during Quarterly Surveillance Hcpi Was Declared Inoperable.Caused by Drain Pot Alarm.Revised HPCI Surveillance Test Procedure.With1999-07-0202 July 1999
- on 990602,during Quarterly Surveillance Hcpi Was Declared Inoperable.Caused by Drain Pot Alarm.Revised HPCI Surveillance Test Procedure.With
ML20209F7901999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant.With 05000263/LER-1999-005, :on 990508,personnel Inserted Manual Scram When Pressure Transient Closed Air Ejector Suction Isolation Valves & Tripped off-gas Sys.Caused by Recombiner Catalyst Migration.Catalyst Was Removed.With1999-06-0707 June 1999
- on 990508,personnel Inserted Manual Scram When Pressure Transient Closed Air Ejector Suction Isolation Valves & Tripped off-gas Sys.Caused by Recombiner Catalyst Migration.Catalyst Was Removed.With
ML20195H0351999-05-31031 May 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Monticello Nuclear Generatintg Plant.With 05000263/LER-1999-004-01, :on 990422,low Reactor Water Level Scram,Group 2 & 3 Isolations & Subsequent HPCI Became Inoperable.Caused by Feedwater Controller Power Supply Failure.Three Power Supplies Replaced & Connections Cleaned.With1999-05-24024 May 1999
- on 990422,low Reactor Water Level Scram,Group 2 & 3 Isolations & Subsequent HPCI Became Inoperable.Caused by Feedwater Controller Power Supply Failure.Three Power Supplies Replaced & Connections Cleaned.With
05000263/LER-1999-003-01, :on 990412,HPCI & Division 1 ECCS Equipment Were Declared Inoperable Due to Svc Water Pump Failure.Pump Shaft Was Mechanically Freed,Check Valve Was Repaired & Pump Was Successfully Tested.With1999-05-12012 May 1999
- on 990412,HPCI & Division 1 ECCS Equipment Were Declared Inoperable Due to Svc Water Pump Failure.Pump Shaft Was Mechanically Freed,Check Valve Was Repaired & Pump Was Successfully Tested.With
05000263/LER-1999-002-01, :on 990329,event Sequence That Results in Available ECCS Being Reduced to Less than That Assumed in Current Safety Analysis.Caused by Failure of Edg.Plant Operating Procedures Revised.With1999-05-11011 May 1999
- on 990329,event Sequence That Results in Available ECCS Being Reduced to Less than That Assumed in Current Safety Analysis.Caused by Failure of Edg.Plant Operating Procedures Revised.With
ML20206N1721999-04-30030 April 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1999 for Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant.With ML20205N0861999-04-12012 April 1999 Safety Evaluation Re Licensee Response to GL 95-07, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power-Operated Gate Valves ML20205P5701999-03-31031 March 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1999 for Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant.With ML20205C1651999-03-19019 March 1999 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 105 to License DPR-22 ML20204H4951999-03-18018 March 1999 SER Concluding That Licensee Established Acceptable Program to Verify Periodically design-basis Capability of safety-related MOVs at Monticello.Therefore Staff Concludes Licensee Adequately Addressed Action Required in GL 96-05 05000263/LER-1999-001-02, :on 990215,HPCI High Steam Flow Isolation During Quarterly Surveillance Test Was Noted.Caused by Inadequate Surveillance Procedure.Revised Surveillance Procedure.With1999-03-17017 March 1999
- on 990215,HPCI High Steam Flow Isolation During Quarterly Surveillance Test Was Noted.Caused by Inadequate Surveillance Procedure.Revised Surveillance Procedure.With
ML20205G7391999-02-28028 February 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1999 for Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant.With ML20202F7901999-01-25025 January 1999 1999 Four Year Simulator Certification Rept for MNGP Simulation Facility ML20199E4871999-01-0606 January 1999 SER Accepting Licensee 951116,960214 & 0524 Responses to NRC Bulletin 95-002, Unexpected Clogging of Residual Heat Removal Pump Strainer While Operating in Suppression Pool Cooling Mode ML20199F6211998-12-31031 December 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1998 for Mngp.With ML20205H0561998-12-31031 December 1998 Northern States Power Co 1998 Annual Rept. with ML20198P0691998-12-28028 December 1998 Safety Evaluation Concluding That NSP Proposed Alternative to Paragraph III-3411 of App III to 1986 Edition of Section XI of ASME Code Provides Acceptable Level of Quality & Safety.Alternative Authorized ML20198M8221998-12-24024 December 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 104 to License DPR-22 ML20198M6901998-12-23023 December 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 103 to License DPR-22 ML20198D0751998-12-10010 December 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting NSP Proposed Change to EOPs to Use 2/3 Core Height as Potential Entry