ML20083J682
| ML20083J682 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 11/22/1983 |
| From: | Baranow S STONE & WEBSTER, INC. |
| To: | James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20083J610 | List: |
| References | |
| 83-11-22, NUDOCS 8401100257 | |
| Download: ML20083J682 (16) | |
Text
Report No. !!3 November 14, 1983 through l'ovember 18, 1983 Personnel en Site
~
Stone & Webster Michigan, Inc.
A. Amoruso D. Cooke R. Scallan S. Baranow R. Corson J. Seely F. Bearham J. Langston W. Taylor J. Barr C. Marrs J. Thompson r~
R. Carpeggiani D. MacBay -
R. Butler J. Chawla
'T. Parker N. Weatherall W. Sienkiewicz A. Smith S. Narayandas Meetings Attended.
Date Attendees Purpose November 14, 1983 Consumers Power Company Daily Staff through Bechtel Power Company Management Meetings November 18, 1983 Stone & Webster CIO MPQAD November 14, 1983 Consumers Power Company Team Meetings through Bechtel Power Company November 18, 1983 Stone & Webster CIO
~ --
November 15, 1983 Consumers Power Company QVP Status Bechtel Power Company Assessment 1
MPQAD Stone & Webster CIO November 15,16,17, 1983 Consumers Power Company Area Team and Bechtel Power Company System Team MPQAD Review Meeting Zack Stone & Webster CIO November 17, 1983 Consumers Power Company Sy' stem Team Bechtel Power Company Staff Meeting MPQAD
~
Stone 8. Webster CIO hovember 18, 1983 MPQAD CIO Sampling of Bechtel Power Company FCR/FCNs Stone & Webster CIO November 18, 1983 Consumers Power Company Weekly.:Sub-Contractors Bechtel Power Company Meeting Babcock & Wilcox Zack Owens-Corning Grinnell 8401100257 840106 Stone & Webster CIO PDR ADOCK 05000329 O
PDR s'
N
JOB NO.
14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO. 23 PAGE 2 Meetings November 14, througn November 18, 1983 - during this period, CIO attended daily :aeetings with staff management and supervision.
Subjects discussed at these meetings were:
(A) Stop Work Orders - percent completion of Phase I and Phase II activities were addressed.
In addition, tentative schedules were addressed of work in all categories covered by Stop' Work Orders.
(B) NonConfomance Reports - The details of each NCR were discussed to decide whether the nonconfomance was representative of a generic problem. Also discussed were the preventative actions that could be undertaken.
(C) Training - Bechtel Power Company advised that a revision to the Training Matrix is in the approval cycleand scheduled for issue in the near future. Due to layoffs andthe availability of in-structors, classes are being re-scheduled for presentation upon completion of the FCR/FCN Review and Resolution Program.
(D) Document Control - a concerted effort is continuing in the re-conciliation of the Design Master Log versus numerous Field Logs.
(E) Procedure approval and Issuance - Bechtel Power Company management requested the 1.atest status of procedure approval and issuance and asked that resp'onsible personnel devote more time in expediting the development, approval and issuance of required procedures.
(F) Project Priorities - The project'has designated the following activities' to be priority items:
- 1) the need to be responsive in closing-out CPCo commitments to the US NRC and of identified US NRC open items.
- 2) the need to have all required design documents in place for start of CCP.
- 3) activities to support Phase I'of the CCP l
l
- 4) activities to support the Remedial Soils Program
- 5) dispositions to be provided in a timely manner to expeditiously close out FCR/FCNs that are in the Resolution Phase.
- 6) completion of the remainder of the design activities.
i
\\.
JOB NO.
14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO. 23 PAGE 3 November 14 through November 18, 1983 - CIO personnel assigned to respective teams, attended team meetings for discussions of:
A) Team 12 - Raceway. Team Organization and responsibilities were established and identified.
- turnoverpackages - 60% were reject.ed by the Test Engineer for incorrect
/
revisions, illegibility, typing errors. Corrective Action: lead system FEs will submit preliminary turnover packages for review by Test Engineer prior to walkdown.
B) Teams 26, 27, 28 - Punchlist Coordination Meeting. The purpose of this meeting was to standardize the method of assembling and reporting commodity totals.
C) BHO Team Staff Meeting - introduction of C. Marrs and W. Taylor of CIO to J. Horn (BHO Supt). Discussion focused on start of CIO evaluation of the BHO Preliminary Hanger Walkdown. In a discussion with MPQAD, CIO was advised that:
a) 500 large bore pipe, hangers will require
~~
reinspection due to location changes b) 200 large bore and small bore hangers will be reinspected upon lifting of the Stop Work Orders. CIO shall perfom.a sample inspection of these activities D) Team 19 - discussion centerec on training assignments to Code Level 3. It was strongly emphasized by the team supervisor that _ individual members of the' team must periodically meet with the supervisor for review of scheduled reading assignments.
