ML20087N832
| ML20087N832 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Monticello, Dresden, Peach Bottom, Browns Ferry, Pilgrim, Brunswick, Quad Cities, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 02/28/1984 |
| From: | Felton J NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | Bell N NUCLEAR INFORMATION & RESOURCE SERVICE |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20083L924 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-84-15, RTR-NUREG-0313, RTR-NUREG-0933, RTR-NUREG-313, RTR-NUREG-933 NUDOCS 8404050060 | |
| Download: ML20087N832 (3) | |
Text
PM - o4
/
'~g UNITED STATES E'
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
5
-E WASHINGTON, D. C,20555
%.....)
FEB 2 01981 Ms. Nina Bell Nuclear Infonnation & Resource Service 1346 Connecticut Avenue, NW IN RESPONSE REFER Washington, DC 20036 TO F01A-84-15
Dear Ms. Bell:
This is in response to-your letter dated January 4, 1984, in t..ich you requested, pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, three separate categories of documents relating to pipe crack problems.
The documents listed on Appendix A are responsive to items one and two of your request. These documents are being placed in the NRC Public Document Room b F0IA file folder 84-15 in your name.
The review of additional documents subject to your request is continuing.
You will be notified when our review has been completed.
Sin rely, g
. M. Felton, Director A
Division of Rules and Records Office of Administration
Enclosure:
Appendix A i
l BELLB4-15 PDR l
l
ATTACHMENT A DOCUMENTS RELATED TO BWR PIPE CRACKS (FOIA-84-15) 1.
01/17/84 Memo for Liaw from W. Koo, re: Trip Report on BWR Pipe Crack Countermeasures 2.
08/30/83 Letter to R. Vollmer from W. Shack (ANL) 3.
01/05/84 Memo for Bush, et.al., re: Guidance for Deliverables 4.
10/10/83 Memo from Nuclear Power Syst. Eng. Dept. - San Jose 1
5.
11/11/83 Letter to R. Stark, NRR from J. H. Gieske, Sandia 6.
11/14/83 Memo for Bush from Shao, re: IHSI 7.
11/02/83 Letter from S. Bush, Review & Synthesis Assoc., re:
Mtg Minutes (10/24/83), Including all Enclosures 8.
11/08/83 Memo for Holahan from Zwolinski, re: Mtg Minutes 10/21/83 9.
12/05/83 Letter to Liaw from Weeks, BNL "Dra.t" 10.
11/10/83 Letter to Cheng from Auerbauch (BNL) 11.
10/11/83 Memo for Ross from Niyogi, re: Stat. Anal. of Pipe Weld Test Data 12.
08/26/83 Note to Denton from Vollmer on Approach to BWR Pipe Crack 13.
10/06/83 Memo for Liaw from C. Cheng & M. Hum, re: Trip Report EPRI Workshop 9/7 - 9/9, 83 14.
08/12/83 Letter to Denton from EPRI 15.
undated Paper by Serpan, et.al. "U.S. NRC Research..." Copy Final 16.
undated Drawings "10-06 Unit 3" 17.
08/05/83 Letter and Mtg Minutes - Memo for Holahan from Zwolinski 18.
undated "BWR-IGSCC Brief" - Viewgraphs 19.
08/05/83 Memo for Holahan from Zwolinski, re: Mtg. Minutes 20.
08/22/83 Memo for Vollmer from Liaw, re: EPRI Course 21.
05/19/83 Letter to Lainas from Commonwealth Edison, re: LaSalle 22.
06/30/81 Letter to Schwencer from Curtis, PP&L, re: Susquehanna 23.
02/06/84 Memo for Eisenhut from Vollmer, re: Vollmer Memo on Use of IHSI 24.
12/08/83 Memo for Comm. Roberts from W. Dircks 25.
10/18/83 Note for Vollmer from Liaw, re: Peach Bottom IHSI 26.
12/29/83 Memo for Record 27.
08/15/83 Memo for DeYoung from Minogue, re: ASME Codes 28.
12/09/83 Memo for Speis from Vollmer, re: Briefing 29.
11/08/83 Memo for Gilinsky from Dircks 30.
08/24/83 Memo for Knight from Bosnak, re: Recommendation 31.
07/13/83 Letter to Denton from Bush, Review & Synthesis Assoc.
32.
08/08/83 Memo for Liaw from Cheng, re: Trip Report 33.
07/06/83 Re: Interim Staff Analysis Criteria 34.
08/15/83 Letter to Liaw from Weeks (BNL), re: Draft Order 35.
01/17/83 Memo for Vollmer from Speis, w/ attachments, re: Action Plan 36.
07/13/83 Memo for Dircks from Denton/Minogue,.re 7/7/83 Proposal for Review of NRC Requirements 37.
09/30/82 (GE Letter) Attn: Johnston - Mtg. Summary 9/16/82 l
38.
08/30/83 Memo for Chairman Palladino from Dircks, re: Japanese Repair Techniques
J.
39.
12/01/83 To: A. Igne from Thompson, Ames Lab., w/ attachments 40.
12/23/83 Memo for Norelius from Eisenhut, re: Allegations on Monticello Replacement 41.
