ML20088A519
| ML20088A519 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 01/31/1984 |
| From: | BECHTEL GROUP, INC. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20088A518 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8404120151 | |
| Download: ML20088A519 (174) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:.__ - UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY CALLAWAY PLA:NT U:NTT 1 I PRIMARY REACTOR CO:NTAINMENT STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST i
/
Final Report ! January 1984 O Bechtel Power Corporation hD kbOC 00093PDR A
.- . . . . _ ~ _ - . _ - - . . - - . . . . - - . _ . - - . _ . _ _ . - . - - _ _ . _ - , , _ _ . . . _ _
4i -.r i 4' 4 i-i l' 1 4. 1, : UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY d-l CALLAWAY PLANT UNIT 1 ' i -
- i. .
1 t 1 1 ! +
- \
j- i i !
- i I .
i
!. l i i t
1-i 1 PRIMARY REACTOR CONTAI! MENT 1 I STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST
- i. Jatuary 1984 t
- . FINAL REPORT !
i( i ! t ! I i i ; I F i r 1, L y i-
- - 1 i
i i-Prepared by l Bechtel Power Corporation ? San Francisco, CA ! t ! L 3 l i i
- t. SU-039 i i f- ,
r , l, i f i
, ~ . - , . ~ ,__ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _
TABLE OF CONTENT _S_ I Section Page
- 1. INTRODUCTION 1-1
- 2. SLWMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 2-1
- 3. CONTAI! MENT STRUCTURE AND PRESSURIZATION 3-1
- 4. TEST PLAN AND PROCEDURES 4-1 4.1 Deformation Measurements 4-1 4.2 Concrete Surface Surveillance 4-2 4.3 Data Acquisition 4-2
- 5. TEST RESULTS 5-1 5.1 Containment Deformations 5-1 5.2 Concrete Surface Surveillance 5-1 5.3 Estimated Accuracy of Measurement 5.-l
- 6. REFERENCES 6-1 Appendix A. Plot s of Deflection Data for Extensometers .
B. Summary Data O SU-039 ii
LIST OF FIGURES Figure 3.1 Containment Structura Cycle 4.1- Taut Wire Extensometer Locations - Wall Radial and Vertical Units 4.2 Taut Wire Extensometer Locations - Wall Radial Units 4.3 - Taut Wire Extensometer Locations - Equipment Opening Units 4.4 Schematic Representation of Taut Wire Extensometer 4.5 Concrete Surf ace Surveillance Areas 5.1 Containment Deformations at 69 psig - Wall and Dome 5.2 Equipment Hatch Peak Pressure Radial Deflections 5.3 Concrete Crack Maping Data - Areas 1 & 2 5.4 Concrete Crack Mapping Data - Area 4 5.5 Concrete Crack Mapping Data - Areas 5 & 7 5.6 Concrete Crack Mapping Area Specimen Data Sheet
.C k
SU-039 111
f
- 1. INTRODUCTION
. The 'Callaway Plant Contaiment Structural Integrity Test was conducted in conjunction with the ?reoperational Integrated Leakage Rate Test from January 4,1984 through January 8,1984. The primary purpose of the Structural Integrity Test was to verify the design and structural integrity of the contaiment to withstand postulated pressure loads l
~ (in conformance 'with Reference 6.1) by imposing an internal pressure ;
of - 115% of design pressure for a period of not. less than two hours. ! To accomplish the intended test purpose, specialized measuring devices (extensometers spring-loaded: LVDTs) were employed in the containment structure to provide the necessary deflection data needed to evaluate ; structural response during containment pressurization, at peak pressure and depressurization. The test was conducted in accordance with site procedure CS-030003-detailing test requirements and instructions for . [ acquiring test data (Reference 6.2). The test procedure incorporated the commitments contained in the Final Safety Analysis Report (Reference 6.3) and conformed to the guidelines set forth in the NRC-approved Bechtel Topical Report BC-TOP-5A (Reference 6.5). f O .e ; i t l t i l [ SU-039 3_3 J
. - . . - - . _ - . . - , _ . , _ . - - . _ _ , . . _ . _ _ . . _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ - _ . _ . _ . - . . _ . - _ . . ~ .
v _- . . _ _-
\ t 2.: .
SUMMARY
ANDCONbNSIONS
' 'n.- T ,
The structural integrity _ test consisted of (1) proof of containment ability to withstand 115? of design pressure and (2) measurement of structural . response to changes in containcmnt internal pressure. ' Test measurements / included gross structurt.1 deformation s'nd concrete .. crack growth. Measurement points were locat'ed along a sample of s'
, typical sections of the containment structure, at thickened sections,
- and at discontinuities. Test measurements were recorded at specified s stages during the pressurization cycle. ~ N t
\_
'N. c '
, h The containment struct3re withstood the test pressure of 69 psig with no indications of strdetural. overloading. MeasuEcd values of'deforma'- -
- tion and concrete crickggrowth were within design allowable values. ,
s 1 The exterior and interior visual examinations verified that the con- s L tainment concrete'and ' liner sqrf aces were in sound condition both be- N fore and s!ter' pressurization. % 1 g
\
e d , 4 All deformations atQ9 psig were less than the values predicted for maximum test predaoya. Vadial movements of the ,contcinment shell i varied between the monitored azimuths at each elevation; however, the , _ , , net diametral growth across the three instrumented disseters' was consistent at all elevations and is both linear with irressure and reasonably close to expected values. s The variati0nd, in kaatal s
- displacement with azimuth'are attributed to (1) slight r'otption of
- the interior structure which is used as a frame of reference,,for radial measurements, (2) the normal tendency'of the sivle cur,vature s
[; bG cylindrical surface off the shel] to "roundout" under ' internal ' pressure, (3) the stiffening ef fect -of the buttresses,;and/or (4) variations' due to openings in' the containment wall. < { c 4 y i
, 1 : 9 .
[ ' Measurements cf the vertical movement.of the dose irerb two-thirds ofl he t predicted value ,at peak test pressure. esthan'/
~
l g .) ,
- l The measured radial deflections at peak test pressure, including
(
.those at the full diametral locations, averaged 40% of the max.imum N ,,
predicted values., "'he radial evements around the equipment hif tsh [" s O behaved linearly wibh , increasing pressure and were in the elst, tic
- region, as expected.
( , !. Surf ace cracks exceeding the threshold of the recordable width of 0.010 .' inches were found in five 'of the seven crack mapping areas. Meas urable , l crack growth.during contaitunent pressurization was noted in grid areas s l 1 and 4. It all cases, cracks did not exceed maximum allowable width , s growth of 0.060 inches. Of particular note are grid areas 3 and 6 1 ( which contained no observable cracks.
, s Overall, .the results of the structural integrity test provide % rect 'g i experimental evidence that the containment structure can withstand the design internal pressure with a sufficient margin of safety and that
. the gross response to pressure is within allowable limits.
t
\
[ t
! 'Q ,
y SU-039 , 2-1 t s'% j
-.,-,s. .
- 3. CONTAINMENT STRUCTURE AND PRESSURIZATION
/O
( ,) The containment is a post-tensioned, reinforced concrete structure designed to contain any accidental release of radioactivity from the reactor coolant system as defined in the Final Safety Analysis Report (Reference 6.3). The containment is designed for an internal accident pressure of 60 psig. The structure consists of a cylindrical wall and hemispherical dome connected to and supported by a massive reinforced concrete base slab. The cylin der wall and dome thickness is increased at three equally spaced locations to form vertical buttresses for end anchorage of the pres tressing tendons. Reinforced openings in the cylinder wall are provided for equipment and personnel access as well as for electrical and mechanical system penetration. The structure is post-tensioned by two groups of stranded tendons. The circumferential group, which consists of horizontal tendons anchored at buttresses 240* apart, prestresses the wall and lower half of the dome in the hoop direction. The vertical group, which consistu of inverced U tendons anchored in the tendon access gallery, prestresses the wall and dome in the vertical direction. The entire interior surf ace of the structure is lined with 1/4 inch thick welded steel plate which serves as a leak tight membrane. Principal dimensions of the containment structure are: 1 7-s Inside Diameter 140 f t ,
' N') Inside Height of Cylinder 140 ft Curved Dome Height (insice) 205'-0" Vertical Wall Thickness 4'-0" nominal Dome Thickness Tapering from 4'-0" at Springline to 3'-2" at Apex Foundation Slab Thickness 10'-0" The containment structure was pressurized pneumatically to verify the required structural integrity and to measure overall leakage. The pressure cycle is shown in Figure 3-1. The test pressure of 69 psig, equal to 1.15 times design pressure (Reference 6.3), was specified to ensure that the test loading includes sufficient margin. Tes t pres-sure was held for a period of two hours to record structural response data. Additional holds were included in the cycle to pennit constant-pressure data acquisition at a 40 psig hold point for stage 2 crack map ping. The hold point at 48.25 psig during depressurization was required to test containment cooling fans.
l3 (a/ SU-039 3-1 e
,_ _ _ _ . , ,m--__.-.. - - . _ - - - . . - . , , . . - ,
/
1 t i Stage 3 ' Crack Mapping & ' NCR Inspection 69 '
' - - - - - - - - - - - 07 M' 0905 60 <
J 50' Hold F'r o Testing CTMT Fan Coolers e e 13.59 1606
- Stage 2 m Crack 40 "- " 2335 EE'"" --
0115 O w M O m m w
" 30-20 10 Stage 1 Crack Mapping Stage 4 1615 Crack Mapping 0
Start 8 Pressurization 0945 Jan 4 Jan 5 Jan 6 DATE (1984) ks FIGURE 3.1 SIT PRESSURIZATTON CYCLE
4 4 i o 4 . TEST PLAN AND PROCEDURES To accomplish the objectives of the structural integrity test the i- containment was pressurized to 1.15 times design pressure for two hours and then depressurized to atmospheric pressure. Pres suriza tion i to 1.15 times design pressure was specified to demonstrate that the 4 containment has a margin of safety with respect to internal pressure loading. Containment response to internal pressure was measured in order to verify that the analytical technique used in the design could accurately define the behavior of the structural elements. < The structural response measurements consisted of gross structural
' deformation and concrete surface crack growth.
4.1 ' DEPORMATION MEASURl!MENTS Gross structural deformations. vere measured using taut wire extenso-meters which spanned between points on the containment wall, dome and springline, and fixed points within the structure. Radial and vertical movements of the containment shell were measured at the
. points shown in Figures 4.1 through 4.3. The indicated points are on b.
~ regular areas of the containment shell as well as on the discontinuity regions represented by buttresses and the equipment opening. Movements were measured by taut wire extensometers attached to one point on the shell and spanning to an opposing point on the shell or to a point on the interior structure.
t The extensometers, illustrated in Figure 4-4, consist of displacement transducer assemblies and low thermal expansion alloy (invar) taut i wi res . A movement between opposing points on the containment shell or between a point on the containment shell and a fixed reference struc-l ture results in an equal evement between the core and body of the linear variable differential transformer (LVDT) which is housed in the transducer assembly. The LVDT output is a voltage which is proportional to the position of the core within the body. The spring in the trans-ducer assembly maintains a nominal 20 lb tension on the wire to reduce sag and eliminate slack at threaded -and swivel connections. . . Each extensometer is calibrated to establish its displacement-versus-voltage characteristics and spring constant (nominally 2 lb/in.). The spring constant is used to correct for the small changes -in wire length which result from transducer displacement. The transducers were calibrated prior to shipment to Callaway. Spot field calibration
. checks were also conducted to ensure that no damage was incurred during . handling .
The transducer's swivels and opposing taut wire ends were secured to L fittings which were affixed to the containment liner and internal s tructures .- Following initial attachment, the transducers were aligned 4 s ,f
),
SU-039 41 4 .u . . . , , . . _ . _ _ _ .._-...-m. _._ . _ -. _ ,_,_ w. __ _-_ , _ _ _ _ . . . ~ - . . _ _ _ - , _ . _ _ ,
with the wires to eliminate LVDT core side loading and the core posi-tions were adjusted to provide the desired travel. The extensometers were adjusted just prior to pressurization so that actuator motion was initiated in the direction of expected displacement. Thus, all extensometers were expected to respond to the initial in-crease in pressure at the start of the test. The LVDTs were wired to excitation power supplies and a scanning data acquisition system (DAS) which converted LVDT output voltage to a digital format for register display, printed record, and direct entry into the site computer. These data were then manually input into a microcomputer for analysis. The computer _was programmed with extenso-meter calibration and temperature constants and a routine which converted raw voltage data into displacement units. Displacement values printed by the computer are corrected for taut wire / spring interaction and for wire angle relative to the specified direction (radial or. vertical) of measurement. Containment gage pressure was measured by a calibrated (+ 0.1 psig) dial gage. In-containment temperature and humidity were recorded by the integrated leakage rate test data acquisition equipment. Out side ambient conditions were measured using conventional weather instru-mentation. 4.2 CONCRETE SURFACE SURVEILIANCE Seven concrete surf ace areas.were monitored as shown on Figure 4.5. Each area covered 40 or more square feet and was divided into nominally one foot squares by stapped-on chalk lines. Each observed crack was measured using an optical magnifier with an etched scale in the optical
. sy s tem . Cracks which were 0.01 inches or more in width were detailed
_on data sheet s. i 4.3 DATA ACQUISITION During the structural integrity test the deformation data were recorded at 5 psig pressure increments and decrement s, at the beginning and end of all constant pressure holds, and at regular intervals during extended holds. At each data acquisition point all _ voltages were recorded 10 times in rapid succession to provide a basis for identifying spuriou s values caused by electrical transients. Only the first of the 10 records was manually entered into the microcomputer for analysis. Concrete surface crack inspections were performed prior to the start of pressurization,'at 40 psig during initial pressurization, at peak test pressure, and following the completion of final blowdown. A SU-039 4-2
D N E o R 0 E C D
- U N O :
D E S N D D AR EA
/ N E
T D S N 5 ~ _ G E N O T S L GO I T N I F L A U C O L S L A I T C
'5 N R I O
/ 1 0 EM E
1 E T
. T R ? 9 t 5 n -
- i 0 2 C A
4 E E V 2 R 2 9 . M R L L E O E P R S D S N
~ . I U N
@D G E A I T N L F X L A
L AI E A I P D D
- , A E R R A I R A W L 4 T L U A f A W T
o 0 8 1 O
'o C 8 V L 6
V
~
5 S V T N E
) M E
C 4 A N L V i ut n ; qT [0 P S 3 o C I V E D S L A l r , C I T 2 R V E V
~
I V 7 3 V , J " 0 I 9 O
- me_
o V c4
+
'o ~o O
- 2 / ,
5 M = c e
~~
Wa E 3 e mm
%h E C
H O z b W < g U C M Uo H j E5 o E E g
- 25e z
J L e m 5 5 O E.p8 i s, e o m !x e! m m a-
. m H
3 N b i w o O \ ~ o x ~ v O 5 i C O '" o A
@ W c
- A :
1 'r) -b % e , 1 1
O O O ! C E7 EI~ 2081 '-6"; gCN E8 EL. 2074 ' i C .
) 9' C E9 EL. 2067 '-6". ggg o
n OPENING ,0PENING HEL.2056'-6" t Y
@l28 EL.2045'-
C 'll EL.2039' , 1 50 2 I44 Sg, C El 2 EL. 2031 '-6", VERTICAL SECTION @ EQUIPMENT OPENING SECTIONAL PLAN @ EQUIPMENT OPENING EL.2056'-6" AZ. 128 FIGURE 4.3 TAUT WIRE EXTENSOMETER LOCATIONS
, EQUIPMENT OPENING UNITS
-~, '
['~';
) sf LVDT SPRING BODY CORE FRAME
[r' 'y ,7 j j ~r CLEVIS PIN jk.- 3.__ _J-I 7. L f ' EVE LOCKING NUT
\
..)
, 2 (3 / /
g.'
-m c- ,IE]L, 4 gw#a,wrm momimawingra tha rm=
Edlf i J IM AW"
- j'~ % I- f;- - I l' '
\
INVAR WIRE (0.05 IN DIAM) (6t ' # 4q) J JJ wTTs i f ' UUU j ( .
'~
ELECTRICAL CONNE Cil0N BLOCK
---E )
-"" e s -' -
FIGURE 4.4 SCHEMATIC REPRESENTATION OF A TAUT WIRE EXTENSOMETER
r%
,O A ~} U AREA 7 7 'x2 ' gg E L,218E'
, __-_ _ ~ _ - -
% e- ~ '
195 8 t n AREA 5 mmAREA 3 N SPRING LINE l " 4 ' x 10 ' " 7 'x7 ' -E L 2135' I ' AREA 2 ' 7'x78,g EL2070- EA 6 AREA 4 ARx}ge 7 qp_ ,4'x10',__E L 2070' EL2056' 6" t AREA 1 i '* ' ER _EL 2000" O' 281' 8 221 161' 120' 100' 41' 0 8 DEVELOPED ELEVATION OF CONTAINMENT i FIGURE 4.5 CONCRETE SURFACE SURVEILLANCE AREAS
- 5. TEST RESULTS 5.1 CONTAINMENT DEFORMATIONS Containment displacements were recorded at the times and pressures listed in Table 5.1. The variation of deformation is illustrated in time-versus-deflection plots in Appendix A, and all recorded displace-ment data sheets are located in Appendix B.
Table 5.2 lists the maximum individual radial movements of the con-tainment at peak test pressure (69 psig). The table also lists the average radial movements measured at each elevation (2015, 2069, 2100, and 2140). Individual and average vertical movement data are listed in Table 5.3. Figure 5-1 shows wall and dome deflection measurement and Figure 5-2 shows radial deflection measurements near the equipment hatch at peak press ure. In the horizontal and vertical plane of the equipment hatch area, the deflections are greatest nearest the tangent point of the hatch (E3, E4, E9, and E10) as expected with a flat plane in a cylinde r wall. The deflections decreased as the diatance from the hatch center increased. , Careful review of Appendix A reveals that the sensors responded to
. containment pressure in a linear fashion. This close linear correlation between pressure and deflection supports the conclusion that the
{s",'s) containment has exhibited proper responce and also meets the criteria of Reference 6.4. Sensors R-17, V-8, and E-8 exhibited normal displacement up to test
. presure but did not recover normally. Post-test inspection revealed that those sensors had moved out of proper alignment, causing excessive friction on the LVDT shaf t bearings, and therefore , resisted axial movement corresponding to the proper displacement.
5.2 WNCRETE SURFACE SURVEILLANCE The designated areas (Figure 4.5) on the exterior surf ace of the _ con-tainment were examined for cracks during the test. These stages of examination were conducted prior to pressurization, at 40 psig during pressurization, at 69 psig, and following the completion of depres-suriza tion. Figures 5.3 through 5.6 illustrate all cracks observed in the surveillance areas that measured 0.01 inches (0.25mm) or greater and indicate crack growth during pressurization. Out of 7 surveillance areas, area 3 has no crack observed and area 6 had only one minor crack observed. Therefore, these two data sheets are not included in this report. - Figure 5.6 is a specimen sheet which explains the format used to present the surf ace crack data. All crack patterna observed during the test are typical for a reinforced concrete containment.
.(~N t, /
SU-039 5-1
5.3 ESTIMATED ACCURACY OF MEASUREMENT O, O The accuracy of measurement is based on the following items: o Calibration of instrumentation o Laboratory testing as in the case of invar wire o Human factors , i.e. , judgment of the reader Displacements of the containment structure were measured using taut wire extensometers. Accuracy of the extensometer is 10.002 inches as long as wire tension remains constant. When the direction of movement changes, extensometer response can lag due to friction and hysteresis in the mechanism. Typical lag is 0.02 inches for a 100-foot long wire. The crack patterns were measured using optical comparators calibrated to measure crack width of 0.1mm and wider. Since most cracks observed
-on the containment were irregular traces on coarse textured concrete surfaces, it was not generally possible to estimate true crack width to better' than approximately 0.lmm. For this reason, reported crack widths are considered to be accurate to within 10.1mm.
v j ~
) f v
SU-039 5-2
Table 5.1 TIMES, DATES, AND PRESSURES FOR TEST MEASUREMENTS
.0- ( _ Year - 1984)
PRESSURE TIME. DATE (psig) 16 15 1/4 .00 1711 1/4 5.00 1800 1/4 10.0 0 1902 1/4 15.00 19 58 1/4 20.00 2051 1/4 25.00 2145 1/4 30.70 2240 1/4 35.00 2335 1/4 40.00 0115 1/5 40.00 0 214 1/5 45.00 0312 1/5 50.00 0411 1/ 5 55.00 0510 1/5 60.00 0612 1/ 5 65.00 0705 1/5 69.00 0905 1/5 69.00 104 2 1/5 65.00 1143 1/5 60.00 1242 - 1/5 55.00 1337 1/ 5 - 50.00 1359 1/5 48.25 1006 1/ 5 48.25 1704 1/5 45.00 1801 1/5 40.00 1905 1/5 35.00 2004 1/5 30.00 2115 1/5 25.00 2235 1/5 20.0 0 0009 1/6 15.00 0205 1/6 10.0 0 0445 1/6 5.00
-0945 1/6 0.00 J '
' SU-039 5-3
Table 5.2
/
SUMMARY
OF RADIAL DEFLECTIONS AT 69 psig Maximum Predicted Radial Deflection = 0.2 inches Elevation Azimuth Ave rage l (ft) 30*/210' 90*/270* 150*/330* (in.) l Reading (in.) 2140 .140* .108* .171* .070 2100 .233* .193* .228* .109 2069 0.093 0.219 .113 .147 .122 .136 .1 38 2015 0.0 48 0.75 .084 .059 .057 .088 .069
- Diametric measurements.
Table 5.3
SUMMARY
OF VERTICAL DEFLECTIONS AT 69 psig Maximum Predicted Vertical Deflection = 0.250 inches l l Distance from Dome Center (ft.)l Reading (in.) l Average (in.) l l l O'-6" V3 = 0.211, V4 = 0.211 .211 l 28'-0" V2 = 0.195, V5 = 0.177 .186 56'-0" Vi = 0.19 9, V6 = 0.17 8 .188 l 69'-0" V8 = 0.054, V7 = 0.061 .058 1 SU-039 5-4
(~g
\ j PREDICTED DOME VERTICAL MOVEMENT RELATIVE TO RIGID BASE MAT
__ (CURVE APPROXIMATE EXCEPT AT ME ASUREMENT POINTS) O g o \
\ AVERAGE OF MEASURED DOME VERTICAL
\ 3 MOVEMENTS REL ATIVE TO TOP OF STEAM GENERATOR SHIELD WALL CONTAINMENT (
E
, 2 8'- 6 , \
, 56' c
UNDEFORMED MIDDLE SURFACE OF CONCRETE AVERAGE OF MEASURED W4LL RADIAL MOVEMENTS AT INDICATED ELEVATION SPRINGLINE EL.2135' - O k v
\
{ PREDICTED WALL RADIAL l MOVEMENT RELATIVE TO 2100, UNDEFORMED MIDDLE g . - SURFACE (CURVE I APPROXIMATE EXCEPT AT MEASUREMENT POINTS) EL.20$9' , 4 o .1 .2 .3 .4 I 1 SCALE : INCHES / EL. 2015' , ,! i ! s. g ' FIGURE 5.1 (] CONTAINMENT DEFORMATIONS AT 69 PSIG - WALL & DOME l
E70 .233 O E8o .272 1 E9o.295
.,148 .20,8 .27[ EL.2056'-6" 2 304 .212 . 106
'El E 2' E3' 'E4 E5' E6 1
- E10 >.307
-L NOTE: View from inside of containment. Units in inches.
Elle.255 E124.215 b Equipment Hatch Azimuth 128 FIGURE 5.2 L EQUIPMENT HATCH PEAK PRESSURE RADIAL DEFLECTIONS c i b *
-~ , - - . - . , ~ , , , , , , ,.-.e,,.,- ,-e,. ,,.,-,,..,n ,-,.-e-_,- ,, --,e, ,w,..-, , , - , ,---,,y. awe.---,,-,.,, , , .
,r%
\
G'l v) %) i t - o.go
.M is .4 '
Et. 20bt'. 8" ._ . .. ..._.. . _ tt. Dopo. .. e-a gi -s o R F A.c c e 3; e v4 eV-
,, n o,,
8 [ sAoo awo . T, .M ' Tayg ' o.c,.' .4
, y, PLh1 E
@ M**
\ }fe L* --
eL .', =@\ ^ ^ ' QU_ om e
@d$
o n @N' r
, $ o*.w*'..A e'n gg,b
' I "} <)
3 Oo .
- A' "a @ 8
[ .- -(i);j .I
- i. , -
c.n .e 4 c , 7,. ,,, o.4 . g _.o ug o.s. e s 7 s
\
o5.u l t t & so-o.t + .4% ed ' l
\-e o'.'2r,
.A soeP we i
AREA 1 AREA 2 l 1
... .. g ..... .. ....... .... .. "7;,
e/ofe4 Is oc> velv:. g o % 'Is(na s.% r mlss e o WA
'/4/e4 ry .< . v,ju ? .so VM '/% it: e. 7dn "2 4o 7@& uuo No cac.Koms E
'/s/a4 r:os w!ss 3 c.9 @firi teso .x, cocc ov* ace '/%4 1.. > a, 1ds5 3 c.9 7#rA uo crac.:. ciauce, l '/s,/e4 to.eo (,5l 41 4 o $'46 %/n4 sa 9a A 4.*,l $1 4 o (# . DJo cEacc. CH Aur.si FIGURE 5.3 CONCRETE CRACK MAPPING DATA AREAS 1 & 2 I
i
n , e s' _
-seE t>ET /T\
ii=9M .- . .L.,
' I V/ ,, k.i@
W ,. o - g@
- e. ,
r(D .g. . . o.s s
' $ sis.
o.s ~. s /R'a,,,,
** *** g %~o ' "" 3_ ,
/
4 o',,, ,,,, e-s ',4" g_ { s,. '"o.so a v O- A, &
' e,. ..,.o g s.
^vcis-- of
.. . o,
,. 2~~
- 4 5 1, jS .n o
-(ip# t' o.l , ' o,.', . . ' d
- v/- k *#
h[ ,'*
.1-9 i'4
. v.
o.1- .g o.s iv" y .
+ *""
..s -
y,
- 2* :a g_
- ive_ evt
$ ivt, .,3,,3o.
o .h rG >;4. o.<. @o.s 4D >.
- o. , , .a ive- t ivi o.T .? ~3 3v4 a.7 @ o.2+ +.*& , o.ws.4 h.g=
O g
*o. . ' ho . . a h i
.i'/[
**su-*** g_J 7777,' x ' , iv -
, t .3.c4
,he e.4#5EDDet. D4EA% AWED AT
. fg/ .;, .
pu 7 e. crac= i.nenec.r a y f DETut. /TN O 7.- . D _ I.
.n ,-.: -
c_. watt. % , suT1sans n.4 etstes ehres . 7 AREA 4 MN'
^
arad 4 FIGURE 5.4
..... ... g ..... . .. " '"*ED .......
VW,, i:os r <M v. I o #4 CONCRETE CRACK MAPPING DATA AREA 4 V'nys it m. m!ss 2 do MgT u u.o.uo ca.cr es.n.xs V
%4 n .o A re,833 3 69 4M f Uu o kJo cence c itusr '4/g to.t% Al.'.g'M 4 o ,$ u d.o. uo ceAcecun.s,c
. . ,. q s e. (J' 1
co1METIC. PA1Cl4 As. nut er>r.a witu CtrtCES E n'. < 47.1 M*A L t2Y" [ 0 8 *964 l \ 0 e Ces & FloTE I
~
~g j
- o. r, . ( [4,,2 g
- A1 *hver.ch A f 64e5 Acts A 15
< o.s om pens,eggo
_ 3PaspecLgpeg . gL, 333*.O* O ' 8 " "' ' *** *
- S'**8'J I W 10" stag q*f.e4 f -
22 f' o..V .. , _ e4 ze G S m ==+- -s-a. a
8 I o ' "*
i ,
\ s .v;_a a i
O , a i ! A- T-
.x- +(w...-
cas,. et - W l v.s % w. ente )
}
1 9 h
~
,t ?.fd.
. . -.a*
..q 4.
i AREA 5 #' "$L I AREA 7 ansa l
,,,. ...v..
? v i ene .e ...,.. , :are v ant ;- staos psio or messans. .. s e r
, v e-a staos es.o e, neesmans
'lefm A cr,s t.*tl9r, l O $tr> l*lf4 3'*10s v)3% 0 0 he .
Mfe4 * *,a in!34 2 40 1h Mo Cl4**4r.e. , ,7 p,a gn,I53 2 40 t% unto uilo SJo <ta.ct:.rs.a gst V /nq 1. e, a i s ' ., . 3 g/t I no r_t e n.W r:_ ,c ' y 5
..j s, o Jg
% ./,,,y 3.,,, ryg F)(( un cvncr. cu <.5
, %-/a4 io:so u 4 _ uo canar.t. '444 io. <, a.:.r,' n 4 o iyf6 FIGURE 5.5 CONCRETE CRACK MAPPING DATA AREAS 5 6 7 4 1 l
~
('~)) Q . STAGE # LLNGTH OF CRACK AT STAGE 1 WIDTH OF CRACK AT STAG { 1 POINT OF MAXIMUN WIDTH i i
/
LENGTH OF CRACK AT STAGE 2 WIDTH OF CRACK AT STAGE 2 ELEVATION STAG E 1 & 2 CRACK LIMIT N
\ I L$NGTH OF CRACK AT STAGE 3 POINT OF MAXIMUM Wl DTH- WIDTH OF CRACK AT STAGE 3 O STAGE 3 EXTENSIOMOF CRACK l
STAG:E 3 CRACK Ll'AIT - AZIMUTH FIGURE 5.6 CONCRETE CRACK MAPPING AREA Il U SPECIMEN DATA SHEET
- 6. REFERENCES 6.1 10 CFR 50, Appendix A, General Design Criteria 1.
6.2 Callaway Plant Primary Reactor Containment Structural Integrity Test Procedure CS-030003, 6.3 Callaway Plant Final Safety Analysis Report (FS AR) . 6.4 ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, 1983 Edition, Section III, Division 2, Article CC-6000, Structural Integrity Test of Concrete Containment Structures. 6.5 BC-TOP-5-A, Revision 3, Prestressed Concrete Nuclear Reactor Containment Structures. 6.6 Callaway Plant Primary Reactor Containment Integrated Imakage Rate Test Procedure CS-030001. 9 + l h^
. 'f SU-039 6-1 i
f-l' ?.
