Text

Performance Indicators,Nov 1991
	ML20086P480
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Calhoun
Issue date:	11/30/1991
From:	; OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To:	;
Shared Package
ML20086P478	List: ML20086P475; ML20086P480;
References
	NUDOCS 9112270036
	Download: ML20086P480 (101)
	v • d • e

_ _ _ . . . .

l.

t FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS NOVEMBER 1991

x r }

gy[g....l.n , ..

L ; D r ,lIll .l _ s g. a a % s300!!!IllE HQ][D i g o !;, .,

B b e w e s Jl J:1m r = -=+ m y

- % &W .e

,,f'

,/

/

Prepared by:

Production Engineering Division System Engineering Test and Performanco Group D

ri ' ] , n' 'j] _.

~~

n ,w.

_7

0%uil of wdka w ain, able,...

d uwok uitsdoin, anul sowiuljwlynnutl...

il w a, b;!ahans cwwnck . co,inanilancinL y ...

il w a, u>ay, of bln,...il w doung. Un job

'ayMUw, fin,slbane,,we,y,bau,. alw iavnerdiwhd, nel Uw, 'wadL of udniaud pwuwts, il w owv own, sy u>adcwk we, ans aaul Uw, pada, anul salklndia n, Ud ca,rnas lwrn, beting, Uw, agM kul of pevso,n,, voijust tin, dnung. Ua.. ?dyM Uainys.

Jaanns).O'Coinawu 4

e

.-__-_.--___-___.__-__------___-._--.--___-----._____-_-----.--------.a

4 OM AH A PUllLIC POWER DISTRICT FORT CALIIOUN STATION

. PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT l

Prepared By:

Production Engincoring Division System Engineering Test and Performance Group i NOVEMllER 1991

i ABSTRACT PURPOSE The *Perforrnance Indicators Program

is intended to provide selected Fort Calhoun plant pertor-rnance information to OPPD's personnel responsible for optimizing unit performance. The information is presented in a way that provides ready identtheation of trends and a means to track progress toward reaching corporate goals. The information can be used for at$essing and monttonng Fort Calhoun's plant periormance, with ernphasis on saf ety and reliability, Some periormance indicators show company goals or industry information. This information can be used for comparison or as a means of promoting pride and motivation.

SCOPE The conditions, goals, and projections reflected within this report are current as of the end of the month being reported, unless otherwise stated.

In order for the Performance Indicator Program to be effective, the following guidelines were followed while implementing the program:

1) Data was selected which most effectively rnonttors Fort Calhoun's periormance in key areas.

2) Established corporate goals and Industry information were included for comparison.

3) Formal definitions were developed for each performance paramelcr to ensure consistency in future reports and allow ccmparison with industry averages where appropnate.

Comments and input are encouraged to ensure that this program is tailored to avdress the areas which are most meaningful to the people using the report. Please refer comments to the System Engineering Department's Test ard Periormance Group. To increase personnel awareness of Fort Calhoun Station's plant periormance,it is suggested that this report be distributed throughout your respective departments.

REFERENCES INPO Good Practices OA 102,

Performance Monitonng Management Information" ,

INPO Report Dated November 1984,

Nuclear Power Plant Operational Data

NUMARC 87 00,

Guidelines and Technical Bases Ior NUMARC Initiatives Addressing Station Black-out at Light Water Reactors *, Revision 1, Appendix D, *EDG Reliabihty Program", dated Apul6,1990.

l l

l

- --.- - . . . . ~ - , . . . _ . - ~ . _ . . - _ _ . . _,-..~-..,.,_._.m . _ , , _ . , . . -_ , , . - , -r, -

Table of Contents / Summary E[DUSTRY KEY PARAMETERS EACE ecuna .gren, cj r t m n .*. ggg int totmi un uynn um FORCED OUTAGE RATE . _ . . - 0 25% .24% 14 0 % 14 7% . .D- .2 UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REAC10R SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL. . ,, . .o. o. 0 0. . l .. .3 UNPLANNED S AFETY SYSTEM ACTUATONS (INPO DEFINITON).. .0- 0 O_ o . l .. .4 GROSS HEAT RATE . . 9 935 10.250. 10 016 . 10 245- . 1 -. .6 .

EOUlVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR .625%- 07% 100 % 08% l .. .7 UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR , .. .. N A . . 90W. 100 % . 7e% . .l. .. B FUEL REllABILITY INDICATOR- _.- - .. N A . 0 75 2 80 2 46. .D. .9 PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE iconmvo .. 166 . . 75 48 5 . . 46 . NA. .10 VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTr! ._ 3 072- 4.500 .1.000 4 9925. . N A.. . 11 OlSABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE.. .0 .0 31. o 40. . 0 44. . l .. .12 QPERATIONS PAGE gous1M .2In. c?f.D perut .. m g;g In" towi i Au t.ottlij n:Um STATON NET GENERATON (10,000 Mwh).. .. N A . .NA. . 35 . 23 1. . l .. .1 FORCED OUTAGE RATE . ,,, . . 0 25W 24%. = 14 ok. 14 7 % . I .. . l' UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL . . . . . . . 0 .. .0 0 .. .0. ..l.. .3 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUA'ONS - (INPO DEFINITION).. .,, .. o -0; .O. 0. ..l.. ,, 4 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS - (NRC DEFINITION).. . .0. .0.. 0~ 0- 1. . 5 GROSS HEAT RATE . . .. 9.935. 10 :50. 10 016 10 245.. . l .. .6 EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR.. . 62 5% - 09W 100 % . 69% l .7 UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR , .. .. N A . . 90L .100%. .78 % .. . . l .. .8 FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR , , , .. N A . . 0 75. . 2 8. 2 46. .D .9 DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT . .. N A - NA. .. N A .. NA. .. N A .. ,13 EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS . . . .. N A . .NA. . 0 69. . 0 76 1 l- .14 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET. .. N A .NA. .NA. N A .. .. N A- .15 DOCUMENT REVIEW . .NA .NA. NA NA- N A .. . 16

,. . _ ~ . . . _ _ . . __ , . _ , _. _ , _ . . . _ . _ _ . _ . _ . _ ,

_ _ _ _ _ . . _ . - _. _ _ _ . _ ._ _ . _ . _ _._. m _ _ ._._ _ ___

MAINTENANCE PAGE enuttny ,cttg. otra UPPE R 1% QQAL TH!? MNITH LAff LLNI?H 1pfSQ EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT REllABILITY ... ...-.. .. ... . . .....NA. ..HA. . N A .. . N A ., . N A .. ..17 DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY (2$ DEMANDS) . . . ..... .. . . . . . . ... N A .NA. .. N A .. N A ~ .. N A ., .18 DIESEL GENERATOR UNAVAILABILITY . . . . . .. N A .. ..N A . .. NA .. N A .. N A .. . 19 AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE l WORK ORDERS (CORRECTIVE NON OUTAGE) . .. NA . .. N A . . N A .. .. N A .. .. N A .. . 20 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (CORRECTIVE NON OUTAGE) . . .. NA . NA. .. N A . NA.. N A. . 21 CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (NON. OUTAGE).. . . . . . . . . . . . . . *458% ,, N A . - 24 LL 1.20 5 % . D . . . 22 i l

RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOT AL MAINTENANCE (NON OUTAGE).... . . . . . '57 ' . ~60%. . 517L 473% I ....... 23 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE.. . .. . . . .. .. ' t 2% . ~ 1.2C 11% OL . D . , . 24 NUMBER OF OUT.0F. SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS. ... .. . . .. .7. . < 15 . . 14. . 26. 1. . 25 MAINTENANCE OVERTIME ., . . . ., N A , . 25% .. . 9% . .16 2% . .. N A ... . 26 PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE) . . .. . . ... ..NA. .. NA . ..$. .3. . NA. . 27 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER P.ACKLOG (CORRECTIVE NON. OUTAGE MAINTENANCE).. .. N A . . <4 50.. .318, ,,302 . . D . . . 28 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE) . . . . . .. . . .. N A .. .80%. . NA . .. N A .. . N A .. .19 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (PRESSURE EQUIPMENT)., .. . . . . .. .. N A s .,80 % . ..NA. . N A .. NA ... . 30 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (GENERAL MAINTENANCE).. . . . . . . .. . .. N A - BOL N A .. N A .. . N A . . 31 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE) . , . . . . , ,., N A . 00% NA. , . N A .. N A ... . 32 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL) . ,, .. N A .. 80L .. NA . .NA. . N A.. 33 NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS . . .. N A .NA. .o. 0. .l. .,34 ii

[

. l M.A,INTENANCE (coni'd)) PAGE ;

roottnf .Crf2. Crf2 errrn m. m inm teornH LAt1 tes.nu ,tnLug NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEMS (NPRDS) REPORTABLE FAILURES . .NA. .NA 0 .7. NA. 35 MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS . .,NA .NA NA NA .NA . .36 g CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE . . . .. N A . 2 00E.6 - 0 07E.7 0 D. 37 CHEMISTRY AND RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION PAGE ffDJETRY ,QfE2, QJ,'CQ UrrEn P. M YH!? t4SNTH LASf L93?nH M PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE > . . . .166 75 48 5 . . 46 . NA. .10 VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOLID RA00 ACTIVE WASTE , , . . . 3.072.. 4 500 . 1.000 4 . . 992 5 N A .. ,11 SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMIS TRY . 'o 24 . . 0 45- .0436. 0 too . l .. .38 PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT . . . . N A .. 2% 14% . 0~. . ..D. . 39 AUXILIARY SYSTEM (CCW) CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS . . . . 2 6' NA. _0. .0. . l .. .,40 IN LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT-OF. SERVICE .. . . . . .. ..NA .6. .6. 4. .D. .41 HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED . . .. N A . .. N A . 0- 0. .. l . . 42 MAX; MUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE (mrem). .. .. N A . .. N A . 266. .183 .. .D. . 43 TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMNATIONS . , , .129' 90 - ~55 . 51 NA. . 44 DECONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA .. .. , ,, . . . ....NA.- . 85% - 89 9% .. 899%- 1, . 45 RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM , . . .. N A .. .NA. .0- _2 . l .. . 46 NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS. .. . .. N A . 40 63 . 63 . .NMA. . 47 GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT (cure).. .. N A . 340 . . NA - , NA. N A .. . 48 LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT.. . .. NA 225 NA NA . NA. .49 iii

....-,.,_.._.._..m . _ , ~ . , , _ . . - . _ - . . . _ . _ _ _ , _ _ _ . . _ . . _ _ . . . , _ . _ _ . _ _ , . . . , . _ . _ _ _ , . _ _ . . . . . . _ _ . _ , , _ _ . . _ . . . - . _ .

i e

SECURITY PAGE courtnv ctra crrQ eter n tm. m tint iDmH tAtt ermH Ip;,c 1

LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE i INCIDENTS (SECURITY) . . . .. .. . -.N A .

. .. NA . . 58 . 55. N A .. ,.50 SECURITY INCIDEN1 BREAKDOWN.. , . .. ... N A . .. N A .NA. _ NA .. .. N A . . 51 SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES .. .. ..NA.

. .. N A .. ,. N A . ~ N A .. _NA. . 52 l

l l

MATERIALS AND OUTStDE SEnVICES f sg -;

enestny CLt2 CTIQ Uretn M. GOf1 TH't tDmH LAtT #DmH }HQQ AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS (NON OUTAGE)... . . .. N A . 35% 2'%-. 10% . .D. . 53 ,

SPARE PARTS INVEWTORY VALUE ($ milhon).. . .NA - .NA 13 8. .13 8. .. N A . = 54 SPARE PARTS ISSUED ($ thousands)... . .. .. N A . .. NA - . 242 7.. .1768.. .NA. .54 lNVENTORY ACCURACY. .. .. . . . . . . N A .. .98% , . 98% . .100% , .. D . . 55 STOCKOUT AATE. .. .. .. .. N A .. . 2% . .26%. . 2 3% ., ..NMA .. 55 EXPEDITED PURCHASES.. ..... . ... N A . .05%. 0%. , . 0% .. .. .. I . .56 INVOICE BRE AXDOWN. . . . . . . .. ....NA. ..NA... . NA. .. N A .. .. N A . 57 MATERIAL REQUEST PLANNING., . . ..NA. .NA. ,38 5% .. . 36 8% , .NA. .57 DESIGN ENGINEERING PAGE PDutinY QTfQ QpfQ UPrf n 9M, M TH!S lA%T){ LAtt iDmH JhQQ OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS.. . . . .

.., N A .. .. N A . . 2 70 .. . 2 74 .. N A . . 58 TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS (EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING) . . .. . . .. . N A . 0 .. 22 . 25 . .. NMA .. . 59 OUTSTANDING ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUESTS (EARS) . ... ,., , , 4,. . ... .. N A , .. N A . 120.. .113. .NA. . 60 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS . . . . N A .. .. NA . 172. .182 . .NA. ,, 61 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE BREAKDOWN . .. N A .. .. N A . .. N A . NA .. NA, 62 i

IV

~ .-.,2.~,. . - - - , - - - . . _ . - . _ , . - - _ -..

-.a . _ . _ . . . - . _.-...c,--._,,4---.. -, , . . - - - ~ . - - , ,

4 l

INDUSTRIAL S AFETY PAGE co_'sint Occa ceca UPPrn *0N 2 7 H't f.ONig i A!1 LONTH E

- DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE . ..o 0 31 . o 40 . o 44 .l. .12 RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS CASES FREQUENCY RATE . .. .... . . . .. N A . .NA. . 3 23- 2 64 . .A. . 63 ,

HUM AN RESOURCES PAGE enfr?ny CEcc ctcu g nr n - , cgyA TH:t usNTH LAtt LO+nH ng,tc NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LERs . . . .... . . . ... . .. N A , . NA . z. .1- .D. . 64 STAFFING LEVEL .. . . . .. NA . .NA. NA. NA. .NA. .65 PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE . .. N A .- .NA. .. N A . NA. .NA. . 65 TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION PAGE l'O 'E T PY pfEQ QEED Ur.Pr n .% g TH"; (ONTH LAt1 LONTH Int!O LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAINING... . .. N A . .. N A . ,. N A . ., N A . .NA. .66 LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS... .. . .. N A . N A .. .. NA . . N A .- N A, . . 67 HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS .. .. .. N A . . N A .. .NA_ .. N A ,. . NA. ..CS TOTAL INSTRUCTON HOURS .. . . ...NA. .. N A - . 2.241 . 2.215 - NA. . 69 TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING., .. N A .. -, N A . . 8 !.38 . .8,071. .. N A . . 70 i

REFUELING OUTAGE [1GT.

INouttnf CEC 2 cec 0 Ur'Pt n 1% M THit LONTH 1 AtT LONTH UC.Q MWO OVERALL STATUS (CYCLE 14 REFUELING OUTAGE) . . .. N A .. NA. . 999 .. 985 . NA. . 71 PROGRESS OF CYCLE 14 OUTAGE MODIFICATION PLANNING... , , . N A .. .NA. . 34 . 34 , NA. . 72 v

- - - - . - - - . . - , - - . , , . , . , - - - . , - - = . , .

OVERALL PROJECT STATUS (CYCLE 14 REFUELING OUTAGE) . . ..NA. .. N A . . 25 25. NA. . 73 OUALITY ASSURANCE PAGE te m tiny ctep ctrn errrn m ggg net tons uti tonn mug VOLATONS PER 1000 INSPFCTION HOURS . . .. N A . ,16 . .1 16. .1 01 . , A .. . 74 COMPARISON OF VOLATONS AMONG REGION IV PLAN 1S . . . . . . ..NA. . fi A . ,NA. .. N A - N A .. . 75 CUMULATIVE VOLATIONS AND NCVs (TWELVENONTH RUNNING TOTAL) . .. N A . .NA. . 5'2 . . 7/2 . . NA . . 76 OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTON REPORTS ..... . .. . . . .. . .. . .. .. N A .NA. . 85_ . 78.. ..D. . 77 OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTON REPORTS. . .. N A m NA. . 0'6 _ .. G'9 , .NA, .78 CARS ISSUED vs. 5,GNIF. CARS vs.

NRC VOLATONS ISSUED vs.

LERs RF. PORTED.. .. . . . . . .. ..NA .. ~NA. .NA . .NA- NA. .79 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS . . . .. , , . . 8L SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX ... . . . . . . .. . 87 REPORT DISTRIBUTION LIST.. .. .. . . . . , . . .. . 89

SUMMARY

SECTION POSITIVE TRENDS REPORT .. . . . , . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . .. . 90 ADVERSE TRENDS REPORT.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT ATTENTON REPORT. .. , . . 90 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT IMPROVEMENTSCHANGES. .. .. . . ... . 90 TABLE OF CONTENTS'SUMM ARY TREND SYMBOLS A- ADVERSE TREND

1. IMPROVED PERFORMANCE D - DECLINING PERFORMANCE NMA . NEEDS MANAGEMENT ATTENTION NA. NOT APPLICABLE

. INPO UPPER OUARTILE vi

, _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . _ _ - . _ - -.__.._______.m__. . _ . _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ . . -

Net Generation (10,000 Mw hours) 50-40-34 01 35 05 31.18

~

o 279 r 26 94 -

}

^

24.76 n 24 23 m pa- ' q:n 21 93 y . 3 is g x x -. .o ;

o,20- C 4; f%;. """"

y? Q' < -l-h, e ' u m se p 1s 30 Mf. fM YIf} ,Y i: '

m p? % M

/M j %

@up;W g{ @W

?. ', W1 , v a 13 28 ;

S *

{ gr ,

'*~

+

? ! 4 L m c a$m 5

J

-{ ,

$l d.. M NS' <. O1 i i i i i i i i i i i i Dec90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 STATION NET GENERATION This indicator shows the net generation of the Fort Calhoun Station for the reporting month.

