ML20090J251

Forwards Response to Concerns Delineated in Nonconformance Identification Rept 022 Re Workprints & Drawings

ML20090J251
Person / Time
Site:	Midland
Issue date:	05/04/1984
From:	Quamme D CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
To:	Karr J STONE & WEBSTER, INC.
References
27883, CSM-0768, CSM-768, LWW-11-84, NUDOCS 8405220404
Download: ML20090J251 (11)

Text

Pj " '

/*

T M h CollSum8IS

,.@O) D POWBf

./

NOlPAL STAFF

{,i N

5p C=

Midland Project: Po Box 1963, Midtend, MI 48640 e (517) 631-8650

((-

'b

[

n May 4, 1984 jp;g scS_ j MA f/ b Mr J E Karr Stone and Webster Michigan, Inc P O Box 1963 Midland, MI 48640 MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER PROJECT - GWO7020 STONE AND WEBSTER CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW NONCONFORMANCE IDENTIFICATION REPORT NUMBER 022 DA'TED 03-23-84 FILE 24.2 S,ERIAL 27883 CSM-0768 LWW-11-84 In pursuance of Nonconformance Identification Report number 022, a response is attached to address your concerns delineated in your Nonconformance Iden-tification Report Form.

Should you or your staff have any questions on the content, contact Lonnie Worley at extension 7707.

' 4241 pC v

D L Quamme Site Manager CC DDJohnson, MEC BHPeck, MEC NIReichel, MEC TASpellman, MEC JBKeppler, Regional Administrator, Region III JJHarrison, Chief, Midland Section, Region III BBurgess, NRC Resident Insepetor RAWells, MEC fb 8405220404 840504

.N N 1 S. @ M PDR ADOCK 05000329 S

PDR

• (

I Serial 27883' 2

2-i, Response to' Nonconformance Identification Report 022 dated 03-23-84.

Workprint 219 is located with team 19.

Discribution is done by Document Control and maintenance of the station is the responsibility of the team receiving the documents. This workprint station will be transferred to.a controlled document L

station under the responsibility of. Document Control for maintenance as well as

. distribution. All workprints audited were new workprints.

(either distributed j

after the stop work order or reviewed in the conversion / verification process).

This program-is in line with our corrective action plan submitted in response

~ to MCARR-DAT-1. QAR number RA-00157 dated 03-28-84 was written in response to.

Nonconformance Identification Report number 022 and closed on 05-02-84.

The following items address each of the concerns identified:

Documents were found to.be missing at the workprint station.

3 1.

Finding 1.

Replacement copy has been attached.

2.

Findings 2, 9, 16, 17.

In all. cases, the distribution had been made from

]

Document Control and the distribution date was noted on the register.

The i

changes had not been posted by the personnel at the workprint station. No unreasonable time delays were found.

A procedure to clarify posting require-i ments (FPD-1.000) was issued on March 23, 1984. These findings would all i

be in compliance with the new procedural requirements of FPD-1.000 which i

requires posting be completed within three working days of the distribution date. Construction assistants were reminded that changes must be completed l~

in three working days per new procedural' requirements (FPD-1.000).

change 8hd'T 3

Findings 6, 7, 12, 13 The rht,x paper had been' removed from the document but had not been crossed off the front of the drawing or change paper had not been removed or converted.- Discrepancies listed have been corrected.

I These workprints were reviewed in the conversion / verification program and workprint station personnel ~were notified of the need to review workprint-

, fgyfg for procedural compliance. . - t r- "7 f 4. Findings 4, 8, 18. Workprint station logs did not accurately reflect in-i formation on hard copy either through omission, miscopying or adding ex-l traneous 'information. - Workprint maintenance requirements were reviewed-with construction personnel responsible for maintaining workprints. 5. Findings 3, 5. Drawing M-652-1-H130-FRL-1 was incorporated and was not 1 listed on the-front of the drawing as indicated on the Audit Report.. { Drawing M-18-370 - alpha and numeric pages do add up to 1064. This number. ~ .is a total page count used for microfilming. 6. Finding 11 indicated the drawing revision to be revision 7'however,~a re - view of the drawing indicated a revision 8 (not-very legible) in the re- ) vision block and a revision 8 in,the description block (also not too. legible,).., This drawing was returned.to.the vendor for. correction.. e 4 4 - - ~,, ,m = .-_,.---,-.____-___------_..-.____.___._.__.---_---------.--_------,_---_---.---__-___-.---,----------.__-------__-------.u-----,_._a. --u--..-..' -A