APPENDIX A CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 N SENSOR 1 R1 , DISPLACEMENT (IN)
.000 .007 .013 .020 .027 .034 .041 . 04f
+--------.-+--- -
+ . - - - _ _ - - - -
-__-+_ - _ + -
.O+ -__ _________+
5.0 + 10.0 +
.15. 0 ~ l +
20.0 t + 25.0 ! + 30.0-: + , 35.0 : + 40.0 ! + t 40.0 1 + 40.0 1 + i: 45.0 1 + 50.O i. 5S.0 i + 60.0 i
+
65.0 t 69.0 : 69.O i + 69.O ! + 65.O ! + 60.0 i +
+
g":3 l
- 48. l
+
+
48.3 i 45.0 I 40.0 l + 35.O ! 30.O I + 25.0 1 + 20.0 ! +
-15.0 1 +
10.0 ! + 5.' O +
.O : +
.O l -+
.O I +
.O I +
A-1
APPENDIX A CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY. 1984 SENSOR 2 R2 DISPLACEMENT (IN) ' I
.000 .012 .024 .036 .048 .060
+= =+
.072 . 08e !
==+--- _+_________,_ ___ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _____
.0+
5.0 i + 10.0 1 + 15.0 t + 20.0 1 + 25.0 1 + 30.0~t + , 35.0 l- + 40.0 1 +
- 40. O' ! ,
' 40. O ' I 45.0 t ,
50.O I , 55.0 I , 60.0 1 + 65.0 1 + 69.O t
+
69.0 i
+
69.0 !
+
65.O I + 60.O + s 55.O !- + 38.3 1 + 48.3 1
- 48.3 i +
45.O I
- 40.0 I ,
35.O I , 30.O I , 25.O i , 20.0.! + 15.0 i + 10.0 1 + 5.0 ! +
.O I +
.O i +
.O I +
.O I +
1 O A-2
1 l i APPENDIX A
- (m-CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 SENSOR 3 R3 DISPLACEMENT (IN)
.000' .008 .016 .024 .033
.041 .049 . 05:
---+_________+- -- --4.--- - +-
_4._________+
.O+
5.0 I + 10.0 1 + 15.0 ! +. 20.0 + 25.O ! 4 30.0 : + 35.O I
.40.0 t 40.0 I .,.
40.0 ! 4 45.0 l- + 50.0 i , 55.O I , 60.0 ! + 65.0 t
- 69.0 1
- 69.0 : +
-69.0 i +
65.0 : + 60.0 1 + i 5.0 l + 48.3 ! , l 48.3 + 48.3 i + 45.0 1 + 40.0 t , 35.O i . 30.0 t .,. 25.0 I , 20.O I. 15.0 I 4 10.0 i + 5.0 i +
.O ! +
.O i +
.O ! +.
.O I +
O f I A-3
- _ . . , , . - - . . _ . - . . _ . , _ _ ~ . _ _ . _ , . , - . _ _ . . - - - _ _ , _ . - _ _ _ _ - - , ~ - _ - - -
APPENDIX A CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 SENSOR 4 R4 DISPLACEMENT (IN)
. 000 .011 .021 .032 .043
+__- --___+-
.053 .064 . 07:
+-- --+_-- _w___-----
.O+ +_________+_________+
5.0 + 10.0 1 + 15.0 t- + 20.0 1 + 25.O I + 30.0 l +
-35.0 1 +
40.0 : + 40.0 i + 40.0 ! + 45.O ! + 50.0 i + 55.O I + 60.0 ! + 65.O I 69.0 1
+
69.O I 69.O I
- 1
+
.[65.0)O.0 1 L25. 0 -l +
- 48. 3 - l -
+
48.3 I + 48.3 !
+
45.0 1 + 40.0 1 + 35.O I + 30.0 1 + 25.O-I + 20.0 1 + 4 15.0 l- + 10.0 l- + 5.0 1 +
.O I +
l .O I + l' .O I +
.O l +
D. L [d f l l-i j' A-4 i
,- ,, -. -. ----,-- - .. . , , - - - . . . - - , , - , - , . . ~ - - - - - . - - - - - . . - . . - - . , . - - - - , . . - - - - - - - . --. . - ~ - - - -
APPENDIX A 1 CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INICGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 l SENSOR 5 RS DISPLACEMENT (IN) +
.000 .008 .017 .025 .034
.s. -- .042 .051 . 05c I
--+ +---------.s.--- -_. ._
_.s.=___
-.O+
-+---------+---------+
5.0 i + 10.O'l + 15.0 : + 20.0 i + 25.O I + 30.O ! 35.O I 40.0 ! + 40.0 l +
'40.0 1 +
45.0 ! + i ' 50.0 ! + 55.O I + 60.0 i + 65.O I + 69.0 1 + 69.0 1 +
~69.0 +
65.0 1 +
.'10. O .. ! +
d5.0 1 + 48.3 l + 48.3 i +
. 48.3'I +
- 45.0-I +
' 40.0 1 35.O I 30.0 I 25.O 1 +
l 20.0 : + 15.0 1 + 10.0 l + 5.0 1 +
.O : +
.O f +
c
.O I +
.O ! +
f ) A-5
1 APPENDIX A CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 SENSOR 6 R6 DISPLACEMENT (IN)
.001 .012. .025 .037 .050 .063
____+-- -- __.,.___ _____ _+_________+__ --
.075 .08E ;
+-- ___+___=_- + ;
.O.!+
5.0 1+
- 10.0 I + '
15.0 t + 20.0-l + 25.0 1 + 30.0 I -
+
35.O 1 + 40.0 1 + 40.0 i + 40.0 1 + 45.O I + 50.0 1 + 55.O I +
;60.0 1
+
65.O I +
- 69. 0 - l +
69.O I 69.0 1 + 5.0 i 0.0 1 + 5.0 1 + 48.3 1 + 48.3 ! + 48.3'l +
- , ;45.O.! +
'40.0 1 +
35.O I + 30.0 1 + j 25.0 I 20.0 I + , 15.0 1 + 10.0 I + 5.0 1 +
.O i+
.O+
l ' .O +
.O +
O A-6
2 APPENDIX A N , CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 SENSOR 7 R7 DISPLACEMENT (IN)
,.. .002 .012 .025 .039 .052 .066 .079 . 09:
_________.e- _p _ _ _ _ - - --.i.=------ _=+=-- ._ a -- _________
.O i+
5.0 ! + 10.0 1 + 15.0 l- + i 20.0 1 + 25.O I -
- ~'
30.O I-35.0 !- .,. 40.0 t ,
-40.0 ! ,
j., 40.O ' : , 45.0 t ,
- 50.0.I ,
.55.0': + l 60.'O t
+
[ 65.0 :
+
! 69.0 1
+
69.O i i 69.0 I + , 65.0 l- +
+
l 5 St: 48.3 I l +
+
+
48.3 : + 48.3 1 + 45.0 1 + 40.0 l- , 35.O I , 30.O ! , j '25.O I ,,.
- ~
20.0 1-15.0 ! + 10.0-! + r -5.0 i- +
- i. - .O.I +
l .O l+ i l .0-!+ i .O.+ l n i O A-7
i ' 1 _, v i ' m
, a APPENDIX A ,s C
CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984', , SENSOR 8 R8 DISPLACEMENT (IN) '
.000 .016 .032 .049 .065 .081 .097 .11t
+____ _ _ - - - - -
---_+_1_______+_- - - - - - - _ _ _ -
-----+--- - -
.O +
5.0 l '- +
-10.0 1 + -
15.0 I +
- 20. 0. ! +
25.O ! + 30.O I + '
. 35. 0 .1 - . . + -
40.0 ! .) *
,- +
40.0 1 *
+
40.0 I 45.0 l~ + g ;,
-50.0 I ,
t 55.0
+
-60.0 ! i +
65.O I --
+
i 69.0 l 69.0 ! 69.O i , , 5.O I O.O I 5.O I 48.3-1 -
+
48.3 .I + ! 48.3 I
- 45.0 I
; 40.0 l- +
2 35.0 1 + 30.O ! 25.O-i' 20.'O I +
'15.0 8 +
10.0 1 + 5.0 I +
.O'l. +
l .O ! + ! .O.1 +
- i. .O.! +
- r. .
4-LO l-I A-8 f
--c., - , _ . - - . . - _ _ . . , , - . , . . . - . - . , . . _ _ -..... _ ...,-. ,.-. .. ,-- ..,_ ... .-._.- _ . _ -......, ,,,_.
APPENIDX A O CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 SENSOR 9 R9 DISPLACEMENT (IN)
.000 .017 .035 .052 .070 .087 .105 .12
__+--- ___+- -+-= ______+_ _____+_________+
--+-
.O+
5.0 1 + 10.0 1 + 15.O I + 20.0 1 + 25.0 1 + 30.0 I 35.O ! 40.0 ! + 40.O-! 40.O-!
- 45. O - I .,.
'50.0 1 +
55.0 I , 60.0 t , 65.0 l , 69.0 t , 69.O I , 69.0 I , 65.O I ,
. f'$0. O . I ,
N._l5.O I , t-48.3 1 , 48.3 i _ ,
~48.3 1 ,
.45.O I 40.0 1 +
35.0 -l- + 30.0 l 25.O I 20.0 1 +
- 15. O i - +
10.0 i 5.0 i +
.O I +
.O I +
.O ! +
.O I +
~ s a l
-A-9
- .. . _~ . _-.__ _ . -_ --__..-_ _ ._,._.. _ ..-... -_ _ __ _.._. - -._ _----_ ___ _ _,,
l t APPENIDX A
].
CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 SENSOR 10 Rio DISPLACEMENT (IN)
.000 .031 - .063 . 094 .125 . 157 . 188 . 21 c
+--- ___+_-- _+- - - - - - - +--- -+ -
=+---- --_ _ _ _ _ + - - - -_+
.'O.+
5.0.I + 10.0 1 -+ 15.0 1 + 20.0 1 + 25.0 1 + 30.O ! + 35.O I + 40.0 1 + 40.O I + 40.0 1. + 45.O I + 50.0 l ,
.55.0 i ,
.60.0 I ,
65.O I
- 169.O I +
69.0 ! + 69.0 l
- 65.0 U I +
p $0.O.! , U5. O . l _ , 48.3-1. , 48.3 1 , 48.3 I ., , i 45.0 t , 40.0 l_ + 35.0 ! + 30.O I + 25.O I + 20.0 I +
-15.0 1 +
- 10. O' ' l +
5.0 1 + (L .01 +
.O I .+
l-
- .O I +
(
.O l +
m ! A-10 I o e,-c-- , w , r,-- . - . -,~,e--.rm
-.f,,,,r-s-,,m,.,-ww+, ,w, r -,w-p.,,-...4,,.--www-,,...,,=4,ye,,,,,-.mw.vr, n nw m.y,--, w-,w w-,,,e- m ,,w- , , , , - , , ,
APPENDIX A
\
CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 SENSOR 11 R11 DISPLACEMENT (IN)
.000 .021 .042 .063 .085
+- .106 .127 .14E
.__+- _+- - - __+-- _+-- ____+
.O+
.--_-+-- __-+
5.0 l + 10.0 ! + 15.0 I + 20.0 i- + 25.0 I + 30.O I + 35.O i + 40.0 1 +
'40.0 t ,
40.0 t , 45.O I + 50.0 t , 55.0 ! + 60.0 i + 65.O i + 69.0 1 + 69.O I +
'69.0 i
+
65.0 1 + 50.O I *
%$5. O ' l - +
48.3 1 *
~48.3 1 +
48.3 1 + 45.0'l + 40.0 1 + 35.O I + 30.O I +
- 25.O I +
20.O l + 15.0 1 + 10.0 ! +
. 5. 0 ! +
.O I +
, .O I +
..O'i +
.O ! +
u A-ll
4 APPENDIX A CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 SENSOR 12 R12 DISPLACEMENT (IN)
.000- .019 .039 .058 .078 .097 .117 .13(
.s.------+--------+-------+_-- _ a _ __ - - - - - + - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - _ +
.O+
5.0 1 +. 10.0 1 + 15.O ! +
'20.0 1 +
25.0 ! + 30.0 1 + 35.O I + 40.0 l- + 40.0 1 + 40.0 1 + 45.O ! + 50.0 : + , 55.0 l , 60.0 I , 65.0'I
+
69.O ! 69.O I +
+
69.O ! I 65.O- ! *
$.0.0 I +
, j5. 0 I , 48.3 1 , 48.3 I , 48.! ! , 45.O I + 40.0 i + 35.0 I + 30.0 1 + 25.O I -. + i 20.0 1 + 15.0 i -+ 10.0 : + 5.0 ! +
.O I +
.O I +
.O ! +
i
. O 'l +
i O A-12
- . - . ._-......-_:.,_.__.._.,..-__-_--.-_.._--_._.~.-...-..._..-.....-___.__-____..,_-.-- -
APPENDIX A
/~'
CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST - . JANUARY, 1984 SENSOR 13 R13 DISPLACEMENT (IN)
.000 .033 .066 .100
+__
.133 .166 .200 . 23;
__---+---------+---------+----- _-+-- -- +---
.O+ ---+---------+
5.0 + 10.0 i + 15.0 1 + 20.0 ! + l 25._O + 30.0-1 + 35.O I + 40.0 1 + 40.O i + 40.0 ! + 45.O I + 50.0 t *
-55.0 t +
60.0 1 + 65.O I
+
69.O
+
69.O i
+
69.0 i-
+
65.0 1
+
D10.'O ! + CdI5. 0 1
' +
48.3 i
+
'48.3 i
+
48.3 i + 45.O ! + 40.0'l + 35.0 l + 30.0 I , 25.O i + 20.0 i . 15.0 ! + 10.0 1 + 5.0 i +
. O -i +
.O i +
.O I +
.O I +
4 O A-13 -
I l l APPENDIX A CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 SENSOR 14 R14 DISPLACEMENT (IN)
.000 .028 .055 .083 .110 .138 .165 .19:
+_________+_________+_________+ - _+____- _+- .____+_________+ ,
.O +
5.0 i + 10.0 1 + 15.0 1 + 20.0 1 +
.25.0 i +
30.0 1 + 35.O l + 40.0 1 + 40.0 I +
-40.0 1 +
45.O I ,
-50.0 1 +
, 55.0 I , 60.0 I + 65.O I + 69.O-! + 69.0 ! + 69.O I + 65.O I
- 1s0. O I +
(C25.O I 48.3 I. + 48.3 1 + 48.3 1 + 45.0 l +
.40.0:I ,
.35.0 -l ,
30.0 I + 25.O ! - 20.0 ! + 15.0.1
'10.0 1 +
5.' O I +
. O .1 +
.O I +
.O I +
.O I +
A-14
APPENDIX A O- CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 SENSOR 15 R15 DISPLACEMENT (IN)
.000 .033 .065 .098 .131
+--
.163 .196 .22E
_+- ___+_________+- _.___+- ___+= t
.O+ -- =+_________+
5.0 1 + 10.0 1 + 15.0 1 + 20.0 1 + 25.0 1 + 30.~ O 1 + 35.O I + 40.0 1 + 40.O I + 40.0 1 + 45.0 ! + 50.0 1 + 55.0 !
- 60.0 1.
+
65.O I + ' 69.O I + 69.O 1 + 69.0 1 + 65.O I + _ C0.0 1 + . - C25.0 1 + 48.3 1 + 48.3 1 + 48.3 1 + 45.O I + 40.0 1 + 35.O I + 30.0 1 + 25.O I +
- 20. 0 . ! +
15.0 1 + 10.0 ! + 5.0 ! +
.01 +
.O I +
.O ! +
.O I +
f 4
.J A-15
i APPENDIX A i
- s_ CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 SENSOR 16 R16 DISPLACEMENT (IN)
.000 .020 .040 .060 .080 .100 .120 .141
+- +-- ---4_________ --
---+-- _a -
_+------------ _+ 1
.0 +
5.0 + 10.0 + 15.0 +. 20.0 + , 25.0 1 + ' 30.O I + ' 35.O I + 40.O I 40.O I + 40.0 1 + 45.0 l 50.0 1 + 1 55.0 t ,
- 60. O - !
65.0 I , 69.O t ,
-69.0 1. .
69.0 !. . 65.O I ,
^$0.;5.OO. I! ,
48.3 , 48.3 1 , 48.3 i , 45.0 ! _ 40.0.I , 35.0 1 + 30.0 t . 25.0 l + 20.O I .,. 13.0 I 10.0 t 5.0 I +
.O ! +
.O ! +
.O I +
-.O ! +
.~ .
A-16 s
APPENDIX A
- O
.Q- CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 SENSOR 17 R17 DISPLACEMENT (IN)
.000 .015 .031 .046 .062 .078
+ .093 .10'
.__+ - _ _ = - - - -
-+- __+=- ____+_= .__+
.O +
5.0 + 10.0 + 15.0 + 4 20.0 + 25.O + 30.0 t + 35.0 . + 40.0.': + 40.0 1 +
~40.0 1 + i
'45.0 : +
-50.0 : +
- 55. 0 ' ! +
60.O. + 65.0 1 +
.69.0 t
- 69. O ' I +
-69.O !
I 65.O I 60.0 I + ^ lI5. 0 I l
'"48.3 1 +
~48.3 :
+ <
48.3 : +
! 45.O !
40.O i 35.O I + 30.O ! 25.O I +
- 20. O ' !
15.0 I , 10.0 i 5.0 ! +
.O-l +
, .O i +
.O ! +
.O I .+
I I
. n v
A-17 l l l
APPENDIX A CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 SENSOR 18 R18 DISPLACEMENT (IN)
.000 .024 .049 .073 .098 .122 .147 .171
+--_ __ _+-- 4 -- +------. +_ .---+----__---+--- _
._+
.O+-
-5.0 ! +
10.0 1 + 15.0 l' + 20.0 1 + 25.0 1 + 30.0.! + 35.O I + 40.0 1 + 40.0 1 +
-40.0 ! +
45.0 f. + ' 50.O i + 55.0 l + 60.0 i + 65.O i + 69.O I ,
- 69. O - l ~ + l 69.0 ! + +
~65.0 1 +
MO.O l. +
' V5. 01 48.3 I.
+
48.3.! + 48.3 1 + 45.0 i +
- ' 40.0 ! + ;
35.0 ! + 30.0.I + 25.O I + t l 20.0 i + 15.0 t + 10.0 I + , 5.0 1 + l .O I +
.O I- +
.O I- +
l -. O ! + i f l l
~
t A-18
.._a___.__.-.__ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ , _ _ . _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . _ _ _ . . . . . . , . _ . . , _ _ . . _
APPENDIX A CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 SENSOR 19 V1 DISPLACEMENT (IN)
.000 .029 .058 .087 .117 .146 .175 .204
+- -+- -+ - - - -
+--- - - - -
+- -- --
_+______ _
.O+
5.0 i + 10.0 1 + 15.0 i + 20.0 1 + 25.0 : +
. '30. 0 ! +
35.0 I + L 40.0 I + 40.0 I + 40.0 I + 45.O I + 50.0 I 55.O-1 + 60.0 I 65.O I 69.O I 69.O I 69.0 I + 65.0 I
$0.0 ! ,j 5.O I +
48.3 ! + 48.3 I 48.3 I 45.O I 40.0 1 +- 35.O I + 30.0 I +- 25.O i + 20.0 ! + 15.0 1 + 10.0 I- + 5.0 1 +
.O I +
.O i +
.O I +
.O I +
9 O A-19
APPENDIX A CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 SENSOR 20 V2 DISPLACEMENT (IN)
.000 .029 .057 .086 .114 .143
+ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ + --
.171 . 2O(
-+- --+---- +=--- -
-4 = --
+_________+
.O+ l 5.0 ! + '
~10.0 ! +
15.O I + 20.O I. -
+
-25.0 +
30.0 ! +
-35.0 l + ;
-40.0 t +
40.0 1 + 40.0 i + 45.0 : + 50.0 i + 55.0 i + 60.0 ! + 65.O : + 69.O I + 69.O + 69.0 1 + 65.0 ! +
$0.0 l- +
;5. 0 i 48.3 i ,
48.3 i + 48.3 1 ,
. 45.0 i +
40.0 i + 35.O ! + 30.0 1 + 25.O ! + 20.0 1 + , 15.0 i + 10.0 1 + 5.0 l +
.O I +
.O I +
i
.O I +
.O I +
t-1 O 1 I ,. A-20
. ~.._._-._._.. _ _ .--..,_ ___. _ .___ . _ ___.,_.__._ _.,_ _ _._ _.__ _ _.-_ .. _._ _ - _ . ,.....__ - _-_._
APPENDIX A CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 SENSOR 21 V3 DISPLACEMENT (IN)
.000. .031 .062 .093 .124
+ .155 .186 . 217 '
----+-- -
=+=-- -+-- __+-- _ _ _ _ , , __
_+_________
-5.0 ! +
10.0 ! +
; 15.0 +
20.0 ! +- 4 25.0 ! + ' 30.0 1 4 35.0 1 + 40.0 1 4 40.0 1 4
.40.0 1 +
45.O I + ] ' 50.0 1 + 55.0 l'
+
60.0 i + 65.0 !
+
69.0 1
+
69.O !
+
69.0 I , . 65.0 1 60.0 i + b5. O I + i k-48.3 i + , 48.3 !
+
48.3 I
+
45.O I + 40.0 1 + 35.0 l- + 30.0 1 + 25.0 1 +
-20.O I 4 15.O I +
10.0 l- + 5.0 1 +
.O I
. .O I +
.O I +
.O l- +
1- + - A-21
. ~ , _ . ._ _ ....,, _,,_..-_. _ ._ - . _ _ _ _ . . _ . , _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _
APPENDIX A D CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 SENSOR 22 V4 DISPLACEMENT (IN)
.000 .030 .061 .091 .121 .152 .182 . 21:
.+---------+---------+- _ __+--==- _ =+----. .=_+- .--+---------+
.O+
5.0 1 + 10.0 + 15.O l + 20.0 i + 25.O ! +
- 30.0 ! +
35.0 1 + 40.0 1 + 40.O I + 40.0 t + 45.0 1 + 50.O l + 55.O ! + 60.0 i + 65.0 1 69.O I
+
69.O I
+
69.O !
+
65.0 1
+
60.0 !
+
.3 ,
48.3.! 48.3 1 45.'O I [
+
40.0 ! + 35.O I + 30.0 l + 25.O I + 20.0 1 + 15.0 i +
-10.0 : +
5.0 I +
.O I +
.O I +
.O I +
.O I +
O , i A-22 .
APPENDIX A CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 SENSOR 23 V5 DISPLACEMENT (IN)
.000 .026 .051 .077 .102 .128 .154 .175
+_-- +----- -__+_________+-- +___. ___-+_ _____+______ #
.O +
5.0 1 + 10.0 l- + 15.0 1 + 20.0 i + 25.O I +
~30.0 1 +
35.O I + 40.0 I + 40.0 ! + 40.0 1 + 45.O I + 50.O ! + 55.O I + 60.0 I + 65.0 I 69.O ! 69.O ! 69.O I + 65.O I fio. O I 5.O !
)48.3 1 +
48.3 1 + 48.3 I 45.0 I 40.0 1 + 35.O I + 30.0 1 + 25.0 1 + 20.0 l + 15.0 i + 10.0 ! + i 5.0 1 +
.0 I +
.' O I +
.O l. +
.O ! +
t . A-23
APPENDIX A CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 SENSOR 24 V6 DISPLACEMENT (IN)
.000 .026 .052 .078 .104 .130 .156 .18:
r- - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - _- =-____.,.-- _.__ _____+____-- __
.O +
5.0 1 + 10.0-I -
+
15.0 l + 20.0 + 25.0 1 + 30.0'I -+ 35.O I + 40.0 I 40.0=! 40.0 I 45.0 ! 50.O I 55.O I 60.0 I 65.0 I 69.0 I 69.O I 69.0 I 65.O I
$0.O-I .,.
j 5.O ! + 48.3 I 48.3 I 48.3 I .,. 45.O l
- 40.O I 35.O I 30.O !
25.O I - 20.0 l- + -
- 15. O - I +
10.0 + 5.0 1 +
.O ! +
.O I +
l' .O I +
.O I +
+ l l I-i f l i I ( A-24 t
. - - . . _ - - . . . . - - . - - - - . - - -_._,...m-,..-_, - _ _ _ . . - _ . , _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ - , _ _ _ . , _ _ _ . - _ . , - _ , . _ . . . ~ . - . , - . _ . - - . , - - . _ .
APPENDIX A d CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 SENSOR 25 V7 EISPLACEMENT (IN)
.000 .009 .018 .026 .035
+--_ _ . - = - _ -
.044 .053 . 06:
+-- ____
+_--- -+ 4. - -___4
.O +
5.0 + 4 10.0 + 15.0 + 20.0 + 25.0 + i 30.0 + 35.0 ! + 40.O I + 40.0 1 + 40.0 ! + j 45.0 ! + 50.O ! + 55.0-l + 60.0 1 + 65.O I + 69.O !
+
69.0 1 i + 69.0 i
+
65.O I
+
p $0.0 1 4 Q5. 0 48.3 1
+
48.3 1
+
48.3 I ! + 45.0 1
+
40.0
+
35.0 1
+
30.0 I
-25.0 I 20.0 I L 15.O-l +
, 10.0 1 +
- 5.0 1 +
l .O I
.O 1 +
.O I 4 ,
.0 1 4 !
I a ( i j- . A-25
APPENDIX A CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 SENSOR 26 V8 DISPLACEMENT (IN)
.002 .006 .014 .022 .030 .038 .046
+---- ---+_____ ___+-- - - - =-+--- -+-- - - + -
+_____-
. 05'
--+
.O'l +
5.0 + 10.0 + 15.0 i + 20.0 1 + 25.0 i +
.30.0 1 +
35.O I + 40.0 1 +
- 40. 0 . ! +
40.0 ! + 45.O I + 50.0 l + 55.O I + 60.0 + 65.0 !
+
69.0 1
+
69.O I l 69.0 1
+
4 65.0 i
+
, p gO.O I + G5. OI 48.3 i
+
+
48.3 1
+
4 48.3 i
+
45.O I
+
40.0
+
35.0 1
+
30.0 1
+
25.0 'l
+
20.0 i
+
15.0 1 + 10.0 1 + 5.0 ! +
.O ! +
.O I +
.O I +
.O I +
l L 1 A-26 _ - , .- _ _ _ . - _ . . , . .~ . , _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . , _ , _ . , _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ . _ - - . ,_____ __
APPENDIX A CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 SENSOR 27 El DISPLACEMENT (IN)
- i. .000 .021 .042 .063 .084
+--
.106 .127 .14E
____+-- +-- -= . - - - - + - - --4.--- ----4.- -- - --
-4._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ +
.O +
4 5.0 1 + 10.0 1 + 15.0 1 + 20.0 1 + 25.O I 4 30.0 i + 1 35.0 !. + 40.0 1 + 40.0 1 + 40.0 1 + 45.O I + 50.O I , 55.0 1 + 60.0 1 + 65.O I + 69.O I + . 69.0 1 + 69.0 1 +
- 65.0 1 *
, C 40.0 l. + ( j 5.0 1 48.3 I + I 48.3 1
- 48.3 I +
4 45.O I
- 40.0 I , ,
35.O I + 30.0 1 + 25.0 1 + 20.0 ! + 15.0 1 + 10.0 1 + I 5.0 1 +
.O I +
1
.O I +
- - .O I +
!- .O I + T f A-27
, , ,.,n,-..,,,n.--, ,_ ,,,n.-.-..---_~,._.-,,,,n., ,.....w.,,-.,,_-., , , _ . , , , - . . _ _ , . , _ _ , , . , . , . , _ , , _ , , , , _ , .
APPENDIX A 1
\
CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 z SENSOR 28 E2 DISPLACEMENT (IN)
.000 .030 .059 .099 .119 .149 .178 . 20E
+-- .----+-- --_+- ._+_________+_________+___. ___+_________,
.O +
5.0 1 + 10.0.! + 15.0 1 + 20.0 1 + 25.O I + '
-30.0 1 +
i 35.O ! + 40.0 1 + 40.0 t 40.0 1 + 45.0 1 + 50.0 I 55.O I + 60.O I 65.O I + 69.0 l- +
~ 69. O ' l . +
69.0 i + 65.O I , 60.0 I + i 35.0 1 + 48.3 I + 3 48.3 I + 48.3 I _45.0 1 + i 40.0 ! 35.O I + 30.0.I + 25.O I + 20.0'l + 15.0 I + 4 10.0 ! + 5.0 l + i .O ! +
.O I +
.O ! +
.O I +
t 4 0 A-28
APPENDIX A CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 SENSOR 29 E3 DISPLACEMENT (IN)
.000 .040 .079 .119 .159 .198
+__-
.238 . 27;
___+- ___4--- ___+------ -+_-- .___+___ -__+_________+
.O+
5.0 t + 10.0 1 -+ 15.0 1 + 20.0 ! + 25.0 t + 30.0 1 + 35.O : + 40.0 i + 40.0 I , 40.0 ! , 45.0. i , 50.0 ! , 55.O
- 60.0 +
'65.O I +
69.O !
+
69.O !
+
69.0 1
+
65.O l +
.60.0 1
+
!!5. O I +
'48.3 i ,
- 48.3 i ,
4 48.3 I , , 45.0 I , ! .. 40.0 I , 35.O I +
- 30.0 1 +
25.O I + 20.0 1 + 15.0 ! + 10.0 1 + 5.0 1 +
.O I +
.O=! +
.O I +
.O I +
i
. %)
A-29
l l
; APPENDIX A i m
i - CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 SENSOR 30 E4 DISPLACEMENT (IN) i-
.000 .043 .087 .130 .174 .217
+- .261 . 3 04
+__-- --_._+---- - - - - - - - -+_-- __ .
__+-- _ =
.+
.O+
5.0-! + 10.0.I + 15.0 ! + , 20.0 1- +
' ~
25.0 ! + '
, 30.0 1 +
35.O I + '
~ 40.0 1 +
40.0 I + 40.0 t + 45.0 i + 50.0 i +
- 55.0.I #
f 60.0 i , 65.0 I , 69.0 I , 4 .69.0 1 + t 69.0 I , 65.0-I ,
. ,,'pO.O 25.O I + ,
4G.3 l + 48.3 I .,. 48.3 ! +
; 45.0.8 40.0 i +
35.O ! + 30.0 t + 25.0 1. 20.O I 15.0 I + ! 10.0 l- , +
~5.0 i +
! .O I +
.O t +
.O I +
l .O I + k I f - i o i 4 A-30
1 APPENDIX A V CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 SENSOR 31 E5 DISPLACEMENT (IN)
.000 .030 .061 .091 .121 .151
+---_ .182 . 21:
--+---------+---------+--- _+---------+=. ____+--=-- _-+
.O+
5.0 i +- 10.0 ! + 15.0 1 +- i
-20.0 1 + '
25.0 1 + . 30.0 1 + , 35.O I , 40.0 1 + 40.0 1 + 40.0 1 + 45.O I + 50.O I + 55.0 1 + 60.0 ! + 65.0 1 + 69.O ! + 69.0 i
+
69.O~l
+
65.0 1 + Cs::l48.3 1 +
'+ -
48.3 1 , 48.3'l + 45.0 I , 40.0 1 + 35.O ! 30.O I 25.0 1 + 20.0 1 + 15.0 1 + 10.0 l + 5.0 1 +
.O I +
.O I +
.O l +
.O I +
A-31
APPENDIX A n v CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 SENSOR 32 E6 DISPLACEMENT (IN)
. 000 .015 .030 .045 .061
+-_________--
.076 .091 .10t
__ - - - + - -
-- - - + = - - - .-_ -=--
____+-
.O +
_________+ 5.0 1 + 10.0 1 + 15.0 1 +
.20.0 l +
25.0 1 + 30.0 ! + 35.O I + 40.O I
- 40. O I -
40.O I 45.O I 50.0 1 + 55.O I +
-60.O_i 65.O !
