ML20084R489

Forwards Response to Concerns Delineated in Nonconformance Identification Rept 023 Re Workprints & Drawings

ML20084R489
Person / Time
Site:	Midland
Issue date:	05/04/1984
From:	Quamme D CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
To:	Karr J STONE & WEBSTER, INC.
References
27884, CSM-0769, CSM-769, LWW-12-84, NUDOCS 8405220391
Download: ML20084R489 (16)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:' 4 s y6 h [f3 ConSumBIS g- [c-2 ) Power Company P NCIPAL STAFF DPHP s5[~ 'JE Midland Project: PO Box 1963, Midland, Mt 48640 * (517) 631-8650 {;r7A JPJ4S F May 4, 1984 $^ g/ g >G A

4L

'F !IIF File Ms Mr J E Karr Stone and Webster Michigan, Inc P O Box 1963 Midland, Michigan 48640 MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER PROJECT - GWO7020 STONE AND WEBSTER CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW NONCONFORMANCE IDENTIFICATION REPORT NUMBER 023 DATED 03-23-84 FILE 24.2 SERIAL 27884 CSM-0769 LWW-12-84 In pursuance of Nonconformance Identification Report number 023, a response is attached to address your concerns delineated in your nonconformance identification report form. Should you or your staff have any questions on the content, contact Lonnie Worley at extension 7707. O'M '~_ D L Quamme Site Manager CC DDJohnson, MEC BHPeck, MEC NIReichel, MEC TASpellman, MEC JBKeppler, Regional Administrator, Region III JJHarrison, Chief, Midland Section, Region III BBurgess, NRC Resident Inspector RAWells, MEC t 8405220391 840504 PDR ADOCK 05000329 gl t S PDR f 'MAY 171984 t 9

1 S:r.ial 27884 2 Response to Nonconformance Identification Report number 023 Workprint Station 209 is located with team 9 Distribution is done by Document 1 Control and maintenance of the station is the responsibility of the team re-ceiving the documents. This workprint station will be transferred to a con-trolled document station and placed under the responsibility of Document Control for maintenance as well as distribution. This program is in line with our corrective action plan submitted in response to MCARR-DAT-1. Workprints that have not completed the conversion / verification process or been distributed as new workprints since lifting of the stop work orders have not been released by MPQAD for Q-work. The following items address each of the concerns identified: 1. All workprints audited were old workprints that had not gone through the conversion / verification process. None of the drawings audited are being used in work packages. One drawing which was voided, was previously used in a work package. The new workprint process and copies of the workprint stamp are described in FPD-1.000. 2. Findings 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 15, 16. In all drawings identified in these findings, the register reflects the new revision status which has been processed. However, none of these. drawings (or change paper) had been distributed. The sticks should reflect previously distributed information. This " historical" information is available in system 38 and can be provided to the auditors upon request. This processing cycle information was re-viewed in the audit entrance meeting. Document Control has verified that all drawings and change paper that were noted on the audit report are correct on the sticks according to the cur-rent distribution status. No further action is deemed necessary. 3 Findings 21, 22, 23, 24. The auditors reviewed the home office revision information as opposed to the field status which is the revision we con-struct to. (There a're large bore isometrics which are revised in the field to add additional welding information. See procedure FPP-1.00). Therefore, the wrong information was reviewed in the register. Document Control reviewed all drawings against the field status, noted discrepancies and took corrective action. These are old workprints and would have been corrected during the con-version / verification process to new workprints. The legibility of the other drawings / change papers was reviewed again during the conversion / verification process to new workprints. e 9 I

Serial 27884 3 '4. Findings 23, 14, 25, 26. Drawing FSK-DVI-M-604-8, was corrected during the conversion / verification process to new workprints. The legibility of the other drawings / change paper was reviewed again during the conversion / verification process to new workprints. 5. Findings 4, 12, 17, 19 Change paper has been removed or added to the drawings per pullback instructions. This would have been corrected during the conversion / verification process to new workprints. 6. Findings 18, 20. An FCN was not listed on the front but was attached. This was a clerical error and was corrected. Document Control is unable to verify the information in the Audit Report on finding 20. Additional information will be required. 7. Other concerns noted on the Audit Report. a. Training - the Construction Assistant responsible for this workprint location, attended training sessions on January 6, 1984 and January 10, 1984.* Instructions on posting and other requiroments of FPD-1.000 and FPP-3.000 were discussed. Document Control has reviewed require-ments with the Construction Assistant. b. Processes followed in workprint stations - These issues will be re-solved when the workprint stations are maintained by Document Control as part of the Document Control Corrective Action Plan. Until this conversion is comple'e, Document Control will review training needs t with the Construction Assistants and arrange for training as appro-priate. 8. Quality Action Request number RA-00155 dated 03-29-84 was written in res-ponse to Nonconformance Identification Report 023 and closed on 05-03-84. LW 5/4/84 O a 9

