ML20084Q439

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Interim Response to Const Implementation Overview Nonconformance Identification Rept 026 Re Site Document Control
ML20084Q439
Person / Time
Site: Midland
Issue date: 05/08/1984
From: Quamme D
CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
To: Karr J
STONE & WEBSTER, INC.
References
NUDOCS 8405210258
Download: ML20084Q439 (6)


Text

.

s.
  • n \

f*/ _,; . mum C.Cricnec~:

l : (f

}

    • Dean L Quemme

\

'Q$ / I Site Manager Midland Project Qf,,. "

Midland Project PO Box 1963, Midland, Mt 486 4 . (517) 631-8650 yg gg gg ULJ4.~tPRP May 8, 1984 D/RA E A/R/ 5 .sr RC DRM PhD SCS l199 4]

SGA ML f,'

Mr J E Karr d!F FIlo dd Stone & Webster Michigan, Inc PO Box 1963 Midland, MI 48640 MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER PROJECT - GWO 7020 STONE & WEBSTER CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW NONCONFORMANCE IDENTIFICATION REPORT NO 026 DATED 3-23-84 FILE 24.2 SERIAL 27889 CSM-0772 LWW-16-84 In pursuance of Nonconformance Identification Report Number 026, an interim response is attached to address your concerns delineated in your Nonconformance Identification Report Form.

Should you or your staff have any questions on the content, contact Lonnie Worley at Extension 7707.

- fg 'e WW CC: DDJohnson, MEC BHPeck, MEC NIReichel.,7MEC 7- _

QGKeppler,; Regional.. Administrator,' Region III ,

JJHarrison, Chief, Midland Section, Region III BBurgess, NRC Resident. Inspector RAWells, MPQAD '

8405210258 840508 8 gDRADOCK 05000329 MAY141984

Serial 27885 2 Interim Response to Nonconformance Identification Report Numter 026 dated March 31, 1984.

Station 309 is located with MPQAD-QC Document Control. Distribution is done by Document Control and maintenance of the station is the responsibility of the workprint station receiving the document.

The following items address each of the concerns identified:

1. Findings 1, 2.

a) A pull back transmittal for FCR-C 7070 to Drawing C-130 was issued March 7, 1984 by FDCC. The change paper was not removed from the drawing at this area per_ pull back instructions. This was a clerical error and corrective action has been taken.

b) A pull back transmittal canntt be located removing FCR-M6676 from Draw-ing C-224. The " construction is complete" status stamp on the back of the FCR was no longer applicable to the drawing. A review of Drawing C-224, Revision 7 at other areas reflected no discrepancies. Therefore, it is assumed that a pull back transmittal had been issued but the change paper was not removed from the drawing at Work Print Station 309

2. Findings 3, 4.

a) The register indicated that Drawing C-97, Revision 6 as having retired change paper against it. The drawing was distributed by FDCC without the appropriate stamping to reflect the correct status.

The drawings at recipient areas, as indicated on the FDDL, have been -

corrected.

A review will be made of the files in the reproduction center to ensure that all drawings reflect the appropriate retirement status as indicated on the DDR.

b) Drawing C-852, Revision 13, was correct in reflecting a retired change paper status. On March 16, 1984, the DDR correctly reflected FCR C-2317 as retired against Drawing C-852.

On March 18, 1984, an operator error was made in requesting the type of report status to be printed from the System 38. Therefore, this DDR did not reflect Drawing C-852 as having retired change paper against it.

This error was discovered by Document Control and the next printout of the register indicated the correct status.

3 Quality Action Request Number RA-00176 dated April 9, 1984 was written in response to Nonconformance Identification Report Number 026.

I

I, n 6%R Numoer RA-00176

... 'DLAND PROJECT -

COnSmem QUAL T 7. D:t2 issues 8. Revision Power 4/9/84 0 m Company QUALITY ACTION REQUEST 9.

Page I of 3

1. Reouir2 ment
  • 10. ASM E Related FPG 7.300 Rev 4 .

FPD 3.000 Rev 11 FP') 1.000 Rev 19

2. Dif.cien
v Stone and Webster NIR-026 identifies the following deficiency during a C10 evaluation of controlled document Station 309:

(1) " Pullback" FCRs still at document station (2) " Drawing Stamp" errors were identified

11. Potental 50.55(e) b Yes No
3. CAR Or.ginated DV 4. Discipline / Division /Section 5. Response Due Date 12. Date Reported to MPQA Mgr JElauen PAP-Tech Services 4/13/84 N/A
19. Action Organization 20. QAR Reviewed
13. Action item No.

.S06231

15. Item Priority 5
17. S/U Code PGM00 Bechtel Field (Q& [y ~

i4 Discipiine 1s. Trend Code 18. Reso Code Document Control N/A ZD-5-0001 BPC0-STF-G 21.Date/[f[fy 4

23. Proposed Corrective Action i 22. Cause f

1 6GE R TmCHE.D 3H E C-T P R M '1 6EE 13TTOE D SHEET Pn6E.1

'I I

f. 1/h1, 24 Responsible Organization / Person 25. Proposed Completion Date N 0 r s.or n Y w . f/J/ a s br& w er l/'A ' l I V / Y /

20 Discos: tion Concurrerice QAR Reviewer Date .POAE l ASME Ontvl Date l 27 Oitoosition Action Tauen d.

I

+ 2E ?.*etaloc of Dsoosition Verification 29. QAR Closed by MPQAD Cete 1

l 5 A::e ptsole UnacceptaDie Swoerceding CAR t .

