Text

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Information DIGEST.1995 Edition
	ML20083N551
Person / Time
Issue date:	03/31/1995
From:	Stadler L; NRC OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER
To:	;
References
	NUREG-1350, NUREG-1350-V07, NUREG-1350-V7, NUDOCS 9505230149
	Download: ML20083N551 (67)
	v • d • e

{{#Wiki_filter:.. 1 1 xg i i 4 5 1 1 =_ 4 7 g tw Y9 00 + 0 ,Y 1 5 ih ) ) A w l's l EEEEEEF !i H BEEEEEF T SEREF ' ~ e + m3ywr y 54E i ,2 r. 7 3 l , yi.g-f ',fa q >h., an l a i. T l$ l t. G l r 'Y W r-Y A .y T- ' M '. A 3,L. / +' yg -p e a s n'C'"*C C"u'***,2T,22, T ';; ^~ m.nw f~ t me, "***T.? '?~4_Ac a.w.i e 7. ) A,.? ' _*^*:"'...~- T"~ :%d t.*W*:2tungh ~*?* *i "*,

?T * ** * *-y"*t*sye g.s.

=,.,e *per 7,a p; 9505230149 950331 PDR NUREO 1350 R PDR

.O n

.~

n

.n n n 9 4 + r. Y ^ I mi l-S0 0 0 -En 'I 6e

==' ~ ~ N EEEEEEE I = REmmmEr i EMEEFO' nErw r ? 34r ~ ( ,..,s p e .k.. ~,7 ^$ 2 -i.:p s ,c r l3-N# 1 ':1 ' %?) y y ;,... Ty*;. .,-.,,,..'G..T._l,2*'.'*".,'R'.**--[yl'._,.'*:,,K*^"_._*~#..- '~T**,': . As iE ' ?UU!lNi, *, kf.,[.t (f.-._-wp.c..L _... jZU w;br*l,:y.L iv.weygg r u ym. ry.r. 9505230149 950331 PDR NUREG 1350 R PDR l t

mn* mp 90 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Availability Notice E Availability of P.eference Materials Cited in FSC Publications Most documents cited in fSC publicat:ons will be available Izorn one of the !ct!owing sources:

1. The NRC Pubhc Document Room. 2120 L Street. NW., Lower Level. Washing!on. DC 205554)001

[~* E

2. The Superintendent of Documents. U S Government Pnnhng Gthce. P. O. Box 37082. Washing'on. DC T

I i S,

3. The National Technical Information Service. Spongbeid. VA 22161-0002

~**** h Although the listing that follows represents the maionty of documents cited in NRC pubhcations. it is not h intended to be exhaustive. [U l f l,,,l O 9 i VU L I.I v Referenced documents availatie for inspection and copying for a fee from the NRC Public Document Room include NRC correspondence and internal NRC rnemoranda. NRC buitetins, circulars. information nobces, inspechon and inves!igation notrces; licensee event reports; vendor reports and correspondence. Commis-j;;, Sion papers: and applicant and ticensee documents and correspondence. 1 I The following documents in the NUREG senes are available for purchase hom the Govemment Pnnting Ottice: formal NRC staff and contractor reports, fSC-sponsored conference croceedings. international agreement reports, grantee reports, and NRC booklets and brochures. Also available are regulatory guides, f' NRC regulations in the Code cifederalRegulations, and Nuclear Regulatory Commission assuances } Documents availab:e item the Nationa! Technical Information Service irdude NUREG series reports and l! technical reports prepared by other Federal agencies and reports prepared by the Atomc Energy Commission, 4 forerunner agency to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. j NUREG-1350 Documents availab!e trom public and special technical littanes include a:I open titerature items.such as Volume 7 i teks.journalartic!cs andtransactions. federa!Registernobces.FederalandStatelegislation and costgressional reports can usua!!y be obtained from these libraries. CompleM , Docum:nts such as theses dissertations foreign reports and t anslations. and non-NRC conference i March 1995 5, ' i proceedings are available for purchase from the otDanization sponsoring the publication cited. 7W. Date Published: t t V Singb copies of NRC dra'l reports are available free, to the extent of suppfy. upon watten reccest to the Office f i d d Mit'nistration. Printing and Mai! Services Section. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC March 1995 ) I' l Division of Budget ! >j sulatairw! at the faC Library. Two White Flint North 11545 Rockville Pike. Rockvil!e. MDCeples alindustry codes a and Analysis 20852-2738.for Office of the Contro!!er 4, y wit he public. Codes and standards are usually copyrighted and may be purchased from the originatingU.S. Nuclear Regulatory ' '] or. H they are American National Standards, from the American National Standards Insteute. Commission

Speedemy, York. NY 10018-3308-Washington, DC 20555 s

10, i i!p.., (. aw I 4 M, e. I I, i l t,

Abstract The!Juclear Regulatory Commission reactors is obtained from monthly cperating information Digest (d: gest) provides a summary reports that are submitted directly to the NRC of in!ormation about the U S. Nuclear by the licensee. This information is reviewed Regulatory Commtssion (NRC). NRC's by the NRC for consistency only and no regulatory responsibihties, the activities NRC independent validation and/or verification is Ircenses. and general information on domestic pertorrred and worldwide nuclear energy. The digest. published annually,is a compilation of nuclear-Comments and/or suggestions on the data and NRC-related data and is designed to presented are welcomed and should be directed provide a quick reference to rnajor facts about to Lori Stadler, United States Nuclear the agency and the industry it regulates. In Regu!atoryCommission Officeof the general. tne data cover 1975 through 1994 Controller. Division of Budget and Analysis. i with exceptions noted. Information on Washington, O C. 20555-0001. For detailed J' generating capacity and average capacity factor and complete information about tables and l for operating U S. commercial nuclear power figures, refer to the source pubhcations. l l l l i l l l l ) NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1995 !NFDRMATION DIGEST iii

I I Contents I Abstract . iii i For More Information xi NRC as a Regulatory Agency .1 Mission and Statutory Authority 2 Principles of Good Regulation 3 ~ l Major Activities 4 Organizations and Functions .5 NRC Locations.. .8 NRC Fiscal Year 1995 Resources 10 U.S. and Worldwide Energy ... 15 U.S. Electricity .16 U.S. Electricity Generated by Commercial Nuclear Power . 23 Worldwide Electricity Generated by Commercial Nuclear Power .26 Operating Nuclear Reactors 29 U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors ... 30 Performance at U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors 41 Future U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Licensing . 44 U.S. Nuclear Nonpower Reactors 51 Nuclear Material Safety 53 U.S. Fuel Cycle Facilities 54 U.S. Material Licenses 56 U.S. Nuclear Material Transportation and Safeguards 59 International Nuclear Safety and Safeguards 60 it NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1995 INFORMATioN DIGEST v

I Radioactive Waste. 61 Rgures(Conhnued) U.S. Low-level Radioactive Waste Disposa!.. . 62

9. U.S. tJet Electric Generation by Sou ce.1975-1993 20 U S. High-level Radioactive Waste Disposal.

. 68

10. U.S. Electric Generating Capability and Electricity Generated by Source.1986-1993 --

.21 Appendices. 73 4 l

11. U.S. Average Nuclear Reactor and Coal-Fired Plant List of Abb'reviations Used in Appendices.

. 74 Production Expenses.1986-1993 22 A. U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors. 75

12. Net Generation of U.S. Nuclear Electricity.1975-1994 24 l

B. U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors Formerly Licensed to Operate. . 88

13. 1993 Net Nuclear Electric Power as Percent of World Nuclear and Total Domestic Electricity Generation

_27 C. Cancel,ed U S. Commercial fJuclear Power Reactors.. . 90

14. Diagram of a Typical Nuclear Rr. actor -

31 D U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors by Licensee. 94 E ap oWommedaNMowedeahs _ _. _ 32 E. U.S. fluclear Nonpower Reactors. 96 F. World List of Nuclear Power Reactors 99

17. Map of f1RC Region il Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors.

. 34 G. Nuclear Power Units by Reactor Type. Wor!dwide. ._101

18. Map of NRC Regica Ill Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors

...... 35 H. Top 50 Reactors by Capacity Factor. Worldwide. ...102

19. Map of NRC Region IV Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors

... 36 1. Top 50 Reactors by Generation. Worldwide. 104

20. Fiscal Year 1994 NRC Inspection Effort at Operating Reactors 37 J.

Quick Peterence Metric Conversion Tables.. .. 106 Glossary.. 109

21. U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Operating Licenses issued by Year..

.. 39 Figures

22. NRC Performanceindicators: AnnualIndustry Averages 1985-1994

.42 1. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Organization Chart 6

23. U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors-Years of Operation 45 2.

Map of NRC Regions. 9

24. U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Operating Licenses-Expiration Date by Year Assuming Construction Recapture

. 47 3. Distribution of NRC Fiscal Year 1995 Budget Authority and Staff. .11

25. U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Generating Capacity.1960-2060 48 4 NRC Budget Authonty. Fiscal Years 1985-1995 12

26. 10 CFR Part 52 Reactor Licensing Process 50 5.

NRC Personnel Ceiling. Fiscal Years 1985-1995 13

27. Map of U.S. Nuclear Nonpower Rextor Sites

. 52 6. Sources of NRC Fiscal Year 1994 Budget Authority 14

28. Map of Major U.S. Fuel Cycle Facility Sites 55 7.

1993 U.S. Electric Capability and Net Generation by Eriergy Source .17

29. Map of NRC Agreement States 58 8.

Map of 1993 Net Electricity Generated in Each State by Nuclear Power 19 vi NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1g95 INFORMATION DIGEST y;i

l Figuras (Conhnued) Tables (Cxhrrad)

30. 1993 Volume of low-Level Radioactive Waste Received at

13. US. Material Licenses by State

~~ 57 U S. Disposa! Facilities.. 63

14. US. Low-Leve!WasteCompacts 66

31. Volume of Lcw-level Waste Received at US.

Disposal Facihties.1984-1993.. 64

15. Spent Nuclear Fuel Stcred at US. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors-Total Metric Tons by State 70

32. Radio' activity of Low-Level Waste Received at U.S.

Disposal Facihties.1984-1993 .._. 65

16. NRC-Approved Dry Spent Fuel Storage Designs.

.7j I

33. Map of U S. Low-level Waste Compacts.-

. 67

17. NRC Dry Spent fuel Storage Licensees

. 72

34. Diagram of a Conceptual Design of the US.

High-leve! Waste Repository .. 69 Tables j

1. NRC Budget Authority, Fiscal Years 1985-1995._..

12

2. !!RC Personnel Ceihng. Fiscal Years 1985-1995 13

3. 1993 Electric Generating Capabihty and Electricity Generated in Each State by Nuclear Power 18

4. U S. Net Electric Generation by Source,1975-1903 20

5. U.S. Electric Generating Capability by Source.1986-1993.

21 l

6. U.S. Average Nuclear Reactor and Coat-Fired Plant Production Expenses,1986-1993 22 i

7. U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Average Capacity Factor j

and Net Generation.1975-1994 24

8. U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Average Capacity Factor by Vendor and Reactor Type,1992-1994.

25

9. 1994 Commercial Nuc! car Pawar Reactor Average Gross Capacity Factor and Gross Generation by Selected Country 28

10. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Average Gross Capacity Factor by Selected Country.1984-1994 28

11. U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Operating Licenses issued by Year 38

12. US. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Operating Licenses-Expiration Date by Year..

46 I viii NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSloN ' 1995INFORMAT!oN DIGEST l

s >p = .t 1

fN i

d For More Information... ] 'F i .i i f The U S. Nuclear Regutatory Commission the following organizabons is available at the j j. (NRC) offers a variety of programs to make agency headquarter's numbers listed below-5 = agency. licensee, and nuclear industry I ~L information available to the pub!ic. The agency Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste

;L rnaintains a Public Document Room in (301) 415-5024

" id Washington, D.C., tha! provides public access Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards $ ;.h to documents certaining to the licensing and (301) 415-5024 3

i regulation of nuclear facilities and enaterials j(

s.; and related agency information The NRC has The Commission qg also established Local Public Document Rooms (301) 415-1292 yg (LPDRs) near the site of each comrnercial NRC/ Department of Energy Meet:ngs t E,j nuclean power reactor, the proposed high-level (800) 841-0286 f t f 5 ;, waste repository, and certain fuel cycle $ $ l} facilities. The LPDR collections consist of a!! Information on NRC staff meetings open to publicly available documents about the facdity. public observation, including those of the i including hearing transcripts. safety evaluation Offices of Nuclear Materials Safety and '(l - reports environmentalimpactstatements,and Safeguards. Nuclear Reactor Regulation, and f 5M inspection and Icensee event reports. The Nuclear Regulatory Research, and the regional f" ? % power reactor and high-level waste LPDRs also o!! ices. is announced on a toll-free telephone ] y% d maintain a microfiche file of att documents recording at (800) 952-%74 and on a toll-free g made pubocly availabIe by the NRC since 1981, efectrorac bulletin board at (800) 952-9676 or [ ld in addnion to those about the nearby nuclear (800) 303-9672 (access through GATEWAY). h _f : h facihty. f { $] d Scheduled Open Enforcement Conferences are 1 The agency makes the rnajority of its regulatory announced at(800)952-9674. j i: and technical publications available for safe at jr 1 ; both the Government Printing O!! ice and the To learn more about these and other sources of i t!u National TechnicalInformation Service. Copies public information about agency activities. send i of agency publications are also routinely sent to Ior a free copy of the booklet. " Citizen's Guide t U.S. Depository Libraries throughout the United to U S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission j ,'n States and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Information'(NUREG/BR-0010. Rev.1), at the j i h. ' N., following address: 4 Finally, the NRC announces the schedules I '! }p} of selected meetings open to De public. U.S Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTit 1 Recorded information about open meetings of Distribution and Mail Services. Washington. D.C. 4

q 20555-0001.

i 3J _! i 4 -i ! . ;.9} i, I $, 3,. 'N f:$ NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1995 INFORMATiON DIGEST xi pF

NRC as a Regulatory ^9=v igig IIII a IIII f 9 IIII E B l l E B IIII g 3 IIII g 3 l IIII l IIII ~ I NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

NRC AS A REGULATORY AGENCY 4 Mission and Statutory Authority Principles of Good Regulation f The mission of the U S Fluclear Regulatory

Low-level Radioactive Waste Policy Act i The FJRC adheres to the following Principles of rneans to evaluate and continually upgrade Commission (f1RC) is to ensure adequate pro-of 1080 l Good Regulation:

its regulatory capabihties. Regulatory techen of the public health and safety. the activities should be consistent with the common defense and security, and the envi-

West Va!!ey Demonstration Project Act

'

Independence - tiothing but the highest degree of risk reduction they achieve.

ronment inthe use of nuclear matenals in the of I980 poss:ble standards of ethical performance Where several effective a!!ernatives are and professionalism should influence available the ophon which minimites the United States The fiRC's scope of responsibil-ity includes regulabon of commercal nuc! car

Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 regulation. However, independence does use of resources should be adopted.

power reactors; nonpower research, test, and not imply isciation. All available facts and Regu!atory decisions should be made training reactors; fuel cycle fachties: medical.

Low-level Radioact we Waste Policy opinions must te sought openly from without undue de!ay.

academic, and indusinal uses of nuclear Amendments Act cf 1985 licensees and other interested members of materials; and the transport. storage and the pub lic. The many and possibly con-

Clarity - Regulations should be coherent.

disposal of nuclear materials and waste.

Diplomatic Security and Anti-Terrorism Act flicting public interests involved must be logical. and practical. There should be a of 1985 considered. Final decisions must be based clear nexus tetween regulations and agency The NRC was created as an independent agency on objective. unbiased assessments of dl goals and objectives whether explicit!y or by the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974
Nuclear Waste Pohcy Amendments Act mformation, and must be documented with implicitty stated. Agency positions should which abohshed the Atomic Energy Commis-of 1987 reasons explicitty stated.

be readily understood and easi!y appiied. sion (AEC) and moved the AEC's regulatory

Openness - Nuclear regulation is the
Reliability-Regulations should be based function to NRC. This act. along with the
Solar. Wmd. Waste and Geothermal Power Atomic Energy Act of 1954. as amended.

Produchon incenhves Act of 1990 pubhc's business, and it must be transacted on the best available knowledge from provides the toundabon for regulation of the pub!icly and candidly. The pubhc must be research and operational experience. nanon's commercial nuclear Energy Policy Act of 1992 mformed about and have the opportunity to Systems interactions. technological participa!c m the regulatory processes as uncertainties, and the diversity of licensees power industry. The NRC and its hcensees share a common requ! red by law. Open channels of com-and recui ory activities must a!! be taken NRC regulations are issued under the United responsibihty to protect the pubhc health and munication must be maintained with into account 50 that risks are maintained at States Code of federal Regu!ations (CFR) Title 10. safety. Federal regulations and the NRC Congress, other government agencies, an acceptsbly low level Once estabbshed. Chapter 1 Prmcipal statutory authorities that regulatory program are important elements in licensees.and the public,as well as regulation should be perceived to be govern NRC's work are. theprotechonof thepublic. NRClicensees, with the intemational nuclear community. rehable arui not unjushfiably in a state of however, have the primary responsibility for transition. Regu:atory actions should

Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended the safe use of nuclear materials.
Elficiency - The American taxpayer. the always be fully consistant with written rale-paying consumer and licensees are regulations and should be promptly. fairty,
Energy Reorgancation Act of 1974 all enhtled to the best possible management and decisively administered so as to lend as amended and administration of regulatory activities.

stability to the nuclear operational and The highest technical and managerial planning processes.

Uranium fMl Ta!hngs Radiation Control Act competenceis required and must be a of 1978.as amended constant agency gaat NRC must establish
Nuclear Non-Froh!eration Act of 1978 l

i 2 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISS10lg

1995 INFORMAT10N DIGEST 3

NRC AS A REGULATORY AGENCY i Maj0r Activities Organizati0ns and Functions The NRC fu!h!!s its responsibihbes through a

Developing and implemenbng ru!es and The NRC is headed by five Commissioners
Analysis and Evaluation of system of licensing and regulatory acbvibes regulabons that govern hcensed nuclear appointed by the President and confirmed by Operational Data - Collects, anafges, that include-achvities the Senate for 5-year terms. One of them is and disseminates information about the designated by the President to be the operational safety of commercial nuclear
Licensing,1he construction and operabon of
Inveshgabng nuclear inadents and Chairman, serving as the principal execubve power reacto's and certain nuclear tratenai nuclear reactors and other nut! ear fachlies, anegahons concerr:ing any matter regulated officer and official spokesperson of the activities, and manages the NRC's incident such as nuclear fuel cycle fachbes and by tne NRC Commission. The staff. headed by the Response Program and the NRC's Technical nonpower test and research reactors, and Execuhve Director for Operations. carries out Training Center overseeing their decommissioning
Enforcing NRC regulations and the the policies and deosions made try the conditions of HRC licenses Commission. The NRC's principal othces are.
Office of Enforcement-Directsatt
Licensing the possession, use, processmg.

enforcement activtbes assocated with NBC handling,and export of nuclear matenal

Conducting pubhc heanngs on matters of
NuclearReactorRegulation-Directsa:!

licensees nuclear and radiological safety, environ-licensing and inspection activities

Licensing the siting, design, construchon, mental concern, common defense and associated with the design, construction.
O!!!ce ofInvestigations-Conducts operation, and closure of low-level secunty, and ant: trust matters and operation of nuclear power reactors and investigations of a!!egations of wrongdoing radioactive waste disposal sites under NRC nonpower reactors by NRC licensees junsdiction and the construchon. Operation.
Developing eltective working relationships and closure of the geoicgic repository for with the States regarding reactor operations
Nuclear Regulatory Research-
Regional O!! ices - Conduct inspection, high-level radioachve was!e and the regulation of nuclear material Provides independent expertise and enforcement,inveshgation, licensing and information for making timely regulatory emergency response programs mthin
Licensing the 0;'erators of nuclear power and
Maintaining the NRC incident Response judgments, anticipating problems o!

regional boundaries that :he headquarters nonpower test and research reactors Program, including the NRC Operations potential safety significance. and resolving ottices originate Center safety issues and developing technical e Inspecting hcensed taolibes and activities regulations and standards

Inspector General-Provides the i

I

Collechng, analyzing.and disseminating Commission with an independent review and a ConduchngthepanopalUS Government information about the operational safety of
Nuclear Material Safety and appraisal of NRC programs and operations research program on hght-water reactor commercial nuclear power reactors and Safeguards - Directs all !; censing and to ensure their effectiveness, e!!iciency. and safety certain nonreac'or activities inspection activities associated with nuclear integnty l

fuel cycle facilibes, uses of nuclear material, ~

Conducting research to provide independent transport of nuclear material, safeguarding of Refer to the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission expertise and information for making timely nuclear material, management and disposal 1993 Annual Report'(NUREG-1145) for regulatory judgments and for anticipating of low-level and high-level radioactive addihonal information regarding NRC othces prob! ems of potenbal safety signibcance nuclear waste, and decontaminabon and and their functions.

decommissioning of facilities and sites Figure 1 is an organization chart of the NRC. I 1 4 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISS!0N j 19951NFORMAT10N DIGEST 5 i

NRC AS AREGULATORY AGENCY l Figure 1. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) l The Chairman The Commissioners i ,_____7__ Othceof the I Ade:sory A omic Safety l' Commatee on [*" and Licensing Nuclear Waste Pat Safeguards I I I I Okeof One of Ona of N Omceof Orficeof Commission Othceof the Executive Director Congressional Pubhc Aftairs er i A pellate Secretary Ior Operations Affairs Adjudarion i I i I l l I Offa of Otta for Ana'ysis Assim for Operations Omce at One of N Smal1 Business and Evahialton of Personnel Controils and Civil Rights 00erational Data I Deputy Executive Director for I Deputy Executive Director for Nuclear Materials Safety, Safeguards and Operations Nuclear Reactor Regulation. Regional Operations and l Support Research j i ~1 1 I I I i l 1 0 info mat Office of 0:hce of Off:ce of Office of e State Programs Enforcement Investigations Administrabon gg, P.esources I l / uee-Othce of Nuclear OffaofNucler Reactor Re7;Iatory - j i i l l Regulation Research l l_ l l Direct Supervision Regioni Region R Region ttt Region N - - - - Loord nahan Pistade!pNa Atla Ita Chicago Dall3s f 4 6 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION . 19951NFORMAT10N DIGEST 7

a F ii f NRC AS A REGULATORY AGENCY i ?# q NRC Locations figure 2. NRC Regions y l' ei

i>

M l Headq:arters: Operations Center: Rockviile Mary!and Rockville. Maiy!and REGION IV REGION 111 [ (301) 415-7000 (301) 816-5100 gg 7 N r i gg 4,y The NRC maintains an Operations Center that MT y ND REGION I I provides a !0 cal poin! fcr NRC conwmications f OR WI l with its licensees. State agencies, and cther l p Federal agencies concerning operating events ID SD NY -MA )MI f in the cornmercial nuclear sector. The / WY 1A e -El

[:

p Operations Center is staffed 24 hours a day by OH pA 'CT j NRC operations c!hters. pg - NE IL IN W E ' k' UT C0 MO .fD k A Regint Offices: CA G D.C. KY The NRC has four regional offices located Region M throughout the United States (see Figure 2): Lis!e. Illinois AZ NM TN OK NC AR 8 l I (708) 829-9500 e SC h ! h-RegionI ( LA )y ys R GA 1 King of Prussia. Pennsylvania RegionIV Tx e (610) 337-5000 Ar!!ngton Texas REGION 11 p (817)860-8100 y G Region !! &( 4 3 Attanta.Geargna RegicaIVFieldOll ice: FL (404) 331-4503 Walnut Creek. Cahfornia i.l i (510) 975-0200 k 1 l t e Regional 0!! ice (4) N Residelt Sites: Technical Training Center: E TechnicalTraining Center (1) [' Q I[R b A Field 0?tice(1) At least two NRC resident inspectors who report Chattanooga. Tennessee D weers(1) to the appropriate regional othce are located at (615) 855-6500 t ? each nuclear power reactor site. Refer to Figure 16 j'l

,j for a map of the U S. commercia! nuclear power reactor sites.

