ML20083P687
| ML20083P687 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 04/16/1984 |
| From: | Eddleman W EDDLEMAN, W. |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| 82-468-01-OL, 82-468-1-OL, OL, NUDOCS 8404200117 | |
| Download: ML20083P687 (33) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ _ _ 1 p soENCE 2 c pTED UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DOCKET Igrf1N-1984 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION '84 APR 19 P3:38 BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BCIA'BD OF SECFtwy Glenn O. Bright '$k,jEEVli' Dr. James H. Carpenter James L. Kelley, Chairman In the Matter of Docket 50 400 OL CAROLINA POWER AND LIGHT CO. et al. ) ar Harris Nuclear Power Plant. ) ASLBP No. 82-h68-01 ) OL Motion to Compel Discovery on Eddleman Contention 65 Negotiations concerning the adequacy and completeness of Auplicants ' answers and responses to the second set of interrogatories j having broken down April 10, on Eddleman 65, this motion is filed by Agreement with attorney Baxter approved by Judge Kelley by oral order. Applicants have agreed to supply copies of the pour packages for other pours in the Harris base mat, containment walls and dome (all those previously not produced). I am having these copied sight unseen by CP&L, with the understanding that if there are any problems with the copies, I enn get back to them for corrective action. I thank the Applicants for their cooperation in this matter. Most of this Motion concerns the completeness of Applicants' answers and/or document production. Without this information, it is 3g not practical for me and/or my consultant expert to review this o 4 N plant's concrete placement record and see if it complies with all 3 25 applicable procedures and in fact avoids voids, honeycombing etc. h, Another problem surfaces in the answer to 65-13(1)(p.17) where me.C only a business address is given. If I contact these folks there, I'm tipping off Daniel (and no doubt CP&L) who I'm talking to. DM
4 S q, Home addresses should be given for persons identified under these interrogatories so I can contact them without notifying Daniel and/or CP&L that 1t's been done. (People working for or with me 1 may also be making such contacts -- but again, if the question or call or letter comes through Daniel's office, it informs them who we are asking questions of, and may identify the u ones asking the questions. Ynis notification of Daniel would deter whittleblowers or potential whistleblowers from talking or making info available. Indeed it would damage intervenor's credibility with whistleblowers or potential whistaleblowers to do a dumb thing a like contacting them at work, which means the info supplied is nearly useless. ) Applicants have clarified that the manswers to 65-15(f)(i) and (ii) are both Yes. In response to 65-116(b) (resnonse at 21), Applicantu produced only the latest version of the concredte specifications and CD C instructions. The interrogatory asks specifically for each procedure for batching process monitoring used in connection with concrete in each pour. A 1983 procedure that is version no 21 or no.12 tells me and my expert (s) nothing about the procedure or specification in effect in 1978 when pour ICBSL 216001 and 002 were poured. I believe Applicants have to have all the versions of each such procedure in their files, by NRC rules. I am willing to pay their expenses to Fet copies of them. Withot.t them we can't check the pour packages versus the procedures applicable to each pour. With them, we can. The files should be all in one place, so they should be readily assemblable for copying. Without them, I and my expert (s) will be left guessing what the procedures and standards were in effect when the cours before 1981 were made, for 1981 is the earlies procedure /QC date on the items supplied. I asked for Since it might be the spe,fific procedures in effect for each pour.
- 5 ;.
7 3-considered burdensome to find the crocedures for each pour, I am willing to pay for copies of all the procedures and specifications, including each revision. Since Applicants are agreeing to supply all the pour packages for the Harris containment base mat, walls and dome, all these procedures will be useful for review. It's simpler to just produce copies of all the procedures & let me sort thru them. On 65-16(h) (p.23) the cure los docunents are identified, but they do not anpear to have been produced. Applicants show no willingness to produce any more documents re this. At least the cure logs for the defective pour and 5% sample should be produced (those in Exhibits 1 and 2 to CP&L's past response to original interrogatories on Eddleman 65 in the first round), p.26 of 3/23/8h resnonse on 65-16(v)greferring to Tech Procedure TP-15 and work procedure WP-05, again the latest versions were produced, but all the historic versions are needed to check the pour packages versus j the nrocedure. Nonswithess exnert " Eagle Eye" informs me that in effect at the time of the pour, without the current orocedure,4you can't figure out if the pour complied to anplicable standards. If it didn't comply, the integrity l of the containment is in question, and that would be a very serious l matter. This is like the 65-16(b) question above. Again, the and history file of the procedures should be all in one place, I'm i willing to pay for copies of all the versions and sort them out. The information is needed to assess conpliance with applicable procedures. Daniel might think this is funny, but I don't. i The response to 65-17(b)\\as' king for specific accept / reject criteria for rebars in nuecific pours and those in the 5% sample, is a dodge. The documents are not identified, the criteria are not in documents produced, and the only rebar drawings I have are some for the base mat. I understand Technical Procedure TP-22 specifies the criteria for rebar. I believe that among the "other an design documents" referred to in this response to 65-17(b) proved include
.; ab r' -h-mummuumurf numerous field changes requests (FCRs), PWs, and so on. There is even one case in documents I already have, where it says i 1 "A DR will be written for 5i cy (Cubic yards) placed with a low l air %", but no deficiency report appears to be in the package (ICBXWhh4001, Exh. 1 TP-15). Another part of this same package says concrete with a preliminary slump of 8 % (outside specs) would be ok'd per "FCR-C-3794"' but that Field Change Request isn't 4 in the package. Without things like this, neither I nor my expert can figure out what was, or was not, ina como11ance with applicable procedures or regulations. I think it unreasonable to have Applicants produce ALL the PCRS and PWs identified in these documents, but they should be required to produce the common ones like PW-C-400k and PW-C-40h0 which, in ICBXW308001's package, are repeatedly referenced on Exhibit 8, TP-22 (rebar) for spacing violations which cover most of pages 6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13 (PW*C *4207 ),1h ( ditto ), ik5,161,17,18, and 19. FCR-C-2937 is identified on page lh of that exhibit, and FCR-C-2825 on p.18, both (as with the others) used to OK the rebar despite its spacing violations, anearently. Without the rebar blueprints and the Mapplicable "other annroved design documents" it would be almost impossible to make sense of this. Yet rebar spacing can be critical to the formation of voids, as even applicants have admitted. The criteria for, and anproval of, spacing deviations or problems, and the corrections ist any made to such snacing, are thus important to ascessing voids, honeycombing, etc. in Harris containment concrete. I propose that the above-listed FCRs, PWs etc, and any others specifically identified by me and/or my exnertis) within a reasonable time (say, 60 days) be produced for inspection and conying, or be produced as copies for which I'd pay 7 cents a page, CP&L's standard rate.
