ML20083G841

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Listed Mpqad Quality Action Requests Corresponding to S&W Nonconformance Identification Repts
ML20083G841
Person / Time
Site: Midland
Issue date: 01/04/1984
From: Quamme D
CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
To: Baranow S
STONE & WEBSTER, INC.
References
CSC-7133, NUDOCS 8401120274
Download: ML20083G841 (15)
v • d • e


Text

.

s 5

~

Consum8m POVl8T Site Manager "r

Company uaua n,,

PRINCIPAL STAFF I J

Edland Project: PO Box 1963, Midland, MI 48640 e (517) 631-865o RA JJ5Ppp

(

-b OE January 4, 1984

[,IE

~3N MAO sch 3/

j-33 JSGA

.(

Mr S W Baranow Stone & Webster Michigan, Inc P.O Box 1963 Midland, MI 48640 MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER GWO 7020 NIR'S 001, 006, 007, 008 & 009 File:

Bl.1.7, 0655 UFI:

99*08, 53*50*04 Serial: CSC-7133 Attached are MPQAD QAR's for the corresponding S&W NIR's as indicated:

QAR' No-~ ~

~

NIR No RT-00016 001 RT-00017 009 RT-00019 006 RT-00020 007 RT-00021 008 These QAR's were written to enter the S&W identified nonconforming conditions into MPQAD's QUAIL System and to review the corrective actions to determine if process corrective action is required.

Q,$ya Awu DLQ/DDJ/ kip cc: JGKeppler, NRC Region III w/a JJHarrison, NRC Region III w/a RJCook, NRC Site w/a BHPeck, MEC-w/a NIReichel, MEC w/a RAWells,'MPQAD w/a 8401120274 840104 4

PDR ADOCK 05000329 7

A PDR 3~901 'o

. Lu AND PROJECT RT-00016

'QtdLITYASSUPANCEDEPARTMENT QUALITY ACTION REOUEST 7.

DATE ISSUED:

8 REY:

12/29/83 0

- 1.

REQUIREMENT:

9. - PAGE 1 0F 3 Bachtel Training Matrix reqeirea Code 3 training for AG C-9.00 10 AS M W TED f:r Lead Team Support Engineer.

YES NO 2.

DEFICIENCY:

Training records show Code 2 training for Roger Guard as reported on S&W NIR #001.

11. POTENT 14OO.55(e)

YES NOh 3.

QAR ORIGINATED BY:

4.

DISCIPLINE / DIVISION /SECTION 5.

RESPONSE DUE DATE

12.. REPORTED TO MPQA

"^

DMTurnbull QSD N/A DATE

/a

3. ACTIDM ITEM NO:
15. ITEM PRIORITY:
17. S/U CODE:
19. ACTION ORGANIZATION 20 CAR REVIEWED BY:

[

SO4120 4

PGM00 Bechtel Constructior

4. DISCIPLINE:
16. TREND CODE:

IB. RESB CODE:

Training Coordinator 21. 'DATf:

'N/A DNT N/A 7

y

' 22. CAUSE:

23 PROPCSED CCRRECTIVE ACTIOM:

Unknown. See S&W NIR #001.

See NIR #001 This QAR is issued to enter the NIR into the QUAIL System.

i F01 IM0RiHT!01 DNLY 24 RESPONSIBLE ORGANIZATION / PERSON:

25. PROPOSED COMPLETION DATE Bechtel Construction / Training Coordinator Actual completion was 8/15/83.

!6. DISPOSITION CONCURRENCE:

st?

/2.

S N/A l

QAR REVIEWER DATE PQAE (ASME ONLY)

DATE l 27. DISPOSTION ACTION TAKEN:

l J

A construction training record for Mr Guard was completed on August 15, 1983 (copy attached).

l No further action required. The checked box on the constrrction training record is consisten@

with Code 3 training required by FPG 2.000 paragraph 5.2.