During the month of November 1991, a not total of 350,526 MWH was generated by the Fort Calhoun Station. The low net generation for the months of September and October is due to the following three forced outages: 1) the station batteries replacement outage from 9/12/91 at 2100 hours0.0243 days 0.583 hours 0.00347 weeks 7.9905e-4 months through 10/6/91 at 1114 hours0.0129 days 0.309 hours 0.00184 weeks 4.23877e-4 months ; 2) a steam leak on the drain line from a turbine control valve was repaired from 10/18/91 at 0307 hours0.00355 days 0.0853 hours 5.076058e-4 weeks 1.168135e-4 months to 10/19/91 at 1116 hours0.0129 days 0.31 hours 0.00185 weeks 4.24638e-4 months ; and 3) a steam leak repair on a test pipe on the high pressure turbine shell from 10/25/91 at 2204 to 10/26/91 at 0810.

Data Source: Station Generation Report Adverse Trend: None 1

wdeC-WW T e-TV'e *'-N' p 'M egye gyyort +-Mw-*--w-Mm- ,.+e. 9-.*a.o.-wwyW.e-.a%--yvy* - v w g- w r-na-w-4y.-W _, virgmy-my wtvg w W'y yy'-rwr--- W'*wWue**C-y 'WVFt'TTrr-*c'rv M f"W*'

vt

- Forced Outage Rate

, -O- Fort Calhoun Goal (2A%)

-O- Industry Upper 10 Percentile (0.25%)

GOOD 15%- l V l 9.7 10% - )

i l

l 5%-

. 1g ; C- 'O O O M O O O O O O ;

i O

i 3 i i 0% 0 0 0 0 O O~{ O O O O 1

'88 '89 '90 ~ Dec90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 :

FORCED OUTAGE RATE :

The forced outage rate was reported as 13.9% for the time period from'12/1/90 to 11/

30/91.

- A forced outage occurred during the months of September and October 1991 when the station batteries were declared inoperable. The generator was taken off line on 9/12/91 and remained off line until 10/6 /91.

The generator was taken off line on October 18 & 19 due to a steam leak on a turbine . ,

control valve before seat drain line. The generator was again taken off line on October 23 & 26 due to a steam leak from a '"strument tap on the high pressure turbine. _

A forced outage occurred during the month of August 1991 to replace failed potential '

transformers (pts). These pts convert 345 KV to 120V for use in the breaker synchro-nization circuit.

2 Data Source: Monthly Operations Report & NERC GAD Forms Adverse Trend:- None 2

yy ,-M,.- y' -y-' $ g m y yt_m. gamy-ph-w -ww esp- ggep++mw-<gwr-w.% y 3 - +y rg-W pg. g- y w= may- e-pwem+-g^99yJp'-t-*t vs y y-% '-fry--'1yi-+.*y+'yye ygy yegy- -v+rv-+eww+' yeq w rt + ws.y'Twywp yg- gbugp'%wWWwe g vm "ye< mfMrwrw 7 > F

3-

-O- Fort Calhoun Goal

-O- Industry Upper 10 Percenti!e O FCS Reactor Gerams 2-1-

i i i i 1 0 m , m , m i m i m ; ;

'87'8B'89'90 Dec90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL There were no unplanned automatic reactor scrams in November 1991 The last unplanned automatic reactor scram occurred on July 2,1986.

The 1991 goal for unplanned automatic reactor scrams while critical has been set at -

zero.

The industry upper ten percentile value is zero scrams per unit on an annual basis. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper ten percentile of nuclear power plants in this area.

Data Source: Monthly Operations Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Adverse Trend: None 3

i

, l 3-E Safety System Actuations

-G- Fort Calhoun Goal O Industry Upper 10 Percontilo 2- GOOD I V

1 ,

1 i i i 1 0 0 i O i O i O i O,B i -- O i B i O i O i 3 r-b

'88 '89 '90 Doc 90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS-(INPO DEFINITION) l There were no unplanned safety ,, tem actuations during the month of November 1991.

The 1991 goal for the number of unplanned safety system actuations is zero.

The industry upper ten percentile value for the number of unplanned safety system actuations por year is zero. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper ten percentile of nuclear power piants for this indicator.

Data Source: Monthly Operations Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Adverse Trend: None l

l 4 l

- 12 Month Running Total SSA 10- -1000

-ft - Critical Hours j i

00 O safety system Actuations(SSA) 8- -800 l h -700 '!

n b k aj g .

.600 0 5

7

$ E

$ 5 f

500 -

9 1 M f!

z (fi 2

$4-10

-400$

$ $ M " 4300 i # }

j $j 2- p .

\ -200 g! 6 ]p -

)

-100 g ,9l

& 0 $ -.0

/g g j -0 i

i i i i --

'88*89'90 DJFMAMJJASONDJ'FMAMJJASON 1989 1990 1991 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS-(NRC DEFINITION) !

This indicator shows the number of unplanned safety system actuations (SSAs) which-

. include the High and Low Pressure Safety injection Systems, the Safety injection Tanks, and the Emergency Diesel Generators. The NRC classification of SSAs in-cludes actuations when major equipment is operated and when the logic systems for _;

these safety systems are challenged. 1 The last event of this type occurred in June 1991 when there were two anticipatory ,

signal starts for DG 2. The first start occurred after a control relay was bumped causing ,

a momentary loss of power to safety bus 1 A4, DG 2 started a second time when a l breaker trip occurred during DG 1 breaker synchronization. DG 2 was not required to-provide power to the safety bus in either of these situations. ,

.The majority of SSAs displayed above were related to 1990 Refueling Outage activities ,

l

and are currsntly being reviewed under the Safety System Actuation _ Reduction Pro; gram. The gcal of the Program is to reduce the number of SSAs at Fort Calhoun, Data Source: Monthly Operations Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Adverse Trend: None 5

[- _

l^~ _ . _ _ _ - . _ _ , _ - ~ , _ . ~ . _ . _ . _ _ . - , , - . _ - . - . . _ . _ . . . . _ _ . _ . . . _ . _ _ _ . _ . _ . . -

i

, l

@ Monthly Gross Heat Rate

-A- Year to Dato Gross Heat Fato 1 1

13- -O- Fort Calhoun 1991 Year End Goat

-O ..Justry Upper 10 Porcentile b '

m 12 Q GOOD 11-l 10270 10520 10304 j '

5 j iO~

( 6-b-d-d -

^

- 5 h# -h-h h- $

d d d

$ 0 U --O

i ph .x .N 11 ' $ S, j l 1

j

{I j

};; $

m ,w -

3 l

.J y:

19 46 y 4 @*

~; ' n;w W

wk e q& q I I I I ( l I i l l I i l I i l

'88 '89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr- May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc 01 i GROSS HEAT R ATE This indicator shows the Gross Heat Rate (GHR) for the reporting month, the previous 1991 months, the year to-date value, and the year end GHR for the previous 3 years,

- The gross heat rate for the Fort Calhoun Station was reported as 10,016 BTU /KWH ,

during the month of October.

- The year to date gross heat ral was reported as 10,332 BTU /KWH.

The above year end Fort Calhoun goal (10,250 BTU /KWH)is the theoretical best gross heat rate that ca') be achieved by the Fort Calhoun Station during 1991. 4 The gross heat rate industry upper ten percentile value is 9,935 BTU /KWH.

Data Source: F olthaus/ Gray (Manager / Source) t Accountability: caworski/Popek Adverse Trends: None 6

e me *rer % e-W. wg,- e-e,,n--Jusy 4'r f am- 6 ery*'-i*N*1 2+ee,*--w-teww* +-"6- e -- -- e eegy +wi'g7 * -*wSW e-WVP-4-rg--s-- ? m~ 3-Np- wn--ei+i gd,-+ p- $ w yup " y y g', y--

O Montn't tar Year.to Date E AF

-O- Fort Calhoun Goal A

-O- Industry Upper 10 Percentile GOOD 100 % - -

77

~~'

80%.

D-fD -

O O -O- O -U D -O gg o. o _

o _

.o _

o _

.o _

o o _o_o_ o _o SC.6 60% - <

1 40%- _

1 20%-

i i i 10% , , , , , , , , , , , ,

'88 '89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jua Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR This indicator shows the plant monthly Equivalent Availability Factor (EAF), the year to-date EAF fot 1991, and the EAF for the previous 3 years.

The EAF was reported as 100% for the month of November 1991. The EAF values for September and October are low due to a forced outage that occurred from 9/12/91 to 10/6/91 when the station batteries were declared inoperable. Also during October:

power was reduced from 100% to 10% from 10/18/91 to 10/19/91 due to a steam leak on a turbine control valve before seat drain line; and power was reduced from 100% tr 10% from 10/25/91 to 10/26/91 due to a steam leak from an instrument tap on the high pressure turbine. The EAF was not affected by the 70% power reduction during Febru-ary, since the reduction was under management control and for reasons of economy (fuel savings).

The year to date EAF was reported as 84.3%.

The EAF Fort Calhoun goalis 69% for 1991.

The EAF industry upper ten percentile value'is 82.5%.

Data Sou cc: Dietz/Parra (Manager / Source)

! Adverse Trends: None l 7

O Monthly Unit Capability Factor For1 Calhoun Station Three Year Average UCF

-O- Fort Calhoun Monthly Goal

-O-- Industry Median (Three Year Average) 100% - g -

m O O -

O -U-O- O -

O --U O O 6 0 g,y . l} Q ??

I D-d : -

O xa O

O.-

D~

G n.

O-c G -

D- -a k

60%-

d - ~

O ' ~~

Y -

U ~

h O E O #

h '3k[ .h h Y

( y 40 W 4 4A F'

gi 9

a W

ms

?i:i -

+

6

M .u Qd j

& f" e m

, 3 20 % 4 ou &g1 E .

s id

y' l $ + 1 o%

N Mh k ~

n, s ? f &

Jan91 Feb. Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR l This ino'icator shows the plant monthly Unit Capability (UCF) Factor and the Fort Cal-houn UCF goal for 1991.

The UCF was reported as 100% for the month of November 1991. The UCF values for

. the months of September and October are low due to a forced outage that occurred from 9/12/91 to 10/6/91 when the station batteries were declared inoperable. Also during October: power was reduced from 100% to 10% from 10/18/91 to 10/19/91 due to a steam leak on a turbine control valve before seat drain line; and power was re-duced from 100% to 10% from 10/25/91 to 10/26/91 due to a steam leak from an instru-ment tap on the high pressure turbine. The UCF was not affected by the 70% power reduction during February, since the reduction was under management control and for reasons of economy (fuel savings).

The UCF goal for Fort Calhoun for 1991 is 90%. The industry median value of 73.3%

(three year average) has been provided by INPO in their 1991 Midyear Report.

Data Source: Generation Totals Reports & Monthly Operating Report Adverse Trends: None 8

i-Fuel Reliability Indicator 6- !

-O- Industry Median Value GOOD 0

4- V i

i 24 x 1.5 1.5 y ,,,

2-C, v n \

v v uy n n v

n v

n v O

,- ;f , , O.

'88 89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov' Dec91 FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR The Fuel Reliability indicator (FRI) was reported as 2.80 nanocuries/ gram for the month of November 1991. .

r The November FRI was calculated using the data from November 1 through 30. The plant was at a steady state operation of approximately 100% power during this time.

, The variation seen in the FRI for the months of July through October is due to the fre-quent changes in power levels during these months. These power changen create a

.small number of days that meet the INPO criteria for steady state operation.- Under the INPO FRI requirements, a plant must be in continuous operation for at least three days

-at a power level that does not vary more than + or - 5 percent. Only the iodine concen-tration values from the days that meet this steady state criteria can be factored into the INPO fuel reliability indicator.

The last detected fuel failure was during Cycle 10. The FRI values observed during Cycle 10 were in the 20 to 80 nanocuries/ gram range (without the density correction j factor which would make the FRI values larger). There have been no observable iodine ;

spikes which would be indicative of fuel failure during Cycle 13 operation.

= A Fort Calhoun goal of 0.75 nanocuries/ gram will be utilized in 1992. Fort Calhoun recognizes the INPO 1995 U.S. industry goal of 0.5 nanocuries/ gram and will revise our

FRI goal accordingly upon_ completion of the current FRI re evaluation by INPO and the issuance of a revised EPRI fuel reliar"'./ program.

Data Source: Holthaus/Guliani Adverse Trend: None 9

\

0 Personnel Cumulative Radiation Exposure (Man Rem) 400 -

-G-- Fort Calhoun Annual Goal (75 Man-Rem)

-D- Industry Upper 10 Percentile (166 Man Rem) 300-GOOD si :MW f@a#'; 200-Y

. ' %']

I'%

V 1 $'

5' 9 D-O--D-O--O-O-DM-D-D-O

.- ': , i

n ;

93.4 100-I@'R .

c o o o o o o o o o--c o

m :.

g a ,g 3T@ w,d 4

/, 0

'88 '89 '90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE)

During November 1991,2.47 man-rem was recorded by TLDs worn by personnel while working at the Fort Calhoun Station. The year to date exposure is 40.46 man rem.

The Fort Calhoun goal for personnel radiation exposure (cumulative) during 1991 is 75 man rem.

The personnel radiation exposure industiy upper ten percentile is 166 man-rem per unit per year.

Data Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP54 10

O Cumuiat,ve Radioactive Oil Sent For Processing (in gallons)

O Cumulative Dry Active Waste Sent For Processing (in cubic foot)

~

12o00 - _ _ _

Bo00 - - .--

F-

~

, m I i I F 4 F I F i F i F i F l F i F ,

I I Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91

==== Cumulative nadioactive Waste Buned

--O - Fort Calhoun Goa! For Waste Duned (4500)

@ industry Upper 10 Percentile Waste Buned (3072) 7500 -

g 6000 - O Radioactive Waste Duned This Month (in cubic feet) 4310 4500 -

C O O O O O O O O O O O gy,4 j 3000 - D O O O O O O O O O O O Jf,'j w

] 1500 -

O

'09 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 Year-end Total VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOLID RA0IOACTIVE WASTE The upper graph shows the volume of radioactive oil and dry radioactive waste sent for processing. The lower graph shows the volume of the monthly, the cumulative annual total, and the year-end total of radioactive waste buried the previous 2 years.

The monthly and cumulative volumes of radioactive waste which were buried during the month of November 1991 have been revised. These revisions are due to the delay involved in the shipping for processing, the processing, and the burying of radioactive waste.

Cumulative volume of radioactive oil shipped off site for processing (gallons) 4,330.0 Cumulative amount of solid radwaste shipped off site for processing (cubic feet) 12,898.0 Volume of solid radioactive waste which was buried during the month of November (cubic feet) 7.9 Cumulative volume of solid radioactive waste buried (cubic feet) 1.000.4 Amount of solid radioactive waste in temperary storage (cubic feet) 120.3 The Fort Calhoun goal for the volume of solid radioactive waste which has been buried is 4,500 cubic feet.

The industry upper ten percentile value is 3,072 cubic feet per unit per year. The Fort Calhoun Station was in the upper ten percentile of nuclear plants for this indicator in 1986,1987, and 1988.

Data Source: Patterson/Breuer (Manager / Source) SEP54 Adverse Trend: None 11

D -1991 Disabling injury / Illness Frequency Rate

- K-- 1990 Disabling injury / Illness Frequency Rate 5 Ynar Average Disabling injury /lliness Frequency Rate 1.4 - -O- Fort Calhoun Goal )

- - + - Industry Upper 10 Percentile 1.2 - GOOD 1- V 0.8 -

0.6 -- 0.56 C.57 -

~

0 SN , _ _

U o.44 0.4 - Or 'N]

C O h

] -

.j-g-h"# -

h O 0.2 -

~

-7

; ~

o 0 0 W/Y Yh M YM'

T ;4 0 h , h , X i r-f T T T MAT'#T i i Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE)

This indicator shows the reporting month disabling injury / illness rate in column form.

The 1990 disabling injury / illness frequency rate and the 5 year average of the corre-sponding monthly oisabling injury / illness frequency rate are also shown.

There were no (zero) lost time accidents reported at the Fort Calhoun Station in Novem-ber. The total number of lost time accidents that have been reported during 1991 is two.

The 1991 disabling injury / illness frequency rate goal was set at 0.31.

The industry upper ten percentile disabling injury / illness frequency rate is 0.

y_eg Year-End Rate 1988 1.6 1989 0.4 1990 0.5. '

L

. Data Source: Sorenson/Skaggs (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 25 & 26 l

12 l

l

~ . - _

O Thermal Output ,

--O-- Fort Calhoun 1495 MW Goal Tech Spec 1500 MW Limit 1500 - '

W 1200-0

$ 900-F 3 '

E 600-E r

300 -

o 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 DAILY THERM AL OUTPUT The above thermal output graph displays the daily operating power level during Novem-ber 1991, the 1500 thermal megawatt average technical specification limit, and the 1495 thermal megawatt Fort Calhoun goal.

Full power operation is anticipated thru January 31,1992 to obtain the burnup window m for Cycle 14 design parameters.

Data Source: Holthaus/ Gray (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 13

2-

Equipment Forced Outage Rate 1.8 -

1. 6 -

1.4 -

1.2 - GOOD

'~

v 0.8 -

0.53 0.6 -

O

'88 0.13 h3

(.

'89 10.4-

'90 O.2 -

Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS The equipment forced outage rate for the reporting month is 0.69.

An equipment forced outage due to the. station batteries being declared inoperable -

. began in September and was carried into October. In addition, two forced outages occurred during the month of October: on 10/18/91 the generator was taken off line due to a steam leak on a turbine control valve before seat drain line; on 10/25/91 the gen--

erator was taken off line due to a steam leak from an instrument tap on the high pres-sure turbine.

. One equipment forced outage occurred during the month of August 1991. The outage.

- was required to replace failed potential transformers (pts). These pts convert 345 KV to 120 V for use in the breaker synchronization circuit.

One equipment forced outage occurred in the month of January 1991 due to the De-cember CEDM housing leak which carried outage time into January.

Data Source: Monthly Operations Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Adverse Trend: None 14 e

l L

f _ -..

_ . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ - _ . _~ . _ . - _ _ _ _ . . _ . . . _ _ _ _ . _ . _ . . . _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _

Operations 1991 Budget ($ Million)

1991 Cumulative Total ($ Million) 80- @ - 1991 Revised Budget 60-40- _ ;

RA 20- VM ff$

0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

~

Maintenance 1991 Budget ($ Million) 20- :

1991 Cumulative Total ($ Million) 1991 Revised Budget 10- .

VM 5- _

yg

-=

=

l}}

Jan -Feb- Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec OPERAllONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET The Operations and Maintenance Budget Indicator shows the budget year to-date as

' well as the actual expenditures for operations and maintenance for the Fort Calhoun Station.-

The December bar graph represents the revised year end budget due to budget revi-sions primarily reflecting the refueling postponement for Cycle 13. The revised year-end budget for Operations was 56.5 million dollars. The revised year-end budget for Mainte-nance was 12.7 million dollars.

The budget year-to-date for Operations was 64.2 million dollars for November while the -

actual cumulative expenditures through November totaled 49.3 million dollars.

The budget year-to-date for Maintenance was 22.5 million dollars for November while the actual cumulative expenditures through November totaled 7.1 million dollars.

!- Data Source: Gleason/ Parent (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trends: None 15

.. -- , -. ... _ _ _ . . _ _ _ - - . _ . _ _ = . . _ -.

~ - - . - . . . - . - - . - _ . ~ . . - - . . . .- -

1000-

Documents Scheduled for Review l Documents Reviewed

= 800 -

--V- Overdue Documents I

600-400 - l i

1 l

l 200-t

T

=

O 7 Dec90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 1 DOCUMENT REVIEW-p This indicator shows the number of completed, scheduled, and overdue (greater than 6 months past the scheduled due date) biennial reviews for the reporting month.- These f document reviews are performed in house and include Special Procedures, the Site-f Security Plan, Maintenance Procedures, Preventive Maintenance Procedures, and the Operating Manual, I' ~ During November there were 49 document reviews completed while 71 document

-reviews were scheduled.L At the end of November, there were 11 document reviews

, : overdue.

F 4-i During the month of November there were 44 new or renamed documents reviewed.

~

1Thase new or renamed documents will need to be reviewed again in 1993.

[ 5 Data Sourcei Patter _ sori /McKay (Manager / Source)

1. -

T- ' Adverse Trend: None SEP 46 1

i i

16-l

. - - ~ . , _ _ , . . . - , .- ,

O Number of Falturev20 Demands --u- Trigger Values f or 20 Demands i

O Number of Faltures/50 Demands -V- Trigger Values for So Demands O Number of Fallures/1oo Demands - - Trigger Values for 1oo Demands 8-GOOD I

6- 'F V T T T T T V- V V --T - V ---- Y 4 4 4 4- - - -

3 ,3 _3 _3 _3 _ _ __ _ _ , , ,

2 -- .

b .

b -

bb bb b bb bb b y 7

+

o o o o o o o h s f I I I I I I i i i i i 1 Dec90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIABILITY This bar graph shows three monthly indicators pertaining to the number of failures that were reported during the last 20,50, and 100 emergency diesel generator demands at the Fort Calhoun Station. Also shown are trigger values which correspond to a high level of confidence that a unit's diesel generators have obtained a reliability of greater than or equal to 95% when the failure values are below the corresponding trigger val-ues. These trigger values are the Fort Calhoun 1991 goal.

The demands counted for this indicator include the respective number of starts and the respective number of load-runs for both Diesel Generators combined. The number of start demands includes all valid and inadvertent starts, including all start-only demands and all start demands that are followed by load-run demands, whether by automatic or manualinitiation. Load-run demands must follow successfui starts and meet at least one of the following criteria: a load-run that is a result of a real load signal, a load-run test expected to carry the plant's load and duration as stated in the test specifications, and a special test in which a diesel generator was expected to be operated for a mini-mum of one hour and in be loaded with at least 50% of design load (see exceptions and other demand criteria in the Dofinition Section).

The demand failure which occurred during the month of August for DG-2 was due to a seal failure on the jacket water pump.

Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 17

. . . . . . . -. .. -. . - = - -- .. -- - - - - ... - -. . . -

O DG-1 Failures /25 Demands l@ DG 2 Failures /25 Demands 5- O Failure Trigger Value for 25 Demands / Fort Calhoun Goal 4- C O O O O O O O O O O O 3-

~

2 2 2 2

~

7 7 ,

}1 N $l l 1- !

$ e a 3 h h M d 00 00 0 0- 00 0-0 00 00 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 $ 0 y 4 i i i i i i i i i i 2

')

Dec90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY (25 DEMANDS)

This indicator shows the number of failures experienced by each emergency diesel

- generator during the last 25 start demands and the last 25 load-run demands. A trigger i

value of 4 failures within the last 25 demands is also shown. This trigger value of 4 failures within 25 demands is the Fort Calhoun goal for 1991, it must be emphasized that in accordance with NUMARC criteria, certain actions will take place in the event that any one emergency diesel generator experiences 4 o.r more -

failures within the last 25 demands on the unit. -These actions are described in the Definition Section. A Standing Order has been drafted for the Fort Calhoun Station to institutionalize and formally approve / adopt the required NUMARC actions.

D_iesel Generator DG-1 has not experienced any failures during the last 25 demands on

~t he unit,

- Diesel Generator DG-2 has_ experienced two failures during the last 25 demands on the unit. An air damper roll pin failure occurred in July 1991, and a seal failed on a jacket -

water pump in August 1991.

Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 18

O Planneo Hours of Diosol Genera;or No. 2 Unavailability

@ Unplanned Hours of Diesel Gonorator No 2 Unavattabihty O Estimated Hours of L,es.1 Generator No. 2 Unavailability E Planned Hours of Diosol Gonorator No.1 Unavailability

'~

-O- Unplanned Hours of Diosol Generator No.1 Unava>Iabihty

@ 200 - _

7s m

150-

$100- - j u, So- m L -E o __JI5lLe o .7 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr

, c May e

JJn

, %Jul h ..., - o wD r c Aug Sep Oct Nov DocG1 M Cumulative Hours of DG 1 Unavanatxbly from 7/1/91 to 8'31/91 O Cumulat;vo Hours of DG-7 Unavailabelity from 7/1/91 to 8/31/91 O Estima1ed Hours of OG-2 Unavailabthly from 7/1/91 to B'31/91 O Cumu =tiva Hours of DG-1 Unavailabihty from 91/91 to 11/30'91 Q Cumulatwo Hours of DG-2 Unavaitatmhty from 9'1/91 to 11/30 91 200 -

O Fort Calhoun Goal (43 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months of unavakabihty per diesel generator)

(150-3 f100-u .. .

50 -

r u. @

O O O O E g.,'-

W 4 i ...a>

0 % t' o ^

e s [f f Ju191 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 DIESEL GENERATOR UNAVAILABILITY This indicator provides a monthly illustration of diesel generator unavailability for 1991 The top graph shows the diesel generater planned, unplanned, and estimated unavailabic hours for DG 1 and DG 2 for each month. The lower graph shows the cumulative hours of unavailability for each diesel generator for two time periods: from July through August, and during September through November 1991.

The Fort Calhoun goal of 43.8 unavailable hours per DG for the last four months of 1991 is based on the 1990 INPO industry median value for diesel generator unavailab!e hours.

There were zero unavailable hours for DG-1 and DG-2 dunng th< 'th of November.

The 14.4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months of DG-1 ut, availability and 18.3 hours3.472222e-5 days 8.333333e-4 hours 4.960317e-6 weeks 1.1415e-6 months of DG 2 u . "ty for the month of October were attributable to planned maintenance activities. The 2.7 estimated unai ._.ble hours for DG 2 were due to a roll pin f ailure.

The 31.4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months of unplanned unavailability and the 161 hours0.00186 days 0.0447 hours 2.662037e-4 weeks 6.12605e-5 months of estimated unavailabi!ity for DG 2 in August were the result of two separate events On August 7, during surveillance testing, DG 2 tailed to crank on the first attempt. On August 26 - 27, DG 2 was inoperable due to the f ailura of a jacket water pump seat.

Data Source: Jaworski.'Ronning (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 19

~

@ September 1991 Outstanding MWOs

~ October 1991 Outstanding MWOs 0 November 1991 Outstanding MWOs 300 -

L 200 - - :

i;"

100 - ! ,

}{n y

m a _ _

0

' I ~I ' ' I' I 6 I i i !

0-3 Months - 3-6 Months 6-9 Months 912 Months >12 Months

- AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS -

(CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE) _

This indicator shows the age of corrective non outage maintenance work orders (MWOs) remaining open at the end of the reporting month, i Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source) -

- Adverse Trend: None 1

20

. a

S 400-350-

- E September 1991 O October 1991 O November 1991 300- , ,

[

3 250- 4, ;.

@Ji

',': *b 200-

t.

,;.; in 150- ' ')/ - *

/

'. m Q:

100- ,;;;. @

wa

's;i "'Q 50 - ' 5' ' 934 -

x

'{' ' H- ',r',< , , _

g_ d'lh}h i J':

_i

'i ,

W ,

E ],

Total Open MWOs Open MWOs>3 Total Open Safety Open Safety Open High Prionty months old Related MWOs Related MWOs > MWOs 3 Months Old MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the total number of corrective non-outage MWOs remaining open at the end of the reporting month, along with a breakdown by several key categories.

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source) -

Adverse Trend: Based on three months of increasing numbers of open high priority MWOs, an adverse trend is indicated.

SEP 36 I

21

Corrective Maintenance Backlog > 3 Months Old 80%-

--Ei Industry Upper Quartile GOOD 60%- Y N

G- O O O O O O O O O O O 40%-

20%-

0%

Dec90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (NON OUTAGE) ,

Th'is indicator shows the percentage of open corrective non-outage maintenance work orders that were greater than three months old at the end of the reporting month.

The percentage of open corrective non-outage maintenance work orders that were-greater than three months old at the end of November was reported as 24.5%

The industry upper quartile value for correctiva raaintenance backlog greater than 3 months old is 45.8%. The Fort Calhoun Station it, currently performing in the upper quartile of nuclear power plants in this area.

Data Source: Pett3rson/Schmitz (Manager /So';rco)

- Adverse Trend: Nonn<

1-22

Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance

~

-O- Industry Upper ouartile (57.7%)

A 80%-

--O- Fort Calhoun Goal (60%)

GOOD 70%-

60 ,'o - p p _

^

50% -

40%-

30%-

20%

Dec90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE (NON OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the ratio of completed non-outage preventive maintenance to total completed non-outage maintenance.

The ratio of preventive to total maintenance was 51.7% in November. The values for this indicator decreased during September and October 1991 due to a greater emphasis -

being placed on completion of MWO work (see p. 22 for the " Corrective Maintenance Backlog Greater Than 3 Months Old" indicator) during the battery outage.

The Fort Calhoun goalis to attain a ratio of preventive to total maintenance greater than 60%.

The industry upper quartile value for the ratio of preventive to total maintenance is 57.7%.

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source) l Adverse Trond: None SEP 41 i

23

l 4%- --dr-- Preventive Maintenance items Overdue

-O- Industry Upper Ouartile

-O- Fort Calhoun Goal 3%-

GOOD 2%-

V O O O O O O O O O O O 1%~

0% A A A A i i i 1 1 1 _

Dec90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov01 DREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE The purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in the administration and execution of preventive maintenance programs. A small percentage of preventive maintenance items overdue indicates a station commitment to the preventive maintenance program and an ability to plan, schedule, and perform preventive maintenance tasks as pro.

grams require.

During November 1991,1,350 PM items were completed.15 PM items (1.1% of the total 1365) were not completed within the allov.able grace period.

The Fort Calhoun goalis to have less than 1.2% preventive maintenance items over-due. The industry upper quartile for preventive maintenance items overdue is 1.2%.

Tne Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the industry upper quartile for this indicator.

Data Source: Patterson/ Linden (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 41 24

4 9 Number of C. R. Instruments Repairable Oa Line 50- Total Control Room instruments Out-of-Service

-O- Industry Upper Quartile For Total Out-of Service instruments 40- --O- Fort Calhoun Goal For Total Out-of Service Instruments 30- _

20- .w/ m. w E

n kn zy n th:- x%

w/s t xx M9 >:s; xe O- -

Q%e Q-Q wh 9;a Q-sw O -

Q%9

-Q-.Q-zg av O-C 2 10-a -

h a-o o-A h o; ff -

o g h hh os -

h a

o-o a fra

%6:

W

% %e M

2%:

MwV M%%

%u XM:

XM M

Mc M

$w w

%&: M ?%" '% .

, '%% MV %% 1%' 42 &

0 , , , , , , i , , ,

JM9 , i Dec90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 NUMBER OF OUT-OF-SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS This indicator shows the number of out-of service control room instruments, the nurnber of instruments repairable during plant operations (on-line), the industry upper quartile for this indicator, and the Fort Calhoun goal.

There was a total of 14 out-of-service control room instruments at the end of November, A plant outage is required to repair 4 of these 25 control room instruments.

The Fort Calhoun goal is to have less than 15 out-of-service control room instruments.

The industry upper quartile value for the number of out-of service control room instru-ments is 7.

Data Source: Patterson/Spijker (Manager / Source)

Positive Trend 25

80%- 1 Maintenance Overtime i 70%- X 12 Month Average GOOD i

-O- Fort Calhoun Goal for Non Outage Months V

50%-

40%-

30*/. -

O C C C C C C C O C C C 20% - t,

,w 10%- , u . ;

-x x ,

0%

Dec90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct - Nov91 MAINTENANCE OVERTIME The' Maintenance Overtime Indicator monitors the ability to perform the desired mainte-nance activities with the allotted resources. Excessive overtime indicates insufficient resource allocation and can lead to errors due to fatigue.

The percent of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was reported as 9% during the month oi November 1991. The 12 month average percentage of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was reported as 8.4%

The Fort Calhoun goal for the percentage of maintenance overtime hours worked has

been set at 25% for non-outage months and 50% for outage months.

LData Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None-I I

L -26 l

0 . _ _ _. . .- . . , ,

15 --

0 Open irs Related to tne Use of Procedures (Maintenance)

O ciosed irs Reiated to tne use of erocecares (Maintena,ce)

O Procedura1 Noncomphance irs (Maintenh.nce) 10-5 5- -

3 33 3 3 2 2 2 / 2

) ._

1 1 1 0 0

/ 0 0 000 000 000 000 000 0 00 0 0 , , , , , i i ; 3 i , i Dec90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the number of open Maintenance Incident Reports (irs) that are related to the use of procedures, the number of closed irs that are related to the use of procedures, and the number of open and closed irs that received procedural noncom-pliance cause codes.

Data Source: Patterson/McKay (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 15,41 & 44 27

800-Q Open MWOs - O- Fori Calhoun Goal 600-O O O O O O O O O O 400-293 302 289 287 281 271 y, , .

. , , . gu. :ey m :am zw

au

< ug: cyn: . .///, xv RE

ce :rge sz-

' < :595-: ge. 74c

, ' , g/h. g%: 949 ys: gy 94';-

200- ,

spy

gy, /,yg. g,g, z?g y;5

; c

- x; w

: 'My /ac lu m em

.. ', xe: sw

Ms% %e- gx/ :ga g;VA ?x&: ;e%; es: 7a: %%

. %% ' : MM: %%- %% SM9: l'#4 %%

1

- j '

MM; x8/ ,Uh %69) %M' 6%'/

i :M% %M :v4 /G1 33% ME l

/$/f<: ',////

.%% '/,'/s: l&g( $6?l/

)

. __' '___ _: _< ?//w .

%x< 14 6: 4x4 xM: 'M% Aw/

0-i i i i i i i i i i i i Dec90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG (CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE M AINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the number of corrective non outage Maintenance Work Orders (MWOs) that were open at the end of the reporting month.

The goal for this indicator is to have less than 450 corrective non-outage maintenance work orders remaining open.

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 36 28

Completed Scheduled Activitios (EM)

-G- Fort Calhoun Goal 100 % -

80% - C Y

^

O O O O O AO O O O

'/

V O 60%

8/30 9:7 9/14 921 928 10/5 10/12 10/19 10/26 11/2 11/9 11/16 11/23 11/30 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (ELECTRICAL MAINTEN ANCE)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Electrical Maintenance. Maintenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activ~ ties.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.

Reoortina Month Comoleted Scheduled A_ctivities Week 1 82 %

Week 2 93%

Week 3 78%

Week 4 85%

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 29

- Completed Scheduled Activities (PE)

--O-Fort Calhoun Goal 100% -

80%- C O O O- O -O - & --O 60% -

40% -

8/30. 9/7 9/14 9/21 9/28 10/5 '10/12 10/19 10/26 11/2 11/9 11/16 11/23 11/30

' PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (PRESSURE EQUIPMENT)

. This indicator shows the percent of the' number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Pressure Equip _ ment Maintenance. Maintenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations snd miscellaneous maintenance activities.

l The Fort Calhoin Station goal forthis indicator is 80%

p Reoortina Month Comoleted Scheduled Activities Week 1 91 %

L Week 2 72 %

L Week 3 82 %

Week 4 75 %

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 'I l

l

l. 30 L

Completed Scheduled Activities (GM)

--O- Fort Calhoun Goal 100 % -

80% - C C O O O O O O O O O 60% -

40%

8/30 9/7 9/14 9.21 9/28 10/5 10/12 10/19 10!26 11/2 11/9 11/16 11/23 11/30 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (GENERAL MAINTEN ANCE)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning General Main-tenance. Maintenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and ~

miscellaneous maintenance activities.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.

Reoortina Month Comoteted Scheduled Activities

~

Week 1 43 %

Week ' 76 %

Week 3 62%

Week 4 79 %

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source) -

Adverse Trend: None ' SEP 33 31 l

Completed Scheduled Activities (MM)

--O- Fort Calhoun Goal 100 % -

80% - C O O-C O O O O i 60%- .

40%

8/30 . 9/7 9/14 9/21' 9/28 10/5 10/12 10/19 10/26 11/2 11/9 '11/16 11/23 11/30 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance ed.!"i+:as as -

-_ compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities _concerning Mechanical Maintenance. Maintenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations,

. and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.

