|
---|
Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
MONTHYEARML20217C7961999-10-0606 October 1999 Marked-up & Type Written Proposed TS Pages,Revising TSs 1.0, 3.6,Bases 3.0,Bases 3.6 & 5.5,to Adopt Implementation Requirements of 10CFR50,App J,Option B for Performance of Type A,B & C Containment Leakage Rate Testing ML20209A7351999-06-23023 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages 3.3-4 & 3.3-6,replacing Page 3.3-6 Re Recirculation Loop Flow Transmitters & Applicable SRs Associated with Function 2.b ML20196B4741999-06-17017 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Changes Made at Plant Subsequent to Receipt of License Amend 178,dtd 980731,for Conversion to Its,Through 990610 ML20195E9101999-06-0808 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Correcting Described Method by Which SGTS Heaters Are to Be Tested ML20205H2891999-03-31031 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Modifying ACs for Unit Staff Qualifications for Shift Supervisor,Senior Operator,Licensed Operator,Shift Technical Advisor & Radiation Manager Positions ML20151Q0621998-07-28028 July 1998 Final Version of Improved TS & Bases Re Proposed Change to Conversion to Improved Standard TS ML20236W1141998-07-28028 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Implementation of BWR Thermal Hydraulic Stability Solution ML20236R9821998-07-16016 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 6.5.1,re Implementation of BWR Thermal Hydraulic Stability Solution ML20236Q0641998-07-13013 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Rev B to Conversion to Improved STS ML20216H0571998-04-15015 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 4.2.C,exempting Neutron Detectors from Channel Calibr Requirements ML20216H0801998-04-15015 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Sections 2.1.A.1.d & 3.2.C,deleting Max Rated Power for APRM Rod Block Trip Setting ML20216B4481998-04-0202 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 4.2.C,exempting Neutron Detectors from Channel Calibr Requirements ML20148G3481997-05-30030 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Changing Frequency of Testing RHR Cross Tie valve,RHR-MOV-MO20,position Indication from Once Per Month to Once Per Operating Cycle ML20138J0751997-05-0505 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Relocating Control of Standby Liquid Control Relief Valve Setpoint in TS 4.4.A.2.a & Associated Bases ML20148B0041997-05-0202 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting SLC Relief Valve Testing Described in TS Section 4.4.A.2.a & Associated Bases in Bases Section 3.4.A Since Testing Is Already Performed Under ISI Program ML20134K3771997-02-10010 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Requirements for Avoidance & Protection from Thermal Hydraulic Instabilities to Be Consistent w/NEDO-31960 & NEDO-31960,Suppl 1, BWR Owners Group Long-Term Stability Solutions.. ML20117K3291996-06-0606 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Safety Limit MCPR from 1.06 to 1.07 for Dual Recirculation Loop Operation & from 1.07 to 1.08 for Single Recirculation Loop Operation ML20100R4431996-03-0505 March 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Change Request 142, Revising TS, DG Enhancements ML20086K4421995-07-14014 July 1995 Revised Proposed Tech Specs Re DG Enhancements Reflecting More Conservative Approach to Enhancing DGs ML20086B7061995-06-28028 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Increasing Required RPV Boron Concentration & Modifying Surveillance Frequency for SLC Pump Operability Testing ML20085J2631995-06-15015 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Extension of Surveillance Intervals for Logic Sys Functional Testing for ECCS ML20083A7241995-05-0505 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Changes to TSs & Associated Bases for License