2S. METHOD OF DISPOSITION VERIFICATION

29. QAR CLOSED '3Y See NIR #001

/g 7./gj MPQAD DATE N/A PFQCE (ASME ONLY)

DATE ACCEPTABLE U bCCEPTABLE O SUPERCEDING GAR W. # fit fDnw 11

w n ae n ss=w x a r v.

., 5 STONE AND WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QCf2 2 of 315.0 Pt

.c,. _

.NONCONFORMANCE IDENTIFICATION REPORT At.tachment 4.1 Revision 2 DATE OF, NpNCONFORMANCE:

August 9, 1983 NIR NUMBER 001 IDENTIFICATION / LOCATION OF ITEMS:

CONSTRUCTION TRAINING RECORDS FOR AG-C.900 DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCE:

Computer records show LSE Roger Guard as trained to Code 3.

Training Matrix require's training to Code 3.

Actual Training Records show Code 2.

~

~

/Ud PROGRAM MGR Mg TNITIAIOR hff3 DATE /ar_r///)efff DATE 3

' CORRECTIVE ACTION BY:

bt04etrL T/f_4 >.~3 4 C o-o a.Jb r4 M o R g.

IDENTIFY ORGANIZATION TAKING CORRECTIVE ACTION l

A construction training record for Mr. Guard was completed on August 15, 1983, copy attached..

No further action required.

The cnecktd box cn the construction training record is consistant with ccde 3 Training required by FPG 2.000:' Paragraph 5.2.

~

l I

m iVERIFICATI011./ SAT)

UNSAT NEW NIR#

CONCURRENCE IINITIATOR/ llh 'n d 6 y'

PRO. GRAM MGR M.o M

?ln")(V$

V' DATE OATE DATE /dwur/ s.?l4f r RL%RKS l

~

~

Pegs 3 of 3

.;,=.

4 CONSTRUCTION' TRAINING RECORD 0662 b

$uM

$ys DATE UA.. S, W hgg;amNr J-ha A L a c e_.

7 ~~

"b f"*

WW'~

N*##

c,SS!GRiiENT

!:*-iECK T-iE AFPROPRIATE BOX (ONE BDX ONLY)

SIGNATURES REQUIRED lI

! COMPL= 4=D READING EMPLOYEE & SUPERVISOR

/

I CCbPt =,scu REA0 LNG AND REVIEW' EMPLOYEE & SUPERVISOR

' Yis a.i SUPERVISOR dj}

1 e

I COU_:L=4=u TRAINING EMPLOY== SUPERVISOR,

& TRAINER J

!, EXEMPT. ROM TRAINING DUE TO PRIOR EMPLOY =h', SUPERVISOR.,

i

  1. Cit-t EXPERIENCE

& CPCO-SMO (NCTE e.1)

DOCUMENT TITLE DOCUMENT TITLE 4G d

'7.oo

' %by a,(de7>

A:.ce-ss

^ f2.=uwon 2-f 83 S!GNATURES DAA=

.... M,, N, -

[-

/O ff 8.3

.-=

. S UFE::',".S O R

.rR:.nc=n C F C C -S t.". O TE :.

E):EMPTION RECUESTS MUST EE SUPPORTED EY DOCUMENTATION OF WORK

.. ELATED EXPERIENCE ON THE REVERSE SiOE OF THIS FORM. REVIEW Oi:

F.ECUESTS FOR EXEMPTION, WITH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION, WIL'L BE T-iE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE TRAINING COORDINATOR. HE WILL SECURE THE

6.

QAR NO:

" MIDLAND PROJECT RT-00017 quai.ITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT.

OUALITY ACTION REOUEST 7.

LATE ISSUED:

8 REV:

12/29/83 0

I.

REQUIREMENT:

9 PAGE 1 0F 2 FPD 1.000, section 7.1.2 requires that the document controller 10 ASME M ED maintain up to date--contre-1. led sticks at locations designated

-- by- - t he -P FE.- --- - -

g 2.

DEFICIENCY:

Stene and Webster NIR #009 identified the fact that one drawing in a sample of 50 was-sisoing.

11. POTENTIAGLS5(e!

YES NOh 3.

