ML20083J255

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Interim Deficiency Rept DER 83-83 Re Incorrect Sway Strut Supporting Class Q/A Piping Installation.Initially Reported on 831202.Sway Strut to Be Replaced W/Itt Grinnell Sway Strut.Final Rept Expected by 840409
ML20083J255
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde Arizona Public Service icon.png
Issue date: 01/04/1984
From: Van Brunt E
ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. (FORMERLY ARIZONA NUCLEAR
To: Bishop T
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
References
ANPP-28540-BSK, DER-83-83, NUDOCS 8401160266
Download: ML20083J255 (3)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:, - __ m. 1$C5Vho Arizona Public Service Company < !!nc - l RO. BOX 21666

  • PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85036 l

19 Jul -9 P;I 1: 34 f Ja'._ ny 4, 1984 ANPP-28540-{SgB .U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region V Creekside Oaks Office Park 1450 Maria Lane - Suite 210 Walnut Creek, CA 94596-5368 Attention: Mr. T. W. Bishop, Director Division of Resident Reactor Projects and Engineering Programs

Subject:

Interim Report DER 83-83 A 50.55(e) Potentially Reportable Deficiency Relating to an incorrect Sway Strut supporting Class Q/A piping was installed. File: 84-019-026; D.4.33.2

Reference:

Telephone Conversation between K. C. Parrish and P. Gage on December 2, 1983.

Dear Sir:

The NRC was notified of a potentially reportable deficiency in the referenced telephone conversation. At that time, it was estimated that a determination of reportability would be made within thirty (30) days. Due to the extensive investigation and evaluation required, an Interim Report is attached. It is now expected that this information will be . finalized by April 9, 1984, at which time a complete report will be submitted. Very truly yours (15JL_ %L E. E. Van Brunt, Jr. APS Vice President Fuclear Projects Management ANPP Project Director EEVB/TRB:db Attachment cc: See Page Two 8401160266 840104 I PDR ADOCK 05000529 S PDR Q

Mr. T. W. Bishop DER 83-83 Page Two cc: Richard DeYoung, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 T. G. Woods, Jr. G. C. Andognini J. A. Roedel D. B. Fasnacht e - r

  • [-i: '# '

A. C. Rogers ,gd?PY_( B. S. Kaplan W. E. Ide h+) W. J. Vo ree s pf.gj-J. R. Bynum .'.n D. D. Green {h,35 P. P. Klute ,50 N A. C. Gehr Qild W. J. Stubblefield i} : y W. G. Bingham Ef.'[I' S R. L. Patterson 3 R. W. Welcher

f. -[~,$

R. M. Grant i-g.2 D. R. Hawkinson L. E. Vorderbrueggen f.gf G. A. Fiorelli ,1 '"" S. R. Frost

ffLh, J. Self D. Canady

'-I'?.. 4 x.M N Records Center Institute of Nuclear Power Operations 1100 circle 75 Parkway, Suite 1500 Atlanta, GA 30339 -m mum u-

o. INTERIM REPORT - DER 83-83 POTENT 1AL REPORTABLE DEFICIENCY ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY (APS) PVNGS UNIT 2 I. POTENTIAL PROBLEM Pipe support drawing 13-SI-193-H008 Rev. 5 and specification 13-FM-204 Rev.12 require the installation of an ITT Grinnell Sway Strut Assembly Size No. 7 for item 61 of the drawing. During a field engineering inspection it was discovered that a Corner & Lada Sway Strut Size 7 was installed and accepted. The required design load for the sway strut assembly is 85,895 lbs. The ITT Grinnell Sway Strut Assembly Size No. 7 has a Level D maximum load rating of 86,500 lbs., whereas the Corner & Lada Sway Strut Size 7 has a level D maximum load rating of 39,480 lbs. II. APPROACH TO AND STATUS OF PROPOSED RESOLUTION Noncomformance Report PC-7460 will be dispositioned to replace the existing Corner & Lada Size 7 sway strut assembly with an ITT Grinnell Sway Strut Assembly Size No. 7 as per design requirements. For the same size designation, the Corner & Lada sway strut has a ~ lower load capacity than the ITT Grinnell sway strut. To verify that other improper substitutions were not made, an evaluation will be made of other Corner & Lada sway strut installations. III. PROJECTED COMPLETION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION AND SUBMITTAL OF THE FINAL REPORT Evaluation of this condition and submittal of the Final Report is forecast to be completed by April 9,1984. t 'i gem'}}