.Seria'l 27883-- 3 Drawings were replaced. Workprint personnel were 7. Findings 19, 20. reminded of the need to check drawing legibility. 5/4/84 b F I 't -i .I'i 8 .l 1 ^ l 1

m m & % K S' Q $ a

,, y a av

6. QAR Number

,, j( j,, y RA-00157 @ Consumers M ID D PROJECT

7. Date issued

8. Rension j

GUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT Power 3/28/84 0 1 Company QUALITY ACTION REQUEST 9. Page 1 of 3

10. ASME Related

1. Requirement Yes No FPG 7.300 Rev 4 FPD 3.000 Rev 11 FPD 1.000 Rev 19 Stone and Webster NIR-022 identifies the following deficiencies during a CIO

2. Deficiency evaluation of work print station 219:

1. Attachments referenced on work prints not attached.

2. Drawing stamp errors have been identified.

j

3. Station log errors have been identified.

i 11. Potental 50.55(e) Yes No

4. Discipline / Division /Secten

5. Response Due Date

12. Date Reported to MPQA Mgr

3. QAR Onginatest by 4 A!MItYMb PAP - Tech Services 4/05/84 N/A

13. Action item No.

15. Item Priority

17. S/U Code

19. Action Organization

20. QAR Revimed by SO 5723 5

PGM00 Bechtel Field

21. Date

14. Discipline

16. Trend Code

18. Resb Code cuent Conkol 3 - gg. g4 N/A E-5-0001 BCPCO - STF-G

23. Proposed Corrective Action

22. Cause dd hNOE b

[. N L 5 EE ATTFC H E.D C 's E n-

25. Proposed Completion Date

24. Responsible Organizat on/ Person

&l-d - W 4 '? D cw 4/s/m en WO sb c#@

26. Disposition Concurrence QAR Revievver Date

.PQAE (ASME Onivl Date

27. Disposition Action Taken

,5 E M77DCED dHL CTL . b. u+

29. QAR Closed by

28. Method of D'sposition Verification SEE ATTACHED foe CLOS uR E Od.5T\\FtC.AT100.

g gg MPQAD date uA Fw s/Wr4 F FOCE (ASME Onlyl' Date kAcceptade superceding QAR Unseceptable M-4/1 A (Rev 1

ST0riE AIO : EESTER EtlGINEERING.CCR? ORATION i;0NC0f;FOR".Af;CE IDEf!TIFICAT' ION: REPORT DATE OF t;0NCONFORMANCE:2i-23-81 t!IR NUMBER O22 IDENTIFICATION / LOCATION OF ITEMS: < WORK PRINT STRTION 2I9 DESCRIPiloN OF NONCONFORMAici: DURIN& THE ONGOIN&. EYRLUR770N OF 5/TEDMUMENi' CONTELZ s CTO PERFCEMED R SRMPLEJNJPEO7@/ DF DOCUNENT.S CONTR/NED RT Wai?M PKINT~ 57'RT/DN 2I9. 7'NE PDPDLR770N WR.S DETZKM/NED 70HE 4I/6. PER 9.5/.5 CWITER/R,R SRMPLF OF 20 DOCUMENTS WFTE FRNDDMLY SELECTER 77/E SBNFLE WRS DETERN//YED '7D BERCLEPl11RE V/ TH / FFJECT RND. 2?'EJTCTR&E V/TH E RE'IECTS. 5.t: 20 D M U N E N t.5 ldET'E FalNO 70 BE' b/SCWEPRNT.CEE' Hi i RCHED S/fte / FO7 SPECIF/C DE7B/LS. [8 PROGRAM MGR /[ f '<ihisiATOR / m_, / p i 0 ATE 3lE3/8</ DATE 3 B&/ 't { CORRECTIVE ACTION BY: l IDENTIFY ORGANIZATION TAKING CORRECTIVE ACTION I'!ERIFICATION SAT UNSAT NEW tilR# CONCURRENCE INITIATOR PROGRAM MGR C*TE DATE D*TE =mRa 6 . - - _ ~... _,

