ML20087J715

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Interim Deficiency Rept Re Design of Diesel Generator Logic Inconsistent W/Fsar.Initially Reported on 840216.Gilbert Assoc,Inc Investigating Possible Safety Implications of Identified Discrepancies.Next Rept Expected by 840430
ML20087J715
Person / Time
Site: Perry  FirstEnergy icon.png
Issue date: 03/16/1984
From: Edelman M
CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO.
To: James Keppler
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
References
RDC-95(84), NUDOCS 8403230045
Download: ML20087J715 (2)


Text

, l THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMIN ATING COMPANY P o. DOX 5000 - CLEVELAND. oHlo 44101 - TELEPHONE (216) 622-9800 - ILLUMINATING BLDG. - 55 FUBLIC SC.UARE Serving The Best Location in the Nation MURRAY R. EDELMAN

,QC C EESI ENT March 16, 1984 Mr. James C. Keppler Regional Administrator, Region III Office of Inspection and Enfor ement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn,' Illinois 60137 l'E: Perry Nuclear Power Plant Docket Nos. 50-440; 50-441 Design of Diesel Generator Logic Inconsistent With FSAR

[RDC 95(o4)]

Dear Mr. Keppler:

Thia letter serves as the interim reoort pursuant to 10CFR50.55(e) on the deficiencies cowarning agreement between FSAR 71gure 8.3-6 (Diesel and Diesel Breaker Logic Diagrams) and the present diesel generator logic.

Mr. P. R. Pelke of your of fice was notit'ied February 16, 1584, by Mr. B. D.

Walrath of The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (CEI) that this problem i

was being evaluated. This discrepancy was identified during a safety system l functional capability review being performed for CEI.by GDS Associa :es.

This report contains a description of the deficiency, planned corrective action and the date for filing of the next report on this subject.

Description of Deficiency Figure 8.3-6 of the FSAR does not conforr to other FSAR requirements nor to I Drawing No. B-208-216. Two discrepancies identified are 'that the FSAR figure i does not include the logic for a diesel generator loss of excitation and the figure identifies two five-second delays whereas the design combines them into - '

a sing 12 five-second delay. Other. discrepancies ware also. identified and the

, possible safety ef fects are being investigated.

I l

l l

l 8403230045 840326 '

PDR ADOCK 05003440

!E a W _Q g .

, '9 Jy N -. - -- .-- .- -  :

l Mr. Jim 2a C. Keppler March 16, 1984

_ Corrective Action Gilbert Associates, Incorpoiated, our Architect / Engineer, is investigating the possible safety implications of the identified discrepancies. It will also be determined whether design changes to conform to the FSAR or a change to the FSAR to reflect the design are r . juired.

We will submit our next report on this subject by April '30, 19C4.

Please call if there are any questions.

Sincerely, Murray R. Edelman Vice President Nuclear Group MRE:pab cc: Mr. M. L. Gildner NRC Site Office Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regt,latory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission c/o Document Management 3 ranch Washington, D.C. 20555 Records Center, SEE-IN Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 1100 circle 75 Parkway, Suite 1500 Atlanta, GeorFi a 30339

.. .