ML20085M160
ML20085M160 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Vogtle ![]() |
Issue date: | 06/23/1995 |
From: | Aufdenkampe J GEORGIA POWER CO., SOUTHERN COMPANY SERVICES, INC. |
To: | |
Shared Package | |
ML20085M109 | List: |
References | |
OLA-3, NUDOCS 9506290066 | |
Download: ML20085M160 (51) | |
Text
r- ._
u.e 9
y 4
AFFIDAVIT OF JOEN G. AUFDENEAMPE, JR.
I, John G. Aufdenkampe, Jr., being duly sworn, state as follows: :
- 1. I am currently employed by Southern Company Services, ,
Inc., as Design Team Leader for the Vogtle Project in Birmingham, 1 Alabama. In 1990, I was employed by Georgia Power Company as.the l l
Manager, Technical Support at the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant i
("Vogtle"). A summary of my professional experience and qualifications is attached to my Profiled Testimony on Diesel Generator Reporting Issues as Exhibit A (GPC Exh. 27).
- 2. I have prepared this affidavit in response to the Licensing Board's request for information regarding calculation of the Safety System Performance Indicator ("SSPI") for Vogtle Emergency AC Power in the 1989-90 time frame. Tr. 4852-53 (May 17, 1995). I
- 3. In 1989, as is still the case today, INPO required the station SSPI for Emergency AC Power to be calculated by taking the average of the individual diesel generator SSPIs. The individual SSPIs are calculated using the following formula:
i Unavailable Hours ,
Hours System Required
" Unavailable Hours" (sometimes referred to as Hours Out of i Service ("OOS")) include known unavailable hours (consisting of 9506290066 950623 PDR 0 ADOCK 05000424 PM i
.. m .. - -
._, e _..,m_. m ,.-m __ _ _ . . - , - -, . . , -
l 6 [,
planned unavailable hours plus unplanned unavailable hours) and estimated unavailable hours. Planned unavailable hours are hours ,
the diesel generator is removed from service for preventive j i
maintenance activities, surveillance testing, plant modifications, and any other time equipment is electively removed from service and the activity is planned in advance. Unplanned unavailable hours !
are hours when the diesel generator is out- of service for ,
corrective maintenance following a failure or human error and any ,
l other known unavailable hours due to unplanned causes. Estimated j unavailable hours are the estimated hours the Diesel Generator is j l
in a failed state prior to being discovered by a test' or operational demand. The estimated unavailable hours are calculated as 1/2 the duration from the last successful operation or test of j the diesel to the time of discovery.
" Hours System Required" is the total number of hours the Diesel Generator is required to be operational during the period of time for which the SSPI is being assessed. Since a Diesel Generator is required for all plant operating modes (i.e., 1 through 6), the " Hours System Required" is equal to the total calendar hours during the assessment period.
l
- 4. The SSPI is calculated for each Diesel Generator, and then the station SSPI is calculated by summing the SSPI's for each Diesel Generator and dividing by the total number of Diesel Generators. As an example, assume Vogtle's four Diesel Generators had the following Unavailable Hours for a month with 31 days (i.e. ,
i 2
1
%~
- 744 hours0.00861 days <br />0.207 hours <br />0.00123 weeks <br />2.83092e-4 months <br />)
Diesel' Unavailable Generator Hours 1A 10 1B 6 2A 4 ;
2B 13 )
The SSPI for each . Diesel Generator and the station would be calculated as shown below:
1A SSPI 10/744=0.0134 1B SSPI 6/744=0.0081 2A SSPI 4/744=0.0054 2B SSPI 13/744=0.0175-Station SSPI: (0.0134+0.0081+0.0054+0.0175)/4 = 0.0111
- 5. The Emergency AC Power SSPI YTD for Vogtle at the and of-February 1990, including 353.53 . estimated unavailable hours for diesel 2A in January 1990, was 0.0804. 133 Performance Monitoring letter sent from the Vogtle site to the corporate office, dated March 16, 1990, (Georgia Power letter log number NOTS-00328),
attached hereto as Aufdenkampe Exhibit Q, item A.19 (Diesel Generator Reliability).
- 6. While INPO guidance for 1989 required thati estimated unavailable hours be included in the calculation of SSPI, Plant Vogtle personnel identified no estimated unavailable hours for 1989. The calculated Year to Date ("YTD") SSPI for Plant Vogtle at the end of 1989 was 0.0052. Egg Performance Monitoring letter dated January 11, 1990 (Georgia Power letter log number NOTS-00252), attached hereto as Aufdenkampe Exhibit R, item C.12 (Diesel Generator Reliability). _
5.
- 7. During my testimony at the Vogtle license amendment hearing, I explained my understanding of the reason why estimated unavailable hours were included in the calculation of SSPI beginning in January, 1990. Tr. 4851-54. Based on discussions with Ms. Debbie Minyard, who was responsible for calculating the SSPI in the relevant time frame, I believed at the time of my testimony that there had been a change in Vogtle's methodology l
which was driven by a change in INPO guidelines. Since my testimony, I have spent numerous hours researching this matter and l
have concluded that I was incorrect. That is, there was no change I in Vogtle's methodology or in INPO guidelines concerning estimated unavailable hours in the 1989-90 time frame. While there was a I change in INPO guidelines issued in 1989, it did not affect the way estimated hours were to be calculated. My incorrect conclusion was based on information provided by Ms. Minyard and, I believe, occurred because the 1989 performance report (Exhibit R) did not l
include a line item entitled " estimated OOS hours," whereas the 1990 reports did include such a line item (Eng, e,c., Exhibit Q).
- 8. In my opinion, it is inappropriate to compare a two-month SSPI (such as the February 1990 YTD SSPI) to a 12-month SSPI '
(such as the 1989 year-end SSPI) for two reasons: (1) when making SSPI comparisons, the time periods over which each SSPI is !
calculated should be equal, and (2) two months worth of data is not a sufficiently long period of time for evaluating long term diesel reliability. Also, INPO SSPI calculations of which I am aware are s
based on a minimum of 12 months worth of-data. INPO now also uses three-year averages to minimize the effect of annual variations such as refueling and planned maintenance outages and to allow more meaningful comparisons of performance. Comparing the 1989 year end SSPI to the February 1990 YTD SSPI would have been like comparing apples to oranges.
- 9. The inappropriateness of comparing the 1989 year end SSPI to the February 1990 YTD SSPI is underscored by the fact that the January 1990 SSPI numbers have been adjusted since 1990. In February 1992, the estimated unavailable hours were re-evaluated in accordance with INPO guidelines. It was determined that the 353.35 estimated unavailable hours on Diesel Generator 2A for January 1990 should not have been included in the 1990 SSPI calculation. The cause of the failure to start associated with those estimated unavailable hours vould not have prevented the diesel from being restarted and brought to load within a few minutes. Under INPO guidelines, such failures should not have been categorized as !
I failures requiring the calculation of estimated unavailable hours. ;
l Using the revised unavailable hours for January 1990, Vogtle's February 1990 YTD SSPI is 0.0180 rather than 0.0804.
- 10. I do not know why the February 1990 YTD SSPI was not included in the SSPI information which I understand was provided to NRC IIT members in April 1990. I have no recollection of the specific reasons for that decision or who made that decision. ;
I
~ ^ ~ ~ *
- e- '~ IMC23 iia 6 i'4:is aos Bi? 140 CCS VCGTLE M b bC P.C2
- 11. Finally, as part of my research, I took the time to listen to the relevant portion of Mr. Moebaugh's Tape No. 32, part of which is transcribed on Intervenor Exhibit 94, and I marked my corrections on, and added additional relevant discussion to, the copy of that transcript which is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
I certify that the foregoing statements are true and correct to the best of my personal knowledge and belief.
kre . ~
ohn G. Aufdey0campe, //r/
Swor to and subscribed before me thi 3rd day f ne 1995.
~
Notary d blic "Y "" '
". % **k {
- k. Nucle;r Ptnt vogtt2 ,-
e# $$n$37[ro. c'eo'$ge acaso GPC EXHIBIT AUmENKAMPE Q C$
- ~;o:Psit;t, sana,,
Nuclear Plant Vogtle gd +$ L \
J
!*e SCu!'e'n eg!rY; System DezF DATE: March 16, 1990 RE:
VNS-AP-19 Performance Monitoring Log: NOTS-00328 FROM: G. Bockhold, Jr.
TO: C. K. McCoy The attached tabulation is in response to your request for performance data input from VEGP for the month of February, 1990.
If you 4279. have any questions, please contact J. C. Williams at extension s/GB/chd JCW -
Attachment xc: W. F. Kitchens W. L. Burmeister J. C. Williams M. D. Barker C. C. Tynan N. O. Superintendents N. O. Managers NORMS
L
- PLANT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH A. OPERATIONS 1.
EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR (%)
' UNIT 1 MONTHLY .
92.58 76.06 ;
UNIT 1 YEAR-TO-DATE 92.58 84.74 UNIT 1 ROLLING AVERAGE 93.99 93.41
- (12 MONTH)
UNIT 2 MONTHLY 97.33 99.83 UNIT 2 YEAR-TO-DATE 97.33 98.52 UNIT 2 ROLLING AVERAGE 93.39 94.02 (12 MONTH)
PLANT MONTHLY 94.95 87.94 PLANT YEAR-TO-DATE 94.95 91.63 !
