ML20084M389
| ML20084M389 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 05/07/1984 |
| From: | Kinne J CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.) |
| To: | STONE & WEBSTER, INC. |
| References | |
| CIO-0035, CIO-35, NUDOCS 8405150349 | |
| Download: ML20084M389 (3) | |
Text
_.
b 54-3 17 PM
- FR1hCIPA, e
'a
/BA gerst 4 Rb hg4A
, g>d IC SCS O
DOCUMENTATION TRANSMITTAL A0 g
SG pggo
-tF To: Stone & Webster - CIO Transmittal No:
CIO- 0035 PO Box 1963 Date: May 7, 1984 Midland, MI 48640 Attention:
George A. Carter The documentation listed below _ is provided herewith, 2 was previously provided on 5-3-84
- as requested by George A. Carter Documentation
Description:
Quality Action Request (QAR) #RA-00126 CIO has X has not been placed on routine transmittal for the described documentation.
$Nl l
h Spnature CC RJCook,'NRC Site '(w/a, unless voluminous)
JJHarrison, NRC Region III (w/a, unless voluminous)
DDJohnson, SMO (w/o)
JCKeppler, NRC Region IIIv(w/a, unless voluninous)
BHPeck, SMO (w/o)
NIReichel, SMO (w/o)
RAWells, MPQAD (w/o)
CMThompson - File 24.2 (w/a, unless voluminous) gay 10 $ M I 8405150349 840507 I
) (
M10384-0001A-QLO6 PDR ADOCK 05000329 S
- 6. CAR Numoer
@ggg MIDLAND PROJECT RA-00126 Power QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT
- 7. Cate issueo
- 8. Revision 02-27-84 0
CompalIY QUALITY ACTION REQUEST i
9' A DIttikIAf
- , 2
- 1. Requirement EME W E E W=
- 44 5
- 10. ASME Ref ated 1.
MPQAD Procedure N-12, REV. 2, Paragraph 4.0 Definitions:
f Jves filno Paragraph 4.1 states in part:
" Inaccessible - An item or attribute of an item, which due to its physical location or configuration, cannot be physically or visually reinspected without removing, and thereby invalidating installed work.
Under the Quality Verification Program, this includes those items or attributes normally inspected in-process and which subsequent construction processing makes inaccessible.
(Continued on Page 2 of 2)
- 2. Deficiency A review of QA Inspection Records generated by MPQAD/QC reveals evidence that the pro-grammatic requirements of MPQAD Procedure N-12, REV. 2 are not being implemented with respect to inaccessible items.
(See Requirements 1 and 2.) Contrary to these require-ments MPQAD/QC has completed and documented the results of QVP inspection activities and are now QA records. These records show Acceptance Blocks signed and dated for (Continued on Page 2 of 2)
"'#'(('
y
- 3. QAR Originated by
- 4. Discipline / Division /Section
- 5. Response Oue Date
- 12. Date Reported to MPQA Mgr DDHallenbeck Elect / PAP /IE 03-28-84 N/A
- 13. Action item No.
- 15. Item Priority
- 17. S/U Code
- 19. Action Organization
- 20. CAR Revi by S04719 2
PGM00 DANott 84 #
BOPQC
- 10. Discipline
- 16. Trend Code essass-J/J%. Resb Code
- 21. Date E
{M B-FM BOPQC 02-28-84
- 22. Cause
- 23. Proposed Corrective Action VOID VOID (per block 27 below)
(per block 27 below)
- 24. Responsible Organization / Person
- 25. Proposed Completion Dets m
an
& G
- 26. Disposition Conc re ce
_y 7{[
I mussu UA.
/ lindf 3/fol.l V y.
CAR Reviewer '
(
Dafe
.PQAE (ASME Only)
Date
- 27. Disocsition Act.on Taken 80PQC has stated that they are implementing the PQCI's as written by Plant Assurance Engineering. Plant Assurance Engineering states that the revised PQCI's implement the requirements of Procedure N-12 and that the situation in question is not an inaccessible item.
The inspection criteria is b ing impleme roperly and no D IA is required.
Lkw&
10 Wr W g
- 28. Metnoo of Deposition Verifiution 297 MR'CTose@
NoNE - VOID H P Leonard (see block 27)
MPQAO Date
'^
Acceptable Unacceptable Superceding QAR M-4/1 A (Rev 1)
C QAR No:
g MIDLAND FROJECT RA-00126
'ouAury ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ACTlON REOUEST DATE:
REY:
02-27-84 0
C,0NTINp AT QM SHE,ET kgh j k(
PAGE 2 Or 2 Block #1 - Requirement (Continued) 2.
MPQAD Procedure N-12, REV. 2, Paragraph 5.4.1a.2 states in part:
" Inaccessible items of inspection attributes shall be identified on a Disposition for Inaccessible Items /
Attributes Form.
For each VIR attribute which is inaccessible, enter the acronym "DIIA" in the AcceDtance Column of the VIR to identify that a DIIA Form was originated."
3.
POCI E-5.0, REV. 14, Section 8, Soecial Instruction #6 states:
"Where insDection fcr cable damage is impractical (i.e. Cable routed through unscheduled flex or metallic conduit, cables routed within bundles, etc.), the requirements of Activity 3.2, 3.3, and 3.5 shall be imolemented on the visible portion of the cable. Note on the IR in Block 15, the portio of the cable not inspected and the reason it is impractical to inspect it."
Block #2 - Deficiency (Continued) specific activities, yet in the Remarks Block of the VIR's, the QC inspectors indicated that they could not perform the inspection or that they could only partially inspect because the hardware was inaccessible.
The QC inspectors did not generate DIIA's and document the DIIA in the Acceptance Block as reoutred.
NOTE:
Loo Numbers of known deficient VIR's V375, V376, V308, V331, V332, V333, V330, V301, V302, V315, V321, V472, V473, V476, V477, V126, V127, V133, V134, V135, V139, V141, V144, V159, V167, V168, V175) l l
l l
l I
i l
M-4/15 (Rev 0)