69.O I
+
69.O !
+
69.0 i
+
65.O I
+
60.0 I 65.0 48.3 1 l
+
+
48.3 I + 48.3 I
~45.0 i +
40.0 I + 35.O ! + 30.O I 25.O I + 20.O I + 15.O I + 10.0 1 + i 5. 0 .I +
.O I '+
i .0-l +
.O I +
-.O I +
4 P l 4 A-32
APPENDIX A 3 CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 , SENSOR 33 E7 DISPLACEMENT (IN) f; .000 .033 .067 .100 .133 .167 .200 . 23:
+-- __+- ____+_________+---- .+--------- _=+---- _+_________+
- . O+
5.0 1 -+ 10.0 I -+
, .15.0-! +-
- 20.0 1 +
25.0 1 + ' 30.0 1 + i
- 3. . 35.0 i +
40.0 1 + , 40.O I +
.40.0 1 +
45.O I + , 50.0 I +
. 55.0 ! +
60.0 ! + i i 65.0 I + 69.O I + 69.0 I
- 69.0 1
- i 65.0 1 +
l p 40.0 ! + t, ;5.O I j " 48.3.! + 48.3 i + 48.3 1 + 4
.45.0 ! +
40.0 __I + 35.O ! + , 30.0 1. + 25.0 t- + 20.0 1 + 15.0 1 + 10.0 ! + l 5.0 1 +
- .O I +- -
.O I +
i .0 I + ( .O ! + I a i 1-( I A-33
=-e ---w-r- *,w --,ww.-- -,y ,,ww.,-,,-r m--- mww.p+,,ge.epw. m % -w w w - a.r - e-w e -gy
. . . .. . _ . . - - _ . . . = . - - - .
APPENDIX A k CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 SENSOR 34 EB DISPLACEMENT (IN)
.000 .039 .078 .117 .155 .194 g
+---------+-
.233 . 27: '
----+. _
- +. ___-+ _+--
=-+---- .__+
.O+
5.0 1 +
.10.0 1 +
15.0 : + 20.0 1 + 25.0'I + ' 30.O I + ~ 35.0 1 + 40.0'I + 40.0 1 + 40.0 ! + 45.O I +
, 50.0-l +
55.O I + 60.0 1 + 65.0 i + 69.O I + j 69.0 ! + 69.0 1 + ( 65.0 1 + 60.0.t + 25.0 i + 48.3 1 + l' 48.3.t + 48.3 l + 45.0 l'
+
40.0 1 + 35.O I + 30.0 i + i- 25.0 l' + 20.0 1 + , 15.0 1 + 10.0 1 +
- 5.0 1 +
!. .O ! +
.O I +
..O I +
.O i +
I i l l i l i A-34
. , - . . _,-._. _ _ .--.._ . , _ -._,..,_,- _ . _ __.~. _ _ __..,, _ ._.. .__. _ _ _ _ _ ,.._. _ .._ -.~.m. - _ , . _ . . . - , _ ,
APPENDIX A
-~.
CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 SENSOR 35 E9 DISPLACEMENT (IN)
.000 .042 .084 .126 .169 .211
-+_________+_____= .253 . 2 95
+_________+____ __+-- __
--+_________+__-- - +
..O+
5.0 1 + 10.0 1 + 15.0 1 + 20.0 1 + 25.O I +
;30.0 1 +
35.O I , 40.0.I + 40.0 1 + 40.O I , 45.0 I , 50.0 1 , 55.O 1 + 60.0 1 + 65.O I
+
69.'O I + 69.0 1
+
69.0 1 65.0 1 +
+
^10.0 1 +
55.O I + 48.3 1
- 48.3 i +
48.3 1 + 45.0 I , 40.0 I , 35.0 t , 30.0 1 + t 25.0 1 + 20.0 1 + 15.0 1 + 10.0 1 + 5.0 i + '. .O ! + l .O I +
.O I +
.O ! +
i l I y) l
- . A-35 is
APPENDIX A O CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY. 1984 SENSOR 36 E10 DISPLACEMENT (IN)
.000 .044 .088 .131 .175 .219 .263 . 307
..O+
+---------+---------+---------+----- .+----- -+----_ =+---------+
5.0 1 +-
-10.0 ! + -15.0 i +
20.0 l + 25.O I + . 30.0 i + 35.O I + 40.0 i + 40.0 t + 40.0 I . 45.0 1 + 50.0 i + 55.O I + 60.0 1 + 65.O 1
+
69.0 l
+
69.O l 69.0 t +
+
65.0 1
+ '10.O !
V 55.O
+
+
48.3 1 + 48.3 I + 48.3 I ' 45.0 t *
- 40. O ' I +
35.0 I , 30.0 1 + 25.O I + 20.0 ! + 15.0 t + 10.0 t + 5.0 1 +
.O 1 +
.O'I +
.O t
.O'l +
\ A-36
l l
;. APPENDIX A
~t i
CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 SENSOR 37 E11 DISPLACEMENT (IN)
.000 .036 .073 .109 .146 . 182
---------+- ----+----
.219 . 25!
__ _ _ + - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - + - ------+---------+
.O +
5.0 I +
< 10.0 1 + ;
, 15.0 1 +
'20.0 1 + i j 25.0 1 + !
30.0 1 + ,
, 35.0 1 +
40.0 1 + 40.0 i + 40.0 I + 45.0 i + 50.0 I + 55.O ! + 1 60.0 l +
! 65.0 1 +
69.0 1 +
'69.O !
+
i -. 69. 0 t 45.O I
- 0. 0 t
' +
55.O I 48.3 I ' -
+
48.3 1 + 48.3 i + 45.O I 4 40.0 I + l 35.0 1 + l 30.0 l + l 25.0 1 + ! , 20.0 1 + ! l 15.0 1 + , 10.0 1 + 5.0 1 +
.O 1 +
.O I +
.! .O I +
.O I +
+ t 4 h A-37 4
+r-- -.-w, --,aw.e,-.c.., -cw. -,e,
. - - - - ,,,wi--- m- m m w ,,,-.g,m-,,c,--,-w.., , --,,-r-.,m-,-.w.,mw--.,_ ,-g#
; APPENDIX A i
i 4 CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 l I' SENSOR 38 E12 DISPLACEMENT (IN) : 4
.000 .031 .061 .092 .123 .154 .184 . 215 , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - __+_____-_ +_________+__-_ ___.,.___
_=___+_________+ 1 l
;. .O+ ! ;' 5.O'I + j 10.0 1 +
i 15.0 1 + i- .20.0 i + j 25.0 I +
; 30.0 1 +
35.O I + 40.0 l + 40.O I + , 40.0 t ! 45.O I l 50.O I
- 55.O I i.
60.O I 65.0 I l 69*O ! ' i 69.O I 69.O I 4 t OO 65 30OI I e5.0 I 48.3 i + i i 48.3 I 48.3 I + j i 45.O I 40.0-I l 35.O I ! 30.0 I 25.0 I + ' l 20.0. I + ! 15.0 i + 10.0 1 + t l 5.0 1 + '
- .0-1 +
! .O I + i .O I + t ! -.O ! + . i . ? t L f i - 5 1 i
- I J
i l I L [ A-38 1
, ,,,-, _ _~ ..,._._ .. . _ .. _ , - .. - , _ _ _ _ ,-..._._ _ _ _ , _ _ _ . . , , . _ . _ , _ .
APPENDIX A i .
- \
CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 SENSOR 39 REF DISPLACEMENT (IN)
.006 .005 .004 .003 .002 .002
- .001 . 00(
+ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ + _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ + _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ + - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ + _ _ _ _ _ _ __+_________+ ___+-
l .O I
+ !
5.0 1 + 10.0 1 + ~ 15.O I + 20.0 1 + 25.0 1 4 30.0 1 + 1 35.0 I + 40.0 1 + 40.0 l + 40.0 I + ' 45.0 ! + l 50.0 1 + 55.0 1 + !
+ ; 60.0 1 65.0 i +
69.0 + 69.0 + 69.0 + ! p 65.0 + 10.0 +
-{55.0 1 +
- 48.3 1 +
48.3 l- + s 40.3 !+ 45.0 1+ 40.0 1 + 35.0 1 + 30.0 1 + l 25.O I + ; 20.0 1 + i 15.0 l + a 10.0 i + <t i 5.0 i + r j .O ! + 2
.O I +
- .O I +
.O I +
r i ( i i t 1 l
!. A-39 l
. . ~ , , _ . _ - _ - . . _ . . . . . _ _ . . . . _ , . . . _ _ . . . . . _ . . - . . _ , . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ . , , _ _ , _ _ . _ _ . _ _ , _ _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , , . _ , . _ _ _ _ , , _
APPENDIX B
. /~'\
s/ ' CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984
SUMMARY
OF' DATA AT 1550 104
.00 PSIG 68.50 F TRANSDUCER VOLTAGE DISPLACEMENT (IN) % OF PREDICTED 1 R1 -2.2740 .000 O.
2 R2 -2.2740 .000 O. 3 R3 -2.0960 .000 O. 4 R4- -2.3930 .000 O. 5 R5 -2.2460 .000 O. 6 R6 -2.1880 .000 O. 7 R7 -2.3010 .000 0. 8 R8 -2.3000 .000 O. 9 R9 -2.3280 .000 O. 3 10 Rio -2.3240 .000 O. 11 R11 -2.3110 .000 O. 12 R12 -2.4330 .000 O. 13 R13 -2.3290 .000 O.
'14 R14 -2.0610 .000 O.
15 R15 -2.2190 .000 O. 16 R16 -1.9680 .000 O. 17 R17 -2.2890 .000 O. jrs 18 R18 -2.3350 .000 0. (~,) 19 V1 -2.5380 .000 O.
- . 20 V2 " -3.0290 .000 0.
21 V3 -3.0680 .000 O. 22 V4 -3.2280 .000 O. 23 V5 -2.9690 .000 O. 24 V6 -3.1600 .000 O. 25 V7 -2.3300 .000 O. ' 26 V8 -2.3100 .000 O. 27 E1 -2.1990 .000 O. 28 E2 -2.2750 .000 O. 29 E3 -1.9800 .000 O. 30 E4 -1.9460 .000 O. ' 31 E5 -2.0690 .000 O. , 32 E6 -2.0490 .000 O. l 33 E7 -2.0810 .000 O. s 34 EB -2.2610 .000 0. 35 E9 -2.2960 .000 O. 36 E10 -2.1110 .000 O. 37 E11 -2.5840 .000 O. 38 E12 -2.2390 .000 O. : 39 REF -1.9660 .000 O. l o B-1 4
APPENDIX B D (_ CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984
SUMMARY
OF DATA AT 1711 104 5.00 PSIG 74.50 F TRANSDUCER -VOLTAGE DISPLACEMENT (IN) % OF PREDICTED 1 R1 -2.2740 .000 O. 2 R2 -2.2310 .005 2. 3 R3 -2.0650 .003 1. 4 R4 -2.3940 .000 O. 5 R5 -2.2200 .003 1. 6 R6 -2.1880 .000 O. 7 R7 -2.2810 .002 1. 8 R8 -2.2390 .007 3. 9 R:9 -2.2850 .005 2. 10 Rio -2.2410 .010 4. - 11 R11 -2.2300 .009 4. 12 R12 -2.4130 .002 1. 13 R13 -2.3330 .000 O. 14 R14 -1.9740 .010 2. 15 R15 -2.0800 .015 3. 16 R16 -1.9700 -
.000 O.
17 R17 -2.2910 .000 O. fg 18 R1B -2.2590 .009 () 2. 19 V1 -2.4640 .008 2. 20 V2 -2.9650 .007 2. 21 V3 -2.9890 .009 2. 22 V4 -3.1610 .000 2. 23 V5 -2.9080 .007 2. . 24 V6 -3.0940 .007 2. 25 V7 -2.3310 .000 O. 26 V8 -2.3310 .002 O. 27 E1 -2.1280 .008 1. 28 E2 -2.1760 .011 2. 29 E3 -1.8310 .017 2. 30 E4 -1.7950 .018 3. 31 E5 -1.9730 .011 2. 32 E6 -2.0260 .003 O. 33 E7 -1.9480 .014 2. 34 E8 -2.1250 .016 2. 35 E9 -2.1340 .019 3. 36 E10 -1.9250 .021 3. 37 E11 -2.4360 .017 2. 38 E12 -2.1100 .015 2. 39 REF -1.9800 .002 0. nv B-2
APPENDIX B .O
\-) CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984
SUMMARY
OF DATA AT 1804 104 10.00 PSIG 76.10 F TRANSDUCER VOLTAGE DISPLACEMENT (IN) % OF PREDICTED 1 R1 -2.2750 .000 O. 2 R2 -2.1890 .010 4. 3 R3 -2.0330 .007 3. 4 R4 -2.3590 .004 2. 5 R5 -2.1880 .006 3. 6 R6 -2.1390 .006 2. 7 R7 -2.2390 .007 3. 8 R8 -2.1890 .013 5. 9 R9 -2.2210 .012 5. 10 R10 -2.1310 .023 9. 11 R11 -2.1540 .018 7. 12 R12 -2.3660 .008 3. 13- R13 -2.2410 .010 2. 14 R14 -1.9050 .019 4. 15 R15 -1.9650 .027 5. 16 R16 -1.9700 .000 0. 17 R17 -2.2910 .000 O. r's 18 R18 -2.1900 .017 3. (_) 19 V1 20 V2
-2.4010 .015 4.
-2.8990 .015
- 4.
21 V3 -2.9100 .018 5. 22 V4 -3.0310 .019 5. 23 V5 -2.8410 .014 4. 24 .V6 -3.0360 .014 4.- 25 V7 -2.3310 .000 O. 26 V8 -2.3000 .002 1. 27 E1 -2.0400 .017 2. 28 E2 -2.0490 .026 4. 29 E3 -1.6780 .035 5. 30 E4 -1.6440 .036 5. 31 E5 -1.8670 .023 3. 32 E6 -1.9580 .010 1. 33 E7 -1.8300 .027 4. 34 EB -1.9880 .032 5. 35 E9 -1.9690 .038 5. 36 E10 -1.7510 .040 6. 37 E11 -2.2960 .034 5. 38 E12 -1.9860 .029 4. 39 REF -1.9860 .002 0. A t I w../ e B-3
APPENDIX B Or i i
\ss' CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984
SUMMARY
OF DATA AT 1902 104 15.00 PSIG 76.30 F TRANSDUCER VOLTAGE DISPLACEMENT (IN) % OF PREDICTED 1 R1 -2.2380 .004 2.
~
2 R2 -2.1410 .015 6. 3 R3 -1.9960 .011 4. 4 R4 -2.3210 .008 3. 5 R5 -2.1510 .011 4. 6 R6 -2.0810 .012 5. 7 R7 -2.1860 .013 5. 8 R8 -2.1210 .021 8. 9 R9 -2.1490 .020 8. 10 R10 -2.0050 .037 15. 11 R11 -2.0640 .028 11. 12 R12 -2.2950 .016 6. 13 R13 -2.0890 .027 5. 14 R14 -1.7810 .034 7. 15 R15 -1.8300 .041 8. 16 R16 -1.9700 .000 O. 17 R17 -2.2910 .000 O. (p) 18 19 R18 V1
-2.1000
-2.3090
.028
.025 6.
7. 20 V2 -2.8080 .025 7. 21 V3 -2.8030 .031 8. 22 V4 -2.9400 .033 9. 23 V5 -2.7630 .023 6. 24 V6 -2.9600 .022 6. 25 V7 -2.3310 .000 O. 26 V8 -2.2940 .003 1. 27 E1 -1.9590 .027 4. 28 E2 -1.9390 .038 5. 29 E3 -1.5060 .055 e. 30 E4 -1.4740 .056 8. 31 E5 -1.7430 .037 5. 32 E6 -1.8840 .019 3. 33 E7 -1.6950 .042 6. 34 EB -1.8310 .051 7. 35 E9 -1.7800 .058 8. 36 E10 -1.5630 .061 9. 37 E11 -2.1460 .051 7. 38 E12 -1.8630 .042 6. 39 REF -1.9910 .003 O. v B-4
APPENDIX B O, (_,) CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984
SUMMARY
OF DATA AT 1958 104 20.00 PSIG 77.13 F TRANSDUCER VOLTAGE DISPLACEMENT (IN) % OF PREDICTED 1 R1 -2.2380 .004 2. 2 R2 -2.0940 .021 8. 3 R3 -1.9560 .015 6. 4 R4 -2.2800 .013 5. 5 R5 -2.1140 .015 6. 6 R6 -2.0280 .018 7. 7 R7 -2.1310 .019 8. 8 R8 -2.0540 .029 11. 9 'R9 -2.0740 .028 11. 10 R10 -1.8810 .052 21. 11 R11 -1.9840 .038 15. 12 R12 -2.2210 .024 10. 13 R13 -1.9120 .048 10. 14 R14 -1.6360 .051 10. 15 R15 -1.7220 .053 11. 16 R16 -1.9700 .000 0. 17 R17 -2.2920 .000 O. 18 Ris -2.0190 .037 7. T 19 [/
's- 20 V1 V2
-2.2080
-2.7100
.037
.036 10.
10. 21 V3 -2.6540 .048 13. 22 V4 -2.8200 .046 12. 23 V5 -2.6610 .034 9. 24 V6 -2.8680 .032 9. 25 V7 -2.3310 .000 O. 26 V8 -2.2410 .009 2. 27 E1 -1.8690 .037 5. 28 E2 -1.8000 .054 8. 29 E3 -1.3400 .074 11. 30 E4 -1.3010 .076 11. . 31 E5 -1.6200 .051 7. 32 E6 -1.8150 .027 4. 33 E7 -1.5580 .056 8. 34 E8 -1.6750 .069 10. 35 E9 -1.6100 .079 11. 36 E10 -1,3750 .082 12. 37 Eli -1.9940 .069 10. 38 E12 -1.7300 .058 8. 39 REF -1.9960 .004 O.
-, S v
B-5 ' L
M'PENDIX B r N. s CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984
SUMMARY
OF DATA AT 2051 104 25.00 PSIG 77.35 F TRANSDUCER VOLTAGE DISPLACEMENT (IN) % CF PREDICTED 1 R1 -2.1990 .009 4. 2 R2 -2.0480 .026 10. 3 R3 -1.9160 .020 8. 4 R4 -2.2390 .018 7. 5 R5 -2.0790 -
.019 7.
6 R6 -1.9760 .024 10. 7 R7 -2.0740 .026 10. 8 R8 -1.9880 .036 14. 9 R9 -1.9990 .036 14. 10 R10 -1.7580 .066 26. 11 R11 -1.8980 .047 19. 12 R12 -2.1440 .033 13. 13 R13 -1.7900 .061 12. 14 R14 -1.5340 .063 13. 15 R15 -1.5540 .070 14. 16 R16 -1.7940 .020 4. 17 ~R17 ' 2.2930
.000 O. , f-ws 18 R18 -1.8850 .053 11.
i ) 19 V1
-2.1040 .048 13.
20 V2 -2.6010 .049 13. 21 V3 -2.5310 .063 17. 22 V4 -2.7040 .059 16. 23 V5 -2.5680 .044 12. 24 V6 -2.7730 .043 11. 25 V7 -2.3310 .000 'O . 26 V8 -2.2340 .010 3. 27 E1 -1.7800 .047 7. 28 E2 -1.6860 .067 10. 29 E3 -1.1750 .093 13.
, 30 E4 -1.1300 .096 14.
31 E5 -1.4950 .065 9. 32 E6 -1.7480 .034 5. 33 E7 -1.4160 .072 10. 34 EB -1.5200 .087 12. 35 E9 -1.4350 .099 14. 36 E10 -1.1900 .102 15. 37 Eli -1.8490 .086 12. 3G E12 -1.6000 .071 10. 39 REF -1.9990 .004 O. C B-6
APPENDIX B O ss CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984
SUMMARY
OF DATA AT 2145 104 30.00 PSIG 77.78 F TRANSDUCER VOLTAGE DISPLACEMENT (IN) % OF PREDICTED 1 R1 -2.1580 .014 6. 2 R2 -1.9980 .032 13. 3 R3 ~-1.8950 .022 9. 4 R4 -2.1910 .023 9. 5 R5 -2.0400 .023 9. 6 R6 -1.9220 .030 12.
.. 7 R7 -2.0160 .032 13.
8 i8 R -1.9220 .044 18. 9 R9 -1.9210 .045 18. 10 R10
-1.6260 .082 33.
11 R11 -1.8080 .058 23. 12 R12 -2.0610 .042 17.
- 13. R13 -1.5980 .083 17.
14 R14 -1.3620 .084 17. 15 R15 -1.3680 .090 18. 16 R16 -1.7940 .020 4. 17 R17 -2.1460 .016 3. 18 R18 -1.7840 .065 13. A' 19 V1 -1.9840 .061 16.
- 20. V2 -2.4890 .062 16.
21 V3 -2.4080 .077 21. 22 V4 -2.5800 .073 20. 23 V5 -2.4460 .058 15. 24 V6 -2.6680 .055 15. 25 V7 -2.3300 .000 O. 26 V8 -2.1990 .014 4. 27 E1 -1.6890 .057 8. 28 E2 -1.5420 .083 12. 29 E3 -1.0100 .112 16. 30 E4 .9520 .117 17. 31 ES -1.3680 .080 11. 32 E6 -1.6760 .043 6. 33 E7 -1.2700 .088 13. 34 E8 -1.3600 .106 15. 35 E9 -1.2580 .119 17. 36 E10 -1.0000 .123 18. 37 .E11 -1.7010 .103 15. 38 E12 -1.4620 .088 13. 39 REF -2.0000 .004 O. t f I-v B-7 _ _ _ -_. _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ . _ _ _ _ . . . _ _ _ . - _ . . _ _ . . . _ . - _ _ _ _ - - , _
l APPENDIX B CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 i
SUMMARY
OF DATA AT 2240 104 35.00 PSIG 77.99 F. TRANSDUCER VOLTABE DISPLACEMENT (IN) % OF PREDICTED 1 R1 -2.1160 .019 8. 2 R2 ' -1.9480 .037 15. 3 R3 -1.8540 .027 11. 4 R4 -2.1380 .030 12. 5 R5 -2.0010 .027' 11. 6 R6 -1.8650 .036 15. 7 R7 -1.9510 .040 16. f 8- R8. -1.8550 .052 21. 9 R9 -1.8400 .054 21. 10 R10 -1.4940 .097 39. 11 R11 -1.7140 .069 '27. 12 R12 -1.9760 .052 21., 13 R13 -1.4590 .099 20. t 14 R14 -1.2710 .095 19. ! 15 R15 -1.1800 .110 22. I 16 R16- -1.6660 .034 7. 17 R17 -2.0640 .026 5. 18 R18 -1.7080: .074 -15. ! l ( 19 V1 -1.8600 .075 20. i 20 V2 -2.3680 .075 20. ,. 2 21 V3- -2.2940 .091 24. 22 V4 -2.4480 .088 24. 23 V5' -2.3410 .069 18. i- . 24 V6~ -2.5560' .067 18.
- . 12 5 V7 -2.1880 .016 4.
L' 26- V8 -2.1630 .018 5. i 27 E1 -1.5960 .068 10. 28 E2 -1.4310 .095 14. I 29 E3 .8360 .132 19. i + 30 E4 .7730 .138 20. I 31 E5 -1.2400 .095 14. ! 32 E6 -1.6040 .051 7. - i 33 E7 -1.1200 .104 15. 34 EB -1.1980 .125 18. 35 E9 -1.0750 .140 20. 36- E10 .8080 .145 21. i; 3'7 E11 -1.5430 .122 17. i. 38 E12 -1.3330 .102 15. P 39 REF -2.0030 .004 O. i 4
~d 4
- B-8
/TPENDIX B
/~S
\ )
CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984
SUMMARY
OF DATA AT 2335 104 40.00 PSIG 78.21 F TRANSDUCER VOLTAGE DISPLACEMENT (IN) % OF PREDICTED 1 R1 -2.0800 .023 9. 2 2 R2 -1.8940 .044 17. 3 R3 -1.8210 .030 12. 4 R4 -2.0720 .037 15. 5 R5 -1.9640 .031 13. 6 R6 -1.8060 .043 17. 7 R7 -1.8910 .047 19. 8 R8 -1.7710 .061 25. 9 R9 -1.7700 .061 25.
, 10 R10 -1.3580 .113 45.
11 R11 -1.6240 .079 32. 12 R12 -1.8890 .061 25. 13 R13 -1.2660 .121 24, 14 R14 -1.1810 .106 21. 15 R15 -1.0280 .126 25. 16 R16 -1.4750 .056 11. 17 R17 -1.9220 .042 8. gg 18 R18 -1.5590 .092 18.
~'
) 19 v1 -1.7280 .090 24. i 20 V2 -2.2410 .090 24.
21 V3 -2.1610 .106 28. 22 V4 -2.3080 .104 28.
, 23 V5 -2.2210 .082 22.
24 V6 -2.4350 .080 21. 25 V7 -2.1880 .016 4. 26 V8 -2.1620 .v48 5. 27 E1 -1.4980 .079 11. 4 28 E2 -1.2940 .111 16, 29 E3 .6640 .151 22. 30 E4 .5860 .160 23. 31 E5 -1.1060 .110 16. 32 E6 -1.5340 .059 8. 33 E7 .9640 .121 17. ' 34 E8 -1.0310 .145 21. 35 E9 .8920 .161 23. 36 E10 .6140 .166 24. 37 E11 -1.3980 .139 20. 38 E12 -1.2010 .117 17. 39 REF -2.0080 .005 O. A i
)
B-9
r APPENDIX B
'b \_/ CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984
SUMMARY
OF DATA AT 35 105 40.00 PSIG 74.66 F TRANSDUCER VOLTAGE DISPLACEMENT (IN) % OF PREDICTED 1 R1 -2.0800 *023
. 9.
2 R2 -1.8880 .044 18. 3 .R3 -1.8210 .030 12. 4 R4 -2.0710 .037 15. 5 R5 -1.9630 .031 13. 6 R6 -1.8040 . .043 17. 7 R7 -1.8700 .049 20. 8 R8 -1.7700 .061 25. 9 R9 -1.7340 .065 26. 10 Rio -1.3400 .115 46. 11 R11 -1.6080 .081 32. 12 R12 -1.8480 .066 26. 13 R13 -1.2660 .121 24. 14 R14 -1.1110 .114 23. 15 R15 .9760 .132 26. 16 R16 -1.4740 .056 11. 17 R17 -1.9230 .042 8.
~('S 18 R18 -1.5560 .092 18.
('~,/ 19 V1 -1.6690 .096 26. 20 V2 -2.1910 .096 25. 21 V3 -2.1140 .112 30. 22 V4 -2.2680 .108 29. 23 V5 -2.1660 .088 24. 24 V6 -2.3880 .086 23. 25 V7 -2.1880 .016 4. 26 V8 -2.1630 .018 5. , 27 E1 -1.4810 .080 11. 28 E2 -1.2630 .114 16. 29 E3 .6480 .153 22. 30 E4 .5540 .164 23. 31 E5 -1.0740 .113 16. 32 E6 -1.5210 .060 9. 33 E7 .9330 .124 18. , 34 E8 -1.0050 .148 21. 35 E9 .8740 .164 23. 36 E10 .6000 .168 24. 37 E11 -1.3740 .142 20. 38 E12 -1.2000 .117 17. 39 REF -2.0060 .005 O. . m B-10 l
i M'PENDIX B
<'^\ !
N-CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984
SUMMARY
OF DATA AT 115 105 40.00 PSIG 74.12 F TRANSDUCER VOLTAGE DISPLACEMENT (IN) % OF PREDICTED 1 R1 -2.0790 .023 9. 2 R2 -1.8890 .044 18. 3 R3 -1.8210 .030 12. 4 R4 -2.0710 .037 15. 5 R5 -1.9630 .031 13. 6 R6 -1.8050 .043 17. 7 R7 -1.8610 .050 20. 8 R8 -1.7500 .064 26. 9 R9 -1.7160 .067 27. 10 Rio -1.3310 .116 46. ; 11 R11 -1.6080 .081 32. , 12 R12 -1.8290 .068 27. 13 R13 -1.2650 .121 24. 14 R14 -1.1110 .114 23.
- 15 R15 .9760 .132 26.
16 R16 -1.4740 .056 11. t
~
17 R17 -1.9210 .042 8. 7-~g 18 R18 -1.5560 .092 18. i t 19 V1 -1.6360 .100 27. 20 V2 -2.1540 .100 27. 21 V3 -2.1140 .112 30. 22 V4 -2.2480 .111 30. 23 V5 -2.1310 .092 25. ! 24 V6 -2.3500 .089 24. t 25 V7 -2.0880 .028 , 7. 26 V8 -2.1630 .018 5. 27 E1 -1.4690 .002 12. 28 E2 -1.2610 .115 16. 29 E3 .6360 .155 22. 30 E4 .5380 .166 24. 31 E5 -1.0590 .115 16. 32 E6 -1.5200 .060 9. 33 E7 .8980 .128 18. 34 E8 .9860 .150 21. , 35 E9 .8630 .165 24. ' 36 E10 .5890 .169 24. i 37 E11 -1.3740 .142 20. l 38 E12 -1.1790 .120 17. 39 REF -2.0060 .005 O.
