ML20082M595

Forwards Listed Repts in Response to S&W Nirs 002,003 & 004 Which Have Been Closed.S&W Requested to Verify Actions Taken

ML20082M595
Person / Time
Site:	Midland
Issue date:	11/21/1983
From:	Ewert G CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
To:	Baranow S STONE & WEBSTER, INC.
References
NUDOCS 8312060197
Download: ML20082M595 (8)

Text

-

7 CO

[ PRitgIPAL STAFF PoMumBM x

wer_.

vu i fna oese 3faa C0mpBRy RRA

.- ? -

RM3F

/C

/[L9 JRMA

.f3 pao SCS v.

uidi.nd eroi.ct: ro e.= ises, uidi nd, ui 4es4o. (st?> sat.seso g

November 21, 1983 Sb-33G S W Baranow, Prograin Manager

~-

Stone and Webster Michigan Inc PO Box 1963 Midland, MI 48640 MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER PROJECT - STONE AND WEBSTER NIRs 002 THROUGH 004 FILE 24.2 SERIAL 26363 MPQAD QARs RT0005, RT0006, and RT0007 written ln response to Stone and Webster N' irs 002,~~003 aid'00T have been closed by MPQAD.

Copies are attached for your

~

information. The deficiencies identified in the QARs have been corrected, or

~

accepted as is.

Accordingly, Stone and Webster is requested to verify the actions taluiin for the 45 inspectors covered by the QARs, for closure of the

~~

NIRs.

-The -broad scopeTevtew-required by QAR RT00010 is ongoing, we will advise you when action as a result of it is complete.

Gary F Ewert, Division Head Quality Services Midland Project 1A--Department GFE/kw

~ ~ - - ~ - ~ ~

~ ~ - - ~

~

- -~~~~~~~~

CC JRKeppler-DLQuamme

~~

~

RAWells 8312060197 831121 PDR ADOCK 05000329 A

pyg

__L1D I DEc 1 1983

'l

6 Q4R NO3 CIDLAND PROJECT RT 00005 QUAL m ASSURANCE DEPARTMEKr QUALITY ACTION REOUEST 7.

DATE ISSUED:

8 REV:

~ _

10/12/83 0

WIR 007.

11. REQUIREMENT:

9*

PAGE 1 0F 2 Vision Exam Records 10 ASME RELATED Forms shown in

- Parformance-Demonstration-Records L B-3M-1 to Parsonnel Certifications O TES

@ NO Qualification Questionnaires s

'2.

DEFICIENCY:

1) Forms shown in B-3M were used.in some cases.

.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ On some certification forms, the revision number of the PQCI to 2) which the individual was certified was.not shown.

11. POTENTIA C 6.55(e)

E_

N0b Thase deficiencies-were-identified on Stone and Webster NIR 002.

3.

QAR ORIGINATED BY:

4.

DISCIPLINE / DIVISION /SECTION 5.

RESPONSE DUE DATE *

12.. REPORTED TO MPQA MANAGER:

D M Turnbull A&T N/A DATE N/A l83.ACTIONITEMMO:

15. ITEM PRIORITY:

17. S/U CODE:

19. ACTION ORGANIZATION 20 REVIEWED BY*

S03485 3

PGM00 Qual. & Cert.

34. DISCIPLINE:

16. TREND CODE:

18. RESB CODE:

25. 'DATE:

Plant Assurance j

A&T I-5 A&T Engineering Branch. /o //2 / SS

22. CAUSE:

23 PROPOSED CORRECTIVE ACTION:

The old forms were not recalled when the

1) The correct forms will be distributed to nsw forms came into effect.

all Level III personnel, with instructions to destroy stocks of forms now on hand by 10/17/83.

(L A Botimer)-

2) Comparison of the old with the new forms (continued on.page 2 of 2) l 24 RESPONSIBLE ORGANIZATION / PERSON:

25. PROPOSED COMPLETION DATE L A Botimer, Qual. -& -Certv Records November 4, 1983 G E Parker, Plant Assurance Eng. Branch

~26 DISPOSITION C0 CU CE:

Y

/0ll SS

/Yh

/0 ff 83

'/

4AR RETIEMER DATE PQAE (ASME ORLY)

DATE

27. DISPOSTION ACTION TAKEN:

1.

Tha correct form $ were distributed.

4.

All 45 folders have been reviewed and all now show the revision number of the PQCI to which the individual was certified.

28. METHOD OF DISPOSITION VERIFICATION

29. QAR CLOSED BY 1.

Examined supplies of blank forms in Inspection Evaluation,

//[/!fi~.

Mechanical QA, Mechanical, Electrical and Civil QC and

/

/,<

Walding/NDE QA and verified that old forms had been thrown

' ' MPQAGr' DATE out.

4.

The Q&C folders have been reviewed and it was verified that corrections were made correctly.

PFQCE(ASME[LY)

DATE ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE SUPERCEDING QAR l

M-4/1A (Rev 1)

e n nu.