Condition Into Containment Flooding ML20198B2531998-11-30030 November 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1998 for Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant.With ML20195E3691998-11-12012 November 1998 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Licensee USI A-46 Implementation Has Met Purpose & Intent of Criteria in GIP-2 & Staff Sser 2 for Resolution of USI A-46 ML20195D2381998-10-31031 October 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Oct 1998 for Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant.With ML20198J4451998-10-22022 October 1998 Rev 2 to SIR-97-003, Review of Test Results of Two Surveillance Capsules & Recommendations for Matls Properties & Pressure-Temp Curves to Be Used for Monticello Rpv 05000263/LER-1998-005-01, :on 980921,HPCI Was Removed from Service to Repair Steam Leak in Drain Trap by Pass.Caused by Localized Erosion of Valve Body.Valve Was Declared Inoperable & Was Replaced with Manual Valve1998-10-21021 October 1998
- on 980921,HPCI Was Removed from Service to Repair Steam Leak in Drain Trap by Pass.Caused by Localized Erosion of Valve Body.Valve Was Declared Inoperable & Was Replaced with Manual Valve
05000263/LER-1998-004-02, :on 980909,manual Scram Was Inserted Following Pressure Transient Closed Air Ejector Suction Isolation Valves & Trips Offgas Recombiners,Occurred.Caused by Seat Leakage.Leaking Valve Seat Was Reworked1998-10-0909 October 1998
- on 980909,manual Scram Was Inserted Following Pressure Transient Closed Air Ejector Suction Isolation Valves & Trips Offgas Recombiners,Occurred.Caused by Seat Leakage.Leaking Valve Seat Was Reworked
ML20154L3471998-09-30030 September 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1998 for Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant.With ML20153F0511998-09-21021 September 1998 Rev 2 to MNGP Colr,Cycle 19 ML20153F8671998-09-16016 September 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 102 to License DPR-22 ML20153E9361998-09-0808 September 1998 Rev 1 to MNGP Colr,Cycle 19 ML20153B0861998-08-31031 August 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1998 for Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant.With ML20151T0981998-08-28028 August 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 101 to License DPR-22 ML20237B8461998-07-31031 July 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for July 1998 for Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant ML20236W5041998-07-21021 July 1998 ISI Exam Summary Rept - Refueling Outage 19 ML20236R1941998-06-30030 June 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1998 for Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant ML20249A5861998-05-31031 May 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1998 for Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant 05000263/LER-1998-003-01, :on 980417,transgranular Stress Corrosion Cracking Was Identified in Control Rod Drive Lines.Caused by chloride-induced Transgranular stress-corrosion Cracking. Affected Sections of Two Lines Replaced1998-05-14014 May 1998
- on 980417,transgranular Stress Corrosion Cracking Was Identified in Control Rod Drive Lines.Caused by chloride-induced Transgranular stress-corrosion Cracking. Affected Sections of Two Lines Replaced
05000263/LER-1998-002-02, :on 980415,main Steam Isolation Valve Position Setpoint Outside Allowed Range,Was Found.Caused by Previous Testing Technique & Use of Particular Switch Model.Eight New Position Switches W/Less Deadband Installed1998-05-14014 May 1998
- on 980415,main Steam Isolation Valve Position Setpoint Outside Allowed Range,Was Found.Caused by Previous Testing Technique & Use of Particular Switch Model.Eight New Position Switches W/Less Deadband Installed
ML20247K3971998-04-30030 April 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1998 for Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant 05000263/LER-1998-001-02, :on 980323,discovered Containment Isolation Valve Leakage Exceeded TS Limit.Caused by Foreign Matl Found on Valve Seat.Repaired Subject Valves & Developed Process to Ensure Cleanliness of Testing Equipment1998-04-22022 April 1998
- on 980323,discovered Containment Isolation Valve Leakage Exceeded TS Limit.Caused by Foreign Matl Found on Valve Seat.Repaired Subject Valves & Developed Process to Ensure Cleanliness of Testing Equipment
ML20217E9611998-04-20020 April 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 100 to License DPR-22 ML20217D8731998-04-13013 April 1998 Rev 0 to MNGP Colr,Cycle 19 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
[
i
(}-
r.,
te if t.
!!M ',
Regulator' File Cy.'
~
v.
g..
43
. k " "'
GENERAL ELECTRIC COhiPANY f$a.;~.
A ATOhi!C POWER EQUIPhiENT DEPARThiENT s
r SAN JOSE, C ALIF.
A oror
/
'I[!;/
?) % / ld =
N 28A
,w.? ?