%.s c B-ll
APPENDIX B 73 i I ' x_/ CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984
SUMMARY
OF DAT4 AT 214 105 45.00 PSIG 76.49 F TRANSDUCER VOLTAGE DISPLACEMENT (IN) 7. OF PREDICTED 1 R1 -2.0410 .028 11. 2 R2 -1.8410 .050 20. 3 R3 -1.7840 .034 14. 4 R4 -2.0050 .045 18, 5 R5 -1.9280 .035 14. 6 R6 1.7430 .050 20. 7 R7 -1.8120 .056 22. 8 R8 -1.7040 .069 28. 9 R9 -1.6640 .073 29. 10 P10 -1.2080 .131 52. 11 R11 -1.5300 .090 36. 12 R12 -1.7610 .076 30. 13 RIO -1.1280 .137 27. 14 F:14 .9780 .130 26. 15 R15 .9760 .132 26. 16 R16 -1.3210 .073 15. 17 R17 -1.8310 .052 10. fy 18 R18 -1.4310 .107 21. (' ) 19 VI -1.5380 .111 30. 20 V2 -2.0600 .110 29. 21 V3 -1.9910 .126 34. 22 V4 -2.1410 .123 33. 23 V5 -2.0580 .100 27. 24 V6 -2.2590 .100 27. 25 V7 -2.0880 .028 7. 26 VG -2.0600 .030 8. 27 E1 -1.3890 .091 13. 28 E2 -1.1460 .128 10. 29 E3 .4840 .172 25. 30 E4 .3740 .185 26, 31 E5 .9480 .128 18. 32 E6 -1.4660 .066 9. 33 E7 .7740 .141 20. 34 E8 .8450 .167 24. 35 E9 .6990 .184 26. 36 E10 .4040 .189 27. 37 E11 -1.2340 .158 23. 30 E12 -1.0650 .133 19. 39 REF -2.0080 .005 O.
,m \. ,
B-12
/WPENDIX B
,n \' CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 GUMMARY OF DATA AT 312 105 50.00 PSIG 77.99 F TRANSDUCER VOLTAGE DISPLACEMENT (IN) % OF PREDICTED 1 R1 -2.0080 .032 13. 2 R2 -1.7860 .056 22. 3 R3 -1.7390 .039 16. 4 R4 -1.9390 .003 21. 5 R5 -1.8860 .040 16. 6 R6 -1.6060 .057 23. 7 R7 -1.7590 .062 25. 8 R8 -1.6280 .078 31. 9 R9 -1.6040 .080 32. 10 Rio -1.0690 .147 59. 11 R11 -1.4310 .101 40. 12 R12 -1.6790 .085 34. 13 R13 -1.0140 .150 30. 14 R14 .9780 .130 26. 15 R15 .6440 .167 33. 16 R16 -1.3200 .073 15. 17 R17 -1.7280 .064 13. f'N 18 R18 -1.3090 .112 22. ( ')
'~'
19 V1 -1.4100 .124 33. 20 V2 -1.9560 .122 33. 21 V3 -1.0700 .140 37.
'"'20 V4 -2.0140 .137 37.
23 V5 -1.9590 .111 30. 24 V6 -2.1630 .111 30. 25 V7 ~2.0060 .028 7. 26 V8 -2.0600 .000 8. 27 E1 -1.2900 .101 14. 29 C2 -1.0100 .143 20. 29 E3 .3040 .193 28. 30 E4 .1910 .207 30. 31 ES .0190 .142 20. 72 E6 -1.4000 .074 11. 33 E7 .6280 .157 22. 34 EU .6060 .106 27. 35 E9 .5100 .204 29. 36 E10 .0040 .212 30. 77 C11 1.0700 .176 25. 99 E12 .9240 .149 21.
'9 OEF -2.0000 .005 0.
l B-13
APPENDIX B
;-~~
I
v
f CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984
SUMMARY
OF DATA AT 411 105 55.00 PSIG 79.50 F TRANSDUCER VOLTAGE DISPLACEMENT (IN) % OF PREDICTED 1 R1 -1.9720 .036 14. 2 R2 -1.7280 .063 25. 3 R3 -1.7090 .043 17. 4 R4 -1.9390 .053 21. 5 R5 -1.0440 .045 18. 6 R6 -1.6200 .064 26. 7 R7 -1.6920 .069 28. O RO -1.5610 .006 34. 9 R9 -1.5100 .089 36. 10 R10 .9250 .164 65. 11 R11 -1.0410 .112 45. 12 R12 -1.5940 .095 38. 13 R13 .0900 .164 33. 14 R14 .8490 .145 29. 15 R15 .6440 .167 33. 16 R16 -1.1610 .091 18. 17 R17 -1.7280 .064 13. f'm 10 R10 -1.2080 .124 25.
\ ~'
) 19 V1 ~1.2910 .138 37.
20 V2 -1.8340 .1 ";6 36, 21 V3 -1.7560 .154 41, 22 V4 -1.0790 .152 41. 23 V5 -1.0340 .125 33.
. 24 \% -?.0450 .124 33, 2n V7 -!.9960 .038 10.
26 VO -1.9690 .041 11. 27 E1 -! 1990 .112 16. 20 EP -.0700 .150 23. 29 C5 - 1310 .213 30. 30 Ed - 0020 . 22r/ 33. 31 C5 .6040 .150 23.
"* 2
. C6 -1,3340 002 12.
3 "' E7 .4710 .174 25. 34 FG - 5100 .206 29. 35 C9 ~500 226 32. 96 C10 .0020 .235 34. 37 *:11 - 'n90 .196 20, 30 C12 - " 19 0 164 23. NO RrF -? 0000 -.00", O. n f _J l B-14 L
APPENDIX B
) CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984
SUMMARY
OF DATA AT 510 105 60.00 PSIG 79.72 F TRANGDUCER VOLTAGE DISPLACEMENT (IN) % OF PREDICTED 1 R1 -1.9400 .040 16. 2 R2 -1.6680 .070 28. 3 R3 -1.ad90 .047 19. 4 R4 -1.0710 .061 22 5 R5 -1.0010 .049 20. 6 R6 -1.5500 .072 29. 7 R7 -1.6310 .076 31. 8 R8 -1.4880 .094 38. 9 R9 -!.4410 .098 39. 10 Rio .7780 .181 72. 11 R11 -1.2430 .123 49. 12 R12 -1.4900 .107 43. 13 R13 6800 .187 37. 14 R14 .7890 .153 31. 15 R15 .4410 .188 38. 16 R16 -1.0100 .108 22. 17 R17 -1.5310 .086 17.
,_s 18 R18 -1.1710 .137 27.
( ; 19 V1
-1.1510 .154 41.
20 V2 -1.7030 .151 40. 21 V3 -1.5930 .173 46. 22 V4 -1.7380 .168 45. 23 V5 -!.7100 .130 37. 24 V6 1.9180 .138 37. 25 V7 -1.9250 .046 12. 26 V8 -1.9690 .041 11. 27 E1 1.0950 .124 18. 20 E2 .7280 .175 25. 29 E3 0590 .234 33. 30 E4 .1930 .252 36, 31 E3 .5440 .174 25, 32 E6 -1.2640 .089 13. 33 E7 .3040 .192 27, 34 EO .3400 .226 32. 35 E9 .1350 .249 36. 36 ClO .2130 .258 37. 77 C11 .7500 .214 31. l 30 Et2 .6410 .181 26.
?? RCF 4.0110 .005 O.
7,
?
B-15
M'PENDIX B
\
[\._/' CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 CUMMARY OF DATA AT 612 105 65.00 PSIB 79.93 F TRANSDUCER VOLTAGE DISPLACEMENT (IN) % OF PREDICTED 1 R1 -1.9090 .044 18. 2 R2 -1.6080 .077 31. 3 R3 '-1.6260 .052 21. 4 R4 -1.8100 .068 27. 5 R5 -1.7560 .054 22. 6 R6 -1.4790 .080 32. 7 R7 -1.5690 . 083 33. 8 R8 -1.4120 .103 41. 9 R9 -1.3560 .107 43. 10 R10 .6180 .200 80. 11 R11 -1.1410 .135 54. 12 R12 -1.3850 .118 47. 13 R13 .4950 .209 42. 14 R14 .6510 .169 34. 15 R15 .2490 .209 42. 16 R16 .8630 .125 25. 17 R17 -1.4280 .098 20.
/~s 18 R19 -1.0360 .153 31.
( 19 V1 .9890 .172 46. 20 V2 -1.5590 .168 45. 21 V.3 -1.4500 .189 50. 22 V4 -1.5810 . 186 50. 23 V5 -1.5810 .153 41. 24 V6 -1.7800 .153 41. 05 V7 -1.9240 .046 12. 26 VG -1.8540 .054 14.
- 27. E1 .9940 .135 19.
28E2 .5940 .190 27. 29 .E3 .2440 .256 37. 30 E4' .3960 .276 39. 31 E5 .3980 .190 27.
't2 E6 -1.1940 .097 14.
33 E7 .1390 .210 30. 34 EP .1650 .247 35. 05 E9 .0590 .271 39. 36 E10 .4290 .282 40. 37 C11 .5860 .234 33. 38 512 .4900 .198- 28. 79 GEr -2.0120 .005 O.
. fs=
e; )
.~.)
4 B-16
APPENDIX B b'v i'
/ CALLAW/"/ STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 r
SUMMARY
OF DATA AT 705 105 69.00 PSIG 79.82 F TRANSDUCER VOLTAGE DISPLACEMENT (IN) % OF PREDICTED 1 R1 -1.8780 .048 19. 2 RT -1.5550 .083 33. 3 03 -1.5900 .056 22. 4 R4 ~1.7490 .075 30. 5 95 -1.7200 .058 23. 6 R6 -1.4190 .087 35. 7 P7 -1.5160 .089 36. 8 RS -1.3540 .110 44. O P9 -1.2860 .115 46. 10 R10 .4890 .215 86. 11 R11 -1.0590 .144 58. 12 R12 -1.2980 .128 51. 13 R13 .3610 .224 45. 14 R14 .5400 .182 36. 15 R15 .0650 .228 46. 16 R16 .7280 .140 28. 17 R17 -1.3390 .108 22.
-m 19 R18 .9230 .167 33.
P I lo VI .8610 .186 50. V2
, 20 -1.4390 .181 48.
21 v3 -1.3430 .202 54. 22 94 -1.4450 .201 54. 23 V5 -1.4740 .164 44, 24 V6 -1.6600 .167 44. 25 V7 -1.8610 .053 14. 26 V8 -1.8540 .054 14. 27 E1 .9080 .145 21.
?O E2 .4880 .202 29.
E3 .4040 .274 39.
"O E4 .5700 .297 42.
~? E5 .2690 .205 29.
E6 -1.1300 .105 15.
~~
E7 .0060 .224 32.
'S E8 .0130 .265 38.
35 E9 ."290 .290 41. F10 .6130 .302 43.
~~
E11 .4460 .250 36. F12 .3630 .212 30. RCF -2.0140 .006 O. B-17
~ ~. . - - . , ~ _ . ~ , .- - . . - - -. . . .. ~. . .. . - -
APPENDIX B CN.L4WAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 r 1
SUMMARY
OF DATA AT 805 105 69.00 PSI 8 75.90 F j. TRANSDUCER VOLTAGE. DISPLACEMENT (IN) 7. OF PREDICTED
.1 R1 -1.8780 .048 19.
2 R2 -1.5500 .083 33. 3 R3 -1.5860 .056 22. 4 R4 -1.7490 .075 30 .- 5 P5 -1.7150 .059 24. 6 R6 -1'.4100 .088 35. 7 P7 -1.5040 .091 36. 8 R8 -1.3430 .111 44. 9 D9 -1.2480 .119 48. 10 Rio ,4650 .218 87. -
- z. 11 R11 -1.0430 .146 58.
12 R12 -1.2600 .133 53. 13 R13 .3210 .229 46. 14 R14 .4580 .192 38. 15 R15 .0650 .228 46. 16 R16 .7250 .140 28. 17 R17
-1.3390 .108 22. ,f s y 18 R18 .8850 .171 34.
.!s )- .19 V1 ,7950 .193 52. 20 V2 -1.3700 .189 50. 21 - U3 -1.2660 .211 56. i 72 V4 -1.A040 .206 55. 23 V5 -1.4300 .169 45. 24 V6 -1.6040 .173 46. 35 V7 -1.8610 .053 14. 26 V8 -1.8550 .054 14. 27 El- .8910 .146 (
- 21. !
28 E2 .4650 .205 29. E 79 E3 4190 .276 39. ' 30 E4 .6010 .301 43.
.31 ES .2380 .209 30.
32 E6 -1.1210 .106 15. 33 E7 .0490 .230 33. 34< EB .0190 .269 38. 35 E9 .2540 .293 42.
- 36 E10 .6340 .305 44. t 97 E11 .4260 .252 36. l 30 E12 .3510 .213 30.
30 REF -?.0140 .006 0. x_; _ t' B-18 I
- _ - -_.----_-:-__2____-. . - .
APPENDIX B
/h.. /\ ,). CALLAWAY STPUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984
SUMMARY
OF DATA AT 905 105 69.00 PSIG 74.40 F
' TRANSDUCER VOLTAGE DISPLACEMENT (IN) % OF PREDICTED 1 R1 -1.8790 .047 19.
2 -R2 -1.5460 .084 33. 3 R3 -1.5780 .057 23. 4 P4 -1.7480 .075 30. 5 R5 -1.7150 .059 24. 6 R6 -1.4100 .088 35. 7 R7 -1.4890 .093 37. 8 PR -1.3240 .113 45. 9 P9 -1.2190 .122 49. 10 R10 .4480 .219 88. 11 R11 -1.0310 .147 59. 12 R12 -1.2280 .136 54. 13 R13 .2880 .233 47. 14 R14 .4560 .193 39. 25 Pf5 .0640 .228 46. 16 R16 .7250 .140 28. 17 Rt7 -1.3390 .108 22. f ,s 18 .R18 .8850 .171 34. 7( ) 19 VI 7460 .199 53.
\/ 20 V2 -1.3200 .195 52.
71 UN -1.2660 .211 56. 2" V4 -1_3650 .211 56. 23 V5' -1.3640 .177 47. 74 V6 -1.5550 .178 48. 75 V7 -1.7940 .061 16. 76 -V8 -1.8550 .054 14. 77 Et .8300 .148 21. 20 E2 .4340 .208 30. 79 E7 .4300 .277 40. 30 E4 .6300 .304 43. 31 E5 .2110 .212 30. 72 F6 -1.1200 .106 15. 33 F7 .0780 .233 33. 94 EO .0430 .272 39, 25 E9 .2700 .295 42.
'6 E10 .6510 .307 44.
77 Eli .4650 .255 36. 78 G12 .3360 .215 31. 3? REF -0.0140 .006 0. B-19
r < l l l APPENDIX B ' n I, s CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 i CI'MMARY OF DATA AT 1042 105 i 65.00 PSIG 70.10 F i TRANSDUCER VOLTAGE DISPLACEMENT (IN) % OF PREDICTED 1 R1 -1.8780 .048 19. 2 R2 -1.5610 .082 33. 3 R3 -1.5780 .057 23. 4 R4 -1.7480 .075 30. 5 -R5 -1.7310 .057 23. 6 R6 -1.4110 .008 35. 7 R7 -1.4910 .092 [ 37. 8 R8 -1.3200 .114 45. o Ro -1.2160 .122 49. 10 Rio .5080 .212 85. 11 P11 -1.0240 .148 59. 12 Rt2 -1.2340 (
.135 54. L 13 P13 .2880 .233 47. ,
14 R14 .4540 .193 39. l 15 R15 .0640' .228 46. 16 P16 .7240 .141 28. 17 R17 -1.3390- .108 22. 1G R18 .8840 .171 34. ; 19 V1 .7000 .204 54.
.\-
20 V2 -1.2760 .200 53. 21 V3 -1.2150 .217 58. T' V4 -1.3490 .212 57. 4 "3 V5 -1.3400 .179 48. -
' J
, ?4 V4 -1.5160 .182- 49. I "5- U7 -1.7890 .062 16.
2A V8 -1.8550 .054 14.
'? E1 .9030 .145 21.
"O E2 .4340 .208 30. ,
'9 r3 .3450 .247 30. .
c 90 E4 .5530 .295 42. 71 E5 .2500 .207 30.
~2 Ph -t.1190 .106 15.
'3 E7 .0460 .230 33. <
74 FG .0390 .262 37.
'5 Go .1660 .283 40.
'A EtO .5150 .291 42.
77 F11 .4660 .248 33.
1 f" ? .3740 .211 30.
4 9 Dee -2.0110 .006 O. l
~- -
p B-20 i i
e J@PENDIX B (
-N
%- CALLAWAY GTRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 l-
SUMMARY
-OF DATA AT 1143 105 60.00 PSIG 67.30 F TPANSDUCER VOLTAGE- DISPLACEMENT (IN) % OF PREDICTED 1 R1 -1.8790 .047 19. 2 P2 -1.6050 .077 31. 3 R3' -1.5700 .057 23. 4 R4 -1.7480 .075 30. 5 'R5 -1.7700 .053 21. 6 'R6 -1.4680 .081 33. 7 R7 -1.5310 .088 35. 8 R8 -1.3390 .111 45. o R9 .-1.2340 .120 48. 10 R10 .6340 .198 79. 11 R11 -1.0990 .139 56. 12 R12 -1.2880 .129 52. E 1~ R13 .2850 .233 47. l 14 R14 ..4540 .193 39. 15 R15 .0640 .228 46. 16 R16 .7240 .141 28. 17 P17- -1.3390 .108 22.
,q 18 to R18 V1
.8830
.7140
.171 34.
J .202 54. 20 V2 -1.2780 .200 53.
'1' V3 -1.2150 .217 58.
i ^7 V4 -1.3490 .212 57. i
*3~ V5 -1.3400 .179 48.
"4 V6 -1.5100 .182 49.
'5 V7 -1.7890 .062 16.
- ?4 V8 -1.8540 .054 14.
I '? E1 .9000 .137 20. 70 E2 .5410 .196 28.
"9 E3 .1090 .249 36.
NO F4 .3900 .277 40. l 71 E5 .3540 .196 28. 7? EA -1.1190 .106 15.
~7 F7 .0650 .218 31.
34 EO 1750 .246 35. 75 EO .0000 .264 38.
- ~6 E10 .3300 .272- 39.
~7 Eli t
- .4030 .232 33.
'1 Ft2' .4730 .197 28.
RcF -2.0110 L .006 O.
-f h, h L s _/
l i L i B-21
APPENDIX B (_j' CALLANAY GTRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 SUMMAPY OF DATA AT 1242 105 55.00 PSIG 66.40 F TPANSDitCER VOLTAGE DISPLACEMENT (IN) % OF PREDICTED 1 R1 -1.8780 .048 19. 2 PC -1.6500 .072 29.
- 7. P3 -1.6000 .055 22.
4 P4 -1.7480 .075 30. 5 R5 -1.0080 .049 19. 6 P6 -1.5280 .075 30. 7 P7 -1.5810 .082 33. O R8 -1.3930 .105 42. 9 R9 -1.3060 .112 45. 10 P10 .7630 .183 73. 11 R11 -1.1830 .130 52. 12 R12 ~1.3490 .122 49. 13 P13 .2850 .233 47. 14 R14 .4540 .193 39. 15 Rt5 .0640 .228 46. 16 R16 .7240 .141 28. 17 R17 -1.0300 .108 22.
<x 18 P18 .9360 .165 33.
! 19 V1 .7940 .194 52. 20 VT -1.3440 .192 51.
?! U3 -1.2830 .209 56.
22 v4 -1,429o ,;o3 54, 23 V5 -1.3400 .179 48. 24 V6 -1.5490 .179 48. 75 V7 -1.7800 .062 16. 26 VG -1.0540 .054 14. 27 E1 -1.0580 .128 18. 28 E2 .6480 .184 26. 29 E3 .0060 .232 33. 30 F4 .2390 .258 37.
,.31 E3 .4610 -
.183 26.
'32 E6 -1.1680 .100 14.
33 E7 .1860 .005 29. 34 EG .3160 .230 33. 35 E9 .1660 .245 35. 36 E10 .1600 .252 36. 37 E11 .7510 .214 31, 70 E12 .6140 .184 26. 39 PEr -2.0110 .005 O. B-22
M'PENDIX B
\ \_ / CALL A' DAY GTRtlCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984
SUMMARY
OF DATA AT 1415 105 48.25 PSIG 66.60 F TRANSDUCER VOLTAGE DISPLACEMENT (IN) % OF PREDICTED 1 R1 -1.9180 .043 17. 2 P2 -1.7090 .065 26.
- R3 -1.6460 .049 20.
4 P4 -1.8000 .068 27. 5 RM -1.8540 .044 17. 6 P6 -1.6040 .066 26. 7 R7 -1.6450 .075 30. O PR -1.4660 .097 39. 9 PC -1.3990 .102 41. 10 P10 .9330 .163 65. 11 All -1.2940 .117 47. 12 R12 -1.4510 .111 44, 13 R13 .3000 .231 46. 14 R14 .4540 .193 39. 15 R15 .0640 .220 46. 16 R16 .7240 .141 20. 17 R17 !
-1.3360 .109 22.
f-s i 10 R10 -1.0490 .152 30. ( ) 19 V1 .9090 .101 48. 20 V2 -1.4410 .181 48. 71 V3 -1.4140 .194 52. 22 V4 -1.5500 .190 51. 23 V5 -1.3900 .173 46. 24 V6 -1.6460 .160 45. 25 V7 -1.7900 .062 16. 26 VR -1.0540 .054 14. 27 E1 -1.1590 .116 17. 28 E2 .0040 .166 24. 29 E3 .1650 .209 30. 30 E4 .0360 .234 33. 31 E5 .6010 .167 24. 32 E6 -1.2660 .009 13. 33 E7 .3440 .100 27. 34 CG .1240 .252 36. 35 E9 .0000 .220 31. 36 C10 .0600 .220 33. 37 C11 .9230 .194 20. In E12 .7660 .166 24. 30 PCF -2.0110 .005 0. m B-23
APPENDIX B ! ) CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTCGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984
SUMMARY
OF DATA AT 1500 105 48.25 PSIG 67.68 F TRANSDltCER VOLTAGE DISPLACEMENT (IN) % OF PREDICTED 1 Rt -1.9190 .043 17. 2 R2 -1.7110 .065 26. 3 R3 -1.6480 .049 20. 4 R4 -1.8090 .068 27. 5 R5 -1.8540 .044 17. 6 R6 -1.6050 .06'6 26. 7 R7 -1.6540 .074 30. O RO -1.4690 .096 39. 9 R9 -1.4130 .101 40. 10 Rio .9340 .163 65. 11 R11 -1.2940 .117 47.
!? R12 -1.4700 .109 44.
13 R13 .3010 .231 46. 14 R14 .4550 .193 39. 15 Rt5 .0640 .228 46. 16 R16 .7240 .141 20. 17 R17 -1.3380 .100 22.
,s 10 R10 -1.0490 .152 30.
/ 19 V1 .9190 .100 40. \-)) 20 V2 -1.4500 .179 40. 21 V3 -1.4140 .194 52. 22 V4 -1.5510 .190 51. 23 V5 -1.4130 .171 46. 24 V6 -1.6760 .165 44. 25 V7 -1.7?10 .061 16. 76 V8 -1.0540 .054 14. 77 C1 1.1610 .116 17. 28 C2 .0040 .166 24. 29 E3 .1600 .000 30. 30 E4 .0350 .234 33. 31 E3 .6110 .166 24. 32 E6 -1.0730 .000 13. 33 E7 .3440 .100 27. 34 EO .1260 .252 36. 35 E9 .3010 .220 31. 36 E10 .0510 .229 33. 37 C11 - .9240 .194 20.
'O C12 .7600 .166 24.
'9 RCr -2.0110 .005 O.
n. B-24
. . . . . _ . . _ _ .- - _ = . - ... - -
/WPENDIX B i
- 1 g,/.. - CALLAWAY-STRUCTURAL' INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984
SUMMARY
OF DATA AT 1600 105 48.25:PSIG 68.90 F TRANSDUCER VOLTAGE DISPLACEMENT (IN) % OF PREDICTED l' . R1 -1.9190 .043 17. 2 R2 -1.7100 .065 26. 3 R3 -1.6480 .049 20. 4 R4 -1.8110 .068 27. 5 R5 -1.8540 .044 17. 6 R6 -1.6130 .065 26. 7 R7 -1.6680 .072 29. 8 R8 -1.4690 .096 39. 9 R9 -1.4580 .096 38. t 10 R10 .9410 .162 65. l~ 11 R11 -1.2940 .117 47. I- 12- R12 -1.4880 .107 43. 13 R13 .6540 .191 38. , 14 R14 .5580 .180 36. 15 R15 .5610 .176 35. 16 R16~ .7250 .140 28. 17 'R17 -1.3360 .109 22. 18 .R18 -1.1140 .144 29. , l[_^~ ' 19 V1 .9190 .180' 48. 20 V2 -1.4580 .179 48. r 21 V3 -1.4140 .194 52.
- 22. V4 -1.5510 .190 51.
23 V5 -1.4360 '
.169 45.
24~ V6- ,-1.6860 .164 44. 25' V7 -1.7900: ' .062 16. -
'26- V8 -1.8550 .054 14.
27 E1 -1.1610 .116 17. 28 E2 .8040 .166 24. 29 E3- .1680 .208 30. 30- E4- .0260- .227 32. 31 E5 .6190 .-165 24. 32 E6 -1.2810 .088- 13. 33 E7 .3450 .187 27. 34 E8 .1260 .252 ~\ 36. !~ M5 E9 .3830 .220 . 31. 36- E10 .0510 .229-
^ '
< 33.
'37 -E11 .9240 ' .194 28.
- M3 - E12 .7660 .166 -=,
24. 39 REF -2.0130 s .OO6- O.
, . 4 4, .
(,d Q , s ,_ . . .-s . v; - ; ~ l- , e es a .
~
B--25, q[ i e x w s
,. \1
, /WPENDIX B
\/ CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984
SUMMARY
.OF' DATA AT 1704 105 45.00 PSIG 67.70 F TRANSDUCER VOLTAGE DISPLACEMENT.(IN) % OF PREDICTED 1 R1 -1.9200. .042 17. 2' R2 -1.7360 .062 25. 3 R3 -1.6690 .047 19. 4 R4 -1.8680 .061 24. 5 R5 -1.8800- .041 16. 6 R6 -1.6510 .061 24. 7 R7 -1.7050 .068 27. 8 R8 -1.5000 .093 37. 9 R9 -1.5030 .091 36. 10 R10 -1.0250' .152 61.
- 11 R11 -1.3410 .112 45.
12 R12 -1.5390 .101 40. ! 13 R13 .7190 -.184 37. 1 14 R14 .6980 .164 33. 15 R15 .5600 .176 35. j 16 R16 .7250 .140 28. 17 R17 -1.3350 .109_ 22. r^s - 1 18 - R18 -1.1540 .139 28.
! 19 V1 .9800 .173 46.
20 V2 -1.5150 .173 46. 21 V3 -1.4590 .188 50.
- 22. V4 -1.6080 .183 49, 23 V5 -1.5080 .161 43.
- 24. V6 -1.7590 .156 41.
25 V7 -1.7930 .061 16. 26' V8 -1.8550 .054 14, 27 E1 -1.2180 .110 16. 28 E2 .8890 .157 22. 29 E3 .2750 .196 28. 30 E4 .0930- .220 31. 31 E5 .6910 .157 22. 32 E6 -1.3210 .083 12. 33 E7. .4460 .177 25. 34 .E8' .1260 .252 36. 35 E9 .4960 .207 30. ,. 36 E10 .1790 .214 '31. 37 E11 -1.0110 .184 26. 38 E12 .8500 .157 22, 39 REF -2.0130 .006 O. c 7 I 1 ,'g % t l-- B-26
, - , . - , w
1 J APPENDIX B
.Ch ,b CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL-INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 L
SUMMARY
OF DATA AT 1801' 105 40.00 PSIG 66.40 F 4 TRANSDUCER VOLTAGE DISPLACEMENT (IN) 7. OF PREDICTED 1- R1 -1.9700 .036 15.
- 2. R2 -1.7830 .056 23.
3 R3 -1.7010 .043 17. 4 R4. -1.9190 .055 22. 5 R5 -1.9160 .037 15. 6 R6 -1.7090 .054 22.
. 7. R7 -1.7530 .062 25.
L 8 R8 -1.5650 .085 34. 9 R9 -1.5610 .084 34. -
'10 RIO -1.1460 .138 55.
4 11 Pli -1.4200 .102 41. 12 R12 -1.6040 .094 37. 13 R13 .7900 .175 35. 14 R14 .6980 .164 33. ] 15 R15 ' .5610 .176 35. 16- R16 .7250 .140 28. 17 .R17- -1.3360 .109. 22. 18 R18 -1.2600 .127 25. 19 :V1 -1.0680 .163 44. 20 V2 -1.6030' .163 43.
'21 V3 -1.5680 .176 47.
22 V4 -1.7160- .171 46. 23- V5 -1.5990' .151 40. 24 .V6 -1.8460 .146 39. 25 V7 -1.'7940 .061 16. 26 V8 -1.8550 .054 14. 27 E 1. -1.2980 .101 14. 28 E2 .9990' .144 21.
.29 E3 .4280 .178 25.
30 E4 .2400 .201 29. 31 E5. - .7990 .145 21. 32 E6 -1.3930 .076- 11.
- 33. E7 .5780 .162 23.
34 E8 .1280 .252 36. 35- E9 .6600' .188 27. 36 E10- .3550 .195 28. 37 E11 --1.1490 .168 24. 38 -E12 .9640 .144 21. 39 ":EF ,-2.0110 .005 O.
, Ms
. ( ) .~
B-27
APPENDIX B 4 CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY. 1984
SUMMARY
OF DATA AT 1901 105 35.00 PSIG 65.20 F TRANSDUCER VOLTAGE DISPLACEMENT (IN) % OF PREDICTED 1 R1 -1.9920 .034 14. 2 R2 -1.8340 .051 20. 3 R3 -1.7350 .040 16. 4 R4 -1.9700 .049 20. 5 R5 -1.9540 .032 13. 6 R6' -1.7680 .047 19. 7 R7 -1.8080 .056 22. O R8 -1.6310 .078 31. 9 R9 ~1.6280 .077 31. 10 R10 -1.2700 .123 49. 11 R11 -1.4990 .093 37. 12 R12' -1.6810 .085 34. 13 R13 -1.0410 .147 29. ! 14 R14 .8460 .146 29. 15 R15 .8400 .146 29. 16 R16 .9500 .115 23. 1'7 R17 -1.3350 .109 22. f 18 R18 -1.3700 .114 23. (_j) 19 V1 -1.1690 .152 41. 20 V2 -1.7060 .151 40. 21 V3 -1.6650 .164 44. 22 V4 -1.G310 .158 42. 23- V5 -1.7010 .139 37. 24 V6 -1.9410 .135 36. - 25 V7 -1.7940 .061 16. 26 V8 -1.8540 .054 14. I 27 E1 -1.3830 .091 13. 28 E2 -1.1150 .131 19. 29 E3- .5940 .159 23. 30 E4 .4060 .182 26. 31- E5 .9150 .132 19. 32 E6 -1.4420 .069 10. 33 E7 .7160 .147 21. c 34 E8 .1280 .252 36. 75 E9 .8310 .168 24.