QAR ORIGINATED BY:

4.

DISCIPLINE / DIVISION /SECTION 5.

RESPONSE DUE DATE

12.. REPORTED TO MPQA DMTurnbull QSD N/A DATE N/A
3. ACTION ITEM NO:
15. ITEM PRIORITY:
17. S/U CODE:
19. ACTION ORGANIZATION 20 QAR REVI BY:

j[

f d Document Contro SO4121 4

PCM00

4. DISCIPLINE:
16. TPIND CODE:

IB. RESB CODE:

21.' 'DATE:

N/A DNT N/A Ah4j g 24 CAUSE:

23. PROPCSED CCRRECIIVE ACTIONt Unkii5idi.-~ S'eT 5&w m 5i009.

See NIR #009.

This QAR is issued to enter the NIR into the QUAIL system.

ff

(

~.

24 RESPONSIBLE ORGANIZATION / PERSON:

25. P:10 POSED COMPLETION DATE Fie[dDocNentControlSupervisor/JudyDavis Actual conpletion was 12/12/83.

DISPOSITION CONCURRENCE:

/

24ff)

N/A

' 'QAR REVIbiER

~ DATE PQAE (ASME ONLY)

DATE

27. DISPOSTION ACTION TAKEN:

i Corrective action had been accomplished. CIO verified that the missing drawings had been j

added to the controlled stick drawinga and performed a sample inspection of the drawings at i

this station. The review was considered to be satisfactory and acceptable in meeting the requirements of FID-2.400 Rev 3, Review and Resolution Program.

Corrective action completed on. December 12, 1983.

, 2s. METHOD OF DISPOSITION VERIFICATION

29. QAR CLOSED BY See NIR #009.

Mp/g3 MPQAD"

~ DATE I

I N/A j

PFQCE ( ASME ONLT)

DATE X UNACCEPTABLE O SUPER! CEDING QAR ACCEPTABLE

~-

gancoDM-W%W Pcge 2 of 2 STONE AND WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION OCE 15.01 NONCONFORMANCE IDENTIFICATION REPORT.1 Revision 2 DATE OF NONCONFORMANCE: December 11, 1983 NIR' NUMBER 009 IDENTIFICATION / LOCATION'0F ITEMM Support Services Building 7 Q.C. Station #55 DESCRIPTION 0F NONCONFORMANCE:

A sample inspection was performed'of controlled Architechural drawings at Q.C.

Station No. 55.

A sample size of 50 drawings representing a lot size of 224.

" drawings was ' selected.

Accept / Reject criteria is; Accept 0 Reject 1.

Drawing Nc. A-213 was missing from Station 55 control drawing : ticks.

As a result, the entire lot' of(the 224 drawings.has been rejected. -

a.

.This NIR describes a deficiency against the Document Control Center.

A check of.the Control Card for drawing A '2T3 does not show any FCR/FCNs.as being applicable.

t

.l g/D Dd PROGRAM MGR

'b l

,1!gT1.4 TOR \\-

~,

^I

DATE ' /zy&zyf_5 DATE 6/4

-3

-l _

L CORRECTIVE ACTION BY:

l

~

MPOAD IDENTIFY ORGANIZATION TAKING CORRECTIVE ACTION

! Corrective action had been accomplished.by MPQAD. CIO verified that the missing' i dwgs had-been added to the controlled stick dwgs and perfonned a sample inspection l c5 the drawings at this station. The review was considered to be satisfactory and I

at
ceptable in meeti.ng the requirements of FID-2.400 Rev. 3, Review and Resolution
h cgram. Corrective Action completed. on December 12, 1983.

i I

[ERIFICATION SAT [ UNSAT NEW NIR#

CONOURRENCE

! "'ITI ATOR 2 k od q rxt PROGRAM MG h g % g

\\7.5\\73\\MD DATE DATE d M.6 / M_-P DATE l :.iteARKS This NIR as issued is closed as corrective action has been completed.

I i

6.