. Response to NIR 022, dated March 23, 1984, QAR RA-00157, dated March 28, 1984

Subject:

Workprint Station 219 Workprint station 219 is located with team 19. Distribution is done by Workprint station 219 is located with team 19. document control and maintenance of the station is the responsibility of the This workprint station will be transferred to e team receiving the documents. controlled document station in 4-6 weeks and placed under the responsibility All workprints of document control for maintenance as well as distribution. (Either distributed after the stop work order or audited were new workprints. reviewed in the conversion / verification process). This program is inline with our corrective action plan submitted in response to MCARR-DAT-1. The For ease of reading, the findings have been grouped by subject. Note: letter identification noted on the NIR has been retained for cross-referencing. 1. In-Process Work Activities (Findings 2, 9, 16, 17) In all cases, distribution had been made from document control and the distribution date was noted on the register. The changes had not been No unreasonable time i posted by the personnel at the workprint station. delays were found. A procedure to clarify posting requirements (FPD-1.000) was issued on March 23, 1984. These findings would all be in compliance with the new procedural requirements of FPD-1.000 which requires posting be completed within three working days of the distribution date. Construction assistants will be reminded that changes must be completed in three working days per new procedural requirements (FPD-1.000). Update of Workstation Logs to Reflect Conversion (Findings 5,10,14) 2. Workprint station logs were not updated to reflect workprints that had been converted / verified. Personnel will be reminded of the need to update logs. Workprint station logs / cards will be standardized when the maintenance of stations is transferred to document control. Until this conversion is complete, workprint maintenance requirements will be reviewed with team personnel for maintainiing workprints by April 6, 1984. j 3. Converstion/ Verification Errors (Findings 6, 7, 12, 13) The change paper had been removed from the document but had not been 1 crossed off the front of the drawing or change paper had not been removed - or converted. These workprints were reviewed in the conversion / verification program. Workprint station personnel will be notified of the need to review workprints for procedural compliance by April 6, 1984. e 0 4

Pags 2 4 Clerical Errors in Station Logs (Findings 4, 8, 18) Workprint station logs did not accurately. reflect information on hard copy either through omission, miscopying or adding extraneous information. Workprint maintenance requirements will be reviewed with construction personnel responsible for maintaining workprints by April 6, 1984. 5. Auditor Misinterprestations (Findings 3, 15) Drawing M652-1-H130-FR1 1 was incorporated and was not listed on the front of the drawing as indicated on the audit report. Drawing M18-370 -Alpha + numberic pages do add up to 1064. This number is a total page count used for microfilming. 6. Missing Documents (Findings 1, 11) Documents were found to be missing at the workprint station. Replacement copies have been ordered. 7. Legibility (Findings 19, 20) Drawings will be replaced. Workprint personnel will be reminded of the need to check drawing legibility by April 6, 1984. I t s iv., ^ N~ h ). ; 032821T4

/CAAb.022 A?7 PEA %/& W )*Tp/ m 'd ti

k..

E4 ~ h ] b. l s a s t $1 4 k T 2 - Q $ 3 b b ( ~ b b M E N W s e s s q s k O 1 t a a n W n'- p c m 1 i 1 cs =:: 3 1 h g$ L 4 4 N N o @ NG a. 4 't BL =R ~ t i kh 4 44 4 4 4 $ 4 $4 A S T 4 b Q th n te v l b b h h h k h h h k '^ g = k $ Q Q d @ Q 'b k N Q Ii k k'l NN I 3 u n 'O m e u b:: o R 1- ~ eo e e e e E,t gg28 m tD t 2,? m m s . ~ a a ema s ': R= s g tg ;e 3 'c 3 A R nc t s e a i @m ? I w3 4 ) ,ve L 1 ' 8 s; E S dM 9E E s li E $ i W % $Ek j@fvc ~4 do og m o r r o o