~6 E10 .5390 .174 25.
77 E11 -1.2950 .151 22. 38 E12 -1.0050 .130. 19. ' , 3o REF -2.0110 .005 O. i a
-f
- \.)i B-28
-APPENDIX B p:
(_ CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984
SUMMARY
OF DATA AT 2004 105 30.00 PSIG 64.80 F TRANSDUCER VOLTAGE DISPLACEMENT (IN) 7. OF PREDICTED 1 R1 -2.0160 .031 12. 2 R2 -1.8810 .045 18. 3 R3 -1.7690 .036 14. 4 R4 -2.0210 .043 17. 5 R5 -1.9910 .028 11. 6 R6 -1.8240 .041 16. 7 R7 -1.8630 .050 20. 8 R8 -1.6990 .070 28. 9 R9 -1.6990 .069 28. 10 R10 -1.3910 .109 44. 11 R11 -1.5800 .084 34. 12 R12 -1.7560 .077 31. 13 R13 -1.1560 .134 27. 14 R14 .9490 .133 27. 15 R15 -1.0810 .121 24. 16 R16 .9500 .115 23. 17 R17 -1.3350 .109 22. 7-4 18 R18 -1.4610 .103 21. ( 19- VI -1.2750 .140 37. 20 V2 ~-1.8090 .139 37, 21 V3 -1.7950 .149 40. 22 V4 -1.9590 .143 38. 23 V5 -1.8030 .'128 34. 24 V6 -2.0460 .124 33. 25 V7 -1.8430 .056 15.
'26 V8 -1.8550 .054 14.
27- E1 -1.4690 .082 12. 28 E2 -1.2490 .116' 17. 29 E3 .7540 .141 20. 30 E4 .5740 .162 23. 31 E5 -1.0330 .118 17. 32 E6 -1.5060 .062 9. 33 E7 .8590 .132 19. 34 E8 .1280 .252 36. 35 E9 -1.0010 .149 21. 36 E10 .7190 .155 22. 37 Ell -1.4260 .135 19. 38 E12 -1.2140 .116 17. To PEF -2.0110 .005 O. p-k, B-29 i!
APPENDIX B pm; f ,)' CALLAWAY: STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984
SUMMARY
OF DATA AT 2115 105 25.00 PSIG 64.60 F TRANSDUCER VOLTAGE DISPLACEMENT (IN) % OF PREDICTED 1 R1 -2.0690 .025 10. 2 R2 -1.9310 .039 16. 3 R3 -1.8030 .032 13. 4 R4 -2.0740 .037 15. 5 R5 -2.0300 .024 10. 6 R6 -1.8830 .034 14. 7 R7 -1.9230 .043 17. 8 R8 -1.7680 .062 25. 9 R9 -1.7680 .062 25. 10 R10 -1.5190 .094 38. 11 R11 -1.6640 .074 30. 12 R12 -1.8410 .067 27. 13 R13 -1.2410 .124 25. 14 R14 -1.0790 .118 24.
! 15 R15 -1.0800 .121 24.
16 R16 -1.0850 .100 20. 17 R17 -1.3350 .109 22. 4 18 R18 -1.6050- .086 17. [ 19 VI -1.3910 .127 34.
\s 20 V2 -1.9210 .126 34.
-21 V3 -1.9110 .135 36.
22 V4 -2.0710 .131 35. 23 V5 -1.9210 .115 31. 24 V6 -2.1580 .111 30. 25 V7 -1.8850 .051 14, 26' V8 -1.8550 .054 14. 27- E1 -1.5600 .072 10. 28 E2 -1.3610 .103 15. L 29. E3
- .9180 .-122 17.
30 E4 .7510 .141 20. 31 E5 -1.1.590 .104 15. 32 E6 -1.5710 .054 8. 33 E7 -1.0110 .116 17. 34 EB 1310 .251 36. 35 E9 -1.1810 .128 18. 4-36 E10 .9090 .133 19. 37 Eli -1.5300 .117 17.
- 38. E12 -1.3400 .102 15.
39 REF -2.0110 .005 O.
. ,r g D
B-30 I
+
/@PENDIX B em
./
Os /)~ CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984
SUMMARY
OF DATA AT 2235 105 20.00 PSIG 64.06 F TRANSDUCER VOLTAGE DISPLACEMENT (IN) % OF PREDICTED 1 R1 -2.0990 .021 8. 2 R2 -1.'9820 .034 13. + 3 R3 -1.8390 .028 11. 4 R4 -2.1190 .032 13. 5 R5 -2.0690 .020 8. 6 R6 -1.9410 .028 11. 7 R7 -1.9860 .036 14. 8 R8 -1.8360 .054 22. 9 R9 -1.8500 .053 21. 10 R10 -1.6440 .080 32. 11 R11 -1.7490 .065 26. 12 R12 -1.9290 .057 23. 13 R13 -1.3680 .110 22, 14 R14 -1.1980 . 104 21.
.15 R15 -1.0810 .121 24.
16 R16 -1.2180 .085 17. 17 R17 -1.3380 .108 22. fg 18 R18 -1.6910 .076 15. (_f 19 20 V1 V2
-1.5010
-2.0400
.115
.113 31.
30. 21 V3 -2.0360 .121 32. 22 V4 -2.1980 .116 31. , 23 V5 -2.0360 .103 27. 24 V6 -2.2610 .100 27. 25 V7 -1.9340 .045 12. 26 V8 -1.8550 .054 14. 1 27 E1 -1.6480 .062. 9. t 2G E2 -1.4940 .088 13. 29 E3 -1.0840 .103 15. 30 E4 .9240 .121 17. 31 E5 -1.2790 .090 13. 32 'E6 -1.6420 .046 7.
- 33 E7 -1.1620 .099 14.
! 34 EB .2450 .238 34. 35 E9 -1.3580 .108 15. 36 E10 -1.0940 .113 16.
)
37 E11 -1.7250 .101 14. 3G E12 -1.4760 .086 12.
. 39 REF -2.0110 .005 O.
"'~
s-B-31 i
, . _ . . . _ _ . . ~ . . . . _ . _ _ . _ . _ . _ _ _ . , _ _ . - . . _ _ _ . . _ . _ _ _ . ~ . . . - _ . . - . . _ _ .
1
/WPENDIX B
.g r'N+
\s / 'CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984
SUMMARY
OF DATA AT 9 106 15.00 PSIG 63.90 F TRANSDUCER VOLTAGE DISPLACEMENT (IN) % OF PREDICTED 1 R1 -2.1250 .018 7. 2 R2' -2.0340 .028 11. 3 R3 -1.8730 .025 10. 4 R4 -2.1680 .026 10. 5 R5 -2.1060 .016 6. 6 R6 -2.0000 .021 8.. 7 R7 -2.0490 .029 11. 8 R8 -1.9090 .045 18, 9 R9 -1.9200 .045 18. 10 R10 -1.7680 .065 26.
.11 R11 -1.8310 .055 22.
12 R12 -2.0190 .047 19. 13 R13 -1.5200 .092 18. 14 R14 -1.3380 .087 17. 15 R15 -1.2380 .104 21. 16 R16 -1.3590 .069 14. 17 R17 -1.5080 .089 18. 4,e3 18 R18 -1.8240 .060 12. '(#~ i 19 20 V1 V2
-1.6290
-2.1640
.101
.099 27.
26. 21 31 3 -2.1630' .106 28. 22 V4 -2.3250 .102 27. 23 V5 -2.1560 .089 24, 24 V6 -2.3860 .086 23. 25- V7 -1.9790 .040 11. 26 V8 -1.9860 .039 10. 27 El- -1.7350 .052 7. 28 E2 -1.6240 .074 11. 29 E3 -1.2540 .083 12. 70 .E4 -1.0980 .100 14. 31 E5 -1.4030 .076 11.
-32 E6 -1.7060 .039 '6.
33- E7 -1.3200 .082 12, 34 E8 .1430 .250 36. 35 E9 -1.5310 .088 13. 36 E10 -1.2790 .092 13. 37 E11 -1.8760 .083 12. 38 E12 -1.5960 .073 10. 39 REF -2.0100 .005 O.
,f% -
1 lQ - - B-32
APPENDIX B
.,s
\
j' CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984
SUMMARY
OF DATA AT 205 106 10.00 PSIG 63.90 F TRANSDUCER VOLTAGE DISPLACEMENT (IN) % OF PREDICTED 1- R1 -2.1550 .014 6. 2 R2 -2.0810 .022 9. 3 R3 -1.9090 .021 8. 4 R4 -2.2110 .021 8. 5 RS~ -2.1450 .011 4. 6 R6 -2.0590 .015 6. 7 R7 -2.1140 .021 9. 8 R8 -1.9730 .038 15. 9 R9 -1.9940 .037 15. 10 R10 -1.8940 . 050 20. 11 R11 -1.9200 . 045 18. 12 R12 -2.1090 . 037 15. 13 R13 -1.6710 . 075 15. 14- R14 -1.3380 . 087 17. 15 R15 -1.4430 . 082 16. 16 R16 -1.5190 . 051 10. 17 R17 -1.5830 . 080 16.
~3. 18 R18 -1.9740 . 043 9.
~~
8 19 VI -1.7610 . 086 23. 20 V2 -2.2910 . 084 22. 21 V3 -2.2790 . 092 25. 22 V4 -2.4650 . 086 23. 23' V5 -2.2740 . 076 20. 24 V6 -2.5030 . 073 19. 25 V7 --2.0230 . 035 9. 26 V8 -1.9880 . 039 10. 27 E1 -1.8240 . 042 6. 28 E2 -1.7440 . 060 9. 29 E3 -1.4180 . 065 9. 30 E4 -1.2710 . 080 11. 31 E5 -1.5280 . 062 9. 32 E6 -1.~7760 . 031 4. 33 E7 -1.4850 . 064 9. 34 E8 .9200 . 158 23. 35 E9 -1.7060 . 068 10. 36 E10 -1.4660 . 072 10. 37 E11 -2.0230 - . 066 9. 38 E12 -1.7280 . 058 8. 39 REF -2.0100 . 005 O.
'Q.
B-33
,,,e--, .-.,_,.y. . . - - , , , - - r--,-, sw. , +-me ..m.r, -er-.m---,, ,,-r- ---.-re..----yps -.-p,--.6--e.-+,wy..,,.,m,--
', w e y,.,w-, .,yg
4 j. APPENDIX B O
- (_,) ' .CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 i
l
SUMMARY
OF DATA AT 445 106 5.00 PSIB 64.40 F TRANSDUCER VOLTAGE DISPLACEMENT (IN) % OF PREDICTED 1 R1 -2.1810 .011 4. 2 R2 -2.1310 .016 7.
- 3. R3 -1.9440 .017 7.
4 .R4 -2.2890 .012 5. 5 R5 -2.1850 .007 3.
; 6 R6 -2.1200 .008 3.
7 R7 -2.1810 .014 5. 8 R8 .-2.0480 .029 12. 9 R9 -2.0710 .028 11. 10 Rio -2.0190 .036 14. 11 R11 -2.0080 .035 14. 12 R12 -2.2030 .026 10. 13 R13 -1.8530 .054 11. 14 R14 -1.4780 .070 14. 15 R15 -1.6240 .063 13. 16 R16 -1.6480 .036 7. 17 R17 -1.7180 .065 13. gy 18 R18 -2.0990 .028 6.
-( ). 19 20 V1 V2
-1.8900
-2.4190
.072 19.
.070 19.
21 V3 -2.4280 .075 20. 22 V4 -2.6140 .069 19. 23 V5 -2.3940 .063 17, 24 V6 -2.6280 .059 16. 25 V7 -2.0740 .029 8. 26 V8 -1.9880 .039 10. 27 E1 -1.9080 .033 5. 28 E2 -1.8690 .046 7. 29 E3- -1.5790 .046 7. 30 E4 -1.4460 .059 8. 31 E5 -1.6580
.047 7.
- 32 E6 '-1.8550 .022 3.
33 E7 -1.6300 .049 7. , 34 EB .9500 .155 22. 35 E9 -1.8810 .048 7. 36 E10 -1.6500 .051 7. 37 E11 -2.1650 .049 7.
- 30 E12 -1.0640 .042 6.
39 REF -2.0090 .005 O. U[ B-34
J M'PENDIX B
. f sq lg,) CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984
SUMMARY
OF DATA AT 946 106
.00 PSIG 65.26 F TRANSDUCER VOLTAGE DISPLACEMENT (IN) % OF PREDICTED 1 R1 -2.2400 .004 2.
2 R2- -2.1860 .010 4. 3 R3 -1.9850 .012 5.
-4 'R4 -2,3650 .003 1.
5 R5 -2.2260 .002 1. 6 R6 -2.1810 .001 O. 7 R7 -2.2730 .003 1. 8 R8 -2.1180 .021 8. 9 R9 -2.1640 .018 7.
.10 -R10 -2.1550 .020 8.
t 11 R11 -2.0840 .026 10. 12 R12 -2.3140 .013 .5. 13 R13 -2.0260 .035 7.
' 14- R14 -1.6050 .055 11.
15 R15 -1.774) .047 9. 16 R16 -1.7260 .027 5.
- 17' R17 -1.8450 .051 10.
s 18 R18 -2.2010 .016 3. [.m A 19 V1 -2.0610 .053 14. 20- V2 -2.6040 .048 13. 21 U3 -2.5880 .056 15. 22' V4 -2.7810 -.051 13. 23 V5- -2.5250 .049 13. 24 V6 -2.7480 .046 12. 25 V7 -2.1210 .024 6. 12 6 V8 -2.1230 .023 6. 27 E1 -1.Y960' .023 3. 28 E2 -2.0030 .031- 4. 29 E3 -1.7480 .027 4. 30 E4 -1.6340 .037 5. 31' E5 -1.8010 .031 4. 32' E6 -1.9410 .012 2. 33 E7 -1.8140 .029 4. 34 EB -1.2490 .119 17. 35 E9 -2.0640- .027 4. 36 E10 -1.8400 .030 4. 37 E11 -2.3240 .030 4. 38 E12 -2.0000 .027 4. 39 REF -2.0100 .005 O.
'~)
- (G B -
APPENDIX B
./*"%
( 1 -
\. /
CALLAWAY~ STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984
SUMMARY
OF DATA AT 1248 106
.00 PSIG 67.00 F 4 .
TRANSDUCER VOLTAGE DISPLACEMENT (IN) % OF PREDICTED 1 R1 -2.2410 .004 2. 2 R2 -2.1860 .010 4. 3 R3 -1.9860 .012 5. 4 R4 -2.3650 .003 1. 5 RS -2.2290 .002 1. i 6 R6 -2.1930 .001 O. 7 R7 -2.3060 .001 0. 8 R8 -2.1200 .021 8. 9 R9 -2.1760 .017 7. 10 R10 -2.1840 .016 7.
- 11. R11 -2.0910 .025 10.
12 R12 -2.3290 .012 5. 13 R13 -2.1280 .023 5. 14 R14 -1.6080 .054 11. 15 R15 -1.7740 .047 9. 16 R16 -1.8010 .019 4. 17 R17 -2.0700 .025 5. 18 R18 -2.2030 (- 19 V1 -2.0830
.016
.051 3.
13. 20 V2 -2.6210 .047 12. 21 V3 -2.5880 .056 15. 22 V4 -2.7880 .050 13. 23 V5 -2.5240 .049 13. 24 V6 -2.6940 .052 14. 25 V7 -2.1210 .024 -6. 26 V8 -2.1630 .018 5. 27 E1' -2.0030 .022 3. 28 E2 -2.0030 .031 4. 29 E3 -1.7560 .026 4. 30 E4 -1.6410 .036 5. 31 E5. :-1.8090 .030 4. 32 E6 -1.9440 .012 2. 33 E7 -1.8400 .026 4. 34 E8 .4100 .218 31. 35 E9 -2.0710 .026 4. 36 E10 -1.8360 .031 4. 37 E11 -2.3240 .030 4. 38 E12 -2.0010 .027 4. 39 REF -2.0090 .005 O. V B-36
APPENDIX B - s s- CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984
SUMMARY
OF DATA AT 1354 106
.00 PSIG 67.40 F TRANSDUCER VOLTAGE DISPLACEMENT (IN) */. OF PREDICTED 1 R1 -2.2410 .004 2.
2 R2 -2.1860 .010 4.
.3 R3 -1.9880 .012 5.
4 R4 -2.3660 .003 1. 5 R5 -2.2300 .002 1. 6 R6 -2.1940 .001 O.
'7 R7 -2.3090 .001 0.
8 R8 -2.1200 .021 8. 9 R9 -2.1760 .017 7. 10 R10 -2.1840 .016 7. 11 R11 -2.1000 .024 10. 12 R12 -2.3340 .011 4. 13 R13 -2.1290 .023 5. 14 R14 -1.6080 .054 m 11. 15 R15 -1.7740- .047; 9. 16 R16 -1.8010 .019 4. 17 -R17 -2.0700 .025 5.
"s 18 R1B -2.2030 .016 3.
I) 19- VI 20 V2
-2.0840
-2.6210
.050 13.
.047 12.
21 V3 -2.5880 .056 15. 22 "V4 -2.7880 .050 13. 23 V5 -2.5240 .049 13. 24 V6 -2.6890 .052 14. 25 V7 -2.1210 .024 6. 26 VG -2.1640 .018 5. 27 E1 -2.0030 .022 3. 28 E2 -2.0040 .031 4.
-29 E3 -1.7580 .026 4.
30 E4 -1.6410 .036 5. 31 E5 -1.8090 .030 4. 32 E6 -1.9440 .012 2. 33- E7 -1.8400 .026 4.
'34 EO .6640 .188 27.
35 E9 -2.0710 .026 4. 36 E10 -1.8340 .031 4. 37 E11 ~2.3240 .030 4. 30 E12 -2.0010 .027 4. 3? REF -2.0100 .005 O. ,'R B-37
5 M'PENDIX B 1
? Q' CALLAWAY STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY TEST -- JANUARY, 1984 1.
SUMMARY
OF DATA AT 1646 106
.00 PSIG 67.40 F TRANSDUCER VOLTAGE DISPLACEMENT (IN) % OF PREDICTED 1 R1 -2.2410 .004 2.
2 R2 -2.1860 .010 4. j 3 R3 -1.9890 .012 5.
- i. 4- R4 -2.3660
.~O03 1.
5 R5 -2.2340 .001 1.
'6 R6 -2.1940 .001 O.
7 R7 -2.3160 .002 -1. 8 R8 -2.1200 .021 8. 9 R9 -2.1750 .017 7.
-10 R10 -2.1850 .016 7.
11 R11 -2.0990- .024 10. 12 R12 -2.3430 .010 4. 13 R13 -2.1280 .023 5.
'14 R14 -1.6080 .054 11.
15 R15 -1.7740 .047 9. 16 R16 -1.8030 .019 4.
- 17. R17 -2.0710 .025 5.
18 R18 -2.1580 .021
'(,
r~')- 19 V1 -2.0840 .050 4. 13.
-20 V2 -2.6210 .047 12.
21 V3 -2.5880 .056 15. 22 V4 -2.7800 .050 13.
.23 V5 -2.5250' .049 13.
.. 24 V6 -2.6880- .052 14.
25 V7 -2.1210 .024 6. 26 VS -2.1640 .018 5. 27 E1 -2.0030 .022 3. 28 E2 -2.0040 .031 4. 29 E3 -1.7590 .025 4. 30 E4 -1.6410 .036 5. 31 E5 -1.8090 .030 4. 32 E6 -1.9430 .012 2. 33 E7 -1.8400 .026 4. 34 ES .5580 .201 29. 35 E9. -2.0730 .024 4. 36 E10 -1.8340 .031 4. 37 E11 -2.3240 .03a 4. 33 .E12 -2.0000 .027 4. 39 REF -2.0100 .005 O.
\
J , i B-38
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY CALLAWAY PLANT UNIT 1 l I PRIMARY REACTOR CONTAINMENT INTEGRATED LEAKAGE RATE TEST ,O Final Report January 1984 l l l 0 Bechtel Power Corporation
l' s 4 i 1 i . i UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY 1 1 CALLAWAY PLANT UNIT I i l l 4 i I ' A I l * ' l 4 1-t i l
- i PRIMARY REACIOR CONTAIl@fENT l
~
i INTEGRATED LEAKAGE RATE TEST 4 . i { January 1984 l FINAL REPORT , i. i i !
!1 I
\ r t i I I
- Prepared by Bechtel Power Corporation f j
. San Francisco, CA :
l I
- SU-051
t
~
TABLE OF CONTENTS Sections Page (
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1 s $ 2.0 S1HMARY 2 * { Test Data Summary Table 4 + 3.0 DISCUSSION 6 4.0 TEST SEQUENCE 7 5.0 INSRUMENTATION AND DATA AQUISITION 8 l 1 Sensor Locations and Volume Fractions Table 9 6.0 TEST PETHODS 11 Appendices i A. Description of Bechtel ILRT Computer Program l !~ ! B. ILRT Stabilization Summary Data t t C. IIRT Trend Report D. . IBM Computer ILRT Summary Data; Mass point, Total Time 3 E. IIRT Plots: Airmass, Temperature, Pressure, Vapor Pressure ! J
- F. Verification Test Summary Data ,
G. ISG Calculation f i i i H. LIAT Summary ' i K. Callaway Computer ILRT Summary Data - i n h i b SU-051 11
IIAT REPORT POR CALIAWAY NUCLEAR STATION
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The reactor containment building Integrated Leakage Rate Test (Type A) was performed .to demonstrate that leakage through the primary reactor containment and penetrations does not exceed allowable leakage rate values as specified in the Plant Technical specifications. This' report describes the preoperational Integrated Leakage Rate Test at the Callaway Plant, Unit 1, per 10CFR50, Appendix J requirments. The preopera-tional ILRT was successfully completed on Janury 8,1984 A Structural Integrity Test (SIT) was conducted in conjunction with and immediately prior to the IIRT. Test results and data for the SIT are in-cluded in a- separate report. Following the completion of the SIT the , containment was depressurized to atmospheric pressure. Containment entry was made for inspection and af ter a 7.5 hours hold the pressurization was started for ILRT. The test dura-tion was 24 hours followed by a 4-hour verification test. The following documents contain the test requirements and acceptance criteria for the ILRT:
~ 1. Callaway- Plant Unit 1 Technical Specification
- 2. Appendix J to 'IOCFR50, Reactor Containment leakage Testing for Water Cooled Reactors.
- 3. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulatory Guide 1.68, Preoperational and Initial Startup Test Program for Water Cooled. Power Reactors.
4 Bechtel Topical Report BN-TOP-1, Testing Criteria for Integrated Leakage Rate Testing of Primary Containment Structures for Nuclear Power Plants.
- 5. ANSI /ANS 56.8-1981 - Containment System Leakage Testing Requirements.
- 6. Callaway Plant Procedure CS-030001, Primary Reactor Containment Inte-grated Leakage _ Rate Test.
A V. SU-051 .
2.0
SUMMARY
.The containment building integrated leakage rate test (Type A) was success-fully completed meeting all acceptance criteria set forth in the governing documents listed in Section 1. The test results are reported in accordance with the requirements of 10CFR50, Appendix J, Section V.B.3.
The calculated leakage rates were 0.045 wt% per day using the Mass Point Analysis technique and 0.043 wt% per day using the Total Time Analysis technique .
.The 95% upper confidence limits were 0.047 wt% per day for Mass Point and 0.051 wt% per day for Total Time Analysis techniques. Ihe acceptance
- criteria of 75% of La is 0.150 wt% per day.
Following completion of the ILRT, a successful verification test was per-formed. The Mass Point calculated leakage rate was 0.228 wt% per day with a lower limit of 0.195 wt% per day and upper limit of 0.295 wt% per day. The Total Time calculated leakage rate was 0.251 wt% per day with a lower limit of 0.193 wt% per day and upper limit of 0.293 wt% per day. During the IIAT and verification test two independent computer systems were used to calculate leakage. The Calloway plant (BOP) computer was generating data simultaneously with Bechtel's IBM-PC computer. A good agreement was found between the two sets of results. The IIAT results of the IBM and plant- computers are shown in Appendixes D and K respectively. V. Pressurization for ILRT started on January 6,1984 at 1738. Test pressure was reached at 0355 on January.7,1984. All containment fans were turned off and a 4.75 hours stabilization period followed. The 24-hour leakage rate test started at 0845 on January 7. The 75% of La allowable leakage j' rate criteria was met af ter 7.5 hours testing, however the test continued for 24 hours per procedure. The 4-hour verification test started at 0950 and was completed at 1350 on January 8,1984. l-Prior to the test, a surveillance of reactor containment penetrations and isolation valves was performed to meet the requirements of Appendix J to 10CFR50, Seetions III D.3. In addition, a general containeent inspeetion i was performed on the accessible surfaces in accordance with Section V. of 10CFR50, Appendix J,' before pressurization. No containment damage was found.- During the ILRT the tendon end anchorage area of the surveillance tendons
- were visually inspected in accordance with the requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.35, Revision 2, Section C, Paragraph 3. However, the inspections were performed since the NRC had not, at the time the IIRT was conducted, l accepted Bechtel's changes to the NRC standard version of Sections 3/4.6.1.6 which was to be used for the SNUPPS Technical Specifications involving l- Containment Vessel Structural Integrity. Bechtel's change involved compliance
- to proposed Revision 3 of regulatory Guide 1.35 instead of to Revision 2.
In the proposed Revision 3, the requirement to perform inspection of the concrete surrounding the tendon end anchorages during the IIAT has been
^
~
eliminated. ' The proposed changes were subsequently accepted by the NRC.
. - All inspected tendon ends were found satisfactory.
j SU-051 2.6
SUMMARY
(Cont'd) The local Leak Rate Test program was completed prior to the IIRT. The a details and results are sub=itted to the NRC in a separate report. The total of the local leak rates are below thez.6 La allowable limit. See Appendix H for a summary of the test results. i l 6 I 1 0 i l l t 4 i I" > l SU-051 - 3-
. ,_,r...-,,. , . ~ ,.E-.,,.,1, m m-e.. , . ..y-, , ,..,y.,m,, , . - _ , , _ .,_, _ _ , , , . . . _ . . _ _ . . . _ , . _.__m._,_
- .-. _ ~
. w- , '] / \n.)
TEST DATA
SUMMARY
TABLE l I A. Plant Information 1 Owner Union Electric Company Plant Callaway Nuclear Station Lo cation Fulton, Missouri Containment Type Post-tensioned Concrete Date Test Completed Janua ry 8, 1984 B. Technical Data 1 Containment Net Free 2,500,000 cu. f t. Air Volume 2 Design Pressure 60 psig
- 3. Containment ILRT Average 40 - 120*F Temperature Limits C. Test Results - Type A Test
- 1. Test Method Absolute
- 2. Data Analysis Technique Leakage Rate: Total-Time
* (per BN-TOP-1) and Mass point (per ANSI 56.8-1981)
- 3. Test Pressure 48.1 (+2,-0) psig 4 Maximum allowable Leakage 0.2 wt% per day Rate, La
- 5. 7 5% of. La 0.15 wt% per day j 6. Integrated Leakage Rate Calculated Up per - 95%
Leakage Rate Confidence Limit wt%/ day wt%/ day
- a. Total Time Analysis 0.043 0.051 l b. Mass Point Analysis 0.045 0.047 i
- 7. Verification Test Imposed 15.20 scfm Leakage Rate, Li 0.20 wt%/ day i
- 8. Verification Test Results Leakage Rate, wt%/ day
- a. Total Time analysis 0.251
- b. Mass Point analysis 0.228 SU-051 _. ._ __ . _ . . . -_ --.___ _ _ .. - . _ - - _ _ _._ _ __
i I I i
. O 9. Verification Test Limits
- a. Total Time Analysis wt%/ days Upper Limit (Li + Lam + .25La) 0.293 Lower Limit (Li + Lam .25La) 0.193
- b. Mass Point Analysis Upper Limit (Li + Lam + .25La) 0.295 Lower Limit (Li + Lam .25La) 0. 195 D. LIRT Adjustments and Other Penalties: None i
E. LLRT Results e LIRT, Subtotal of Type B and C Tests: 17,694 seem or 0.00842 wt%/ day Total LLRT Leakage: 0.00842 wt%/ day < 0.6 La = 0.12 wt%/ day ' 4 0 i i J h a SU-051 , I !
. . . _ . _ _ . , . , _ _ _ . _ _ _ , , _ _ _ , _ _ . . _ _ . , , , . ~ . . . . _ _ _ , . _ _ _ . _ , . _ . , _ _ . . . _
- 4. ,_ 3.0 DISCUSSION f 1
\- / During the Structural Integrity Test preceding the ILRT, the containment penetrations were inspected for leaks and no leakage was found.
The pressurization system consisted of Atlas - Copco, diesel motor driven oil free compressors, a refrigerated air dryer and moisture separator. pressurization rate was between 4.6 and 5.8 psig/hr. All containment isolation valves were lined up in post-LOCA condition in accordance with the ILRT procedure. There were no exceptions to the valve lineup. The containment was pressurized to 50.05 psig (test pressure is 48.1,
+2, -0 psig), when the compressors were s topped. All containment fans were turned of f at the beginning of stabilization period. Af ter stabilization was achieved a 24-hour ILRT was performed. The resulting leakage rates were well below the allowable limits.
Two computers were used for simultaneous processing of the ILRT data. Callaway's BOP plant camputer and Bechtel's IBM-PC computer were calculating leakage rates independently using a common data input. A comparison of the two separate results in Appendix D (IBM-PC) and Appendix K (BOP) indicate a very close correlation between the leakage rates. O n
; a \m / .