1 I i i (lQ 1 I! c Note: A!aska and Hawaii are inch ded in Region IV. Source-Nuclear Regulatory Commission ( 8 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1995 INFORMATION DIGEST 9 (

lkk NRC AS A REGULATORY AGENCY j - ij bh NRC Fiscal Year 1995 ReS0urceS Figure 3. Distribution of NRC FY 1995 Budget Authority and Staft j j;l( (DcIlars in Millions) ? i ( Appropriation . Management and Support 7 ; The fSC was appropriated 55256 milhon for

inspector General (tG)

[" $i-Fisca! Year (FY) 1995 The fJRC's FY 1995 A(k INSPECTOR A personnel ceilmg is 3218 ful!-hme equivalent in 1985 constant dollars, the fJRC's FY 1995 EMM bi*# - ""t - GENERAL l h 0 10 CLEAR $51) I- $ (FIE) staff. budget has decreased approximately 15 percent (see Table 1 and Figure 4). A!! hough the f4RC k.r I NUCLEAR 1% r .y The fiRC allocates funds and staff to the personnel ceihng has fluctuated over the past y) ($163 E)) -i'N fo!icamg programs (see figure 3) ten years, it is currently less than the FY 1985 - ;g.gg 1 3 level (see Table 2 and Figure 5). _M

Reactor Tota! Aat5or4 i - P

$5256 tAllion j d

Nuclear Materials and fJut! ear Waste j~\\ $

DOLLARS BY PROGRAM l M I i.iN Civil Penalties ! [;4 Ihe NRC's enforcement program seeks to violahons to Seventy level V for those less E 'c b[ k M W-> d' M I 's 3rciect the pubhc health and safety by ensuring serious. Civi! penalties are normally issued for p 3

omphance with regulations and hcense Severity level 11! or higher violations The

[N -[ ' 4 g4 -~ (41) u

onditions, obtaining prompt correction in amount of each cml penalty assessed re!!ects MANAGEMENT NAM)NUCLEMASTE' I%

8 .kf.!, treas of ncncompicnce, deterring further the amount that the f1RC ultimately decides is df* SUPPORT g"g(591)Jy/p" Kincomphance, and encouragmg improvement appropnate through its enforcement process 3 " Mdp 3 &q, (W ki 1(%Is' d I )f licensee performance. The NRC enforcement (proposed penalty, licensee response, and 1rogram is governed by the NRC Enforcement imposition of penalty) or the hearing process. E h, 'chty found at 10 CFR Part 2. Appendix C. More significant violations result in civil ii !? i ihree primary enforcement sancbons are pena!!ies. In FY 1994,approximatsly

::A wailable notices of violation; civil pena l ties.

53 9 million in civil penalties was paid. STAFF BY PROGRAM

!r ind orders to modify. suspend or revoke This inc!udes the total amount assessed and icenses. The NRC ranks vic!ations actordmg those being paid over time. These civit j% b.

h$g j, ' ',,h ' 0 their level of severity. Severity levels range pena!!:es are deposited in the U.S. Treasury REGIONW '$i M t rom Seventy Level I far the most sigmhcant and are not used by the NRC g l3l Di fdWt 4I - RESIDENT tlSPECTORS d l (181) q / 5 i ! M-4 1 3218 FTE ' ~h' TM Std l! I

lk i

. 5} l STAFF BY LOCATION pT [}j{ Nore Percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number. Totafs do not equal sum of cornponents due to munding j Source Nuclear Regulatory Commission t :4 0 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISS!0N 1995 INFORMATION O! GEST 11 i'N 1

i i,
'W NRC AS A REGULATORY AGENCY s

i ,j E i h, i' ,1.. Tab!e 1. NRC Budget Authority, FYs 1985-1995 Table 2. NRC Personnel Ceiling, FYs 1985-1995 g j (Dollars in Millions) } Fiscal Year Staff Fiscal Year Actual Dollars 1985 Constant Dottars g j 1985 3.491 1 i: 1985 444 444 1986 3.491 i 1986 400 390 3369 ij 1937 1987 401 377 3250 ( g 19g3 j 1988 393 355

1989 3.180

) . ii 1989 420 359 3.195 j ' [( 1990 1990 439 366 3240 j .] 1991 .j 1991 455 3 74 3.335 j i 1992 1992 513 399 1993 3.343 p 1993

540 412

- 1994 3293 l! d 1994 535 399 3.218 ! I;; 1995 1995 526 381 Q a t Figure 4. NRC Budget Authority, FYs 1985-1995 Figure 5. NRC Personnel Ceiling, FYs 1985-1995 DOLLARS IN MILLIONS y STAFF 600 4000 { s 300 2000 i j 1935 CONSTANT DOLLARS Q 200 1 1000 r L1il 100 [ j .{ 0 935 86 87 83 89 90 91 92 93 94 1995 1985 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 1995 - FISCAL YEAR f. FISCAL YEAR M i Note: Douars are rounded to the reatest milhan. Note (T&ie 2and fg;re SJ The data ret:ect full-btne equivalents (FTE) See Glossary for definition.

j' Soura (T&!e 1 and Figure 4) Nuclear Regutatory Commission Source (Tele 2andFigure51 tiuclear Regutatory Commission i

12 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1995 INFORMATION DIGEST 13

1 $[ k; d:"1.t m i 4 11 -e O!: U$ a= .a figure 6. Sources of NRC FY 1994 Budget Auttiority 3a OrMwMe j

's Energy E

il i:.4 1 q 4. 1 )

li

, N. s J M1Q M,yf .<gr4,44 4 gS.M g. ? t .p ..b. xh n, e".d. h, k, b$0h 'h,,n W&k, ? 1 l 0. g c- ,Mn <nr;;1m E' < x- -:JM '4 REACTORFEES e- "4 D f ' +Ni -f C 'f2f$;/4(;$4330);W NW '.dY NUCLEAR MATERIAL FEES .A <teiWi

'{4g;,y

- 1 T n! L' 4 [.g5yD"dE4 A' C L.7 % j.} j". ! j:y w,ga;g ;.8.v%.,djdpfE 9"~ 4. it w c ($80.0) '" C ' ~M 4" r A 15 %

rg.W.;;j!!hg 'g[%~ ~ *si $ g g

.4 -4 4 4wN h;N5"^@h'""rwAp/*%.[ff]iT'W&.79pj; Yji,y U'-l 4 ~ -hEr2&?. M W t4 '?' ? il j}ljjQ y'19iy{%M;Wt? ye h. -3 w l (f Wh9 M[p$ ' ? },'.f '* \\ NUCLEARWASTEFUND ' ' - N; M.. ' R \\ $k r ;&

i[$, !!

H-hn: i ($22.0) V.- .\\. 4% n. t

h)hhth.

Y. f yi. : h ' 00LLARS IN MILLIONS ~19$% ~ ' h5 %.c \\j ) <a !3% kPI .w., @MUY h[Y [ [,7 2{1 j.- Tota! Authority: f ~$ L $535 Malion t.o E F4 Vir;r 5 ?I ,,h.

y mi

~i '.4_ < l'.;. .t 4 l

$ I..t i

WP. 't i The Oma: bus Budget Recontdiation Act of 1990, as amended. requires the NRC to recover 100 percent 'jiJ ~D l ci its budget authority, less appropriations from the Nuclear "laste Fund, for FYs 1991-1998 by fi- 'd assessing fees to its hcensees. In FY 1994, the NRC was recuired to collect approximately $513 N > il I million through these fees. In FY 1995, the NRC is required to coilect apprcximately $504 mdlion. R i g j? The fees assessed to the major classes o! NRC licensees in FY 1994 were: A .m l Class of Licensee Range of AnnualFees 3- : J j Operating Power Reactor $3.100.000 ~ !_. A Fuel Facdity $1200.000 to $3200.000 '4 Uranium Recovery Facihty $36.370 to $74.670

}

[ Transportation Approval $1.070 to $64.870

j r,

l Matenais User $970 to $32.570 g p y( at ' 1. F-il / jI I Note Percentages are rounded to the nearest atole nurnber. . j .p i v Source: Nuclear Regulatcry Commission 1 ( t'. 1> l 14 NUCtFAR REGul ATORY COMutSSI0tt

4 U.S. AND WORLDWIDE ENERGY [ i U.S. Electricity figure 7.1993 U.S. Electric Capability and Net Generation by Energy Source i i Capability and Net Generation deub!ed, waile electricity generated by at: ,4 $Q3j HYDROELECIRIC omer sources has decreased by 29 percent dNC a (301) y*. L. & (96) i U S electric generating capability totaled (se Tab!e 4 and Figure 9) 33 i 14 % F' @ jag]- Q %h%1 apprcximately 700 gig 3 watts in 1993 taudear PETROLEUM energy accounted for appronmately 14 percent Elactricey from coal and nuclear sources whiti (70) c, t of this capabd:ty (see Figure 7) accounted for 59 percent of the U S. genera'ing 10% _Qgg gJ( 1 - npp$p t capabil.ty, produced 79 percent of the net 1 (132) U S net electric generahon terated approumately electncity generated in 1993 (see Table 5 and 1 t1g [ e [ i 2.883 tacusand gigawatthours in 1993 Nuclear Figure 10). t l energy accounted for apptonmately 21 percent of th*s generation (see Figure 7). r Average Production Expenses i in 1993.109 cperahng nuclear reactors in Total Capabidy : CAPABILITY l 32 States generated approximately one-htm of The production expense data presented here 700 Gigawa"s the nation's efectricity (see Table 3 and Figure 8). include a!! nuc' ear and coal-bred utihty-owned I stearn electnc plants (see Table 6 and hs ] 7 Stres relied on nuclear power for more than Figure 11). j! l 50 percent of their electricity. PETROLEUM p

In 1993, production expenses averaged 7

+ 14 adthonal States relied on nuclear power $21.51 per megawatthour for nuc! ear j 1.639)~ fr (100) i 3% j g.w}fy / e for 25 to 50 percent of their electricity. reactors and $19 65 per magawatthour for l coa!-!: red plants. 57% g, , _,g [ Since 1975. nuclear electric generation has PN ij ! b f*p.94 HYDROELECTRIC f topled and coa:-fired generat:on has almost fi@ ky (265) gj 9% r $;e x v g I ! GAS ' l ] (25 i Tota! Ganerabon" 9 GENERATION 2.883 Thousand Giganatthours f i i l

Total value includes approximate!y 2 gigawa's et cther generating capabtey (geothermal. refuse. sotar. w nd. and j

wood). ahich represents less than 1 percent et total capa5!dy q

- Total value inc5 des approxirnately 10 thousand gigawatmours of ge.eration by cther energy sources (gacther.

mal. wood, wind. maste, photovottaic, and sotar). mhich represents less than 1 percent of total ganeration Note Net summer capabihty. Percentagas a e rounded to the nearest mhole number. Totals do not equal sum of i j comporients due to independeed rounding 3. ' j Source. DOE /EIA inventory of Power Plants in the United States 1993 IDOE/EIAM5 (93)). Table 1 (page 24 and i DOE /EIA f.ionbly Energy Rev;ew (DOE /EIA-0035 (91/11)). Tatie 7.1 (page 95) ( l 16 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1995 INFORMATION DIGEST 17

f .r f U.S. AND WORLDWIDE ENERGY Table 3 1993 Electric Generating Capability and Electricity Generated Figure 8.1993 Net Electricity Generated in Each State by Nuclear Power in Each State by Nuclear Power r EerCEAMEM1!Glt3I EttstDMcMitCltai - l State Capability Generation State Capability Generaties ' Alabama 24 18 Missouri 7 18 1 Arimna 25 36 PJebraska 23 26 l Arkansas 18 36 riew Hampshire 46 66 ND VT Caldernia 10 26 tJew Jersey 28 71 i f j on MA I Connecticut 48 79 flew York 15 25 l io so ] Florida 11 17 florth Carchna 23 26 l WY m o l 'CT 1 Georgta 18 28 Ohio 8 6 !!hnois 39 59 Pennsylvania 26 38 lo*a 6 12 South Carolina 40 60 l UT co 'W Kansas 12 19 Tennessee 14 6 gy toutsiana 12 25 Texas 8 5 1 = Maine 36 76 Vermont 45 81 nu Ok Maryiand 16 26 Virginia 24 43 Massachusetts 7 14 Washington 5 7 E M:chigan 18 33 Wisconsin 14 23 Minnesota 18 30 Others* 0 0 - 1 Mississippt 16 44 E uareinan50str> u E 25%i0 50% C4 I E isio24s ot) t O Nme08) > i, eah a k nae net summer cacabary Percentages are rounded to the nearest whoie ninnter. - lfp We:Ilwre arm canmercial reactms in Alaska a Hanaii Percentags atManded to the nearest whole number. source coma inventory et Power Piants in the united staies m3 to0wA-oo95 (93)t tabte 17 (page as) and. DOE /EIA Electnc Power Mor@ly (DO(/EIA-0226 (94/10)). Table 16 (page 21) Source. DOE /EIA Elecinc Power Monthly (D0f1EIA-0226 (94/10)). Table 15 (page 21) r 18 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMtSS10ll 1995 INFORMATION DIGEST 19

n l' (; k U.S. AND WORLDWlDE ENERGY

f' '>

g 5 t I ( ilj Tab'e 4. U.S. Net Electric Generation by Source,1975-1993 Table 5. U.S. Electric Generating Capability by Source,1986-1993 h{ . k (Thousand Gigawatthours) (Gigawatts) 1 s Year Coal Petroleum Gas Hydroelectric Nuclear 1975 853 289 300 30BM. 1 73 Year Cor! Petroleum Gas Hydroelectric Nuclear j

g 1976 944 320 295 284 **

191 1986 290 78 117 89 85 j 1977 935 358 306 220 251 1987 293 76 118 90 94 2 1978 976 365 305 280 276 1988 295 77 116 90 95 Il h y h; 1979 1.075 304 329 280 255 1989 297 78 117 90 98 b 1980 1.162 246 346 276 251 1990 300 77 120 91 100 P jd ; if f h 1981 1.203 206 346 261 273 ' 1991 300 72 126 92 100 fy h 1982 1.192 147 305 309 283 1992 301 72 127 93 99 1983 1.259 144 274 332 294 1993 301 70 132 96 99 > q. ~ k 1984 1.342 120 297 321 328 1{L 1985 f.402 100 292 281 384 =b il 1986 1.386 137 249 291 414 } [. !) f-;Il I 1987 1.464 118 273 250 455 Figure 10. U.S. Electric Generating Capability and Electricity 1988 1.541 149 253 223 527

3*

b I589 1.554 158 267 265 529 1991 1.549 111 264 276 613 PERCENT PERCENT j; ) 1990 1.558 117 264 280 577 E 1992 1.576 89 264 240 619 120 120 i (% -[ 1993 1.639 100 259 265 610 Figure 9. U.S. Net Electric Generation by Source,1975-1993 100 M 1@ S l,~ i; THOUSAND GIGAWAITHOURS ] q: h 80 t 80 .I J 1800 3 ! j . )' u 3 1 j 16

so eo 4

COAL

~~

N N 1400 y .} f f e n

)

~ ,2w 1 j; 1000 ) A...... --......,,, ALL OTHER S0l RCES 20 20

- - - - - =.....,,,.. ***........

jI 400 NUCLEA 1986 1987 1988 1989 1991 1992 1993 1986 1987 1988 1 990 1991 1992 1993 200 # E OTHER O COAL O NUCLEAR E OTHER O COAL O NUCLEAR j 0 .y . p 1975 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 83 89 90 91 92 1993 Note (Table S and f,gure 10) Net summer capability. Percentages are rounded to the nearest whole number } YEAR Source (Table S andfigure 70). 00EdlA Inventory of Power Plants in the United States 1993 (DOEAm@95 (93)). !1 4 Source (Table 4 and figure 9) 00E/EM Monthly Energy Review (DOE /EM-0035 (94/11)). Table 7.1 (page 95) Table 1 (page 24) and DOE /EM Monthfy Energy Review (DOE /EM-0035 (94/11)). Tatie 7.1 (page 95) i 20 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1995 INFORMATION DIGEST 21 9

U.S. AND WORLDWIDE ENERGY t i Table 6 U.S. Average Nuclear Reactor and Coal-Fired Plant Productl0n Expenses, U.S. Electricity Generated by C0mmercial Nuclear Power i ; 1986-1993 (Dol!ars per Megawatthour) j j in 1994 net nuclear-based electric generation

More tnan hatt of the U S. commercial Operation Total and Production in the Un !ed States produced a total of nuclear reactors operated above a capacity y

j ; Year Maintenance Fuel Erpenses 642 thousand gigawatthours (see Table 7 and factor of 70 percent in 1994 (see Tabie 8). ? ] ; Nuclear-figure 12). 1 I 1986

12 84 7.56 20 40 in 1993, the average U S. net capaaty factor reactors'had the highest average capaaty J

1987 14 04 7 73 2117 g was 73 percent it increased to 75 percent in fac1 cts compared to those of the other three m] iggg ja jg 7.gg 22.08 1994. S nce 1984, the average capacity vendors. The seven B&W reactors had ?, 1989 15 05 7.56 22.61 lactor has increased 17 percentage points an average capacity factor of 86 percent 4 t990 14 65 7 24 21 89 (see Table 7). The average capacity factors for the oaer 1. 1991 14 75 616 21 51 three vendors were the following: 1292 15 35 6 26 21 61

Capacity factor is the ratio of ette 37 Ger.aal Electric reactors-68 percent.

r 1953 15 49 6 02 2151 generated to the amount of energy that could 50 Westinghouse reactors-77 percent.

['

Coal-hi*d: have been generated (see Glos'ary). and 15 Combustion Engineering reactors-1936 4 25 17.31 21 56 80 percert(see Tabte 8). t 1987 4.14 16.45 20 59 i 1988 4 12 15 84 19.96 s( 1989 4 07 15 70 1917 li 1990 4 29 15.92 20.21 1991 4.39 15 93 20.32 1992 4 32 15 44 19 76 Y 1993 4 34 15 31 19 65 i Figure 11. U.S. Average Nuclear Reactor and Coal-Fired Plant Production it Expenses,1986-1993 M, 3 NUCLEAR COAL-FIRED } 00LLARS PER MEGAWATTHOUR DOLLARS PER MEGAWATTHOUR

1 50 50

,j ,) 4J 40 (i fj h 30 30 i g% ' u, 20 A 20

==-- 10 10 e s y n 0-0EEEEEEEE ( 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 l YEAR YEAR i: l O Dreation and a Fuel a operanonand O rud ( Mamtenance Maintenance ,. (; l l PMe(Table 6andfiguie 11). Costs have not t)een adlusted to tenect inflation. Smyre (Table 6and figure 11) Utiitty Data Instdute. Inc.,1993 Production Costs Operating Steam Electric Flarus 'i i (UDI-2011-94) i 22 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1995 tNFORMAT10N 0lGEST 23

kI t I U.S. AND WORLDWIDE ENERGY y Table 7. U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Average Capacity Factor and Table 8. U.S. Commercial Nuc! ear Power Reactor Average Capacity Factor by Net Generation,1975-1994 Vendor and Reactor Type,1992-1994 Number of Average Annual Net Gene _ratiGLDf Elesirkit! Number of Percent of Operating Capacity Factor Thousands of Percent of Operating Net Nuclear Year Reaclors (Percent) Gicawatthours Total U.S. Caracity Factor Reactors Generated 1975 51 67 167 83 1992 1993 1M M2 M31M l i,. 6 0 1 1978 66 67 271 12.3 50 to 70 Percent 27 20 23 23 17 18 1979 66 61 252 11.2 l, 1980 67 58 248 10.9 Below 50 Percent-13 12 11 4 3 3 T 1981 10 61 268 11 1 x 1982 - 72 58 278 12.4 Total 110 109 109 100 100 100 i: 1983 74 58 280 12.1 {h 1984 82 58 317 13.1 Average fh 1985 89 63 371 15.0 Number of Capacity Percent of g 1986 95 60 404 16 2 Operaung Factor Mt Nuclear y Reactors (Percent) Generated 1987 102 62 446 17.3 1992 1993 1994 1992 1993 1994 1992 1993 1994 [gd 1988 108 65 522 19.3 Vendor b'I 1989 109 63 528 19 0

}

1990 111 68 576 20.5 Babcock & Wilcox 7 7 7 84 87 86 7 7 7 1991 111 71 613 21 7 it i 1992 110 71 620 21.8 Combustion Engineering 15 15 15 75 77 80 15 16 15 i 1993 109 73 611 22.2 General Electric

37 37 37 61 68 68 28 30 29 1994*

109 75 642

Includes two reactors (Browns Ferry 1 and 3) which are in extended shutdown. The average annual capacity factor excluding Browns Ferry 1 and 3 is 77 percent.

Westinghouse Electric 51 50 50 75 73 77 50 47 49 ' i~

- Data are not ava:!able-Total 110 109 109 100 100 100 Figure 12. Net Generation of U.S. Nucitar Electricity,1975-1994 Reactor Type:

THOUSAND GIGAWATTHOURS y i( '! 700 Boi!ing-Water Reactor

37 37 37 61 68 68 27 28 29 Pressurized-Water Reactor 73 72 72 76 75 79 73 72 11 400 l

Tota! 110 109 109 100 100 100 + 300 200 i.ll; 100 includestw reams (Br wns ry t aM 3) wc are uxW swdomn. li; 975 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 92 1994 [ YEAR me AeragecapachfaMs sed on net rnaxnum deem capac4 See Glossary for dehmbon Refer to me(TXte law hgure i/) Average annual capacity factor is b.ased on nel mammum dependable capacity to nead We WE See Glossvy let defsmbon. Source (Ti'le rana ngure 72; t.censee data as compi:ed by the nuciear neguiarory commission So"* ''"5 d't' "Pid b' '"' "" R*9"t 'y commission 24 NT 8r'1 ran orrutt aTnov r nnniecine saec surnopostma me ret

y g s .t > c U.S. AND WORLOWlDE ENERGY L . $.x C il {5 Worldwide Electricity Generated by Commercial Nuclear Power Figure 13. 1993 Net Nuclear Electric Power as Percent of World Nuclear / and Total Domestic Flectricity Generation j 4 N in 1994. 424 cperahng reactors in 33 countries Of the countries cited here. reactors in Japan i i had a maximum dependable capaaty of (74 percent). the United States (73 percent), PERCENT OF WORLD NUCLEAR GENERATION p j 337.St8 megawatts electric (net MWe) and Canada (76 percent) had the highest gross d i =t capacty factors in 1994 Reactors in the United kf SWEDEN FORMER

Refer to Appendix F lot a world hst of States had the greatest gross generation by 3%

USSR. i j nuclear power reactors and Appendix G almost double the next highest producer. g 10 % % j y for nuclear power units by reactor type. France (see Table 9) \\ GERMN(Y i ; wcrlduide i1* - 7% ./ NN( h h.. P C#4ADA = Refer to Appendix H for a hst of the top '. [*' g-1993 were the Unded States and France. and Appendix I for a list of the top 50 units - - j't gjN g C & Major producers of nuclear efectrioty during 50 units by gross capacity factor, worldwide, 4% ~ i} t>y gross generation, worldnide. ,.c N D, - 7 i .. 4 '- +yg kj ;3

Approxirnately 29 percent of the world's net

'OTHERS nuclear-generated e!ectrioty was produced Over the past ten years, the average annual y in the United States (see Figure 13). gross capacity factor has increased 17 percent- }?-) i age points in the United States. Since 1992, r

