ML20086H362
| ML20086H362 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem, Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 11/26/1991 |
| From: | Albert R, Keimig R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20086H366 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-272-91-29, 50-311-91-29, 50-354-91-22, NUDOCS 9112090093 | |
| Download: ML20086H362 (7) | |
See also: IR 05000272/1991029
Text
.
.SnriCUARDS Itir0RMAT!0ft
DE JMIflATION MADE BY
bdk
_ S . @p
b1 Sr
Signature-I 1(L le-Of f ice-llatt!
-
,
'
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COhihilSSION
REGION I
50-272/91 29
50 311/91 29
Report Nos.
50-354/91-?2
50 ?l2
'
50 311
Docket Nos.10-354
.
DPR 70
License Nos.
Licensce:
htblic Service filectric and Gas Commtly
Facility Name:
Salc.m and Ilope Crcck Generating Stations
inspection At:
Ilttococh Bridge. New Jersey
inspection Conducted:
November 4 8.1991
/2/
//-R,-f/
Inspector:
Mrd
-
R.' J. Albe physical Security inspector
date
Ak
//!:4/9/
Approved By:
_ /#
>>
- ate
1. R. Keimig,'dhief. Safeguards Section
d
Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards
Inspection Summary: Unannounced Physical Security inspection (Combined inHEuca
Report 50-272/9129. 50-311/91-29. and 50-354/9122)
Areas insoccted: Licensee action on previously identified items and follow-up on actions
taken in response to the Regulatory Effectiveness Review (RER) conducted on April 10-14,
1989; management support, security programs plans and audits; protected and vital barriers;
assessment aids; protected and vital area access control of personnel, packages, and vehicles;
alarm stations and communications; testing, maintenance and compensatory measures; and
security training and qualifications.
Reinlin The licensee was in compliance with NRC requirements in the areas inspected.
9112090073 911126
ADOCK OD000272
O
-.
. .
--
. . -
.
- - -
.-
-
.
. _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _
~ . - . _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _
.
i
.
t
DETAILS
1.0
Key PersonncLCenlacled
Licensec_aud contracter
- D. Cole, Medical Services Supervisor
- R. Fisher, Site Protection Screening and Iladging Supertisor
.'
- J. Fleming, Senior Staff Engineer (Audits)
J. Iloffman, Security Supervisor
- W. IIolmes, Operations Manager, Wackenhut Corporation
- M. Ivanick, Senior Security Regulatory Coordinator
- J. Johnson, Security Supervisor
- j. leeb Security Support Assistant
- R. Mack, Medical Director (Medical Review Officer)
- R. Mathews, Program Manager, Wackenhut Corporation
- R. McCarthy, Psychological Services Administrator
- P. Moeller, Manager, Site Protection
1
- M. Pastva, Nuclear Licensing
- J. Raincar, Assistant Medical Director
- D. Renwick, Nuclear Security Manager
- M. Samuels, Fitncss for Duty Administrator
- C. Weiser, Senior Staff Engineer
U. S. Nucleat_Ecgulatory Commission
- S. Pindale, Resident inspector
- indicates those present at the exit interview.
2.0
Licensee Action on Preylously Idtntified Items
2.1
Ehy11 cal Security: The inspector reviewed the licensee's actions on the
following previously identified items:
2.1.1 (Closed) IFI 50-272/89 22-01,50 311/89-24 01, and 50 354/8919 01:
Several denciencies were identified with the intrusion detection system
(IDS) covering the protected area (PA) barrier. The deficiencies were
attributed to an aging system and the fact that only 25 percent of the
1DS were being tested per quarter. During this inspection, the
inspector reviewed the licensee's corrective actions, which included 100
_ percent testing of the IDS cach quarter, and found them satisfactory.
This item is closed.
2.1.2 (Closed) VIO 50-272/89-22-03,50 311/89-24-03, and 50 354/8919-03:
Several deficiencies were identi0ed in the area of security training and
.
-..
. - . . - . -
..
-.-
- - - -
~
.
--
. - ,
--
- - . .
_ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _
_
. _
S
'
3
qualification. During this inspection, the inspector reviewed this area
and, except for one minor oversight which is discussed later in this
report, found the corrective actions satisfactory. This item is closed.
2.2
fitness for-Duty (FFD): The inspector reviewed the licensee's actions on the
following previously identified items:
2.2.1 (Closed) UNR 50 272/9010-01,50-311/9010-01, and 50 354/90-07-
01: The licensee had not established a time limit between when an
individual was notified for FFD testing and when the individual was
required to report to the testing facility. During this inspection, the
i
inspector reviewed this aspect of the FFD program and determined that
f
the licensee had incorporated a 2 hout time limit in its procedure, with
'
situational discretion, between notification and testing. The corrective
action is satisfactory. This item is closed.