a m n e 0 %'F1 /G U ggyQgg

6. QAR Number MID PROJECT RA 00169 C6HSumtf5 QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT

7. Date issued

8. Revision POW 8f yfpofga 0

Company QUALITY ACTION REQUEST s. Page 1 of 4

1. Requirement

10. ASME Related b Yes No FPG 7.300 Rev 4 FPD 3.000 Rev 11 FPD 1.000 Rev 19

2. Deficiency Stone and Webster NIR-023 identifies the following deficiencies curing a CIO

(. valuation of work print station 209:

1) Attachments not referenced or attached

2) Work prints and attachments illegible

3) Drawing stamp errors have been identified

4) Attachment status on work prints does not always reflect System 38

11. Potential 50.55tel (DM) byes bNo g /fg @ f 6 bg/

4. Discipline / Division /Section

5. Response Due Date

12. Date Reported to MPOA Mgr

3. QAR pricinated by PAP - Tech Services 4/05/84 N/A 13.~ Action item No.

15. I' tem Priority

17. S/U Code

19. Action Organization

20. QAR Reviewed by SO 5721 5

PGM00 DW - Bechtel Field

14. Discipune 1s. Trend Code

18. nesb Code

21. Dai.

h eed Cm Wol N/A ZD-5-0001 BCPCo - STF-G 3-2%-84

22. Cause

23. Proposed Corrective Action SEE RTIRGpleD SHEET 6 BEE RTTTCHED 5 HEET3

24. Responsible organization / Person

25. Proposed Completion Date D DC.

1 fp

26. Disposition Concurrence 3 3 W-__

disle A Ok $A)4l50l24 QAR Reviewer Date .PQAE (ASME Only) Date

27. Disposition Action Taken 6CE RTIK2lED 6HEETS f,ik i

28. Method of D1oosition Verification

29. QAR Closed by Sa-Arrn c H ED fcR C.Lora (2E Ju.s r7f tcArtOA).

Q gg MPQAD h I Cfete w Ro _shira %Amept-. D unameet-e O s.e,ced-CAR " oca ia a e o 'v> o* M-allA laan 11

i.' '*

Rc

ponsa to NIR 023, dstad March 23, 1984, QAR RA-00155, datad March 28, 1984

Subject:

Workprint Station 209 Workprint station 209 is located with team 9. Distribution is done by Document Control and maintenance of the station is the responsibility of the team receiving the documents. This workprint station will be transferred to a controlled document station in 4-6 weeks and placed under the responsibility of document control for maintenance as well as distribution. This program is 4 inline with our corrective action plan submitted in response to MCARR-DAT-1. i 'Workprints that have not completed the conversion / verification process or been i distributed as new work prints since the lifting of the stop work orders have i not been released by MPQAD for Q-work. l Note: For ease of reading, the findings have been grouped by subject. The letter identification noted on the NIR has been retained for cross-referencing. 1. Old Workprints versus New Workprints i All workprints audited were old workprints that had not gone through the, conversion / verification process. None of the drawings audited are being used in work packages. One drawing which was voided, was previously used in a work package. These workprints will need to complete the conversion / verification process if they are to be used in the field in work packages. The new workprint process and copies of the workprint stamp ara described in FPD-3.000. 2. Discrepancies Between Resisters and Information on Sticks (Findinas 5. 6 (_ 7, 8. 9. 10. 11, 13. 15, 16) In all drawings identified in these findings, the register reflects the new revision status which has been processed. However, none of these drawings (or change paper) had been distributed. The sticks should reflect previously distributed information. This " historical" information is available in System 38 and can be provided to the auditors upon request. This processing cycle information was reviewed in the audit entrance meeting. Document Control has verified that all drawings and change paper that-were noted on the audit report are correct on the sticks according to current distribution status. No further action is deemed necessary. 3. Misinterpretation of Realster Revision Information (Findinas 21, 22, 23, 24) f The auditors reviewed the home office revision information as opposed to the field status which is the revision we construct to. (These are large bore isometrics which are revised in the field to add additional welding information. See procedure FPP-1.000). Therefore the wrong information was reviewed in the register. t i t 0 .--w...,--,,, --.-..,,----,-n- ,-r, ...-,-~.--y-,-...,,w-- n--.--we.-,----,-~-ww ,$w--n--- +~,,,y,...,-- n,,-,-,. ~ - - - ,f-4