09/16/83 Memo for Lainas from Johnston, re: Safety Evaluation Peach Bottom 2, Browns Ferry 1 42.
08/10/83 Memo for Vassallo from Clark, re: Mtg 8/9/83-(TVA) 43.
08/30/83 Memo for Vollmer from Johnston, re: EPRI Round Robin
- 44. 03/25/83 Memo for Liaw from Igne, re: "BWR Primary Piping Question" o
h r,
'o UNITED STATES
$)
- \\ g"(,
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION p
q E WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555 h
j/
JAN 17 1984 MEMORANDUM FOR:
B. D. Liaw, Chief Materials Engineering Branch Division of Engineering THROUGH:
Warren S. Hazelton, Section Chief Materials Application Section Materials Engineering Branch FROM:
William H. Koo Materials Application Section Materials Engineering Branch
SUBJECT:
TRIP REPORT - SEMINAR OF COUNTERMEASURES FOR BWR PIPE CRACKING I attended the Seminar on Countermeasures for BWR Pipe Cracking on November 15 to 18, 1983, at Palo Alto, California, which was sponsored by Boiling Water Reactor Owners Group (BWROG) and Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). The agenda of the seminar and the attendance list are provided in Attachments 1 and 2, respectively.
There was no hand-out from the speakers. A seminar proceedings compiling the speakers' presentations will be provided to each seminar attendant by EPRI at a later date.
Mr. R. Vollmer (Director of Division of Engineering, NRC) presented a talk on Tuesday morning regarding NRC persepective on BWR pipe crack issues. His talk was well received by the audience. The seminar was divided into three major sessions, namely, Problem Resolution, Remedy Development and Remedy Application. The subjects presented in the sessions of Problem Resolution were related to ultrasonic inspection of IGSCC pipe cracks, critical crack size and crack growth analysis, and leakage evaluation and detection. Most of the presentations did not provide any new information.
Those presentations providing some interesting or useful information are summarized below:
(a)
T. Mucciardi of the General Research Corporation reported that an automatic off-line data processing technique (using broad-band beam) to size the~ crack depth based on crack tip diffraction method was developed. The hardware and software allowing automatic selection of the crack tip will become available in the first quarter of 1984.
This-data processing technique can also measure
Contact:
W. Koo X-28589 XA Copy Hos Been Sent to PDR o
vt
?
\\
l 1
B. D. Liaw JIJ! 17 b4 pipe thickness.
However, the speaker emphasized that this technique may miss shallow cracks, crack tips hidden behind the root, and cracks running into the welds, weld fusion lines, or other metal-lurginal aggregates.
(b)
- 8. Mohamad of J. A. Jones reported the status of an advanced manual inspection system, which is designed to improve the data analysis.
An instrument called ALN 4060 (ultrasonic flaw discriminator) developed by EPRI is capable to discriminate IGSCC cracks from root geometry, and was qualified at NDE center with test scores of 83% correct calls, 16% false calls, and 13% miss calls.
The speaker emphasized that ALN 4060 requires training and can only be as smart as you train it.
For example, if the instrument was trained with NMP-1 IGSCC specimens, it will do a good job in identifying NMP-1 type IGSCC cracks.
(c)
A. Okamota of EPRI described some computer programs developed by EPRI for crack growth analysis in BWR piping. Whoever are interested in using these computer programs can contact the speaker.
PICEP Program is an EPRI developed pipe crack evalua-tion program using line spring model and influence function method. The cost to run this program is relatively low in comparison with the program using the 3-D finite element model.
(d)
G. Light of Southwest Research Institute (SWRI) presented some test results to show the effect of backlay cladding (BLC) to the UT inspection of defects. The cladding deflected the beam and reduced the amplitute.
Based on the testing on notches, the best UT results were obtained by using a 3/8 inch to 3/4 inch size transducer with a 45 degree shear wave at 1.5 MHZ.
The results also show that for a good UT inspection, the cladding should be processed by low heat input with a thickness not over 1/4 inch and circumferentially appl'ied by shielded manual arc welding.
The speaker also reported that the treatment of IHSI did not affect the UT detection of IGSCC cracks in a 12 inches diameter 100 schedule piping.
(e)
G. Dau of EPRI reported that a document (NUC-MR-1A), following ASNT format, is under preparation by an ad-hoc committee (initiated by utilities) to incorporate tougher requirements for UT personnel qualification and certification.
EPRI will recommend this document to ASME for reference in Code Section XI for NDT performed for nuclear power industry.
The final draft of the document will be submitted to NRC for endorsement.
ASNT will publish this document and INP0 will audit the certification program.
~
7
f B. D. Liaw C 17 1954 l
)
In the Remedy Development and Remedy Application sessions, the pres-entations were centered upon the results of development, testing, qualification, and application of the remedies to mitigate the IGSCC in BWR piping.