- Reoortina Month Comoteted Scheduled Activities Week 1 - 82 %

Week 2 86 %

Week 3 - 82 %

- Week 4 85 %

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 32

Completed Scheduled Activities (IC)

--O- Fort Calhoun Goal

' 100% -

80% - O O O O O O O-- O O --O 60% -

40%

-8/30_ 9/7 9/14 9/21 9/28 '10/5 10/12 10/19 10/26 11/2 11/9 11/10 11/23 11/30 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED mal!1TENANCE ACTIVITIES

-(INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL)

This indicator shows the parcent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number c; scheduled maintenance activities concerning Instrumenta-tion & Control.- Maintenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.

Reoortino Month Comoteted Scheduled Activities

. Week 1 ' 94 %

Week 2 83%

Week 3 81 %

Week 4 74 %

-Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 33

. . - . ~ . . . . - - . - - - - - . . - . - . _ - - . . . . - . - . . ~ . - . . -

3-3-

O Number of Missed STs Resulting in LERs -

2-1-

, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

.i . 6 iO , , , , ,, , , , , , , ,

'89 '90 Dec90 Jan ..Feb Mar Apr May Jun- Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS This indicato'r shows the number of missed Surveillance Tests (STs) that result in Lic-ensee Event . Reports (LERs) during the reporting month. The graph on the left shows the yearly totals for the indicated years, During the month of November 1991, there'were no missed STs that resulted in Lens.

Data Source: Monthly Operating Report & Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 60 & 61 l

34 l

~ - - ' --

15-O Confirmed NPRDS Component Failures O Suspected NPRDS Component Failures

-A- Total NPRDS Component Failures 10-8 8 7 7 E \7 7

[Ne[

^

] Neg#

5- s 4 4 4

..h + -

3 r

0 0 0 ,f 0 0 0 0 0 S 0 0 0(0 1 6 6 1 4 1 i i I i i

1 Dec90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 NUMBER OF NUCLE?.R PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEMS (NPRDS)

REPORTABLE FAILURES

\ This indicator shows the total number of NPRDS component failurus and the number of confirmed NPRDS component failures. The total number of NPRDS component failures is base-J upon the number of failure reports sent to INPO. The number of confirmed NPRDS component failures is based upon the number of failure repons that have been accepted by INPO. The difference between these two figures is the number of failure reports still under review by INPO.

During November 1991, there were no (0) confirmed NPRDS component failures.

The industry average for confirmed NPRDS component failures is 10 per month.

Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

Adversa Trend: Nene

15- :- Components With More Than Ono Fallur0

-X- Components With More Than Two Failures ;

10-GOOD V

5 -.

/

y >

N X V '

X A h h

0 h h Doc 90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS The Maintenance Effectiveness Indicator was developed following guidelines set forth by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Opera.

tional Data (NRC/AEOD). The NRC/AEOD is currently developing and verifying a maintenance eff9ctiveness indicator using the Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System (NPRDS) component failures.

This ir.dicator hac been revised to show the number cf NPRDS components with more than one failure during the last eighteen months and the number of NPRDS compo-nents with more than two failures during the last eighteen months. The number of NPRDS cornponents with more than two failures in an eighteen month period should in(cate the effectiveness of plant maintenance. (This change applies only to the Sep-tember through November 1991 data. The data for December 1990 through August 1991 is based on a twelve month interval.)

During the last 18 reporting months there were 11 NPRDS components with more than 1 failure. 'cG t .,11 had more than two failures. The ta0 numbers of the components with more than two failures are CH+1 A and CH 1B.

Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 30

20- .

- Calculated Check Valve F6vre Rate per Milkon Cornponent Hours !

Industry Chock Valve Fa: lure Rate per Mit! ion Component Hours f

15-i

-o- Fort Calhoun 1991 Goa!(2.00 E 3)

I 10 i m 10-S ,

GOOD .

.k V 5-V i

& W% b 3 . . . O c o--o- o o

, 0 i

'89 '90 Dec90 'Jan - Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 Check Valve Failures CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE This indicator shows the Fort Calhoun check valve failure rate, the Fort Calhoun Ooal !

and the industry check valve failure rate. This rate is based upon failures during the previous 18 months.' The check valve failures at Fort Calhoun Station, for the previous two years, are shown on the left. i The data for the industry check valve failure rate is three months behind the reponing month due to the time involved in collecting and processing the data, t For August 1991, the fort Calhoun Station reported an actust check valve failure rate of

- 6.07 E 7 while the industry reported an actual failure rate of 2.81 E 6, At the end of November, the Fort Calhoun Staten reported a calculated check valve failura rate of ;

6.07 E 7. 1

- The Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is a failure rate of 2.00 E 6.

Data Source: JaworskilDowdy (ibager/ Source) i Adverse Trend: None - SEP 43 r

37 ;

l t;

.,.w.. -..._,,..........,,_.._...._,...,._,_....._,__.__..,m__,.._.__._.__._._.-_.~.-_.__

e

- secondary System CPI

-+- secondary System CPI Umit GOOD o

-0 . r rt Calhovn Goal (.45)

~

-C)- Industry Upper Quanlle V 1- ; ; l ; l ; i : ; :

o se oy 0.5 - p- ..c .C C~& - fr ~r) g" u - - ,,

a i , ,0- -.

'8' W No/90 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 l

I 200-175- + Hours Chemistry is Outsirte 00 Guidelines 150-7 125-GOOD]

100- y 75-

50- +

25-lJ 0 X A L m

m

'90 Nov90 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug sep Oct91 i SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY The top graph, Secondary System Chemistry Performance Index (CPI),is calculated .

- using the following three parsmeters: cation conductivity in steam generator blowdown, sodium in steam generator blowdown, and condensate pump discharge dissolved .

oxygen. The bottom graph shows the total hours of 13 parameters exceeding the l Owne.s Group (OG) guidelines during power operation, ;

The Fort Calhoun goal for the CPIis 0.45. The CPI wes reported as 0.436 for the !

month of October. The industry upper quartile value for this indicator was 0.16 for ;

August 1989 through Dec.1989. The CPIindustry value then changed to 0.24 for 1990. ,

The number of hours outside the OG guidelines was reported as 23.7 hours8.101852e-5 days 0.00194 hours 1.157407e-5 weeks 2.6635e-6 months for the month of October.

The above two chemistry indicators are one month behind the reporting month due to the time needed for collection and evaluation of the station chemistry data.

Data source: Franco /Glantz (Manager /Soucce)

Adverse Trond: None ,

- 38 i

k -+d$

fN? TM 'r w 9t W e+-tv.-if-wpr***4*'P -' -'

10%-

Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of Umit

{

8%-

--O- Fort Calhoun Goal 6%-

GOOD 4%-

v j

3 3 2%- C O O O -O O O O O O

n 93 'i 27 2 : -

jp ..

,V#,#? 0% A L n n n ,

'89 '90 ' Nov90 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 PRIMARY GYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT The Primary System Chemistry - Percent of Hours Out cf Limit indicator tracks the primary system chemistry performance by monitoring six key chemistry parameters.

100% equates to all six parameters being out of limit for the month. This indicator is one month behind the reporting month.

The Fort Calh'oun goal for this indicator is 2%. l 1

-The' Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of Limit was reported as 1.4% for

' the month of October.

-A plant outage'in November and December 1990 resulted in a higher percentage of

- hours out of limit.

Data Source: Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source) ;

Adverse Trend: None -

4 i

L

! 39

10- *%" ' Auxiliary System (CCW) Chemistry Hours outside Station Limits g, @ Industry Upper Quanile 8-7-

GOOD 6-Y 5- [

4-3-

D 0 D---C O O D -D C O O O g.

1-0 0

n. g,x,g. .g, g g n , , n , x,n,g,

' .gg ' .90 Nov90 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 AUXILIARY SYSTEM (CCW) CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS The Aunilary System Chemistry How. Outside Station Limits indicator tracks the monthly lic9rs that the Component Cooling Water (CCW) system is outside the station chemistry lima The above chemistry indicatoris one. month behind the reporting month due to the time riseded for data collection and evaluation of the chemistry data for the station.

The auxiliary system chemistry hours outside station limits was reported as zero hours :

for the month of October.

The industry upper quartile value for auxiliary systems chemistry hours outside station limits is 2.6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months .

Data Source: Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trerd: None 40 l

Number of Instruments Out of Service

--O- Fort Calhoun Goal 7

7- -

N 9z: 6 e 6 6 6- .Q C C C C y O .y C .v C y

i M ?,::) :,, ,, :

4' s s by w 5 >x se S- '$fgj y 7 'g j g 7 '$ g

, : :: %+ : :s 'ce : /tc x: w:m

/ f: ? -

% %:; :M 2

'1 '

S "4' 51 % f N' # '%

4- 4%: x%' c %7 .a ko y C' 7 y/7 4%: '<;9 ]

X6

'/,M

~</ ,. ,

y, w w": v

' GW ' 'e/,-:

g' f X6i , /C , 92 '

3 3 3 u<; :n sc 3- ?%

vs-.

%6.

/p

M:.

xe:

SW 16%: XM

n 5% ;

%7

=

79 n:,

So.

xn xp

-.:9

.'e 70 Ox

,s' w.

ff6: ,: Z6 '/S: @% :W C'/ <G. 'z , %'< ;9:.: '/

M6. ./ %V 94: X@ %?; 'l, <%, % s:- fa.

xx

?.,.

2- 24: V: %+ tw v.y %9: u m w;., :e: a

,%&: x6': +b'9:

MV 4%: %l1; sy. m. ny w: %c: ,,

i: WA' Md %?: XM1 %% 6%' <.

M' V/< %: /W:-

xe ru'

': x% 26: /;w tu as: tw %s: 9x %

1- 4 ': x% V& 24: gM 2/ M9 ce %7 :w 4x, :w; 2'V 'M !s MV '.pg. wy: 9:9: m: xe. pn ?x: x.;

'< '.: %% %%, VX: /

'/& '.W %+. M/, wx 79: :%: ;%,

1. ,: V4: ZE f3: M :42! %?' 'se 2? 'e: W: xe' O- , , , , , , , , , , , 3 Dec00 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 IN LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT OF SERVICE This indicator shows the total number of in line chemistry system instruments that are out of service at the end of the reporting month. The chemistry systems involved in this indicator include the Secondary System and the Post Accident Sampling System (PASS),

- At the end of November there was a total of 6 in line chemistry instruments that were out of service, Of these 6 instruments,4 were from the Secondary System and 2 were from PASS.

The Fort Calhoun goal for the number of in line chemistry system instruments that are out of service has been set at 6. Six out of service chemistry instruments make up 10%

of all the chemistry instruments that are counted for this indicator.

Data Source: Patterson/Renaud (Manager / Source) l Adverse Trend: None 41 I

f

O Total Weste Produced (Kilograms)

- Federal & State Monthly Limit (Kg) 1000 -

800 -

600--

400 - ,

200 -

70.4 24 9 39.9 34.9

Tf/j'y 97 15 4.9 15 0 0 0 0 0

, , ,A,m; , , , , , , , ,

Dec90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED This indicator shows the total amount of hazardous waste produced by Fort Calhoun each month. This hazardous waste consists of non halogenated hazardous waste, halogenated hazardous waste, and other hazardous waste produced.

During the month of November,0.0 kilograms of non halogenated hazardous waste was produced 0.0 kilograms of halogenated hazardous waste was produced, and 0.0 kilograms of other hazardous waste was produced.

Date Source: Patterson/Henning (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 42

5000-OPPD 4500 mRenvyr. Limit 4000-O Highest Exposure for the Month (mrem)

O Highest Exposure for the Quarter (mrem) 3000-O Highest Exposure for the Year (mRom) 2000-1147 7

1000- a: #

alklk' (Ib 9[/s lc]

^

266 282 ,

$(.

0 l +:MMsv@ 4 8:ssz N$0$ m[

i November 1991 MAXIMUM lt4DIVIDUAL R ADIATION EXPOSURE During November 1991, an individual accumulated 266 mrem which was the highest individual exposure for the month.

The maximum individual evposure to date for the fourth quarter of 1991 has been 282 mrem.

The maximum individual exposure reported to date for 1991 has beer. ',,147 mrem.

The OPPD limit for the maximum yearly individual radiation exposure is 4,500 mrem /

year.

Date Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 43

__ _ e._ _ _ __...__.._ _ _ __.- _ _ _ _ -_-- - - _ . . . . _ . _

i

, i i

237 250- !

7 D Monthly Personnel Contaminations f

GOOD Cumulative Personnel Coritaminations ;

j 200- '

y -O- Fort Calhoun AnnualGoal(90) t i -O- Industry Upper Quartile (129) !

157 : l

~"r 150-

D O O O O O O O O O O O

100- -

i O O O O O O O O O O O O

/-

50 -

, z, _

n 7

6 3

3 4

,n ,

2 4

89 '90 -Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep- Oct Nov Dec91 TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS ?

This indicator shows the number of skin and clothing contaminations for the repor1lng '

month.- A total of SS contarninations have occurred during 1991.

There was a total of 237 skin and clothing contaminations in 1990.

The 1991 goal for skin and clothing contaminations is 90.

. The industry upper quartile value for total skin and clothing contaminations is 129 per ~

unit annually. .

Data Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 15 & 54 44:

D --ae-Mw'- -y,erew-pw am- -w wasm gy - wpo t- w w-3+v-+-u- 1m+q=<e,e-g*,-g4% is v-m e e, $- sy3gy yg. p yg 1r +esyWAm h-poe-%1-q e- t y ywy y y ,y,se u-y we u-W t'We3 w r- g 9mM--g --t-=te,y

1 f

100% - -- Decontaminated Auxiliary Building ~ Radiation Controlled Area

-O- Fort Calhoun Goal (nonSutage months) 90%-

/

o c'c o o o o o o o o o 80%-

A 70%-

GOOD 60%-

50 %

Dec90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 DECONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA This indicator (formerly titled " Decontaminated Auxiliary Building") was revised in June 1991 to include the new Radwaste building and the areas of the C/RP building that will be considered Radiologically Controlled. The graph shows the percentage of the RCA that is decontaminated (clean) bc.; M on the total square footage, a Fort Calhoun goal i of 85% decontaminated auxiliary building (non-cutage months) and a goal of 75%

decontaminated auxiliary building (outage months).

At the end of the reporting month,89.9% of the total square footage of the RCA was decontaminated.

I Date Source: Patterson/G u ndal (Manag e r/ Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP54 1

45

i l

10-B- ;

Number of Identified PRWPs l

6-4 4- 7 1 M

yx,-

yn 2-7,w .; ;e I

ge h

+p,:

1 1 1 l*f .

/Ap n 1

[$

tw 6%:

h #

JS h 0

l 1 I i i i I I I I I I Dec90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM The Radiological Work Practices Program Indicator shows the nurri sr of Poor Radio-logical Work Practices (PRWPs) which were identified during the re porting month. The PRWPs are identified through a review of the monthly Radiological Occurrence Reports and Personnel Contamination Reports.

The number of PRWPs which are identified each month should indirectly provide a means to qualitatively assess supervisor accountability for their workers' radiological performance, During the month of November 1991, no PRWPs were identified.

Data Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager /Sou rce)

Adverse Trend: None SEP52 46

l O Total Number of Hot Spots Number of Additional Hot Spots identified

--O- Fort Cathoun Goal 65 65

- 63 63 s ( ?{

53 53 53 54 54 54 55 g M'g g g, c % a w c:

50- y*s 6',::

2 4" * *'

g

'? * ;

g' -

3',: ;M & - 4 4 'e,-:

2 % # y ,', y ;, //

.V' : % h.: l. ': : '? . , 6' . 'h: X /,l

+

$b---9,;0 x x:

$3 M$3 n: %

f3y I3

9 h3 I3 ,

33 w

i3

x 0

f,;: fi ^ 4: y 0: '

, % 9 % ./.

,; :s: iC; & ; ; % c n +'

gj 'A % & X , ... ?: ,c #

a: 3: 6 4: E 9' %: ,' 4: m F W

25 - % % % '& V :6 V y 4' : % .9 2 6 /., , :. & 7 &;

A 7,: x: :.

Y % 5 01 ? E

z: w w 'e. . - ,e 4: z- c i : a% 'y x /, : /, , .6 '+ : X Q

.e 10 .! $ $

x

$/,;

si 10 $ $

x g

'g/, %

'O "4 g

s p 9

, %. 4:

w- & S 7,:

u '

se 5. m u

's 0 at:j 0 4 3 z 0 e 07: 3 %

1 x 0 S 0 i i i i i i i i i i i I Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS This indicator shows the total number of hot spots which have been identified to exist in the Fort Calhoun Station and have been documented through the use of a hot spot identification sheet A hot spot is defined as a smalllocalized source of high radiation, A hot spot occurs when the contact dose rate of an item or piece of equipment is at least 5 times the General Area dose rate and the item or piece of equiprnent's dose rate is equal to or greater than 100 mrem / hour.

ALARA personnel conducted an in-depth survey of the entire auxiliary building during the month of August, During November one hot spot was eliminated in the piping of WD 025 in Room 23 and one new hN spot was identified in the valve body of WD 513 in Room 9A.

The Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 40.

Date Source: Patterson/Wiiliams (Manager / Source) 1 Adverse Trends: None 47

@ Monthly Radioactive Gas Discharged (Curies) 800- Cumulative Radioactivo Gas Discharged (Curies) .

--O- Cumulative AnnualGoal(Curies) ,

600- GOOD 465 Y

(. 400-4

7. ,,, 0 0 0 0-c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 . ..

(: .'

y.7 164 g, 200-i If

'89 i

k.

'90 i 0- i i i i i Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun91 Jul

-, i i ,

Aug Sept Oct

, i Nov Dec01 GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT.

The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for Janu-ary 1,1991 through June 30,1991. A total of 42.2 curies have been released to the environment during this time.

The Fort Calhoun Station cumulative annual goal for 1991 is 340 curies for this indica-tor.

The gaseous radioactive wasto being discharged to the environment is calculated overy six months.