France produced appronmately 17 percent the capacity factor in Sweden has increased Total World Net Nuclear p

of the worifs net nuclear-generated 9 percentage points (see Table 10). Electnc Generabon. } l electrioty The r!uclear portion of its total 2.080 Thousand Gigaarthours . g domeshc electr.oty generahon was y g 5} apptosmately 78 pertent (see Figure 13). PEFiCENT OF TOTAL DOMESTIC NET ELECTRICITY GENERATION } 78 % i. $ 80 y

p. g 0

4'N i ' k i 4 m 2 42 % -3 M F l 40 fM 30 % egg 4 i Jam 4 J4 e

S 6:

tc. 4 20 % 2 17% it v' b 18 % j h ![ .s i Ei i N JT f6_ f li 0 CANADA FRANCE-GERMANY JAPAN SWEDEN UNITED FORMER y STATES USSR !l u. I Note. Data is prehminary Percentages are rounded to the nearest whole nurnber. Source DOE! eta internahonal Energy Annual 1993 rD0E/EIA-0219(93)). Va'ious Tables l = Ii c 26 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1995 INFORMATION DIGEST 27

l i Table 9.1994 Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Average Gross Capacity Factor eral % h ClOat and Gross Generation by Selected Country r t i b: Reactors Number of Average Total Operating Number of !' j{, t Gross Gross Nuclear Reactors Operating ii Number of Capacity Generation in Top 50 Reactors In ! l'1 Operating Factor (Thousand by Capacity Top 50 by

l

.I '1 Country Reactors (Percent) Gigawatthours) Factor Generation , j r i Canada 20 76 111 5 0 l 3 i France 57 67 359 0 10 j Germany 21 72 151 3 9 'h, Japan 49 74 254 6 5 }l Sweden 12 76 73 1 2 ij l United States 109 73* 672 20 22 M Former U S S R. !i -l Scurce Excerpted frorn Nucimfiscs Week @ 1995 by McGraw-H:ll,Inc. Reproduced by permissiort } Further reproduction prohibited. ,.h, Q' j n ) 1 0 Table 10 Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Average Gross Capacity Factor by 'W 3< SelectedCountry,1984-1994 j ~ Avgfrage. GLOSS Annual Capacitylactor (Percent) Country 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 + l Canada 72 72 73 72 77 74 61 72 68 70 76 L A: France 70 71 67 60 58 62 63 63 63 69 67 i Germany 76 87 78 75 74 69 66 66 72 69 72 Q /; Japan 70 71 76 77 71 71 72 72 72 73 74 ] Sweden 76 71 81 77 77 74 75 85 67 62 76 ~ i, United 56 58 57 57 64 62 66 69 69 71 73 States 158 63 60 62 65 63 68 71 71 73 751* 9 1 Fuer u s s a - o For companson. U S. a<erage gross capacrty factor is used The 1994 U S. average net capacity tactor is f 75 percent (mtluding Browns Ferry 1 and 3 sh:cri are in extended shutdown) The 1994 U.S. average net capac#y factor excludmg Browns Ferry 1 and 3 is 71 percent. Brackets ll in Table 10 denote average net caacity factor. ] see G!ossary for definition. 1; " Data are not ava< fable. ]j ' Nde (TaNe 9 and 10) Percentages are rounded to tne nearest whole number Source DOE; IIA Commercial Nuclear Power 1991 (DOE /EIA-0438). Table 18 (page 40). Nucleonics Week C 1995 h by McGraw-Hdl. lac. and hcensee data as compiled by the IJuclear Regulatory Commission { 28 NiiCl FAR RFGtH ATORY COMMISSION

h OPERATING NUCLEAR REACTORS i U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors . i L Figure 14. Typical Nuclear Reactor I i - t-There are currently 109 commercial nuclear Principal Licensing and Inspection 'i [' power reactors hcensed to operate in 32 States Activities How Nuclear Reactors Work [<' i ' r ?. ' (see Figures 15-19). in a w:s cym.va, pessun.~op.,y.ucem n,e en cues rea. h

The fiRC depends primarily on reactor and Nesseo =*w a N wary cent bcc crnes N '** 2 m sm I
1 is undertonstruchon (Watts Bar 1) facihty inspechons as the basis for its W5*3W *'"' 9'""85 'Su"25 " "* " 8 3*2M '"8 5
t rndependent determinahon of ficensee n turve.no pecuces emww Bcug wee tems re srMa to e

,,33,ng,,,,,,,.,,, m s,,,,,c,, m.,,,no e g

5 are partia:!y comp!cted, but construction comphance with NRC regulabons-se e n m w,,e s c:n is ceec h =e ano e trceorems h r

j ] has been deferred (Belletonte 1 and 2. eiectnca't, pe== red pumps Emrgmcy cooing are e stcored h the our cs Petry 2. Wa!!s Bar 2. and Washington - On average, appreximatefy 4.400 ""* c'" t' P"""'d b 55" S"*852 0"' W 5" $# '5 " i I fluclear 1) inspection hours were expended at "'

D*" # #" * "

each operating reactor dunng FY 1994 i e Refer to Appendices A-D for a fishng of (see Figure 20). c% currer.t!y operahag. tormerly cperahng and k'Dr d canceted U S. commercial nuclear power Apptox;mately 20 separate hcense changes l reactors are requested per power reactor each year-l I resulbag in more than 2.000 separate NRC g j Di'tersity - Although there are many reviews per year. %r a. j, e [* 'p,.. T'f M similanhes. each reactor design can be jI l cons:dered unique A typical hght-water

Approxima!ely 5.300 reactor operators are reactor is shown in Figure 14.

licensed by the NRC: 3 d = 4 reactor vendors - Each operator is requah!" 4 More renewal

+1 e i.

3 7 Y i

48I:censees of a 6-year license 54 I

j

80 different designs

-p +J y

i

71 s:tes

. Approximately 2.000 reactor event reports are 4 ,j assessed by the NRC annua!!y. 1 i Experience - The 109 reactors licensed to cperate have accumulated 1.687 reactor-years

The NRC is overseeing the decommissioning o experience (see Table 11 and Figure 21). An of 13 nucicar power reactors

,* % L([\\ j r q e- } y,', (i.j i. j addibonal 193 reactor-years of erperience have 1 i been accumulated by permanently shutdown I reactors. l A tar j 3 r i (* I I l i / I tut y l y N N 3 ,p5% gr% ~_ _ jl

p. 1 i

[ ] I [' i

r. ;

i Source Peter Miller and Pierre Mion. National Geographic Society C. Reproduced by permission. Furtder reproduction prohibited. 30 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1995 INFORMAT1oM DIGEST 31

l. t OPERATING NUCLEAR REACTORS 1 Figure 15. U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors Figure 16. NRC Region I Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors l WA O A y l ta E } ur ,,g y7 MN OR l A A E ID SD WA 3 WY AA Mt BI A AA

CT A\\ m AA #

M la ~ uv nt i,. iA 'i ) A AA NJN A vi UI A\\ ,t

N DE NH CO l

W MDAA A CA g p gA l A A M0 A KY g( j g j A NY a a A G e NC j -l ^ } Al OK AA A f A I*M ed "T . i, A g ( dA n AA RI A A A g MS Al GA AA y A LA A A PA I TX - A AA A AA A L NEW JERSEY t I ru A HopeCreek1 A( A AA A A A OysterCreek rt g 1 A A Safem 1 and 2 A 4k MD NEW YORK A Lcensed to 0perate (10'3) DE A James A FdzPatrck AA D UnderConstruction(1) A Ginna O DeferredConstruction(5) A Indian Point 2 and 3 .]' A Nine Mile Point 1 and 2 k CONNECTICUT PENNSYLVANIA 'q. c A HaddarnNeck A Beaver Val ley 1 and 2 g A Mi!! stone 1.2.and 3 A Limerick 1 and 2 h A Peach Bottom 2 and 3 M MAINE MASSACHUSETTS A Susquehanna 1 and 2 P- ; A MaineYankee A Pilgrim 1 A ThreeMileIsland1 MARYLAND NEW HAMPSHIRE VERMONT A Calvert Cl#41 and 2 A Seabrook1 A VermontYankee Ete. There are no commercial reactors in Alaska or Hasaii. $0urm Nuclear Regulatory Commission Sourm Nuclear Regulatory Commission A Licensed to Operate (29) 32 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1M5 fMFORMATION DIGEST 33

l OPERATING NUCLEAR REACTORS .y Figure 17. NRC Region Il Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors figure 18. NRC Region Ill Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors ALABAMA NORTH CAROLINA TENNESSEE ILLINOIS 10WA MINNESOTA A Browns ferry 1.2.and 3 A Brurewick 1 and 2 A Sayaoyah 1 and 2 A Bradwmd 1 and 2 A Duane Arnold A Monticello A Joseph M.Fa' ley 1 and 2 A McGuire 1 ard 2 E WattsBar 1 A Byron 1 and2 A Prarne Island 1 and 2 O Be!!efonte1and2 A ShcaronHarris1 e WattsBar2 A Clinton MICHIGAN A Dresden 2 and 3 A Big Rock Point MISSOURI i VIRGINIA A La Sa!!e County 1 and 2 A D C. Cock 1 and 2 A Ca!!away A Quad Cities l and 2 A Fermi 2 ILORIDA SOUTH CAROLINA A North Anna t and2 A Zion 1 and 2 A Palisades OHIO A Crysta! Ruer 3 A Catav.ba t rad 2 A Surry 1 and 2 A Nos Besse A St Luce 1 and2 A Oconee11,and3 A Perry 1 A TurkeyPoint3and4 A H B. Robirpi? e Perry 2 A Sumrner 5 A da Halch 1 and 2 AA A Vogtle 1 and 2 A Point Beach 1 and 2 vn gy / MISSISSIPPI I A GrandGulf 1 AA wt Me NC (' AA IN AA A AA MI y A AA A A A A A ii ** AA A u u AA EO AA A AA A AA OH MS AL IN l O a AA AA l AA i g } M0 A } ? FL j A LicertedtoOperate(33) 3 l O UnderConstruction(1) 0 DeterredConstruction(3) L A LicensedtoOperate(28) AA Source Nuclear Regulatory Commission Source Nuclear Regulatory Commission (' S 34 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1995 INFORMATION OlGEST 35

OPERATING NUCLEAR REACTORS 9 Figure 19. NRC Region IV Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors Figure 20. FY 1994 NRC Inspection Effort at Operating Reactors NUMBER OF PLANTS D WA 40 Mi A ND OR 6 ID 7 30 l SD 30 a 'ft: Ag l WY ~ 25 NE A 'g 4 tN UT A CO z 20 !i CA } 0 1 - ?9 15 i A I# I4 A ?kN I 15 l G $h D) AA N 10 jN ' l Ird h A fiM OK 10 i gg hk AA 5 ARKANSAS AA A AtWklear 1 and 2 LOUISIANA 0 A <2000 2000-2500- 3500- 4500- 5500- 6500- 7500- 8500- >9500 2499 3499 4499 5499 6499 7499 8499 9499 AR1ZDNA A Waterford3 AA A PaloVe'de1,2,and3 HOURS OF INSPECTION EFFORT NEBRASKA CAllFORNIA A Cooper A Doblo Canyon 1 and 2 A FortCalhoun A San Onofre 2and 3 TEXAS WASHINGTON KANSAS A Comanche Peak 1 and2 A WashingtonNuclear2 A Wolf Creek 1 A Sou:hTexasProject1and2 e WashingtonNuclear1 A Licensed to Opera:e(19) O Deterred Construction (1)

cte-There are no convrercial reactors in Alaska or Ibwaii.

Source Nuclear Regula! cry Commission Source. Nuclear Regulatory Comrnission l j 36 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1995 INFORMATION DIGEST 37 l

i [{ OPERATING NUCLEAR REACTORS jl 4 TaNe 11. U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Operating Licenses Number Total Number Tctal ]a Issued by Year of Number of of Number of Reactor Licenses Operating Reactor Licenses Operating Year Narne hsw Ucensu Year Nam ism Wenm Number Tota! Number Total of Number of of Number of 1985 Byron 1 9 53 1987 (Contned? l Reactor Licenses Operating Reactor Licenses Operating Catamba l Shearon Harns t 4 YQar Name issued Licenses Year Name issued Licenses Dtab!a Canyon 2 V09tle l Fermi 2 1988 Bratenood 2 2 103 .] 1952 *B:g Rock Point 1 1 1974 (Cont.nued) 1967 Haddam Neck 1 2 Ocenee 3 Limenck 1 South Texas Project 1 1969 Dresden 2 4 6 Peach Bottom 3 Paio Verde 1 1989 timenck 2 3 106 Genna Pra'r:e Island 1 Rws Bend 1 Menas W 2 N ne P.tle Point 1 Praine bland 2 Waterford 3 VoGfle 2 Oyster Creek Three Mile bland I Welt Creek 1 1990 Comanche Peak 1 2 108 1985 Catanba 2 5 93 Seabrock 1 1970 H B Robinson 2 3 9 1975 y,11 stone 2 1 45 Hope Creek 1 1993 Comancte Peak 2 1 109 MJb!me 1 1976 Beaver Valley 1 7 53 M'ustom 3 Point Beach 1 Browns Ferry 3 Note (Table if andfigure21) 1971 Dresden 3 2 11 Brunsed 1 Palo Verde 2 Limded to reactors licensed to opsat Monbcei:o Cabot CMb 2 Perry 1 1972 Pa4sades 6 17 Indian Point 3 1987 Beaver Varley 2 8 101 Year is based on the cate the indial full power Pi!grrm 1 Sa!em 1 Braitacod 1 operahng license was issued. QuadCd-s1 St Lucie 1 eyeon 2 Source (Tabte if andfsure22) Huclear Rgulatory Chnton Commission 021 C ttes 2 1977 Crystal River 3 4 57 Nine Mde Point 2 Surry I Davis Besse Turkey Pomt 3 D. C. Cock 2 Palo Verde 3 1973 Browns Ferry 1 14 31 Joseph M.Farley 1 Fort Ca!houn 1978 Arkansas Nuclear 2 3 60 trean Pomt 2 Edwin i Hatch 2 Figure 21. U.S. Comm3rcial Nuclear Power Reactor Operating Licenses Kewaunee Ncath Ama 1 lssued by Year Maine Yankee 1980 North Anna 2 2 62 Ocmee1 Sequoyah1 NUMBER OF LICENSES ISSUED Oconee 2 1981 Joseph tA Farley 2 4 66 16 Peach Bettom 2 McGuire 1 yy Point Beach 2 Salem 2 m a I4 Surry 2 Sequeyah 2 Turney Point 4 1982 La Salle County 1 4 70 Vermont Yankee San Onofre 2 12 Zion 1 Summer Zicn 2 Susquehanna 1 10 9 8 1974 Arkansas Nuclear 1 14 45 1983 McGuire 2 3 73 Brenns Ferry 2 San Onc!re 3 8 7 Brunswd 2 51 Lucie 2 6 6 d CaNet CMts 1 1g84 Ca!!amay 6 79 6 d d 5 Coccer Diablo Canyon 1 4 4 4 4 d D C. Cook 1 Grand Guit 1 4 3 a d 3 d d 3 3 Duane Arnold La Sane County 2 2 2 2 Edwini Ha'ch 1 Susquehanna 2 2 i g i 1 James A. FitzPartd Washington Nuclear 2 0 1962 67 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 901993 YEAR 38 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1995 INFORMATION DIGEST 39

U" OPERATING NUCLEAR REACTORS 6 Performance at U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors i k ) Performance Indicator Program Systematic Assessment of Licensee Performance The Performance Indicator Program is a singie. I coordinated. overall NRC program that provides The Systematic Assessment of Licensee p an addrtional view of operational pertormance Performance, or SALP, Program is an integrated r and enhances the NRC's ability to recognize NRC effort to collect and evaluate observabons ji areas of changing safety performance of and data to assess and better understand the 4 operahng plants. When viewed as a set. the reasons for a licensee's performance. The performance indicators (Pts) for a given plant purpose of the program is to direct NPC b provide additional data for determining attenbon and resources towyd those reas that I; I[ performance trends Pts focus attention on the reflect weaknesses and that involve nuclear need to assess and understand undertying safety. This involves a review of licensee causes of identihed changes by evaluahng performance over an extended period of time h' other available information (see Figure 22). (normaUy about 18 months) in areas such as yj operations. engineering, maintenance, and plant y; The Pt Program is a tool that must be used only support ]l in conjunct on with other tools, such as the f I results of routine and special inspections and On the basis of the review. a rating is assigned the Systematic Assessment of Licensee to reflect the quahty of licensee performance j Performance Program for providing input to w: thin each area evaluated. The SALP j NRC management decisions regardmg the need evatuations are discussed with the licensee to k to adjust plant-specthe regulatory programs. communicate the results of the evaluation. h Pls have hmitations and are subled to Those discussions are usuany conducted in a ]!! misinterpretation. Therefore.cautionis public meeting. The NRC cont nua !y reviews r warranted in the interpretation and use of the the SALP process to idenbfy procedural i data. The application of Pts for purposes and change or ref nements that can be made to in manners other than those stated above will improve on its intended purpose of clear and

f be counter la the NRC objective of ensuring concise communication to licensee manage-f operational safety.

ment regarding the strengths and weaknesses of plant performance. For the latest SALP rating by -{ reactor, refer to NUREG-1214. Historical Data Summary of tne Systemahc Assessment et f, l Licensee Performance." 1!t i I i l 1 I l l i 40 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1995 INFORMATION DIGEST 41

P OPERATING NUCLEAR REACTORS Figure 22. NRC Performance Indicator $; AnnualIndustry Averages,1985-1994 EQUtPMENT-FORCED OUTAGES AUTDMATIC SCRAMS WHILE CRIT! CAL SAFETY $TSTEM ACTUATIONS FORCED DUTT.GE RATE PER 1000 CRITICAL M AVERAGE NUMBER OF REACTOR SCRAMS AVERAGE NUMBER OF ACTUATIONS AVERAGE FORCED OUTAGE RATE (%) AVERAGE EQUtPMENT-FORCED OUTAGE RATE I2 ,27 $3 110 110 a m 8 99 5-f -45 10 ~ "9-' 89 93 m d 21 ? a 86 ' 4-36 2 -' 8- -7 2 ^ f i e, 3 i r y 3 :i e i 15 4 i ' I ~h, ' j l 3-2 8 i s 13 6- ( l I 23 i I2 k I) t i / i 1 0 i m s m 2 l 10 10 ? 3 3 I 06 jj -h 16 2-I~ ! l i '"0808~ 4~ E ~ 15 14 4 4 h 3 ) g 9 y i a r 8 j 1 04 04 04 04 p 4 1kS 1561987198819891990'1991199219931994*985 1986 1987 1983 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994* 19 5 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994* t985198619871928198919901991199219931994' ~ ~ ^ YEAR YEAR MAR M yi t Rl $!GNIFICANT EVENTS SAFETY SYSTEM FAILURES.. COLLECTIVE RADIATION EXPUSURE g t AVERAGE MAN-REM AVERAGE NUMBER OF SIGNIFICANT EVENTS AVERAGE NUMBER OF FAILURES 3 4 600,577 37 . Estimatedvalue 35 W 500 ' " TM MtM areas psed a@vd Ma M ,33,33 34 T ,73 y 24 N \\ m resulted from rectassifatatten of sa'ety system ) 4'8 failures. 3 m \\ \\ \\ s s 400 -~ ~ = 2- \\ \\

cle Data represtml annual industry acages oth J

\\ \\ \\ y2 p lants in extended shutdow'1 excluded These data j 17 23 23 % g s N \\ ~ l \\ \\ i 267 rnay dt!fer slightly from previously pub!:shed data j e p i 255 .\\ .1 .\\ .1 1g 300-2_ \\ N i di 4 g m 243 as a rasult of refinements in data Qua!ity j i r 206 i ~ \\ \\ i I ( { f lf , I 1 Source Licensee data as Comptied by the Nuclear d m -j 9 j 9-08 1- { j Regulatory Commission F ~ G5 ? 2 I e t ? t i l 100 - 3 I s 03 03 03 02 N 5 i = 3 y / 0 0-- 0 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994* 1985 1936 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994-1985 1986 1981 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994* YEAR YEAR YEAR 42 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1995 INFORM.%3N DIGEST 43

OPERATING NUCLEAR REACTORS l i Future U.S. C0mmercial Nuclear P0wer Reactor t.icensing Figure 23. U.S. Commercial Nuclear PowerReactors-Years of Operation i Reactor Aging and License Renewal in December 1991, the NRC issued the rule and associated documentabon that describe . i wA In 1994. 45 reac! cts were 20 years or older. what a licensee must be able to demonstrate for A i. This represented approximately 41 percent of the NRC to make a determination that the plant MI

? ME i.

ND the licensed reactors oroducing aporeximatery can conhnue to be operated for up to Mn 33 percent of net noctear-generated electricity 20 additional years beyond the expiration of its OR g y 4 (see Figure 23) 40-year hcense. In 1994. the NRC published yy g fA [A ID so wt for public comment, proposed amendments to i u' In contrast, by the year 2000. 62 reactors will the license renewai rule that would focus the f 33 1g pi WY l be 20 years or cider. This represents license renewal process on the management Of g g I PA Id approximately 57 percent of the iicensed the adverse effects of aging on certain systems. tN NE i gA{'g}AO. 4k 'fUM^ reactors producmq approximately 46 pe cent of structures, and components during the period CH j-DE Y net nuclear-generated electricity. of extended operation. The final rule UT 31 C0 3 W MA modifications are expected to be published ty CA KS .6 VA in 2000. the bcensed nuclear generating Summer 1995. O MO KY A, capacity could begin to decrease as reactors ~ .N i begin to reach their 40-year terms, a limit The NRC is conducting research providing the La TN NC imposed by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as technical bases to ensure that critical reador Az OK AL g ,A amended (see Tabte 12 and Figures 24 and 25) components, safety systems and structures LLg NM AR p ] <4g will provide adequate reliabildy as reactors Extend:ng reactor operating licenses beyond age. Research resu!!s will be usefulin MS Al GA 'l 1 the;r current 40-year terms adi provide a viable assessingsafetyimplicationsof age-related LA TX L 3 approach for electric utilities to ensure the degradation during the 40-year license and in adequacy of future electricity-generahng supporting safety decisions associated with 33 O v capacity that oilers significant economic license renewal. i tenefits when compared to the construction of g A new reactors. 4 YEARS OF NUMBER OF AVERAGE COMMERCIAL OPERATION REACTORS CAPACITY (MDC) A 0-9 30 1102 4 10-19 34 975 A 20-29 44 742 A Over30 1 67 Note There are no commercial reactors in Alaska of Hawaii. Calcuh:ted data as of 1994. Source. fluclear Regulatory Commission 44 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1995 INFORMATION DIGEST 45

OPERAllNG NUCLEAR REACTORS Table 12.U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Operating Licenses-Number Year Number Year A5885$"8 A558"i"9 Expiration Date by Year Reactor Licenses Construction Reactor Licenses Construction Year Name Erpired Recapture

Year Name Erpired Recapture
Number Year Nirmber Year 24 m r W 2027 haMa% 2 5

of Assuming of Assumin BraM 2 CatanM 1 Reactor Licenses Construction Reactor Licenses Constructice

I Ygar Name Empired Recapture

Year Name Erpired Recaptirre' Pato Verde 1 South Texas Proied 1 Susquehanna 2 Vogtte 1 2000 B:q Rock Pemr 1

2014 (Cc.cren;#[ cms i Wa*erford 3 2028 South Texas Protact 21 2005 Dresden 2 1 C#ve 2025 T* mi2 5 2029 Limerd 2 2 2007 Haddam Neck 2 Cooper MJ; stone 3 Vogtie 2 Pahsades 201f D C. Cook f PaloVerde 2 2030 Comanche Peak 1 1 2008 Diatio Caryon 1 2 2021 Duane Arnold River Bend 1 2033 Comanche Peak 2 1 Mame Yar kee 2012 E&nI lWch 1 Woif Creek 1 2009 G5nna 3 James A FitPatack 2026 Bradaced 1 9 " Year assumes that the mammum number of y ars for P&ne MJe Pmnt 1 &onee 3 Bron 2 constreon recasure W am to N cunent Oyster Creek Peach Bot:cm 3 Cataaba 2 expiration date This column is lim:ted to reactors 2010 Diam 1Cryon 2 5 2025 Praine island 2 Chnton eligtte for construction recaptu e See Glossary for H B Rctinson2 Three MJe Island 1 Hope Creek I det.ncon. MM0"e 1 2015 ind:an Point 3 2 N:ne MJe Point 2 Note (tad!e 12andfqure24) Monbcello Mil 4 tone 2 W@o rems W to We. abr 1 2011 D den 3 1 Bro sF Waron Hanis t MUacle12M@2# NM 2012 Pilgnm 1 6 Brunsaick 1 Regulatory Commission Quad Cmes 1 CaNert Cidts 2 Quad Cities 2 Crystal River 3 Suny 1 Sa!em i By1 Figure 24. U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Operating Licenses-r Yan ee 2017 Da 0 C.CN2 Expiration Date by Year Assuming Construction Recapture 2013 Browns rcry 1 15 Fort Ca%un Joseph M Farley 1 Indan Pomt 2 2018 ArkansasNuclear2 3 NUMBER OF LICENSES EXPIRED Kemau m Edwin i Hatch 2 jg hI North Anna 1 m Ocenee 2 2020 North Anna 2 3 Peach Bottom 2 Salem 2 3 Point Scach 2 Sequoyah 1 Praine Island 1 2021 Joseph M. Farley 2 3 15 13 13 i San Onche 2 2022 McGuire 2 i San Onotre 3 2022 Seq.ryih 2 7, s 9 Suny 2 2022 Grand Gutt 1 4 Turkn Point 4 La Salle County 1 10 a lion 1 Sumrner j 4 a 7 } l 7 7 1 Zion 2 Susquehanna 1 m 6 m 6 2014 Arkansas Nuclear 1 13 2023 La Sa!ie County 2 4 f ,{ Brenns ferry 2 McGuire 2 I i t I Brunsmck 2 St Lucie2 3 3 i ) 3 3 3 ( ~ 5 5 i Washington Nuclear 2 2 i i' j 2 3 i 4 + 3 j 2024 Bren t T 1 1 1 1 Ca!:away ggg { j l j i / k 1 L 0 2000 06 07 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 2026-YEAR 33 46 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1995 (NFORMATION DIGEST 4I

l 1 1 1 l l OPERATING NUCLEAR REACTORS a l Figure 25. U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactor Generating Capacity,1960-2060 Future U.S. C0mmercial Nuclear P0wer Reactor Licensing (Continued) i MAXIMUM DEPENDABLE CAPACITY (NEI GIGAWATTS) 120 . Standardization of Future Reactor Designs performance of future light-water reactors. The } UNDER 106 0 TOTAL fJET GWa davelopment of these common utility [ / i llandardization can minimize excessive requirements and their review by the NRC ar. i C0fiSTRUCTION DEFERRED (6. GWe) j 'iversity in reactor designs and can increase important steps toward achieving the benefits of g; 7 ggg) i

0nfidence in the safety. reliability. and standardization.