Basically, there are three major approaches to mitigate the IGSCC pipe cracking, namely, (1) to reduce the sensitization of the material by means of using nuclear grade or low carbon stainless steel or applying corrosion resistant cladding (CRC) and solution heat treatment (SHT), (2) to minimize the tensile residual stresses by means of applying Induction-Heat-Stress Improvement (IHSI), La:;t-Pass-Heat-Sink-Welding (LPHSW), or Heat-Sink-Welding (HSW), and (3) to improve the water chemistry by means of applying hydrogen water chemistry, deaereation during start-up or control of coolant impurities. Most of the information presented in these sessions was already known and no new remedy was proposed in this seminar.
The IGSCC experiences in Japanese and Swedish BWRs and their methods of mitigation were reported in this seminar.
Their presentations are briefly summarized below:
(a) IGSCC Experiences in Japanese BWRs IGSCC cracking in large diameter piping also occurred in Japanese BWRs. However, due to their policies of early mitigation of all piping susceptible to IGSCC, including replacing all cracked piping, the extent and severity of pipe cracking in their operating BWRs are consequently less extensive than that experienced in this country. They reported that IHSI was applied to approximately 300 welds in 3 plants and Heat-Sink-Rewelding was applied to approximately 200 welds in 5 plants.
In Fukushima I, Unit 3, IHSI was applied to 5 cracked recirculation sweepolet welds for continued service. After servicing for one year, the piping, consisting of the cracked sweepolet welds, was replaced. UT inspection of the 5 cracked sweepolet welds, before and after IHSI, indicated that IHSI did not propagate the existing cracks (based on length measurement, and the amplitude in DAC).
The results of the UT and PT performed on the cut-off welds also indicated that the cracks in the sweepolet welds did not propagate after IHSI during the one year operation period.
(b) IGSCC Experiences in Swedish BWRs The Swedish BWRs experienced very little IGSCC pipe cracking.
So far, there are only 7 welds reported to be cracked.
Ti.9 Swedish BWRs have no jet pumps in their recirculation systr.m which are I
m.
N B. D. Liaw JAN I 7 1984 similar to our Nine Mile Point 1 plant.
The oxygen content in the 4
recirculation system at above 110'C was reported to be less than 4
300 ppb.
They attributed the good experiences to the following causes:
(1) lower carbon content (<0.05% and on the average 0.04%)
in the piping materials, (2) minimized heat input and controlled hold time between passes during welding, and (3) maintaining high purity in water chemistry.
The Swedish applied in-reactor hydrogen water chemistry to control the oxygen content in Rhingals 1 and its effect on IGSCC were monitored by performing Constant Elongation Rate Test (CERT) and Electra-Chemical Potential Test (ECPT) on 304 stainless steel (0.046% C). The results indicated that an oxygen content of 5 ppb or less in the water is required to prevent IGSCC.
This is much lower than what we have believed in this country that an oxygen content of 20 ppb or less in water will prevent IGSCC.
However, it is not known at this time what other oxidizing impurities were present in the Swedish BWR which were not taken into account in the experiment.
i As the piping replacement program is going t'o be carried out by the utilities in an orderly fashion, some utilities may have to operate j
the plants with repaired welds for several fuel cycles before the i
scheduled piping replacement program can be completed.
Therefore, we will soon be facing the task of approving continued service of those plants for more than one fuel cycle. One issue we have to resolve in that task is to determine the reliability and accuracy of UT inspection performed on overlay repaired welds, which so far has not been firmly established. To justify con-tinued operation of plants with overlay repaired welds for more than one fuel cycle, we have to rely on the results of UT inspec-tion to determine the crark growth rate and to show that the growth of the existing cracks in the repaired welds will not exceed the new Code allowable limit. Therefore, a credible UT inspection of overlay repaired welds is essential to justifying continued operation of those plants for more than one fuel cycle..For the cracked welds repaired by thin overlay, the margin of safety relies greatly on the soundness of the-remaining piping ligament underneath the overlay.
Based on the information presented in this seminar, I firmly believe.that the industry is not ready to provide a credible UT inspection technique for overlay repaired welds at this time.
In view of the urgency of this matter, I recommend that we should request our consultants to provide an answer or at least a status report on this issue.
I also under-stand that Monticello and Hatch 2 will soon replace their i
l' :
^
~1 l'
i, L;;
=. -.
., - _., +..
\\
B. D. Liaw JA,'l ! 7 1984 recirculation system piping.
There are many overlay repaired welds in those two plants..I suggest that we should take early action to request from the utilities for some of those overlay repaired welds when avail-able and send them to our consulting laboratories as field samples to determine the credibility of the UT inspection techniques currently used or proposed to be used by the industry on overlay repaired welds during the in-service inspection.