PLANT ROLUNG AVERAGE 93.74 85.86 (12 MONTH) 2.
UNAVAILABLE GENERATION (HRS) i
- a. FORCEDOUTAGE UNIT 1 MON 1NLY 23.70 3.07 UNIT 1 YTD 23.70 26.77 UNIT 2 MONTHLY 0.00 0.00 UNIT 2 YTD 0.00 0.00
- b. MAINTENANCE OUTAGE UNIT 1 MONTHLY 0.00 0.00 UNIT 1 YTD 0.00 0.00 UNIT 2 MONTHLY 0.00 0.00 UNIT 2 YTD 0.00 0.00
- c. PLANNED OUTAGE (BASIC)
UNIT 1 MONTHLY 0.00 121.93 UNIT 1 YTD 0.00 121.93 UNIT 2 MONTHLY 0.00 0.00 UNIT 2 YTD 0.00 0.00 -
- d. PLANNED OUTAGE (EXTENDED)
UNIT 1 MONTHLY 0.00 0.00 UNIT 1 YTD 0.00 0.00 UNIT 2 MONTHLY 0.00 0.00 UNIT 2 YTD 0.00 0.00
.* PLANT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH
- 3. DERATED GENERATION (HOURS)
- a. FORCED UNIT 1 MONTHLY 21.92 3.68 UNIT 1 YTD 21.92 25.60 UNIT 2 MONTHLY 26.70 0 UNIT 2 YTD 26.70 26.70 1
! b. MAINTENANCE
' UNIT 1 MONTHLY 183.85 505.75 L
UNIT 1 YTD 183.85 689.40 UNIT 2 MONTHLY 15.50 0.00 UNIT 2 YTD 15.50 15.50
- c. PLANNED UNIT 1 MONTHLY 21.87- 277.52 UNIT 1 YTO 21.87 299.34 UNIT 2 MONTHLY 45.83 0.00 1
UNIT 2 YTD 45.83 45.83 )
- 4. DERATED GENERATION (MWH)
- a. FORCED UNIT 1 MONTHLY 13841.08 1218.75 UNIT 1 YTD 13841.08 15059.83 UNIT 2 MONTHLY 727.43 0.00 UNIT 2 YTD 727.43 727.43
- b. MAINTENANCE UNIT 1 MONTHLY 10733.00 19271.25 UNTT 1 YTD 10733.00 30004.25 UNIT 2 MONTHLY 10475.83 0.00 l UNIT 2 YTD 10475.83 10475.83 C. PLANNED j UNIT 1 MONTHLY 8079.80 18200 1
UNIT 1 YTD 8079.80 26279.80 UNIT 2 MONTHLY 10155.83 0.00 UNIT 2 YTD 10155.83 10155.83 l
l l
i
. PLANT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS JANUARY FEBRUARY- MARC)3
- 5. EQUIVALENT DERATED GENERATION (HRS).
- a. FORCED UNIT 1 MONTHLY 12.83 1.13 UNIT 1 YTD 12.83 '13.96 UNIT 2 MONTHLY 0.66 0.00 UNIT 2 YTD 0.66 0.66
- b. MAINTENANCE UNIT 1 MONTHLY 9.96 17.86 UNIT 1 YTD 9.95 27.81 UNIT 2 MONTHLY 9.44 0.00 UNIT 2 YTD 9.44 9.44
- c. PLANNED UNIT 1 MONTHLY 7.49 16.87 UNIT 1 YTD 7.49 24.36 UNIT 2 MONTHLY 9.15 0.00 UNIT 2 YTD 9.15 9.15
- 6. GROSS MAXIMUM CAPACITY (MWe)
UNIT 1 1162 1162 UNIT 2 1179 1179
- 7. GROSS DEPENDABLE CAPACITY (MWe)
UNIT 1 1160 1109 UNIT 2 1178 -1177
- 8. PLANNED ENERGY LOSS (MWh)
UNIT 1 MONTHLY 0.00 131562.5 l
UNIT 1 YTD 0.00 131562.5 -
UNIT 2 MONTHLY 0.0 0.0 UNIT 2 YTD 0.0 0.0 ,
l PLANT MONTHLY 0.0 131562.5 PLANT YTD 0.00 131562.5
. . . - - - . . _ ~
. PLANT PERFORMANCEINDICATORS JANUARY. FEBRUARY MARCH !
. 9. UNIT CAPABILITY FACTOR (%)
UNIT 1 MONTHLY 92.75 78.57 -
UNIT 1 YTD 86.02 78.57 I
UNIT 2 MONTHLY 97.41 100.00 UNIT 2 YTD 98.64 100.00 -l PLANT MONTHLY 95.11 89.44 .
PLANT YTD 92.42 89.44 !
- 10. UNPLANNED ENERGY LOSS (MWH) l i
. UNIT 1 MONTHLY 58226.2 23802.5 ~
UNIT 1 YTD 58226.2 82028.7 !
UNIT 2 MONTHLY 21359.1 . 0.0 . !
l I
UNIT 2 YTD 21359.1 21359.1 PLANT MONTHLY 79585.3 23802.5 'i PLANT YTO 79585.3 103387.8
- 11. UNPLANNED CAPABILITY LOSS FACTOR (%) l UNIT 1 MONTHLY 7.25 3.28 ;
i UNIT 1 YTD 7.25 5.37 l
UNIT 2 MONTHLY 2.59 0.00 t UNIT 2 YTD .2.59 1.36 PLANT MONTHLY 4.89 1.62 PLANTYTD 4.89 3.34
- 12. REFERENCE ENERGY GENERATION UNIT 1 MONTHLY 802776.0 725088.0 UNIT 1 YTD 802776.0 1527864.0 UNIT 2 MONTHLY 825840.0 . 745920.0 UNIT 2 YTD 825840.0 1571760.0 PLANT MONTHLY 1628616.0 1471008.0 PLANT YTD 1628616.0 3099624.0 ;
l 1
PLANT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS l JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH
- 13. REACTOR THERMAL ENERGY ;
GENERATED (BTU) ;
UNIT 1 MONTHLY 8.102E.12 6.182E+12 UNIT 1 YTD 8.102E+12 1.428E+13 .
UNIT 2 MONTHLY 8.544E+12 7.815E+12 i
UNIT 2 YTD 8.544E+12 1.636E+13 '
- 14. HEAT RATE BEST DAY DATA !
t
- a. ACTUAL GROSS HEAT RATE (BTU /KWH)
UNIT 1 10028 10526 UNIT 2 9879 9870 l i
- b. ACTUAL THERMAL GENERATION (MWt)
UNIT 1 - 81828 81760 ,
UNIT 2 81821 81789 ,
- c. ACTUAL ELECTRICAL GENERATION (MWe) f UNIT 1. 27850 26510 UNTT 2 28267 28283
- d. CIRCULATING WATER TEMPERATURE (DEG-F)
UNIT 1 69.9 70.2 UNIT 2 66.1 63.0
- e. ADJUSTMENTTO ACTUAL GHR(MWe) l l
UNIT 1 MONTHLY -0.46 -0.17 l
UNIT 2 MONTHLY 1.48 0.63 l
- f. POWER LEVEL ATWHICH ACTUAL HR :
WAS DETERMINED (%) .
i UNIT 1 99.97 99.94 )l UNIT 2 99.79 100.00 l
- 9. DATE OF BEST DAY DATA UNIT 1 01/02/90 02/05/90 UNIT 2 01/26/90 02/26/90 ADJUSTED GROSS HEAT RATE (BTU /KWH)
UNIT 1 10031.9 10527.7 UNIT 2 9866.8 9864.5
l
. PLANT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS i
JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH
- 15. AUTOMATIC REACTOR TRIPS
!- a. TOTAL AUTOMATIC REACTORTRIPS UNIT 1 MONTHLY 1 0 UNIT 1 YTD 1 1 UNIT 1 CUMULATIVE 20 20 I UNIT 2 MONTHLY 0 0 l
L UNIT 2 YTD 0 0 ,
i UNIT 2 CUMULATIVE 4 4
( b. AUTOMATIC REACTOR TRIPS /
l 1000 CRITICAL, HRS.