.. %Q%r T.,
45Q
- 7 N/.4, fc. /
w'
- a SUhih1ARY OF hiONTICELLO BIOLOGIC AL SHIELD WALL STRENGTH by G. L. Davis hiarch 21, 1972 9102120454 720608 PDR ADOCK 05000263 P
PDR
{/* In or' der to assure the AEC Regulatory o
o p,
My-the Monticello reactor vessel can withstand the pressure that c ould be developed g.
hh'* by failure of a nozzle safe-ench General Electric investigated the strength characteristic s of the shield wall. This investigation is now complete. The g,,
following is a description of the investigation which has shown the shield wall L
strength to be more than adequate ana that even if the penetration plugs should become missiles, they would not have sufficient energy to penetrate the primary
- y containment.
The biologic al shield wall is a right circular cylinder of approximately 24
"~
I feet outside diameter which is anchored to the Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) support pedestal at its base and the ring truss at the top. As shown in the attached figure, an annulus is formed between the RPV and the biological shield wall. The shield wall is approximately 26 inches thick and consists of 27 inch WF columns tied together by horizontal WF beams and 1/4 inch steel pla t e s. These plates are welded to the olumn flanges, both inside and outside, thereby forming a double walled shell. The shell is filled with conc rete f or shielding purposes. Pipes leaving the vessel at elevations below the top of the shield wall penetrate the wall. A number of the penetrations utilize removable shield plugs fitting around the penetration to allow access to the pipe welds for in-se rvic e ins pec tion. In order to reduce the possible energy of any one shield plug piece, the space is filled as much as practical by small concrete bricks.
The circle-to-square conversion is made by the use of pre-cast concrete pieces, segmented at the 90' positions. All bricks and shield pieces are retained by a 3 /16" steel plate bolted to the penetration flange.
The investigation aimed at resolving the ACRS concern for the biological shield integrity involved definine the break area and location and calculating the resulting peak pressure in the annular space between the biological shield and the reactor pressure vessel. Particular attention was given to the pressure at the shield wall penetration shield plugs.
i To calculate the peak pressure inside the biolacical shield, a leak in the recirculation nozzle, equivalent in area to a 28" recirculation line break wa s a s sumed. The break location was assumed such that the leak would be between the reactor vessel and the biological shield although, if a leak must be postulated, the nozzle to safe-end weld is believed to be more
{
susceptible to failure.
At Monticello, the nozzle to safe-end weld is i
located about 12 inches inside the shield wall and therefore an assumed break i
of this weld would result in a lower pressure inside the shield than under j
the above assumption, i
It was further assumed that the vessel insulation in the annulus is either crushed or blown off; that saturated water is being discharged into the annulus at a rate corresponding to critical flow; that steam and water are
' i L
1.^.-.-
~
T ~, -..
a
m y -
na O
~o
{
y Y'" well inixed so that vent flow stagnation enthalpy is equal to reactor water i
DA enthalpy; that steady blowdown and venting flows are appropriate due to the
" rapid pressure buildup in the annulus; that the friction loss of the vent
- ? a area is equivalent to a pipe whose FL/D is approximately 0.25 and in which 4:ps,
critical mixture flow occurs at the exit.
I The leak described above is assumed to be equivalent in area to a 28" recirculation line, or 3. 65 aquare feet. This release is vented through an area of 88. 77 square feet comprised of the annular gap between the reactor pressure vessel and the biological shield plus the gaps between each line and its penetration through the biological shield, The peak pressure in the annulus based on the above assumptions, neglecting local stagnation and distribution effects was calculated to be 36. O psi at the recirculstion pipe penetrations through the biological shield.
Conclusions The biological shie:d wall, based on an allowable stress of 150% of the 1969 AISC allowable stress, has the capability of withstanding a uniform internal pressure of 58 psi. This is sufficiently above the calculated uniform peak pressure of 36 psi such that the shield wall integrity is assured.
The calculated peak pressure could result in missiles since the 36 psi is sufficient to eject the largest shield plug with an energy of 16.2 ft, kips.
In light of this missile potential, the containment's capability to withstand the impact of such a missile was investigated. The ejected shield plug was
" Conservatively assumed to tumble during its flight to allow a pointed corner to impinge on the. 635 inch (minimum) thick steel containment liner plate.
An analysis based on U.S. Reactor Containment Technology, ORNL-NSIC-5 and assuming the 3 /16 inch retainer plate did not restrict possible missiles, established that the containment could withstand a missile with an energy of
- 18. 4 ft. kips.
The c alculations reported herein demons: rate that the biological shield is adequate and that potential missiles would not penetrate the primary containment thereby demonstrating that loss of integrity of the nozzle would have "no intolerable consequences".
p 1
d w
@ Aid.m..
