ML20087C845

Forwards Closed Const Implementation Overview Item 057 Re Training Classes

ML20087C845
Person / Time
Site:	Midland
Issue date:	03/01/1984
From:	Karr J STONE & WEBSTER, INC.
To:	Quamme D CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
References
SWM-040, SWM-40, NUDOCS 8403130195
Download: ML20087C845 (5)

Text

. . _ - - _

STONE AND WEBSTER MICHISAN. INC.

,gg P.O. BOX 1963, MIDLAND. MICHIGAN 48640 ray CIPAL STAFF Q D&) y [W g %x

, pp e o ""

3 *l ~ U

,M i

14509

.y y I

' * " * - N/A l'* "o- S W m - o VO

=

" g ;-

.h t . ." f ** '- N/A

-[p i.(- /Otia)bDEAR SIRS:

3F filO rus oLLOWING a E arraCME : O ==~r ...a ar tv.

.To D. L. QUAMME, CPCo Midland (site) -,c o o

_ co f t. enNr _ t oouCleLS. Earu t CA os EacM o-O aa-.~os O s rei ieario~s L O oocu-=~rs O -ors o co~ =~es STATUS l PLEASE NOTE I SENT FOR YOUR l 0 .~au Oa ovio l O ==visio~. O o-issio~s Oa ova 6 0 co-==~r

' O su->~a v Oa ovio as visso ',',* ",',',',",*=,,,

, O aooirio~s O co ccrio~. O use O . rio~

l O ~o co -e~r I, O u~ cci raet O co-- ~rs O 2. 's. O co cu .~ce e

' O suoo .r. oms as ~orro rx1 CLOSED n  !

l YOUR ATTENTION IS DIRECTED TO THE FOLLOWING:

nataAsto om: O ... .cario~ O u c ..e o ~ecessa r ars . t. ,

O t.ase ==visi ~o su.-ir ~rs == oouci='an - c o >6 a r ruas ca os.

~

O t==se su.-ir ars == oouc'=tas ->cao i'- a e ru e ea os o- Doocu-=~rs O o a--as O s-o o ra.6 -

O ' sass =<ru== o a co-v a*ca o 1 is =41==. t ==a -a rou - ovat o co--e~rs.

l 0 'sasi ac ~o-' moor scii v o ra.s -are .' =r s'a~.~a a~o ru --a v =~ctoiro co- o rao o =.

! O -r rause 1-ar raiae ~or=> a = = acco oa~ce -era rou v~on sva~o-a: . ~or. t=*sa aovise vs I

snouto an, visso~

as.~

vo oocu- urs o o awi~as eru ro we rwir e~vo6va a ica e~c-IM PORTANT wassTa= au c-assu c.66 w co a on a t-ewr wir.nw re~ nos oars avs~ ruous a on -ns sare-ars ca~.sast.

seon rus avisio .s -aos wn-our cost.

rue suar-ue

.or as sava~ rur -ury ri-c. orwa =.ori -wisa.

svo aras a

The following Closed CIO Item / Hold Point Notification (s).is (are) attached for your action /information:

i C 067 i l

t l

, e ud J. E. Karr CIO Program flanager cc:IJGKeppler,'US:NRC -

JJHarrison, US NRC RJCook, US NRC RAWells, CPCo

.CIO Site File (2) 8403130195 840301 APAmoruso (2) {DRADOCK05000 ,

NIReichel, CPCo Agg 0029 SG Initiator 7M = 1

~

M/f 1

\ . . . . - . . - . _

/

(

- sheet 1 of 1 STONE & WEBSTEN " E'N 0 l HOLD POINT NUMBER CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION I O mACKED ACTION ITEM I

OVERVIEW O TRACKED INFORMATION ITEM N/Bl4Nd NvCZE48 fl4NTJ.O. NO.14509 8 TRACKED RECOMMENDATION ITEM '

REFERENCE (C) O UNTRACKEDITEM N/A l O HOLD POINT NOTIFICATION CONDITION DETAILS l

It was noted that a trainer evaluation was performed during the trainers first class he taught. CIO however was informed that in future training this evaluation may not take place until after a substantial amount of classes have been taught. This would result in training classes given previous to the evaluation being disqualified, 7

if the trainers evaluation is not approved.

Since this evaluation is used as part of the trainers " approval to instruct", CIO recommends that evaluation be performed on no later than the first training class taught.