UNIT 1 0.9991 0.9725 UNIT 2 0.6716 0.6035
7000 CR ACAL HRS.
UNIT 1 6.9938 6.8075 UNIT 2 4.7015 4.2248 - l
- 16. MANUAL REACTOR TRIPS UNIT 1 MONTHLY 0 1 UNIT 1 YTD 0 1 UNIT 2 MONTHLY 0 0
.- UNIT 2 YTD 0 d
- 17. UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS
- a. EMERGENCY CORE COOLING SYSTEMS UNIT 1 MONTHLY 0 0 UNIT 1 YTD 0 0 UNIT 2 MONTHLY 0 0 UNIT 2 YTD 0 0
- b. EMERGENCY POWER UNIT 1 MONTHLY 0 0 UNIT 1 YTD 0 0 UNIT 2 MONTHLY 0 0 UNIT 2 YTD 0 0
j _...m 3 . - * - . -m 4 - - . - , . ,. - - -m .. -
. PLANT PERFORMANCE IND6CATORS 4
JANUARY FEBRUARY
- 18. SAFETY SYSTEM UNAVAILABILITY >
i
UNIT 1 PLANNED HOURS OOS 3.22' 52.37 UNIT 1 UNPLANNED HOURS OOS 0.00 0.00 ,
UNIT 1 ESTIMATED HOURS OOS 0.00 0.00 '
UNIT 1 TOTAL HOURS OOS 3.22 52.37 -,;
i UNIT 1 SSPI MONTHLY 0.0011 0.0239 >
UNIT 1 SSPI YTD 0.0011 0.0100 !
i UNIT 2 PLANNED HOURS OOS 0.62 0.00 i L
UNIT 2 UNPLANNED HOURS OOS 0.00 0.00 UNIT 2 ESTIMATED HOURS OOS 0.00 0.00 '
UNIT 2 TOTAL HOURS OOS 0.62 0.00 UNIT 2 SSPI MONTHLY 0.0002 0.0000 UNIT 2 SSPI YTD 0.0002 0.0001
- b. AUXIUARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM UNIT 1 PLANNED HOURS OOS - 2.72 6.30 UNIT 1 UNPLANNED HOURS OOS 0.00 25.55 UNIT 1 ESTIMATED HOURS OOS 0.00 0.00 UNIT 1 TOTAL HOURS OOS 2.72 31.85 i UNIT 1 SSPI MONTHLY 0.0012 0.0194 UNIT 1 SSPI YTD 0.0012 0.0000 UNIT 2 PLANNED HOURS OOS 1.12 1.02 UNIT 2 UNPLANNED HOURS OOS 0.00 0.00 l
UNIT 2 ESTIMATED HOURS OOS 0.00 . 0.00 ,
- i UNIT 2 TOTAL HOURS OOS 1.12 1.02 j' s
UNIT 2 SSPI MONTHLY 0.0005 0.0005 UNIT 2 SSPI YTD 0.0005 0.0005
'l
. PLANT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH)
- 19. DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY PLANT SSPl MONTHLY 0.1429 0.0112 ,
PLANT SSPI YTD 0.1429 0.0004 ,
e
- a. DIESEL GENERATOR 1A-SSPI FOR MONTHLY 0.0017 0.0019 ,
SSPI FOR YTD 0.0017 0.0018 START DEMANDS 2 5 START FAILURES 0 0 ,
+
LOAD-RUN DEMANDS 2 4 LOAD-RUN FAILURES 0 0 PLANNED HRS OOS 1.30 1.27 i
UNPLANNED KNOWN HRS OOS 0.00 0.00 l l
ESTIMATED HRS OOS 0.00 0.00 HOURS OF OPERATION 3.52 44.4 FAILURE DATES N/A N/A
- b. DIESEL GENERATOR 1B SSPI FOR MONTHLY 0.0229 0.0006 SSPl FOR YTD 0.0229 0.0123 START DEMANDS 4 5 START FAILURES 0 0 LOAD-RUN DEMANDS 3 4 LOAD-RUN FAILURES 1 0
\
PLANNED HRS OOS 0.40 0.38 UNPLANNED KNOWN HOURS OOS 16.63 0.00 ESTIMATED HOURS OOS 0.00 0.00 HOURS OF OPERATION 4.65 35.74 l FAILURE DATES 1/3/90 N/A
- c. OtESEL GENERATOR 2A SSPI FOR MONTHLY 0.5110 0.0375 SSPl FOR YTD 0.5110 0.2863
.< PLANT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ,
f
-JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCEI
- 19. c. DIESEL GENERATOR 2A (CONT.) ,
I START DEMANDS 7- 8 I
START FAILURES - .2. O_ j i
LOAD-RUN DEMANDS 3 '5 LOAD-RUN FAILURES . 0- 1 I
PLANNED HOURS OOS 1.92 24.80 ~i UNPLANNED KNOWN HOURS OOS 24.90 0.37 f ESTIMATED HOURS 008 363.36 0.00 .
HOURS OF OPERATION 6.02 9.06 FAILURE DATES 1/24/90 2/1/90 1/25/90 !
- d. DIESEL GENERATOR 28 SSPl FOR MONTHLY 0.0369 0.0047
-l SSPI FOR YTD 0.0359 0.0211 START DEMANDS . 4 2.
START FAILURES 0 0 LOAD-RUN DEMANDS 3 2 r
LOAD-RUN FAILURES 0 0 PLANNED HOURS OOS 3.33 3.18 j UNPLANNED KNOWN HOURS OOS 23.36 0.00 ESTIMATED HOURS OOS 0.00 0.00 HOURS OF OPERATION 6.54 4.19 FAILURE DATES N/A N/A B. ENGINEERING
- 1. ACTIVE DESIGN CHANGE REQUESTS UNIT 1 MONTHLY 220 223 UNIT 1 YTD AVG. 220 222 UNIT 2 MONTHLY 52 58 UNIT 2 YTD AVG. 52 55
. 2. OUTSTANDING AS-BUILTNOTICES CRITICAL 29 21 NON-CRITICAL 1264 1369
.- - PLANT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS JANI;ARY FEBRUARY MARCH C. MAINTENANCE
- 1. CORRECTIVE MWO'S COMPLETED UNIT 1 MONTHLY 224 149 ,
t UNIT 1 YTD 224 373 UNIT 2 MONTHLY 138 89 I UNIT 2 YTD 138 227 . -
PLANT 362 238 l
l PLANT YTD 382 600 l . TOTAL MANHOURS 2213.5 2033.5 1 1 TOTAL MANHOURS YTD 2213.5 4247-l
- 2. OUTAGE WORK COMPLETED ;
UNIT 1 4 89 UNIT 1 YTD 4 93 UNIT 2 10 1 UNIT 2 YTD 10 11 PLANT 14 90 PLANT YTD 14 104 l '
TOTAL MANHOURS MONTHLY 131.0 679.0 1
TOTAL MANHOURS YTD 131.0 810.0 l l
- 3. NON-OUTAGE CORRECTIVE MWO'S OUTSTANDING UNIT 1 510 521 UNIT 2 325 324 PLANT 835 845
- 4. OUTAGE CORRECTIVE MWO'S OUTSTANDING UNIT 1 618 667 UNIT 2 250 259 PLANT 868 926 t
l
.e -
. PLANT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH
- 5. CORRECTIVE MWO'S OUTSTANDING LESSTHAN THREE MONTHS OLD UNIT 1 NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED UNIT 2 NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED 1
PLANT NOT REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED
- 6. SCHEDULED PREDICTIVE MAINT. TASKS COMPLETED ,
UNIT 1 MONTHLY 70 37 l
UNIT 1 YTD 70 107 UNIT 2 MONTHLY 40 34 UNIT 2 YTD 40 74 PLANT MONTHLY 110 71 PLANT YTD 110 181 TOTAL MANHOURS MONTHLY 410.0 480.0 ,
4 TOTAL MANHOURS YTD 410.0 890.0
- 7. PREDICTIVE MAINT. TASKS NOT COMPLETED WITHIN ALLOWABLEINTERVAL UNIT 1 MONTHLY 35 39 UNIT 1 QUARTERLY 35 74 l UNIT 2 MONTHLY 35 42 ;
l UNIT 2 OUARTERLY 35 77 l PLANT MONTHLY 70 81 PLANT QUARTERLY 70 151
- 8. UNSCHEDULED PREDICTIVE M AINTENANCE I COMPLETED (MANHOURS) l PLANT MONTHLY 120.0 120.0 PLANT YTD 120.0 240.0
- 9. PERIODIC MWO'S COMPLETED l l
UNIT 1 MONTHLY 95 79 '
UNIT 1 YrD 95 174 UNIT 2 MONTHLY 37 44 UNIT 2 YTD 37 81 PLANT MONTHLY 132 123 PLANT YTD 132 255 TOTAL MANHOURS MONTHLY 709.0 819.7 TOTAL MANHOURS YTD 709.0 1528.7
- PLANT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
' JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH
- 10. PERIODIC MWO'S NOT COMPLETED WITHIN ALLOWABLEINTERVAL UNIT 1 MONTHLY 0 1 UNIT 1 OUARTERLY 0 '1 UNIT 2 MONTHLY 0 0 P
UNIT 2 OUARTERLY 0 0 PLANT MONTHLY 0 1 PLANT QUARTERLY -0 1
- 11. PLANNED MAINTENANCE COMPLETED MANHOURS PLANTMONTHLY 847.0 1489.5 PLANT YTD 847.0 2316.5
- 12. MWO'S ON-HOLD FOR SPARE PARTS i i
UNIT 1 MONTHLY 79 56 l
UNIT 1 YTD AVG. 79 68 j 1
UNIT 2 MONTHLY 30 26 UNIT 2 YTD AVG. 30 28 PLANT MONTHLY 109 82 ,
i PLANTYTD AVG. 109 96
- 13. TECH SPEC SURVEILLANCES COMPLETED UNIT 1 MONTHLY 439 399 UNIT 1 YTD 439 838 UNIT 2 MONTHLY 311 253
)
UNIT 2 YTD 311 564 PLANT MONTHLY 750 963 l PLANT YTD 750 1713 TOTAL MANHOURS MONTHLY 6896.2 3478.8 TOTAL MANHOURS YTD 6896.2 10374.9
- 14. CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS OUT OF SERVICE UNIT 1 MONTHLY 38 34 UNIT 2 MONTHLY 28 28
PLANT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH D. RADIOLOGICAL SAFETY
- 1. PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (MANREM)
- a. DOSIMETER MONTHLY 1.84 47.717
- b. DOSIMETERYTD 1.84 49.56
- c. TLD MONTHLY 1.64 NOT AVAIL
- 2. SKIN / CLOTHING CONTAMINATION
- a. MONTHLY 1 15
- b. YTD 1 16
- 3. BODY COUNTS > REPORTING LVL 1
- a. MONTHLY 0 0 b.YTD 0 0
- 4. l BODY COUNTS > REPORTING LVL 2 ;
l
- a. MONTHLY 0 0 l b.YTD 0 0
- 5. EXPOSURE GREATER THAN 5 REM / YEAR
- a. UTILITY PERSONNEL MONTHLY 0 0 ;
YTD 0 0
- b. CONTRACT PERSONNEL ,
MONTHLY 0 0 YTD 0 0
- 6. SOLIDS SHIPPED (CU-M) !
