ML20085M522

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Question & Answer Responses to NUMARC Survey in Support of NRC License Renewal Rulemaking
ML20085M522
Person / Time
Site: LaSalle  
Issue date: 11/11/1991
From:
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To:
References
RTR-NUREG-1437 AR, S, WM, NUDOCS 9111110108
Download: ML20085M522 (50)
v • d • e


Text

1 Commonwealth Edison LaSalle County Station Units 1 & 2 NRC Docket Nos. 50-373/374 l

140k$$

DR 1437 C POR

QUEAI1QRi_AND ANSVJRS e

QUESTION A.1.

Which of the following current techniques for at-reactor storage are you using and how?

A.

Re-racking of spent fuel.

B.

Control rod repositioning.

C.

Above ground cry storage.

D.

Longer fuel burnup.

E.

Other (please identify).

RESEQHSE for A.1 Grneral:

The first line strategy has been to complete all high-density spent fuel rack installation projects, for continued wet storage in the existing fuel pools. Never racks have been designed for the capability to store conaolidated fuel.

Station Sttgi[1g:

Zion Units 1 and 2 Shared pool has been re-racked twice. A third re-rack is in progress.

will reach loss of full core diacharge capability (LFCDC) in 1994 with existing racks.

This additional re-racking modification will e.itend LFCDC to 2006.

Dresden Unita 2 and 3 both pools have been re-ra:ked once.

Dresden 2 will reach LFCDC in 1999 and Dresder: 3 will reach LFCDC in 2000.

Quad Cities Unita 1 and 2 Shared pool has been re-racked oncc.

will reach LFCJC in 2001.

LaSalle County, Byron and Braidwood initial re-rack effort completed or underway.

will reach LFCDC in 2013, 2011 and 2012, respectively.

45183:2

. l l

OUESTIOfLAi2 Do you plan on continuing the use of these guttent techniques for reactor storage of spent fuel during the remaining time of your operating license or do you expect to change or modify them in some vay?

QE m Q1LAt). Which of the following techniques for at-reactor storage do you anticipate using until off-site spent fuel storage becomes available and how?

A.

Re-racking of spent fuel.

B.

Control rod epositiening.

C.

Above ground dry storage.

D.

Longer fuet burnup.

E.

her (p..ase ' Jenti8y).

RESPONSE for A.2 and A.3 7.ica new racks vill provide storage through the year 2005.

e will change to fuel rod consolidation or above ground dry storage af ter

  • 906 and employ through or beyond 2011.

e Dresden pending results for structural evaluations and demonstration of such technology for BWR fuel, vill chr,ge to fuel rod consolidation after 1999 (Dresden 2) ano 2000 (Dresden 3) and employ the option through or beyond 2011.

Quad Cities pending results of structural evaluations and demonatration of such technology for BWR fuel, will change to fuel rod consolidatien after 2005 and employ the option through or beyond 2011.

LaSalle County, Byron and Braidwood vill continue to we*.-store fuel in high density array a

using current technique through at least T011.

t I

4518d:3 1

e Will the techniques described above be adequate for continued OUESTION A.4.

at-reactor storage of spent fuel for the operating lifetime of the plant, including a 20-year period of license renewal, or are you developing other plans?

RESPONSE for A.4 (For all 6 Stations)

Commonwealth Edison believes that rod consolidation and/or Yes.

above ground dry storage vill be adequate for the operating lifetime of the plants. Construction of new storage facilities, either at a particular plant site or an off-site location to receive spent fuel from one or from several plants, appears to be technically feasible but is likely to be very expensive for vet pools as compared to dry storage technologies.

QHEXIl0N A.i.

Do you anticipate the need to acquire ad#itional land for the storage of spent-fuel for the operating lifetime of the plant, including a 20-year period of license renewal?

If so, how much land? When would this acquisition occur? Where?

(If answer is "yes", 3 - 4 sentences.)

RESPONSE for A.5 (For all 6 Stations)

No.

QUEST 1QILL.ft. Do you anticipate any dditional construction activity on-site, or imtediately adjacent to the power plant site, associated with the continued at-reactor storage of spent fuel for the operating lifetime of the plant, including a 20-year period of license renewal?

(yes/no)

FESPONSE for A.6 (For all 6 Stttions)

Dry storage facility construction may be opted for Zion Station for spent fuel storage after the year 2006.

For remaining stations through the year 2011 UO Beyond the year 2011 (for all r.tations) -- PROEABLY QUESTION Am2 If you answered yes en question 6, triefly describe this construction activity (e.g. expansion of fuel storage pool, building above ground dry storage facilities).

RESPONSE,for A.7 (For all 6 Stations)

Any construction activity veuld be related to facilities built in connection with above ground dry storage.

].

b v 1P?

Henry f. Bliss b

cc:

Spent Fuel Task Force Membera P. J. Garnier-Davis P. G. Kuhel/S. G. Miller L. B. Wilson 4518d:4

.-v e.

l Station LaSalle County 0 f

R.R.

  1. 1 Box 2.

2601 N. 21st Rd.

Marseilles,IL 61341 Initial operating current License Proposed Licens NRC Docket i License Expiration Expiration 50-373 04/17/82 04/17/22 50-374 12/16/83 12/16/23 B. Low.evel radioactive waste management questions:

foe LLRW Disposal (i.e. LLRW Policy

1. Under the current scheme is there Amendments Act of 1985 ami regional compacts) currently or sill suffic'ent capacity for wastes generated license renewal period be available to yout

~

during the plant (s)?

If so, what is the basis for this conclusion?

The Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety (IDNS) low-).evel waste facility is designed for 50 year disposal Yes.

200,000 cubic feet period with an anticipated annual volume ofthree years the Central Midwest Comp per year.

In the last (CMC) has disposed under 200,000 cubic feet each owner.

is/are denied access to a

2. If for any reason your plant (s)for a short period of time, what plans licensed disposal site for continued LLRW disposal?

do ycu have LaSalle If the station is denied access to a disposal site, IR County Station has on site an Interim Radwaste Storage racility The facility was designed to store approximately a 3 years o At the present time, the station does not have st-sg has been des. ne waste only.

A generic DAW storage buildin9 capacity for DAW.

This building could n-;t u

for the each of the 6 Ceco facilities.

Depending on

-a to approximately 2 - 5 years generation of DAW.

length of time the station is shut out of a disposal site, act

-s..'

would be taken to initiate th'e construction of the DAW storage The station will continue to pursue further volume reduction ta -

.t such as incineration, smelting, sort, segregation etc. that a:e

-t In a couple of pages please describe the specific methods of What

3. LLRW management currently utilized by your plant.is managed by:

LLRW (by volume) percentage of your current

- - _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ - - ~ ~ ~ - " - - - ~ ~ ~.

2.

Dry Activo Weste A. Wasto cocpcetion?

.____....____..___________________________,. ____________l 4 of total l Description Volume l

_____j

_______....______________________________ _______3 l

1.

Precompacted Hot DAW

..__________l Procompacted drums sent to the vaste l

35.3 l

processor for supercompaction. Also 96 cubic foot bins of wood, small l

l metals, and miscellanecus materials are l

l sent to the waste pro:essor to be repack _l l

)

aged and supercompacted the material.

l l

q

_________________________________________l____________l l

B. Waste _ segregation (through special controls or segregation at radiation check point)7 The station has in place a dual trash can system where by potentially contaminated material is put in a specially designated trash can and contaminated waste is in an alternate color trash can.

Each bag is surveyed.

put If-the dose rate of a bag is below the administrative limit the contents of the bag goes through a detailed sort using a survey table for release of material.

C. Decontamination of weete:

__________l

_________________________________________: __4 of total J Volume i

Description i

Metallies --

Approximately 100% of the l

metallies are decontaminated on site or 2.0 i

at an off si'_* waste processor.

____________i D. Sorting of waste prior to shipment?

At the present time 100% of the DAW is serted for items which can be decontaminated and reused or released as clean.

i

~

j 1

c. Other (please specifyl

____________g

_________________________________________l)

% of total I volume l

escription j.___________;

_________________________________________l 0.0 1

incineration

_____________________l_____0.7 l

l

____________________ly Waste Absorbed Oi

____________l

.._______________________________________ll 0.0 1

Demin Elements

____________________l_____0.0 l

_____________________idges (in HICs) l rilter Cartr

_________._________l____________t

______________________dware 0.0 1

j Activated liar

_______________l____________i

__________________________date.)

(* Note: None shipped to II.

Wet waste

____________l

_________________________________________l1

% of total l Volume l

Description

__________..l

_________________________________________l l

A. Resinst J

1.0 1

Solidification 10.1 l

Dewatering

________[

________________________(solidified)

____31.7 l

Concentrator waste

___________ j B.

_________________________________________l 17.3 I

_________________________________________1____________l C. Sludge 0.6 i

Decon Wasts

_______i D.

_______________________________________,_ _____0.0 i

E., solidified 011

_________________________________________\\____________s In a couple of pages, please describe the anticipated plans to be utilized by your plant (s) during 4.

for LLRW management the remainder of the operating license and through the licen:'What pe

'-3--

license renewal term.