QAR NO:

MhtAND PR0XCT RT-00019 qu.u.m ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QUALITY ACTION REOUEST 7.

DATE ISSUED:

8 REY:

12/29/83 0

REQUIREMENT:

g.

PAGE 1 0F 3 10 ASME RELATED FPG-2.000 Rev 5 identifies requirements for maintaining construction training records.

~

1 DEFICIENCY:

Ston2 and Webster NIR #006 identified numerous deficiencies in construction training records.

11. P01ENTIAON55(e) I YES NOk QAR ORIGINATED BY:

4.

DISCIPLINE / DIVISION /SECTION 5.

RESPONSE DUE DATE

12.. REPORTED TO MPQA MAMAGER DMTurnbull QSD 1/6/84 DATE
. ACTION ITEM h0:
15. ITEM PRIORITY:
17. S/U CODE:
19. ACTION ORGANIZATION 20 QAR REVIEWED BY:

.. DISCIPLINE:

16. TREND CODE:
18. RESB CODE:

Training Coordinator ~ /[

SO4122 3

PGM00 Bechtel Construction

21. ~ DATE:

9 hj N/A DNT BC PCO FEST p

23.. PROPOSED CORRECTIVE ACTION:

k.

CAUSE:

I

~

.ikd

!4 RESPONSIBLE ORGANIZATION / PERSON:

25. PROPOSED COMPLETION DATE l 6 DISPOSITION CONCURRENCE:

1 QAR REVIEWER DATE PQAE (ASME ONLY)

DATE

27. DISPOSTION ACTION TAKEN:

2S. METHDD OF DISPOSITION VERIFICATION

29. QAR CLOSED BY MPQAD DATE PFQCE (ASME ONLY)

DATE UKACCEPTABLE O SueERCtDINs QAR ACCEPTABLE N-4/1A

_fp.v 1)

}

n 3

p STONE AND WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QCI 15.01

/ttachment 4.1

, NONCONFORMANCE-IDENTIFICATION REPORT t

R vision 2 PAGE 1 0F 2 DATE OF NONCONFORMANCE:

NIR N M ER 006 OCTOBER 27, 1983 IDENTIFICATION / LOCATION OF ITEMS:

BECHTEL DOCUMENT CONTROL CENTER DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCE:

During the revie, of 2054 non-manual Construction Training Records, three areas of discrepancies were ob' served which were not in compliance with the requirements of FFG-2.000 Rev. 5. " Training of Construction Personnel." (The following Teams

^

I were evaluated #5, 6, 8, 9,12,13,16,17,19, 20,'25, 26, (27/28), 29, 30,31, 32/33), BHO Team Staff.

(See attached for descriptions of Discrepancies)

N,, M i ou n1,.

PROGRAM MGR

[ng

~

JHIIIATOR g

DATE 2-/oir 2 O [993 DATE MM #5 /f8 l

CORRECTIVE ACTION BY:

IDENTIFY ORGANIZATION'TAKING CORRECTIVE ACTION l

l IVERIFI' CATION SAT UNSAT NEW NIR#

CONCURRENCE l INITIATOR PROGRAM MGR

!DATE DATE DATE lREMARKS

.-.4

,...,._,r,.____m,-

,_,.-m.,

,._-,,,,m.,_,..,

,..yw.___,__,_v,-.m

.s 3

Pega 3 of 3 NIR 006

1) Course Rosters Att'achment D to FPG-2.000 exhibited one or.more of the

{'

following discrepancies.

M

~

BLOCX NO.

ENTRY REOUIRED ENTRY RECORDED 1

CCP DWG. No. FIG. No.

2 (a)~Name of lesson Either a',.b. or c missing (b) Procedures (c) Revision 6

Location of Session Bechtel 10 (a) Signature Either a or b missing (b) Print Last Name 5

^ ~

Instructor Name ~

Instructor Department In addition many entries

/

were left blank

2) Reading' Records Attachment C to FPG-2.000 exhibited one or more of the

.-following discrepancies:

Reading Record

1) The department and or assignment lines are illegible or incomplete.
2) Assigned reading performed on-October 11, 1933 and September 29, 1983 were not documented on Reading Fom Attachment C, Rev. 5.