SU-051 _
4.0 TEST SEQUENCE
-FN
\-- Containment pressurization started on January 6,1984 at 1738 with all compressors running. The test pressure was reached at 0355 the following i day. l l
The Test Phases were as follows: l Test Phase Time Duration Date Pres suriza tion 1738 - 0355 10:58 hrs Jan. 6-7 Stabilization 0400 - 0800 4.00 Jan. 7 ILRT 0845 - 0845 24.0 Jan 7-8 Verification 0845 - 0950 1.1 Jan. 8 (s tabilization) Verification Test 0950 - 1350 4.0 Jan. 8 Depres surization 1500 - N.A. Jan. 8 (s tarted) f) l V s SU-051 -- ,. v . ,..m, ,e--.,-g,,,-w.---- . , , - . . , , __e _n_ - , , , ,,.g.-m --..,-y., , ,, . , , ..,.e.,ee,,,..,_,__, , - - . , - - ,-,,
5.0 INSTRUMENTATION AND IRTA ACQUISITION O The following instrumentation system was used:
-Reqd. Description Data Absolute Pressure 2- Precision Pressure Gauge Range : 0-100 psia Mansor Model 10100-001 Accuracy: +/-0.02% FS Sensitivity: 0.001 psia Repeatability: 0.0005% FS ,
Resolution: 0.001% FS Calibr. Date: 12/20/83 Drybulb Temperature 24 . Resistance Temperature Range : 0-150*F Detectors, Platinum Accuracy: +/-0.10'FS -^ 100 ohm RTD's Sensitivity: 0.10*F I Repeatability: 0.10*F Calibr. Date: 12/22/83 Dewpoint Temperature 6 Dewpoint Detectors, Range : (-58)-212*F O, Chilled Mirror EG&G Model 660-1 Accuracy: Sensitivi ty:
+/-0.54*F 0.10*F Repeatability: 0.10*F Calibr. Date: 12/22/83 JFlow Meters 2 Mass Flowmeter, Range : 1.5-15 cfm Volumetrics Accuracy: +/-l.0% FS i
. Model W-096-7B 'ty: 0.1%FS'
'ty: 0.10 scfm ,
e: 12/22/83 l The BOP plant computer was utilized for da on system. All instru- l ments were directly connected to the comp
- sures and tempera-tures were' continuously displayed on the I-PC used a direct l data input from the plant computer.
f i O SU-051 ;
- c. _. _ . . . . _ . _ . _ _ _ . . _ . . _ . . - . . _ . _ . _ . . . _ . , _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ . _ . . . . _ ~ _ . . . _ .
e~~N DRYBULB AND DEWPOINT TEMPERATURE SENSOR LOCATIONS RTD'S i l Eleva tion Azimuth Distance From Volume Tag No. (ft) (Degree) CTMT Center (ft) Fractions GF-TE-1 2180 0 28 0.0327 GP-TE-2 2180 90 28 0.0327 GP-TE-3 2180 180 28 0.0327 GP-TE-4 2180 270 28 0.0327 G P-TE-5 2140 45 35 0.0553 GP-TE-6 2140 135 35 0.0553 GP-TE-7 2140 225 35 0.0553 GP-T E-8 2140 315 35 0.0553 G P-TE-9 2100 0 35 0.0530 GP-TE-10 2100 90 35 0.0530 G P-TE-11 2100 180 35 0.0530 GP-TE-12 2100 270 35 0.0530 GP-TE-13 2060 60 56 0.0463 GP-TE-14 2060 180 56 0.0463 GP-TE-15 2060 300 56 0.0463 GP-TE-16 2060 Center 0 0.0463 ,7- T G P-TE-17 2031 180 22 0.0176 \-'# GP-TE-18 2030 0 61 0.0380 G P-TE-19 2030 120 59 0.0380 GP-TE-20 2030 240 61 0.0380 G P-TE-21 2010 0 27 0.0380 GP-TE-2 2 2010 90 33 0.0380 G P-TE-2 3 2010 270 22 0.0380 GP-TE-24 1988 0 22 0.0052 1.0000 DEWCELLS G P-ME-19 2180 Center 0 0.1309 GP-ME-20 2140 Center 0 0.2213 G P-ME-21 2100 Center 0 0.2119 GP-ME-22 2060 Center 0 0.2025 G P-ME-2 3 2030 120 59 0.1141 GP-ME-24 2010 0 27 0.1193 1.0000 t'h N] SU-051 _9_ _
The overall Ins trumentation Selection Guide (ISG) value was calculated [v ,} (see' Appendix G) in accordance with ANSI /ANS 56.8-1981 based on above ins trumentation and on a 24-hour test duration. The calculated ._ ISG = 0.0069 < 0.25 La. There was no instrument failure; therefore, ' pos t-IIRT ISG calculation was not required . The ILRT data collection system consisted of drybulb and dewpoint temperature sensors, precision pressure gauges and mass flow meters. All sensors were connected to the BOP plant computer. The computer was used for Data Acquisition System, scanning, collecting and storing data in 15 minute intervals. Bechtel's IBM-PC computer was connected to the BOP plant computer with a direct data link. The pressure gauges and flowmeters were installed in an instrument cabinet supplied by Volumetries. O O SU-051 -}o_
,; . 6.0 TEST METHOD The containment leakage rate testing method applied is the Absolute Method as described in ANSI /ANS 56.8-1981. This is a direct application of the ideal gas law, PV = WRT. Two data analysis techniques were used:
- 1. The Mass Point Analysis Techniques This technique calculates the containment air mass at each time interval.
A straight line least squares analysis is used, and the slope of the + regression line represents the rate of change of air mass with respect to time, which is the leakage rate. 2 The Total Time Analysis Technique This technique calculates leakage rate based on the most recent data point taken at the start of the test. The overall leakage rate is e determined by applying linear regression analysis to the leakage rates at each time point. A 95% upper confidence level was calculated for leakage rate data as required by ANSI /ANS 58.6-1981. This is to ensure a 95% probability that the calculated leakage rate value is within the acceptance limits. All
) ' calculations were done with the BOP and IBM computers using an ILRT computer .p program described in Appendix A.
1 0 The temperature, pressure and contalment air assa history are plotted by the computer program. The plots are in Appendix A. 1 s O SU-051 - 11 -
- , , - ..r-g - - , , - y-~.m-- ,- , .,_,_,,m..m -._g, , , - - - - - - ,,g4rc s_.w -. , e c , m em ,%, . . , .. . _ _ - _ , , _ . , --_ri.m_. g.,e,--- --
.7
CONTAINMENT PENETRATION , i* ,._______ BECHTEL' I l I ! < IBM-PC
- BOP PLART l M CRT DISPLAY a
' [ l I l l COMPUTER l s
'l / !
l i e 30P ! - BUFFER PRESSURE & FLOW . r
^ !
' ~ '
- PROCESSOR l AMP MANUAL DISPLAY /
I a l , ! RTD ! l "------" 24 RTDa ) : LEAK
/
SIGNAL COND I; l J/ g , f '-
, 4 l l' VERIFICATION e l 3 '
AUTO m . l l ' a ! - , THERMAL MASS ~ SCANNER l 6, FLOW METER / 4 DEWPOINT ; DEWPOINT I l g l / p, SYSTEM i- , y 0-15 SCFM $ SENSORS y CONTROLLER l ! ' g g 4 L
, p _________q l l, -
l
/ '
I m PRECISION l g 3 p l THERMAL MASS I } l' TRANSMITTER M ! l FLOW METER ! 2 DIGITAL l l l )' l m DATA l , 0-15 SCFM l m uT .- I . 6) ,; l l tocata l PRECISION _-> !
! l l
/g PRESSURE l 2 l l 2 1 TRANSMITTER l g,, _ _ _ ,,, _ _ y l _ _ _ ,,, ,,l i t__________a -
2 i CALLAWAY UNIT 1 ILRT DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEM i , i l
4 am._ , .._6- A -- .- - 4- .--,_--_a b --% __ a - _-- _- f i APPENDIX A DESCRIPTION OF BECHTEL ILRT COMPUIER PROC".".M 1 . e .i t f 4 i l t I i I 4 0 i
, - - - ,, ,-, .--- . - - ,~.._-. ...-...--__.--_.._--,.--_4.m.,.. . e_ ,_.,---,,,,e,,-w,,,--w,,,,,ww-,,.,--m_. _-
APPENDIX A 3 DESCRIPTION OF BECHTEL ILRT COMPUTER PROGRAM A. ' Program and Report Description
- 1. The Bechtel ILRT computer program is ,used to determine the inte-grated leakage rate of a nuclear primary containment structure.
The program is used to compute leakage rate based on input values of time, free air volume, containment atmosphere total pressure, drybulb temperature, and dewpoint temperature (water vapor pressure). Leakage rate is computed using the Absolute Method as defined in ANSI /ANS 56.8-1981, "Contaiment System Leakage Testing Requirements" and BN-TOP-1, Rev 1, " Testing Criteria for Integrated Leakage Rate Testing of Primary Containment Structures for Nuclear Power Plants".
! The program is designed to allow the user to evaluate containment leakage rate test results at the jobsite during contalment leakage testing. Current leakage rate values may be obtained at any time during the testing period using one of two computational methods, yielding three different report printouts.
- 2. In the first printout, the Total Time Report, leakage rate is com-puted from initial values of free air volume, containment atmosphere '
drybulb temperature and partial pressure of dry air, the latest values of the same parameters, and elapsed time. These individually computed leakage rates are statistically averaged using linear re-O gression by the method of least squares. The Total Time Method is the computational technique upon which *the short duration test criteria of BN-TOP-1, Rev 1, " Testing Criteria for Integrated Leakage Rate Testing of Primary Containment Structures for Nuclear Power Plant," are based.
- 3. The second printout is the Mass Point Report and is based on the Mass Point Analysis Technique described in ANSI /ANS 56.8-1981,
" Containment System Leakage Testing Requirements." The mass of dry air in the containment is computed at each data point (time) using the Equation of State, from current values of contaiment atmosphere drybulb temperature and partial pressure of dry air. Contained mass is " plotted" versus time and a regression line is fit to the data i
using the method of least squares. Leakage rate is determined from the statistically derived slope and intercept of the regression line.
- 4. The third printout, the Trend Report, is a summary of leakage rate values based on Total time and Mass Point computations, presented i as a function of number et data points and elapsed time (test dura-tion). The Trend Report provides all leakage rate values required for comparision to the acceptance criteria of BN-TOP-1 for conduct of a short duration test.
1u SU-043 A-1 v- -
-.w, - me. , , .,- ...n.._w,
- 5. The program generates a predictor report based on Reference 7. The
" predictor" is an estimate of the upper bound on the change in mass
' () , point calculated ' leakage rate which will occur during the next four hours. The estimate is based on the mass point calculated leakags rates and 95% UCLs during the previous four hours.
- 6. The program is written in a high level language (FORTRAN) and is designed for use on a micro-computer with direct data input from the data acquisition system. Brief descriptions of program use, formulae used for leakage rate computations, and program logic are provided in the following paragraphs.
B. Explanation of Program
- 1. The Bechtel ILRT computer program is written, for use by experi-enced ILRT personnel, to determine containment integrated leakage rates based on the Absolute Method described in ANSI /ANS 56.8-1981 and BN-TOP-1.
- 2. Information loaded into the program prior to or at the start of the test:
l
- a. Number of containment atmosphere drybulb temperature sensors, dewpoint temperature (water vapor pressure) sensors and pressure gages to be used in leakage rate computations for the specific test
- b. Volume fractions assigned to each of the above sensors
(
- c. Calibration data for above sensors
- d. Test title
- e. Test pressure
- f. Maximum allowable leakage rate at test pressure
- 3. Data received from the data acquistion system during the test, and used to compute leakage rates:
- a. Time and date
- b. Containment atmosphere drybulb temperatures
- c. Containment atmosphere pressure (s) .
- d. Containment atmosphere dewpoint temperatures
- e. Containment free air volume.
- 4. Af ter all data at a given time are received , a Summary of Measured Data report (refer to " Program Logic," Paragraph D, " Data" option command) is printed.
SU-043 A-2
\
5 If drybulb cnd dewpoint temparcture censors should fail during the i tcot, the data from the cancor(s) are not used. Tha volume frac- i tions for the remaining sensors are recomputed and reloaded into the program for use in ensuring leakage rate computations. l C. kakage Rate Formulae
- 1. Computation Using the Total Time Method:
- a. Measured leakage rate from data:
PV1 i = W1RT1 (1) pvt i = WiRTi (2) 2400 (W1-W) i ati W1 / Solving for W1 and Wi and substituting equations (1) and (2) into (3) yields:
' ~
. 2400 TPV1ii Lg = 1- (4)
Att TPVt1i where W,Wi 1 = Weight of contained mass of dry air at times t i and ti, respectively, Iba. T,Ti 1 = Containment atmosphere drybulb temperature at times ti and ti, respectively, 'R. P,Pi 1 = Partial pressure of the dry air component of the con-tainment atmosphere at times ti and ti, respectively, psia. 4 V,Vi 1 = Containment free air volume at times ti and ti, res pe c-l tively (constant or variable during the test), f t , 3 ti, tg = Time at 1st and i th data points respectively, hr. att = Elapsed time from ti to ti, hr. R = Specific gas cons tant for air - 53.35 f t.lbf /lbe.*R. l Li = Measured leakage rate computed during time interval ti to t i, wt.%/ day. To reduce truncation error, the computer progran uses t the following equivalent formulation:
-2400 "aW i "
Lg-ati W1 l e - - SU-043 A-3 i l l .. !~
, . , _ .,___,--,;-$ ...- r. :n z;'u ; < s e , w ..-.. t - -- .e " + - - - - - - + a ' - - - - -
where AWi Wi-W1 W1 W1 AiP V Ai A P gVi T Ag
+ + -
P1 V1 PV11 T1 g , ATi Tg api =Pi-P1 Ag=Vg-V1 V T Ai=Ti-T1
- b. Calculated leakage rate from regression analysis:
I = a + b a tN (5) where L = Calculated leakage rate, we.%/ day, as determined f rom the regression line. a = (gli - bm t i)/N (6) N(gLg ti) - (gLi )(m ti) N(atgZ) - (m t g)Z N = Number of data points
-N I"I i=1
- c. 95% upper confidence limit on the calculated leakage rate:
UCL = a + b atN + S_ (8) L where UCL = 95% upper confidence limit we.%/ day, at elapsed time atN+ SU-043 A-4
y , .- - .- - ~ For a ty < 24 S_ =t 0 025;N-2 [(IL1 2 - agli - bgL istg)/(N-2)]I/2 x [1 + 1_ + (3t 3- 3)2j (93) L N t-(mt 2g _ ( 73 t i)2/N)]1/2 where t0 025;N-2 = 1.95996 + 2.37226 + 2.82250 ; N-2 (N-2)2 For atN2.24 S T
=t0 025;N-2 [(gL1 2 - arti - bgL sti)/(N-2)]1/2 i x [1_ +(stN N
al)/ (9b) (gg ti 2 _ (Z gi)273)) W 1.6449(N-2)2 + 3.5283(N-2) + 0.85602 where to.025;N-2 = I t= Calculated leakage rate computed using equation (5) at total elapsed time 3 ti, %/ day.
- Ia t i
.i~
t=
.(
v) 2. N Computation using the Mass Point Method
- a. Contained mass of dry air from data:
Wi = 144 P 4V4 RTi (10) where All symbols as previously defined.
- b. Calculated leakage rate from regression analysis, W = a + b at
-. -b L = -2400 -
a (11) , where L = Calculated leakage rate, wt.%/ day, as determined f rom the regression line. v SU-043 A-5
a = (Zw1 -bn t1)/:: (12) b = N(IW i ati) - (IV i )(B ti) (13) N(EatgA ) - (M tg)2 atg = Total elapsed time at time of ith data point, hr N = Number of data points Wg = Contained mass of dry air at i th data point, Ibm, as computed from equation (10). N I=I i=1 To reduce truncation error, the computer program uses the following equivalent formulation: AWi b _ a= Wy .1 + (I - E ati)/N (14) W1 W1 _ O AWi
. AWi .
N (I att) - E E at t
- Wi Wi N( Iatg2 ) - ( IStt)2 AWi where is as previously defined.
W1
- c. 95% upper confidence limit.
-2400 UCL = (b - Sb) (16) a where UCL = 95% upper confidence limit, wt.%/ day.
[ ! .Q l SU-043 A-6
m 1/2 SN (y Sb = to.025;N-2 A [NB t1 - (U tt)#] (17) where t0 025;N-2 .1.6440(N-2)2 + 3.5283 (N-2)2 + 0.85602 (N-2)2 + 1.2209 (N-2) - 1.5162 I[wt - (a + b a ti)] N N-2 I 1 -
=W1 '
I(aw1/w1 )2 - [t(aw1/w1 )]2j3 i N-2 . [r(aw1 /w 1 ) ac1 - r(aw 1 /w 1 )(n e t )/N]2.il/2 (18) I(a eg2 ) _ (r sg )2/N .
- d. Predictor:
2[(UCL-L)+4(lAl+2S)] A p) Predictor = 100 La where UCL = 95% upper confidence limit of mass point calculated leakage rate at end of test - La = mass point calculated leakage rate at end of test A = value of linear regression analysis slope of mass point calculated leakage rate vs. time for last 4 hours of test data
- SA = linear regression analysis standard deviation of slope j La = allowable leakage rate l
In terms of elasped time, a t and mass point calculated leakage rate Lag calculated at the end of ith time interval. I I
, v SU-043 A-7
l l O A = 1 M I 4 hr Lmi - B I 4 hr ati _ , (19) ME _ 4 hr Lata ti-I4 hr b i I at1 . (20) { 4 hr B = 2 MI at1 2-I att 4 hr 4 hr I Lai - A I . Lmi - B I Lmi a ti 4 hr 4 hr 4 hr S = (21) i [M-2] [H I 4 hr ati - (I4 hrati)2)
-Lag = mass point calculated leakage rate evaluated using da ta up to time att.
I , 4 hr = summation over last 4 hours of test data. ' N O- . g N-M&l M = number of data points for last 4 hours of test. i O SU-043 A-8
. _. _ _ _ _ - _ _ . - - _ _ - __ -_. _ _ _ _. __ _ .~
r D. Program Logic
- 1. The Bechtel ILRT computer program. logic flow is controlled by a set
- of user options. The user options and a brief description of their associated f unction are presented below.
- t OPTION COMMAND FUNCTION Af ter starting the program execution, the user either enters the name of the file containing previously <
entered data or initializes a new data file. DATA Enables user to enter raw data. When the system requests values of time, volume, temperature, pressure and vapor pressure, the user enters the appropriate data. Af ter completing the data entry, a summary is printed out. The user then verifies that the data i
~ were entered correctly. If errors are detected, the user will then be given the opportunity to correct the errors. After the user verifies that the data were entered correctly, a Corrected Data Summary Report of time, data, average temperature, partial pressure of dry air, and water vapor pressure is printed.
TREND A Trend Report is printed. (~~) 1\s - TOTAL A Total Time Report is printed. l i MASS A Mass Point Report is printed. ' TERM Enables user to sign-of f temporarily or permanently. . All data is saved on a file for restarting. CORR Enables user to correct previously entered data.- LIST A Summary Data Report is printed. . READ Enable the computer to receive the next set of data from the data acquisition system directly. PLOT Enables user to plot summary data, individual sensor data or air mass versus time. DELETE - Enables user to delete a data point. t INSERT Enables user to reinstate a previously deleted data i point. ' VOLFRA Enable user to change volume fractions.
}
PRED A' predictor report is printed. SU-043 A-9
OPTICN [_ w) COMMAND FUNCTION IIME Enable the user to specify the time interval for a report or plot. VERF Enable the user to input imposed leakage rate and calcaluted ILRT leaka.e rates at st rt of verification test. E. COMPUTER REFORT AND DATA PRINTOUT MASS POINT REPORT The Mass Point Report presents leakage rate data (wt%/ day) as deter-mined by the Mass Point Method. The " Calculated Leakage Rate" is the value determined from the regression analysis. The " Containment Air Mass" values are the masses of dry air in the containment (lbm).
". These air masses, determined from the Equation of State, are used in the regression analysis.
TOTAL TIME REPORT The Total Time Report presents data leakage rate (wt%/ day) as deter-mined by the Total Time Method. The " Calculated Leakage Rate" is the - value determined f rom the regression analysis. The " Measured Leakage Rates" are the leakage rate values determined using Total Time calcu-la tions . These values of leakage rate are used in the regression analysis. TREND REPORT The Trend Report presents leakage rates as determined by the Mass Point and Total Time methods in percent of the initial contained mass of dry air per day (wt%/ day), versus elapsed time (hours) and number of data points. PREDICTOR REPORT The predictor reports presents a predicted upper bound on the change in calculated mass point leakage rate over the next four hours.
SUMMARY
DATA REPORT-The Summary Data report presents the actual data used to calculate leakage rates by the various methods described in the " Computer Program" section of this report. The six column headings are TIME, DATE, TEMP, PRESSURE, VPRS, and VOLUNE and contain data defined as follows:
\. ,
SU-043 A-10
- 1. TIME: Time in 24-hour notations (hours and minutes).
A $ (/ 2. DATE: Calendar date (month and day).
- 3. TEMP: Containment weighted-average drybulb temperature in absolute units, degrees Rankine (*R).
4 PRESSURE : Partial pressure of the dry air component of the con-tainment atmosphere in absolute units (psia).
- 5. VPRS: Partial pressure of water vapor of the containment atmosphere in absolute units (psia).
- 6. VOLUME : Containment free air volume (cu. ft.).
F.
SUMMARY
OF MEASURED DATA AND
SUMMARY
OF COPJtECTED DATA The Summary of Measured Data presents the individual contairment atmosphere drybulb temperatures, dewpoint temperatures, absolute tot al pressure and f ree air volume measured at the time and da te.
- 1. TEMP 1 through TEMP N are the drybulb temperatures, where N = No. of RTD's. The values in the right-hand column are temperatures (*F), multiplied by 100, as read from the data acquisition system (DAS). The values in the lef t-hand column
'I ) are the corrected temperatures expressed in absolute units V (*R).
- 2. PRES 1 through PRES N are the total pressures, absolute, were N = No.
of pressure sensors. The right-hand value, in parentheses, is a number in counts as read from the DAS. This count value is converted to a value in psia by the computer via the instrument's calibration table, counts versus psia. The left-hand column is the-absolute total pressure, psia.
- 3. VPRS 1 through VPRS N are the dewpoint temperatures (water vapor pressures), where N = No. of dewpoint sensors. The values in the right-hand column are temperatures (*F), multi-plied by 100 as read from the DAS. The values in the left-hand column are the water vapor pressures (psia) from the steam tables for saturated steam corresponding to the dewpoint (saturation) temperatures in the center column.
The Summary of Corrected Data presents corrected temperature and pressure values and calculated air mass determined as follows:
- 1. TEMPERATURE (*R) is the volume weighted average containment atmosphere drybulb temperature derived f rom TEMP 1 through TEMP N.
r DH-165 A-11 L - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
l l 1
- 2. CORRECIED PRESSURE (psia) is the partial pressure of the dry air (s component of the containment atmosphere, absolute. The volume weighted average containment atmosphere water vapor pressure is subtracted from the volume weighted average total pressure, yielding the partial pressure of the dry air.
- 3. VAPOR PRESSURE (psia) is the volume weighted average contain-seat ateosphere water vapor pressure, absolute derived f rc-c l VPRS 1 through VPRS N.
- 4. VOLUME (cu. f t.) is the containment free air volume.
- 5. CONTAINMENT AIR MASS (lba) is the calculated mass of dry air in the containment. The mass of dry air is calculated using the containment free air volume and the above TEMPERATURE and CORRRECTED PRESSURE of the dry air.
l l k l t I l 5U-043 A-12
O BEcHTEt cOnTAinuEnT ! INTEGRATED LEAKAGE RATE TEST COMPUTER PROGRAM FLOW CHART ( SIGN ON ) t
\ ENTER BASIC / / ENTER PREVIOUS \
glNFORMATION /
~-
NO
\ VALUES FROM FILES /
, YES '
r M DATA - ; ENTERS
SUMMARY
< (OPTIONS)" DATA STORED ON
' SELECTED FILES
<rPREV o o ,
" ^
<FCORR ;
SUMMARY
DATA : v
' ERROR 7) "
[ YES STORES
SUMMARY
CO IONS s, t
SUMMARY
OF <* TREND l TREND REPORT l MEASURED DATA m
<rTOTAL ; TOTAL TIME REPORT
'ERRORf)
- NO
< MASS : MA3S PolNT REPORT CORHECTED "
SUMMARY
DATA PRINTUUT ,
<r LIST = , PRINT OUT OF
SUMMARY
DATA
<> TERM
- (SIGN OFF )
( ) I A-13 \ _ ___ - - -. - - --- - --. - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---- - '-'~~~- ~ ~~~~~~~~ "~'
1 f 1 t 1 !9 i I i, 4 1 i j 1 } i APPENDIX B STABILIZATION
SUMMARY
DATA ) l O I l l L f f t i { i I O r f
I O CALLAWAY ILRT TEMPERATURE STABILIZATION FROM A STARTING TIME AND DATE OF: 400 107 1984 TIME TEMP ANSI BN-TOP-1 (HOURS) ( R) AVE T AVE T DIFF AVE T (4 HRS) (1HR) (2 HRS)
.00 534.79
.25 534.23
.50 533.81
.75 533.46 1.00 533.15 1.25 532.87 1.50 532.65 1.75 532.44
- 2.00 532.24 -1.275*
2.25 532.08 -1.075* 2.50 531.92 .945* 2.75 531.77 .841* 3.00- 531.63 .762* s 3.25 531.51 .677* 3.50 531.39 .628* 3.75 531.29 .573* 4.00 531.17 .907 .464 .44* .269* INDICATES TEMPERATURE STABILIZATION HAS BEEN SATISFIED
w (~'k CALLAWAY ILRT ['s./ -
SUMMARY
DATA ALMAX = ~ .200 VOLUME = 2500000. VRATET = .243 VRATEM = .245 TIME DATE TEMP PRESSURE VPRS VOLUME 400 107 534.793 63.7942 .3498 2500000. 415 107 534.232 63.7325 .3460 2500000. 430 107 533.807 63.6798 .3442 2500000. 445 107 533.455 - 63.6384 .3406 2500000. 500 107 533.154 63.6002 .3393 2500000. 515 107 532.867 63.5644 .3361 2500000. 530 107 532.646 63.5388 .3347 2500000. 545 107. 532.436 63.5139 .3326 2500000. 9 600 107 532.243 63.4893 .3312 2500000.- 615 107 532.081 63.4681 .3289 2500000. 630 107 531.916 63.4492 .3278 2500000.
, 645 107 531.772 63.4310 .3265 2500000.
700' 107 531.630 63.4146 .3249 2500000. 715 107 531.513 63.3985 .3240 2500000. 730 107 531.390 63.3847 .3218 '2500000. 745 107 531.291 63.3706 .3204 2500000. 800 107 531.166 63.3574 .3201 2500000. n. .xj i n 4 4 w
- I
( 1 a i 1 1 1, 4 e !e 1 I 4 t ' i 1 t i 1 4 i ! i' l l i i 4
- i '
i ! 4 t i ; a t 4 i APPENDIX C i 4 ! e i ILRT TREND REPORT ! i
, I i
~ r h t h l I p h i e V e i i l. t
- - -n,- ...~ --~.--
APPENDIX C CALLAWAY ILRT gwg TREND REPORT TIME AND DATE AT START OF TEST: 845 107 1984 NO. END TOTAL TIME ANALYSIS PTS TIME MASS POINT ANALYSIS MEAS. CALCULATED UCL CALCULATED UCL
------------=- _ _ - - = -
4 930 .137 .066 1.736 .094 5 945 .364
.082 ' .054 .692 .078 .204 6 1000 .062 .039 .449 .059 7 1015 .137
.088 .047 .371 .070 8 1030 .124
.018 .021 .286 .035 9 1045 .057 .090
.021 .255 .039 .080 10 1100 .061 .024 .237 .043 11 1115 .076
.079 .032 .232 .054 12 1130 .084
.098 .045 .236 .070 13 1145 .099
.097 .054 .236 .080
'14 1200 .071
.107
.054 .225 .077 .100 15 1215 .079 .056 .218 16' 1230
.078 .098
.103 .064 .220 .087 17 1245 .106
.092 .068 .217 .089 18 1300 .099 .106
.072 .217 .093 .109 19 1315 .091 .075 .213 20 1330 .094 .108
.091 .076 .210 .094 21 1345 .107
.091 .078 .207 .095 22 1400 .106
.084 .079 .203
[~\ . 23 1415 .079 .077
.093 .103
*(_ 24 1430 .082 .077
.198
.194
.091
.089
.100 25 1445 .098
.071 .075 .189 .086 26 -1500 .095
.077 .075 .186 .084 27 1515 .093
.070 .073 .181 .081 28 1530. .090
"- .074 .072 .178 .080 29 1545 .088
.078 .072 .175 .079 .087 30 1600 .072 .071 .172 .078 .085 31' 1615 .075 .071 .169 .077 .084 32 1630 .074 .071 .167 .076 .082 33 1645' .073 .070 .165 34 1700 .075 .081
.071 .069 .162 .074 35 1715 ;O74 "
.080
.069 .160 .074 .079 36 1730 .077 .069 .159 .074 .079 37 1745 .073 .069 .157 .074 38 1800 .070
.075 .069 .155 .073 39 1815 .078
.068 .068 .153 .072 .077 40 1830 .065 .067 .151 41 .071 .075 1845 .066 .066 .149 42 1900 .070 .074
.069 .066 .147 .069 43 1915 .073
.056 .064 .144 .067 44 1930 .071 058 .063 .142 .06G 45 1945 .070
.066 .062 .140 .065 46 2000 .069
.073 .062 .140- .065 47 2015 .070
.066 .062 .138 .065 48 2030 .069 fS
~( j 49 2045
.068 .062 .137 .065 .069 i
.069 .062 .136 .065 50 2100 .062 .068
.061 .134 .064 .068' C-1
~_ . _ __ _. _ _ - _ _ .__- - __. . - _ _ . - . - . - _. _ _ . - - __ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _
I l APPENDIX C O . (,,) CALLAWAY ILRT TREND REPORT (Continued) ' TIME AND DATE AT START OF TEST: 845 107 1984 NO. 'END PTS TOTAL TIME ANALYSIS NASS POINT ANALYSIS
, TIME MEAS. CALCULATED UCL CALCULATED
_,,-----------__--_-________--_- UCL 51 2115 .064 .061 __ _____________________
.133 .~063 .067 52 2130 .064 .060 .132 53 2145 .063 .066
.064 .060 .131 .063 54 2200
.066
.061 .059 .129 .062 55 2215 .065
.062 .059 .128 .062 .065 56 2230 .060 .058 .127 57 2245 .061 .064
.064 .058 .126 .061 58 2300 .064
.062 .058 .125 .060 59 2315 .063
.064 .057 .124 .060 60 2330 .063
.059 .057 .123 .060 .062 61 2345 .060 .057 .122 .059 62 O .062
.063 .056 .121 .059 63 15 .062
.062 .056 .120 .059 .061 64 30 .061 .056 .119 65 .059 .061 45 .062 .056 .119 .059 66 .061 100 .058 .055 .118 .058 67 115 .060
.058 .055 .117 .058 .060
(~h ( ,)- 68 130 .055 .054 .116 .057 .059 69 145 .057 .054 .115 .056 70 200 .059
.061 .054 .114 .056 71 215 .059
.056 .053 .113 .056 .058 72 230 .056 .053 .113 .056 73 245 .058
.053 .052 .112 .055 .057 74 300 .054 .052 .111 .055 .057 75 315 .055 .052 .110 .054 .056 76 330 .006 .051 .109 .054 .056 77 345 .046 .050 .108 .053 .055 78 400 .052 79
.050 .107 .052 ' .055 415 .051 .049 .106 .052 .054 80 430- .050 .049 .105 .051 .053 81 445 .051 .048 .104 .031 .053 82 500 .051 .048 .104 83 .050 .053 515 .052 .048 .103 .050 84 530 .052
.~ O51 .047 .102 .050 .052 85 545 .051 .047 .101 .049 .051 86 600 .047 .046 .100 87 .049 .051 615 .049 .046 .100 88 .048 .050 630 .051 .046 .099 .048 .050 89 645 .052 .046 .099 .048 90 700 .050
.050 .045 .098 .047 .050 91 715 .048 .045 .097 .047 92 730 .049
.049 .044 .097 .047 .049
,_s 93 745 .049 .044 .096 94 .047 .049
( 800
\s) .