DPR-46 ML20083A1341995-05-0202 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Temporary Rev to SR to Extend Two Year LLRT Interval Requirement ML20149H8821994-12-27027 December 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Control Room Emergency Filter Sys ML20078S5711994-12-22022 December 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Definition of Lco,Per GL 87-09 ML20073J2371994-09-26026 September 1994 Proposed TS LCOs 3.5.C.1 & 3.5.C.4,increasing Min Pressure at Which HPCI Sys Required to Be Operable from Greater than 113 Psig to Greater than 150 Psig ML20071K1541994-07-26026 July 1994 Proposed Tech Specs to Increase Flow Capacity of Control Room Emergency Filter System ML20070M6671994-04-26026 April 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Intermittent Operation of Hydrogen/ Oxygen Analyzers ML20065K1931994-04-12012 April 1994 Proposed Tech Specs,Reflecting Removal of Definitions 1.0.Z.B.1 Through 5,change to LCO 3.21.B.1.a (Line 5) Re Ref to 10CFR20.106 & Change to Paragraphs 1,4,5 & 6 (Lines 6,3,8 & 2 Respectively) Re Ref to 10CFR20.106 ML20058N2881993-12-10010 December 1993 Proposed Tech Specs for Pressure Vs Temp Operating Limit Curves ML20058N2321993-12-10010 December 1993 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.21, Environ/Radiological Effluents, 6.5, Station Reporting Requirements & 6.5.1.C.2 Re 10CFR50.59(b) Rept ML20058M2591993-09-28028 September 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Modifying Organizational Structure by Removing Mgt Positions of Site Manager & Senior Manager of Operation ML20056G5971993-08-31031 August 1993 Proposed TS Re Primary Containment Isolation Valve Tables ML20056G5821993-08-31031 August 1993 Proposed TS Re Primary & Secondary Containment Integrity ML20056G2341993-08-25025 August 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Section to Reflect Operational & Design Changes Made to CNS Svc Water Sys During 1993 Refueling Outage ML20056F3331993-08-23023 August 1993 Proposed Tech Specs 6.0, Administrative Controls, Reflecting Creation of Mgt Position of Vice President - Nuclear ML20045D8991993-06-23023 June 1993 Proposed TS SR 4.9.A.2 Re Determination of Particulate Concentration Level of Diesel Fuel Oil Storage Tanks ML20045C0031993-06-14014 June 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Associated W/Dc Performance Criteria ML20045C8301993-06-14014 June 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating New Requirements of 10CFR20 ML20035G7171993-04-23023 April 1993 Proposed,Deleted TS Section 3/4.5.H Re Engineered Safeguards Compartments Cooling ML20128L5561993-02-12012 February 1993 Proposed TS Table 4.2.D, Min Test & Calibr Frequencies for Radiation Monitoring Sys & TS Pages 81 & 84 Re Notes for Tables 4.2.A Through 4.2.F ML20128E6201993-02-0101 February 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Current NRC Positions Re Leak Detection & ISI Schedules,Methods,Personnel & Sample Expansion,Per GL 88-01 ML20127B8331993-01-0505 January 1993 Proposed TS Pages 53,55,70 & 71,removing Bus 1A & 1B Low Voltage Auxiliary Relays ML20115F8531992-10-15015 October 1992 Proposed Tech Specs Page 48,reflecting Relocation of Mechanical Vacuum Pump Isolation SRs ML20115A3481992-10-0808 October 1992 Proposed TS Section 6.1.2 Re Offsite & Onsite Organizations, Delineating Responsibilities of Site Manager & 6.2.1.A Re Min Composition of Station Operations Review Committee ML20104B2091992-09-0909 September 1992 Proposed TS 3.1.1 Re Reactor Protection Sys Instrumentation Requirements & TS Table 3.2.D Re Radiation Monitoring Sys That Initiate &/Or Isolate Sys ML20104A8691992-09-0202 September 1992 Proposed TS 3.9 & 4.9 Re Auxiliary Electrical Sys ML20099D4151992-07-28028 July 1992 Proposed TS 3.6 Re LCO for Primary Sys Boundary & 4.6 Re Surveillance Requirements for Primary Sys Boundary ML20096D6111992-05-0404 May 1992 Proposed Tech Specs Change 100 to Eliminate Main Steam Line Radiation Monitor Scram & Isolation Functions ML20113G8241992-05-0404 May 1992 Proposed Tech Spec Pages for Removal of Component Lists,Per Generic Ltr 91-08 1999-06-08