- a. DRY ACTIVEWASTE 10.45 0.00
- b. RESIN, SLUDGE. BOTTOMS & OTHERS 5.72 3.75
- c. TOTAL RADIOACTIVE WASTE MONTHLY 16.17 3.75
- d. TOTAL RADIOACTIVE WASTE YTD 16.17 19.92
PLANT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH
- 7. SOLIDS GENERATED (CU-M)
- a. DRY ACTIVEWASTE 0.00 0.00 1987+1988+1989 = 101.76
- b. RESIN, SLUDGE, BOTTOMS & OTHERS 0.00 0.00 1987+1988,1989 = 63.18
- c. TOTAL RADIOACTIVE WASTE MONTHLY 0.00 0.00
- d. TOTAL RADIOACTIVE WASTE YTD 0.00 0.00 1987+1988+1989 - 164.88
- 8. TEMPORARY STORAGE (CU-M)
- a. DRY ACTIVEWASTE 0.00 0.M
- b. RESIN, SLUDGE, BOTTOMS & OTHERS 0.00 ' ~ 0.00
- c. TOTAL RADIOACTIVE WASTE MONTHLY 0.00 0,.00
- d. TOTAL RADIOACTIVE WASTE YTD 0.00 0.00
- 9. FUEL RELIABILITY (MICROCURIES/ML)
- a. FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR 1.) IOOINE - 131 UNIT 1 MONTHLY 2.138E-04 1.893E-04 UNIT 2 MONTHLY 2.222E-04 2.255E-04 2.) IODINE - 134 UNIT 1 MONTHLY 5.012E-03 5.063E-03 UNIT 2 MONTHLY 7.033E-03 7.580E-03 3.) PURIFICATION CONS. (SEC-1).
UNIT 1 MONTHLY 1.762E-05 1.762E-05 UNIT 2 MONTHLY 1.604E-05 1.583E-05 4.) POWER LEVEL ATWHICH FRI INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED UNIT 1 MONTHLY 100 % 100 %
UNIT 2 MONTHLY 100 % 100 %
- b. ESTIMATED NUMBER OF FAILED FUEL RODS (FFR)
UNIT 1 MONTHLY 1 1 UNIT 2 MONTHLY 0 0
PLANT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH
- c. MOST RECENT CONFIRMED NUMBER OF FFR
. UNIT 1 1 1 .
UNIT 2 0 0
- d. DATE LAST POWER OPERATION w/FFR UNIT 1 1/31/90 2/23/90 UNIT 2 - N/A N/A
- e. TECHNIQUE THAT IDENTIFIED FAILURE UNIT 1 5 (I-131/l-133 RATIO) 5 (1-131/I-133 RATIO)
UNIT 2 N/A N/A
- f. CAUSE OF FAILURE UNIT 1 7 7-UNIT 2 N/A N/A
- g. FAILED FUEL ROD CYCLE UNIT 1 1- 1 UNIT 2 N/A N/A
- 10. RADIATION OCCURRENCE REPORTS MONTHLY 0 0 YTD TOTAL 0 0 E. CHEMISTRY PARAMETERS
- 1. PERFORMANCE INDEX UNIT 1 MONTHLY 0.125 0.138 UNIT 1 YTD AVG. 0.125 0.132 UNIT 2 MONTHLY 0.176 0.145 UNIT 2 YTD AVG. 0.176 0.161
- 2. % OF TIME AUX COOLING OUT OF SPEC UNIT 1 MONTHLY 0.50 % 0.00 %
UNIT 1 YTD AVG. 0.50 % 0.25 %
UNIT 2 MONTHLY 0.00 % 0.00 %
UNIT 2 YTD AVG. 0.00 % 0.00 %
-l PLANT PERFOfudANCE INDICATORS '
, 4 i
\:
JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCFi
- 3. CONDENSATE PUMP DISCHARGE I DISSOLVED OXYGEN (PPB) !
~ UNIT 1 MONTHLY 2.00 2.50 i
UNIT 1 YTD AVG. 2.00 2.55 UNIT 2 MONTHLY 2.90 2.60 UNIT 2 YTD AVG. 2.90 2.75 ,
' 4. CGMOENSER AIR IN-LEAKAGE (SCFM) ,
l UNIT 1 MONTHLY 32.00 31.00 UNIT 1 Y TD AVG. 32.00 31.50 UNIT 2 MONTHLY 19.00
.l 17.00 i UNIT 2 YTD AVG. 19.00 18.00
- 5. STEAM GENERATOR BLOWDOWN CATION CONDUCTIVITY (MICRO SICM)
UNIT 1 MONTHLY 0.135 0.165 UNIT 1 YTD AVG. 0.135 0.150 UNIT 2 MONTHLY 0.253 0.216 UNIT 2 YTD AVG. 0.253 0.235 6.' STEAM GENERATOR CHLORIDE (ppb)
UNIT 1 MONTHLY 1.30 1.30 UNIT 1 YTD AVG. 1.30 1.30 UNIT 2 MONTHLY 1.60 1.90 -
UNIT 2 YTD AVG. 1.60 1.75 l
- 7. STEAM GENERATOR SULFATE (ppb) !
i UNIT 1 MONTHLY 1.70 1.50 i
UNIT 1 YTD AVG. 1.70 - 1.60 1
UNIT 2 MONTHLY 1.90 1.50 l l UNIT 2 YTD AVG. 1.90 1.70 l
- 8. STEAM GENERATOR SODIUM (ppb) *
- UNIT 1 MONTHLY 0.90 1.30 UNIT 1 YTD AVG. 0.90 1.10 UNIT 2 MONTHLY 2.00 0.90 UNIT 2 YTD AVG. 2.00 1.45
-- . - . . - . _-. __ ~ _ _ - . -- _
=*
PLANT PERFORMANCE IND6CATORS '
JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH F. ADMINISTRATIVE PARAMETERS
- 1. NRC VIOLATIONS
- a. LEVEL 1 0 0
- b. LEVEL tl 0 0
. c. LEVEL!!! 0 0
- d. LEVELIV 1 2
- e. LEVEL V 0 0
- f. TOTAL VIOLATIONS MONTHLY 1 2
- g. TOTAL VIOLATIONS OPEN 49 45
- 2. LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS
- a. PERSONNEL ERRORS UNIT 1 1 0 UNT 2 0 0'
- b. DESIGN ERRORS UNIT 1 0 0 UNIT 2 0- O
- c. EXTERNALCAUSES UNIT 1 0 0 UNIT 2 0 0
- d. DEFECTIVE PROCEDURES UNIT 1 0 1 UNIT 2 0 0
- e. MANAGEMENT /OA DEFICIENCY .
UNIT 1 0 0 UNT2 ,
0 0
- f. OTHER UNIT 1 0 0 UNIT 2 0 0
- g. TOTAL LER'S UNT1 1 1 UNIT 2 0 0
N. . .
- O PLANT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH [
- 3. SAFETY LOST TIME ACCIDENTS -
- a. MONTHLY 0 0 b.YTD 0 0 '
WORK RELATED FATALmES l i
- a. MONTHLY 0 0 i b.YTD 0 0 RESTRICTED WORK ACCIDENTS
- a. MONTHLY 0 0 b.YTD 0 0 TOTAL MANHOURS WORKED
- a. UNIT 1 ST MONTHLY 43551.75 51679.00 YTD 43551.75 95230.75
- b. UNIT 1 OT MONTHLY 3399.25 8897.00
{
YTD 3399.25 12296.25
- c. UNIT 2 ST MONTHLY 20044.25 27702.00 YTD 20044.25 47746.25
- d. UNIT 2 OT MONTHLY 2150.75 2184.00 YTD 2150.75 4334.75
- e. GENERAL ST MONTHLY 102698.00 94233.00 YTD 102698.00 196931.00
- f. GENERAL OT MONTHLY 5880.50 8362.00 YTD 5880.50 14242.50
- .. .* ' PLANT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS i
JANUARY' FEBRUARY MARCH:
- 4. MEDICAL ATTENTIONS j MEDICAL ATTENTIONS MONTHLY 1 1 l MEDICAL ATTENTIONS YTD 1 2 -
- 5. ABSENTEEISM
- b. PERSONAL HOURS PERSONAL HOURS MONTHLY 1.67 1.09 ;
I PERSONAL HRS / PERSON YTD AVG. 1.67 1.38 s
i
[
L
+
t t
- \
. l l
1 I
i 1
l .