(by volume) will be managed by:

- - - - - - - - -. ~ -... _ _ _

~

3.

Dry Active Waste l

A. Waste compcction?

__________________________________________)

___________i l

% of total l Volume l

1 Description

_____l____________l miscellaneous waste precem actedl l

Hot DAW, 2.0 l

onsite, sand blast grit and ether f ow-i able materials

____________l

_______________________________te process _l See l

Precompacted drums sent to was lIncinerationi or for supercompaction.________________________.____..___________l_________

J l

Waste shipped to Waste Processor as bulk DAW in sea Land containers.

The Waste See l

Processor sorts, segregates, packages and Incinerationi l

supercompacts the waste..

_________________________________________l____________;

Waste segregation (through special controls or segregation B. at radiation check point)?

N: change from response 3.I.B.

is anticipated.

C. Decontamina: on of wastes?

3.1.C.

No changed is anticipated from response Metall;;s te prior to shipment?

D.

setting or No change from response 3.I.D.

is anticipated.

E. Other (please specify)

_________________________________________!.___________t

% of total i Description volume i

j.___________!

28.0 1

Incineration Absorbed Oily Waste l

0.6 I

__________________..______________________l____________;

0.0 Demin Elements

_____t

____.________________________in HICs)____________q-______0 Filter Cartridges

(

1 1.

__________________..______________________i_______0 Activated Hardware 1

0.

II.

Wot Weste (Packaged in Final form)

_________________________________________! ___________l l

t of tota volume l

Description

____________l i

l l

1 A. Resins:

l 21.0 l

Solidifl ation l

0.0 l

Dewatering

____________l

___________________________lidified) 29.0 l

B. Concentrator Waste (so

____________l

_________________________________________l 14.0 1

C.

Sludge

__________________________racility Waste _______________l_______

l 0.0 D. Waste Water Treatment.________________________________________

I 1.0 1

E Decon Waste

_______l

_________________________________________ _____1.0 l

r. Solidified 011

_________________________________________j.___________i 100% of the resin will be solidified as mandated

(* Noter form rules.)

by IDNS draft waste

5. Do you anticipate the need to acquire additional land for the storage of LLEW for the operating lifetime of the plant, If so, how including a 20 year period of license renewal?

Where?

(if When would this acquisition occur?

much land?

answer is "yes", 3-4 sentences)

No.

information on the timing of future low-level waste if yeu answered yes to question 89, over what periods

6. To provide
streams, these activities contemplated?

of time are Refer to question 9.

7. Do you anticipate any additional construction activity,to the power plant site, on-site, or immediately adjacent associated with temporary LLRW storage for the operating including a 20-year period of license lifetime of the plant, renewal? (yes/no)

Yes briefly describe this If you answered yes to question 7, storage areas for steam generate:

B. construction activity (e.g.

components or other aaterials exposed to reactor environment length of. time the station is shut 02-Depending on the one DAW storage building will be r

of the disposal facility,

l l.

I low-level waste streams information on future and warte compact To provide which may effect workforce levels, exposure, 9.

planning, do you anticipate any major plant modifications orare likely refurbishment thatlow-level radioactive waste prior to, or during, describe the If so, please relicensing period for the plant? types of modifications do you Also, what anticipate to be necessary to achieve license renewal operation these activities.

through a 20-year license renewal term?

The waste will be decontaminate Retack Unit i fuel pool 1993.

for disposal.

Turbine rotor - 1992 - 1993 1992 (Unit 2)

Replace Process sample panels - 1991 (Unit 1)

'"-------.____m.____

Respor.ses to A'quatic Resource Questions LASALLE GENERATING STATION

[

Question 1 There have been no modifications and or changes to the condenser cooling water intake or discharge system since issuance of the operating license.

Question 2 There exists no documentation of any adverse impacts on aquatic resources due to operation of LaSalle County Station. Since January,1984 there have been a total of 45 violations of the Station's NPDES permit (through May, 1990), and no enforcement actions by EPA.

Permit violation records prior to 1984 are not readily available but can be retrieved from the Company archives if necessary.

1 Question 3 Since the issuance of LaSalle. County Station's Operating License in 1982, the NPDES permit was renewed twice (11/84 and 8/89).

The 1984 permit involved changes from the previous permit as a consequence.of_the initiation of plant discharges associated with station operation.

1he_ previous permit was written primarily to

-cover _ plant construction and start-up related discharges.

Changes in the 1989 permit generally concerned minor technical corrections-'to the wastewater discharge designations of some outfalls, and minor relaxation of some pollutant monitoring requirements because-of the station's good-compliance performance-under the previous permit.,

)

Question 4--

L.

'No operational studies were required for this facility due to-the

[

use of a closed cycle cooling system and the location of the L

intake and discharge, on a section of the Illinois River with L

poor water quality.

Five years (1974-1978) of construction-studies showed.the most abundant species were emerald shinner, l

gizzard shad and carp.

The three species combined represented 82 to 94.7 % of the ish collected during-the 5 years. The f

l l

differences that were noted in the abundance of fishes in the river from 1974 thru 1978 reflected natural variability in the fish populations _ associated with the river conditions.

1

LASALLE STATION

' Question 5 Entrainment and impingement studies were not required when the station began operation due to the design of the intake and the poor water quality in the Illinois River.

Based on the predictive 312"b" submitted in November, 1976, the intake was approved.

Question 6 Nothing has happened to either enhance or degrade the biological resource near the site.

However, tighter controls on and improved water treatment process by upstream dischargers, especially in the Chicago area has re;ulted in a gradual improvement of water quality.

If it will continue to the point that the biological community will become more diverse remains to be seen.

The improvement will be hindered by toxic bottom sediments that are resuspended in the water column by the constant barge traffic.

Even in a top quality stream the design of the LaSalle intake and discharge structure will prevent any significant detrimental affects to the environment.

Question 7 The Illinois River in the vicialty of the station has little recreational fishing but does have some boating although both activities are increasing as water cuality improves.

There is no commercial fishing in the ar?a because the wate rJality is still poor. He have not identified any impacts on the b : of the Illinois River by others due to the operation of the LaSalle County Station.

Question 8 LaSalle County Station discharges effluents to the Illinois River.

The Illinois River has a long history of environmental insults dating back to the 1800's, when flows in the Chicago River were reversed so untreated sewage should be discharged through the Illinois River system and away from Lake Michigan.

While significant recover of the river system has occurred, particularly over the last 10 years, numerous impacts on aquatic resources continue including:

the existence of dozens of municipal sewage plant discharges; dozens of direct and indirect

LASALLE STATION

  • Question 8 (continued) industrial discharges of process wastewaters; urban, rural and agricultural runoff; heavy barge shipping traffic; operation of locks and dams; the presence of toxics contaminated river sediments; and persistant dredging activities.

Commonwealth Edison has not studied the cumulative impacts of these influences to enable one to accurately assess their relative contributions on water quality degradation.

Question 9 316"b" - Predictive study attached approved 12/29/79 316"a" - Not required because of closed cycle cooling system.

8442e RGH: ssp i

)

- - - ~ _. - - ~ _. _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

ATTACHMENTS TO AQUATIC RESOURCE QUESTIONS BRAIDH000 STATION Braidwood Generating Station Hakeup Hater Intake System February, 1977 Braidwood Station Kankakee River Fishes of the Braidwood Station Aquatic Honitoring Area, July - August 1989 January 1990 Braidwood Nuclear Station Entrainment and Impingement Studies January 1990 BYRON STATION Byron Generating Station Impingement Monitoring 1985 - 1986 October, 1986 Byron Generating Station Impingement Monitoring 1987 - 1988 August, 88 Byron Generating Station Fish and Aeromonas Hydrophilt l1onitoring Program,1989 March, 1990 DRESDEN STATION Dresden Gcnerating Station Cooling Hater Intake Impact Report February 28, 1977 Dresden Nuclear Generating Station 316(a) - 410(c) Demonstration December 5, 1980 Final Report Dresden Station Aquatic Monitoring 1986 January 1987 Final Report Dresden Station Aquatic Monitoring, 1989 February, 1990

=LASALLE STATION ~

LaSalle Generating-Station 144keup Hater Intake System November 21, 1976_-

QUAD CIT 7.ES

. Quad Cities Nuclear Station Three Sixteen a & b Demonstration February, 1975 Quad Cities Nuc1 car Station Supplement to 316a & b demonstration March 16, 1981 Quad Cities Aquatic Program 1988 Annual Report Vol I Feb 89 Quad Cities Aquatic Program 1908 Anriual Report Vol II Feb 1989 210H STATION Zion Vol I 316

'a" & Re:Sted Material l:

'Dec "74" U

Zion Vol II i

316 "a" % Related Material l

Sept 1576 I

Zion & Haukegen Generating Station l

Suppl aental.Information in Support of Alternative Effluent Limitations December 1976 Zion Generating Station c

L Entrainment & Impingement Studies Vol I, 1976 March 1976 Zion Generating Station Ertriin:nent & Impingement Studies Vol II,1976 March 1976-Zion Station Environmental Monit9 ting.in Lake Michigan June 1970 through 5:pt 1974 June 1979 l

84C7e l.

o

Subject:

Results of Socioeconomic Questions 1 and 2 for NUMARC Survey Ouestion 1:

Number of permanent workers on-site for 1989.