,' ' t 5-The " answer"t to 65-17(c) on page 29 does not exnlain how the documents are combined into a " pour package". The procedures are required to see how it is done. 65-16(v) mentions these procedures, but not all versions of them are produced, so pour packages made under other procedures are in what I've got (and will get), but nothing to check their contenti against, to see what should be in there according to procedures in effect when the pours were made. The resnonses (pp30-31) to 65-18(c)(d)(e)(f) anpear somewhat evasive. There may be records of those meetings or reconnendations but none are produced or identified. Applicants have g declined to make available a legible version of the names of personE identified in the nour packages, desnite their practice of saying "the requested information can be determined from the cour package", e.g. to 65-18(1), p.32, and similar response to 65-18(j), p.31. I believe the answer to 65-18(h) is false or misleading. CP&L document 00056k, pour package for ICBXW256001, Exhibit 1 TP-15 4 describes this as "a most difficult placement" (This may be Exh 2). A fuller answer is thus required. The response to 65-18(0), pp 32-33, is evasive. The questinn is highly specific while the answer is very general and does not respond to any of the items (i) thru (v) in the question. This is extremely relevant as it regards the source of and cause of known voids /honeycombing in a pour in the Harris base mat. Applicants have further clafified, re 65-20, that the pour in the base mat is the only one in the Harris base mat, containment wax 11s or dome in which they iddntified voids or honeycombing. (p35) Answers to 65-21 and -2P (pp 36-37, response Mar '8h) refer to documents but identify none. There appear to be no darawings of,
- ., * *,] or procedures for, concrete repairs in the nour nackages I have received to date, though several note repairs being made.
Further, the documents referenced in the discrppancy reports (see response to 65-23(a), p.37) are not identified, though they are soecifically requested in the question. In response to 65-23(b) (up37-38) the documents giving the procedure under which annroval was given, are not identified, nor produced. Again, the documents asked for in these questions are most relevant, since CP&L claims it has fixed everything that needed repairing in Harris containnent concrete. The crocedures for, and procedures for approval of, the repairs or deviations left in place, are most relevant. I and/or my expert (s) must have them to exanine and compare with the placement reports, to evaluate the compliance of the renairs with anplicable prodcedures which Anolicants so snugly cite about this contention. To do that you need the specific docunents requested. I think they should all be produced for the 5% sample already produced, and for the defective pour that was repaired (so CP&L says). Applicants clarify that another valid answer to 65-2h(c) is Yes. On 65-27(e) I have not made reouests for most of daem yet, and none have so far been nroduced. (see np h0-kl, Mar 23 resnonse). For the reasons stated above, I nove the Board to order i production of the information requested above so that I and my expert (s) can examine the concrete information I have received and will b getting under agreement with Applicants. CERTIFICATE OF NEGOTIATIONS f I sooke with Applicants ' counsel Baxter by phone at length h 4-8h, l and in person 4-10-8k. We were unable to resolve the matters on which the above motion seeks to compel discovery. We did resolve those matters noted herein and some other minor matters. Anplicants and I disaFree on what is required, thus the above motion was filed. O, g, {,.y M'- I affirm the above is trrue, l 44P/
l' Rsv. 7 Exhibit 1 CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY SHEARON BARRIS NUCLEAR POWER Fu NI F M CDfENT CHECKLIST FuCDENT NO. [ OBMA%CO4 toCATION Cod. # l es+. Wal A2. s os += m*, el. n e 'sc, ov' ~ CHECKLIST REMARKS INITIALS Free Fall Height 6 5b. M@ Rate of Rise Sab. MQ Hot Weather Conditions DSI-N4 Cold Weather Conditions id/A k@ Layer Thickness 6M-k'O Use of Placing Equipment 6d. k Consolidation N'
- k@
Embedded Itens 6 ab. MA8 Forms 6 d. MA8 Cleanup Maintained Td. MQ Mixint To Placine Intervals 6d* k@ Shifted /Femoved Febar Peplaced ba N@ Y ldoM t.Juned/ &l00td-U.'Lirafton iecfAHto up.s *. bk COMMENTS awter - awJ over -obaum. 4 mx+ ck:<+,3th,%+. CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR M Y b k DATE f -// f f CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SUPERVISOR h DATE b~ NM 3 4 FOR INFORMATION ONO
FORM NO. IT6T Vev 8 Ezhibit:.1 Y *0 0 R E T 000572 2 wp.05 C SHNPP FILE PLACEMENT {jglgy REPORT PLACEMENT NUMBER jggggg g a LCCATION (INCLUCE ELEY. IF LN BLDG.) SCHEDULED DATE: [6A*fW7A'sxg%,f Y $d.- YW /2,/'2//b t ll E TYPE PLACEMENT ESTIMATED CLANTITY TEMR Lt)dlT ' SLUMP LIMIT YES NO gg / f c, sf, p.p. 7"p SEISMIC CLASS I h PRCPOSED PL ACEMENT METHODS : K; HECK APPLICABLE SPACES .g C UR'NG m UNFC#VEO SVRF h g TR ANSPCRTING PLACING VIBRATION FINISHING FORut0 SURF. WATER 2 3 BUGGY O CauTE g INTERNAL ,5 STEE' L TROWEL) Q FORMS ALONE O WET svRLAp a BUCKET % TREMIE O FORM TWOOD FLOAT ' O TARPS O PoLTETNTLENE C CONVEYCR .O ORCP O O HAIR aRuSH s O LNSULATION O cur:NG CoMeeuNo-3 puwp O O 9.. -eROOM. FNSH" O FORMS S WATER OKuREz a b TRUCx 0 m;eeER iLOAT O NM C 6-O sERs,CE c s._ Emv 44/ Ac t t g CunE o p ,gg / m O M ert
- G ALLONS RtCU1 RED.,.-
4
- NTC At*ED WEATFER COMMENT & CLAR1FICATICN TO PROPOSED METHCCS f
O'#N.)E /) CLREiCAiS1 ~ f4y, pg,p g/,y,, M s g n IE PA4 MARY M ASON AY DWG. NO.- RATE OF RtSE //4 g pg g g /'j #/,r,,ar ) ygg ms._"37pp r (,66A N*$0D A~ f bf/Ar W /'ed (nacfdow Mf5ct) $. DES. STRENGTn jf.4;gy, DESIGN MIX'C00E ' 4 g. - NAME/ TITLE, FEASON Sc6 MITT 4Na A6L InE A80VE j jf gNh k PRE-PLACEMENT
- CONSTRUCTOR lCONST. lNSPECTt'ON OUALITY ASSURANCE l
CHECK 0tJT REF. PROC. N CATE INSPECTOR H Of SIGNOFF CATE CLA.SIGNOFF CONTACT SURFACES d-o 6 +e '2 W 2 FCRMS , p-2 2 h jf pjg J. Wo.c g 3_ REINFOROING STEEL g // A g 4 EMBEDS ' d$f' /ac*. gt y, WDE;$ WON V 9.Pi W'/o A. f4 4 @/h ' 6 ' ELECTRICAL o 9 CODE /SElSMIC *ELDNG tf _c_. CtIn-+ H'-of R QSwd \\&,. r A il '2 I I ( l CONSTRUCTOR SIGNCFF (AREA SUPT) TIME: fjf4 C.L
- 1GNCFF, 7 d %d/ M d' j
TIME;g+,.g CATE74.2/ FX.I M M. b w <((A ( CATE /M r'- [^ 3 M DATE PLACED j g g g ,. g _ ear k YDS.CONCRET V YOS PLACED IN CCNCRETE MS DELIVERED l l((b THIS PLACEMENT YARDS WASTED GROUT (4$ YAROS GROUT CONCRETE if '3 >5 YARDS PLACED CONCHETE O y DE LIV E RE D l8 Grout 1 oe b ELSEWHERE grout O ) y ACCEPTANCE CF PLACEMENT METHCOS & CC' PLETENESS CF ABCVE INFORMATION naut M u n $ W. 8 tu & lc x ? 0.T. e TnTtE' __R_E'/ AR(S L ATT ACH RE LE 5AN T REPORTS) Cart igasm .h W N /f
- O 7 M M 7" M
w.wx ~ c,- s, s.".a n/ V ff/ CM=l
- b y Y j
~ s u n-new, I _...-.n.. ,=66 r.Un mrue O
Rev. 7 Exhibit 1 7/81 CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT PLACEMENT CHECKLIST l PLACDENT NO. I CSvhWW60/ LOCATION dev f. El Ed. l>Jall a
- b. NM rel. d3'1b #N' CHECKLIST REMARKS INITIALS
[ Free Fall Height M. d Rate of Placement M. Hot Weather Conditions d/A 40 Cold Weather Conditions bd d Layer Thickness
- DS b.