Lib.t :v /Y /Sk'V William H. Koo Materials Application Section 4
Materials Engineering Branch Attachments:
As stated cc:
R. Vollmer W. Johnston l
W. Hazelton C. Cheng R. Klecker M. Hum B. Turovlin 1
-.E.2' b
=
l, b
.c 4 p
~
ATTACHMENT 1 11/10/83 AGENDA SEMINAR ON COUNTERMEASURES FOR BWR PIPE CRACKING November 15, 16, 17, 18,-1983 Myatt Palo Alto Time 9:00 Welcoine EPRI K. Stahlkopf BWROG M. Taylor 9:10 Overview of the BWROG Research &
J. Danko Develognent Program 9:20 NRC Perspective on BWR Pipe Crack R. Vollmer - NRC Issues Session 1A - Problem Resolution, Tuesday, November 15. REDWOOD I Chairman J. Lance J. Quinn Cochairman Paper Paper Title Author-Organization 9:50 198 UT Perfonnance Capability 8e6 R. Stone - J. A. Jones 10:15 199 Weld Crown Contour Machine C. Shaw - Sigma 10:40 BREAK 10:55 197 ISI Training Program R. _ Stone - J. A. Jones 11:20 32 Surveillance Pipe Tests R. C1 ark - BNWL 11:45 132 Crack Depth Sizing Using the T. Mucciardi - Gen. Res.
Root Tip Method Co rp.
12:10 LUNCH, REDWOOD II
~-
....,g.J.u
_.s,-.,,
.y 7
- +
_-..m.
1 Session 18 - Problem Resolution, Tuesday, November 15, REDWOOD I Chairman J. Hoffman Cochairman D. Norri s Paper Time Paper Title Author-Organization 1:00 26 NDE of IGSCC Countermeasures G. Light and R. Beverly -
5dRI 1:25 21 Status of Advanced Manual J. F. Hunt - J. A. Jones Inspection Systems 1:50 196 Automated Data Acquisition--
J. C. Wade - J. A. Jones Offline Analysis 2:15 181 Determination of Critical S. Ranganath - GE Crack Size in BWR Piping 4
2:40 232 Experimental Basis for the G. Wilkowski - BCL Net-Section load Criterion for Evaluation of Flawed BWR Piping 3:05 BREAK i
3:20 B3 Determination of Crack Growth -
R. Horn - GE -
Rates in BWR Piping 3:45 261 Leak-Before-Break Analysis of A. Zahoor EDS BWR Piping R. Gambl e 4:10 33 Estimation of Flow Rates
' R. Collier - BCL Through Stress Corrosion 4
Cracks 4:35 13 Analysis of Flow Through Inte-D. Abdollahian -
granular Stress Corrosion S. Levy, Inc.
i Cracks 1[ Computer Programs for Analysis 5:00 D. Norris - EPRI of Cracked BWR Piping A. Okamoto - IHI 5:25 ADJOURN 1
a 4
--+<-+
--******T*-_
~ " ' * ' '
Y
~
Session 1C - Problen Resolution, Wednesday, Nove.nber 16 Chainnan M. Taylor J. Gilman Cochairman a
Paper
^
]
Time Paper Title Author-Organi zation 8:30 22 Integrated System for Pipe Y. H. Jeong - J.A. Jones Inspection:
Status of Evaluation / Qualification 8:55 121 Radiographic Applications M. Lapides - EPRI 9:20 42 Status of Personnel Qualifi-G. Dau - E PR I cation and Certification 9:45 43 Sunnary of NDE Activities G. Dau - EPRI 10:10 182 Localized Leak Detection Using Moisture-sensitive Tape P. Riddl e - Techmark 10:35 462 Computer Prograns for Crack A. Okamoto - EPRI Growth Analysis in BWR Piping 11:00 BREAK Session 2A - Remedy Development, Wednesday, November 16 Chairman R. Hanford Cochai rman W. Childs Paper Time Paper Title Author-Organization 11:15 71 Qualification of Solution Heat G. Gordon - GE Treatment, Corrosion Resistant Cladding and Heat Sink Welding 11:40 202 Production and Impleaentation E. Sayer and R. Tunder -
of Nuclear Grade Stainless GE Stecl Piping 12:05 LUNCH, REDWOOD III I
\\
i I
3-
..%--ww.
e-.w..
==.
.e.
.w w
.g.w.