1 100 wadaMity of future nuclear power reactors. CURRENTLY i Te NRC has revised its regulations to make The f4RC issued final design approva!s for two I LICENSED TD , ne licensing process for future nuclear power evolutionary designs. the GE Advanced Boihng-l OPERATE eactors more stable and predictable. The Water Reactor (ABWR) and the ASEA Brown 2 (93 8 GWe) i,anges shou!d substantia!!y improve the entire Boveri/ Combustion Engineering System 80+. j t ki, itensing process, with the goal that future in July 1991 There are currently too other i, L luclear power p! ants will use standard reactor fight-water reactor designs under FJRC review l

p' p

- $esigns atready certitied by the NRC and will be that employ some passive safety features, the ig g fi g ocated at preapproved sites (see Figure 26). Y!estinghouse Electric advanced passive - t I $,) y reactor (AP600) and the GE simphfied boihng-i; The NRC has reviewed the Electric Power water reactor (SBWR). Finally, the NRC l' g. j i ' lequirements Documents. Each document is a apphcation materiats for the CANDU 30 design, 25 ! 3esearch Institute Evolutionary and Passive completed an acceptance review of the j l B i F

omprehensive statement of utility require-a heavy water moderated and coo!ed reactor. in

( ments for the design, construction, and preparation for a design certitication review l 0 j iie***34 *i4 giaeiiiiei iei. i.g 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2000 ' i l l YEAR I licensed Capacity @ licensed Capacity - Extended 20 Years f I l l l 1 - I f Note. Data assume current expiration dates have been adjusted for construction recapture and hcenses extended 20 years See Glossary for cetinitton Source: Licensee data as compded by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission i l 48 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION j 1995 INFORMATION DIGEST 49

OPERATING NUCLEAR REACTORS Figure 26.10 CFR Part 52 Reactor Licensing Process J.S. Nuclear Nonpower Reactars DESIGN EARLY SITE CERTIFICATION COMBINED LICENSE PERMIT uclear nonpoweneactors are designed and

8 nonpower reactors have possession only neseac.teshng,andcab nal teenses.

PROCESS PROCESS PROCESS mposes. for example.

Since 1958. 69 ticensed nonpower reactors DES 03 APFtiCAIpi a in the performance of research and testing have been decomrnissioned.

CERTfiCMei FOR COUSINED EARLYSITE in the areas of physics, chemistry, biology. Rt?tE tgpg FERMli medicine matanats sciences, and related

Refer to Appendix E for a listing of operating fields U S. nuclear nonpower reactors.

= in educating people for nucicar-related Principal Licensing and inspection careers in the power industry, rntional Activities [ Acp3no defense, research, and education l RULEMAFf6 UO SIMF REY!EW yx.OMORY = Apprntimately 300 nonpower reactor I OPT 0iAL HEAME "E here are 45 nonpower reactors licensed to operators are licensed by the NRC: I f perate in 27 States (see Figure 27): i f g unaMORY - Each operator is requablied before i NG E + 1 construction permit application submitted renewalof a6-yearlicense. j E by Arkansas Tech University is under NRC FINAL DES &J V ACRS review.

Approximately 40 nonpower reactor APFR0we ANDSTAFF inspections are conducted annually.

CCM8MD FEVEW

5 nonpaaer reactors are being decommis-LICDG sioned.

= i

CES APFtlCAIDi MiGSIMF FOR MY d

REVIEW CONSTRUCT 04 Simi l ROVERT: CAT 0r APPtlCATION OPTOIAL FCR f(ARIf4 DESGN E CERi!FICAIO4 i ? OPERM04 l l "Findmg 6 sued after construction to determine ahether the conditions of the combined Icense were rnet. f ACRS-Advisory Comminee on Reactor Safeguards. ~ Scurce Nuclear Regulatory Comrrussion j 6 1 50 hUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1 1995 INFORMATION DIGEST 51

1 F ti i figure 27. U.S. Nuclear Nonpower Reactor Sites 't< i Safety L i A ND VT"" f g OR ] 3,g ID g m e A pg A j 1 A WY A w AA " 'c!,, i A ^ i IA FA 'l A , FN N NE .A . ru g OH j A A It in g r g A A MDAA A} A i CO yrj A 1 CA A KS M0g gy l Medical A TN i i y g, AA NM AR SC I A i n y ^t ( us i n g a i i A FL l l A wenseamoversem

Am canon u cens:e re<= m Academic Industrial Ncte. There are no nonpcmer reactors in Alaska of Hawaii.

Source. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 52 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i

[ T NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY l U.S. Fuel Cycle Facilities (gure28. MajorU.S.FitelCycleFacilitySites t The fJRC licenses and inspects a!! commercial inJanuary 1991.the flRC received an f nuclear fuel faol: ties involved in the prccessing acplicahon to construct and curate the V'A m and fabricahGn of Uranium ore an!o reactor fuel. nahon's first privately owned uranium e uy ME enrichment fachty in Homer. Louisiana. ND There are 9 nt!;or faciht.es hcensed to operate The NRC is currently reviewing the application : un in 8 States (see Figure 28) and expects to reach a decision after hearings ( L MA OR

Uranium Fuel Fabrication Facilities Report for tre facihty was pubhshed in SD WI '

NY arecompletedin 1995 TheSafetyEvaluation ID wy ui RI January 1994. and the final Environmental N L5 pA CT - General Atomics (SanDiego.Cahfornia) Impact Statement was published in NE NJ August 1994. W A OH it ,y DE - ABB Combusbon Engineering (Hematite. ei UT MD { { CA\\ Mtssoun) The Energy Pohcy Act of 1992 placed C0 1 m, yg KS M0 m significant new responsibihties on the VC. g, gy - GeneralElectric(Womington florth The Act established the United States g A NC Carchna) Enrichment Corporation a*qd.res the NRC f L In to regulate. from a hea!!h. safety and sateguarjs ? AZ nu AR OK - WaWnghouseElectric(Columbia South perspectiva, the Iao gaseous d:tfusion uraniurn g Carchna) enrichment faolities which the Corporation OA '* At leases from the Department of Energy. The - Nuclear Fuel Services (Erwin. Tennessee) NRC will have regulatory oversight of the i k existing gaseous ddfusion enrichment facilities i y LA - Babcock & Wilcox Fuel Company at Paducah, Kentucky, and Portsmouth. 0hio. I Il (Lynchburg. Virginia) The NRC published the Final Rule. Certifica-tion of Gaseous Odfusion Plants." on - Babcock & Wdccx (Naval)(Lynchburg. September 23.1994. The Corporat onis Virginia) ex.nected to submil an application for 'I cerhtication in April 1995. It is expected the v - Siemens Nuc! ear Power Corporation imtialcerbhcationorapprovalof acomp!iance d (Richland. Washington) p!an will occur in October 1995. y l

Uranium Hexalluoride Production Facilities Principal Licensing and inspection t

Uranrum fuel Fabrication Faolity (6)

Activities j m usamum Hexat:uonde Produchon Facdity (1) - A!Iied-Signalincorporated

Uranrum Ennchment fachty Site (t)

(Metropohs. Ilhnois)

NRCissuesapproximately80new, renewal *
A Gaseous Diffusion Ennchment Faolity (2) or hcense amendments 'ar fuel cycle 4

facilities annually. y 1i f sote There are no fuel cycle facht es in Alaska and Hawaii f Source Nuclear Regulatory Commission i 4 54 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1995 INF0MADON DIGEM N

i f I NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY t U.S. Material Licenses table 13. U.S. Material Licenses by State NumbtLDLLicensts Humber oLLitcosts Agreement Agreement Approximately 22.000 hcenses are issued for Industrial - Used in such areas as radiogra-istate NRC States State NRC States medical. acv!cmic. and industria! uses of phy. gauging devices, gas chromatography. nuclear matenal(see Table 13) welllogg!ng.and smoke detectors Mabama 21 403 Montana 88 0 . Ancratimately 6.600 hcenses are admints-uaska 55 0 Nebraska 4 168 teua by the NRC. Principal Licensing and inspection a hizona 18 297 Nevada 5 153 l Activities

Apptox!mately 15.000 licenses are e]4 kansas 8

261 New Hampshire 10 99 administered by the 29 States that parbcipate

NRC issues approximately 4.500 rew-l in the NRC Agreement States Program. An renewal or hcense amendments for material, California 66 2230 New Jersey 555 0

i Agreement State is one that has signed an hcenses annually. The Agreement States

Colorado 30 409 New Mexico 22 255 agreement with the NRC anowing the State issue more than 13.000 such actions

' Connecticut 219 0 New York 52 1.689 to regulate the use of radioactive material annually. , 3elaware 63 0 North Carolina 16 529 within that State (see figure 29).

NRC conducts approximately 2.300 health ; Jistrict of Columbia 55 0

North Dakota 7 75 Medical - An eshmated 8-9 million diagnostic and safety inspections of nuclear rnaterial and therapeubc chnical procedures using licensees annua!!y. The Agreement States lorida 23 1.100 Wo 623 0 radioactive material, of which approximately conduct approximately 4.800 such Georgia 18 503 Oklahoma 243 0 250.000 are therapeubc. are performed inspections annually. r iawaii 72 0 Gregon 13 299 annuauy I daho 78 0 Pennsytvania 823 0 Acad mic - Used in universities, colleges. 11inois 62 780 Rhode Island 3 80 e f other academic instituhons in course work i ana.earch ndiana 308 0 South Carotina 12 320 .awa 6 216 South Dakota 47 0

(ansas 21 323 Tennessee 31 560 l Kentucky 15 392 Texas 60 1.642

- I Louisiana 12 520 Utah 16 233 Maine 6-125 vermont 37 0 Maryland 66 520 Virginia 408 0 f Massachusetts 464 0 Washington 23 379 q d Michigan 538 0 West Virginia 211 0 l Minnesota 181 0 Wisconsin 277 0

Mississippi 10 317 Wyoming 84 0_

l . Missouri 319 0 Others* 169 0 Total 6,573 14,877 i 3 l Others inc!rde temtories such as Puerto Rico. Virgin Islands. Gaarn. and Amencan Samoa ! Vote NRC data as 0102/03/95. Agreement States data a<e latest available as of 02/95. 1 Source Nuclear llegulatory Commission 56 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1995 fNFORMAT10N DIGEST 57 I

,I!l 9 Y d g 5 n T e y i E d !eo la oo n f tn F e t s u n at A m y r e c i s el mot ict S ie ahl ipta sc a rt a x xS yac i o,o n oe h i L f u r dr t r d pnb A et n pe e a r I ca fsa pht eat R d nn! at in vl ! E n eoa soU is oe r A s

r. ict tef nt u nin r f T

a,e tae e en as h h o r a unt ecj o e n o r l a M taepr vt i pa wlpr lain R la5nle dl f mim. un aa e ao v icr r l oeey A s hl e, 8 g c npa ctat la E d i u a pi smt ysn r u a L r slee s a e t n cdsn weta C a wt dfo u es n a - inm. da na g ie u mer U rt o N e r ino e cally n t e s v e vi r o yi e x f et p r i a cici oa Cr t s l le r i C u C u pli fa pnn 0 cn Rpoa R1 un R csc Nsifena S Nact N1 na r d na n o d .it tnM e t a v e o s p3 t for ya s ro p gb o ad s et e n taw r n yspn s. r a a p te r akl 3 s fa t foae Elat n i 0 i r e n dcc o n sc us au 0 R r t a i es gn fo n on. p c

0. W r

r pee e e T les ot gl c t 1 l 'einlifai ni amio psl et y et s r e p taMlty T l - e ud la mne n r n I a t c sni rasf r t o s o i tr n e c d a oad a, t f yd m u r E a posn s n e pr ns G ix n I e a, e m Dnrt ad a u oWa l t s n D r r a n s ooca 0 s r r a s nr eipit u n a p N M ia tapsg s yo l h r p r st t tae t e smfa n t e 0 ia nc d r u ee is aUse a tclacou np os e s T n A tc@c M u uicn a t od on le e r r c dob nf u i R f e i. n ao o Cni dWl taod c o s; f.is Ri 1 o l O n s t o n laes N Cor tan Njmt u c n c ia nu r F o r N r i e e o el ic i pi ie ot h uf mi C e t a t Rt cnpc 3t t nn Negs e iier R a 5 v NWm S. e pisnp t0 an mn PA 1 e ht vt ini 9 nd oa r c 9 t s ea s h U T

n. d T n 3

I a 'lga il[ 4 i ,a yfhj j g ( tt I ba e i f I N R O I J ED S g N DM S I pTP M M y'g.dn V h O y C $~ A A y%'. i%- Y F V 1? R O yg s. W T A H 4y. L i 3p{N E U O G R M i .Y ? R n f" 3 f A L E dO I L r(y M,fn C L } U tw I kH N %)*lf t 'd* 0 s R te o.' M ta S NM g{ g 1 n n em 7 g e wih: o r e gy WT to g A D} D h 2 N S 6 ~ gfd' $,E}d l i a n e s r e f~ .sg . 'f{,N ] i t g ia a w t a S n H o y 9.4 h, E-v g?85 w t p d is n n na is h e m a m k k n .i s r

y[',g-%$

e r la o C (%A z.Y 4 te e A. { W 4-s ry rg D $d' Ii A zt 1/ la 9 A I

- pG

>.f $ ; re u C f; 3QW,Ef..v ta 8 g tN%jM%t(%#b f[j. y[ihi k Ag[cjf? t fo a R yi, J-s 2 e p 5* 1 R A N

9. W g

) '. n r e j di 2h m s le d .v 9 e a c 9L i r O i r3% ' r ta 2 i C e u a N. j; e

[k,;,-

a r a D e ru f l' c ig D uc e ru g F t S c, i

-.. -.. - ~ ~ - _. 4 i l li f Internalianal Nuclear Sately and Safeguards j Radioactive The NRC participates in a broad program of i internabonal co0perabon related to nuclear

NRC and the Department of Energy,under g

{g3 { V satefy and sateguards. the U S. Cocperative Threat Reduction 4 Prcgram are also assisting theiJew 1 j

NRC has 33 arrangements /!etters of independent States of the former Soviet F

i agreement signed atth regulatory organiza-Union (FSU) that inhented the FSU's i trons These arrangements /tetters of nucfear arsenal (Kazakhstan. Russia and i agreement: Ukraine)in the areas of nuclear material v control and accounting, and physical 4 l - Ensure prompt notification of safety protection. I j problems that warrant action or } j investigation

NRCparticipatesintheprogramsof the g

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) ij - Provide for bilateral cooperation on and of tre Organization for Economic c i j nut! ear safety, sateguards. waste Cocperation and Development's Nuclear t i management.and environmental Energy Agency concerned with reactor p S j protection w;th: safety research and regulatory matters, j radiation protet. fica, waste management. j' - Argentina. Belgium Brazil, Canada, transportation, safeguards, standards, f 8 China. Czech Republic. Egypt, training, and technical assistance. Finland. France. Germany. Greece. 4 Hungary. Indonesia. Israel. Itafy.

NRC implements IAEA safeguards at NRC- ;

Japan. Kazakhstan. Korea. Lithuania, licensed nucl ear facilities in the U.S. and p 4 Merico. Netherlands. Peru. helps strengthen and maintain their [ M Phihppines. Russia. Slovak ettectiveness woridaide. Republic. Slovenia. South Africa, i Spatn. Sweden. Switzerland. Taiwan.

NRC licenses imports and exports of L

Ukraine and the United Kingdon nuclear facilities,equrpment, material,and E related commoddies. b

NRC is assisting Russia. Ukrame and L

Centraf and Eistern European countries

NRC is involved in approximately 45 joint !!

(Bulgaria. Hungary the Czech and Slovak international safety research agreements. h 4 Republics and Lithuania) that use Soviet-Participants share the funding, technical D designed reactors to improve nuclear safety support. and results of specific projects and d regu!ation. These assrstance efforts are programs. y carried out primanly through training, u working group meetings, exchange of J speciatists, and document exchanges. J a c v 13 i i i i l 60 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ' i

7 b 4: 'v RADI0ACTIVEWASTE U.S. Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal L Figure 30.1993 Volume of Low-Level Radioactive Waste Received at ll U.S. Disposal Facilities (Cubic Feet) Appronmately 800 thousand cubic feet of low-Active, Licensed Disposal Facilities: q level radioactrve waste was disposed in 1993. i a 45 percent decrease from the preceding year

Barnwell, South Carchna I

(see figures 30 and 31)- { g ACADEMIC

Hanford. Washington (restricted access e

(12K)

Industry e!! orts to minimize waste generation to only the florthwest and Rocky Mountain i MEDtCAL 2%

and to reduce the volume of waste by compacts) (5K) cornpaction and incineration have contrib-i, 1% l uted to the decrease

Clive. Utah (restricted to only Class A low p J

N actnnty, high volume waste. e g. slightiy 4 GOVERfMEriT 7

The f4RC has deve!cped a classificahon contaminated soil) 3 I

(95K) system for low-level waste based on its l 12 % pettohal hazards. and has specified disposat Other Disposal Facilities: and waste form requirements for each of the "* "' m three general classes of waste-A, B, and C.

Ward Va!!ey, Cahfornia (hcensed in 1993, !

Class A waste contains lower concentrations condshoned upon future ownership of the 1 of radicactive material than Class C waste. site by the State, action is being challenged ! in courI) SOURCE The volume and radioactivity of waste vary from y year to year based on the types and quanhties

Beatty,fievada(ceaseddisposaloperations 4 Totat Arnount Receive!.

of waste shipped each year (see Figures 31 on January 1,1933) y 792 Thousand Cutac Faet and 32) 'j Disposal Facilities Under License k The Low-level Radioachve Waste Pohcy Review by the Agreement State Amendments Act (LLRWPAA) of 1985 Regulatory Authorities: [ authonzed j CLASS C

Boyd County, flebraska i

(14K)

formahonof regionalcompacts;nine r

2% compacts now active (see Table 14 and

HudspethCounty Texas CLASSB Figure 33)

N

Wake County, florth Carolina W
Exclusion of waste generated outside a compact
System of rnilestones,incenhves, and penalties to ensure that States and compacts f

f will be responsible for their own waste fj-If CLASS I d h' classification of aas'e, however,is a complex process. For mere information, vote Class A easte contains lower concentrations of radioactive material than Class C easte Determinahon of the rounded to the nearest thousand cubic feet and percentages are rounded to the nearest who!e number. Totals do not equal sum of components due to rounding { Source DOE 1993 State-t:y-State Assessment of Lew-level Radioachve Wastes Received at Commercial Disposal i Sites (DOE!LLW-205).(page A 1 andpage A-2) h 62 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION k 1995 INFORMATION DIGEST 63

i l RADIDACTIVEWASTE J I Figure 31. Volume of Low-Level Waste Received at Oigure 32. Radioactivity of Low-Level Waste Received at U.S. Disposal Facilities,1984-1993 U.S. Disposal Facilitics,1984-1993 2 VOLUME (Thousarids of Cubic Feet) RADIDACTIVITY (Thousands of Curies) m , io -h 2.619 d f-867 ..y L mum g: j,; f h 2500 800 749 ifd I 8 L~ T iw iN f. (k h 2000 Y. .i 1.805 1.842 [ 601 h if;4 i d. 548 i yN y 'iE "I" 1.626 i 600 m y g f$ M 1.369 .jj h; k'f he T. ji p,'{I i 1500 '. I, j6 h T lis. ij %}d 1.143 l? O b i6 1000 LI 1y;2-c. c g 1 400 g. gp mg r

c.,

4 w %a 270 ~60 d2 D W vi W A y' j h'M ME M h'i 234 "h bI lp^ I !.k b h e ~,4 gj w[ 200 'y

d 6

Po w 4; h M@ iin 7 7 .t3 $m W W 4 v:j j a. 500 i 4"i dj Lh 3,.3 ff .'4< 't ,T) Q s.t 3 g x.u. . 9, m 4 4 g y m u E I Y h ih h h$ h 7 l kN Eh b d YN li l M 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 :? 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 YBR 5 YBR $4 i e Ts L "gamcu rt>4;qW m n @g -J:4tp i tsijj?IlIANFORDpph..,f,;g 4 e (.ghj q e L J g

E*'

1993 VOLUME BY DISPOSAL FACILITY F 1993 RAD 10 ACTIVITY BY DISPOSAL FACILITY fMe Volumes are rounded to the nearest thousand cubic feet and percentages are rounded to the nearest hficie Rad cactmty is rounded to the nearest thousand curies and percentages are rounded to !!c nearest ahole riumber. t sholenurnber. Source DOE 1993 State-by-State Assessment of low-level Radioactive Wastes Received at Commercial Disposal (M Source: DOE 1993 State-by-State Assessment of Lon-Level Radioactive Wastes Received at Commercial Doposal Sees (DOE /LLW-205). Tatie 2 (page 61 { Sites (DOEALW-205). Table 2(page6) dy 64 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ' 1995 INFORMATION DIGEST 65

x, RADIDACTIVEWASTE '.% !4 U.S. Low-Level Waste Colnpacts Figure 33. U.S. Low-Level Waste Compacts Percent of Total Volume Percent of TotalVolume of Low-LevelWaste of Low-Level Waste Crmp Disposed in 1993 Compact Disposed in 1993 NORTHWEST i Nertimst 19% Central Midwest 8% WA ~ Alaska I!!>nois" 3 Mit y 5 Kentucky MI I d Hawaii 4 Appalachian 8% OR Montana Wre g L R! Oregon MWand R Utan WY y NORTHEAST OH APPALACHIAN Washington-West Virginia \\ IN CT Wyoming 5 Northeast 5% South:estern 4% UT M0 FA Connecticuta ( NJ k ve mese,- Cahfornia" W O DC North Dakota Southeast 35 % D ROCKY CENTRAL South Dakota MOUNTAIN !NTERSTATE Rocky Mountain 5% Georgia CENTRAL Colorado" NE pag 33g q tt MtDWEST Neva@ North Carclina" New Mena South Carolma-I gy Midxest 3% Tennessee p KS Indiana Virgmia SOUTHWESTERN Unaffiliated States 12 % unnesota og District of Columbia <01% NO j AR VA M'ssou" Maine' 0% r SOUTHEAST Ohio" j j Wisconsin g Hh husetts - 3% Michigan 0% CA SD 1 ! j LAj] SC Centrallaterstate 3% New Hampshire 0% 1 E GA Arkansas New York" 7% j$ M Al Kansas Puerto Rico 0% O ,~ p s-@ll{l' l Louisena RhodeIsland 0% f l h, Texas"* 1% AZ Neoraska" Oklahoma Vermont' O6% f-g" yt

