ML20087P669

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Final Deficiency Rept U-71 Re Induction of Auxiliary Boiler Exhaust Gases Into Control Room.Initially Reported on 840224.CO/CO2 Monitors Coupled W/Smoke Detector & Human Detection of Malodors Provides Control Room Ventilation
ML20087P669
Person / Time
Site: Callaway Ameren icon.png
Issue date: 03/28/1984
From: Schnell D
UNION ELECTRIC CO.
To: James Keppler
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
References
U-71, ULNRC-782, NUDOCS 8404090260
Download: ML20087P669 (3)


Text

7

.k di UNION ELECTRIC' COM PANY 1901 GRATioT STREET sT. Louis. Missouns.

l-

. March.28,_1984 s

"9 T.* *,"."'

a...

.~~,.w

..co...............

'Mr. James G. Keppler Regional-Administrator

U.S.. Nuclear. Regulatory. Commission Region III 799' Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn', Illinois 60137.

DeariMr. Keppler r ULNRC-78 2 FINAL-10CFR50.55 (e) REPORT U-71

, ' INDUCTION OF ~ EXHAUST GASES INTO CONTROL ROOM

~

CALLAWAY PLANT

.On February 24, 1984 Union Electric informed the NRC Region III office of a potential significant deficiency under 10CFR50.55(e) Lregarding the induction of auxiliary boiler

' exhaust gases into the:Callaway Plant Control' Room.

This deficiency was reported as.a;significant deficiency on March 2, 1984.. Subsequently, on March.22, 1984,. Messrs. Pelke and Cho'illes - of the NRC were :co atacted and 'it. wasi agreed that a 2

final report would be: transmitted to the NRC on or'before

! March 30,.1984.

The event-occurret on December 30,_1983 when exhaust

~

. gases from-the plant auxiliar; boiler stack apparently entered

the; control building' air ' intake' as. a result of a temperature linver,sion"or a downdraft condition.

As:a point of. reference, the' control building. air intake penthouse is-located'approximately L70 feet' below and 90 feet southeast of.the' stack.

Control ~. room A

. operators noticed the' smell.of exhaust. fumes'for approximately thirty minute's.to an' hour.

During the event, our constructor's safety.personnelLanalyzed.the control room' atmosphere and' deter-minedithat-the _ oxygen-level was adequate, and there were no.

measurable combustible' gases present.

The ventilation system

. was.then ' switched to the recirculation mode to alleviate the

~

condition.Z Subsequently, one individual indicated he was naus-

.,eated and.could:not> complete:his1 work shift..This individual 1 eft?theicontrol room and subsequently recovered without; seeking 1

W'

- medical assistance..Another individual. indicated that=he was' o

L"lightTheaded" but-he.did.not:become'111.= A third person in

~

the. control room' revealed'that the odor.was unpleasant but it
  • f

_did'not;cause himytofbecome ill. =Othertpersonnel-were in the control room ats the. -. time, L and they experienced little discomfort.

From tihe.information' available L regarding the event,-

lit 11slindeterminate'which combustion gases or concentrations

'of' gases'affected the operators.

The operator.who became.ill~

9 S..

Q~

e4o4o9o260 84032s.

"~

APR 2'

y PDR ADOCK 05000403

- M p.

1 e.,

,,9 pon

, pi

-. 7 q3 y

??

/

A E..,

2 v

l

-Lexh'ibited symptoms similar to.that of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide exposure.. Carbon monoxide is the predominant cause of E

Jillness'from the inhalation of exhaust' fumes due to its inter-ference.with:the transfer of oxygen to the blood.

Carbon dioxide has.the same effect, but to a much lesser' degree.

Exposure to these gases is' difficult.for humans to detect because the gases

are= colorless and. odorless.

Other predominant gases in the exhaust fumes, such as unburned hydrocarbons and sulfur dioxide, produce a characteristic malodor thatxindicates their presence.

These gases can produce

.the'same discomforting effect on an individual; however, the

~

1 symptoms may be' caused.by either a. physiological _ reaction or by s

ca psychological. response to aLdisagreeable, but benign odor.

For example,=the pungent smell._of sulfur dioxide produces a repugnant response from'most individuals at a concentration well below that which is_ considered harmful.

It-is not known what stimulus caused the reaction in some of the individuals in the controlLroom as-they recovered shortly thereafter without requiring medical attention.

Regardless, fumes were detected by the occupants of.the. control room and'it did prompt them to take necessary corrlctive~ action.

! Regulatory Gu'ide 1.78. addresses the use of human detection as a mechanism'for identifying. hazardous chemical (buildup although we recognize this means.is not_ appropriate for carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide.

Therefore, redundanc i non-IE; monitors for'these gases are being installed in the control

building air. intake duct to alarm operators if unacceptable levels

~

of.these gases, as defined
by OSHA, are reached.

7

.Our A/E, Bechtel Power / Corporation ~ considered the ilocation of the. control building' air intake duct relative to che auxiliary boileriand diesel ~ generator exhaust stacks in their foriginal design.. Based cnt engineering judgement, they determined 4that.the system design would meet 7the requirements of Regulatory

. Guide ~l.781for controlaroom habitability.

In addition, the original' design provides an ionization-type smoke detector for

thecair intake duct-to alarm the operators of-the presence of smoke..However,.this detector'was not operational at the time

~

' of? the' event and: it :is : indeterminate 'if its sensitivity can be

~

equated to levels of fumes'that would-impair operator performance.

The smoke detector.will be. operational' prior.to fuel-load while the gas.monitorsEare expected <to be installed and operational

.priorsto ascension,above 5%_ power.

If the. permanent gas monitors

' ' are noE operational at that time,. port'able detection equipment twill;beiutilized within--the control room.

k.

In summary,.we believe. thati necessary steps are being-

.ta en to-assure con rol room habitability.

The addition of t

lCO/CO : monitors coupled withothe= smoke detector and human detection 2

'of. malodors _provides a; Control Room ventilation ~ system design which c.M,

s a

L

[

_f i ~'

,f-

.o

. d*

3 assures that control room occupants have adequate warning of these potential environmental. conditions.

This is our final report regarding this matter.

i Very truly yours, Donald F. Schnell JJS/JJM/glp cc:

B. L. Forney,-NRC Region III Richard DeYoung, Director, I&E NRC Resident Inspectors, Callaway Plant (2) 12 "

Missouri Public Service Commission I

i't,.

9 1

k -v -

.1.

' N. - _