(on-site CECO and guards)

Braidwood:

839 Byron:

875 Dresden:

1,222 LaSalle:

863 Quad Cities:

724 Zion:

796 Ouestion 2:

Average number of permanent workers on-site, in five-year increments starting with the issuance of the plant's OL.

Byron:

1984-1988 773 1989 875 Braidwood:

1986-1989 820 Dresden:

1972-1976 474 1977-1981 1064 1982-1986 1317 1987-1989 1227 LaSalle:

1982-1986 767 1987-1989 838 a

Quad Cities:

1972-1976 292 1977-1981 616 1982-1986 666 1987-1989 694 Zion:

1973-1977 412 1978 1982 696 1963-1987 722 1988-1989 B13

.r*

r-l 1

_.. _. _. _. _ _ _. _ _. _. ~. _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.

In answer to your June 28, 1990. request, attached is a summary listing the sonies paid to the various taxing districts as related to our nuclear stations.

The two years listed include 1985 taxes (paid in 1986) and our latest year, 1989 taxes (payable in 1990).

As we discussed, the monies are attributed to the large tax parcels we identify a2.the " station" and we estimate this represents the majority of money we pay to the individual taxing districts.

For instance, a station (including the cooling lake) may consist of numerous small tax parcels but the majority of monies (90%+) are etnev.ated by the parcels on which the station buildings are located.

Additionall',, we have paid actually one-half of total amount lieted for 1989 taxes.

The remaining one-half will be paid by S6ptember 1, 1990.

f i

l l

l

l 1985 *iaxes 1989 Taxes Station / Taxing Districts (Paid in 1986)

(Payab.e in 1990)

Braidwood Forest Preserve 580,297.28

$1,658,149.78 Will County Building Commission 990,086.05 832,176.72 Reed Township 33,533.34

$3sB09.08 Reed Township Road & Bridge 68,203.40 108,120.94.

Reed Township Ceneral Assistance 20,461.02 15,952.27 Braidwood Fire District 231,891.57 743,553.00 School District 255-U (Grade School) 7,143,169.64 9,304,604.24 Community College District 525 1,381,118.85 2.151,783.89 Godley Park District 157,975.57 1,025,176.43 County (Will) Funds 2,896,371.18 5,820,805.85 Fossil Ridge Public Library 98.894.94 564,533.09 Reed Twp. v.

Mosqu.to Abatement 221,559.30 Lawsuit versus County 225,104.27 S13,602,002.88 S22,735,528.86 Byron County (Ogle)

$ 2,182,730.39 2,771,890.64 Ceneral (Ogle Cour.ty) 86,137.40 t

" cy Road & Bridge 605.148.01

_ D: n-3chool ??6fNews Byron Unit 2) 5,888.994.34 12,611,082.78 Da: act School 220 (Now:

Oregon) 390,131.05 506,628.61 Junior College 511 (Now J.C. 51) 1,168,593.32 1,861,216.08 Junior College 523 27,170.34 47,310.61 Byron Fire District 622,637.83 920,924.57 Oregon Park District 920,402.14 1,271,682.78 Byron Library 93,133.33 172,622.17 Byron Forest Preserve District 259,723.93 861,636.88 396,124.76 Rocxvale Township S12,244,802.08 21.421,119.88 Dresden Grundy County S

516,279.22 S

672,348.14 Cooselake Township 5,375.30 17,901.74 General Assistar.ce (Grundy County) 625.04 Grundy County Road & Bridge 25,001.41 77,115.20 Road & Bridge (Gooselake Township) 4,500.26 172,137.14 Unit School 1 (Grade School) 3,086,674.70 4,41.,648 /3 Joliet Junior College 525 303,017.15 417,r-e.18 Coal City Fire District 5 60,003.40 69,713.52 238,403.01 Coal City Library S 4,001,476.48 S 6,136,338.66

pp 1

L aGa11e E B. Sanitarium 45,550.36 3

157,985.90

' Aunty. Hig'avay (LaSalle) 396,104.28 347,987.84 County Briege (LaSalle) 96,251.68 173,992.82 Hental Health (LaSalle County) 337,480.74 334,415.80 Other Ceunty Funds 1,587,994.03 1,183,162.62 Brookfield Township 871,828.54 758,266.12 Seneca High School 160 2,361,185.82 3,244,293.24 Seneca Grade School 170 2,432,088.72 2,838,887.08 Junior College 513 (Now 1.V. Comm. Coll.)

699,522.58 731.8'9.02 Seneca Fire District 115,068.69 117,272.00 Karseilles Fire District 90,708.20 153,462.76 Brookfield / Allen Assesor 8,714.32 8,b M.70 307,621.50 Seneca Library District

$ 9,042,497.96 510,357,866.40_

Quad Cities (7 57.-C.E.Co. 's portion)

County (Rock Island). Taxes S

105,531.00 124,430.27 Cordova Township 22,132.80 22,693.30 Road & Bridg1.(Cordova Township) 20,149.20 15,001.25 School Distiict Unit 1 (Grade School) 527,202.60 550,382.06 Cordova Fire District 20,462.40 54,575.29 6,925.20 24,224.75 Cordova Library-45,031.20 73,370.36 Blackhawk College 503 747,434.40

$864,677.28 Zion County (Lake) 888,708.27

$989,927.34 County Road & Bridge Fund (Lake) 172,108.99 T.B. Sanitorium 7,823.14 Forest Preserve.

240.952.58 254,603.62 Zion Park District 990,49d 96 1,322,870.52 City of Zion.

1,739,865.34 2.175,703.60 College of Lake County 532 14 2,6 D. ' '+

445,111.21

-High School No. 126

't. 5 54, 31. 6 5 4,095,023.09-Township (Zion) 251,904.97 425,526.32 North Shore Sanitary District 519,456.20 439,769.88 Zion-Benton Public Lit-ary 256,598.85 345,406.30 School District No. 6 (Grade Sctwol)

.1, M 9,662. 7 9 3,457,063.44 S12,624,976.08

$15,951,005.32

Commonwealth Edison g.

LaSalle County Station Units 1 & 2 NRC Socket Nos. 50-373/374 e

5 4

I h

y 6-e

..-n..~

~

t<

eg L OUESTIoss aun An w m OUESTI0lt 1.1.-~Which of.the following current techniques for at-reactor m

storage are you using and how?

3"7-'~~A.

'Re-racking of spent fuel.

B.

Control rod repositioning.

C.

Above ground dry storage.

?

D.

Longer fuel burnup.

E.

Other (clease identify).

RESPONSE for Ad The first line stre.tegy has been to complete all high-density.

General:

spent fuel rack installation projects, for continued wet Never racks have been storage in the existing fuel pools.

-designed for-the capability to store consolidated fuel.

Station Soecific:

Zion Units 1 and 2 A third re-rack.

Shared pool has been re-racked twice.

+

is=in progress.

will reach loss of full core discharge capability (LFCDC) in 1994 with existing racks.-

  • ~

This additional re-racking modification will extend LFCDC to 2006.

Dresden' Units 2 and 3-both pools have been re-racked once.

Dresden'2 will reach'LFCDC in 1999 and Dresden 3 will reach LFCDC in 2000.

-Quad Cities Units l'and 2 s

Shared' pool has.been re-racked'once.

will. reach LFCDC in 2001.

LaSalle County, Byron and Braidwood initial re-rack effort completed or uriderway.

will reach LFCDC in 2013, 2011 and 2012, respectively.

4518d:2

[.-

.~

n-3 OUESTION A.2._ Do you plan.on continuing the use of thJse current techniques storage of spent fuel during the remaining time for reactot

.. sf of your operating license or do you expect to change or modify them.in some way?

Which of the following techniques for at-reactor storage do OUE$ TION A.3.

you anticiosit using until of f-site spert fuel storage becomes available and how?

A.

Re-racking of spent fuel.

B.

-Control rod repositioning.

4 C.

Above ground dry storage.

D.

Longer fuel burnup.

E.

Other (please identify).

RESPONSE for A.2 and A.3 Zion new racks will provide storage through the year 2006.

will change to fuel rod consolidation or above ground dry storage af ter 2006 t ad employ through or beyond 2011.

Dresden pending results for stru:tural evaluations and e

demonstration 6f:such technology for BWR fuel, will change to: fuel rod-consolidation after-1999 (Dresden 2) and-2000 (Dresden 3) and employ the option through or beyond 2011.