M-4,'1 A (Rey

l0NE & WESSTER MICHIGAN, INC.

g r, c, p &

NONCONFORMANCE IDENTIFICATION REPORT Au 2 af J4 %

, *I~ 1 of 4 DATE OF NONCONFORMANCE:

3/31/84 NIR NUMBER 026 Kkl IDENTIFICATION / LOCATION OF ITEMS:

(Centrolled) Document Station 309/MPQA0 DESCRIPTION OF NONCON.70RMANCE: '

During the C10's ongoing evaluation of Site Document Control (Station 309) CIO performed a sample inspection of documents contained at Work Print Station 309.

The population was determined to be 2431, per 95/5 criteria, a sample of 125 documents were randomly selected. The sample was determined to be acceptable

~

.w ith two rejects and rejectable with three rejects. (Four documents were found to be discrepant as follows:)

1. Drawing C-130, Rev.13 - FCR-C7070 is listed and attached to Drawing C-130, DCC's records indicate FCR is a " pullback". Station 309 notified February, 1984.

-2. Drawing C-224, Rev. 7 - FCR-M6676 is listed and attached to Drawing C-224,'

4 DCC's records indicate FCR is a " pullback". Station 309 notified April, 1983. ,

I l

2 A ..' % PROGRAM MGR //[/$. /

f'%- [ (

J h1TIATOR ,/

f DATE 2/[fV DATE 7 _/' - >?'/

CORRECTIVE ACTION BY: ,

i IDENTIFY ORGANIZATION TAKING CORRECTIVE ACTION f

i

( .

l i

e VERIFICATION SAT UNSAT , NEW NIR# CONCURRENCE INITIATOR PROGRAM MGR DATE DATE DATE REMARKS ,

,-,-e,-w.,-w-, wv,,-.----e,n<~+~----ww,--v~w,-rw--- -

~---.- +-~--,,<,~-,-,ve.----- ---n n~ - e m v o- - - - - ---- - w ---v-- - ~ -

ga) g4 IC=2 2 Cf 2

. -) 'y m' .,^~~

2na , . - . .,

4

  • DESCRIPTICN OF NDNCONFORMANCE (Con't')

PACE 3af}4

  • 2. ~ Drawing C-97, Rev. 6 - Drawing does not have "R" symbol. DDR shows  %

. Drawing C-97 as having an "R" status. (incorrect;y)

'4. Drawing C-852, Rev. 13 - Drawing has "R" symbol. DDR show no "R" symbcl. (incorrectly)

  • Items 3 and 4 - Sepias were verified to have an "R" stamp which identifies discrepancies wtth register.

D G

. . m ,

)

Q4 4sf!

,; *. )

Raspense to NIR 026, dated April 3, 1984; QAR RA-001'76, dated April 9, 1984

Subject:

Work Print Station 309 Work Print Station 309 is located with MPQAD-QC-Document Control.

Distribution is done by Document Control and maintenance of the station is the responsiblity of the work print station receiving the document.

Note: For ease of reading, the findings have been grouped by subject. The letter identification noted on the NIR has been retained for cross referencing.

1. Change Paper Not Removed From Drawings (Findings 1 and 2)

(1) A pull back transmittal for FCR-C7070 to Drawing C-130 was issued March 7, 1984, by FDCC. The change paper was not removed from the drawing at this area per pull back instructions. This was a clerical error and corrective action has been taken.

( 2 )- A pull back transmittal cannot be located removing FCR-M6676 from Drawing C-224 The " Construction is Complete" status stamp on the back of the FCR indicated the FCR was no longer applicable to the drawing. A review of Drawing C-224, Revision 7 at other areas reflected no discrepancies. Therefore, it is assumed that a pull back transmittal had been issued but the change paper was not removed l

l from the drawing at Work Print Station 309. Corrective action will be taken by April 18, 1984. ,

2. Discrepancies Between Register and Sticks (Findings 3 and 4)

(3) The register indicated that Drawing C-97, Revision 6 as having l

retired change paper against it. The drawing' was distributed by FDCC without the appropriate stamping to reflect the correct status.

The drawings at recipient areas, as indicated on the FDDL, have been i corrected.

A review will be made of the files in the reproduction center to ensure that all drawings reflect the appropriate retirement status as indicated on the DDR. This review and any corrective action ic scheduled to be complete by April 27, 1984.

(4) Drawing C-852, Revision 13, was correct in reflecting a retired change paper status. On March 16, 1984, the DDR correctly reflected FCE C-2317 as retired against Drawing C-852.

On March 18, 1984, an operator error was made in requesting the type of report status to be printed from the System 38. Therefore, this l

DDR did not reflect Drawing C-852 as having retired change paper

! against it. This error was discovered by documer.t control and the I

next print out of the register indicated the correct status.

No further corrective action is required.

Msr

~

l 0073ml

-. .