CurrentHostState(2) g

" Selected Host State (12) d em (3) 1 5 O Licensed Disposal Site -Operarens Conditened on Site Ownership (Under Litigation) (1) O ApprovedCompact(9) fue.Dataasof 01/25/95. A!askaandHawaii flote. Totais do not equal sum of components due to independent round6ng E3 UnathliatedState(10) ong westCornpact MoRa Source-DOE 1933 State-by-State Assessment of Low-Level Rascactrve Wastes Received at Commercial Dtsposal Sites (DOE /LLW-205). Table 1 (pages 3 and 4) and the Nuclear Regulatory Commisssion Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission 66 . NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1995 INFORMATION DIGEST 67

i l RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE I j { U.S. High-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Figure 34. Conceptual Design of the U.S. High-Level Waste Repository l E ] Appicumately 21000 metnc tons o! spent . Theuisposalot high-levelradicadivewaste ! suaract racam nucicar fuel is stored at comrnercial r:uclear requires a determination of acceptable health i NW *'" l power reactors as of 1993 By the year 2001 and environmental impacts over thousands i runrat UE*@ this amountis expected to inuease to of years es*

ams I

j 48.000 metrjp tons (see Tabte 15) %%EI [g$ f

Current plans caff for the ultimate disposat e

,= w. UC[

In 1990. the !!RC amended its regulabens to of the waste in sohd form in a licensed deep,e authorite hcensees to store spent luel at stable geologic structure (see Figure 34 tar a J W

j the f1RC. Seven cask designs have received level waste repository), %o @[-';,- . A[ t j reactor sites in storage casks approved by conceptual design of the candidate high-x # "I. w ~~, i cerhhcates of comphance as a resu!! of this j r rulechange(see Tat 9es 16 and 17)

The Amendments Act designated a candidate j

< i' i site for a high-level waste repository at T he tioctear Waste Pchty Act of 1982 and the YuccaMountam,tievada. 00Eisdetermin f. haclear Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1987 ing site suitabihty. l-i specify a detaced approach for high-tevel g p radioactrve waste deposal, with the Department . U:timately. any high-level waste reposetary j of Energy (DOE)havirigoperahonalresponsi-willrequire an tiRC license. 4 bility and the fiRC havmg regutatory responsibihty for the transportahon. storage. ( and geologic d!sposalof the waste. [ ] l r dnsw ] 4 d A i i 1 /* A [. k Source. Pc'er Meer and Perre Mion. National Geographic Society C. Reproduced by permission. i ] Further reproduction prohibited. N 68 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION $ 1995 INFORMATION DIGEST 69

) RADIOACTiVEWASTE 1 Tatie 15. Spent Nuclear Fuel Stored at U.S. Commercial Nuclear P ' ReaCI8'5 l Table 16. NRC-Approved Dry Spent Fuel Storage Designs Total Metric Tons by State

1 f

Storage Certificate of l Design Compliance Stata 1993 2003 State 1993 2003 j Storage Design Capacity Approval Approval

Vendor Model (Assemblies)

Date Date Mabama 1.352 2.165 Mississippi 299 606 ! Generaittuclear Metal Cask 21PWR 09/30/1985 08/17/1990 Are na 424 1.167 Missouri 239 469 j Systems, incorporated CASTORV/21 b Vectra Technologies. Concrete Module 7PWR 03/28/1986 Arkansas 551 883 ?Jebraska 551 820 f incorporated t1UHOMS-7 Ca!stema 1 342 2235 flew Hampshire 64 296 k Westinghouse Metal Cask 24 PYa 09/30/1987 08/17/1990 f Colorado 15 15 flew Jersey 1.058 1.840 Electric MC-10 f( Foster Wheeler Energy CorneteVault 83 PWR or 03/22/1988 Connecticut 1.224 1.756 New York 1.724 2.599 Florida 1.302 2.122 tiorth Carolita 1.091 1.930 ~ Applications. Modular Vact! 150 BWR Incorporated Dry Store I $ Nuclear Assurance Metal Cask 26 PWR 03/29/1988 08/17/1990 Ge0f 9 a 916 1.745 Ohio 349 811 3H'nois 3.551 6.197 Oregon 359 359 Nuclear Assurance Metal Cask 28 Canisters 09/29/1988 08/17/1990 lowa 235 358 Pennsywania 2.275 4201 Corporation f1AC-C28 S/T (tuei rods .j from 56 PVM gaasas 189 411 South Carolina 2.042 3.403 assemblies) Loesana 318 791 Tennessee 376 1.006 Vectra Technologies. Concrete Module 24 PWR 04/21/1989 Mame 426 535 Texas 320 1.130 Maryland 576 905 Vermont 366 501 Transnuclear. Metal Cask 24 PWR 0 7/05/1989 11/04/1993 Incorporated TN-24 fj Massachusetts 429 571 Virginia 1.115 1.805 Nuclear Assurance Metal Cask 28 PWR 02/01/1990 WChigan 1.a94 1.959 Washington 189 402 h Corporation t1AC-128/ST ennesota 839 1,138 Wisconsin 777 1.113 I PacificSierra VentilatedCask 24 PVO 03/29/1991 05/07/1993 Nuclear Associates VSC-24 Total 28.047 48.244 y" Vectra Technctogies. Concrete Module 24 PWR f4/A 01/23/1995 incorporated Standardized 52 BWR NUHOMS-24P NUHOMS-52B late Values include spent nuclear fuel stored at forrnerly operating reactors and exclude sperd fuel stored d DOE tacilities Note FWR-Pressurized-WaterReactor.EYS-BoilmgVaterReactor 'ource DOE Spent Fuel Storage Requirements 1993-2040 (DOE /RW-0431). September 1994 ~ Source fluclear Regulatory Commission 0 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1995 LNFORMATION DIGEST 71

_..m . ~... _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ i .i, 11 Table 17. NRC Dry Spent Fuel Storage Licensees e SS i Reactor Name Datr Storage Utility is.w ed Vender Modet Surry 1.2 General Nuclear Metal Cask Virginia Electrre & 07/02;t986 Systems. CASTOR V/21 Power Corrpany incorporated i H. B. Robinson 2 Vectra Tech : ologies. Concrete Module Carolina Power & OP 13/1986 incorporated NUHOMS-7 Light Company i Oconee 1. 2.3 Vectra Technologies. Concrete Modute Duke Power Company 01/29/1990 incorporated NUHOMS-24P Fort St Vrain Foster Wheeler Modular Vaun Pubhc Service 11/04/1991 Energy Applications. DryStore Company of Colorado incorprated l l Calvert Ch!!s 1. 2 Vectra Technologies. ConcreteModute l Batt;more Gas & 11/25/1992 incorporated HUHOMS-24P ( Electr!c Company Paksades Under General Pacitic Sierra Ventilated Cask I l Consumer Power License Nuclear VSC-24 l Company 05/11/1993 Associates l Pratrie island 1. 2 Transnuclear. Metal Cask j Northern States Incorporated TN-40 Pcwer Company g i Rancho Seco Vectra Technologies. Concrete Module l Sacramento Municipal Incorporated NUHOMS-24P thhty District I I i i I i .I l

Apphcation Received

. Source-Nuclear Regulatory Commission { 72 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I i

h 0 Appendix A Abbreviations Used in Appendices U.S. Commerical Nuclear Power Reactors j ACEC0%1N Belgan Consortnen w.tn Westmghouse JONES-J A Jones l AE: Archited-Engneer KAIS: Kaiser Eng neers 19g11994 i l AECL: Atomic Energy of Canada. Ltd KWti Kraftwerk Union.Siemens AG nt Con Type CPIssued Average ' Operating Utility NSSS OLIssued License Capacity AEE-Atomenergoexport LIC. TYPE: License Type tacation NRC AE Licensed Net Comm. Op Type & Factors AEP. Arnencan Electric Power CP: Construchon Perm.t Docket Number Region Constructor MWt MDC Exp. Date Number (Percent) AGr1 Aerolet-General Nucleonrcs OL-FP: Operatog License-Full Power B&R Burns & Roe OL-LP: Operating License-Low Power hs Nudear 1 IV FWR-ORYAMB 2568 0836 12/06/1968 OL-FP 89 3 B&W. Babcock & Wilcox MDC: Maximum Dependable Capacdy-Net Er'tergy 0perations. Inc B&W LLP 05/2tn974 DPR-51 79 3 l BALD. Baldw n Associates MHt MdsubishiHeavyindustries L!1 6 MI WNW of Russellvitie. AR BECH 12/19/1974 83 7 BECH. Bechtel MWe: Megawatts Electrical 050-00313 BECH 05/20/2014 98 3 BRRT: Brown & Roct MWI Megawatts Therma! I BWR Boihng-Water Reactor NIAG: Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Arkansas Nudear 2 IV PWRWWB 2815 0858 ? COMB-. Combusbon Engmeenng NPF: Nuclear Power Facihty Entergy Operations.Inc COMB CE /98 F6 0 COMM.OP Dateof Comme cialOperabon NSP: Northern States Power Company 6 Mt WNW of Russel:vitie. AR BE CON TYPE: Conta nment Type NSSS: Nuclear Steam System Supplier & 0 $ 00368 89 3 DRYAMB. Dry. Ambient Pressure Design Type DRYSUB Dry.Subatmospheric 1: GE Type 1 Be Vancy 1 I PWR-DRYSUB 2652 0810 06/26D970 OL-FP 522 HTG-H:gh-Temperature Gas-Cooled 2-GE Type 2 @t Cc WEST 3tP 07/02D976 DPR 66 88 5 17 M1 W d M@@ess. PA S&W 10/01n976 61 4 ICECND. Wet ice Condenser 3. GE Type 3 0 % 00334 S&W 01/29/2016 77 6 LMTB Liguid Metal Fast Breeder 4 GE Type 4 MARK 1: Wet Mark I 5. GE Type 5 Beaver Valley 2 1 PWR-DRYSUB 2652 0820 05/03/1974 OL-FP 94 1 MARK 2. Wet. Mark 11 6: GE Type 6 Duquesne Light Co WEST 3LP 08d4/1987 NFF-73

84 l

MARK 3. Wet. Mark til 2LP: Westmghouse Two-Loop 17 M1 W of McCandless.PA S&W 11/17D987 72 4 ] OCM. Organic Coo ed & Moderated 3LP: Westinghcuse Three-Loop 050-00412 S&W 05/27/2027 97 8 j PTHE Pressure Tube. Heavy Water 4LP: Westinghouse Four-Loop I SCF: Sodium Cooled. Fast CE: Combustion Engineering Belletonte 1-It PWR-DRYAMB 0000 1235 12/24/1974 CP 1 SCGM: Sodiurn Cooled. Graphite Moderated CE80: CE Standard Design Tennessee Vaney Authority B&W RLP (DER) CPISSUED: Date of Construction Permit issuance LLP: B&W LoweredLoop 6 Mt NE of Scottsboro. AL TVA CPPR. Construdion Permit Power Reador RLP: B&W Raised Loop 050 @ 438 M CWE: Commonwealth Edison Company OLISSUED. Dateof Latest FullPower Operating CX: Crihcal Assembly License BWontd-H PWR-DRYAMB 0000 1235 12/24/1974 CP TennesseeVaney Authonty B&W RLP (DER) CPPR-123 - DANL Daniet International PG&E: Pacihc Gas & ElectricCompany 6MINEof Scottsboro AL TVA ~ DBDB. Duke & Bechtel PSE: Pioneer Services & Engineering 050 @ 439 TVA DER. Design Electric Rating PUBS: Pubhc Service Electric & Gas Ccmpany DPR: Demonstration Power Reactor PWR. Pressurized-Water Reactor Big Rock Point m BWR-DRYAMB 0240 0067 05/31/1960 OL-FP 83 8 DUKE: Duke Power Company R: Fesearch Consumers Power Co. GE 1 05/01A%4 DPR-6 46 1 EBSO. Ebasco S&L: Sargent & Lundy 4 Mt NE of Charlevoa. Mi BECH 03/29n963 72 6 EXP. DATE: Expirahon Date of Operating License S&W: Stone & Webster 050-00155 BECH 05/31/2000 69 9 FRAM. Framatome SBEC: Southem Services & Bechtel FLUR: Fluor Pioneer SSL Southern Servicesincorporated Bradnood I IU P WDRYAMB 3411 1120 12/3th975 OL-FP 50 8 G&H. Gibbs & Hill TNPG: The Nuclear Power Grcup Commonwea?h Edison Co. WEST 4LP 07/02n987 NPF-72 72 7 GCR: Gas-Coo!ed Reactor TOSH: Toshiba 2 SSW dJodeR 07/295 988 88 6 GE: Genera! Electric TR. Test Reactor g 10n7/2026 75 3 GHDR: Gibbs & Hdi & Durham & Rtchardson TVA. Tennessee Valley Authority Braidwood 2 tu PWR-DRYAMB 3411 1120 12/316 975 OL-FP 66 6 G!L: Gilbert Associates UE&C: United Engineers & Constructors Commonwealth Edison Co. WEST ALP 05/20/1988 NPF-77 89 0 GPC: Gmgia Power Company UTR: Universal Training Reactor 24uisswogjoitetit S&L 10/17D988 74 9 HlI: Hitachi WDCO: Westinghouse Development Corporation 050-00457 CWE 12n8/2027 6 HWR: Pressurized Heavy-Water Reactor WEST: Westinghouse Electric g 74 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1995 INFORMATION DIGEST 75

I t Appendix A. U.S. Commercial Iluclear Power Reactors (Continued) 1991-1994 'l Ml# Unit Con Type CPIssued Average s Unit Con Type CPissued Averste Operating Utility NSSS OLissued License Capacity 70perating Utility NSSS DLissued License Capacity Location NRC AE Licensed Net Comm. Op Type & Factors

Location NRC AE Licensed Net Co: nm.Op Type & Factors 1

Dock;t Number Region Construttor MWt MDC Esp. Date Number (Percent)

Docket Number Region Constructor MWt MOC Erp. Date Number (Percent)

Brownsferyr 1 11 BnR-MARK 1 3293 1065 05n0n%7 CL-FP 0 Calvert Cidis 2 i PWR-DRYAMB 2700 0840 07/07A969 OL-FP 50 3 Tennessee va>y Autho'ity GE 4 12/20n973 DPR-33 0

Battimore Gas & Electric Co COMB CE 11/30n976 DPR-69 90 9 10 M1 PTN of Decatur. At TVA 08/01/1974 0

! 40 MI S of Annapoi!s, MD BECH 04/01n977 68 6 050 @ 259 TVA 12/20/2013 0 l 050@318 BECH 08/31/2016 89 8 Browns ferry 2 11 BWR-MARK 1 3293 1065 05n0/1%7 OL-FP 413 Catasta t Il PWR4CECND 3411 1129 08/07/1975 OL-FP 67.4 TennesseeVal!ey Authonty GE 4 0&"J2A974 DPR-52 69 7 Duke Power Co WEST 4LP 01/17/1985 NPF-35 70 9 10 M1 PTN of Decatur. Al TVA 33Mtn975 61 9 6 M1 flNW of Rock Hdl. SC DUKE 06/29/1985 76 6 0 % 00260-TVA 06/28/2014 78 1 !050-00413 DUKE 12/06/2024 98 9 Browns ferry 3 BWR-MARK 1 3293 1065 07/31/1968 OL-FP 0 h Catamba 2 U PWR-ICECND 3411 1129 08/070 975 OL-FP 73 5 Tennessee Valley Authonty GE 4 08/18/1976 DPR-68 0 y Duke Poner Co. WEST 4LP 05d5n986 NPF-52 93.5 10 Mt NW of Decatur. AL TVA 03/01/1977 0 % 6 Mt NNW of Rock HalSC DUKE 08/19/1986 82 5 050-00296 TVA 07/02/2016 0 3 050 @ 414 DUKE 02!24/2026 77 6 BrunswEk 1 11 8%Rt/ ARK 1 2436 0767 02/07A970 OL-FP 65.4 Clinton ill BWR-MARK 3 2894 0930 02/24n976 OL-FP 74 2 Carchna Power & Light Co. GE 4 11A2/1976 DPR-71 27.1 h lilinois Power Co. GE 6 04/17/1987 NPF42 60 4 M M! E of Clinton. Il S&L 11/24n987 72 2 2 MI N of Southport.NC UE&C 03 nan 977 -1.0 6 0W00325 BRRT 09/08/2016 88.6 $ 050-00461 BALD 09/29/2026 91 0 Brunsark 2 Il BWR-MARK 1 2436 0754 02M7/1970 DL-FP 55 1 $ Comanche Peak t IV PWR-DRYAMB 3411 1150 12n9n974 Ot-FP 53 2 Carchna Power & Legnt Co GE 4 12/27D974 DPR 62 19 0 3 Texas Utames Electnc Co WEST 4LP 04/17n990 NPF-87 68 6 2 MI N of Southport.NC UE&C it;03D975 60.2 l 4 MI N of Glen Rose.TX G&H 08n3/1990 71 0 050-00324 BRRT 12/27/2014 72.8 j 050-00445 BRRT 02/08/2030 70 9 h Byron 1 III PWEDRYAMS 3411 1105 12/31n975 OL-FP 65 2 Comanche Peak 2 IV PWR-DRYAMS 3411 1150 12n96974 OL-FP Commonneatth Edison Co WEST 4LP 02/14n985 NPF-37 92.6 i Texas Uhtmes Elecnic Co. WEST 4LP 04/06/1993 twt-89 17 Mi SW of Rockford,it S&L 09/16d985 76.0 bc4 M1 N of Glen Rose.IX BECH 82 8 050-00454 CWE 10/31/2024 76 1 % 050-00446 BRRT 0242/2033 52.2 n Byron 2 Ill PWR-DAYAMB 3411 1105 12/31A975 OL-FP 90.6 ' Cooper IV BWR4tARK1 2381 0764 06/04A968 OL-FP 71 8 Commonwea:th Edison Co. WEST 4LP 01/30/1987 NPF-66 72.0 Nebraska Pubbc Power Distoct GE 4 01/18n974 DPR-46 92 8 17 Mi SW of Rockford.!L S&L 08/21D987 78.8 h 23 Mi S of Nebraska City.NE B&R 07/01n974 55 5 050 @ 455 CWE 11/06/2026 98.2 050-00298 B&R 01/18/2014 33 3 h CrystalRiver3 Callaway I!! PWR-DRYAMB 3565 1115 04/16/1976 OL-FP 101 3 ll PWR-DRYAMB 2544 0818 09/25/1968 OL-FP 75 9 Union EWnc Co. MST 4LP 10/180 984 NPF-30 81.9 Florida Power Corp B&W LLP 01/28n977 DPR-72 73 5 to Mi SE of Fulton.M0 BECH 12/19/1984 85.5 h 7 Mt NW of Crystal River.FL GIL 03n3n977 84 5 050-00483 DANI 10n8/2024 102.4 [ 050-00302 JONES 12/03/2016 82.9 Ca! vert Chlts t i P%%DRYAMB 2700 0835 07/07A%9 OL-FP 75 6 Davis-Besse ill PWR-DRYAMB 2772 0868 03/24/1971 OL-FP 76 3 Barhmore Gas & Electnc Co. COMS CE 07/31A974 DPR-53 56.8 i Toledo Edison Co. B&W LLP 04!22/1977 NPF-3 99 3 ( 21 Mi ESE ct Toledo.OH BECH 07/31A978 79 2 40 Mi S of Annapotrs.MD BECH 05/68M975 101.1 0 W 00317 BECH 07/31/2014 64.3 050-00346 BECH 04/22/2017 84 0 I Q (Continuedl 76 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1995 INFORMAT10:101 GEST 77

Appendix A. U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reacters(Continued) s i I 1991-1994 M 1-1994 gg Con Type CP issued Average f Unit Con Type CP issued Average Oparating Utility hsss CL issued License Capacity Operating Utility NSSS OLissued License Capacity Location NRC AE Licensed Net Comm. Op Type & Factors ' Location NRC AE Licensed Net Comm. Op Type & Factors Dochet Numser Region ConstrPCtor MWI MDC Exp. Date Number (Percent) . Docket Number Region Constructor MWI MDC Exp. Date Number (Percent) D C. Cock 1 111 PWR-ICECND 3250 1000 0125/1%9 OL-FP 83.2 . Ferm: 2 111 BW4 MARK 1 3430 1085 09/26/1972 OL-fP E6 7 Insana%chgan Pcwer Co WEST 4LP 10/25/1974 DPR-58 55 7 Detro4 Edison Co. GE 4 07/15/1985 hPF-43 T90 11 Mt S cf Benton Harbor, M1 AEP 08G8/1975 100 0 25 M1NE of Toledo.0H S&L OtR3/1988 87 2 050-00315 AEP 10/25/2014 65 7 050-00341 DANI 03/20/2025 0 7 Fort Calhoun N PWR-DRYAMS 1500 0478 06/07/1968 OL-FP 77.6 D C Cock 2 Di PWR-lCECND 3411 1060 03/25/1969 OL-FP 85 9 14 Omaha Public Power Distnd COMB CE 08 S 9/1973 DPR-40 60 4 lihaMdgn Pomer Co WEST 4LP 12/23/1977 DPR-74 11 Mr 5 of Ber: ton Harbor, Mi AEP 07/Df/t978 g;j 19 Mt N of Omaha.HE GHDR 09/26/1973 74 1 050-00316 - AEP 122 3/2017 38.0 050-00285 GHDR 0&O92013 98 4 Diablo Canyon 1 N PWR&YAMB 3338 1073 04/23/1968 OL-FP 78 3 Ginna i PWR-DRYAMB 1520 0470 04S 5/1966 OL-FP 84 6 ~ Rochester Gas & Dectnc Corp. WEST 2LP 12/10/1984 DPR-18 84 4 Pac 6c Gas & Dectric Co MST 4LP 11/02/1984 DPR80 79 0 122 m of San Luis PG&E 05/07/1985 06.0 20 MI NE of Rochester,NY GIL 07/01/1970 85 0 2MW8 f8.4 M4 BEH M&7T9 81 9 050 75 Grand Gulf 1 18 BWR-MARK 3 3833 1143 09M4/1974 OL-FP 91 1 Diabl0 Canyon 2 IV PWR-DRYAM8 3411 1087 12M9/1970 OL-FP 81 0 Entergy 0perations.Inc. GE 6 1151/1%4 NPF-29 81 4 Pacific Gas & Dectnc Co. WEST 4LP 08/26/1985 DPR-82 96.9 25 MI S of Wcksburg. MS BECH 07/01/1985 76 9 12 Mi WSW of San Luis PG&E 01<13/1986 81.8 050-00416 BECH 06/16/2022 96 0 Otnspo. CA pcgg 12/09a010 82.9 MW323 Haddam Neck i PWR-DRYAMB 1825 0560 0526/1964 OL-FP 74 9 CT Yankee Atomic Power Co. MST 4LP 12/27/1974 DPR-61 78 9 13 Mt E of Meriden, CT S&W 01/01/1968 76 2 Dresden 2 IV BWR-MARK 1 2527 0772 01/10/1966 OL-FP 55 9 43 4 050 @ 213 S&W 06/29/2007 77.4 Commor: wealth Edison Co GE 3 02/20/1991 DPR-19 9 Mt E of Monis. IL S&L 06 S 9/1970 45 0 050-00237 UE&C 01/10/2006 60.2 H. B. Robmson 2 11 PWR-DRYAMB 2300 0683 04/13/1967 OL-FP 80 0 Carolina Power & Lght Co. WEST 3tP 092 3/1970 DPR-23 671 Dresden 3 1:1 BWR-MARK 1 2527 0773 10/14/1966 OL-FP 37 9 26 Mi from Florence, SC EBSO 03/07/1971 70 0 Commonaealm Ed: son Co GE 3 03/02/1971 DPR-25 23$5 054 00261 EB50 07/31/2010 771 9 MI E of Morns. IL S&L 11/16/1971 73 3 M M249 UE&C 01/12/2011 24 0 Hcpe Creek 1 1 BWR MARK 1 3293 1031 11 & 4!1974 OL-FP 81 9 Pubhc Sennte Electric & Gas Co. GE 4 07n5/1986 NPF-57 77 9 Duane Arnold ill BWR-PERK 1 1658 0515 06/22/1970 OL-FP 91.9 18 Mt SE of Wilmmgton,DE BECH 12/20/1986 97 7 IES Utilmes. Inc. GE 4 02/22/1974 DPR-49 73 7 050-00354 BECH 04/11/2026 78.9 8 Mi ffN of Cedar Rapids. IA SECH 02/01/1975 71 1 1 050--00331 BECH 02/21/2014 91.1 Indian Point 2 i PWR-DRYAMS 3071 0951 10/14/1966 OL-FP 47.5 Consondated Edison Co. WEST 4LP 09/28/1973 DPR-26 95 7 72 24 MI N of New York City,NY UE&C 08/01/1974 72 0 Edom L Hatch 1 BWR-MARK 1 2436 0741 09/30/1969 OL-FP 94 4 6 050-00247 WDC0 09/28/2013 92.8 Georgia Pcwer Co. GE 4 10/13/1974 DPR-57 11 M1 N of Baxley. GA BECH 12/31/1975 76 7 M 00321 GPC 08/06/2014 84.8 Indian Point 3 l PWR-DRYAMB 3025 0965 08/13/1969 OL-FP 86 4 Power Authorityof theState WEST 4LP 04/05/1976 DPR-64 56 2 Edwal Hatch 2 11 BWR-MARK 1 2436 0765 12/27/1972 OL-FP 73.8 cf New York UE&C 08/30/1976 14 1 Georgia Power Co. GE 4 06/13/1978 NPF-5 69.8 24 Mt N of New York City, NY WDC0 12/15/2015 0 11 M1 N of Baxter.GA BECH 09/05/1979 75 4 050-00286 050-00366 GPC 06/13/2018 78 1 78 NUCLEAR REGULATCRY COMMISSION 1995 INFORMATION DIGEST I9