Date Source: Franco /Kfist (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None l-48

O Monthly Radioactive Liquid Discharged Cumulative Radioactive Liquid Discharged

-O- Cumulative AnnualGoat 231 228 175 200-0-0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0-0 0 y GOOD 100- d Y 4.8"B.3"""2[ 4

, , , , 0 i i i i ; i , , i , i ,

'88 '89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec91 g40000-

.9 y 30000-7 j 20000-C o

10000-2370 29104 B00 3300 3750 3010

5 0- i O i a i

' '9i '

a 6

1 4

i i l Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec91 LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE Et4VIRONMENT The l' quid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for January 1,1991 through June 30,1991. The liquid radioactive waste that was discMrged to the environment from all sources totaled 70.3 curies during this time. The Fort Calhoun Station cumulative annual goal for 1991 is 225 curies.

The bottom graph shows the volume of liquid radioactive waste that has been released from the radioactive waste monitor tanks and steam generators. The volume of liquid ,

radioactive waste discharged to the environment from the radioactive waste monitor tanks and the steam generators totaled 19.2 million gallons from January through June 1991. The liouid radioactive waste that was released I s the environment includes liquid released from the steam generators due to the fact that radioisotopes were detect?d in the steam generator blowdown. The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to trie environment is calculated every six months.

Data Source: Franco!Krist (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 49 l l

1

. l l

loggab!c; Reportable Irwidenia (Does not incl %c 1

30 - systen,Feilurcq GOOD 25 - '

20 -

10-5- s% ,,

0- S-- ih91r , ,

~~

r- ; i i -" i m Dec00 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91

-- Sat.urrty SyWem Failures GOOD 80-

'\ %# w%

40-i 0- -

i- i i - r-* -* i .--" *--

. i ~j i i D9c90 Jan Fet' Mar Apt May Jun Jul Aug Sep 04 Nov91 OGG ABLE/REPORTA0LE iNCID ENTS (SECURITY)

The Loggable/ Reportable Incidents (Secerity) Indicator is depicted in two separme graphs. Tta first chart depicts the total number of loggualeireportable ir. cide nts con-corning Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDVs); Security Badges: Security Kay Control; and Access Corarol and Authorization which occurreo during the reportir.g month. The bottom graph shows the total number of loggab%/ reportable incidents concerning secu-rity system failuras whien occurred during thL reporting month.

During the montli of November 1L91, there were 58 loggable/ reportable incidents identi-fled. System failures accounted for 56 (97%) of the loggable/reponable incidents, and 41 (73%) of these were environmental failures. The two loggable security incidents irivolved two lost / unattended security badges. The increase in environmental failures y as primarily due to poor weather conditions (ice and snow).

Data Source: Sefick/Woerrier (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 50

- - . . ~ - - ~ - . - . , , - -

M Security Report' Log incidents August 1991 O Secunty Report' Log incidsnts September 1991 Secuoty Re;3 ort' Log incidents October 1991 16- D Security Heport' Log incidento November 1991 GOOD M" Jan'91 7 Feb'91 0 12-y Mar '91 2 Apr '91 3 1 May '91 1 l Jun'91 1 e_ Jul '91 2 Aug '91 1 Sep '91 4 l Oct '91 2 )

Nov '91 2 4- l 3

1

[2

.',i 2

1 0- +

0 0 0 0 g l'[ -

9 0 0 0 0 Oj- l0 0 LD Dadges Key Control Access Control SECURITY I44CIDEtJT BREAKDDWN This indicator now shows the number Of incidents concerning the following items for the reporting month: Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDVs), Security Badges, Access Control and Authorization, and Security Key Control.

Data Source: Sefick/Woernor (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trond: None SEP 58 1

51 i

i 50-

Environmentrl Fallu.et Q Failures

~. ,

40-GOOD 30-23 V 20- 18

't 10- g E

I o 0 0 0 0 L f! 0 0 0- , ,

, , ,.4 ,

Alarms CCTV Ccmouter S T .n Equip. Doors Card Readers SLCLAlTV SY fa IM F ALLURES This indicator shows the number of inc.d4 .its concernin0 the fol:owing itt nt, for the reporting month: Alarm System Failures, OCTV failures, S i:urity Computer Failures, Search Equipment Fallures, Ccor lardAa e Failuras and Car.' Reador Failures. Alarm systems and CCTV failures are now divided ir u two utegoriec: 9nvironmental failures and failures as defined in the performence indicator definitions.

Number of incidents: Octor er '31 November '91 System Fal!ures Env. FalhgeLf ailurca_ . Env Failures Failures Alarms 9 5 23 8 CCTV 23 0 18 1 Computer N/A i' N'A 0 Search Equipmerf N/A 0 N'A 0 Door Hara are N'A .1 N/A 0 Card Readerj N 'fL,_ , _,,,,, O N'A 0 Totals $5 18 41 15 Data Source: Sefick/Woerner (Manager /Sc ret)

Adverse Trand: None SEP 58 l !

I S2 l_. ,

. i. -

Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Pans 9% - -O- Fort Calhoun 1991 Goal 8%- GOOD 7%- y 6%-

5%-

4%- -

o O o -c 0 ^

o -o -- 0 0 -o 2%-

2%-

1%-

0% --

Dec90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS (NON. OUTAGE)

This procurement indicator displays the percentage of open, non outage maintenance items that are on hold awaiting parts, to the total amount of open, non outage mainte-nance items.

There was a total of 753 open, non outage maintenance work orders (MWOs) with 15 of these MWOs on hold awaiting parts at the end of the reporting month.

The 1991 Fort Calhoun Goal for this indicator is 3.5% of the total number of open, non-outage MWOs awaiting parts.

Data Source: Willrett/ CHAMPS (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 53

_m _ _ - . . . . ___ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ . - _ _ . _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ . _ _ .

30- j

- Spare Paris inventory Valvo ($ Milhon) 25-20-15-10- !

5-0 , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Doc 90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE -

The spare parts inventory value at the Fort Calhoun Station at the end of November was reported as $13,641,144.

Data Source: Steele/Huliska (Manager / Source) +

Adverse Trond: None

- Spare Paris issued ($ Thousands) 500-400-300-200-100-o , , , , , , , _ , , , , ,

Nov90 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 SPARE PARTS ISSUED The value of the spare parts issued during October totaled $242,735.

Data Source: Steele/ Miser (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None <

L 54 1

l l

4 inventory Accuracy

-O- Fort Calhoun Goal (93%)

100%~

oh M<> 0 -o o o 9s%-

90 %

Doc 90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 INVENTORY ACCURACY This indicator shows the accuracy of the actual paris count for the warehouse compared to the counts contained in the MMIS computer system for the reporting month. I During November 1991,675 different line items were counted in the warehouse. Of the 675 line items counted,17 items needed count adjustments. The inventory accuracy for the month of November was reported as 98% The Fort Calhoun 1991 goal for this indicator ir 98%

Data Source: Willrett/McCormick (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None

% of Pich Tichota 7%- Generated When Parts 6*,6 - are not Available, etc.

- O -- Fett Calhoun Goal O C O O- C O O u O s .,. -

0%

Doc 00 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov01 STOCKOUT R ATE This indichtor shows the percentage of the number of Pick Tickets generated when the amount of par 1s requested is equal to or less than the minimum stocking level and parts are not available.

During November, a total of 955 Pick Tickets were generated. Of the 955 Pick Tickets generated,25 Pick Tickets (2.6%) were ganerated when the amount of parts reounswd

- was equal to or less than the minimum stocking level and parts were not avaliable.

The Fort Calhoun 1991 goal for this indicator is 2%.

Data Source: Willrett/McCormick (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 55

2% ~ $

- % of Total Purchases that are Expedited

-O- Fort Calhoun 1991 Goat (0.5%)

t h

I 1%-

l C O O O O O O-- O O O 0%- , , , , , , , , , , , i Doc 90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 .

EXPEDITED PURCHASES This indicator shows the percentage of expedited purchases compared to the total -,

number of purchase orders generated during the reporting month.

During November, there was a total of 265 purchase orders generated Of the 265 purchase orders generated, none (0) were expedited purchases.

The Fort Calhoun 1991 goal for this indicator is 0.5%.

Date Source: Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source)

Positive Trend 3

56 w e-,y,,--~w-,,'we,w-...,m-,-e,w--mo.,--.~t- -'-ws_ e e e e-m, e - + - - "

- - . . . . - . - . - . - . . - _ _ - ~- - . - -. _ . - _ . - - _ _ ~ .-.

100- !

B0-00-Ao-22 20- ,,. . . ,;; ; ,, , , , , . . , 12 o- ^

i

@i ##'Y"' ' ' ' j -

i i Service invoices COE Invo6ces Miscotlaneous INVolCE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows the number of service invoices. COE invoices, and misecllaneous invoices for the month of November 1991 Date Source: Wilfrett/Fraser (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trond: None _

l Percenta00 of Material Requests for issue with i the Request Date the same as the Need Date 100%-

i 80% -

A 60% ~

40%- \

20% ~

0%

l Dec90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 MATERIAL REQUEST PLANNING l'

, This indicator shows the percentage of material requests (MRs) for issue with their

, i request date the same as thel _r need date compared to the total number of MRs for l

issue for the reporting month,-

i-During the month of November, a total of 955 MRs were received by the warehouse. Of the 955 total MRs received by the warehouse,368 MRs (38.5 % of the 955) were for ,

issue with their request date the same as their need date.

Data' Source: Willrett/McCormick (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend:- None +

57

600 -

- Total Modification Packages Open 500-425 425 E E l W'? .%i

/ 400 f

mE el j 337 I

\

Lj

' ~-

300-l Bl

! : ?

N '

- i

, '/: l l F2 .. :

, gon

'88 '89 '90 Doc 00 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS This indicator shows the total number of outstanding modifications (excludin; outstand-ing modifications which are proposed to be cancelled).

Categorv Reoorting Month Form FC-1133 Backlog /in Progress 16 Mod. Requests Being Reviewed 79 Design Engr. Backlog /In Progress 97 Construction Backlog /In Progress 47 Design Engr. Uodate Backloa/In Progress 31 Total 270

/

l At the end of November,40 additional modification requests had been issued this year l and 28 modification requests had been cancelled. The Nuclear Projects Review Com.

l mittee (NPRC) had completed 180 backlog modification request reviews this year. The Nuclear Projects Committee (NPC) had completed 148 backlog modification request reviews this year.

Data Source: Jaworskirrurner (Manager / Source)

Scofield!Lounsbery (Manager / Source)

Adverri Trend: None 58

O Temporary Modifications >1 cycle old (RFO required for Removal)

O Temporary Modifcations >6 months old (Removable on line)

-O- Fort Caihoun Goal for Temporary Modifications (0) 6-5-

4-3 3 3- r...,

2 t'O.','

' . 2 2 2 ;

g- , .,. , ,

"' yL y ' l',9,,, ,::: : . '. , , ':

W x ,

1- ??', ??:- ' '

O 7:7 '

O ' ' ' '9 ,

O

, O i

September October November TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS (EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING)

This indicator provides informtion on the ; umber of temporary modifications greater than one fuel cycle old regt ;ng a refueling outage (RFO) for removal and the number of temporary modifications removable on line that are greater than six months old. Also provided is the Fort Calhoun gc . .'or temporary modifications.

The goal for this indicator was changed in August 1991 to be more indicative of Fort Calhoun's ct;ntrol and management of temporary modifications. There are currently 2 temporary modifications that are greater than one fuel cycle old. Both of these modifica-tions are 100% ready to be removed during the 1992 refueling outage. These are: Al-198 power supply fa!Iure alarm, and pressure indication for RW/CCW HXs. In addition, at the end of November there were 3 temporary modifications installed that were greater than six months old that can be removed on line. These were: handjack close of CCW/

RW valves, which is awaiting a system engineering evaluation of EAR 91282; replace-ment of AC 191/192 valves which are awaiting installation (MWOs 91295 and 91296, scheduled for 1/6/92); and replacement of relay 91/2883A (MWR #9104362 written awaiting MWO).

At the end of November, there was a total of 22 TMs installed in the Fort Calhoun Sta-tion.15 of the 22 installed TMs require an outage for removal and 7 are removable on-line, in 1991 a total of 44 temporary modifications have been installed and all but 11 of those have been removed.

_ Data Source: JaworskiRurner(Manager / Source) l Adverse Trend: None SEP G2 & 71 59

- TotalNumber of Open EARS 200 -

150-100-50-0 Dec90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 60- @ DEN 0 3 months 9 SE 0 3 months 50- O DEN 3 6 months O se 3 6 monins 40- O DEN >6 months E SE >6 months 30- 25 20- 17 9

11 10 -

9 10- 1 '

4 E E 3 32 5 4 10 001 g_0Og m 01 # 1 1 i 6 i i Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 OUTSTANDING ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUESTS (EARS)

The top graph shows the total number of open EARS at the end of the reporting month.

The bottom graph shows the EARS by Design Engineering Nuclear or System Engi-neering responsibility and their age in months at the end of the reporting month.

There was a total of 120 open EARS at the end of November. Of the 120 total open EARS,97 were Design Engineering Nuclear's responsibility,20 were System Engineering's responsibility, and 3 were Nuclear Projects' responsibility.

Data Source: JaworskiNan Osdel(Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 l

l 60 j

ECNs Backlogged in DEN 4- ECNs Opened During the Month

-V- ECNs Completed During the Month 200-150-100-V V- Y 7 '

/ . =

.,.. ;p \y s ,w n i Q/

0 Dec00 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS This indicator shows the number of Engineering Change Notices (ECNs) awaiting completion by DEN, the number of ECNs opened during the reporting month, and the number of ECNs completed by DEN during the reporting month.

At the end of November 1991, there was a total of 172 DEN backlogged open ECNs.

There were 37 ECNs opened, and 73 ECNs completed during the month.

Although the number of open ECNs is currently high, activities are in progress to reduce the backlog of open ECNs. It is expected that the number of open ECNs will continue to decrease.

Data Source: Phelps/Pu'verenti (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 61

. . .. _ - _ _ _ _ _ . . - - - - . - _ . _ . .. -. - _ - - _ - . . - - - - . . ~ . - ._ .

Q DEN Engineering not complete O System Engineering Engineering complete. MWO not written C Maintenance MWO scheduled, but not c >mplete

. 64

~

39 41 E'

- gg "5

#'y

M ;6 A[fj; 6 6 10

{1- -- 3 g ,

5 .i ggg7; I I I o 3 months 3 6 months > 6 month 9 ECfff.AC]LLT1 CHANGES _OREN O DEN Engineering not complete System Engineering Engineering cortplete. MWO not written C Maintenance * .WO set.oduted, but work not complete 90- g 74 6~

22 30-g_ _ _I- a 3 4 ,

7 10 9 bh we 0 3 months 3 6 months > 6 months ECf tS U B SI11LLT EREELAC E M ENI.EARTS_ OPE N D DEN Engineering not cornplete O sysiem Engineering . v aixdown or confirmetion noi compieie 50- 41 40- 33 4 4 0

0 _

li i i

0 3 months 3 6 months > 6 months EPtLD_OC.UMENT_ CHANGES _QEEN ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows a breakdown of the number of Engineering Change Notices (ECNs) that are assigned to Design Engineering Nuclear (DEN), System Engineering, and Maintenance for the reporting month. The graphs provide data on ECN Facility Changes Open, ECN Substitute Replacement Parts Open, and ECN Document Changes Open.