T., a..'. ' .Paga 2 Document Control reviewed all drawings against the field status, noted discrepancies and took corrective action as follows: Finding (22)- FCR was removed. ICS stamp was placed on front of drawing. Finding (23)- Status stamp was placed on front of drawing. Finding (24)- ICS stamp will be noted on front of drawing. These are old workprints and would have been corrected during the conversion / verification process to new workprints. 4. Lenibility (Findinas 23, 14, 25, 26) Drawing FSK-DVI-M-604-8, was illegible. It will be corrected during the conversion / verification process to new workprints. FSK-DVI-M-6048 win be checked at all other stations for legibility by April 6, 1984. i The legibility of the other drawings / change paper is believed to be l acceptable. It win be reviewed again during the conversion / verification process to new workprints. 5. Change Paper"Not Removed or Added to Drawinas (Findinas 4. 12, 17, 19) Change paper had not been removed from or added to the drawings per pull back instruction. This would have been corrected during the s conversion / verification process to new workprints. l 6. Other Miscellaneous (Findinas 18, 20) 1 An FCN was not listed on the front but was attached. This is a clerical error and will be corrected. Document Control is unable to verify the information in the audit report ) on finding 20. Additional information win be required. 7. Other Concerns Noted on the Audit Raport a) Trainina The construction assistant responsible for this workprint location attended training sessions on January 6, 1984 and January 10, 1984. Instructions on posting and other requirements of FPD-1.000 and FPP-3.000 were discussed. (Attendance sheets attached). Document Control win r again review requirements with the construction assistant. b) Processes followed In Workprint Stations These issues will be resolved when the workprint stations are maintained by Document Control as part of the Document Control Corrective Action Plan. Until this conversion is complete, document control will review. training needs-with the construction assistants and arrange for training ( as appropriate. \\ W..84

a A a e a STONE AND WEBSTER. ENGINEERING CORPORATION NONCONFORFANCE IDENTIFTCAT10N: REPORT DATE OF NONCONFORMANCE: 3/22 /M NIR NUMBER 035 7 IDENTIFICATION / LOCATION OF ITEMS: f A/dVN7?OAl .2 0V DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCE: bf./0/hlC T55 0{l60/N$5 EVAOlWE0Al Of 3/7f~ 'dg o g gy- &MYA04 d@ MA&MB)> A?SAMAk6M8Dar/s// op Hilkf5&$$$/N8 kI~ Nd& h)/Xl7~37;47770N /l0. & 7FE AcktiA770^/ WAs 3&FARis/fD) TD 8E(//6 ?64' 9r/.e bk/ h /km k $NW Of& ONSW NYkk ~ + N$ 850

• Y EA28V)/-f //lh 6

///Alh M 227Md/E M / AfJMAHo A? ' /d t f & 77 7 .2 LATSers. ~2)oeawin73 <ddes /9x4 ro 4g.3isc41-PM7~ SHE A77M#f) 3#fb3 26 Skene 3na. A PROGRAM MGR / g/ s Ililil AI0ii Md3 M DATE DATE .3.2 :r 8/ i CORRECTIVE ACTION BY: IDENTIFY ORGANIZATION TAKIN,G CORRECTIVE ACTION ! VERIFICATION SAT UNSAT NEW NIR# CONCURRENCE .' INITIATOR PROGRAM MGR DATE DATE DAT-EEMARf:5 i

w

• su,rrr.