{ Appetidbr A. U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors (Con /nmer!) T N I igg 11994 t' 1991 1994 Unit Con Type CPtssued Average j Unit Con Type CPIssued Average Operating Utifify NSSS OLissued License Capacity Operating Utility NSSS OLissued License Capacity Locatirn NRC AE Licensed Net Comm. Op Type & Factors ! Location NRC AE Licensed Net Comm. Op Type & Factors D rcket Number Region Constructor MWt MCC hp, Date Numtier (Percent) t Docket Number Region Constructor MWt MDC Erp. Date Number (Percent) James A FdzPatrick l BWR-MARK 1 2436 0774 05/20n970 Ot-FP 49 4 McGuire 1 11 PWR-ICECND 3411 1129 02/23/1973 OL-FP 69 2 Pcer Aut?d.fy of the State GE 4 10n7D974 DPR-59 0 l Duke Power Co WEST ALP 07/08n981 NPF-9 75 5 of New York S&W 07# 8/1975 69 5 [ 17 Mt S of Charlotte.NC DUKE 12/01n981 55 8 8 MI NE of Oswego, NY S&W 1057R014 73 4 050-00369 DUKE 0542/2021 69 5 050-00333 r McGuire 2 It PWR tCECND 3411 1129 02/23n973 OL-FP 96 2 Joseph M Farley 1 11 PWR-DRYAMB 2652 0812 08/16'1972 OL-FP 75.9 Duke Power Co. WEST 4LP 05/27D983 NPF-17 68 4 Southern Nuclear Operatmg Co WESF 3tP 06!25/1977 NPF-2 79 2 7 mis of Chartotte.NC DUKE 03/01n984 68 8 18 MI SE of Dothan AL SSI 12!01/1977 %5 50-00370 DUKE 03/03/2023 87 5 050 00343 CANI 06/25/2017 85 2 [ Mastone l i BWRMARK1 2011 0641 05n9n966 OL-FP 30 6 Joseph M Farley 2 il PWR-DRYAMB 2652 0822 085 6/1972 OL-FP 93.4 I Northeast Nuclear Energy Co. GE 3 10/31n986 DPR-21 62 9 Southern tbxtear Operahng Co WEST 3tP 03/31/1981 tAPF-8 74 7 I 3 2 M1WSW of New London. CT EBSO 03/01/1971 93 9 18 Mi SE of Dothan. Al S$f 07/30n981 72 3 050 00245 EBSO 10/06/2010 58 5 050 00364 BECH 03/312 021 99 3 Miltstone 2 i PWR-DRYAMB 2700 0873 12n t/1970 OL-FP 522 Kenavnee UI PWR-DRYAM8 1650 0511 08.06n968 OL-FP 82 2 Northeast Nuclear Energy Co. COMB CE 09/30n975 DFS65 35 3 Wisconsm Puthc Service Corp. WESI 2LP 12!21n973 DPR-43 87.7 32 Mt WSW of New London CT BECH 12/26n975 82 3 27 Mr E of Green Bay Wf PSE 06n60974 85 3 1 050-00336 BECH 07/31/2015 47 8 050-00305 PSE 12/21/2013 88.5 Mdistone 3 i FWWDRYSUB 3411 1137 08/09n974 OL-FP 28 5 la Saffe County I 4! BGMARK2 3323 1036 09n00973 OL-FP 75 2 Nariheast Nuclear Energy Co. WEST 4LP 01/31/1986 NPF-49 65 8 Commonetatth Edison Co. GE 5 0833n982 NPF-11 70 9 3 2 MI WSW of New London.CT S&W 04/23n986 65 1 11 MISE of Ottawa. Il S&L 01/01/1984 79 3 050 @ 423 S&W 11R5/2025 94 5 050 4 373 CWE 05nTn022 54 2 Monticello BWR-MARK 1 1670 0536 0609D967 OL-IP 76 6 u Saue County 2 1:1 BWR-MARK 2 3323 1036 09D0/1973 OL-FP 96 0 Northem States Power Co. GE 3 01/090 981 DPR-22 94 6 Comrnonweafth Edrson Co GE 5 03/23D984 NPF-18 63.5 k 30M1NWof Minneapolis MN BECH 06/30n971 82 3 11 Mi SE of Ottana. IL S&L 10n98984 64.4 C 050-00263 BECH 09/08/2010 84 3 050 4 0374 CWE 12n6/2023 92.9 Nme Miie Point 1 I BWR MARK 1 1850 0565 04/12n965 OLJP 11 9 litnencki i BWR-MARK 2 3293 1055 0609n974 OL-FP 88.0 Niagara Mohawk Power Corp GE 2 12/268 974 DPR C 54 2 PECO Energy Co GE 4 08/088 985 NPF-39 672 6 MI NE of Osmego. NY NiAG 12/01n969 88 0 21 M1 NW of Philade!phia PA BECH 02/01n986 94 6 050-00220 S&W 08/22/2009 99 4 050 40352 BECH 10/26/2024 85.0 Nine Mile Point 2 i BWR-MARK 2 3323 0994 06/24D974 OL-FP 68 6 Lamenck 2 l BWR-MARK 2 3293 1055 06/190 974 OL-FP 77 3 I thagara Mohawk Power Corp. GE 5 07/02D987 NPF-69 54 5 FIC0 Energy Co GE 4 08/25D989 NPF-85 91 6 6MINE of Oswego.NY S&W 03D1n988 82 6 "y 05040410 21 MI NW of Philadelphia. PA BECH 01/08D990 80 8 S&W 10/31R026 96 0 050-00353 BECH 06/22/2029 921 3 h North Anna l H PWSDRYSUB 2893 0900 02D9D971 OL-FP 70 5 Mame Yankee i PWR DRYAMB 2700 0860 10/21n968 OL-FP 85.1 l ! Virginia Electric & Power Co WEST 3LP 04/01/1978 NPF-4 70 6 Maine Yankee Atomic Power Co COMB CE 06/29D973 DPR-36 70.9 40 M1NW of Richmond.VA S&W 06/060 978 73 1 to MIN of Bath. ME S&W 12/28n972 76 2

3 050-00338 S&W 04/01/2018 86 2 050 40309 S&W 10/21/2008 88.0

}i (Centmued ,i:4 11 80 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION h 1995 INFORMATION DIGEST 81

Appendix A. ILS. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors (Continued) c 1991-1994 1 1991-1994 Unit Con Type CP issued Average Unit Con Type CPIssued Average Operatmg Utility NSSS DLissued License Capacity Operating Utility NSSS Ot issued License Capacity location NRC AE Licensed Net Comm. Op Type & Factors

Location NRC AE Licensed Net Comm. Op Type 8 Factors Docket Number Region Constructor MWt MDC Exp. Date Number (Percent j Docket Number Region Constructor MW1 MDC Exp. Date Number (Percent)

Nceth Anna 2 II PWEDRYSUB 2893 0887 02/19/1971 OL-FP 96 5

Peach Bottom 2 i

BWR MARK 1 3458 1093 01/31/1968 OL-FP 54 8 Vagmia Eiettnc & Pcser Co WEST 3tP 08/21/1980 t&PF-7 79 2 ' PECO Energy Co GE 4 12/14/1973 DPR-44 61 2 40 MI NW cf R(.hrnand. VA S&W 12/14/1980 78 5 17.9 Mt S of Lancaster. PA BECH 07/05/1974 83 4 050 @ 333 S&W 08/21/2020 96.4 05 H 0277 BECH 0& 08/2013 77 8 Oconeet it P%R-DRYAMB 2568 0846 11/06/1967 OL-FP 81 2 Peu Bo:fom 3 1 B%RMARK1 3293 1035 01/31/1968 OL-FP 56 1 Dee Pcner Co B&W LLP 02/06/1973 DPR-38 84 5 rtC0 Energy Co. GE 4 07/02/1974 DPR-56 79 0 30 M1 W of Greeanne, SC D8DB 07/15/1973 88 0 17 9 MI S of Lancaster, PA BECH 12a3/1974 69 6 050 002fa DUKE 02/06/2013 82.1 j 050-00278 BECH 07/02/2014 978 Oconee 2 11 PWEDAYAMB 2568 0846 11/06/1967 OL-FP 100.2 Perry 1 111 BWRMARK3 3579 1166 05/03/1977 DL-FP 87.9 Oute Power Co B&W LLP

GTf41973 DPR-47 80 0 Cleveland Elecinc tuum nating Co.

GE 6 11/13/1986 NFF-58 70 0 30 MI W of Greenvae.SC 0B08 09/09/1974 84.1 7 M1 NE of Painesvi!!e,OH Gtt 11/18/1987 38 9 050-00270 DUKE 10/06a013 83 0 050-00440 KAIS 03/18a026 45 0 Oconee 3 11 PWR-DRYAMB 2568 0846 11/06/1967 OL-FP 75.4 Perry 2-In BWRMARK3 0000 1205 05/03/1977 CP Duke Power Co B&W LLP 07/19/1974 DPR-55 73 3 Cleveland Elecinc i:tummat ng Co GE 6 (DER; CPPR-149 - 30 M1 W of Greenvme.SC DBDS 12/16/1974 99 8 7 MI NE of Pamesvine.OH GIL 0 % 00287 DUKE 07/19/2014 76.5 050-00441 KAIS Oyster Creek i BWR-MARK 1 1930 0619 12/15/1964 OL-FP 54 7 Pilgnm 1 1 BWR-MARK 1 1998 0670 08a6/1968 OL-FP $8 4 GPU Nuclear Corp. GE 2 07/02/1991 DPR-15 84 5 Boston Edison Co GE 3 09/15/1972 DPR-35 80 6 9 Mi S cf Toms Rrver, NJ B&R 12/01/1 % 9 873 4 ulSE of Plymouth MA BECH 12/01/1972 74 0 050 4 0219 B&R 12/15/2009 67.8 i 050 00293 BECH EV8/2012 65 2 PaMades DI PWR-DRYAMB 2530 0730 03/14/1967 OL-FP 76 2 Point Beach t ill PWR-DRYAMB 1519 0485 07/19/1967 OL-FP 85 4 Consumers Power Co COMB CE 02/21/1991 DPR-20 75.9 Wisconsm Electnc Power Co WEST 2LP 10/05/1970 DPR-24 84 6 5 MI S of South Haven. M1 BECH 12/31/1971 55 4 13 Mt NNW of Manitowoc WI BECH 12/21/1970 89 5 050 00255 BECH 03/14/2007 70 6 0501J0266 BECH 10,95/2010 91 9 Palo Verde l IV P%RDRYAMB 3300 1221 05/25/1976 OL-FP 87.1 Point Beach 2 til PWR-DRYAMB 1519 0485 07/25/1958 OL-FP 86 8 h WisconsinElectricPowerCo. Anzona PutAc Semce Co COMB CE80 06/01/1985 NPF-41 66.4 WEST 2LP 03/08/1973 DPR-27 86 1 35 Ut W of Phoenix, AZ BECH 01/28/1986 70 3 13 ui nnw nt Man,towoc.WI BECH 10/01/1972 90 5 050-00528 BECH 12/31/2024 91.4 050-00301 BECH 03/08/2013 88 3 Palo verde 2 IV PWR-DRYAMB 3800 1221 05/25/1976 OL-FP 77.3 Prairie tsland 1 PWR-DRYAMB 1650 0513 06/25/1968 OL-FP 90 d Alizona Putmc Servite Co. C0M8 CE80 04/24/1986 NPF-51 94.4 Northern States Power Co. WEST 2LP 04/05/1974 DPR-42 79 1 36 MI W of Phoenix, AZ BECH 09/19/1986 47.9 28 MISE of Mmneapolis.MN FLUR 12/16/1973 98 9 050'00529 BECH 12/09/2025 61.5 050 4 0282 NSP 0&D9/2013 82 7 Pato verde 3 IV PWR-DRYAMB 3800 1221 05/25/1976 OL-FP 70.3 Prairielstand 2 Ill PWR-DRYAMB 1650 0512 06/25/1968 OL-FP 102 3 Anzona Put!ic Service Co COMB CE80 11/25/1987 NPF-74 78 2 Northern States Powar Co. WEST 2LP 10/29/1974 DPR-60 73.3 36 M1W ot Phoen!x, AZ BECH 01/08/1988 87.8 28 MI SE of M nneapolis MN FLUR 12/21/1974 85 0 050 4 0530 BECH 03/25/2027 63.8 050-00306 N5P 10/29/2014 101.5 4 (ContinuM) 82 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 19951NFORMAT10N DIGEST 83

4 4 3 Appendix A. II.S. Commercial Iluclear Power Reactors (Contited) ? I h 1991-1994 1991-1994 Ulit Con Type CPissued Average Unit Con Type CP isseed Average Operating Utility NSSS OLissued License Capacity f Operating Utility NSSS DLisseed License capacity Location NRC AE Licensed Net Com:n. Op Type & Factors Location NRC AE Licensed Net Comm. Op Type & Factors Docket Number Region Constructor MW1 MDC Erp. Date Number (Percent) h Docket Ntimber " legion Constructor MWt MDC Exp. Date Number (Percent) Quad Cit I!! 8%E MARK 1 2511 0769 02n5n967 Ol4P 52 5 [ Sequoyah 2 H PWR-tCECND 3411 1106 05/27A970 OL4P 94 8 Cornmon,ses t wearm Ecson Co. GE 3 12n4n972 DPR-29 611 Tennessee Vaney Authoary WEST 4LP 09n5n981 DPR-79 73 8 20 M1 NE cf Mohne.IL S&L 02n83973 74 9 9 5 M! NE of Chattanooga.TN TVA 0$!01n982 21 0 050-00254 UE&C 12/14/2012 24 8 050-00328 TVA OSn5/2021 60 2 Quad C$es 2 ill BWR-MARK 1 2511 0769 02n5n967 OL-FP 78 5 Shearon Harns i H PWR-DRYAMB 2775 0860 01/27d978 OL4P 78 6 Commonwealth Edison Co. GE 3 12n4/1972 DPR-30 57 7 Carohna Power & Light Co. WEST 3LP 01/12n987 NPF-63 71 6 20 MI NE cf Mohne.IL S&L 03n0n973 46 2 20 Ml SW of Raleigh.NC EBSO 05/02/1987 99 9 050 40265 UE&C 12n4/2012 59.6 j 050-00400 DAM 10/24/2026 80 4 River Bend 1 IV BAR MARK 3 2894 0936 03/25/1977 OL4P 81 6 I South iezas Prefect ! IV PWR DRYAMB 3800 1251 12/22n975 OL4P 65 8 Entergy Operations. Inc GE 6 11/20n985 NPF-47 33 6 Houston Lighting & Power Co. WEST 4LP 03/22n988 NPF-76 66 1 t 24 Mt NNW of Baton Rouge.LA S&W 0646A986 64.1 ] 12 MiSSW of Bay City.Tx BECH 08/25n988 6.1 050-00458 S&W 08/29/2025 59 6 .1 050-00498 EBSO 0S'20/2027 75 3 4 Salem t i PWR-DRYAMB 3411 1106 09/25n968 OL-FP 70.3 Soum Texas Project 2 IV PWR-DRYAMB 3800 1251 12/22n975 OL4P 66 2 Pubhc Sennce Dectre & Gas Co WEST 4LP 12/01/1976 DPR-70 54.5 Houston Lightmg & Power Co. WEST 4LP 03/28/1989 NPF-80 94 1 18 Mi S of Wdmington. DE PUBS 06/30n977 60 5 12 Mt SSW of Bay Cdy. IX BECH 06d9n989 63 050-00272 UE&C 08M3/2016 59 3 050-00499 EBSO 12n5/2028 54 7 Salem 2 I PWR-DRYAMB 3411 1106 09/25/1968 OL-FP 79 1 3 St Luciel n PV&DRYAMB 2700 0839 07/01/1970 OL-FP 78 8 Pubhc Service Det:ric & Gas Co. WEST 4LP 05/20/1981 DPR-75 48 6 ! Florida Power & Light Co. COMB CE 03S1n976 DPR-67 %9 18 MI S ot Wdmington. DE PUBS 10n3n981 572 1 12 MI SE of ft Pece.FL EBSO 12/21n976 73 9 050-00311 UE&C 04/18/2020 57.8 i 050-00335 EBSO 03/01R016 84 1 San 0 notre 2 lY PWR-DRYAMB 3390 1070 10n8n973 OL4P 61.5 l St Lucie2 ll PWR-DRYAMB 2700 0839 05/02/1977 OL4P 101 1 Southern Cahtomia Edison Co COMB CE 09/07/1982 HPF-10 93.6 Florda Power & Light Co COMB CE 06n0/1983 NPF-16 73 7 & San Diego Gas & Dectre Co. BECH O&V8/1983 81 6 A 12 M1 SE of FL Pece.FL EBSO 0&V8n983 64 1 4 MI SE of San Clemente.CA BECH 100 8/2013 99.3 } 050-00389 EBSO 04/062 023 76 3 050-00361 San Onofre 3 tv PWR-DRYAMB 3390 1080 10/18/1973 OLJP 91.9 ' Summer 11 PWR-DRYAMB 2775 0885 03/21/1973 OL-FP 68 9 Southern Cahtorma Ed: son Co COMB CE 09n68983 NPF-15 72 0 South Carolina Electrc & Gas Co. WEST 3LP 11/12/1982 NPF-12 %7 & San Diego Gas & Electre Co BECH 0001n984 75 2 26 M1 NW of Columte.SC GIL 01/01n984 78 7 4 MI SE of San Clemente.CA BECH 10/18/2013 97.0 050-00395 DANI 08/06/2022 57.3 050-00362 1 , Surry 1 Il PVADRYSUB 2441 0781 06/25n968 OL-FP %3 Seabrook 1 i PWR-DRYAMB 3411 1150 07/07A976 OL4P 67.6 i Virginn Elecinc & Power Co. YKST 3LP 05/250972 DPR-32 76 1 i North Atlanhc Energy WEST 4LP 03/15D990 NPF-85 77.g 17 MI NW of Newport News.VA S&W 12/22n972 91 1 Service Corp UE&C 08/19n990 89 8 050 4 0280 S&W 05/25/2012 71 4 13 MI S of Porthsrnouth.NH UE&C 103 7/2026 61 6 050-00443 Surry 2 PWR-DRYSUB 2441 0781 06/25n968 OL-FP $83 Virginia Electric & Poner Co. WEST 3tP 01/29/1973 DPR-37 93 7 Sequoyah1 It PWR4CECND 3411 1111 05/27D970 OL-FP 73 9 17 MI NW of Newport News.VA S&W 05/01n973 66 4 Tennessee Va!!ey Aumonty WEST 4LP 09/17D980 DPR-77 84.8 050 40281 S&W 01/29/2013 91.5 S 5 MI NE of Chattanooga, TN IVA 07/01n981 12 6 050-00327 TVA 090 7/2020 62 1 IC8CIS'#1 84 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1995 INFORMATION DIGEST 85

.5 d Appendix A. U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reacters(Continued) n f 1991-1994 1999 39,4 Unit Con Type CPissued Average g Unit Con Type CP issued Average Operating Utility NSSS Olissued License Capatti A Operating Utility NSSS DLissued License Capacity Location NRC AE Litensed Net Comm. Op Type & Factors b location NRC AE Licensed Net Comm. Op Type & Factors Docket Number Region Constructor MWt MDC Erp. Date Number (Percent) [ Docket Number Region Constructor MWt MDC Erp. Date Number (Percent) Susquehanna t i BWR-MARK 2 3293 1040 11/02n973 OL4P 96 8 Watertord 3 IV PWR-DRYAMB 3390 1075 11D4/1974 OL-FP 17.3 IS aIc PA BECH 5 Entergy Operahons. Inc. COMB CE 038 6/1985 NPF-38 80 T 050-00387 BECH 07D7/2022 92.4 p 20 Lt W of New Orleans. LA EBSO 0924n985 970 3 050-00382 EBSO 12n8/2024 84 2 Suse# anna 2 1 BWR-MARK 2 3293 1094 11,U2n973 OL-FP 76 9 PennsyNane Powes & Light Co GE 4 06/27A984 NPF-22 78.3 ,' Watts Bar 1" It PWR-ICECND 0000 1165 01/238 973 CP 7 MI NE o? Berwd. PA BECH 02/12D985 91 2 i TennesseeVa!!ey Author 4y WEST 4LP (DER) CPPR-91 0504)C388 BECH 03/23/2024 72.8 1 10 Mt S ct Sprog Cdy. TN TVA N TVA I; 050-00390 Three Mae'Islami t i PWR-DRYAMS 2568 0786 0$n8/1968 OL-FP 80.1 GPU Nuclear Corp B&W LLP 04n9/1974 DPR-50 100 5 d Watts Bar 2-11 PLWICECND 0000 1165 01/23M973 CP 10 Mt SE of Hamsburg. PA Gtt 09/026 974 86 6 p TennesseeValley Authorsty WEST 4LP (DER) CPPR-92 050 @ 289 UE&C 04n9/2014 95 7 j 10 M1 S of Spnng City. IN TVA Turkey Pomt 3 11 PWR-DRYAMS 2200 0666 04a70967 OL4P 22.5 p 050-00391 TVA Flooda Pceer & Light Co WEST 3tP 07D9n972 DPR-31 58 4 Il 25 Ml 5 of Miams. FL BECH 12n4n972 97 0 l] Won Creek 1 IV P%%DRYAVB 3565 1160 05/31n977 OL-FP 58 9 054 00250 BECH 07n9a012 84 4

I. Wott Creek Nuclear Operating

%IST 4LP 06/04d985 NPF-42 85 5

Corp BECH 09/03/1985 79 6

] 3 5 MI NE ot Burlington.KS Turkey Pornt 4 u PWR DRfAM3 2200 0666 G4/27H967 OL-FP 13 7 DANI 03nt/2025 84 7 Florida Pcwer & Light Co WEST 3tP 04D00973 DPR-41 79 3 054 00482 25 Mi S of Miam:. FL BECH 09/07A973 81 4 3 050-00251 SECH 04n0/2013 83 0 ] Zion 1 I!! P%%DRYAMS 3250 1040 12/26n968 OL-FP 46 8 Commonweatth Edison Co. WEST 4LP 10n9n973 DPR-39 45 0 Vermont Yadee i Ba% MARK 1 1593 0504 12/11n967 OL-FP 93.1 4 VT YarSce fadear Pomer Corp. GE 4 02/28n973 DPR-28 84.4 4 40 MI N ot Chicago. IL S&L 12/31n973 77 1 050-00295 CWE 04/06/2013 45 5 5 Mi S ct Brattletoro. VT EBSO 11/300 972 76.4 d 050-00271 EBSO 03/21/2012 97.8 F Vogue 1 N PWWDRYAMB 3565 1169 06/28/1974 OL-FP 77.8 ~ Zion 2 111 PWWDRYAMB 3250 1040 12/26n958 OL-FP 56 3 i Commonwea::h Edtson Co. WEST 4LP 11n4n973 DPR-48 58 7 Georgta Pcaer Co WEST 4LP G3n6/1987 NPF-68 96 1 40 MW of Crucago. IL S&L 09n7/1974 58.1 26 Mi SE cf Augusta. GA SBEC 06/01n987 85 7 j 0504)0304 CWE 11n4/2013 675 050-00424 GPC 01/16/2027 86.1 p Vog'ie 2 u PWR-DRYAMB 3565 1169 06/28/1974 OL-FP 92.6 l Georgia Power Co. WEST 4LP 03/31n989 NPF-81 79 7 3 26 Mi SE of Augusta.GA SBEC 05/20n989 87.1 M 050-00425 GPC 02M9/2029 91 2 j Washington Nuclear 1* IV PWR-DRYAMB 0000 1266 12/24D975 CP h Washington Pubic Pomer B&W LLP (DER) CPPR-134 - h Supply System UE&C 4 12 MINWof Rd!and.WA BECH U 050-0046u y i Washington Nuclear 2 IV BWWMARK2 3323 1086 03/19n973 OL-FP 44.3 h Washington Pubic Po.er GE 5 04n3D984 NPF-21 59 7 Naes