E) Team 6 - discussions focused on establishing priorities'of work activities currently underway and for future work activities of the CCF.
F). Team 23 - items discussed were:
, a) recall of all "old" FCR/FCN forms b) "new" FCR/FCN forms scheduled'for issue week of November 21, 1983 c) identification requirements of Q and non-Q items on Punchlists d) team is currently developing guide lines for training and orientation of Field Raceway Engineers in order to '
provide unifom input by the Engineers for statusing and for non-Q work.
JOB NO.
14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT lltEPORT NO. 23 PAGE 4
~
Team 14 - items discussed at t'he weekly meeting:
a) electrical and mechanical comodity lists which required updating and return on October 24, 1983 has been re-scheduled to November 28, 1983 b) Action items for Ann Arbor-
- l'nstallation of Monitors - cost effectiveness
- demolition of walls in electrical and civil areas for equipment ingress / egress c) Construction Punchlists (Units 1 and 2):
- each system / discipline engineer is responsible for providing-accurate descriptions of punchlist items l
l
- each item will be reviewed by Supervision for accuracy
- updated punchlists will be given to.the mapper, daily,I for input into the computer d) members who will require additional training will be identified on the next revision of the Training Matrix I
Teams 25, 26, 27, 28 & 29 - items discussed were open NCRs, it was learned that NCRs were being returned from Ann Arbor directly to the Initiator of the NCR, thereby bypassing the nonnal routing sequence. This is leading to lost or misplaced documents. This problem will be addressed by team representatives. -
Discussion of area completion schedules to review short and long Term Area Turnover requirements and to establish methods of resolving prob'lems which may impact on Turnover schedul.es.
It was discussed that certain' areas of high priority to CPCo are found in low priority modules. These areas could be deferred or missed. CPCo and SPCo will meet to preclude this from occurring. CIO will be in attendance at this meeting.
O e
.. m
JOB NO.
14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO. 23 PAGE 5 November 15, 1983 - QVP Status Assessment Meeting. The major restraint affecting Module 340 continues to be the Stop Work Orders issued on the improper use of FCR/FCNs. A schedule for release of the Stop Work Orders has not been established.
' November 15, 16, 17, 1983 - Area and System Team Meetings. At these meetings, the subjects.of importance addressed were:
- status of resolution of restraints'
\\.
- schedule of resolutions for removing restraints
- effect of the Stop Work Orders on restraints Restraints discussed at weekly meetings are relevant to on-going activjties rather than the CCP. Typically they fall into categories such as procurement delays, dispositions to NCRs, and delays in obtaining design or construction details. At each meeting, a review of response status and target dates for removal of restraints is discussed in detail and where necessary, an action is assigned.
November 17, 1983 - ~ System Team Staff Meeting. At thi_s meeting Team Supervisors and their assistants discuss items that could result in problems and their effect on Corrective Action.
Discussions centered on:
- improvement of hydrostatic testing
- construction work packages - 11 submitted to Supervision - O rejected s
- re-scheduling and concellations of training class November 18, 1983 - FCR/FCN Review and Resolution Program. At this meeting a presentation was given by P. Milano, MPQAD and F. Thomas, BPCo of the functions and purposes of the FCR/FCNs, to CIO personnel. MPQAD and BPCo led CIO personnel step by step from the origin to completion of the FCR/FCNs.
I I
CIO advise MPQAD that a sampling inspection of Phase I " good" FCR/FCNs for the civil and mechanical disciplines was scheduled for November 19, 1983. At the request of R. Wells, CIO delayed the inspections until November 22, 1983 to allow MPQAD to reaudit Phase I activities.
=
?
e I
(
JOB NO.
14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO. 23 PAGE 6 November 18, 1983 - Weekly Sub-contractors meeting subjects discussed at this meeting were as follows:
- Babcock and WJlcox -NSSS
- 1) B&W submitted training program to CPCo for approval
- 2) B&W will use Bechtel system for evaluation of classroom training
- 3) B&W are in the process of re-organization of personnel
- 5) All Q-work has stopped pending completion of B&W retraining Zack-HVAC
- 1) Training program submitted to MPQAD for approval 4
- 2) Dispositioning of NCRs is proceeding on schedule.