M Use of Placing Equipmene 5ts t. Od Consolidation $nt. [$ l Embedded Items
- Sai, d
Forms bal d Cleanup Maintained dai, [LA Mixina To Placing Intervals bab Shifted / Removed Rebar Replace d/A d A cmecfts 4 oaftsdeky-tf alacetu%f (t'[ <ewelu l over-C0mENTs II Sur**'Oi sock h, Tenn U. $yekr3 ys) hn$ bC'x Am.e, sse,h V.,'C t& h (JF4 U nog l D,9 ggk a ngck (gsu,\\ff,, h ?, l$ be U Y en tn e e C4 b bt e l J ik to w a 90 n l l CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR '44./CN ' NW/! NDATE /M/*D-- [ CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SUPERVISOR _ DATE /2,. 78[82 - - as l 1
Rev. 5 AROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY 8/82 SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT 3 gg FIELD INSPECTION REPORT FOR REINFORCING STEEL - REQUIRED DRAWINGS Placement Number l C M L S 4 34 4 0 0 1 Coordinates d'A. O*4o Sfoff Computer Printout Reviewed (L/3 ,2-so-r2 Elevation @f38 to 841f4 t Daily Document Log Checked fu3 ,2.u. n Documer.t Control Contacted fu3 a. ao.c u C.I. Review f Area Engineer Review Drawings Required / Revision: Affecting Documents Masonry CAR-attil-Cr-buSCd8 FrRf-A2ts/54~,vh flamn-A--I A< eat -064cIR.5) id-C-37t3/AAA'l (twsi. 3ow+3 g.a.2w.$ \\ QQ.( _ y q {.1.L L rr,( -r. e o q u [C.Jw.Gs Wrcker lam Reinf*orcing CAR - AW'l-C= -c(dem) FCE-c-x 744 /l4A & rire % w._I.Q./ ~ ( 1 .g.y (g4 -Cl42fLb) Embeds Penetraeions CAR.3v r -Cr-(M-2(On f \\ LmeA h=rd' '-2 IIA'-G -153SCM h) -pas (Reh Dowels Bar Bending CAL.att/7 B--9ce3-to
== _ -.--==--.
====,-,y _..w........... e
. kev. O Exhibit 13 ~ 5/82 - FIELO INSPECTION REPORT FOR TP-22 p, 4 og 3 CONTAINMENT EXTERIOR WALL g DOME REINFORCING STEEI; PLACEW.NT NO./ LOCATION [ 04M%)444 001 l fA5 HEOLLE No. OM-3Ll b'l ~0~ ObbOIhh.* ~ Old'l 04) ; - DIN 2 0 INSPECTOR W d( /Jr d2 02---- DATE /2-20-71 FIELD ENGINEER P A N. A M m DATE /p_ /Jb /AJL / DE90N QUANTITIE S PER SMEET / grucpls HORIZONTALS Verticals OLAGONALS AOQ PENETRAThG STEEL SMEAR GARS OTMER I.b'UIF; I.F., O.F. Laver 2.0.F. .o wS S,6 VERT /MOR. / OfAG. i ns t o o 6 cq o "'7119## CESA F#W eESc. = =c.En~czS cogg0v5 4m La f i I. i=, O* +o 360* tod.lahf<., Grule. r (p \\ &\\ Wi-P \\ ggoceno M c n e. &s i , 6'R GR S a Q-5 s s 4 1 l f. liori a.onds O* A c St cf M-M l( N I(Seh 5 Q on e_ Q, ,Q4 i, f ll5heu-br:s bwt!y &be<Ofed N-Mct s 6A yx g gy,gy
- conc g,z 1
r l l G p eo ..g, mar. ee me- <*Na e ,e-
Rav. 1
- V6"S"
- w***
- - ' ' ' ~ * * * * * * * *
- u.u u u i
"'- 5 val SHNPP FELD INSPECTION REPORT FOR EMBEDDED PLATES, PENETRATION, AND ANCHOR BOLTS w,,.., PLACEMENT NO. I C 6 xta i m 4 c o l PAGEi 0F45 DRAWING S REV. 0AR-aun - cr-cc,ea /cs) INSPECTOR DESCRIPTION DISCREPANCIES CORRECTIVE ACTON ITEM LOCATION TYPE-(IOR Q, AB 4, RELATED 10 TYPE, SIZE, DR, PW, FCR, DCN INDIVIDUAL INSPECTED PENETRATION) SEE, MTON, INSTALL ATION, ETC. NOTIFIED DESIGN QTY. VS ACTUAL DESGN QTY., ETC. QUANTITY, DIMENSIONS,Elt EMBED PLATES W * *N TM's Pl* I PENE-M*0 D'*"' plate.ks W place w d be.3e.t (icGwen cn2.) TRATON "' ' ',. 6, .09op D. B.-% 4.s Wded back as c4 2-2e <c2 / I O-Ac-O - ANCHOR BOLTS b Nltl& hcles de leS /r [ &d,,, omER O*J' S'88 19
- } $jk"Ec, Ma re.a-id.1 j
uc-a e n s++ w m -,s a r plate h 2's" 'O '3 Meiwi Stuh /.3 -J o-P 1, j % t-3 7vt.g g
- 4).A h 6*d W<L iv < 7" 4 Thereded Af )Qcck.,sb4 t3 se s
u,aa 4s1 km Wlorak-
- 0) Tc2-c 3 744 i
M Fivts ue M eck - [
.k Rm g Ut0 LINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY Exhibit 2 G/82 SJON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PIANT TP-15 POST PLACEMENT CHECKLIST PLACEMENT NO. ) 0 6 Y(.D ll' N C P I LOCATION ODai.#1A5cf.Ldall PLACED /2-J i - V1-SURFACE AREA d/A END OF CURE / 2 cRT-A CURE COMPOUND (AMOUNT) N/At CURE / PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS Dovece eva /425r.h!waad Qehackh /~7d>ur Mo%eur, i s-CHECKLIST l REMARKS I INITIALS FINISH l A~. Steel Trowel l M 'A [4/3 B. Wood Float M/A Md C. Broom M/A M48 D. Hair Brush bJ/A 8s.8 E. Rubber Float M/A M'd F. Keyways Installed d IA ['8 FORMS Form & Shoring Re= oval Q/A M REPAIRS Type of Repair Required (Cosmetic OStructural EgForms Still In Place M. % QuS I-5-th k'O EMBED PLATES W/ SCREW-IN-STUDS "l Thread Engagement N,/ A g SEISMIC CAP l -. Procer Gap Maintained N /A g CURING / PROTECTION EXTENSIONS REMARKS A. Water N h Ith bt-7 dev3mord M4.0 B. Curing Compound dfk M /4 843 C. Ponding MM M /A [A.6 D. Burlan AJ/A AJ % [Q3 E. Wet Sand Mb DN kA6 F. Polvethlylene /A AJ/A-Mad G. Tecoerature N d4 M - 7 cde'/s h 60 F [&O ~ COMMENTS: /) CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR. I DATE /-8-83 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION SUPERVISO m /uk a _ [QATE /-/d -A3 O