Deterred Construction (5)

Supply System B&R 12n3n384 75 0 i "Under Constructen (1) Iof Richland.WA BECH 12/20/2023 70 8 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Icensee data as compiled by the Nuclear Regulatory Ccmmisol fl 86 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION d 1995 INFORMATION DIGEST 87

i Appendix B sondix B. v.s. c==neecisi necient re er nuctas F===ir uceasse operse rcatw U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors ommmininin i Unit Con Type OLlssued Alternative Selected Formerly Licensed to Operate l tocanon Mwi Shut os.n Correni Stat.: Rancho Seco PWR 08/16/1974 SAFSTOR Herald. CA 2772 M/M W Ulit Con Type OLissued lie na e e c ed Location MWt Shutdown Current Status i San Onotre 1 PM 03/27/1967 SAFSTOR an Cm CA W WW Bonus

BWR 04/02/1964 ENTOMB

( Punta Higuera. PR 50 06/01/1968 ENTOMB Shepingpert

PWR N/A DECON CVTR "

PTHW 11/27/1962 SAFSTOR I "9 ^ Parr, SC 65 01/01/1 % 7 SAFSTOR 1 Shoreham BWR 04/21/1989 DECON 3" Dresden t BWR 09/28/1959' SAFSTOR Morns. lL.- 700 10/31/1978 SAFSTOR i Three Mile Island 2 PWR 02/08/1978 (3) j ndeny wnsh A 0 MM E!k Rwer

BWR 11/06/1 % 2 NCON Elk Rwer, MN 58 02/01/1968 DECON Completed

{ Trojan PWR 11/21/1975 DECON Fermil SCF 05/10/1963 SAFSTOR f .OR 3m WW W L agoona Beach. MI 200 09/22/1972 SAFSTOR Yankee-Rcwe PWR 12/24/1963 SAFSTOR annn Coup m MM D Fort St Vram HIG 12/21/1973 DECON {5) Platteville.CO 842 08/18/1989 DECONin Progress GE VBWR BWR 08/31/1957 SAFSTOR Pleasanton.CA 50 12/09/1963 SAFSTOR Hallarn

SCGM 01/02/1962 ENTOMB Ha!!am. NE 256 09/01/1964 ENTOMB

( Humboldt Bay 3 BWR 08/28/1962 SAFSTOR t Eureka. CA 200 07/02/1976 SAFSTOR " Holds byproduct hcense from State of South Carolina. i Notes: See G!ossary for dehnibons of decommissioning alternatives. Indian Point 1 PWR 03/26/1962 SAFSTOR Buchanan. NY 615 10/31/1974 NRC Review (1) Rancho Seco SAFSTOR decommissioning plan was submitted on May 20.1991. NRC appecval was dehtd by i j bbgation which was resolved in August 1994. NRC plans to issue decommissionmg order in earty 1995. La Crosse BWR 07/03/1967 SAFSTOR i (2) San Onoire 1 decommissioning plan was subrnitted to the NRC in November 1994. The hcensee plans to Genoa.WI 165 04/30/1987 SAFSTOR mamtain the facihty in SAFSTOR unhl Units 2 and 3 permanerdy cease operation at whu;h time all units are E ""# Pathfinda BWR 03/12/1964 SAFSTOR Sioux Falis. SD 190 09/16/1967 DECON Completed (3) Three Mile 1s!and 2 has been placed in a monitored storage mode until Unit 1 permanentty ceases operaten. at which tane both units are planned to be awawW. W Trows cunendy in h procen sewng N Meam genera *We pressurW As W 'PA 15 9 SAFST them to Hanford. WA tot disposal. On.lanuary 26.1995, the licensee submined a decommissioning plan that Piqua

OCM 08/23/1962 ENTOMB

[. prop sesDECONof thetaclilybeginningin1998. Piqua.0H 46 01/01/1966 ENTOMB l (5) Yankee Rowe received a possession on!y bcense on August 5,1992. The hcensee submitted a decommission-ing plan on December 20,1993. Decommissioning alternative depends on the availability of lowbei waste disposal facihties. The decommissioning plan was approved on February 14.1995. i Source-DOE Integrated Data Base for 1990. U.S Spent Fuel and Radioactwe Waste. Inventories. Projections. and [ Characteristics (D0E!RW-0006. Rev 6), and Nuclear Regulatory Commission 88 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMutSS10N 19g5 INFORMATION DIGEST 89

Appendix C Appendix C. Canceled U.S. Conunercial Nuclear Pecer Reactors (Continued) 2 Canceled U.S. Commercial h unii DI" Con Tree uwe Per unit Siai s Nuclear Power Reactors a Uiiiity E6e 1 & 2 PWR 1980 Canctld i Oho Edison Cornpany 1260 Under CP Review Unit Con Type Date p Utility MWe Per Unit Status vi Forked River 1 PWR 1980 [ Jersey Central Power & Light Company 1070 Wim CP Aliens Creek 1 BWR 1982 D Houston Light,ng & Power Company 1150 under CP Review l-Foc Cathoun 2 PWR 1977 4 Omaha Pubhc Power Distact 1136 Under CP Review A!! ens Creek 2 BWR 1976 L Houston Lighting & Poner Company 1150 Under CP Review Q Futton 1 & 2 HIG 1975. h PhiladelphiaElectricCompany 1160 Under CP Review Atlanta 1 & 2 PWR 1978 Pubhc Service Electnc & Gas Company 1150 Under CP Review b GrandGul!2 BWR 1990 l EntergyOperations, incorporated 1250 With CP Bailly BWR 1981 Northern Indiana Puthe Service Company 645 We CP ,. Greene County PWR 1980 I4 Power Authority of the State of NY 1191 Under CP Review Barton 1 & 2 BWR 1977 Alabama Power & Light 1159 Under CP Review Greenwood 2 & 3 PWR 1980 Detroit Edison Company 1200 Under CP Review o Barton 3 & 4 BWR 1975 Alabama Power & Light 1159 Under CP Review M Hartsville Al & A2 BWR 1984 TennesseeValley Authority 1233 W:th CF Black Fox 1 & 2 BWR 1982 h Pubhc Service Company of Oklahoma 1150 Under CP Review Hartsville B1 & B2 BWR 1982 J Tennessee Valley Authonty 1233 With CP Blue Hills 1 & 2 PWR 1978 Gutt States Ut!hties Company 918 Under CP Review Haven 1 PWR 1980 n Wisconsin Electric Power Company 900 Under CP Review Callaway 2 PWR 1981

l Union Electre Company 1150 With CP Haven 2(formerly Koshkonong 2)

PWR 1978 P Wisconsin Electric Power Company 900 Under CP Review h Cherokee 1 PWR 1983 Hope Creek 2 BWR 1981 Duke Power Company 1280 With CP l Public Service Electric & Gas Company 1067 With CP Cherokee 2 & 3 PWR 1982 a Duke Power Company 1280 With CP Jamesport 1 & 2 PWR 1980 LongIsland Lighting Company 1150 With CP Clinch Rtver LMEB 1983 ij Project Management Corp.; DOE; TVA 350 Under CP Review Marble Hill 1 & 2 PWR 1985 2 Chnton 2 BWR 1983 ' Pubhc Service of Indiana 1130 With CP liinois Power Company 933 With CP E Midland 1 PWR 1986 h Consumers Power Company 492 WeCP Davis-Besse 2 & 3 PWR 1981 Midland 2 PWR 1986 Toledo Edison Company 906 Under CP Review l Consumers Power Company ?18 With CP Douglas Point 1 & 2 BWR 1977 Potomac Electric Power Company 1146 Under CP Revew h N (Continued) i 90 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1995 INFORMATION DIGEST 91

1 Ap;:andix C. Canceled U.S. Conunercial Nuclear Power Reactors (Continued) Canctied Canaled Unit Con Type Date i Unit Con Type Date Utility MWe Per Unit Status j Utility MWe Per Unit Status i Montague 1 & 2 BWR 1980 Shearon Harris 3 & 4 PWR 1981 Northeast Nuclear Energy Company 1150 Under CP Review f Carchna Power & Light Company 900 With CP e Neo England 1 & 2 PWR 1979 i Skagit/Hanford 1 & 2 PWR 1983 Neo Englat Power Company 1194 Under CP Review f Puget Sound Power & Light Company 1277 Under CP Review Neo Haven 1 & 2 PWR 1980 }: Sterling PWR 1980 Neo York State Elecinc & Gas Corporation 1250 Under CP Review d Rochester Gas & Electric Corporation 1150 W th CP North Anna 3 PWR 1982 Summit 1 & 2 HIG 1975 Virginia Electric & Power Company 907 W;th CP i Delmarva Power & Light Company 1200 Under CP Review North Anna 4 PWR 1980 I Sundesert 1 & 2 PWR 1978 Virginia Electnc & Power Company 907 With CP M San Dego Gas & Electric Company 974 Under CP Review I! North Coast 1 PWR 1978 i Surry 3 & 4 PWR 1977 i Puerto Rico Water Resources Authonty 583 Under CP Review p Virginia Electric & Power Company 882 We CP Palo Verde 4 & 5 PWR 1979 Tyrone 1 PWR 1981 Anzona Pubhc Service Company 1270 Under CP Review Northem States Power Company 1150 Under CP Review Pebbie Springs 1 & 2 PWR 1982 Tyrone 2 PWR 1974 Portland General Electnc Company 1260 Under CP Review Northem States Power Company 1150 With CP i Vogtte 3 & 4 PWR 1974 Perbns 1. 2. & 3 PWR 1982 Duke Power Company 1280 Under CP Review Georgia Power Company 1113 With CP Phipps Bend 1 & 2 BWR 1982 Washington Nuclear 3 PWR 1995 Tennessee Val ley Authonty 1220 With CP Washington Public Power Supply System 1242 We CP Pilgnrn 2 PWR 1981 Washington Nuclear 4 PWR 1982 Boston Edrson Company 1180 under CP Review Washington Public Power Supply System 1218 With CP Pilgnm 3 PWR 1974 Washington Nuclear 5 PWR 1982 Boston Ed: son Company 1180 Under CP Review Washington Public Power Supply System 1242 With CP Quanicassee 1 & 2 PWR 1974 Yellow Creek 1 & 2 BWR 1984 Consumers Poner Company 1150 Under CP Review Tennessee Valley Authonty 1285 With CP + Rrver Bend 2 BWR 1984 Zimmer 1 BWR 1984 Guil States Utdities Company 934 WeCP CincinnatiGas & Electric Company 810 With CP l Seabrook 2 PWR 1988 Pubhc Serv ce Co. of New Hampshire 1198 We CP i Caklina c i

fe: Cancelation is defined as public announcement of cancelabon or written notification to NRC.

& Light Company V CP Only docketed applicabons are indicated. l Source: DOE /EIA Commercial Nuclear Power 1991 (DOE /EIA-0438 (91)). Appendix E (page 105) and l Nuclear Regulatory Commission i l 92 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 19951NFORMAT10N DIGEST 93

Appendix D w a v1 cuiniacmcina-nacumeamsmund - Utility Unit U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power IES Utahties. Incorporated Duam Amold Reactors by Licensee l m,nois Power Company Ctmton incanascrugan Power Company D C. Cook 1 & 2 Mair:e Yankee Atome Power Company Mame Yarkee Utility Unit Niagara Mohant Power Corporation Nine %le Pomt 1 & 2 Anzona Puthc Service Cornpany Palo Verde 1. 2. & 3 Norm Atlante Energy Service Corporahon Seabreak 1 Baltirnore Gas & Electnc Company CaNert Chtts 1 & 2 Northeast Nuclear Energy Company Wtstone 1. 2. & 3 Boston Ecson Cornpany Pilgnm 1 Northem States Pceer Company Monticello Carchna Power & Light Corrpany Brunsmick 1 & 2 Nortt:ern States Pomer Company Praine Island 1 & 2 Carchna Power & Light Company H B Robinsen2 Omaha Pubhc Power Distuct Fort Calhoun Carchna Power & Light Company Shearon Harris 1 Pacific Gas & Electric Company Diablo Canyon I & 2 Clevefand Electre muminating Company Perry 1 & 2 PECO Energy Company Limenck 1 & 2 Commoi: wealth Edson Company Brardwood 1 & 2 PECO Energy Company Peach Bettom 2 & 3 Commonweatth Ecson Company Byron 1 & 2 Pennstyvania Power & Light Company Susquehanna 1 & 2 Commonatatt Edson Company Dresden 2 & 3 power Authonty of the State of New York Inden Pcint 3 Commonwea:m Ecson Company la SaVe County 1 & 2 Power Authonty of the Sta*e of New York James A FitzPatrch Commonacatm E6 son Company Quad Cites 1 & 2 Pubhc Semice Electre & Gas Company Hope Creek 1 Commonaca:m Edison Company lion 1 & 2 Pubhc Service Electic & Gas Company Sa'em 1 & 2 j. CT Yarikee Atome Power Company Haddarn Neck Rochester Gas & Electric Corporatica Ginna Conschdated E& son Company incan Pomt 2 South Carchna Electrc & Gas Company Summer Consumers Power Cornpany Big Rock Point Southern Cahtomia Edison Co. & Consumers Poner Company Pahsades San Diego Gas & Electre Company San Onotre 2 & 3 Detroit E6 son Company Fermi 2 Southern Nuclear Operat:ng Company Jose;h M. Farley 1 & 2 Duke Power Company Cataaba 1 & 2 Tennessee Va!!ey Authonty Belletonte 1 & 2 Duke Power Company McGuire 1 & 2 Tennessee Valley Authonry Browns Ferry 1. 2. & 3 Dul.e Power Company Oconee 1,2, & 3 Tennessee Valley Authonty SeQuoyah 1 & 2 l Duquesne Light Company Beaver Varley 1 & 2 Tennessee Va!!ey Authority Watts Bar 1 & 2 Entergy Operahons, incorporated Arkansas Nuc! ear 1 & 2 Texas Utihties Electnc Company Comanche Peak 1 & 2 Entergy Operations. Incorporated Grand Guit 1 Toledo E& son Company Davrs-Besse Entergy Operations.trcorporated Rever Bend 1 Union Electric Company Caltamay Entergy Operations, incorporated Waterford 3 VT Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation Vennent Yankee Flonda Power & Light Company St Lucie 1 & 2 Vagmia Electric & Power Company North Anna 1 & 2 Florida Power & Light Company Turkey Point 3 & 4 vaginia Electrc & Power Company Surry 1 & 2 Florida Power Corporation CrystalRiver 3 Washington Public Power Supply System Washington Nuclear 1. 2, & 3 Georgia Poner Company Edwini Hatch 1 & 2 w,sconsin Electric Power Company Point Beach 1 & 2 Georgia Power Company Vogtte 1 & 2 Wisconsin Pubhc Service Company Kemaunee GPU Nuclear Corporation Oyster Creek Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation Wolf Creek 1 GPU Nuclear Corporation Three Mile island 1 Houston Lighbng & Power Company South Texas Protect 1 & 2 Source: Nuclear Regutatory Commission 94 NUCl_ EAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1995 INFORhlATION DIGEST 95

i Appendix E Appendix E. U.S. Neciew Neapeww Nesctm(Contitx.ed) i U.S. Nuclear Nonpower Reactors Lka$a auct"Tvp Lia= Trp L'a = Location OLlsteed Docket Number Number Nationalinstitute o' Nuclear Test OL TR-5 ? Standards & Technology 06/30/1970 50-184 Gartrrrsburg. MD i Licensee Reactor Type License Type License 1 Location OL issued Docket Number Number North Carchna State Puistar OL R-120 University 08/25/1972 50-297 Aerotest Trga(Indus) OL R-98 Raleigh. NC San Ramon.CA 07/02/1965 50-228 m Pe a R-75 Aikansas Tech University Inga Columt:us. 0H 02/24/1961 50-150 Russe!!vdle. AR CP /sphcation Under Review by NRC Oregon State University Tnga Mark II OL R-106 Arrned Forces Radiobiology Trica OL R-84 Corvams.0R M7/1967 S 243 Research institute 06/26/1962 50-170 i Bethesda. MD Pennsylvania State University Triga OL R-2 Unwersity Park.PA 07/08/1955 50-5 Cornet! Univers;ty Zero Power OL R-89 Ithaca. NY 12/11/1962 50-97 Purdue University Lockheed OL R-87 West Lafayette. IN 08/16/1962 50-182 Comell University Triga Mark 11 OL R-80 !!haca. NY 0t/11/1962 50-157 Reed Conge inga Mark I OL R412 Portland 0R 07/02/1968 50-268 + Dow Chem <al Company Inga OL R-108 i Midland. M1 07/03/1967 50-264 Rensselaer Polgechnic Cntical Assembly OL CX-22 1 inststute 07/03/1964 50 225 Generaf AtomcsMarki Triga Mark i OL R-38 Troy, NY n 0 89 Rhodeisland Atomic Energy GE Pool OL R-95 General Atormcs Mark F Triga Mark F OL R-67 Commission 07/21/1964 W93 San Diego. CA 07/01/1960 50-163 Nanagansett R! General Electnc Company Nuclear Test OL R-33 State University of New York Putstar OL R-T7 Pleasanton. CA 10/31/1957 50-73 (Buttato) OT24/1%1 50-57 Buttalo. NY Georgia institute of Heavy Water OL R-97 Technology 12/29/1964 50-160 Texas A&M University AGN-201M #106 OL R-23 Atlanta, GA CoWge Station. IX 08/26/1957 50-59 Idaho State Univers ty AGN-201 #103 OL R-110 Texas A&M University Triga OL R-128 Pocatello ID 10/11/1967 50-284 Co!!ege Station.TX 12/07/1961 50-128 towa Sta:e University Atgonaut OL R-59 U.S. Geological Survey Triga Mark I OL R-113 Ames. lA 10/16/1959 50-116 Denver.00 02r24/1969 50-274 Kansas State University Triga OL R-88 Lwtyof Arizona Triga Marki OL R-52 Manhattan. KS 10/16/1962 50-188 Tucson.M 12/05/1958 50 113 Manhattan College Tank OL R-94 University of Cahtordat Triga Marki OL R-116 Bronx NY 03/24/1964 50-199 Irvine 11/24/1969 50-326 Irvine. CA Massachusetts institute of HWR Reflected OL R-37 Technology 06/09/1958 50-20 University of Florida Argonaut OL R-56 Carnbridge. MA Gainesville.FL 05/21/1959 50-83 (Continued) 96 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISS!ON 1995 INFORMAIt0N DIGES1 97

4 5t Appendix F t e Licensee Reactor Type License Type License h treation elIssued Docket Number Number [ World list of Nuclear Power Reactors t: 0 I Unes.ty of ubno:s Inga OL R-115 thbana. IL 07/22/1969 50-151 [ Under Construction in Operation Or On Order Total Unnersty of mmois Lopra OL R-117 I Number Number Number Urbana.IL 12/27/1971 50-356 Country of Units Net MWe of Units Net MWe of Units Net MWe Universtly of Lone?1 GE Pool OL R-125 Lowe.L MA 12/24/1974 50-223 Argmhna 2 935 1 692 3 1.627 Beigrum 7 5.527 0 0 7 5.527 Unimsity of Ma7 and Inga OL R-70 t Bras! 1 626 2 2.458 3 3.084 Cohege Park. MD 10/14/1960 50-166 i Bulgaria 6 3.420 0 0 6 3.420 i Canada 22 15.439 0 0 22 15.439 Unwersity of Mactugan Pcci OL R-28 Ann Arbor. M1 09/13/1957 22 [ China 3 2.100 2 1.200 5 3.300 Cuba 0 0 2 834 2 834 Uruvers:ty of PAssourvRona Paci OL R-79 i. Boha. MO 11/21/1961 50-123 Czech Repubhc 4 1.632 2 1.780 6 3.412 Finland 4 2.310 0 0 4 2.310 Umversity of Missoun/ Tank OL R-103 L France 55 57.373 5 6.410 60 63.783 Columtaa 10/11/1966 50 ISS Columbia. M0 Germany 21 22.715 0 0 21 22.715 Hungary 4 1.729 0 0 4 1.729 India 9 1.620 7 2.040 16 3.660 University of f ew t&xco AGN-201tD112 OL R-102 r Albuquerque. NM 09/17/1966 50-252 ll Japan 49 33.859 5 4.833 54 43.692 ? KazAhstan 1 135 0 0 1 135 Univeistty of Texas inga Mark !! OL R-92 4 Aushn.IX 01/17/1992 50-602 Kcrea 9 '.220 7 5.963 16 13.183 Lithuania 2 2.760 0 0 2 2.760 University et Utah /Inga Trga Marki OL R-126 Mexico 1 654 1 654 2 1.308 Saft Lake City. UI 09/30/1975 50-407 Netherlands 2 507 0 0 2 507 University of Wrgenta Pool OL R-66 Pakistan 1 125 1 300 2 425 Charlottesville, VA 06/27/1960 50-62 Philippines 0 0 1 605 1 605 University of Wisconsin Trca OL R-74 Romae 0 0 5

3. 2 5

W Madiscn. WI 11/23/1960 50-156 Russia 25 19.799 4 3.375 29 23.174 Slovakia 4 1.632 4 1.664 8 3.296 Veterans Adrmnistrabon inga OL R-57 Stevenia 1 620 0 0 1 620 South Africa 2 1.840 0 0 2 1.840 Washington State Unuersity Inga OL R-76 Spain 9 7.084 4 3.947 13 11.031 Punman. WA 03/06/1961 50-27 Sweden 12 10.075 0 0 12 10.075 Worcester Polytechnic inshtute GE OL R41 S b.tand 5 3.025 0 0 5 3.025 Worcester. MA 12/16/1959 50-134 Tainan. China 6 4.884 0 0 6 4.884 Ukraine 14 12.095 6 5.700 20 17.795 Umled Kingdom 34 11.540 1 1.188 35 12.728 United States 109 99.238 6 7.2 79 115 106.517 Total 424 337.518 66 54,022 490 391,540 Note. Operatte. under construction. or on order (30 MWe and over) as of 12/31/94. For the United States. the s u owns 1 and 3 M We @We in exW Mm. Note. Lumted to nonpower reactors Icensed to operate. Source: Excerpted from Nuclea' News c March 1995 Reproduced by permission. Further reproduct:on prohibited Source: Nuclear Regutatory Cornmission 93 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1995 INFORMAT10N DIGEST 99

s s [ Appendix G t Nuclear Power Units by Reactor Type, Worldwide I In Operation Total Number Number Reactor Type of Units Net MWe of Units Net MWe Pressurized light-water reactors 245 215.669 284 252.461 Boiling light-water reactors 92 75 861 98 81.891 Gas-cooled reactors,all varieties 35 11.699 35 11.699 Heavy-water reactors, all varieties 34 18.576 50 26,471 GrapNte-rnoderated light-mater reactors 15 14185 16 15.710 Liquid rnetal fast-breeder reactors 3 928 7 3.308 Total 424 337,518 490 391,540 i l Note: Operable, under construction, or on order (30 Lthe and over) as of 12/31/94. For the United States, the nurnber of units in operation includes Browns Ferry 1 and 3 whch are in extended shutdown. Source: Excerpted from Nuclear News e March 1995. Reproduced by permissiort Further reproduction prohibited 100 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1995 INFORMATION DIGEST 101

i App;ndix H Appendix IUpp 50 Reactors by Capacity Factor, Worldwide (Continued) Top 50 Reactors by Capacity Factor, Worldwide 1994 1994 Gross 1994 GTOS5 1994 Capacity Gross Capacity Gross Reactor Factor Generation Reactor Factor Generation Contry Unit Type Vendor (Percent) (MW5) { Country Unit Type Vendor (Percent) (MWh) South Korea' Yonggwang-1 PWR West. 103 02 8.573203 Sweden Forsmark-3 BWR ABB Asea 9112 9 576.952 US Ca!!away PWR West 100 37 10.480.645 t U.S. Three Mile island-1 PWR B&W 9110 6.9n6.471 Switzer!and Beznau-2 PWR West 100 16 3.193.684 Canada Pickering-3 PHWR AECL 91 48 4.343.550 Japan Takahama-3 PWR MHI 100 00 7.620.900 Batain Chapelcross GCR UKAEA 91 42 1,922.086 Japan Ikata-2 PWR MHI 99 94 4.955.045 Japan Fugen HWLW Hit et al 91 23 1.318101 U S. San Onctre-2 PWR CE 98.90 9163114 U S. Vcgtle-2 PWR West 91.16 9166.659 U.S. San 0nofre-3 PWR CE 98.50 9 124.402 Hungary Paks-1 PWR CE 90 95 3.665.005 IJ S Fort Calhoun PWR CE 98 36 4.316,858 U.S. Palo Verde-1 PWR AEE 90 76 10.391.900 U S. Farley-2 PWR West 9825 7.505.081 Spain Trillo PWR KWU 90.56 8.456.903 U S. Prairie Island-2 PWR West. 9799 4.806.870 Hungary Paks-2 PWR AEE 90 36 3.641.075 U.S. Catanba-1 PWR West 9716 10.319.615 Finland Loviisa-1 PWR AEE 90 29 3.677.921 Argentina Embalse PHWR AECL 97.68 5.544.518 Canada Gentil!y-2 PHWR AECL 97.36 5156193 Canada Pickering-8 PHWR AECL 9615 4.576170 U S. Byron-2 PWR West % 68 9.950.910 Japan Mihama-3 PWR MHI 96 53 6.985.017 Finland O!kituo!o-1 BWR ABB Asea 96 38 6205235 Belgium Tihange-2 PWR Frara. 96 19 7.929.440 US. Comanche Peak-1 PWR West 95.98 9161.370 Germany Stade PWR KWU 95 64 5.630.119 U S. Vermont Yankee BWR GE 95 28 4.507.304 Japan Fukustama l-4 BWR Hitachi 9528 6.543.623 Spa n Almaraz-1 PWR West 9523 7J58.590 U.S. Peach Bottom-3 BWR GE 95 19 9.155.900 i US. Beaver Valley-2 PWR West 95 13 7.399.788 U.S Arkansas Nuclear 1-1 PWR B&W 95.05 7.518.885 U.S. North Anna-2 PWR West 95.01 7.881.381 Canada Point Lepread PHWR AECL 94 14 5.607.878 Japan Tomari-2 PWR MHl 93.92 4 163.453 Switzertand Goesgen PWR KWU 93 52 8.110.005 Britain Hinkley Pt B-2 GCR NPC 93 44 5.388.000 South Korea Keri-4 PWR West 9323 7158131 Germany Emsland PWR KWU 93.02 11.105.937 U S. Limerick-2 BWR GE 92.95 8.891.054 U S. Millstone-3 PWR West 9216 9.815.469 Finland Oikiluoto-2 BWR ABB Asea 92.41 5.949.968 Germany Neckar-2 PWR KWU 92.13 11.016J31 US Susquehanna-1 BWR GE 91.84 8.728.886 Source: Excerpted from Nucleonics Week @ 1995 try McGraw Hill,Inc. Reproduced by penmssion. Canada Darlington-4 PHWR AECL 9118 7.517.056 Further reproduction prohibited, 102 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1995 INFORMATION DIGEST 103