1. m i mm i>j, si Nm hig ep o&

w vooO! tu o I$c. u e ~ ~ ~ hk. k k h' W N' o q % E I?

t

?s mym

d;S T

Y995 E s i, s m ow.t I I 4 i= 6?A44 gn;5TT5i4 4s 2 m@D@ m,hfn 795 Q

To LhMorley Fnow DRRainey gggg Darc May 2, 1984 POW 8r company suestcT MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER PROJECT - QAR RA-00157 g,,,, FILE 17.0 SERIAL 27879 co==cs c~oc~cc cc Lhv 9-84 A. review of the discrepancies listed indicated all of the items were corrected. This review however; indicated that two of those listed were not a Station 219 problem. Item 11 indicated the drawing revision to be revision 7 however, a review of the drawing indicated a revision 8 (not very legible) in the revision block and a revision 8 in the revision discription block (also not too legible). This drawing was returned to the vendor for correction. Item 15 verified that document M18-370 did in fact contain the 1064 pages indicated on the front. Some of the pages were numbered A, B, C, etc. and some preliminary pages were not counted in the page count. All other items were corrected. I recommend closure of QAR RA-00157. i 4

d.: ' STONE AND MEESTER ENGINEERING.CORFORATION NONCONFORI%!CE IDENTIFICAT'10N: REPORT l DATE OF NONCONFORMANCE:3-2.3 81 N1R NUMBER CJ2 IDENTIFICATION / LOCATION OF ITEM 5: \\ WORK PRINT 3TRTIDN 219 l OESCRIPTION OF NONCONTOR.'AtCE: pgjgjyg 7,jf gyggjpg poggggy,gg py l 5/TEDTUNENT CONTElZ.., C70 P/RF0FMEP R SRMPLE/NJPECRW l DF DOCUMENTS CONTR/MED RT WDRM PKlWT.' STRT/D.W El9. 1 THE PDPL/LR7~/DV WRS DETfFMINED 70BE' 4//4. M771.5/.5 CKITENIAR SRMPLl'0F B0 DOCUMENTS WEEE RRNDDMLY SElEc. ItLL 7'ME.SRMPLE WRS De itxM//YED 7D BFRClePurHE \\ V/7H /KF 7ECT RND. TEJTCTR&F V/TH E RE'.IECT3. S&iF I l'O DMUNENTS IdETE FOINO 70 BE~ b/SCFEPRNT SJT i 17TTRC//ED St/EET FLW SPECIF/C Ef7M/LS. [ 1 [f PRO P W MGR / / d m Ah1 TJAivk/ / p DATE 3/E3/84/ UATE J ' - 8W i CORRECTIVE ACTION BY: ICENTIFY ORGANIZATION TAKING CORRECTIVE ACTION 4 l 1 1 l S. o i M j ! VERIFICATION SAT UNSAT neb' NIR# CONCURRENCE f 1:,:::;~;R .U ::.;. M3R TE CAIE

A DATE L

y m aanen e~ingswr zwvv _W 25 k Q dnAMM 44 th h R 4 4 H R \\ k D 4 M' uk b b (4 2 1)2 L M m y c q c s s r j h.-4 lt y c t g th S y R NN 1 9 .m W = D M k N = i \\ b I N o 6 9 0 a k QQ 4 E 4k $4 t 44 R 4 4 4 E R A q 8 4 't! E f f f% 2 &4 4 44 ESb 4 3 h g $JA 4 4 udf4 4 44 i d @S N i1 fv0$ t e 4 EUt g W 6 C' y 2 00 h tp m @ *2 g i n s o b $ k I O, h b E ' $$k =* k{ I I i 3 5s o ',8s E S NM e E.E M E !$ t W %. g a a L ~ + e ius e 2 e k ~ C md Cd b t u og i u r s o r o s.a m o m te w I k y esi op n &h v o ooi N N mh .s y cc s L e 9 1A s k L.,.e'.$ .s -Q t, $.. it (" tO 14 s s. ,s s. s. ~ c' s 7 '4 4 D 7 -4. n, N. I.,. N 4. '. at kg E7. 4 0 o D $h i i - h m r' t 1 _, _ L u. mm acu e A o ~ m x m w 2 L t}}