I QA-24 [ CAROLINA POWEFOLIGIIT COMPANY page g c f. 2/81 CORPORATE QUALITY AMURANCE DEPARTMENT ~,' Rev.0 CONCRETE TEST REPORT (Procedure CQC-13) PLACEMENT NO. 168W $N00 l DATE Id-dl-S A MODE OF PLACEMENT d(# DI5c///td6c IDCATION onfdIMfsd 9i j ) WEATHER: ( d) CLEAR ( ) OVERCAST ( ) RAIN ( ) OTi!ER h ( ) HAZY ( ) FT)G ( ) P. CLOUDY i ACCU AIR UNIT TEST CYLINDERS TICKEI TIME YARDS SLUMP TEMP. THERM. AIR METER UNIT VP. SCALE RESU LTS SET LAB NO. SAMPLED PLACED (IN) (*F) NO. (7.) NO. WP. BUCKET NO. DAY DAY DAY DAY NO. REMARKS 7 2fd 2@ a y y CftL dlL (fdL (HL fn%rnary f,,y el G
- 93f(t5 PM Sii13 b.
MH
- 59 7 4ME sow, '/bO [5370 ICbblO I-W(,5 0
I' s AM Cf4L 7 %. C(d" C f4L. [/4l. Qbl(o$ sk 3DPM N h7 Y3 WElcbu SMC D ,[ggl,,p wy 0/ $frmf cf gf( go np 4t14 lU b MK$ sems AM i4 pg pai g % A*. C-/75/ r$5c/cp
- AM l
PM
- AM l
- PM 3 AM i
- PM
}[} AM t PM i
- AM
- PM
- AM
- PM
- AM a FM AM
- PM
- AM
- PM SLUMP REQUIRED b-liifff in.
DESIGN MIX # USED TN7 Qhh3 INSPECTOR8/4 k p F W ATE /)"oll-6 V AIR REQUIRED 6-9 7. DESIGN STRENGTH E000 /SI LAB QA/QC INSPECT DATE M e -{ per rd-c.- 3714 QA/QCSPECIALIST[ DATE /~ h ef 3
W Fonu No.17s7 EXHCT I p,COuCREYE @ g 0005673., s gP-o. g,. SMPP ntE !!!!I! PLACEMENT REPORT PLACEMENT NUMBER tg g gggp[ LOCATION (INCLUDE ELEV. IF pd SLDs.) SCHEDULED DATE: & p h m W " Y f M cJL X 9/26/B 3 ll TYPE PLACEMENT ESTIMATED QUANTITY TEMP LIMIT ilLUMP LIMIT YES NO h M tvM 6o c4. 70, p ISMc us I & PROPOSED PLACEMENT METHOOS (QNECK APPLICABLE SPACES) M LadFOMED SURE TRANSPORT 3dG PLActM4 V18 RAT 10N gi FOMED S4AtF. WATER g BUGGY O CNuTE O INTERNAL g STEEL TROWEL O FORMS ALONEMT BURLAP O BUCKET O TREW4E & FORM .% WOOD FLOAT.O TARPS O POLYETNLENE O f CONVEYOR O DROP O M d 8 d HAIR BRUSH' O INSULATION O CURING COMPOUND: PUNP D O t .'j ^f, BROOM FINISH Q FORMS & WATER O KUREZ O g TRUCx 0 ~ hp j,c9% goat O O NUTEC lo O l SERVICE CONQ M#8 QUAD CURE O O g PROTECTION NNO ANTICIPATED WEATHER 5 C " "S: COMMENT & CLARtFICATION TO PROPOSED METHODS y //d7 - CURE (DAYS ) 7 pu,um 4 % fy,ym g - O PRIM ARY MASO'#tY DWGL NO. RATE O,F RISE M M W 3 zf'ye 3og.25 s, & $$-80/b8 ' Sf$ 4-4 %* M -/Z f w z s A 4 4 d sA W W M W DES STRENGTH
- - NAME/
LE SUBMITTING ALL THE ABOVE I I68f/ /i d h l BY:/ M/N DATE: 3 LE: PRE-PLACEMENT CONSTRUCTOR CONST INSPECIlON QUALITY CONTROL L CHECKOUT REF PROC. [yk hD DATE INSPE CTOR O.C. SIGNOFF DATE I CONTACT SURFACES c,4[ C% 4((f#d'# S,5 slNu//W u 2 FoRuS &. 22. &nfifj>C&f N5 NMOS 3 REINFORCING STEEL w p_j/ M4/. #Mdf-47 /. h M l + 4 EMBEDS QVf/////[69([e6 0,/us h ~ g EMBEDS M MM 3 PIPE WM2 MdM >6 D4M Y"IN h 6 ELECTRICAL p/OQo / /3 M///((' /M 'hY N]8 b I JN#'Y' ND'YN'WY h 7 CADwELDS wp e / V/k J e~ $$h)WAff T.25 0bW& $-W I $~ M 5 8 ROP WELDING M's s N-2M/d N fha 5' * ' '*" CODE WELDING .yf ' 7 "s k{'p ' x Y' '$'d f;bfg')f f 4 I'dN3 U SEISMIC WELDING WN N r ' eN'Y'
- 24 N O MM' D h
10 CLE AN - UP gg-o fJp v>w E YSIf d/hZo[dbs( %'" MMD'+'9 I'MO'Nk'D'I e e CONSTRUCTOR SIGNOFF ( AREA SUPT) TIME : f'/ // # C. GNOFF TIME: pfQ/f J. B #>>,,# DATE:F'.19.fJ l 48 DATE: FM ME [py / ~- DATE PLACED 'y g g L YDS. CONCRE'fs YDS PLACED IN J-CONCRETE # 0 7' DELIVERED l Yl'8 THIS PLACEMENT 2.- MM NU GROUT / fz YDS. GROUT CONCRETE 87 6 YDS PLACED CONCRETE 6 C Ou I DEUVERED M GROUT D 0 0 1/,, ELSEWHERE GROUT v 0 o U 'A CEPT CE O PL ACEMENT METHOOS & COMPLETENESS OF ABOVE INFORMATION NAME: TITLE: 8,[ DATE:
- 73) @f g
REM ARKS (KT7ACH RELEVANT hEPORTS) / { ~ .,...ri. ... s, s- ~ ~ ~ - O
R',v. 7 Exhibit 1 7/81 TP-15 i CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPAhT SHEARON HARRIS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT
- d. 2d 30 PLACEMENT CHECKLIST PLACDiENT NO.