_E blH / tuiv DOCUMENT REV REV DOCUNE74TS IN LISTED DN RTTCll TD OTHER N/JHBER DWG. TEG. HIGUESTIDN REG F71'ONT BRCH COMMENTS No 7* O N FA/)l. /5 TH L OG s/ro tos - ~ ' Y h12t?BD /-ll2 / / TA k!?n/ off to-7 ~8 3. ( 26/ 8/l/ T Y' ih ACCO -IS~~ 1 'h i L E G/o/// 7 Y

1) A Ce*B-31.?

5 NOT 4/S7f)> U f$k - /11-2 rc/3 / 1)its e D 3Blu / S /1 v. MNED /3 e/ r mof l- //'/-/ oH RPG/sreR h) 2Et30-t-/ /

2) 4 & G/AS/L/ Ty*

9xDcu ass di so rra ckaD N c> r on i/ g 3 4 pr Gis Ts=2 , ) p p13 p _? - P. 2)- (EG/n/t/TY 0 LEfil"Ild7 Y ' I" o Y66 t-sy-In -2 Ea8 3 s4=cR c -4/31 A ri A c^//ED eur No 7- /d j'7 o& REGtSTrR 9)) J G1515 2 4 \\ ~((v1) ZDcM 8978 / fck C -& 2/=/3B / d I) Not D .3 8 0 <f HIrif cH/3D 13 v r eve >r l N Ren t s Tr= R - i e, a Ent)~</ - 3' _, .3 'O 'n % ~ ! = W s:?iN b ~ ~ " ' " " ' t ! y ) >EB15-7-4 / ~

2) L EG/sout 77 - Eben a.a <><j r'q."2.

>f I iy i=cx cua is riscuso eu r avr is s 7/=D on pnow r

92).7& B o 5 0

0' .t).Z~DCN Soo9-I'6 -#2 LLE G/B//J Ty-I 3)19 77ArHe DF cg py-gg 9of Gg <j gjc gqg_5 E u r tvor on nn Gis72/?. l /).Z'D CN 82'17/M04D 3 7s*7 s977s9CHEd I AUT NC!T AAt R E G 15 711 4> ? l'a/<!E88 // A 3 ~ l. ~ 2)..t.Dcr4 8 2'7 7 PG #2 420/B//ZTY I" # O' # W jl)4).?EDD-/O-/ 3 h-qw $2"j F C R --? .ty,4 No r w 2 r ryst on i= guns,- e-> <= D tr' G. l/$') A SCB / 3 fcx m to 14-6. No r neirran <w FROM T c F J'W G - l /6) 3GCB -8 5 4 4~ !) O rdt ~CH G A7'rACHL=D F3ur Nor RE /57GR ( ge]) yppp3c-fgn -f 2 2-y Fcs/ sia 3 Nor t</Rtr 7E At cA/ /=noar eu= Dwa. /) FCN M - /3 G 2.0 NOT 4/STED C A/ ~

18).?IICD 5 (o

/= RAN r n/= ht t / /Z

• a)DWG No 7" cN

$ w G.

j e e n e e n g $ v$ )}a$ f h! )Ih lk 3 A h} . n l 5 5 s ana o d i ng 3 1 Eu 4 sg q} d 4 3% p j + e%q e1 9h 1 bu a Lg t 6 o w e c R% Ab E N %p$ t as w e !Q@$. l ' I f 3 i Ki gm,, a ~- w.x E $ \\ 'd! l 4){li L".H k% je ~ o m ~ {l m h~ $h Y h %k h

• $1$%

dti 59 i s ,i f!j kMH$)$ i in$?j . D i si dv s 2 ~ $$ 5 $ 5 bb5L % B

g/9 o O/55' \\q C '?Q '\\.c l 'l

• p.

ea ....._.. i..... ..l...I ' '.. t. M v

m. h.c.