- 3) Verifying through Walkdowns that NCR reject tags have not been removed from reject &d items
- 4) Removal of surplus rental equipment from. job site Owens-Corning
- 1) Owens-Corning to provide new milestone dates for insulation completion
- 2) Owens-Corning described the on-going method of providing status of hydrostatic testing Grinnell
- 1) Approval not received from MPQAD of procedures for the Fire Protection System ACTIVITIES
- 1) Training Records CIO attended and evaluated on construction presentations of classes on:
- Area Release for Construction FPG 7.500 Rev. 1, FIG 7.510 Retr. 0 (This training course was evaluated by TET and was judged as unsatisfactory) g
JOB NO.
14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO. 23 PAGE 7
- Area Construction Completion Activities FIG 7.410 Rev. 1 (This training course was evaluated by TET and was considered satisfactory
- Area Status Assessment and Punchlist Development FPG 9.910 Rev (This training course was evaluated by TET and was considered satisfactory)
- BF1 Hanger Walkdown FPM 9.200 Rev.
ge (This class was not evaluated by TET at this prjyentation).
- 2) System Interaction Walkdown of the Auxiliary Building' continues in accordance with Mark Technology Corporation (MTC) Procedure WTP-3-Q
" Procedure for Performing Walkdowns of SSIP/S Target's.
Seven (7) interactions were analyzed and documented by Mark Technology Corporation (MTC). CIO witnessed six (6) interactions.
The evaluation of the implementation of the program was judged to be satisfactory and in compliance with MTC procedure WTP-3-Q..The CIO evaluation was performed utilizing Checklist MP-MIS-MJ-002.
- 3) Preliminary Walkdown - CIO performed a verification November 17 and '8,1983, of the Bulk Hanger preliminary walkdown in Module 340. The walkdown sas per-formed in accordance with the requirements of BPCo procedure FPM 9.200, Rev. O " Bulk Hanger Organization Hanger Walkdowns."
Hanger lists were generated by the Team to identify.the present installation and inspection status. This data will be processed'by being entered into a computer tracking, Material Labor Control System (MLCS).
The evaluation of the implementation of the program was judged to be satisfactory and in compliance with procedure FPM 9.200, Rev. O. Results of the evaluation have been documented on Checklist MP-MIS-042 BHO Walkdowls.
GENERAL
- 1) Mr. R. G. Burns, Assistant Corporate QA Manager was on site November 15 and 16, 1983 for discussions on procedure development and staffing.of CIO personnel.
- 2) The following personnel have been assigned to the CIO staff on November 14, 1983:
Mr. Nea1Weatherall, Mechanical QA Engineer Mr. Ralph Butler III, Mechanical QA Engineer Mr. Srinivasan Narayandas, Trending Analyst Signed affidavits with resumes of Mr. Neal Weatherall and Mr. Ralph Butler have been transmitted to Mr. J. J. Harrison, US NRC. Signed affidavit of Mr. Srinivasan Narayandas has also been transmitted. His resume will follow when received.
JOB NO.
14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO. 23 PAGE 8
- 3) Protocol Infraction - Cbpies of the Transcript of the US NRC/Public meeting held on November 10,1983'were distributed to CPCo and BPCo management, in violation of paragraph 2 of the Protocol.
Mr. J. J. Harrison was advised of this infraction on November 17, 1983 and requested that a copy of the Transcript be transmitted to his office as required by the Protocol. A copy of the Transcript was presented to Mr. R. Cook, US NRC Senior Inspector (site) on November 18, 1983.
O Corrective action was taken by CIO management by'reinstructing CIO personnel of the Protocol requirements. A memoranaum has been issued to all personnel advising that distribution of documents to CPCo, BPCo and sub-contractors will require management approval.
4)
Prior to lifting of Stop Work Orders relating to the FCR/FCN Review and Resolution Program, CIO has established a Hold Point at the conclusion of Phase II activities to evaluate the adequacy of MPQAD performance during Phase I and Phase II activities. The Hold Point encompasses all the Stop W rk Orders with the exception of Stop Work Order No. FSW-36 which has been o
lifted by MPQAD. This Hold Point does not apply to Phase III.
~ --.
O i
n
\\
e 0
-*m.,
o.
s l
l
\\
i.
- e. w SIDHE & 1lEBSTER HIClllGAN, INC.
HIDLAND HUCLEAR C0 GENERATION PLANT CIO OBSERVATIONS' Observation Originating CPCo Response
. Status Close-Out Number Observations Document /Date Document /Date Open/ Closed Document /Date 030 Heed to review Vendor Equipment Report No. 5
--Open Verification Program - HPQAD/SMO 7/18/83 031 NIRs 002, 003, 004 and 005 were issued on Report No. 16 Open October 3, 1983 for discrepancies observed 10/3/83 in the review of Training Records of 6 of 45-HeQAD personnel.
