ML20087E868
| ML20087E868 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba  |
| Issue date: | 02/15/1984 |
| From: | Tucker H DUKE POWER CO. |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20087E845 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8403160299 | |
| Download: ML20087E868 (2) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:, - DUKE POWER GOMPANY I*.O.IIOx 3318D GilAHLOTTE, N.C. 28242 HALH.TUCKEH reupisong I ,,,J"*, "f,"'",",, February 15, 1984 (*) = =' Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Regional Administrator U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Re: RII:GB/LF/CS 50-413/83-52 50-414/83-39
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
Please find attached a response to Violation No. 413/83-52-01,414/83-39-01, as identified in the above referenced inspection report. Duke Power Company does not consider any information contained in this inspection report to be proprietary. Very truly yours, d / e Hal B. Tucker LTP/php Attachment cc: NRC Resident Inspector Catawba Nuclear Station Mr. Robert Guild, Esq. Attorney-at-Law P. O. Box 12097 Charleston, South Carolina 29412 Palmetto Alliance 2135} Devine Street Columbia, South Carolina 29205 8403160299 840308 gDRADOCK 05000413 PDR _J
Duke Power Company Catawba Nuclear Station Response to Violation 413/83-52-01, 414/83-39-01 Violation: 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion II, as implemented by the licensee's accepted QA' program which committed to Regulatory Guide 1.146 and endorses ANSI N45.2.23-1978, Qualification of Quality Assurance Program Audit Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants, requires the licensee to establish qualifications for auditing personnel. Paragraph 2.2 of ANSI N45.2.23-1978 is explicit in requiring the licensee to establish personnel qualifications for auditors. Contrary to the above, the licensee had not established written quali-fications for auditors. The licensee's Procedure QA-130, Qualification and Training of Lead Auditors, Revision 8, specifies the minimum qualifications for Lead Auditors but does not address auditors.
Response
1. We admit the violation. 2. Cause of. violation was failure to establish written qualifications for auditors as required by Paragraph 2.2 of ANSI N45.2.23-1978. Our present program of qualifying auditors met the intent of N45.2.23-1978, but was not stated as such in Duke QA Procedure QA-130, " Qualification and Training of Lead Auditors." .3. Action taken to correct this violation has been to revise Duke -QA Procedure QA-130, to fully meet the requirements of ANSI N45.2.23-1978. 4. Revision '9 of Duke QA Procedure QA-130 shall assure that Duke's written qualifications for Auditors and Lead Auditors is-in full compliance with applicable regulations,
- codes, and. standards.
5. Full ~ compliance will be achieved by March 15, 1984. L t..- =}}