~

c.

3) Team Records and TSR (Training Status Report) show training completed Document Control Files showed no record of training. For example:

NAME TEAM #

TRAINING REOUIREMENT DISCREPANCY Kran felder Management FPD-2.000 Code 2 No Record in File l

J. Hull '

32/33 M-204 Code 5 No Record in File J

l In addition to these violations, inconsistency was noted in 4 areas:

(1) Modification to records, some lined through, signed and dated and others simply lined through. (2) Some entries on course register are completed using pencil while most are in ink.

(3) Difficulty is experienced in de-temining the accuracy of records where attendance at a course carries credit for several others.

(4) Some entries carried the revision number to l

procedures.and some omitted the revision. (5) Proper " Course Roster Fom as l

licted in Procedure.FPG-2.000 were not utilized. (6) Some courses on Rosters contain information not identical to matrix listing.

It is recommended that the disposition to this HIR include a corm:ittment to verify training records of each individual prior to status assessment assignment.

G l

9

- ~~

-,-n, -,.,, - - - -

,,-,w

$IDLANDPROJECT

  • - /

cu'At m ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT OU ALITY ACTION REOUEST 7.

DATE ISSU 8 REY:

12/29/83 0

1.

REQUIREMEKi:

9.-

PAGE 1 0F 3 FPG-2.000 Rev 5 identifies the requirements for generatini, and 10 ASME RELATED maintaining records of the training of construction personnel.

O TES bNO 2.

CEFICIENCY:

Stone and Webster NIR #007 identified numerous discrepancies in the records kept on construction personnel.

11. POTENTIAO 2.55(e)
YES, MOh 3.

QAR ORIGINATED BY:

4.

DISCIPLINE / DIVISION /SECTION 5.

RESPONSE DUE DATE

12.. REPORTED TO MPQA MANAGER:

DMTurnbull QSD 1/6/84 DATE n/a

3. ACTION ITEM NO:
15. ITEM PRIORITY:
17. S/U CODE:
19. ACTION ORGAXIZATION 20 QAR REVIEWED BY:

SO4123 3

PGM00 Bechtel Construction Trcining Coor'dinator

4. DISCIPLINE:
16. TREND CODE:
18. RESB CODE:
21. DATE:

N/A DNT BC PCO FEST g

g3 24 CAUSE:

23 PROPCSED CORRECTIVE ACTION:

C ' ; *'g, I '

, r. n 9.,j

{

r.- P O :

- r3 E{h.4i:,{'y.i..:s4 V 'I 3

.g 6

i 24 RESPONSIBLE ORGANIZATION / PERSON:

25.

PROPOSED COMPLETION DATE i

i 1

,26 DISPOSITION CONCURRENCE:

QAR REVIEWER DATE POAE (ASME ONLY)

DATE i 27. DISPOSTION ACTION TAKEN:

1 l 2S. METHOD OF DISPOSITION VERIFICATION

29. QAR CLOSED BY l

l l

MPQAD DATE l

l PFQCE (ASME ONLY)

DATE UlblCCEPTABLE OSUPERCEDING QAR ACCEPTABLE u o rs e on...

,1

Pags 2 of 3 STONE AND WEBSTER ENGINEERING COR? ORATION '

QCE 15.01 NONCONFORMANCE IDENTIFICATION REPOItT 4.ttachmfnt4.1 Revision 2 c

~

Page 1 of 2

.DATE OF NONCOMFORMANCE:

November 7, 1983 NIR NUMBER 007 IDENTIFICATION / LOCATION OF ITEMS:

DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCE:

During the review of 834 non-manual Construction, Training Records, two areas

.of discrepancies were observed which,were not in compliance with the requirement::

\\

~

of FPG-2.000 Rev. 5, "Trainirig of Construction Personpel."

(,The followlng Teams

~

were evaluated #24. Field Procurement, Sub Contractors, Managements, F.E. Staff, and CGSO.

