ML20087J280

Rev 0 to Std Deficiency Rept

ML20087J280
Person / Time
Site:	South Texas
Issue date:	05/09/1986
From:	HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20082V059	List: ML20082V101 ML20087J280
References
FOIA-93-642 B-212, NUDOCS 9505080175
Download: ML20087J280 (6)

Text

.

~

l. lll:'

p. # --

e

= ' ' '

l s f.as.

VWecys

~

1

[

SOUTH TEX AS PROJECT eAcg i

cs 5

/

/ STANDARD DEFICIENCY

,SSU E O.T E a SE ERiTv "ve' u

\\

REPORT May 9, 1986 e

na n, a DeKQv5MEOOumeNG 3

OEF,OER-N. _

REQUIREO ?

SOR NO

• Rall? 1 b,-

g Surveillance 58-967 vES a NO @

a EvisiON 0

k ORGAN 12ATiON d

PERS N 5 CONT ACTE Q RESPONSE OUE DATE Q

g p

j Ebasco QA C. Bowma6-G. Stater June 6, 1986 3

g REOuimEMENT Q

MM 4

E0 0

1 See Page 2 g

ac e g,.;

5 ouiciENCv/RE A$0N FOR REJECTION i

o 5

See Page 2

]

.E=

5

.I S

A*

. m" RECOMMENDEO ACTIONiSi 6 REMEDIAL

@ INVESTIGATIVE

@ CORRECTIVE Q

U a

c<

S.ee Page 3 INITIATOR 7

7.c c w

,5 -T-S04TE hi2 AJbpP

. M*A

.f/f (,kATE t is e

R. M. N

/

Charette y, u T. U

=

O*

R EMEOl AL/INV E SilG A Tiv E AC TIONIS)

{j

=

_J.J x

8

..m i

b EFFECTIVE DATE

{

.m,

~

h

{

CAUSE OF THE CONOirlGN & CORRECravE ACTION TO PREVENT RECURRENCE

{

$l g

r a-w e

a EFF ECTivE OATE

{

y DATE

{

SIGN A TUR E 1

o ACCEPT O AMENOEO INITs A TOR O ATE ATL/SUPERv 4SOR OATE {

g

RESPONSE

REJECT

RESPONSE

4 AMENDEO Q ACCEPT INITI ATOR DATE A TL.SUPERv sSOR OATE E O

R ESPONSE U REJECT INI TI ATOR OATE A T L;$UP ERV ISOR OATE {.

C V E R IF 1-Q SAT C A TIO N U UNSAT REMARK $

j{

p 9505000175 941206

/

id PDR FOEA LAWRENC93-642 PDR 3

[

OATE f

QA CLOSURE

.I l

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT PAGE 2

0F 5

STANDARD DEFICIENCY REPORT,,,,,,,

3 212 CONTINUATION SHEET REVISION:

0 BLOCK 9 REQUIREMENTS

1. QAl-19 Rev. 3 paragraph 7.1.,1 states:

"CRG shall review records / packages based on specific review criteria obtained from the appifcable drawings specifications and procedurds.

Generic review requirements for inspection and test records shall meet the following requirements, as applicable.

a. Sufficient infomation s>.all exist to permit identification between records and acc'ivity or item to which it applies.

b. The records shali contain a description of the type of cbse:"!: tion.

t

c. Evidence of completing and verifying of the type of

observation.

d. The date and results of 'the inspection or test.

e. Infonnation related to nonconformances.

f. Inspector or data recorder identification.

1

9. A statement as to the acceptability of the results.

i

h. Records shall be completed with all blocks addressed on the appropriate forms.

i. Records shall indicate current QCPs, DesLgn Documents and amendments as applicable at the time of inspections.

s J. The completed activity will reflect compliance to appl'icable 1

t codes and engineering requirements, except as may be addressed y

under the requirement of SSP-8, "donconformance Reportings" and QCP-15.1, " Identification and Control of Deficiency Notices."

2. QAl-19, Rev. 3, Paragraph 13.1 states:

)

" Prior to Ebasco's certifying the Code Data Report, 'the SQR Supervisor shall perform final review of the documentation.

package to assure that all required QA records have been provided for Code items and sign the System / Subsystem Release (Attachment

3. 6 ).

Upon review acceptance by SQR, Ebasco shall certify the Code Data Report and the package shall be suba,itted signature on the Code Data Report.

5987H/RMN

)

SQA 0070 2/84) l

1

!i g

s m.

~

SOUTH. TEX AS PROJECT PAGE '3 0F 0

' STANDARD DEFICIENCY REPORT.

S m o.

8-212 CONTINUATION SHEET REVISION.

0

3. Ebasco QAM-ASM6 Section III, Section'III-4, Rev. 7 Paragraph 2.1 states:

" Corrective action shall be required for identified and documented nonconformances associated with code items or services.

Paragrapn 2.2 states in part:

"The need for corrective action may be identified from the

{

following sources:

a) Inspection activities perfomed by Site Quality Control.

b) Surveillance and audits performed by Site Quality Assurance.,

f c) Site Qualitg Records document reviews."