RT 00005 MIDUutD PROJECT QU ALITY. ACTION REOUEST DATE:

REv:

ourt.m ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT

~

10/12/83 0

CONTINUATION SHEET PAE 2 0F 2 indicates that with one exception the use of the ine,orrect form cannot have resulted in any lack of information or incorrect approvals.

Therefore the incorrect forms will be allowed to remain in the files.

3) The one exception, which does not apply to the electrical inspectors included in this Q11, is the Personnel Certification Form, where QA-37-0 does not req'uire the approval of the PQAE for ASME-related PQCIs, while QA-37-1 does require it.

This probleni will be cddressed in QAR RT 00010.

4) All currently va' lid certifications in the population of 45 will also be reviewed to i

identify those on which the revision level of the PQCI was omitted. The revision level will be added and the forms will be reapproved by a Level III person.

(I. A Botimer and G E Parker) l l

l u

ll M-4/IB (Rev 0) 1

MIDLAL'D PROJECT

" 7' RT 00006E'~

QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTNENT QU ALITY ACTION REQUEST 7.

DATE ISSUED:

8 REV-10/12/83 '

NIR 003 A

1.

REQUIREMENT:

9 PAGE 1 0F 2 h

Procedure B-3M-1, Section 5.10.1 requires _that each certified 10 ASME RELATED individual pass an annual vision examination.

YES

@ NO 2.

DEFICIENCY:

Ona individual was found to have had his vision examination conducted nine days after the expiration of his' previous annual examination.

This deficiency was identified ou Stone and Webster NIR 003.

11. POTENTIAO 2.55(e

~

TES

.I 3.

QAR ORIGINATED BY:

4.

DISCIPLINE / DIVISION /SECTION 5.

RESPONSE DUE DATE

12. REPORTED TD MPQA D M Turnbull A&T.

N/A DATE 1

13. ACTION ITEM NO:

15. ITEM PRIORITY:

17. 5/U CODE:

19. ACTION ORGANIZATIENt 20 REVIEMED BY:

S03486 I'

PGM00 Q&C Records Group j

I4. DISCIPLINE:

16. TREND CODE:

18. RESB CODE:

Program Development 2L 'DATD Group Special Proiects

/d [/1 3

A&T I-5 A&T

22. CAUSE:

Z3 PROPuSED i.veusCTIVE ACTION:

1) This individual's~ supervisor has written a memo to be put in the training folder, Unknown.

saying the 3/18/83 examination is satis-factory. evidence that the. individual's ~

visual acuity was acceptable during the 9 day period by which the examination was overdue.

Completed 10/11/83.

(Continued on page 2 of 2) z4 RESPONSIBLE ORGANIZATION / PERSON:

25. PROPOSED Co rLETION Dnat L A Botiner Q&C Records D Msrrninri-I t-specivi-L oj o;..

8 November 4, 1983

~

--it -} Ober+e.- t

- Deve-1m,... :

. vi 2

~26. DISPOSITION Cm

,ino yE:

/c -/3-W N/A

f. -f J-f 3 s

QAR REVIEMER DATE PQAE (ASDE' OdLY)

DATE l 27. DISPOSTION ACTION TAKEN:

~ ~~ ~~~

'~ ~ ~

'~

~~~

l.

As proposed in Block 23 2.

As proposed on Page 2

28. METHOD OF DISPOSITION VERITICATION

29. QAR C ED 1.

Verified the presence of the memo in the folder.

ff j 2.

The Q&C folders have been reviewed and it was verified

/

///)ff g_

that all lapses in vision examinations had been identified.

" V MPGAD DATE and that justification for the lapsed period has been documented.

PFQCE (ASME ONLY7 DATc.

ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE SUPERCEDINE QAR M-4/IA (Rev 1)

e.

ggg g RT 00006 w _A m c_ospaansur QUALITY ACTION REQUEST DATE:

REW CONTINUATION SHEET 10/12/83 t-1 PAGE 2 0F 2 8

2)-- -All qualification folders in the population of 45 will be reviewed to identify similar lapses. Each case, identified will be dispositioned by the appropriate supervisor and documentation to this effect will be put in the files.

(L A Botimer)

3) Corrective action to preve,nt recurrence will be taken in accordance with QAR RT 00010.

- - = ~ -

~

l I

~ ~ -

s M-4/IB (Rev 0)

0.

O E9s MIDLAND PROJECT Rt 00007 QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT

_ QUALITY ACTION REQUEST 7.

DATE ISSUED:

8 REY:

NIR 004-~

10/12/8311/16/83 -

0-1

8. REQUIREMENT-9*

PAGE 1 0F 23 d

g/s/dlt 14 ASME RELA E

[

B-3M-1, DR 141, Section 5.6.3 requires that OJT be documented.

C YES

@ NO

8. DEFICIENCY:

-In a sample of 6 training folders, two lacked documentation on OJT or the lack of nepd for it Two lacked a revision number on the PQCI on which OJT was given.

Ona-lacked-a-t4t-le-for the PQCI on which OJT was given.

Thass deficiencies were identified on Stone and Webster NIR 004.

11. POTENTIA O f.55(e)

YES N0h

13. QAR ORIGINATED BY:

4.

DISCIPLINE / DIVISION /SECTION 5.

RESPONSE EDE DATE'

12. REPORTED TD MPQA MANAGER:

(

D M Turnbull A&T N/A DATE N/A L3. ACTION ITEM NO:

15. ITEM PRIORITY:

17.'S/U CODE:

19. ACTION ORGANIZATION 20 QAR REVIEWED BY:

S03487 3

PCM00 MPQAD QC

,/

2f. /

d*

DA

14. DISCIPLINE:

16. TREND CODE:

18. RESB CODE:

Q&C Records A&T

._ _ I.5_

A&T Program Development g [g g

i 22. CAUSE:

Z3 PROPOSED CORRECTIVE ACTION:

l 1)

It has been established that the two persor Personnel failed to follow the steps whose folders lacked documentation on OJT n3cessary to ensure that records reached had.: received such training and that docu-tha files, mentation existed at one time.

However, ' it was evidently not turned in to Q&C Records.

If the search for this documentation proves fruitless, a memorandum will be prepared b3 the certifying agency (Contihued on page 2' 24 RESPONSIBLE ORGANIZATION / PERSON:

-25.

PROPOSED COPFLETION DATE MPQAD QC - E L Jones bg n 58eichm^nf li *5-Oberl, November 4, 1983 E

~26 DISPCSITION CONCURRENCE:

A

/d /$

5 NIA lC / $ E.5

~ QAR REVIEWER DATE PQAE (ASIE ONLY) '

DATE

~

27 DISPCSTION ACTION _TAKEN:

Tha two ' olders identified in the audit now contain a memorandum from the Level III stating 1.

f that OJT was given.

DR #163 issu_ed -ll/.18/83 -af fee.tive; 12/5/8.Q changes sect-ion 5_.6.,3 of B-3M4. t.o; requiy.e:

3..

3 documentation o,ft t,hef de.c.is: ion t; hat OJT- %s-not; requ; ired.,

4.

The. checA1_i_st; now in u.s.e. by Q&C Records personnel. requires _ that., they chec_k. O.J.T_ Recor_d_s for_-

the presence of the titles 'and revision numbers of PQCIs on which trainine was niven.

28. ME'IBOD OF DISPOSITION YERIFICATION

29. QAR CLOSED BY All items m'entioned in block 27 have been verified, by review Ag

// J/f 8.'

of all 45 folders.

p@QAIT DATE M/#

PFQCE (ASNE ONLT)

DATE ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE E SUPERCEDING QAR N-4f1A (Rev 1)

Q4R NO:

ouAi.I

!s amENr UALITY ACTION REQUEST DATE:

Ey:

CONTINUATION SHEET 10/12/ 311/16/8 5

-e 1

~~

PAGE 1 0F

-J_ 3 d

NM e/a4 seving'that the lack of an OJT record does not inva li'd a t e thTin~d i'vi~du a l'FEei tl f En t ion b2cause the presence of a Performance Demons'tration record confirms'the-fact that the individual h che required ability.

(ELJones)

~

2) QSrC-Ruv& J -ftritters-du-the-W3titnr trf-43 vi44-be-revirwed-ttr-ih-fy-any vi.imi tuses-2 of-mies4trg-03-T-mvds,-e windtrg-tit-les-tyr-revisitm uum'm2-.--fruch-tmrivsitnrs-vid-1--be-

- cesR4-fiest-by-nie-<etn-fying-egencys---(LABotimee-)-

SEE PAGE 3- - - - - - -

- - --b

\\

,,,{f$///M/g l

l

_ 3) MPQAD Procedures will be revised to require documentation ~of any decision that 0JT is

~

not requiredT'"(RJ0berlel-

~-~ ~ - '

l

4) Checi. lists are being developed for Q&C Records personnel which will remind them to return, for correction, any records which do not-show revision numbers or cities for PQCIs.

(LABotimer)

M M-4/15 (Rev 0)

RT 00007 I

xintAxo PanaEcr nurt m assuRAxCE DEPARMENTc OU ALITY. ACTION REOUEST CATE3 REW CONTINUATION SHEET 11/16/83 1

~

~PAGE ~3 0F 3

l' l

^

~

l[ ////d/S.5 l

2) Since MPQAD procedures did not require that the nee'd or lack of need to perform 1

OJT be documented, it cannot be established if OJT records' from other folders' ~~

~ - ' - l

~~

l l

l l

are missing.

The lack of an OJT record in an individual's file does not invali-l.

~

date the individual's certification because the presence of a successful Perform-I 1

ance Demonstration Record in the file confirms that the individual has the required ability. A request will be made of appropriate personnel to search for and submit l

l any OJT records they may have.

l r

l j

i i

h l

l l

l l

M-4/1B (Rev 0) l 1

- - -.