.1om. Z. 5 Eh _ C.'.m o. U 9 _._ _ _ w n . '. !,I t#1 ' ' ' O.nabu .Z:% v .3 0.. ...M%... D n. f. v -s ... ai.ea...RC.., i l.2.. i M 1 : w ~ /urir Zt '..... t ..lcd.htAvi42:/. h /d - ~ ? 'd! 85/~ 4'),+ e nf. b ._i 4f \\. Q L 3Shpw . %,.9. _. _ __ _ su. 3 . =. _ _ _.. m dW

• A3

! (.!kM(a_. f.%Qc?3 /'/avn.S . b V S. D.-. ..Ibhlllh.Atbh2 YSn' //. .<es i li S / gA0'Y .<o

• • • "'******-****u8**'

..., p 4/Gs' t, p' u di.<* .--i.sf8' e7 Y$thw.. h m 79'97. A*d.5 SA, Nk"~b t i _ _lpy?2d4u ...$1 <.<:.s..YCo..-. -. -- ^' ?. 2 / 7 ..E, a,N %,.r/ '[ j s., Q b v 7; ao w(' M,,y6,4w P 1D N 4" / 9 (,I .,.{ .w 72 d Geb/9 l y 62l0 Euit freer bk'c>Ib 't ,g., p.g(A nn n2 'tb tkL WW d^ -m n> sa l yw 4sy

6. w shy to

& es = l r

l :. ~ \\ q-jga q / h G Q; t$ l; _ 6ta A5 k a0L - 74 8 z. dmca bpw2 anvr Y"' r: 737f cjSm: /)d-t Cw.c.#.9......NP2dD-6(L . /0 0 73.... U l succ 3 r I' cub.sch% F_.hdald.b') 0 .0 P ? -l- .] 3 2(p 0 C

. 0,

y b0 0J.% h% "YSA, d, 29, 63 '7?'{7 Yld >>79 + S... Yr s 73&o 0 t0'de,cJ rucona. a m

• c 't, t G, % o yo x t

I r jhsM-% YfiNS~ f), Le* & b0 (g QG h 5*h.__ g S 4 citaLa.u3 GAuu Alt 1626 c Sfa ~ d A L mvec r s z.s / 6 I l /- ( : -ES [ Qb:ec

~ ~., \\ DISTRIBUTION FOR QAR # RA-00155 ACTIONEE: BTFoote, Bechtel-Midland INFORMATION: JABauer, Midland WRBird, P-14-418A JEBrunner, M-1079 RECameron, Midland JWCook, P-26-336B GREagle, AAO-TASK DEHo"n, Midland LRJessmore, Midland ^ JFKnight, P-14-416 ODLanham, Midland I BWMarguglio/DJones, JSC-220A ERMouser, Midland GEParker, Midland i RCSember, Midland CMThompson (ALAB - 2) 4 4 e e g 4

'To Lhvorley CORSulH85 Darc May 2, 1984 POWOI C0mpany Suescc7 MIDLAND ENERGY CENIER PROJECT - QAR RA-00155 g,,,,y FILE 17.0 SERIAL 27881 Con =csrowocuce Lhw 10-84 CC During an overview of Document Control Station (209 team 9) items 1 through 7 were found to be corrected. Action implemented as a result of QAR RA-00155:

1) Attachments not referenced or attached

2) Work prints and attachments illegible 3)

Drawing stamp errors have been identified 4) Attachment status on work prints does not always reflect system 38. Action of Document Control Assurance Group:

1).Ibcument Control Assurance Group performed 100% overview of Station 209 of discrepancies identified in the (QAR RA-00155).

The discrepancies noted have been corrected. No other discrep-ancies were found. Recommend closure of QN1 number RA-00155.

h .~ STONE AND WEBSTER. ENGINEERING CORPORATION HONCONFORI%NCE IDEf;TIFICATION: REPORT DATE OF NONCONFORluNCE:.3/22-/6i4-NIR NUMBER 005 IDENTIFICATION / LOCATION OF ITEMS: h f A /d V N 7IO Y ,.2 OV DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORIMNCE: bf./A//\\lC:> WE ox/So/MS Ev44///7DA/ OF3/7E hm/gewr dom 7204 e7~29 MdBe/a4 A?S4' kE/#3'2277sf of p hYaME/Zsd6Mr.2/M6h Ark //st)s TD V(o ph/Mr 3rp7wkMo. 20it 7FE,2khwe770M WAfs 2c/2eR/A/2 P64 9s/ ehrfbn..AS,44fkEofeo 2maxtstc MFAEMdh.c SWnc12h. THE sas/Ac WgN 'h E /t.a kh 7e HL hW l bSWb WM z LR TSers. 'hoeawrms edgM6xh 7a & 2/scM- 'Parsff MrM#D 3/K93 24 Ske/nc hwa. // PROGRAM MGR / // s lhj il AI0i< DATE .3//--3 DATE .3.2:!r 8 / 6 CORRECTIVE ACTION BY: IDENTIFY ORGANIZATION TAKING CORRECTIVE ACTION VERIFICATION SAT UNSAT f;EW NIR# CON URRENCE n:,: ;:.