.~ Appendix ! j Appendix 1. Top 50 Reacters by Generaties Worldwide (Continted) i Top 50 Reactors by Generation, Worldwide i 1994 1994 1994 Gross 1994-Gross Gross Capacity Grass Capacity Reactor Generation Factor Reactor Generation Factor Corntry Unit Type Vender (MWh) (Percent) Country Unit Type Vendor (MWh) (Percent)-. I Germany Isar-2 PWR KWU 11.133.647 90.14 I Germany Emsland PWR KWU 11.105.937 93 02 Japan Fukushima ll-1 BwR Toshiba 8.678.812 90 07 Germany Neckar-2 PWR KWU 11.016.731 92.13 U.S. South Texas-1 PWR West 8.640.300 75 02 Germany Grohnde PWR KWU 10.847.195 88 83 France Betteville-2 PWR Fram. 8.602,430 73 84 Germany Philippsburg-2 PWR KWU 10.815.198 88 06 South Korea Yonggwang-1 PWR West 8.573.203 103 02 1 Germany. Brokdorf PWR KWU 10.708.133 87.63 Germany Biblis B FWR KWU 8.513.500 74 76 U.S. Ca!!away PWR West 10.480.645 100.37 Japan Ohi-3 PWR MHI 8.497.825 8221 U.S. Palo Verde-1 PWR CE 10.391.900 90 76 Spain Trillo PWR KWU 8.456.003 90 56 U S. Ca awaba-1 PWR West 10.319.615 9716 Japan Fukushima l-6 BWR GE 8.353.260 86 69 Germany Grafenrheinfeld PWR KWU 10222.876 86.77 France Penty-1 PWR Fram. 8.345.594 68.94 U S. Grand Gut!-1 BWR GE 10.013.995 87.53 U S. Waterford-3 PWR CE 8.313.680 82.31 U S. Byron-2 PWR West 9.950.910 96.68 U.S. Diablo Canyon-2 PWR West . 8 289.904 81.30 U S. Millstone-3 PWR West 9.815.469 9216 France Cattenom-4 PWR Fram. 8281.357 69 41 U S. Vogtle-2 PWR West 9.766.659 91.16 Japan Obi-4 PWR MHI 8206230 79.39 US San Onotre-2 PWR CE 9 163.714 98.90 France Gotech-1 PWR Fram. 8.169.955 68 43 U S. Comanche Peak-1 PWR West 9161.370 95 98 Japan Tsuruga-2 PWR MH1 8.154.998 80 25 U S. San Onotre-3 PWR CE 9124.402 98.50 U.S. Limerick-1 BwR GE B.142.240 85.12 Sweden Forsmark-3 BWR ABB Asea 9.576.952 9112 I Germany Gundremmingen-8 BWR KWU 9.339.628 81.39 U S. Vogtle-1 PWR West 9243J25 86 28 U.S. Peach Bottom-3 BWR GE 9.155.900 95.19 France Penly-2 PWR Fram. 9.130.417 75.42 France Cattenom-3 PWR Fram. 9.077.951 76.09 U S. McGuire-2 PWR West 8.998.663 83.86 France Cattenom-2 PWR Fram. 8.990J37 7723 U S. Wo!! Creek PnB West 8.910.666 85.34 U S. Limerick-2 BWR GE 8.891.054 92 95 Sweden Oskarshamn-3 BWR ABB Asea 8.876.231 84.09 U S. Nine Mile Point-2 BWR GE 8.871.404 85.93 France Flamanville-2 PWR Fram. 8J57243 74.33 U.S. Susquehanna-1 BWR GE 8128.886 91.84 U.S. LaSaile-2 BWR GE 8 103.929 88.56 France Paluel-4 PWR Fram. 8.697297 73 82 h: Excerpted from Nucleonics Weeko 1995 by McGraw Hin inc. Reproduced by permission. France Nogent-1 PWR Fram. 8.695.325 74.63 Further reproduction prohibited. 104 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1995 INFORMATION DIGEST 105

AppIndix J f Appendix a. a.ick neverence metric conversies Tabies (con /inced) Quick Reference Metric Conversion Tables '* *T From inch-To Metric Multiply SPACE AND TIME Quantity Pound Units Units By From inch-To Metric Multiply Thermodywie

F
K "K

(=F + 459 67)/18 Quantity Pound Units Units By temperature Length mi(statute) km 1.609 347 Celsius

F

'C

- C = (*F-32)/18 yd m
0914 4 temperature ft (in!)

m

0.304 8 in cm
2.54 Linear expansion
F4
K4or *C4
1.8 coe!!icent Area m/

km2 2 589 998 2 Thermal (Blu = in)/lft

h * 'F)

W/(m e aC) 0 144 227 9 aa,e d 4 N6873 yd-m 0 836 127 4 conduchvity 2 112 pg 9 n'0 903 04 } 2 r 2 Coe fcient of Btu /(11

h * *F)

W/(m. *C) 5 678 263 in2 cn/

64516 l

heat transfer Volume acre foct m 1 233 489 Heat capacdy BtW W 1MG 3 yd m 0.764 554 9 l Spectic heat Btu /(!b + *F) kJ/(kg **C)

41868 3

3 ft3 3 m 0.028 316 85 i capacty L 28 316 85 Entropy Btu /'F kJ/*C 1 899 108 gaiton L 3.785 412 !!oz mL 29.573 53 i Speofe entropy Btu /(Ib * *F) kJ/(kg **C) 41868 ini crn3 16 38706 Speofic it'ternal Btullb kJ/kg

2.326 Velaaty mi/h km/h 1 609 347 tt/s m/s
0.304 8 MECHAltlCS Accelerat:on

!!/s2 in/s2 0.304 8 Frcm inch-To Metric Multiply NUCLEAR REACTION and IGNI2ING RADIATION Quantity Pound Units Units By ass ton (short) t(metric ton)

0.907 184 74 From Inch-To Metric Multiply (eigh!)

tb(avdp) kg

0 453 592 37 Quantity Pound Units Units By Moment of mass Ib = !!

kg

m 0 138 255 i

Activity (c!a cune (Ci) MBq 37.000 0 radionuclide) dpm Bq(becquerei) 0 016 667 Densdy ton (short)/yd3 t/m3 1.186 553 tb/R3 kgw3 16 018 46 Absorbed rad Gy (gray) ~0 01 Concentration Ib/ gal gi 119 826 4 dose rad cGy 10 Dose tem Sv(sievert)

0 01 Momentum tb + ft/s kg *m/s 0.138 255 equiva!ent rem mSv 10.0 mrem mSv
0.01 Angular Ib
ft /s kg en9/s 0 M2140 H 2

mrem pSv

10.0 rnamentum Exposure (X-and roentgen (R)

C/kg (coulomb) 0.000 258 Moment of Ib + 112 2 kg.m 0 042 140 11 rnmma ravs) Inertia Force kip (kilopound) kN (kilonewton) 4 448 222 lbf N fnewton) 4 448 222

Exact conversion factors

. Exact conversion factors (Continued) 163 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1995 INFORMATION DIGEST 107

1 MECHANICS (Coatlaae r) Gl0$sary From inch-To Metric Multip! l AGREEMENT STATE-A State that has signed an agreement with the NRC a!!cwmg the State to Quantity Pound Units Units By Moment of Force. Ibf * !! N*m 1 355 818 totwe tti

tt N.m 0 122 984 8 BOILING-WATER REACTOR (BWR): A nuclear reactor in which water, used as both coolant and Pressure atm (std) kPa (kitopascat)
101 325 moderator, is allowed to boil in the core.

tar kPa

100.0 2

CAPABILITY: The rnaximum load that a generating station can carry under specif ed conditions for a

bf/m (!crmer!ypsi) kPa 6 894 757 inHg (32'F) kPa 3386 38 given period of time without exceeding approved limits of temperature and stress. Net summer itH,0 (392*F) kPa 2 983 98 capability is used in the digest. Measured in watts except as noted otherwise.

inh O(60*F) kPa 0 248 84 2 mmHg (O'C) kPa 0.133 322 CAPACITY FACTOR (Gross): The ratio of the gross electricity generated, for the period of time considered, to the energy that could have been generated at continuous full-power operation during the S!!e55 2 kip /in (formerlyksi) MPa 6 894 157 same period-2 Ibf/in (formerfyps>) MPa 0 006 894 757 2 ibffm (formerlypsi) kPa 6 894 757 CAPACITY FACTOR (Net): The ratio of the net electricity generated. for the period of time consid-lbf/!!2 kPa 0 047 880 26 ered, to the energy that could have been generated at conhnuous full-postr operat:en during the same Energy. kah MJ

36 period.

work cal J (Jouie)

4.184 m

Btu kJ 1.055 056 CASK: A heavify shielded container used to store and/or ship radioactive materials. Lead and steel are ft

lbf J

1 355 818 common materials used in the manufacture of casks. therm (US) MJ 105 480 4 40@ oh more SadonneNsposMowM rakahaste on a Pooer Blu/s kW t bp (etectoc) kW

0 6

u W 0 293 071 1 CONSTRUCTION RECAPTURE The rnaximum number of years that cou!d be added to the license To convert from metric units to inch-pound units, divide the metric unit by the conversion tactor' expiration date to recover the period from the construction permit to the date when the operating hcense was granted. A licensee is required to submit an application for such a change. .g CONTAMINATION: The deposition of unwanted radioactive material on the surfaces of structures, areas, objects, or personnel. DECOMMISSION: The process of safeiy removing a facility from service fol! owed by reducing residual radicadivity to a level that permits the release of tne property for unrestricted use. DECON: A rnethod of decommissioning in which the equipment, structures, and porttons of a facihty and site containing radioactive contaminants are removed or decontaminated to a level that permits the property to be released for unrestricted use shortty after cessation of operations. DECONTAMINATION: The reduction or removal of contaminated radioactive material from a structure, area, object, or person. Nore. The informahon contained in trus table is intended to famdiarize NRC personnel with commonly used SI units and provide a quick reference to aid in the understanding of documents containing SI units. The converston factors ENTOMB: A method of decommissioning in which radioactive contaminants are encased in a provided have not been approved as NRC guidelines for development of licensing actions, regutabons or policy. structuralty long-lived material, such as concrete. The entombtrent structure is appropriately maintained, and continued surveillance is carried out until the radioactivity decays to a level permitting Source Federal Standard 376A (May 5.1983). Preferred Metric Units for General Use by the Federal Govemment unrestricted release of the property. and International Commission of Radiabon Units and Measurernents. ICRU Report 33 (1980). Radtation Quanhties and un t (Continued) 108 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1995 INFORMATION DIGEST 109

d I l Stessaes (Coenued) i FISCAL YEAR: The twelve month period. from October 1 through September 30 used by the Federal 4 NET SUMMER CAPABILITY: The s*eady hourly out:iut that generating equipment is expected to Govemment in budget formu!ahon and execution The i scal year is designated by the calendar year in supp!y to system load exclusive of auxiliary power, as demonstrated by tests at the time of summer peak wtsch it ends. l demand Measured in watts except as noted otherwise. n' FUEL CYCLE: The series of steps invchtd in supplying fuel for nut! ear power readers. NONPOWER REACTOR: Reactors used for research, training and test purposes. and for the production of radioisotopes for medical and industrial uses. FULL-TIME EQUIVALENT: A measurement equal to one sta!! person working a full time work C schedule for one year. POSSESSION ONLY LICENSE A form of hcense that allows possession but not operatron. GENERATION (Gross): The total amount of e!cctnc energy produced by a generating station as PRESSURIZED-WATER REACTOR (PWR): A nuclear reac!cr in which heat is transferred from tne measured at the generator terminals. Measured in watthours except as noted etherwise. core to a heat exchanger via water kept under high pressure without boiling the water. ? GENERATION (Net): The gross amount of electric energy produced less the electric energy { PRODUCTION EXPENSE: Production expenses are a component of generatica expenses that consumed at a generahng station for station use Measured in watthours except as noted otherwise. includes costs 'ssociated with operation, maintenance, and fuel. i GIGAWATT: One bilhon watts. RADIDACTIVITY: The rate at which radioactive material emits racation. Measu'ed in units of becquerels or disintegrations per second. GIGAWATTHOUR: One billion watthours. SAFSTOR: A rnethod of decommissioning in which the nuclear facihty is placed and maintained in HIGH-LEVEL WASTE: High-level radioactive waste (HLW) means (1) irradiated (spent) reactor fuel, such condition that the nuclear facihty can be saiely stored and subsequently decontaminated (deterred (2) hauid waste resultmg frorn the operahon of the first cycie schent extraction system, and the decontamination) to levels that permit release for unrestricted use. concentrated wastes from subsequent extraction cycles. in a facility for reprocessmg irradiated reactor fuel; and (3) schds into which such liquid wastes have been converted. HLW is primarily in the fctm of SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL: Fuel that has been removed from a nuclear reador because it can no longer spent fuel discharged from commercial nuclear power reactors.11 also includes some reprocessed HLW sustain power production for economic or other reasons. from defense activities. and a small quanhty of reprocessed commercial HLW. URANIUM FUEL FABRICATION FACILITY: A facihty that(1) manufactures reactor fuel contaming LOW-LEVEL WASTE: Low-level radioactive waste (LLW)is a general term for a wide range of wastes. uranium for any of the following (i) preparation of fuel materials;(ii) formation of fuel matenats into ladustries, hospitals and medica! educational, or research instdutions; private or govemment desired shapes; (iii) app!ication of protective cladding. (iv) recovery of scraa material, and (v) storage laboratories; and nuclear fuel cycle facihties (e.g.. nuclear power reactors and fuel fabrication plants) associated with such operations; or (2) conducts research and development activities. using radioactive materials generate low-level wastes as part cf their normal operations. These wastes are generated in many physical and chemical forms and levels of contaminatiert URANIUM HEXAFLUORIDE PRODUCTION FACILITY: A facikty that receives natural uranium ;n the form of ore concentrate; enriches it. either by gaseous di! fusion or gas centr fuge methods; and MAXIMUM DEPENDABLE CAPACITY (Gross): DependaMe main-unit gross capacity, winter or converts it into uranium hexafluoride, summer, whichever is smaller. The dependable capacey varies because the unit efficiency varies during the year due to cooling water temperature variatir% !! is the gross electrical output as measured at the WATT: The electrical unit of power. The rate of energy transfer equivaient to 1 ampere flowing under a output termrnals of the furbine generator durbg the most restrictive seasonal conditions (usua!!y pressure of 1 vo!! at unity power factor. summer). Measured in watts except as :ioted otherwise. WATTHOUR: An electrical energy unit of measure equal to 1 watt of power supplied to, or taken from. MAXIMUM DEPENDABLE CAPACITY (Net): Gross maximum dependable capacity less the normal an electrical circuit steadily for 1 hour. station service loads. Measured in watts except as noted otherwise. WHEELING SERVICE-The movement of electricity from one system to another over transmission MEGAWATT (MW): One million watts-facihties of intervening systems. Wheeling service contracts can be estabhshed betwaen two or more MEGAWATTHOUR (MWh): One million watthours. 110 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1995 INFORMATION DIGEST 111

l kTa.l* O' '" ** ' i**4,,,,. BISUCCRAPHsC D.ATA SHtti

- - 'E"G-1330 m was R

se. wwn .n 7 Nuclear Regulatmy Comminum l Informaiam Digest g norn. vs.n I lws Ideiam g g . e on onme mean f. . r o, L Sudier. et al. ^^"*' f a niamm sow.wo em o. l' . ~,,. - l me, .e .s a e i I' D wisam of iludget and Analyte Offre of it e Coniculier p U.S. Nuclear Regulamry Commissam hhmston, DC 20335 e,e,eu. e

w. w..

.e4. e.e, c. s e==... .es ra ca. n .e l Same as & ahme. l l k j . i. r=w ie. 1he Nm:lcar Regulatory Commianum Infoematum Digest (degem) Prownies a summary of infonnaawm about the U1 i 1 Nuclear Regulatory Commissam (NRC) NRC's regulatory responsabdmet. the actrones NRC Irenses and general mformaism on dawnems and worldwule nudear energy. The digest, publuhed annually, e a compdatum of audear. and NRC related dat.s and is desegned to prownse a qvc3 reference to msg facts stamt the agency and the mduary it regulates in general. the dau cover 1973 thnnsgh 1991, with escepteons noted. Information ce generstang capuc. ny and average capaasy factor for getating US commercial swclear power reactors is ohtaaned freen monthly oper. ating reports that are swbmeted directly to the NkC by the hcensee. The aformaism is remewed by the NRC for camusiency only and no mdependent vahdatam and/or venficatum is performed. J M 3} = m. (- '8 'e' awoa4.eca r<=is am es. s. me i. no , s ia avaa ama avv s.artw e 4 Unlernsted 1 = escu rv et a.ec. rum g,gmg,, p,,g i NRC Facts Unclassif=vf C* inne e. I Unct24Anfied _e .seu w eaaa .. ~ Ob .W.C 90 %4 if 0 6 y t a "A F-'. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION h

h. E

~*@' **r T?l*."g ?.W z *... f'.*C*~.C Oi'*NI..y.a. a y mu.7tF"'#IJI'*f*M*.* *cM * - P1'

.....s...-tr % ~,.~...,.,,.. w.w.v, . w. ....~ vumwca;rs.u.um.yu y w-:.,. memmun:.v...a.w - g;w:,...j7;:m ,aW.y.x 1. Jew **+amt r.PaPy.*M.:e*"Ne w 4**vw' M s** 4eW 9,.t~er e m m:tyn. v .'*.:@ M.A..::'d.wg's 1:dt ?hD.%. ^y.M.v?.$..?..d.*.F.;:d...M.. ,.b:.?.w :.'. %X.t* MI'r'< f dit..A$,ot+'O. N m @N.'.c R S.*.' A u y.s s g -.r I e

_( l l l

m., r.

g., : e. ,,,...4, s ,t he .# bI I l'I , _,I ., f h,' f ff h ' [*ik'Iii 'D, W f M g 'k 4 1

5'-

ki. o m. c. f j [' ], a'., t ', c, nMjjyj.gmr.II.N[ E !):

p4 'M f,

M. m{ e! m # <. i n -giphm gu mFiigN.::.- J

M;; N h @ N. yily,w!Pn@I N $ N $ISIbN NY N R i h M M T?fri z

1 s'M!! tr i i .,! I b Nb! i l ?u d..j m

.m (

l Iit '.$ i j i. ,.m.; a

p

e M i:

i + l !3 {%y ,Ig%. j 2 x FIRST CLASS MAL 1

J; POSTAGE AND FEES PAID i

l .c . ipp*d i USNRC ,j )3 p;$j PEMNT NU. G 67 i -. 3 i ]

Q*'I;t' q

j. l <E j i a c. .j N&Y$ h l Hd,n,!. i:#shi I y. l ... ~ l ,ri i (d;k }39$3 f[ Nif0M 1 m olcvi f argpppuucPu~nt ca r nws suc s g= i h.4.? j l -4somcron fjd,b w SSS w;.;e - dpih,Y b g-a .~ r i-l4phit dlN'!' 1! ,his!vli. s if .d',iE!! I .. E ' ll d'i 'a f .s; ki iti' .N? <l.:Ut,.l-j A

T...

j. N ' t! ~

J (T 1i .M i bT${1. I - ! M::.. 40 fj!-

Ei!:

bli

'-M-4 u-a .h . e bhlh9h"MNdMNdI[ E@ ~ u M. M h frii k s h:m,..: h h.dg h.h 2 k N b .I kib ; N

r. i j,M:

atinggilupM ak ifMyy d ..;d b gy si i 1 M ; '.i.* - . Dy <: d b 7 - =_ hh d ., % e.. ,-1 ',,.c w.p[ .., k p ag .g . n ~,j,. t ps.A,

y,

.6 ..:.;. 2.' + W.h.,3 l:.m.u. p. N 'W E - %y l '.m % r 7 ji e e J- ~ s ~3 Wigi;f-t >> f-v ;1 ( i t g l ' r 'r c;m&'e a. q 6 a 2 \\ a f(bg: - j a i' F . v

,^

,7 m g t. t .a v 7+ -p . -s -.msmAspuAs... ~ M :, #.i Ji , a::t !!M fa, 3 ~ l' fp H9g' NI'I@M '

$$f

' POSTAGE ANQfEESPAID ' ~ J y z.3 ~ t, ' 1. , :., ; e

. #sgec 3.

d d PERMITNU && k .j i j m N W j'ix i r y

ti.% ";j. nt d

ei ~ r w${

JD

' ' _, ' _9 y M'[.(:: ki 3 i ~ ~ m n na,,' :. <w- ::~.;:4j5jyy Fs;}y z.- w ,u ,,4 t, _b $ s 1 a' o' 16 w .n w& w;y 5-" ~, ~~,,n c lI ~ L 4. i j ~ J g =2? V~~ e h 1 ;%. Efty J; 'K [e. ,s (, ] J.L. 4, p H 4 c~~

~~a mte~~
~~'t t ; w. 9.~~
It
~~- '_='6 s-4 jeg (: ' i, 1 ,Q s' qj,; ~ e w gz 4 .~.y~~
~~< ::g;M 1'~~
7 ,['f - l i*4, ,3:d;y:g$g f e - % *L e' m 4 .'q 5. .u w' ^ t ^ 1 N-5h$A-l 1 o t 4 ~ - i .mu. e ,=7 j;?:bJ[i O a(' < f 'O nUbi?y$$ g$ . + 0c N p.1 ~ ~N ~ Y,' A ch 1 ~ t - i 2,- ^ l O ni M N i '. ~J'7~ . i - N ~ " pC. -}i ' i i R?bQM4 h ?g ~ i ~ ' ' ' ( ,r w e A r.- W - h * - W v tGut w-C ~ d-;; cen= 4 ase**.M < a. c 1 a u g;; r. ,c .l j ',4;;; p+ .,v a-c 4 h {seJ[,n.y.. I hh-g a,_a ..-wa
}}

ML20083N551

Text

Navigation menu

Search