ML20083H352

Requests Clarification of Kemper to NRC Re Completion of Const & Possible Fuel Loading Date

ML20083H352
Person / Time
Site:	Limerick
Issue date:	01/09/1984
From:	Sugarman R SUGARMAN & ASSOCIATES
To:	Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8401130170
Download: ML20083H352 (2)

Text

-

SUGARM AN & DENWORTH ATTORN EYS AT LAW sulTEaos CO S E R1 J. S UG AR M AN suite f"' NoRTM AM ERIC AN SulLDING ," g g JrANNER.OENWORTH 121 SOUTH BROAO STREET uoas rar 4.so PHILAD ELPHIA. PEN N SYLVAN I A 19107 ROSIN T. LOCKE (215) 546-0t 62 ROBERT RAYMOND ELLIOTT, P. C.*

COUNSEL e 8 TOT ADMITYEO tes PA.

January 9, 1984 Mr..Darryl G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing l U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission l Washington, D.C. 20555

Subject:

Limerick Generating Station, Docket No. 50-352

Dear Mr. Eisenhut:

I have received a copy of Mr. Kemper's letter to you i dated December 27, 1983, on behalf of Philadelphia Electric Company. This letter is completely incomprehensible, and I should like clarification as to its meaning from you.

While the letter appears to state that the construction completion date for Unit 1 is August 1, 1984, Mr. Kemper also states that the status is "as reported in our October 25, 1983 letter".

Moreover the referenced letter does not specifically state that the construction completion date'is August 1, 1984. Rather, it states that "Our construction schedule for Limerick Unit 1 will permit fuel loading by August 1, 1984".

It is incomprehensible whether there is a charge between the October 25, 1983 letter and the December 27, 1 983 letter.

Furthermore, it is incomprehensible whether the applicant believes that its schedule will permit fuel loading by August 1, 1984.

Since the terminology is language of NRC art, I request you to

. clarify what the Commission understands the applicant to be saying.

Since this matter involves not only the applicant's schedule but the Commission's regulations, I wish to inquire as to what the schedule is, as understood by the Commission, regarding the date upon which fuel loading might be permitted at Limerick Unit 1.

I would appreciate an answer that responds separately to fuel loading for testing purposes and the different stages of testing, if any, and fuel loading for operating purposes. I would also appreciate a reference to any Cormission guidelines or regulations which define any of these terms and provide the time frames for 6

8401130170 840109 8j PDR ADOCK 05000352 A PDR

Mr. Darryl.G. Eisenhut ' January 9, 1984 implementing them.

Furthermore, I would appreciate knowing what the Commission's understanding is of the present schedule for Unit 1 construction completion and fuel-loading, as understood by the

-Commission..

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely, Robert J. ou arman RJS/kc cc: Judge Lawrence Brenner Judge Peter Morris Judge Richard Cole Troy Conner, Jr., Esquire Ann Hodgdon, Esquire

. . .