[COMd3O D I LOCATION Oonf.#f Ed. Mall A2 ssmit.c,et. aos.a.s' n.soe.a.s > ~~ ~ CHECKLIST REMARKS INITIALS Free Fall Height dN-4 Raee of Placement b- [$ Hot Weather Conditions b. k sa s. ass Cold Weather Conditions PM/A Q Layer Thickness daf. k Use of Placing Equipment [4 Consolidation 6f. k Embedded Items bM. [@ Forms M. kd Cleanup Maintained 6a4. k4 Mixing ~ To Placing Intervals M. k'O Shifted / Removed Rebar Replace bd/A kd COPMENTS 5mtrO M sak to SktNieN I! CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR DATE 8 99-D CCNSTRUCTIONINSPECTIONSUPERVISOR[b DATE 9~/~8.7 c/ C C W f S ;i W,fe.T.'[v N* t. as !
s-e Rsv. 5 CAROLINA P0 tier E LIGHT CCMPANY 8/S2 SHEARCN HARRIS NUCLEAR PC'iER PLANT cGO FIELD INSPECTION REPORT FOR REINFORCING STEEL - REOUIRED DR. WINGS Placement Number /C6XLUSOf00f Coordinates $2 3isofo /6' Computer Printout Reviewed F-J713 Elevation Jt".2 3hiafdo 309.35 Daily Document Log Checked idf-93, Document Control Contacted f-2513 C.I. Rev v Area Engineer Review / Drawings Required / Revision: Affecting Documents Masonry (ME pit,7-G-cyp 30/RO) OCM-550~/647(Ed[AOs Gre.M doyeE) -ob3t (es) FCR-c-4097(' Half-nali on s hear-holIs) Pt&c- @40(Saau,,o Acm /.2. 3AD ho-C-@os((Snu,w k E0b I. Q Reinforcing CAR.2fG7-Cr-063'/ (Qs) Po-e-#207($oacn, -[ous 7. f.4 lo. AM'b -(No3(r(Q5h F~CA C-D9WhDb-evn"AsteNdireN) -Ofs33('R4 FCR-&;tR39(L@pino hf $frar-Bard 'Ob3;L(pa) PdQ-0-3(?15(5DNerM -9&tet>Gfb*h -b639 (94) FCR-C-LI.M ? [5h: N skew &lis) PM-C-D332(P' rm[Gohs J/Jhn/ves). -063t(9)__ c ~ O&sofaa . Fce-c'-iv.2, FAN'l set is !?"+ azu) -0651 fed) Pk1-C-/4%V("& dun " reatitteMenhsb I a.m -Ob'lI(ts) Fee-e-710 (Lmer-nth fcferu) -Cl> 35(Ql) FCR-C-'la99(Cols+.Gernt c%es) -C454(Db FCC-C-41(>4 Ikee niale e&'latereuv) --O7co(eh Fee-C-4332.llno0a siears DeueD n = = =: u c.a - C 70'I(p 3\\ Pw-c-4299(13ea+ 6hul< -S-ts'o) a i M " P&M i273ff),,Hed Reetel) Fel-c.-Was (Exced Geah n...... R: C k 7 !^'~rne anlc, w! b-l- ~ Y. CAA-3l&9 Cr-229(RID R492H3 - a ss sor (e d Bar Bending oA#.31u7 8-War- .~4,ct,fm7.9A 9 9 0
Rev. 5 E::hibit 1 CARCLINA P0 tier & LIGHT COMPANY I?-2 8/S2 SHEARCN HARRIS NUCLEAR PC'?ER PLA% Sheet N of 30 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT FOR RE!NFORCING STEEL - REOUIRED DPE INGS Placement Number / <dt:<J3cfoo t Coordinates 2 2. 3150 fo 60 Computer Printout Reviewed S-JT f3
- 7 E
Elevation 303.M' to 30F.M ' Document Control Contacted W.*f-p C.I. Review h A Area Engineer Review / y u-Drawings Required / Revision: Affecting Documents -Y c c ~ ~r Mk Seet Com. (Rerd Ru3 6-J+P3 RON-41(R.O - -89tRd- -WRd Reinforcing -4/f(pd -3fles)< ~l(24 -41(91)' -5I(Eo) + -34 (Ro') ' -)(R4). ~5el(Rh' -.-:. w ~62(R$) 1 psa *-)44 _(,gy -Gb(Rs). -b $(20).
- = c v'i:-.:
-fo9(Ab). f'o 6-24 93 ~47(p6 -64 led
- b4h{tD w=
6@(Rd
- 4 **'"*fb
-64cleb -/,40le) ee v-v : ~(,,Wan /41 P-J413 e O
sammarr COB'"AINMENT EXTERIOR WAl.. TN22 '.r NSt CTION
SUMMARY
SHEEi PLACEMENT NO.Mf666330800( 50 b // b 4( OATE I~N-E3 INSPECTOR FIELD C;GINEER yyM, A e _ AATE _ A/25,/s 5 gs,edw,Lp{fd / OESCN ACTUAL c= M CCRRECT6VE t.C.v-Dua LOCATICN INSPECTED ITEM OVANTiTY QUANTITY [ DrSCREPANCrES ACTION NOT.F tE";
- g. 33g. 9 VERTICALS M
R0W I (f4 M Af. 303.35 ' R0W 2 [ f YO MM ROW 7 g3 39 ROW 8 &l 6l HORiZCNTALS ROW 3 g g PCw 4 y RCW 9 g ROW 10 3 ADD 6T6CSAL PER Cr*Ts. HCR1Z0NTAL SO JO VERTICAL OIAGONAL R0W 5 /5 i5 ROW 6 /;,3 -l5 g AC3. FENETRATLCN
- IO s
STEEL / VERTICAL t/- 4 d6 ye - O(/.5 ) t HORIZONTAL [r/ [A v OIAGCNAL { '3 Ag yp p[g.C.ypo$
- AJoSe, D 4%
FACE BARS / / RAOiAL BARS INNER ' See_ 4 ch OUTER %g f. 4kg oh RING SARS Qg .}pg of S* EAR BOLT ASSEMBLY, g qay. OTsER j)fi e % w.s (ce-mD /M //.2. 3 e&a bses ^.4 aem ~^ E x.s >n It"1 a m s / / As nor -O&Mi her me+ over iskr / / As Lee -ovtso a 9 A./t nee w -emw / J As 'wr-rm c4cw ~~ FN-C-+Iito bMw I 4 O y e-. . one.eep --
- oe -
. Se e**euv e sp acetW emp****me teed
- D ' *
- ' 4be e a e
a.eio e 9 0
- R'av. 1 9/80 Exhibit 8 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT FOR TP-22 CONTAINMENT EXTERIOR. WALL g f 3o PENETRATION STEEL PLACEMENT NO./LOCATCN I
0900I s$R ENote S$EDULE.NO. OA4-31Il#7 *[r ab 37 [OTI.* -N. 3MI4O l3dhlehem Wat 7099~4l(th NSPECTOR /d Df DATE f-23-73 FIELD DIGINEdt n//lDX /M_ - DATE s /25/#3 // [ESIGN QUANTITES PER SHEET / VERTICALS HORIZONTALS ACQ PER DeG. CAAGONAs.S ACO. PEPETRATaON STEEL FACE RADAL SAR5 Rf*3 5t h R R T QTc Rod t2,7,8 pow 3,4,9,to HORATRI RCW 5.6 HOR / VERT /DAG. EsARS ffERCUTER SARS AM WS 20 PSllTN9dW c%S% N&% r eese..neu omen ANess ' "#E*' TASVP uwm smer-iepoa wut, ,3 iso f a 9. 5-iYo CCJBo g 3 Speg Drelahcas Pgdjcs/o D.hes CC.2b l A g f >/ - CC-259 l l cc-2 09 t cc 27o, i i CC-31L < l l CC-J73. S. R 0 313 l 1 B-393 l l r D -> 9.L l l 6 Mi l l 8-MO 'l l i S-389 [ l g.232 1 i e L
=_==== = E_ 7_." & '",73f Exhibit a
- 1 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT FOR TP-22 CONTAINMENT EXTERIOR WAl.L FENE TRATION STEEL 70E00 PLACEMENT NO./LOCATCN' [ COILO OOS'iD 0 a 5" E* N " NHEcuut cal-98&i-Q -(% 3 7/'ts) ' - CVo%/Qh N O.