(See attached for descriptions fo Discrepancies)

~

1rh8Yn,MO PROGRAM MGR M

_INIIIAIOR d

DATE' Mo Em bra ' 7, /9B.3 DATE b " M Z/f85 CORRECTIVE ACTION BY:

w IDENTIFY ORGANIZATION TAKING CORRECTIVE ACTION I

VERIFICATION SAT UNSAT NEW NIR#

CONCURRENCE INITIATOR PROGRAM MGR DATE DATE t

DATE r-

' F.EMARKS

--,.. - = ~. -, -, -,_,.,,,

._,,,-n.,__n,,,...n,_

MA LAL 14 U v All UUUM Paga 3 of 3

,s NIR 007

~

Course Rosters ttachment D to FPG-20.00 exhibited one or more of the

,,(}$ 1) following discrepancies.

BLOCK NO.

ENTRY REQUIRED ENTRY RECORDED 1

CCP DWG. No. Fig.

No. Course No.

2 (a) Name of 1esson Either a, b, or (b) Procedures c missing (c) Revision 6

Location of Sessi6n

. Bechtel In addition some entries were left blank 2)

In addition to these violations, inconsistencies were noted in 6 areas:

~

~

~ (1) Modificationtorecords,somelinedthrough,signedsndyated and others simply lined through.

(2)

Some entries 'on. course ister are completed using pencil while most are in ink. '(3)

Difficu'l y is experienced in determining the accuracy of records where attendance 'at So'e entries carried a course carries credit for several others. - (4) m the revision number to procedures and sone omitted the revision.

(~5)

Proper " Course Roster Form" as listed in Procedure FPG-2.000 were not

.f.

utilized.

(6)

Some courses on Rosters contain information not identi, cal to matrix listing.

It is recommended that the disposition to this NIR include a committ-ment to verify training records of each individual' prior to 'itatus assessment assignment.

9 e

e S

2

MIDLAND PROJECT RT-00021 cuAt.m' ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QU ALITY ACTION REOUEST 7.

DATE ISSUED:

8 REY:

12/29/83 0

1.

REQUIREMENT:

g*

PAGE 1 0F 3 FPG 2.000 identifies the requirements for, and the approvals 10 ASME REIATED rsquired for training matrices.

Various people generate and approve the matrices but the one common factor is that CP Co YES b NO SMO gives final approval to all of them.

2.

DEFICIENCY:

Stone and Webster NIR #008 identified five inadequacies in the system team training matrix in a sample of 50 which represented 318 job assignments.

11. POTENTIACD.55(ef YES, _,,,,

Noh 3.

CAR ORIGINATED BY:

4.

DISCIPLIhE/ DIVISION /SECTION 5.

RESPONSE DUE DATE

12.. REPORTED TO MPQA MANAGER:

DMTurnbull QSD 1/6/84 DATE N/A

3. ACTION ITEM-MO:
15. ITEM PRIORITY:
17. S/U CODE:

19 ACTION ORGANIZATION i20 QAR REVIEWED BY:

SO4124 3

PGM00 CP Co Site Management

4. DISCIPLINE:
16. TREND CODE:
18. RESB CODE:

Organization 2'. DATE-1

/j2.[).7[f3 N/A DNT CPCO SM 22.

CAUSE:

23 PROPCSED CORRECTIVE ACTIOM:

(3p 5 pj P Q C N P T E C ""

[J l'; 3. !, ij s if

.49d IlaI'JD.Idl!it (. !4 t

l

~ ~ ~

24 RESPONSIBLE ORGANIZATION / PERSON:

25. PROPOSED COMPLETION r*

I6 DISPOSITION CONCURRENCE:

QAR REVIEiiER DATE PQAE (ASME DNLY)

DATE

27. DISPOSTION ACTION TAKEN:

23.

METHOD OF DISPOSITION VERIFICATION

29. QAR CLOSED BY

~

MPQAD DATE PFQCE (ASME ONLY)

DATE ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE D SUPERCEDING QAR

,e...