[Table view] Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & TEST REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20217C7961999-10-0606 October 1999 Marked-up & Type Written Proposed TS Pages,Revising TSs 1.0, 3.6,Bases 3.0,Bases 3.6 & 5.5,to Adopt Implementation Requirements of 10CFR50,App J,Option B for Performance of Type A,B & C Containment Leakage Rate Testing ML20209A7351999-06-23023 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages 3.3-4 & 3.3-6,replacing Page 3.3-6 Re Recirculation Loop Flow Transmitters & Applicable SRs Associated with Function 2.b ML20196B4741999-06-17017 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Bases Changes Made at Plant Subsequent to Receipt of License Amend 178,dtd 980731,for Conversion to Its,Through 990610 ML20195E9101999-06-0808 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Correcting Described Method by Which SGTS Heaters Are to Be Tested ML20207A0761999-05-14014 May 1999 Rev 3 to CNS Strategy for Achieving Engineering Excellence ML20206J2661999-04-22022 April 1999 CNS Offsite Dose Assessment Manual (Odam) ML20205H2891999-03-31031 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Modifying ACs for Unit Staff Qualifications for Shift Supervisor,Senior Operator,Licensed Operator,Shift Technical Advisor & Radiation Manager Positions ML20236W1141998-07-28028 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Implementation of BWR Thermal Hydraulic Stability Solution ML20151Q0621998-07-28028 July 1998 Final Version of Improved TS & Bases Re Proposed Change to Conversion to Improved Standard TS ML20236R9821998-07-16016 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Section 6.5.1,re Implementation of BWR Thermal Hydraulic Stability Solution ML20236Q0641998-07-13013 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Re Rev B to Conversion to Improved STS ML20206P9051998-07-0707 July 1998 Rev 2, Strategy for Achieving Engineering Excellence, for Cooper Nuclear Station ML20216H0571998-04-15015 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 4.2.C,exempting Neutron Detectors from Channel Calibr Requirements ML20216H0801998-04-15015 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Sections 2.1.A.1.d & 3.2.C,deleting Max Rated Power for APRM Rod Block Trip Setting ML20216D8971998-04-0808 April 1998 Rev 1 to Strategy for Achieving Engineering Excellence ML20216B4481998-04-0202 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 4.2.C,exempting Neutron Detectors from Channel Calibr Requirements ML20203G4271998-02-24024 February 1998 Rev 0 to First Ten-Year Interval Containment Insp Program for Cns ML20202H5311998-02-11011 February 1998 Strategy for Achieving Engineering Excellence ML20216G1571997-09-0505 September 1997 Rev 2.1 to Third 10-Yr Interval Inservice Insp Program ML20210H5641997-08-0707 August 1997 Rev 2 to NPPD CNS Third Interval Inservice Testing Program ML20148G3481997-05-30030 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Changing Frequency of Testing RHR Cross Tie valve,RHR-MOV-MO20,position Indication from Once Per Month to Once Per Operating Cycle ML20148G8531997-05-0909 May 1997 Nebraska Public Power District Nuclear Power Group Phase 3 Performance Improvement Plan, Closure Rept ML20138J0751997-05-0505 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Relocating Control of Standby Liquid Control Relief Valve Setpoint in TS 4.4.A.2.a & Associated Bases ML20148B0041997-05-0202 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting SLC Relief Valve Testing Described in TS Section 4.4.A.2.a & Associated Bases in Bases Section 3.4.A Since Testing Is Already Performed Under ISI Program ML20138H3861997-04-29029 