.. , N lear a 3 g GPC EXHIBIT Waynesboro. Georg2 30830 Tetophone 404 724-8114 AUPDENKAMPE R 1 i
404 554-9961 ;
i Georgia Power
~ewav,e.ru.re l
DATE: January 11, 1990 i
RE: VNS-AP-19 Performance Monitoring j Log: NOTS-00252 i FROM: G. Bockhold, Jr. ,
TO: C. K. McCoy
.The attached tabulation is in response to your request for performance data input from VEGP for the month of December, 1989.
If you have any questions, please contact J.'C. Williams at extension l
, 4279. j l
hhf CW/GB/chd ff 1 I
l Attachment xc: W. F. Kitchens W. L. Bumeister J. C. Williams M. D. Barker C. C. Tynan N. O. Superintendents N. O. Managers ,
NORMS l l
I I
I
.s.
, [
t i
l l
PIANT PMU99WCE INDICA 2CRS AVI!VYID Oct-89 Nov-89 Dec-89 A.OPERATICH3 ;
- 1. AD7USTED NET EUDCIRICAL DERGY (leff) l UNIT 1 8,726,069 681,140 768,940 822,960 l UNIT 2 5,561,283 659,096 762,869 766,136 -
- 2. 14JIVAIJ!NF AVAIIABILTIY FACICR (%) j UNIT 1 M2fIHDf ICL 83.87 98.33 100.00 UNIT 1 YEAIMt>IR2E NA 90.51 91.21 91.96.
UNIT 13 CLUNG AVI! RAGE ICL 82.58 90.56 91.96 (12 M 3frH) -
UNIT 2 M3f!Muf ICL 79.72 95.92 91.59 UNIT 2 YEMMt>Dn2E 10L 92.53 93.05 92.85 IMIT 2 3 CLUNG AVERAGE 10L 92.53 93.05 92.85 PIANT M2f!Huf ICL 81.80 97.13 95.80 PIANT YEAR-20-DA3E 10L 91.22 91.89 92.30 PIANT 1RLING AVERAGE 20L 85.68 91.43 92.30
- 3. EQUIVAIRfr PtBCED CLTInGE FACICR (%)
UNIT 1 ICtf!Huf ICL 14.06 0.00 0.00 UNIT 1 YEMMO-Dn2E 10L 6.62 '
6.02 5.51 UNIT 1 ROILING AVI! RAGE ICL 6.53 6.52 5.51 (12 M2fDI)
UNIT 2 PCNIHDf ICL 3.16 2.50 7.44 UNIT 2 YEAR 'It>DATE 10L 2.34 2.36 3.06 UNIT 2 ICILING AVERAGE ICL 2.34 2.36 3.06 PIANT M2f!HDf IGL 8.61 1.25 3.72 ;
PIANT YEMMO-DATE 10L 5.11 4.67 4.57 i i
PIANT ROILING AVERAGE }0L 5.22 5.07 4.57 l 1
-. _ - _ . . . . , . . . . _ i
r"- .
I f
?
PIANI' PERIGMANCE INDICXIWS '
AVE / YID Oct-89 Nov-89 Dec-89
- 4. REACIUR CRITICAL (HOURS) ,
UNIT 1 PONIHIX 8412.98 658*05 720.00 744.00 UNIT 2 PENIHIX 5211.61 629.52 708.10 721.70
- 5. GENERA 2Gt CH-IINE (IOURS)
UNIT 1 PONIHIX 8277.17 640.24 720.00 744.00 UNIT 2 PONIHIX 5106.24 609.65 702.00 688.60
- 6. UNAVAIIABIE GENERATICH (HRS)
- a. FORCED CKTIAGE l
INIT 12OfIHIX 482.83 104.76 0.00 0.00 4 UNIT 2 )Df!HIX 165.94 23.57 17.98 55.37
- b. MAINITNANCE CK7EAGE
~
I UNIT 1 POf1HIX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 UNIT 2 PONIEIX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 <
- c. PIANNED CK7EAGE (BASIC)
UNIT 1 POfIHIX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 UNIT 2 )DilHIX 141.54 100.55 0.00 0.00 l
- d. PIANNED CUIAGE (DCIDEED) ;
. l UNIT 1 PONIHLY 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 i UNIT 2 )Df1EIX 11.23 11.23 0.00 0.00 l
- 7. DERATED GENERATICE (100RS)
- a. IGCED i i
UNIT 13OfIHIX 938.44 0.00 45.10 0.00 ,
UNIT 2 POfIHIX 168.06 0.00 2.57 0.00 ,
)
l
i . l 1
i
!' l' l
1
, PUFP PERPG09MCE INDICNIWS l 1
l AVEAfID Oct-89 Nov-89 Dec-89 l
- b. MAINIDUNCE UNIT 1 M2fIHIX 0.00 ~0.00 0.00 0.00 UNIT 2 M2fINIX 88.37 0.00 88.37 0.00
- c. PIANNED 1
UNIT 1 M2f1HIX 160.02 52.24 19.93 0.00 UNIT 2 M2f1HIX 97.73 38.88 39.40 19.45
- 8. IERATED GENERATICE (M4H) ,
g
- a. FORCED l UNIT 1 M2fIHIX 196,578.76 0.00 10,642.36 0.00 UNIT 2 M3fIMIX 37,863.11 0.00 107.45 0.00
- b. MADfIDUNCE UNIT 1 M3f1HIX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 i UNIT 2 M3fIHIX 2,819.44 0.00 2,819.44 0.00 l
- c. PIANNED UNIT 1 PON1HIX 44,953.92~ 16,618.10 2,391.80 0.00 $
UNIT 2 M271HIX 34,244.38 17,086.10 9,429.70 7,728.58 i
- 9. B30IVAIDff CERATED GENERATICN (LOURS) i
- a. FMCED UNIT 1 M2f1HIX 179.64 0.00 9.83 0.00 -
.c UNIT 2 PONIHIX 34.96 0.00 0.10 0.00 ,
- b. MAINIDENCE -
UNIT 1 M2fIMIX 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 t
UNIT 2 M2fIHIX 2.60 0.00 2.60 0.00 1
1
PIANI' IERIGMANCE INDICAIGtS AVE / YID Oct-89 Nov-89 Dec-89
- c. PIANNED 100RS INIT 1 M2fIHLY 41.51 15.34 2.21 0.00 INIT 2 M2fIHLY 31.63 15.78 8.71 7.14
- 10. REACTGt 'IfEEMAL INERN GENERATED (BIU)
INIT 1 M2fIHLY 9.41E+13 7.31E+12 8.16E+12 8.65E+12 (WIT 2 . N 5.87E+13 6.94E+12 8.02E+12 7.97E+12
- 11. REAC'ICR 'IHERMAL ENERGY GENERATED (MWH)
INIT 1 M2f1HLY 27,557,754.0 2,142,954.0 2,391,716.0 2,535,607.00
. UNIT 2 M2fIHLY 17,207,113.0 2,034,639.0 2,350,213.0 2,335,572.00
- 12. GROSS ELECIRICAL GDERATION (M)
UNIT 1 M2fIHLY 9,161,520.0 714,730 805,480 -
860,950 INIT 2 M2fIHLY 5,813,966.0 689,256 798,539 801,186
- 13. STATION SD WICE ( M )
INIT 1 M2fIHLY 450,910 38,640 36,540 36,760 c
LNIT 2 M2fIHLY 265,590 35,770 36,480 36,440
,14. OPERATIONAL HEAT RATE (BIU/M)
GRASS HEAT RATE INIT 1 NA 10232.5 10,134.2 10047.0 12 M2fIH ROLLING AVERAGE NA 10163.2 10,160.8 10163.7 UNIT 2 NA 10074.0 10,044.9 9947.8 ROLLING AVERAGE NA 10066.6 10,063.5 10,049.00
- 15. AITICATIC REACIIR 'IRIPS LNIT 1 M2fIHLY 2 1 0 0 INIT 2 M2fIHLY 4 1 0 1
PLANT PERPG89WCE INDICATORS AVS/ YID Oct-89 Nov-89 Dec-89
- 16. UNPIANNED MANUAL REAC'ICR TRIPS i UNIT 1 EffIHLY 3 0 0 0 UNIT 2 MCHIHLY 1 0 1 0
- 17. UNPIANNED SAFE 1Y SYSTEM ACIUATIONS (EMDGENCY 03tE COOLING SYSIDE)
UNIT 1 0 0 0 0 UNIT 2 0 0 0 0
- 18. UNPIANNED SAFEIY SYSTD( ACIUATIONS (DER 2NCY POWER)
UNIT 1 0 0 0 0 UNIT 2 2 1 0 0
- 19. SAFEIY SYSTEM UNAVAIIABIIATY EST/ENOWN 100RS CLTI-OF-SERVICE
- a. HIGH PRESSURE DUECTION SYSID(
UNIT 1 (HOURS)/PIANNED 166.89 43.43 0.10 33.93 (ICURS)/UNPIANNED 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 UNIT 1 (SSPI) 0.0050 0.0165 0.00 0.0114 UNIT 2 (HOURS)/PIANNED 24.32 1.66 6.07 3.17 (HOURS)/UNPIANNED 0.00- 0.00 0.00 0.0 UNIT 2 (SSPI) 0.0012 0.0007 0.002'1 0.0011
- b. AUXIIJARY FEEDNhTER SYSID(
UNIT 1 (}DURS)/PIANNED 147.24 0.00 28.40- 4.44 (100RS)/UNPIANNED 102.38 0.00 0.00 0.0 UNIT 1 (SSPI) 0.0099 0.0000 0.0131 0.0020 UNIT 2 (IOURS)/PIANNED 9.17 0.43 0.80 1.81 (IOURS)/UNPIANNED 9.04 9.04 0.00- 0.0 UNIT 2 (SSPI) 0.0012 0.0050 0.0004 0.0008
- 20. C0tfIRDL ROCM INSIRLMENIS OUT OF SERVICE UNIT 1 33 36 38 48 LNIT 2 27 28 29 41
l l
PUNT PERIUMANCE INDICKIORS AVE / YID Oct-89 Nov-89 Dec-89 B. ENGINEERING
- 1. ACTIVE IESIGN GANGE REQUESTS (EAG) (AW)
UNIT 1 234 249 255 206 ,
UNIT 2 42 55 63 44 l
- 2. OCTISTANDING AS-EULT NCTTICES (AVG)
UNIT 1 800 1075 1125 1140 UNIT 2 87 112 122 117
- 3. NPRDS FAIIDRE REPORIS -
UNIT 1 107 8 4 6 UNIT 2 32 10 3 0
- 4. DEFICIENCY REFCRFS UNIT 1 83 6 6 8 UNIT 2 85 4 6 1 C.MAINITNANCE
- 1. CORRECTIVE N00'S CIEPIETED UNIT 1 3,596 253 253 . 220 UNIT 2 1344 232 144 172 PIANT 4,940 485 397 392
'IUIAL MANIOURS 51,735.0 4902.0 . 4453.0 3335.0
- 2. CXJIAGE NCEK CIMPIEEED UNIT 1 250 48 16 1 UNIT 2 110 84 2 5 PIANT 360 132 18 6
'IUIAL MANIOURS 4,299 1582 378 29.0
PIANT PEmMBENCE INDICWIWS AVE / YID Oct-89 Nov-89 Dec i
- 3. HIGHEST PRICRITY CIERECTIVE IMD'S OCMPIETED IMIT 1 3 1 -0 0 INIT 2 1 0 0 0 ;
PIANT 4 1 0 0 '
i TUDLL PUNOURS 66 12 0 0 >
- 4. NON417DGE CIERECTIVE IMD'S CU1FIRNDING (AVG) .