2.2.2 (Closed) UNR 50-272/90-10-02,50-311/9010-02, and 50 354/90-07-
02: The lleensee had not established a policy for testing personnel with
,
infrequent unescorted station access. During this inspection, the
inspector reviewed the licensee's revised policy, which terminates
unescorted station access for personnel who do not enter the PA during
a 60 day period and were not covered by both random testing and
continual behavioral observation. - The licenste's corrective ..: tion
appears
8.sfactory. This item is closed.
2.2.3 (Closed) UNR 50-272/9010-03,50 311/9010-03, and 50-354/90-07-
03: The licensee was not conducting random testing between 7:00 p.m.
and 6:00 a.m., which constituted a predictable gap in testing. During
this inspection, the inspector reviewed the licensee's corrective actions
and supporting documentation. The inspector verified that the licensee -
tests on backshifts, weekends and holidays. The corrective actions
were satisfactory. This item is closed.
- 3.0 _
Follow-ng_mLJlegulatory Effectivene1LBeview (RER) Findings
On April 10 14, 1989, the NRC conducted a Regulatory Effectiveness Review
'(RER) at the Hope Creek Station. The report of the RER lindings was transmitted to
-
the licensee on April 26,1989, On June 19, 1989, the licensee responded to the RER
L
fmdings by letter and outlined those actions already taken and proposed to correct
potential weakr. esses that were identified. During the security inspection conducted
November 13 - 17. 1989, the inspectors reviewed the licensee's corrective actions that
'
had been completed at that time. During this inspection, the inspector reviewed the.-
status of the licensee's action on the items which still remained open.
l -
~
5
6
s - - ~ +r + -c n . c
r,.rvr u.
ee.--,new--<
+-->,eer,
,
s,
,n
,,n
e n -- - e n-m
,e--vn,,,,,a,,--,w,
-.
.v,..e
v.a n -
-1
..
,~-se
, ,
e
-e
re
.
.
4
3.1
Following are the results of the inspector's review of several of the licensee's
actions that remained open at the conclusion of Combined Inspection Nos. 50-
4
272/89 22,50 311/89 24, and 50 354/89-19, conducted on November 13 - 17,
1989. The section and finding numbers referenced are from the RER report.
3.1.1 Section 2.2.1, Findinc 5
THis PARAGPAf H CONTAINS SAFEGUARDS
lt#0!!MAiiON AND IS NOT FOR FUBl!C
D!$C105URE 11IS INTENiiOHALLY
LEFT ELANK,
The licensee has completed its evaluation of an IDS system suitable for
this particular application. However, the IDS has not yet been
installed. Compensatory measures are still being implemented. This
aspect of Finding 5 will remain open until the IDS is installed and
eviewed during subsequent inspections.
3.1,2 Section 2.2.5
IHG PARACPANI CONTAINS SAf EGVARDS
'
INFOPM!diOW AND i3 NOT FOR PUBLIC
DISCLOSURE II15INTENiiONALLY
LEFI BLANK.
Licensee Action .
Illis FARAGRAPH CONTAINS SAFEGUAPDS
INFORY MH AND 15 NOT fCR PUBllc
DISCLO5Un if 13 INTENil0NALLY
'
LEfi BLANK.
This item will remain open until tne final phase is completed and
reviewed during subsequent inspections.
.4.0
Management Suonort. Security Program Plans aqd Audits
4.1
Management Suonort
-
Management support for the licensee's physical security program was
determined to be adequate by the inspector. This determination was based
upon the inspector's review of various aspects of the licensee's program during
this inspection, as documented in this report.
"+'W
p'#4,a3,9,_.
p,,
--9,9.,v._,,,,t_,
,.,9
, , , .
,m
, , ,,y
m
,qg
,.,,.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .
,,,p_,,g
_.zg,,,
._ ,, ,
_Mgm.,,.,,,,_,p._,_
y
, , ,, ,,
,,
, , , , , , ,_,.4,g
g,,_,
_ _ _
_.-_ _ __._._._
_
_ . _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _
,
.
5
4.2
Audits
The inspector reviewed the 1991 annual security program audit report and
verified that the audit had been conducted in accordance with NRC approved
physleal security plan (the Plan). The inspector's review found that the results
of the audit were reported to the appropriate levels of management. The
inspector verified that the licensee appropriately addressed the audit findings.
No deficiencies were noted by the inspector in the audit process.
5.0
Protected and Vital Area Physical Barriers. Detection and Assessment Aids
5.1
. Protected Area Barriers
- The inspector conducted a physical inspection of the PA barrier on
'
November 4,1991, and determined by observation that the barrier was
installed and maintained as described in the Plan. No deficiencies were noted.
5.2
holation Zones
The mspector verified that the isolation zones were adequately maintained to
permit observation of activities on both sides of the protected area barrier. No
deficiencies were noted.