April 1997 Rev 1.2 to CNS Third Interval IST Program ML20134K3771997-02-10010 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Requirements for Avoidance & Protection from Thermal Hydraulic Instabilities to Be Consistent w/NEDO-31960 & NEDO-31960,Suppl 1, BWR Owners Group Long-Term Stability Solutions.. ML20134E1091996-10-25025 October 1996 NPPD Cooper Nuclear Station Third Interval IST Program, Rev 1 ML20117K3291996-06-0606 June 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Safety Limit MCPR from 1.06 to 1.07 for Dual Recirculation Loop Operation & from 1.07 to 1.08 for Single Recirculation Loop Operation ML20100R4431996-03-0505 March 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Change Request 142, Revising TS, DG Enhancements ML20101L8381995-12-31031 December 1995 Reactor Containment Bldg Integrated Leak Rate Test. W/ ML20113B0531995-12-29029 December 1995 Rev 4.1 to NPPD CNS Second Ten Yr Interval ISI Program for ASME Class 1,2 & 3 Components ML20093L1901995-10-18018 October 1995 Rev 0 to Third Ten-Yr Interval ISI Program for Cns ML20086H7341995-07-14014 July 1995 Rev 7 to CNS Second Ten Yr Interval IST Program ML20086K4421995-07-14014 July 1995 Revised Proposed Tech Specs Re DG Enhancements Reflecting More Conservative Approach to Enhancing DGs ML20086H7601995-06-30030 June 1995 Rev 4 to CNS Second Ten Yr Interval ISI Program for ASME Class 1,2 & 3 Components ML20086B7061995-06-28028 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Increasing Required RPV Boron Concentration & Modifying Surveillance Frequency for SLC Pump Operability Testing ML20085J2631995-06-15015 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Extension of Surveillance Intervals for Logic Sys Functional Testing for ECCS ML20098B0231995-06-12012 June 1995 Nuclear Power Group Phase 3 Performance Improvement Plan ML20083A7241995-05-0505 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting Changes to TSs & Associated Bases for License DPR-46 ML20083A1341995-05-0202 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Temporary Rev to SR to Extend Two Year LLRT Interval Requirement ML20098B0201995-01-31031 January 1995 Rev 3 to Cooper Nuclear Station Startup & Power Ascension Plan ML20083M0401995-01-20020 January 1995 Rev 1 to Restart Readiness Program ML20083M0901995-01-13013 January 1995 Rev 2 to Startup & Power Ascension Plan ML20149H8821994-12-27027 December 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Control Room Emergency Filter Sys ML20078S5711994-12-22022 December 1994 Proposed Tech Specs Re Definition of Lco,Per GL 87-09 ML20083M0141994-11-0909 November 1994 Rev 3 to Phase 1 Plan, ML20083M0321994-11-0808 November 1994 Rev 0 to Restart Readiness Program ML20073J2371994-09-26026 September 1994 Proposed TS LCOs 3.5.C.1 & 3.5.C.4,increasing Min Pressure at Which HPCI Sys Required to Be Operable from Greater than 113 Psig to Greater than 150 Psig ML20149F9921994-09-15015 September 1994 Rev 1 to CNS Startup Plan ML20098A9961994-08-25025 August 1994 Rev 0 to Cooper Nuclear Station Performance Improvement Plans Phase 1:Startup Planning Process 1999-06-08
[Table view] |
Text
.~.
~. - -. -.
h w
v p
e GCMAC
.. 7,. y.oe W
MW PMI l
IN.
Se6 T -
332[p fog ggA g gg7 TAP g gggy EAc yg,gg gg4,,g,,
wfR sov-i.
g
, A*
780"-
722.21* VC$$tL h
__ EL M ROSEWOUNT 7Dg.
92.56" Gr
$40"[ R A NGC N
Lg 64o v n^j k )_ -
/
SSv-LINE -
OEMAC yARwAv I'*33 l
ROSEMOUNT SOg.
.)
l BARTON YARWAY l
)
(
S77$6"/-+2 23
+66' -.- H l
+W6A 76.7:*1
- W 159 33 (7I h'k. $58 $18)'
42.5WHi ALARM d
544.25(4) 3 7,$apg, t.D ALARM y
5292)(3) 0,
-[
8 C "'d 2 8-* --
-O NEAcitM 12 5" ( 3)
M4 tt" (4) khlC 4"' 0" f
Idit.75[NR o".
0 o
/l
(
ft.S6" e60" l
Lis. iol e
g,g.g4
$06-(8'II I 'CFgED wATMd f
(2)
. 37' 2 d N fik RE N h.p INITIAf t RC12. HPCt. )
- I TRIP #ECIRC. Puups l
( N-4 30" l
N 400"-
-371.2S (l) el4S.b"(l)
.. 45 6 366 75" 10" :--mittATL RHR, C. S.,
TAF-e 152.16"" 0" 330".