Quad Cities pending results of structural evaluations'and

- demonstration of such technology for BWR fuel, will change to fuel rod consolidation after 2005 and employ the option through or beyond 2011.

LaSalle County; Eyron and Braidwood will continue to wet-store fuel ir. hith density array.

using current technique through at least 2011.

451Rd:3

l l

Will the techniques described above be edequate for continued fuel for the operating lifetime

\\

QUERIlQH.A21 at-r-actor storage of spentincluding a 20-year period of license renewal.

j of the plant, f

or are you developing other plans?

l

.tY RE1EQs1E for A.4 (For all 6 Stations) rod consolidation and/or Commonwealth Edison believes that above ground dry storage vill be adequate for the operating Yes.

Construction or new storage facilities, lifetime of the planta.

a particular plant site or an off-site location to fuel from one or from several plants, appears to be either at receive spent is likely to be very expensive for vet technically feasible but pools as compared to dry storage technologies.

Do you anticipate the need to acquire addill2DAl_ land for the otorage of spent-fuel for the ope ating lifetime of the OtJESTION A.5.

If so, including a 20-year period of license renewaltWheret

plant, When would this acquisition occur?

how much land?

is "yes". 3 4 sentences.)

(If ansvet RESPONSE for Ami (For all 6 Stations)

No.

Do you anticipate any Add 1112Dal constructisn activity on-site, or immediately adjacent to the power plant site, OUESTION A 6.

associated with the continued at-reactor storage of spent including a fuel for the operating lifetime of the plant, 20-year period of license renewalt (yes/no)

RESPON3}:_f2I_Ad (For all 6 Stations)

Dry storage facility construction may be cpted for Zion fuel storage after the year 2006.

Station for spent NO For remaining stations through the year 2011 PROBABLY Beyond the year 2011 (for,all stations)

If you an'avered yes to question 6, briefly describe this OUESTION_A42 construction activity (e.g. expansica of fuel storage pool, building above ground dry storage facilities).

RESPONSE for A I (For all 6 Stations) 111 ties built in Any construction a ttivity would be related to f::

connection with thove ground dry storage.

- s)

L' A C'}1p v

Henry I. Bliss

(

Spent Fuel Task Force Members cc:

P. J. Garnier-Davis P. G. Kuhel/S. G. Miller L. B. Wilson 4518d:4 l

~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

r LaSalle County Station l

R.R.

61 Box 220 l

2601 N. 21st Rd.

Marseilles.IL 61341 Current License Proposed Licens Initial operating Expiration Expiration License NRC Docket i 04/17/22 04/17/82 12/16/23 50-373 12/16/83 50 374 B. Low-level radioactive waste management questions:LLRW Policy for LLRW Disposal (i.e.

scheme is there

1. Under the current Amendments Act of 1985 and regional compacts) td currently or will sufficient capacity for wastes genera e renewal p'eriod be available to youris the basis for th during the license If so, what plant (s)?

The Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety (IDNS) l low-level waste facility is designed for 50 year disposa Yes.

0 cubic feet period with an anticipated annual volume of 200,00three years the C In the last 200,000 cubic feet each owner.

per year.has disposed under (CMC) is/are denied accesc to a

2. If for any reason your plant (s)for a short period of time, what plans licensed disposal sitefor continued LLRW disposal?

do you have LaSalle If the station is denied access to a disposal site,Facility County Station has on site an Interim Radwaste Storage 3 years of was:e The facility was designed to store approximately aCu f se;.d:t nave s:- r the station does not At the present time, A generic DAW storage building has been des.:m waste only.

This building could t.:

capacity for DAW.

for.the each of the 6 CECO facilities.

Depending on

-a to approximately 2 - 5 years generation of DAW. leng act'.

-s f the DAW storage would be taken to initiate-the construction o duction

+ ---

The station will continue to bursue further volume res hat are hd of In a couple of pages please describe the specific met o s What LLRW management currently utilized by your plant.is managed by:

3.

LLRW (by volume) percentage of your current

- ~ - - - - - -. _. _

n:

. I.

Dry Actavo Westo

~

  • '~

A. wasto corpoetion?

...__.....___ __......__._____..________l__......._..l l 4 of-total l

-s volume l

Description

....._..___ l gy....__......._________...._____.-..___

l 1.3-l Precompacted Hot DAW........____

...._-___......___........__p.______.....l to the waste 1

l Precompacted drums sent 35.3 l

for supercompaction. Also 96-cubic 'oot bins of wood, small

'l l

processor and miscellaneous materials are l

l l

metals,to the waste processor to be repack.:

l sent aged and supercompacted the materiat......._...__.-.........__.. __

l B. Waste' segregation (through special contr71s or segregatio" radiation' check point)?

at The station has in place a cual trash can system where by potentially contaminated material'is put-in a specially designated trash can and cot.taminatad waste isEach ba in an' alternate color trash can.

limit If the dose rate of a bag is below the administrative put i

the contents of the bag goes through a detailed sort us ng a survey table.for release of material.

C. Decontamination of waste:

Sorting of waste prior to shipment?

D.

At the present ties 100% of the DAW is sorted for items which can be decontsminated and reused or r:1 eased as clean.

l

\\

. ~.

n c._Othor /p10cs0=spectfy1-

___.._____________________________________;l

% of totai l Jescription i

volume l

______l

______________________________________l______.0 l l

0 incineration

_______l a.T

_____________________ p____0.7 l

._________________ly Waste l

-Absorbed Oi

____________l

________________lements__________________

___0.0 l

Domin_E

____________________4

________l I

0.0 l

_____________________idges (in HICs)

Filter Cartr

____________l

________________________l 0.0 l-

_________________d Hardware Activate

_____________l...__________i

_______.____________________te.)

None shipped to da

(* Note:

.II.

Wet Waste

__________________..______________________l____________gt of total i i

Description l

Volume-l l

_____________________..___________________l____________

i

)

A. Resins:

l 1.0 l

solidification l

10.1 l

-Dewatering

.________l

______._________________(aolidified)_____________

l B.-Concentrator waste

_________________________________________l-_

17.3

____________l C. Sludge

_________________________________________ll 0.6 i

e D. Decon Waste

_________________________________________ll 0.0 E.! solidified 011____________________________________

In a couple-of pages, please describe the anticipa.ted plans during for LLRW management _to be' utilized by your plant (s) 4.

remainder of the operating license and through the licec the license renewal term.

will be managed by:

(by volume)_

(

  • e I.

s I-

i Dry Activo WOSCO WOcto cQCpoetion?

A.

j

.._______________________________,_________j____________ l t of total volume l

Description

___.__________________________l____________ll ge3________iscellaneous waste precompactedl m

l 2.0 l

Hot DAW, sand blast grit and other flow-l l

onsite,

________l able materials

___________________l____See l

______________________nt to waste process-l Precompacted drums se lIncinerationi or for supercompac'_. ion.__________________ ______________________i___

i l

Waste shipped to Waste Processor as bulk The Waste l

See l

in Sea Land containers.seg6egates, packages andjIncinerationl DAW l

Processor sorts, supercompacts the waste-.

_________________________________________i____________;

ion Waste segregaticn (through special controls or segregat 5.

radiation check point)7 at F:. change from response 3.I.B.

is anticipated.

Decontamination of wastes?

C.

Sorting or waste prior to shipment?

D.

No change from response 3.I.D.

is anticipated.

Other (please specify)#

E.

_________________________________________li

% of total i l

Volume i

Desetiption

______________..._________________________l____________

l 28.0 i

Incineration ________________._____i.___________i

___________________ily Waste 1

0.6 i

Absorbed O

____________i

_________________________________________ll 0.0 i

_______i Demin Elements ___________.._______i_____1.0 l

______________________dges (in H7Cs) l Filter Cartri __________.________l___..________i

______________________dware l

0.0 Activated Har

.--._____________.________________.________l____________

rorm woe _westo tFuck. aged in rtnal

II.

_________________________________________i_____f total l %o l

l'

~l volume

-l

. Description l________.___l-

-l l

sc l

l l

21.0 l

A. Resins':Solidification l

0.0 l

Dewatering

______l____________{l

___________________)l 29.0

________________ Waste (solidified

________________.________________________l________

-B. Concentrator l

14.0

_l

_______l C. Sludge

_______________l_____0.0 l-

__________________________racility Waste 1____________l D. Waste Water Treatment _____________________

1.0 l

____________l E. Decon Waste

_______;_________________ll 1.0 1

________________11-

____i T. Solidified 0 100% of the resin will be solidifiwd as man by IDNS' draft waste form rules.)

.(* Note fer the

5. Do.you anticipate-the need to_ acquire additional land f the plant,.
storage of LLRW for the operating lifetime o newal?

If so, how

. including a 20fyear period of license reWhen-would this acquisitio

he r e ?

(if much land?.