5.3
Assessment Aids
The inspector observed the PA perimeter assessment aids and determined that
they were installed and operated as committed to in the Plan No deficiencies
were noted.
5.4
Protected Area and Isolation Zone Lighting
The inspector conducted a lighting survey of the PA and isolation zones on
November 4,1991. The inspector determined by observation that lighting in-
the PA and isolation zones was adequate. The inspector reviewed the
licensee's corrective acticns for potential lighting weakness identified during a
,
previous inspection. No deficiencies were noted,
5.5
Vital Area Barriers
The inspector conducted a physical inspection of selected vital area (VA)
barriers on November 5 - 6,1991, and determined by observation that the
barriers were installed and maintained as described in the Plan. No
deficiencies were noted.
&
-.
- - -
.
.
- - - - -
- -
.
.
- -.
. -.
______ _ _____-__ _ ___ _ - __
._ _. _.____- _.- _ . .________ - _-_ _ _ _ _ _ .__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _.. ______ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ . ___
.
,
i
6
6.0
Protected and Vital Aga Access Control of Personnel. Packages and Vehicles
6.1
Personnel Access Control
'
The inspector determitied that the licensee was exercising positive control over
personnel access to the PA and VAs. This determination was based on the
following:
The inspectors verined that personnel were properly identined and
'
-
authorization was checked prior to issuance of badges and key cards.
'
No deficiencies were noted.
The inspectors verified that the licensee was implementing a search
-
program for firearms, explosives, incendiary devices and other
,
- unauthorized materials as committed to in the Plan. No deficiencies
'
were noted.
The inspectors observed personnel access processirg during peak and
.
-
'
off-peak periods. - The inspectors interviewed security force members
(SFMs) and licensee's security staff about personnel access procedures.
No deficiencies were noted.
The inspectors determined, by observation, that individuals in the PA
-
displayed their access badges as required. No denciencies were noted.
6,2
Package and Material Access Centml
The inspector determined that the licensee was exercising positive control over
-
packages and materials that are brought into the PA at the main access control
portal. The inspector reviewed the package and material control procedures
and found that they were consistent with commitments in the Plan. The
inspector also observed package and material processing and interviewed SFMs
,
'
and the licensec's security staff about package and material control procedures.
No deficiencies were noted,
7.0
Alann Stations
The inspetor observed the operations of the Central Alarm Station (CAS) and the
Secondary Alarm Station (SAS) and determined that they were maintained and
operated as committed to in the Plan. CAS and SAS operators were interviewed by
the inspector and found to be knowledgeable of their duties and responsibilities. The
inspector veri 6ed that the CAS arid SAS do not contain any operational activities that
would interfere with assessment and response functions. No deficiencies were noted,
.
+-+-+-*w
- u"
iv-tr-
-w*W"Wv--*tr-+ww-v eq vew-1--c=%^
= -
e
it---y--
1"Te--"
uef"r*g*P--9
-Te-em='"7-w=wm
-v--
3-g-
wp-
pumse w-sr
-- qr ar7
w--=8-Wfv'Nr.3
-sW-P?4CF-?
9FP""
-F-rv'"r'*-=*T M r'
'rv-
'1-
r
'
.
e
,
7
8.0
Testing. Maintenance and Comtv nsatory Measures
8.1
The inspector reviewed testing and maintenance records and confirmed that the
records committed to in the Plan were on file and readily available for NRC
and licensee review. The station provides instrumentation and controls
technicians to conduct preventive and corrective maintenance. A check of
repair records indicated that maintenance and testing are accomplished in a
timely manner. No deficiencies were noted.
,
8.2
The inspector reviewed the licensee's use of compensatory measures and
determined them to be as committed to in the plan. However, the
compensatory measures for some marginal assessment aids were potentially
weak. The licensee agreed to evaluate this potential weakness and take action
if needed. This matter will be reviewed during a subsequent inspection.
9.0
Srcurity Training and Oualification
The inspector randomly selected and reviewed the training and quali0 cation records
for eight SFMs, including supervisory personnel. Their physical and firearms
qualifications records were also inspected. The inspector determined that one SFM
had not been tested for glaucoma through an oversight, as part of a requalincation
physical. The licensee took immediate corrective action by testing the individual
during this inspection. The licensee also committed to doing a 100 percent audit of
SFMs medical records to ensure that all required testing had been conducted. This
matter will be reviewed during a subsequent inspection.
10.0
Fait interview
The inspector met with the licensee representatives indicated in Paragraph 1 at the
conclusion of the inspection on November 8,1991. At that time, the purpose and
scope of the inspection were reviewed and the findings were presented. The
licensee's commitinents, as documented in this report, were reviewed and confirmed
with the licensee.
_
=
-.