ML20087H594

Aircraft Movements at Harrisburg Intl Airport,CY83

ML20087H594
Person / Time
Site:	Three Mile Island
Issue date:	12/31/1983
From:	GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML20087H556	List: ML20087H554 ML20087H576 ML20087H594
References
NUDOCS 8403210088
Download: ML20087H594 (5)

Text

_

.-  ?.

. 's '

- ATTACHMENT II 4

t t

' AIRCRAFT MOVEMENTS AT THE'HARRISBURG

.' INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT JANUARY 1 THROUCH DECEMBER 31, 1983 Itinerant Commercial' 6,980

' Air Taxi 22,437 General' Aviation 26,512 Military '5,119 61,048

c Local-Civil 40,677 Military 7,738 48,415 TOTAL 109,463

Movement.of Aircraft Larger than 200,000 pounds Less than 1% of Total 109,463; <1,095 1

l l:

i- 8403210088 840301

.' PDR ADOCK- 05000289

' (. _ - R :.

PDR .e_

. 1 0  ;,.- c7. . .

~.

pQ Attachment III Page-1

-Annual 1 Report;Regarding.the Periodic Leak Reduction Program Tests (T. S . 6. 9.1. B. 3)

The periodic leak reduction program as reported-in March,-1983, is composed of

-the following plant surveillance procedures-(the systems affected are as indicated):

t. ' Surveil'1ance Procedure No. Affected System 1303-11.16 Decay Heat Removal System

'1303-11.18 R. B. Local Leak Rate Testing 1303-11.27- Makeup and Purification System

~- 1303-11. 28 ; Liquid Waste Disposal System 71303-11.29 Waste Gas Disposal System

'1303-11.30 Reactor Coolant Sampling - Liquid & Gas

.1303-11.31 Hydrogen Recombiner System 1303-11.50 Reactor Building Spray System

.. . . ~

' Table-I summarizes ~the results of the leakage Reduction. Program tests and

"'~

-inspec'tions'by procedure number that.were performed between January 1 and

.,f D ecem eb r,31; 1983. Component identification of those components found to be

~ icaking and _the type repair .(if . required) are included in Table 1. Leaking

. components were repaired and retested such-that'the as found leakage was tsignificantly reduced.

X, t

E-

~

n.

b Y

y - er m,, ,--y= =- - m.-,w-yv--- -w*= .- v v v-~-y v.-r

l .

Attachment III

,' Page 2 TABLE I A ; e 1: Surveillance Date of Component Leakage Type Repair Per-Procedure No. -Performance Identifi- AS FOUND AS LEFT formed Prior to cation 'As Left Test 1303-11.16- :5/21/84' 'DH-V15A 16,427 cc/hr 33 cc/hr: Adjusted DH-V15A

-(Loop A) (4.34 gal /hr) (.0088 gal /hr) packing.

'5/22/84' N/A 0 0 N/A

-(Loop B)

1303-11.18 (See 305,863 seem 32,716 seem (See Note 1)

(See Note I) Note 1) 1303-11;27- 8/21/83 MU-P- 1A 720 cc/hr To ba done in Job Ticket CB686 1984 submitted MU-P-76A 1000 cc/hr 0- Repaired body to Bonnet Leak per Job Ticket (J .T . )

1. CB635 '

MU-V-76B 4800 cc/hr 0 Repaired body to Bonnet Leak per J.T. #CB634 MU-V-92 900 cc/hr 0 Repaired body to Bonnet Leak per J.T. #CB633-MU-V-196B 100 cc/hr 0 Repaired Stem Lea per J.T. #CB636

.MU-V-197B 200'cc/hr 0 Repaired Stem Leak per J.T. #CB637 MU-V-194B 300 cc/hr 0 Repaired Sten Leak per J.T. #CB638 l

~1303-11.~28 (See Note 2)

-2 1303-11.29 '3/24/83 WDL-V-310 3.5x10 CFM 0 Adjusted Packing per J.T. #CA470

-1 Adjusted Packing WDL-V-312 1.0x10 CFM 0 per J.T. #CA471

-1303-11.30 8/12/83 -CA-V31 60 cc/hr 0 Repaired steam

' leak per J.T.

1. CB915 ,

1303-11.31' ~6/10/83 N/A 0 0 N/A 1303-11.50 (See Note 2) l l 753 cc/hr (liquid)

TOTAL "AS LEFT". LEAKAGE - See Note 3 32,716 SCC:1 (gaseous) m

Q;p '

&,OI  :.W n p '

tm 6 i-: 4 s.

Gg. -[W y i _ ,

4.- w. , -

r .2 .-

- 3 i -

Attachment III C / ,Page:3' L

TALLE I

~

1(Continued):

1 Note 11': The'following valves were' considered failures during performance of 1303-11.18 and repaired by' Job' Tickets prior to "as left" test:

DH-V64,iDH-V69, IC-V3, and IC-V4.

The following valves passed the le'akage' tests,but were repaired because of; material degradation:

W AH-V1' ' A/B/C/D. ~ Acceptable-total Reactor Building' leakage that can be

~

YD- - attributed ta : local l leakage must be-less :than. 104846'SCCM per 1 Technical' Specifications. The exact. performance of the local leakage testsioccurred on different dates at various times during the 1983

~

=~-

. calendar year.

Q I JNoteIIs ;Not-performed (in 1983 since' required performance.is once each refueling

- - interval. Satisfactory as ilef t"-performance last occurred in Y December 1982 and the required retest interval was not due in 1983.

-f,' Note 3: -Due to the' extended 1(>4! years): shutdown. conditions and plant radio-

. n$ , '

1 activity.: levels, .the .2 hour2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> site boundary and 30 day low population di

~

" zone offsite dose considerations were not' limiting conditions for

'N ' s

• ~

l acceptable. leakage criteria in.1983. Therefore all "as-found" and1 ~

% "as-left"' leakage recorded did not significantly increase the likelihood p ,

cor magnitude of either on'or off-site releases during 1983.

e s -3;w y ;-;  :.

k y

nt 1 5

\

N 1 A'

T: (

w g g t .

.{-

g

+

a-J

's* _

at v M

, , , - . .--.. . , . ,, .l. -. . , . , , , - . _ , - . , , , _ . , . . , _ . . . , . . . . , , -.m.,.,,---..,-...,,,,.-, ,,,_,,.-...-_,-,..,.,m,..,,, ~ , .

c.

p,...--*-.

s ss . -

Attachment IV

, q .,

x

- UP-

• s s

,\

Pressurizer Power Operated Relief Valve and Pressurizer Safety Valve Challenges for the Calendar Year 1983.

s i,

n

'No p'ressurizer power operated relief valve and pressurizer safety valve i '

challenges occurred during 1983, per Technical Specification 6.9.B.4.

t.

f P

s- .

'N 3'

5..

i h'-

is

$ k .,

a

?,

t .

$ 4-t h v

%. g ny gr-N.

(- L 1

(s% JQ ,t,.

- g.y

-g

,' E f ,

w, . ,

lQ- .

r

, *1 g

c ',; .

l e'.k' \-5 t 'l 'k. <

/ . .. y >