No.

answer is "yes", 3-4 sentences) low-level waste

~6. To provide information on the timing of futurestream riods of time are these activities contemplated?

Refer to question 9.

l L

7. Do you anticipate any additional construction activity, site.

to the power plant or_insediately adjacent h

rating

-associated.with temporary-LLRW storage for t e opeincluding a 20 on-site, lifetime _of-the plant, l

Yes renewal? (yes/no) i
8. If you answered yes to questien 7, briefly describe th sstorag l

i nt construction activity (e.g. components or other saterials_ expo h

Depending on the length of time the station is s ut :u one DAW storage building will be -

I' of the, disposal facility, 2-a n

To provido inforcotion on futuro low-lov,ol'wasto stro ct 9.

j lant sodifications or

. planning, ao you anticipate any ma or prefurbishment th the level radioactive waste prior to, or during,_ describe If so, please low.M#pasing period for the plant? types of modifications do you rel Also, uhat renewal operation these activities.

anticipate to be necessary to Lehieve license through a 20-year license renewal ters?

The waste will be decontaminate Rerack Unit i fuel pool 1993.

for disposal.

1992 - 1993 Turbine rotor -

1) 1992 (Unit 2)

Replace Process sample panels - 1991 (Unit 9

6e

. - ~.

~

e.

3:

c, w

Responses to Aqu'atic Resource Questions LASALLE GENERATING STATION

- Question 1 There have been no modifications and or changes to the condenser cooling water intake or discharge system since issuance of the operating license.

Question 2 There exists.no documentation of any adverse impacts on aquatic resources due to operation of LaSalle_ County Station.- Since January,_1984 there have been a total of 45 violations of the Station's NPDES permit (through May, 1990), and no enforcement

. actions by EPAi _ Permit-violation records prior to 1984 are not readily available but can be retrieved from the Company crchives if necessary.

. Question 3 Since the issuance of LaSalle County Station's Operating License in 1982,-the NPDES permit -was ' renewed twice (11/84 and 8/89).

The-1984 permit involved changes froin the previous permit as a consequence of the initiat'.on of plant discharges associated with station operation. The previous permit was written primarily to cover plant construction and: start-up related discharges.

Changes in the 1989: permit. generally concerned minor technical corrections to the wastewater discharge designations of some outfalls, and minor relaxation of some pol.utant monitoring

. requirements.because of the itation's 9001 compilance performance-Lunder the previous permit.

. Question 4-No-operational'itudies were required f.or this facility due to the Mse of a ;Iosed cycle coeHng systte and the. location of the intake and discharge, en a section of tie Illinois River with five years (1974-lV78) 'cf constructioni

. poor water quality.

studies showed the most abur. dant species were emerald shinner, gizzard shad and carp. The three species combined represented 82 The to 94.7 % of.the fish collected during the_5 years.

differences'that were noted in the abundance of fishes in the river from 1974 thru 1978 reflected natural-variability.in the fish populations associated with the river conditions.

4

,'l + :

,.n.

..n,

,,,.,,...,,,.,,nwe7,,

w

[

l LASALLE STATIC 3

_g.

Questio.i 56 Entralnment and impingement studies were not required when the station began operation due to the design of the intake and the Based on the poor water quality in the Illinois P.tver.

predictive 312"b" submitted in November,1976, the intake was approved.

Question 6 Nothing has happened to either enhance or degrade the biological resource near the site. However, tighter controls on and improved water treatment process by upstream dischargers, especially-in the Chicago area har resulted in a gradual If it will continue to the point improvement of water quality.

that the biological community will become more diverse remains to The improvement will be hindered by toxic bottom be seen.

sediments that are resuspended in the water column by the constant barge traffic.

Even in a top quality stream the design of the LaSalle intake and discharge structure will prevent any significant detrimental affects to the environment.

Question 7 The Illinois River in the vicinity of the station has little rect eational fishing but,does hin some boating although both There is no activities are increasing as wawr quality improves.

commercial fishing in the area because the water quality is still He have not ioentified any impacts on the use of the poor.

Illinois River by others due to the operation of the LaSalle County Station.

Question 8 LaSalle County Station discharges effluents to th-Illinois The Illinois River has a long history of environmental River.

insults dating back to the 1800's, when flows in the Chicago River were revarsed so untreated sewage should be discharged through the Illinois River system and away from Lake Michigan.

While significant recover of the river system has occurred, particularly over the last 10 years, numerous impacts on aquatic resources continue including: the existence of dozens of municipal sewage plant disc.harges; dozens of direct and indirect

b 6

LASALLE-STATZCJ

. -. 3-Tuestion'85?lentinued)'

Q industrial ~ discharges of process wastesaters;-urban.. rural and agricultural runoff; heavy barge shipping traffic; operation of locks and dams; the presence of toxics contaminated river sediments; and persistant dredging activities.. Commonwealth Edison has not studied the cumulative impacts of these influences to enable one to. accurately assess their relative contributions ion water quality degradation, Question 9 316"b" - Predictive study attached

. approved 12/29/79

--316"a" - Not required because of closed cycle cooling system.

8442e=

RGM: ssp 9

4 4

J 4g y

'..)

v y

,..w n

,,w,

w. w r-+

gn.

---g-

I ATTACHMENTS TO AQUATIC RESOURCE QUESTIONS BRAIDH000$i4 TION f

Braidwood Generating Station Makeup Hater Intake System February, 1977 Braidwood Station Kankakee River Fishes of the Braidwood Station Aquatic Honitoring Area, July - August 1989 January 1990 Braidwood Nuclear Station Entrainment and Impingement Studies January 1990 BYRON STATION Byron Generating Station D

Impingement konttoring 1985 - 1986 Octobe, 1986 4

Byron Generating Station impingement Monitoring 1987 - 1988 August, 88 Byron Generating Station Fish and Aeromonas Hydr.ophila Monitoring Prograa 1989 Harch, 1990 ORESDEN STATION Dresden Generating Station l

Cooling Water Intake Impact Report February 28, 1977 Dresden Kuclear Generating Station 316(a) - 410(c) Demonstration December 5, 1980 Final Report Dresden Station Aquatic Honitoring 1986

. January 1987 Final Report Dresden Station Aquatic Monitorin, 1989 February, 1990

3' l

LaSalle Generating Station Makeup Water Intake System f

November 21, 1976 f5 QUAD CITIE5' Ouad Cities Nuclear Station Three Sixteen a L b Demonstration February, 1975 Quad Cities Nuclear Station Supplement to 316a & b demonst ation March 16, 1981 Quad Cities Aquatic Program 1988 Annual Report Vol I Feb 89 Quad Cities Aquatic Program 1988 Annual Report Vol II Feb 1989 ZION STATION Zion Vol I 316 "a" & Related Haterial Dec "74" Iton Vol 11 316 "a" & Related Haterial Sept 1976 Zion & Haukegan Generating Station Supplemental Information in Support of Alternative Effluent Limitations December 1976 Zion Generating Station Entrainment & Impingement Studies Vol I, 1976 March 1976 Zica Generating Station Entr inment & Impingement Studies Vol II, 1976 March 1976 Zion Station Environmental Honitoring in Lake Michigan June 1970 thrcugh Sept 1978 June 1979 8487e

"--'---.-~____%____

+

4

$$1

Subject:

Results of Socioeconoalc Questions 1 and 2 for NUWUtC Survey Ouestion 1:

Number of germanent workers on-site for 1989.

(on-site CECO and guards)

Braidwood:

839 Byron:

875 Oresden:

1,222 LaSalle:

863 Quad Cities:

724 Zion:

796 Ouestion 2:

Average number of permanent workers on-sits, in five-year increments starting with the issuance of the plant's OL.

Byron:

1984-1988 773 1989 875 Braidwood:

1986-1989 820 Dresden:

1972-1976 474 1977-1981 1064 1982-1986 1317 1987-1989 1227 Lt.Salle:

1982-1986 767 1987-1989 838 Quad Cities:

1972-1976 292

{

1977-1981 616

(

666 1932-1986 1987-1989 694 lion:

1973-1977 412 1978-1982 696 1983-1987 722 1988-1989 813

/*

s.

?

11 11

't In answer to your June 28, 1990, request,-attached is a summary listing the monies paid to the various taxing districts as related to our nuclear stations.

The two years listed include 1985 taxes (paid in 1986) and our latest year, 1989 taxes (payable in 1990).

As we discussed, the monies are attributed to the large tax parcels we identify as the " station" and we estimate this represents the majority of money we pay to the individual taxing districts. For instance, a station (including the cooling lake) may consist 94 sumerous small tax parcels but the majority of monies (90%+) are generated by the parcels on which the station buildings are located.

Addicianally, we have paid Trenally one-half of total amount listed for 1989 taxes.

The remaining one-half will be paid by September 1, 1990.

h O

hi a

P i

i l

L l

6 4

m a

m

~

.~

. ~.-.-

.-..-. _ = _.