_ Be4 tekem pn 4+ goe-W #4 ' 48 bidb'-f DATE 943Y3 NSPECTOR t FIELD ENGINfER g/ /A /3 /. _L.g DATE s /.! 'J / g r, / A SGN QU M sTES PER SHEET /. / VERTICALS HORIZONTALS ACO. PCH CMG. GAGONALS ADO PEPETRAT6CN STEEL FACE RADh*. SARS RN SrCi.vf GWWM Rod l.2.7,8 pow 3,4,9,fo MOR/ VERT ROW S6 HOR /VE.TT/DAG. BARS ffEFA: UTER BARS ALT C S is ~ = =- AD ARet Qt fTV A Y C,(t 00'9710N_ OLSCRE*At4C4(f, a yi y ic I n koe,the4 wis B-M7 1 ( S eaygVelahcmaDg-c-eyo D.8% p a,,ogg3 g / / w/ D->20 I ( l B 3 8 'l l l B-as3 / l l B-J f 2. / I r i l B -48 ' l 8-270 t i s. 4-J79 / [ l B-a77 / l i 8-27i / l I l B-J7/e / l 'l i 6.a73 B-J21 I 5.273 / I 3 i 1 e 0
~ se,t 9/80 Exhibit 8 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT FOR TP-22 CONTAINMENT EXTERIOR WALL PENETRATION STEEL fof30 Pt.AcEMENT NO./t.OCATCN ( CSX Q30E00( a$$ Y $ *s5fDULE OM d' OIld "CT' Ob 3'I{A5\\ 7 *003I#[M NO. A (tele Le e pt,t t-go% -4/(44 MSPECTOR . ibaCE M OATE 9'M-73 FIELD ENGINtER y;///<)6'u A/, f,,w DATE A /25' /s 3 06 WANTITIES PER SPEI51 / VERTCALS HOR 12ONTALS ACO.PER Oso. DAGONALS ADO. PEfETRATION STEEL FACE RADAL BAR5 RhG 5HFAR BOLT QTr1Ft.n rod t2.7,8 AO W 3,4,9,10 HOR / VERT ROW 5,6 HOR / VERT /DAG. BARS ffERMUTER BARS ANMELES IB. "Sli N W W e81Frv otilMv ersewneu eise=E=iness ' f#@v' '". ASVP w =.a,.w f s gog %g3 B-aus l l Cswo a rue @c'sVtel'h*^$ FW-C-4c40 DBP l 8[ g.p g B-ar7 1 ( S-)W l l l l 8-959 l r 6.260 ( I l B & lot 6 a62. 1 ( B-a3 l I B-ath I ( B-M5 ) l B-bGir l l B-atn 'I [ B-3fA' I 1 S S i B-069 j 0 - -.m e 0
I O Exhibit 8 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT FOR TI'-22 CONTAINMENT EXTERIOR WALL PENETRATION STEEL 9 00 S PLACEMENT NO./LOCATCN I d6% Q 30TOO (' 0"#$E*bE OAd~EIIA *OT'Ol# 37 (A aAR NO. 7~ I'y,(25h Be k le % Petst-90%~ 4t(s)) hd W. bArrdlM ante T-2 M3 INSPECTOR FIELD ENGINEEK /gh 6h DATE in/2S-At, p SON QUANTITES PER SMEET / U' VEuT1CALS HORt20NTALS ADO.PER OwG. OLAGONALS MSTEEL FACE RADIAL SARS RFeG 3rf.AR BOLI QTHER ROW I,2.7.8 ROW 3,4,9,lo HOR / VERT ROW 5,6 MOR/ VERT / DIAG BARS NERMUTER BARS ASSEMLES 19/l _ tat 9aEW 08!s*rTv $faMY DESCRAT10N OtSCREPANCIES [Ni$h'vL #NN' ~&=. aus.'a ** ys-Sca l,bewesis B-970 I Qs-ISO k Ik (corJ) O O B -a.3 s I 1 T 6-m. l l l B->M I \\ l l B-3IL l } l I 8-3ii g' I i CC-aso 13 13 i l l I Dud Roa ster #ca's Qgern gag 0C-3'70 -y I l 3,gs g,$ a K c gm g.x,, Pus C-@'W 0,Bugn f i
....-~. --...-...._ g3.1 mm. FIELD INSPECTION REPORT FOR TP-22 CONTAINMENT EXTERIOR WALL lo0030 PENETRATION STEEL PLACEMENT NO./LOCATCN [ OMONOOl s"[EN0t#3 SC7EDULE ONE~al&PG -0433(4#),' -432/4d NO. . be%Ielu!m Petnt-10%~5f(RO NSPECTOR DATg 9.23 iT3 FIELD ENGINEER // /MA= DATE 32/25' /Ar 'G f SEh QUANTITES PER $>EL7 / f VERTICALS HORtZONTALS ADO. PER CMG. DIAGONALS AGO. m i NATION STEEL FACE RAQlAL BAR5 RNG 5 PEAR BOLI QTNER ROW I,2,7A A0W 3,4.9,tO HOR / VERT ROW 5,6 MOR/ VERT /DAG BARS ffERA) UTER BARS ASSEMELES 5 l5 "S7fl9aEW O8L?r% El#r% oEscumOn oise=E=AncisS C "!"EI!vE ogt N wlm bw r isenG 3at pg;mg etno 3 \\5* +o l & O CC-7, 6-34$ cc-i, 3 33g l 1 Sowg do\\ekens M-4mo A89% OW h [ l (c N , 0-3 7, j } ec-t cc-7 m., pg I l Cc 7 g s 3 p3;q< l ec.i cca, 6-244 il6 Roca Horizemis Cc.L, is-3 u I I sise 616e 43*3
- M'7 "# DD
' B-374 i 1 CC4' 6-311 I l 00- 1, '8-32 I j cc-r ) \\ 3 oc S,8-3 9 j i i 4 .~. e -e
~
- $1 Exhibit 8 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT FOR TF-22 CONTAINMENT EXTERIOR WALL PENETRATION STEEL