I UNIT 1 604 507 441 519 UNIT 2 2087 332 350 365 PIANT 778 839 791 884
]
- 5. OUDGE CIRRECTIVE IMD'S OUTSTANDING (AVG) !
UNIT 1 356 344 438 511 )
UNIT 2 1471 171 225 233 PIANT 479 515 663 744
- 6. CORRECTIVE IMD'S CU1F DNDING IHIS THAN THREE M2fIHS OLD (AVG)
UNIT 1 301 298 257 300 UNIT 2 1459 232 240 240 PIANT 422 530 497 540
- 7. PREVENTIVE & PREDICTIVE )MD'S CIMPIEIED UNIT 1 M2fDEX 2,079 152 186 132 UNIT 2 PENDIIX 580 67 100 52 '
PIANT M2f1HIX 2,Gb9 219 286 184 TUDLL 19MOURS ?6,C72.6 1664.5 2136.0 1118.5 ;
I 4
4 e
, , ~ , - - - -
PIANT PEREMMANCE INDICWIORS i
AVF/nD Oct-89 Nov-89 Dec-89
- 8. HtEVENIIVE MC'S NOT OCHPIZIED WI'IHIN AIIDHAEEE INIERVAL (AW)
UNIT 1IM IHIX 15 5 0 1 UNIT 2 M2f1HIX 5 0 a 1 2 1
PIANT M]NIHIX 16 5 1 3 )
1
- 9. MC'S ON-lOID FtR SPARE PARIS (AM)
UNIT 1 MJNIHIX 72 59 54 56 UNIT 2 }0NIHIX 283 39 44 33 PIANT M2fIHIX 96 98 98 89
- 10. TECH SPEC SURVEIIIANCES CNPIEIED j UNIT 1 PONIHIX 4,089 425 334 378 UNIT 2 PONIHIX 2,259 328 L.69 289 PIANT POfIHIX 6,348 753 603 667
'IUIAL MANHOURS 32,608.53 6,000.90 4,546.19 4,032.66
- 11. CI24]UCT OF MAINIDENCE
- a. NORMAL 100RS REFER 'IO ATIAQMENT 1
- b. OVERTIME 100RS REFER 'IO ATDCiMENT 1
. c. RADIATICN EXEOSURE, DOSIMETER (MAN-REM) REFER 'IO ATIACHMENT 2
- e. IDST TIME NmVNIS REFER 'IO ITEM E. 4 1
m_,
l PIANT PERPGWmNCE INDIch20RS AVEVYID Oct-89 Nov-89 Dec-89
- 12. DIESEL GENERA 2tR REZJABIIETY (PIANP SSPI)- 0.0052 0.0003 0.0076 0.0175-
- a. DIESEL GENERA 2TR 1A (SSPI) PGt 1A 0.0058 0.0000 0.0280 0.0009 STARr IE!MANDS 21 1 1 1 SDRP FAIIURES O O O 0 IchD-RN IIIMhNEE 18 1 1 '1 IG&RM FAIIURES 0 0 0 0!
. PIANNED HRS OLFIK:F-SERVIG 49.68 0.00 20.15 0.68 IMPIANNED HRS G7f OF-SVC. 0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.00 ICURS OF OPERATIN 34.91 2.78 1.70 2.05 FAIIURE Dh21l5 NA NA NA NA
- b. DIESEL GENERA 2Gt 1B (SSPI) FGt 1B 0.0131 0.0000 0.0010 ' O.0538 STARr IE!MhNEE 19 1 1 1 SDRE FAIIURES O O O O IDAD-RLM IIiMANDS 18 1 1 1 IDAD-RN FAIIURElS 1 0 0 0 PIANNED HRS OLTP-OF-SERVIG 99.82. 0.00 0.70 40.00 IMP [ANNED HRS OL7f OF-SVC 35.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 HOURS OF OPERATICH 32.30 1.57 2.05 2.22 FAIIURE DR2ES NA NA NA NA
PIANT PERPMMANCE DOICA20RS AVF/WD Oct-89 Nov-89 Dec-89
- c. DTML GENERA'ICR 2A (SSPI) PIR 2A 0.0015 0.0022 0.0014 0.0026 STARP MMANDS 11 2 2 1 S'IART FAIIURES 0 0 0 0 IDAD-10N IINANDS 10 1 2 1 IDAD-RUN FAIIURES O O O . O PIANNED HRS OMF-SERVIG 12.73 1.63 1.00 1.93 UNPIANNED HRS OL7f-OF-SVC. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100RS OF OPERATICH 25.65 2.58 4.57 2.00 FAIIDRE DA2ES NA NA NA NA
, d. DIESEL GENERA 2tR 2B (SSPI) EtR 2B 0.0019 0.0010 ,0.0015 0.0153 SIARP MNANDS 10 1 1 2 SIART FAIIDRES 0 0 0 0 ICAD-RUN MMANDS 9 1 1 1 IDAD-RUN FAIIDRES 0 0 0 0 PIANNED HRS CLTT-OF-SERVICE 6.95 0.77 1.05 1.80 UNPIANNED HRS OMF-SVC 9.62 0.00 0.00 9.62 HOURS OF OPERATION 16.59 2.25' 1.93 2.23-FAHURE IRTES E R R R D.RADIOIDGICAL SAFEIY
- 1. ERSONNEL RADIATICN EXFOSURE (MANREM) - I
- a. DOSINETER 39.524 7.785 1.925 1.05
- b. TID (PREVIOUS MNIH) 30.811 3.479 6.65.3 1.342
- 2. SKIN /CIDIHING OCNIAMINATICH 72 11 5 1'
- 3. BODY CDUNTS > RERETING LVL 1 0 0 0 0
- 4. BODY COUNIS > REPORTING LVL 2 0 0 0 0
PLANT PERPG89mCE INDICNIORS AVEVYID Oct-89 Nov-89 Dec-89
- 5. - SOLIDS SHIPPED (0.T-4f) ** 'IUDLL
- a. GUf ACTIVE WMTIE 70.04 18.31 4.88 0.45
- b. RESIN, SIUDGE & BCTFIQtS 30.17 9.47 0.00 0.00
- c. OIL AND OIHER 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
- d. FII2ERS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
- e. 'IUDLL RADIQACTIVE 1GWSTE 100.21 27.78 4.88 0.45 SOLIDS GENERATED (CIJ-M) ** 'IUDLL
- a. GQf ACTIVE 10SIE 101.70 18.31 4.88 0.45 1987+1988 = 78.06
- b. RESIN, SIUDGE & BDPIGIS 55.79 5.72 0.00 0.00 1987+1988 = 36.92
- c. OIL AND OIHER 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1987+1988 = 0.00
- d. FILTERS 7.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 1987+1988 = 7.39
- e. 'IUDLL RADIQACTIVE 10&rE 164.88 24.03 4.88 0.45 1987+1988 =122.37 TDGGA10f S' IMAGE (CU41) ** 'IODLL
- a. GUf ACI'IVE %9SIE 47.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
- b. RESIN, SIUDGE & BOTICMS 25.73 0.00 0.00 0.00
- c. OIL AND OIHER 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
- d. FILTErtS 7.22 0.00 0.00 0.00
, e. 'IUDLL RADIQACTIVE WASTE 79.95 0.00 0.00 0.00 PER MNIH
- 6. GASES REIEASED (C.URIIS) -
UNIT 1 PCNIHLY 199.68 17.44 14.50 15.27 UNIT 2 MNIHLY 75.16 15.65 3.68 27.22
- 7. LIQUID 10SIE DISQiMGED (CURIES)
UNIT 1 IONIHLY 2.64E-01 3.63E-02 3.53E-02 1.28E-02 UNIT 2 MNIHLY 5.03E-02 1.93E-02 7.56E-03 1.63E-02 _
7 PIANT PERIUMANCE INDICATORS AVE / YID Oct-89 Nov-89 Dec-89
- 8. FUEL RELTABIIIIY (MIGOCIJRIES/ML) (AVERAGE) ,
- a. IODINE - 131 UNIT 1 1.7 2-04 1.92 1.9E-04 1.97E-04 UNIT 2 1.85E-04 2.48E-04 2.08E-04 2.11E-04
- b. IODINE - 134 UNIT 1 4.11E-03 4.79E-03 4.34E 4.50E-03 UNIT 2 5.16E-03 6.52E-03 6.35E-03 6.74E-03
- c. RRIFICNTIN CCHS. (SEC-1) . .