1

~

1985 Taxes 1989 Taxos (Paid in 1986)

( Paya b le in 199 Station /Taxina Districts B r a id wood __

580,297.28

$1,658,149.78 Forest Pre se rve.

. - =

.WillCountyBuCNItagCommission 990,086.05 832,176.72 33,533.34 63,809.08 Reed Township 68.203.40 108,120.94 Reed Township Road & Bridge Reed Townst.ip Ceneral Assistance 20,461.02 15,952.27 Braidwood Fire District 231.891.57 743,553.00 School District 255-U (Ci ie School) 7,143,169.64 9.304,604.24 Community College District $25 1,381,118.89 2,151,783.89 Cudley Park District 157.975.57 1,025,376.43 County (Will) Funds 2,896.371.18 5,820,805.85 Fossil Ridge Public Library 98.894.94 564,533.09 Reed Twp. vi Mosquito Abatement 221,559.30 Lawsuit versus County 2_25,104.27-

$13,602,002.88

$22,735,528.86 Byron County (Ogle)

S 2,182,730.39 2,771,890.64 Ceneral (Ogic County) 86,137.40 Ogle County Road & Bridge 605,148.01 District School 226(Nows Byron Unit 2) 5,888,994.34 12,611,082.78 District School 220 (Now: oregon) 390,131.05

'506,628.61

. Junior College 511 (Now J.C. 51) 1.168,593.32 1,861,216.08 Junior College 523 27,170.34 47,310.61 Byron Fire District 622,637.8) 920,924.57 Oregon. Park District 920,402.14 1,27,682.78 Byron Library' 93,133.33 172,622.17.

- Byron Forest Preserve Districe 259,723.93 861,636.88 396,124.76 Rockvale Township

$12,244,802.08 21,421,119.88 Dresden Grundy County

$16,279.22

-672,348.14

-_Cooselake Township 5,375.30 17,901.74

- General Assistance (Crundy County) 625.04 Crundy County Road & Bridge 25,001.41 77,115.20

- Road & Bridge (Cooselake Township) 4,500.26 172,132.14 Unit School 1 (Grade School) 3,086,674.70 4,471,648.73

- Joliet Junior College 525 303.017.15 417,076.18-Cost City Fire District-5 60,003.40 69,713.52 238,403.01.

Coal City Library-

$ 4,Lul,476.48 S 6,136,338.66 s

i

,,, ~,,

,-rvv.-

+

4.

,___e..-.,

,m

.mm-

n -e.

-s

LaSa11e 45,550.36 157,985.90 T.B. Sanitarium County Eighus (LaSalle) 396,104.28 347,987.84 County Br18 '

11 )

96,251.68 173,992.82 Mental Healt 11e County) 337,480.74 334,415.80 Other County (d$de 1,587,994.03 1,103,162.62 Brookfield Township 871,828.54 758,266.12 Seneca High School 160 2,361.185.82 3,244,203.24 Seneca Grade School 170 2,432,088.72 2,838,887.08 Junior College 513 (Now:

1.v. Comm. Coll.)

699,522.58 731,819.02 Seneca Fire District 115.068.69 117,272.00 Marseilles Fire District 90.708.20 153,462.76 Brookfield / Allen Assessor 8,714.32 8,699.70 307,621.50 Seneca Library District

$ 9,042,497.96

$10,357,866.40 Quad Cities (75%-C.E.Co.'s portion)

County (Rock Island) Taxes 105,531.00 124,430.27 Cordova Township 22,132.80 22,693.30 Road & Bridge (Cordova Township) 20,149.20 15,001.25 School District Unit 1 (Grade Senool) 527,202.60 550,382.06 Cordova Fire District 20,462.40 54,575.29 Cordova Library 6,925.20 24,224.75

-Blackhawk College 503 45,031.20 73,370.36 S

747,434.40

$864,677.28

. Zion

-County (Lake) 888,708.27

$989,927.34 l

. County Road & Bridge Fund (Lake) 172.108.99 T.B. Sanitorium 7,823.14 240.952.58 254,603.62 Forest Preserve

. Zion Park District 990,498.96 1,322,870.52 City of Zion 1,739,865.34 2,175,703.60 l

College of Lake County 532 342,653.34 445,111.21 High School No. 126 3,554,832.65 4,095,023.09 Township _(Zion) 251,904.97 425,525.32 North Shore Sanitary District 519,456.20 439,769.88 Zion-Benton Public Library 256,598.85 345,406.30 School District No. 6 (Grade School) 3,654,662.79 5,457,063.44 l-

$12,624,976.08

$15,951,005.32 l

l l

i G

4 l

Nnmowcc \\ S lEMt so n UTILITY k__ swas %,.aussec a sa,.aw. cues, 2o n sue Add;Wnncl i n hNrmdion -tt So c io c c0_$2/nic EHCLOSURES o,,ec m ns 3+4 t

b 4

f h.

l

.I 96 l

i

y Exhibit A y

August, 1990 h

.1980 Taxes n

Station /Taxina_Qis tricts M in 1981)

O Braidwood Forest Preserve 72,038 H111' County Butiding Commission Reed Township 22,588 1

' Reed Township Road & Bridge 24,725 Reed Township General-Assistance

- Braidwood Fire District.

205.797 School District 255-U (Grade School) 3,082,869 Community College District 525 190,367 Godley Park District County (Hill) Funds 407,040

-Fossil Ridge Public Library 113.495

Reed Twp. versus. Mosquito Abatement Lawsbit versus County

$ 4.118.919-Byrsk

'Countj-(Ogle)._

831,512

- Gsnec:.i'901e Country) l Ogle icinty Road.& Bridge 439,48B

Disf,1ct 5:hool 226 (Now:

dyron Unit 2) 3,804,249-inistrict !chool 220 (Now: Oregon) 149,751 Junior College 511 (Now:

J.C. 51) 287,391 Jt,nicr College 523 9.114

Syron F1re District-924,683

'~;.

Gregon Park. District 184,937 llyron 11brary 27,775 38yren Forest Preserve-

'Rockvale Township 458.122

$ 7,117,022 Dresden Grundy_Cou1ty' 296,379 Gooselake Township 3,452 General Assistance (Grundy County) 411

_Grundy County Road & Bridge 20,465 Road-& Bridge (Gooselake Township)-

Unit' School.1-(Grade School) 1,719,508 Joliet Junior College.525 167,258 Coal City Fire Olstrict 5:

73,232

..O Coal' City Library

$ 2,280,705 1919Y:

-v

h Exhitit A August, 1990 c

Page 2 1980 Taxes Station /Taxina Districts IE3id in 1981)

LdAllt T.B. Sanitarium 17,705 County Highway (LaSalle) 264,253 County Bridge (LaSalle) 132,126 Hental Health (LaSalle County) 198,718 Other County Fr'.ds 470,109 Brookfield Tov. ship 717,449 Seneca High S:nool 160 1,661,098 Seneca Grade !,chool 170 1,680,653 Junior Collet 1513 (Now:

1.V. Comm. Coll.)

618,353 Seneca Fire liistrict 82,844 Harseilles F' *e District 41,488 Brookfield /A10..'. Assessor Seneca Library District

$ 5,884,796 Ouad Citiet (75% - C.E.Co.'s portion)

County (Rock Island) Taxes 63,767 Cordova Township 6,487 Road & Bridge (Cordova Township) 15,735 School District Unit 1 (Grade School) 304,621 Cordova Fire District 9,938 Cordova Library 2,208 Blackhawk College 503 25.121 5

427,877

~

Zion County (Lake) 457,230 County Road & Bridge Fund (Lake) 152,964 T.B. Sanitorium 121,374 Forest Preserve 259,374 Zion Park District 716,603 City of Zion 1,328,459 College of Lake County 532 347.454 High School No 126 3,340,268 Township (Zion; 299,277 North Shore Sanitary District 1,050,796 Zion-Benton Public Library 259,374 School District No. 6 (Grade School) 3,606.293

$11,939,466 1919Y

6

)

RESPONCE TO NUMARC QUESTIONNAIRE ON SOCIOECONOMIC QUESTION FOR ALL UTILITIES TO'SU? PORT PART 51 RULE CHANGE.

Question # 3 parts A and C.

Both the BWR and PWR sites indicate that about 700 to 800 additional workers are involved in normal planned outages.

This number includes contract labor and Commonwealth Edison personnel not normally assigned to the site.

A maximum number of personal used at any one site appears to be about 1200 people used during the six month pipe replacemcnt outage during the fall 1985 to spring of 1986.

18 planned outages are presented by station in the attached six tables.

Question f 3 part D All sites report that about 125 additional workers not normally assigned to the site are used each outage to perform ISI and Erosion Corrosion Program Inspections.

This number includes; insulation removal and replacement, scaffolding, surface preparation and the inspection. The inspections take place through out the outage.