312.24, 5* ART bl E'
NE NW N Lh M3f 6")
b
)gg.33 (9 'Il IN STRU MENT
.4 313 t*".39 RACK 3Og. $
d co/3 M
/
( 25.S a 25 61 2
at wrowi PCRMLLSN p
g 2S0" E
}
b WATER LEVEL NOMENCLATURE
[h 202.16"
]
)-
igg' y 20e W LEVEL HEIGHT ABO /E INSTRUMEflT HT A80VE d
bg f,".
a 200.
E NO.
VESSEL ZERO REAOING TAF "oNc '7'I.
(
NO22LE 16 L $"
- C
( in.)
(in) 4_,
NQZZLC r (3) 375,2$
$8.$
222,69 150 j
17) t$9.25 42.t 206.69-(4) 144.25 27.5 198.69 1)
(3) 129.2% -
12.5 176 69
- 10(
h, l
(2) 479,75 37 127,19
('
371.25
.44 5.5 18,69 sv l
cf. _
--)
E Lt V ATION 917'.0" FIGURE 2.1.1 vesset so7Tou REACTOR WATER LEVEL IN01CATICN CORRELATICN "IO~
9107260218 910719 PDR ADOCK 0500029G 06/13/88 P
PDR
4 l
_OC f cu-as)
"I AMMCEMENT Of Iwsumm7 l
E
[SsuTwuN o 8
ttyrt. gr. wc2 Reaurus p
.se H
i 1*"
~
)'
Fun PsceasEk Cwst ne I
O^
(
6 No. 9 f.
i Ss +S
~
l (U-92)
(U-94) fl l'
STEAM NOZZLE I
P MS r
NARROW RANGE 72nr -
(+3.o)--
MT/RFP TRIP
[
E rw CONTROL 7of j.
V PEPutSSNE SCRAM i
- 17o I #.
_=
e
~-..o
+
[
55#
Q/-
sa s
,1y
..of r
5' 5 -
[
(u-es)
(U-91) 1I "U#
I7 y
rUEL ZONE
.2.5_ mW
(+22 ( _+ m -- " giv.
_ l 25 ECCS RRP (Rtp, CONinNVENT i,t,_,,
3733 gg)
INIT!ATION q gg; 3ppgy i.
"U-y7 5 -
--+200
.,2 3 --
(
559 25 (7)
LD N ST344.25 (4)
~~4 so
~~+ao TNIERtOCK
+ 1e 5-SC***
l z
m c, 2x T
(
~
1 0
. I+'"l __Stz sr 3
~.
LT-52 f
LG 833 LG 101 j
LT-92 l
f LT-61 h
(GEVAC)
A-C
('
I
-tr-
- F --
^*U
^ ~~ 0 I, (GEMAC) l N
/
Q DADAT) j i
43y
.e m
om
(+io)--_tso pt.25 O)
DC M r
g 352 56"
_,3o
_,,.o
(
LT-59 A-C
~
d (W)
US-72 US-57/5e
]
(ROSEMOUNT) O A-D MB
- - 3a 3T f (YAWAY)
(YA @ AY)
Qf etww m t k
W
_ C 'UO j
h
\\
.2%3r vis-73 ue
--_i3o yog m
37g (YARWAY)
LT-91 A-C
- Dew'or
(
i (ROSEMOUNT) i
,g
_._[
IJOTE
%s avrt maowcs **t act to v:mit =
18'T y
/
'1 AppED
"'"M%" " N WATER LEVEL NOMENCLATURE
% T ;!,,W $ ",7*@ Q ice I
L L. as ertcet_
l REACTOR VESSEL LEVEL WITH RESPECT TO:
j EOy VESSg2ERO INST. Z_ERQ g
y s
37s 23 ss.s.
222.es FIGURE 2.1.1 4
a$
E!!S N$.