UNIT 1 1.77E-05 1.7 E-05 1.76E-05 1.762-05 IMIT 2 1.54E-05 1.5E-05 1.59E-05 1.61E-05
- 9. OEMISI5E PARAMEIBIS
- a. P5tPW MANCE INM X (AVERAGE) _
UNIT 1 0.18 0.17 ,
0.22 0.11 UNIT 2 0.23 0.21 0.18 0.15
- b. AUX CDOIJNG OUT OF SPEC (AVERAGE) .
UNIT 1 1.98 0.00 0.80 0.80 UNIT 2 2.27 1.40 3.50 0.00
UNIT 1 4.53 4.10 6.30 2.20 UNIT 2 3.61 3.80 3.30 3'.50
- d. C mDENSER AIR IN-IEAKAGE (SCFM)
(AVERAGE)
IMIT 1 23.56 27.00 28.00 30.00 UNIT 2 14.11 14.00 18.00 19.0
F PIANT PERIUMANCE INDICAIORS ,
AVE / YID Oct-89 Nov-89 Dec-89 1
- e. STEAM GENERATCR BIDWDOWN CATICH CIEDUCTIVITY (MIC30 S/CM) (AVERAGE)
UNIT 1 0.160 0.140 0.144 0.120 IMIT 2 0.352 0.262 0.234 0.197
- f. STEAM GENERA 2tR QEIRIIE (;pb)- (AVERAGE)
INIT 1 2.26 1.7 2.2 1.40 ,
UNIT 2 2.71 2.40 1.80 1.20 o
- g. STEAM GENERAITR SUIFATE (ppb) (AVERAGE)
UNIT 1 1.42 1.30 1.70 1.40 UNIT 2- 2.43 1.70 1.50 1.10
- h. STEAM GENERAltR SODIIM (ppb) (AVERAGE)
UNIT 1 1.42 1.90 1.90 0.60 UNIT 2 2.26 2.70 2.10 0.70
- 10. RADIATICN OCX1RRENCE REFCRIS 16 1 -
2 0 E.ADGNISTRATIVE PARAMETERS
- 1. NRC VIOIATICNS
- a. IEVEL I O' O O O
- b. IEVEL II O O 0. O
- c. IEVEL III O O O O
- d. IZVEL IV 28 1 2 1
- e. IEVEL V 1 0 0 0
- f. TUEAL VIDIATIOiS 29 1 2 1
- 2. NRC OPEN ITEMS (AVERAGE)
- a. 7UEAL OPEN 58 52 56 54
- b. OPENED THIS PON1H 6 1 14 3
l- .
1
(-
l l
PIMfr PERFtEMANCE INDICXIGtS AVE /MD Oct-89 Ncv-89 Dec-89
- c. C10 SED 'IHIS M2mf 8 0 11 4
- d. IN PROGRESS ('IO CIDSE) 39 31 26 35
- e. MANAGEMENT ATTENTICH 0 0 2 0
- 3. LICENSEE EVENT RFMRIS I
- a. PERSCNNEL DhWS :
UNIT 1 12 0 0 1 UNIT 2 10 1 0 2
- b. IISIGi ERRCES i UNIT 1 11 1 0 0 UNIT 2 12 0 2 1
- c. DEERNAL CAURES UNIT 1 0 0 0 0 UNIT 2 0 0 0 0
- d. DEFECTIVE PHOCEDURES UNIT 1 4 0 ,
1 0 UNIT 2 8 0 0 1
- e. MANAGEMENT /@ EEFICIENCY UNIT 1 1 0 0 0 UNIT 2 0 0 -
0 0 i
- f. OIHER UNIT 1 4 0 1 0 UNIT 2 2 0 0 0
- g. 'IUIAL IER'S UNIT 1 32 1 2 1j UNIT 2 32 1 2 4
! r i.
I
- l. PIANT PERPGDENCE INDIC3GtES
+
AVE / YID Oct-89 Nov-89 Dec-89
- 4. IDf7f-4'IME N J
- a. 'IDIAL IOST-TIME NrTwnIs 0 0 o o ,
- b. 'ITEkL MMGOURS WCEKED
- 1) UNIT 1 Er 942,278 47,232 42,218 57,492
)
- 2) UNIT 1 Or 41,950 2,962 2,623 4,891 '
)
- 3) UNIT 2 Sr 789,858 38,274 35,009 43,360 l
- 4) UNIT 2 Or 48,607 6,644 2,748 4,385
- 5) GENERAL Sr 709,018 93,567 95,866 168,677 I
- 6) GENERAL OT 46,950 4,651 7,190 15,166
- 5. MEDICAL ATIBfrICES 17 1 2' 1
- 6. ABSDfIEEISM (AVERAGE)
SICK HRS / PERSON 2.87 2.21 1.99 3.03 '
PERSONAL HRS /PIRSON 1.42 1.40 1.44 1.81 ,
j l
i PIANT PERPGD9WCE INDIC3GGtS i l
(ATDOMENrl) I Performance Irdicator Data "Maintenanos Cbrukact of Operations" OC'IOBER NCMMBER DEX2MBER l nan nan .
man ,
StraightTimeStraightTimeStraightTimel
- 1) NBCMANICS AND PGUSUM 15,930 15,207 20,921
- 2) ErMCIANS AND PGtEMAN 11,830 11,195 13,E17
- 3) INS'I5 DENT AND CCNmOIS TETNICIANS 10,694 10,535 13,417
- 4) SUPERVISGtS AND MANAGERS 273 331 350
- 5) NCN-STATIN CMPANY INPIDYEES 0 0 0
- 6) CCNIRACP PERSWNEL 13,827 13,590 19,401
, 7) MhINTENANCE DIHER 2,893 2,929 3,578 55,447 53,787 71,484
- 8) TOULL MhINIENANCE ocIOBER NOVEMBER DECDEER I "B" "B" "A" Overtime Ove.ctime overtime
- 1) MECMANICS AND PIREMAN 2,836 364 1,202
- 2) EIECIRICIANS AND PGtEMAN 1,126 762 374
- 3) INSIMMENT AND OWI3OIS TETNICIANS 1,639. 872 2,292
- 4) SUPERVISCES AND MANAGERS 2 1 :2
- 5) NCN-SDLTICN CINPANY EMPIDYEES 0 0 0
- 6) CWIRACT PERSWNEL 2,436 585 715
- 7) MAINIDOHCE OIHER 103 165 36
- 8) 'IUDLL OVERTIME MAINTDUNCE 8,142 2,749 4,621 l
l l
l
I i
l PIANT PERPG59M2 INDICNIORS (ATIAD MENT 2) l RADIATIN EXPOSURE PM ROUTINE l PIANT MAINTDOHCE (REN)
JOB CIASSIFICNTI N OCIOBER NOVDEER DEDCEMBER (REVISED) (ESTD92E)
- 1) MECHANICS AND PMENAN 0.831 0.019 0.022 4 l
1
- 2) EIECIRICIANS AND FWEMAN 0.016 0.000 0.033
- 3) INSIRLMENT AND CWIROIS TEWNICIANS 0.226 0.079 0.037
- 4) SUPERVISCRS AND MANAGERS 0.209 0.000 0.001 i
- 5) NN-SD2IN CIMPANY EMP10YEES 0.000 0.002 0.000
- 6) CGfIRACT PERSCNNEL 1.359 0.126 0.034
- 7) HEAIIDI IHYSICS 0.966 0.021 0.018 ,
- 8) OPERATICNS 0.140 0.027 0.029 j I
TUI:AL (REM) 3.747 0.274 0.174 NO.0F MAINTENANCE UTILITY 0 0 0 i PERSONEL > SREM/ YEAR NO.0F MAINTENANCE CINIRAct 0 -
0 0l PERSONEL > SREM/ YEAR i
+
l l
i l
l .
l E ,
GPC EXHIBIT AUFDENKAMPE S l' INT. EX. 94 2 TAPE 32 l 3 Date: 4-4-90 '
4 Location: John Aufdenkampe's office.
5 l 6
7 SEGMENT #2 l
+ 8 TR. 46-49 9
10 '
11 MOSBAUGH: What.did you say about this stuff here? I i
12 AUFDENKAMPE: What stuff?
13 ' 00, 070; MOO 51"'_'" ; ] ( """ ; AUFDENKAMPE s-)- 'Ibe 006 14 number's a combined Unit 1 and Unit 2 number. What, but what I 15 don't understand.