((o03o Pt.ACEMENT NO./t.CCATCN I OXu)308@l a"R $ Noe "*GS$EDut.E A NO. MM-Jlh7 -Cr-Oh W[d' Ch'?O/44 ) Be%l*M Pr.'n+ < Ro+1-31 foot ~%fo1( ~on fan:-1N 4 Nwd8M duec[/AT. DATE 47'm/-53 nspEcTom FIELD ENGIN1ER _//~/M/ h###- MTE B />_s;- Ase :s I N51GN QUANTITES PER SPEET ~ VERTICALS HORt20NTALS ADO. PER CMG. DAGONALS ADO. PEff.TRATION STEEL FACE RADIAL BAR5 RrdG 5HE.AR SQLi om ROW I,2,7,8 po W 3,4,9,to HOR / VERT ROW 5,6 MOR/ VERT / DIAG BARS NERA) UTER SARS ASSEMELES b
- 25'B23 c81Rr%
&?INr% oesc a ron otsenEnnetEs
- b"$dn'*' We%S#'
== san ww a c,,ts asc4o 1 s-ose 5(s(f f ( U'of%s Pk>C-4Co*1
- p. 67
['*
- OG l
7 CO 4o bb G I I 5 i I 56 i i 38 I I co w 26 l cn w a l 18 ) oc h ra l I 'Is l l q,,,,,, 9 t l /o / i II I I ro se 90 I2. j-CO to 535 534 / \\ I ) ) i i i
,.,m>,,,e
..--,,-<w,,-,,,,,,,,ww,- -e,--n,-_, ,---,-,,-,,-.-w-,n,--g ,w--w-- r.-, e,~e-
-.....-w ..... - - =.. .n.. ...v Rev. 1 Exhibit 8 FIELD INSPECT;lON REPORT FOR m 22-CONTAINMENT EXTERIOR WALL PENETRATION STEEL r2003o PLACEMENT NO./LOCATON ( CBX LO3 Of00 i a"#E"NONG" 5EDULE NO. 048-3/97 -Or-@39[A).* *OG39[#3b S _ PAAlekem PemF sfcqq-c/A2),,3,raog, o3,(og.arcy) b d. dau//dW oaTE 9-M -P3 aspEcroR FIELD Enc 15EEn 14/JML K--_ 'DATE 9 /zSVEs s-QUANTITES PER SPEET / /4 / gDE51(N VERTICALS HORt20NTALS ADO.PER OwG. OLAGONALS ADO. PEftTHATION STEEL FACE RADIAL EARS Rres "/ TAR BOLT orr1Eii ROW f,2.7,8 A0W 3,4,9,10 HOR / VERI ROW 5,6 HOR / VERT / DIAG BARS NERAXJTER SARS ASSE*G.Es I7 -"S!Ll M W 0%S% &?In% r essenianou eme=r,Aucas '"#EEI,"' Tenn-eo*wm we p % prpg (p40 l 1' 3ts0 n4.s-is o 6'll (,0/ x w eti I \\ 733 co +c es I N / ) /39 I 1 /37 h 9(A l Q.S-Iso lo /G* co m 9 ra fl/r I l co n u s T3A l I co ic nn /o'/ f ) /3 / i /0(r I I 1 /07 I I 16 9 .l I sensa ] l h ) es to sa Wl1 a p., Add'l Dinonis As pc M&Mo( Pt&C4M(b&y ~,.,,. -n-.
r ..._m .'.
- ksYl
~ Exhibit 8 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT FOR TP-22 CONTAINMENT EXTERIOR WALL PENETRATION STEEL g3op3o ptACEMENT Nost.oCATCN I C8KLO 3Of00( BAR BENONG E N O. BAf -ots-).Cc - Obs f Nd n NSPECTOR Y htte M OATE Y lY D PIELD ENGINE 1R //j'/'hfje/W DATE R /zS/F7 // O@ pANTITES PER SPEE# / VERTICALS HORt20NTALS ADO. PER OWG. OWGONALS ADO. PE?e.IMATION STEEL FACE RADIAL BARS RNG SPO W BOLI arr1EA rod 1,2,7,8 ROW 3,4,9,fo MOR/ VERT ROW 5,6 MORdVERTJDAG. BARS NERMUTER 8ARS ASSEHLES l+ l NA=3aNE o0d" r*iry o"u2DY DEsteption otSc=EPANCtES [ fi$ hive igt WO Abl'l }{vrt20r%~4 k2c9. = 69'O'!. 1 CC-@4 / N' I l 30 t;* Jo G 5-120 &b Uto\\n+1ws Pw-c-co? D.B w [pq g 3og o Eh $-9/9 ( { 2 OC-A M i c(.qyo l l B. 3w's CC e f  \\ ec4xe I i gi. m., i dome lap s[alied OC-QCi (Og g gg h u-133r6 FcR<-2437 D,i3rp S eihn ]\\er% , j) um caca 00- M 4 4 BJoe ) J u e-MA rn g.9 J O e n - -,. -. -,,
g Exhibit 8 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT FOR TP-22 CONTAINMENT EXTERIOR WALL PENETRATION STEEL 13ofso PLACEMENT NO./LOCATCN ( C8Xtd.SOfCCI e5$$ No. ONE.21fo1-G-Cfr5 ClAS) o'~ C54///25 -C&5/NO E INSPECTOR d
- b2 DATE C-JV-n FIELD ENGINEER /ML,/(/M -
" DATE a /25-/g3 '7( @
- QUANTITIES PER SHEET
/ VErtTICALS HORtZONTALS ADO.PER OuG. DIAGONALS ADO. PEN.TRAT60N STEEL FACE RADIAL BARS Rf4G 5MEAR SQL.T QTrf.R ROW 1,2.7,8 R0W 3,4,9,10 HOR / VERI ROW S.6 MOR./ VERT / DIAG. BARS ffERAXJTER BARS ASSEMEJES M (7EI9adM oNiiry oiv D y 'DESCRi8710N OLSCREPANCtES ((fh /* Nh>N' ~)S & llftl1 Cal.f 919
- W+. s -t4 o dC-759 S a M Uro b as. Pwc @ 7
- 0. 6%
/ 1 t 9'/.2 CC-909 I1 II f 00-%7 10 10 6C-379 2 g cc-910 x y \\ ec-395 3 3 qs.1go w mc [C-909 10 lo i cc-qu9 is is y \\ Thee barj sh.f+d i ,t 'M31 7 7 ) c,, %_,,,,, pe.c.n c, aae h.l l u e e
== = --.m.. . - ~ ~ - O ,....__.v..,.-,-