Paragrapn 2.3 states:

t

'"The responsiole reviewrs of the aoove data shall detemine the

~

need for correctiveiction as early as possible in order to preclude tne condition (s) and tne corrective action required snali De documented, utssemination of corrective action information to responsible individuals -shall be performed in a minimum lengtn or time.-

Paragrapn 3.4 states in part:

"When conditions requiring corrective action are identified during the performance of review in accordance with this section, s

it is to be documented on a standara Deficiency report tsnown in Appendix 11 as Exh1D1t Jb-5IP) wh1c4 $nall De InitiateG anG.

logged by the Quality Assurance site supervisor or nis designee, identifying the deffe1ency, severity level, anc recomunendations, and issued to the respons1 Die organization for response.-

4. SQAP-O', Rev. 2 " Deficiency Reporting", Paragraph 6.2 states in 2

part:

"When an SDR condition is identified, the following actions are taken:

6.2.2 Severity Level 11-a deficiency which is not of major importance, but does not require both remedial and corrective actions; examples include: - repetitive deficiencies" b987H/MN l

SQA 007(12/04)

?

i d'

SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT PAGE 4

0F S

STANDARD DEFICIENCY REPORT,,,,,

B-212 CONTINUATION SHEET REVISION:

0

.I BLOCK 10 DEFICIENCY / REASON FOR REJECTION Ten (10) completed Records were reviewed to the requirements noted in Block 9.

These records have been transmitted to HL&P RMS Vault.

Specific examples are as follows:

1. Contrary to the requirements noted in Block 9. Item 1, the following document package deficiencies were noted:

o CV-1232 FW 004.1 PDC is for the original weld FWOO4 without PDC paperwork for FWOO4.1 in the package.

9-

,,, o EW1213 FW0043 The Fabrication Che:cklist doesn't; identify what piec'es of x

4

. material, i.e. He'at. Numbers,. that were. welded on. FW0043;

.~

9

2.. Contrary to the requirements noted in Block 9. Item 2, the following package was transmitted to HL&P RMS Vault without ANI final review of the PDC and FCL's.

RH-1114 FWOO2.1 RH-1114 FW0003.1

3. Contrary to the requirements noted in Block 9. Items 3 and 4, ESI QA performed surveillance SE-1305 on 3/14/86 which identified 38 out of 41 document packages which exhibited deficiencies similar to those noted above. As a result of the protiless noted, a rough draf t SDR (E-448) had been written to address both remedial and corrective actions necessary to resolve the problem..On 4/25/86 Bechtel QA performed surveillance (SB-967) which identified the following deficiencies:

Of 10 additional packages reviewed, 4 exhibited problems o

similar to those noted above, The defic'iencies noted in Ebasco Surveillance SE-1305 had been o

corrected and reverified by ESI.

o As of S/5/86, the SDR proposed by ESI QA had not been issued.

g I

5987H/RMN

e r.

a

{ **

5 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT PAGE 0F 5

STANDARD DEFICIENCY ' REPORT S0a NO.:

8 212 CONTINUAT10N SHEET REVISION:

0 s

Note: As a result of the deficiencies noted above, diC QA has classified this SOR as a severity level 1 due to the O

sigaf ficcnt and repetitive nonconformances which affect hardware, and for which previous correct action (s) have'.

been ineffective.

BLOCK 11 REC 0PetENDED ACTION (S)

1. Correct the above documents within the current program.

2. Investigate to determine the extent of the above deficiencies turned over to HL&P RMS Vault, provide results.

3. In accordance with paragraph 2 above provide objective evidence-to demonstrate that.previously reviewed records are accurate and complete.

4.. Investigate the reasons the SUR wasn't; issued in accordande'with f

, ' SQAP-02 and provide results.

5. Provide lesson plan (s) for training for review and approval.

6. Retrain the individuals to the proper procedures, provide objective evidence.

l

7. Provide to Bechtel QA prior to implementation, the corrective actions to be.taken to preclude recurrence.

\\

b l

5987H/RMN SQA 007 H 2/84)

.brr Ak. $)"'

ONhb gs CASE CHRONOLOGY gg GPCleJ0av p egg g,y,segg DATE OPENED fl. CA3 Y- 0 '"7 ~ D TT Y V

f activ8TY s4TE 1/* M 111) fct A e % 7s

'l4m%A5 A D ri t'N ei -

Stt84 d5 Sfl'?fndd / ydkr/43 Ab 0Cirke) Aro C Ntre - f hf S *I ~ l(~1lin% .hur mmi dn{H I lAlllA 't-hbNMfM kA lW di C$t h O .12 Q3W c, S b cees h & W S n w S-. klo g,& NQ sp,,ea pa; af ((s5h1*13 h 0VtM A Ys ! Jew eMilt GosAs C]Oct AM 01 A W 22'R/d3 /7775 6WAo-, rum /IL9u / Ter?Pryc 26 Al/Gk.3 &l) hina) - AtAt A / V l/(.6v11eP (dA (1 i f-24'M 7 fM' I) khuWeo - No cAcn ce I 69 0%a m c L~ o 4 khtpl u d%f 'w @% etM e bu, /<'a~m M/ El s=d O l b 27 - Au Jd cc &d ul b [ o 12 JbJfet [.l M-Wtu Wwd[eb -Od M w h b [bd/bdw~ U S F01 (LoS4b l l I i l 4 \\ l l Information in this record was dele:ed ~ in accordance with thegegdom of Information -r -- nu, m.upuvaa F0IA 93 4V2_- d \\ ACTIVITY COE3 L/w e LETTER Os NEWO TC

• TEtiPMoseE CALL suSP e saSPECTION sie e esETisse tut a swyEST14ATION RCP-a RCPORY ttSatCD

.}}