16 WILLIAMS: 1990. ,
i 17 AUFDENKAMPE: Yeah, but '
18 WILLIAMS: [ INAUDIBLE]
19 AUPDENKAMPE: Oh, silly me. Why didn't we put 1990 on 20 here?
21 WILLIAMS: Because it looks really shitty.
22 AUFDENKAMPE: Really, really shitty.
23 WILLIAMS: I mean like - .
24 AUFDENKAMPE: Does George know? ,
25 WILLIAMS: -- 08. Yes he does, I told him.
26 AUFDENKAMPE: "Oh, you didn't give him '87 data. Where 27 did he get this shit from?
28 WILLIAMS: From me. I gave it to him. That's what 29 1 gave him.
30 AUFDENKAMPE: Ocohh. Yeah I see now. Oooohh.
31 MOSBAUGH: Do we have, I mean do we have good '87 32 data?
- c. .;
1 AUFDENKAMPE: Yes.
2 WILLIAMS: Yeah, but its' only for a half yecr.
-3 MOSBAUGH: Post commercial, we didn't tabulate it--
4 INPO didn't require it, right, till commercial.
5 WILLIAMS: Not till commercial. . Actually it doesn' t, 6 they don't require it until a year after commercial declaration.
7' AUFDENKAMPE: George sees-- [ INAUDIBLE].
8 WILLIAMS: Yeah. He's not seeing the for t for the 9 trees.
the enefe'me sheet (or shit) l He needsi'inaudibl:'
'\ ,QMdenW < tohe ?instead of callina mems:
Lo:IUn and) directing 10 me to do work, I crc: 'ir r' "le?' !
- did whichbe is pwhy'Wh:=0, w
11 that yesterda [ is 1
12 AUFDENKAMPE: Well, I went over there and dropped it on l l
13 his desk and left. l 14 MOSBAUGH: So what's the '90 numbers?
15 AUFDENKAMPE: Oh, they're terrible 16 (laughter) 17 MOSBAUGH: So,why are they so terrible and these are 18 all so good?
19 AUFDENKAMPE: Because we had three failures in '90, not 30 counting what occurred since that, during the event. There were 21 four failures in '90.
33 MOSBAUGH: These are--these aren't, these aren' t the 23 unavailability numbers? l i
24 AUFDENKAMPE: Yes. Those are the unavailability !
'25 numbers.
26 MOSBAUGH: Well, how's that related to the failures? !
2 i
l' AUFDENKAMPE: The failures, the failures are used i'n 2 calculating the unavailability.
Lob '
3 MOSBAUGH: I raean, but doesn't the unavailability A
4 include LCO time? ,
5 AUFDENKAMPE: It includes out of service time.
6 MOSBAUGH: Right. ,
7- AUFDENKAMPE: I don't know how --
when we do the l
/S h, A.5 8
unavailability number, we do failures as well asAout of service 9 time, right?
10 WILLIAMS: Yes.
11 MOSBAUGH: How do you --
12 AUFDENKAMPE: Is there a weighing factor? ;
13 WILLIAMS: No.
14 MOSBAUGH: How do you compute it?
15 WILLIAMS: Its the time it wasn't in service 16 (inaudible).
17 MOSBAUGH: Well, hold it. If it failed, how do you -
18 know what that time is? ,
19 WILLIAMS: Which? That it would not have served its 20 function?
21 MOSBAUGH: Yeah.
22 WILLIAMS: You take the time to the last successful 23 start and divide it by two. ,
24 MOSBAUGH: Yeah, okay. So what about --
25 AUFDENKAMPE: So when you get a failure, you 26 automatically get two weeks.
I r -
1 MOSBAUGH: Yeah. Well, if you' re on a monthly cycle,- '
2 you get two weeks of out of service time.
3 WILLIAMS: Yes, and that's true.
4 MOSBAUGH: When did we have failures?
5 WILLIAMS: When did we have failures?
6 AUFDENKAMPE: '89, we didn't have any.
7 WILLIAMS: In '89 --
8 MOSBAUGH: No failures in '89?
9 WILLIAMS: That's true. In '88, we had --
10 MOSBAUGH: On both units?
11 AUFDENKAMPE: Yes.
12 MOSBAUGH: It was on both units here?
13 AUFDENKAMPE: Oh, I'm sorry. We did have one load run 14 failure ,in '89.
%t coe, (w whaw .Yhwal *%pr: ;
, 15 WILLIAMS: h'cil, ac kn0L 'inaudibic) nJuly--[Q;titems:
ery ae-aa 16 little extra -- (inaudibic) et the time.
17 AUFDENKAMPE: So we've had one, two, three, four l
)
18 problems in ' 907 (pause) -- Where's the NRC report? Did she finish j 19 it last night?
20 WILLIAMS: (Inaudible.) It was a load run failure, i a,Y f. W he.n 3+ k 15 -fe 4a.kt. l 31 not a start failure. Load run failure -- (inaudible).
33 AUFDENKAMPE: Well, one is a f ailure too -- (inaudible) .
$IHUW4Alcod3 23 M(INAUDIBLE Jewte' .m nis.CONVERSATION)y MMyuj T5.,5,m k{ g ( ym ; gs ytec la54 24 f"ILL!.'"_gt ; Althoug'h1 IY guesd really the is fe w m e.
25 appropriat mehdelay n:: t hc _. !'11 reft : to take immediate corrective 26 action. I just won't get involved in this. That was on the way i
1
1 out. (Inaudible.)
t 5
l ..
1- SEGMENT #3 2 TR. 50 3
4
'a WILLIAMS: True (INAUDIBLE). So that's why I didn't 6 give him 1990 numbers, and I told him that, and we discussed, we 7 discussed this Sunday how bad it looked, for 1990, for both units.
1 8 MOSBAUGH: So what's the number for 1990.
9 AUFDENKAMPE: .08 10 WILLIAMS: .08 1 11 MOSBAUGH: .08 la AUFDENKAMPE: We are probably in --
13 MOSBAUGH: Is that pro rata or how did --
14 WILLIAMS: That's for January and February.
/
C nt.wed on A&de.d Iwsed "A ")
l PENIAhTL\WPDOCS\TLP\ LICENSE. PRO \ TAPES.!NT\32 2-EI.94 l
1 Y
l l
l i
l 6
I
. ee-ae-ises te:se aos e77 vias ses voorte paosecy o.e2 Insert "A" Transcribed section ALM So alght pareent of the time? Is that the meaning?
Williams That No ALM Yeah, No that's pmrated for the year than Williams No that'sjust January and February ALM No hold it if we had --No, no that must be pro-rated for the year, isn't it.
JGA You have to know what's involved in the calculation ALM I understand except you had those start failures you end up with these two week chunks-right Williams You got, you got one -- that's a plant number. You got one diesel that is uh JOA What's the formula?
Williams You got one diesel that's 28.28.
ALM Yeah Williams The SSPI is strictly an arithmetical average of the four, of the four, diesel SSPI's JOA Yeah but I, is it is the diesel SSPI uh hours hours (inaudible -talkover)
Williams Hours out of service divided by hours required. And the plant SSPI in SSPI diesel 1 plus SSPI diesel 2 divided by four. And, and you get one bad player, which that one's a bad player diesel 2A was point 28 and it drags the other one down,because diesel 2B is point 002 very low. . point 0018 point (inaudible)
ALM OK, but that's, that's before we event took into' account the event.
Williams 'Ihat's true, that's February, we haven't even hit March, ALM Right Williams Mamhis going to be worse.
ALM Oh yeah Williams 'Ihere is only probably one saving grace in March h- n= we may be able to not count the hours out of service for the other diesel that was not required to be operable at the time.
ALM If the fonnula was set up that way.
Williams It is.
ALM (inaudible) however divided by required (inaudible) long pause (spparently reviewing pmcodure)
< Telephone call to Alton Rogers to setting up PRB meeting >
long pause (apparently continuing to review procedure)
Williams (inaudible)(apparently quoting f! rom procedure) component unavailable hours are not counted when certain componems are electively removed Bom service for planned activities or are out of service for unplanned activities and the reactor is in a mode that allows components to be removed from service for unlimited time with out encurring a limiting conditon for operation. -
ALM um hum OK l
1 l
, ,es-ae-icos se:se aes en vies ses voon.c moccer P.e8 e
I JOA How about if we use the word sunnised instead of believes.
ALM I don't !!ke the word intennittent and I don't like the word believed. In regulatory con... +g sdations.
Williams You can use spurious.
ALM I don'tlike that one either Williams Then they didn'tuse that one.
ALM Intermittent sh intennittent to me innans you have not done enough investigation to find out what the real cause was (1- 'ahina).
JOA (inaudible)
ALM Or your don't, or you don't have or fou don't have the management commitment to go find out. 'Ihat's when your willing to accept an intermittent answer.
Breakintape 9
l
!