ML20087M223
| ML20087M223 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Saint Lucie  |
| Issue date: | 03/09/1984 |
| From: | Williams J FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20087M216 | List: |
| References | |
| L-84-60, NUDOCS 8403290114 | |
| Download: ML20087M223 (2) | |
Text
.
i ji)
,3 g g, 4 0
(
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY March 9, 1984 L-84-60 Mr. Janes P. O'Reilly Regional Administrator, Region II U. S. Muciear Regulatory Commission 101 Marietta Street, Suite 2900 Atl anta, Georgi a 30303
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
Re:
St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Decket Nos. 50-335, 50-389 Inspection Report 83-43/71 Florida Power & Light Company has reviewed tne subject inspection report and a response is attached.
There is no proprietary information in the report.
Very truly yours, (gherp
[o J. W. Wil1'i ans, Jr.
Vice President Nuclear Energy JWW/PLP/js Att achment cc:
Harold F. Reis, Esquire PNS-LI-84-82 8403290114 840319 gDRADOCKOSOOOg PEOPLE,. SERVING PEOPLE
{
+
ATTACHMENT Re:
St. Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-335, 50-389 Inspection Report 83-43/71 Finding 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion VI, as implemented by Section 6.0 of Florida Power and Lignt Topical Report FPLTQAR 1-76A, requires in part that Measures assure that documents are distributed to and used at the location where the prescribed activity is performed.
Contrary to the above, during a routine periodic audit of Unit 2 Control Roan procedures (Administrative, Operating, Onergency and Off-Normal), several exanples were found of f ailure to properly control procedures.
Response
1.
FPL concurs with the finding.
2.
The finding occurred due to personnel oversight as a result of reorganizing the Operating Procedure Index and reidentifying some procedures from " Plant" (affecting both units) to individual unit procedures.
Individuals were not paying close attention to the pre-fix when preparing and issuing procedures.
3.
As corrective action, all indexes have been reviewed against master copies and the procedures in Control Room have been verified against those indexes.
4.
To preclude further problems, the personnel involved have been instructed to pay close attention to detail when handling procedure revi sions.
5.
Full compliance was achieved by February 24, 1984.
O t