ML20087J124
| ML20087J124 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 04/28/1995 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20087J122 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9505050288 | |
| Download: ML20087J124 (2) | |
Text
p rug 11 UNITED STATES pe g
j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION t
WASHINGTON, D.C. 2056H001
\\...../
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NOS.180 AND 161 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NOS. DPR-51 AND NPF-6 ENTERGY OPERATIONS. INC.
ARKANSAS NUCLEAR ONE. UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-313 AND 50-368
1.0 INTRODUCTION
By letter dated August 30, 1994, as supplemented January 19, 1995, Entergy Operations, Inc. (the licensee) submitted a request for changes to the Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit Nos. I and 2 (ANO-1&2), Operating License Nos.
DPR-51 and NPF-6. These revision: provide explicit details which would allow design changes to the intake structure to restrict unauthorized access at ANO-l&2.
2.0 EVALUATION The licensee's proposal to modify and add additional delay features to deter attempts at unauthorized entry to the intake structure protected area perimeter barrier was analyzed by NRC headquarters staff.
It was determined that these changes, in conjunction with the existing assessment and detection capabilities, will continue to provide adequate coverage and protection levels to the protected area perimeter barrier at the intake structure.
3.0 FINDINGS It is the staff's determination that the amendment to the Arkansas Nuclear One Industrial Security Plan, as described in the licensee's letters of August 30, 1994, as supplemented January 19, 1995, does not increase the risk of sabotage 1
at the facility. The plan continues to satisfy 10 CFR Part 73.55 require-ments.
4.0 STATE CONSULTATIOS l
In accordance with the Commission's regulations, the Arkansas State official was notified of the proposed issuance of the amendment. The State official had no comment.
t i
9505050288 950428 ADOCK0500g3 DR
5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION
The amendments are related solely to safeguards matters and do not involve any significant construction impacts. Accordingly, the amendments meet the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR Sl.22(c)(12).
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b) no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendments.
6.0 CONCLUSION
The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:
(1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
Principal Contributor: Robert B. Manili Date: April 28, 1995