BRAIDWOOD A2P01 AIR 01 A2R01 Outage Dates 2/II,S9 to 3/2639 92S9 to 12/1559 N1WO to 5/2490

- Days of Outage 43 104 73 Schedule Variance

+3

+ 35

+4 lacremental expenne cists 52,720,000 521,000,000 516,vo,000 (laciude O.T,)

Nrmber of Surved A PM's 369 562 697 Outage Work Requmts completed 639 (248) 1872 (591) 1830 (333)

(Nurnber added) 63 %

(46%)

(224)

(egvessed in %)

- Station Wort Requests 1161 2540 2175 Completed during outage Outrge crpmure in REM 3t$

235.5 138.5 Number et Mods completed

. 27 (0) 5(4) 39 (0)

-(#>5000 Man hn)

No, Saubbers tested (* ! ailed)

None 162 (21) 72 (2)

' Number of Mod Apprtwali etters 21 after 6 Mo. Cutoff

% of dtal unit outage time 4$%

0%

0%

Mrjor Planned Work other No refuel actwities performed, "A' DG 18 mo Insgution Replace 311 Rc:ca thra routine refuel Planned surveillance outage "B" DG 5 yr Lupection Rebuild MSIV's 3 LP Turb Insrections Replace RCP Seal SG Moist Carry <wer Mod ATWS Mod SO U bend Stress Reheve D/O Inspecton Replace all RCP seats Snubber Reduction Major Work Add d None Repixe SG Snubber PM Vav. nepacks Repaired loop S:op Vanes Replaced 2 LP Trub, inspected' Replaced Turd Stationary litades Repsaed CST Floor i

Schedule Vanances

+3 Dual Unit outage and

+20 trop Stop Vane Prop

+3 A RCP Seal Replacement l

charginpaNe repair

+2 Wuer Clanty Prob

+ 11V/GV Testing

+1 CV Surv Test Delay

+3 Rx Flange Cleaning l

+4 Cont Iso Valve Failed

+2 Rept RHR Suction Valve i

+2 B Diesel Gen Problems l

+1 Rod Drop Comp Problem I

l l

I l

l September !!,1990

BYRON DIR02 B2R01 BIR03 Outage Dates 93M to 11/9 38 in/89 to 3439 1/5/90 to 3/4So

. Drys of Outage 67 38 58 Schedule Vanance

+3

-4 1

Incremental expense asts

$15,861,400

$11,237,000

$19,821.100 (include O.T.)

Number of Surveil & PM's 466 574 1653.

Outrge Wort Requesta completed 2180 (1078) 1914 (5M) 1771 (5(A)

(Number added) 127 %

39 %

47 %

(exprtsaed in %)

Station Work Requests 2581 2361 2155 Completed dunng outage Outage crposure in REM 325

'l0 256

. Number of Mods completed 36 (1)

(A(3) 54 (1)

(#>5000 Man hn)

No. Snubben tested (# failed) 755 (41) 31 (0) 45 (!)

Number of Mod Apprtwal Letters 12 titer 6 Mo. CutMi

- % of dual unit outage time 0%

fr4 5%

Major Planned Wo<k other Replaced 'A' LP Turb Rotor Replace 2 LP Roton Replace 2 LP Hotors than routine refuel Removed 482 Snubben LTT 100% of the Fuel Install Gen Fiber Optics ILRT Replaec 4 Turb Gov Vatn. Shot;ren SG SG Tubes Stresa Rehved Replace 4 Turb nrot Valve Plugged 16 SG Tubes.

Plugged 14 SG Tubes W DG $ yr inspecton Main Gen Crawl Drough insp Main Gen Crawl nrough insp Mtjor Work Added Tested 700 Addidonal Reconst 5 Fuel Bund Struct Repair NDCT l_

Snubber:

Gen Wandangs Repair l-(

l l

!1 Schedule Variances

-2.5 Bet er han Anticipated

-3 Better than Ant Perf 3 SG Activitica: Fill & Vera

+4 Seal Table 12aka 1 Turb Bal Rolls Not Req

+2 Repeat Pr.r Safety Valve

+2.5 51 Check Vatve Prob Test; Spunous Rx Trip;

+2 Accum Fill Line Leak Gen Coiutuettvity

-3 Only 1 Balance Run Req Septemter 11,1990

DRESDEN D3R10 D2R11 D3RI1 Outge Dates T27/S8 to 6%S8 10M38 to 2,71189 12/3,19 to 2/11/90 Days of Outage 91 114 70 Schedule Variance 0

+ 15

+1 Incremental expense ctsts 57,765,NO

$22,519,000 59,0tX),000 (include O.T.)

Wumber of Surveil & PM's 2053 881 Outage Work Requests completed 1161 1835 (585) 1369 (432)

(Numttr added) 46 %

40 %

(expremac ' in %)

20 4 Swon Wort Requesta 2A41 1778 Completed during outage 472 Outage exposure in REM 11M 321.9 43 (1)

Number of Mods completed 46 (1) 42 (0)

(O25000 Man hrs) 19 (5)

No. Snubbers tested (a failed) 23 (0) 16 (0)

Numtw of Mod Apprtwal Letters 4

after 6 Mo, CutoU 15 %

% of dual unit outage time 11 %

39%

Check Plate Repair Major Planned Work other SBLC Mod Replaced 54 CRD's llP Turb Owthaul than routine refuel DW Thickness Measus MSIP 127 Welds Main Gen Overhaul Changed 61 CRD's DCRDR Moo

. DCRDR Mais Replaced 250 V Battery Recoated Torus ILRT Vacuumed CRD Gude Tubes Control Rotxn Ann Mod Chem Decon Replaced 32 CRD's Replaced 2 Battenes Cleaned Main Cond MOV Testing DOP MOV Overhaul SRM/lRM Dry Tute Rept 3

Replaced JP Beam Bolt Mejor Work AddeJ Replaced 125 V Battery 24 Weld Overlays P:pe Suppwt Work Repair DW Heat Damage Turb Extract Repairs

~

Recost DW Head inercased 151 Rework 1 CRD Sdiedule Variances

+9 Weld Owrtays

+1 Drain Rx Cav & Decon

+2 CRD Rework

+4 Surwillance Prob 6

September 11,19'X)

(

IASALLE LIR02 L2R02 LIR03 L2R03

- Outage Dates Nils 8 to 7/R%8 10/15/S8 to 2/1059 9/15/t19 to 1/10*4 Days of Outage 117 118 117 Schedule Variance

+ 12

+ 13

+ 27 lacremental czpense cruta 517,42*DJ0

$15,973.000

$15,lla,2tw (taciude O.T.)

Number of Surved & PM's 1240 838 Outrge Work Requests mmpleted IW8 2374 (908) 2168 (645)

- (Number added, 62 %

(42%)

(expressed in %)

Station Work Reqrests 2591 3463 3433 Completed during outage Out ge expcuure in REM 925 1182 788 Number of Mods completed 79 (12) 69 (10) 52 (10)

(#>5000 Mao hrs)

Na Snubters tested (d' failed) 238 (B) 249 (18) 36 (2)

Numter of Mod Approvalletters after 6 Mo. Cutoff

% of durt urut outage time 5%-

0%

26D Major Planned Work other MSIP 27 Welds DW CMing Mod DCRDR Mcds than rouhne refuel Inspect 1 LP Rotor Rt Water Lwl Mod DW Cooling Mod

- Elimmated 958 Snubbers Ehmmatec 747 Snubbers SOR Switch Mod Inspect Gen Rotor Remmed FM CRD Appendiz R Mods DW Cooling Mod Recire Disch Valve Repair Chemical Decon llRT HFA Relay inspection I LP & llP Tuts Inspection Major Work Added Repair RR Pump DW Prns Test Generator Rotor Swap Repair Recirc Disch Valve Mods Caused by MS!P Work T/G Re-ahgnment.

T/G Reabgn Recir Disch Valve Repair Rework 5 CRD's Schedule Variances

+2 DW Press Test

+2 DW Noble Gas Problem

+3 Struct Steel Mods

+5 Contractor Shutdown OC 4 2 Rework CRD's

+3 Mod Scheduhng Prob

+1 TIP Purge Problems

+4 Dual Umt Outage

+ 1 TlP Indexer Prob

+1 Refuel Bridge Problems

+2 FW Control Prob

+3 Rt Vessel Assy & Decon

+ 2 Start-up Problems

+4 T/G Re ahgnment

+1 DW Air Leaks

+3 Gen Disc Oil Prob

+1 Alt Bus Bar Problem September 11,1990 l

l l

QUAD CITIES -

02R09 OlRIO O2R10 QlRII Outage Dates '

4/10/SA to 675/M -

9/10/S9 to !!/23/89 2/4M to 5/8,a90 Days of Outage 76 RO 93 Schedule Wnance

+6

+ 10

+ 10 incremestal cxpense costs S10.821,000

$13,750.000

$20.281,200 (indade O.T.) -

Number of Suned & PM's 964 947

' Outtge Work Requests completed 1156 (379) 1290 (VO) 1755 (834)

(Number added) -

3G 33 %

(92%)

(crpruned in %).