Data Source: Phelps/Pulverenti (Manage r/ Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 62

l 5- 0 1991 RecordaMe hjury/laness Freahency Rate

~~~ " ~+-- 1990 Recordable injury /11nes: Frequency Rate 5 Year Average Recordab!e injury /l! ness Frequency Rato GOOD

~

3.09 3-2.73 2M 2.5 - 2A p,p5 I

2~ A' N A- 6

.- 4- s

'O - ,

6- -

- 6,

/

1.58 -

g ,/

1.5 - -

f% / n ,

!% y - -*'

'~

y \

/

0.5 - /

/

I i 6 i 4 i i i i i i I Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Scp Oct Nov Dec RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS CASES FREQUEt1CY RATE This indicator shows the 1991 monthly,1990 monthly, and the Fort Calhoun Sta' ion 5 year monthly average of the recordable injury / illness cases frequency rates.

A recordable injury / illness case is reported if Nuclear Opertlions Division personnel are injured on the job and require corrective medical treatment Deyond first aid. The record-able cases frequency rate is computed on a year-to-date basis.

There were four recordable injury / illness cases reported during the month of November.

There has been a total of 16 recordable injury / illness cases in 1991.

lept ReccidabitC.p3ps Year End Ralg 1988 11 2.6 1989 11 2,2 1990 1 2.1 Data Source: Sorenson/Skaggs (Manager / Source) adverse Trend: Based on the 5 year average recordable injury / illness frequency rate, an adverse trend is indicated. SEP 15,25 & 26 63

l

).

50 - -

46 e Licensee Event Reports

[") Personnel Errors Reported in LERs

~

Cumulative Licensee Event Reports

-+-- Cumulative Personnel Errors Reported in LERs

- 29 30-26

. 'i ;~

20-

'; 12

' 9 A

)' '.: 10- ,g

. . i

. /

i' ; !' , , ,f '

I _

, e i i i0 i s

i i

a n, i , ,

E i

nn i i i

1 i i

'88 '89 '90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LERS This iridicator shows the number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) with event dates duritig t'~ 9, porting month, the LERs attributed to personnel errors, and the cumulative total of bcth. The year-end totals for the three previous years are also shown.

In November 1991, there were three LERs reported. Two of these LERs were attribut-able to personnelerror, s

There have been 27 LERs reported s.) far in 1991 and 11 of these LERs have been Il attributable to personnel error.

Data Source: Short/Howman (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 15 64 1

600 - 539 558 O Actuai Division siatring O Authorl2ed Division Starfing

@0-aC 005 204 l 200 - - !

50 52 I I 0 , ; 3 Nuclear Operations Production Engineenng Nuclear Services STAFFING LEVEL The authon eu and actual staffing levels are shown for the three Nuclear Divisions.

Data Source: Sorenson/ Burke (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 24 I -C}- Nuclear Operations Division Turnover Rate

-e- Production Engineering Division Turnover Rate 10% -

-O- Nuciaar Services C vision Turnover Rate 8%-

4 g 2%- O C O -O--C O-O- -

o% .

J90 A90 S90 090 N90 D30 J91 F91 M91 As1 M91 J91 J91 A91 S91 0 91 N91 PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE The turnover rates for the three Divisions are calculated using only resignations from OPPD.

Division Turnover Rate NOD 3.1 %

PED 5.4%

NSD 2.0%

Currently, the OPPD corporate turnover rate is being reported as approximately 4.0%.

This OPPD corporate turnover rate is based on the turnover rate over the last four years.

l Data Source: Sorenson/ Burke (M' nager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 65 4

Total Requalification Training Hours

+ Simulator Training Hours 60-

[] Non RequalificationTraining Hours 50-41 36 36 30- f': 28

.r . 24

22 -

20- 18 i 18 0 : '. 37

! / ,

. 16 ,-

j' 14 * ,. - t ,-

i r22 ; :;

10- y

c' 3 p

i %,

8

.?.

8

/.

4 4 ,

' ;c Z (f /l C : 4 i '/ 0 0 If 0 hh 6! I h .

1 0 i i i i , , i Cycle 91 1- Cycle 91-2 Cycle 913 Cycle 914 Cycle 915 Cycle 91-6 Cycle 917 LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFIC ATION TRAINING This indicator, formerly titled "SRO and RO License Examination Pass Ratio", was revised in August 199110 more accurately reflect training department procedures.

-This indicator provides information on the total number of hours of training given to each crew during each cycle. The Simulator training hours shown on the graph are a subset of the totaltraining hours. Non Requalification Training Hours are used for AOP/EOP verification & validation, INPO commitments, GET, Fire Brigade, Safety Meetings, and Division Manager lunches.

Exam failures are defined as failures in the written, simulator, and Job Performance Measures (JPMs) segments of the Licensed Operator Requalification Training.

L All of the twelve candidates passed the NRC Licensed Operator Requalification exami- !

nations.

Data Source: Gasper / Herman (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 68 66 l

O

a O SRO Exams Administered 50- O SRo Exams rassed E RO Exams Administered i 40- O RO Exams Passed

~

30-e J

20- : --

4 ,-

l-10- ' - . , ,

, _I : ( j _

I" :

f , l_

i 0 , , , , , , , , , , ,

Dec90 Jan _Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS This indicator shows the number of Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) and Reactor Opera-

-tor (RO) quizzes and exams taken and passed each month. These internally adminis-tered_ quizzes'and exams are used to plot the SRO and RO candidates' monthly progress.

During the month of November 1991, there were no internally administered SRO or RO exams taken.

During the month of October 1991, seven NRC administered SRO exams were taken and all seven of these exams were passed in addition, seven NRC administered RO exams were taken in October and all seven of these exams were passed.

Data Source: Gasper / Herman (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 68 67

I i

O Hotlinesinitiated 35-

- D Hotlines Closed -!

l 30- @ Hotlines Overdue < 4 Weeks 8 Hotlines Overdue > 4 Weeks 25-20-

-l 15- -

n 10- -

1

- - _ i ; -

.; m :

~ ~

5- ! 5 I -

-1 a

! j 5 [ -

3 i - 1 - 1 y : ; : 4 .

i : l >

a : j d

4

- 2 2 - : H ,

n 2 -

": ( 2 c-E 2 0

1

~

E 2 9

O -

3 =

i 6 i i 1 -l i I I I i i Dec90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct - Nov91 HOTLINE TF1AINING MEMOS This indicator shows the number of Hotline Training Memos that were initiated, returned for close out, overdue less than four weeks, and overdue greater than four weeks for the reporting month.

October 1991 initiated Hotlines 17 Closed Hotlines 12 Hotlines Overdue < 4 wks. 8 Hotlines Overdue >- 4 wks. 4 Data Source: Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None sa

- Other Training (1000 Hrs.)

@ General Employee Training (1000 hrs.) -l

@ Technical Support (1000 Hrs.)

-l em styand Radiation Protection (1000 Hrs.)

6-O Maintenance (1000 Hrs.)

'6 g @ f Operations (1000 Hrs }

r 84-

_g , . . .

a h nu L:

g;;; E h ....

i L...

I. =g 7-e y g.

s g u a s rg

- e:

8 -

(

_ = = .. ,

8 _

N _

r - --

r 5 E -

i i i i i i i i i ; i i Nov90 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr . May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 TOTAL INSTRUCTION HOURS This indicator displays the training instruction hours administered to the listed depart-ments for the month of October 1991'.

This indicatoris normally one month behind the reponing month due to the tima re-Lquired for data collection and processing.

DEPARTMENT SEPTEMBER '91 OCTOBER '91

- Operations 558- 340 Maintenance 277 432 Chemistry and Radiation Protection -791 609-Technical Support 99 202 General Employee Training 442 _536 Other 47 _ 123 Total 2,214 2,242-i Data Source: Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None-L l '.

i 69

0 Other Training (1000 Hrs.)

@ General Employee Training (1000 hrs.)

@ Technical Support (1000 Hrs.)

O Chernistry and Radiation Protection (1000 Hrs.)

)

30- 1 O Maintenance (1000 Hrs.)

,25- 2 Operations (1000 Hrs.)

g- j I

y 20- .

E o

i r ..... -

mI E'~ ...., g -- ..

! w ..:,

$ @ M El L.. .... . .,. . ,

"~

$ 5~ 3 = @ I I!t $$ .y I

[ E E E E5 E

- - = -.

_ y i I i i I i l i l I i i Nov90 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING This indicator shows the total number of student hours for Operations, Maintenance,

- Chemistry and Radiation Protection, Technical Support, General Employee Training, and Other Training conducted for the Fort Calhoun Station.

This indicator is normally one month behind the reporting month due to the time needed

-to collect and evaluate the data.

DEPARTMENT SEPTEMBER '91 OCTOBER '91

- Operations 2,574 1,151 Maintenance 692 952 Chemistry and Radiation Protection 1,216 1,720 Technical Support 631 1,231 General Employee Training 2,764 3,069 Other 194 415 Total 8,071 8,538 Data Source: Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 70 1.

l l

l _,~

l Total 0utage MW0s

--b- MW0s Ready to Work

-O- Outage MWR Backlog 800-600-400 - -

200- g o-o 0

Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 OVERALL MWO STATUS (CYCLE 14 REFUELING OUTAGE)

This indicaar shows the total number of Maintenance Work Orders (MWOs) that have been approved for inclusion in the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage and the number of MWOs that are ready for work (parts staged, procedures approved, and paperwork ready for ~

field use). Also included is the number of outage related Maintenance Work Requests (MWRs) which have bee'1 identified for the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage, but have not yet been converted to MWOs. Any MWOs generated after the start of the outage will be reflected in a separate indicator labeled Emergent MWOs.

At the end of the reporting month, there were 999 total outage MWOs with 637 of these Ready-to- Work and a backlog of 19 MWRs.

Additional data points will be added to this indicator as information becomes available.

Data Source: Patterson/Dunham (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 71 l

TotalOutage Modifications

- Mods With Planning Docurnent Apprevd 40-

-O- Mods With Final Design Approved -

--+-- Mods With Construction Package Approved 20- ,

10-0 .

Aug90 Sep Oct: Nov Dec Jan91 Feb Ma: Apr May Jun ' Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 PROGRESS OF CYCLE 14 OUTAGE MODIFICATION PLANNING This indicator shows the status of modifications aporoved for completion during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage. Additional data points will be added to this indicator as

-information becomes available.-

Of the 34 total outage modifications, two are in the process of being canceled: MR-FC-89-060,"GE-MAC Power Supply Replacement" and MR FC-91-004,"DG Cooling Sys-tem Enhancements."

i-Data Source: Patterson/Dunham (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend:- None SEP 31 I'

l 72

50-

- Total 0utage Projects

+ Projects with Preliminary Schedules 40_ Submitted

-+- Projects with Detailed Schedules Submitted 30-20- ^

10-0 Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Ju' Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 OVERidt PROJECT STATUS (CYCLE e4 REFUELING OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the status of the projects which are in the scope of the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage.-

The project that does not yet have a detailed schedule is Secondary Side Dry Lay up.

Additional data points will be added to this indicator as information becomes available.

Data Source: Patterson/Dunham (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None:- SEP 31

(,

L i

73 l

- Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours 9- -O - Fort Calhoun Goal i

-$ GOOD

=.

S6- y 5 -h=

n o

. '3r !

E

. 2.6 p3-l l h -

F C O -

O O O O O O il~ .

i

~

i , 0 , , , , , ,. , , , , , _ ,

'88 '89 '90- Nov91Dec ; Jan Feb Mar. Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS

This indicator displays the number of NRC violations cited in inspection reports per 1000 NRC inspection hours.. This indicatoris one month behind the reporting month -

. due to the time involved with collecting and processing the data.

The violations per 1000 inspection hours indicator was reported as 1.16 for the twelve -

mon!hs from November 1,1990 through October 31,1991.

- The Fort Calhoun Goalis 1.6 violations per 1000 inspection hours for 1991.

Data Source: Short/Howman (Manager / Source)

- Adverse Trend': Based on four consecutive months of declining performance, an adverse trend is indicated.-

-74 m _ _

l 5-O Violations per 1000 Inspecti;n Hours (12 month Period)

E Violations per 100' Inspection Hours (1991 Only) g 4-S I

8 5

e 3-R 5

O o 2.22 5-a 2 1.76 1.76

~3 m 1.68 1.68 YN e 1.58 ib I'#8

.5 16 1.41 T 7 1.39 h % 1 63 5 3 1'1 1;12 1.14 0%;gq %{g

,, , !) , j

%p

> 1- ! ;1 w we 43 ,

QQ g%gg. ;y n ;; 1 e .,4 05 0.43 l 4

% W s;g Ni gp g$$g I

3g A

f j h )

0 .

i i Fort Cooper River CommancM Wolf Arkansas South Waterford Calhoun Bend Peak Creek One Texas COMPARISON OF VIOLATIONS AMONG REGION IV PLANTS This indicator provides a comparison of violations per 1000 inspection hours among Region IV nucleer power plants. The data is compiled for a twelve month period from November 1,1990 to October 30,1991 and for the calendar year 1991 only.

The Fort Calhoun goal for 1991 is 1.6 violations per 1000 inspection hours.

Data Source: Short/Howman (Man'.ger/ Source)

Adverse Trend: None 75 l

_ -- m - - -

75 -

0 Nurnber of Violations During the Last 12 Months O Number of NCVs During the Last 12 Months 50-

h 20 18 3 -

15 12 12 33 $3 7

T-o a _

9 7 7 7 7 4 tg * - -y -5

5 5 -

5 5h E!! @y! qp

- 3 - -

2 2 2 g w jll( a q 1 d

t. ,

y y y i 4 4 _l 6 6 6 6 6 i i i Nov90 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul - Aug Sep Oct91 CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND NCVs (TWELVE-MONTH RUNNING TOTAL)

The Cumulative Violations and Non-Cited _ Violations (NCVs) indicator shows the cump-lative ilumber of violations and the cumulative number of NCVs f:.r the hst twielve months.

This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved with =

1 collecting and processing the data for this indicator.

Data Source.- Short/Howman (Manager / Source)

, Adverse Trend: None i

1 76

.) .

O Outstanding CARS That Are Modification Related

-A- Outstanding CARS > Six Months Old Total Outstanding CARS 150-100 -

A 50 -

4% a O

Dec90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS This indicator shows the total number of outstanding Corrective Action Reports (CARS),

the number ci outstanding CARS that are greater than six months old, and the number of outstanding CARS that are modification related.

At the end of November 1991, there were 85 outstanding CARS,48 CARS that were greater than six months old, and 4 CARS that were modification related.

Data Source: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source)

Adve' 1 Mnd: None 77

20 -

-C}- NOD Overdue CARS

~

-h- NOD C ARs With Extensions Granted 10-A - g Dec90 Jan Feb My Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91

~

-C}- PED Overdue CARS 25 -

20 - -A- PED CARS With Extensions Granted 15-10-0 - # ' -

"- ' m C D--

Dec90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 o-5- --{"}-- Other Overdue CARS l 4-

-&- Other CARS With Extensions Granted 3-2- ,

- T"--C i u i C i Dec90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov91 OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS This indicator shows the number of overdue CARS and the number of CARS which received extensions broken down by organization.

Overdue _ CABS Overdue CARS September '91 October '91 November '91 NOD 1 0 0 PED 0 0 0 Others 0 0 0 Total 1 0 0 Extended CARS Extended CARS ~

September '91 October '91 November '91 NOD 2 3 2 PED 2 4 4

~hers t 0 2 0 Total 4 9 6 Data Source: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 78

1990 SALP Funct.

Area CARS Signif. C ARs NRC Viola LERs A) Plant Operroons 62 0 2 10 B) Radiolog 28 2 0 0 Controls C) Maint/ Surveil, 180 8 6 4 D) Emergency 7 0 3 0 Preparedness E) Security 26 u , 3 l F) Engr / Tech 172 5 3 12 Suppori G) Safety Acses ' 29 0 0 0 Oual. Verd. ,

H) Other 1 0 0 0 Total 505 15 19 .

~

1991 SALP Funct. l Area CARS Signif. C ARs NRC Viola. LERs l A) Plant Operations 29 (3 1 1 5 (2)

B) Radclog Coretols 11 (4) 0 2 0 C) Maint/ Surveil. 64 (1) 0 1 7 D) Emergency '6 0 0 3 Preparedness E) Security 5 0 1 3 F) Engr /iech Suppori 89 (13) 3 (1) 1 1011)

G) Safety Assess < 26(2) 1 1 2 Qual Vent.

H) Ginc: 0 0 0 0 l Total 240(25) 5 (1) 7 27 (3) }

Note: ( ) indicate value for the reporting month. -

CARS ISSUED vs. SIGNIFIC ANT CARS vs NRC VIOLATIONS ISSUED vs. LERs REPORTED The above matrix shows the number cf Corrective Action Reports (CARS) issued by the Nuclear Services Division (NSD) vs. the number of Significant CARS issued by NSD vs, 3 the number of violations issued by the NRC for the Fort Colhoun Stui .n in 1990 and 1991. Included in this table is the number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) identified by the Sta' ion each year. The numoer of NRC violations reported is one month behind the reporting month due to the tim & involved in collect.ag and processing the violations.

Data Source: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source)

Short/Howman (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 15,20,21 79

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - . - - - - . - - - . - - . - - - - - - I

4 PERFORMANCE !NDICATOR DEFINITIONS AdE OF OUTGTANDING MMNTENANCE WORK DH- erawr has been estabbshed based upon the 1990 indus-MRS try median value provided by INPO.

Th4 inciator 1:<ds the total numcar of ov%anding cor-rectrue non+itage Maintenance WrA Oroers at the Fo*t DECONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED Celhoun Stat.t.n versus thus age in mouths. AREA The percentage of the Radiaton Controlled Area, which 4 MOUNT OF WORK GN HOLD AWAITit4G PARTS includes the auxihary building, the radwaste bu!! ding, and This it'dcator is def.ned as tl e percentap of oper., non. areas of the C/RP building, that is decontaminated based outagh maintenance work Jr gra that arri, on hold av ait- on the total square footage. This indicator tracks perfor-ing parts, ta .he total number of open, non cutcge, main- mance for SEP # 54.

temce work orders.

DISABLING INJURY FREOUENCY RATE (LOST TIME AUXd.lARY S', STEMS CHEMISTRY HONS OUISIDE ACCIDENT RATE)

STATION LIMITS This indicator is defined as the number of acridents for The cumulative hours t5at the Co ,oonent Coobng Wcter all utikty personnel permanently assigned to the station, system is outsfe the staten chemistry hmit. The nours involving days away from work per 200,000 man-hours are eccumulated from the ' rsi sample eacnedug the hmtt worked (100 man-years). This does not include contrac-until additanal camphng snows the pirameter Y be back tor personnel. This indicator tracks personnel perior-within kmrtt. mance for SEP #25 & 26.

CAF.s ISS9ED v1. Sir;NIFICANT CARS vs. 6.RC VIO- DOCUMENT REVIEW (BIENNI AL)

LATIONS vs. LERs REPORI ED The Document Review Indicator shows the number of Pavhs a compatison of C ARs issued, NRC violatons, documents reviewed, the number of documents sched-and LERS reported. This indicater tracks perfortnance for uled for review, and the number of document reviews SEP #1b,20, & 21. that are overdue for the reporting month. A document review is considered overdue if the review is not com-CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE plete within 6 months of the assigned due date. This indi-Compares the Fort Calhoun check valve f ailure rate to cator tracks performance for SEP #46.

ine industry check valve f ailure rate (tailures per 1 mil lion componem hours). The data for the industry f ailure rate EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIABIL-is three months behind the Pi Report reporting month. i(Y This indict tot tis.eks performance for SEP #43. This indicator shows the number of failures that were reported during the last 20,50, and 100 emergency die-COMPAR13r)N OF VIOLATIONS AMONG REGION IV selgenerator demands at the Fort Calhoun Staton. Also PLANTS shown are tr gger values which correlate to a high level Provides d',ts on V olatons per 1000 inspecten hours for of confidence that a unit's dieselgenerators have ob-Regen ir nuclear power plants. tamed a rehabihty of greater than or equal to 95% when the demand f ailures are less than the trigger values.

COr. RECT 1VE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG Gf! EATER 1) Number of Start Domands: Alt vahd and inadvertent TVAN 3 MONTHS OLD start demands, including all start only demands and all Tae percentage of total outstanding corrective mainte- start demands that pro followed by load run demands, nanca items, not requiring sn outage, tnat are greater whether by automatic or manualinitiaton. A start only than three months old at the end of the period reported. der *and is a deraand in which the emergency generator is t, tarted, but no attempt is made to load the generator.

CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS & NON CITED VIOLA. 2) Number of Start Failures: Any failure within the emer-TlON3 (12 MONTH RUNNING TOTAL) gency generator system that prevents the generator from The cumulative number of violatons and Non-Cited Vo- achieving specified frequency and voltage is classified as fatons for the last 12 months. a vahd start f ailure. This includes any condition identified in the course of maintenance inspectons (with the emer-DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT gency generator in standDy mode) that definitely would This indicator shows the dady core thermal ov'put as have resulted in a start failure if a demand had occurred. 1 measured from computer point XC105 (ir thermal mega- 3) Number of Load-Run Demands: For a vahd load run watts). The 1500 MW Tech Spec limit, and the unmet demand to be counted the load-run attempt must meet portion of the 1495 MW FCS daily goa! for the reporting one or more of the following criteria:

month are also shown. A)A load run of any duration that results from a real auto-matic or manual initiaton.

DIESEL GENERATOR UNAVAILABILITY B) A load run test to satisfy the plant s load and duraton This indicator provides monthly data on the number of as stated in each test's specifications.

hours of diesel generator planned and unplanned un- C)Other special tests in which the emergency ganerator availabihty. The Fort Calhoun gxl for tne second ha!' of is expected to be operated for at least one hour while i 1991 for the number of unavailable hours per diese! gen- loaded with at least 50% of its design load.

80

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFit4tTIONS (Cont'd)

4) Number of Load Run Failures: A load run f ailure tatons, Maximum generaton is the energy that can be should be counteo for any reason in whch the emer- produced by a unit in a given perod if operated continu.

gency generator does not pick up load and run as pre- ously at maximum capacity.

dcted Failures are counted during any vahd load run demands. EXPEDITED PURCHASES 5)Excoptons: Unsuccessful attempts to start or load-run The percentage of expedited purchases which occurred F.hould not b-a counted as vahd demands or f adures when dunng the reporting month compared to the total number they can be attnbuted to any of the following: of purchase orders generated.

A)Sputous ti!Pt that was8 ' be bypassed in the event of an emergency. FORCED OUTAGE RATE B,Matfunction of equipment that is not requ: red cuKg an This indcator is as!.ned as the percentage of time that emergency. ths unit was unavailable due to forced events compared D)lntentionaltermination of a test because of abnormal to tne time pinned for electrical generaton. Forced conditions that would not have resulted in major diesel events a'e failures or other unplanned conditons that generator damage or repair. require removing the unit from service before the end of D) Malfunctions or operating errors which would have not ths next weekend. Forced events include startup failures prevented the emergency generator from being restaned and events in0ated while the unit is in reserve shutdown and brought to load within a few minutes. (i s., the unit is available but not in survice).

E)A failure to start bccause n .orton of the starting sys-tem was disab!ed for test purge, if followed by a suc. FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR cessf ul start with the starting system in its normal ahgn- This indicator is defined as the steady state primary Cool-ment. ant I 131 activity, corrected for the tramp uranium contri-Each emergency generator tailure that results in the gen- bution and normahzed to a common punhcaton erator being declared inoperable should be counted as rate, Tramp uranium is fuel which has been deposited on one demand and one failure. Exploratory tests during reactor core internais f rom previous defective f uel or is corrective maintenance and the successf ultest that fol- present on the surf ace of fuel elements from the manu.

lows repair to venf y operabihty should not be counted as f actunng process. Steady state is defined as continuous demands or f ailures when the EDG has not been da- operatons above 85 percent power for at least seven clared operable again. days. This INPO indicator uses an industry normahzed ietdown purificaton rate. The FRI has also been calcu-ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) BREAK- lated using FCS's actualletdown punicaton rate. These DOWN calculatons revealed that the use of the plant's actual This indicator breaks down the numoer of Engineenng rate would resuit in an approximate 45% mcrease in FRI Change Notices (ECNs) that are assigned to Design data.

Engineering Nuclear (DEN), System Engineenng. and The density correction f actor is the rato of the specihc Maintenance. The graphs provide data on ECN Facihty volume of coolant at the RCS operating temperature Changes open, ECN Substitute Replacement Pans (540 degrees F, Vf . 0.02146) diviced by the specific open, and ECN Document Changes open. This indicator volume of coolant at normalletdown temperature (120 tracks performance for SEP #62. degrees F at outlet of the letdown cochng heat ex-changer,Vf. 0.016204), wh:ch results in a density cor-ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) STATUS recton factor for FCS equat to 1.32. This density correc-The number of ECNs that were opened. ECNs that were ton f actor aff ects both the INPO and Plant Specibe FRis.

completed, and open backlog ECNs awaiting completon by DEN for the reporting month. This indicator tracks per- GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DIS-formance for SEP #S2. CHARCED TO THE ENVIRONMENT ,

This indcator displays the total number of Curies of all EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITI- gaseous radioactive nuchdes released f rom FCS.

CAL HOURS Equipment forced outages per 1000 critcal hours is the GROSS HEAT RATE inverse of the mean time between forced outages Gross heat rate is defined as the ratio of total thermal caused by equipment f ailures. The mean time is equal to energy in Bntish Thermal Units (BTU) produced by the the number of hours the reactor is enticalin a pered reactor to the total gross electrical energy produced by (1000 hours0.0116 days 0.278 hours 0.00165 weeks 3.805e-4 months ) divided by the number of forced outages the generator in kilowatt hours (KWH).

causec by equipment failures in that perod.

HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR The total amount (in Kilograms) of non.halogenated ha2-This indicator is dehned as the ratio of gross available ardous waste, halogenated hazardous waste, and other generation to gross maximum generaton, expressed as hazardous waste produced by FCS each month.

a percentage Available generation is the energy that can be produced if the unit is operated at the maximum power level permitted by equipment and regulatory limi-81

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (Cont'd)

HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS The number of Hotline Training Memos (H1M) that are MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS initiated, closed, and overdue less of greater than 4 The number of Nuclear Plant Rehability Data System weeks for the indcated month, A HTM is a training docu- (NPRDS) components with more than 1 failure and the ment sent out for immediate review. The HTM should be number of NPRDS components with more than 2 f ailures reviewed and signed within 5 days of receipt of the HTM during the last 12 months.

HOURS CHEMISTRY IS OUTSIDE OWNERS GROUP MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER B ACKLOG GUIDELINES The number of corrective nonmutage -1aintenance work Total houru for 13 secondary side chemistry parameters orders that remain open at the end of the reporting exceeding guidelines during power operaton Power month. This indcator was added to the Pl Report to operation is defined as greater than 30% power. The 13 trend open corrective non outage maintenance work or-parameters tracked are steam generator pH. caton con- ders as stated in SEP #36.

ductivity, boron silea, chloride, sulf ate, sodium, f eed wa-ter pH, dissolved crygen, hydrazine, iron, copper, and MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN condensate pump dischargo d ssolved oxygen. This indcator is a breakdown of corrective non outage maintenance work orders by severai categones that re-IN LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT OF SER- main open at the und of the reporting month. This indca-VICE tor tracks maintenance perioimsoce for SEP K36, Total number of in line chemis'ry instruments that are out of service in the Secondary System and the Post MAINTENANCE OVERTIME Accident Samping System (PASS). The *4 of ovemme hours compared to normal hours for maintenance. This includes OPPD personnel as well as INVENTORY ACCURACY contract personnel.

The cercentage of line items that are munted each month by the warenouse whici need count adjustments. MATERIAL REQUEST PLANNING The perceit of material requests (MRs) for issues with INVOICE BREAKDOWN their request date the same as their need date mmpared The number of invoices that are on totd due to shetf lif e, to the total number of MRs.

COE, and miscellaneous reasons.

MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIA*ilON EXPOSURE LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS The total maximum amount of radiaton race ved by an This indicator shows the number of SRO and'or RO quiz- individual person wormg at FCS on a monthly. quarterly, zes and exams that are administered and passed each and annual basis, mor.th. This indicator tracks training performance for SEP #68. MWO OVER ALL STATUS (CYCLE 13 REFUELING OUTAGE)

LICENSED OPERATOR REQUALIFICATION TRAIN- The total number of Maintenance Work Orders (MWOs)

ING that have been wntien for completon during the Cycle 14 The total number of hours of training given to each crew Refueling Outage. MWOs whch are wntten after the start dunng each cycle. Also provided are the simulator train- of the Refueling Outage will be labeled Emergent MWOs.

ing hours (which are a subset of the total trainir g hours), Also shown is the number of MWRs which have been the number of non-requal:1 cat,on training hours and the identified for the Cycle 14 R fueling Outage, but have number of exam f ailure< . This indicator tracks training not yet been converted to MWOs. This ind4cator tracks performance for SEP #68. periormance for SEP #31.

LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS TO THE ENVIRONMENT The number of radiologca! hot spots which have been This indnator displays the volume of liquid rao cactive identified and documented to exist at FCS at the end of waste relea:ed from the radioactive waste monitor tanks, the it OMing month. A hot spot is a smalllocalized to include releases through the plant blowdown if radio- source v radiation. A hot spot occurs when the contact active nuclides are detected in the blowdown system, dose rate of an rtem is at least 5 times the General Area The curies from all releases from FCS to the Missouri dose rate and the item's dose rate is equal to or greater River are a!so shown. than 100 mrem / hour.

LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY)

The total number of secunty incidents ur the reporting month depicted in two graphs. This indicator tracks secu-nty performance for SEP#58.

82

I l PERFORMAt1CE It4DICATOR DEFit4lTIOt1S (Cont'd)

NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEM (NPRDS) FAILURE REPOR1S SUBMITTED OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS The data plotted is the tota 1 number of NPRDS compo- The number ci Modifcation Requests (MRs)in any stale nent f ailures (confirmed and possible) and the number of between the issuance of a Maddicaton Number and the confirmed NPRDS component f ailures. The total number completion of the drawing update.

of NPRDS component f ailures are based on the number 1) Form FC-1133 Backlog /In Progress. This number rep-of failure reports that have been sent to the institute of resents moddcaton requests that have no' been p! ant Nuclear Power Operations (INPO), Confirmed NPRDS approved dunng the reporting month.

component failures are based upon f ailure reports that 2)Modifcation Requests Being Reviewed. This category hdve been accepted by INPO. Possible NPRDS compc- includes:

nont f ailures are based upon f ailure reports that are still A )Moddcaton Requests that are not yet reviewed.

under review by INPO. NPRDS is a utility industry users B.)Modif caton Requests being reviewed by the Nuclear group program which has been outlined by INPO and Projects Review Committee (NPRC) implemented at FCS- C.)Modif cation Requests being reviewed by the Nuclear Projects Commrttee (NPC)

NUMBER OF OUT-OF SERVICE CONTROL ROOM These Maddicaton Requests may be reviewed several INSTRUMENTS times before they are approved for accomplishment or A control room instrument that cannot perform its design cancelled. Some of these Moddication Requests are re-function is considered as out of service. A control room turned to Engineenng for more informaton, some ap-instrument which has had a Maintenance Work Order proved for evaluaton, some approved for study, and (MWO) wntten for it and has not been repaired by the some approved for planning. Once planning is completed end of the reporting period is considered out of service and the scope of the work is clearly defined, those Mode and will be counted. The duration of the out of-service tcaton Requests may be approved for accomplishment condition is not considered. Computer CRTs are not con- with a year assigned for construction or they may be can-sidered as control room instruments. celled. Allof these different phases require review,

3) Design Engineenng Backlog'In Progress Nuclear NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN Planning has assigned a year in which construction will LERS be completed and design work may be in progress.

The number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) attributed 4) Construction Backlog'In Progress. The Construction to personnel error on the original LER submittal This Package has been issued or construction has begun but indcator trends personnel performance for SEP #15. the moddoaton has not been accepted by the System Acceptence Committee (SAC).

NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RE- 5) Design Engineering Update Backlog'In Progress. PED SULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS has received the Moddceton Completon Report but the The number of Seveillance Tests (STs) that result in drawings have act been updated.

Lcensee Event Reports (LERs) during the reportin9 The above mentoned outstanding modificatons do not month. This indicator tracks missed STs for SEP #60 & include modif catons which are proposed for cancella-01- ton.

OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET OVERALL PROOCT STATUS (CYCLE 14 The year to- date budget compared to the actual expen- REFUELING OUTAGE) ditures for Operations and Maintenance departments. The number of projects which affect the scope of tne Cycle 14 Refueling Outage and the number of projects OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS for which detailed schedules have been submitted. Th!s This indicator displays the total number of outstandin9 indcator tracks performance for SEP #31.

Corrective Action Reports (C ARs), the number of CARS that are older than six months and the number of modif'- OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION cadon related CARS. REPORTS The number of overdue Corrective Action Reports OUTSTANDING ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE RE- (CARS) and the number of CARS vihch received exten-QUESTS (EARS) sons broken down by organizaton for the last 6 months.

The total number of open EARS and the number of open EARS broken down by thdr age in months. This indicator tracks performance for SEP #62.

I 83

s PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (cont'd)

PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTE- RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRAC1lCES PROGRAM '

NANCE ACilVITIES The number of identified poor radiological work practees The % of the number of completed maintenance activi- (PRWP) for the reporting month. This indicator tracks ties as compared to the number of scheduled mainte- radiological work performance for SEP #52.

nance activities each week. This % is shown for each .

maintenance craft. Maintenance activities include MWRs. RATIO OF PREVEN 11VE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE IJWOs, STs, PMOs, calibratons, and other miscella- The ratio of preventive maintenance (including surveil-neous activities These indcators track Maintenance per- lance testing and cali braton procedures) to the sum et '

formance for SEP #33. r;or -outage corrective maintenance and preventive main-tenance completed over the toporting period. The ratio, PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULA. expressed as a percentage,is calculated based on man-TIVE) hours. This indicator traLks prever6 ye maintenance ac-Collective radiation exposure is the total external whole- tivities for SEP #41.

body dose received by all on site personnel (including

~

contractors and visitors) during a time period, as mea- RECORDABLE INJURY CASES FREQUENCY RATE sured by the thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD). Col- (RECORDABLE INJURY RATE) lective radiaton exposure is reported in units of man. The number of injuries requiring more than normal f rst rem. This indcator tracks radologeal work performance aid per 200,000 man hours worked. This indcator trends for SEP #54 personnel performance for SEP #15,25 & 26 PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE The ratio of the number of turnovers to average employ- INDEX ment. A turnover is a vacancy created by voluntary rosig. The Chemistry Performame Index (CPI)is a calculation naton from the company. Retirement, death,terminaton, based on the concentration of key impurities in the se.:-

transfers within the company, and part time employees ondary side of the plant. These key impurities are the are not considered in turnover, most likely cause of deterioration of the steam genera-tors. The chemistry parameters are reported only for the

, PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE penod of time greater than 30 percent power.

This indicator is defined as the % of preventive mainte- The CPI is calculated tising the following equaton: cpl .

nance items in the month that were not completed by the (Ka'O.8) + (Na20) + (0,/10)) / 3 where the following are scheduled date plus a grace penod equal to 25 % of the monthly averages of: Ka = average blowdown cation scheduled interval This indicatof tracks preventive main- conductivity, Na . average blowdown sodium concen-tenance activities for SEP #41, traten, O, = average condensate pump discharge dis-solved oxygen concentraton.

PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY 'A OF HOURS OUT OF UMIT SECURITY INCIDENTS BREAKDOWN The % of hours out of limit are for six pnmary chemistry The number of Secunty loggable' reportable incidents is parameters divided by the total number of hours possible - broken down into the followmg categories:

for the month. The key parameters used are: Lithium, 1) Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDVs) Incidents re-Chloride. Hydrogen Dissolved Oxygen, Fluoride, and lated tc the use of LDVs e g., keys left in the vehicle, Suspended Solids. EPRilimits are used. loss or keys, or f ailure to return keys.

2) Security Badges . Incidents associated w^ improper PROCEDUR AL NONCOMPLI ANCE INCIDENTS use and handling of secunty badges. Incdents include (MAIMTENANCE) security badges that are lost, taken out of the protected -

The number of identified incidents concerning mainte- area, out of control on site, or inadvertently destroyed or nance procedural problems, the number of closed irs broken.

- related to the use of procedures (includes the number of 3) Access Control and Authorization Admmistrative and closed irs caused by procedural noncompliance), and procedural errors associated with the use of the card-

- the number of closed procedural noncompliance IRS. access system such as tailgating, incorrect security This indicator trends personnel performance for SEP badge issued, and improper escort procedures. This also

15,41 & 44. includes incidents that were caused by incorrect access authorization information entered into the secunty sys-PROGRESS OF CYCLE 14 OUTAGE MODIFICATION tem computer.

