ML20083P999
| ML20083P999 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oyster Creek |
| Issue date: | 01/08/1975 |
| From: | Shoop P INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS |
| To: | Anthony Giambusso Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20083P992 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8302220481 | |
| Download: ML20083P999 (1) | |
Text
f%3 international Brotherhood r
charin a siad soupn o.x. nan
'at"O lat = 6oa'
'6
- A > *** '
' dElectricalWor' h
Presiden d.]"
Secretary
,'g s
~
a 2*
~
', '[, -
..,[
112515:h St. N.W.
.hlV
$'$ne n.
.c.
o
^
Jaguary 8,1975 s
U. S. Atomic Energy Commission Angelo Giambusso, Deputy Director.
,- ~r
. ~.
~
.for Reactor Projects U~ [
"Directora te of Licensing 6-
~.
~
Washington, D. C. 20545
Dear Mr. Gianbusso:
s The IBEW represents the bargaining unit personnel at the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station.
In reviewing the FES for Oyster Creek, an item of interest was 6
found in 5.4.3.3.- Occupational Radiation Exposure. A valve of 450 i
man-rem per year was given for the unit.
q
. - 4 m...,f ma w.a cynaia ;7,c zay.s o
of Data 'on Occupational Radiation Exposure Experienced at Operating Nuclear Power Plants." This report lists the exposure for the various
~
operating stations. While not identifying the Oyster Creek data by name it is possible to identify the station. For the year 1973 on site personnel received 551 can-rems with off site personnel receiving I
898 man-reas. The year 1972 was only slightly below the 450 manerem valve given in the FES. The 1974 figures are not available.
i
]
The AEC Sth (1972) and 6th (1973) Ionizing. Radiation Exposure
' Record and Report while not giving the total man-rems does not list
[
the number of individuals in each exposure bracket. Oyster Creek data indicates a greater number of exposed personnel in the higher brackets.
Our concern is obvious since most of this exposure is to bargain-
]
ing unit personnel who are our members.
a We realize that the 450 man-rem per year for on site personnel is j
a guideline. The fact that it has been exceeded is not greatly disturb-ing. The comparison of the Oyster Creek exposures with the rest of the industry is the disturbing factor.
.l What can the IBE'i do to help reduce this exposure history at Oyf 1
Creek?
Sincercly',
1, 8302220481 750213 j
PDR ADOCK 05000219
- P PDR Paul R. Shoop g
International Representat i, i