YES ".3, wo NO ATTA,CHMENTS l DATE RESPONSE REQ'D. INITI ATOh/ D ATE If T il iAPPROVED/DATE l 2/?4/84 &$? JLjubuf g/iy/Sy 1 && C//7lpyt RESPONSE /

Reference'Fage 2 of attached correspondence, Serial 27325 dated February 24, 1984, CFEwert to BHPeck.

(PAGE YES w o .* s t 1 NO ATTACHMENTS EST. CORRECTIVE ACTION RESP.Ot t TITLE DATE COMPLETION DATE  !

y} jf 'I U 0CitLT$$7 RUSPOtJSE ACCCPTEp DATE RE[sfCI)1SE V RIFIE.D / C OSED DATE JkMM2578 3/ihv / b) - y .

Mr &{ ?q

.sEE BT7DC///%ENT .IE '

~,'.

J '

Item 057 Attachment I

., To BHPack  ? * . Page 1 of 2 From GFEvert CONSUMERS

' POWER Date February 24, 1984 COMPANY Subj ect MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER PROJECT- Internal CIO ITEMS 056 AND 057 Correspondence FILE 24.0 SERIAL 27325 CC DEBeaudoin GEParker GFE 61-84 (5D[ohEEn~f NIReichel HPNunes RAWells Following is MPQAD's response to the subject Stone.and' Webster CIO Items:

ITEM 56 ,

Part A ,

This part reports that the MPQAD lesson plan fer PQCI C-1.50 in the refer-ence document section referenced Revision 11 of Specification C-306 while Revision 12 is the current issued revision. This is in keeping with current ,

practice in the MPQAD Training Branch and in no way impacts the validity of the training.

MPQAD lesson plans are developed utilizing various documents as references.

In order to know the revision of the document when the lesson plan was

, develop'ed the ravision number is included in the lesson plan. Thereafter I the revir. ion number is only changed when a revision to the lesson plan is required. Required revisions to lesson plans are determined by appropriate l personnel and are based on changes to documents which impact lesson plan source documents which in turn may impact information in the lesson p3an. ,

In this case the revision of Specification C-306 from Rev 11 to Rev 12 did ,

, not result in a. revision to the PQCI. In turn a revision to. the lesson plan was not required. As a result there is no training impact and the training

~

is acceptable.

Part B This part reports that PQCI C-1.50 Attachment A Table B-2 is inconsistent i with referenced Specification C-305 which has a Specification Change Notice ho. 13007 against it. This is also in keeping with current MPQAD practice and does not impact training.

In this case the' process outlined in the second paragraph of the response to Part A was also followed to determine if the lesson plan required revision.

Since the PQCI did not require revision due to the SCN, the lessen plo did.

not require revision and there is no impact on training.

• The basis for not revising the lesson plan is that the SCN is clear and usable by inspection personnel without additional' training or revision to the PQCI. Inspection personnel are required by the PQCI General Instructions to research and utilize the latest inspection criteria.

IC0284-0003A-QLO7 , ,

~

. .c Item 057

. t. - - -

Attachment I 2 Page 2 of 2 ITEM 57 .

'This item recommends that evaluations that are used as part of the " approval, to instruct process" be performed on no later than the first training class...

taught. MPQAD Training Branch practice is te evaluate on it.structor the -

first time that an instructor instructs a course (lesson plan or lesson ,

plans). This.in fact is required by Training Branch Instruction TBI 1.3.

The TBI establishes a process by which an instructor becomes approved to instruct both a first course and additional courses. The TBI does not ,

require that an instructor become reapproved each time a lesson pisa is revised. This is not necessary as the instructor has demonstrated capa-bility through the original approval process. The evaluation may take place doing a pilot class, en actual class, or during any other method that allows the instructor to demonstrate capability and be evaluated.

O e #

e S4

• 4 e ,

2

' 3 e

I 6

e e ,

66

• 9 g

9 e

e e

S e

Ic0284-0003A-QLO7 t #

Item 057 Attachment II Explanation of Response Acceptance In following up on this item it was concluded that the trainer D. Liechty had previously been approved to instruct and the class taught was for an additional lesson plan. Since this was one of the instructors additional

! 4esson plans the evaluation was not required to be performed on his first

class. The only evaluation to be performed on the first class is the per-formance evaluation of the instructors initial new lesson plan, which in this case had previously been performed.

This is in accordance with TBI 1.3 and due to this, the response provided is acceptable.

1 1

4 ,

1 4

7- D p +- 1 --*e - e 1==. - e, -i t.-Nw< -e s -

gr m- e*i- * -*