...g
Session 2B - Reinedy Development, Wednesday, Novenber 16, REDWOOD I Chairman A. Zeuthen Cochainnan R. Jones Paper Time Paper Title Authors 0rganization 1:00 27 Fundamental Microstructural C. Briant - GE Investigations of Nuclear Grade Stainless Steel 1:25 163 Crack Growth Rates and N. Ol sen - BNWL Demonstration of LPHSW in large Diameter BWR Pipe 1:50 82 Investigation of Last Pass R. Horn - GE Heat Sink Welding as a Pipe Renedy 2:15 151 Qualification of Induction H. Offer - GE Heating Stress Improvement as a Pipe Renedy 2:40 BREAK 2:55 142 Studies on Weld Overlay W. Newell J. A. Jones Repair of BWR Piping 3:20 be4 Analytical Considerations for E. Rybicki - U Tul sa Stress-Related Renedies 3:45 85 Residual Stress in-KRB Welds G. Hofer - KWU 4:10 192 Results of Residual Stress,
W. Shack - ANL Measurenents of Stainless Steel Pipe Welds 4:35 103 Summary of Stress and R. Jones - EPRI Sensitization Renedies 5:00 ADJOURN 5:30-7:00 Attitude Adjustnent Soiree, REDWOOD II
Session 2C - Remedy Development, Thursday, Novenber 17, REDWOOD I Chainnan C. Banks Cochainnan W. Bilanin Paper Time Paper Title Authon Organization 8:30 31 Low Tenperature Sensitization it. Cal iv. sri - SR I Studies 8:55 84 Parametric Pipe Studies R. Ho rn - G E 9:20 11 Laboratory Studies on Startup P. Andresen - GE Deaeration 9:45 81 Pipe Tests on Deaeration D. Hale - GE Startup 10:10 124 Deaeration Studies in Sweden L. Ljungberg - AA 10:35 BREAK 10:50 131 Stress Corrosion Cracking 41.-Macdonald - OSU Studies on Stainless Steel 11:15 72 Laboratory Studies on Hydrogen B. Go rdon - GE Water Chemistry 11:40 12 Effects of Coolant Impurities P. Andresen - GE on IGSCC 12:05 LUNCH, SCOTCH 22
5 Session 2D - Remedy Development, Thursday, November 17, REDWOOD I Chaiman J. Larson Cochaiman W. Childs Paper Time Paper Title Author-Organization 1:00 231 Decontamination of D. Weyman - YAECO Recirculation Piping 1:25 123 ECP Variations of Filmed J. Liebovitz Stainless Steels with Hydrogen W. R. Kassen l
and Oxygen Concentrations and S. G. Sawochka - NWT Acids and Bases 1:50 193 Effect of Sulfate and Chloride R. J. Kurtz and Intrusions on Cracking of D. Shannon - BNWL Stainless Steel at 238"C 2:15 201 Crevice Corrosion Chemistry D. Taylor - GE Studies 2 :40 104 Summary of Environmental R. Jones - EPRI Remedies
.3:05 BREAK Session 3A - Remedy Application, Thursday, November 17 Chaiman G. Krause Cochairman R. Smith Paper Time Paper Title Author-Organization 3:20 63 Electrochemical Potentiokine-K. Friedman - Western Piping tic Reactivation Tests to Y. Nakagawa - IHI Determine Sensitization 3 :45 64 BWR Pipe Cracking at TEPCO K. Fueki - TEPC0 4 :10 191 Pipe Cracking Remedies in W. Sagawa - Hitachi Japan: Part 1 4 :35 141 Pipe Cracking Remedies in M. Yajima and Japan: Part 2
- 5. Nakayama
.Toshiba 5:00 73 Implementation of Pipe G. Gordon - GE Remedies in the USA 5:25 ADJOURN vm.
m La__-_ _ __ :___ : _
==
Session 3B - Reinedy Application, Friday, Novenber 18, REDWOOD I Chairman G. Gresock Cochainnan R. Jones Paper Time Paper Title Author-Organization 8:30 34 In-Reactor Hydrogen Water R. Cowa n - GE Cheni stry--USA 8:55 122 In-Reactor Hydrogen Water C. Jansson - SS PB Chani stry--Sweden 9:20 111 Replacement of Recirculation P. Kasik - MPR Piping 9:45 BREAK 10:00 183 Use of the IGSCC Damage Index P. Ricardella for Cost / Benefit Evaluation T. Gerbe r - SI A of Renedies 10:25 195 Overview of BWROG Repair R. Sinith - J. A. Jones Application and Training Facility 10:50 61 Evaluation of Equipment for S. Fib an - J. A. Jones Pipe Renedy Application 11:15 62 Application of Corrosion S. Finb an - J. A. Jones Resistance Cladding for BWR Piping 11:40 LUNCH, SCOTCH 22
)
t
- 1 k '
A-
Session 3C - Remedy Application, Friday, November 18, REDWOOD II Chairman D. Sancic Cochaiman R. Snith Paper Time i
Papar Title Author-Organization 1:00 112 Res~idual Stress Improvement K. Krause - NSP for Replacement Piping 1:25 221. Training Techniques for D. Vandergriff-J. A. Jones Remedy Application 1:50 161 Repair of BWR Piping with J. E. Charnley - NUTECH Weld Overlay 2:15 BREAK 2:30 25 Application of Induction D. Bertossa - GE Heating Stress Improvement 2:55 143 Structural Reinforcement of F. Novak et al -
Sweepolets: Analysis and Welding Systems Application 3:20 102 BWR Pipe Repairs in Sweden C. Jansson - SSP 8 3:45 41 Sunmary of Renedy Application J. Danko - EPRI 4:10 ADJ0 URN i
W30-2588 C3/34. _.
o -
11/10/83 PAPERS AND AUTHORS Seminar on Countermeasures for BWR Pipe Cracking Novenber 15, 16, 17, 18, 1983 Paper Time Paper Title Authorw0rganization Th 9:20 11 Laboratory Studies on Startup P. Andresen - GE Deaeration Th 11:40 12 Effects of Coolant Impurities P. Andresen - GE on IGSCC 4
T 4:35 13 Analysis of Flow Through Inter-D. Abdollahtan - S. Levy granular Stress Corrosion Cracks f
T 1:25 21 Status of Advanced Manual J. F. Hunt - J. A. Jones Inspection Systems W 8:30 22 Integrated System for Pipe Y. H. Jeong - J. A. Jones Inspection:
Status of Evaluation / Qualification F
2:30 25 Plant Applications of D. Bertossa - GE Induction Heating Stress laprmvement T
1:00 26 NDE of IGSCC Countermeasures G. Light and R.