032 NIR 006 issued on October 27, 1983 to ad-Report No. 20 Open dress discrepancies observed during sample 10/31/83 inspection of Construction Training Records of Teams 5, 6, 8, 9, 12, 13, 16, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26 (27/28) 29,.30, 31, 32/
33 and BHG staff.
033 NIR 007 issued on November 7, 1983 to Report No. 21 Open
=
address discrepancies observed in two areas 11/08/83 during inspection of Construction Training Records for Teams No. 24, Field Procurement i
Sub-Contractors, Management, Field Eng-Ingering Staff, and Construction General Services Organization.
/
/
r
t STONE & 1lEDSTER HICilIGAN, INC.
l
_ MIDLAND NUCLEAR COGENERATION PLANT
~
CIO OBSERVATIONS Observation Number.
Observations Originating CPCo Response
. Status Close-Out Document /Date Document /Date Open/ Closed Document /Date 034 NIR 008 issued on November 14, 1983 to Report No. 22 Open address five unsatisfactory conditions 11/14/83 observed during the review of 50 training i levels assignments in the System Team
. Training Matrix of the Construction Training Program.
~
035 CIO observed that dielectric isolation Report No. 22 Open spacers for galvanic protection of copper 11/14/83 pipe to galvanized steel pipe supports were missing in some areas on.this system, Small Bore (Instrument Air) KAC Systems, drawing FSK-J-30-0220 Sheet 2 Rev. 7.
O F
e 13 p'
f l
,s
$ TONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
~
CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW Il0LD POINT LOG
SUMMARY
~
l NO*
SUBJECT ORIGINATING CPCo RESPONSE STATUS CLOSE-0UT DOC /DATE DOC /DATE OPEN/ CLOSED DOC /DATE 001 Adequacy of drawings A8 - large bore pipe Report No. 6 Letter Closed Report No. 9 hangers. CIO established Hold Point when MPQAD 7/25/83 8/9/83 8/15/83 issued 2 NCRs against the use of red-lined drawings which were volded.,by Project Engineering.
002 Material traceability of installed hangers (E3).
Report No. 6 Letter Closed Report No. 9 CPCo response dated 7/1/83 indicated report on 7/25/83 8/9/83 8/15/83 material traceability was to be issued in a timely maaner. Due to uncertainty of when the.
report would be issued, a Hold Point was established by CIO.
003 Has a program been developed and responsibilities R'eport No. 6 Letter Closed Report No. 9 established for personnel assigned to process 7/25/83 0/9/83 8/15/83 nonconformances?
Has a meeting been held with Project Engineering to discuss methodology of processing non-conformances?
!s'
- . u
$ TONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN. INC.
CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW HOLD POINT LOG
SUMMARY
ORIGINATING CPCo RESPONSE STATUS CLOSE-00T NO.
SUBJECT DOC /DATE DOC /DATE OPEN/ CLOSED DOC /DATE 004 Evaluation of Phase I Management Rev.iew Report No. 1 Letters Closed CIO Letter to Committee meetings.
6/3/83 7/1/83 J.G. Xeppler through 8/9/83 dated 10/12/8:
Letter of 6/30/83 l
005 CPCo has committed to develop a Vendor Report No. 18 Open Equipment Verification Program. Program is 10/17/83 required before implementation of Phase II.
006 NIRs 002, 003, 004 and 005 issued October 3 Report No. IE Open 1983 to address discrepancies observed during
- c. sample inspection of Training Records of 6
.of 45 MPQAD personnel. Corrective action must be completed before'any inspections can be performed by the 45 personnel in question.
007 Evaluation of Management Review of results of.
Report No. 19 Open Phase I activities.
Evaluation pf Management 10/24/83 Review Committee plans and procedures for Phase:LI implementation.
a
,i
?
}).
Re-worded
4
$ TONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW HOLD POINT LOG StMtARY l'
NO.
SUBJECT.
ORIG'INATING CPCo RESPONSE STATUS CLOSE-0UT DOC /DATE DOC /DATE OPEN/ CLOSED DOC /DATE i
j 008 NIR 006 has been issued on October 27, 1983 to Report No. 20 Open address discrepancies observed during the sample 10/31/83 inspection of 2,054 Construction Training records of 31 members of Teams 5, 6, 8, 9L 12, 13, 16, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, (27/28), 29, 30, 31, (32/33) and BHO staff.
