ML20083G896
| ML20083G896 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Summer  |
| Issue date: | 12/23/1983 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20083G894 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8401120445 | |
| Download: ML20083G896 (2) | |
Text
-_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED.TO AMENDMENT NO. 19 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NPF-12 SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY SOUTH CAROLINA PUBLIC SERVICE AUTHORITY I.
INTRODUCTION By letter dated October 8,1982, the. South Carolina Electric & Gas Company (SCE&G) requested changes to-correct errors in the Technical Specifications.
--The errors are administrative involving typographical errors and incorrect plotting of the rod bow penalty curve data.
II.
EVALUATION Figure 3.2-4 specifies the rod bow penalty as a function of burnup. The figure consists of two data points with a straight line drawn between them. The data points are correct; however, one of the data points (33,.0272) is plotted incorrectly resulting in an incorrect figure. This amendment corrects the plot of the data point and redraws the straight line.
Table 3.8-1 lists the containment penetration conducter overcurrent pro-tective device test setpoint criteria. The long time test setpoint for reactor coolant pump B is listed as 3690 amps. This is a typographical error and is being changed to the correct setpoint of 3960 amps shown by reactor coolant pumps A and C.
An additional change corrects the numbering of the limiting condition for operation on page 3/4 4-5 to 3.4.1.4.1.
The final change corrects the
(
spelling of a word (ALTERATIONS) on page 3/4 9-9.
We have reviewed each of the above changes that the licensee has proposed and find them acceptable. These changes are administrative in nature and are consistent with the design that was reviewed and approved by the staff durirp the operating license review.
(
One requested change to correct typographical errors in Figure 6.2-2 is l
not being made, because the errors were deleted subsequent to the request by Amendment 18 issued October 31, 1983.
III. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION We have determined that the amendment does not authorize a change in effluent types or total amounts nor an increase in power level and will not result in any significant environmental impact. Having made this determination, we have further concluded that the amendment involves an 8401120445 831223 PDR ADOCK 05000395 P
I
-2<
action which is insignificant from the standpoint of environmental' impact and, pursuant to 10 CFRi$51.5(d)(4) that=an environmental impact state-ment or negative declaration and environmental impact appraisal' need.not be~ prepared in connection with the issuance of this amendment.
IV.
CONCLUSION The Comniission made a proposed ~ determination _ that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration which was published in the Federal Register-(48 FR 43145) on September 21,.1983,: and consulted with' the state of South Carolina.. No public comments were received, and the state of South Carolina did not have any comments..
We have concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:
(1)lthere is reasonable assurance that the health and' safety of the
~~public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, and
'(2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's
.. regulations and the issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.
. Principal Contributor: Jon B. Hopkins, Licensing Branch No. 4, DL Datedi December 23, 1983
)
.. _. _