Beverly - SWRI W
1:00 27 Fundanental Microstructural C. Briant - GE Investigations of Nuclear Grade Stainless Steel Th 8:30 31 Low Temperature Sensitization R. Caligiuri - SRI 1
Studies T 11:20 32 Surveillance Pipe Test Results R. Cl a rk - B NWL T
4:10 33 Estimation of Flow Rates R. Collier - BCL Through Stress Corrosion i
Cracks F
8:30 34 In Reactor Hydrogen Water R. Cowan - GE Chemistry Studies F
3:45 41 Summary of Remedy Application J. Danko - EPRI 4,
)
Paper Time Paper Title Authur-Organi zation W
9:20 42 Status of Personnel Qualifi-G. Dau - EPRI cation and Certification W
9:45 43 Sumnary of NDE Activities G. Dau - E PR I F 10:50 61 Evaluation of Equipment for S~. Finlan - J. A. Jones Pipe Remedy Application F 11:15 62 Application of Corrosion S. Finlan - J. A. Jones Resistance Cladding for BWR Piping Th 3:20 63 Electrochemical Potentiokine-K. Friedman - Western i
tic Reactivation Tests to Piping Determine Sensitization Th 3:45 64 BWR Pipe Cracking at TEPC0 K. Fueki - TEPCO W 11:15 71 Qualification of Solution Heat G. Go rdon - GE Treatment, Corrosion Resistant Cladding and Heat Sink Welding
[
Th 11:15 72 Laboratory Studies on Hydrogen B. Gordon - GE Water Chemistry Th 5:00 73 Implementation of Pipe G. Gordon - GE Remedies in the USA Th 9:45 81 Pipe Tests on Deaeration D. Hal e - GE Startup W
1:50 82 Investigation of Last Pass R. Ho rn - GE Heat Sink Welding as a Pipe Remedy T
3:20 83 Detennination of Crack Growth R. Ho rn - G E Rates in BWR Piping i
Th 8:55 84 Paranetric Pipe Studies R. Horn - GE W
3:45 85 Residual Stress in KRB Welds G. Hofer - KWB F
3:20 102 BWR Pipe Repairs in Sweden C. Jansson - SSPB W
4:35 103 Sunnary of Stress and R. Jones - EPRI Sensitization Remedies
)
Th 2:40 104 Sunnary of. Environment R. Jones - EPRI Remedies F
9:20 111 Replacement of Recircula (on P. Kasik - MPR -
Piping
]
ll F
1:00 112 Residual Stress Improvement G. Krause - NSP j
for Replacement Piping
?,
E -'
- -j- - ;, ;-~
Paper Time Paper Title Author-Organization 4
W 8:55 121 Radiographic Applications M. Lapides - EPRI F
8:55 122 In-Reactor Hydrogen Water C. Jansson - SSP 8 Chemistry - Sweden Th 1:25 123 ECP Variations of Stainless J. Liebovitz Steels with Itydrogen and Oxygen W. R. Kassen Concentrations and Acids and S. G. Sawochka - NWT Bases Th 10:10 124 Deaeration Studies in Sweden L. Ljungberg - AA Th 10:50 131 Stress Corrosion Cracking D. Macdonald - OSU Studies on Stainless Steel T 11:45 132 Crack Depth Sizing Using the T. Mucciardi - General Root Tip Method Research Corp.
Th 4:35 141 Pipe Cracking Remedies in N. Yajima and Japan: Part 2
- 5. Nakayama - Toshiba W
2:55 142 Studies on Weld Overlay W. Newell - J. A. Jones for Repair of BWR Piping F
2:55 143 Structural Reinforcenent of F. Novak, J. Fox - Wel d of Sweepolets: Analysis Syst.'
and Application D. Ricardell a - SI A T
5:00 144 Computer Programs for Analysis D. Norris - EPRI of Cracked BWR Piping A. Okamoto - IHI W
2:15 151 Qualification of Induction it. Offer - GE Heating Stress Improvement as a Pipe Remedy W 10:35 152 Computer Programs for Crack A. Okamoto - EPRI Growth Analysis in BWR Piping W
1:25 153 Crack Growth Rates and N. 01 sen - BNWL Demonstration of LPHSW in large Dianeter BWR Pipe F
1:50 161 Repair of BWR Piping with J. E. Charnley - NUTECH Weld Overlay T
2:15 181 Determination of D itical S. Ranganath - GE Crack Size in BWR Piping W 10:10 182 Localized Leak Detection R. Riddle - Techmark Using Pbisture-Sensitive Tape l
la F 10:00 183 Use of the IGSCC Damage P.' Ricardella - SIA Index for Cost / Benefit -
T.' Gerbe r - SI A I!