..T _ __.. - l .. _ ~ _.. _ 80 Exhibit 8 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT FOR TI'-22 f CONTAINMENT EXTERIOR WALL t PENETRATION STEEL ggpy PLACEMENT NO./ LOCATION ICOXO 30800I 8 5 $ $ Y uCE CA R-A I07~ 0- -OGSC(R$): ~ 6MI {/2ST) NO, EeAlchen h-int <b90~W[AD &uff . dizce[b WSPECTOR OATE f-d V'73 FIELD ENGINEER p7'/ J u / M M - DATE S /zG /F3 / Of9GN ' QUANTITIES PER SHEEf / VERTICALS HORtZONTALS ADO. PER CMG. DAGONALS ADO. PEfETRATION STEEL cACE RA06AL SARS RhG 5tfM Sc4.i or gji n RCM 1,2,7,8 ROW 3,4,9,10 HOR 1 VERT. ROW 5,6 HOR / VERT /DAG. BARS rN ROUTER BARS ANS b I A$h SNT$v NANY DESCRiRTION OLSCREPANCtES ah NiN A w~ em'~a" g pa s L & ticets l CC-47 3 3 s s % ( 3-i w @8"% e%w Peoyao? D.8% 0 CC-15 8 s} 4 Y Cc-7-s 7 3 3 1 00-759 a A ) u s.un -G&B-2 54-g g 3-2%5 I B-23 7 I i 8-226 I l l E-a3s 1 i { 6-034 [ B-ass l t 8.232. l 1 B -331 1 i B oso I l I / \\ 6 -Ja9 i
a..-~. -...o m .Rev. 1 W' Exhibit 8 FIELD INSPECTION ' REPORT FOR TP-22 CONTAINMENT EXTERIOR WALL PENETRATION STEEL gop3a PLACEMENT NO./ LOCATION (CS M 3CsCO) SAR NOING ULE NO. OM-38M 4-00EM M?-/%#1Md ~ &t4fdn., A+ 1reqq-s9AS NSPECTOR /m#8 Y bt8M DATE 7 Id*73 FIELD DIGINttR g/AfM2 : DATE A /zv/ms
- DES 14tt QUANTITES PER SHEET
/. VERTCALS HORIZONTALS ADO.PER OwG. DAGONALS ADO. PEPtIMAT60N STEEL FACE RADIAL BAR5 RNG 5NLaR liKA.I QTHE.R ROW I,2,7,8 pow 3,4,9,to MOR/ VERT ROW 5,6 HOR / VERT /DAG BARS NER& UTER BARS ASSEMELES $b "S!E!WW 081&rv &?In% eese. nou ome=E AucsS f"!E ",'#*4P m wr % Rowvo w s 0-del? 31 t*C+o Q S-uqD(ccAl.) W3 0** B-DaJ l I i 8-327o I l 8-005 l i B-334 I l B-223 I s S-aap, g g f 40-l$o to /G* l l 6-arx j ~ B-ae 3 i l B-D14 } } l t B-at5 l l t B-atu '( 1 p -ar? / l \\ a -as - / l e O m --m--- -m- - - + 's.*-- ' ' ' ' ' " ' - ~ ' ' ' " " ' - " " " " * ' ' ' ' " " ' ' ' " " " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ' ~ ~ ' * * "
[ -- = -- .---._.r.____-_._... j jp0 Exhibit 8 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT FOR Ti>-22 CONTAINMENT EXTERIOR WALL PENETRATION STEEL ggpg PLACEMENT NO./LOCATCN l O8xOSOfCOI U$$$0$"" SCHEDULE OAE~NN -b ~M C[E i- 00W /MI s NO. BetUeLete Wet-9099-89 fed NSPECTOR fM- -bE h DATE T b24 f3 _ FIELD ENGINEER /J//he_ - DATE_ s /z v /s 5 / DES $8 QUANTITES PER SHEEf / VERTCALS HORt20NTALS ADO. PER CMG. DAGONALS ADO. PEfETRAT60N STEEL FACE RAOIAL SARS R1NG Sr1EM 5AT OT6 W k2.7,8 mow 3,4,9,fo HOR / VERI ROW 5.6 HOR / VERT /DAG. BARS ffERXXJTER BARS AW se .2 1 nsggg,4g ,gsTry $?[O% r CESCmPTION DtSCREPANCtES ((khkva nMcNL i eem s% vescets h ~O d T S A so -fr., s bo(ccn[, W% ~ N ( / 13 -2 9 O j .I V 'V /3-231 i l B-ato I I E-209 g-l \\ \\ B-237 g co-mo i 2. IL Spasgnlek& tt FCCL-10% p}ry G.lY 4 e O
. 2
. :.: _.. _ =..=.._....-- ~ :.._ ; T. :e ~ T
- [
~ Exhibit 8 FIELD INSPECTION REPORT FOR TP-22 CONTAINMENT EXTERIOR WALL PENETRATION STEEL gq cp 3g PLACEMENT NO./ LOCATION IOON TOOI
- n. ES" S S ULE CAR.;21(17d5--C' %[O l M iiE$ *Cf/LA(VLD*-b(o^b5($
aAR No. .00hI81 art Phnf 7099~5F(dD NSPECTOR DATE 9 23-D FIELD INGINEER g/J.3/ W s DATE & / s/s:s ( giOESIGN QUANTITES PER SPEE"T / VERTICALS HORt20NTALS ADO.PER OMi. GIAGONALS ADO. PEPETRAT60N STEEL FACE RADIAL BAR5 RNG 3rf.AR lipOLI OrrigR ROW t.2,7,8 ROW 3,4,9,to HOR / VERT FCW 5,6 MOR./ VERT / DIAG BARS NERAXJTER BARS ASSE % ES 51 5 NENaEIdsY o0Nr$v $?lMy ' OESCRIATION OtSCREPANCIES fi f VE N 10 L w~ u" m qti:-pa no,unt, 8lE* +o l&O CC-49Q,6 3'lf Spect3 ' ole 4+cos pu-c-co? D.Bp 0 cc-4ao,g.337_ / i WH99, S 35 ,j) f / CC'ko,B I I V'/ff sa u en gc.ygg' o'3i7 ec.qco / I I CC-Y % e ec.4co, B 36 ' ) H / \\ \\ \\ n B-Sl9 ' I g.qp g ((A, B 344 jog.gogg jjo,,,,,,j, I stv fo/4,o -5pagg bid %s N-c-vr7 0.a7 Ct-Vot, a-332. " l o CCA55,g.3;q sse-00-40/ R-3(,r-l l ccwss, B'^ "? Ct-@t, l l C0-435, B-34 -/ CC-40s, I l ' B-319 -l'l \\ \\ 1' \\ ec-voi, i ~- -,,,-,,..,-4,,, ,,._,-,_.__,,,,,n, .,v,.,, ,,,,, _,,,, -}}