95- 815
.046
.049
.044
.043
.095
.095
.046
.046
.048
.048 96 830 .047- .043 .094 .046 .048 97 045 .048 .043 .051 .045 .047 C-2
,,_.i,__ . 2 . u as. __, . . . m u... . , , - . s h _ .%h2 2 .-__%., . ha am ,__ , , _ , , _ . . ,,_,___A,,,,__ _,,._,.a2,,.__m,_ i 4 m ,.m,p,.J. ,6_aj d
I l APPENDIX D IBM COMPlTTER AND ILRT
SUMMARY
DATA - MASS POINT AND TOTAL TIME i l 1 ( 1 t I
. t j i 4
I a t i
.I I
i 4 i __________.__,___.___...__.m.____,-_-,_..
APPENDIX D
;j s .CALLAWAy ILRT
()
SUMMARY
DATA ALMAX = .200 VOLUME = 2500000. VRATET = .243 VRATEM = .245 TIME DATE TEMP PRESSURE VPRS VOLUME ! 045 107 530.886 63.3213 .3172 2500000. 900 107 530.818 { 63.3112 .3158 2500000. 915 107 530.719 63.3013 .3147 2500000. 930 107 530.649 63.2903 .3147 2500000, 945 107 530.584 63.2830 .3135 2500000. i 1000 107 530.504 63.2737 .3128 2500000. 1015 107 530.430. 63.2633 .3127 2500000. 1030 107 530.352 63.2566 .3108 2500000. 1045 107 530.298 ! 63.2480 .3110 2500000. i 1100 107 530.241 63.2406 .3104 2500000. 1115 107 530.190 63.2330 .3095 2500000. 1130 107 530.135 63.2246 .3099 2500000. 1 1145 107 530.091 63.2188 .3082 2500000. 1200 107 530.030 63.2130 .3075 2500000. 1215 107 529.974 63.2051 .3074 2500000. 1230 107 529.941 63.1983 .3072 2500000. 1245 107 529.896 63.1935 .3060 2500000. 1300 107 529.851 63.1866 .3064 2500000. 1315 107 529.806 63.1816 .3054 2500000. (~N 1330 107 529.760 63.1756 .3054 2500000. (m,) 1345' 107 529.724 63.1706 .3044 2500000. 1400 107 529.670 63.1646 .3044 2500000. 1415 107 529.616 . 63.1583 .3047 2500000. 1430 107 529.591 63.1543 .3037 2500000. I 1445- 107 529.546 63.1502 .3028 2500000. l 1500 107 529.522 63.1459 .3026 2500000. 1515 107 529.470 63.1403 .3027 2500000. 1530 107 529.443 63.1360 .3025 2500000. 1545 107 529.423 63 1324 .3011 2500000. 1600 107 529.378 63.1275 .3010 2500000. 1615 107 529.349 63.1231' .3009 2500000. 1630 107 529.311 63.1183 .3012 2500000. ^ 1645 107 529.285 63.1149 .3006 2500000. 1700 107 529.253 63.1110 .3000 2500000. 1715 107 529.226 63.1067 .2998 2500000. 1730 107 529.201 63.1026 .2999 2500000. 1745 107 529.172 63.0995 .2995 2500000. 1000 107 529.147 63.0956 .2994 2500000. i- 1815 107 529.107 63.0920 .2985 2500000. 1030 107 529.079 63.0890 .2985 2500000. 1845 107 529.052 63.0852 .2970 2500000. ! 1900 107 529.027 63.0810 .2985 2500000. j 1915 107 519.013 63.0804 .2941 2500000. 1930 107 520.973 63.0767 .2963 2500000. 1945 107 520.956 63.0718 .2977 2500000. p[x} ! 2000 107 528.949 63.0685
\> .2975 2500000. ,
2015 107 528.911 63.0657 .2968 2500000. i 2030 107 528.885 63.0616 .2974 2500000. ! _ ,,,,,_,,___,, l D-1 ;
APPENDIX D
-s CALLAWAY ILRT -(u_; ) SUf1 MARY DATA (Continued)
ALMAX = .200 VOLUME = 2500000. VRATET = .243 VRATEM = .245 TIME DATE TEMP PRESSURE VPRS VOLUME 2045 107 528.867 63.0586 .2974 2500000. 2100 107 528.833 63.0563 .2962 2500000. 2115 107 528.817 63.0533 .2967 2500000. 2130 107 328.809 63.0520 .2960 2500000. 2145 107 528.784 63.0487 .2933 2500000. 2200 107 528.755 63.0457 .2953 2500000. 2215 107 528.732 63.0424 .2956 2500000. 2230 107 528.716 63.0407 .2948 2500000. 2245 107 528.700 63.036C .2952 2500000. 2300 107 528.681 63.0349 .2946 2500000. 2315 107 528.660 63.0315 .2955 2300000. 2330 107 528.633 63.0298 .2947 2500000. 2345 107 528.622 63.0276 .2944 2500000. 0 108 528.612 63.0249 .2951 2500000. 15 108 520.594 63.0228 .2942 2500000. 30 108 528.580 63.0208 .2937 2500000. 45 100 528.569 63.0186 .2939 2500000. 100 108 528.534 63.0159 .2941 2500000. - s 115 100 520.521 63.0142 .2938 2500000. ( ) 130 100 528.498 63.0123 .2937 2500000.
\' 145 108 528.497 63.0110 .2930 2500000.
200 100 528.489 63.0075 .2936 2500000. 215 108 528.462 63.0062 .2928 2500000. 230 108 520.452 63.0046 .2924 2500000. 245 108 528.428 63.0020 .2922 2500000. 300 108 528.412 63.0004 .2926 2500000. 315 108 520.40d 62.9991 .2919 2500000. 330 108 528.393 62.9964 .2926 2500000. 345 108 528.378 62.9994 .2881 2500000. 400 108 528.354 62.9929 .2916 2500000. 415 108 528.346 62.9921 .2914 2500000. 430 108 528.328 62.9904 .2916 2500000. 445 100 ~20.318 62.9001 .2914 2500000. 500 108 . 28.304 62.9863 .2917 2500000. 515 108 528.299 62.9849 .2911 2500000. 530 108 528.276 62.9824 .2911 2500000. 545 108 528.273 62.9816 .2909 2500000. 600 100 528.247 62.9802 .2908 2500000. 615 108 528.240 62.9777 .2913 2500000. 630 100 528.232 62.9757 .2900 2500000. 645 100 528.225 62.9736 .2914 2500000. 700 100 520.208 62.9729 .2906 2500000. 715 108 528.197 62.9720 .2900 2500000. 730 100 520.101 62.Y693 .2907 2500000. 745 108 528.175 62.9681 .2904 2500000. 800 100 528.157 62.9670 .2092 2500000. 815 108 520.151 62.96,8 .2902 2500000. 830 108 520.142 62.9643 .2097 2500000. 845 100 520.127 62.9622 .0098 2500000. D-2
APPENDIX D /
~_s CALLAWAY ILRT
') LEAKAGE RATE (WEIGHT PERCENT / DAY)
\J MASS POINT ANALYSIS TIME AND DATE AT START OF TEST: 845 107 1984 TEST DURATION: 24.00 HOURS TIME TEMP PRESSURE CTMT. AIR MASS LOSS AVERAGE MASS (R) (PSIA) MASS (LBM) (LBM) LOSS (LBM/HR) 845 530.886 63.3213 804853.
900 530.818 63.3112 804829. 24.1 96.5 915 530.719 63.3013 804853. -24.0 .4 930 530.649 63.2903 804819. 34.2 45.8 945 530.584 63.2830 804826. -6.9 1000 27.5 530.504 63.2737 804827. -1.6 20.7 1015 530.430 63.2633 804809. 18.6 1030 29.7 530.352 63.2566 804842. -33.8 6.1 1045 530.298 63.2480 804815. 27.9 19.3 1100 530.241 63.2404 804807. 7.5 20.5 1115 530.190 63.2330 804787. 19.9 1130 26.4 530.135 63.2246 804763. 24.6 32.9 1145 530.091 63.2188 804755. 7.3 1200 32.6 330.030 63.2130 804776. -20.8 23.7 1215 529.974 63.2051 804760. 16.0 26.6 1230 529.941 63.1983 804723. 36.8 34.6 7S 1245 529.896 63.1935 804730. -6.9 30.7 q_,/ 1300 529.851 63.1866 804711. 18.7 33.3 1315 529.806 63.1816 804716. -4.7 30.4 1330 529.760 63.1756 804709. 7.4 30.4 1345 529.724 63.1706 804700. 8.7 1400 30.6 529.670 63.1646 804704. -4.3 28.3 1415 529.616 63.1583 804707. -2.4 1430 529.591 26.6 63.1543 804695. 11.5 27.5 1445 529.546 63.1502 804710. -15.0 1500 529.522 23.8 63.1459 804692. 18.1 25.0 1515 529.470 63.1403 804700. -8.0 1530 529.443 23.5 63.1360 804605. 14.9 24.9 1545 529.423 63.1324 804670. 15.2 1600 529.378 26.2 63.1275 804677. -6.9 24.3 1615 529.349 63.1231 804661. 13.1 1630 529.311 25.2 63.1183 804661. 3.0 24.0 1645 529.285 63.1149 804657. 4.0 1700 529.253 24.5 63.1110 804656. .5 23.9 1715 529.226 63.1067 804641. 14.9 1730 529.201 24.9 63.1026 804628. 13.1 25.7 1745 529.172 63.0995 804634. -5.6 1800 529.147 24.3 63.0956 804622. 12.3 25.0 1815 529.107 63.0920 004635. -13.2 1830 529.079 23.0 63.0890 804639. -4.1 22.0 1045 529.052 63.0832 804633. 6.4 1900 529.027 22.0
~s 63.0810 804618. 15.1 23.0 I I
,y D-3
APPENDIX D
'^
(,) CALLAWAY ILR1 LEARAGE RATE (WEIGHT PERCENT / DAY) MASS POINT ANALYSIS TIME AND DATE AT START OF TEST: 845 107 1984 TEST DURATION: 24.00 HOURS TIME TEMP PRESSURE CTMT. AIR MASS LOSS AVERAGE MASS (R) (PSIA) MASS (LUM) (LDM) LOSS (LDM/HR)
~~------------------------------------------------------------
1915 529.013 63.0824 804656. -38.4 18.8 1930 528.973 63.0767 804646. 10.4 19.3 1945 528.956 63.0718 804608. 37.3 22.3 2000 528.949 63.0685 804578. 30.7 24.5 2015 528.911 63.0657 804599. -20.9 22.1 2030 528.885 63.0616 804586. 12.3 22.7 2045 528.867 63.0586 804576. 10.0 23.1 2100 528.833 63.0563 804399. -22.3 20.9 2115 528.817 63.0533 804584. 14.5 21.5 2130 528.809 63.0520 804579. 4.6 21.5 2145 528.784 63.0487 804575. 4.1 21.4 2200 528.755 63.0457 804580. -4.9 20.6 2215 528.732 63.0424 804573. 7.3 20.8 2230 528.716 63.0407 804576. -3.1 20.2 2245 528.700 63.0368 804552. 24.4 21.5
-s 2300 528.681 63.0349 804555. -2.9 21.0
( ) 2315 528.660 63.0315 804544. 10.6 21.3 x> 2330 528.633 63.0298 804563. -18.8 19.7 2345 528.622 63.0276 804552. 11.0 20.1 0 528.612 63.0249 804532. 19.6 21.0 15 528.594 63.0228 804533. .9 20.6 30 528.580 63.0208 804530. 2.8 20.5 45 528.569 e3.0186 804519. 11.6 20.9 100 528.534 63.0159 804537. -18.2 19.5 115 528.521 63.0142 804534. 2.7 19.3 130 528.498 63.0123 804546. ~11.7 18.3 145 528.497 63.0110 804530. 16.3 19.0 200 528.489 63.0075 804498. 32.0 20.6 215 528.462 63.0062 804522. -24.1 18.9 230 528.452 63.0046 804517. 4.9 18.9 245 528.428 63.0028 804530. -13.6 17.9 300 528.412 63.0004 804524. 6.4 18.0 315 528.408 62.9991 804514. 9.8 18.3 300 528.393 62.9964 804503. 11.7 18.7 345 528.378 62.9994 804563. -60.5 15.3 400 528.354 62.9929 804518. 45.1 17.4 415 528.346 62.9921 804518. .1 17.2 430 528.328 62.9904 804524. -6.0 16.7 445 528.310 62.9881 804510. 14.2 17.2 500 528.304 62.9863 804508. 1.5 17.0 7 I v D-4 t _s
APPENDIX D CALLAWAY ILR1 sj LEAKAGE RATE (WEIGHT PERCENT / DAY) MASS POINT ANALYSIS TIME AND DATE AT START OF TEST: 845 107 1904
- - TEST DURATION: 24.60 HOURS TIME e' TEMP PRESSURE CTMT. AIR MASS LOSS AVERAGE MASS
'R) (PSIA) MASS (LDM) (LDM) LOSS (LBM/HR) 515 528.299 62.9849 804498. 10.3 17.3 500 528.276 62.9824 804501. -2.9 17.0
., 545 528.273 62.9816 804496. 5.4 17.0 600 528.2,47 ;62.9802 804517. -21.0 15.8
^
615 528.240- 62.9777 804497. 19.3 16.5
.' 630 Q28.232 '62.9757 804484. 13.7
.s
's 17.0 645 5J0.225 62.9736 804466. 17.2 17.6 700 509.208 62.9729 804483. -17.0 16.6
. . , -71T 52't.197 62.9720 804489. -5.3 16.2
,- 75@'t,Oti.181 62.9493 804479. 10.0 16.5 745, 5.*SR, 3 75 62.96R1 804474 4.8 16.5
-/ 800 52f.s .1:s 62.9678 804496. -20.2 15.4 815 528,151'. 62.9648 804457. 29.1 16.4 850 ,5 *.'8. 14 2 ' 62.9643 804475. -8.2 15.9 045 528.I'.*7i62.9622 804471. 4.5 15.9
,- s' - .
I L y F'<$E AIR %'OLLt1E USED (CU. FT.)
'O =2500000.
~
REGRESSIO4'LINE ,~ ,
. , s .'INTERCtit*T (LDM) ,
= 804798.
; J' SLdPE (LDM/HR) .J = -15.0
= .200
' MAXIMUM ALLOWAD'_E LEAKAGE RATE
- w. 75% OF MAXIMUM'ALLOWADLE LEAKAGE RATE = .150
' THE UPPER 95% CONFIDENCE LIMIT = .047
- ', f- ' =
THE CALCULATED LEAKAG( RATE .
.045
./, ,
, g
- s w
. , , , , , - <s' .
*n
*% \
., s
< j,
* ~
t 3
,,Y r,
g 3
~ .
e g T '
~
,\. ,
~ ~
,m * \ '? ,, # " ,
, .~ _ 35
/e
APPENDIX D l l
-~x .
CALLAWAY ILRT
}
'# LEAKAGE RATE (WEIGHT PERCENT / DAY)
TOTAL TIME ANALYSIS [ TIME AND DATE AT START OF TEST: 845 107 1984 TEST DURATION: 24.00 HOURS TIME TEMP PRESSURE MEASURED (R) i (PSIA) LEAMAGE RATE ' 845 530.886 63.3213 L 900 530.818 63.3112 .288 915 530.719 63.3013 .001 .; 930 530.649 63.2903 .137 945 530.584 63.2830 .082 i 1000 530.504' 63.2737 .062 1015 530.430 63.2633 .080 l 1030 530.352 63.2566 .018 1045 530.298 63.2480 .057 1100 530.241 63.2406 .061 1115 530.190 63.2330 .079 1130 530.135 63.2246 .098 1145 530.091 63.2188 .097 1200 530.030 63.2130 .071 1215 529.974 63.2051 .079 ; 1230 529.941 63.19G3 .103 ' (~)
\_,/
1245 529.096 63.1935 .092 1300 529.851 63.1866 .099 1315 529.806 63.1816 .091 1330 529.760 63.1756 .091 1345 529.724 63.1706 .091 1400 529.670 63.1646 .084 1415 529.616 63.1583 .079 " 1430 529.591 63.1543 .082
.1445 '529.546 63.1502 .071 !
1500 529.522 63.1459 .077 i 1515 529.470 63.1403 .070 1530 529.443 63.1360 .074 1545 529.423 63.1324 .078 1 1600 529.378 63.1275 .072 1615 529.349 63.'1231 .075 1630 529.311 63.1183 .074 1645 529.285 63.1149 .073 1700 529.253 63.1110 .071 1715 529.226 63.1067 .074 1730 529.201 63.1026 .077 1745 529.172 63.0995 .073 1800 529.147 63.0956 .075 1815 529.107 63.0920 .06G 1830 529.079 63.0890 .065 1845 529.052 63.0852 .066
~x 1900 529.027 63.0810 .069 ~l \ <j I
i D-6
i
.-- APPENDIX D
,-- , CALLAWAY ILRT
.(^j LEAKAGE RATE (WEIGHT PERCENT / DAY)
TOTAL TIME ANALYSIS TIME AND DATE AT START OF TEST: 845 107 1984 TEST DtdtATION: 24.00 HOURS TIME TEMP'. PRESSURE MEASURED (R) "' (PSIA) LEAKAGE RATE
---------- ::. 2 - - _ - - - - - _ - _ - - - - - - - - - - - -
1915N 529.013 63.0824 .056 1930- 528.973 , 63.'0767 .058 1945 528.956 s 63.07,18 .066 2000 % 528.949 % 63.0685
~ .073 2015 1 528.911- 63.0657 .066
- 2030 528'.'885 63.0616 .068
-2045' 528.867 63.0586 .069 21DO ' 528.833 63.0563 .062 2'115 528.817 63.0533 .064 2130 5 2 8 . B'0 9' 63.0520 .064 2145 528.784 63.0487 .064
. 2200 -528.755 63.0457 .061 2215 528.732 .,.63.0424 .062 s, 2230 528.716 63.0407 .060 2245 528.760 _ 63.0368 .064 s 2306 528.681 63.0349 .062
' (~'N . 2315- 328.660 63.0315 .064 5 ,f 2330 '528.633 '63.0298 .059 2345 "S28.'622'- 6 3 . 0 2 7 6'~~ _.,' .060 0 ,;528.612' 3 63.0249 .063 15 528.594 63.0228 .062 30 528.580~ 63.0208 .061 45 528.5$9 '63.0186 .062 100 528.534 63.0159 .058 115 529.521 63.0142 .058 130 528.498 63.0123 .055 145 528.497. 63.0110 .O'57 200 ' 528.489 -63.0075~ .061 21D 528.462: 63.0062 .056 230 528.452 ,63.0046 .056 L2451 5 528.2428 63.0028 .053
, 30G[ 528.412 63.0004 .054 315' 528.408 62i9991 .055 330 528.'393 62.9964 .056 345 528.37'8 62?9994 .-046 400- 528.354 62.9929 .052 415 528.346- 62,9921 t .051
, 430 528.328 62.9904 .050 445 528.318 62.9881 .051 500 520:304 "
62.9863 .051 7"~N r
! l-9/ \ s.
6-E
*%.,,n
- D-7
%s
APPENDIX D (~"] CALLAWAY ILRT
;( j. _ LEAKAGE RATE (WEIGHT PERCENT / DAY)
TOTAL TIME ANALYSIS TIME AND DATE AT START OF TEST: 845 107 1984 TEST DURATION: 24.00 HOURS TIME TEMP PRESSURE MEASURED (R) (PSIA) LEAKAGE RATE _-- --- - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ = - --- ___________ 515 528.299 62.9849 .052 530 528.276 62.9824 .051 545 528.273 62.9816 .051 600 528.247 62.9802 .047 615 528.240 62.9777 .049 630 528.232 62.9757 .051 645 528.225 62.9736 .052 700 528.208 62.9729 .050
,. 715 528,197 62.9720 '
.040 730 528.181 62.9693 .049 745 528.175 62.9681 .049 800 528.157 62.9678 .046 815 528.151 62.9648 .049 830 528.142 62.'9643 .047 845 528.127. 62.9622 .048
'[ \-
MEAN OF THE MEASURED LEAKAGE' RATES MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LEAKAGE RATE
= .067
= 200 75% OF' MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LEAKAGE RATE = .150 THE UPPER 95% CONFIDENCE LIMIT = .051 THE CALCULATED LEAKAGE ~ RATE = .043 4
J f i >.-
%.J D-8
a .y y a e s._._ - a-_ u.# -m _..a, _m . Li..- gf- - - _ _ _ a_aAua_a% _.m_,,y , a__., mm__..., l l 4 i j' - c APPENDIX E ILRT PLOTS
- e ,
l f 4 f Ir i 6 L
APPENDIX E CALLAWAY ILRT [V]- AIRMASS LBM X 1000 M3.646
-+
803.746 803.847 603.948 B04.048 804.149 804.249 804.350 804.451 804.551 B04.652 804.753 804.853
.. .+... . .+. ... ..__.+ .. ...+ ___+ +.. __. + __ .__+_ ___ ,.
' + _+ B45 :
+
900 i' + 915 i
+
930 1.
+
945 1-
+
1000 :
+
1015 :
+
1030 1
+
.1945 1
+
1100 1
+
!!!5 t +
!!30 1
+
1145 !
+
, 1200 : +
1215 1
+
1230 1
+
1243 1
+
1300 :
+
1313 !
+
1330 :
+
1430 1
+
1443 i + 1500 !
+ - 1513 : +
1530 1
+
1543 :
+
.1600 1
+
1615 :
+
1630 l
+
1643 :
+
1700 :
+
1715 : + f _1730 l' + 1745 !
+
1800 :
+
1815 !
+
1830 :
+
1845 :
+
1900 1
+
1915 :
+
1930 l
+
1945 1
+
'2000 : +
f .O.5 : + IC3- + 2043 :
+
12100 :
+
E-1 b
APPENDIX E
'~
CALLAWAY ILRT s AIRMASS LBM X 1000 (CONT'D) 803.646 803.746 803.847 803.948 004.049 804.149 804.249 804.350 804.451 804.551 804.652 804.753 804.853
+.. .+.........+ +. + .. ...+...... +.........+.... + .. .+ -. ... + .....+
21151 + 2130 ! + 2145 1 + 2200 ! +
-2215 ! +
2230 1 + 2245 1 + 2300 : + 2315 1 + 2330 1 + 2345 i + 0i + 15 : + 30 1 + 45 : + 100 1- + 113 ! + 130 ! +
^
143 1 + 200 : + gal 245 :
+
300 : + 315: + 330 1 + 343 : + 400 1 + 413i + l 430 1 + l 443!-- + 500 1 + 515 i + ! 530 1 + l- 545 !. + 600 ! + 615 i + l 630 i + t 645 : + 700 l + ( '715 : + i 730 1- + l 745 1 + 800 : + 813 1 + 830 l- +
+
W[ *3+.. + ...+... ...+.. .+ - .+.... ...+ + +-- + +.- ...+. .....+.. -+
.803.646 803.746 803.847 803.948 804.048 804.149 E04.249 804.350 804.451 804.551 804.652 804.753 804.853 t
E-2
l l 1 APPENDIX E g- CALLAWAY ILRT Q MASS PDINT LEAKAGE RATE (+) AND UCL(%)
.000 .030 .060 .090 .120 .150 .180 .210 .240 .270 .300 .330 .360
+ + .+ . +- + - + - +. + .+ + + +
845 1 900 1 915 1 9M ! + 945 ! + 1 1000 i + 1 1015 i + 1 1030 i + 1 1045 i + 1 1100 i + 1
!!!5 i + 1 1130 i + 1
!!45 i + 1 1200 i + 1 1215 i + 1 1230 i + 1 1245 i + 1 1300 i + 1 1315 i + 1 1330 t + 1 l 1345 : +1 l400 i +1 l p',jl415i +1 1430 i +1 1445 1 +1 1500 : +1 1515 1 +1 1530 i +1 1545i +1 1600 i +1 1615 i +1
.!&30 i +1 1645 i +1 1700 ! +1 1715 i +1 1730 1 +1 1745 i +1 1000 i +1 1815 i +1 1830 i. +1 1945 i +1 1900 ! +1 1915 1 +1 1930 i +1 1945 i +1 2000 i +1
- 0. +1
' 2045 i +1 2!00 ! +1 E-3
APPENDIX E CALLAWAY ILRT l MASS POINT LEAKAGE RATE (+) AND UCL (%) (CONT'D)
.000 .030 .060 .090 .120 .150 .210
+...+-_-_-,.__..,__.____,____..___,__.,____.180 .240 .270 .300 .330 .360 2115 1 +1 2130 I +1 2145 I +1 2200 1 +1 2215: +1 2230 1 +1 2245 1 +1 2300 I +1 2315 I . +1 2330 1 +1 2345 l +1 0i +1 15 I I 30 1 1 45 I I 100 I +1 115 1 +1 130 1 +1 145 I +I 200 ! +1 215 1 1 230 1 1
-g 245 i +1 300 1 +1 315 1 +1 330 1 +1 345 I I 400 1 +1 415 1 +1 430 l +1 445 l +1 500 1 +1 515 1 1 530 1 1 545 ! +1 600 I +1 615 i +1 630 1 +1 645 i +1 700 1 +1 715 1 !
'730 1 1 745 1 1 800 I +1 815 1 +2 830 1 +1 845 1 +1
- g , , + __ __.+ . + _ __.: , __ +._ -,____ __,.__ ..__. -,-
'd .000 .030 .060 .090 .120 .150 .100 .210 .240 .270 .300 .330
+
.360 E-4 4-
l
)
APPENDIX E l 1 ( CALLAWAY ILRT TOTAL TIME LEAKAGE RATE (+) AND UCL(%)
.000 .030 .060 .090 .120 .150 .180 .210 .240 .270 .300 .330 .360
+_._+ + + . .+ .+. . +.. +.
+ .+
845 1 900 1 , 915 1 930 1 + 945 i + 1000 i + 1300 !. + 1030 ! + 1 1045 i + 1
!!00 1 +
1115 i + 2
!!30 ! +
1 1145 l + 1 1200 ! + 1 1215 1 + 1230 1 + 1 1245 : + 1 1300 t + 1
.1315 : +
1 1330 i + 1
. 1345 1 +
1 1400 i~ + 1 1415 ! + Z 1430 1 + 1 1445 + 1 1500 ! + 1 1515 I + 1 1530 : + 1 1545 i + 1 1600 1 + 1 1615 1 + 1 1630 1 + 1 1645 : + 1 1700 l + 1 1715 : + 1 17301 + 1 1745 l' + 1 1900 : + 1 1815 i + 1 1830 i + 1 1845 i ^ 1 1900 t + 1 1915 : + 1 1930 1 + 1 1945 ! + 1 2000 I + 1 15 : + 1 l 30 1 + 1 2045 l + 1 2!00 i + 1 E-5
APPENDIX E CALLAWAY ILRT TOTAL TIME LEAKAGE RATE (+) AND UCL (%) (CONT'D)
'.000 .030 .060 .090 .120 .150
+-..--+.__-.-..__....______.180 2113 I
.210 .240 .270
.300 .330 .340
+ T 2130 i + 1 2145 I + 1 2200 1 + 1 2215 ! + 1 2230 ! + 1 2245 i + 1 2300 i + 1
-2315 i + 1 2330 l + 1 2345 : + 1 0i + 1 15 : + 1 30 : + 1 45 i + 1 100 ! + 1 115 ! + 1 130 ! + 1 145 i + 1 200 i + 1 215 I + 1 g3 2M i + 1 245 1 + 1
(]300t + 1 315 i + 1 330 i + 1 345 : + 1 400 i + 1 415 t + 1 430 1 + 1 445 ! + 1 500 i + 1 l 515 1 + 1 530 1 + 1 H5 t + 1
- WI + 1 615 ! + 1 630
- + 1 645 1 + 1 700 i + 1 715 i + 1 730 : + 1 745 : + 1 000 1 + 1 815 i + 1 830 1 + 1 845 : +1 e
,- U n , _ ___ .
.000 .030
.060 .090
._______ .__ _.. .__ .. ___+- .. . .____..
.120 .150 .ls0 .210 .240 .270 .300 .330 .360 E-6
APPENDIX E i CALLAWAY ILRT
~O. TEMPERATURE DEGREES F 68.457 68.687 68.917 69.147 69.377 69.607 69.837 70.067 70.297 70.526 70.756 70.986 71.216
. .. .+ .+.. .. ...... .... ... . .. ..., .....+ ....... .. .# ... ., _,
'843 :
+
900 :
+
913 :
+
930 :
+
941 4 1000 i + , 1015 : '
+
1030 : + 1043 : +
!!00 : +
1115 ! +
!!30 : +
1143 : + 1200 : +
" 1215 :
+
1230 : + 1243 : + 1300 : + 1315 : + 1330 : + 45 : + p 0: + 15 :- + 1430 : + 1945 : + 1500 : + 1513 : +
. -1530 : +
1543 : +
-1600 : +
1615 - +
'1630 : +
1645 : + 1700 : + , 1715 : +
'1730 : +
1745 : + 1800 : + 1815 : + 1830 : + 1845 : +
'1900 : +
1915 : + 1930 : + 1943 : + 2000 : +
- /~'3 : .