.A B
l
1 W.
o O
- n..
k i
RE ACTOR VESSEL
~
/
f yz DRYWE LL HE AD
/
\\
/
\\
'_f fJ.
/
\\
@r 1 4
i BIOLOGICAL SHIE LD 3
r---
7 l ACTIVE i t
DRYWELL e
i CORE l k
L_._ _ _
s 9
r.'zg*
~20 'S ' '
=
n u
(
1 8
(
6 I
i l
3 h
g l
A l
c o
s v.
3 l
l J,
l 4
6 i
I v.
V.
i J
6 C
s g.
~
v s
.,(
- 'i
.f
__. L _ _.J b**
R r
1
.I i
t i
MONTICELLO REACTOR PRESSURE VESSEL AND SYELD WALL F
e i
t.
m
~
L.
O o
AEC DIRTRIBUTION FCR PART 50 DOCrET MATERIAL (TEMPORARY FORM)
CONTROL NO:
3187 r"
FROM: Northern States Power Co. DATE OF DOC:
DATE REC'D I LTR MEMO RPr UTHER Minneapolis', Minn.
55401' 4 3.caward c
.6-8-72
,,6-12-72,,
X g.
.r M,, pas,,
(
-'. SENT AEC-FDR ]DR l
. ORIG e CC e ' <OTHER*
~
,$s. g-
[..
...SINT LOCAL P kesholt n.v, 4, g y. q y*.
- is, ;,
- q. w ey #..ma ax
- a. m
>+
~. DOCKET NO:
NO CYS FEC'D s
~
g p.parwmy W W.L.n.
s>
ak i
Mc W N M w 263
, e u n. g 3 91 eu u ete'st.
.l g4
~-
.%EISIM s_.
I g,p -
sw AN n
e
~
n
.agow -
FOR ACTICE/isuismTION + e W 6-12=72 ~~m
~--
W; mmmq(L}mg wcmENIEL(L)a e VASSALI4(L)'.+gg8PLIEMANN(L),,,,; w,, x KNIGEION(ENVIRO
-e y
QM.hpoopiespWa*WW/coopies 4),;ag sW/
W/ 9 Copiea W/ Copies Copies i@c CIARK(L)
SCIMENCER(L
'H. DENTON
-<J CHrIV00D(FM)
~ / Copies'_
W/ Copies' W/ Copies W/ Copies W/ Copics
'~
W GOLLER(L)
STOLZ(L)
SCHEMEL(L)
DICKER (ENVIRO)
W/ Copies W/ Copics W/ Copico W/ Copics W/ Copies INTERNA. DIJrRIBUTION F0 FILES)
E'ELLO-L
.0LLMER-L KARAS-L L/A P4R EU rw
- 00RE-L DENTON-L(,h IMSON-L L/A BJR EG OIIR (2) $ LANGE-L GRD/IS-L BRCfdN-L L/A PdR C-RM P-506 PfWLICKI-L GAMMILL-L WILSON-L L/A WR WJ:C2,ING & STAFF UfHOMPSON-I A
KNIGHTON-ENVIRO KARI-L L/A BWR OIAMBUSSO-L b#JDESCO-L T UE4 DICKER-ENVIRO S4ITH-L L/A BWR
%dJYD-L-BWR, 98LONG-L
' FROJ LDR ENVIRO:
GEARIN-L L/A BWR
'DEYOUNG-L-WR
' WfAINAS-L
"* ' DIGGS-L L/A JLLER-L-ENVIRO SHAO-L SALTZMAN-IND.
' TEETS-L L/A
, ;0VHOLT-L-OPER NAROYA-L MCDONALD-PIANS WADE-L L/A ENVIRO WarrH-L ORRIS-RO NUSSBAUMER-FM BRATIFAN-A/T l
WACCARY-LhTR
-L i
SMILEY-FN HARLESS-ENVIRO j
SCRROEDER-L
, CASE-L [Qk I P. DOuLINS-L l
EXTERNAL DISURIBUTION d -LOCAL PDR M uneapoils, m nn.
1-SAN /LA/NY--FDR ITTIE-(LAUGHLIN) 9-NATIONAL LAB'S 1-CHIEF WATER REACTORS I
A-NSIC-(BUCHANAN)
ANL/0RUL/BNWL l-RD....E. HALL F-309 GT l
l-ASLB-YORE /SARYE l-R. CARROLL-0C, GT WOODWARD /H. Sr.
1-R. CATLIN, A-170, GT f.-C. MIIES-C-459, CT 1-CONSULTANr' S M6 CYS ACRS-HOLDING NEWMARI/BLUME/AGBABIAN 1-DR. GERALD S. TITJOUCHE BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL IAB
_-, _ l
~w-4 m