ML20084K593
| ML20084K593 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Beaver Valley |
| Issue date: | 04/17/1984 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20084K577 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8405140105 | |
| Download: ML20084K593 (2) | |
Text
4,,__.-_--
l-pec UNITED STATES c,
,og
. y (4 g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g-5
,f g l WASHINGTON; D. C. 20555 o,{e 3
g il N> j
+.
a SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION.
[
RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 77 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE N0. DPR-66 DUQUESNE LIGHT COMPANY
}
OHIO'EDIS0N COMPANY PENNSYLVANIA POWER COMPANY BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION, UNIT NO. 1
~
DOCKET N0. 50-334 Introduction By letter dated November 3,1983, Duquesne Light Company (the licensee) proposed to amend Operating License DPR-66 by eliminating in its entirety Appendix B.
Appendix B consists of two types of enviror, mental specifications :
radiological and non-radiological. The latter type of specification is to be addressed by a separate action.
Discussion and Evaluation Appendix B of the Operating License consists of two types of environmental Technical. Specifications.
The first type, which comprises most of Appendix B, has.to do with limits on radiological effluents and their measurement.
All'of this type of specifications (RETS) have been incorporited into Appendix A of the license (Amendment No. 66, March 28, 1983). The presence 1
- of this type of specification in both Appendices A and B causes inconsistency and confusion.
We have reviewed this proposal of the licensee.
The licensee's proposed RETS submitted on October 22, 1982, for inclusion in Appendix A of the license along with the associated reference document, "Offsite Dose Calculation Manual" submitted on December 1, 1982, meet the intent of NRC guidelines, in toto, as described in detail 'in the Safety Evaluation Report associated with Amendment No. 66.
Thus, on the basis that all environmental specifications have been incorporated, similar specifications that are present in Appendix B P
can be eliminated.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION n
We have determined that the amendment does not authorize a change in effluent types or total amounts nor an increase in power level and will not result in any significant environmental impact.
Having made this determination, we have further concluded that the amendment involves an
. action which is insignificant from the standpoint of environmental impact, and pursuant to 10 CFR $51.5(d)(4), that an environmental impact statement, or negative declaration and environmental impact appraisal need not be prepared in connection with the issuance of this amendment.
8405140105 840417 PDRADOCK05000g
2-a..
CONCLUSION We have concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:
(1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, and (2) such
! activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations and the issuance of_this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense or security or to the health and safety of the public.
Dated: April' 17, 198r Principal Contributor:
W. Peinke V
L 4
9 I
e 4
e e"
___._____-_______._--_2_______..___.________m__._-.
_______