, PLANNING 4) Secunty Key Control < incidents involving Secunty key The number of modifcations approved for planning (to control, e.g4 lest Secunty keys. Secunty keys removed determme fenibility) for completion during the Cycle 14 from site, or f ailure to return Secunty keys. This type of Refueling Outage. This indicator tracks performance for event does not reflect incidents concerning LDV keys.

SEP #31. This indcator tra:.ks secunty periormance for SEP #58.

84

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (cont'd)

SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS Incidents involving alarm system f ailures, CCTV f ailures, The number of temporary mechanical and electrical con-security computer f ailures, search equipment f ailures, figurations to the plant's systems-door hardware failures, and card reader f ailures These 1) Temporary configuratons are dehned as electrical

. system f ailures are further categorized as folcws: Jumpers, electrcal blocAs, mechancat jumpers, or me.

1) Alarm System Failure Detection system events in- chanical blocks whch are installed in the plant opotating volving f alse! nuisance alarms and mechanical fattures. systems and are not shown on the latest rurson of the

2) Alarm System Environmental Failures Degradations P&lD, schematc, connection, wiring, or flow o,i,3r% ,

to detecton system performance as a result of environ. 2) Jumpers and blocks which are installed tw Surveil.

mental conditons b e., rain, snow, frost). Iance Tests, Maintenance Procedures. Cabbration Pro-3)CCTV Failures Mechancat failures to all CCTV hard- cedJtes, Special Procedures, or Operating Procecures ware components. are not consideted as tempotary modecatons un\en the 4)CCTV Environmental Failures - Degradatens to CCTV iumper or bbck remains in place atter the test or proce.

performance as a result of onvironmental conditons (i e, dure is complete. Jumpers and blocks installed in test or rain, snow, f rost, fog, sunspots, shade). lab instruments are not considered as temporary modifi-

5) Securrty Computer Failures Failure of the multi- catons.

plexer, central processing unit, and other computer hard- 3) Scaffolding is not considered a temporary mod ficaton.

ware and software. This category does not include soft. JJmpers and blocks which are installed and for which ware problems caused by operator error in using the MRS have been submitted will be considered as tempo-software, rary modificatons until final resoluton of the MR and the

6) Search Equipment Failures - Failures of x ray, metal, jumper or block is removed or is permanently recorded or explosive detectors and other equipment used to on the drawings. This and cator tracks temporary modife-search for contraband This also includes incidents catons for SEP 862 & 71.

where the search equipment is found defective or did not functon property during testing. TOTAL INSTRUCTION HOURS

7) Door Hardware Failures - Failure of the door alarm The total number and department breakdown ci training and door hardware such as latches, e!ectre strikes, instructrJn hours administered by the Training Center.

. doorknobs, locks, etc.

8) Card Reader Failures Incidents caused by mechani. TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING cal breakdown of card readers, but not improper use of The total number of student hours of training for Opera-the card readers. (See Access Control and bons, Maintenance, Chemistry >Radiaton Protecten, Authorizaton). This indicator tracks security performance Technical Support, General Employee Tra:ning, and for SEP #58, Other Training conducted for FCS.

SPARE PARTS ISSUED TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS The dol!ac value of the spare paits issued for FCS during Reportable skin and clothing contaminations above the reporting period. background levels greater than 5000 dptn!100 cm squared. This indicator trends personnel performance for STAFFING LEVEL SEP #15 & 54.

The actual staffing level and the authorized staffing level for the Nuclear Operatons Division, the Production Engi-neering Division, and the Nuclear Services Divison. This indicator tracks performance for SEP #24.

STATION NET GENERATION The net generation (sum) produced by the FCS during the reporting month.

STOCKOUT RATE The total number of Pick Tickets that were generated during the reporting month and the total number of Pck Tickets that were generated during the reporting month when the amount of parts requested is equal to or less than the minimum stocking level and parts are not avail-able.

85 1

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (Cont'd)

UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR The ratio of the available energy generation over a g:sen time period to the reference energy generaton over the same time period, expressed as a percentage.

~ UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL ,

This indicator is defined as the number of unplanned automatic scrams (reactor protection system logic actuatons) >

that occur while the reactor is critical The indcator is further defined as follows:

1) Unplanned means taat the scram was not pan of a planned ter,t or evolution.

2) Scram means the automate shutdown of the reactor by a rapid insertion of all control rods that is caused by actua-tion of the reactor protection system. The scram sgnal may have resu!!ed f rom exceeding a setpoint or may have been spurious,

3) Automatic means that the initial sgnal that caused actuaton of the reactor protection system logic was provided from one of the sensors monit; ng plant parameters and conditons, rather than the manual scram switches (or

- pushbuttons) in the main control room.

4) Critical means that during the steady state condition of the reactor prior to the scram, the effective multiplcation factor (k,) was equal to one.

UNPLANNED SAFETY SWTEM ACTUATIONS.(INPO DEFINITION)

This indicator is defined as the sum of the following safety system actuations:

1)The number of unp%nned Emergency Core Cooling Svstem (ECCS) actuations that result from reaching an ECCS actuation setpoint or from a spurious / inadvertent ECCS signal 2)The number of unplanned emergency AC power system actuatons that result from a loss of power to a safeg Ads i bus. An unplanned safety system actuation occurs when an actuaton setpoint for a safety system is reached or when a spurious or inadvertent signal is generated (ECCS only), and mapr equipment in the system is actuated.

Unplanned means that the system actuation was not part of a planned test or evolutio' The ECCS actuatons to be counted are actuations of the high pressure injection system, the low pressure injectoi, system, or the safety injection tanks.

UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS (NRC DEFINITION)

The number of safety system actuations which include (gn!g) the Hgh Pressure Safety injecton System, the Low -

, Pressure Safety injection System, the Safety injection Tanks, and the Emergency Diesel Generators. The NRC clas-sification of safety system actuatons includes actuations when major equipment is operated gng when the logic sys-tems for the above safety systems are challenged, VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS -

This indicator is defined as the number of violations sitec in NRC inspection reports for FCS per 1000 NRC inspection hours, The violations are reported it, the year that the inspection was actually performed and not based on when the inspection report is received. The hours reporteo for each inspecton report are used as the inspecton hours.

VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE This indicator is defined as the volume of low-level solid radioactive waste actually shipped for burial. This indcator also shows the volume of low-level radcactive waste which is in temporary storage, the amount of redcactive oil that -

has been shipped off-site for processing, and the volume of sohd dry radioactive waste which has been shipped of1_.

j aite for processing. Low level solid radcactive waste consists of dry active waste, sludges, resins, and evaporator L

. e 4ttoms generated as a result of nuclear power plant operation and maintenance. Dry radioactive waste includes -

l contaminated rags, cleaning materials, disposable protective clothing, plastic containers, and any other material to be disposed of at a low level radioactive waste disposal site, except resin, sludge, or evaporator bottoms. Low level re-

' fers to all radioactive waste that is not spent fuel or a by product of spent f uel processing This indicator tracks radio.

- logical work performance for SEP #54.

86

SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX The purpose of the Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Performance Indicators Index is to list perior-mance indicators related to SEP ltems with parameters that can be trended.

SEP Reference Number 15 Eng increase HPES and IR Accountabihty Through Use of Performance Indicators Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance) . . 27 Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations . , , .44 Recordable injury Cases Frequency Rate , , , . . 63 Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LERs . . 64 CARS issued vs Significant CARS issued vs NRC Violations issued vs LERs Reported . . 79 SEP Reference Number 20 Quality Audits and Surveillance Programs are Evaluated, improved in Depth and Strengthened CARS issued vs Significant CARS issued vs NRC Violations issued vs LERs Reported . . 79 SEP Reference Number 21 Develop and Conduct Safety System FunctionalInspections CARS issued vs Significant CARS issued vs NRC Violations issued vs LERs Reported .

SEP Reference Number 24 Complete Statt Studies Staffing Level . 65 SEP Reference Number 25 Training Program for Managers and Supervisors implemented Disabling Injury / Illness Frequency Rate . .12 Recordable Injury / Illness Cases Frequency Rate . . 63 SEP Reference Number 26 Evaluate and implement Station Standards for Safe Work Practice Requirements Disabling injury / Illness Frequency Rate . .12 Recordable injuryllliness Cases Frequency Rate . . 63 SEP Reference Number 31 Develop Outage and Maintenance Planning Manual and Conduct Project Management Training MWO Overall Status (Cycle 14 Refueling Outage) , , . 71 Progress of Cycle 14 Outage Modification Planning . , . 72 Overall Project Status (Cycle 14 Refueling Outage) . . 73 SEP Reference Number 33 Develop On-Line Maintenance and Modification Schedule Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities (Electrical Maintenance). .29 (Pressure Equipment) . . 30 (General Maintenance). . . 31 (Mechanical Maintenance) . .32 (Instrumentation & Control) . . 33 SEP Reference Number 36 Reduce Corrective Non-Outage Backlog Maintenance Work Order (MWO) Breakdown (Corrective Non-Outage Maintenance). . 21 Maintenance Work Order (MWO) Backlog (Corrective Non Outage Maintenance) . .28 SEP Neference Number 41 Develop and implement a Preventive Maintenance Schedule Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance . . 23 87

h-O Pieventive Maintenance items Overdue . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . 24 -

Procedural Noncompliance incidents.. .. . .. ... .. . . . . . . . . . . . ., . . , , . ... 27 SEP Reference Number 43' Implement the Check Valve Test Program Check Valve Failure Rate.. . .. .... . ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . , , , . . .. . 37 SEP Reference Number 44 -

Compliance With and Use of Procedures Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance) . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 2 7 SEP Reference Number 46 Design a Procedures Controland Administrative Program

- Document Review .. ... . -. .. . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... :.16 SEP Reference Number 52 Establish Supervisory Accountability for Workers Radiological Practices Radiological Work Practices Program. .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....46 SEP Reference Number 54

- Complete implernentation of Radiological Enhancement Program Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative) ... . ., , . . . . . . .. . .10

-Volume of Low-Level Solid Radioactive Waste... ., . , ,. . . . . . . . 11

- Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations . .. . . .. . ... .. . . . . ... ... .... . 44 -

Decontaminated Radiation Controlled Area , ., , . . . . . , . . . . .......45 SEP Reference Nuniber 58.

Revise Physical Secunty Training and Procedure Program Leggable/ Reportable incidents (Security) .. . .... .. ... . . . . . , , , , ., ,.50 i Security incident Breakdown,, ... . .... . ,, ., ,. . . . . . . . . . . . .,51 ,

Security System Failures .. ., . . . , . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..........52 SEP Reference Number 60 Improve Controls Over Surveillance Test Program Number of Missed Surveillance " w Resulting in Licensee Event Reports,. ,, . . . . . , .. 34 SEP Reference Number 61 Modify Computer Program to Correct:y Schedule Surveillance Tests

. Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resutting in Licensee Event Reports. . . , . ... . . 34 --

SEP Reference Numbetg2 Establish Interim System Engineeis Temporary Modifications .... . .... . ... . ..., , , , , .. . . . . . ............,........59-

, Outstanding Engineering Assistance Requests (EARS) .... ... .. ...... . . . ......... . 60 -

= Engineering Change Notice Status . ... .. . . . . . . . . . . . , , , , .. . . . . . . . . , . . 61 - ;

Engineering Change Notice Breakdown -. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... ,,. . . .. . . . . 62 --

SEP Reference Number 68 Assess Root Cause of Poor Operator Training and Establish Means to Monitor Operator Training Licensed Operator Requalification Training . . . .

. . . . . .. . . . . . ., .66 License Candidate Exams. . . . . . . .. . . 67 -

SEP Reference NumberH

. Improve Controls over Temporary Modifications L Temporary Modifications . . .. .. . . . 59 l

88

REPORT DISTRIBUTION LIST

'i. H. Guy W.J.Ponec

- R. L. Andrews R. M. Hawkins T. M. Reisdorff G. L. Anglehart M. C. Hendrickson A. W. Richard W. R. Bateman R. R. Henning D. G. Ried ~

K. L. Belek K. R. Henry G. K. Samide A. D. Bilau J. B. Herman T.J.Sandene B. H. Blome G. J. Hill B. A Schmidt C. N. Bloyd K. C. Holthaus S. T. Schmitz J P.Bobba M. A Howman F. C. Scofield C. E. Boughter L. G, Huliska L. G. Sealock M. A. Breuer C.J. Husk H.J W 'tk C. J. Brunner1 R. L. Jaworski D. K. t ..itel M. W. Butt R.A.Johansen J. W. Shannon C. A. Carlson W. C. Jones R. W. Short J, W. Chase J. D. Kecy C. F. Simmons G. R. Chatfield J, D. Keppler E.L.Skaggs A. G. Christensen D. D. Kloock J. L. Skiles A. J. Clark J. C. Knight F. K. Smith O. J. Clayton D. M. Kobunski R. L. Sorenson R. P. Clemens G. J. Krause J. A. Spilker J. L. Connolley L. J. Kripal K. E. Steele G. M. Cook J. G. Krist W. Steele M. R. Core J. B. Kuhr H. F. Sterba S. R. Criter L. T. Kusek G. A. Teeple D. W. Dale L.E. Labs M. A. Tesar R. C. DeMeulmeester M. P. Lazar T. G. Therkildsen R. D. DeYoung R. C. Learch J. W. Tills D. C. Dietz S.E. Lee D. R. Trausch J. A. Drahota R. E. Lewis P. R. Turner T. R. Dukarski R. C. Liebentritt J. M. Uhland P D. Dunham C. J. Linden C.F.Vanecek R. G. Eurich B. R. Livingston J. M. Waszak H. J. Faulhaber J. H. MacKinnon M. A. Ferdig G. D. Mamoran V. H. Frahm J. W. Marcil F. F. Franco N. L. Martice M. T. Frans - D. J. Matthews H. K. Fraser J. M. Mattice J. F. W. Friedrichsen T. J. Mcivor S. K. Gambhir K. S. McCormick J. K. Gasper R. F. Mehaffey W. G. Gates K. J. Morris M. O. Gautier D. C. Mueller S. W. Gebers R. J. Mueller J. M. Glantz J.B.Newhouse J. T. Gleason M. W. Nichols L. V. Goldberg C. W. Norris D. J. Golder J. T. O'Connor D. C. Gorence W. W. Orr R. E. Gray L. L. Parent M. J. Guinn T. L. Patterson E. R. Gundal R. L. Phelps l

89

r o

POSITIVE TREND REPORT INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT ATTENTION REPORT The Positive Trend Report hshlights several Perfor-mance ind% ors with data representing continued per. This section lists the ;ndcators whch show inadequacies formance -bove the sta.sd goal and indcators with data as compared to the OPPD goal and indcators whch represent 4 g significant ir provement in recent fr.onths. show inadequaciee as compared to the industry upper quartile. The indcators will be compared to the industry The following indicators have been selected as exhibiting upper quarti le as relevant to that indcator, positive trends:

Number of Out-of-Service Control Poom inttrurnents 47 PO h s nd r,ator has shown improved performance for the ex eeds the Fort Calhoun goal oi 40.

month of October and in November the number of out of-service control room instruments (14) is below the Fort Stsout Rate Calhoun goal.

(Page 55)

The percentage of pick tickets generated when the Excedited Purchases amount of parts requested is equal 10 or less than the minimum stocking level and parts are not available is hs tot has shown a rate of zero percent expe-dited purchases for three consecutive months.

" " "9" *'

Temocraw Mod 6 cations (Page 59)

ADVERSE TREND REPORT The age of temporary modifications for the reporting month exceeds the Fort Calhoun Goals.

A Performance Indicator which has data representing three (3) consecutive months of declining perfornance End of Management Attention Report, constitutes an adverse trend. The Adverse Trend Report

~

explains the conditons under nhich certain .ndcators are showing adverse trends. An r xplanation will be provided for indicators with data representing three months of to.

clining performance that have been labeled as adverse trends. PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT The following indicators are exhibiting adverse trends for IMPROVEMENTS / CHANGES the reporting monthr G oss HaaLBatt Mai,n,tgnance Work Order Breakdown (Corrective Non- (Page 6)

Outage) A note has been added to indicate accountabihty.

-(Page 21)

The number of Open High Prionty MWOs has increased Una Canability Factor for three consecutive months. (Page 8)

This INPO international Indicator has been added to the Recordable Wurv/Mness Cases Frecuency Rate report.

(Page 63)

.This indicator has been defined by the Manager of the Diesef Generator Unavailabibtv Safety Department as exhibiting an adverse trend based (Page 19) on the 5 year frequency rate. Estimated hours of diesel unavailability due to start and Vstatens oer 1000 lasoection Hours

_ (Page 74) Outace Ref au indicators This indicator has shown an increase for four consecu* (Pages 71,72 & 73) tive months. The text for these indicators has been revised.

Pos6ve Trend Reoort End of Adverse Trend Report. (Page 90)

This section has been added to the report % a met ns of emphasizing improved performance and conMuc ex-cellence in performance.

End of Indcator Improvement / Changes Report.

90

FORT CALHOUN STATION OPERATING CYCLES AND REFUELING OUTAGE DATES Event Dats Range Pioduction (MWH) Cumulative (MWH)

Cycle 1 09/26/73 02/01/75 3,299,639 3.299,639 1st Refueling 02/01/75 - 05/09/75

Cycle 2 05/09/75-10/01/76 3,853,322 7,152,961 2nd Refueling 10/01/76-12/13/76 '

Cycle 3 12/13/76 03/30/77 2,805,927 9,958,888 3rd Refueling 09/30/77 12/09/77 *

Cycle 4 12/09/77 10/14/78 3,026,832 12,985,720 4th Refueling 10/14/78-12/24/78 *

Cycle 5 12/24/78 01/18/80 3,882,734 16,868,454 5th Refueling 01/18/80- 06/11/03 *

Cycle 6 06/11/80 - 09/18181 3,899,714 20,768,168 6th Refueling 09/18/81 -12/21/81

Cycle 7 12/21/81 -12/06/82 3,561,866 24,330,034 7th Refueling 12/06/82 04/07/83 *

Cycle 8 04/07/83 - 03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736,405 8th Refueling 03/03/84 07/12/84 *

Cycle 9 07/12/84 - 09/28/85 4,741,488 32,477,893 9th Refueling 09/28/85 01/16/86 *

Cycle 10 01/16/86 - 03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 10th Refueling 03/07/87 - 06/08/87

Cycle 11 06/08/87 09/27/88 4,936,859 41,771,505 11th F- eling 09/27/88 01/31/89

Cycle 12 01/31/89 02/17/90 3,817,954 45,589.459 12th Refueling 02/17/90- 05/29/90

Cycle 13# 05/29/90- 02/01/92 # Planned Dates 13th Refueling

02/01/92 05/01/92

Cycle 14# 05/01/92 09/18/93

14th Refueling 09/18/93-11/13/93

Cycle 15# 11/13/93 '03/11/95 15th Refueling # 03/11/95- 05/06/95

FORT CALHOUN STATION CURnENT PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS

RECORDS

First Sustained Reaction August 5,1973 (5:47 p.m.)

First Electricity Supplied to the System August 25,1973 Commercial Operation (180,000 KWH) September 26,1973 Achieved Full Power (100%) May 4,1974 Longest Run (477 days) June 8,1987-Sept. 27,1988 Highest Monthly Net Generation (364,468,800 KWH) October 1987 Most Productive Fuel Cyc!e (4,936.859 MWH)(Cycle 11) June 8,1987 Sept. 27,1988

_ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _

ML20086P480

Text

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search