Evaluation of Remedies I]
l'
[* !-
j--
=
7,
Paper Time Paper Title Author-Organization W
3:20 184 Analytical Considerations for E. Rybicki - Univ. Tulsa Stress-Re1ated Reinedies Th 4:10 191 Pipe Cracking Renedies in W. Sagawa - Hitachi Japan:
Part 1 W
4:10 192 Results of Residual Stress W. Shack - ANL Measurements of Stainless Steel Pipe Welds i
Th 1:50 193 Effect of Sulfate and Chloride R. J. Kurtz and Intrusions on Cracking of D. Shannon - BNWL Stainless Steel at 288'C i
F 10:25 195 Overview of BWROG Repair R. Snith - J.A. Jones Application and Training Facility T
1:50 196 Automated Data Acquisition--
J. C. Wade - J. A. Jones Offline Analysis l
T 10:55 197 ISI Training Program R. Stone - J. A. Jones T
9:50 198 UT Perfonnance Capability R. Stone - J. A. Jones Demonstration T 10:15 199 Weld Crown Contour Machines C. Shaw - Sigma 4
Th 2:15 201 Crevice Corrosion Chemistry D. Taylor - GE Studies W 11:40 202 Production and Implenentation E. Sayer and of Nuclear Grade Stainless R. Tunder - GE Steel Piping F
1:25 221 Training Techniques for D. Vandergriff-J. A. Jones Renedy Application T
9:20 NRC Perspective on BWR Pipe R. Vollmer - NRC Crack Issues Th 1:00 231 Decontamination of D. Weyman - YAECO Recirculation Piping i
l T
2:40 232 Experimental Basis for the G. Wilkowski - BCL Net-Section Load. Criterion l
for Evaluation of F1 awed BWR Piping T
3:45 261 Leak-Before-Break Analysis of A. Zahoor EDS.
BWR Piping R. Gamble t
14 i
li W30-2614 C3/35~
1 e-ATTACHMENT 2 Seminar on Countermeasures for BWR Pipe Cracking November 15, 16, 17 & 18, 1983 ij l
NAME COMPANY l
Alkire, Gary D.
Northeast Utilities Auerbach, Clemens Brookhaven National Laboratory Banks, Carl Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.
Bayles, Peter Philadelphia Electric Co.
Behravesh, Mohamad J. A. Jones Applied Research Co.
Belford, Michael Southern Company Services i
Bergstrom, Jan OKG (Sweden)
Brocco, Marco ENEA (Italy)
Brook, Mark Combustion Engineering Brown, Boyd W.
EG&D, Idaho
- Bruemmer, S. M.
Battelle Northwest Chen, Lieh Taiwan Power Company Clark, Robert A.
Battelle Northwest Copeland, Fred Structural Integrity Assoc.
Cox, Gorden Babcock & Wilcox Construction Co.
Cragnolino, Gustavo Ohio State University Davies, T.
I. T. L.
- Dillon, R.
L.
Battelle Northwest Eason, Ernest Failure Analysis Associates Enright, Bob Seattle Industrial Finesi, Fabio ENEL (Italy)
Findlan, Shane J. A. Jones Applied Research Co.
Ford, Peter General Electric R&D Center Fox, Michael Nutech Gamble, Ron Impell Giannuzzi, Anthony Structural Integrity Assoc.
Gordon, G.
M.
General Electric Co.
Gothard Michael E.
Tennessee Valley Authority Haask, Al Babcock & Wilcox Hakala, Juho TVO (Finland)
~**{~'"~~
~ ~ ~ ~
'3
~
~"
+
f m..
-?-
NAME COMPANY Hanford, Ray Carolina Power & Light Co.
Harrington, Edmond Wright Schuchart Harbor Harrington, K. V.
Iowa Electric Light & Power Co.
Heald, Jerry D.
S.
Levy, Inc.
Hilling, Chuck Babcock & Wilcox Hoffman, John Yankee Atomic Electric Horn, Ron General Electric Company Hsu, L. C.
Nutech Jansson, Christer Swedish State Power Board Jeng, Yi H.
J. A. Jones Applied Research Co.
Jones, Harold L.
J. A. Jones Applied Research Co.
Kass, J.
General Electric Krupowicz, John J.
Combustion Engineering Kawamoto, T.
IMI - Japan Keneshea, Francis Quadrex Corp.
- Koh, P.
K.
Taipower Advisor (Taiwan)
Koo, W. H.
U.S. NRC Krause, Greg Northern States Power Company Kurtz, Randy Sargent, Lundy Kurtz, Rick Battelle Northwest Kusuhashi, Miako The Japan Steel Works Lance, Jack Yankee Atomic Electric Co.
Lareau, Jack Combustion Engineering Larson, John Nebraska Public Power District Leibovitz, Jacques
- Liaw, B.
D.
U.S. NRC Light, Glenn Southwest Research Institute Ljungberg, Lars ASEA-ATOM Maloney, E. J.
Public Service Electric & Gas Medal, Rolf G.
General Electric Mehta, Har i
Mezzanotte, David.A.
E. K..DuPont Co.
Mittelberg, Roger DuPont Morin, Ulf Sydkraft Mucciardi, A. N.