+
i
\.1043
[3 : + 2!00 : + E-7
APPENDIX E (~'~ 3 CALLAWAY ILRT \ ,) TEMPERATURE DEGREES F (CONT'D) 68.457 68.687 69.917 69.147 69.377 69.607 69.837 70.067 70.297
+.. ~.....,- _,.........,__ -,_
70.526 70.756 70.986 71.216 2115 : + ~ 21301 + 2145 : + 2200 1 + 2215 : + 2230 i + 2245l + 2300 I + 2313 I + 2330 i + 2345 ! + 0i + 15 ~ + 30 i + 45 + 100 +
!!5 : +
130 + 143 ! + 200 : + 215 : + @l 300 : + 315 : + 330 : + 343 : + 400 : + 413 : + 430 ! + 445 : + 500 : + 513 : + 530 : + 545 : + 600 : + 615 : + 630 : + 645 i + 700 l + 713 1 + 730 . + 745 i + 800 l+ 813 + 830 !+ 3+
+ ...+.........+ -, .......,- -,- ,.......... _, _,........., _,_ _,
68.457 68.687 69.917 69.147 69.377 69.607 69.837 70.067 70.297 70.526 70.756 70.986 71.216 E-8
APPENDIX E CALLAWAY ILRT PRESSURE PSIA 62.962 62.992 63.022 63.052 63.082 63.112 63.142 63.172 63.202 63.231 63.261 63.291 63.321
.+ .+ .+ . .+ ... .+. ... .... .. .+- .. .. ...+ _, .., __,.,.... ....,
843 :
+
'900 1
+~
915 1
+
930 1
+
945 1
+
1000 1
+
1015
+
1030 i + 1045 i + 1100 1
+
1115 1
+
1130 l' +
!!45 1 + , 1200 l +
1215 : + 1230 : , 1245 1 + 1300 : + 1315 : + 1330 !. + (!I 1430 : + 1443 ! - + 1500 : + 1515 1 + 1530 i + 1543 1 + 1600 1 + 1615 ! + 1630 : + 1643 1 + 1700 1 + ' 1713 : + 1730 ! + 1743 : + 1800 1 + 1813 : + 1930 : + 1843 : + 1900 i +
- 1915 +
-1930 i + '1945 ! + '2000 ! +
nl Nd45: +
+
2100 : + E-9 1
4 APPENDIX E 4 1 . CALLAWAY ILRT PRESSURE PSIA (~ CONT'D)
~62.962 62.992 63.022 63.052 63.082 63.112 63.142 63.172 63.202
- s. ~. .+- +.. .. .+ . . .+ .......+.. . _,_
63.231 63.261 63.291 63.321 2130 1- + 2145 :. +
'2200 +
2215 I + MM! +
'2245 1 +
2300 1 + 2315 ! ' + 2330 t + ' 2345 i + 0: + 13 i + 30 .+
. '43 1 +
'100 : +
115 : + 130 1 + 145 : + 200 ! + 215 1 + 6l 300 : . 313 : + 330 : + ' 343 i + 400 1 + ! 415 : + i-430 i . +- l 445 ! + 500 : +' 513 ! -+ 530 : +-- , 545 i + 600 ! + 613 !~ +
^ 630 i +
643 I .+ 700 1 - - + 715 ! + 730 !~+
'745 : +
800
- I!5 +
830 + 843 +
/"~ N ,.. . +.. . ..+...- _4 .. ...+_ + ....+ ..+ ......,
..+...... .+ .......+.........+
N 62.962 62.992- 63.022 .63.052 63.082 63.!!2 63.142 63.172 63.202 63.231 63.261 63.291 63.321 E-10
APPENDIX E 7x CALLAWAY ILRT (,v) VAPOR PRESSURE PSIA
.288 .291 .293 .295 .298 .300 .303 .305 .308 .310 .312 .315 .317
+.. _+... ....+- ..+_- __+ -+.........+ .. ...+
.+. _,_ _+.... ...+_ .,
845 :
+
900 :
+
915 :
+
930 :
+
945 :
+
1000 :
+
1013:
+
1030 :
+
1043 :
+
1100 :
+
1115 : + 1130 : + 1143 : + 1200 : + 1213 : + 1230 : + 1243 : + 1300 : + 1315 ! + 1330 : + . 1345 : + 5l 1430 : + 1443 : + 1500 : + 1515 : + 1530 : + 1545 : + 1600 : + 1615 : + 1630 ! + 1645 : + 1700 : + 1713 : + 1730 : + 1745 : + 1800 : + 1815 : + 1830 : + 1845 : + 1900 : + 1915 : + 1930 : + 1945 : + 2000 : + 5: + l + t 5: + 2!00 : + E-11
. APPENDIX E ,- x,
, CALLAWAY ILRT (v) VAPOR FRESSURi? PSI A (CONT'D)
.288 .291 .293 .295 .298 .300 .303 .305 .308 .310 .312
+... -+- .+- .... .. .315 .317
-+ .......+...................,...... .,__
2113 : + 2130 : + 2145 : + 2200 : + 2213 : + 2230 : + 2245 : + 2300 : + 2315 ! + 2330 : + 2345 : + 0: + 15 : + 30 : + 43 : + 100 : +
!!3 : +
130 : + 145 : + 200 : + 213 : + , ,3 ,
+
'sm. 5 : 300 : + 315 : + 330 + 345 + 400 : + 415 : + 430 : + 445 : + 500 : + 515 : + 530 : + 545 : + 600 : + 615 : + 630 : + 645 : + 700 + 715 : + 730 : + 745 : + B00 ! + B15 : + B30 : + 845 : + G......+............................................................................,............................+
.288 .291 .293 .295 .298 .300 .303 .305 .308 .310 .312 .315 .317 E-12
4--"Au- -a_ ., , __ _ __ l
)
l APPENDIX F VERIFICATION TEST
SUMMARY
DATA f 4 4 l i l l l l l l D
- - - ~ ~ - - - - - - - - . _ _ , . _ , n,. --
APPENDIX F () rx CALLAWAY ILRT LEAKAGE RATE (WEIGHT PERCENT / DAY) MASS POINT ANALYSIS TIME AND DATE AT START OF TEST: 950 108 1984 TEST DURATION: 4.00 HOURS TIME TEMP PRESSURE CTMT. AIR MASS LOSS AVERAGE MASS (R) (PSIA) MASS (LBM) (LBM) LOSS (LBM/HR) 950 528.075 62.9508 804405. 1005 528.059 62.9487 804402. 2.5 10.0 1020 528.053 62.9462 804379. 23.8 52.6 1035 528.044 62.9428 804348. 30.8 76.1 1050 528.045 62.9410 804325. 23.4 80.4 1105 528.022 62.9383 804325. .8 63.7 1120 528.024 62.9347 804276. 49.1 85.8 1135 528.001 62.9316 804272. 4.6 76.2 1150 527.989 62.9288 804255. 16.5 74.9 1205 527.982 62.9257 804225. 30.4 30.1 1220 527.971 62.9232 804210. 14.8 78.0 1235 527.956 62.9202 804194. 16.2 76.8 1250 527.962 62.9187 804166. 27.9 79.7 1305 527.946 62.9167 804165. .9 73.9 1320 527.930 62.9136 804149. 15.6 73.0 1335 527.923 62.9109 804126. 23.4 74.4 1350 527.908 62.9079 804111. (v~') 15.4 73.6 FREE AIR VOLUME USED (CU. FT.) =2500000. REGRESSION LINE INTERCEPT (LBM) = 804408. SLOPE (LBM/HR) = -76.4 VERIFICATION TEST LEAKAGE RATE UPPER LIMIT = .295 VERIFICATION TEST LEAKAGE RATE LOWER LIMIT = .195 THE CALCULATED LEAKAGE RATE = .228 F-1 t
APPENDIX F [~'\ CALLAWAY ILRT
-\s) LEAKAGE RATE (WEIGHT PERCENT / DAY)
TOTAL TIME ANALYSIS TIME AND DATE AT START OF TEST: 950 108 1984 TEST DURATION: 4.00 HOURS TIME TEMP PRESSURE MEASURED (R) (PSIA) LEAKAGE RATE
- - - = _ _ _ - _ - - - _ _ - = _ - - -
+
950 528.075 62.9508 1005 528.059 62.9487 .030 1020 528.053 62.9462 .157 1035 528.044 62.9428 .227 1050 528.045 62.9410 .240 1105 528.022 62.9383 .190 1120 528.024 62.9347 .256 1135 528.001 62.9316 .227 1150 527.989 62.9288 .223 1205 527.982 62.9257 .239 1220 527.971 62.9232 .233 1235 527.956 62.9202 .229 1250 527.962 62.9167 .238 1305 527.946 62.9167 .220 1320 527.930 62.9136 .218 sx 1335 527.923 62.9109 .222 ( ) 1350 527.908 62.9079 .220 MEAN OF THE MEASURED LEAKAGE RATES = .211 VERIFICATION TEST LEAKAGE RATE UPPER LIMIT = .293 VERIFICATION TEST LEAKAGE RATE LOWER LIMIT = .193 THE CALCULATED LEAKAGE RATE = .251 9 b/ F-2
. - =- - _. - _ _
= . .
APPENDIX F CALLAWAY ILRT l
SUMMARY
DATA ALMAX = . 200 VOLUME = VRATET = 2500000.
. 243 VRATEM = .245 TIME DATE TEMP PRESSURE VPRS VOLUME 950 108 528.075 62.9508 1005 108
.2902 2500000. '
528.059 62.9487 .2893 2500000. 1020 108 528.053 62.9462 1035 108
.2888 2500000.
528.044 62.9428 .2892 2500000. 1050 108 528.045 62.9410 1105 108
.2885 2500000.
528.022 62.9383 .2882 2500000. 1120 108 .528.024 62.9347 .2883 2500000. 1135 -108 528.001 62.9316 .2889 2500000. 1150 108 527.989 62.9288 1205 108
.2887 2500000.
527.982 62.9257 .2888 2500000. 1220 108 527.971 62.9232 1235 108
.2883 2500000.
527.956 62.9202 .2888 2500000. 1250 108 527.962 62.9187
-1305 108
.2883 2500000.
527.946 62.9167 .2878 2500000. 1320' 108 527.930 62.9136 .2879 2500000. 1335 108 527.923 62.9109 .2881 2500000. 1350 108 527.908 62.9079 .2881 2500000. (-)) x. 4 F-3
, - * , , - , ,.1- -
, , -jw ,.,.w ,4 .--,,-._,,.,-,,,,,.-r__,. --,-..,,,_-_.,,----,..-..%-., , , . , . _ _ , - . - . , - - . . . , . , .
O ' APPENDIX G ISG CALCUIATIONS O r i r
ISG Calculations V Reference ANSI /ANS 56.8-1981, Appendix G A. Test Parameters La = 0.2 %/ day leakage rate P = 62.8 psia containment pressure T = 528 *R drybulb, average temperature Tdp = 63 *F dewpoint temperature t = 24 Hr. test duration B. Instrument Parameters
- 1. Total Absolute Pressure No. of sensors: 1 Range : 0-100 psia Sensitivity error (Epy): .001 psia Repeatability (CP y): .001 % of full scale (EP)2 + (Ep)2 I.000001 + .000007 ep = + =
=+ .0014142 No. of sensors 1
- 2. Water Vapor Pressure 1
%). No. of sensors: 6 Sensitivity error (Epy): + .10
- F Repeatability error (Eg): + .05 *F Dewpoint temperature 78 *F Vapor pressure change @ 47 *F: .0094 psia /*F Epy =
(.10) ( .006) = .0006 c py = ( .05) (.006) = .0003 EPv2+Cpy2 .00000036 + .00000003 e py =+ _
= .00027386 No. of sensors 6
- 3. Tempe ra ture '
No. of sensors : 24 Sensitivity error (E T) : 0.1 *F Repeatability error (CT): .05 *F ET 2 + "T2 .01 + .0025 e 7=+ No. of sensors
=+ = .0228217 24
.g Y DH-158 g_1
4
, C. ISG 2400 2i
'I *p ) +Z[epy)2 ['T I ISG = + _
I +i _ t _ (P ) (P) (T )_ i 2400
=+ 2 [.001414232 1 1+2l [.00027386)2l+2[.02282'17)2 i 4
24 ( 62.8 j (62.8 ) ) ( 528 i
?
2400 ISG = + (.000069199) = .0069199 %/ day 24
.2 5 La = ( .2 5) ( .2) = .0 5 > . 006919 9 1
e f c = h I f i j. i ! O 1 DH-158 G-2 i :
-_. -- - . - . . . . - . - - . - . - - . - _ - = _ _ . - - - - . - . _ . _ - - - . _ . - . . ~ . .
_ . ~ - . - . G i 4 I l t 1 i i i
- l APPENDIX H :
j. 3 i LLRT SIMMARY j i ! 1 i i l J i I j l [ l l l l l l I i I I I ' Ii k i I l ! 1 l
APPENDIX H
SUMMARY
OF LOCAL LEAK RATE TEST RESULTS Sum of measured leakages 17,318 seem Sum of the squares of errors 141,782 seem Square root of the sum of squares 376 seem Reported leakage rate =
= sum of measured leakages + square root of the sum of squares
= 17,318 + 376 = 17,694 = .0084 2/ day.
Acceptance criteria: Reported leakage < .6La
.6La = (.6)(. O = .12/ day = 3 2,0 2 seca a
17,695 seem (.0064 2/ day) < 3 2,0 2 scan (.12/ day) Total local leak rate is meeting the acceptance criteria. O t 0 0 DH-13) H-1 l
, _ 4 _ - ,. _ em.h -- .-. -__
5 APPENDIX I CALLAWAY COMPUTER ILRT
SUMMARY
DATA
. s
. . . ,._--_,.-_ . ,,.v .--.. .-. . , , -,.___ . . . m_..--__,m. _ , , _ , _ . , - , , , . , w,mm,,., _ , _.,, , ~ ,_ ,,,, ,p-%,_w.
O I l' i 1 i
- TIME 8.475 CALLAWAY ILRT DATA REDUCTION PROGRAM i ILRT TEST
SUMMARY
i DATE TIME j TFST STA9T: 1-07-19H4 8.725 1 Tesi STn": 1-08-1989 H.475 \ i 4 6 i i i MASS POINT METHOD TEST TIME tlRS. 1.EAK RATE %/ DAY 4 95% CONFTOENCE LTMIT %/ DAY-_ _ CONTAINMENT AIR MASS LBMS e* i l 1 I k a 5 i M i I i l
f ) T1"E Hos. LEAK RATE %/ DAY (N/ ) CONFIDENCE' LIMIT %/ DAY CONTAINMENT A ASS LBMS x_20.500 0.21944P46F-01 0.1631C017E001 0.8048514a o0L 4.750 0.10PP1926Eo00 0.38479140E+00 0.80481800E+06 1.000 0.93562555E-01 0.22464788F+00 0.80481983E+06 1.P50 0.73631534E-01 0.15510946E+00 0.80482223E+06 1.s00 0.H0539712E-01 0.13558574F+00 0.80480508E*06 . , I.750 0.4P273136F-01 0.10065681F+00 0.80483973E+06. 2.000 0.431852n4E-01 0.87?89847E-Of 0.8048125PE+D6, / P.P50 0.4552871PE-01 0.80153174E-01 0.80480607E+06 ; ) P.500 0.549P9306E-01 0.84520869E-01 0.80478727E+06
- P.750 0.69189671E-01 0.97743630F-01 O.80476340E+06
%.000 0.7H05954PF-01 0.10367894E+00 0.80475696E+06 3.750 0.76171066F-01 0.98030606E-01 0.8047723?'E+06 5 5.500 0.7568T450E-01 0.94503375E-of 6.8047e345E'+06 3.75 1 0.83248846E-01 0.10133P40E+0a , ' O.8047P711E+06 ,
a.000 0.86471970F-01 0.10767709E+00 1 0.R0472855E+06 4.750 0.00962621E-01 O.10599985E+00 0.80471065E+06 4.%00 0.91749A56F-01 0.10517449F+00 0.80e71591E+06
][-
U.7%0 0.9P163874E=Of 0.1047111PF+00< 0.80470916E+06 ' S.000 :s 0.92ctParl4E-01 0.10340475F+00 0.80470103E+06 5.P50 f} 0.91860A3RE-01 0.10175876F400 0.80469984E+06 >
%.500 0.89185211E-01 0. 985 7 ! 865E -01 0.80470910E+06 ;
g 5.790 3) 0.A7507933E-01 , 0.9625?SP0F-01 0.6046982PE+06 ,' ' gr, N ono q) 0.844GrusPF-0! 4.97997723F-01 0.80o707 TIE +06 , 6.Psn (( 0.6503530PF-01 0.91070367F-01 0.80468966E+06 6.404 q 0.364974PPF-01 0.88308003E-01 0.80469848E+06 6.750 0.79061757E-01 0.86469993F-01 0.80468414E+06 > 7.onn 7.P50
]s 0.786H1319E-01 0.85501740F-01 0.80466946E+06 $
'9 0.77140478E-01 0.837303040-01 0.80467697E+06 4
7.500 9 0.76395338F-01 0.82595546E-91 0.804664P6E+06 3 1 7.7%a 0.754 TAP 80E-01 0.6 761457E-91 0.80465554E+06 4.000 k$ 0.75389683E-01 0.80880325E-01 0.80465183E+06 ,- s
$4.250 0.74553698F-01 0.79780459F-01 G,80465181E+06 '
.s N.500 0.73454811E-01 '0.78417286F-01 0.80464368E+06 '
O.7%o 0.73H04747F-01 0.784R5067F-01 0.R0463105E+06 9.000 0.7TT74457E-01 0.77H17932E-01 0.80463074E+06 % 9.750 0.73276100E-01 0.77483460E-01 0.80461905E+06 @ 9.5nn 0.7PP86305F-01 0.76389804E-01 0.80463265E+06 @ 4.754 0.70077906E-01 0.75076407E-01 0.80463713E+06 y 10.n0 0.69867175E-01 0.73906517F-01 0.80463093E+06 10.75 0.69PTh676F-01 0.73155425E-01 0.80461649E+06 10.56 0.6701n106E-01 0.713107P8E-01 0.804655 PIE +06 16.75 0.65?3P119E-01 0.696R1459E-01 0.80464537E+06 11.06 0.64767245F-01 0.69040448F-01 0.80460837E+06 11.25 0.65176059E-01 0.69280488E-01 0.80457830E+06 11.50 0.64690179E-01 0.68646110F-01 0.80459947E+06 11.75 0.6446PP47E-01 0.68?6T693F-01 0.804587P8E+06
(N 2.110 (_,37.7% 0.64398753E-01 O.680382h0E-01" ~ 0.63549738E-01 ' 6.804577: 06 17.50 O.67137623E-01 0.80460021E006-0.630T361?E-01 0.66515396E-01 17.7% 0.67717037E-01 0.80458611E+06 13.no 0.66077562E-01 0.80457535E+06 0.62233071E-01 0.65499276F=01 IT.75 0.61545796E-01 0.80457816E+06 14.50 0.64759300E-01 0.80458353E+06 0.60977814F-01 0.64117567F-01 11.7% 0.60til2677E-01 0.80457657F+06 Id.no 0. 63(19 ? 0 3 2E-01 0.8045735PE+06 0.601859PPE-01 0.63164322F-01 14.P5 0.598094P9E-01 0.80455569F+06 14.5n 0.62707170E-01 0.80455889E+06 n.59705776F-01 0.62506175E-01 14.75 0.59141403E-01 0.801454221E+06 I 14.0n 0.61901942E-01 0.80456128E+06 0.587 slot 44F-01 0.61437351E-01 15.75 0.58640550E-01 0.80455054E+06 15.50 0.61?51804F-01 0.80453120E+06 0.583T0295F-Ot 0.60875632E-01 15.75 32 0.58tt?292F-01 0.80453867E+06 16.00 D* 0.60586402E-01 0.80453006E+06 6.5 ROP 0566E-01 0.60419585F-01 16.P4 [k 0.57560784E-01 0.80451878E+06 ' 16.50 ' 0.59928382E-01 0.80453716E+06 O.57 POP 194F-01 0.59524431E-01 16.75 3) 0.566P06P1F-01 0.80452844E+06 17.00 0.5894?646F-01 0.80454028E+06 C3 0.56260146E-01 0.58540954E-01 17.P5 $j 0.56315428F=01 0.80452392E+06 17.50 0. 585 31244 0 F -01 0.8044924PE+06 7 .4 0.5596147tE-01 0.58141228F-01
" 17.7s 0.55546589E-01 0.80451661E+06 t4.n9 3 0.57702676E-01 0.80451850E+06 0.5500430AE-01 0.57160891E-01 19.75 09 0.545PT/sP1F-01 0.80452596E+06 1R.50 0.56675545E-01 -
0.80451991E+06 [] 0.5414P927F-ci 0.56269025E-01 14.7% pp 0.5347A347F-01 0.80451032E+06 j 10.00 (7 ! 0.55963713E-01 0.80449870E+06 4.928555P7E-01 0.55117046E-01 19.P5 E 0.5P379766E-01 0.80455951E+06 19.50 $ 0.546P5150E-01 0.80451457E+06 ~ 0.51AR7467E-01 0.54176246F-01 14.75 h 0.513177?tE-01 0.80451475E+06 0.53564021E-01 0.80452113E+06 ) PD.00 $ 0.508R3%14E-01 0.53117303F-01 70.p5 U 0.50453017E-01 0.80450717E+06 Po.5n 0.5?670916E-01 0.80450595E+06 es 0.50113800E-01 0.5230P347E-01 } Po.75 $} 0.49774061E-01 0.80449578E+06 i 43 0.51892767F-01 0.80449898E+06 I Pl.00 0.49T736 APE-01 0.515176P6F-01 0.800/19354E+06 km P1.Ps @g 0.48R05333E-01 21.so %( 0.Il8414450F-01 0.50969115F-01 0.80451469E+06 c 0.50561276E-01 0.80449571E+06 k x
- 21.75 0.48135441E-01 PP.00 %g3 C4 0.50250P40E-01 0. 8 0 ti tl 8226 E + 06 s 0.<l7987674F-01 h
{ i PP.P5 P/.so ( 0.476655P3E-01 0.47P83T17F-01 0.5005954HF-01 g 0.49714574E-01 0.49320394E-01 0.804tl6559E+06 0.80448?63E+06 PP.7s 0. 4 69 7 'i o 81 E - 01 E3 0.80448809E+06 P3.no b3 0.48988617F-01 0.80447831E+06 0.t:6691020F-01 C5 P3.P4 C) 0.46P15H26E-01 #* 0.48680631F-01 0.804'37356E+06 P3.So 0.4R215556E-01 0.80449583E+06 PT.75 h 0.4546465HF-01 b 0.47936847E-01 0.804'46715E+06 os io.ns645Pi?F-oi I 10. ' iSa i 794E-o il 0.80447549E+06
7 T'OT AL TJME ME'THOD a> . IEST fivE HRS. 1.EAK RATE %/ DAY O 000 95% CONFIDENCE LIMIT %/ DAY MEASURED" LEAK NATE */ DAY' 0.99990000E+04 0.99990000F+04
.n.pSo n.34771H36E+00 0.99990000E+04 0.500 0.99990000E+04 0.34771836E+00
' 0.71944032F-01 0.99990000E+04 O.750 0.721a0976E-01 0.71944032E-01 t.000 0.18564647E+01 0.14733523E+00 0.65P01360E-01 0.76872455E+00 1.250 0.49032845F-01 y 0.1051664AE+00
'1.500 ~0.50440354E+00 0.78404797E-01 0.53744393E-Ot 0.414P28n1F+00 1.750 0.23899080F-01 0.99428045E-01 P.000 .0.31890806E+00 0.26195303E-01 0.2205n408E-01 0.28310497E+00 2.P50 0.224P293aE-01 0.63398445E-01 7.500 0.25999241E+00- 0.64980239Ebol 0.2M938934F-01 0.25173650E+00 P.750 0.40063735E-01 0.809042P5E-01, /
3.non 0.25341527F+00 ' O.99430491E-01 0.4M113P88E-01 0.25133251E+00
; 3.750 0.4H56P146E-01 0.975450P7E-01 1
T.500 -0.24004396E+00 0.75950778E-01 j 0.49704065E-01 0.23145575E+00 0.78080481E-01
/3.750 0.56531904E-01
' ~q 0.23208856F+00 a.000 o 0.60041673E-01' 0.10177185E+00 4.25n O.22926601E+00 0.94338477E-01
-i 25 0.65241H2SE-01 0.22841502E+00 0.10134922E+00,-
/
4.500 0.67404516E-01 y- 4.750 I' 0.22067305E+00 >
,<0.92231839E-01
- O.69157339E-01 0.P210301PE+00 5 n00 0.70740989E-01 '0.91618797E-01 5.2.50 2 0.21770634F+00 0.91884756E-01
# 0.7147AM79E-01 0.21382004E+00 ' ' t
, 5.500 3[ 0.70622764F-01
'0.88187567E-01 5.750 0.20853304F+00 ~ 0.79155258E-01 f9 0.702M9775E-01 0.PO420P78E+00
, 6.000 0.68812399E-01 0.81573729E-01
- i 6.P50 0.19H95177E+00 0.73447783E-01 '
7p 4.6H39HH55E-01 0.19514578E+00 . 6.s00 -a 0.670463PPE-01 0.78932701E-01 I h.750 I9 0.19056832E+00 0.71850141E-01
- 0.66411051E-01 0.18699194E+00 7.000 'i 0.663662P1F-01 0.75522546E-01 7.750 D~ 0.16427704E+00 0.79080143E-01 0.65594431E-01 0.lR091985E+00 l 7.500 ED 0.65P68586F-01 0.73264390E-01 i
7.750 3 0.17821635E+00 0.75877262E-01 0.65115760E-01 0.175R4933E+00. g
- 6.000 0.64881750E-01 0.76784344E-01 m i 9.750 0.1735160SE+00 0.75765.900E-01 0.64429223E-01 0.17105336E+00 g R. Son 0.64120694E-01 0.73478468E-01 s j ', , 8.750 0.16885845E+00 0.74169662E-01
- 0.64101041F-01 0.1670887hE+00
- 9.n00 0.638H6H11E-01 0.76353059E-01 s
! 9.P50 0.16518357E+00 0.74335657E-01 0.63R9P409E-01 0.16361052E+00 ! 9.500 0.63779049F-01 0.76095267E-01 9.750 0.16141876E+00 0.69827842E-01 0.62422712E-01 0.15903946E+00 0.66663171E-01
{
,x
('
~
10.0n 0.61671560E-01 10.25 0.61239013E-01 0.15683946E+00 ' 14.50 0.tS504H19F+00 O.66844955E-01 10.75 0.59697800E-01 0.15P16214E+00 0.69416591E-01 0.5840M765E-01 0.14958H20E+00 0.56767184E-01 11.00 0.5H002658E-01 0.58177523E-01 11.P5 0.147994P7E+00 11.54 0.5H197298E-01 0.14714360F+00 0.66884285E-01 11.75 0.57793933E-01 0.14563759E+00 0.73367972E-01 12.00 0.5756974HE-01 0.14437426E+00 0.66285105E-01 17.25 0.57453446E-01 0.14327190E+00 0.67967393E-01 IP.50 ~ 0.56807444E-01 0.14161292E+00 0.68969233E-01 0.563R0633E-nt 0.140227R7E+00 0.6204469PE-01 17.7% C)i 0.560AR090E-01 0.6416H693E-01 13.00 s4 0.556R1818E-01 0.13902526E+00 1T.25 D3 0.137724R2E+00 0.65427550E-01 13.5n P~ 0.55134P48E-01 0.13629791E+00 0.63522793E-01 s 1%.75 0.5465948tF-n1 0.13497823E+00 0.61116144E-01 0.54190299E-01 0.6152307tE-01 1 14.00 [j 0.13369075F+00 14.25 d-n.53946435E-01 0.1326R058F+0n 0.61064252E-01 14.50 0.53602952E-01 0.13153001E+00 0.63772840E-01 1's.75 % 0.53446181E-01 0.13071443E+00 0.61984755E-01 15.nn 0.52978979E-01 0.1P451862E+00 0.6434635tE-01 15.75 3, 0.52620131F-01 0.12846313E+00 0.59400140E-01 ss n.52466878F-01 0.60545P64E-01 15.50 I4 0.52173978F-01 0.1P76611HE+00 0.63333979E-01 15.75 'l 0.51944769E-01 0.12671619E+00 16.00 DC. 0.12586085E+00 0.60875041E-01 I n.51803731E-01 0.1251235tE+00 0.61539753E-01 16.75 D 0.51415421E-01 0.62679047E-01 i 16.Sa b 0.51094290E-01 0.12412017E+00 0.58342093E-01 16.75 0.50620H96E-01 0.12320716E+00 17.r n 0.tPP14072E+00 0.59034758E-01 % 17.75 0.5029n691F-01 0.121P5113E+00 0.56045965E=31 5 17.50 0.50751440E-01 0.12070284E+00 0.58090227E-01 5 4 17.75 0.49934956F-01 0.11984937F+00 0.62694940E-01 E 0.49576631E-n1 0.11896tSHE+00 0.57677380E-01 g 0.56547530E-01 l
o . O O
~
I h . tin e 14.Ps 0.4913043'0E-01 g 0.4H7P3170E-01 0.'1179b935E+00 1H.50 0.11707153E+00 0.54525493E-01 h 0.dR3aP299E-01, 0.54767464E-01 14.75 r- 0.11623853E+00 19.on 0.4R114696E-01 0.5557235HE-01, Q 0.47342579E-01 0.11550450E+00 lo.PN q 0.11423426E+00 0.56680299E-01 14.50 g 5 rs 0.a6978677F-01 0.11335239E+00 0.46391000E-01 19.75 g 0.4650PGA0E-01 0.52749107E-of N m o.46017864E-01 0.11246647E+00 20.u0 h 0.11152769E+00 0.52045313E-Or 20 P5 P ta o.45629948E-01 0.11070308E+00 0.50423660E-01 20.54 g 0.45240431E-0t 0.51874111E-01 rg 0.44912173E-01 to 0.1098MS'18E+00 70.75 D 0.10914460E+00 0.51414354E-01 s P1.00 4 b 0.44549995E-0t. $ 0.10837383E+00 0.52265897E-01 l
& P1.75 0.44218255E-01 0.51176449E-01 i
?1.50
% { 0.43730349E-01 g
rq 0.43365566E-01 0.10764046E+00 0.10675293E+00 0.51339739E-01 { 0.106001RSF+00 i Pt.75 3 0 & ' 0.4776823HE-01 I P / 0 <i I4 y n 4T075931E-01 0.t0534300E+00 O.49845435E-01 a2876297E-01 " 0.51116561E-01
??.7% 0.10479493E+00 2P.5n --i g 0.42560R21E-01 D 0.10411975E+00 0.52794944E-01 g n 0.4P205058E-01 0.49918109E-01.
22.75 y g 0.4189A493E-01 g 0,t0340584E+00 P3.co ' g 0.10P75346E+00 0.48639874E-01 23.25 g 0.01610175E-01 Q 0.10P12781E+00 0.49386355E-01. g 0.41192455E-01 0.49465437E-01 2%.56 0.10136395E+00 24.75 O _n.400P9719F-01 0.46077279E-01 _0.10077017F+00
%l4.406n6027F-01/ 0.49226464E-01 C a l l. t r; t. Y ti RT I? A T n HF DHC i lini PPor,R AM lERMINATEDl0.10013064E+00l 0.47661940E-01 g
.o i t'1 h
- E 1
_ . - _ _ _ . _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _}}