NEN l
e REACTOR WATER LEVEL fJ SNE N*ts ELEVATION 917* INDICAllON CORRELATION 3 72 ' 5 2 "51
'* *2 /
VESSEL BOTTOM
]
m Y
I Iy r
(u-8s)
"I sauroOws ese
75 1 (U-92)
(U-94)
~
rSTEAM NOZZLE NARROW RANGE 722 2f4 GP 2.3.5
(+ 300)~~
<(
MT/RFP TR P
/
ADS W.EC FW CONTROL 7w PEWGSrd WAu
- 170
.gc
.mo
.c EW
$3 5 gpp is 5 s
(U-85)
(g_g j)
T7 -
~
s WIDE RANGE P1*
FUEL ZONE 4;3 _ gg 60 {
ECCS
+
7 p* WTA'NVENT
(
_ 225
,t,_,,
373,73 (g)
INITIATION g,q 3pp3y "I#-
35925 (7) 273 - LD N 53 1344.25 (4)
--+M
+M INTERtOCK
~T-
+ w.,2 3-
+ +2 5 -. sceaw m
cc 2.v T
T T
~
516 If.
W
(*
- L __512 W mst m T. _. ___. _.
._._.Y.
--Y LT-52 4
g3 g3
,,3 3g3 LT-92 LT-61 A-C Na
--*" I#' - 3 7 -.
A& t4 A-D
'N
- Q/
3Q (YARWAY)
(BrRTCN)
(ROSEVOUNT)
(GEMAC)
(GEMAC)
..g 4-y a
?
_ i.5 5 -
- t45 5 -
RHR.CS CPt.7
(+10)_ -150 3" M ( )
UCR -tso
-tso T
ng 3525(.
g LT-59 A-C
~
f (T*O US-72 US-57/58 (ROSEVOUNT)
A-D AAG
( _ - 39 W_. p (YARWAY)
(YARWAY)
Qf rtmes;w 25T-4
___-soo
-_ iso 7g 7ee.ss-UIS--73 AAB a
37,'
(YA7WAY)
LT-91 A-C
-m *
(ROSEVOUNT)
'8' 5~ Ps _
ettiswm or newvw. mstswv
,.g w
t r#1 m 4D*Cs A E *CT TO SCM E '8 RF1.afrps M ET.4CTOR WS*71. (TV1 WATER LEVEL NOMENCLATURE g"Q,L'Q^J 7sMQ
$w
- s mws t REACTOR VESSEL LEVEL WITH RESPECT TO:
1
- VESSEL ZERO INST. ZERO TAT
/
NO.
rr c-2 r-r 3r_
373.2s ses 2nes nGURE 2.1.1
"'59 25 42.s 2*S.69 iu 2s 275 292 ss el REACTOR WATER I EVEL I
529 25 12.5 178 69 I
47935
-37 127.19 ELMTION 917*- INDICATION CORRELATION
)
375.25
-145 5 t a s9 VESSEL BOTTOM A
i
%b
~
. ~...
3.7.b 6 3.7.C MSES (cont'd) liigh efficiency particulate absolute (11 EPA) filters are installed before and af ter the charcoal adsorbers to minimize potential release of particulates to the environment and to prevent clogging of the iodine adsorbers. The charcoal adsorbers are installed to reduce the potential release of radiciodine to the environment.
The in place test results should indicate a system Icah tightness of less than 1 i
percent bypass leakage for the charcoal adsorbers and HEPA filters. The laboratory carbon sample test results should indicate a radioactive methyl iodide removal efficiency of at least 09 percent for expected accident conditions.
If the performance of the HEPA filters and charcoal adsorbers are as specified, the resulting doses will be less than the 10 CFP,100 guidelines for the accidents analyzed.
Only one of the two standby gas treatment systems is needed to cleanup the reactor building atmosphere upon containment isolation.
If one system is found to be inoperable, there is no immediate threat to the containment system performance and react operation or refueling operation may continue while repairs are being made.
If neither syseen is operable, the plant is brought to a condition where the standby gas treatment system is not required.