- General Research Corporation Muscara, Joe
' U.S. NRC f
- ),
, y v.-.*-
- 7 e< +e-
+
Wa'tes=***
+-M*
f, ' ' '
' ' ' " " " ~ ~ ~
' ' ' ~ ' '
i
,NAME COMPANY McCracken, Conrad U.S. NRC l
- Nakagawa, Y. G.
IHI Naula, Marcel KKM Nestell, James E.
MPR Associates, Inc.
l Newell, W. F.
J. A. Jonec Applied Research Norris, Paul P.
CG&E Novak, John A.
Pennsylvania Power & Light i
Pearsall, Ray Gilbert Commonwealth i
Persson, Ingemar Swedish State Power Board Pitcairn, Dave Nutech Ranganath, Sam General Electric
- Rao, K. P.
Tarapur (India)
Regis, Vittorio ENEL (Italy)
Riddle, Parvin Techmark Limited Rodholm, Peter ITL Sancic, David New York State Power Authority Schmidt, Charles SRI Schuster, Randy Tri-Tool, Inc.
Seiler, Aron Impell Shack, Bill Argonne National Laboratory Schakinovsky, Michael L.
Nuclear Engergy Services t
Shaw, Craig Sigma Research Skrincocky,-Dennis Combustion Engineering Smilie, Robert Gulf States Utilities Smith, Richard E.
J. A. Jones Applied Research Co.
Spalaris, Costas Quadrex 1
Stone,. Robert M.
J. A. Jones Applied Research Stuckey, Kenneth B.
Babcock & Wilcox Suzuki, Kazuhiro.
Tokyo Electric Power Company Taboada, Al U.S.
NRC l
Taylor, Malcolm E.
Pennsylvania Power and Light Co..
t Teichman, Larry Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.
Tesch, Tom ANI-h Todd, Roger Niagara Mohawk Power' Corp.
Tovissi, Lewis Babcock & Wilcox.Const. Co..
Trombley, Michael Mercury Co.
i I.
g
- m = e e e'= - e: * - " " ' * *
'-NM * " ' ~ * '
NAME COMPANY Umemoto, Jadahiro IHI Umino, David Nutech Vandergriff, Doug J. A. Jones Applied Research Van Petten, David J.
Babcock & Wilcox Const. Co.
Veronesi, Luciano Westinghouse Wade, Janet J. A. Jones Applied Research Co.
Walker, James L.
Nuclear Energy Services Walter, John H.
Rockwell International i
Warren,-Michael V.
Newport News Industrial Corp.
Watkins, Arthur D.
Mississippi Power & Light Weeks, John R.
Brookhaven National Laboratory Wheeler, Charles Illinois Power Company Wendland, W. G.
American Nuclear Insurers
- Weyman, G.
Dea Craig Sigma Research Wilkowski, Gery Battelle Columbus
- Willertz, L.
E.
Pennsylvania Power & Light l
Williams Murray E.
Boston Edison Company
- Yoshida, T.
Hitachi, Japan Zeuthen, Albert W.
Long Island Lighting Co.
l -
1.
t t
9 '
.,7 c
' ^ ^ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
NAME COMPANY Andresen, Peter General Electric /CRD Atteridge, David Battelle Northwest Burns, Robert Nuclear Energy Service, Inc.
a Chapman, Terry General Electric Collier, Robert Battelle Columbus Cortland, Paul Impell Doubleday, Edward C.
Nuclear Energy Services,.Inc.
Elliott, J. P.
Torrey Pines Technology Ellis, Don SWEC Goldstein New York State Power-Authority Gordon, Barry General Electric Grover, Jeff APTECH Hale, Don General Electric j
Hofer, G.
KWU Igne, E. G.
U.S. NRC/ACRS Isaacs, Hugh S.
Brookhaven National Laboratory Kasik, Phil MPR Associates Kassner, Tom Argonne National Laboratory.
Lindsuog, A.
RKS Mikesell, Walter R.
CBI Industries
- Nagata, P.
K.
INEL Offer, Henry General El'ectric J
Olson, Norm Battelle Northwest ~
O'Toole, Connie General Electric Paterson, Steve APTECH.
Quinones, David SAI Richman, Roger APTECH Schuster, Randy Tri-Tool, Inc.
Sobcn, Bert Nutech Ueda, Hiroshi Sumitomo Metal Vallenas, Pepe CYGNA Verble, Kenneth D.
Babcock & Wilcox Construction a
Vollmer, Richard H.
U.S. NRC Weiss, Stuart C-E l
t White, Carl Tennessee Valley Authority i
1
- White, R.-E.
Yankee Atomic Electric Willens, Ken Yankee Atomic Electric H
Yajima, M.
Toshiba.
N-
. Zielonka, Andy EBASCO Services -
- - " ~
L..
?-
EPRI STAFF Bilanin, Warren Childs, Wylie Cubicciotti, Dan Dau, Gary Danko, Joseph Gilman, Joe Jaffee, Robert Jones, Robin Lapides, Mel Liu, Soung-Nan Norris, Douglas Okamoto, Asao Quinn, Jim Stahlkopf, Karl a
o
- - = r ---
r______-
- '- + - - - - - + - - '. "r-----
--... t r r n,
'