(..;:

CATE LATE g.7-t.: 4

w i ,, n, 1CUA't. NT ITEV REV DOCUNENTS IN USTED ON RTTCll. TD OTHER ~ D N B E R D W G-REG.INQUESTION REG FRONT BRCH COMMENT 5 _ N0 7'" d N FJ)Df /5TM IdG s/fotdS - Yt*DP '2.22;__./ / 'rA ka s_ on- /cu-7 -8 3 - n l ha-1(*.1 r/- Q __l2 GI13/l/ T Y lII 0lOI Y t'f3 1l ' 'i N0/* 4 / Sit *t k - frr - c ejy l 1 kJ-/ gHe<D 3Blo / u si i r d C/ED e a r svor . oM RfG!sreR ht30-t-f /

t) 4 E G/n/t./TX l

, ylr A yEDcH 5ts di se r r a ckes D N o r ori \\ 3 nn als rnR J g315 -: - 2_

3) LEG /n/UTT l

• ) LE Qla IL47' Y L D c N o Y&B sp-po. run; 3

4 cR c -4/.51 si r ia ct/Es) (3 u r Nor IEoP..1 - 2 ff-SM cN REG!srrR 1 -{fs u1)EDcN 0 9-78 / fcR c --4s.:s y t e asnns r v- \\ _ ) 1Dcp a t'st 'en

• x 6 6aroser r r-r au-<n-y s3 e -.s -7 3

(4) s.) Nosa :s a oy arrsesen s u r au-r nn Rsrcpts 78 R - 1 3 Gno-</ - 3 'A*n#? !!?Er?NN>T"'" *"' "*' O 11 p. -.'-a / ($

2) 4 2 Grases 77~

Ebov 82 'J9 Pr "2. e sp ex a w sortm uao euraser LisrED cH PnoN 7~ ' 2 B B-5 C) 0* 1 i .t) ZDCN 8 00 9-l'6 -*v2 L u cw" a sAr ry- { .9)ArrACNn DFCR r?-66 90f G6')8/anr 485n a as<72R. cs A ur nor l

1).E'D CN 8 2"17^/Not.D.9 737 Ar7Acsrb Aur Nor

^r Rsnts ran b e.1. 3- , EDP .'? - // 2)..t.Dcr4 8 29 7 FG #2 Le CP/B//ZTY j (Etsi) / 3 /h, ZDcss o '/2 LEG /D M'TY N* " * ^/ FM'r .v w f. &' FCR 4 Qf9 pce><-7-/ 3 p r:cR M to /4-6 NeI w Is r rg; As am 9 tic B .*1 -3 4~ f FROM T of.D it/ G. i asa a n r rscue D our tvor _) o r~ sees.kg 6/s rnn & pin c-fgo -t 2 2-vwa. 'r7 TEN CA/ INA 2,9 FCAs dr8 3 NOT f FnoMr en v /) FCN M ~ 1.S G 2.o N o r J-/ 3 7 tD osv e $pc]> ~Bi'-6 p na As r nn rua n. ,k hW0 NOY AN _ _ d _,W ~-

W h e e s e u i g t I t t 1 8 ? q ) g q 4 E l j I Y 1 B b !: A l 4 *4 5 ) 1 j M ta sa 1 g$ t d a 1 h 3 3 ! ! 5 $ :E k j 3 5 0h0$ 3I e 4 M g l i tu E 2 h g k h @.h-O m 9f o e S o o os c m sd c 4 vem a Mk 's 4p a s{ ,ok 1$2 i ~* ( Qg e.3cs e n wet t 1.1 B E t3 k 5 k N } .$s R a u 2, t ?. C a wm 3,D hY ', %.. i a! k %4 i wT?, I< M s .~c h! k h $t h k$ 5 k _I k h N i k h 'i k }; - I hdiIP ki i hb5 bb}}