4.7.B & 4.7,C BASES Standby Gas Treatment Svrttp and Secondtiry Containment Initiating reactor building isolation and operation of the standby gas treatment system to maintain at least a 1/4 inch of water vacuum within the secondary containment provides an adequate test of the operation of the reactor building isolation valves, leak tightness of the reactor building and performance of the standby gas treatment system.
Functionally testing the initiating sensors and associated trip channels demonstrates the capability for automatic actuation.
Periodic-testing gives sufficient confidence of reactor building integrity and standby gas treatment system performance capability.
Pressure drop across the combined IIEPA filters and charcoal adsorbers of less than 6 inches of water at the system design flow rate will indicate that the filters and adsorbers are not clogged by excessive amounts of foreign matter. A 7.8 hw heater is capable of maintaining relative humidity below 70%. lleater capacity and pressure drop should be determined at least once per operating cycle to show system performance capability.
The frequency of tests ar.d sample analysis are necessary to show that the 11 EPA filters and charcoal adsorbers can perform as evaluated.
Tests of the charcoal adsorbers with halogenated hydrocarbon refrigerant shall be performed in accordance with ANSI N510 1980. The test canisters that are installed with the adsorber trays should be used for the charcoal adsorber efficiency test.
Each sample should be at least two inches in diameter and a length equal to the thickness of the bed.
If te-st results are unacceptable, all adsorbent in the system shall be replaced 182
... *,, y 6.0 AMINISTPfsTIVE CONTROLS 6.1 ORCANIZATION 6.1.1 Eernonsibility The Division Manager of Nuclear Operations shall have the over all fulltime onsite responsibility for the safe operation of the Cooper Nuclear Station.
During periods when the Division Manager of Nuclear Operations is i
unavailable, this responsibility automatically shifts to either the Senior Manager of Operations, th" Senior Manager of Technical Support Services, or the Senior Manager of Staff Support (in that order).
During periods when none of these individuals are available, the responsibility may be delegated in writing to one of the managers in the Nuclear Operations Division, j
6.1.2 offrire and Onsite Orrantrationg Onsite and offsite organizations shall be established for unit operation and corporate management, respectively.
The onsite and offsite organisations shall include the positions for activities affecting the safety of the nuclear power plant.
A.
1.ines of authority, responsibility, and communication shall be established and defined for the highest management levels through intermediate-levels to - and including all operating organization positions.
These relationships shall be documented and updated.- as 3'
appropriate, in the form of organization
- charts, functional descriptions of departmental responsibilities and relationships, and i
job descriptions for hey personnel positions, or in equivalent forms of documentatiott. These requirements shall be documented in the USAR.
r B.
The Division Manager of Nuclear Operations shall be responsible for overall unit safe operation and shall have control over those onsite activities necessary for safe operation and maintenance of the plant, t
C.
The Nuclear Power Group Manager shall have corporate responsibility for overall plant nuclear safety and shall take any measures needed to ensure acceptable performance of the staff in operating, maintaining, and providing technical support to the plant to ensure nuclear safety.
D.
The individuals who-train the' operating' staff and those who carry out health physics and quality assurance functions may report to the appropriate onsite manager;. however, they shall have sufficient
-organizational freedom to ensure their independence from operating pressures.
6;1.3 Plant Staff - Shift conmiement l
The shift complement at the station shall at all times meet the following requirements. Note: Higher grade licensed operators may take the place of lower grade licensed or unlicensed operators.
A.._
lA licensed senior reactor operator (SRO) shall be preeent at the station at all times when there is any fuel in the reactor.
B.
A licensed reactor operator shall be in the control room at all times when there is any fuel in the reactor.
C.
Two licensed reactor operators shall be in the control room during all startup, shutdown and other periods involving significant planned control rod manipulations.
A licensed SRO shall either be in the Control Room or immediately available to the Control Room during such periods.
219-
+.v.ay
-sa e-
+
w-we <gw--ge==
4n -v e----.w,--*----yw-.--o-w e=,m+iumoc--,.g-y e=----m-am=3-+v*-i'--r.+ee-yw
-