1 Corrective action must be completed before any walkdown, assessments can.be performed,by the
~
personnel in question.
009 NIR 007 has baen issued on November 7, 1983 to Report No. 21
" Open address discrepancies observed during sample.
11/7/83 i
inspection of 834 Construction Training records
..of 18 members of Team 24, Field Procurement, l
Sub-Contractors, Management, F.E. str.ff and Construction General Serivces OrganEzation.
Corrective actico must be completed before any I
walkdown, assessments can be performed by the personnel in question.
I 1
88 l
i s'
?
j 1
l S' TONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
j CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW
~~
J HOLD POINT LOG SIM1ARY i
ORIGINATING CPCo RESPONSE STATUS CLOSE-0UT NO.
SUBJECT DOC /DATE DOC /DATE OPEN/ CLOSED DOC /DATE i
010 NIR 008 was issued November 14, 1983 to address Report No. 22 Open 5 unsatisfactory conditions observed during the 11/14/83 l
review of 50 training level assignments re-presenting a lot size of 318 assignments on,
the System Team Training matrix of the Con-l struction Training. Program.
1 Corrective action must be completed before any walkdown, assessments can be perfomed by the j
personnel in question, i
l l
i, l
011 Prior to lifting of Stop Work Orders relating to Report No.23 Open the FCR/FCN Review and Resolution Program, CIO 11/21/83 l 0 has established a Hold Point at the conclusion of Phase II activities to evaluate the adequacy of MPQAD perfomance during Phase I and Phase II activities. The Hold Point encompasses all the l
Stop Work Orders with the exception of Stop Work Order No. FSW-36 which has been lifted by MP0AD.
ThisholdPointdoesnotapplytoPhaseIII.
l
,I
!.+
l
r
~
STullE & WElriTEll iCilllIAII, INC.
CUllSiltVCllull IH1'l.EMElllMitWI UVEltVIEW NIR I.UG SUHiARY f lilli Hl'QAD DATE DATE DATE
(
HU.
NCil NO.
SUBJECT OF DISP. BY CLOSED REMARKS 0
OAR NO.
ISSUE MPQAD 0
NIR issued us
(
closed-no cor-N/A Training Records 8/15/83 8/15/83 8/17/83 rective action
)001 i
required I
002 QAR Forms from both procedures B-3M*and RT 00005 B-3M-1 are intennixed in training 10/4/83 10/12/83 records 003 QAR Yearly vision examination was exceeded 10/4/83 10/12/83 RT 00006 OJT training records not available In" RT 00007 training records. Revision number not 10/4/83 10/12/83 004
~
listed on OJT Record
)
Memo to CPCo ad-4 l
QAR Personnel Certification Fonn QA-116-1
. vising that NIR-005 RT 00011 Attaclunent D is unavailable in record 10/4/83 10/12/83 10/20/83 can be closed out.
005 i
files Records for Level II I
certifications have beer, verified by CIO i
s i
i Discrepancies in three areas of 006 Construction Training Records 10/27/83 i.
j QCI 15.01 QACilliEl4T 4.3
q' t
I-3 3
T 1 N S
E
- 0. M K
R 5H1 A
1 C M
A.
E I TV R
C TF QAR l
J D
EP E
TS AI I
. V DD C R N E I V 3
O 3
8 8
/
N N
/
4 A OY E
7 1
R E
U
/
/
G I
I TA TFS 1
1 l
A4 AOS 1
1 C
t D
I i T F NU ES e
M g
h EG cn l
st lt E LU ui-a t
T PL rwb r
nf S M touie eeo B IR slS g n rm nl ne eny E
I W NN oo
,E G wgc O
Cft i a) ndn ssus I
T feel o nsqe E C ohmei oaec N U teit i
di 0 R s
rFc tl ar r T aru
,u ie t
FS eoc r
dvea N
rfott nehm O
T a
rns olt C
C sP e n n c
g E
od moo gf n J
w r d e Ci ynoi B
toig t
ri n
U ceada onwi S
nel nnz tiea iRI a ai cair
,M n
arvt fa fte sg en4
,f a s
rn ii2 s a r in o
cn rtO tiei ni.oS a
ht aaot s
sdtc p r N c ge ne u
eT anc uvgr r
srii
- rnt, cnmtrv eeis soaner vsrn iieoee ibuo D t tC nS Fodc O
DN 8
A QR PC HN s
R.
7 8
IO 0
0 NN 0
0 l
3 jl ii j
!i ej
)
i l
i l!;
11i!!)