QAR Ns. RT-00021 Paga 2 of 3

^ '

STONE AND WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QCI 15.01

~ NONCONFORMANCE' IDENTIFICATION REPORT A.ttachment 4.1 Revision 2

.O PAGE 1 0F 2 u9 DATE OF NONCONFORMANCE:

NIR NUMBER con IDENTIFICATION / LOCATION OF ITEMS:

SYSTEM TEAM TRAINING MATRIX, REY.1, DATED. JULY 20, 1983 DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCE:

During the review of the adequacy of the construction training matrices,a sample size of 50 training level assignments., representing a lot size of 318 assignments, five unsatisfactory-conditions were -observed in the train,ing level assignments.

The System Team Training Matrix of the Construction Training Program was utilized to perform the review.

~

See the attached for unsatisfactory conditions observed.

The five unsatisfactory condition,s reported represents a reject condition for tnis ' lot size of 318.

/

f/ '...

..c 0.

PROGRAM MGR l

INITIATOR W W & /0,f f DAT$

//9 23 DATE CORRECTIVE ACTION BY:

IDENTIFY ORGANIZATION TAKING CORRECTIVE ACTION l

VERIFICATION SAT UNSAT NEW NIR#

CONCURRENCE fINITIATOR PROGRAM MGR A

jDATE DATE DATE l

I I REMARKS, lt i..

J

NIR #008

~

PAGE 2 0F 2

_r

1. 'FPG 9.700, " System Team _ Charter" FPG 9.700 appears on the " System Team Training Matrix" as a Level "0" (no training required) for the system team field engineer, mechanical. -

Paragrapn 5.2.7 of this procedure identifies the job responsibilities and reporting relationships for the system team field engineers. As l

such, a. level of training of "0" (no training) is not satisfactory.

2.

FPO 1.201, "Bechtel Assigned Post Turnover'(PTO) Work".

FPO 1.201 appears on the;" System Team. Training Matrix". as a Level "0" (no training required) forthe system team field engineer, mechanical. '.

In discussion with the Team #5 supervisor, itwas noted that the Team

~ ~ ' ~

members do get involved in. Post Turnover Work. Because of this involvement by the Team.meinbers, la-level of training of "0" (no training) is not satisfactory.

3.

FIG '1.400 " Preparation, Review and Routing of Field Engineer's Reports."

FIG 1.400 iricludes responsibilities for several disciplines, le; mechanical,

'~

civil, welding, and instrumentation as well as including responri.bilities for'the electrical discipline. The following conditions were noted as -

being. unsatisfa.ctory-(a) The " System Team Training}iatrix" under the column' entitled " Responsible Discipline" shows thi.s prgcedure. to be an electrical, discipline _

2_-

g.

procedure.,

(b) The " System. Team Training Matrix" re. quires the field engineers of the mechanical,and the.instrumentati6n disciplines to receive a level "2"

. training whereas the field engineersof the electrical and welding disciplines receive a level "3" training. There is an inconsistancy of training levels being assigned..

' 4.

Specification M-214, " Piping System Erection Fit-up Control Requirements."

M-2h4 appears on 'the " System Team Training Matrix" as a level "0",.(no training required) for the system team field engineer, welding.

Specification pages 3, 5; 78 and 8 address welding. Also, weld fit-ups are addressed throughout this specification.. As such, a level of training of "0". (no training). is not satisfactory.

5.

Drawing E-039

." Seismic Wireway Supports."-

E-039 appears on the " System Tdam Tra'ining Matrix," as a level "0"

(no training required) for the system team field engineer, welding.

This drawing contains weld sizes and weld symbols for typical wirewsy supports. As such, a level of training of "0"

(no trainir.g) is not satisfactory.

It is recommended that the disposition to this NIR include a committment

{

to verify the adequacy of all training matrices.

y_, -

_,_---,-h_,._

_y

--,,,..,,., -,,., -,,e.,_-, -,, __ -,,_.

._--.,,---,,,my,

_,,,,.-,c

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20083G841&oldid=4366211"