Station Wort Requests 1759 1569 2188 Completed dunng outage Out ge crposure in REM

$21 671 601 Number of Mods completed 36 41 (0) 32

(#>5000 Man hrs)

- No, Snubbers tested (# tailed) 20 (0) 85 (5) 20'o) g

> Number of Mod Apprtwat 1.etters 5

' after 6 Mo. Cutoff

% of curl unit outage time 10 %

0%

0%

Major Planned Work other than routane refuel 2 LP Rotur Inspections Main Gen Overhaul DO Mod & Inspection Turb Vahr inspections 18 Weld Overtap Replace Recire End Cap MSIP 47 Welds Torus Paint Touchup Replace 2 LP Rotors Remov llead Spray Une Installed Recir Pump Clamp Replace RWCU Une Retnove CRD Return Une Removed CRD Return Une Remove llead Spray Une Major Work Added 16 Weld Overlays 885 Work Req Added Aftes LPRM Range Repair Reptaced C" LP Rotor 30 Day Cutoff Rx Flange Repair Expanded ISI Rx Head Crack Investigatkm Flued }{ cad Mod Repair Ext Steam Iso Valve Repair Turb Casings

' Sch:dule Wriances

+3 Drywell Asbeston Removal +1 Rs Head Crack l

+ 2 Recire Sys Decon Delay

+6 RBCCW Il.RT Failures

+ 2 QC Stop Work Order

+2 LPRM Mange k: pairs

+6 Replace Rectre Pump Seal +1 Rs Flange Repair 3 Made Up Ilme September IL 1990 l

l

ZION 7.lR10 72Rio ZlRil Z2Ril Outtge Datu 1".538 to SNw 10/13/88 to 11".&Ta 9n/89 to 1,".5.w Days of Outage T5 76 140 Schedule Variance

+5

+6

+71 incremental expc (include OT.)

$20,917,000

$17,749,000

$18,800,000 Numter of Surveil & PM's 1178 IM5 Outage Work Requests completed (Number added) 2a00 2157 (700) 2920 (1173)

(exnresu:d in %)

4%

67 %

Station Work Requests Completed during outage 3125 3A65 3904 Outage exposore in REM 73' 467 480 Number of mms completed

(#>5000 Man hrs) 37 (15) 31 (7) 30 (3)

No. Snubben tested (# tailed) 324 (12) 218 (4) 24 (1)

Numter of Mod Appnwal Letters after 6 Mo, Cutoff

% of dual unit outage time 07, 13 %

4%

Mapr Planned Work other

  • Main Gen Rotor ILRT S/G Tube Plug Replacement than ratine refuel Replace RCFC Motor 0 DG Overhaul Replaced FW Pump Turd RHR Pump Seal Drain Mcal Replaced 10 incore nimbles Aux FW MOV Mod Repaired RilR Pump Seal DCRDR Mods Repaired 4 SI Check Vatves Replaced RCP Motor Major Wort Added Rx Ilead Repair S/G Girth Weld Repair SI Check Vahe Repair Blackout Mod Replace DG Generator SG Snubber Repair Repaired Rx Ilead SG SlecungTlu;;s. g AdJitK>nal Work in 'A' SG Replace RCP Rotor Close LSIV's Replace D/O's Deanngs Sn.edule Vanances

+4 RCS Drain Down

+1 SG Chem Excuruon

+ 4 148 Bus 0,..., -

+1 RCP Motor lingh Current +2 RCS Fill & Vent

+1 Check Valve Test Prob

+5 AFW MOV Mod Delay

+ 1 Hohdays

+18 D/G Repair Detays

+2 nrust Bearing Tnp Prob

+3 Delay with PT 10

+1 Unit 2 Forced Outage

+9 Connoscal Leaks

+9 AFW MOV Problem

+5 Repack Ril Valve

+3 RPI Cal's and Testmg

+5 Repair AFW Pump

+3 Repair EllC Controla September 11,1990 L. _ _ _ _

In answer to your June 28, 1990. request, attached is a summary itsting the monies paid to the various taxing districts as related to our nuclear stations.

The two years listed include 1985 taxes (paid in 1986) and our latest year, 1989 taxes (payable in 1990).

As we discussed, the monies are attributed to the large tax parcels we identify as the " station" and we estimate this represents the majority of money we pay to the individual taxing districts. For instance, a st. Tion (including the cooling lake) may consist of numerous small tax parcels but the majority of monies (90%+) are generated by the parcels on which the station buildings are located.

--Additionally,_we have paid actually one-half of total amount listed for 1989 taxes.

The remaining one-half will be paid by September 1, 1990.

l

.. j

?

1985 Texeo 1989 Taxes Station / Taxing Districts (Paid in 1986)

(Payable in 1990 Braidwood Forest Preserve

$80,297.28

$1,658,149.78 Will County Building Commission 990,086.05 832,176.72 Reed Township 33,533.34 63,809.08 Reed Township Road & Bridge 68,203.40 108,120.94

-Reed Township Central Assistance 20,461.02 15,952.27 Braidwood Fire District 231,891.57 743,553.00 School District 255-U (Grade School) 7,143,169.64 9,304,604.24 Community College District 525 1,381,118.89 2,151,783.89

[

Co31ey Park District 157,975.57 1,025,376.43 County (Will) Funds 2,896,371.18 5,820,805.85 Fossil Ridge Public Library 98,894.94 564,533.09 Reed Twp. v. Mosquito Abatement 221,559.30

~~

Lawsuit versus County 225,104.27

$13,602,002.68

$22,735,528.86 Byron County (Ogle)

$ 2,182,730.39 2,771,890.64 Ceneral (Ogle County) 86,137.40 Ogle County Road & Bridge 605,148.01 District School 226(Now Byron Unit 2) 5,888,994.34 12,611,082.78 District School 220 (Now:

Oregon) 390,131.05 506,628.61 Junior College 511 (Now:

J.C. 51) 1,168,593.32 1,861,216.08 Junior Oo11ege 523 27,170.34 47,310.61 Byron Fire District 622,637.83 920,924.57 Oregon Park District 920,402.14 1,271,682.78 Byron Library 93,133.33 172,622.17 Byron Forest Preserve District 259,723.93 861,636.88 396,124.76 Rockvale Township

$12,244,802.08 21,421,119.88 Dresden Grundy County 516,279.22 672,348,14 Cooselake Township 5,375.30 17,901.74 Ceneral Assistance (Grundy County) 625.04 Grundy County Road & Bridge 25,001.41 77,115.20 Road & Bridge (Cooselake To6, ship) 4,500.26 172,132.14 Unit School 1 (Grade School 3,086,674.70 4,471,648.73 Joliet Junior College 525 303,017.15 417,076.18 Coal City Fire District 5 60,003.40 69,713.52 238,403.01 Coal City Library S 4,001,476.48

$ 6,136,338.66 t

7 a

-LaSalle-45,550.36 157,985.90 T.B. Sanitarium County Highway (LaSalle) 396,104.28 347,987.84 County Bridge (LaSalle) 96,251.68 173,992,82 Mental Health (LaSalle County) 337,480.74 334,415.80 Other County Funds 1,587,994.03 1,183,162.62 Brookfield Township 871,828.54 758,266.12 Seneca High School.160 2,361,185.82 3,244,293.24 Seneca Crade School 170 2,432,088.72 2,838,887.08 Junior college 513 (Now 1.V. Comm. Coll.)

699,522.58 731,819.02 Seneca Fire District 115,068.69 117,272.00 Marseilles Fire District 90,708.20 153,462.76 Brookfield / Allen Assessor 8,714.32 8,699.70 307,621.50 Seneca Library District 5 9,042,497.96 510,357,866.40_

Quad cities (75%-C.E.Co.'s portion)

-County (Rock Island) Taxes S

105,531.00 124,430.27 Cordova Township 22,132.80 22,693.30 Road & Bridge (Cordova Township) 20,149.20 15,001.25 School District Unit 1 (Crade School) 527,202.60 550,382.06 Cordova Fire District 20,462.40 54,575.29 Cordova Library 6,925.20 24,224.75 Blackhawk College 503 45,031.20 73,370.36 747,434.40

$864,677.28 Zion County (Lake)

E88,708.27

$989.927.34 County Road & Bridge Fund (Lake) 172,108.99 T.B. Sanitorium 7,623.14 240.952.58 254,603.62 Forest Preserve Zion Park District 990,498.96 1,322,870.52 City of Zion 1,739,865.34 2,175,703.60 College of Lake County 532 342,653.34 445,111.21 High School No. 126 3,554,832.65 4,095,023.09 Township (Zion) 251,904.97 425,526.32 North Shore Sanitary District 519,456.20 439,769.88 Zion-Benton Public Library 256,598.85 345,406.30 School District No. 6 (Grade School)

},659,662.79 5,457,063.44

$12,624,976.08

$15,951 005.32

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20085M522&oldid=4353547"